ML13211A260

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 5 of 14
ML13211A260
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2013
From:
Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A260 (40)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:B N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

Z-I8!67j-Y s-I Equip. Class 1 2 4- (7m-rfet~jý if)Equipment Description

..AaeJ T f--i,.itr

.,,t $ I

/Location:

Bldg. C6 FloorEl. J/&1, .Room, Area 0 /Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO" Nfj of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[N"I U" N/A'Y0'NE] U" N/AD YC3'/N-3 u-- N/AD YO NO U-' N/A[P YRNr-O UI 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 0: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>PAGE 203 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2" I " 1-3 -PI Equip. Class 1 2_<4 r7;;,wJvrM erx )Equipment Description J t i, ra,,, ...r g' x t.. 4 " .AC- & AX(4 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YVN UQI N/AD]YO(fNE] UCI N/AQI Y&/[b 1/ N/A[]YGIN[] UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ý"N'I u-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 3 oV i " A//T--j- 1t-0 -c 2,re.M .L., ou r-.-1 .,,,,'fl. 'JZ ,oZ.- .0 Evaluated by: //P R I -Date: PAGE 204 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOR PAGE 205 of 433 4 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION q2 PAGE 206 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:(@

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

a- 3 R 2*-U3-00I Equip. Classu 9-O LJ_! Equipment Description Aijy' WI'C (Z 04] A Location:

Bldg. (AA'to01 FloorEl. 900' Room, Area &A-Pr.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) e,,,.6 (LSbM Cori,'okS Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anch 3 rage free (.visible cracks co orete near the anchors?o fM 5s.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

_X3PrEOQt

-0031'ý) r. 5" 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNI NCI UC- N/AC YX'/NE- UC- N/A-'YC NED UC: N/Af(YgNCD U[- N/AC]Y'C(/Nr UC)12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 207 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. Equip. Class' ý-O(]ý'i (CPNn Equipment Description

"-Ltvl; ?If (Yle iay l peat\Q( ft Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YXND UFI N/A[]YPNC] U-I N/AQ-YW/NQ UD] N/AD Yý N[ UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ND U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) kiwee7 '4baýWo SJ'wwr I/ 7 y.-.r" h,,, 1 L~ /0f t( EWt5 3 C3 Evaluated by: Q#ik'A/f4~4 A6W 2 Date: ~27Zi~PAGE 208 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 209 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 210 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

I -U 3 -'014- Equip. Class 1 2 20 (. c PGQe (5)Equipment Description P4Iaa!r !ay Lo.l.ne Location:

Bldg. Cr,'dfo/ Floor El. -200' Room, Area _._-22_Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Al"014f C0o1'frOI Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEN 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y N-NEI U- N/AQ 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YX NO UE N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE No UE N/A 1'5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YW NO UE N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Mq+& c(cLkSu~0V XXV2Ck.7.2 J) AV. 4 b+- Yw4 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YX'NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

"2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 211 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2-1 '%1O6 -U Equip. Class' 2.0LT. !(- P"iSr Equipment Description AwU-I'ca1Y MayC 1 pao.'(Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y'NI- UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NJ--] Ur N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?U' N/AD YX'NE U[]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý/ND Ur]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SEE 2-1?I6iJ3-OI1 R,-_l EA- W#R.Lt(' C.Cw r(Art).Evaluated by.Date: hkO.117Zi/.-<C-4 >PAGE 212 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 2 PAGE 213 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 214 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status__ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ED No. 1o/6'F/-U

-00/ Equip. Class's? 20 Equipment Description 52-F &.5E44a'R O, TR-,q/M , Location:

Bldg. C 'rAool. Floor El. 2oo' Room, Area ,'?4 /Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) -oz,,' ,r4-> d vo,/7o5. CO Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YPK NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchrage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

A 3.34,Eo' -00002.-)

\r, 12.0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yr NO UC- N/A-YX'NEI UC N/AC YC NCI UC N/A9 YW NC UC N/AC Yvf NO UC 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>PAGE 215 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-12./'3-890/

Equip. Class 1 2 2.o Equipment Description .fP 56QUEA(CEW ,"rn "A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targetp free from impact by nearby equipment o0 structures?

rv..-efrivpOF(-

V~-;, ý,s.J, anl 4'ke Y)'NC] UI" N/AC1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yj N[] UC1 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

YX 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YXNC UCI N/AC-Yý NEI UC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý(NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

,.oo Evaluated by: j\/Ma 1 kIilnsfn Date:~f 27 ~ty~< C-4 )>PAGE 216 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 217 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION V PAGE 218 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.10 PAGE 219 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-2O3-4-4-oof Equip. Class 1 2 e'// _4T -- e 1ejss /7 Equipment Description 4ESEL.. q r--io A Location:

Bldg. I~a Floor El. ".2o .Room, Area ,,1/o/" Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 0,.L9AV4t " -'t IAIC.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anehora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N;K of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Aor /T- 5-0;1 5 lz7PLe 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX NEI UE N/AE YX NE UE N/AO YK NEI UE N/AE Y9 NEI UE/Yl-fNE UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>PAGE 220 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 -,74"o3 -641- oo Equip. Class 1 2 P' (/61-1 c . -Cd1$S /7 Equipment Description b/S3 .. e A(ER,?'R Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YR ND UD N/AD Y; NEI UD N/AD Y5( ND' U[ N/AD YX NDE Ur Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI Ui" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NVOXJE Evaluated by: P el 1"4 1- LAq V/P V0Z1 £-/q7S'/_Date:

/SZ Z0/2-I d ............

<C.4 >PAGE 221 of 433 OACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION f2*IV 1" PAGE 222 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2P PAGE 223 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2-21 4 0 3-&r4--o00-Ff01 Equip. Class1 2 17 (&t t Equipment Description W5*1e( Ge,rr Z' S k Al- S'Ikr Location:

Bldg. Di#Jc I Floor El. 2-5 Room, Area 4t .-OManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) lftcai )r F'[ (" Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YkN"I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
2. X4AKo L Z- I I /-,r, J-,o YI- NEI U- N/A-Y[X NEi UI N/AD Yg NO UiD N/AD Yo NEI UO N/AD 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y potentially adverse seismic conditions?Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4* C-3 >PAGE 224 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z2-" 3 -"-00141 Equip. Class 1 2 i'7 ( ker WS)Equipment Description DA , e5 CIrfl((dP -IXn 4 av Air hilfr 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yo NC UC N/AC YX NC UC N/AO Y( NO uri N/AD YI N UIC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YQ NCI ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 1 ý//~Yj4.Y(o 12PmO4VK Date: 9/e/< C-4 >-PAGE 225 of 433 9 A.ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 200 Am's PAGE 226 of 433 4APACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 227 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1-1+3-17fokiV'quip.

Class 1 2_____________________

1U Location:

Bldg. D, Floor El. '--& Room, Area PLI 0 I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y X Nr UI NIA-YK NO UO N/AO YX NO UO N/AO YN NO UO N/AO 2-,X4,4 gc'/- 139 -+6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y5 UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 228 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2sr2p 3 VOl Equip. Class'2.1--1 Equipment Description D(7 4 4r, q-aS,6r si Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?P/P/060W 4rT,4 t/lR6b P9:/ PC-ý tI A/10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y9 NO UJO N/AO Y NO UrO N/AO Yo NO U(O N/AO Yp NO UFO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

1 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SEE --2403- C74-oo/ Fo-Y ARE,1 .,/.ku-/Evaluated by; z5'~ A 4wo t'cLo4CA10S-t-Date: 0 Z/.9 5/ rI z-- < C-4 PAGE 229 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2*0 PAGE 230 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I PAGE 231 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.01 of 2 Status N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z 403 -/' & / Equip. Class" 2~rI~Co~{ f)~hp Equipment Description 1 0, .(£[ T.& -6r ; ý!- f Location:

Bldg. DFOX T Floor El. 2I ' 4 Room, Area ,C-4 o/Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

(2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NE] UE] N/A[(YE] NE UE] N/A[X YE] NE] UE] YE] NE] UE] N/Ai YAN-] U[]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B. Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )>PAGE 232 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I- I- f Q ." r -I Equip. Class'2 ýý76 kle, L 4 Av, -o I I EquipmentDescription , '--' 6'.,! -Puijp Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NEI UO N/AQ Y0 NO UQ N/A-YK NO UD N/AO YN NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MocA f Evaluated by: :, ýD~7 ,6(-ý&----

Y,#1 Date: 9 / ..(~Q~V4-'~ j A ~7 V(~ C'o< C-4 >.PAGE 233 of 433 ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 2-2403-P4 001 DIESEL FUEL OIL STORAGt TANK PUtMP #1 TRN A PAGE 234 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION q2 PAGE 235 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status:(.

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. --' P& -o -Equip. Class1 2 2Z Equipment Description "a, 1 .21 CrL z Location:

Bldg. D Floor El. "L) -Room, Area joi Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N[of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

/Y -r / M7 .f" /6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX NEI UO N/AEJ Yjq NF-- U[ N/A[C Y50 NEI UO N/AM YO NO U- N/As Y% NO U0 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )PAGE 236 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- 2*3-P& -) CT I Equip. Classu 2- o Equipment Description D 4 14 6f- Crtz p. j Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y N NO U] N/AQ-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling files and lighting, Ypq NO U[] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YQ NEI UO N/AQ YPQ NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y; NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) seo' 2 -z 0 3 -o / ,'row , , ,, , Evaluated by: -' 4t/O Date: /5/2..-t AS/-<C-4 >PAGE 237 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 PAGE 238 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 I]PAGE 239 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ZA PANEL PAGE 240 of 433 ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

--_____________________

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0-AWL SNOW I 4m&21A 4 a e PAGE 241 of 433 NO.SNCO6RPT 2 ESON NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.IT 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 09052012 A/PAGE 242 of 433

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13211A260&oldid=1540859"