NL-13-1236, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 12 of 14

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 12 of 14
ML13211A251
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2013
From:
Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A251 (46)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-t ?O(,-03-OA I Equip. Class14 -i.-,, ,,icn '12,d j ,o,,<, "r,,,it Eauioment Description tA5 '4b(- Z'ý,54. 'Panel 2-Abil Location:

Bldg. r -. Floor El. jio'-o" Room, Area P- Q>z2-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage

('See >W<. dcxIc 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild /sace oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the co crete near the anchors?YE]]l YC] NE] U-- N/AD YE] NEI U-1 N/AZ YE] NE] UE-] N/A[]Y[: NE] UF- N/AD]YE] NE] U[]5. Is the anchorage configuration consis nt with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies i fae item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuratio verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anc orage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse s' mic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Page 127 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -.- O 1-- 1)P1 Equip. Class1214

-býs4, bAu+o, 1,nels J ivam,,ic. -ran, .4 r -Equipment Description OL5 %4b(- 615t, Panel 2-abil Interaction Effects ( e.. 4tjJC cA 4, 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEI NEI N/Al]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lig ng, YE] NE- UED N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipm t?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to7id damage? YE] NE] UE]1 N/AE1 7-10. Based on the above seismic teraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse s imic interaction effects?YEI NE-] UE]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NE]I U-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A v;-,%,,\ , , opc Ai .

crnponpnls 0j ca 1 W,-5 omment r4ur (Add on p 0 may / W cbcdde asneck es r oy) ner a~vvr.e- conci 4,ont , T-n i1 0 S.Lc V eotyn 100Ice8Ao 4O fr- -Cý %Nkrn--\ C~i~jc.,ne'n t 5 were- cteVc felt SeCL re d ) £tl% 0 e ir 4V6>tln~rrS con nc-c 4 i.,P lkj0 tx VI -co ~ uov G.f Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

WAN kvQ 0??rtA, -o %CSPCL+- I4C oC'1\h'V-5-c C.. OlC.- Cb b~ j?Evaluated by: R -' 14 3"sr" ., S/ .-.Date: ?/18J13 Aj US-M CjWC---?4 L 7-< C-4 >Page 128 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: 5-A CI ON 2.0!!/I 17E age 1 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 3

-rTT.1it 7.-x Ir f A T'lt"7: MIC W) NO. SNCV061-RPT Page 1 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- 15o,- S3 -Dsi Equip. Class 1 2 2-L 4p*1-a. Panels Eouinment Descrintion 111; NMr ziani Location:

Bldg. 3 Floor El. igo-o'- Room, Area 1t S 2- Ck Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraee (5c 5twJL JCLAP- B/zo/I-L)1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y--J L['of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YE-] NEI 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild su ce YE NEI oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the con ete near the anchors? YE N[E]5. Is the anchorage configuration consiste t with plant documentation?

YE NE[-1 (Note: This question only applies if item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration rification is required.)

UE- N/A[UE N/A[]UE- N/A-UE N/A[6. Based on the above potentially adverse fige evaluations, is the anchorage free of conditions?

YEI NEI U--12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )>Page 133 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Equip. Class 2 2- Lpw aol,&.y. Sc-.A; ,.. $ %i.,ii.,-, ýaie5,s_.l Equipment Description N'A P4be. 7 24rN Interaction Effects (S-r SWC '4AL /-l 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NEI-,[] N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmi 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid d age?YEI NE- U(: N/A[: YEI NEI U[I N/A[E 10. Based on the above seismic intc of potentially adverse seismic ii is equipment free YE[ N[3 U[-'effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[E] U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?A ,sua% i%,\ spe&,%av.

o4 4,'r.. ir,,,.\ Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-Two Atov-. .r, .ou ,-L opr.,J duL 30-- beo"1 a%%40.c CL govt. 1~~'OC.C~U84 I v ^ w9 c,~ to 011 O'4.Evaluated by: Z ' /---'-- 4.9 Date: 2/i1/15 So S eý IrL .ý" j , 1-~-~ ;.c~4WV 3 H .A C-4 )Page 134 of 231 9 TACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSION#P rage i 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02.

VERSION 2.0 age 1 Jb o0 9 TACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS K Page 137 of 231 W.0 I'age 136 OT 231 11-r 7,.N 2.0 9 age 1 A TT TT,7 age ATT-Ir "7 N CHEC NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 40-~- ~-~I.vage 1, VACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO IQ ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 2AD1-10 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 143 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(@

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 2--1 o1-Q3- \J 6 Equip. Class" 2 14- r)% io-,el, n,,tm Tr.avs.4,, , Equipment Description

\7_0 4AC. N-o.\ 1 Z i Location:

Bldg. -Avux Floor El. 2-20'-0" Room, Area RJ141 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraee ( 5e-e- S W C- 40,r 2 ~/ Z 0/ 7-)1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose har are?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible crack n the cc YEI NEI YEI NE] UE' N/A[E YEI NEI UE- N/AE-YEI NEI UEr N/AEF Y[E] NEI UEr N/AE-YEI NEI UE--)ncrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configurat yn consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only pplies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage co iguration verification is required.)

6/12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Page 144 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- 10ol- 03 '41 r Equip.

Diunc aA *u4nwn&4i. .aa4r, Swuad.f Equipment Description 12-0 N4 A.L Y-+.. b -.% I Pa- ID14 bt Interaction Effects ( C o.4cl %/Z0117")7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEI NEI N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and ligh g, YE] NE] UE] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipme 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to a id damage? YEI NEI UE] N/AE]10. Based on the above seismic in action evaluations, is equipment free YE] NE]1 UE]of potentially adverse seis *c interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A v, tumA\ %n.atc4ibh 04 4,h.. rt%. r V~o.\ T 1 ,O'*1~ O )f-c l.n-AkS n~o+ *ide.cjuaý4z

%,ý ee~.tv-e.

d, ,'reccc 4 v-u -e C.5 4 re-.s~ Co'~rcA+,n,~ £W~cC~b~t~~

~ " ~ OV~ dC-.'JidtvC'.

o-C o 4 hcr o.d U.ý-5e- -s~mic- Cawdcl 4;Ofl .Vo o.dyc-r- Sie wC.. cpri;4;on. w~ere feanvd.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) tN o'- .Evaluated by: I I-/~~< 6- ~ /o Ioe, l t~jz If Date: 01/o 1 /i/010<C-4 >Page 145 of 231

ATT At'IRA-IKIT 7*WALKDOWN C" VI IQTC cKlfl%/nlz4 00,r'I ') n T-7 IN cI ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2.- 12 1 -Q'5-N A ' Equip. Class" 2ý'Uro.AL Pemexs qyA u 1! 1V r. S :4 1-A Vwx ft Výs le -t. ý5 Equipment Description

\z.o .\VA \JiA\o Panedl z.1'i 5 Location:

Bldg. .Floor El. 1%c,'-o" Room, Area , Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae (See.- Swc_ do,.k,_A 'S /z~t/lq I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item o of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose har are?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more th mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible crack in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configurat n consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only pplies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage co iguration verification is required.)
6. Based on the ove anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially dverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI YE-- NEI UE1 N/AE YE" NEI UE-1 N/AE]YEI NEI UE" N/AE-YEI NEI UE-1 N/AE YEI NEI UE)12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )0 Page 149 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2-101 -GI-VI'\

s4 ¶OWA& Aa 1 van &.ale' St.Equipment Description 12b N"C.- 'P40a. ;kWr,1_ %InteractionEffects (5'C sw(- j-7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO] N E] N/AEI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lig ng, YE] NEI UE1 N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipm ?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to id damage? YEI NE] UE] N/AE'10. Based on the above seismic i raction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NE] UE]of potentially adverse seis ic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[4 NE] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A -4i,,\ !vpt4-pcor o4 4 yve ;n4,,-rv\

Ckc,".j, 0.( 4-' co.)Dn cA.- " cleV- Lo,- S.-e., iC. C.U... ,.% 0 C&.'. euv 8'Y% -L 04 Co ",c -t's Yl' A4 O.4LEtU 4cqu , SPLCLUre d, Iclreclcecl

'LO *VNu-%'e_

4 e'nerlnfYs C0V1t -1`t;A'&ý c~ iwCO. C0li4ign tWr~e 4 OutJ.cl. Q Vnioa-, [%%up I-, 0 4 on A,) iOi-1t'Co.

4 5c 4-ion.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)-Fouy,,d r s.* -Co. cover- .,!,4s. 4"k, 4j , coio,,, Jior- Yi,, rep'LuI-4 o-. ¶.ei0k- 0'- 01jero.'h; 1; noi~'- -G,, k'V~i! lp~nal* Cbvr..1 4 1ow,%-ego r A- 4 1 ;L 91 W&- t.e1\,aA.j Lrj docurn.,A 4h, covj 1 i soi.h-ý ' I~JcA ecWUL..ý*-*'3*~

P*~o~~y o cN Evaluated by: _ -I / -Te 5: 12 & -Q, Date: O ./ol -3 I/ /'8(/15< C-4 >Page 150 of 231 9 TACHMFNT 7- IFMIC WALKDOWN CHF:CKL ITS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02.

VERSION ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 v-'age 1 A "TT 7.-rc Hage 1,bi ot 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

Z-Wioi- -NJ II Equip. Class1 2 tl- nsA,.: , aytPa.t%*

e.% armj.. .MC.P.4A'Ta, ..i4chm., Equipment Description Izo VAiC \,;4a\ ¶Pqc,. 2.-Y1 A Location:

Bldg. , Floor El. iyo'-O" Room, Area ýL 1 2cl Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae (Se ~ca. JC4- I91.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item e of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose har are?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more th mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks n the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configurati consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only plies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage con guration verification is required.)

YEI NEI YEI NEI UEI N/AE YE] NEI UE- N/AEl YEI NE3 UE- N/AE-YEI NEI UE- N/AE Y[-E NF-I UE 6. Based on the potentially acq anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.( C-3 >Page 154 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-\1go-Q'6-NJI I Equip. Class12lg-F;b,; ,Pia.Is .P° rr "T,,, ghGt Equipment Description I zo VAC, \Ji.:4c\ 'Pan-, 2.-R Pi A Interaction Effects ( 5W.. ., Ii/ ))7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEI NE- r E- N/A[']8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and 1 ting, YE1 NEI UE N/A[I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equi ent?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibili o avoid damage? YE NE UD7 N/AC7 10. Based on the above se' *c interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NEI UE7 of potentially adv e seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y1 NEI UE'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

w , s\ , o 4 4,s,.

0o4 4vmL Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) coeism'c.

0- a aa.I -OnlCevr, 4W t's "10;"-C-1

.C--t;%V (Lej~a'.r:6 513-165 V%& beq,.ij Evaluated by: -- "" /--oso." (I,.

Date: OtIg/L15 las. ~ S -&~,dAC~t9A1 I /z, A13 A C-4>Page 155 of 231 A TT A CL T 7. Cr-IQPAICf

\AIAI VflCnAINI I'1"\IXtn1 DDT Ae MA RI

-rTT AiT 7.TQc I age tACH, OWN (I-'*'*s rage i 9 TACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHE(

9 VAC QT 7-ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 k. U. -00 Equip. Class" 2 Z0- Ir,-4 rm., 4 oV% Co"A.-.o I 'Oael\s Equipment Description Axuiiv-, U CL.%%A. pan-1 A Location:

Bldg. _.,,-c\ Floor El. zoe- Room, Area P, A .2-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e (See- 5LC do.lej )]a-t~ L')1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item o of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose har are?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more th mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks* the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configurati consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only plies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage conf ation verification is required.)

YE- NEI YF- NEI UE1 N/AE-YE] NEI UE1 N/AE-YE3 NEI U[-1 N/AE-YE3 NEI UE1 N/AEl YEr NE] UE3 6. Based on the potentially ad anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Page 161 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2.- \t,- '*-0 \ Equip. ClassC 1 2 ZO- , p..ne_ , Equipment Description , iX. e\c.. a'L P\Interaction Effects (Sega. SLC. (A- LA Bi"lca l 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEI NEI N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and light , YEI] NEI UE] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipme 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avo damage? YEI NEI UE] N/AE1 10. Based on the above seismic inter ion evaluations, is equipment free YE] NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic teraction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?%

v I-ývt 4 pe.c4ar% o4 4v%- oypo.,,-I'%ý5Cf'oiTe ,Luc,-% Pa.r4%w-vc A or% if% #.Iaiorb ko ChieCK for 0.Wprv -Wv5 Vt COA1 A;r% -IT PM-4(C.U%0-j4hp_

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: / ".- -" / "To~c 12.. ,A Date: o'!t/al< C-4 )I Page 162 of 231 ATT KIT 7-I SIT T -.:M II IQTQ (ZKlP\/nrI-D 1_DT0 n rage I ATTAr'WRUIZNIT 7- IZI(ZkAflr

%AIAI i-erlCWAlkiI-I _DDT 013 \/C'O rage 0'+ of A TT A t"I,- IAPI:IlT 7'IC WALKDOWN C kin C'Z7IWIAlWC"'\/n 1g M l_1:DDT rage o3 o1 ATTACLJI-A IMT 7."' \AIAI VIri"%AIKI r 4I DDTr (),) \/Cocln~Kl )A/'age 1 Do OT Ll O ACHMFNT 7-.0SFISqMIC WA! KD)OWN C ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 6) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 2.- \,f\-,-'-

O'--l Equip. Class 1 2 20- 0 %- 4,-u,,- ,, C,,,A-,a ¶Pane 5 Equipment Description IUYcAwy .l ~vi ,A. Pq 1NL.Location:

Bldg. I Floor El. zac'- o" Room, Area rL ; 7..Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage (Se-. Swc... 86,4 S/C'l '.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose har are?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than ild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in e concrete near the anchc ,rs?YO-- Nil YE NE UE N/AE YE NEI UE- N/AE YE NE UE N/AE YE] NE UE-I N/AE-]YEI NE U-5. Is the anchorage configuration co sistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applig if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configura on verification is required.)
6. Based on the above a horage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse s ismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Page 168 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 72-12,- A'l- O14 Equip. Class 1 2 ZO" u,.,d ,,,t CbA.\ %as Equipment Description

\,- .ri .Interaction Effects (See.. Swc,.. ACL.A-ý 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE] NEI E] N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lig g, YE] NEI UE] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipm?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to id damage? YEI N[I U[:] N/AE]10. Based on the above seismic i raction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NE] UE1 of potentially adverse seis c interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y14 NEI UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?A -i ,, 04ea. o-. ;n. r*yta raovn"PQn.Y.5 C pe To'ý. : ow I/i(.Jzo13 -L chcIc. 40e Ox-heircm~w,-,r r-ov%'A1n5.7n 1,POW-41fula0.g

ý.lW 'SWE toov~ )K~L cO \Dfr. ~'4-r -C, comonr^4~

Lar". O.41e~JUo4c.%'

scuýL cta%- 4%4v.rw.S Cov%nct4gn 5_%Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

W a e..Evaluated by: .-t / "3"n s," t .. /4 r. rs de z- Date: 01. /1 &./ a, of 5 Page 169 of 231 r7 ige 1 tu o0 AT.7.age 1 -i oi

-7.age i tz O0

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-13-1236,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._2.0,_Vogtle_Unit_2_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_12_of_14&oldid=892159"