ML13211A259

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 4 of 14
ML13211A259
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2013
From:
Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A259 (77)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: @ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Equip. Class'2 , Con',oI I --/-,43 5 20 Equipment Description Sd S (,M-1-) TrSJ( C.""t -Tr 4A Location:

Bldg. Cort'rdl Floor El. )2-Ot Room, Area CoDrd-oI fd ti,(I(+) -.1-1, t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

"'44A kU5 C Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments, Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] Nýof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

'X NEI U[] N/AE-YX NE] UE] N/AE 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE] N/AX PVEI-p-ID E &" 5cT/7-1'0 J To0 4>8~~Z J6A-E-7 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

do, 11 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NEI UE N/Ag YANE] UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment,< C-3 >PAGE 126 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -SM Equip. Class 1 i TC4 0/ Pao .[tr Equipment Description 501,'t Y5/V SA.t f (TeS] Js- -Tr1-eq ft Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NC UC N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NO Uti" N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YJ NO U N/AC 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YX NCI U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo Ni U'i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/1/4,P £A/g% t:2f 0?Y' ~ $ e2E6A /M T 70 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5- 2 -/600- Q5- /-/VC 470 AR, 4 , f-t--k-RY Evaluated by: 4>,--1" t- 10 VL-.P4.SA'fC

ý( Date: / 1/ ¢of_t C-4 >PAGE 127 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 128 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 129 of 433

  1. ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOR .0 PAGE 130 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: YQU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 (- I W S"0.2- Equip. Class" 2.2. (LD- Vol iayt ')/Equipment Description RIaCdr ThrIJ Location:

Bldg. C-o rh"*'O Floor El. I F_0 _ Room, Area 80 7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yk'N-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YOI NE UW'N/A-YE NO UDýN/A[-I YEO NE UO/N/AEI YE NE UO"N/A[E 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE W potentially adverse seismic conditions?

5tw~d4 3 n 0fC nC6W%.-C4

(,,, 7 e, is rrulr Co4-ý k .I 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 131 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. 2-W!I-(C$ 002-- Equip. Class'2 2 (Low Equipment Description 4Ar.O( rc $(Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines hbve adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yk/NO UF N/AD Y0 NO UD N/AD YO NO'UO N/AF Yý('NO UE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO" Ný(U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?+r C& Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N ,; o JXrl cmt Evaluated by: #ki 't(/"/1/ LJ'lti'vi~lq Date: 91t 41_2-__< C-4>PAGE 132 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 200 PAGE 133 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 134 of 433 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS PAGE 135 of 433 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-/I3- -05"' 00/ Equip. Class"' 2 o(/,'s'/¶IC, T 4w7,,eoL p4,/a5)Equipment Description X64foWA?Location:

Bldg. e,0/,,r7oL Floor El. ZLo Room, Area IVA~ 1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) "rtoeA6f-OGl Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] NXJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN ND U- N/A[-Y9 NO UOi N/AE YX NO UE N/AD YO NE U- N/AJR YN NO U--11 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 136 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -I23- D5001 Equip. Class'_ _____Equipment Description

--ermnf Pro0(vsi 9 UniL On A (4 J Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

4YNO UD N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NE U N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yý NO UD N/A]YiNr UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No aA4'j~onA c~ompw -.Evaluated by: W111 4 ill1oh Date: 270W 91271ZOIZ< Cel4 PAGE 137 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I PAGE 138 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2-L60 A Equip.Class

/Equipment Description HOvtAZ CC"Jý1.OL_ z (I.iC t )Location:

Bldg. c--,.,QL Floor El. 2GO k Room, Area K3 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1NC-- UO N/A[-4 NEI UC- N/AC]N NC- UC N/A-Y[-] NEI UE-I YY NC3 UFC 11 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 139 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 2- ,9 -/ 5A Equip. Class 1 2 / (MAcTb. eoKt,,vRoL

£,.e Equipment Description --l-i..c1")

2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y*ND U-- N/A[I Y-N- UD- N/ADI Y#ND N]U- N/A-1 YX NDI UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NDI UID adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y" Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

S3E r=-r= z -7$S \ ALCCc Evaluated by: iNr'cj/izsD' Date: C: _ , -"7_ jo ý z a9 efa , / Z-4 C-4 )PAGE 140 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 141 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Statusy N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- /A "5 3 -AEquip. Class" 2 I A'1.t" o.j Vdt,, 0 4"j Equipment Description MOT coam(O0 crx Location:

Bldg. A(,AX" FloorEl. 7Zzto A Room, Area 1< /'YI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

U_.rr, ,4491-AM .i)t.4'Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yg No of the 50%0 of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXNEI UE- N/A-YN- Uf N/A-Yý NEI UI- N/AD I NE U- N/A-Y NEO Ul 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3>PAGE 142 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-(7iOs 53-4//15 Equip. Class'2

/ti[C,&4 a; M/iA "A[ Ao.Tbo 49#9d.Equipment Description M4S0O P4Of COti7KOZ.

rT4 24/S Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YxNEI UI-] N/Al YNNEI UE] N/AD YV1N- UD- N/AD Y'ON UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y(.Nr-] U[:]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Q 0 t-- ^Evaluated by:/Date: 0 C ';*/.d< C-4>PAGE 143 of 433

  • , ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 HIeGH D 4 LAGE1 0 PAGE 144 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-/go53.-BL Equip. Class" 2/Equipment Description MAOV 1114r &v2N7ftoL CAR, 2,88C Location:

Bldg. C-OA'PROZ Floor El. 4?O' Room, Area B/1'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-] NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yg NO U- N/AE YXNO UE N/A'4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[] NO UE N/AX'_O7-0AlE '/o To EM8,,90tE 57eL 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

/W7, -Werfl o 54ato 1-6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE- NE UE N/AX* NEI UE Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 145 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2.-6'9C 5" Equip. Class 1`I Equipment Description / /,orjn -2zABC Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YK'NO UC-1 N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX N- UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YJp NEI UC N/AC YX NEI U Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA NC UC" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/,V9AI" Evaluated by: 'f '~ 'LoA5 Mai-It Date: s9 /Zo/.< C-4 >PAGE 146 of 433 SACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION1 PAGE 147 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-493'-.53 ASO I Equip. Class 1 2 Z Equipment Description

-60 V 5WrTC/1-'

4R Z,,5O " Location:

Bldg. 0,Yr-areoi Floor El. /8'0 Room, Area 9'8o f Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 45f" Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YC N4 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?k'E-L~-P Zp c~AV~ ~~ TO EA1B EPPC-P 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X N- U- N/A-YNC- UI N/A-YXNIO UO- N/A;K P&/--/) YC NC U- N/AK Y/V NO U-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 148 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-/A05- -5.3 -Equip. Class'a z Equipment Description 1/f 0 V S~(/ r~'e~1 R2.4B04-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NEI UI- N/AF-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NFi U0 N/AF-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

N 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YX NI U0I N/AD]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y NE] UD"]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? Y%/ .5 /V o _ *? -/-*M 2 .. , " d -.c- p T '-, ,q -~ _..)Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: '0 0-'" "!z/ Date: S, Z ' 20/2.-<C-4 )PAGE 149 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS I*NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 150 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 i I I ,lei PAGE 151 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sh t1 o+/-2 Status: n~i~Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. '2- IS5-,- 5 z~ r"~Equip.

Class 1 2 -Equipment Description

'Z -L0 -rý-- -'-r s.6 Location:

Bldg. C00-t_- L Floor El. t 1o' Room, Area RS Co Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

CLTL'( -L Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I, 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y4NO UOl N/AONO U- N/AD NE UD N/AD Yý NO UO N/A-6gAVjr1(,JL-!

ZK~c34- 3z36 3 -5 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXNO UD 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 152 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1- --'Rquip. Class1 2 0- -Equipment Description rzlr-NP- '4'a'1-Nj-za

--r7yý- r'-_Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y ND UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 1ý ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YXNO UD N/AD Y UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y. ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

!\Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) k~3L-,, Evaluated by: z?.~-J' 'C-?; I D -.-: Date: _ -2__ 1 __ D __oiý 1 4. 17 /Z 'ý " z (ý<C-4 >PAGE 153 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOR PAGE 154 of 433 4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 155 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 13"Cije .U1 /I Status: 0N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- I3c'-S-'-f

£Cg Equip. Class'2 /4 --rS , ,,f-Equipment Description (SoL.-on iJ -t'-(,.Location:

Bldg. C-.--cL_ Floor El. 1 o' Room, Area (Z2C 4.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

FF LC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yg ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y&ND UD- N/A[D YXNDI UD- N/AD-YXNDI UED N/AED Y*ND] UD N/AD YI NE UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 156 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2- T3tt6 Equip. Class 1 2 M- '70A1 " A,, , Equipment Description (2-U"Z Oto.Od-o , ,-'a4-l.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y1 NCI UtI N/A[l 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y /NO Ut- N/AC]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.D~oatt~a chcd-- lin he ý-UM7 o a-i- d ]9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y4NI UOi/A 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NEI Ut]1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could No] Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:_.. >64W3ZtiV OSY Ci-J. / d~- L~7L~/Date: &I -" 04 -ta-as//' 29/Z ..2 PAGE 157 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.o kAN FAIWURE OVERLWA" Nvt, _, 'i, " 2XIlit.12

'ZoZ.1i 117 X, t A. ~ W PAGE 158 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 159 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentiDNo.

2-/8o7-26.'31P Equip. Class __ 1_Equipment Description

./rT"l ,4C /

ZPAD -/r_Location:

Bldg. eooyrgo 4 Floor El. /180 Room, Area X8-f/Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yd NO]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ NEI Ur N/AE-3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YjX NE] U- N/AE-oxidation?, '/ f-/6-/12 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN- NO U[- NIA,%ht 4-p To Co 4:,PET/A/4 To , _e=$ .5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Yq NEI U-] N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)A/

/5! 5,eC/,AfED o"AI i 57U,/. 5 r Z --.UHt Cf- FrAre rrf,4 r "A/'e 7.7- /3 47-bf 4 fouf COR'*' 5 ,PEl? 5 W " ;s -NF/f -E7H our mt ,'6.' ased on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 160 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-M07- Y3 -/ 4- Equip. Class'2 AG Equipment Description V-/'r 4I- AC /A/LVZ 7- ZPP/.Z74-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y N U' N/A'8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y ' NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

  • o/&,R r~,!/.4 4e,V' 0,q O.C41r--T

,/7-0F -l /'a1f -ef- " R e5,eLr /-ejv/rp5

/7" -r- 7Y-H,4r 7?-A,!E 15".ottCft~At~#

avidmg 7- N P"]U'"]N/A 4 'gbatdc]Pd linesr~avtadequate Iekibility to avoid damage? NO UD N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YA NO UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJX' NDI U'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N0 4 Evaluated by: _ ,)4vft 4Ie5 1 e: Date: ~/ o'~< C-4 >PAGE 161 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 162 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:-)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -806 1 -A rA Equip. Class_/5" Equipment Description

/Z5 11'9e Al7-r6, e Y 24P1 18 Location:

BldgLCF"#er

.Floor El. /80 ." Room, Area "8 Z 7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 40 d,,4r7"eAf/O'5 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YX NE] UE] N/AE)YZ NE] UE] N/AE]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YX NE]1 UE] N/AE]Cc,1,,V4FCr1oN" 7-o lotwm~oE , c., 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YE NEI UE] N/AX NV0r W17 TVf 5,0;/0 .54 A4Poz t.6 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y NE] Ur]"Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 163 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ZSo04 -"93- YAEquip. Classu 15 Equipment Description

/Z T1,t'PC. -'q4 Y :,4 04?Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yp NEI U0 N/ACr 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NEI Uf N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NE UC NIAC Y)K NO U0 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yg NCI UC-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 10 Evaluated by: A" ,V/p k A.1-,'0 $- 7 ate: 62' '/L-MAiW~ W W8Ai/< C-4 >-PAGE 164 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO*:13ýevs PAGE 165 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOA PAGE 166 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 01ICCL 1 01 Z Status:ON-.

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

-63CrA Equip. Class' (4 (&1*y Equipment Description

&Ia Chotr~tr .2A IC Location:

Bldg. (orý"o Floor El. 10O1 Room, Area gR297 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

_ _ _,_Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YW NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visiblc cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

AX3 4-P0O -001 FO, VCR. .2,0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YV' NEI UD N/AC YX N[ UE N/ACI YO NEI UC- NIA9NOC UC N/AC Y4 NO U-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 167 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3- SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

-i63- (-AA- Equip. Class" 2[ (6ttK-ty C'umP [ --Ved'r,)-I Equipment Description

-C( " .2..f)q l C2TA-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YK NEI U0 N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y ND" UD" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YVND UDI N/AD" Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)(N-] UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)2- 11-06 015A -iL AEIX A , Evaluated by: 11 't/ [1"I/"lf01"C Date: t2 3- wz 8?lel 0/ Z-/<C-4 >PAGE 168 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 169 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS S 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 170 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 9- 0V- -P Equip. Class'2 14-Equipment Description

'&$ V) L'C Joyi1flJn d t .A"P1)Location:

Bldg. (.C0Dtri FloorEl. 10' Room, Area 1,8.-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Svtaurot L Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NW of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yf NEI U- N/AD-3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YV NEI UD N/AD oxidation?
4. I -fkh corree of si d- the onre t A S th a ho? Ys nef11Nr/i U- N1V 4. Is the anchorage free of vissiblc cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YWNDJ UD N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Nof- tr v , "mie.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD ND UD N/A*Yb/NOT UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 171 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 5060-341 Equip. Class" Equipment Description 115r VL DCP,s40'u!1u0 Paevd, 2aff I)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YL('N- UI' N/AD YINDI UD N/AD Y1 NO UD N/AD YW" NO uD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SEE -I s F, Evaluated by: (4711;756r

.,4D4t4v £oPion, ~ -y/)Date: / /- ZO.4 C-4 >" PAGE 172 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 290 PAGE 173 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0*,j PAGE 174 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 10 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 175 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Starus:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

1-1'06-S3-0)5A Equip. Class'2 2- (LOW V016st )Equipment Description 125- \ ýwjf, 3- 1 Location:

Bldg. _______ Floor El. " RooAreaRP2.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 6ou1 ~ louor &tIVuer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN'ND 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

5s 4 LrýC- OX)1ýr CLOV f~f 4. Is the anchorage free of visible craqk4 in the ncrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

2"(3AO-3-03o4-5, \lf(. 1.0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN[NEI UEI NIAEI Yf Ni UL- N/A-YEI NEI UE] NIAK y NEI UE N/AEl Y&NEI U-J' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes ofEquipsient.

ý<C-3 >PAGE 176 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. e i 5 A Equip. Class.1 2 ( 0L 1..5vik Equipment Description 1.25- OIC S,4.4ju 21121 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX No U0 N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YK NEI U" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI UD- N/AD YK NEI UD1 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'NI- UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:~fAb~, P 14V0" -C>9R5cY Date: 8Mz#1j S/, z& -/'< C-4 >PAGE 177 of 433 ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION P 1 I I PAGE 178 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2*0 PAGE 179 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: Y (9 U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-/8407- .1'6V Equip. Class" 2 /1(D/$r*/sur/oN P RtTE?1r74TE Equipment Description

/20 VAC Vf4lr I S A Z9YZ8 Location:

Bldg. ,,U'I Floor El. ZZO' Room, Area ,/?/7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 54&QC-4, E P Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD" NQ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y14 NE] UE- N/Al]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NE] UE] N/A--oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yg NE] UE] N/AFD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NE] U-] N/Ag (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

/v 7- /IAf SAA4Ph 45 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YX NEI UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

F,--vA u A nD &'Y.' Ot1P4AsA / $hZ/2.12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix S; Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 180 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z7-/ -/5 Equip. Class' /' i%-) 'LU ,

Equipment Description O -C-6 t/77a- /IS1T PAMO/- 7-/6 V/ a Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

4NEI U0 N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y\ NKU-- N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?-M r C- t s LA-) C- Z'50k-E&2 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YlN[-- Ur- N/AEr YV NE- UM Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yf NE] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-.~-~t- ~ )u-C~UDate:

Evaluated by: 157" --21 -ý ---7-2-/I I I I 1 .1ý(CA-4 PAGE 181 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Is NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 182 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Si.PAGE 183 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 184 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, 2-/,'7-43

-i'/4 Equip. Class 1 Equipment Description

/20 4,4' ,'¢t AZ p,4A/eZ Ziy/I,&Location:

Bldg. ,'/i"o9-FloorEl. i$go' Room, Area 1'63/Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y N-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

[-:.DP No. (3P-FoSh,.E-4-.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y' NEI UE N/AE Y'K NE UE N/AE NE UE N/Ax -6VU- N/AE YX NE UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 185 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-180"7 -C,3 -VI Equip. Class" 2 _4" Equipment Description 130 NWA Vi'4k( PQVt 2-PY[B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YK NCI UV] N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling files and lighting, Y[1 NC UC" N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

I 0b , 5 't s , k 9 t,, f t 5CW -,4,

,._9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YV/NE U"- N/AC Y4"N" UC"I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5 CE 2-1107-"Y3-104- FOk. MCA-A Evaluated by: / flf/lkti0n Date: 4QZVI Z'Al"~ VP11`"R-1Af 62 -cdý<C-4 >PAGE 186 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 187 of 433

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO*PAGE 188 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION PAGE 189 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Statusoo U ,*7$4 //.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2--1tWJ-,3-VYt Equip, Class2 14'Equipment Description i a 't vU- P414 1qnd -,PYIA Location:

Bldg. CsmJ!tal Floor El. "_f_1__ io m,-r 12 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

S I P4f Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD NX 2. is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks W e concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

0-4 A s-o~ 7osarnpg&-

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y9 NEI UEI N/AD1 YWNI- UDJ N/A[]YE NEI UD- N/Av YE- NO U-] N/AD Y)(NE U[D 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 190 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. ).-Ipo H7 -V,1 Equip. Class" +Equipment Description 120 \IPG \IhW Andie 24YIA-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipent or structures?

Y[3 NX p it u" N/A]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, y NO Ui N/AF and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lincs have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismi iUt ratirn effects?YWNDI UD1 N/AD1 YD Ný U0 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'ND- UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

S 2-I'0(v- S3- DSA FO. ,4-jt WMXK-9Y CU -cLI0ST(,-W), Evaluated by:f~~f~~~

Mq~kt wl~sr Date: 9129 2-<C-A >PAGE 191 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2*0 PAGE 192 of 433

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 C.- * -PAGE 193 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 194 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 195 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment iD No. 1-'4o7°,-

/" Equip. Class'Equipment Description R "I't7- -SAO -.6t2,' F zY/Location:

Bldg. eoAfirO- Floor El. /0O 7 Room, Area _ 18 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y] N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

ao-ý ,I,'.145,:,, swvPd 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

/N NEI U] N/AC YY NEI UC N/AC YX N- U- N/AC1 YO NC UC N/AX Y NCI U-n Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

  • < C-3 >" PAGE 196 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-/Y0P7-Y?

-/9Z" Equip. Class 1',4--Equipment Description

/C(/.4-5)

,?"A,.FoRAf 2BC(2,kX -/Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y0 ND UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJ' ND U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?A ND UO N/AD I ND UD'q Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A 4 a -- A ,4..e,4 ..-.- 9? -5 e Z- 2 Evaluated by: ' /Z4kr4 Cý k Date: -&O ' -/<C-4 >PAGE 197 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 198 of 433 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS M Z-1$07,i3(0 4-O0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 199 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 2Z-[T07-7r3-./-

Equip. Class"#Equipment Description f22f,-/APo1 C e, r OW gil Ai Ad.e1 / 2"//a4 Location:

Bldg. Ca Floor El. oOV "-'Room, Area tfi 33 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yff NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YJ NC- UC- N/A[-YO/NF] UC- N/AC-Yd'NEI UC N/AC-l YE' NEI UC- N/AC Y)N- UC-2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 200 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 11P-T-. -Z0 Equip. Class" 2 17 Equipment Description k)(all IB C 0 2,(A X".,'T,.j 1, 2,4-y14-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ZJ NC3 U- N/A[I YJ"NE UCF N/ACl Y/N- UI-1 N/AC3 Yý NE-- UC-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NCI UC1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

~, ~ ~ 'TO it.ai34T -vrw Crc;"-iPo'.436sJ VJýrrAikR'0 '.' ~ ~ ~ I U n0' "rkc T6 -&-.- fZ%.4_ ,ta tr X-7-,#r5 Evaluated by: 0/ Date:/< C-4 >PAGE 201 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 202 of 433

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13211A259&oldid=1540861"