ML13211A262

SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 7 of 14

ML13211A262
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	07/25/2013
From:	Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A262 (61)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y 6) U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

-'//- 3006 8 Equip. Class1 2 7

Equipment Description 4e/W11 A74W

-S-I*' - A&*WIn-641.v(Y'O)

,&-/WS/V Location: Bldg.

1A4X Floor El. ZZ Room, Area

/5/',

1. /#/M4 EF'. 29 C*.,'

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraie I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD N%

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

T7-'e

,L*z-V/'

/5*

/N-e.-/i'

• g*r, tt:.7

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE UE NI,0A YO NE UE U/AN YEI NEI UE N/AX YE NEI U-N/AW

)N*

UE 52 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )

PAGE 300 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Z-I/3/V-017aB Equip. Class'2 7

Equipment Description A94 /

,T*,

A 5

f -

,oL 64/5l TS °Ak MS/V Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y% NO UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO N% U-N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

,F'/

~ PA',Q7O7<Ct*//"

PIa/p vH jQ4V

,EAD /5 4 f 4,A

,eMe 86cvVs-

"tcY#47 5-.,,9 e

h, 5"oz.'509) 6

9. Do attached lines have adequate flrxibility to avoid damage?

YA NJ U" N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YA NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y~' NO U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-- JL/;/~ CF Ol*o*

tV oN

,t9 8-oD-E 0-P 6

57tL-,

,,V-'PT4BL,36.

-F R

• R-J t,4,,LK.-tYp

.s*E=

2-p5V -*oo*-

Evaluated by:

A* W',

Date:

J /d

~

<0C4 >"

PAGE 301 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 302 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 303 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 304 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 i

/

k PAGE 305 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO PAGE 306 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 307 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:15N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2-1V--2'.-2 Equip. Class-'

/

_ A Equipment Description i"P,-L V A-- "

"'(

j Location: Bldg.

4]X' Floor El.

/ I d' Room, Area j24 /0 4L Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] N[E' of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NE] UE] N/A YE] NE] UE] NIAX YE] NE] UE] N/Aý2 YE] NEI UlE] N/A"

)NE]

UE1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

PAGE 308 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

2-- i+VY--2'7 Equip. Class" 2 ___________________

Equipment Descrintion

/./ F.1 V 41r-Jc

/

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

I NDI U[-1 N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1$

NEI U-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Y'¢ N[3 UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/-

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) u ut.

N ý 0r,-79 11'.0 NO-Evaluated by:

Date:

0" 20C?.

< C-4 >

PAGE 309 of 433

ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.10 PAGE 310 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 9

20

)12 PAGE 311 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo.

2-/1UV,71<FO Equip. class-7(&etP,,,,,<

<-O,,-*,J4

• 'DI/l4)

Equipment Description

/R 7-f L/fL r--60 po,-J vw-W Location: Bldg. r146 Floor El. ZOO' Room, Area

?A-O/

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

ZY 6 P,,,/

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NA*

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'-j)- t:,I r 6 ý-l P* -,5.,. t r YE] NE U[

N/A0 YE NE UE N/AJg YD NE UE NIAU(

YE" NEI UE" N/AA Y0 NE UE Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C3 >

PAGE 312 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No..2-lb -7 150 Equip. Class 12 "7

Equipment Description fUCDT wkrtSoloA Valve

( eAfU"L. Oewrkia u%~

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX NEI UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y* NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

V4< ND UD N/A-INN ND UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI U[']

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

.X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

=.,j

/"I

'C--r',

1Lot' Date:

"e2-

.- 2ac"C.z 0

/Z~;z

"-< C-4 >

PAGE 313 of 433

V ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION

.0 PAGE 314 of 433

ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 I

PAGE 315 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.

2-L-Q

/tlk Equip. Class' 2 Lf -i44t er OJr*}ea

-ý

• /e,*,A O!fý..1j (&hiw Equipment Description A M A A /v5A n'tokw A/7O /

Location: Bldg.

r4q&u FloorEl. Iq46-'

RoomArea

,(e-t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

VeW(&,

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I V-LbJ aL CO-

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UE N/AV YE NEI UE N/A*

YE NE UE N/AM YE NEI UE N/Av Y

NEI UE

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>

PAGE 316 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo.

Equip. Class" A'

Of-,e

/,,,d et* )

J UIMo'dc Equipment Description cPA mrAA-oy4 m.oi/

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

4 NEI UC-N/AC

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NC3 U0 N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

I'

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YY NE U-] N/AC Y[P N Ur Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yl, NEI U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

. (-,.C' Evaluated by:

Date:

Y4).4 L

Ce~ 2 Z

ý<C-4 >

PAGE 317 of 433

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 200 PAGE 318 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 r

NMI-PAGE 319 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: e N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. ;-

1-52 Equip. Class"_ 7 Equipment Description Lef' kn f5d 1J1 'on /0 V Location: Bldg.

J-LY Floor El.

1I V-'

Room, Area UZ..I063 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] Ný of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UE N/Ao

"/v YEI NEI UE N/A<'ý YE' NEI UE" N/Ac*

YEI NEI UE N/Ao/

YE/NCI UE "2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 320 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. 2L4 "

15-2-.

Equip. Class' l 7 Equipment Description I-PN'doyfl rsT(-o *(

o fr0V Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

1 0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YD'NOUI"U N/AD Y ZN Ur1 N/AD Y-NUD lID N/A[D YQN3 UD-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ZNDI UID adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

ý)/

Evaluated by:

"A 11UJU a'

Date:

61$

<C-4 >

PAGE 321 of 433

OA*TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.00 PAGE 322 of 433

4 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 323 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOIRO PAGE 324 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No..-2 -RV -

-7 % A Equip. Class1 2

• (14oJ* Ofj$d V4/"f)

Equipment Description 1Qt+& *'Af/ A 4v i'c5 F/oV Lý LSoo(o,i MOtV Location: Bldg. A'UX FloorEl.

1171-0" Room, Area (PIUD1IS Ab',A7 ? A('68 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

L41,hivr.

S6-00 #m 244400

'07a)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YOE~k

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE UE N/A&V YE NEI U-N/AL'IE YE NE EN/A YE NEI UE N/Ar Y[E/NEO UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

PAGE 325 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

, I

-'6116 Equip. Class' 2 S t'i;)

Equipment Description

-". 7t4, A 4. Pcs IMI-/

.4Akjkb

• mwv Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y2(Nr" U-I N/AQ Y[a1/N[: UE] N/AE]

YkIN-E] Uf-/l Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y5

[EK-Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Y+-e~/~LC$I2 Date:

ev.3 / /7~- /z

-<C-14 PAGE 326 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONP ik I I 7

F 4

PAGE 327 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. 2-HV-'8,97A4 Equip. Classt 2 25-I?

o-aIA' TT*O v' v

-C4 Equipment Description

£1C'1/5&15 501-/c r/S1OA,/

l 0 ef oMv' 4-f,'/

Location: Bldg.

AUX Floor El. /XO "

Room, Area RS//el1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

A/le 7"/M "0',o 4'.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NP of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YE NE UE N/A1 YE NEI UE N/A$

I-YE NEI Ui N/Ag

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

zlNe W 4A A

aUTiF z>

q4L4V6

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE U-E N/AK YX NEI ul 11 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B. Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

PAGE 328 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Z-/V

?A'07A Equip. Class1 2 Aflo'oP6AT4-'*

,,-RvE-ieý4j$s '

Equipment Description aCp/Z!;I s

.i"/

e 1

"q,,$-

eAcA EcT,woV Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX Ni U-N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y

N UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y5 ND UD N/AD YK N] UDl Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) v, AC'*§ A4*7-- 6,1 a" Ci c O*O 0

&-VL)/ Tb/'

'5b-7

-/2

-^o-7 F0'z*

A E

Evaluated by:

c, y*o/

/

-/

Date:

A

ýU,4V/ildO~Cb/R~2

-a-

< C-4 >

PAGE 329 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 330 of 433

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 331 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 332 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 'D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2*,V -9313 Equip. Class' 2 V (Mo~r-y(Of - Val¢e)

Equipment Description SiWI (O~ttvofl *1t',11,d I*OV Location: Bldg.

A'uxJ FloorEl.

130"'

RoomArea 91?117 -, Aq' "04)

](°',%)

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

V'

__1_0 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I ki -

L-~i tjE CvN05-I

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO YE NE UE N/Ay(K YE N-U-

N/Av YE NEI UE N/A[*

YE NE UC N/Aý NO UU Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

PAGE 333 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Equip. Class"2 Equipment Description c

m f' C ofNoVI Miiji4 W*V Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

4 NO U-N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NI U[- N/A" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y) ND U-N/AD YiN-UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y

N UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.

/ ~-'K Date:

8_ -

2_u_ i 67i z, /,0f Z-I

< C-4 >,

PAGE 334 of 433

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 335 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 336 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. Z-0-ti 0A Equip. Class12 18 (t*¶w't 44T *Lr Equipment Description C.kA t

'1 A. "

('toip P6. WrmW'- --

Location: Bldg.

AQY-Floor El.

t a9' Room, Area

".ZA i 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

IL&,

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y NCo

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yrv NCi UC] N/AC:

Y; NEI U-N/AE-Yg NCI UC1 N/AC]

YX NC UC-N/AC YX NCi Un 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 337 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 11) No.

2 i4Y 1w(O Equip.ClW1 Equipment Description Ce P,6' L,,r AD Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YW NE] U-] N/AO 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YO/NE-U=

N/AO YX' NE] UE] N/AD Yk NO UE]

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI(NO UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A~o4 Evaluated by:~~'~5V Date:

V3i 0 c12-1<C-14 PAGE 338 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONR PAGE 339 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 340 of 433

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet I of 2 Status:(D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) 4..4.

I

, $7, EquipmentIDNo. 2- "'"

750 Equip. Classu "y "

7(Aov.

Equipment Description

¢,ofe-'

DIO, L

&.r-oM,

Location: Bldg. r-4 Floor El.

Room, Area RotL Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO) N*

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

W46sc

• T jCV-M T~..

~.1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y% NO U-N/AC Y) NO UO N/AQ YO NO U[C N/A$

Y[O NO UO N/AX Y% NO U-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

PAGE 341 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No.

'I WY15'0 Equip. Class 1 2 Y (.1-U 1a vjLj.

Equipment Description P4ad1C" (0o00*-+/-

I;*'Ain A' *d~Okt~l Valve,.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y NDI U-N/AD Yý NEI U-N/AD" YIf ND U-N/AD YX NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NDI U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5::cZ-'

7'!r'2-C-

-2

- 7.-5O Evaluated by:

A J.,

Date:

< C-4 >

PAGE 342 of 433

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 200 PAGE 343 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Z/-4H" --90Z.) Equip. Class"2 -A/1TrA'n 1Z

/,7" -

C 55 A?

Equipment Description

/-'7, 0, DP14 X 7",4r,*.l -

4 l

Location: Bldg.

04 Floor El. 2o 1

Room, Area

,- iO2_

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

IP1,414CA',l 7/qo 0.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NX*

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

_. le

/1wo A/'-rC

't,-T 7-Rv 'r 5/

7"

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO Nr UO N/AJý YE NEI UO N/Az YE NEI UE N/Acý YO NE UE N/AP Y5ýNO U0 12 Enter the equipmcnt class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<( C-3 >

PAGE 344 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. 2-!--

90ZO Equip. Class' rn~r

'A

,*f Equipment Description

/A-. O, im' y 7,4 --

3 eil.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YJ NO UD N/AQ YKJ NO UO N/AO YkNO UO N/A=

Yp NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. lhave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YANO UO Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

S,-e I --

49..>3

-A4f.-$

o Evaluated by:

C.iL..s

/

Date:

//

zA'4VILD 'VoP6o'09AS&,

7

,Jr

-<C-4 )ý PAGE 345 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 346 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Statu#@

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

2-" 1-.J:tf[

Equip. Class1:

Equipment Description 0f"T '/

Zt&d i*n L

4 7",*-

Location: Bldg. Cif A/&,.# Floor El.

1-&-0/

Room, Area c.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yý'NE-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y~d NEf U-N/AD Y[I9' NEI U-- N/AF-Y[NND U0 N/A'-

Y[W(N-UD-N/AED

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[d potentially adverse seismic conditions?

• Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

-< C-3 >

PAGE 347 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Z LT- "1 Equip. Class"/

Equipment Description C"T,Ab. / Ie-JS i*,.Jf-,9 s.. _

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZN1uNfUC-N/AC 7",o Iy, -felar, ae-4"r 4

,,p -,t,,r,*,*,-, 1-"r "PI/

6pvid xlip -~fr"A" e

iL tr k-r rdf e

4 a-.~4

8. Are overhead equipment, distr ution syster, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIe*NC U0 N/An and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

f'-('y -. 7 /v'/-'.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

f'*.7 7 i*',/.

YMN[N-U-

N/AC Yn Ni U-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YffNr] Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

C~

Date:

e, I-PAGE 348 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION.04P PAGE 349 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Starus:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlDNo. 2-?SV 3004(

Equip. Classt2 0+40 Equipment Description MCJ; t 5raW!,o.A/ gf;, i ValveQ_

Location: Bldg.

iArUtC Floor El.

22-01 Room, Area to,_16_

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-1 NO(

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Li'e-ol' VVe..

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NE] UE] N/Akf YE] NEI UE] N/AO(

YE] NE] UE] N/Aof YE:] NE] UE] NIA" Y)"NE] UE]

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )>

PAGE 350 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment No.

P S-o0 Equip. Class' 0 LO,'lt(

Equipment Description M41'11 S aila ýý-'j Wk, Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yg Nr U[

N/ArI YK NO UIO N/AD YO NE U-N/AD (

Y)/NO UE-Other Adverse Conditions

.1

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN ND UlM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

M1Ia )1k.(f oy' 2n0ý L-1 -4 conr4cli'ons (rlat~fs).1) ee ankJ',

V~M4-S) 00 ~I MP04'vlf.c-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A101V&

Evaluated by:

M

• /

[

I Date:

A2ýZIW-1 4Af.-'- £4 L'MR &'

/6X 1e2-

< C-4 >

PAGE 351 of 433

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 9

NO, SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 352 of 433

3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 353 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 She t 1 of 2 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

'Z - P7T-3 C1 0 Equip. Class"_

Equipment Description SW I 4rtagnc f,.

AW

• 7,,/;

-A, Location: Bldg. Av4,V Floor El.

1J23t-f-0 Room, Area A !o.3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N2' 7 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YB-50 UEJ N/A0 YDN-DUE]N/AC YB"E NOUN/AD YEI NE3 UED N/Af~

Y19 0UEI 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendi 13: Classes of Equipment.

<* C-3 >

PAGE 354 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 2-Pr T o3001 Equip. Class0 Equipment Description S4 1 P&'awr-e, -V XPL/

7-JhtA d.4 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

U[--'] N/AD" YEJ-1UD N/A" YO'ND UO N/AD YSINO UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YD DU0 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

ýS Xr-2 a-Y1V

-¶f Fc'ý W C Evaluated by'. d I

,/

AZ Date:

< C-4 >*

PAGE 355 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION P PAGE 356 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y (Nu Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

1-9

- 3N0 Equip. Class'2 0*

o+"*t Equipment Description KAm5.

as

\\16 qlv - 5 ](

Location: Bldg.

A, Floor El.

)1-5' Room, Area P, *5*

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NJ

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of po ten tilly adverse 4eismif conditions?

YE] NE] UE] N/AX YEI NE] UE] N/Av YE] NE] UE] N/AX YE] NE] UE1 Yý'NE UE]

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

ý<C-3 >,

PAGE 357 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

- PV -300IO Equip. Class2 0

)

Equipment Description A+sM4..

V[*

l & I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact bynearby equipment or structures?

YI-Ný' UO N/A[]

(-ko-4ev1ýC10 f'A -j>q

ý /X V) i'Cd 4504 Ltdr(cO+

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and fighting, NEI Ul] N/A"]

and nmasonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YVNE] U-] N/Al]

YO N9] UE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y"/N[ U']

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SCLE.2-P V-3004-FOK AP.0-1 WAd063Y dfCtccrýlT(Awc).

sols \\,A 1r-w rMd],' "4A r

.dyjers C04,t,(.

Y-OA Evaluated by:

mtAd4-ý Q j V M'sm~t~

1)04- '1vp Date:

"Al 20r1 9/-

'// zo0/ 2-

<C-A >

PAGE 358 of 433

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 359 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 360 of 433