NL-13-1236, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 9 of 14

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 9 of 14
ML13211A243
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2013
From:
Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A243 (44)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:CY)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2- t2:5- U,-btP Equip. Class 1 2_ ___Equipment Description r- =-L ?1-7 A'L .P T -1'6WOS#1LJ' 1J41VE Location:

Bldg. F" Floor El. -Room, Area ZA O's Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO YO NO UI- YE NE U" N/AN1 YE NEI UE N/Ag YO NEI UE N/AtýNEI U-12 Enter the equipment class name firom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>PAGE 426 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment I No. I. /Zi-'- -G ( Equip. Class" 2 grLe Equipment Description 5p,,rJt FrAiL Pi4T ,aiM A 5/4CIW9V £ ,-I 77.:mo 1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YoNEI U" N/AO Y'VN- UI" N/AD Yo NO U" N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yg ND U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 0 -;. (L,. /i],ly o/,p L Date: " c~( C-4 0 PAGE 427 of 433 9 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 a i PAGE 428 of 433 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

'AWIATION AREA 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 429 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 StavusD N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z 14V -P 7J"GA Equip. Class" C Equipment Description SFP 4 Lt( X taefle} tLhaIs .L,. L .Location:

Bldg. -UX Floor El. I 1.-10 # Room, Area A-Cs 1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEI NE/"" 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

/,,/C 7- /, S p 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI] NE] UE] N/A[f'YE] NEI UE] N/Ax!ýYE] NEI UE] N/Aa" YEI NE] UE] N/A[Y[I NEI UE]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 430 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2.W P Zi+/- Equip. Class" 2_ _ _Equipment Description S"FPP A 1 4-,i o'L*M -h a- , Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?4 UO N/AO Y[9'NO UQ N/AQ YM! NO UI" N/AO Y4i' N UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YCKNI" U'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) f 2/43 6-90 1 -fir /)e'7, m Evaluated by: Date: O-f~'bVo~aO*119, 9A-11< C.4>PAGE 431 of 433 E ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 432 of 433 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0O NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 433 of 433 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 7 UNIT 2 -SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (Version 2.0)NO. SNCV061-RPT-02 Page 1 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

.-i soo- -.- Wvc- Equip. Class 1 2 zo-_1",, 41uMi 4 and Co,4,-r,\

Pf.rajs Equipment Description 14-A .P, R.I Location:

Bldg. Ctn-el Floor El. zzW'- o" Room, Area fl. IbV 4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage (5ee- .SWC_ do,4-e.d v/Zo/l.)1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[] NE: U[-]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild s ace YE-" NEI UE--oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in t concrete near the anchors? YE- NEI UE 5. Is the anchorage configuratio consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI UE-(Note: This question only plies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage co iguration verification is required.)

] N/A[E N/AE--N/AE-N/A[]6. Based on W'e above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NEI UE-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )0 Page 2 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-- I SO HVC.. Equip. Class 2 zo-:En%. + an.. Cý,4,.o Payi.1 Equipment Description V V C. P ,a1 Interaction Effects (S,, StWC 80,kea V/1/- )7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEI NEI N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and 1 ting, YE-] NEI UE] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equi ent?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibi to avoid damage? YE] NE] UE:] N/AE]10. Based on the above ismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NE] UE1 of potentially a erse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y(K NE] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A iveA qeckr;ov%

o4 41,, ovtU i/C c 4rovy% s.- o ojj...,,.ýe Ccl% pJ,4-oi~ on 5 W eý cl Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) tuo aewtýCed b y: 6.--W 0- ,..,. ,r, %c 4i" r Vate : Nc/tA;.\30 Evaluated by: 6. S s .\ ~ ~ .Date: _____________

>zj OL 043 I'P C-43 Page 3 of 231 F-9 RTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 12-1 500-Q5-HIVC Page 4 of 231 ATTA('WKAINAFT 7- qFI=MI~lr U'AI vflCWAIKM

(-I=Vl I5(ZT5Z NKrI q~r/rl-1PDT-

'~\/1:::1 Ir k/i t I I I'b Page 5 of 231

,HMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0!!U UIv u l a)

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ;.-t..o4-Q S-PCI Equip. Class" 2 2 0 -:1,,2,rVmroel.e.#t0 an-, Cn4r-l Pane lS Eauinment Descrintion D -,-, 6 ---N I Location:

Bldg. Ce .Floor El. zzo'-o" Room, Area 12. b Li Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage (Se_ ý,LJC 4 S /ZOLz )1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild suce oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the conc ete near the anchors?YO YE] NEI UE-] N/AE YE NE UE N/A[YE NEI UE N/A[5. Is the anchorage configuration consisterl/with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if thfitem is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration vyfification is required.)

Y[E] NEI UE N/AE YO NE UE-6. Based on the above an potentially adverse sei: is the anchorage free of conditions?

2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Page 7 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- IQ 3-'"PL I Equip. Class 12 2_ -2 runLenrqe, nc,4,o~nd (kjx4rJ Pone Ls Equipment Description

'i)rpcLe 5 Conirol G ý I Interaction Effects (see.- SW_ 8.e8 S/zo/llZ)7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE-] NE Jir N/AL 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and ii and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipnmi YO NE U-I N/AL 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility damage?YE-] NEI U- N/AL 7 10. Based on the above seism interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse7ismic interaction effects?Y[-] NEI U[IE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI UE-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

i, cal ,,p,, 4 ,ov' o4-ý- 4 ' comi)Qn,-

5 O0 *~-'~~ C obmment s Lua. rmcj -6 Cht1 4r OWvI 0Luc'rW Ch t/ 9i 0 13. .dtn pages may bIe a as -A C.or4A, rvns LAjei- Co~jr\.A-.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

C-0ieIc'vw-or loo6e pi~-4-P- cyoa 1 rýiA Evaluated by: d y, / : .Ulernir'i de z Date: 0 t .1 0 1 2-Q I I I/eh/J141WTo 'g* (f1Cr-i 4 C,< C-4 >Page 8 of 231 9 9O Kinl' ~ ~ ~4 148 I47 Ia8-tu ul ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALIL ISUSS- ----mweom Iue m .sltltmtqg* mtm ue I lmtllellt~tolllllm e,... .60W633'SNCVO6I-RPT r I3J 1 1uI ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-\ -Q5-l Equip. Class'2 ao- 4s,,-,' ,V, Crl4pol Panels Equipment Description .ror-ce.t I 4 C. Location:

Bldg.

Floor El. z2d- o" Room, Area T,. bq Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage (5e-.. SWC.. 6*.c. S/31/17-)1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item o of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose ha ware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more an mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cr s in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage confi ation consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question ly applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorag configuration verification is required.)
6. Based o e above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potent ly adverse seismic conditions?

Y[-- NEI YO-1 NE UE N/A[l YEi NE UEI N/A[: YE NE UEl N/A[-'YE NEI U- N/AE YO NO UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

,< C-3 )Page 12 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2.-160'A-5-PS1 Equip. Class 1 2 20 -"T-I4-,umen4

  • .Yd Cr%+rnI Panals Equipment Description InteractionEffects (see. C. 64.-,a.d 2/1011M.7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEI UEI- N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles a ighting, YE] N[- UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the e ipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexib' to avoid damage? YDI NDI UD N/AD]10. Based on the above ismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YD ND UE]of potentially a rse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ ND] UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

q *\ "-,cA-V;oY%

o-C 4 ,d,,,1 0£v npo",xt5 0£ 4, NcA\:',nL4 4: w ct £O--crme-J 4.o cvinek. 4oair SQ icC- C Al %C 'Ct "j. CAL Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: TC., r t.. -,.Lchz.Date: o1 a)I --8r< C-4 >Page 13 of 231 I.1-OWN CI-NO age

'IN 9 fl ATTArfWRA-FKIT 7-SMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS uu¶n1i Kirlf'

_I:DDT_-O'

\/ClD ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- 14o 5-C 5- JSI Equip. Class" 2 ez-In oa ymer4m, t d a ,d C.nfI t endis.Equipment Description SXJin ,c- tL"'..1 Zi r eab Location:

Bldg. C,,,,,4....

Floor El. zypO Room, Area aL. ,a ' 1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage (Sec. 5wC. A,4-,,a t ./Zoiz.')1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEr 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible near the anchors?YE: NEI UE N/AE YEI NEl UE-] N/AE YE-] NE-] U[E N/AE YEI NE UEr N/AE-YEI NEI UE-5. Is the anchorage configuration consi)4ent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies/ the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuratigfi verification is required.)
6. Based on the above potentially adverse evaluations, is the anchorage free of 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Page 17 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 p Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-l1,os- C 5 -S. Equip. Class"t20 "n I girad Con4,eJ Panels Equipment Description Qert,-%4e.. .t.1% :rrd Z) C&%6 Interaction Effects (see d-i..J aI z-Xol01?.)

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[3 NEI N/AE!8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and Ii ing, YE! NE! UE- N/AE!and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equi nt?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibilit avoid damage? YE! NE! UE! N/AE!10. Based on the above sei c interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE! NE! UE!1 p of potentially adve seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK NE! UE!adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

$4 "ts,,., 1s, 0ptcCova 04o .A-. , omporit+.Comme nt ,A4P" ditional ae may beQvnpdn4r aded tefV.ssja ry,), 0 &n 3 e -ri', CJ 4 1-4:3W&+SW" 'I 1-t ,ae." C,., // 4A~ SA1"n 4wo WuiV a r Jwvfts-tacl hal,ý/Scv.th,-%ow~.u4~

P-O oA~.c Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Z Ma;/ 3"a z. A. e.,,-t/ Tv-o Date: I1.1 zo 1, ,I , 4 C-4 >Page 18 of 231 A TT KIT "7.\MIAI II(ZTQ Tinl CI( \/IA_1PPT, In~kt D 1)jyu

/A.TT Ar P 1-,N& I I: T 7" ITT r \AIAI 1ITn 7\AIM I1.rl'Wl ICZT(IKl(') 4Z M \/()I"-DIDIT Gomm m#ANN" lom- -= -00 r-dy ATTAr'WKAr-KIT 7- QI=I(ZKAI('

IAIAI Wr)nXA/Ki (Wr-r'Wl IQ'IlI) CZMlr\/nr"I

_DT-i a/- I Ul zo I ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .- -c,5-P S- 6fb3 Equip. Class'2 Zo- Inm-ru wn&yWw pJ Caniml PaneltýEquipment Description O 1",,. IA Location:

Bldg. C Floor El. z,'-o" Room, Area iL. k -1 6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.A n c h o r a g -e ( 5 e -s .J o e / a ? I % ý1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild suce oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the con ete near the anchors?YE-]YE N[E UE- N/AE YE[ NFE UE- N/AE YEI NEI UE- N/AE YEI NEI UE N/AE Y[-] NEI U[]5. Is the anchorage configuration with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if t1V item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration v/,rification is required.)
6. Based on the above potentially adverse Ige evaluations, is the anchorage free of conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3>Page 22 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- 1(o5- PS-SD f Equip. Class" 2s .a,,dl Conr-o\ 'Pancls Equipment Description S'%-4,lnwx Pna l 111T% A Interaction Effects (Sec 5$c. dE,, g /a- 117-)7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE] NE-]E] N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and Ii ing, YE] NE] UE N/AE1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equip nt?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility t void damage? YE] NE'] U[-] N/AE]10. Based on the above seis interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NEI UE]of potentially adverse ismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE& NE] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? tv.¶pec;on o 4 ir4kc C*oIpOc--4 5 0 'CsLcc ab.e Wo-%~r P-.ertoma ov% S.~ /I V/OIS k 4, ch. O'Cvr Sa.00.*c O%'In5i. /~fnCA~S+C t;V 1
  • ci o .P n ný e e Cleý 3 5 c r ,cv, ret ~ ! ý6 0 er ~cr conncý;^.%

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Nx) O' e-l Evaluatedby:

a-., ". na6,- .Date: 311/z1o13 4 C-4A>Page 23 of 231

.9,-~7.kLKDOWN:KLISTS N 1-RPT-rl'yt LZ4 0 L3 I U ION4 9 P"-Y7.CHECKLISTS

). SNCVO61-RPT-rage Zo of PT-02, VERSION 2.0/y- Ul

-.KI I£T£q-5T NO' -q]'/rlP Tn k/[IPcIflNJ 9 r)A;'1 I Page 27 of ATTAC T\/NRT_1iPTNg k InKI 0 n F I I ATTAf'.IT 7.RAIf" IIAl VfI"'MAIKI 1 DDT ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (S N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2- 16 OS-s-S-r0 Equip. Class'2 zc- 1 2, , , Equipment Description 5qEC*u;y TE5T CJU-_rvETi

--TMQ%Location:

Bldg. C FloorEl. 2Zo'-O" Room, Area n-Ib4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage (SeeS riao e e(.st t 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item fe of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose h ware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more th mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible crack n the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configurati consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only plies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage con guration verification is required.)
6. Based on the ab ve anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially ad erse seismic conditions?

YEI NiE YEI NEI UE- N/A[: YEI NEI UE] N/AEI YE: NEI U[] N/AEl YEI NEI UE[" N/AE1 YEI NE] U[12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Page 30 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

l-579 Equip. Class'12zo-_

rI4-Urne" avJ Covidrol Vancls Equipment Description -rL T E '5-7 C GNT -r-"A I Interaction Effects (Sec wc. do,,.td J i A I17-)7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEI NEI N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and li ng, YEI NEI UE- N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equip t?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility t void damage? Y[-E NE1 UE N/AE 10. Based on the above seismi nteraction evaluations, is equipment free YE- NE UE1 of potentially adverse s smic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NE] UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A ,,; su&\ ',3,, pc .4 0* cc-v , C.Aý4 5 Of VV';ýb C.%V4L..'t LVC6_% P#4ý"ý OV o jtI5/akj oi *0C'fleCtf.

Jý 0%%',r aCJU-r%C.

100,AcU'Bi.

4LW.N'o o4.jv e-4 si 5-c- cov'Jý4;0,nsw~

L fJP v-.a fkY.n- ;ue- i! Clow mm .1 ov, AN. .~i cc~n Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: -T..-- "o, IZ. /14 ' Cie. Date: O1 1/1aois<C-4 >Page 31 of 231 OAr'WRA;=l w'RffWN 1C.1-ATT rTT-ItT rAIA! 7nn cAIh. (TCZ P 1 0 DT 0 rage ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 0.0 1,1 7- CeIICfAI('

XAIAI VnnlCAIKI

'U~CI'Li ICTrC KIC'A CQt-IC"1AC4 DOT- A') XIDCOI~Pr%

9 F rdcj

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-13-1236,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._2.0,_Vogtle_Unit_2_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_9_of_14&oldid=892165"