MNS-15-053, Emergency Plan, Revision 15-2

Emergency Plan, Revision 15-2

ML15211A380
Person / Time
Site:	McGuire, Mcguire
Issue date:	07/21/2015
From:	Capps S Duke Energy Carolinas
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
MNS-15-053
Download: ML15211A380 (51)

Text

S DUKESteven D.Capps Vice President ENERGY°McGuire Nuclear Station Duke Energy MG01VP I 12700 Hagers Ferry Road Huntersville, NC 28078 0: 980.875.4805 f: 980.875.4809 Steven .Capps@duke-energy.com July 21, 2015 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Serial No: MNS-15-053 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001

Subject:

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370 Emergency Plan, Revision 15-2 Please find attached Revision 15-2 to the McGuire Nuclear Station Emergency Plan. This revision is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q) and does not result in a reduction in the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan or the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.

Questions regarding this submittal should be directed to Kay Crane, McGuire Regulatory Affairs, at (980) 875-4306.

Steven D. Capps Attachments www.duke-energy.com

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission July 21, 2015 Page 2 (Two Copies) cc: Mr. V.M. McCree, Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1 257 (One Copy)

Catherine Haney, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Mail Stop 14 A12 Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 (w/o attachments)

Mr. G.E. Miller NRC Project Manager (McGuire)

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 08C2 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. John Zeiler NRC Senior Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear Station

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission July 21, 2015 Page 3 bxc: ELL (EC2ZF)

Master File 801.01 EP File 111

DUKE ENERGY McGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE EMERGENCY PLAN APPROVED: <* ./ ', y*

• ~,

SITE VICE PRESIDENT DATE APPROVED:____________

REVISION 15-2: July, 2015 EFFECTIVE DATE: July, 2015 ORIGINAL DATE: August 25, 1980 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

McGuire Emergency Plan List of Effective Pages Emergency Plan Approval Cover Sheet Coversheet Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 Emergency Plan Revision List Page 1 thru 2 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 Table of Contents Page 1 thru 6 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 List of Figures Pagel1thru 2 Rev. 15-1 May, 2015 Introduction Pages i-i1 thru i-7 Rev. 13-3 October, 2013 A. Assignment of Responsibility Pages A-i1 thru A-5 Rev. 14-3 September, 2014 B. Onsite Emergency Organization Pages B-i thru B-13 Rev. 14-2 June, 2014 C. Emergency Response Support & Resources Pages C-i1 tbru C-2 Rev. 09-1 July, 2009 D. Emergency Class Svstem/EAL Basis Document Pages D-1 thru D-83 Rev. 14-5 December, 2014 E. Notification Methods & Procedures Pages E-1 thru E-11 Rev. 14-4 October, 2014 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

McGuire Emergency Plan List of Effective Pages F. Emergiency Communications Pages F-i thru F-7 Rev. 15-1 May, 2015 G. Public Education & Information Pages G- 1 thru G-4 Rev. 14-3 September, 2014 H. Emergency Facility & Equipment Pages H-i thru H-17 Rev. 14-5 December, 2014 I. Accident Assessment Pages I-1 thru 1-3 Rev. i4-5 December, 2014 J. Protective Response Pages J-1 thru J-22 Rev. i5-i May, 2015 K. Radiological Exposure Control Pages K-i1 thru K-4 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 L. Medical & Public Health Support Pages L-i1 thru L-2 Rev. 13-3 October, 2013 M. Recovery & Re-entry Planning~

Pages M-1 thru M-5 Rev. 06-2 September, 2006 N. Exercises & Drills Pages N-i thru N-3 Rev. 15-i May, 2015 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

McGuire Emergency Plan List of Effective Pages

0. Radiological Emer2ency Response Trainin2 Pages 0- 1 thru 0-2 Rev. 10-2 November, 2010 P. Development Periodic Review & Distribution of Emergency Plans Pages P-1 thru P-10 Rev. 15-1 May, 2015 Q. Appendices Index Pages Q-1 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 Appendix 1 Definitions Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 Pages 1 thru 4 Appendix 2 Meteorological Program Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 Pages 1 thru 4 Appendix 3 Alert & Notifications System Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 Pages 1 thru 5 Appendix 4 Evacuation Time Estimates Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 Page 1 Appendix 5 Agreement Letters Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 Pages 1 thru 4 Appendix 6 Emergency Plan Distribution Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 Pages 1 thru 4 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

McGuire Emergency Plan List of Effective Pages Appendix 7 SPCC Plan Coversheet Rev. 15-1 May, 2015 Table of Contents Rev. 15-1 May, 2015 Pages 1 thru 75 Rev. 15-1 May, 2015 Appendix 8 Hazardous Waste Contingency Plan Pages 1 thru 19 Rev. 13-1 March, 2013 Appendix 9 Hazardous Materials Response Plan Pages 1 thru 14 Rev. 13-3 October, 2013 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

DUKE ENERGY COMPANY McGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE EMERGENCY PLAN REVISION LIST August 25. 1980 Date Issued Revision 37, March 1992 Change 1, October, 1980 Revision 92-1, August 1992 Change 2, February, 1981 Revision 92-2, October 1992 Change 3, June, 1981 Rev. 93-1, April 1993 Change 4, August, 1981 Rev. 93-2, June, 1993 Revision 1, November 16, 1981 Rev. 93-3, December 1993 Revision 2, February, 1982 Rev. 94-1, January, 1994 Revision3, February, 1982 Rev. 94-2, June, 1994 Revision 4, April, 1982 Rev. 94-3, August 1994 Revision 5, June, 1982 Rev. 94-4, October 1994 Revision 6, July, 1982 Rev. 95-1, February 1995 Revision 7, September, 1982 Rev. 95-2, April 1995 Revision 8, November, 1982 Rev. 96-1, April 1996 Revision 9, January, 1983 Rev. 96-2, July 1996 Revision 10, February, 1983 Rev. 97-1, April 1997 Revision 11, June, 1983 Rev. 97-2, May 1997 Revision 12, November, 1983 Rev. 97-3, July, 1997 Revision 13, March, 1984 Rev. 98-1, January, 1998 Revision 14, August, 1984 Rev. 98-2, February, 1998 Revision 15, January, 1985 Rev. 98-3, May, 1998 Revision 16, March, 1985 Rev. 98-4, July, 1998 Revision 17, May, 1985 Rev. 98-5, August, 1998 Revision 18, November, 1985 Rev. 98-6, November, 1998 Revision 19, January, 1986 Rev. 99-1, March, 1999 Revision 20, July, 1986 Rev. 99-2, July, 1999 Revision 21, May, 1987 Rev. 99-3 November, 1999 Revision 22, June, 1987 Rev. 00-1, April, 2000 Revision 23, November, 1987 Rev. 00-2, May, 2000 Revision 24, March, 1988 Rev. 00-3, November, 2000 Revision 25, July, 1988 Rev. 01-1, January, 2001 Revision 26, July, 1989 Rev. 01-2, June, 2001 Revision 27, September, 1989 Rev. 02-1, March, 2002 Revision 28, October, 1989 Rev. 02-2, August, 2002 Revision 29, November, 1989 Rev. 03-1, April, 2003 Revision 30, March, 1990 Rev. 03-2, June, 2003 Revision 31, April, 1991 Rev. 04-1, February, 2004 Revision 32, July, 1991 Rev. 04-2, July, 2004 Revision 33, September, 1991 Rev. 05-1, July, 2005 Revision 34, October, 1991 Rev. 06-1, January, 2006 Revision 35, December, 1991 Rev. 06-2, September, 2006 Revision 36, January, 1992 Rev. 07-1, May, 2007 1

Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

Rev. 07-2, December, 2007 Rev. 08-1, September, 2008 Rev. 09-1, July, 2009 Rev. 09-2, December, 2009 Rev. 10-1, May, 2010 Rev. 10-2, November, 2010 Rev. 11-1, March, 2011 Rev. 11-2, August, 2011 Rev. 11-3, October, 2011 Rev. 12-1, May, 2012 Rev. 12-2, June, 2012 Rev. 12-3, November, 2012 Rev. 12-4, December, 2012 Rev. 13-1, March, 2013 Rev. 13-2, June, 2013 Rev. 13-3, October, 2013 Rev. 14-1, January, 2014 Rev. 14-2, June 2014 Rev. 14-3, September, 2014 Rev. 14-4, October, 2014 Rev. 14-5, December, 2014 Rev. 15-1I, May, 2015 Rev. 15-2, July, 2015 2

Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

DUKE ENERGY MCGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE EMERGENCY PLAN Table of Contents Page#

i. Introduction A. Purpose i-1 B. Scope i-1 C. Planning Basis i-3 A. Assignment of Responsibility A.l.a Organization A-i A.l.b Concept of Operations A-3 A.l.c Block Diagram Interrelationships A-3 A.l.d Key Decisionmaking A-3 A.1.e 24 Hour Emergency Response A-4 A.2.a Responsibility for and Functions of Emergency A-4 Response Organization A.2.b Legal Basis for Authority A-4 A. 3 Agreement Letters for Emergency Response Support A-4 A.4 Individuals Responsible for Continuity of Resources A-5 B. On-site Emergency Organization B.1 Plant Staff Under Emergency Conditions B-i B.2 Emergency Coordinator B-i B.3 Emergency Coordinator (line of succession) B- 1 B.4 Functional Responsibilities of Emergency Coordinator B-2 B.5 Minimum Staffing Requirements B-2 B.6 On-site Functional Area Interfaces B-2 B.7 Augmented Support of On-site Emergency Organization B-2 B.8 Contractor and Private Organizations B-3 thru B-4 B.9 Local Agency Support Services B-4 B.9.a Law Enforcement, Emergency Traffic Control, Related B-4 Police Matters B.9.b Early Warning or Evacuation of the Populace B-5 B.9.c Radiological Emergency Monitoring Assistance B-5 B.9.d Hospitals, Medical Support B-5 B.9.e Ambulance Service B-5 B.9.f Fire-fighting B-5 B.9.g Public Health and Safety, Evaluation of the B-5 Radiological Situation B.9.h Local, State and Federal Support Responsibilities B-6 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 1

Table of Contents Pn C. Emergency Response Support and Resources C.i1.a Individuals Authorized to Request Federal Assistance C-I C. 1.b Federal Resources Arrival Time C-i1 C. 1.c Emergency Operations Facility Resources C-i1 Available to Federal Response Organizations C.2.a State and County Representation at the Emergency C-i Operations Facility (EOF)

C.2.b Licensee Representation at the Off-Site EOC's C-i C.3 Radiological Laboratories-Availability and Capability C-2 C.4 Emergency Support From Other Organizations C-2 D. Emergency Classification SystemiEAL Basis Document Emergency Classification System/EAL D- 1 thru D-83 Basis Document E. Notification Methodology E. 1 Notification of Response Organization E- 1 E.2 Activation of Emergency Organization E- 1 E.2.a Notification of Unusual Event E- 1 E.2.b Alert E-2 E.2.c Site Area Emergency E-4 E.2.d General Emergency E-6 E.3 Emergency Message Format (Initial) E-8 E.4 Emergency Message Format (Follow-up) E-9 E.5 State and Local Organizations-Disseminating Public E-9 Information E.6 Alert and Notification System E-9 E.7 Supporting Information for Public Information Message E-9 F. Emergency Communications F. l .a 24 Hour Notification Capability F-i1 F. 1.b Communications With State/Local Governments F-i F. 1.c Communications With Federal Organizations F-2 F. 1.d Communications Between Site, EOF, EOC's F-2 and Monitoring Team F. i .e Activation of Emergency Personnel F-2 F. i .f Communications Between NRC, EOC and F-2 Monitoring Teams F. i1.g ERDS Data Transfer F-2 F.2 Medical Support Communications F-3 F.3 Communications System Testing F-3 Rev. i5-2 July, 2015

Table of Contents Page #

G. Public Education and Information G. 1/G.2 Public Education and Information Program G-1 G.3.a News Group - Location and Contacts G-1 G.3.b News Group - Media Center G-1 G.4.a Public Spokesperson G-2 G.4.b Spokesperson Information Exchange G-2 G.4.c Rumor Control G-2 G.5 News Media Training Sessions G-2 H. Emergency Facilities and Equipment H.1 Technical Support Center/Operations Support Center H-i H.l.a Control Room H-i H.l.b Technical Support Center (TSC) H-i H.l.c Operations Support Center (OSC) H-2 H.l.d Alternate Facilities H-2 H.2 Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) H-2 thru H-3 H.3 State and Local Government Emergency Operations Center H-4 H.4 Activation and Staffing H-4 H.5 Assessment Actions H-4 H.5.a Meteorological, Hydrologic and Seismic H-4 thru H-5 H.5.b Radiological Monitors H-6 H.5.c Plant Parameters H-6 H.5.d Fire Detection H-6 H.6 Data, Monitoring Equipment and Analysis Facilities H-6 H.7 Off-site Radiological Monitoring H-7 H.8 Meteorology Instrumentation and Procedures H-7 H.9 Operations Support Center H-7 H.10 Emergency Equipment/Instrumentation Inspection, H-7 Inventory, Operational Check, Calibration H.11 Emergency Kits H-7 H.12 Receipt and Analysis of Field Monitoring Data H-7 I. Accident Assessment 1.1 Emergency Action Level Procedures I-1 1.2 On-site Capability and Resources to Provide Initial I-i Values and Continuing Assessment 1.2.a Post Accident Sampling I-1 1.2.b Radiation and Effluent Monitors I-i 1.2.c In-plant Iodine Instrumentation I-2 1.3.a/ Method for Determining Release Source Term I-2 1.3.b 1.4 Effluent Monitor Readings Vs On-site/Off-site Exposure 1-2 1.5 Meteorological Information Availability 1-2 1.6 Release Rates/Projected Doses for Offscale Instrumentation I-2 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 3

Table of Contents Pg 1.7/ Field Monitoring Within EPZ 1-3 1.8 1.9 Detect and Measure Radio iodine Concentration in the EPZ I-3 1.10 Relationship Between Contamination Levels 1-3 and Integrated Dose/Dose Rates 1.11 Plume Tracking 1-3 J. Protective Response J. l .a Onsite Alerting and Notification J- 1 thru J.l1.d J.2 Evacuation Routes and Transportation J- I J.3 Personnel Monitoring J- 1 J.4 Site Evacuation Procedures - Decontamination J-2 J.5 Personnel Accountability J-2 J.6 Protective Equipment Breathing Apparatus, Protective J-2 Clothing, KI J.7 Protective Action Recommendations J-3 J.8 Evacuation Time Estimates J-4 J.9 lInplementing Protective Measures J-4 J. 10 Implementation of Protective Measures for Plume J-5 Exposure Pathway J.10.a EPZ Maps J-6 J. 10.b EPZ Population Distribution Map J-6 J. 10O.c EPZ Population Alerting and Notification J-6 J. 10.d EPZ Protecting Immobile Persons J-6 J. 10.e Use of Radioprotective Drugs for Persons in EPZ J-6 J. 10O.f Conditions for Use of Radioprotective Drugs J-6 J. 10.g State/County Relocation Plans J-6 J. 10O.h Relocation Center Locations J-6 J. 10.i Evacuation Route - Traffic Capacities J-6 J. 10O.j Evacuated Area Access Control J-6 J. 10.k Planning for Contingencies in Evacuation J-6 J. 10.1 State/County Evacuation Time Estimates J-6 J. 10O.m Bases for Protective Action Recommendations J-6 J. 11 Ingestion Pathway Planning J-7 J. 12 Relocation Center - Registering and Monitoring J-7 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 4

Table of Contents K. Radiological Exposure Control K. 1 Onsite Exposure Guidelines K-i1 K.2 Doses in Excess of 10CFR Part 20 K-i K.3 Emergency Personnel Exposure and Records K-i K.3.a Distribution of Dosimetry K-i1 K.3.b Dose Records K-2 K.4 State/Local Plan for Authorizing Doses Exceeding PAG's K-2 K.5 Decontamination K-2 K.5.a Action Levels for Determining the Need for Decontamination K-2 K.5.b Radiological Decontamination K-2 K.6 Contamination Control Measures K-2 K.6.a Area Access Control K-2 K.6.b Drinking Water and Food Supplies K-2 K.6.c Recovery Efforts K-3 K.7 Decontamination of Personnel at Relocation K-3 Assembly Area L. Medical and Public Health Support L. 1 Hospital and Medical Support L-1i L.2 On-site First Aid Capability L-1i L. 3 Public, Private, Military Hospitals, Emergency Medical L- 1 Facilities L.4 Transport of Accident Victims L-2 M. Recovery and Reentry Planning and Post-Accident Operations M.i1 Recovery/Reentry Plans and Procedures M-i M.1i.a Outline of Site Recovery Plans M-i M. i .b Outline of Recovery Plans M-2 M.2 Recovery Organization M-3 M.3 Information to Members of Recovery Organization M-4 M.4 Total Population Exposure Estimates M-4 N. Exercises and Drills N.i.a Exercises N-i N. 1.b Exercise Scenario/Response N-i N.2 Drills N-i N.2.a Communications N-i N.2.b Fire Drills N-2 N.2.c Medical Emergency Drills N-2 N.2.d Radiological Monitoring Drills N-2 N.2.e Radiation Protection Driils N-2 N.3 Exercise and Drill Execution N-3 N.4 Exercise Critique N-3 N.5 Critique Action Items N-3 Rev. i5-2 July, 2015 5

Table of Contents Pn

0. Radiological Emergency Response Training

0. 1 Offsite Agency Training 0-1

0. 1 .a Emergency Response Training (Offsite Agency) 0-1

0. 1 .b 0ff-site Support Agency - Participation in Training 0-1 0.2 Site Organization Training 0-1 0.3 First Aid Training 0-1 0.4 Training For Radiological Emergency Response 0-2 Personnel 0.5 Training Period 0-2 P. Responsibility for the Planning Effort P. 1 Emergency Planning Staff Training P-1 P.2 Emergency Response Planning P-1 P.3 Site Emergency Planning Manager P-i P.4 Review of Emergency Plan P-i P.5 Distribution of Revised Plans P-i P.6 Supporting Plans P-2 P.7 Implementing Procedures P-2 P.8 Table of Contents P-2 P.9 Audit of Emergency Plan P-2 P. 10 Telephone Number Updates P-3 Q. Appendices Index Q-i Appendix 1 Definitions Q-2 Appendix 2 Meteorological Program Q-6 Appendix 3 Alert and Notification System Description Q-10 Appendix 4 Evacuation Time Estimates Q-15 Appendix 5 Agreement Letters Q-16 Appendix 6 McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan Distribution Q-17 Appendix 7 SPCC Plan Appendix 8 Hazardous Waste Contingency Plan Appendix 9 Hazardous Materials Response Plan Rev. 15-2 July, 2015 6

K. RADIOLOGICAL EXPOSURE CONTROL To assure that means for controlling radiological exposures in an emergency are established for emergency workers.

K. 1 Onsite Exposure Guidelines Onsite exposure guidelines consistent with EPA 400-R-92-00 1, Table 2-2, "Guidance on Dose Limits for Workers Performing Emergency Services" are shown in Figure K-i.

Members of outside emergency services responding to a call from the site are considered emergency workers and must also be protected from excessive radiation doses. Their doses are not to exceed guidelines as established in Figure K-i.

K.2 Doses in Excess of 10CFR Part 20 The Emergency Coordinator or the EOF Director is responsible for authorizing emergency workers to receive doses in excess of 10OCFR20 limits. An on-site radiation protection program shall be implemented during emergencies which shall be consistent with ALARA conditions.

The site will be responsible for providing medical treatment and rescue efforts for life-saving missions. Site procedures are in place for expeditious decision-making with reasonable consideration of the relative risks involved in a lifesaving mission involving radiation exposure.

K.3 Emergency Personnel Exposure and Records K.3.a Distribution of Dosimetry Provisions have been made for maintaining records of emergency personnel during a radiological emergency on a 24-hour per day basis. The Operations Support Center will provide a means for keeping track of exposure to personnel involved in a radiological accident. Distribution of dosimeters (self-reading and TLD badges) will be provided for all personnel.

The issuance of High Range and/or Multiple Dosimetry will be in accordance with Radiation Protection procedures.

Should any offsite agency respond to an emergency at the site during a nuclear emergency, dosimeters will be provided for their use to determine any exposure.

Rev. 15-2 K-i1 July 2015

K.3.b Dose Records The Operations Support Center through the Radiation Protection section shall have the responsibility of keeping records of the doses received by emergency personnel involved in any radiological accident. Normal operating procedures shall be followed--

for the use of dosimeters and the TLD badges. Distribution of the dosim-eters and badges shall be through Radiation Protection.

K.4 State/Local Plan for Authorizing Doses Exceeding PAG's See County and State Plans.

K.5 Decontamination K.5.a Action Levels For Determining the Need For Decontamination Guidelines as established in the System Radiation Protection Manual will be used to determine action levels for decontamination. Pre-planning efforts have been established by the Radiation Protection Section.

K.5.b Radiological Decontamination AD-RP-ALL-2009, Personnel Contamination Monitoring and Reporting, defines the specific action levels for determining the need for decontamination of personnel.

PT/0/A/4600/088, Functional Check of Emergency Vehicle and Equipment, defines the means for availability of supplies, instruments and equipment. Radiation Protection Policy Manual Policy P1-3 provides direction for waste disposal. HP/Of/B/1 009/024, Personnel Monitoring for Emergency Conditions promotes means for decontamination of emergency personnel. Handling of contaminated injured personnel is provided in HIP/0iB/1009/022, Accident and Emergency Response. Transportation of contaminated injured personnel is described in site procedure RP/0/A/5700/005, Care and Transportation of Injured Individual(s) From Site to Offsite Medical Facility.

K.6 Contamination Control Measures K.6.a Area Access Control - The site will be evacuated when site management declares a Site Evacuation and a potential threat exists for safety of non-essential personnel. Once the site has been evacuated, access to the site will be limited by the Highway Patrol on the public highway and then Site Security will limit access to the site except through established access procedures.

K.6.b Drinking Water and Food Supplies - Drinking water and food supplies can be brought in by private vendor if necessary. Arrangements will be made by the Commodities and Facilities Manager/Designee.

Rev. 15-2 K-2 July 2015

K.6.c Recovery efforts will be determined by the Emergency Operations Facility Organization (see Section M).

K.7 Decontamination of Personnel at Relocation Assembly Area Should non-essential plant personnel be evacuated fr'om site to a relocation area, provisions for extra clothing and decontaminants suitable for any type of contamination have been made.

Extra clothing and supplies have been placed at the relocation site to take care of site personnel.

Relocation assembly areas have been determined so that site personnel can be relocated to a safe site quickly and can be decontaminated (if necessary), monitored and released. Records will be made of the exposure of all personnel released fr'om the relocation site. (Site procedures provide for emergency supplies to be provided at the off-site relocation assembly area.)

Rev. 15-2 K-3 July 2015

FIGURE K-i1 Emergency Worker Exposure Guidelines (a)

Dose Limits Activity Total Effective Dose Lens of Eye Other Organs (b)

Eqiuivalent (TEDE)

All 5 rem 15 rem 50 rem Protecting Valuable 10 rem 30 rem 100 rem Property Lifesaving or 25 rem 75 rem 250 rem Protection of Large Populations ___________________

Lifesaving or > 25 rem > 75 rem > 250 rem Protection of Large Populations (c)

(a) Excludes declared pregnant women (b) Includes skin and body extremities (c) Only on a volunteer basis to persons fully aware of the risks involved Based on EPA-400-R-92-00 1, Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents Rev. 15-2 K-4 July 2015

DUKE ENERGY MCGULRE NUCLEAR SITE SECTION Q APPENDIX INDEX Appendix 1 Definitions Appendix 2 Meteorological System Description Appendix 3 Alert and Notification System Description Appendix 4 Summary of Evacuation Time Estimates Appendix 5 Agreement Letters Appendix 6 Distribution List for MeGuire Emergency Plan Appendix 7 Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan Appendix 8 McGuire Hazardous Waste Contingency Plan Appendix 9 Hazardous Materials Response Plan

APPENDIX 2 MCGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE METEOROLOGICAL PROGRAM INTRODUCTION The meteorological program described in this appendix was developed using guidance provided by NUREG-06 54, Revision 1, Regulatory Guide 1.23, Proposed Revision 1, Regulatory Guide 1.111, Revision 1, and Regulatory Guide 1.109.

EFFLUENT DISPERSION MODEL A computer model which simulates the transport and diffusion of released effluents is a puff-advection model which incorporates a horizontal wind field that can vary in time but is consistent in space. It is assumed in the puff-type model that the spread within a puff along the direction of flow is equal to the spread in the lateral direction (i.e., horizontal Gaussian Symmetry). In the model, concentration averages are obtained by summing concentrations of individual elements for the grid points over which the puffs pass. Features incorporated into the model include the use of primary, backup and predicted data, building wake effects and an assumed ground release mode. Appropriate persistence would be used for initial releases until a meteorologist is notified to provide predictive data.

INSTRUMENTATION Figure 2-1 shows the type and number of parameters measured at McGuire Nuclear Site. The meteorological conditions present at McGuire Nuclear Site warrant the use of the basic described meteorological variables. These include wind speed and wind direction measured at high and low levels, delta-temperature and sigma theta for stability classification, ambient air and dew point temperature and precipitation.

DATA HANDLING Meteorological data for dose calculation consists of a primary digital recording/storage system and a secondary analog chart recording system both of which meet system accuracies and other specifications as suggested in Regulatory Guide 1.23, Proposed Revision 1. In the digital system meteorological variables are sampled at varying time (1-60 seconds) intervals from which 15 minute total, average and/or standard deviation quantities are computed. Digital data is placed on an external PI server accessible to computers that are used for emergency effluent dispersion modeling and dose calculation. The chart recording system is maintained as a backup to the digital system.

DOSE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Dose assessment is calculated through a dose projection computer model Unified RASCAL Interface (URI). The model provides for the assessment of off-site radiological doses and accommodates both real time and forecast modes in the calculation of exposures to the general public. The model provides results of the sum of the effective dose equivalent from external radiation (both plume and ground deposition) and the committed effective dose equivalent from the inhalation of radioisotopes (the sum of both factors equaling the total effective dose equivalent of TEDE), and the committed dose equivalent to the thyroid (CDE thyroid). Dose conversion factors are derived from Regulatory Guide 1.109.

1

The model uses source term (amount of radioactivity in the unit vent, containment and containment leakage or steam release valves), flow rates and real time meteorology to calculate doses. Unit vent grab sample analyses or unit vent radiation monitor readings are used to determine concentrations of radioactivity within the unit vent source temn. Containment atmosphere samples, containment process radiation monitors or containment high range radiation monitors are used to determine concentrations within the containment source term. The containment design leak rate is used unless factors, such as containment pressure, indicate that another value is more realistic. Equivalent concentrations fr'om a steam release are calculated by using known or assumed steam mass release rates and the specific steam line radiation monitor reading.

PHYSICAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Continuous parallel signals enter each Operator Aid Computer (OAC) and the analog recorders. The OAC calculates end to end 15 minute quantities, starting on the hour, for all meteorological variables (except sigma theta) with a sampling interval of 60 seconds. It calculates a 15 minute average for high and low level wind direction and speed; 15 minute averages are also calculated for delta-temperature, ambient temperature and dew point temperature. Total water equivalence is computed for precipitation. Sigma theta is calculated by a field unit with a sampling interval of one second again for end to end 15 minute periods starting on the hour, and then is fed to each OAC. All quantities are stored on the OAC with a minimum recall of 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. This data is transferred to the MNS PI Server.

Data stored on the PI server is accessible to computers which are used for emergency effluent dispersion modeling and dose calculation DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SUBSYSTEMS Sensors to Operator Aid Computer Lightning protection is provided for all sensors and signal conditioning equipment; wind sensors are outfitted with heating jackets, when necessary, for protection against icing conditions. Signal conditioners and the sigma theta field unit are housed in an environmentally controlled building at the base of the high level tower. Signal cables to the OACs and analog recorders are shielded to minimize electrical interference.

2

Operator Aid Computer (OAC) to MNS PI Server The process computer OAC system which is utilized for data storage consists of SAIC, HP and RTP equipment. Each unit OAC is a backup for the other, capable of supplying the same required meteorological values. The data is transferred to the MINS PI server which is the server used for long-term data storage and retrieval. Plant data on the PI server is accessible to computers that are used for emergency effluent dispersion modeling and dose calculation.

QUALITY ASSURANCE Meteorological components have been designed, procured and installed as a non-safety related system.

Equipment has been purchased from suppliers which have provided high quality, reliable products in the past. Surveillance during construction was provided as for any other non-safety system.

3

FIGURE 2-1 MCGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF THE UP'GRADED SYSTEM Measurement Existing high level and High level wind speed System 10 meter tower and direction Low level wind speed and direction Delta-temperature Low level sigma theta Dry bulb temperature Dew point Precipitation 4

APPENDIX 3 DUKE ENERGY MCGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE ALERT ANT) NOTIFICATION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Alert and Notification System for McGuire Nuclear Site consists of an acoustic alerting signal and notification of the public by commercial broadcast (EAS). The system is designed to meet the acceptance criteria of Section B of Appendix 3, NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-l, Rev. 1.

The Emergency pians of Duke Energy, the State of North Carolina. and the counties of Mecklenburg, Gaston, Catawba, Lincoln, and Iredell include the organizations and individuals, by title, who will be responsible for decision-making as regards the alert and notification system. The county locations from which the sirens would be activated and, potentially, the request for an EAS message would come are manned 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day. Each organization's plan describes provisions for use of public communications media or other emergency instructions to members of the public. The plans of the state of North Carolina include a description of the information that would be communicated to the public under given circumstances.

A. Concept of Operations A system of 67 fixed sirens is installed and operational in the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) around McGuire Nuclear Site. A backup means of alerting and notification is described in the State and County Plans. This backup method includes area-wide emergency service vehicles traversing the area and giving both an alerting signal and notification message.

Each county will control the activation of the sirens within its boundaries (except for Catawba County - their one siren will be activated by Lincoln County). Each county also has the capability to activate all sirens in the EPZ from its control point.

B. Criteria for Acceptance The alert and notification system for the McGuire Nuclear Site provides an alerting signal and an informational or instructional message to the population (via the EAS) on an area-wide basis throughout the 10-mile EPZ within 15 minutes from the time the cognizant off-site agencies have determined the need for such alerting exists. The emergency plans for the state of North Carolina (Annex E) include evidence of EAS preparation for emergency situations and the means for activating the system.

Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

C. Physical Implementation

1. The activation of this alert and notification system requires procedures and relationships between both Duke Energy and the off-site agencies that support Duke and McGuire Nuclear Site. When an incident is determined to have reached the level requiring public protective actions, Duke contacts the cognizant off-site agency via DEMNET and provides its recommendations. This system is available for use 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day and links the Control Room, TSC, EOF, SERT headquarters, the county warning points, and the county EOC's.

2. The expected performance of the sirens used in this system is described in Figure Q-1.

These sirens complement existing alerting systems. The ambient background sound level in the McGuire area is taken to be 50 db for areas of "less than 2000 persons/per square mile" and 60 db for areas above this density. On this basis, the siren coverages are designed to provide a signal 10db above the average daytime ambient background.

Furthermore, the sirens have been located to assure that the maximum sound levels received by any member of the public should be lower than 126 db.

The basis for selection of the 60 db(c) and 70 db(c) criteria is documented as follows:

Location of heavy industry - There is no "heavy industry" in the McGuire 10 mile EPZ.

Attenuation factors with distance - 10 db loss per distance doubled (See Figure Q-I)

Siren output db(c) at 100 ft. vs. assumed range and acoustic frequency spectra -

2001-AC: 126+ 1.0 db at 100 feet Assumed ranges per Figure Q-I, 10 db loss column Frequency Spectra:

2001-AC: top frequency 750 Hz Map showing siren location - See Figure Q-2 Mounting height of sirens - 50 feet (approximate)

Special weather condition considerations (such as expected heavy snow) - None The siren system will produce a 3 minute steady signal and is capable of repetition.

2 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

Test Program Periodic testing of the sirens is performed as follows:

Test Req'd By Mill Req'd Freq. Norm. Freq. Perf. By Duke Silent Test FEMA-REP- Every two weeks. Normally performed weekly 10,NUREG-0654 Rev, on Thursdays.

1, App. 3____ ____

Full Cycle Test (called FEMA-REP-10, Annually. Normally performed on the full-scale test by NUREG-0654 second Wednesday of each FEMA) Rev. 1, App. 3 quarter, or during the biennial exercise. See Note

___ ____ ___ _ __ ___ ____ ___ __ 1 below.

Growl Test FEMA-REP-10, Quarterly and after See NOTE 1 below for NUREG-0654 PM is performed. quarterly test.

Rev. 1, App. 3, See NOTE 3 below for FEMA CPG 1-17 growl test following PM.

March 1, 1980

_________________{PIP-G-00-0135} _____________________

NOTE: 1. Quarterly full cycle tests fulfill/exceed the requirements for quarterly growl tests.

2. Each site may elect to perform some method of feedback system verification during the full cycle siren test.

3. For the FEMA CPG 1-17 growl test following PM, the siren chopper is sounded for a short period of time so that it never produces full sound output. {PIIP G-00-0 135 }

Refer to FAM Section 3.3 for a detailed narrative of the siren test program.

Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

FIGURE Q-1 SIREN RANGE IN FEET 12 AND 10 dB LOSS PER DISTANCE DOUBLED MINIMUM LEVEL 2001 AC COVERAGE 126dB(c)SIREN IN dB 12 10 85 1125 1830 80 1500 2600 75 2000 3680 73 2260 4210 70 2700 5200 68 3000 6000 65 3600 7400 60 4800 10400 4

Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

Figure Q-2 Siren Locations 5 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

APPENDIX 4 DUKE ENERGY MCGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATES DECEMBER 2012 The evacuation time estimates described in part J of this plan were prepared for McGuire by KID Engineering, P.C. Report KLDTR-50 1, MNS, development of Evacuation Time Estimates, revision 1.

See MNS-ETE-12132012-000, MNS Evacuation time Estimates (ETE) dated December 2012.

The purpose of the study was to update the permanent resident population count for the EPZ around McGuire Nuclear Site due to population growth.

The ETE Report has been made available to site, state, and local planners for their use.

Six scenarios were chosen to be studied and ETE listed is for entire EPZ:

1. Winter weekday, fair weather conditions. Estimated evacuation time is 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> 35 minutes.

2. Winter weeknight, fair weather conditions. Estimated evacuation time is 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> 10 minutes.

3. Summer weekend, fair weather conditions. Estimated evacuation time is 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> 30 minutes.

4. Winter weekday, adverse weather conditions. Estimated evacuation time is 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> 40 minutes.

5. Winter weekend, adverse weather conditions. Estimated evacuation time is 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> 10 minutes.

6. Summer weekend, adverse weather conditions. Estimated evacuation time is 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> 55 minutes.

The evacuation study is available in the MNS Emergency Planning office for study and review.

1 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

APPENDIX 5 AGREEMENT LETFTERS The following agreement letters support the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan.

A general description of the contents of each of the letters of agreement below follows the name of the facility or governmental agency.

1. Carolinas Medical Center--Describes the arrangements between Carolinas Medical Center and Duke Energy Corporation relative to the medical care and treatment to also have injured personnel that may also have radioactive contamination.

2. Huntersville Fire Department--Describes the type of assistance which the Huntersville Fire Department will provide to the McGuire Nuclear Station in the event of an emergency such as a radioactive release, hostile action, large scale fire or natural disaster (i.e., hurricane, tornado, earthquake or flooding) or hazardous material issues.

3. Cornelius Volunteer Fire Department-- Describes the type of assistance which the Cornelius Fire Department will provide to the McGuire Nuclear Station in the event of an emergency such as a radioactive release, hostile action, large scale fire or natural disaster (i.e., hurricane, tornado, earthquake or flooding) or hazardous material issues.

4. Mecklenburg County Fire Marshall--Confirms that the Mecklenburg County Fire Marshall will respond to a request from the Huntersville Fire Department or Cornelius Fire Department for assistance in dealing with a fire emergency at the McGuire Nuclear Station.

5. North Mecklenburg Rescue Squad (DELETED)

6. Mecklenburg Emergency Medical Services Agency (MEDIC)--Describes the assistance to be provided by MEDIC to support the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan. Assistance may include providing lifesaving care, transporting patients, and operating ambulances and quick response vehicles to provide services.

7. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Emergency Management Office--Describes both emergency and non-emergency assistance by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

Emergency Management Office to support the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan.

8. Iredell County Civil Preparedness Agency--Describes both emergency and non-emergency assistance by the Iredell County Civil Preparedness Agency to support the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan.

9. Lincoln County Department of Emergency Management-- Describes both emergency and non-emergency assistance by the Lincoln County Department of Emergency Management to support the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan.

10. Gaston County Department of Emergency Management-- Describes both emergency and non-emergency assistance by the Gaston County Department of Emergency Management to support the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan.

11. Catawba County Department of Emergency Management--Describes both emergency and non-emergency assistance by the Catawba County Department of Emergency Management to support the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan.

12. Cabarrus County Department of Emergency Management-- Describes both emergency and non-emergency assistance by the Cabarrus County Department of Emergency Management to support the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan.

13. REAC/TS--Describes the arrangement for the US Department of Energy (DOE)

REAC/TS facilities and team to be available to provide back-up capability and assistance to Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. in the event of a radiological emergency.

14. DOE - Savannah River--Describes the arrangements between the US Department of Energy, National Nuclear Safety Administration to support the Emergency Plans of the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress nuclear sites DOE/NNSA assistance will be advice, detection and identification of radioactive materials, and/or monitoring and assessment actions essential for the control of the immediate hazards to health and safety.

15. INPO--Certifies that [NPO will assist the McGuire Nuclear Station in acquiring of other organizations in the nuclear industry as described in Section 1 of the Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

Emergency Resources Manual, IiNPO 03-001 and the United States Industry Response Framework.

16. North Carolina-- Describes both emergency and non-emergency assistance by the State of North Carolina Department of Public Safety, North Carolina Emergency Management (NCEM) and the State of North Carolina Division of Health Service Regulation, Radiation Protection Section (BPS) to support the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan.

17. Letter Documenting Duke Energy Assumptions for Offsite Dose Calculation Methodology--Documents the assumptions that the McGuire Nuclear Station utilizes in performing offsite dose calculations for (1) atmospheric dispersion, (2) deposition, (3) radiological, (4) information included on the emergency notification form, and (5) accounting for internal dose to emergency workers.

18. Duke Energy Back-Up TLD Reader (DELETED)

19. Joint Information Center--Establishes an agreement regarding, and provides reference to , the operating guidelines, processes, and procedures governing the use of Joint Information System (JIS) and Joint Information Centers (JIC) by providing a holistic approach for a communications response to a declared emergency or significant event at the McGuire Nuclear Station.

20. Alternate Site Agreement--Describes the terms and conditions of the agreement between the Catawba Nuclear Station and the McGuire Nuclear Station for using either facilities existing business unit space; in this case the Technical Support Center or Alternate Technical Support Center as an alternate site Emergency Operations Facility in the event of a service disruption and/or a disaster rendering the primary Emergency Operations Facility unavailable and relocation of the primary Emergency Operations Facility is necessary.

21. Safe Industries (Hale Pump Repair Vendor)--Describes the agreement to the request by Duke Energy regarding assistance with technical support after hours and in emergency situation. In the event a Duke Energy site is in need of emergency technical support , trouble shooting, or assistance with the equipment or operation of Hale pumps.

22. Duke's Lincoln Combustion Turbine Facility Operating Agreement with MNS/CNS/ONS on Emergency Supply of Diesel Fuel--Documents the contingency plan between Duke Energy's Lincoln Combustion Turbine Facility Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

and Duke Energy's McGuire, Catawba, and Oconee Nuclear Stations concerning the Lincoln Combustion Turbine Facility providing the emergency supply of diesel fuel during a disruption of normal diesel fuel supply.

23. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department (CMPD) Describes the type of assistance which the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department will provide to the McGuire Nuclear Station in the event of an emergency such as a radioactive release, hostile action, large scale fire or natural disaster (i.e., hurricane, tornado, earthquake or flooding).

These Letters of Agreement are updated as necessary and at least every three (3) years to ensure adequate awareness on all parts concerned of the existence and commitment to provide agreed services or assistance. The actual letters are not included as part of the McGuire Nuclear Site Emergency Plan but can be located in the Duke Energy electronic data Fusion system.

Rev. 15-2 July. 2015

APPENDIX 6 MCGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE EMERGENCY PLAN DISTRIBUTION NAME McGuire Nuclear Site Document Control, MG05DM Site Emergency Planner, MG0 1EP Site Emergency Planner (TSC), MG0 1EP Control Room, MG010OP Operator Training Director, MG03OT Operations Staff Manager, MGO01OP Operations Shift Manager, MOO01OP Radiation Protection Manager, MG0 1RP Satellite File, MOO1S1 Environmental Management, MG01lEM Regulatory Compliance, MGO01RC EOF Director's Area McGuire Emergency Planning, MG0 1EP NRC McGuire NRC Resident Inspector, MG01A NRC Regional Administrator (copy forwarded by Emer. Plan)

NRC Regional Administrator (copy forwarded by Emer. Plan)

NRC Document Control (copy forwarded by Emer. Plan)

NRC Office Of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Emergency Planning Consultant/NSRB Staff E. M. Kulhr, EC05P News Group Emergency Planning Consultant, ECl12X Catawba Nuclear Site CNS Emergency Planning Manager, CN0 1EP North Carolina Director, Division of Environmental Health, Radiation Protection Section, Raleigh, NC NCEM REP Program Manager, Raleigh, NC NCEM Western Branch Office Manager, Conover, NC Cabarrus County Coordinator, Cabarrus County Dept. of Emergency Mgmt., Concord, NC 1 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

APPENDIX 6 MCGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE EMERGENCY PLAN DISTRIBUTION Catawba County Catawba County Emergency Management Coordinator, Newton, NC Gaston County Coordinator, Gaston County Dept. of Emergency Mgmt., Gastonia, NC Iredell County Coordinator, IredeUl County Civil Preparedness Agency, Statesville, NC Lincoln County Director, Lincoln County Emergency Services, Lincolnton, NC Mecklenburg County Director, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Emergency Mgmt. Office, Charlotte, NC Oconee Nuclear Site ONS Emergency Planning Manager, ON03EP 2 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

APPENDIX 6 MCGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE EMERGENCY PLAN DISTRIBUTION (ADDRESSES)

Director Division of Environmental Health Radiation Protection Section 1645 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1645 REP Program Manager NC Division of Emergency Management 4713 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-4713 Western Branch Office Manager NC Division of Emergency Management 3305-15 16th Ave. S.E.

Suite 305 Conover, NC 28613-92 13 Coordinator Cabarrus County Department of Emergency Management P.O. Box 707 Concord, NC 28026-0707 Michael F Weber, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Mail Stop T-8A23 Washington DC, 20555-0001 Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

APPENDIX 6 MCGUIRE NUCLEAR SITE EMERGENCY PLAN DISTRIBUTION (ADDRESSES Continued)

Emergency Management Coordinator Catawba County Administration Building 100-A South West Boulevard Post Office Box 389 Newton, NC 28658-03 89 Coordinator Gaston County Department of Emergency Management Post Office Box 1578 1615 North Highland Street Gastonia, NC 28052 Coordinator Iredell County Civil Preparedness Agency Post Office Box 788 Statesville, NC 28677 Director Lincoln County Emergency Services 115 W. Main Street Lincointon, NC 28092 Director Mecklenburg Emergency Management 228 East 9th Street Charlotte, NC 28202-2852 4

Rev. 15-2 July, 2015

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)

Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites BNP El EREG #: 1934861 CNS 0]

CR3 0]

HNP 0]

MNS x 5AD #: 1934860 ONS 0]

RNP 0]

GO []

Document and Revision MNS EMERGENCY PLAN Section K (RADIOLOGICAL EXPOSURE CONTROL) rev 15-2 July 2015 Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

Made the following change to K.5.b, Radiological Decontamination:

Replaced "SH/0/B/2001/003, Investigation of Skin and Clothing Contaminations" with "AD-RP-ALL-2009, Personnel Contanmination Monitoring and Reporting".

This Emergency Plan change DOES NOT impact any planning standard of 10 CFR 50.47(b). This Emergency Plan change DOES NOT impact any emergency planning function as set forth in the elements of Appendix E of 10CFR part 50. Therefore a 50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation is not required.

Yes Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed?

Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or No IX 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4 Evaluation is not ,10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Attachment 4, Justification:

Part V.

Bounding document attached (optional) 011]

Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes 0

] No Ix

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602

• EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)

Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IV and Jusifiatin:required. Enter address non Jusifiatin:justification and editorial complete changes Attachment 4, Part V & Vl.

Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria)

Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-i Section I1? If answer is yes, then check box.

1 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) Assignment Of Responsibility (Organization Control) 1la Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. [

lb The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis [

(24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan.

2 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) Onsite Emergency Organization 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned [

2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. [

3 10 CFR_50.47(b)(3)_EmergencyResponseSupport and Resources __

3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. 0]

3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the OEOin accordance with the emergency plan. [

(NA for CR3) 4 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) Emergency Classification System 4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. fo[

(Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)I 5 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) Notification Methods and Procedures 5a Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification 0]

of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (30 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification.

Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions 0]

to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3)

Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-1 0, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and 0]

Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)

ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

6 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6) Emergency Communications 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response [

organizations._________

6b Systems are established for prompt Communication to emergency response personnel. j0 7 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7) Public Education and Information 7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the [

___plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. [

8 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilities and Equipment 8a Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. [

8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. [

9 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9) Accident Assessment 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. I []

10 10 CFR 50.47(b)(!0) Protective Response 10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) 0]

10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available 0]

to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10Oc A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including 0]

those for hostile action events.

10Od KI is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that 0]

chose to provide KI to the public.

11 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1 1) Radiological Exposure Control 1la The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. 0[

12 10 CFR 50.47(b)(12) Medical and Public Health Support 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. 0]

13 10 CFR 50.47(b)(13) Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. 0

[

14 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) Drills and Exercises 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) 0]

is established.

14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, 0]

and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses.

14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. 0]

15 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) Emergency Response Training 1 aTraining is provided to emergency responders. 0

ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete X , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal.

If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete [ , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.

Part V. Signatures: ______

Pr*paer Name (Prin t: Pr ek iigaur D ate-

• Reviewer Na~ne *(Print)',*d Revi er Signa . 7LDate"/..

Approver (EP Manager Nan/e (Print): A p orver Sign~jt'ur: Date KvnL Mury _ _ __ _-__ _ _

Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) "Approver Signature: D at:

__ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _A,-__

Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments.I I

• One for EP to provide the 10 CER 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), 0 to Licensing.

• One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.

QA RECORD

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)

Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites BNP 0]

EREG #: 1934878 CNS []

CR3 0]

HNP 0]

MNS x 5AD #: 1934880 ONS 0]

RNP 0]

GO 0]

Document and Revision MNS EMERGENCY PLAN Section Q (APPENDIX) rev 15-2 July 2015 Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

Made the following change to Appendix 5:

Removed the agreement letters from the Emergency Plan. These letters of agreement will be stored in FUSION.

A description of each letter of agreement was added.

This Emergency Plan change DOES NOT impact any planning standard of 10 CFR 50.47(b). This Emergency Plan change DOES NOT impact any emergency planning function as set forth in the elements of Appendix E of 10CFR part 50. Therefore a 50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation is not required.

Part I1.Activity Previously Reviewed?

Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or Yes ID No IX 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4 Evaluation is not ,10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Justification: Attachment 4, Part V.

Bounding document attached (optional) L 011 Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes 0 NoI X

ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IV and Jusifiatin:required. Enter address non Jusifiatin:justification and editorial complete changes Attachment 4, Part V & VI.

Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria)

Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-i Section I1? If answer is yes, then check box.

1 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1 ) Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control)___

la Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. ___

lb The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis [

__(24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan.___

2 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) Onsite Emergency Organization __

2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned ____

2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. ____

3 10 CER 50.47(b)(3) Emergency Response Support and Resources 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. 0]

3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. [

__(NA for CR3) __

4 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) Emergency Classification System __

4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. I[

__(Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.) I__

5 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) Notification Methods and Procedures 5a Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification 0]

of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (30 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification.

5b Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions 0]

to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) 5c The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-1 0, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and 0 Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)___

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)

Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

6 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6) Emergency Communications 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response El organizations.

6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. 0]

7 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7) Public Education and Information 7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the 0]

plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. 0]

8 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilities and Equipment 8a Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. [

8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. [

9 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9) Accident Assessment 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. Jo 10 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) Protective Response 10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) El 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available []

to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including 0]

those for hostile action events.

10Od KI is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that 0]

chose to provide KI to the public.

11 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1 1) Radiological Exposure Control 11 a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. El 12 10 CFR 50.47(b)(12) Medical and Public Health Support 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. El 13 10 CFR 50.47(b)(13) Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. El 14 10 CER 50.47(b)(14) Drills and Exercises 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) El is established.

14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, El and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses.

14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. 0]

15 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1 5) Emergency Response Training 15Sa Training is provided to emergency responders. [0

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)

Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete X , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal.

If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete [] , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.

Part V. Signatures:

Pr oarer Name (Print): Prep g aue Da t */ _.

Csson Reviewer Name (Print): Reviewer SignatuJre:* .* Date; Approver (EP Manager Nam6 (Print): Approver Signature: "tDate:

Approver (CFAM, asrequired) Name (Print) A pprv *g ntr ae Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. I

• One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), 0 to Licensing.

• One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.

QA RECORD

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)

Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form

• ii~

l y  :: :Sc eeni ng and Evaluation Num

....ber . .......

. : ,..... ... . . Sites....

BNP 0]

EREG#: N/A______CNS 0]

CR3 0]

HNP 0]

MNS x 5AD#: N/A_____ONS 0]

RNP 0]

GO 0]

Document and Revision Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

A typographical error was removed from the header on Section Q Appendices 2,3,4,5,& 6 of the McGuire Emergency Plan.

Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes []JNo 0 I Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4 Evaluation is not ,10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Justification: Attachment 4, Part V.

Bonigdocument attached (optional) 0[

Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes 0] No Ix

Page 2 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IVand Jusifiatin:

i a yporapica hisactviy chng totheheaersin herequired. Enter address non restferecedappendTis ceiit s. atpgahclcagotehaesih justification and editorial reerncd ppndcecomplete changes (yes) Attachment 4, Part V & VI.

Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria)

Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-i Section I1? If answer is yes, then check box.

la Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. 0]

lb The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis 0]

(24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan.___

10 CCFRR 500.47(b)2(2n) ie EOnsite Emgaergnency Organization' i ! *:ii~*ii:ii :ii::i:!

• i:iii i*~i:~ i*i, ;:~i, :>4~:ii:!;

i:!i:!:ii~ ii :**::.  :!!

2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned ____

2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. [

!3 i0i

• !1 CFR 501417(b)(3): Emergencgy ResponseiSuJpporti:an~d Resources,;i:ii::i:~,ii::iiiii*i*!ii*:!i~~i!*iii:: iii:**I i i:

3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. 0]

3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. 0]

(NA for CR3) 4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. [

(Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)___

5a Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification 0]

of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (30 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification.

Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions 0]

to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3)___

Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-1 0, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and 0]

Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)___

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)

Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

6 1 F 5Q9(b)(6) Eer~gencyd Comncations:

6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response 0]

___organizations.

6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. 0]

7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the 0]

___plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. 0]

8a Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. [

8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. [

9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. 0]

10Oa A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) 0]

10Ob Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available 0]

to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including 0]

those for hostile action events.

10Od KI is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that 0]

chose to provide KI to the public.___

11:: *10 CER 50.47(b)(*!*1') i~ialogicalExposure Contol*.... o ~ *K **........ j *< .... *...;

11la The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. 0]

12 ...K 10C............2

.. . . .... Me "i*a and PublicHealth* Support-.:  :.*::  ::*: *;*.** *,*

12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. 0]

13O1 CFR 50'.47(b)(1k3), coyery*Plah~dnn4nand Iost-acidernt,,perationsK:,:; *  : **** ...

13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. 0]

14* 1 CFR 50.47(b)(I14) Drils and Exercises*

i;;0  : . ... * . .. .. .... .. :.... ........*:* *.....

14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) 0]

is established.

14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, 0]

and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses.

14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. 0]

1"5 i* ;10 CFR 50.47(b)(1~)*Emergency ResponseKTraining K:*;*

.iKiK K.: ** *:I*

Q. :KKK, Ki

• 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. 0

[

EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)

Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)

16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. [

16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. [

PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete x , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal.

If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete [] , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.

Partt : inatures:,.-.*:,*** ** . :; *  :*:::*.,* ** * .. *. .....

Preparer Name (print): Perr Signature:/ *. Da e:

Reviewer Name (Print): * *6"*u Date:

Approver (EP Manager Name (Print): Aprv rSgature: Date:

Approver (CFAM asreuired) Name (Print) Approve, igna 'ture:/- Date*

Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. I

• One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), 0 to Licensing.

• One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.

QA RECORD