ML20245B472
Text
- * ^
I s
/D a ... .....
- * '.* UMil D st Af t 5
[$ / 4 NUCL i AH Hi GU1 ATORY COMMISSION n .. t ..,s. e . is c . c u -
. \(+ .//
. June 13.19%
i ;
F( WSD AM.'. P F (4 : tinde L. Rebirser, (Pief
'y 7, ee oc.* o f In'c rr.c t ion & Prisery Ac t s Fre w t. ,
o , m ne e< Rules A ke n ,d>
(*fi;t of ACriristr&ttori N ram (6 c1 An- pr're (. M e # //..) ' ' ' < '
0**:ct ef Inic s t iga t ior.s SU5JE C T : FO! A44-291 f
ios r n< - randur of Ma., 23. 19fi, forwarded a number of documents for re-review. 01 has corrieted its restew.
0 ir,itte:ly resperded to this reasest or August 17, 1964, by providing i docunerti located in 22 files. In hovember 1964, you forwarded 1 file for
.; re-review. O! responded to that request on May 6,1985. The appendir to your "
i May 23, 1985 memorandum i'idicated 18 additional files were being sent for re-resiew. However, in adoitior, to the 18, 2 more were included in the
- package we received. There still remains 1 01 file (04-83-005) that has not been returned to 01. In a telephone conversation with Connie Pappas on June 13, 1955, it was determined that this file should have been but was not re turned to 01. She agreed to send it back. Upon receirt ef the file., 01
.i will re-review it and responc as soon as possible.
I it.e ir.'ornat1or. to be deleted as a result of our re-review has been bracketec i
in blue ini.. WE have not removed any of DRR's notes from the inventories or
- documents. The documents are being returned as requested.
O! has no objection to the release of documents 19, 21, 24, 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35-50, 52, and 54-57. Portions of documents 20, 22, 27, 28, 29 and 53 should be withheld pursuant to exemptions 6 and 7C. Portions of docments 25, 34, 51, and 53 should be withheld pursuant to exemption 70. Document 51 q should be withheld in its entirity pursuant to exemption 7A.
- . ' ;. cr 3 * :' .ttr#. eld oursse-. tc. eier;tior 7A cc'sists of investigatcr.
re:oras cc. ;iled f or law enforcenu,t purocses the release of which would interfere with an ongoing enforcement proceeding. Release of this information could allow those being investigated to learn the scope, direction, and focus of inves tigatory ef forts, and thus could pcssibly allow ther to take action tc shield pctertial wror.gdoing or a violatior of NRC recuirements fror irvestig3 tc 'c .
Irf;rr.ctice. withheid pursuer t to eie stior s 6 and 7C consists of personal
]l ir f o rr.a t u r the disticsure c f which w0ulo constitute an dnwerrented invesicn ; !
of persy.pl privacy. '
l r,f o rna t icr. withheld pursuant to erem? tion 70 consists 6f the names and other idt r tifying inf ormatior the disclosure of which would re' veal',the identities of '
Ct.' f i de "t i t i s W tes. -
Q4 o t &
9706160714 870605
- Q 4 -8'4 -O 1 fr g7 Ifos1fs$291 T
( -. . - . ..-..a. ~ . . . . ,
..-) .
- Y. ' W Linda Robinson 3
?
Inf omation withheld pursuant to escrption $ consists of draf ts containino' the preliminary advice, opinions , and reenerendations of; rnerbers of the staf f'.
Release.of this type of infomation would tend to inhibit the f rank and candid .'
exchar.gt. of infortnation in future deliberations and thus would not be in the
- . putlic interest. There are no reasonably segreable factual portions because releist of the facts would permit er indirect inquiry into the predecisional
~
profess Of the agency.
Enclosures:
As stated 4
e t.
^,s -
C'1 s t r1 bu t i on :
01:s/f F01A-84-291 OI:c/f OI:r/f CAR:r/f RHerr JHunt 01:
01 I-CARee/c/jh BBHayes 06/13/85 06/ /8E -
06:FOIAS/F0lA-84-291 ,
O