ML20245B417
Text
p r
j/"%
UNITED STATES q
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
~'
ne 3
- j OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS FIELD OFFICE. REGION IV
'" "U"JGIS. tex!SEI'
- e
Title:
WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION U.S. NRC 0FFICE OF INVESTIGATION REVIEW 0F WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION QUALITY FIRST PROGRAM INVESTIGATION RECORDS Licensee:
Case Number: A4-85-005 Kansas Gas and Electric Company Report Date: June 12, 1985 P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Control Office: 01:RIV Status: CLOSED ASSIST Reported by:
Reviewed by:
Y'O 0
+
Donald Driskil1 -
R.' K.' Herr Senicr Investigator 01:RIV Director. 01:RIV i
$/
Markafirson Investigator, 01:RIV i
1 WARNING The attached document / report has not been reviewed pursuant to 10 C.F.R 52.790(a) exemptions nor has any exempt material been deleted. Do not disseminate or discuss its contents outside NRC. Treat as "0FFICIAL USE ONLY."
,j 8706160483 070605 f-[T-O@ - M SIU
-291 PDR 19
[
l
]
.=
1
'4, 4
4 I
l June 12, 1985 DETAIL OF ASSIST TO INSPECTION Purpose of Assist to Inspection Pursuant to a May 24, 1985 request by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV Regional Administrator, Office of Investigations Field Office, Region IV Senior Investigator D. D. DRISKILL and Investigator M. EMERSON were assigned to assist in a Region IV review effort of Wolf Cree 9 Generating Station (WCGS) Quality First (Q1) inspection / investigation records for adequacy in the investigation of concerns provided to Q1 concerning WCGS. The NRC Q1 4
Review Group, directed by RICHARD DENISE, Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects, Region IV consisted of NRC representatives from Region IV, NRR, I&E and 0I. The planned Q1 file review effort was divided into a review for adequacy of technical matters investigated by Q1 and a separate review of Q1 investigations conducted concerning allegations of wrongdoing at WCGS. The NRC review effort was scheduled for May 27-31, 1985.
{
Details of Investigative Activities On May 27, 1985, the Q1 Manager, CHARLES SNYDER, provided the NRC Q1 Review Group with a computerized listing of all Q1 concerns investigated since the Q1 inception in early 1984. The computer listing divides the Q1 investigation case numbers into two separate groups; the KG&E telephone hotline (for i
allegations) into a sequential listing prefaced by the designation " HOT" and another sequential listing of investigation file numbers prefaced by the designation "QCI" (Quality Concern Investigations). Those investigation file numbers prefaced QCI were initiated upon Q1 receipt of allegations / concerns expressed by " walk-ins" or via termination / exit interviews of personnel l
employed at WCGS. A review of the computer printout disclosed 66 Q1 I
investigations (broken down into 151 concerns) were initiated between March 20, 1984 and May 9, 1985 as a result of allegations / concerns obtained via the KG&E telephonic hotline. The printout additionally listed 205 QCI investigations initiated, between March 12, 1984 and April 29, 1985. The data contained on the printout of Q1 investigations included a " categories / concern code" for each concern reported (i.e., code A03-harrassment/ intimidation, code A08-falsification
{
of records, code A17-drugs). SNYDER provided a key to these codes which is appended as Exhibit (1).
It was determined that the 01 investigators would review the Q1 investigative. concerns which were considered to be associated with matters generally investigated by NRC 01. The Q1 printout listed 85 concerns identified above as codes A03, A08 and A17. Twenty technical j
concerns investigated by Q1 were also selected for review by 01 subsequent to j
review of a Q1 summary list (Exhibit 2). Seven additional Q1 investigations i
were reviewed by 01 at the request of the technical review group.
i
r y
n The OI participation in this review of WCGS Q1 records was limited strictly to a review and evaluation of the Q1 investigative file's contents. It is helpful to refer to to the December 21, 1984 W. J. WARD to BEN B. HAYES memo entitled 01 EVALUATION OF KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM, (Exhibit 3).
This memo provides very informative background relative to the Q1 program and j
its interrelationships with other WCGS and KG&E departmental entities. This j
memo also contains a number of accurate observations and conclusions concerning j
the Q1 operational shortcomings and programmatic deficiencies. These j
observations have been further corroborated by the findings of this separate j
evaluation of the Q1 case files.
j The May 27-31, 1985 review of Q1 investigative files performed the 01 investigators, involved a total of 112 concerns / allegations which were contained in 75 Q1 investigative case files. The OI review and evaluation
)
found approximately 2/3 (77 oi 112) of the Q1 investigations to be inadequate in that they do not support the conclusion reached by the Q1 investigator. The inadequacy of these investigations appears to be primarily the result of two
{
fundamental shortcomings in the Q1 program itself.
It appears Q1 personnel lack formal investigative experience and training. Also the Q1 program lacks l
the necessary program requirements to ensure that objective, professional and j
complete investigations are performed. The following observations by reporting i
and participating investigators were made relative to Q1 investigations j
reviewed, each of which result from the aforementioned programmatic shortcomings:
1.
Q1 interviews of allegers were almost always inadequate. The initial interviews, based on reviews of the interview notes, which were contained in most case files, do not reflect that the alleger was questioned in adequate detail concerning the allegation / concern necessary to perform a meaningful investigation. The traditional
{
investigative "who, what, when, why and where" were not obtained.
This defect in many of the investigations appears to have been the responsible factor for the inadequacy of Q1 investigations and the t
resultant lack of credibility in their conclusions.
2.
Q1 investigations appeared to rely on the Q1 perception of " impact on safety" as a basis for closing many investigations prior to the I
resolution of the allegation.
It was noted, in some cases, that the investigator did not recognize the full extent of the potential for j
safety significance of the allegation. Most allegations of drug abuse did not reflect consideration of the possible adverse effect to j
hardware or records which could result from onsite drug use.
Furthermore, the' perceived " impact on safety" was used, in some j
cases, as a basis to find allegations " unsubstantiated" when in fact ample evidence was obtained to corroborate the allegations / concerns.
It was also noted that the statement of "no impact on safety" was often used as a basis to close investigations prior to adequate ll resolution.
t
o r
~
- ' l 3.
As reported in Exhibit (3), page 6, the Q1 " reports seldom provide the detailed documentation to support their conclusions that we expect in 01 reports of investigation." The Q1 reports generally do not provide the dates investigative efforts were performed nor do they. consistently identify the sources from which the investigative I
information was obtained. Basically, they provide just the j
information the investigator used in reaching his/her conclusion.
It was noted, and is of concern to the OI investigators, that the facts I
contained in the narratives of the reports are often times insufficient to reach a credible conclusion. A critique of many of the Q1 reports give the impression that a conclusion was reached prior to or early in the investigative process and information was reported which was believed to be a basis for supporting that conclusion. Participating investigator noted his occasional frustration with some reports which contained " unexplained leaps in logic to reach a conclusion."
j The OI review disclosed several Q1 investigative files which contain evidence which cast significant doubt on the integrity of the Q1 program.
In one j
instance an alleger reported having been subjected to harassment and i
intimidation by supervisors (Q1 report QCI 84-79T, allegation 2). The report does not reflect a detailed explanation regarding the harassment and intimidation and the investigative report reflects only the interviews of two supervisors. The supervisor allegedly responsible for the harassment and intimidation denied the allegation and refused to discuss the matter further.
A second supervisor described the alleger as having problems with absenteeism and tardiness. The Q1 records review reportedly disclosed the alleger's performance evaluations were good and reflected no excessive absenteeism or tardiness. Q1 did not make any effort to resolve the apparent discrepant testimony of the one supervisor. An 01 review of the notes relating to the initial interview of the alleger disclosed the alleger had provided detailed 1
information relating to four instances of harassment, intimidation and threats which were not only absent in the Q1 report but contradict the Q1 characterization of the actual allegation. This contradiction is viewed as a serious misstatement of the allegation in the Q1 report. The review of another Q1 file (QCI 84-94) disclosed interview notes wherein a female employee described incidents of being physically and sexually harassed by co-workers and a supervisor. The alleger also reported having discussed the situation with a member of management who told her "to quit if she couldn't handle the normal construction atmosphere." The Q1 investigation minimized the nature of the harassaent but did find the alleged behavior to have occurred. The Q1 report states "the practice (the physical and sexual harassment).... has been stopped. as a form of in-house horseplay by management." The Q1 report states "intimication and harassment, as defined by (10 CFR) 50.7 and (Energy Reorganization Act, Section) 210 has not been proven" therefore, the allegation is " unsubstantiated".
It was found that in many cases, Q1 reports do not accurately reflect the true nature of the respective allegations.
The 01 review of Q1 investigative file QCI 84-14 (allegation 19) provides evidence of KG&E management influencing the conclusion.of an investigation without regard for the investigator's findings. This investigation appears to
3, f3 s.i have been thorough and objective in its initial substantiation of the harassment and intimidation allegation, as documented in a confidential memo by 1
the manager of Q1. The file also contains a confidential memo, from the KG&E legal department to the KG&E WCGS QA manager, stating the allegation was not substantiated as defined by 29 CFR Part 24 (the D0L statute regarding discrimination). Subsequently the Q1 final report was prepared stating the 1
allegation of harassment and intimidation was not substantiated "as defined by 29 CFR Part 24. This appears to represent an effort by KG&E management to influence the conclusion of a Q1 investigation. The investigation focused on
" harassment and intimidation" which is not the subject addressed in 29 CFR 24.
Although KG&E may be defining harassment and intimidation utilizing the 29 CFR 24 definition of discrimination, this is not the criteria used by NRC to substantiate an incident of alleged harassment and intimidation.
It appears that the KG&E legal department's interjection of a legal opinion on this matter persuaded Q1 to disregard its original conclusion in this matter.
It was additionally noted that several other Q1 investigations of harassment and intimidation were also found " unsubstantiated" by Q1 who quoted 29 CFR 24 and the Energy Reorganization Act Section 210.
The 01 review of Q1 case files also disclosed a number of instances wherein Q1 listed the allegation on their initial investigative plan and did not perform any investigation. Some other cases did not list in the plan all allegations of wrongdoing which were made.
An OI review / critique sheet was prepared for each Q1 case file reviewed. These i
review sheets identified the Q1 case file number, the allegation title (s), a brief synopsis of the Q1 investigation performed and an 01 evaluation of Q1 findings / disposition. These review sheets are appended, in sequential Q1 case file number order as Exhibit (4). Amplification of these individual review / critique sheets will be provided upon an appropriate request.
On May 28, 1985 reporting investigator obtained from a confidential source 55 manila folders each containing documents purportedly copied from original WCGS Q1 investigation files. The confidential source also provided one additional bundle of documents allegedly copied from a Q1 investigative file.
Between May 29 and May 31, 1985 L. E. ELLERSHAW, Reactor' Inspector, NRC Region IV performed a review and comparison of these documents utilizing the original Q1 investigative case files. This review disclosed that the respective WCGS Q1 files were more complete and comprehensive than the files obtained from the source. Additionally ELLERSHAW reported having found no evidence of alterations or missing documents in the original Q1 investigative files. ELLERSHAW's memo concerning this review is appended as Exhibit (5).
a bi)!
~
6 J
m n.
-1 l
t
'I - +
Findings In conclusion a significant number of Q1 investigations,.concerning wrongdoing, were performed and documented in a manner that does not meet' accepted standards of investigative practice._ Q1 is not staffed with or supervised by personnel J
who recognize or have been trained in the fundamental precepts of investigations.
(
The Q1 effort, as evidenced by its investigative files, fails to adequately resolve allegations of wrongdoing atWCGS.
This Assist to Inspection is closed.
Exhibits 1.
Q1 Category Coces
+
2.
Q1 Summary List.
3.
01 Memo dated 12-21-84 i
4.
01 Review Sheets 5.
Ellershaw Memo I
1 I
~
l
- i
~
j l
r 00l-P.S~
........ m......
RECEIPT FOR PROPERTY - CHAlN OF CUSTODY A4 -%E-- 005 l
611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 US Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Region IV Arlington, Texas 76011 r =....
-je 1
b@C AT.D. p. Pace.mtv woe.m p.CDv.81 04%h7D'GW {
~
I
\\
t MGC ~T2 tvi t: vJ ITED DisCRIPTION OF ARTICLES Quas,trTY
~n a
w..a.t.
w,.a.
s....a
..a n,a...,w. ~ i
~
l A
55 maw p venJoe es emeerniwnks 7Wes ~tEthTioc To KG(E l
b'CG.5 CI i wVe-T1G#ncAS.
E l
"i;sJWTG OT 'REccep.S TSL AT I QG *TO Qd 34 D A D N N M * @ MI i
i CERTIFY THAT i HAVE RECEIVED THE AATICLES LISTED A80VE.
DaT.
m.ae. ase D Te T6 F. (Puun.s...Fyods 58Ga 8 f W.4 1
5lZ9f % N,J%d}%mw, S,c_L6cainc., t4QCC
,,s.
QQ l
cMain or cusfooy care neu=ovisneo sv nectivro av evneoss o* cxa.or or custoor c$
.h_ E ' G 5 W W 5@M T$T ng u.t.
3,w.t e_%
eb kn_
m f' $f '.4-S5
..t 1 s cre A.w
%.ee. ?>bu vate hc* n
~,
c
.. n, s. -
i i...
a%
-Ob.
Y l
b
. ~.
b. bl$ b'/f f*
Db $ G W/W E Y c! /
g 1 0 & C.
i e-, dpu
,g
_^W_0 5
, h/05 / Yet u 4
)
p
.... ~. _
sia.a rum.
s en a r wa.
l 884 Vie 81EMv0 CMAsse F0mu S12013 1
mum
1 y,,
m p.
~
CCr#IDENTIALITY AGREEMENT w _>
I have information that I wish to provide in confidence to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
I request an express pledge of confidentiality as a condition of providing this'information to the NRC.
I will not provide this information voluntarily to the NRC without such confidentiality being extended to me.
- i It is my understanding, consistent with its legal obligations, the NRC, by agreeing to this confidentiality, will adhere to the following conditions:
(1) The NRC will not identify me by name or personal identifier in any NRC initiated document, conversation, or communication released to the public which relates directly to the information provided by me.
I understand the term "public release" to encompass any distribution outside of the NRC with the j
exception of other public agencies which may require this information in j
futherance of their responsibilities under law or public trust.
(2) The NRC will disclose my identity within the NRC only to the extent required for the conduct of NRC related activities.
(3) During the course of the inquiry or investigation the NRC will also make every i
effort consistent with the investigative needs of the Commission to avoid actions thich would clearly be expected to result in the disclosure of my identity to persons subsequently contacted by the NRC. AT a later stage I understand that even though the NRC will make every reasonable effort to protect my identity, my identification could be compelled by orders or subpoenas issued by courts of law, hearing boards, or similar legal entities.
In such cases, the basis for granting this promise of confidentiality and any other relevant facts will be communicated to the authority ordering the disclosure in an effort to maintain my confidentiality.
If this effort proves unsuccessful, a representative of the NRC will attempt to inform me of any such action before disclosing my identity.
I also understand that the NRC will consider me to have waived my right to confidentiality if I take any action that may be reasonably expected to disclose j
my identity.
I further understand that the NRC will consider me to have waived my rights to confidentiality if I provide (or have previously provided) information to any other party that contradicts the information that I provided to the NRC or if circumstances indicate that I am intentionally providing false information to the NRC.
Other Conditions: (i f any) m "5 0F N ^+ee m m u mrsd remt I /
nearie achmew
% m c %,n u s
'3)RW4tg k(Au g,g y%
I have read and fully understand the contents of this agreement.
I agree with its provisions.
Octe Signature oY source of information
~
Typed or Printed Name and Address Agreed to on behalf of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission O l ~2 C L:LA Date Signature Typed or Printed Name and Title Revision 1.
/7f-85 005
-W
y_
)
enfat b
/
4>1C 1
S 9
s, i
e 9
...-,.~.~.--~~ ~ ~ ~-
-"-^
~
M I
t'G i
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS
~
o: 3 - Yv F4
- .: 3 39
)
ASE NUMBER: //0 7 Fl/ - $ 6 [/+2)
}
1TLE: l}LleD) MT fossessEn oAsb USC Oy Z'DeofifN8 So&eet" (NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
WW61 #/
/)NoNypetous CALLee_
s> sTM
'y,,'ay'* eat.c. ouT of svQcT5 BecI feibu th oaf 0o/~fwer Anopyeda.s ChltN. w'sTarsser)
M d'4 M 7.
sersee Suf' ret sat eeftsom SNW E
NRNe0 To Seckso/y
~
Sec.coesT unciks te,rdiT~cksus vafetoucTive ssi/Gy senef f\\
y
.Susseya e5 S7gy,,.e.rT To raepfrucos secret "ney Dr0w 'T Ftw0 issy 37Asf..
\\
h Se a se d w m w / u*~* A l'id "" " "*0 Of % va:T.
- Zmes7hW;s: hwass coq,ay a,s ses c) ' osn' e) p l.,Wck (LT'. q' Sb'*A 4Kve.tY'fh y
ALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE (DISAGREE
? LAIN:
/ttb [dL(60 Of Oy &l TO SLINV4T C f0SS10ff SASI Atl & $ @ M f
IO tyeo Ta DaTAsl Jus feefomo By Su.hacT D,spsi% sic sue,re7 unilaou ?.
hadTi c4fe ay msk : g u d- ) -
1 1
i
.)
X 4 X 8 9_. 0 0 5 r
ExHisir-Y I
1 PAGE L,,,,,op_ 8 7 pgg A478f-005 -6al t m
' s,57 F
c CPEN '.+ -3.g
[
1 105CDl 5' 21-S+
l
}
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS l
H ASE NUMBER: hot B4 - 13 (U j
ITLE: A ue<,t3 bemumem or DlC CC hPEc reg BY TIC CC Eufscorso g
?
'.YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
1
- ptc c e resde - remkd b Qi d he uns
'i
% s+,2
% W5 Q C + + viso c. T L, idsydm a Magod b f L a, m c w - % %
w er swsd a e U we b usas 6.a fork 3
g c&t supatias 16. e q / N evo~J oa oderf s te
~, &J m 94. e etdJ w s,y, soc mo_s b ur.oeg 64 L L ebkiLd) ocb' wig G h5 ~,.. pA.i te1% h.uidh
(
evocAuc.
c
.\\
N.
9 VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE - Ye.g :
DISAGREE
- ^*"*
OL., sa\\a9sO To i J u u, Y a F a n;b9ec, kc6 mel'hA ' ass %
9 W<, W5 o c s e b, a '.bic w y.c.a uv % md 3 ~~b < e I QI. To d isco.s s -My pee b m 4 8 '+,
OI D i
'fb d oa msuMm.e vnG.4 iwk o.s k ""k to A p < c a l u _ w. t L p e & L t-PA 4 % % %< c. w cu m,,
q H,
ia
., g i % * %e/ d'=E L.
c., 4,c ag
,q, -
-} I 5
h rawC c,(
ue c% m,a g g q
))
mdk.dca.ws M3 %g4
- q j
(
c.
'l
.g isG J
s
- f i!
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS 1: 4-/1-TI/
. : 4-19%If AsE NwaER: Nor M-if 0)
All& v$e of b17 Ay Cae IkTife90 fitssN TTLE:
YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
AMcA>y Mov5.cMine tepseTot one $tSM(Ior3^*0) /bSSeuel O(T ou N-Dfoenna seeceaso 7;
ctla f s p seeus,ry (at,-ssa) eqs.eM6elsTy GvMs<615 G)/ hfs.tra 1+Ar concsex o w e e,t.
ivs y
e e VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE t
XPLAZN:
&l OSf Afoodh hIlP]MIren UAlPc word,ggue,44, g3 gg,4,g
- g,)4,;ggg yg;g j
co co.,,a.
f /ssta k i b < M f tM i 8C&W O M A Coat?n*4S As e m tt eF r
sos)c5 reep.oaaii7Er,sr sate,
$*c a bl.ec$ S A%% l &
y
'i 1
1 Ju E
h L
-s.
bM N *. s -q-M,
Ct.osE b '. 5-g. g,{.
)
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS
'i ASE NUMBER:
f4c7 M., gg (g3 4, ('Q ITLE:
g) W uNxww Pegsopa paivenso. A
@ Twb uHers CAMAAC usEs I SELLS bece.s ou strc.
INbnitbuets (inwrmes]) est peuss og sg7c, s
YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
g.
i.eb.ir CrewAte (,ucewser wompea sivsu) uses med..v M m, d vis.n l D i. M w u d **uan W 504 O "' % *
& tiew'tNil h abe d.co3, o.1 Wes.s. Tkt pers.n wk.
ce e At.U.44 % dvoqs 4. J 4 v u, d e v p ci+ wess. %
"ce ke W
- a. s i y *, _,o i
\\
FALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE
' PLAIN:
Th o. Qi. CA ygds M 4t A.
maae *I N ud Ca**bo 9"
d hC 5/i4[s4 ca.
W#
nh buu e,M, h Q c.mtsau's j
S-fkt+ Qi muesi,4
' " = % %. 4 cas m J4 w w w c c.c u. u., & %.aeiva,.+ % u.> A
" '7*M. ~.a o
s u
% % we. oh co-hd ums o
s...g s,,,,,
- - We vq ued A N 4 1 re.p et u f
k g
Q,,
1 $$ MOMD FW WMds N U OOb
- w, w ~N ag d.div;dvaa.:
k 1
6.wi"r N
W * # 4 W8 as.u. s _N..u,'F*
(
~_
(Us'vido=0.> ( p=aders et.o wu
+
., m w rkel is s fet v& sr._
+4
+%ed.u -o e
% %a.e %k sa. a
) w a ker. f y
sy sw iw ut u.> css aveas w d u.,6 P**st% b e,%,..W
.o, t e.a y = 0*T w t. %,,ae ed meu6 sfcds.5 ttu % s.or % D e t. swue d.Su Irc4t,y veQahd hk ai.ssep
~
e d 'ss e s,,
I*
\\
- n..e-m e
1--
s.
i r di+% e *Mk N "b'Edd ""**" " "
k Ot g r-5 w e. s s44 wh.d wwy eFad to 4#.cm.ke. a p.vika. sh, <4 sw sat.ct, e kt me.dts W sem.t n
uAh y
y p%q,y gf s'tdh.$
A m e.mo We-bmM d ca.oh oP h an %,.2 de q o5ersk=d <4. A w ir ddl. 4 yed ik m.
WU W Q1 A h Q d... ad w eem.<y oc e
V cA*u Es m o d te r e d o v-
.r f.ca s t. 3 e # G Y to-e
% To d%=~te_ h k.me e*14.6 J2
(~.pm:.f (r. sard cW t 4est 5 % vi>cr M
% ed
~4ed R.~.ce t~q m. g ay er m g,,e,w %
d*R m esch h h p>5cw may L w ow sar.dy %r h site,,
Qi 9+11 k%
veseMUJf-ft a_
~4 a 7
c.c A m urrec A ro 3
m.
mg
- 1 l
1 j
i 4
l i
i
a -e
- ma 1
spew,. r-t3-54 D
cwseo : t-t-s4 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS I
ASE NUMBER: tIOT S't-Z O h )
ITLE: A Maged Emi.wrec., rice op fErew Ts.st Espcm peq ggy g YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
% 5) 3154 % og% s on g 4 wi u ).' Q.1 M Ero4 Itst EM Providtd 3
" Die-D. * % 54 con, #
ter
% e. udt war.e aAQ. %.a. h (-Frew MSc t* 198+)
M M re Ia.Q.** D." h we-(t-4 cr aQ4g s44,2 Dtc t%maevig 9ew."ts.d M's t ced4c "to A
9 b pv.h.
cow 4,-
v VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE __'C
DISAGREE XPLAIN: g gi, E rd44chs' N a.bswe TLC YO oWb O ^ ^ ~rf 4
we re_ re.vw".. M. Cw%;f" wih h vdn< disanad N *Ak. ICSf ow -hde hP weet c r gvb<.) bV Ttc. A 1910 d bT 66eds e
e4 tkdi i % D 'Yiisk Wa.ce pvessd4.d wsk an.c.L sdeegoed shm
.G M +s r N. % q ts R
j wo. s. m Dec.% % 2a, n.eer v as W ervtsas< d % o t. J escr a svacfa d % J e n s d**
d r 3
%h j
4.c.k N3I It*W t Ytuttrw mh, N CL owa M *< M A ~ & ~. A e* 5-p,.Ji.L J, w A Lg, J q c-oda-4 Ro. rep..-
.A A o_ 4 &csd4 w k h s. L i Q,
- c. 2 6 a g gi ma q I
- 97AR*rf6 k
j,' 0 *8* b REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS c: 6 5-t4 i
1
//07 E4-22 (/)
i iSE NUMBER:
hffay s ferb 4640 g4
& UnkkdUSP T06L [#l0 *$
LTLE:
y e
DiOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
ANO fM"S [Ald!K UkTed bevys veg. Bot $' f alO ra Tabl Cor:8 *i JuB ecT ne T Fu d4st Ibm bGied.
i j
0fAtk D Se userIy Nb Aqe ng Q ew "
DISAGREE TALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
TLAIN:
$uttI Aef4hteb N46
=~
f ti g prw*1 Ob AC(m ()
By f)/, 7b De7N eule ovG6 f Secce'rTy the@y 'ik d
Aab tevyuse/rwsL(irve**rao*y"d'Th.
Psss< ole sary tenu imiser of %
l
> i
- ?
7
.J
r. a r-s REVIEW OF W LF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS
~
'opraeo: (.n ~ (e- %$
c.tese4: r-c.55'
?
~.ASE NUMBER: HOT S4-25 '(gKp) ( (7.$)
CITLE: A9wt'4cos h04tqa.Ud3 re.3ad Q r.e c u c( f.A., G eef,%, I { H, w 1 deep vag hY %d Pesane_Q/
3YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
Q4) ser %ed %f wc uSAd bd5 cu.= -F=cs#ie<I,
19DC wa,m d t&w' M,
hr.sa,4 hM (t,) Aaavi.4 Ad Niuf Aq Iupuh k-3e< l A 9.sd M 4'-
ser
,se u %s, we c e Sa ww.
x M 'DiC W h 4 'iG vos'cuse:[. AACbqdtu Sei str.bsida(Gl k4) A4.d use. eC dev35, bag 'D(C mtdd(n. qd psenn.a.( cd M ktwed Seca "Depi, kG E Prese.cI
- 01. F02a encad.
%r au d "DC. 9 P \\ Pr.3d Mgr teexe, advrs'c/
% d d.t d.
Lt-at-S E MkO
~Z [
EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE
]
EXPLAIN:
b%ONw5-54 k $7 CLP % bo b e k ada5o gwagp ffg]
l q
NA @ YC.
h dVg 5
' k-g Q
j 7
- a r a-
' c g ~e
%.c,isc% u a
,c _ g c
"'W e ' '~ - ( ab o a.o d.ce3, m-w %.d,
,,s w w-t iN k ce.p%t.
, g.,,4
- l y e mo..it a. 4 y j
W - Ed t
- ' M % c t M e A % c e e,tv %
to eco$, etc I
g f.
A
l
> 12 sr i
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS 1
4 (Se aux 8ER: +ter s+-u (0 ITLE: AWdI N#A*
M " " 't
- A 'f "^ p c k % N c e N ft w % d #
% da.y, jusY be9eA if."
rdOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
of %y,,;pg equt c.%y iLi %2t*% Ides " 4.t - o w Ltadaa<,,o h used ou. su.%..J kte. %%Q s%fd aunemtM Q docJL :
- us b ues.-...~4.t A % g.a m,g g, u %,
yg hs-At wes,t "
i
\\
ETALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE h al % tJo e ALA :s Qt<a.se f 4 % 4 er o s I A viau> d
% of w h e C ed b mera
.,.3 % p 6 v_ o..m ku.h 6 3
r% M aAtM in G M 4 6 6., obMd d
%,q
- '^ $ M /cd oe Qx& Mr. t p. A mvast 4 '
7 k
ggggg
- ~+-t.re ue ~ s.m,,_w a A er-I i ;
I m
b=a kbo A er SP: Q4-is i v e. 5 3 ;. ~ o P A k J r.5 9
f
rN w co REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS open o: to-4-%4
@.ag-Sy cacaso:
CASE rOfBER: llQT~ % 4-SP.,
AA%sger reeuM heded ed -f'M ci hd m wh MFcAd 3,.
IITLE:
4%es m saf 9 % '9 i B las A U ras a d d M Cr d f
SYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
Qi mue%sfdk or -ft.ic w:dtu aPPeans N kauf Ime&Q
- ide.rvibed oCQ P425hM %d h OO1 er - % F odu b 'g 9
i&sJW (oy eL~) us.4 3 %Q c%43%4 VeditLded Mc he hwd F&
M %L wfe mer} A NALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE XPLAIN:
OK 41
/9 f
?
l
s\\%lSs oh.u ! io -M -1f REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS eteras : s *M
-l
)
4SE NUMBER: HOT T4-55 ITLE: %@g ve p Q use er beoGr oN JIre k..
(NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
O f i~ st q.t.u h m r*N8s A% ewymou.,12Aph,% 44 1 Le % ut* ef = v p % % % %9Li 4ft- (eenw dr'*t t4 N d ib U.o<1, eo.s C,a. L 4 A %
e= =.y KGE P-3 d LL - pe, y,mt,-A h 24,4 g
~ - ~ ~ -
~.t gu.LK v. c.+. J
- ' 8 M
- 5-et u=% 4 (A h.( ks.s p, p 6 %f W tC-3
'Mv4
- a. fii~.
7 QI fA c~Ns'<. b%
hi (qds oFi-J' Tid.% i a,,, 6,m oc m aw s a ute tw p..., ++. Q e s -3 d <v5.s.
VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
GREE s
DISAGREE KPLAIN:
5bb eIs ve 3 dg wgodTJe t 9 ck h
> Q aQ.,e v s SATy % s w e a cT, w e c L,. 4 d 4
b-h hk an.us.
% at e s w u e_. n d d
+a-a
% % %M q_ ce.c 4 e f e g fg y
m,L.y a.s
, uwc w.c 1l wM % 6-ads
+s. dL rx we.M b
pi Lo.o e Lo.,
- c=5AJ era % M et j
m 4
-r-aj D - 3 g--
c5D REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS
. speno:. T- \\ t.-%4-
' *8d: Ee.4 CPCM
'ASE NUMBER: GGI %4-fl
( ui cig mINSTECL Lt ST-FooNP I W FiL E ITLE: Aged os,e of hg g eg g,7.g
' YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
i Q L w a T d w 4-s< d cc.v % 5 A n.fi a s poo M +o @L 2-ts-s y s
A uv% or Ms Q Q NGu:. % T-27-% dbd*#2 h "@ 788" d % 4h oG1 er em mq dot c.se (l0 WG5 ess 3
4 tv. 64 L +Lo 01 wvect@e use L &, &% z Gl o
%sTiqdux d rave-h, b Qer s 6
% 3-t+-s + (s
- **NWA tr%&ew cloaa.b draq os w sk
.^r prov4fel d d W % R:, % A b " "M CE WC,<s-s ms, uw Q 7 oog uq
~ % % ~%. w es d.+g r-as y c-u-u 4
- Ms ove/sqk.f % 41 % d ft.o h % D I Ng fG ob d Y
DIW" 7 EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE W 'Or8aw v.o g u ( 4 n a C v 2 A w..., 4 g 4,
%~ N<d& W rd w.t se tak,d _
WA
\\MmL 4x_
~~
to M tbs %
c.mc.b.
i o
I' Hj r
0 Y e
s (C
i
.e
i t
0 I
f h
}
/
l l
1 d
\\
e 4.
i O
e 9
9 9
4
i pp j
r se -s REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS
/
opwo: ~3 S c4csee: i t - 3 c, -ts CASE NUMBER: @ S 4 -o ;
TITLE:- A% 4 r{ l-t o r IC Eut.Qoyee SYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
%, nnny vagAd ht % former ~bic ce ^4yee uns 1% 'bt a.I brvas GM adyp[ h NC 6-6, h
oLcuLtel % % aC weRey-- w <ecu%
aD A ticx. W 4 k3 ca h)ec VhsubdgT M EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE EXPLAIN:
ok iT
Edh$(
/%E 1
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS i
spe neo:
'3 !9-84 I
- 4fsso: 4/-fs.yy ASE NUMBER: Qc_T gy - g g y b* SIAL *W UNC DreelskytaOtufSj14SStyk
- YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
N h
fY by Lfill51 u f In S$fe( S W h
- BA.
Cht%su 16e47 tab 6 b4$ Ony $
fI
<%e nef<*t ta &+fg M wSua,rnAf -io-e<i.
i NALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE l
CXFLAIN: g j Jg
& p,'g corse fMMI'A To
, &, (n4/h 7~e
/% '0 ll Y'
Wf NWI es,3% 16
$4cu g y km W twold ia.
C*re sus f M "n~ E ^ W ~ N t 4-*A & W 70s-sr rb QI {WA l~'#
r$'
j A*e DY kM uneRa-( 'Q"steinreL essiymTS,
em fenM $ Mv7~ Ak by Soy v~enn( sistas eg.,sy y s m,,,,;p g, f(, yg g,'q jg, tc - 94, 7Q os seie ute s.e.,, air,,ea,is,a;;;p s,., reg.,.qg,
Suse tppp*~7Ly srat wex y!W D& 144f c9 'f '91I /"/^5 uddory f w s
& T6 f I f
- ~ W rm ere,os t a-io.gy.
- ) l J,
NO 58lI0
- Uf hl (5
OfNff 0Mk 6 (gy 26
)
e i
i
dMy gg-
{
~~
/*E REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS Wmo: J - #f-W
- L*6ee: (- y
.ASE NUMBER: $cy gy.fa {g
. INT 'msNflh a hat @&5W Bf I~/*1/ I'fQm4T I
1YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
(csseeus, si q'wW LAt sospa nlT4 G Q l Al(tf j 'Ol #' #~1 G-4 -84) sessr-l,rg mp ny y,7&+.-r~,&rA.
y n,4 p m,s ao W Q n os'o.m7 km saffilikr F4 rs.cnriie 7
IMtNATE cueWpcWW pefiig,
"</<' Hol0 AGeewT *pg is, Q,
?!ALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
DISAGREE EXPLAIN:
w,pah o's f lf'pd-T w%.
f MTf ' & / $ Zw!sG '%
84*c() vaEC g2 d
J i
1
)
5 1 i i
I
.2 f.
j 1
-l
T ~3O-SS
)
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTICATIONS opew o: T-29 -% &
udsso:
)
CASE NUMBER: GCr *54 g 3, ( A)
IITLE: A.O.42qM o r pavo. e s g, g y I> ic g,,lity Ca.gv y.gg i
SYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
i-*d.d4 reel _. J y Qt Pv9M ue s
% SNe w d h 5 %
D 1
f EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE EXPLAIN:
M* Ylem b
- 0 s& qs e$ A
\\-
y
- ** J4.CLftg L. s.co,T %f.e.u 7
- @d v a (de fa $6J
.r 1 Q.sc hi htd4 cu%
'S
^
1'
' ~ u-u )
~N
' die o1 g av7d.9Effy p d bi 4
%+
r ddi.s M%4 g m a ~ J Jea a n a L v & u s x a d tu s - 4.
~
u cA%s m#q frog dder. (14m.u;fyQ4- c3 i e
- 7Af'W BE
~ REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTICATIONS cAcwo: 3 M \\ M6t-0; ll- /- y ASE NUMBER: Ocf 84f-/(, (q CITLE'* e%~' Fe(d bu,G~ a s Qqt ac,;., y 74 cag aq iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): WTQ Wk Fr& fed (H Sv60sto14710u es ~f* ids le ; 1"'*1 ' "9S' */"" hf s'supuvik e)Tes a *nuou v rw diTW.es-/~;e sos" " ' "7 "' ~ %se. supa he ty-s Cem,Geds at s,,,ces g,.p,ee gep,,eo g pij sey vis17iew 6ecwasesecM % we7~ ce mfle2e, NALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE M tJf4 decusis.*TPO a DCPLAIN: D s.,p/eC mr cousseire feTesmj%ATs (M4NthY =0 49 *[ O E'"/f* e.rssao evin a ser Acerveray oscon~no M'#E# 'RimoEs% owa ca conf 4TS l L ~ ^~ "so eM@necTro*s fide T' lS x% ep s w. ne G+E J&oek coetesieu m n: Xoes 74 ft&+t : edatph.u-Afd 2 3, t9'8 6 % peove's,3 H. ' AoNS!1 soilsr gagsyssnnrad. 3,94)n v,sy,mtK Th : bDRA Nadijrs 564 sw $ h"fI W' fcw S4 sos 5e 6. srb N*T4 co.re.,. *g e,,,,,m,,yo yea,'WWh) geom'Q S +- Q t z~ed na..- cc wr.44,av.-sy a,zw w su-eeg 3<, 2-r,a nig w @*;f8-efu pep nems..nz ^ W e >** nnrra sas, r.r.c unc, pra,say :z;e,,,r,y~ ma 89%,4 s J
cM4anec>m em gs. p cwse m ar ~ ~un enf o,L (rs. ~ cc afn y '. (a + p;n n( M FM l 1 l \\ t ) I l i l i i 1 i = '.. i 1 l3
- j i h
4
- 1 *'s o-u~ 1 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS i opew o: 4-i n-s+ ) w eed: io-a-st QC.7 M-21 (3)
- ASE NUMBER
CITLE: A%.4 Dessik.Cu. Miif7E/f*A6.(.ca.frea er T&d %15Gs Inc. DroovrM hevdh-1 I j 3YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): M iva$g.m tcgut dce Nr 7QvEd by OfoNT 4 M CEts d { y y .i. C w c h e. A c m e h h n d % escue J ife5 M CI mves;Eg d o @ b med o.5. f4.QadT N h N s M -gUe. h.)omerows TW pre ad wed usc.Qshs e.,k WW4 du.$ Ql vevtew c# Tiu( pvoo -.e-d f<cevd 5 ad $6 TuAs._ Oe M uro.s. em ewA....L g _m,_h G.* d i L, ref) 5.ce.se esOso O... A k
- y g g a q
e EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE i
~
EXPLAIN:
W ns $ W M%s sNQ %$ km ssf6 G
qL
.. RO
' J s A A es~,
M M -
c,. %/ c A; wf.
C. h~kva C & & :
3 T t A.ve r o % k % ~~<
m A m A d as p ryd, h gd dw, m+
L a m of cee..
om v..c4 ) v-At.
m u p,, W w 6 M v % a s i )
~ % % u,astra, wase (d.i.d X 6 L 7 L ree ni d>e / ss-N M
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS
' okaaeo; 4-11-9 cassee: q.2A QCT T4-56 h)
CASE NUMBER:
AMoc ed ur, of d, op. b y Tec. R < a p a s I oc. pe,to4 -
TITLE:
j SYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S):
.i DI 54N Cct.(Ieu$.4 memo Ives.:Eex q % cQI htca_f g k TN W%u m e (wcected m dQ b
u v6w m 3-t u_,d (wo j
GL arc eh4 qq.
'O g6 0"
L WMo
$'cba-3 Qee ve_&qh) &
0 5-e.A J ug Of Pr.a. M E s weO% TW voock) S c6cb o f p.p s,s m, ctcc o14 d e C c{q ou e
EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE ISAGREE EXPLAIN:
'h b hdas dish tued dwd o Q Ap i
i m secedy e =A.c%4 v
- Y **t&w5c & ') p f w d j q acesuk M^ MLoA h c 4LTg Q y hue k%Qd !oP s
+ f 6 97 i .e 4
$\\19fST I c>D i i REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTICATIONS ,j l 'l opew o: 4 W uc4eo: '.ASE NUMBER: Q Q $4 g7(l) A%.JTiw of ~ptus use ow s cyg
- ITLE:
l j (
- YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
p w G2<,.eq r OL m t. % ME Pes., ek U ~m a r ems %<s s h t * % e. c m m a s e~.y,w 'ductiN war.c. x=f i p % veAM d did tv=Le h vu.F arms %h Ab." m
- h d*% u s.e.c w
h ' t do Je.< vee.l A d fb QJiw.r { ms soce <.e.0 W m E ,,..A y v(rasM4A m o. w W,& v e.o.s.hol j %rw % 4.;.c.f %. f \\ VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE } ] .KPLAIN: Tu- - pOaI- (bvch e {:. %eu- - w= b tm A i A +. A m, oc,avace 4 " *
- ba"h %.e r s cEm no wr%(g eMv". k$LgJ h&
MM t b i % 's rhak,-s.A a,: ~ t~u a a A o m,_o A, ~ e G 1 a
s\\mlsr } i REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ~ Naco: (a-71 'sp uoco: 4 % ASE NUMBER: QCr 39-53(U Aacm3%h op ' Drug A 4;.Q.c.o ka.Q, Abog ITLE: Sk ou YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): Maag.c s c.. wce w is<h> tLJ 6 pr vs!L 2 mf cu.5 % u.> k's k 7 " " " ^ ^ La-vul k Lh'Cy % (i) saxparbcd dvu9 uws. 't~W m' L A-4 % 2r 6. Pv.,e.e.$ Al ,ee d' ~ o i t.o _ w. un. F-pa.s ek Lk. ~ y < Ad L afr h Is Ufy Lu r u Pa^ *^ d - e rA=Jrve. -- cmnJ.u e ~m %saduhCd VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE E KPLAIN: y&5 is Q.1 Es.0.4. E, % w3Fv$es.J % 8f C# ""*td 5 .c,_,a .w -~ m A u.s, u u m,s a k - ~ t & d a c e,r te %,. J % e, e @ %..ty of no% M <mm k kds.'a.e @c~pr-as f 9% a.ew..nd e-q k-Ghye of h =div A. b A0025ees u-.. , a.44 wr 3 1 ) ek%4A P d q_ - e e <.0. 4 W maed w( aaaagav.Qwb 6. a% odLfid iclul'S ~*r? @ %' 4 616.c %3 4 u mers est. icdv.baus. Q y , 9 c.save 'M " W. awe n ?
5 14 I 0969 : 4-W 67 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS CLoifD'. ts' 27-S p ASE NUMBER: GCE 74 -@ t ITLE. A,06e.982 088- @ MO*8 0" 0 " YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): g g a i grw&4.4 A Qi hM
- 2. idivdv Q.s (kwd) ou. drugs 4.t u r e s.
Gi reFA.cis mittaa,, v re4<,1 % gg p, ope.k Ma A OI-C4Io d. c u _ %.y v e,l't s s d oc.u m e t 3 h~ Ks i fr e. y_f a u.cl B i 0 Pr. ~ t e C-sowhJb)ta m i %4 imaaog, n..a.ye,- udk w sith.. y 4(vt[* + m 4'< - b it -,. A. . Es.r n ndra.4 d eh i s. &.p %c s%te.3 bib A %. c.au.<.,A n n A u r-L.uas. indwd a @seWa M <d "= yee re rGr* al. r %.A. 7 l 9fALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE t DISAG E b kb .F och (k 3 <- N6 tio[e.T'y 8 " O' d m k p.a.AM%d No oW YMae 4c dstie.s op %sa paw s @ i k e.v h + k t NM, i.w.#or< a a e.v%N ob ~%uldrugum % e.g u-S a.;.crJcks OTHEpt toenTWlED NWSMl AREAS 4 Owbe: P,.se d w.. m Gi dik %y cht...t s ii 4 g 9"*b %vm~ 4 3 %., ma,_Ag y g F
slp{9 s-N_ REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS CLosso : so-sr-9 LSE NUMBER: Ger 15 4 44 7 (7) AAQo.$o7 sed h.t Was% (c.se e.up.Qoyee d WCGS f*Ah k8 W M lac " b.dAc N ll d # 'TLE:
- ,g
, *..us u-o r,,.m.., u %, y c 1.. 1 ) 'NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): I N 4 5 N Chiot.d w6k o.cao$ ey dised Le imi ubC,_4 "" We.d ou.il to d ' W %g 4 1 c ve { was o&w U*Md as o n Sn.., gd i IALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE
- PLAIN:
et ) o en j 1 1i !\\ 1l I 1
- i 1
{ l
r{eq gg N REVIEW 0F WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS c0 d u..w-g
- j
.ASE NUMBER: C)CI B4 -GST (4) i ) 'ITLE : *USE. of 7)guGs" 'BY TscHw;4 4,i,yt.g ty c_ S.u,plC VT f5 @ LA.hCGS iYMOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): _ g _, J _ o p h o.t R.04.- duc.b ad v'(*' N ** tm&d % % n % ex A,bols+ m. to 6 se %p.,3 M.at< d^'c' b '* ** "' ' A **E
- b.4A;.d Es eev,L l Q.4thser. ?
- rM 2
- uS "ose er d~'7 c "
=9$ y %.Ao_a.gb Q,g,, r % tr A i.dweuof 4 4r
- ' w S t v - + - A, q r e, % s A h al e3 muy h u 4 A w.b '~
% A caso cy.t a s
- u. pkg # m<ues itL r/rr i r/2e(ss =%Ir k it a.
y A--b.F wv&.C T*.u <w.r.4.yees =4al ib.A ek. pv4r" - w DIEGRE
- VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION
AGREE 'XPLAIN: 1 D 1sussw d tsues. $ve $sc$m no% W n%ec cbscCou SQWk i 4%ses ur p<spRa. Aa %.d.Q.y use. j' pace.s % s L 's Ta fo ik ui me. ore dd tdo emy di dec.om4u.} LYEO t&cvsEw sw.gZEA- @6%tak r9Q dupehEo1 x%v& @ x 3 y - n* -w a......<f-j ) usi poo<4 j u.so N xara Av6 a e,c rwa m. s .A. ecoadw LdEd A % A.4.a. i.og.s cursery resu.sttiwg L % ons, h e 3 LM E 5 9 h d bS2, f g{
-~ gg( 7.L t-94 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS CLOSED. 7, ka 7-l7- ' SE 14 UMBER: DC 34-70 b) i
- ng %.e o.. or woe m ausa se << a-e~euer m E:
?, (NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): no mue@qdtim p4med ,.r.~.4.A % s.t. xos,.ra. ,ln(se .u - o:h saa e ra w to suor,i% 7 Qab:s (w.1;,4t o drog <>.,a.t g gdh d Co M concun d M G( CA. c.0.od --v E. 3+, W OE JALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE { " N "i oi,. L..oA W e o_ enm3 resta*IiW'r *# Ov4'Af 4 '" <quQ Leo 3 by a4Gh ec wd %ne if no LMMd 'F esa. k%.1 my 2d A tus <nse, 9 ri -u as j d
- w4 yCy v4e a ups
,a eka, A f,i.o g,u; 6.t2_.
- A As t, ~ W S. g ;m_n,. m, g on %' g _.
so wu prov'.44 .g ty_ 3,g, h % - % m. m c.is a 3 _ n, & a_o.e 8= h , 4 e ot. 54 w mu,., ,,7 $: we k h d Q" f tu #L..~4,,,, L sus m ~~Es a%e - GL'A
-...-..-__,.,....._____,#.i_..~.,... e.- v.....,___.,...... MfFr 'T Q l otep 1.l a.Sp REVIEW 0F WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS CLCae'D: 7-\\ 4-% ASE WUMBER: QCT" M 7 3 Aryde. af % Osg d u.)cs.5 1TLE: 9 1 3 1 YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): Apr 4 4 i l '!
- ^ s-w -% ~
- qM 5 m
d.vo 9 o A.e d ct~3 e cd u3 css ') J u yc<n b) peautddd se.Q d ou w 6 duqsowl ? @ &,c M 2 iu 4 d u.,I a em e u scu.5 l 1 M AGREE VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE \\ Wh)\\& h L DJ 9 a ~w fa suef& ~N5 a N_ ces.p s,Ulity or of..= % 64. A
- c. d - t u.,',(. A %,f 01
\\ te.f M 4 t i s 4 h S ec u M 1 s - *g < d w, d u t m y w e4 set d ed a dd g = d A t 3 b ~ n -tr as wA em: g cus %.p.ef'(ots u t) y ho kS_ g,3p Wf kt W CSS PM* 4'- A-y wo so.&ty accessmeuI' i I \\ l
v,- -m %w/w y 1 l 1 OPGO 7 12 - Fl REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS CLOSED t I ST I ASE NUMBER: QCf S4 ~1l ITLE: AoCaqad %_t tG t E srae.r-Up Ga.ove % ddle Momi-Asa4 o p Om { $gur ' / CF OR.OG.s oM safe w# TH pJ SrARt -OP OG6/%)( 2AT1ct4 -l _i 1 i YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): n o O L m ecek pve-m d w $4.eurk C h [ w 7[gy Q e-t b - Yr w.u.fe_rr[ q 5 w h a b v p 4dd e ^oh Qt Mt. cQcad, l N b C4=s si4_s *:* cub-up yt opp msal o F h %% ~ &%. dae ft Osch a s 4 m k dapf-4 t% VeW&cq i e - - ( ll I-t VALUATION OF Q1 FiWDINGS/ DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE XPLAIW: > M6 "b4 of tbutard of Qat-j > ^9% ec s a m % cl d ess L h (% AQ ( W a h sit ~uu b or, q y += % ~ 4 or 7 9 n d-f N s 'i { l b m e </7 1
3drdy W ) , -r i g i I,i t.j REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS \\ open o: 7 iq eq "4*o: / a f pf
- ASE NUMBER
- $C,{ d4-7 W h+
( M )- CITLE0 N coo wac r~sperib Ayed hs 30 '3 M""# Y D y g & Guo,L Q Aa ry Gay ec*de of pla, $ctk 's h0For/O Dw& Canpet (pocs) ca C*0'J!iU Oveth he 78-JM77 I"MCCoule~ O' 3YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): i No.'E IIf0YN ady cs.d.4 z-sp p ) S~rfN N M f/^*} & 1 P1*( Ce./1p~ r** La JN olf i
- a. u y co,, pere cresyurcia n.e ce~c 4,M x W cuoioe'affbudE*ffp.cc ro 4cy7~0F.o**!&7 M o4'*I) '"
/ O s e v ~ J.s u'i~4ed Ev e G f Mil &IIn8tp g e g g 6 Oh::.s!& *T+I8*' ~ o ...Cor cW.so Coast & TE &Qs'% Ved a hd(_. Ceaur'y s M Rue s*V Tl Se AccQ" EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: V DISAGREE EXPLAIN
- E fofuA**lek. N,NC N & $4#
f# c u a e s s a h rs - S ro f f,y & I13 cse d kRh GFM 16 ftf - 6sg + Q@ lcoq opo. QFM.-1014-e44 ~ .w,g e e A ,f yyJ ' +<r=
3 t T hC 75-J ) } ,, I REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS qv -i 3 j'. o/wwo: "I-R-5i h cw&q: 9.t WT Q E.S$ $"3 W (t) CASE NUMBER:
- Nd T k N ef Tecw.cas ugg ge t
SYNOPSIG OF CASE / CONCERN (S): %et sW wr % d kai meve) W 4 d a5 s ch & - N the* a re. pried beaud 'sk (omd Afo " ' M '#9*
- OI cou.mn.n9 %
vf re.f_aa.h % ao043<r c "dM "*b s4 h.fg.. he s u elt @ (wt h d%r)as.,L, I weaa.4 64 1 _\\ e-sAst;Ji m g EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS /DISPCGITION: GREE DISAGREE EXPLAXN: 0f r en L 5e G l. i fu i
S *Z h if5 &h REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ScWo: ~~/-20 4 f i i acaco: g,p gf GCI T4 -OS5T (2) '(3) .ASE NUMBER: 'ITLEh Aqcl M K(riE D*m% h T W 6 m bol d AJcN-CeI(,hj W %< Pew. m a Om let B i % ('i E(- y h YCrY & NY D Pb81w act Q a Q gu & g f,j u q Q .YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): % egk, 'N 9 ,(,Q * ; 9* A J2 f re w s { i-%4 s u g N O edL i pg I f .UALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE .XPLAIN: b atQQ2.sgEE bd k h o subg b (q C c ew e '=r % ~k Ad5 /dmh e d dw g dr%s A M'^~1 - { s p..
~ REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTICATIONS opes : 1-4-St* g z. t r-SP . Cicoro : 8 .ASE MUMBER: C;cI %4 -9 i M/ ,ITLE: ACQ.Sej r( H of' M Arsco A ss.+ % r-Test Evc nvaert e r YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): w 4,< itdic.1 b i sula q ueud n L L w f e r a. MN o w ss. %t u Od nei <e'Jee a eremoii d 6 W k u o ~wW W W.s datei c 6 ed is s A a. %a 4o ud bk fed b a 9P er." ~ S k
- m oi veemt d% c4 Jeru,Jos of % 65 $(ge s m t-up G w
~ yc ud A %o rs %co s wiser,sa g N DE/ 545't % P a u as p*c A s ek.L.( re.go.ir.el y ~5 5 euk oftA M 9 1e ouet 6 m m % b w Lf c T* W T h m% m sc w eP b cloh s 4b arca.3or m d % g m s, p u m e.p, a g g hu_u s ocx b y,( O 4,7 VALUAILON OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE 5 DISAGREE K1** nd vr&d % pms1%ck, kQ%pis duTe'sj'os a + =v a h ter reectelg neuec cbu.eed. Afa er s A%U2 cemd a mits Gm.uq ks chd. 9 +a Qs y % & 6a&vud,&n % e6% d sr l we me. 'l 3 l
~ 30WW e S REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS i i j ope =o: T-'-31/, CLc:sh: I-1-86 i CASE NUMBER: M -N -093W [E) T1TLE: pg fu p,,yypl})pymd fy lJeddef 6A, T a SYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): u euy a ut ea r~ w wanpy ~.,'SM@ M & & S$ kOE. 9/4/ftfsr*TnL 4 [ QC R 5 f nr wn-1 i EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: DISAGREE 0 "f'h N h inh 0/Euf At fM & & EXPLAIN: k N 4 W A M n i ff CJ p d w hk I H 5 6 9 f 'ff4 8W PIN. Sw 7 b a 4 (
i I w 2 e a QCE 7L(-0f} q f f8 f 8 Y l f .b SN l I [g yd$ $ gg e Y og g.ia sy ,we cavoc. Msl'croes aNe CJoewA*1 w a u i d.edo) H Y by &l W-m egraqsnr<otw o-u,goesoa,~ uuw 4.i.em %. E4sti+, <s np 3 aes r;,faa m est nao y folue ) na ttt/ ss T a,a m e e. ( = p m, g,qibe. 1 M i es a st gl ( A s p u i c u ogr.e - -o & ne ne.gmg
- Case icoTes et/esT blik peped un m.sg no me
,,,o Ariro *ea m., r-- RtfstTeety <rnree q 0,ie ees Aya so^rsx ot* cec su kk c pia-t's,9u 74 uac,p.es.c.oursin fesT,fa 0%r)jse sa ~ bea,ee aset.erura r.se,ses. co conen a va:es o,.;,nea w S9 d 6 fffet f ecKup 's 2,,yik y,,4, _ Y
, e g.. ,we4*%#F$43g,, wega, .J.'.O M* fWW 8'W ~ C_-^_,.'~[,
- bhw, M_--
gy, a guyng _ b REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS - okwo:3-6-Sy aes.o: g_g q,y. OK S4 Cl3 W (5) ASE NUMBER: IITLE: g%d ".E k H or B{ B TwsoLArraQ QC_ Twspa.cico s l 3'JNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): Oi %i Mcde.s 5 E l G. G t A p 4 d u s % g g g,,,, a 4 d-e i up c.py awy r4 g j 4 d .I 4 IVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE IIPLAIN: 0 5 + b n m.s fe w <esaad Mch e s = a'k 1 3 a. i. >7
5/2S I REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS '\\ opemo: 6-o-54
- ttsee: $ at-4sy MSE NUMBER: %E 94-ID4
- ITLE: Lutp r E H "BY gqs.m sratT-Op GnocP MQrMT WiNST A KCrE EmPLDYq
) l
- YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
k ec e. sws - n Gy SvaJn. A + c P E+ 0 k n mel sk&-<.y m d
- c. no pswuR., IuTM c b u la r m o,d inv u t s,-f % L % eA4d fEr dis <reIf Ms M d'i.A d ed
. TLa ca.fM k 4e e 4 Ebus<c' M ye.4 S yt ed uwhn.d 3, FM L4. h a i pinds a % d d M 3 ) a u, %. u i ~ m m 2 _ as, w. %,- _ Msswh w RAY-a-Q.s.a.fu &cu &,,) & JR
- kO 83 b k rd w e'2fI "4 4 <~~C, SAits.t
- vse QA %,ir. L(,,T:.13,, o c, yn -r;.% '
i d i,y, b ,t h ....t g t 93 er to kG.,q d eg d i a,jite., at.QA c3k. 4 % dui g.t6 f o(f k }4'r 9 g,
- C +9 AS d. - M.Jh w '
T* WALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE. DISAGREE' , Q 1. s, b d M I b aC320.cg M o. qi,. _.Jd q ws.h.traluQ 4 *vc644 SM-ur N e t m M w a au u o f p a d. e rs e 4 3 E A W g a,. 4 4 ve=J* b .A umh,d m2%, % mta o -h,t - M . L J t.1...% %c. es ep h i i J<
-~~;__-_____-- __,__.,..,~.,_..z___.... ' REVIEW OF ' _ _.T C" "' ^1 JNVESTIGATIONS PM*0: tesse: 'ASE NUMBER: QC 10 4 W IITLE: iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): k Ok Wd u.Jk k d c M 7 SMA %Cim oP ri n, 1 ru,ng f ~ xmd e, to sa,(q l NALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE XPLAIN: s 1 9 I
30 M'y W PE REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS wwo: r-44-F(/ ame: 7 7_py W $y-t// T~ h~f2) .ASE NeuseR: ] "' ' #/ 0ibctrio~Gha mils 7 kg p,w_ [vfe,Ty <m m) Z F etc Z 2 kang pesa utilLase fi$
- .7 l
1 i
- YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
fh(h(ygpkhh flifssp4 9 + E Af M Vd "M Nf AIl! & AgvwW w set 4fng 5pvesThT,k Pina Libr ucoso cor> cud 4G dd*% W, Y4 f'N Obes so T~ cost *+1h Auf oTk +pslie's { fir's cwm, 'You so >eepine,iary Gutunnos A"o m t%'N Buel o ^ **'/ ( ) Q csacres k. Oil.SolsEwctd<f CMf5,453s3 feovim 6 y MALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE ISAGREE
- XPLAIN:
N mad k O \\ il n l. ~ (o S e
Tl'2.Glst-QO REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS 1 skeo: 1-if-W
- Auso: g g 6.gg l
i MSE NUMBER: QC,I Sy.13i W ((o) A Q ed Qads.fe<dic,L op Q A (,,, ai(g,, dig,p.shcq e/ q, TITLE: rw
- YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
%e s ba te.l. disr e t % of au M e.R re9xda M.P Tu 5 'u 2*p=Io i s y % ~- ~ u r resh. u..a n+ a mLed due te .u c-s&d-Q GE h (.AJ4J2d s ( l .' VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE l 2 PLAIN: l
- '9hw cbssQc & h'C
\\ Lad eW' '-l % sw fa.%,4 A Tecmd.,i(GE teetu.,se Pr mt c Mia, q i mg E u'sT d % v.og L 3 I 4 e I
~ ~. >> < s 4 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS . oN=o: 9 -i s - t f- "*64: 62.it-6F 4ASE NUMBER: C;C.C 'M -G6T (l) 'CITLE: T { 14 of % 3 g C, Qc_ hpfg iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): A%ec rev.~hP_d bi,3 Exit Eid a vs k W e 6. % o-e I of rs,4. q L3 9,,63 EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREl; DISAGREE so L ~ot;3. g er a,Aug 4 A artim 3 Ja'%~3~ L M. A~ s e egg ).1i b) i J l
- S/tv i
Go I REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTICATIONS / opew o: 5 7+ q-gt. s f .;ASE NUMBER: Qcr -SA-131 w (z) i (1) CITLE: HkT or KGE GLA A oorr eR. iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): Q 4 A. % er r<po&d to 41 La. ma s u.ki of Ktr da. 4 tiuh sf Lh; s) ks 'sk.$ %.* 3 m wt me cmawss A sf vg..vd ti; euf.m d.-h G 3) gan.,,c &ted md a:% aLu k=ad W Qa.d & G QulvN 40. ..w j.t. ; A& L 4At ea.s Rir i !l VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE ?,XPLAIN:,,,,, gg,h g, g -h&J AQA v m< 4 u;A e e.st&A aga y i ek d at ca
- w. _ 4 :n M
j 4 i 7d i
_ - ~ w ~.- .-.. ~.. - ~ iftS[S S~ to 3 -S e P( w., : 0 0 t dud 1Eb.' p.-)3 -9Y { REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ) l 1 ) I ASE NUMBER: QCf 142 7- (F) l ITLE: H j r ' oF v e-w cLD W r u sescro g r YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): j +qu s%.Dsl ka-es A G re,.d fo r S 4.c.etswe ou of M M n NP" *
- NS "S d e f'- P*^ib.
ucm.: hh %yJt: e y *dout of Qi. wws ht~ %s imm3qMo.. **. wee'4.I_q Hkr a %'s m&r, be 1 w % g.4 a.p c4 is m,_ c.q,,, p a, y,Q dsse r. .%Ti ~ i
- UALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION
AGREE DISAGREE '.XPLAIN : b k
- h M **-vi % g pf%d E [ww.%tw g1 7,,, o, Jg/ 4 O
en h 't e 4 ) 7Z l l l
- g.
T A ST OPE 4 ; it.,-t L-S Y ClosEb : to-wsy REVIEW 0F WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ASE EUMBER: Q C.I 1!F4 -14 5 7 ITLE: Q4% F e s Y h 48.g2. % t .INOPSXS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): %g pd%M cae ~5 woh emaaTIN i IA. C* dw A Pa n. < tg.a. cts me.ttu Poes u L.4 % WG \\ E Le.g Q b9, t A 2" R-M #-A u-b
- c. I \\
c. . w t,qq _,4 f1ALUATION OF QI FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE KPLAIN: 1 b 0 YDlQ 1 l o .i.
- ~
7>
5\\29 $T oftk O~M*M C45E9
- t 2 -st-E i REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS I
ASE NUMBER: QC.I 14 - 15F W (4) ITLE:. P =77E b t c Ttc. AA4e eu rep [imdd (wydtQ for talkag % C1 Ces Cem at : H(r ?, GOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): A4o ,,.o s As_d c i dis 3 TEchM 4 t.av d Hfr.QGpis% o*e A%c Elded sk,a.
== ve.ceivec[ 4. we b rqvi M F4A. M lesq *ia Q1. Md'9d* 6 urA Ja2 nv w vous t74cuiU s C k % d d e k. b b wets (e pried 4 " LoApeg4 " w j-Q< k Qf, j VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE KPLAIN: b w& wwe g 3 e,.~ pe.AQ M G1 % c.4 E wa.<swf ads i re,%/, g 4 /; "L5Wf9 A *, c.g 4,, 1- ) M'
_.,._,,--.~_...m.-e-,*,----_- l E f 2 5f 8 E-C.O cN m t-31-ST CLo$FD *. 7.- t 1 ** f REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS .I i \\SE NUMBER: QCr SS-154 7 (2) ITLE: M a.mA55 ANT I N1' tut DATeosa o F-Did f *.,r. cme-A s_ Q G Twye,.To r ~(NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): % ex notel. H h r sea.avvel Fv m & w % n D sc v c k g C + v,se e diswws v dt. (g.t,,,g ge,7,,,gc,f,,, 44,y,tg g, , y,. p W4 4. Aa%, ac& %( S o f,
- r %e pye w a e, w g e
%eTu w s ' i+ + tu { suwdsso r .1 u es1.,$sm e mte l w ':p.c u s W.lau.3s } dtse.Qea.d & Ho n%I'AW4U s ord % sty of e6%p4.Ch'w - ve.pd M Awviscr> w a<e Q1 ' M ikdj iEshwa s c[ a *DM Mff. f e.t s wo IALUATZON OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE 5 DISAGREE i (PLAXW: 3 qms e.WO *i o. h ] Ob Zu.Ve T de w 1 1 i o en s j Y l 77 l
~. = p w
- 2-14 -5 5 card : 2 2o ~$$
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 IhTESTICATIONS 'I LSE NUMBER: QCI' - ( 90 T ~TLE: I*TlW b6Ted Ano
- thscmENT AL.L.EGATicWS BY g g { g & & Y Ron.L C L rm.K
- g. Q i
.NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): %d tn b d d % 't L u s.* Q y so,, (q g Ws. Time ca.d, s 'ALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: EE t DISAGREE TLAIN: w.Tih QA doesA't tuvesk4 goy q a,g j er k
- t. 1cL 0
= 1 9/
OfMA $( di.7- /9-I REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS Q C ff - /f/ Q (fj ASE NUMBER: h^'*jfmdflates ec siteg sexug gem T s 1 i YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): i n z y n o,ogy f M a u N G e f yre P S, j 0(C Sm/f ef csmpl+tweb op 7 vol Hus\\einsud kmR A l ls o cso9 'e& ef Ehyces estar (mste) gtss s n& 54toyee wsu n n,sy e m es m m n ro a;eca,~o i W VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE t DISAGREE XPLAIN CW AeMW 2 ht. Fours aao /lGtE ZATecnl Aud;T (taici,iTa} 'nosony net,pg. [ME lMbiJ h u*d &I ls @ We'ogpooggpo gage 4 op " 4
. flES %f I e%: 3-27-89 c saco *. 5-7t-$5 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS \\ t { ASE NUMBER: Q C.I %S-2t2.~r(3)l(4) ITLE: (3)Fassw.c.Artea or heme.wreeg iw INsutA-rio W ucAK PAKwes @ r.,wigw.uJ mawmmt or 'Tecanics meTnts, rN( j 604 9LOY 64 d'D ' "MCM (r 4 } r YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): ($ A%u a.dvs54 41 + ms d a - (. e = % 3 re J A., f Q, u % ~~ w~~; -kad, u s a,, w. i 6,, % E (' d,,,',3,gt, _ a Q (q, m, g, g f,-s r*o*O **4 a he t yAidi fio, A a. VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGRE DISAGREE xe ut": 3 ot _a.,s._.Au.m 4u ua ic-a, uid Jh ve.& r. m a sue & ve bibed v,v> med 'Q. (AidM,(i,cd4M. ud g.A,,,. at A,L etJ k m% og, y gg 'h 4 $ de Ob o dM [ g as = %4b w s4_ .: 1 &Ol n -- I'^- d &qEt<%, g p'
y 1 -.......n...~-.~---------~~~~~~'~~*~*~ l j f} t t;- 1 oPf s ; 7 D' 1 C &Os g D
- 3,ge, b' f
i REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS i ASE NUMBER: QC.I *$5 - R S W (2.) ITLE: r~dividuo M. b n ecess To L 4.veA..IL-- QC. ~i?+ce'iving E'v.A % Yi40PSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): A* a%*< ree44 te w o 4. o.n adivMvg O % r _ w g wu. u asQ -.(_%i-does,,.4- (My m w. % r.,#.
- d. c t o-r u oc_. h.viy t _. %e Ao sw u u 44 q m h ue,,ss'o u
( a t sk.2sf~ k. eury goe.n d s ( m m <rs w test % %sh 'ss 4 p VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE W
- xrtA18,
- .g at,.
y31 E e w y gr,s M & d e -~$$%'N N 3,, w h J _ a ts %< % ~ ~.4-g a. g. a ' d. s k a.s s w m % m*g ~ '* J-4.a hbo. d' ., ' h it @ - di
- .e d r**t CM de-frp 6m k d, fr 6.co Qeci i
3 s g._%,, i % gveiTe=*c { 9 inuel. w-rc.&g.T.m $t,,5,c,f go,;(,y, A %.44 "N* no %o re sY e.-t dh rom k p VeomA4.5 M i J. c quT.c i T44 A of K sq s$aw, 6Y./ gdEb kW ep.C k % "P 5 s M* eVs [ M kk [Jbjec &aF + y.di< hec -ti, otw ee.s. s.t. 4.Ar get.wp e spee s i ?i a %s. %d.- j - h kk @ g)- he3c +,%Te_ AL L.kjed eme took & g} @ h t, dis desod u e T m f Teov;t.w A ocEcceivs*CS*" Q a* I*U N #*# W-i
1 O F EV% Q Q R$ 3Cg(@A CO O 4 OMIM o ma ee au2dy L., L scms v er4 4 os %%A j r c.~t ed N' h.b r earfd of ex3pEIou usk n '1LE Laua [ 'q b-ca ,'y %f w.+se. sect,L~ A, awy d~dau = ~ t sh 3, 1 k 6 Ossa s~ -L mm., d. , to -.-. vee a._ t, s
- buiw%
m. ve.v q se F.,Q .4 I en J ] 4 9
....,. _ -.. - _. _ n, ~. - - -. 824Y4')'$V ) REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS-eewo: Lise.D: @ J~ [4./ - 2 7 [/) g p f ASE NUMBER: (8) hselfed ce"& IN Y8$)Geow&s & a. + $69, &ss C n ME^4 / J;vs e Set QCI gl(-G 7)he~warye-4 TNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): coacs */ SuosTsocikrek l
- 8 oaSvosTueN bat M*ca ce"T*cT*I' S/P*lY C#es'Groet M~4 SW %e QCf-Itl-1II w Q, vere 7a m* ia.yech*4 i
M me. Fi erQS Rsa ?L;r Arch QC kees s pde gyg g74, d ~ R* { DePrir sreTe %Y civil Q t cow wsT tas$ b.TTeuKs f**P*** Q%d I4. % I C-Snede e4+ qsd ST*/ 5. tsud/uetoy zusp. Los ?,~ 4f ree r s/) a 6J we24. s r avol. ) coxc usai: c ' ' ^ * = "'***W faz o.,.<,y aa <a r*<t +~ssw ^.dh,*scoaEM abt, ss. ras &tlerik nac Asc4/we6lX up. does,,,ay og cuit c-seek & penwpS 11 4txnkras/ A*Q. S2RE IALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE inenTh G M W (Ve N GLAIN: f > d h 4 % eat x 7 GN M 'k N / fo IMP 9a,iQ p p,og neDaar c.co.l vs n<< JQ.saes.9se s-e S ed k"
- h " *M o *Y b's. *5" D*'*~'e ' ** '**W l
Er i t ,& afis a '- C 6 e Fhhs Th h yld O A y W ( O * ' g,te Oses**Tccu7*'" G I.Te'WYh" YM) h NWE' Wonfav-l o g '*' war ra s syne <. ou amo it snaT89.wo e m ar y y, 34 kw"B . g,. m,' F4 conreasperifieur:s.> G h'+.t-Q. L. ras 1 QcJ gy.g, cay plgem pg g, n m ',TTG r ate v a.,,k + ci?774,aw a B. t... k posm apa,;) g j os. > ia...
J HILL ^!07'et ) 'Ym,,,,
- W'?f i Telecc o a i ff C, J.(, &
\\ 6 / 7 - R'f its J.} 4 [ E.,,, CS So G iw aits u,9Q re s n,<.Tnn hi^e )) iL' T* ' Gag. -Y devesh ih E y i _..- cou L in p to .]D1 "{es a o'r lcl.aan"s.47.4p1,,,L,1 ra wk y-,a.o y e ~ M 'fkQ sors n se:u mik m,5 caacur /am-x fefl*& c n y L r 9,eu.at,. s s,ean, 'fense F M Gls Lnct> D/C ,,= itnyte Afw K0+tisA &/ 3[00*rcb M O N**>f a ? .,hoidrCA)ct.%aert/trBy~,- t ,,.a y sa ~ I /fil( cea*Kuree[nic](Rooy seop ?,) s#D Fw0 "s "et.sexgett s r s o w w k n' ; 63 vts M1.E \\ u.) t CI'+ Tea e oc e>9~' T 6isc K E ~tios. ~ u se u.+s -o r gy,rpg u.<% nese .e QA Cs.47~,h4=fesa f-s 'l Le,a.;( p ) Oft cosy)f ] Tx3 'TJ ixe' o. A. aqq,vese ~ - p.x 4,/ // /E.or weas e 01 f
- Ul lY M*"I")
{ co/ 1 v><o n e 'ceo, g,,o y
- s aw rosea s eiei ki s
i .p_ r: l '#" i l Ha n ,eep, 4,,,, - 4 q v.a w + 1 ~ f x, sje b re a,ew f isn) as p~a i s, .a ~,,n i .& g _T,y 1~ 5 & w w ce g a,ys u s aq& en s Mup l lw .u co.o r..a. o7ou n.)W ** '* D t " "'~ " em u. w. /
- c es il mfe om% N 4-e</-0R(o 1
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS 1 . ope = o: 4 M utse.c: (.$-% $C[ [@h /[ dN
- ASE NUMBER
, :ITLE: jpfg$fleg$ 4 g g g,3 gg,p,},7;g iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): O#
- % h k ' T S h ur Y t E / W X) S s o r,.c,,;.7,9 9'-' 4 4 9 n a %,Q s a u s
&s odi% & n prs b ariie qs.7'Wps',ya,x,., %
" ^ : 4Tro1 xnappomsty aivrw,A.ce
~
r n g,4 q
f
- 1 W N ' Y O 5 W M ffde*'3 fi q h h se un k r f & s50i f M
- S W 6 Wco o~ "//"8 J
w, ras.zw. er9. !!Mey J:t ru rs vr r4f-ftcy,4..;4 ua ~..si cmsr
- x,,,_,,
,, s a t a a.. r e, " g s s - i cn ri a,cr. <. 8 y T-Q 3#
- am p g ('se$2 M ?4 d & g,Z~A>4Ttfi k M City Ad" *f S 8 Y '" Nest & A T % 'T C O dfecex TWM MaAsl e,e sjkJd-4 tspfrsesM,rNA.
f l D"*YRMTWea g sows *Y >%~4 -ro fu,Q/
z edl0$N coaw"u \\ _ ioctt 's & -y W 4J~@( 7Le cocenedbeined pf " KG f Fn.'6 QCf 74-6 7fye w q A M A w ~ p,; a,,, w, s epp ~s y - 7Q Ud ern f ne c&h 4sy tcm & ~0 N ~ j CW (. b_ W W6 mt TW TQ Q =3l+ Eust 2"f 4 " "3 D s @ fr y tr y O Ba d ( R ) e agasa a a p;~r m Giz~ n,ic.a ~ ~s <v m a - a 4 --~rm a - \\ ) i l 4D a .i S e i.
. _ _.....ru.*wm u-#** *a w - -- -=b -=w=* 9 f 7 9 l F.,) g GXD REVIEW 0F WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS e ped: 6 !-54 CLC'5FD I l ~7 -8 5' ASE NUMBER: QC.I $ 4.- 9 tt f (11) g FE rvwLe Tt.casem. n. cts = Ls ItJ C. E ** P t4VI E. A.caeged I{ H ($bumL h PHysicRL) pr A ITLE I @ e% ed N.ttwr w...t, M b,3t w, a, ogg,,,,,, +* t u
- mr & %c r u.c.a rests a u, w,,
f YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): %evich.opr\\9 # h*A repe#.A b 01. Wd da uea s % w er pLyrica.Q) k-Wed ha supeevtsor" o a l 5=*itknMc5 scyo a,s ~,. au a,aa. M Pos.M ruder s e,n s - se+s a Mcaua$u =bo r4ee%-tMcL W
- te goit 4' sk. co Adn'+ 4 % n.cm.4
-+~m cbT3uuad 4bu,%w<e. > e e m,Aa w,;rt-or u %% s note _s m... o sg W-t&Q i.Jervia.a.r N n9er.) h Tk. Of M 39-c ree.d he,ibs' o co q c <.3 c, r,J...+ S he, eso,te r ht, '3 u rower b-*ds7uMek. un.s ha to he -troe." no -Atd 4.m.p;oa or N_ obnoo* 0 is cc u.v omA u tcu. Qi rep,(t, m cegt O & Tb " or + q.3 %,,,, y ho y cb5 SO.'r er ha.5. M been pr vey., %rM % At<td' "% p%h # PJ O i o eL #9 'her buds kos Lt% deef.ad e
- o. 4.cm or in koog 6cs, h
h M QI repert goes %. fe Ek1te ft.af
- "at w.bst*%%.d ou d -6wf 4e L,_ u eftwut weM. ~% g" &
(DISAGREE ] UALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE s T h L_,,mA0>aq of'4k25 C'C#cdo%, is M Otcs 'fti,, % me, m e r % w es-t d ie pe a. , y e as d e d Q i. w t h ; y o(Audo+t %f y if sd hEhfag q ec ou % ur& &y ; h s h a-A &.=Ar e A -co m b c A to A a, od<evu pu.LoJe#y os. tuoRQ cts ser~.,_s, pobddo & ccWl AQ,g A
- a. sat %~3 L s e c c_ sid o b. T u - r
,.t auk % l ol re. pry uom:. u.3rttteu uauG4 c6wek preve;4d' qcu.a s. j v4W m eM % <ec4.s. W w.hk 4 %_ a ooCogo:tich,. c. sea q w a. pre is b Gd %d % +4,w J q w wr s,% wi.A umc A meJcoua4 cm h of. rymt m um. it w.m ~.ted k wks.k kn, oaaca+b ".= t nve.stnde.d a.. d N >- m_ -ee re c #ed i5 unsciT. t<GuTog o.u.6 disg,s,_ - M of ce%< A . S 4+- ~ i .,,t.,+ n, u n r--.~ < s i-
~- s 9 i g 2 ecd ew et 4tu 3 m \\ er-R~ ma.2e, wk w ctCCto e Ms1e d Tef,,Y h 5%. 7% jd ca_ppfte j f w of (coed Mico tc r % e%cn = p mid ~ P L gm, u w,*d om ich af coess (rmt) ce du t wese no b tiud. mo-ck A eEh m = yr may Lee 6 23 sens<Tbc 1o h MM of hIndg hu P eas, I c a21u.5 W k M. vu w $ Cora,dd be M< r4 4 cou4 ciel re corrobordo. % sMair m d Q % NONW'*1"- 6uk ou:to. % ps Q b h "c " k CE* M.i ulyLt we.Lo, $ of . is J au e uentw JeA .ogteafedTeq cednhulq -6: rec 0ufau. O m h aoG qcd rou s K e e
- p. e 6.'. 4#'=
J.J J %.,6, e n.w,41 6e4? & ' %, </ f r,WA' y.- 4,,gg esau.e e dadW4-4,m gyg gj A gpa ' 3 N ctes44: 4 FI REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS No{ W -/a 0) .ssE maser: M;" Cables De nor Mx A DE4 MTe suck Dhaa ta Then Tb MLow m ev g;~ nr su,. exim,;ainrs. .YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): WN Y' lECLAticiq( &(lef%
- F *"'% sm,a rsua-ap a sams.r~ssn)dia'"
e y,,s.uc w.cs ~ < e ,e-+o 0 en v 1 l 1 e i 9
_..~.-~...__.,.,_.~_.._u..,_.....__. 0(
- 1 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS CPeMO: S ~31-f4 LLC 6sO: jg. y,
- ASE NUMBER
- ##[ 74-3.'2, [l-CITLE: feoputtMal of is<nTrennL rsm p
'N ^'W'& M eil, Uf ydn 6 obj of ptnTattkl Af* 4 'iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): A U y ce co m e w 12 t't*Tse<< is bi s off wuord MTio aartm; 713 k a Poaesm. &n;r red %rt c.a.es+., A estw f< s "~~ "+ i r std e Al(f m ~~r~'~ g swa u~0u par wrj GsneSuh. r %p asa: S ;. 9,sra. m, oi i~eam r cua4 ro "cQ" ~~r% nc~ x 'y g m y n,;.a ros cue se/sssk ry a !" " *T*N " * ~T~" "* nw" i ? VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE ~g g/fm,,j qawsdiN) Coffnfish R tNoslijk@ HMrssm T S S # 5 txPLAIN: WW W b U N$ hA5 A$ Megh 6 .) 1 - l 1 4 e
.. m 'S' ~5 c - 6 7 l l REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS 0"%~N WWO 9 '.3,, y g
- Aesee:
HM 7't-3 3 (~2' ASE NUMBER: Awq uw,b M s-h.a.k C eM i g b ose is coww2.iwo. o r kiNt*W A4 w Au. viet.ATrav g ITLE: tw THt cc.W M EM-D C'4 WM drTQ. YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): gi %E i%Mih edTm <e.3 - L. c; Z % =f'*a. ' FMd L. m+c T W Pecs. u m.4 6 vu. 4 puh S~o i 5 Y(e) w tom-tt-d i I i G. w.o % Ae.= $ Y k wfs na_Q .l l e
- VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE 1 'XPLAIN: c.ddve3g iswp,3f g w
- "f
- 5
~ q ,p "'""'oG % a.a+pv.sesed. Q An g g _ we tw.it% tion ] 7 no aduw 1 _g ftevg clurr Q 4 y k WCh.s ggy y 4,y.e _ s. 1 s_. =9 s L4)q % + L4 ogca.s reppt 7 4 lY f
REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS vc=o: 9-27 P<f Mse 0: II - 6'-[(tj
- ASE NUMBER: //4 7~ Ftf gg) ([
.ITLE: fyA' Qg y97*y,955W Getj Tb AI, i iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): A^)essyndas cMin stofwice &h,MA n ioat 14 61% uny ey Sq l^'3/efie~ f HA~jert. DePlcI!*'c'!5 ta h A0y. Bla; CMle\\ WT4 CW Tb Q1~ ~1'o yhtg.cpaa7y a m veud # e Bo b T h ' W AS 6 4e $s Fet 4t aJ&c/c. "s*TIsRea 7ka'consees MBy d I Uy kecesTund By di A~e 650
- VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGR,EE SassrownWo, 2PI.AIN: h../.0 o g 7h o k u)
- tt n ^;A i 4' g p7 M g3'fy/ 4 M fIA hea MleyTt2 E f 2e d s
of = 7 wye ~'t **s/*
- 15 MPca.2~~Lael&niN G
@ w /i n op Y Aupfik ' S *fec00< 15 Qt Esvedspre e no: N Y O'N ** M
- H Y "
hy.igo / ^ @ we.raevda er 04 14<Tsa s aka ** *f 1 7 GI As sussrnkne g,7go m; j-9 Tensfn ra e)nunTledew cn~cetteD vo Gr*u*Rb usu hr w e. ara kem TbMRt ol0 ad~ T+de f>tsc.o. / & L l
T $ *JOf 3 'S REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS WWO: 8 - M -D
- 4 *se 0: (. 3 g s-ASE NUMBER: M cT SE-fo o
'ITLE: A nony me,cs A %=. Tic 24. hd N ITerE E k C $www s% (a, direchad b sea Q u*t % u nsrg our Ct.aperb .YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): QL mw*detNa-desc.(cd Q 9,opr(=is p /oen b 8 v4 ma<e em Ec<k[ g e,-% regm<& M w,,%.y %g geph ~ k= L pawider e q $.i h ry,"e.4ta d d da.m ed 4 t h 'b b deu d
- a. S unkcotvugg,ky
! VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE ISAGREE' !XPLAIN: LveNgdic.u 'Too su p a r [. c_. C, h ec.o $ d %.DQ.Ie. L GLYdt O " ( 6 ~~~ ." e n=Le to L 0A.x @ c.,.udiss fa v.c.E b 4
- o. eer%
tM n' ego sreve4 be. d c A cm ~ bE" o.a. - wg " S % ttu. A ee A a.. 1 6 a S Y />
...,~.--b. ~ -- A - - ~ ~ ~ * - - = - - - - - - l w sc { I - l REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS
- r* 0
- 3-t 2 -%
us4 4: g. gr. gg
- ASE NUMBER
- QQ4 $4 -02_ ( 7)
CITLE: T \\g : K6 E ste.r-UP ENe,,wect RECuipED To REtuN oeJ SITE. (uany oT) usHerHge: WE HAs. wgx to to ch Nc7 cQ Bf FIACb. 3YN0?STS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): i Q h Isr nhaea or,-ezug 2,w <ee.k ess %4a c. ,....., c.~ e4 % c a.u.sYrued cu w M 'k twc4vig 9 3.c.s R< a. of pais.h.Gw g % tA kH c 0Etaw u.sikcud MeSik is h M4 dio do N OT veysv4-ev.ds W Q f g gpg I s T s C O 24 d oc u. 9 j 1 \\ M S0.J 54Ad Qb MoIC4.6
- (
suA M & d u;M g c. a:4 [ EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE EXPLA1N: h u.>W s 1lt EkeTEb i ct-osce ou g go Te Fit.E V ice trnNDARD Qi Es pot 4-EORA{ h Mo-Q1 iw.MT afr% 9 % u& t s ukid-ts A c h of & - w FS'*"5 ~.o d im & L x yd pee 4, h hh li 1i ]l 5 9 f
....~..--. .w --- ~ - ~'~~* '- ~' ~ 5-BED--%S REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ^ ) oper o: 3 -7.c-t y unsso: u-9-s y 14
- ASE NUMBER
- QCy ca77- (4)((g)
Ag.d M ' Dregs cu.a. 6 ,,g2.2 y t 'c O-s CITLE: @h % d E 9 rro n c u.s % Y e ie s o n d deo. win 5 o. i 3YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): Q) qi r Med &L6 ~0 % Yse tb 4*ue b %. TL., M ac mat.( w uud o. te LM pt.A54u.s tuwcO.Med 6k a sas p dad emon of w yu m iM. td W pu Qst, & G dsd grous'de. AnnserspWu~ sC Jel~ 203,
- ot k u.% Lny ewi ah 4 m R:t J rr W <Gewd
.bv Ghu Mem c.-- L.ucca,McT, h # ua.] (t C -... % hei C.wves fehT ~ w 4 2fy (sean-s-9& (5) i QI ve+= 8 do....o..A x M,-tm,,,J.e ve.v, % g le jco A-t-fj j 5' % #ec ~.d n... A w u < -,su.c aA.a.s. 4g y 0.3 &6 L N_g N 1 EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE D SAGREE EXPLAIN: % ---.:; r TwcIsM M de.Vvsb 8 %er ducMcM ~Wf acM % tuet,n% +s % wtwiwk kuu% etc-. r%L _3 a re., a~Mm
- One Wou.k h v'A.P Q f6 h k h k
% a.%-y urw ar w n a = rte rt#usfr + 3 1 er secA %i muhh t Aetn4 mkb m x.sa, m c4 m ~ s'.,+. ijl' @ uded % td -.Jey bainuwA .j ~ mL-e s g, /m.m., (eve 9 misp' 4 i i
1.- 27*y W /6 I REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTlGATIONS onmo: 3 g "*6* D; II 3 - ffl{ y $ C [ [ (/ - d / [ [ (l)
- ASE NUMBER:
UN AC(4ffpfle fog fpq Jpdic4NhAS 64 LIMS 29f.H(f-lQ ANO R$7-NCf' /D u CITLE: iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): gpo4 %#U Q p m 7.:.,f pus 6eDi# $ 4" 'UTNY W J REQ NALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE ff(( & //ff CodcMUS edhNi(tbB6&lyWMwe(~ M IN* G+14Ty h ( 6ep,hea w,rMt mbt A/b*'?4 Gy Gj W E'W Vdh 5*'W Rie co 7451'$ aster uTi(W: 6 M e^' b 2 % f P & Au74"waeosf.[ "" !' W "'" r Ate se.,e& DuecLy inrevin.at ee9a%. f GKG&TM"W,**#' WO "tw ue4 We iT /ws % " i r o 4 7i
A ~.... - = _ - _ _ _ =. - x REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTICATIONS wrwo: s.at.py i Meso: t.03-P3- { ASE NUMBER: Qcy. gy.f tf ((9} ] o Qp [ +( (p, gg3(, 1TLE: f + g (g p ( y,p 3 g u,g c YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S); P y 2/ m X Qlfv4X so M nT M sa n ooJL M
- L 30 Bs a ~TW.
Le]Q (csar.kGt) Tb ~' 19 N'YN2 shTkt Htt cose*4a sot,r.>8s%Tr$y eS*'ay AFT 4 700 MD fR /T 24. CreX G*A PW ] A sdjeq'. l I,v7eeoffde co ur,pesonoce us.<e.%eno &cu ne et.0) ro: 2.M l V A CeeFuN~hl 7Le vny eff'src77u sf / s*Br**'N fte w4.'c4 pocounTs5h [WI)( A l ConTeo~ee en Q /.inve.s5}g,o'n (c, y;ic) A,'c f s ASS naonT / TM k'ar T 9 @6 Fmis ed Auf, /W/ 2%71Tlep %eTofoce% be" H/r of SibeeTuf fr~fhyeP h^ 'bO 6 } Cox r usTxs qcz qq.,y u i y
- VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE DISAGREE
- = ;-~
IPLAIN: nonarfL Sll Ad og,0cSte, taves7,*r d'<bn concea res By i t-m s /?e,M Tef cad *I & SV6fA~cokeQ H+E was h6sof venTy WM b^ t'op F?fsn~1I N r*stras 4S 4 pj tof ns UMo bS7*xikT+C m iryt% fem (qM. aad. t . 4 i
~..a. ...._,.._...~.n.-_ ... - ~..,.... - J T o -EL5" \\ y e REVIEW 0F WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS wwo: 4 - t ro-e> 4 u*4ee:, - 3.( -3 5- 'ASE NUMBER: Oc r TA ~2a w (Q .'ITLE : FTu.eoce,.T f H "Dc m p2cyee66 d c.a w e L% k-d i ehd=6.J ls kg 6 out of 9d1 wd ~b k:2s.p 6 Prow w s WF c$r.fi=4 iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): Of.sma%5:w vsyd emQ M "00'^& Ma.ta.s to Qk %1 m.m konamn a > pm.a s e %d S t.Q. Avs u t
- V' b
- S S @ usaca m w Lt g Sw fu (g g g,
M Coueuk
- b Q"%u'd.e tLa.i sis.d.suidue.$ Lscu ju i k ' ' '
'r' ~ % e w., & 04.f htert l ! VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE EXPLAIN: A re.viw ee % Q b M d.acJ2eJ b iu6U sw+<.t,.i..s4 seTas n k a & ~\\~u b or enaAser* J N- @ w e w.h dne.ba4 iim L geh m-Gesd(W k-mW ate u ri f+ cc2ep%4 q % w% 6 J vabet.>rn c w eaaa+9 ri n -% i d"> Tf %dct-c.aa M k is w kG., u_w.3 tr\\,4gdigdt.gd. i .> \\ Oh vweat spacIC h, of Q f.( vs,. 44 4 ggf. ]-; w.M w.oEi( g,
- J w e_
h. ] &7
3bM25 A$ REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS 9.- I f 't 4 Sewo: m e e: p je4 p 2 $C[-8/-Co?g y h 4( '.ASE NUMBER:
- g v3e4 gtigj}ggjbTy r) UN djydsved f.ene livdecnG.by IQr(eg g y 4x4 oudSyved coa of (Q}
.1TLE: .f ^' 0' "' VY $dN#8 WMil. a 8+tG ber'd fut lMensspur4T (4,, - v**306sT*^*Tt 6 } iYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): 4 & (naTu gspecpR: Jef*S U Sed To claeleg 9 y, ,, p u,3 Q Ljoy sin 50 -yea /W3 -36 4 oscrh i&sdw pHAre.m Ap**(, M oisc ot:
- 8 Gl o*'ly devabe kessud frie re.r.ec seu o, vet,9 g g
/' NALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: DISAGREE g ft),6C, ins %'M W 'XPLAIN: W MW]IN'Y *," h .Jl yfg,f'y (guAa( A4 6 A'AC . : r n s, 7c %. kr,,, n s~o An oi o> ,,,r 6 ysa ;iua a.x,b7 sq ftdF M/pb " 7ta a oiep or it<. acoe co-eua <r.*rd viarose s rie"spr,y 'g, cesgwos wer ape *y/co <~~ Pesecrud Ay M Mikh,a. M, fla *S, Jet%g so7 c.ssitineu,( Te de A 'd * */ ' l AG fog. m,4,4 in, s 7;, g,;,,or ISs cae 1 1 0 V f, S*T~ fesvAs* MIL foe Ho9tensso'<A!T is =
- tt "Jie seca; mys, mae er "
i i a h
I l k 8b' REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS 4-27 54 pemec: OC 0 ", 0;7 Qi tesee: si te.- %af- _.ASE NUMBER: Qct 9A-33T C) .ITLE:.I t H or Qc rum b by CRMr ~ d .YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): "' N desen%vs en}aa a, r}g"ww %{.; y g y;_, % cw Cs e 6 o p cura.4
- Iw~ b L ep g
U Ew... id W L
- b "O f
y
- ud
-W " cWd oc 442%6 ' 91 cu& u L o f Os %j d g
- _,__
'" ~ ww+ v h s dg ko W e VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE ~ XPLAIN: l ci ruuf bs ad sidA monga% 4 % M )
==-- N h " " b 5f3h d % N rs cueoset h. fs u Q ot ~c% a 4 IA UNiM kg C Q ~ asa O O A bF M I NQ ar Q u reg q, . j j 5 .e {i .,k )
w r ..%q, y *,, '. w+.m. w 'w ma p 4 a 5,, REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS @e*o: TlM154 unse4: 12-ny-$4
- ASE NUMBER: % 4 4-30 I N ( h
'tITL h %d h'Mb ei M hb5 d W G*Q5 @ A%e.d Fce. m w o r T w et.co_ b eam.umeee 3YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): h, Q1 h. reAIS 4""" " ' N# w w % er, 1 + k. wtu k & rs J ro & La % d s d Q %Ae,a Leof no%65 ~ @t wmec% of 54 oc % "To k f<< dsuQowd sw &.sev ws, i
- M M CCdd'.) CI kO u&,M LJ % <qdad.rs hok e.w3-Jy39 ( g o w Q fy M g f.
f Y n L.. ar %. Mw w va \\ h.....t -- c. a ea u s,a u
- u. V A L % & d b Oi "*PdM
~ m a a k ' 1 ' ' Sche e r W.se) h.. ,0. .. % eq A O,ery ou fa'I { ac%y wes. na ww - e a ~ m sac.rm s - AafR.qcdig uws.d d d M EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE h1 no feras k p r c m e l en <n ubad u " W c"OA N o Sced job re.vice_o er sq of M k%r pbs 3 % dew by 0( ux,n ew w s.,v.id <ws mucL. eass s ~~es not b e h bg %er %d pre-feed a va<g cmevebw i Pe seas.iv' e rePch l-sk w A q cu:e.<pl M e P h e.e %.c s
- N S xJ m ewhM A Q t c i, j '
y r ) W Te ' T L.s ciochn ec- % be Mt - s.4o s'+ c <pb j
30 ist4f ff - AG-REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS $* M'0Y 4tM o * ' 'e s s: p /t/. g d MSE NUMBER: t@cf FL/-37 [t) .ETLE: InTimikT?w, toas 1seo-ear +,9 a,7zsq egup (Classyceaa..pez
- YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
}}(( Wemn.+1w s7+WApd c+N hIk N T^l !& FiUf ~ Tottby ewass ras #4 Crs psa-, sia-T**&y("~Nf 4 M /k M 70 "o r-orisw i m ra., c m. Arrireafag va 9~ .vAwATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE s ~a yp a; u m w uysa,c.eiakar S g-vin ex n-n.s~; p =1": &Fys y'4 oe uThp4~ fie// aa& " "W 7a @'"/** wmor<k,. r ) ~ 4 4 M np s p 4 ~. n o, w, un % ugg~,- q -r ~r.ec r wg as~ss va sow-raTW iJJIis + aA% itj gagg ],p S .&V 3Y ^
1 ... s 3b M,Y85~ t+6 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS pe n o: F *7 - VI usso: 6" gtl \\ (p<f-70/.3 77 [I) ASE NUMBER: ' 54krstIhAR4A o LJ M C fe & nY d &) a oll.ev T Cp ug z [ ctr u, 7 coeu uecp u ) YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): i;F&rN4be
- TN h h & & T
.C.>Teitv % sf 3 4gg unts \\ va c;oo,a) no Q sp,, 4 po,,gy y aa, ssr osx. Sg 5'O m co unM rs aassri.; trab. l CG5 Asf'pp geft fysl& "ycedoes PD h / To$lk.6Ml h 5 k ./AIS A a W S X T M-m 4pk.d Al xq: % Ml6 Y A*6 d*'S A W W. f and & U lo$// / N C' YAf' (W 'f w & & Q TW W 'Th 9 w. &w 6 y x a, M. + VAL ATI N OF Q1 F INGS/ DISPOSITION: AGREE ISAGREE ([ ' ese'T~ ~ y gpg p.),$((' A A /Q IPLA J: a -- r mmyg.m, w. - c .,,4. m jf.2 is.;$ wn-% TD & &s % 6: ,~,r M Q 01. u rw n in -m ja gnpm% s u J Ae ~nMa w.4 ny n.xe / setah 4 p(un 4) a 'mF'"'*,y w,, p sise 1; 4 sor & sarf~ w p i j ~ ~: n n;-ut,L C ra pu:u ~= m.=l,;%u~ y =k. l &: >,w y r piyu p hh "4 T
3dN"f'tf ) ) REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS - l 4 - 5** $4 open o: 4*G M): tp.jf. ftf
- "'E u n s u a **'"* M *Y Qcr 8'4 - 4 7r(1) c^s n uaER:
eon
- '4C
' * * ' I TITLE: 7-Y !N8!YIUW sot To ceJuT~ ML SYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): gg g te u.ns TAS 6yA30 & pet % C*ll 4dC c uswea p yLy. g nooo m ag -a. say se < u*sn.r uo4 s,. r oss re r ein u esp Mf su .s. iru.a E "7 N N"(Stk) enty Mu ro.zuTwoLa hus a on s 4 Evitu m 0N Or 21 m m cS m Sr0S m 0N. icREE Cosertar /+Q W Ql 'TTeeses W (142.) rs is fsM d<Jf's!N'"- EXPLAIN
- ar/*<W coscans vassesveret.
I l Plbey } lf fY* S'$$ .xxe 's r,,,, 4 ] a ri x y u s a vsl6 g &saunso. &J P'E *'[ #"# 'g a v,,ssr.a.4iw is. a Reprn69 uin % s* a 'iT p/M**s 80 7"s7'1 *T~ f "V /f*:0D. 1 -} a -1 I l
1 T JD-W REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS vcwo: 6 e2 :1***o: H g( ASE NUM3ER: @ S4-44 W h) (5) '5, (fo) 'ITLE: M D H ' 5 "'"# Y'" ' ' * * "" "* "D "'* #* W M3 (p) FmeiricATicu ! 3marOP %Eccm.05 (Pitt of) Tt4MD CM WM6cr REscW hcH CO CcMm 6NC$ (5) ri a : AQs On.,J oged hi% t. s%e e Md. <<go ted by AsMG
- YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
g %.< r43.*+d h Ci kis cowca.a..P ;r i 4 hr d.e.r w.946 rg r+EQac~fe ohn e-QC. idea 44 u.xs IXe.rvenuaed cu d cle.+sWl eccurreuex g [h em h Q$ weKcd<c'.a,ef ibh mk~ffer de% dad ik. 9 tMrewnN bis I"*Y1QM I2ag, f. *di,.iG.4 9 Stwtus, #msc.(d sa-fe~rvien.e,( w " cu8t repG.5 ne98ik" Qi invest'a dw< (M twa +" bt- ~ of sustaeant.cc wko diT3 ik5dd oeco%dicu. c=cisYe a4' t *ItrE=wf. r rye.d. A sfadt.d L. hrwf,ud % e r-b- <. ef duwMMy wth kn. Ah, A hu Sup.wm c% 4,( w casti.k ww chtuued ity G1. 014 J. cion,-4 y L mQ g IVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE IXPLAIN: @ o$ Fice c - % e O A 63 c=002,3e< cC49 rd. er' s :rveaawie< a.c. a.i w a w a pa u e. -tit" u m s wLd to. wm -tcad Qi, y c ufJ,,7; q, a.1 equfad u % 6. no af %4 ht tc ritsAe it 5. ot rw+ % 9 'stdtup psd wve. We.tvrA-N. % 4.o e l' A hi u rove m %%p mk =M pm.>r&ntel A,cb j.j c~.o1 .scw s.nn ytk m,rmA< c,it ru del ,u. l )p } d not < @ vreved. CLc.c.or ba.Ak $ rW$ eh J l NO S e44A. 4 C.R.)cuG I I wexy,ec%e2 y maa:ger wem k% e-^W 6v 5% Ae. Ttt ec.ucousia eb or of *t ~Y =ks Jah oF Wr4 a.1 6. % d,4 u me M ue b Ml cc. ween, wha ( n m. M w r
Sh 7 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ew : e -es -s4 etcMD : ID-io-Sy isE BUMBER: QCI. "64 -(o 1 T ) ITLE: FAL5s ricAT ioH o r 96ccROS *, D ic PipaDers La. e vt'ampel Q ^ on %u-Q %dd { rsa va.mers m % %u.5%, RhTrfER Tam 1lCrurr Rcetwoodc,- THE Robs tu THE HWGEE R. ST*ru s, y" A s Reque p.vb, f i 20PSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): M i+4A veM ryds Edu e%%, M ao l a s%%A % unrad%sF % %D.%s%~ &.d aci suala % v %e,s % .,a 2.~,e<,,.a,o a e-/ % un' sdJ k%gers. % 4-m aOs o s a 41 % se. ip. c4 not red-fyee %rt, s T+oe MZ~ cRe yd, u uu.suhdeu_kteh.d. I 1 /ALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE Tw 4 4/4 M D M e[ - 30 h 61 IW @ Pe^ b ~ o ' e b A. sc oret e i e e % r s ce d w co,1 m.4 m.-t 6 #w + ~ s u o % ccm2,co,as) 7 some k=~. Sees. 6Jo e %,q tb aebcruke., wLo-t (>com pteA this adli)< ry y v. % cedeced j,ijz, @ A 54'4"Obo tc4% FA 21aA ss 9 <e~, ~ er adacf% q 4~,w s u bi be 6, issw = im prepnefq d.d DC " #- % c_ M v a s e c u s tt> % memo (s I " % t%s um %4 suihdsatJ3... Cec %g_fd '
j ..,....,.._.s..._.___ _ _ ~ - C 'sQ V REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS Okt.5f1 I4 8tf ct.csec 2 s a gg ASE NUMBER: QCI T4 '76W h; hb hh / T) Fe csiesso T.tcomes mue ME.a did et have ve.6 M nu,3 d eq (FAD wA srt Ab6). IILE: @ ItW : Ham.un. < >r a ir. oc red *<s G tesvorts m iu%,cwnee re.aeset rosas @ Faw Rr<oco3. Tuc ht.5d r Pter-edu b towsgso ~ twWm Jmec l (NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): I (y) p,.rg : o.ss ith ar* N^ O C*^d' b **Abi c = tc 59Md Q VaAiciA5 f 6' a ' wt sur,wi= i,64.me. or + % 5 64 7 d.% ev. A. % % i.h,vl % dM ts M ttula c%ation uaAsubskdd. (,y %, ~7 34,'.t.% At4 N r 5 99 ca oc %40 fo wet % mW e t6 t -.. a.3 bag e.,mFt persws-4d. AG.04.aec tt.prel$ W rep d f 4Tfi...,,,ts Q Jc,p,T.a< in d t >.n as-.a. xme-..igv.Jh. ss& & tad.This c M c/A I ss p.svi w s (ok we h TIC d6a5 Da.A b vgw se d u..+,,,._ r.sv%.... ,4 "I.5 1.
- bb *% 4 N
c % g g {ycu. b& 'te asb afF' Q '&Ybd, but peu ~~
- ~
u DISAGREE (y) iTALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE 49 KPLAIN: g J, g g n it g-( N 'E3 bdE*8' p ,,t ncaica.ad a cv r %+ u emko h corrdere.k ev p % ect ue on-twTe.cvib % so#, --a-
- 4.e.
re.c.oyd re.vi =.o sw%.saf.s. la rocAlc an.9 M w $7 34 Qc md a.oswel tu imect rda.,, pr.s ta e. ors - h w,A w. A,4 L rev,t w isw<G &J 7 l (D %o=-fe-. iceI427= eer b el to 4Ss,w.d.iF r}g. g Occ<Jerd ) i oTHE4 ; et cah h cads docud iderview of bu 4444.pdop (,b. couL i sbAM cdoout cw su.faa4 vise stftuqTiq % pd wa ~ to 5 4 w ce w L - la n&. sed... Ms n.aa% Gin.. U& y g 9 QQ kaxwled to u. +
l ,_..,__..~_-.,-~..-z... g@{'tetf69 9 7tT.59 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS CLCSGP O 8 f .SE. NUMBER: O C.E' '64 -R T (-D TLE: A&g.al. Ik d oF A 'DIC. GC hpm.e.be NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): q u r,4dta Qi+%i dt. coas ikTAdd / au I
- 55*/ d sd3%
I 2 ;r J. m o a < % ) i; &.:t a a u_u~
- nNA pu " vec<enna -re. 6. cad W '.e e h u - T u u:. u a c e g e o J ' o d j
kwusM h indthNecu." blaf im no N Eue.stive. o hsba'Dut.idm u %dthss s h = Nes4 s. e Ho reprew.a Ir. d O.t ree -red ictir a., a 6 somossoes Ci>, ou.F ul-dabzl stu. mse f w wk bai%u u d a.bdua. h o 1. reed dod:s1br*+5 el 4 4.,. er vidc/ D * 'S M 't-SRsk e... oe O e.ac.m p 2 of hewM i Qi m A si m.* r I H-nef s d st d d y 'ALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE REE ' PLAIN: @ Qt did wet resdie %eic spo;kd d6e} A T,diej ef on.a.rupawuco nd w m s u n.Q. v e d @ G1 o&uw) % cA superviie ts deq c.Wtist A todadm; W1 4,. nod 6e %cesad susp/eriw.. @ A re>A s of % e. Q t b d ep k r notas i _. e F G t M I*' > tush oCCb er disefesed 4,e prodd.2. 4 g,6s Ah 3 SW u"4 W. uw. M, %A& tad W he%d. Ii - weu. u% ch4 mmi ulk.'id paced L h oi meed >w,-me ma. % ter M i s a 3 % too ! 5 Ase. --% a ddMA erov<d.( x ba<,& A o.d4Cw-O. '"*^T h ek Q % %t de u % u k +5 Q - 9 YE M M.
--- - = -- ~~~ s s-3 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS C t. oWD 2 2.9. p QC.T. 74 - FOT (1) \\SE NUMBER: LTLE: At.L 6GSO Dt AT Dic GCT~nspd L.i.3As FiruED FoD NOT 4ccESTNG. TRA*JsFEA ,o wc, mmeou was, wex, s.c. Gv 6 u) r (NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): Q1 iweE.3.Ti% eP naqqed r{H of q a ca t'es.c_cl % dy %u-A %r~M - A.go t d.h. a p ry.,'tJ to scddhid A >c.mqdicon?.1 %tsL._ m P w.e.d A
- b l. m s W O"A $5%
m_. remi % Ar.. f, k u,as 4 64
- M aked L:oy u d n s-j e j e <
J sfu/g4 /ALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE CPLAIN: "h GL re_ph dm d closc rk M" j- ~LM d a A % % me.de_cL L Le ti b eus. 3 dadal A l o s 7/z/sy .,6 v s tad. 2,_ ^ 2 + C D c S 't ""'#4 % b 5F4 La hr c% b*ts d 5L msf m{a_ 4 k M isi b %.ps vlz/sel. su 6.cA,./ -t-La +~~s Re. N r@l H % wd5 * % sked L il. " sk _ n, tern M u 7pgq a b ro % r. ~ % A cm. w - 4 / r a m 4 u ) r~d. m Jaq 2. cA h hi.4,_. ku +%. u.nau 4Le 4.<LA-e cs pt h ti.%Ju 3.L. m ptred a w=.ks 6%. h Cs( c.cya f' ds,cnd caddv4ss 6 EM r d claS49 e %so 2 de kr. W..%t u.u w eg e_putd ydtis Ats e Ad ad d re t w, u. -.. ~....- ~ 57
6 9 6 !* N ieepre(u-m n % w KGR~~*-* M f Conceea */ is 4 O ~ A l.
as payer M REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS McMo: cp.,q. p '4 8*o: i-43 pg-y
- ASE NUMBER
- $$gy - d9C) T'
((p ITLE *- A QueTn Sysren was tqdseu c+1 bic O vnliTy k segrec QJ vasvesTndt*Te6}
- YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
~ glfy M)dW Q_{ f Bijhr coacMac,7ab cP uLOL w m SoeteTNTec g 41 s y cosa m of Q s sTes u es N/M By 04 raTw!"fl % Sv$ef8elh 7Te e Ti cease % *ugeh coaceu(Quau.
- VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION:
AGREE
- XPLAIN
j)L7 Loo 7 s Th QL. IMvfSTijnI!N fL4n c&m f Ixinvoeu $ Ot& QC /tesensel 7Le 01 1%' des e T'~ ccaTina TLese ueTeevit% s. W W4 'G GasT14s 'is coas'em gjg pu,T AFTA h tat +euvu 6 f cag Semee yesycToe spiar,q(geany a oa,;.a.t 9 5~f
- ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ Tl2%fW REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS W40: 1 44 W ese: g_g gf .ASE' UMBER: QCI. '$4 -103 N 'ITLE: Tuac "Dsc. EmptCV6Cs An.t. BEWr CcmDERtb Foe HIEC BV KGlE bh MHo AAE At.Lt(REDLY D(Lu dr us E ft.5 .YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): hs Qe repsded. Io Q l M Two "D IC. w eO6Y*es bd.'A ews[duu2.2 b j hb.a. % WGE (,b.h. td :$ Aed) 0.r4 drq O Sc.r$.
- N C A c. J Q
- c. CO2.7 de h eGQa.Ser
. LA. Ias ' fee M' N h *..Te Qi M o.dwissh k M kas ca w u u aA4. M % od% =% M ~ * + w22e, u wr ned tr tw anr.p rta ww M rM, gv A-ob (Wer t ~.,% w,,Ah t.- A nr GA b.pt. d ca.w s A ci %.eesua$to<rs e W% a. Okr 7 F% t%_ k&E QA %< 45 Qf. J#*A A*\\ a to yed. % K6.F M h.c h %, Tka
- *.e si h.a. m d M i m e.s Asifev s%fe's +LA. sadem4s t<<4<- 6 s, t 4ah q-9.ab $chf-wrm.4.
tu~n%.%,r*q M h
- .1'w M L* ired % K G tF ems hd, % +tw h We, fc h.4. ebY naerd.
is j VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DNGREE .XPLAIN: ht u Qer toca.s vsch pva p h % rqatA NS bW t d or h ed 4~3 og % h ?_. psms } @) Tka Co.e de s %>r td4 eL.4b & E Pa.44 i *d*'/M / %Q o.3 Oce.s w e.<= wked 4tu.0, job ch.$e's u.>e.re.. es Q %.u w.ummed Ma.~%o earuss m u maa.s, M.g it ~ oa h._ c.m. A A s MJp % duM (de h u m uck n % r ,9.d e h # Q i. p g, t,,_._ a %* * - a % an<.c% uc qA s- , a + w - a % m e.26<c 4 ~ 3 o m s *
- M k se.E o% % Omk A - ~ A <r a w %. q
'p % % Q. s,afe.Ty M sr h-hO ?
T'~~5c-E r - h GP REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS
- cwo: 'i-t$-14
' "C0 ' >a oev$de.wg % %, % "ASE NUMBER: Oc.f 94-ic6 VJ (t) IITLE: A.0.Qc.pd Di ss r.. tg Ti.a ni dh ~D(C Doeom d h v., w f or SYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): IW *Y'qdW< A citu Ar%=i.m 1 as "To PE RSt.AY gc w bsrAic BY 8 9msr> oat T y s. ca.-w - Ah sta hts Ac.h en cdumn
- WTes ru. we( Q is
< m-A.... A. s ws se. z...r-wre canarto ~ , j _,jbjeg, " Oj Coe. o N cd='e oM ger Eh F-ar-g4 Qahv- -% o'6L ) Ls.. C6 4.
- a. disevs%. TI % e w. pO~ *-3 q d f 'blC b Ed2.a. dks% cdG c h.-1r.gu Osiw Cw M er' uM M[s o
L "' " W sdwe d m4 p*6 over q AMoog diack e c-%g, 9 EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE EXPLAIN: l No Qb rep *Ak $VCPA Vd $ 3 3'[I% I. { i A ocdcdo M M~.L G2._h h a-M %sewd wk or o< +. K ius nfta M << G <<d. "M Y"Y. A ..t l1 I i .s Y t t' \\ $3 l 1
.c REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ~ ope =o: s-s5-s+
- **o: 1.29 g
.;ASE NUMBER: QC Wi06W @
- ITLE: AlpEGE.b DiscRimWAMcN o F D c h PWYE4 W blCMMT
';YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): A%ersd oA N "r - (no.I.$ disc <r it.1 ydd z '4 DW %d A q % M w % ct, k_ is purssii5 gv4%
- O"L
- A Prom % a&fid & c%
r g g. i kn%" *& ~:m (3. -reekue R. aaongr,6s ao a, s a-r wQ ise ve whd-Jat.2( i M, L_ t ' ) DISAGREE NAI.UATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: E( ^ ^'"' osisu
- 2. f. ~-,,,, m, a~
O bd%I Ed embc_e C" " ' E I { l4, w A e d o# disyr<.am d 6 + h.1 %. 'i di fi d G1 s%v6 dca kot q q as.fi.a. A a g,& ] mA.e -ce c p - m ~,ca t~.ita 4 % 4, mcuy ad 6 ve ban pvapuA, re_5 4,ved, tk.n-prsS2A u E. I 3
..;b.~~.a--.------"'-~~~"^~""'"
- P46-69
~ l REVIEW 0F WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS .I e w.aca: f6 - 7 "7-S 4 an.o: QCE 24-ll4 T (~i) (3) { (5)
- ASE NUMBER
.ITLE: W 0 ) so.= 'D.<c ~ a-tim ce r4s : T mar omt-sewt cut-terree svwr,.so. Auveur teamq,. 1 Pa.e@ss wm. gg p iEEC) @ TMt EmetcYECS 7c00 THERy' co to SAFary Too tko< A/. ( -1
- YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
g my w gi mJr4Dg(Mr prom.tal over wome, l L mc oiW.m6 cc rw oh tkas.s q.3 pomotel ew amm., rw ch ge%. ec discro.4 fic]- Lk mem m{ ihhCmJ cae. mw t rmuc4/ L Tu(
- c. w m e v s.e s. c n = cud -, %.%~%%i 4
h M d(& ot e a e a
- o. reput of imed 9dcc cwe==, D5 *d a +s ma,.aa
.,a cas anas.4" h A%er &til. W h WA 2**M % we-va % me a mwom y,- n s m w a rec ue e% b W % < n,' %
- A -
1 i*' ry,,- 4 No 41 iu.Its# m wt % 4bs aco.u;dT;g 1 a O'-( b4%**cmt emptcyees 4. 7wtt4 =DQegev dges,
- KG s.+ rup.ms.ble 6..
i erms \\ u d'Tec,.v of c% P *Y*d l aw t-N M d Nu aCOcwITo7u.e bwdd h M Mf % er w U-8-W S
- VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION
AGREE SAG
- XPLAIN.
Il k 4 k cww pr.Lotty k.~e idat #44... i.u.f<mca,. I t w d"cr'~ dfTm e-eb'ck aLci.ctr tee bssed. Oi mLsc.ooed e4 A Tml O@u gr. I+ rc me do b.J we Tu t met uxold ab +Jaf._ a>. aC&;&w.r >ck
==1. e % su b ot w h 6tia; ove,.d. swold 6e isthbd au mt +
- 4.,oe % t,6 vee < %
ek-tuu..%e Javee or Secbct ciuco.T9 +tu's M g 9 es 1 N A L W a*, cu. sb v V' V e.c u d.e d - O h J I4 bd & f c stdeud w %.5o,.( 04tttv ey m tsi," {] Mb Mg nadds $d cA,A, o f b cOCrg
- MG k I h.
w FO C v9% M &. vara {coab ss. " nsay bo_ % ero% ueo wk. "$ 4 -to os% %. eqt w L Lond ve>eaW & h P'W % O SHb. J[
.... -, - - ~ ~. 7. - u - ---a-~~~^v"~ -~~-- .-- ---~ j. 5' f3*tf%.T REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS c* t.w: 9 27-Irp C.tc)co : ) -io-45 ESE WUMBER: M E.4. - ll 6 ("4) '.TLE : %ah td h TO"*4 h P' N fNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): j > TW., 4 e.s y e. as' d.n.) Q 1. s d k 5
- N f.A-.
%d*C+645 ; ikOy 8. ** Ve - % Qi 4 % a A.s h i & ww 9, au 4&t.ow,,,AA_t e. i b U $D d idi k bcu.lc. %j u r y. n A P ui e.uped k trafGen to jok. W' **Y dS* SU - =$CM u s,.u -o s,S..u, a, <>. m d in M ar*i. A re w, d. # ss D"M Us f% PMi w.9wk f6 Q.I %Di.: ~ O N M Su p.4 1/d - % A fi M '"*' 4 'e.tur~ i Sito o% Lis s < Q u.f L,,,g " O "" t [ & u p..d d g pg % sg.$ diMI mp % rek IALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE (PLAXN: Vs.k # a m L _, 4, m % " S f b M* ca.t p,L7 %Ls .e > ~ w._J -in.s.c= w e.f.. m-m ~ %. 4 O *^ T[E7[Sy Q itj'S/3y 4 5 sf it. i 67
- z% bT REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS W*o: 9 -z 6-84
- Acaso: o-g t, g4 QCI SA-138W ( *).
'ASE NUMBER: 'ITLE: d hDA*8REMT FRcrn %4e.uistog to APP 90 V f,. TM5PEctIcH 'YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): n me. u. eL - 4 usaA.., z w oc r. m tu a ged \\u. m L*'# % m de oc. .. ped wW.* La veG a2 Fo wa<*'9" Q i su d.$dwe pOm.. g e fQ4,is iduneuss oE bsuaQ4dgad a u- -y q agh 4.rJ 'l Q C p u s e w as A flu e u W'80 K 9 c4Alvyts kouMtV4.0 NE4 g M& M Qhvv\\e b h o o.p p u m 'f' % "< m a 4.s<_. m - ed - n.cocAl yeod %:g,.m a f k.VAI.UATIONOFQ1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE 4 ' XPLAIN: k-Qi g*ve$g2.g reeccI roi s '**wca. M c % d M *wt M N W.cM a< so ns o %4. o f W s cwfodm fh3, Q w a.5 re. M d eJd. N od$ w d M si-c.<_
- c. d aZIe) h -ts, LJ to, prekkes k* w at ba4A L.e.
r.essAad -d k.5 .h p., Lh s " s2ussSs pe, J,r l< d a.s sa1E M v% K inae&g.5a.e & p%&.
- d u L. % s aa.%,,dtin v A% W ss uaa.1 o r H ' E.
,(
- W es 4125 & ' 8 cts k d ox W;ec ivdNAt.t.
1 t were o. % % 4 5 c A <. %.>. 9 A litb d.che, L'S 3et u cht Q Ib sevexd Qc Sat <rous* *b %h, > Ct~ d o s ' W 16 ss(d'o ~Yo 'tr cwy,", a ' W T I'v.e e f h i- '/( E g k ~
4. ~, 4 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS meno: 1127-84 ao:e0: st-sr SV .ASE NUMBER: Qcf d' 4 - /3'O I C.L. O O Ndi coa OUcT Thetouf 'Inve8 /jo4TE*a Ryace y NO T - 56) 7 'ITE.E: YNOPSTS OF CASE /CONCEP.'.3): 50 meoxe nor n,ary iorannea trerao c.t ia,ru;ra of fem.Eqhyeas wo Al Lave ctentre SvP<wsoe u(to cue ro u,e, es defriwo. 4 Doeum # e ut>T L ertM!~*00 & ro sAjeci ()HeT~- ED ] pa" unao I,h 'e F g yo7 y mairie,a na v4eonssw,sc nwen. wwy CT E 4tey e.s cucera ses.T A 4 A4 Ettoacous sr,,g,ji~ cescoea ouy y e st,7y 4 sT5 iqstTMca a El,UATZON OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAG xetAtN: OI s747es, R ;; = "itic7lo'aj QI o',0 se 0,'O a T Ds t M <>rd o co^teu u *s ulT4s4 weeuY no ""5"8ST*** *,- bIc Suj edusLabA. .l I -l h _ L,,.
r{2.S/5'9 cD REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ve*o: t t-l 6-3P
- usso: i g.30-Srf
.ASE NUMBER: CCr li4 -lGI T 'ITLE: .YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): Q L AQ4- <$~h s td an%e spa k w i k M V'ea. 9resi d e43 4 b9 W C%ns d YO.ad SL ks ' u.o gd " " ~ m r. A., W b y % Lca, resa.a.ih +s. mL w % ~ %.A. 4r VGs L.eqd Nf. "*f* *d kd Wa Q pv5Eh m rea p se. A MA k b %dds M4fde[4M 01 46cI, to ue . VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE .XPLAIN: or,J.e dis J o u s u.= pvokh w'b b ""E( S "3 -nu:s ~ nq,- < u.a.3 L u.doad. Ocacq.02.th04 6 Ce =he Q L 4%_ # % -m - m3..c4 d 6 m. s 6 p.bw w dt< oi. e k < epad Q t w - 4._ k hh h m SA hd Lque%dm.&--m%.a,~ At rq did' aut p, u ao v.eDC c-ouw s S E seCh
- M =Frefy,y e<ah y its.h~tmnkk e
76 y t i
s REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ope = o: , ucsee: V66 CCC TA -Ko ( T Ed W b EN MYI '.ASE NUMBEP.: L lITLE:
- yNOFSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S)
I Lo4A33 %s by 7 - evXc.ad2. o F m O h site %b C W ' ~" crW & aE Q( cr b ph W m a% % WWuS o P 'CCG.5 ,up sfa, pre y _ og m v's at %f k d keks vd u8o - wo
- v 5 Lee dLc_/ %; I hP(- ( Ne kd VecQA2' Ta cM 4Ap o u.
NALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE IFLAIN: M ena.Q. Nh thV. .p, Q 4a. 3 ( A = c-e m.w e F Phr - ~5d 2 M kL h6 O CLA.A L hl \\ 6%f 1 1 sO e 77 I
,=_
- .c
~. . - ~._ Sl29{W CPE n : t 6'T ctc5ce : t.2 '5 -tYT REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ,SE EUMBER: OCI 9 5 -l n 'l' .TLE: A u. r.c,E D F*e9iFis Anc4 c F" B \\ B hsuwsosa OC.im g gen', r' 'EOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): Q1 redd %4h'm % d seuwa.g '8( e I u d. A 4 c.. Q c <x3pa; %, m sost- +e 4 ts k=.v e hiKM re-e hapute.d tw a# M 'MMa re,Ts, u i comp #4r ev w3 -e d a., Acs - v.a 6eJ.m 4 h <4s)ca w ca"!'". d A o i - u w g d fi.; d P o Q - vie r.utia,-.. s _&_ <rh L C - &A W va 4 'ALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE l
- PLAIN:
Qi.. J.f $ % v 4 O "' "' ' ' O5 N .g.A 4 7
- .,q.c %.r o., % wy L bd Le &
gA,% w % tel. L o f nevi u.9 % de- --d ' 9..kd bt *~ N * ' I' (..s.4.u<c,e H a.ac<. M e"~h " &* * "ddhb '""ikEIm uc.J, u.,iQ tm.s M rekaL.e A tres wtalter. cd. <eca.uls re.p+ % %L n <. ~ h a-def. ~ A h .m s,... _,. I
~. '2gM W ~ REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS 0: of. 2P-?( =l @-Li-8f \\ iSE NUMBER: 4Cf ff-/96kl (1) TLE: h :---...; z g ;, g,( ppfgfg gpg kip Nyg u,kg y,,1,,e,y
- ,7,c, g,, (4y,,_pp LIS/
\\ 84t#v,5c (g, LJea l~ Td Ql s?#fsMo h Cd*CPd" * - (NOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): bic. Employee Refodeo %T ue La Be /tkee ca Lay occ Lisrsecuse sse soy 47 os- "m~si.. Tie' coscw to Qs. &,l .LP ORSIrf hk A. Ale *(cb ~ me 5 orscg q lotyoff sl~ M Qnt[IQ4 Cdmo'fe4TS sA ftS'#* l Fot es n sne srdce 7Gs coa ce,ea, Jamess 9-ose zuspcToes heaTo A'ee A AbTRA'T *L Hetb u**te y eBl d ug,Q gasy f 82; #D wots s par n s.,sieer c.ner,ea "pto@stly 6erk A0WO U@fontJL l o O'l QCQ3fk'C0t.S T5e ArgtT hl 5 7b GT*+It 55. 5 AutHp Is))NVM%) of Nt ot h CPLA1N: luoo'y 7Le H(eg Fov2-7ssyc76is & Aurop} mde n(( g;,,.s,'W$1st+1Wk 2xoM. As,cer; nToiafInTm>0@. M I A* urn 3r*Tes ce&ss rasfecKees 'ul.s DaO tubT hiles > OikocTukt uem '" '~*T pl*cea e r & " r o p e p g,, 9 p f s y,A = n i
r 5'-3 e,- 6 h" M 4 REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS ' #e* 0: ~3-te-51% casoso: 6-so-T,4 f* ~ 'ASE NUMBER: CC:t A.c 2.T C) d 46*S4Ja. / 'rMr rneped,$n hs.rd s DV Tm t E.*q in eer-IITLE: A4044 SYNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): G i 4 f c. h a.pov. c r t,_ mm . v.a.l t _3 h
- naqJt, Q1 tudeg
.kTM doias s uves.cl a&ev.-4 Pr=Med krect (WCGS) nrow6 Se.e.v.<t 'De.et. se g ace,,s r.acorJs. 'D*1~ernod S >seeet' u>a s A 3 Ect.#e) Meo. (uA.u. L's msrutEhe.ns are p.rfor.<J) o**ly Cl hmes ik 9 masek 5 GL %,La:*g,,,g a,,g __,, y,,,,,, _3.,.,, a.%.,, e r,k 9ang kLeew ssme en.h45 If N rea.senedle f5 cm.nclude tid, eg e nder was wei CSNs ida.d-ly Var *[y :M u v fa c,e tLLu i acceral"" w b., proca u re, NN fC'erreehie. )-c}~,eq Mo c.orcec'Tioe o.8M~s, vecM k ea.u.w ac, @4. r.ced q yQ Me.ted by shc(,,p,op ;t,,, .m 6 .%.,7, % s go,d a f EVALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE EXPT Altt: QL's e.meAa slw wd cwW<c$ ~e a bT' C8Aota k Eb5 a.$A$ : QcJuN9 t&c kclxof (gcy d4 w.d hc&sh W-i1 o r % &u..s p ra ed,,a s ve 9 e u m a.e e t. d. M-so, buse Au. red, d su.6 aPAt GA, na bb tMes%cEm m p.Co.cmed. Sm&s %., pal Poeude s k-od km W m "*' N - s L' dete_r o F cacce.ss t, prove ; beycd o_ fasede Mi> r s l 5 v>r w e h C c.. t. e k m A eroc,Au.a.Q.vicC G ous (Md'vsdoct.d3 1 a.AR. rayaQ:u.(y "ter twswdulf Ph &s5 theur. he's) r % o t cdic% c.on ch n.e.3 uda% 4) aht. 3 y 9 V
w.m.,, essema, m,J auhamsewhm4% A'ils - musesumm%..-,e 4.- -_***N*- ow .o+-+ 9 ~ REVIEW OF WOLF CREEK Q1 INVESTIGATIONS weno: acceo: 1 I .ASE NUMBER: csDMog 's 'ITLE: I YNOPSIS OF CASE / CONCERN (S): c d & d k h k k V,s ] alty G$f Gsq L eJe i~h o f { ] } co. m y % a,_g,Wb3 J c - A'-. W r~w %i _c, Ess I I[G N * * %.w m M9 ~ y V ho 4 ', * 'c4 ' & 4 g, g ** s # p > e-s $ d v .~~%e wt,~ x J Pm n+.c g A 4DWA As /.o o p+ se a. m VALUATION OF Q1 FINDINGS / DISPOSITION: AGREE DISAGREE d a, .7 XPLAIN: j] b (3 E % v 3ry5 4g y, w e j, W h e s a dd.w w$Q s (:- s_w A e 4 w w k w. % po cam e arn,A d ~ ~~~ h rm H %.wr os s.m ~ da~d~%,i%fk v m et % JL,e w tc w.,_ -h O g f
1 *h ~t it 5="' u d y -!=-b-def' a d Q rwe ci ren A er t~7 3 m ' Ad Al re_ec.r'>i s c ire _ o F A twe%f e.-fe l et o, do. f..in ~, gat.isve g d, Q,d., join 1ed cmd. (e 3 lly a.sc, s+ m ce.< t = % o,At u %.y mu. cListh J ito s e e e aT._a pads d wof fu2a.J -tEgalb, cr* 3 v v % k b , bvious % n. p r o c.20,< h is q sc m.*w.-c 91 reect.s. h M.a.ay tTdes re pe cts Jc a'4 % u %.a.x p k k s k d w o s w< % <d n ou saa. w-Q_ w.e&g 3,v e 1ap s %t de.c.o,wed
- i. Jh th. veeuf c <- h-t="m ~am"a"xs.1 c.e.es'.u"~~ ~ ' ~ " - -
"'c * '" " acr_s4_ e ocr_ u _ n,,r
- d*S C
'N (efe S 9 Ve i yVes a an. k hb r ser,-osly b.eks tnagt.y$n9 evearienc.,., o%. My ed soees s',e n u z'*:=;1 ocr m* q, ci ec wn.e.1 e usere Pouwd to-6se. ove<0 coked or cd Gens 4 nd culgo% m tes%ahd ud%s ubic.k c~ pA kve %.f sca.4 ese%er % K s.\\ E ~ ~ y ~ k. GCI 84-9 4T O cr -e4 79 T I6 M repov defisNiy'4-Xht PLVidtuct_ khet k C.Jo ocdA.f.5( i c-%eA doe. t, vnmead/ Qutd deri. u.Da4 pres s vre, d one peoet was CaAsiGd. th twv.m i% v.eeevted s erhd sJoc~dcu. Tw repoet uk% was = b d,a te d q his Tw % icas r#es. o c.r -u-u r EXHIBIT t PpGE 97 or 9f, p3gg;3) G7 i )
s! Iiens $14kd c.\\ pet.gd b UI codt / d<-c o m.. d m id % T#3 Q} ~d d..., -Pe t a e e ecs. stw g u,... s ',J e a M J o t be
- u., e 14<
mq,gg., es ksh.t$ To N. q w, n,) gj C,w as uu,,4, rs c,cT-s4-i2.c ccr. u. 3c. C~CE TI L CT-4A - 2g N -fM-30 l GcI - 6+ - 26 O # ' ti9 -6 Cc I-N - 25 1 C CI-H-- 2.7 ' e,er.s;+ - e a. Gcr-59-27ff4u4-cms cc r -sA - c1 G,cr-54 -2q pcr. cA.- 83 QCE 2 3 Ccr - s+ - 2.1 qcr 44-2c Ccr t + D{4 - 19 t,cI - s + - 12. G CI-M-1% c tI - st - Ic, CCE -W- ( 7 - t cI -s4 - 22 CC# 44r semode M ders C cr.g - ic s CCE 'A-2 2. t.crs -26 LCr-M-C9 l GCc-M-6 Gcr eg.- i37 r Gcr-M -Ct c cr -M - 35 Cscr @ t. e q. C,cr - M - 34 CCr-s+-c3 G c r -S4 - 33 CsCr -g_c 7 L cr 32. g.%-6 H O T ~%+ ^ 10 "'T ' N -C+ gc,7_ 34.- F HcT -86 o9 64cT - 5+ - o 3 Her-st 13 Hur-W-c h sc7-%+-c2. HtT- $4 12 140 T C7 2 t+cr - Ts4--c) HOT-59-17 H & -T4 { O l gcr-s4.-It H cT -g4-c.S e h u M u. C1uw-4whu t..c.1 a 4 - i 2c cud ecusisIt cf G l m 3ss 'I yew"'"V b )$-g5-0o5_ ff
- oo Print Oicgnostics for: AS!
+TO ENSPECTION [ Total Formatting Exceptions = 4 Total Listed Below = 4 The Following Two Formats Will Be Used: Page/Line Format Exception Message Found By The IBM 5520 ~ Sheet Number Format Exception Message Found By The Printer 2.0.0/1 0013-Text And/0r Header Margin Text Overflow 3.0.0/1 0013-Text And/0r Header Margin Text Overflow-4.0.0/1 0013-Text And/0r Header Margin Text Overflow 5.0.0/1 0013-Text And/0r Header Margin Text Overflow 4 l i 4 n 6 //f-85-o05-t,< L
UNITED STATES 8 c NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g.,,,,,.. g REGION IV / j n (11 RYkN PLAZA DRIVE. $UITE 1000 f "o,, ARUNGTON TEXAS 74011 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL - ) 1 DATE/ TIME: 36 Me4 / 7 ff PRIORITY: Imediately 1 Hour j 2 4 Hours MESSAGE To: hlLL l-lUTuf/FoA/ R k M'FRf MESSAGE FROM: NUMBER OF PAGES: 4 __ PLUS TRANSMITTAL SHEET TELECOPY NUMBER: VERIFICATION NUMBER: CONTACT: 2 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS / ATTACHMENT (S): l 1 Transmitted & Verified by: DISPOSITION: Return to Originator Place in Mail Other .l NAME DATE j \\ A M S-oos -g t
l NRC TASK FORCE -KG&E QUALITY FIRST REVIEW TEAM MEMBERS ~ DICK DENISE REGION IV DIRECTOR DRSP LAWRENCE PARTIN REGION IV SECTION CHIEF DRSP TOM NASH REGION IV ALLEGATION COORDINATOR J0E YOUNGBLOOD NRR LICENSING BRANCH CHIEF WALT HAASS I&E s DON DRISKILL REGION IV OI BUD CUMMINS REGION IV SRI WOLF CREEK PARK:EEERSON, REGIDNITV 01 HOWARD BUNDY REGION IV RI WOLF CREEK BRUCE BARTLETT REGION IV RI WOLF CREEK OBJECTIVES TOCOMPLETEREVIEW0FALLKG&EQUALITiFIRSTFILESTODETERMINEWHETHERKG&EHAS PROPERLY DEALT WITH THE CONCERNS BROUGHT TO THIS ORGANIZATION BY THE EMPLOYEES OF KG&E AND ITS CONTRACTORS I AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW, TO DETERMINE WHAT NRC ACTIONS ARE REQUIRED GENERAL PROTOCOL j i NRC REVIEW WILL BE (GENERALLY) BASED ON A REVIEW 0F THE FILES, INDEPENDENT INVESTI-GATIONS AND INSPECTIONS ARE NOT ANTICIPATED DURING THIS EFFORT INTERVIEWS ARE NOT TO BE CONDUCTED WITHOUT TEAM LEADER AUTHORIZATION THERE ARE TO BE NO DISCUSSIONS WITH KG&E PERSONNEL REGARDING THE PROCESS, CONCERNS, RESULTS, DOCUMENTATION, ETC. NO PATERIAL IS TO BE GIVEN TO KG&E NO MATERIAL IS TO BE TAKEN OR REPRODUCED FROM THE KG&E FILES WITHOUT TEAM LEADER APPROVAL ALL REVIEWS ARE TO BE DOCUMENTED ON THE TASK FORCE FORMS; THESE ARE TO BE RETAINED l BY THE TEAM LEADER 00 NOT RECORD THE NAMES OF PERSONS EXPRESSING CONCERNS - PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY CONDUCT REVIEWS USING THE GENERAL STANDARD OF: DID KG&E HANDLE THE MATTER LIKE THE NRC WOULD HAVE HANDLED IT. THIS INCLUDES PROPER FOLLOWUP WITH PERSON CONCERNED BRING SIGNIFICANT ISSUES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE TEAM LEADER AT ONCE i1 ALERT THE DI MEMBERS TO ANY SIGNIFICANT ISSUES INVOLVING INTIMIDATION / HARASSMENT OR j WRONGD0ING BE ALERT TO SIGNS OF MODIFIED FILES, INCOMPLETE WORK, IGNORING OF LEADS, ETC GIVE M iORITY TO HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES, BUT!ALSO TO MANAGEMENT INTEGRITY ISSUE. ~ GET THE NON-NRC ISSUE INTEREST OUT OF THE WAY QUICKLY WITH MINIMUM TIME SPENT f 4-75-005 g c
p.r 3 4FFICIAL USE VNLY ,, :J l
- CASE JCHRONOLOGY ReLE Nunsets DATE OPENED
~ OPENED SY A'/- 8P00 C /AVrw M /92S' DADniJxi a 7 DATE +4CTiv iTY l l \\ h W WE A/A aMM A$$ os sd nWW j ~ 'A d, - /v r 12ao / A o [ W e & M j L/ - A2/X K1 6 - z A W* /& VE A n Mc=#_ \\ / / Y, / 9 S.$ - tdCA M, 8'2-[~W /"sktf fh .....~ t t l e ACTivlTY CODES L/M e LETTER CR MEMO TC e TELEPHONC CALL INSP e IRSPECTl0N MTS
- enEETING iMV a INVESTIGATION RC P-a REPORT ISSU(0 0FFICIAL USE ONLY 00 NOT DISCLOSE
,y4 - f5-DOS-/ ow n::-T1e Rw. s L -- j
^ N C FERM 306 e- ) U.S. NUCLEAa KEGULATOAY COMMIS810N so i INVESTIGATION STATUS RECORD, INSTRUCTIONS; This form is to be comp 6eted whenever significant activity has occurred relative to a case or at least every 30 days If rio change has occurred during the 30 day reporting period, indicate "No Change" in the status block, Keep the original with the case file and send one copy to Headrauarters, Offee of Investigations. Cast =UM8ER CATEGopy o# Pict A4-85-005 T C ggo,sa OI FIELD OFFICE ~l o. oesn4Timo niacron s iaomovat uciuste I ,y,,,,,,,'u REGION IV V.VENDom x.0THER assic,=eo To suoec' WOLF CREEK: REVIEW OF Q1 PROGRAM T)R T RK' T 1.1. STATUS ISpecdy dere, and provide e bnef descnothn) { DATE: JUNE 12, 1985 ON MAY 24, OI HQ REQUESTED A REVIEW OF THE Q1 FILES.AT WOLF CREEK AS AN ASSIST TO REGION 4. DURING THE SECOND WEEK OF JUNE IT WAS l DECIDEE TO REPORT FIELD WORK IN THE FORM OF A "ASSIAT" REPORT. J ) I j DATE: JUNE 2f 1985 THIS REPORT IS CLOSED I l i 1 i' e i 1 l A4-75MS-p t j
i ^ M~TATION DATA FORM 1S. NUC1. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION m % an (11-E2) Instructione on reveres side RECEMNG OFFICE Docket Number (if applicable) ' 1. Fxility(les) involved: (Nemel (d more then t or d WdL/ r /'&Y O 5~ O O o 8f g 2. genenc, wnte GENERIC) JALI A/$ hrAs f(" r
- 2. Functional Ares (s) Involved:
(Check soorooneis bestest i operations onsite health and safety 1 construction offsite health and safety safeguards emergency preparedness other (specety) i 3.
Description:
l'> lfi/A s l / l Tl r i vlel I l l I l l I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ( U'" '* * "*3 l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 1 I I I I I I i l I i 14l41-19171-101o151 l l IIIIIIl l 1IIIII
- 4. Scurce of Allegation:
tcheck soproonste boxi contractor employee security guard l licensee employee news media E NRC employee private citizen organization tspecifyl other (specity) MM DD YY
- 5. Date Allegation Received:
t 0 5 1 1 W [M MM
- 6. Nrme of Individual mret two iniesse and test names Receiving Allegation:
- 7. Office:
p i I ACTION OFFICE I
- 8. Action Office
Contact:
mest two initiale end teet nemet
- 9. FTS Telephone Number:
- 10. St:tus:
Open, if followup actions are pending or in progress j tcheck one, Closed, if followup actions are completed MM 00 YY
- 11. Drte Closed.
1 3,
- 72. Rzmarks:
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I Il (Umst to 50 casrectors) i Office Year Number
- 13. Allegation Number:
.A-l l /14'-85-003-3. a o ,}}