ML20245B425

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Sufficient Merit Re Handling of drug-related Issues Has Not Been Found to Warrant Initiation of Ofc of Investigations Investigation Into Q1 Program
ML20245B425
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 12/19/1985
From: Martin R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Herr R
NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI)
Shared Package
ML20245B374 List:
References
FOIA-84-291, FOIA-85-101, FOIA-85-161, FOIA-85-327, FOIA-85-600 NUDOCS 8706160522
Download: ML20245B425 (2)


Text

-

-I n . .-

-

  • r DEC f9 N MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard K. Herr, Director Office of Investigations, Region IV FROM: Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator

SUBJECT:

KANSASGASANDELECTRICCOMPANY(WOLFCREEK)Q1 PROGRAM

Reference:

Memorandum, R. K. Herr to R. D. Martin, dated 10/28/85 We have reviewed the referenced memorandum and its attachments for the purpose of determining whether or not they contain information which would warrant the initiation of an 0I investigation into the Q1 Program itself. Region IV does not believe that the technical information contained in the concerns attached to your memorandum warrant further investigation by 01. Any technical matters contained in those concerns were reviewed and dispositioned during the course of the review conducted by Region IV, NRR, and IE of the Q1 Program. Details of those reviews and the conclusions drawn are already a matter of record.

Concerns related to the handling of drug-related issues have been previously  ;

identified during the OI assistance that was given to those reviews of the Q1 Program. As we both know, NRC has not issued any guidance nor taken a firm position as to the precise manner in which drug-related allegations are to be handled by licensees. Therefore, whether drug-related concerns were -

appropriately handled by KG&E is arguable since no objective standards exist against which Region IV can evaluate. In any event, should such matters be judged as wrongdoing, then they clearly fall within the purview of OI's jurisdiction to determine whether or not they should be pursued further.

Finally, the undercurrent contained within the concerns expressed in the three  ;

interviews is a conviction on the part of the individuals that there was some effort by the licensee to attempt to use Q1 to circumvent NRC interest in problems. Given the extent of the review of the particular technical issues involved in the concerns; the review of all other issues identified in the Q1 Program; the extent of our followup relative to other potential wrongdoing l

RA:RIV RDMartin:jc ,

12/ /85 l i

t 8706160522 870605 SI -291 PDR

, h h'OM '

c. .,7

.,..z-..._ ._ .., -- ,, .- . . _ . _ ~~ . ~ ~ - _ - ._ __._

, .% m, S

Richard K. Herr, 01 ..

i cases; the-files made available to us; and our ability to interview people  ;

involved in the program, I cannot find sufficient merit in the generalized concerns of these individuals to warrant Region IV recommending that 01 conduct  :

an investigation, i Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator CC .

B. Hayes, 01 M. E. Emerson l t

'k v

+

l e