Proposed Tech Specs,Revising pressure-temp Limits for Heatup & Cooldown,Normal Operation & Pressure TestingML20236K691 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Cooper |
---|
Issue date: |
10/28/1987 |
---|
From: |
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20236K655 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 8711090312 |
Download: ML20236K691 (8) |
|
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217C7961999-10-0606 October 1999 Marked-up & Type Written Proposed TS Pages,Revising TSs 1.0, 3.6,Bases 3.0,Bases 3.6 & 5.5,to Adopt Implementation Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Option B for Performance of Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20209A7351999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.3-4 & 3.3-6,replacing Page 3.3-6 Re Recirculation Loop Flow Transmitters & Applicable SRs Associated with Function 2.b ML20196B4741999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Changes Made at Plant Subsequent to Receipt of License Amend 178,dtd 980731,for Conversion to Its,Through 990610 ML20195E9101999-06-0808 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Described Method by Which SGTS Heaters Are to Be Tested ML20205H2891999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying ACs for Unit Staff Qualifications for Shift Supervisor,Senior Operator,Licensed Operator,Shift Technical Advisor & Radiation Manager Positions ML20236W1141998-07-28028 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20151Q0621998-07-28028 July 1998 Final Version of Improved TS & Bases Re Proposed Change to Conversion to Improved Standard TS ML20236R9821998-07-16016 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.5.1,re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236Q0641998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion to Improved STS ML20216H0801998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 2.1.A.1.d & 3.2.C,deleting Max Rated Power for APRM Rod Block Trip Setting ML20216H0571998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20216B4481998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20148G3481997-05-30030 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Frequency of Testing RHR Cross Tie valve,RHR-MOV-MO20,position Indication from Once Per Month to Once Per Operating Cycle ML20138J0751997-05-0505 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Control of Standby Liquid Control Relief Valve Setpoint in TS 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases ML20148B0041997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SLC Relief Valve Testing Described in TS Section 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases in Bases Section 3.4.A Since Testing Is Already Performed Under ISI Program ML20134K3771997-02-10010 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Avoidance & Protection from Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities to Be Consistent w/NEDO-31960 & NEDO-31960,Suppl 1, BWR Owners Group Long-Term Stability Solutions.. ML20117K3291996-06-0606 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Safety Limit MCPR from 1.06 to 1.07 for Dual Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.07 to 1.08 for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20100R4431996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 142, Revising TS, DG Enhancements ML20086K4421995-07-14014 July 1995 Revised Proposed Tech Specs Re DG Enhancements Reflecting More Conservative Approach to Enhancing DGs ML20086B7061995-06-28028 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increasing Required RPV Boron Concentration & Modifying Surveillance Frequency for SLC Pump Operability Testing ML20085J2631995-06-15015 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Surveillance Intervals for Logic Sys Functional Testing for ECCS ML20083A7241995-05-0505 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Changes to TSs & Associated Bases for License DPR-46 ML20083A1341995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Temporary Rev to SR to Extend Two Year LLRT Interval Requirement ML20149H8821994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Control Room Emergency Filter Sys ML20078S5711994-12-22022 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definition of Lco,Per GL 87-09 ML20073J2371994-09-26026 September 1994 Proposed TS LCOs 3.5.C.1 & 3.5.C.4,increasing Min Pressure at Which HPCI Sys Required to Be Operable from Greater than 113 Psig to Greater than 150 Psig ML20071K1541994-07-26026 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Increase Flow Capacity of Control Room Emergency Filter System ML20070M6671994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Intermittent Operation of Hydrogen/ Oxygen Analyzers ML20065K1931994-04-12012 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Removal of Definitions 1.0.Z.B.1 Through 5,change to LCO 3.21.B.1.a (Line 5) Re Ref to 10CFR20.106 & Change to Paragraphs 1,4,5 & 6 (Lines 6,3,8 & 2 Respectively) Re Ref to 10CFR20.106 ML20058N2321993-12-10010 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.21, Environ/Radiological Effluents, 6.5, Station Reporting Requirements & 6.5.1.C.2 Re 10CFR50.59(b) Rept ML20058N2881993-12-10010 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs for Pressure Vs Temp Operating Limit Curves ML20058M2591993-09-28028 September 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Organizational Structure by Removing Mgt Positions of Site Manager & Senior Manager of Operation ML20056G5971993-08-31031 August 1993 Proposed TS Re Primary Containment Isolation Valve Tables ML20056G5821993-08-31031 August 1993 Proposed TS Re Primary & Secondary Containment Integrity ML20056G2341993-08-25025 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section to Reflect Operational & Design Changes Made to CNS Svc Water Sys During 1993 Refueling Outage ML20056F3331993-08-23023 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0, Administrative Controls, Reflecting Creation of Mgt Position of Vice President - Nuclear ML20045D8991993-06-23023 June 1993 Proposed TS SR 4.9.A.2 Re Determination of Particulate Concentration Level of Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tanks ML20045C0031993-06-14014 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Associated W/Dc Performance Criteria ML20045C8301993-06-14014 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating New Requirements of 10CFR20 ML20128L5561993-02-12012 February 1993 Proposed TS Table 4.2.D, Min Test & Calibr Frequencies for Radiation Monitoring Sys & TS Pages 81 & 84 Re Notes for Tables 4.2.A Through 4.2.F ML20128E6201993-02-0101 February 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Current NRC Positions Re Leak Detection & ISI Schedules,Methods,Personnel & Sample Expansion,Per GL 88-01 ML20127B8331993-01-0505 January 1993 Proposed TS Pages 53,55,70 & 71,removing Bus 1A & 1B Low Voltage Auxiliary Relays ML20115F8531992-10-15015 October 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Page 48,reflecting Relocation of Mechanical Vacuum Pump Isolation SRs ML20115A3481992-10-0808 October 1992 Proposed TS Section 6.1.2 Re Offsite & Onsite Organizations, Delineating Responsibilities of Site Manager & 6.2.1.A Re Min Composition of Station Operations Review Committee ML20104B2091992-09-0909 September 1992 Proposed TS 3.1.1 Re Reactor Protection Sys Instrumentation Requirements & TS Table 3.2.D Re Radiation Monitoring Sys That Initiate &/Or Isolate Sys ML20104A8691992-09-0202 September 1992 Proposed TS 3.9 & 4.9 Re Auxiliary Electrical Sys ML20099D4151992-07-28028 July 1992 Proposed TS 3.6 Re LCO for Primary Sys Boundary & 4.6 Re Surveillance Requirements for Primary Sys Boundary ML20113G8241992-05-0404 May 1992 Proposed Tech Spec Pages for Removal of Component Lists,Per Generic Ltr 91-08 ML20096D6111992-05-0404 May 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Change 100 to Eliminate Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Scram & Isolation Functions ML20090A8061992-02-25025 February 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Dc Power Sys 1999-06-08
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217C7961999-10-0606 October 1999 Marked-up & Type Written Proposed TS Pages,Revising TSs 1.0, 3.6,Bases 3.0,Bases 3.6 & 5.5,to Adopt Implementation Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Option B for Performance of Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20209A7351999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.3-4 & 3.3-6,replacing Page 3.3-6 Re Recirculation Loop Flow Transmitters & Applicable SRs Associated with Function 2.b ML20196B4741999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Changes Made at Plant Subsequent to Receipt of License Amend 178,dtd 980731,for Conversion to Its,Through 990610 ML20195E9101999-06-0808 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Described Method by Which SGTS Heaters Are to Be Tested ML20207A0761999-05-14014 May 1999 Rev 3 to CNS Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20206J2661999-04-22022 April 1999 CNS Offsite Dose Assessment Manual (Odam) ML20205H2891999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying ACs for Unit Staff Qualifications for Shift Supervisor,Senior Operator,Licensed Operator,Shift Technical Advisor & Radiation Manager Positions ML20151Q0621998-07-28028 July 1998 Final Version of Improved TS & Bases Re Proposed Change to Conversion to Improved Standard TS ML20236W1141998-07-28028 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236R9821998-07-16016 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.5.1,re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236Q0641998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion to Improved STS ML20206P9051998-07-0707 July 1998 Rev 2, Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence, for Cooper Nuclear Station ML20216H0571998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20216H0801998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 2.1.A.1.d & 3.2.C,deleting Max Rated Power for APRM Rod Block Trip Setting ML20216D8971998-04-0808 April 1998 Rev 1 to Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20216B4481998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20203G4271998-02-24024 February 1998 Rev 0 to First Ten-Year Interval Containment Insp Program for Cns ML20202H5311998-02-11011 February 1998 Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20216G1571997-09-0505 September 1997 Rev 2.1 to Third 10-Yr Interval Inservice Insp Program ML20210H5641997-08-0707 August 1997 Rev 2 to NPPD CNS Third Interval Inservice Testing Program ML20148G3481997-05-30030 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Frequency of Testing RHR Cross Tie valve,RHR-MOV-MO20,position Indication from Once Per Month to Once Per Operating Cycle ML20148G8531997-05-0909 May 1997 Nebraska Public Power District Nuclear Power Group Phase 3 Performance Improvement Plan, Closure Rept ML20138J0751997-05-0505 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Control of Standby Liquid Control Relief Valve Setpoint in TS 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases ML20148B0041997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SLC Relief Valve Testing Described in TS Section 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases in Bases Section 3.4.A Since Testing Is Already Performed Under ISI Program ML20138H3861997-04-29029 April 1997 Rev 1.2 to CNS Third Interval IST Program ML20134K3771997-02-10010 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Avoidance & Protection from Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities to Be Consistent w/NEDO-31960 & NEDO-31960,Suppl 1, BWR Owners Group Long-Term Stability Solutions.. ML20134E1091996-10-25025 October 1996 NPPD Cooper Nuclear Station Third Interval IST Program, Rev 1 ML20117K3291996-06-0606 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Safety Limit MCPR from 1.06 to 1.07 for Dual Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.07 to 1.08 for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20100R4431996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 142, Revising TS, DG Enhancements ML20101L8381995-12-31031 December 1995 Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test. W/ ML20113B0531995-12-29029 December 1995 Rev 4.1 to NPPD CNS Second Ten Yr Interval ISI Program for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Components ML20093L1901995-10-18018 October 1995 Rev 0 to Third Ten-Yr Interval ISI Program for Cns ML20086K4421995-07-14014 July 1995 Revised Proposed Tech Specs Re DG Enhancements Reflecting More Conservative Approach to Enhancing DGs ML20086H7341995-07-14014 July 1995 Rev 7 to CNS Second Ten Yr Interval IST Program ML20086H7601995-06-30030 June 1995 Rev 4 to CNS Second Ten Yr Interval ISI Program for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Components ML20086B7061995-06-28028 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increasing Required RPV Boron Concentration & Modifying Surveillance Frequency for SLC Pump Operability Testing ML20085J2631995-06-15015 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Surveillance Intervals for Logic Sys Functional Testing for ECCS ML20083A7241995-05-0505 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Changes to TSs & Associated Bases for License DPR-46 ML20083A1341995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Temporary Rev to SR to Extend Two Year LLRT Interval Requirement ML20083M0401995-01-20020 January 1995 Rev 1 to Restart Readiness Program ML20083M0901995-01-13013 January 1995 Rev 2 to Startup & Power Ascension Plan ML20149H8821994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Control Room Emergency Filter Sys ML20078S5711994-12-22022 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definition of Lco,Per GL 87-09 ML20083M0141994-11-0909 November 1994 Rev 3 to Phase 1 Plan, ML20083M0321994-11-0808 November 1994 Rev 0 to Restart Readiness Program ML20073J2371994-09-26026 September 1994 Proposed TS LCOs 3.5.C.1 & 3.5.C.4,increasing Min Pressure at Which HPCI Sys Required to Be Operable from Greater than 113 Psig to Greater than 150 Psig ML20149F9921994-09-15015 September 1994 Rev 1 to CNS Startup Plan ML20071K9311994-07-27027 July 1994 Diagnostic Self Assessment (DSA) Implementation Plan ML20071K1541994-07-26026 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Increase Flow Capacity of Control Room Emergency Filter System ML20070M6671994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Intermittent Operation of Hydrogen/ Oxygen Analyzers 1999-06-08
[Table view] |
Text
.
LIMITING CONDZTIONS FOR OPERATION SURVEILLANCE, REQUIREMENTS 3.6 Primary System Boundary 4.6 Primary System Boundary Applicability: Applicability:
Applies to the operating status of Applies to the periodic examination the reactor coolant system, and testing requirements for the i reactor cooling system.
Objective: Objective:
To assure the integrity and safe op- To determine the condition of the i eration of the reactor ecolant sys- reactor coolant system and the tem. operation of the safety devices related to it.
Specification: Specification:
A. Thermal and Pressuri'.ation Limitations A. Thermal and Pressurization Limitations
- 1. The average rate of reactor coolant 1. During heatups and cooldowns, the-temperature change during normal heat- following temperatures shall be per-up or cocidown shall not exceed manently logged at least every 15 100*F/hr when averaged over a one- minutes until the difference between hour period, any two readings taken over a 45 minute period is less than 50*F.
- a. Bottom head drain.
- b. Recirculation loops A and B. ;
- 2. During operation where the core is 2. Reactor vessel temperature and reactor critical or during heatup by non- coolant pressure shall be permanently nuclear means or cooldown following logged at least every 15 minutes when-shutdown, the reactor vessel metal ever the shell temperature is below and fluid temperatures shall be at 220*F and the reactor vessel is not or above the temperatures shown vented.
on the limiting curves of Fig-ures 3.6.1.a or 3.6.1.b.
I
- 3. The reactor vessel metal temperatures for the botton head region and >
beltline region shall be at or above 3. Test specimens of the reactor vessel the temperatures shown on the base, weld and heat affected zone metal limiting curves of Figure 3.6.2 subjected to the highest fluence of during inservice hydrostatic or leak greater than 1 Mev neutrons shall be i testing. The Adjusted Reference installed in the reactor vessel adjacent !
Temperature (ART) for the beltline to the vessel wall at the core midplane {'
region must be determined from the level. The specimens and sample program appropriate beltline curve (8, 10, shall conform to ASTM E 185-73 to or 12 EFPY) depending on the current the degree possible, accumulated number of effective full j power years (EFPY). The ART curve !
for the bottom head is valid to l 12 EFPY. !
l 90 yd1090'312 occa hoeoa ;
P
-132- !
i__-.____.__~-____m._
LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION ! SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS'
'3.6.A (cont'd.)- i.6.A (cont'd.). d The schedule'for withdrawal of the remaining two caps'ules'is based on.
ASTM E185-82 and is as.follows:..
Second Capsule r 215: EFPYJ Third Capsule: 12 EFPY' l
l l
l I
d 1
.J 1
i J .
1 J
m i
4
- 4. The Reactor vessel head bolting 4. When the reactor vessel head bolting j 3
studs shall not be under tension studs are tensioned'and the reactor is' unless the temperaturesof the vessel in a Cold Condition, the. reactor. vessel '
head flange and the head is greater shell' temperature immediately'below l) than 80 F. the: head-flange shall be permanently.
recorded. ,
- 5. The pump in an idle recirculation loop 5. Prior'to and duEing startup of a'n I shall not be started unless the temp- idle, recirculation loop,'the temperature eratures of the coolant within the of'the reactor coolant in'the operating idle and operating recirculation loops and idle loops.shall be permanently are within 50 F of each other. logged.' ;
l
- 6. The reactor recirculation pumps shall 6' . Prior to - starting .a recirculation pump,,
not be started unless the coolant ttua reactor coolant temperatures cin <!
temperaturesbetweenthedomeangthe .the dome'and in'the bottom head drain, bottom head drain are within 145 F.' - shallibe compared and permanently
' logged.=
c
-133-'
I~
3.6.A & 4.6.A
~ - - " ' ~ ~ ~ " - ~ ~ -
BASES l
Thermal and Pressurization Limitations i The requirements for the reactor vessel have been identified by evaluating the need for its integrity over the full spectrum of plant conditions and events.
l This is accomplished through the Station Nuclear Safety Operational Analysis (Appendix G) and a detailed functional analysis of' the reactor vessel. The I limits expressed in the technical specification for the applicable operating states are taken from the actual Nuclear Safety Operational Requirements for the reactor vessel as given in Subsection IV-2.8 of the Updated Safety Analysis Report.
The components of the nuclear system pressure boundary are constructed so that j its initial maximum nil-ductility transition temperature (RT NDT) is not' greater I than 40'F, as cited in Subacetion IV-2.5 of the Updated Safety Analysis Report.
The heatup-cooldown and hydrostatic test minimum pressurization temperatures were l calculated to comply with the recommendations of Appendix G of Section III, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1972 Summer Addendum. .
1 The temperature versus pressure limits when critical which are presented in i Figure 3.6.1.b assure compliance with Appendix G of 10CFR50. ;
I Tightening the studs on the reactor vessel head flexes it slightly to bring together the entire contact surfaces adjaer.nt to the 0-rings of the head and vessel flange. The reactor vessel head flange and head are constructed ,
so that their initial maximum NDTT is 20*F, as cited in Paragraph IV-2.5 of the l Updated Safety Analysis Report. Therefore, the initial minimum temperature at 1 which the studs can be placed in tension is established at 80*F (20*F + 60*F). j The total integrated neutron flux in the head glange rggion will be less than that {
at the core mid-plane level by a factor of 10 or 10 ,therefore,tgymaximum '
calculated fluence in the head flange r:gion will be far below 1 x 10 nyt. l With such a low total integrated neutron flux in the head flange region, j there will be no detectable or significant NDTT shif t, and the minimum stud tightening temperature remains at 80*F.
1 The reactor vessel is designed in accordance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III, for a pressure of 1250 psig. The pressure limit of 1035 psig represents the maximum expected operating pressure in the steam dome when the station is operating at design thermal power. Observation of this limit assures that the operator remains within the envelope of conditions considered by Chapter 14 of the Updated Safety Analysis Report.
Stress analyses have been made on the reactor vessel for both steady-state and transient conditions with respect to material fatigue. The results of these analyses are compared to allevable stress limits. The apccific conditions analyzed included a maximum of 120 cycles of normal startup and shutdown with a heating and cooling rate of 100*F per hour applied continuously.over a temp-erature range of 100*F to 546*F. The expected number of normal heatup and cool-down cycles to which the vessel will be subjected is 80.
-146-
~_. _. _. . _ . - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . __ . . . _ . _ . - . . - . _ . . -
m_ -
,6 3.60A & 4.60A BASES (cont'd)~
~ ~~ -~~ ~ ~ ' ~
As described in the safety analysis report, detailed stress analyses have been made on the reactor vessel for both steady-state and transient conditions with respect to material fatigue. The results of these analyses are compared to allowable stress limits. Requiring the coolant temperature in an idle re-circulation loop to be within 50 F of the operating loop temperature before a recirculation pump is started assures that the changes in coolant temperature at the reactor vessel nozzles and bottom head region are acceptable.
The coolant in the bottom of the vessel is at a lower temperature than that in the upper regions of the vessel when there is no recirculation flow. This J colder water is forced up when recirculation pumps are started. This will not i result in stresses which exceed ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codeg Section j III limits when the temperature differential is not greater than 145 F. j i
The first surveillance capsule was removed at 6.8 EFPY of operation and base I metal, weld metal and RAZ specimens were tested. In addition, flux wires were )
tested to experimentally determine the integrated neutron flux (fluence) at the I surveillance capsule location. The test results are presented in General Electric Report MDE-103-0986. Measured shifts in RT of the base metal and weld metal i werecomparedtopredictedvaluesperRegu1NIryGuide1.99, Revision 1. The !
measured values were higher than predicted, so the 1.99 methods were modified to reflect the surveillance data. The test results for the flux wires were used i with analytically determined lead factors to determine the peak end-of-life (EOL) ]
fluence at the 1/4 T Vessel wa1 depth The value corresponding to 40 years operation (32 EFPY) is 1.5 x 10{8 n/cm2 .
The adjusted reference temperature (ART) of a beltline material is defined as the initial RT plus the RT shift due to irradiation. The curves of l Figures 3.6.1.gD1nd 3.6.1.b rk2Iect a beltline ART of 110'F, making them valid for operation up to 12 EFPY. Figure 3.6.2, the pressure test curve, includes curves with ART values for 8,10 and 12 EFPY to provide more flexibility in pressure testing. Figure 3.6.2 also has a separate curve for the bottom head region. The bottom head curve does not shif t with increased operation. Therefore, the bottom head temperature can be monitored against lower temperature requirements than the beltline during pressure testing.
B. Coolant Chemistry Materials in the primary system are primarily Type-304 stainless steel and Ziracloy cladding. The reactor water chemistry Ibnits are established to provide an environment favorable to these materials. Limits are placed on conductivity and chloride concentrations. Conductivity is limited because it can be continuously and reliably measured and gives an indication of abnormal conditions and the presence of unusual materials in the coolant. ' Chloride limits are specified to prevent stress corrosion cracking of stainless oteel.
Several investigations have shown that in neutral solutions some oxygen is required to cause stress corrosion cracking of stainless steel, while in the absence of oxygen no cragking occurs. One of these is the chloride-oxygen relationship of Williams , where it is shown that at high chloride concentration little oxygen is required to cause stress corrosion cracking of stainless steel, and at high oxygen concentration little chloride is required to cause cracking.
These measurements were determined in a wetting and drying situation using alkaline-phosphate-treated boiler water and thereforat are of limited significance to BRR conditions. They are, however, a qualitative indication of trends.
1 W. L. Williams, Corrosion 13, 1957, p. 539t.
-147-
. ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ ,_ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - .
4 B
l
' INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK"
-154-
1 l
4 1600 I I.
VAUD TO 12 EFPY
.k 1400 ADJUSTED BELTLINE, 1/4T FLAW, ART = 110*F 1200 T 1000 h
a k
5 800 E
w w
E 600
, SAFE l
OPERATING l
REGION . _
400 NON BELTLINE FW NOZ2LE UMITS, 1/4T FLAW, RTNOT=28*F 200
/ BOLT PRELOAD TEMPERATURE = 80*F FLANGE REGION RTNDT = 20*F e
0
'N 200 390 MINIMUM VESSEL METAL TEMPERATURE (*F)
Figure 3.6.1.a Minimum Temperature for Non-Nuclear Heatup or Core Cooldown Following Nuclear Shutdown 155 t
l 1800 l i
l VALID TO 12 EFPY k
l 1
1400 , I ADJUSTED BELTLINE 1/4T FLAW, ART =110*F l
1200 1000 I l s
W 800
(
r a
600 NON 8ELTLINE SAFE FW N0ZZLE UMITS - OPERATING PLUS 40'F,1/4T FLAW REGION RTNOT = 28'F 400 ,
FLANGE REGION RTNDT = 20'F; MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE 200 " TEMPERATURE = 80*F .#
PER 10CFR50 8f APPENDIX G s
4 0
0 100 200 300 MINIMUM VESSEL METAL TEMNRATURE ('O Figure 3.6.1.b Minimum Temperature for Core Operation (Criticality) -
Includes 400F Margin Required by 10CFR50 Appendix G
~15e
l 1800 BOTTOM EFPY HEAD REGION 8 10 12 l 1400 l l }* f I //!
f / //
/ ///
I // /
/ // /
BELTLINE CURVES.
1/4 T FLAW,
/ f/
) I /
/
ADJUSTED AS 1000 j f f /
SHOWN; EFPY ART (*F) y
! / /// a di "o
4
'2 g 800 / /// SAFE l
E [ r
/)[ OPERATING REGION i ///
///
600 f,r f 110'F =
1 400
/
312 psig
\
- -- BOLT PRELOAD 200 l ' TEMPERATURE FLANGE REGION = 80*F j [ RTNOT = 20*F 0
100 200 300 0
MINIMUM VESSEL METAL TEMPERATURE ('F)
Figure 3.6.2 Minimum Temperature for Pressure Tests Such as Required by Section XI 157
. - - - - - _ _ .