|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217C7961999-10-0606 October 1999 Marked-up & Type Written Proposed TS Pages,Revising TSs 1.0, 3.6,Bases 3.0,Bases 3.6 & 5.5,to Adopt Implementation Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Option B for Performance of Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20209A7351999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.3-4 & 3.3-6,replacing Page 3.3-6 Re Recirculation Loop Flow Transmitters & Applicable SRs Associated with Function 2.b ML20196B4741999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Changes Made at Plant Subsequent to Receipt of License Amend 178,dtd 980731,for Conversion to Its,Through 990610 ML20195E9101999-06-0808 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Described Method by Which SGTS Heaters Are to Be Tested ML20205H2891999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying ACs for Unit Staff Qualifications for Shift Supervisor,Senior Operator,Licensed Operator,Shift Technical Advisor & Radiation Manager Positions ML20236W1141998-07-28028 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20151Q0621998-07-28028 July 1998 Final Version of Improved TS & Bases Re Proposed Change to Conversion to Improved Standard TS ML20236R9821998-07-16016 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.5.1,re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236Q0641998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion to Improved STS ML20216H0801998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 2.1.A.1.d & 3.2.C,deleting Max Rated Power for APRM Rod Block Trip Setting ML20216H0571998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20216B4481998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20148G3481997-05-30030 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Frequency of Testing RHR Cross Tie valve,RHR-MOV-MO20,position Indication from Once Per Month to Once Per Operating Cycle ML20138J0751997-05-0505 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Control of Standby Liquid Control Relief Valve Setpoint in TS 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases ML20148B0041997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SLC Relief Valve Testing Described in TS Section 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases in Bases Section 3.4.A Since Testing Is Already Performed Under ISI Program ML20134K3771997-02-10010 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Avoidance & Protection from Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities to Be Consistent w/NEDO-31960 & NEDO-31960,Suppl 1, BWR Owners Group Long-Term Stability Solutions.. ML20117K3291996-06-0606 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Safety Limit MCPR from 1.06 to 1.07 for Dual Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.07 to 1.08 for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20100R4431996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 142, Revising TS, DG Enhancements ML20086K4421995-07-14014 July 1995 Revised Proposed Tech Specs Re DG Enhancements Reflecting More Conservative Approach to Enhancing DGs ML20086B7061995-06-28028 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increasing Required RPV Boron Concentration & Modifying Surveillance Frequency for SLC Pump Operability Testing ML20085J2631995-06-15015 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Surveillance Intervals for Logic Sys Functional Testing for ECCS ML20083A7241995-05-0505 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Changes to TSs & Associated Bases for License DPR-46 ML20083A1341995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Temporary Rev to SR to Extend Two Year LLRT Interval Requirement ML20149H8821994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Control Room Emergency Filter Sys ML20078S5711994-12-22022 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definition of Lco,Per GL 87-09 ML20073J2371994-09-26026 September 1994 Proposed TS LCOs 3.5.C.1 & 3.5.C.4,increasing Min Pressure at Which HPCI Sys Required to Be Operable from Greater than 113 Psig to Greater than 150 Psig ML20071K1541994-07-26026 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Increase Flow Capacity of Control Room Emergency Filter System ML20070M6671994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Intermittent Operation of Hydrogen/ Oxygen Analyzers ML20065K1931994-04-12012 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Removal of Definitions 1.0.Z.B.1 Through 5,change to LCO 3.21.B.1.a (Line 5) Re Ref to 10CFR20.106 & Change to Paragraphs 1,4,5 & 6 (Lines 6,3,8 & 2 Respectively) Re Ref to 10CFR20.106 ML20058N2321993-12-10010 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.21, Environ/Radiological Effluents, 6.5, Station Reporting Requirements & 6.5.1.C.2 Re 10CFR50.59(b) Rept ML20058N2881993-12-10010 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs for Pressure Vs Temp Operating Limit Curves ML20058M2591993-09-28028 September 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Organizational Structure by Removing Mgt Positions of Site Manager & Senior Manager of Operation ML20056G5971993-08-31031 August 1993 Proposed TS Re Primary Containment Isolation Valve Tables ML20056G5821993-08-31031 August 1993 Proposed TS Re Primary & Secondary Containment Integrity ML20056G2341993-08-25025 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section to Reflect Operational & Design Changes Made to CNS Svc Water Sys During 1993 Refueling Outage ML20056F3331993-08-23023 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0, Administrative Controls, Reflecting Creation of Mgt Position of Vice President - Nuclear ML20045D8991993-06-23023 June 1993 Proposed TS SR 4.9.A.2 Re Determination of Particulate Concentration Level of Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tanks ML20045C0031993-06-14014 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Associated W/Dc Performance Criteria ML20045C8301993-06-14014 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating New Requirements of 10CFR20 ML20128L5561993-02-12012 February 1993 Proposed TS Table 4.2.D, Min Test & Calibr Frequencies for Radiation Monitoring Sys & TS Pages 81 & 84 Re Notes for Tables 4.2.A Through 4.2.F ML20128E6201993-02-0101 February 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Current NRC Positions Re Leak Detection & ISI Schedules,Methods,Personnel & Sample Expansion,Per GL 88-01 ML20127B8331993-01-0505 January 1993 Proposed TS Pages 53,55,70 & 71,removing Bus 1A & 1B Low Voltage Auxiliary Relays ML20115F8531992-10-15015 October 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Page 48,reflecting Relocation of Mechanical Vacuum Pump Isolation SRs ML20115A3481992-10-0808 October 1992 Proposed TS Section 6.1.2 Re Offsite & Onsite Organizations, Delineating Responsibilities of Site Manager & 6.2.1.A Re Min Composition of Station Operations Review Committee ML20104B2091992-09-0909 September 1992 Proposed TS 3.1.1 Re Reactor Protection Sys Instrumentation Requirements & TS Table 3.2.D Re Radiation Monitoring Sys That Initiate &/Or Isolate Sys ML20104A8691992-09-0202 September 1992 Proposed TS 3.9 & 4.9 Re Auxiliary Electrical Sys ML20099D4151992-07-28028 July 1992 Proposed TS 3.6 Re LCO for Primary Sys Boundary & 4.6 Re Surveillance Requirements for Primary Sys Boundary ML20113G8241992-05-0404 May 1992 Proposed Tech Spec Pages for Removal of Component Lists,Per Generic Ltr 91-08 ML20096D6111992-05-0404 May 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Change 100 to Eliminate Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Scram & Isolation Functions ML20090A8061992-02-25025 February 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Dc Power Sys 1999-06-08
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217C7961999-10-0606 October 1999 Marked-up & Type Written Proposed TS Pages,Revising TSs 1.0, 3.6,Bases 3.0,Bases 3.6 & 5.5,to Adopt Implementation Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Option B for Performance of Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20209A7351999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.3-4 & 3.3-6,replacing Page 3.3-6 Re Recirculation Loop Flow Transmitters & Applicable SRs Associated with Function 2.b ML20196B4741999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Changes Made at Plant Subsequent to Receipt of License Amend 178,dtd 980731,for Conversion to Its,Through 990610 ML20195E9101999-06-0808 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Described Method by Which SGTS Heaters Are to Be Tested ML20207A0761999-05-14014 May 1999 Rev 3 to CNS Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20206J2661999-04-22022 April 1999 CNS Offsite Dose Assessment Manual (Odam) ML20205H2891999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying ACs for Unit Staff Qualifications for Shift Supervisor,Senior Operator,Licensed Operator,Shift Technical Advisor & Radiation Manager Positions ML20151Q0621998-07-28028 July 1998 Final Version of Improved TS & Bases Re Proposed Change to Conversion to Improved Standard TS ML20236W1141998-07-28028 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236R9821998-07-16016 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.5.1,re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236Q0641998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion to Improved STS ML20206P9051998-07-0707 July 1998 Rev 2, Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence, for Cooper Nuclear Station ML20216H0571998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20216H0801998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 2.1.A.1.d & 3.2.C,deleting Max Rated Power for APRM Rod Block Trip Setting ML20216D8971998-04-0808 April 1998 Rev 1 to Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20216B4481998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20203G4271998-02-24024 February 1998 Rev 0 to First Ten-Year Interval Containment Insp Program for Cns ML20202H5311998-02-11011 February 1998 Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20216G1571997-09-0505 September 1997 Rev 2.1 to Third 10-Yr Interval Inservice Insp Program ML20210H5641997-08-0707 August 1997 Rev 2 to NPPD CNS Third Interval Inservice Testing Program ML20148G3481997-05-30030 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Frequency of Testing RHR Cross Tie valve,RHR-MOV-MO20,position Indication from Once Per Month to Once Per Operating Cycle ML20148G8531997-05-0909 May 1997 Nebraska Public Power District Nuclear Power Group Phase 3 Performance Improvement Plan, Closure Rept ML20138J0751997-05-0505 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Control of Standby Liquid Control Relief Valve Setpoint in TS 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases ML20148B0041997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SLC Relief Valve Testing Described in TS Section 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases in Bases Section 3.4.A Since Testing Is Already Performed Under ISI Program ML20138H3861997-04-29029 April 1997 Rev 1.2 to CNS Third Interval IST Program ML20134K3771997-02-10010 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Avoidance & Protection from Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities to Be Consistent w/NEDO-31960 & NEDO-31960,Suppl 1, BWR Owners Group Long-Term Stability Solutions.. ML20134E1091996-10-25025 October 1996 NPPD Cooper Nuclear Station Third Interval IST Program, Rev 1 ML20117K3291996-06-0606 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Safety Limit MCPR from 1.06 to 1.07 for Dual Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.07 to 1.08 for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20100R4431996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 142, Revising TS, DG Enhancements ML20101L8381995-12-31031 December 1995 Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test. W/ ML20113B0531995-12-29029 December 1995 Rev 4.1 to NPPD CNS Second Ten Yr Interval ISI Program for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Components ML20093L1901995-10-18018 October 1995 Rev 0 to Third Ten-Yr Interval ISI Program for Cns ML20086K4421995-07-14014 July 1995 Revised Proposed Tech Specs Re DG Enhancements Reflecting More Conservative Approach to Enhancing DGs ML20086H7341995-07-14014 July 1995 Rev 7 to CNS Second Ten Yr Interval IST Program ML20086H7601995-06-30030 June 1995 Rev 4 to CNS Second Ten Yr Interval ISI Program for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Components ML20086B7061995-06-28028 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increasing Required RPV Boron Concentration & Modifying Surveillance Frequency for SLC Pump Operability Testing ML20085J2631995-06-15015 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Surveillance Intervals for Logic Sys Functional Testing for ECCS ML20083A7241995-05-0505 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Changes to TSs & Associated Bases for License DPR-46 ML20083A1341995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Temporary Rev to SR to Extend Two Year LLRT Interval Requirement ML20083M0401995-01-20020 January 1995 Rev 1 to Restart Readiness Program ML20083M0901995-01-13013 January 1995 Rev 2 to Startup & Power Ascension Plan ML20149H8821994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Control Room Emergency Filter Sys ML20078S5711994-12-22022 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definition of Lco,Per GL 87-09 ML20083M0141994-11-0909 November 1994 Rev 3 to Phase 1 Plan, ML20083M0321994-11-0808 November 1994 Rev 0 to Restart Readiness Program ML20073J2371994-09-26026 September 1994 Proposed TS LCOs 3.5.C.1 & 3.5.C.4,increasing Min Pressure at Which HPCI Sys Required to Be Operable from Greater than 113 Psig to Greater than 150 Psig ML20149F9921994-09-15015 September 1994 Rev 1 to CNS Startup Plan ML20071K9311994-07-27027 July 1994 Diagnostic Self Assessment (DSA) Implementation Plan ML20071K1541994-07-26026 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Increase Flow Capacity of Control Room Emergency Filter System ML20070M6671994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Intermittent Operation of Hydrogen/ Oxygen Analyzers 1999-06-08
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
6.0 6DJTNISTRAI.IVE CONTROLS 6.1 ORGA_HIJATION 6.1.1 Pennonsibility The Plant Mana u er is directly responsible foc the safe and efficient operatica of the plant by providing direction for operation, radiological, engineering, and maintenance support activities. The Plant Manaper reports to the Site Manager who has overview and coordination respor bility for ensuring the safe and efficient operation ,f Cooper Nuclear Stacion. During periods of time when the Plant Manager ic unavailablo, his responsibilities automatically shift to the Senior Manager of Operations. During periods of a time when the Plant Manage r and the Senior Manager of Operations are not available, the responsibilities of the Plant Manager may be delegated in writing to one of the managers on the Cooper Nuclear Station Site staff qualified for this pocition.
6.1.2 Offsite and Onsite Orranizations y Unsite and offsite organizations shall be established for unit < peration and corporate management, respectively. The onsite and offsite organizations shall include the positions for activities affecting the safety of the nuclear power plant.
A. Lines of authority, responsibility, and communication shall be established and detined for the highest management levels through s intermediate levels to and including all operating org eization positions. These relationships shall be documented and updated, as appropriate, in the form of organization charts, functional descriptions of departmental responsibilities and relationships, and job descriptions for key personnel positions, or in equivalent forms i
of doctunentation. These requirements chall be documented in the USAR.
L. The Site Manager shall have overview ar.d coordinate the activities of
% the following positions:
B.1 The Plant Manager who is renponsible for overall safe unit operation and who has control over those onsite activities necessary for safe operation and maintenance cf the plant.
B.2 The Senior Manager of Site Support who is directly respansible for supporting the sale and efficient operation of the plant by providing direction for training, outage and modification _
coordination, station security, and administrative support.
C. The Nuclear Power Group Manager sbd.1 have torporate responsibility for overall plant nuclear safety and shall take any measures needed to ensure acceptable performance of the staff ir. operating, mai~i-ining, md providing technical support to the plant to ensure nuciser safety.
.. The individuals who train the operating staff cnd those who carry out health physics and quality assurance functions may report to the appropriate onsite mar. age r ; however, they shall have sufficient organizational freedom to ensure their independence from operating pressures.
6.1.3 Hant Staff - Shift Complement The shift complement at the starion shall at all times meet the following requiremento. Note: Higher grade licensed operators may take the place of lower grade licensed or unlicensed. operators.
A. A licensed senior reactor operator (SRO) shall be present at the station at all times when t-here is any fuel in the reactor.
B. A licensed reactor operator shall be in the control room at all times when there is any fuel i1 tk reactor.
C. Two l! censed reactor operators shall be in the control room during all startup, shutdown and other periods involving significant planned control rod manipulations. A licensed SRO shall either be in the control Room or lumediately available to the Control Room during such periods.
9210140249 921008 ~219~
PDR ADOCK O$000298 P PDR _ _ _ _ _ ______ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _.
- n. . .
.f^ __
- 6.2:; B.EVIEW : ANDf AUDI,I T
6;2 1 The organization and duties of comnittees for the' review and audit of- station operation shall be=as outlined below:
A, = Station Operationst Review Committee m. W g
1, SORC shall have a minimum of eight voting members - comprised' of . the-folk wing:
- a. Chairman: Plant Manager or alternate
- b. Individuals from'the following disciplines: -
Operations Radiological (Chemistry / Health Physics)
Maintenance Engineering. >
Koacter Engineering
+
Instrumentation and Control The above, according to individual job title, shall meet '
4 requiremeury , .
as described in Sections 4,2, 4.3,1, or 4.4 of the ' Arnerican National . '
Standards Institute 1;-18.1 1971, " Selection and Tretning of Personnel for -
Nuclear Power Plants."
Non-voting members rnay also serve on SORC- to broader. . its expertise in other areas (e.g.,. Quality Assurancs).
All alternate members shall be appointed in wrf ting by the SORC Chairmans to serve on a ternporary basis; however, no more ithan two alternates shall .
- participate as voting members in SORC at any one time.
- 2. Meeting Frequency: Monthly, and as required.on cal 1~of the Chairman.
- 3. Quorum
- SORC chairman plus such a number es to constitute a majority of -
the voting members. ,
4
- 4. Responsibilities:
- a. Review all proposed normal,- abnormal, maintenance and ernergency -
operating procedures specified in 6. 3.1, 6.3. 2, 6. 3. 3, ' and 6. 3. 4 and l
proposed changes thereto: .and . any other proposed procedures or changes thereto deterrnined by any member to= effect nuclear safety, p
'b. Review all proposed tests and experiments and their results, which involve nuclear hazards not previously reviewed for conformance with technical specifications. Submit - tests which may 3 onstitute - an :
unreviewed safety question to the NPPD Safety Review and Audit Board -
for review.
- c. Review proposed changes to Technical Specifications.
-d. Review proposed changes or modifications to station - systems or equipment as discussed in the USAR or which involves an unreviewed l- safety question as defined in 10CFR50.59(c), Submit changes to equipment or syst. ems having safety significance to the NPPD Safety ,
I '
Review and Ar.oit Board for reniew.
i .e . Review station operation to detect potential nuclear safety hazards.
--220-
i m
7" '
6;2 -(cont'd)
- f. . Investigate- .all violations of- Technical - Specificatiions, ' including; reporting evaluation' and recommendations to prevent recurrence,- to the Nuc1 car.. Power Group Manager and to the Chairman of the NPPD Safety .
Rrview and Audit Board,
- g. Perform special: reviews and investigations and render reports thereon-as requested by the Chairman of the Safety Review and-Audit-Board,
- h. Review all reportable events specified -in' Section 50.73 to - 10CFR
-Part 50.
?
Review drills on emergency procedures (including plant evacuation) and' ao pv of communication with off site groups.
j, Periodically review procedures required by .Specificarions; 6.3,1, :
6.3.2, 6.3.3, and 6.3.4.as set forth in administrative procedures.
- 5. Authority
- e. The Station Operations Review Committee shall be advisory,-
- b. The Station Operations Review Committee shall recommend to the SORC Chairman approval or disapproval cf proposals under items 4, a through e and j above. In case of disagreement between the recommendations of L the Station Operations Review Committee and $.he Plant Manager, the courso determined 'by the Plant Manager to be the more s.onnervative will be.followed. A written summary of the disagreement wil.1 be'sent -
to the Site Manager, Nuclear Power Group Manager, and - to the NPID l-Safety Review and Audit Board.
- c. The Station Operations Review Committoe shall report to the Chairman of the NPPD Safety Review and Audit Board on . all reviews and.
investigations conducted under items 4.f, 4.g. 4.h, and 4.1.
- d. The Station Operations Review Committee shall make determinations regardi.ng whether or not proposals considered by the Committee involve unreviewed_ safety questions. This determination shall be subject to review by the NPPD Safety Review and Audit Board.
- 6. Records:
Minutes shall be kept for all. meetings of the Station Operations Review-Committee and shall include identification of - all documentary material reviewed. Copies of the minutes shall be-forwarded to the Chairman of the NPPD - Safety Review and Audit Board 'and the liuclear Power Group Manager vithin one month.
.7. Procedures:
Written administrative procedures for Coumittee operation sha, t be prepared and maintained describirg 'the method for submission ano -content of <
presentations to the committee, provisions for use of. subcoimnittees, -review -
and approval by members of written Committee evaluations - and l recommendations, dissev . on of minutes, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
l r
-221-o n , n- r - .a ,-.-
. 1
s ,7 m, .
7 O " 6.2 J(cont'd)?
w Proposed tests or experiments which involve an unreviewed: safety!
question.as= defined in Section 50.59, 10LCFRi
'd. Proposed changes to Appendix A Technical Specifications or;the-CNS: Operating License.
c'. Violations of-applicable codes, regulations, orders, Technical Specifications, license requirements, or of internal- procedures?
or instructions:having nuclear safety significance,
- f. Significant operating abnormalities or deviations from normal' and' expected performance of plant equipment _ that affect nuclear safety.
- g. All -reportable events specified in Section:50.73 to '10CFR Part 50,
- h. Any indication of an unanticipated, deficiency in some-aspect of. '
' design or operation of safety related : structures :- systems , .or components.
- i. hinutes of meetings of the Station Operations Review Committee.
j, Disagreement betwean the recommendations of he Station Operations Review Committee and the SORC Chairman,
- k. : Review of events covered under e,f,g, and ;h . above L include reporting to appropriate members of management on the results of:
investigations and recom.nendations to prevent or rnduce D the r probability of recurrence,
- 5. Authority: The-NPPD Safety Review and Audit' Board shall report to and.be edvisory to the Nuclear Power Group Manager' on. thosel areas of-responsibility specified in Specifications 6.2.1.B,4:and-6',2,1.B;7,
- 6. -Records:
Minutes shall be recorded for all meetings of the NPPD -Safety Reviaw and
-Audit Board and shall identify-all documentary material reviewed, Copies of the minutes shall be forwarded :to ;the Nuclear - Power Group Manager, Sit'e
-Manager, and the Plant Manager, and such others as the Chairman - may .
designate within one month of the meeting.
, 7. Audits:
Audits of selected aspects of plant operation shall be perf- ned undet the: .
cognizance of SRAB with a frequency commensurate with their : s'afety-significance. Audits. performed by the Quality Assurar :e Depart ant which -
meet this specification shall be considered J to heet the SRAB audits requirements if the audit results are reviewed by'SFAB. .'A representative
-portion of-procedures and records of the activities performed during.the audit period shall- be audited and, in addition, observations of performance of operating and maintenance activities shall be included. These audits >
shall encompass: .
223-E a
.u
, 3-
-.i-6.3) - (cont'd)
-- 6 . 3 . 5 l lIrpporary Chances:
Temporary changes to procedures which do not change the intent of the original:
procedure may be made, provided such changes are approved by two members of the
' operating staff holding SR0' licenses. Such changes shall be documented and subsequently reviewed by'the Plant Manager'within one month.
-6.3.6 Exercise of Procedures Drills of the Emergency Plan procedures shall be conducted annuallyi including a check of communications with offsite support groups. Drills on ' the l procedures specified in 6.3.2. A, B, and C above shall be conducted as part of I the retraining program.
6.3.7 Programs The following programs shall be established:
A. Systems Intenrity Monitorinn Program A program shall be-established to reduce leakage to as low as practical.
levels from systems 'outside the primary - containment during a seriousL accident that would or could contain highly radioactive fluids. .This-program shall include provisions establishing preventive' maintenance and' periodic visual inspection requirements / and leak testing requiremento for each system at a frequency not to exceed refueling cycle intervals. ,
.q B. ' Iodine Monitorinn Pronram )
A program shall -be established to ensure the capability to ' accurately determine the airborne lodine concentrstion in. vital areas under accident-conditions. This program shall include training of personnel, procedures
~
. for -monitoring and provisions for - maintenance of sampling and analysis .
equipment.
C. Post-Accident Samplinn System (PASS) ,
l
- A program shall be established to ensure the capability to obtain and analyze reactor coolant, radioactive iodines and particulates jn plant gaseous - effluents, and containment atmosphere samples under i accident conditions. - This. program shall include training-of personnel, procedures .
for sampling and analysis and= provisions . for operability of sampling and analysis equipment, 9
l l
-2?7- -
- - -. - .. . - . . - - - - - . - - . . - ~ . . - . . + . - - . - -