ML20236H556

Rev 3 to Procedure TRCP-0009, Instructional Staff Training & Qualifications

ML20236H556
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	08/02/1996
From:	Friedman A VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML20236H449	List: ML20236H447 ML20236H508 ML20236H531 ML20236H539 ML20236H554 ML20236H556 ML20236H563 ML20236H570
References
TRCP-0009, TRCP-9, NUDOCS 9807070258
Download: ML20236H556 (33)

Text

'

Lsvel 2 Controll:d Distribution Maintain d by this Departm:nt Do not remove this documsnt for fistd work CorporateNuclearDepartment y, ,,,,, , ,,, Administrative Procedure e 1993 by Vuginia Power. All Rights Itasened

Title:

Instructional Staff Training and Qualifications l

Lead Department: Nuclear Training Procedure Number Revision Number Effective Date TRCP-0009 3 08/15/96 Revision Summary

. Revised Section 4.1 to update the revised length of BTP & CTP l Added Training to Supervisor / Training Specialists / Peer On-The-Job / Task Performance Evaluation NuclearTraining FOR INFORiiiATION l

VIRGINIA POWER PROPERTY This document is the property of VIRGINI A PO#ER and is to be returned upon reques t. No permission is grant ed l to publish, reproduce. transmit. or disclose to another any infor:ation contained in this document.

Approved by: ~

A l b Manager Nucle'ar Training ' bat /

9807070258 980630 rum = mrse m en PDR ADOCK 05000338 Y PDR

VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 POWER REVISION 3 -

PAGE 2 OF 33 l

intentionally Blank

l-VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 t POWER REVISION 3 l PAGE 3 OF 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 PURPOSE 5 2.0 SCOPE 5

3.0 REFERENCES

/ COMMITMENT DOCUMENTS 5 4.0 DEFINITIONS 6 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 7 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 9 6.1 Instructor Qualifications 9 6.1.1 Position Qualification 9 6.1.1 Position Qualification 9 6.1.1 Position Qualification 9 6.2 Professional Skills Development 9 6.2.1 Basic Instructor Certification 9 6.2.2 Basic Training Program Waiver 9 6.23 Master Instructor Certification 10 6.2.4 Continuing Instructor Training -

10 6.3 Maintaining Technical Expertise 10 6.4 Instructor Observation Appraisals , 1) 6.4.1 Frequency 11 6.4.2 Methods  !!

6.43 Follow-up 11 6.5 Additional Assessment Instruments 12 6.6 Training Staff Rotation 12 7.0 RECORDS 13

TRCP-0009 VIRGINIA REVISION 3 j POWER PAGE 4 OF 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

Page Section ATTACHMENTS 15 1 Instructor Technical Qualifications Chart 2 Intructor Training Certification Program Basic Training Waiver - 725449 (Mar 19

%)

3 Supervisor /haining Specialist / Peer Classroom Observation Appraisal-Nuclear 21 Training-720422 (Mar 96) 4 Supervisor /fraining Specialist / Peer Laboratory Observation Appraisal-Nuclear 23 Training- 720420 (Mar %)

5 Supervisor /fraining Specialist / Peer On-The-Job Trainingfrask Performance Evaluation-Nuclear Training - 720423 (Mar %) 27 6 Supervisorffraining Specialist / Peer Simulator Observation Appraisal-Nuclear 31 Training - 730529 (Mar 96)

c.

1 VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 i- POWER .-

REVISION 3 l PAGE 5 OF 33 1.0 PURPOSE 4 1.1 This procedure establishes qualification requirements for Nuclear Training instructional staff. ,

1.2 This procedure establishes the methods by which Nuclear Training staffinstructional skills and

' ~

I technical skills are developed, upgraded, and documented.

1.3 This procedure este'elishes the methods by which Nuclear Training instructors are assessed.

2.0 SCOPE This procedure applies to the acdvities of Nuclear Training Department personnel.

3.0 REFERENCES

/ COMMITMENT DOCUMENTS 3.1 ' References 3.1.1 NUREG-1220, Training Review and Criteria 3.1.2 INPO 85-006, Principles of Training Systems Development 3.1.3 INPO 88-012, Guidelines for Instructor Training and Qualification i 3.1.4 ACAD 91-015, The Objectives and Criteria for Accreditation of Training in the i Nuclear Power Industry 3.1.5 ACAD 91-016, The Process for Accreditation of Training in the Nuclear Power I Industry 3.1.6 ACAD 92-00t, Guidelines for the Conduct of Training and Qualification Activities 3.1.7 VPAP-2301, Nuclear Personnel Qualification l 3.1.8 VPAP-2701, Station Training Program 3.1.9 VCAP-2701, Corporate Nuclear Training Program 3.1.10 TRCP-0002, Systematic Approach to Training 3.1.11 TRCP-0006, Nuclear Training Program implementation 3.1.12 TRCP-0007, Nuclear Training Program Evaluation 3.1.13 TRNS-2701, Nuclear Training Program 3.1.14 Nuclear Instructor Training and Certification Program Guide 3.2 Commitment Documents None i

l

TRCP-0009 VIRGINIA POWER REVISION 3 .

PAGE 6 OF 33 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Nuclear Instructor Training Certification Program (NITCP)

A three-phase program providing basic, advanced, and continuing instructional skills development for instructors. A detailed description is in the NITCP Program Guide.

4.1.1 Basic Training Program (BTP)

A five day program of instruction (depending on the number of participants) designed l to provide new Nuclear Training instructors with the fundamental skills and knowledge required to begin instruction.

4.1.2 Advanced Training Program (ATP)

A program of workshops and guided self-study designed to provide instructors with the knowledge, skill, and ability to develop and demonstrate professional competencies.

4.1.3 Continuing Training Program (CTP)

A program ofinstruction, consisting of at least 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> annually, designed to maintain l and improve instructional skills.

4.2 Technical Qualifications The combination of knowledge, skill, and ability required in the individual's field of speciality.

4.3 Instructional Qualifications The combination of knowledge, skill, and ability required to organize and deliver learning experiences.

l 1

VIRGINIA TRCP-0009

. . POWER REVISION 3

]

PAGE 7 OF 33 ,

l 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 Manager Nuclear Training The Manager Nuclear Training is responsible for:

~" ~

5.1.1 Approving NITCP training schedules.'-

5.1.2 Approving BTP waivers.

5.2 . Superintendent Nuclear Training The Superintendent Nuclear Training is responsible for:

5.2.1 Approving NITCP training schedules.

5.2.2 Approving Basic and Master Instructor Certification.

5.2.3 Recommending BTP waivers.

5.3 Supervisor Nuclear Training The Supervisor Nuclear Training is responsible for:

5.3.1 Evaluating instructor qualifications.

5.3.2 Qualifying instructors.

5.3.3 Conducting instructor observation: fer i.t=:cr .

5.3.4 Approving instructor plans for improving technical skills.

5.3.5 Requesting BTP waivers.

5.4 Supervisor Nuclear Training Development and Evaluation The Supervisor NTDE is responsible for:

5.4.1 Developing NITCP design, curriculum, and implementation strategies.

5.4.2 Developing NITCP instructional materials, evaluation instruments, and schedules.

, 5.4.3 Evaluating NITCP effectiveness.

t 5.4.4 Implementing inter-site NITCP activities, f

I L__ _ _ _

VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 POWER REVISION 3 .

PAGE 8 OF 33 5.5 Training Instructor The Training Instructor is responsible for:

5.5.1 Improving instructional and technical skills. _

5.5.2 Performing peer observation, when directed.

5.5.3 Reviewing and acknowledging observation appraisal forms.

5.6 Training Specialist The Training Specialist is responsible for:

5.6.1 Developing, conducting, and documenting Basic, Advanced, and Continuing Instructor training.

5.6.2 Assessing instructional skills.

VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 POWER -

REVISION 3 PAGE 9 OF 33 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 6.1 Instructor Qualifications 6.1.1 Position Qualification The Supervisor Nuclear Training shall ensure that eachinstructor is qualified in accordance with the requirements of VPAP-2301.

6.1.2 Training Program Instructor Qualification

a. The cognizant Supervisor Nuclear Training shall ensure that the instructor, prior to initially conducting training, has: -

1. Completed the Basic Training Program (unless waived).

2. The background and previous experience to meet the requirements of Attachment I and specific program requirements.

b. The Supervisor Nuclear Training shall prepare an Instructor Qualifict. tion Record Mj for each instructor, listing the training courses or program areas forwhich the -

instructor is qualified. These certifications shall be approved by the Superintendent Nuclear Training and retained in the individual's training files.

6.1.3 Qualification Review At least annually, the Supervisor Nuclear Training shall review the Instructor Qualification Record of each instructor to ensure currency of qualification.

6.2 Professional Skills Development 6.2.1 Basic Instructor Certification Unless a waiver has been approved at the time of assignment as an instructor, instructors must complete the Basic Training Program (BTP) of the NITCP within six months of assignment.

6.2.2 Basic Training Program Waiver .

An instructor's supervisor may request, the Superintendent Nuclear Training may recommend, and the Manager Nuclear Training may approve waiver of BTP based on a case-by-case evaluation of the instructor's previous experience and education. This waiver would be documented on the Instmetor Training Certificat;on Program Basic Training Waiver Form, (Attachment 2).

TRCP-0009 VIRGINIA REVISION 3 .

POWER PAGE 10 OF 33 I

6.2.3 Master Instructor Certification

a. Master Instructor Certification is obtained by the completion of the NITCP Advanced Training Program (ATP) as defined in the NITCP, Program Guide.

- b. Program requirements must be completed within twenty-four months of completion or waiver of BTP.

6.2.4 ContinuingInstructorTraining NITCP Continuing Training is designed to upgrade and update the instructional skills of Nuclear Training instructors.

a. Continuing instructor training will be conducted in ce with the

~

^ ~

requirements of the Continuing Training'section of e NIYCP Program Guide.

b. All instructors will participate in NITCP Continuing Training upon assignment to Nuclear Training.

6.3 Maintaining Technical Expertise

' 6.3.1 Operations instructors who maintain active NRC licenses satisfy the requirements of

. this step by completion of the required number of on-shift hours.

6.3.2 Nuclear Training supervisors shall ensure that instructors not maintaining active NRC licenses schedule at least 64 hours7.407407e-4 days <br />0.0178 hours <br />1.058201e-4 weeks <br />2.4352e-5 months <br /> annually, recommended two (2) days per quarter, for periodic in-plant participation in their areas of technical specialty.

6.3.3 All instructors are required to attend the annual continuing training sessions in their respective area with the exception of those courses they have developed or are scheduled to instruct.

6.3.4 Each instructor's supervisor shall develop, with the instructor, an annual training plan with goals for maintainir.g technical expertise, and shall monitor and document progress toward those goals.

VIRGINIA TRCP-0009

. POWER <

REVISION 3 l PAGE 11 OF 33 6.4 Instructor Observation Appraisals 6.4.1 Frequency

a. Each instructor shall be observed atleast once in each applicable environment each calendar year. Each observation shall be conducted by the Superintendent Nuclear - --

Training, Supervisor Nuclear Training, or training specialists.

6.4.2 Methods

a. The observation should last at least one hour of instruction or the entire length of the training session.

b. The observer shall document specific and overall comments on one of the appropriate observation appraisal form:

. Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer On-the-Job Trainingfrask Performance l Evaluation-Nuclear Training Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer Laboratory Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer Classroom Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training

. Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer Simulator Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training 6.4.3 Follow-up l

a. The observer shall review the observation appraisal form with the instructor,

b. The instructor shall document comments, disagreement, or concunence on the observation appraisal form.

l 1

1 l

l l

l

TRCP-0009 VIRGDGA .

POWER < -- REVISION 3 .

PAGE 12 OF 33 6.5 Additional Assessment Instruments -

6.5.1. Directions for the use of the following forms, which provide feedback from trainees on instnmor performance, are contained in TRCP-0007, Nuclear Training Program _ .

. Evaluation: .__ _. . .._. _ . _ .

,_ ..c _ .g.-5 r- -

r =1 -

. Classroom Training Evaluation

. Laboratory Training Evaluation

. . Simulator Training Evaluation

. On-the-Job Training Evaluation

. Licensed Operator Requalification Program (LORP) Evaluation 6.5.2 Directions for the use of the following forms, which provide management observations on instructor performance, are contained in VPAP-2701, Station Training Program, and in TRCP-0007, Nuclear Training Program Evaluation:

. Management Observation of Classroom Training Management Observation of Simulator Training

. Management Observation of Laboratory Training

. Management Observation of On-the-Job Training 6.5.3 As necessary, supervisors shall take appropriate action to correct or improve instructor performance in response to trainee or management feedback.

6'.6 Training Staff Rotation 6.6.1 The rotation of training staff with plant staff will be in accordance with the Nuclear Training Program Nuclear Standard, TRNS-2701.

6.6.2 Nuclear Training management will work with plant management to identify mutually acceptable exchanges of individuals with characteristics wholly commensurate with expected job requirements.

l VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 POWER -

REVISION 3 PAGE 13 OF 33 4 j

l 7.0 RECORDS j Prior to transmittal to Records Management or Nuclear Training Records, the sender shall ensure that: , !

. Each record is packaged, when applicable , _ ; m ._ g. ..

. QA program requirements have been fulfilled for Quality Assurance records

. Each record is legible, completely filled out, and adequately identifiable to the item or ,

activity involved

. Each record is stamped, initialed, signed, or otherwise authenticated and dated 7.1 The following individual and packaged documents and copies of related conespondence completed as a result of the performance or implementation of this procedure are Station records. They shall be transmitted to Records Management in accordance with VPAP-1701.

7.1.1 Individual Records None 7.1.2 Record Packages None 7.2 The following individual and packaged documents and copies of related correspondence completed as a result of the performance or implementation of this procedure are Nuclear  ;

Training records. They shall be transmitted to Nuclear Training Records in accordance with l TRCP-0011. Nuclear Training Records Management.

7.2.1 Individual Records l I

a. Instructor Qualification Record

b. Copies of BTP/ATP Certificates

c. Instructor Observation Assessments

d. Instructor in Plant Time Record i 7.2.2 Record Packages None 7.3 - The following documents completed as a result of the implementation or performance of this procedure are NOT records and are NOT required to be transmitted to Records Management or to the Nuclear Training Records Management Coordinator.

None

VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 POWER REVISION 3 PAGE 14 OF 33 l

Intentionally Blank l

l

'$M'

VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 POWER REVISION 3 I PAGE 15 OF 33 ATTACHMENT I (Page 1 of 3)

Instructor Technical Qualifications Chart Trainees Subject Matter Instructor Technical Qualification Reactor Operator Academic Subjects, e.g.: Successful completion of training / education in Mathematics . Chemistry (RO) subjects being taught, at or above the level to be

. Health physics . Physics achieved by the trainees: OR, Senior Reactor . Reactor physics . Materials

. Thermodynamics . Heat transfer Operator (SRO) A bachelor's degree in engineering or a related

. Fluid mechames . Electrical science science that includes courses in the subjects Shift

• Process control principles being taught Technical Adviser (STA) Generic nuclear plant technology, e.g.: SRO license on a Westinghouse PWR; OR,

. Reactor control and operating characteristics Successful completion of SRO training,includ-ing simulator certification at the SRO level, at a

. Radiation protection and control Westinghouse Pwr

. Chemistry control

. Reactor plant instruments and controls i

Plant-speci6c training (other than simulator RO/SRO license on a Westinghouse PWR with

)

training)on: similar safety related systems to the station: OR, l

. Systems Successful completion of SRO training, includ-

. Operations ing simulator certi6 cation at the SRO level, at a

. Transient response Westinghouse Pwr with similar safety related

. Procedures required for plant safety systems to the station Simulator training on: SRO license at the station: OR,

. Systems SRO certi6 cation including simulator

. Operations certi6 cation at the SRO level, at the station: OR, i

. Transient response i

. Procedures required for plant safety Have previously held SRO license at the station I and current in LORP Non-licensed Power Plant Fundamentals, e.g.: RO license at the trainee's Station: OR, j Operators

. Applied electrical, mechanical, chemical,I&C, Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the sub- i and nuclear fundamentals ject being taught, at or above the level to be i

. Equipment and component descriptions and achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous principles of operation training / education

, Plant-specific technology, e.g.:

l

. Procedures and operating practices

. Plant systems and components

. Practical factor demonstrations l

E .-

I TRCP-0009 VIRGINIA REVISION 3 POWER PAGE 16 OF 33 ATTACHMENT I (Page 2 of 3)

Instructor Technical Qualifications Chart

~

InstructorTechnicalQuali6 cation ~ ~ ~  !

Trainees Subject Matter Academic Subjects. Successful completion of training / education in Engineer subjects being taught, at or above the level to be Technical Generic nuclear plant technology, achieved by the trainees: OR, Manager Plant-specific training (other than simulator A bachelor's degree in engineering or a related trauungh science that includes courses in the subjects being taught S.unulator traim.ng, Engineering principles, processes, and proce-dures Nuclear power plant technology; e.g.: Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the sub-Technicians and ject being taught, at or above the level to be Maintenance Per-

+ Principles of plant operation achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous sonnel

+ Plant systems and components training / education and through job performance j

Radiation protection and control principles, Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the sub-Radiation Protec-including radiation detection instruments ject being taught, at or above the level to be tionTechnicians achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous training / education Plant-specific radiation protection instmments, Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the l

systems, and procedures subject being taught, at or above the level to be achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous training / education and through job performance; OR, Completion of all qualification requirements for the senior level radiation protection technician j

position at the trainee's Station f

Chemistry principles, including chemical analy- Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the sub-Chemistry Technicians sis equipment and techniques ject being taught, at or above the level to be achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous training / education Plant-specific chemistry control systems and Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the sub-procedures ject being taught, at or above the level to be achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous l training / education and through job performance:

OR, Completion of all qualification requirements for the senior level chemistry technician position at the trainee's Station

l.

1 i VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 POWER REVISION 3 PAGE 17 OF 33 ATTACHMENT I (Page 3 of 3)

Instructor Technical Qualifications Chart Trainees Subject Matter , Instructor Technical Qualification Electrical Mainte. Electrical principles, equipment, and mainte- Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the sub-nance Personnel nance practices ject being taught, at or above the level to be achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous trammg/ education Plant-specific electrical systems, and mainte- Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the sub-nance procedures ject being taught, at or above the level to be achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous trammg/ education and through job perfonnance; OR, Completion of all qualification requirements for the senior level electrician position at the trainee's Station Mechanical Main- Mechanical principles, equipment, and mainte- Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the sub -

tenance Personnel nance practices ject being taught, at or above the level to be achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous training / education Plant-speci6c mechanical systems, and mainte- Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the  !

nance procedures subject being taught, at or above the level to be i achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous l training / education and through job performance:

OR, Completion of all qualification requirements for the senior level mechanic position at the trainee's Station i instrument and Principles of process instruments and controls, Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the sub-Control Techni- including electronics, pneranatics, and hydrau- ject being taught, at or above the level to be cians lies achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous i training / education and through job performance Plant specific instrumentation and control sys- Demonstrated knowledge and skills in the tems and mair.tenance procedures subject being taught, at or above the level to be achieved by trainees, as evidenced by previous training / education and throughjob perfonnance;

[ OR, I

l Completion of all qualification requirements for i

the senior level instrument and control techni-cian position at the traince's Station

________________a

MGN REVIS[O POWER PAGE 18 OF 33

~~

\  !

Intentionally Blank

TRCP-0009 l REVISION 3 PAGE 19 OF 33 r Instructor Training Certification L ,o Program Basic Training Waiver T HCP-0009 - Attachment 2 ...

Instructor (Name) Nuclear Training instructor Employee Date

~

Trzining Center (Name)

}

l Wilv:r Justification (Indicate below the specific qualifications of the instructor that support the waiver request.)

l l

l Signatures Training Specialist Request (Signature) Date Superivsor - Training Concurrence .(Signature) Date Superintendent Recommendation (Sign 6ture) Date ,

I M: nager Nuclear Training Approval (Signature) Date I t

,_ _ _.. l

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ - __ -- - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -A

VIRGINIA TRCP-0009 POWER REVISION 3 ~

PAGE 20 OF 33 L

_u.,..... - _- gju ;. ,.  :-m. :- . .-.= 3pm Intentionally Blank

TRCP-0009 REVISION 3 PAGE 21 OF 33

/ Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer u Po Classroom Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training

_ T HLP 0009 - Attachment ~ 3 Instructor (Name) Date Obs:rver (Name) Time From To Courss/ Program Topic / Lesson Plan Locttion Class Size Check the block that best represents the rating of your observations.-

l l Obs:rvation Elements j A Sb lectives and Content

1. Objectives were presented clearly to the participants. Satisfactory D Needs improvement P r

, 2. Participants were maos aware of the methoos Dy which the Not Appleable objectives would be evaluated. Satisfactory Needs improvement Dor ObservM

! 4 Objectives were appropnate for tne course, topic, and Not Appicable participants. Satisfactory Needs improvement ,g

4. Content was appropriate for the course, topc, and Not Applicable participant,. Satidam News improvement or Observed Comments 9 Preparation

1. The lesson plan war approved and followed in the class. Satisfactory Needs improvement OUr Me"$7*

2. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of the lesson plan Not Appleable Satisfactory Needs Irnprovement content, or Observed

3. The instructor was prepared (availability of matenals and Not Appleable eouipment). Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed

4. The instructional setting was consistent with and supported Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs improvement the topic and objectives. or Observed Not Appleable

5. The material presented was accurate and up-to-date. Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed Comments l

l l

C. Presentation ,

The instructor stimulated interest in the topic. Needs improvement Not A a Satisfactory ,, d P '

2. There was a logical flow (organization) to the class. Satisfactory Needs improvement r e t

3. The Instructor's platform skills and teaching methods Not Applicable snhanced the learning process- Satidactory NMs improvement or Observed Form too 720422(Mar 96)

TRCP-0009 REVISION 3 .

PAGE 22 OF 33 Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer Classroom Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training L Pret.entation Loritenued Not Appicable

4. The 6nstructor used techniques such as questions and Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed di:cussiong to encourage critical thinking and analysis... .. .

Not Applicable

5. The major points were made clear and distinguished f rom less Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed important materlaf.

6. In:1ructional aids enhanced and clarified the presentation. O Satisf actory ONeeds improvement O o", del* *u*'*

Not Applicable

7. Tha instructor used specate examples of practcal plant Satisfactory Nuds improvement or Observed application.

Gomments D instructor Participant interaction .

'^*****'*

1. The instructor projected interest and enthusiasm concoming Satisfactory ONeeds improvement 0"roObserved the subject.

• P ble

2. The instructor appeared to respect the participants. Satisfactory Needs improvement , , d

3. The instructor encouraged interaction. O Satisf actory Needs improvement Oo,Wei*d Not Appicable

4. The instructor evaluated participant comprehension and or Observed rstaught as needed.

5. Instructional techniques were appropriate for participant level. O Satisfactory ONeeds improvement ,,

P "f'

Comments Strengths Suggestions Segnatures Date instructor (Signature)

~

Observer (Signature) Date Comments l

F ellow-up ltems a ,

1 Date Obtzrver (Signature) germ raonzatuar mi

TRCP-0009 REVISION 3 PAGE 23 OF 33 Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer l

__ Laboratory Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training

, _ I HLP 0009 Attat hment 4 Page 1 of 3 instructor (Name) Date Oos:rver (Name) .l Time From To Course / Program Topic Loc: tion Number of Parte: pants Check the block that best represents the rating of your observations.

Obserotion Elements A Obpectives and Content

1. Objectives of the session were presented clearly to the N participants.

Sa ist Neds improvemM Q ot Appleable or Observed

2. Objectives clearly defined the performance expected of the Not Applicable 3 ,

participants. or Observed Performance conditions and standards reflected job Not Appleable Sa@ factory Needs improvement r quirements. ,

or Observed

4. Ltboratory activities were appropnate for the stated Not Applicable objectives. stisfW News improvemd or Observed Comments B Preparation

1. All necessary safety equipment was available and in proper Not Applicable Satisfeory Needs improvem working order. or Observed No p able

2. Required procedures / references were available to participants. Satisfactory Q Needs Improvement ,

3. All necessary tools, equipment, and suppl:M were provided t 1 AppleaNo Satisfactory Needs improvemt.it participants. or Observed

4. The laboratory was arranged to facilitate performance of the Not Applicable activity.

Satisfactory D Needs ing :,ement or Observed

5. All f acts and data provided to participants were realistic and Not Applicable up to date.

O Satisf actory Q Needs improvement or Observed

6. The instructor demonstrated skill and knowledge regarding the Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs improvement cctivity, or Observed

7. Participants were adequately prepared for the laboratory Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs improvement exponence. or Observed Comments Not Appleable

1. Instructor reviewed any hazard associated with the activity. Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed Fwm NO DO420Ms 06)

TRCP-0009

< REVISION 3 PAGE 24 OF 33 Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer Laboratory Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training 1 HCF0009 - Attathment 4 Page 2 of 3

~

C Safet Cont inued Not Appicable

2. Puticipants were informed of the location and use of safety Satisfactory Needs improvement Qor Observed equiprnent and protective clothing.

3. The laboratory was arranged to reinforce safe work practices. Satisfactory Needs improvement CEr%%*J*'

Not Applicable

4. Appropriate provisions were made to assure safe handling of SMist NWs @vm Qor Observed hazardous materials.

P *

5. Instructor reviewed the proper response to potential mishaps. Satisfactory D Needs improvement r

6. Instructor encouraged safety questions from participants. O Satisfactory Q Needs improvement O"r 1"7*!

Comments D Acttvety Management Not Appicable 1, instructor provided adequate guidance and direction to g g g or Observed p:rticipants.

2. Participants were allowed to review instructions / directions and Not Applicable Sa inf actg Q NM improvW or Observed etk questions as needed.

Not Applicable

3. Instructor effectively demonstrated the skills required to Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed complete the activity.

Not Applicable

4. Instructor encouraged questions and involved participants in Satisfactory O Needs improvement solving their own problems (as appropriate).

C or Observed

5. Instructor circulated among work stations to monitor Not Applicable g ,,

or Observed participant progress.

6. Instructor provided posttive as well as corrective feedback 1 Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs improvement participants, or Observed

7. In:tructor ensured that participants followed appropriate Not Applicable Satisfactory O Needs improvement or Observed s&tety practices.

p 8

8. Instructor concluded the activity by summarizing major points. Satisfactory Needs improvement ,

Comments L Remseliation

1. Instructor provioed feedback, identifying areas of weakness Not Appicable Satisfactory Needs improvement or ObserM during and upon completion of the task.

2. Instructor provided/ arranged for rernedial training as necessary. Satisfactory O Needs improvement 07 d' Pi*

Comments F Cleanup Documentation

1. Instructor documented completson of training, evaluation, and/or 1 AppleaNe O Satisf actory Needs improvement or Observed rzmedial training.

2. Lcboratory tools, equipment, and supplies were returned to the Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs improvement original / proper condition. or Observed Form 72D420 Mar 981

TRCP-0009 REVISION 3

( PAGE 25 OF 33 Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer Laboratory Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training T HCP 0004 Attachment 4 .

Page 3 of 3 F Cleanup Documentsteon Continued

3. Training documents / records were completed correctly. O satist.ctory O Needs improvement DE,2,PU*

Comments Strengths Suggestions Seanatures Instructor fSignature) Date Observer (Signature) Date Comments Followwp items -

Observer (Signature) l Date I

VIRGDilA TRCP-0009 POWER REVISION 3 ,

PAGE 26 OF 33 l

^ - -

y intentionally Blank l

We

l TRCP-0009 l .

REVISION 3 PAGE 27 OF 33 r Supervisor / Training S ecialist/ Peer

~ ~ ~ " " "

On-the-Job Training ask Performance Evaluation - Nuclear Training l

.,,,, T HLP-0009 Attachment 5

• Page 1 of 3 Initructor (Name) Date Ocurver (Name) Time From To Cours1/ Program Task /JPM Locc. tion l Training Evaluation Ch:ck the block that best represents the rating of your observations.

Obs:rvation Events j A Pr epar at son l Not Applicable I

1. A JPM was available and had been reviewed. Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed h

2. All required equipment, tools and materials were available. Satisfactory Needs improvement ,", tObP Not Applicable I Appropriate conditions existed for task training / performance. Satisfactory C Needs Improvement or Observed

4. Teek-related safety considerations were reviewed (questions ' ^PP' ***

l i wire encouraged).

SWW  %&Wed 0o"r Observed

5. All necessa safety equipment was available and in proper

• Satisfactory D Needs improvement Ob

6. Th3 instructor took appropriate actions to reduce anxiety and Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs improvement intirest/ motivate trainee. or Observed

7. Th3 OJT process was described appropriately (questions Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs Improvement w:re encouraged). or Observed -

Not Appleable

8. The instructor assessed trainees' prior knowledge of the task. Satisfactory Needs improvement , g Comments s

~

B Presentation

1. 3 OJTITPE was petormed on a rnix* up and/or in a laboratory setting. the emNot Appleable Satisfactory Needs improvement LJor Observed differences e actual plant equpnenttenvronment were explained.

2. The instructor demonstrated and explained each step of the Sat sf actory Needs improvement

• b

1:sk in a logical sequence. 0o"r Observed' ^PP'

3. The instructor promoted professional work practces (safety, Not Appleable C Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed s:lf checking, and procedural use and adherence),

Procedures / references were appropnately employed in the Not Appicable pr sentation. or Observed

5. The instructor demonstrated the use of all tools, equipment, Not Applicable end techniques required for task completion.

Satisfactory C Needs improvement or N M

6. The trainee was positioned to observe the performance of Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs improvement each activity. or Observed Ferm MO 720423(Mar 96) b

. 1 1

TRCP-0009 REVISION 3 .

PAGE 28 OF 33 Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer On-the-Job Training / Task Performance Evaluation - Nuclear Training i 1 HCD-0009 - Attachment 5 Page 2 of 3 H Pr ewntation Connoued N

7. Th3 instructor used questons to monnor trainee Satisfactory Needs improvement Q,ot Appleable gg i comprehension and elicit critical thinking.

Not Applcable

8. Two-way communcaton was established and maintained Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed (questions were encouraged).

Not Appleable

9. Safety considerations were emphasized during the O Satisf actory Needs improvement or Observed presentation. '

Not Appleable

10. M Jor points were reviewed and steps were repeated as SatidW Ne Wpmm or Observed necessary.

Not Appleable

11. The mstnetors memods and exarrpies ennanced the loaming process, (The g or Observed covers audio vmuals, moda, bormg versus kiterosing methods, etc.) ,

I Camments

~

C Pr actic e Not Appliceble

1. Appropriate alternatives were employed if practice was not Satisfactory N'. eds improvement or Observed possible on actual equipment or under actual task conditions.

P

2. Trrinee was provided adequate time for practice. Satisfactory D Needs improvement , ,

3. Instructor verfed tramee corrprehensen by asliing approprate questens Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed and encouragog the trames to explam task seps.

4. Trinnee was allowed to solve small problems without Satisfactory Needs improvement or e t p e

5. Instructor coached the trainee when appropriate. Satisfactory Needs improvement ,

6. Instructor and trainee reviewed the major aspects of task Not Appicable Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed trrining prior to evaluation.

7. Upon completion, training was properly cocumented and Not Appheable n:cessary housekeeping was performed, or Observed l

Comments D E valuation

1. Instructor verified that the trainee was prepared for evaluation Not Appicable Sat sf actory Needs improvement or Observed cnd had successfully completed all training requirements

2. Procoeurs use and nonerence, sofl<neoung, moustrial saiety.ano 9000 work Not Appleable O Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed prmwere med m evMngM Ma P

3 The evaluacn phase was clearty dranguished from the tranmg phase. Satisfactory Needs improvement rO e

4. All necessary safety equipment was available and in proper Not Appleable - -

g, 9 g or Observed working order,

5. Evaluator refrained from coaching or asking leading questions. Satisfactory Needs Improvement r

6. Conditons and equipment were appropriate for task N performance.

Satisfactory Needs' improvement Oo,otObse,ved Appleable Form 940 r20423(Ms e6) a

F TRCP-0009 i . REVISION 3 PAGE 29 OF 33 Supervisor / Training S ecialist/ Peer On-the-Job Training ask Performance Evaluation - Nuclear Training

. I H(.P 0009 Attar.hment 5 Page 3 ol'3 D E valuation Lontenutid

7. Upon completon, evaluaten was properly documented and necessary housekeeping performed. Satisfactory D Needs improvement O o"r Observed' ^ * * '

The following items are to be completed only if improper performance le noted.

8. Incorrect performance resulted in terminaten of the 3, ,

Not Applicable evaluaten. or Observed

9. Instructor clearly identified the knowledge or skills required t '^**'***'*

Satistadoy Need- Impmvement successf ully complete the activity. O o"r Observed

10. Instructor encouraged questions from the trainee. Needs improvement Satisfactory or ed

11. Instructor identified / arranged appropriate remedial training. Satisfactory Needs improvement O",We'iT*

o Comments sngths Suggestens i

l l

Signatures instructor (Signature) Date Oossrver (Signature) Date Comments l

FeHow-up items -

Observer (Signature) Date em na raamme em )

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . )

TRCP-0009 VIRGINIA REVISION 3 ,

POWER PAGE 30 OF 33 M .. ..

M -

Intentionally Blank

I TRCP-0009 REVISION 3 PAGE 31 OF 33 f

~

- s====r Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer Simulator Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training I HLP-0004 Attachment 6 Page 1 of 3 Instructor (Name) Date i I

Ob=rver (Name) Time  !

From To 0:urss Scinino Simulator Training / Practice Simulator Evaluation Check the block that best represents the rating of your observations.

Observation Elements A Planning Preparation

1. Scenario pre-reviewed / validated to insure: app,.

a. standards / expectations are current Satisfactory Needs improvem ..,

b. scenarios will function as designed or Obsewed

2. Pts-brief/ shift turnover preparation activities emulate the plant )

as much as practical; Not Applicable

a. logs Satisfactory Needs improvement or Obsewed

b. out of-servce equipment

c. color magnets in place

3. Instructor preparation evident by detailed understanding of Not Applicable scanario objectives / events / expected responses. Satisfactory Needs improvement or ObservW Commsnts Not Applicable

t. Simulator set up and rear 1y prior to admitting participants. Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed

2. Instructor assigns pcsitions, dehvers effective turnover, and Not Appleable Satisfactory Needs Improvement Ellows participant readiness pnor to event initiation. or Observed

3. Evints/matrunctions/degrwe of degradation ettectively g .

coordinated; adequate opportunity to meet each objective Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed before proceeding to next evem.

4. Instructorslevaluators locate themselves for optimum Not Applicable Satisfactory Needs improvement observation of individual / team responses, or Observed

5. Sound observation techniques demonstrated by accurately Not Appleable Satisfactory Needs improvement rteording events, times, and participant response. or Observed

6. Dunng the training mode, effectively utilized simulator Not Appleable Satisfactory Needs improvement capabilities (freeze, backtrack) to correct performance problems. or Observed

7. During the training mode, demonstrated effective questioning r9 Not Applicable end discusslon techniques. L.j Satisf actory Needs improvement or msorvd mments Form No 730529(Mar 96)

TRCP-0009 REVISION 3 PAGE 32 OF 33 Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer

- Simulator Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training T HCP-0004 - At t x hme nt T) Page 2 of 3 L Simul. dor Boot h Oper ationn .

Needs improvement " ^PP I'

1. Initi:1 conditions set up in accordance with scenario guide. O Satisfactory ,

N. Effrettys simulator console operaton demonstrated controls. Not Apphcable O Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed serrens, PEDS, malfunctions, overrides, degradations.

Not Applicable O. Will pt:nned coordination with instructor (s)/ evaluator (s) on Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed thi floor.

4. Rimiin:d focused and attentive to simulator operator duties. O Satisfactory Needs improvement ,

5. Roupt:ying ommunicatons were in accordance with App able Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed communication standard.

@omm:nts Needs Improvement

1. DIbri;f conducted in a constructive atmosphere. Satisfactory DEL ^"e"O' Not Applicable

2. Participant self-critique effectively facilitated. O Satisfactory Needs improvement or Observed PP

3. Scsnario learning / evaluation objectrves reviewed. Satisfactory Needs improvement Q bse

4. " Big Picture" items associated with event (s) discussed. Satisfactory Needs improvement of

5. Partcipant weaknesses and strengths properly identified ot Apphcable O Satisf actory Needs improvement or Observed (tschnicti and team skills).

6. Consequences of inappropnate actons(s) appropnately Needs improvement #EEI* # '

Satisfactory or Observed discusssd; the significance was not over or under stated.

7. For insppropnate actions, evaluator provided instructional Not Applicable g

guidinc3 to correct knowledge /abikty weakness (es). or Observed B. Sststy/ALARA/self-checking included whenever appropriate. Satisfactory Needs improvement , ,

9. Staten/ industry events utikzed when appropriate. O Satisfactory Needs improvement r ee

10. Obtainsd appropriate reference materials, or interpretation of Not Applicable exp*ctations when standards are questioned / challenged. or Observed

11. Sucesssfully influenced team / individual to " buy-in" t #

• Satisfacto'Y Needs improvement l Joi Dbserved constructive entcism.

Commsnts

• - mentat6on Administration , , _ .

1. or termal evaluations, the appropnate competencies / behavers Not Applicable s:ltet.id 1or comment / score reduction; double jeopardy O satisf actory O Needs improvement O or Observed conside. red and avoided if appropnate.

j 2. For forma, evaluations, congruence exists between actual t p p:rform:nce, Jabriefed performance, and documented Satisfactory D Needs Improvement . d p:rtormince, e m 7m299= su

r TRCP-0009 i REVISION 3 PAGE 33 OF 33 Supervisor / Training Specialist / Peer Simulator Observation Appraisal-Nuclear Training IH( P 0009 - Attar hrrwrit (> . Page 3 of 3 I I)ot unie tila tiori A(tmittiste ationi ( 42rit aritwd

3. Thorough remediation plan recommended / developed when Not Appleable appropriate. or Observed

4. Procedure change recommendation submitted to Supenn- Not Applicable tsndent-Operations and Procedure Group when appropriate. Satisfactory Needs improvement or % serve

5. A SMR is initiated for simulator problems /toquests when N appropriate, Satisfactory Needs improvement C ot Appleable or Observed l 6. Enhancements / revisions to the simulator exercise guide are documented, discussed with pears, submitted via TIR when Satisfactory Needs Improvement O ,o ae,e,yeo appropriate.

Commsnts l

l I

l Str3ngths l

Suggestions i

Segnat ure s

~

instructor (signature) Date Oossrvsr (Signature) Date Commsnts f ollow+p items ",.... '

)

I l

l Obssrver (Sgnature) Date a

Form 73ONf9(Me 06)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .