ML20235Y455
| ML20235Y455 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1987 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235Y440 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8707250272 | |
| Download: ML20235Y455 (64) | |
Text
.
n I'
i CR31623.0 1
)
i 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2
I 3
i NRC and TVA MEETING I
4 THE INDEPENDENT DESIGN INSPECTION 5
i (IDI) 6
)
l TVA Complex 7
Tennessee River Room Chattanooga, Tennessee Wednesday, July 8, 1987 9
i The TVA meeting convened at 1:00 p.m.
I 10 I
BEFORE:
12 JOHN ZWOLINSKI, Presiding Assistant Director 13 Office of Special Projects 14 l 15 16 l
17 1
18 19 20 1
21 22 l
23 8{072 h[k$$0
{
24 27 T
25 ACE. FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.
202 347 3700 Nationwide Coverage 80N36-6646 3
1
's 2
l l
i 1
1 MR. ZWOLINSKI:
Good afternoon.
I am John j
2 Zwolinski.
I am the Assistant Director f or the TVA 3
pr oj e ct s, Of fice of Special Projects, j
4 The purpose of today's meeting is to have 5
the staff present its general plans and schedules to 6
conduct an independent design inspection of the essential 7
raw cooling water system at Sequoyah.
j 8
Prior to turning the' meeting over to Mr.
9 Ke ppl e r, I would like to go about the room and have each 10 of you identify yourself loud enough so that our 11 stenographer can record it.
Let's start here at the 12 ta bl e.
13 I am John Zwolinski.
Stewart D.
- Ebneter, 14 Director of TVA Projects.
Jim Ke ppl e r, Director of the 15 Of f i ce of Spe ci al Projects.
16 B rian Grimes, Deputy Dire ctor, Division of 17 Reactor Inspections and Saf eg'uar ds, NRC.
Eugene Imbro, I-18 will be the key leader f or the IDI.
19 Bob Shewmaker, co-team leader f or the IDI.
20 Frank McCoy, I am the sequoyah Section Chief.
Gary Zech, 4
21 Assistant Chief for the Special Programs of th e TV A '
22 Proj e ct.
23 Bill Kagay, Lead Civil Engineer for th e 24 Engineering Mechanics Group at Sequoyah.
Charlie g
25 Johnson, Lead Civil Structural Engineer at Sequoyah..
SMITH REPORTING AGENCY (615) 267-0989
3 1
Bob Williams, Lead Electrical Engineer at t
't 2
Seq uoy ah.
Rick Daniels, Lead Mechanical Engineer at 3
S eq uoy a h.
Frank Carr, Mechanical Systems Engineer at 4
Segtoyah.
l 5
I am John Cox, Assistant Proj ect Engineer at l
l 6
S eq uoy ah.
I'm Doug Wilson, Chief of the. Nuclear 7
Engineering Branch.
I am Nick Ray, Deputy Director of 8
Licensing and the team leader f or TVA.
9 Chuck Mason, Deputy Manager, Office of 10 Nuclear Power.
Steve White, Manager, Office of Nuclear 11 Power.
Charlie Fox, Deputy Manager of Nuclear Power.
12 I
Herb Abercrombie, Site Director at Sequoyah.
I I
13 John Kirkebo, Director of Division of Nuclear i
l 14
! Engineering.
I 15 Can we start back over there, pl ea se ?
i 16 l
I am John Hosmen, Project Engineer, 17 Seq uoy ah.
Di ck G ri dley, Director of Nuclear Safety 18 Licensing.
19 i
Walter Andrews, Assistant Director of the 20 Division of Nuclear Quality Assurance.
Sherry Johnson.
21 Ben Charl son, A dvi so r, ONP.
22 J.
J.
Wilder, Assistant to the Chief Nuclear 23 Engineer.
Ken Jones, Restart Test Manager at Sequoyah.
24 Dennis McCloud, Manager of Generic Licensing.
p
?
25 Nick Kazana, Director of. Nuclear Quality SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
'a 4
i 1
Assurance.
Gerald Nicely, Senior Ele ct ri cal Engineer,.
l t
i 2
Ele ct ri cal Engineering Branch.
1 3
Dan Wilson, Chief of Nuclear Engineering.
4 Marvin Belew, I&C Engineer.
Vince Bianco, Lead Nuclear 5
Engineer at Sequoyah.
6 Martin Bailey, Civil Engineer at Sequoyah 7
Nuclear Pl a nt.
Ken Mogg, Piping Analysis Engineering 8
Mechanics.
9 Martin'Tormey, Engineering Assurance.
Tony 10 Capozzi, Manager of Engineering Assurance.
Bob Alsup,
]
l 11 Director of Nuclear Safety & Licensing.
12 l
Raymond Alvarez, Nuclear Security.
Bob 13 Buchholz, Mr. White's representative at Sequoyah.
14 Can we start at the back of the room, 15 please?
16 Tom Ippolito, Licensing.
Ward Stewart, Site 17 Director, Watts Bar.
Bill Wegner, Advisor, ONP.
Steve 18 Hedgepath, NUS Corpor ation.
19 Mike Campagnone, Site.Inve stigation.
Johnny 20 Clark,' House Interior Committee.
Katherine Ch ena ul t, 21 Sub-Committee Oversight & Investigation.
22 Tom McG rath, Assistant Site Representative 23 at Seq uoy ah.
Gene Rogers, Nuclear Maintenance Manager.
24 Bill Pennell, Manager of Engineering &
f t
l 25 Technical Services.
Bob Cantrell, Deputy, Director of
-SMITH REPORTING AG ENCY '(615) 267-0989
1 5.
1 the Division of Nuclear Engineering Branch.
(
2 Can we come up this wall, please ?
l 3
Bill Bass, Advisor, ONP.
Patrick Willard, j
1 4.
Knoxville Journal.
Jamie Hancock, US-101 News.
Steve 5
Epley, News-Free Press.
Mike Andrews, Channel 12 News.
6 Hai-Boh Wang, Discipline Leader, CiYil 7
Structural, IDI.
Jim Leivo, Instrumentation and Controls 8
Systems Discipline Leader for the IDI Team.
9 Dick McFadden, Electric Power Discipline 10 Leader for th e IDI Team.
Andy' DuBouchet, Mechanical 11 Components Discipline Leader, IDI.
12 Ron Parkhill, NRC, IDI Team Leader of l Mechani cal Sy s t em s.
Ken Jeniss, Resident Inspector, 5
13 14 Seq uoy ah.
15 Thank you.
16 I will be sending around attendee list.
If I
17 you could fill these out, it will be attached to the 18 tr a n s c ri pt i on.
19 Jeff, would you have some remarks?
As you know, a month ago we 21 made the decision to conduct an independent design 22 inspection at Sequoyah.
1 23 During-the past month, we have been. busy 24 assembling a team to carry the task out and putting 25 together, in detail, the kind of inspections we need to
. S M I TH REPORTING AG ENCY (615) 267-0989 j
J
6 l
1 conduct and where the focus will be.
2 We' re here to share that with you today, 3
along with the schedule that, we have worked out f or 4
carrying out this effort.
5 Steve, do you want to bring up anything?
I 6
MR. EBNETER:
Just a few comments.
You have 2
7 heard several references to the " Independent De sign I
8 Inspection."
This is. of ficially entitled an " Integrated l
9 Design Inspection."
This is the official title we will 10 be using f or it.
11 It will be an inspection of the 12 l multi-discipline engineering team, 10, 12, 14 experienced i
1 f
13 fengineersof design at nuclear plants.
We will be 14 concentrating on the Essential Raw Water Cooling System.
l l
l l
15 The official st ar t date for this IDI is l
i 16 today, July 7th.
Our target date f or issuance of report i
l 17 is November the 6th.
18 I will have Gene Imbro, as team leader, 19 discuss the details of the schedule in j ust about one l
20 minute.
21 The IDI will_be compliments d by an as-buil t 22 inspection.
The IDI will be looking at the dauign l
23 aspects.
24 In the as-buil t, we'll be looking to see if g-i 25 the design outputs and the design intent has been 1
SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
i 7
l 1
f aithf ully translated into hardware.
{
4, 2
The two will run concurrently.
They will be 3
interfacing with each other, feeding each other 4
information for the inspection.
l l
5 The as-built will be -- the team leader will 1
i 6
be Frank McCoy, who's sitting down at the end of the l
7 ta bl e.
i 8
Their on-site inspection will run August 3rd l
l 9
to August 14th, and that will overlap with Gene Imbro's 10
.IDI Team, who will be at Kno xvill e.
There will be about i
11 a one-week overlap there.
1 i
32 l
The team leader, Gene Imbro, has an
)
1 13
! assistant, Bob Shewmaker.
Both of these gentlemen are 14 NRC employees at the Bethesda Office.
Brian Grimes is 15 Gene's supervisor out of Bethesda.
They, essentially, 16 will run the IDI.
17 For the details of it, I will turn it over 18 to Gene Imbro.
Gene has his staff here, the discipline 19 leaders, and he can give you the details of the schedule 20 and some background on what we are going to look at and 21 introduce the team members.
{
l 22 Gene?
l 23 MR. WHITE:
Before you start.
Obviously, l
4 24 this effort that you're embarking upon is very important i
1 l
25 to the star t-up at Sequoyah.
1 SMITH REPORTING AGENCY (615) 267-0989 3
u________________________.__________-
I
8 l
l l
We, al so, have established a team, an 1
f I
2 interface team, whose sole duty during this period of t
3 time will be to satisfy the NRC's needs.
4 We will support you at the site at Sequoyah, 5
support you at Knoxville, we will support you at any 6
location.
7 The function of this interf ace team will be 8
to provide you rapid and accurate responses on a daily 9
basis.
Any questions that come up, we want to answer-10 them as quickly as possible, and we want to support you l
)
linthat regard.
j 11 l
12 l
Additionally, we knbw that you don ' t want to
)
13 l redo previously done work, that you want to minimize l redoing things that have already been perf ormed by TVA, 14 1
t i
l 15 and we think that the use of the interface team, this l
16
' team will assist you in the ef f orts, in your efforts to favoidduplications.
17 i
18 So, we' re ready to get started.
19 MR. IMBRO:
I would j ust like to, again, 20 introdu ce my self.
My name is Gene Imbro and I am with l
l 21 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Division of Reactor 22 Saf eguar d and Inspections.
I will be the team leader for j
i 23 the IDI, and I have other gentlemen here with me that I
24 will be co-team lea der s.
I "f
25 I would j ust quickly like to give you a SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
I 9
I I
i 1
brief rundown of what we are going to do to accomplish i
2 and finish the IDI.
l 3
As Stu said, the correct title f or this 1
4 inspection is " Integrated Design Inspe ction. "
And the 5
reason it's called an " Integrated Design Inspection" is l
6 that we try and cover all the main disciplines that are 7
involved in the design of a nuclear power plant.
8 The team is going to be composed of 14 1
9 members, including myself and Bob Shewmaker, the co-team I
10 leader.
i 11 The main disciplines, as we see them, are:
12 Mechanical sy st em s, which is the cooling systems design;
)
{
13 the mechanical components, which encompasses the design I
14 of piping, pipe analysis, pipe supports, equipment 15 mountings; civil structural, which is essentially the 16 building design development amplified and all the 17
! components that go into the design that house the l
18 buil din gs ; the electrical power distribution system and 19 instrumentation and controls.
20 Now, again, the reason it's called 21
" Integrated" is we would like to go back and test the 22 interfaces.
23 As you-all are aware, a nuclear power plant 24 is a very complex structure.
It involves a lot of 25 systems and components, and there are many technical SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
s-10 i
I disciplines that are. involved to make a design come off i
2 and wor k adequately.
3 In order f or this obj ective to be 4
accomplished, all these disciplines must communicate with 5
each other and interface in a manner so that technical 6
inf ormation can transf er effectively-back and f orth j
7 between all the people involved.
l 8
One of the main objectives of this 9
inspection is to test that interface to make sure that-1 10 the proper communication has gone on between all 11 technical disciplines and that people are using the 12
{ correct inf ormation to base their calculations and 3
13 evaluations upon.
14 l
Just to go through what we're going to be i
15 looking at.
The emphasis of the inspection is, 16 essentially, to test the implementation. of the FSAR 17 commitments.
18 Basically, we will use the ERCW as a sample l
19 sy s tem to assess whether or not the ERCW meets-the j
l 20 commitments that was made to.the NRC in the FSAR and.
l l
21 meets any other regulatory requirements.
-)
22 Al so, obviously, we will test that these 23 requirements have been correctly implemented by looking g -
24 at the detailed calculations.
And that's described as 25 "Te chni cal Adequacy of Design Documents."
j i
SMITE REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
__a
11' I
l l
4 1
Design interface control is, _ essentially, 2
what I mentioned bef ore about 'the communication between 3
disciplines, which will be what we will be testing.
1 4
What we would, also, like to test as a part 5
of the integrated design inspection is we want to look at 6
the design change control.
7 Now, we understand that -- in fact, I have 8
been, personally, involved with the design based on a 9
verification firm, which has been ongoing f or the past 10 few years.
11 That program is a program which TVA put 12 forth, which starts at the time that the operating
{
13 license was issued and looks at all changed documentation 14 from that point f orward.
We would like to look in this 15 inspection at the design change control.
16 Just a brief description of the inspection 17 activities.
Obviously, we have been pretty busy in the 18 last month trying to put together a team of, what we l
19 consider, experts to review the design of th e ER CW j
i 20 sy st em.
1 3
21 The inspection is going to be conducted, 22 primarily, in Knoxville.
We will be at the site f or two j
23 days for the team to be f amiliar with the system, have a g
24 walk down of the system so they really understand when i
25 they review the drawings and calculations what the SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
13 l
1 hardware looks like.
(..
2 We will, as a part of the inspection-3 identify, if any, restart. issues.
Meaning, things we 4
need to accomplish bef ore the plant is. restarted.
5 Obviously, we will prepare '.an-inspection 6
report, which is scheduled to come out right now for 7
November the 6th.
And we will f ollow up any inspecti'on 8
report findings, if such things exist.
9 Some of the things we are going to look at 10 in a little more detail are listed.up here on this next 11 slide.
Basically, it's essentially what you-might' think 12 of as common sense when you sit down and design a - nuclear
(
13 power plant.
14 We're going to test the validity of design 15 inputs and assumptions.
All calculations are made with 16 certain assumptions, and we would like to see that.those 17 have been properly j ustified, in fact, by appropriate 18 technical ' data.
1 19 Design inputs; again, is essentially testing 20 j u st discipline interf aces so that the pr.oper design 21 emphasis has been properly transf erred between groups.
22 We would, also, like to test the validity j
23 that conf orms the design specs, even though TVA has q
24 design specifications.
I guess, in a way, the FSAR is a 25 design specification.
We would,. also, test conformance SMITH REPORTING AG ENCY (615). 267-0989 3
13 I
to those documents.
I\\.
2 The validity of analysis; _what we would like 3
to do is to review calculations and examine the methods 4
by which the calculations were perf ormed to assure 5
ourselves that they have been done with, you know, 6
generally. accepted industry practice and in accordance 7
with our requirements.
8 Proper instrumentation of ' system interf ace 9
requirements; again, that is Jooking at dis ciplina ry 10 communication.
Il Proper compo nent classification would be the 12 lproper saf ety classification of' components, whether or l
13 not things are a Category 2 or 3.
I 14 Control of design changes; again, this is 15 going to look like covering ground already covered 16 bef ore.
We are going to look at the design changes that 17 were made by POL to assure that the changes that were 18 made to the design as a result of field change requests 19 and non-conf ormance reports are properly dispositioned.
20 The system that was selected f or this review-21 is the " Emergency Raw Cooling Water System. "
22 Why was the Emergency Raw Cooling System 23 chosen?
g 24 There could have been a lot of other i
25 sy st em s.
We have some basic criteria that we use when we SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
14 l
1 have done IDI's in the past.
Listed up on the board are
!(
2 the maj or criteria.
3 First of all, the system has to be essential 4
to plant safety.
In other words, it has to be a saf ety 5
related system.
6 It should be designed, primarily, by the l
1 7
architect engineer, which in this case is TVA.
It should 8
be a representative of the saf ety features in other 9
systems, and it is.
I 10 It should be a design that involves 11 interf aces between the internal S vendor and the AE and 12 other external vendors.
I 13 We think that the Essential Raw Cooling 14 System will meet all these c ri t e ri a.
Therefore, it was 15 an appropriate system f or us to look at.
l 16 You can go through the schedule of the IDI.
17 I think Mr. Grimes would like to discuss that with you.
18 MR. GRIMES:
Before I start the schedule, 19 let me just say that the integrated design inspection has 20 been done on a number of plants before licensing to l
21 provide the commission additional assurance that the 22 design has been properly carried out at the particular
)
23 plant looked at.
4 24 In this case, we' re doing the same type of g-1 25 effort with about the same number of people over the same SMITH REPORTING AG ENCY (615) 267-0989
1 15 l
l l
l 1
time frame, and I will describe how that f alls out in l
[
2 detail.
1 1
3 The IDI process was begun af ter a team 4
assembly yesterday.
We had a meeting of our f ull team in 5
Bethesda, and Gene will go over that in a little more 6
detail later.
Today, the July meeting is recorded.
1 7
Tomorrow, the team will be in Knoxville to I
8 discuss one-on-one with their discipline counterparts 9
exactly how the inspection will progress and what 10
,information is required at this point f or us to do our I
l 11 l preparation bef ore the on-site inspection portion.
l 12 l
For the next two weeks, we will be -- the 13
! team will be reviewing documentation and preparing to 14 come on-site July 27th.
15 We will come actually to the Sequoyah site, i
1 i
16 lfirst, f or a couple of d ay s, as Gene mentioned, to assure 17 that the team members are all f amiliar with the actual 18 configuration of the sy s tem.
Then, we will go to l
\\
l 19 l Knoxville f or a couple of additional days that week.
20 Then, there will be a week of in-of fice 21 review where the team, again, will at their own offices l
22 be examining documentation preparing f or the questions 23 for their time at Knoxville.
24 Then, we come back to Knoxville on August 4
j l
9 j
25 10th f or a two-week period of design documentation 1
i l
SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
16 l
l t
l inspection, f ollowed by one more week of in-of fice 1
l i
I 7.
' review.
3 And then a final on-site week, August 31st 4
through September 4th, of inspection at Kno xvill e.
That 5
final week, usually, will involve a finalization of the 6
team findings, making sure that the team has 7
documentation to back up their specific findings that 8
will appear in the report.
9 Then the f ollowing week, we would plan an i
10 l exit meeting, a f ormal exit meeting with TVA.
It co ul d 11 lbe at Kno xvill e or here, at TVA's option.
12 By that time, we expect that all of the 13 lissueswill be known f airly well.
The individual 14 findings will be known to TVA through periodic meetings l
15 of your counterparts with the team and also bi-weekly 16
! meetings, which Gene will describe later with TVA.
17 i
By October 9th, however, we expect to 18 f ormalize, what we believe, are the restart issues.
- Now, j
19 these are not only the individual findings, but any 20 generic significance that we extract f rom the individual 21 findings that we believe fall within the restart scope.
22 We plan, essentially, to use TVA's 23 acceptance criteria for restart that TVA is using and 24 that the NRC has agreed to.
g t
25 We expect, then, within a two-week period to a
SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
y 17 1
receive by October 23rd TVA's response to these restart 1
(
2 issues.
3 We would expect a final week of inspection i
4 of November 2nd to the 6th to verify that the issues we 5
have identified during the inspection have been 6
com pl e te d, and you can close those out.
Also by November 7
the 6th, the inspection report, with all issues 1
8 identified, will be issued.
9 And sometime in the August-September time 10 frame, we will be identifying the schedule f or subsequent -
]
11 responses by TVA to those other non-restart issues, and 12 we will want to have that schedule established bef ore we 13 restart.
Then the team, as necessary, will participate t
34 in verification of those other items, also.
15 That completes the schedule.
I will give it 16 back to Gene f or a little more detail on how the team l
l' 17 will work.
18 MR. IMBRO:
On the screen is a slide that 19 lists all the team members.
As you can see, the team is 20 broken, essentially, into five areas.
As we discussed l
l 21 bef ore ; the systems area, the components, electrical j
')
22 pow er, instrumentation and control, and civil structural.
23 With me today I have. brought the discipline I
f 24 leaders, and I would like them, in a moment, to give you 1
25 a little bit of an idea of what their backgrounds are and i
SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
18-I i
I their qualifications are to do this type of inspection.
Is 2
As f or myself, I have 22 years of 3
experience.
I have been with.the NRC for the last 13 4
years.
The last three or four of those have been 5
involved doing design inspections and supervising design 6
inspections similar to this one.
1 7
Prior to joining the NRC, I did work f or-8 Combustion Engineering,. and I worked fo.t Union Hill as an' 9
assistant design engineer.
10 Bob, would you like to introduce yourself ?
11 MR. SH EWMAK ER :
I'm Bob Shewmaker.
I, 12 l basically, have 25 years of experience, six of it in
\\
i l?
13 private industry in the nuclear field and commercial, i
l 14 field.
15 I have been with the Commission about 18 16 years, 19 years.
I have been in the Licensing Area I
i 17 Inspection Enf orcement and the Office of Standards.
I i
18 I was a member of the group that, basically,.
i 19 developed the IDI program and was a member and discipline 20 leader on the first three that were conducted.
21 Currently, I am' in the - Of fice of Spe cial f
l 22 Projects.
23 MR. IMBRO:
Okay.
Ron?
I 24 MR.'PARKHILL:
My.name is Ron Parkhill.
I
.f t
25 am going to be the IDI Mechanical Systems Team Leader. I SMITH REPORTING AG ENCY (615) 267-0989 L - -
19 5
1 have had 16 years of experience in the nuclear 6asign I
2 area, the last three of which have been with the NRC.
s l
3 Prior to that, I worked with AE, a manuf acturer with l
4 three utilities.
I am Andy DuBouchet.
I'll 6
be heading the group of mechanical components.
I have i
7 got about 10 years of research in teaching and civil I
8 en gi ne e rin g.
I have about ancther 10 years in design and i
9 analysis in engineering.
For the past f our years, I have l
l 10 participated in NRC inspections of about a dozen nuclear j
l
?
11 power pl ant s.
i 1
12 MR. MCFADDEN:
My name is Dick McFadden.
l 13 I'll be the electrical power discipline leader.
I have l
l l
14
,about 20 years of experience as a design engineer, i
15 a naly ti cal engineer and engineering manager f or a major
)
16
- electrical manuf acturer and several consulting firms in 17
! nucl ear power generation distribution, power system lprotectionandheavy industrial electrical power 18 19 di s ci pli ne.
20 MR. LEIVO:
My name is Jim Leivo.
I am the 21 instrumentation and control systems discipline leader.
I 22 have, approximately, 20 years of total nuclear power 23 pl ant experience.
24 Recently, I have been involved in two other 4
+.
(
25 l inspections in support of the NRC Inspection Program SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
20 I
lsimilartothisone.
1
(
l t
2 j
I, also, have had lead design responsibility lfor the application of instrumentation and control 3
4 systeras f or nuclear steam supply system vendors and 5
independent consulting firms and applications that are 6
similar to this one, 7
MR. WANG :
My name is Hai-Bob Wang.
I am 8
the discipline leader of the civil structural.
I have 9
been with the NRC f or over three ysars, mainly doing'IDI.
10 Prior to j oining the.9AC, I was with n 11 private firm for 12 years doing nuclear power plant 12
' str u c' ural design analysis.
I, al so, have cevarsi years c
13 of teaching and. research.
I have a Ph.D in structural 34 engineering.
15 l
MR. IMBRO:
So, you have an idea now that l
16 lthe team is a f airly seasoned bunch of veterans in design l
17 and evaluation of nuclear power plants.
18 Just a little more in the way of statistics 19 and some calculations.
The tota) cumulative experience 20 of the team comes up to like 304 years average 21 experience.
Average experience is 22 years.
l 22 All the team members, including us on the 23 NRC ctaff, are registered professional engineers.
All 24 the team members have had substantial design and f
25 supervisory design experience.
Many of the f olks with us SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
21 1
have advanced degrees.
8 i
t
-2 Just to get on a little bit with the conduct 3
of the inspection.
I would like to emphasize that I 4
think it's really important that our team members have a i
5 direct one-to-one correspondence with their counterparts I
6 on the TVA si de.
i 7
I have been encouraged by my people that if 8
they pick up a drawing or calculation or any other 9
document and they have any question on it, they should ltry and contact the person who has generated that piece 10 11 lof work, that has the direct inferface.
l 12 l
I think that's really important.
It helps l
\\
13 us not only to evaluate the calculation, but also to I
14 i evaluate the caliber of the people that did the work.
15 The ne xt item.
I know that TVA is very l
l 16 l anxious to have this completed, and you have off ered and 17 lwe certainly accept the support, i
18 l
You are a big organization.
We're only 14 19 people.
It's very easy for you to overwhelm us with 20 kindness, so to speak, in trying to help us out doing our 21 job.
So, to keep --
22 MR. WHITE:
That's better than underwhelming 23 you.
24 MR. IMBRO:
To keep things in a proper g
l 4
l per s pe ctiv e, it's very casy f or you to overwhelm us with 25 SMITH REPORTING AGENCY (615) 267-0989 L
I I
I 1
presentations and the like.
(
I 2
We would -- presentations, I would like to l
3 have all the presentations cleared through me.
We may 4
request presentations, if we feel such are necessary, but 5
we want the team's time to be spent ef ficiently doing 6
inspections rather than listening to presentations.
7 Al thou gh, presentations are not totally ineffective.
8 In terms of status, I was planning on and 9
j ust thinking how the inspection would work, I was 10 thinking of communicating with TVA, at least, twice a 11 week.
12 l
I was thinking, right now, of probably 13 Wednesday morning and Friday morning, but we can work out 14 those details during the course of the inspection.
15 If we find any significant items, we will 16 l cer tainly not wait until those times to communicate with 17 TVA.
We will let you know in a prompt manner.
18 Just quickly, these are the types of things 19 you are likely to see in an IDI report.
As Mr. Grimes 20 said, the NRC has done, I believe it's five IDI reports.
21 They wero all done on antioil plants.
But 22 in any case, those reports exist in the public document 23 room, and certainly I am sure you have looked at them 24 al r ea dy.
25 The types of findings that are a necessary i
S MITH REPORTING AG ENCY (615) 267-0989
1 part of the IDI report, e s se nti ally, are three i,.
2 categories; deficiencies, unresolved items and 3
observations.
And they are pretty sel f-e xplana t ory.
4 Deficiency is something -- is an instance 5
where we find you may not have complied with what the 6
PSAR ' states or it may be in violation. of some regulatory 7
requirement.
8 Unresolved items; if at the time of the 9
inspection there are some items which are lef t. lingering 10 which we need more inf ormation to assess, they will be 11 put in the unresolved item category.
l 12 observations; you might look at those as
(
13 gratuitous advise.
If our people think there may be some 6
14 way that you can improve the.way you do business,- we may 15 pass that on to you.
But in any case,'that's something 16 you do not have to do, TVA does not have to respond to.
17 So, in summary, that concludes'my 18 presentation in going through.
I just wanted to give 19 you-all a pretty brief thumbnail sketch of what the IDI 20 will consist of.
21 If you have any. questions, I will be happy 22 to answer them.
23 MR. WHITE:
We might want to hold our 24 questions unt il later.
It'might be better f or TVA to 25 introduce our team-and tell how they are going to SMITH REPORTING AG ENCY (615) 267-0989 L___-___________-_______-_.
.I 24 l-1 operate, and then -- because the NRC may have questions, 2
al so.
We can hold all the-questions until we hear f rom 3
both sides, if that's in agr,eement.
4 MR. KEPPLER:
Fine.
5 MR. WHITE:
I would like to introduce the 1
6 team leader for the integrated design inspection on i
7 behalf of TVA, Mr. Ray.
8 MR. RAY:
Yes, sir.
9 MR. WHITE:
Go ahead.
10 MR. RAY:
Good afternoon.
My name is Mick 11 Ray.
I am the team leader f or TVA f or this ' activity.
12 Basically, I am responsible to provide whatever support i
13 is required for the succe ssf ul completion of the
/
1 14 integrated design inspection.
i 15 This, obviously, includes certain f acilities 16 and administrative support for the NRC team, but more 17 importantly the development of rapid response mechanisms 18 to any issues identified with the NRC during these 19 i nspe cti ons.
20 To support that, the development of an 21 eff ective TVA interf ace team is the key ingredient to our i
22 success.
l 23 May I have the first slide, pl ea se ?
24 This is the team, which is composed of very 25 experienced TVA personnel.
In fact, the resumes are in SMITH REPORTING AG ENCY (615) 267-0989
25'
]
1 the handout package to give some beyond to the depth of
]
2 this team.
.)
3 It's organiz ed to. support concurrently the 4
integrated design inspection and ~ the field inspections at I
5 the same time.
6 As you can see, the engineering portion is 7
headed by Mr. Doug Wilson.
The engineering team is l
8 organized very similarly to what Mr. Imbro indicated as 9
the NRC's five disciplines.
So, we're prepared to-10 f unction on a one-on-one basis by disciplines.
11 The engineering-team will be supported by 12 Mr. Dennis McCloud in Licensing, Mr. Walt Andrews in i
13 Quality Assurance.
14 i
To support the field inspection, Mr. John 15 LaPointe will have the lead support with Mr. Bob Olson in 16 the Modifications Organization.
17 As seen on the chart, Mr. Ken Jones is-our.
18 interf ace with the restart test program.
Any required 19 engineering support f or the field inspection will also be 20 provided by Mr. Doug Wilson's engineering team.
21 Theref ore, we will have consistency between the operation 22 in Knoxville and at Sequoyah.
23 In addition to these people, we have also g
24 arranged for escorts, which are available to you, -in i
25 order to maximize your field inspector's time.
SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY. (615) - 26 7-09 89 E
26 l
l l
i 1
1 1
As Mr. White indicated, we are prepared to I
l j
k 2
jcupport inspections at both Sequoyah and at Knoxville.
l i
3
'We have arranged space near the existing NRC office at i
4 Se q uoy ah, and tomorrow we will visit the office space in 5
Kno xvill e.
6 Change the slide for me, please.
1 7
Another key to our success is the use of a 8
computerized system whicn sill track all identified 9
issues f or both the Integrated design inspection and the i
10 field inspection.
Il The printout f rom this program will provide l
12 the basis f or our daily working meetings to assure a l
l 13 rapid response to your identified items and to assure 1
lthat all the NRC issues are being pursued.
14 I
15 As Mr. White indicated, it's consistent with 16 lthe NRC's letter statement that the IDI should f ocus on 17 areas not directly covered by TVA's other ef f orts and 18 should minimize redoing work already perf ormed by TVA.
19 The management of all the programs discussed l
l 20 at the May 21st meeting will be available to discuss, in 1
21 depth, the review of the Essential Raw Water Cooling 22 Sy st em, the findings and any actions to correct the 23 concern.
Again, a listing of these programs are provided l
l 24 in the handout.
25 In conclusion, as Mr. White stated, we are l
SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989 l
i 27 j
l I
prepared to provide whatever support is required to I
(_
2 assure that these inspections are successf ully completed 3
in the shortest possible time.
4 MR. ZWOLINSKI:
Thank you very much.
Do you 5
have any comments 7 6
MR. EBNETER:
Just one comment.
Gene Imbro l
7 is the team leader.
He's in full charge.
You should not.
)
8 be experimenting.
If Gene has instructions to that 9
effect, they are it.
Your contacts should be right 10 through Gene.
l If you have an argument with Gene, you talk II 12 to him.
Don't call me.
We want to minimize the number i
f.
13
'of people who are involved with that inspection..
i 14 i
MR. WHITE:
Me ddlin g.
I 15 i
MR. EBNETER:
No.
Gene has total charge of 16 this inspection.
17 I
MR. GRIMES:
I have one thing.
It occurred 18 l to me as you were discussing TVA's aspects, as you 19 mentioned, the avoidance. of duplication.
I guess we --
20 that is not one of our objectives.
21 We are looking at this particular system, in 7
22 depth, and looking at the work, the design work that we 23 have done there.
And to the extent TVA has done work in 24 those areas, al so, our check will be a check on TVA's f
i 25 oversight, as well.
SMITil REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
28 l
\\
i 1
So, we are not going out of our way to avoid
,/
l.
2 things which have been overviewed by TVA, particularly.
3 MR. WHITE:
I don't know how that fits in j
l 4
with the letter, Mr. Keppler, now.
I wouldn' t accept the remarks j
6 that was just made exactly, because I think it_is not our 7
intent to dwell on_ areas that you have spent time on.
J 8
MR. EBNETER:
You have done calculations in 9
civil areas.
The team will have to review that jcalculationtotheextent to verify the validity of it 10 i
11 and the assumptions used in making that and the accuracy 1
l of the final calculation.
They may not have to redo the 12 5
13 calc, but they have'to look at the cale and verify it.
]
i 14 l
MR. WHITE:
I just want to make sure that --
15 can I make a try. at this to say that the verification 16 effort is going to focus on areas not directly covered by 17 our other eff orts and should minimize redoing work 18 al rea dy pe rf orme d by TVA.
i 19 I think that was the intent, and I just want 1
1 20 to make sure that hasn't changed f rom what you said.
21 MR. EBNETER:
We will have to do what we 22 have to do to verify the design.
Those comments were f or 23 your benefit to minimize the impact on your staf f.
It's 24 nothing to do with my staf f.
They will do whatever they 25 have to do to do the verification.
It will involve
?
SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
29' 1
looking at a lot of work you have already done, t-N.
2-obviously..
3 MR. GRIMES:
I would say that TVA, _for 4
e xampl e, Engineering Assurance has done extensive work in 5
an area, we might choose our sample to overlap a small:
6 part of that rather than a large part of it.
7 MR. WHITE:
That's what I' refer to as 8
" Minimizing redoing. "
So, we're I think on the same wave 9
length.
10 May I ask a couple of questions to verify.
11 what we said in the earlier meeting in Washington?
12 In terms of heat-up, we can' proceed heat-up
(
13 as we are ready, even though this is still ongoing?
I I
14 want to make sure that is - -
15 MR. KEPPLER:
As you complete the necessary 16 prerequisites and satisfy your own requirements and have 17 done the appropriate things of training and so f orth, we 18 would expect you to be able to heat-up in parallel.
j 19 MR. WSITE:
I wonder if I could ask one of 20 the --
1 21 MR. EBNETER:
That's non-nuclear.
22 MR. WHITE:
I understand that.
23 MR. EBNETER:
We would like to' meet with you 24 bef ore they actually go into the heat-up process.
k 25 MR. MASON:
We will talk about some of that
)
SMITH REPORTING AG ENCY (615) 267-0989
30.
l 1
I I
1 tomorrow?
j 2
MR. KEPPLER:
Yes.
3 MR. WHITE:
I guess the other question I
)
4 would ask is that the restart issues, I think I 5
understand this f rom what you said, is that really they 6
will be identified.
j
.i 7
To me, a restart issue is significant; and l
l 8
therefore, should be identified that day.
And the 1
9 schedule says you're going to -- and I want to make sure l
19 I understand.
l 11 l
MR. KEPPLER:
We intend to make TVA aware of 12 significant findings.
It's not our intent to wait --
d 13 MR. WHITE:
To wait until the 23 rd of l
l i
14 October?
15 MR. KEPPLER:
I think you can look at the 16 sche dul e.
I think, depending on the nature of the 17 findings, you ought to be able to be dealing with a lot 18 of these as we are going along.
l l
19 MR. WHITE:
We intend to.
There are places where we will i
21 be able to comply.
We will have to see how the 22 findings --
23 MR. WHITE:
That's what we are going to try 24 to do with our team.
Precisely, we would hope that f-i 25 finding out on a very frequent basis what your concerns SMITH REPORTING AG ENCY (615)- 267-0989
31 1
are, we can bring you inf ormation, provide them with all
((,
2 of the concerns and move on a daily basis.
3 That's the reason, really, we have 4
computerized this effort.
We intend to keep a very close i
5 track and make sure we are supporting you in every way we j
6 can.
7 MR. GRIMES:
The way we, traditionally, l
8 operated on these ty pe s of inspections is f or every 9
discipline to keep track by number of the issues we 10
- identify, the findings we identify.
11 So, you will be verbally told a number at 12 lthe same time you're told by me of the finding.
So, you 13 will be able to refer back to that, and you can keep your l
1 14
! own tracking system.
15 MR. WHITE:
So, we ought to put that in our 16 l tracking system.
Obviously, if yo'u will share anything 17 lelse that you need in the tracking system.
l 1
Just one thing.
During the l
I i
19 course of the inspection we may not be able to identify 20 particular issues.
We may not be able to categorize 21 issues as we start.
We will try our best.
l l
22 We will identify what are the significant 23 issues.
And then as soon as we can reach our 24 determination, we will let you know if they have become g
25 restart issues or not.
l SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
32
'l MR. WHITE:-
Certainly, by identifying it as
/K 2
a significant issue --
3 MR. IMBRO:
It could be a potential restart-4 issue.
5 MR. WHITE:
-- it might be that'we would be 6
f oolish not to look at it.
7 MR. FOX:
You will be using the same base 8
for rationale you used on the restart theory?
9 MR. IMBRO:
Yes, sir.
We will be using the I
10 same criteria.
l 11 MR. WHITE:
So, we can look at -- because we 12 ought to be able to independently 'come to' a conclusion I
l i
(
13 and not have to wait for it, independently come to a 8
14 conclusion of whether we can restart.
15 MR. IMBRO:
The thing we would hope to focus l
16 on, in addition, at the exit meeting, and we hope I
17 certainly by the time we give you a letter on restart 18 issues, is any generic implicaitons that come out of 19 these individual things.
20 So,.one of the strengths of the IDI is it 21 looks at the integration at cross disciplines, and things 22 which we find in one discipline may have some 23 implications f or others.
We would find that out towards 24 the.end of the inspection and as we prepare f or the exit j
i 25 meeting.
SMITH REPORTING AGENCY ( 615 )' 267-0989
33 l
l l
1 We should have a very good idea day-to-day 2
what the individual findings are and by the exit meeting 3
what our integrated conclusions are.
4-MR. EBNETER:
I would like to take two 5
minutes and have Frank McCoy and Gary Zech, who will be 6
involved with the as-built inspection, give you a rundown i
7 of their functions.
8 MR. ZECH:
I am Gary Zech, Assistant Chief ~
9 f or Special Pr oj e cts.
At my right is Frank McCoy, 10 Sequoyah section Cheif.
We will be assigne d, -bas'ically, l
l l
11 full-time as the team leader f or the walk' down portion - of l
12 the inspection..
We will have a number of team members d
13
,from the region.
I l
i i
14 I will ask him to describe what. his scope 15 will i n cl u d e, but it will be team members from the region 16 from the staf f in Atlanta, as well as team members from 17 I the OSP Project Etaff at Sequoyah that will ' direct' that 1
18 walk down.
19 Frank, go ahead.
20 MR. MCCOY:
What we expect to do. is - an 1
21 as-built verification of the system, I guess your design 22 documents and your drawings completed, a s-confi gu re d -
23 drawings.
f 24 I will be employing a team of about eight
?
25 people f or a two-week period.
We are expecting at this l
l SMITH REPORTING AG EN CY - (615 ). 26 7-0 9 89
(
34 I
l l
l l
l l
l 1
' point to have some independent measurements done.
)
i i
2 I should be finalizing within the next week, 3
completely finalizing who the team members will be and
)
4 will be in touch with Mr. LaPointe to get the necessary 5
information that I will need to get us started on that.
6 MR. KEPPLER:
When is that going to be?
7 MR. MCCOY:
August the 3rd.
1 8
MR. KEPPLER:
We will need quite a bit of 9
support.
We will be doing independent measurements on 10 concrete.
We will be doing some anchor bolt measurement 11 supports.
So, we will need support in that area.
12 l
MR. FOX:
I think Olson will be the linterf ace with that.
And LaPointe.
15 MR. ZWOL INS KI :
As an administrative matter, 16 I passed the meeting attendance list around.
Please sign 17 it.
18 Thank you.
19 END OF MEETING 20 21 22 23 24 25 SMITH REPORTING. AG EN CY (615) 267-0989
~
~
1 CERTIFICATE OF OPPICIAL R E POR T E R '-
k.
This is to certify that the attached proceedings before the UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION in the matter of:
NAME OF PROCEEDING :
NRC/TVA MEETING AN INV ESTIG ATIV E INT ERV I EW OP:
l l
DOCKET NO:
l PLACE:
TVA COMPLEX
/
TENUESSEE. RIVER' ROOM I
MARKET STREET CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE DAT E :
JULY 8, 1987 were held as herein appears, and-that this is the l
o ri gi nal t r an s c ri pt thereof f or the file of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ISistt_
( Ty ped )
i erlM
. Nixon Official Reporter Reporter's Af filiation SMITH REPORTING AG ENCY l
POST OPPICE' BOX 6127 CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37401 k,
i
,r,-,
R I
NRC HANDOUT 1
SEQUOYAH INTEGRATED DESIGN INSPECTION l
NRC/TVA MEETING CHATTAN0OGA, TENNESSEE JULY 8, 1987 l
l l
GENE IMBRo, TEAM LEADER, NRC l
BRIAN GRIMES, DEPUTY DIRECTOR DivlSION OF REACTOR INSPECTION AND SAFEGUARDS OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION, NRC l
l s
TVA IDI (INTEGRATED DESIGN INSPECTION)
PERFORMED BY TEAM OF NRC INSPECTORS WITH CONTRACTOR ASSISTANCE (TEAM OF 14)
If1SPECT10NS ADDRESS FIVE DISCIPLif1ES
- MECHAfl1 CAL SYSTEMS
- MECHANICAL COMPONENTS
- CivlL/ STRUCTURAL
- ELECTRIC POWER l
- INSTRUMENTATIOfJ AND CONTROLS lilSPECTION EMPHASIS 1
l
- IMPLEMEriTATION OF FSAR COMMITMENTS l
- TECHNICAL ADEQUACY OF DESIGtJ DOCUMENTS I
- DESIGN INTERFACE CollTROL
- DESIGil CHAfiGE CONTROL (PRE-0/L)
If4SPECT10f1 ACTIvlTIES
- INSPECTION PREPARATION
- DlkECT If1SPECTION AT
- TVA DESIGN OFFICES
- PLAf4T SITE
- IDEllTIFICATION OF RESTART ISSUES
- IlJSPECT1014 REPORT PREPARATION
- FOLLOWUP OF INSPECT 10fl REPORT FINDINGS
s 1
INSPECTION TOPICS VALIDITY OF DESIGN INPUTS AND ASSUMPTIONS VALIDITY OF AND CONFORMANCE TO DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS VALIDITY OF ANALYSES PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF SYSTEM INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS
- PROPER COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION CONTROL OF DESIGN CHANGES I
i l
i SELECTION CRITERIA FOR THE SAMPLE SYSTEM THE SAMPLE SYSTEM WILL HAVE SOME OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTEElSTICS:
- LE ESSENTIAL TO PLAf;T SAFETY
- DESIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT-ENGINEER (TVA)
- BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SAFETY FEATURES IN OTHER SY, STEMS
- BE A DESIGN WHICH INVOLVES INTERl4AL INTERFACES BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL AREAS AND EXTERNAL INTERFACES WITH THE NUCLEAR STEAM SUPPLY SYSTEM VENDOR, COMP 0flEliT VENDORS, AND ENGINEERING SERVICE l
ORGANIZATIONS ESSENTIAL RAW COOL!!;G WATER SYSTEM HAS BEEN SELECTED FOR REVIEW.
l l
l l
L
SCHEDULE FOR INTEGRATED DESIGN INSPECTION AT SEQUOYAll UNIT 2 DATE ACTIVITY JULY 7, 1987 TEAM ORIENTATION MEETING AT BETHESDA, NRC OFFICES JULY 8, 1987 MEETING WITH TVA AT CHATTANOOGA -
(DISCIPLINE LEADERS ONLY)
JULY 9, 1987 INSPECT AVAILABILITY OF DESIGN'D0 CEMENTATION TVA/ KNOXVILLE (DISCIPLINE LEADERS ONLY)
\\
JULY 13-24, 1987 INSPECTION PREPARATION - (ENTIRE TEAM)
JULY 27-28, 1987 INSPECTION /WALKDOWN OF ERCW SYSTEM AND RELATED SUPPORT SYSTEMS JULY 29-31, 1987 INSPECT 10tl 0F DESIGN DOCUMENTATION TVA/ KNOXVILLE AUGUST 3-7, 1987 INSPECTION OF DESIGN DOCUMENTATION (IN-OFFICE REVIEW)
AUGUST 10-21, 19E7 ll4SPECTION OF DESIGN DOCUMENTAT10fl TVA/ KNOXVILLE AUGUST 24-28, 1987 INSPECTION OF DESIGN DOCUMENTATION (IN-OFFICE REVIEW) i i
J
.s AUGUST 31-INSPECTION OF DESIGN DOCUMENTATION SEPTEMBER 4, 1987 TVA/ KNOXVILLE SEPTEMBER 11, 1987 EXIT MEET!flG (TVA/ KNOXVILLE?)
OCTOBER 9, 1987 ISSUE LETTER TO TVA IDENTIFYING RESTART ISSUES OCTOBER 23, 1987 RECEIVE TVA RESPONSE TO NRC RESTART ISSUES NOVEMBER 2-6, 1987 REINSPECT 1014 0F OPEN RESTART ISSUES NOVEMBER 6, 1987 ISSUE INSPECTION REPORT SUBSEQUENT DATES FOR TVA RESP 014SE AND CLOSE OUT OF REMAINIflG ITEMS TO BE DETERMlf!ED l
l l
l l
1 l
l l
~
r l
w
l l
4 IDI TEAM 1
E. V. IMBRo, TEAM LEADER (NRC)
R. SHEWMAKER, Co-TEAM LEADER (NRC) l MECHANICAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS COMPONENTS POWER
- R, W. PARKHILL (NRC)
- A, DuBoUCHET
- R, McFADDEN J. HOUGHTON V. FERRARINI J. HALLER R. hASTERSON l
INSTRUMENTATION CIVIL AND CONTROL STRUCTURAL
'J.
LEIVo
- H.
WANG (NRC)
S. CHEN A. UNSAL 0
MALLON l
- DISCIPLINE LEADER
l l
l l
IDI TEAM EXPERIENCE /0 QUALIFICATIONS l
J l
- 304 YEARS COMBINED TEAM EXPERIENCE l
- 22 YEARS AVERAGE EXPERIENCE 1
l
- ALL TEAM MEMBERS ARE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 1
- TEAM MEMBERS HAVE HAD SUBSTANTIAL DESIGN AND SUPERVISORY i
DESIGN EXPERIENCE l
l l
- MANY TEAM MEMBERS HAVE ADVANCED DEGREES I
l 1
l l
1 l
l l
l l
_J
s J
i CONDUCT OF INSPECTION TEAM MEMBERS Il!TERFACE DIRECTLY WITH COGNIZANT TVA WORKIrlG LEVEL PERSolli EL ON A ONE-Oli-ONE BASIS TVA PRESEl4 TAT 10NS TO TEAM ONLY AS REQUESTED OR APPROVED BY TEAM LEADER
- STATUS MEETINGS WITH TVA TWICE WEEKLY (WEDNESDAY Af1D FRIDAY AM)
- SIGillFICANT ITEMS WILL BE PROMPTLY IDENTIFIED TO TVA
y 4.
l 8
TYPES OF'IDI FINDINGS i
DEFICIENCY.
A: DEFICIEf4CY IS AN ITEM WHICH IS AN-ERROR, l
IlJC0liSISTENCY, OR PROCEDURAL. VIOLATION WITH REGARD TO I
LICENSING COMMITMENTS, SPECIFICATIONS, PROCEDURES, CODES, OR REGULATIONS THAT IS IDENTIFIED DURING THE IDI. -FOLLOWUP ACT10ft IS REQUIRED FOR LICEl4SEE RESOLUTION OF THE. DEFICIENCY AND NRC EVALUATION OF THE RESOLUTION.
Ul RESOLVED ~lTEM.
AN UNRESOLVED ITEM IS A QUESTION TH T REQUIRES MORE INFORMATION TO REACH A CONCLUSION..llCENSEE
. RESPONSE AND NRC. EVALUATION ARE REQUIRED.
y O_B_SERVATION.
AN OBSERVATION IS AN ITEM THE INSPECTION TEAM.
CollSIDERS APPROPRI ATE TO CALL TO THE ' ATTENTION OF THE LICENSEE ALTHOUGH 11 IS NEITHER A DEFICIENCY NOR AN UNRESOLVED-ITEM.
)
IT CAN INCLUDE ITEMS RECOMMEllDED FOR LICENSEE CONSIDERATION
.j THAT HAVE NO SPECIFIC REGULATORY REQUIREMENT.
LICENSEE.
l RESP 0 HSE IS NOT REQUIRED.
1 I
I 1
4
OT O O WM SN M
O A SL I
PL
/
C LA T O L
I RT S
CI
&I AL B
I W
l U
O R -
l i
l CS H
T B i
C. B C
l O
i E
NO L D EC E
B N
E
- T O
S N U
L I
I O O A N T
P O
I Ta R
C AL U S N
I R
T E
H Ei C O t
Pi U
P J
l OO R
S J
m LR
/
A I
l I
H Vl M
I i A N R
S CC E
E W
T Y D Y G A
E S
A R
Y R E A D S
Sl I
OS L
K Ql T
I QD D. T M A E Y E
N A L
A OG T
E T W
TE MK S
PA S N SN O
E O C. L E
T L
J E
I H B D
D R
K C
U N
O E
M E
T L
C CF L
P S M JA c
EF l
E O
i D S Y
RS D
I E
P N
E M
N l
XV l
E R
D O
OT N S
I I
TA CCO MS EL I
E E T TE l
Y R C S N l
I l
O T
R A Y
l B
R O
A E
N A
J O S
C D
K O
M
.K R
S l
I i
EI
~
C C
. L K
f ' ',
LW E
I R
I M
J D_ G U
O D
1
M L OI CLA PLI T O LN OHjCL B
/
L CI C
&I WY R
WN S
I B
N R
RY E V
I I
N O
T O
BRMG BR OT B
CE OEMO OA S N C
LA L BGI R BM J
RT E
AL N
T N
O N
S N L N O
NO N
A I
EC O O OY RS T
B R
P SE NON ITa U NL OLI C
K AL T H A TY I
L R
C OB YAI E
P EN U J ETW U
PH R
N P
P S
OO TEI E L L
SI T EV E S
J L R OE A A
/
LR A JT N
A H
I E.
V M
S I
H C
H R
CC I
I A N S
M R
W Y G E
E Y D R
A A A D S
I OS R E O N T
L UE K
NA N
RESS C
D E Y I
M T
NA G H TR Y
QD MA L
E A
OG G C REH D T EHS N E T T
S PA O A BT GU I
W TE MKM H OU L
S N SN RO O LN E O S
.S D. L.
T J C.L E E
.R HB KR E. A I
E I
D D
D R
.K C
OW.
E D
J U
N O
M L
E C
Lc P
SM I
N E
DS Y
D E
i R
N E
R E
M N
X V S
E N
D R
N E
UH I
I D
O OT N MS AZ L
I AC R
W TA CC O
EL MIE E HR R
I E T T
I NE AWN E N J.
T H RC S N EB CO A Y
O R
O RA Y A D BM J
O S D R K
B N
A J
E E
C AI N KI E
O M
H.K G B A CG K
S R
L
~
~
C C B
R UU E
F I
EI E RE HA
,l l
I K
NW M
K D C
I D
M J
G U
O D _
j j
l i
l I
l 1
SEQU0YAWINDEPENDENTDESIGNINSPECTION j
)
PREPARATIONFORINSPECTION
- ASSIGNED TVA PERSONNEL TO ESCORT NRC INSPECTORS y
- LOCATIONS FOR NRC AND TVA TEAMS
- COMPUTERIZED TRACKING SYSTEMS
- DAILY TEAM MEETINGS i
IMPORTANCEOFOTHERTVAPROGRAMS l
-PROGRAMSDISCUSSEDATMAY21,1987TVAlNRCMEETING c
k j
i 3
L-i
1 j
l l
l MICHAEL J. RAY l
CURRENT POSITION:
Deputy Division Director, Nuclear Safety and Licensing l
EDUCATION :
BSME, Purdue University - 1966 i
MSNE, Purdue University - 1971 l
EXPERIENCE:
18 years of nuclear related experience as follows:
l
\\
2 years as Manager of Special Projects - Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation S years as Assistant Vice President - New York State Electric and Gas 3 years as Project Manager - New York State Electric and Gas for i
I design / construction / licensing projects 2 years Licensing Supervisor l
1 year Licensing Specialist for Stone and Webster 2 years Licensing Engineer for TVA j
j 3 years U.S. Navy OTHER U.S. Navy Nuclear Power School Registered Engineer in New York and Massachusetts I
1 1
l l
i l
DOUGLAS W. WIL3ON CURRENT POSITION:
Chief Nuclear Engineer, Division of Nuclear Engineering EDUCATION
- BSEE Clemson University - 1961 EXPERIENCE:
26 years with TVA as follows:
1.5 years Sequoyah Project Engineer for Division of Nuclear Engineering efforts 1.5 years Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Design Services Manager 11 years - Nuclear Engineering Branch l
2 years assigned to Reactor Design Division of Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1 year assigned to Advanced Reactor Division of Westinghouse 9 years - Engineer in Electrical Design Branch l
l
1 JOHN F. COX I
CURRENT POSITION: Assistant Project Engineer /DBVP Project Engineer, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant EDUCATION : BSME University of Tennessee - 1970 l
EXPERIENCE:
- 17. years with TVA as follows:
1 year Assistant Project Engineer - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 4 years Assistant to Chief Nuclehr Engineer - Office of Engineering 6 years Licensing Manager - Office of Engineering 2 years Licensing Engineer - Office of Engineering I
4 years design review NSSS Contract Enginee - TVA Nuclear Power j
Plants l
l 1
i I
I 1
'l
s FRANK P. CARR CURRENT POSITION:
Engineering Specialist, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant EDUCATION :
BSME Tennessee Technological University - 1969 EXPERIENCE:
13 years with TVA in the following:
Supervisor of Mechanical Engineers Scheduling Environmental Engineering Contract Administartion Systems Engineer Principal Engineer in Mechanical Engineering Branch OTHER Registered Professional Engineer in State of Tennessee 5 years of Environmental Engineering Experience - Douglas Aircraft Co.
l
1 l
l RICK DANIELS l
CURRENT POSITION:
Principal Meachanical Engineer, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant I
EDUCATION :
BSME Tennessee Technological University 1974 EXPERIENCE:
13 years with TVA as follows:
6 years design on Bellefonte Nuclear Plant 2 years design on Browre Ferry Nuclear Plant S years design on Sequoyah Nuclear Plant /Hatts Bar Nuclear Plant OTHER Registered Professional Engineer in State of Tennessee Member of ASME i
Member of ASHRAE I
1 1
I 4
e.
ROBERT C. WILLIAMS, JR.
CURRENT POSITION:
Lead Electrical Engineer, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant EDUCATION :
BS ME University of Tennessee - 1971 EXPERIENCE:
16 years with TVA as follows:
6 years as a manager in the D1 vision of Nuclear Engineering 10 years as an engineer in the Division of Nuclear Engineering 1
i
)
I
________________________________m_
CHARLIE JOHNSON i
CURRENT POSITION:
Lead Civil Engineer, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant i
EDUCATION :
BSCE Indiana Institute of Technology - 1962
]
EXPERIENCE:
26 years of nuclear related experience as follows:
4 years Lead Civil Engineer at Sequoyah Nuclear Plant j
19 years Civil Engineer for TVA l
3 years Lead Civil Engineer for Hartsville and PB OTHER Registered Engineer in Tennessee and Kentucky Member ASCE i
i
+
__-a_-
)
O, j
l l
BILL KAGAY CURRENT P03ITION: Assistant to Lead Civil Engineer, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant l
EDUCATION : MS CE, University of Missour1 - 1969 PHD CE, University of Missouri - 1971 I
EXPERIENCE:
16 years with TVA as follows:
10 years as a manager in the Civil Engineering Branch of the Division of Nuclear Engineering 1
6 years as a Civil Engineer in the Olvision of Nuclear Engineering OTHER Registered Engineer in the State of Tennessee I
l l
1 l
l
JAMES MADDOX CURRENT POSITION:
Supervisor, Project Administration > ction, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant EDUCATION : Associate in Engineering Science, West VA Community College - 1970 BS ME, Tennessee University (Nashville / Knoxville) - 1981 EXPERIENCE:
17 years with TVA as follows:
1 year as Manager in the Division of Nuclear Engineering 6 years as Mechanical Engineer - Bellefonte Nuclear Plant 10 years as Design Engineer - Drafter / Engineering Aide O
__.______________________~_____U
i DENNIS E. MCCLOUD CURRENT POSITION:
Manager, Generic Licensing Branch i
EDUCATION : BS Engineering Services (Nuclear Option)
Tennessee Technological University - 1974 EXPERIENCE:
13 years witn TVA as follows:
9 years Licensing 4 years Project Management / Outage Management O
MARVIN K. JONES CURRENT POSITION:
Restart Test Manager, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant EDUCATION.
BS ME University of Alabama EXPERIENCE:
17 years TVA experience 9 years as group manager for various groups 2 years Quality Assurance Engineer - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 4 years Test Engineer - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 2 years Test Engineer - Fossil Plants I
i 4
WALTER E. ANDREWS CURRENT POSITION: Assistant Director, Division of Nuclear Quality Assurance EDUCATION :
BS EE, Tennessee Technological University - 1962 EXPERIENCE:
25 years with TVA as follows:
1 year Site Quality Manager - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant J
6 years various Quality Assurance Chief positions 5.5 years Supervi'or, Quality Assurance - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant s
10 years Electrical Engineer - Fossil Plants 2.5 years Preop Test Engineer - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant i
i I
- ~,~
]
1 JOHN T. LAPOINTE 1
CURRENT PCSITION:
Deputy Site Director, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant EXPERIENCE: 24 years of nuclear related experience as follows:
4 years at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station as assistant to the Project Manager - contracted from Stone and Webster 20 years - U.S. Nuclear Navy l
OTHER U.S. Naval Nuclear Power School l
]
ROBERT W. OLSEN CURRENT POSITION:
Modifications Manager, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant i
EDUCATION :
BS ME Tennessee Technological University - 1967 EXPERIENCE:
19 years with TVA as follows:
3 years Modifications Manager - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 4 years Assistant Construction Engineer - Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 3 years Assistant Construction Engineer - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 1 year Construction Supervisor - Bellefonte Nuclear Plant 8 years Construction Engineer - Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant l
l l
l
1.m 1
1 o
PROGRAMSPROVIDINGDATA FORTHEERCWSYSTEM-l
{
l PROGRAMNAME l
CableTraySupports DesignCalculations l
AlternateAnalysis MainSteamTemperatureIssue SensingLir,es FireProtection
{
Welding RestartTestProgram
- =
~
Component 8cfiete Part Qual.
CableAmpacity
- ~
s '
A able Install 8 tion Fuses ContainmentIsolation SystemStructuralSupportIssues 0 9-02)
Moderate Energy i.ine Break i
flooding PlatformThermalGrowth HeatCodeTraceability DB&VP EnvironmentalQual.
i 1
- 1
i DISTRIBUTION FOR MEETING
SUMMARY
DATED: July 17, 1987 i
Facility: Sequcyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 w/ enclosures w/o enclosures
' Docket File KBarr, RII NRC PDR MFields Local PDR JKelly i
EMarinos JKeppler/JAxelrad
\\
RHermann SEbneter JFair SRichardson JZwolinski
\\
KClark BDLiaw i
CJamerson GZech, RII
\\
FMiraglia, P-428 JDonohew i
EJordan, MNBB-3302 SRConnelly, EWS-360 i
JPartlow, EWS-360 TRote11a Projects Rdg.
KJenison, Rll FMcCoy, RII 1
CWilliams, R111 i'
BGrimes, EWS-360 G1mbro, EWS-346 JMilhoan, H-1149 s
ACRS (10)
OGC-Bethesda, MNBB-9604 Hon. M. Lloyd**
Hon. J. Cooper **
Hon. A. Gore **
Dr. Henry Myers**
TVA-Bethesda SCN File
"~
- Copies sent to persons on facility ser' ice list
- Advance copy of transcript sent under separate cover i
E _ ___
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _