|
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20249B9401998-06-18018 June 1998
Confirmatory Order Modifying License,Effective Immediately. Orders That Util Shall Complete Final Implementation of Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barrier Corrective Actions at Plant, Units 1 & 2
ML20217F4531998-03-25025 March 1998
Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Monitors at Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
ML20216E4541998-03-0909 March 1998
Exemption from Requirement of 10CFR50.71(e)(4) to Submit Updates to Sequoyah Nuclear Plants,Units 1 & 2 FSAR within 6 Months of Each Unit Refueling Outage
ML20141J1831997-05-23023 May 1997
Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty.Orders That Licensee Pay Civil Penalty in Amount of $50,000 within 30 Days of Date of Order
ML20136H0571997-03-17017 March 1997
Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty.Order Resulted from 960708-0822 Insp Which Indicated That Licensee Had Not Conducted Activities in Full Compliance W/Nrc Requirements
ML20092J2551995-09-15015 September 1995
Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exams
ML20077M6381994-12-29029 December 1994
Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operation for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20078N9371994-12-0808 December 1994
Exemption Granted from Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Section III.D.3 Re Performance of Local Leak Rate Tests at Intervals No Greater than 2 Yrs.Exemption States Will Be Performed During Cycle 7 Refueling Outage
ML20065A0821994-03-22022 March 1994
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR19 & 20 Re Radiation Protection Requirements Amended Definitions & Criteria
ML20058P2501993-12-16016 December 1993
Exemption for Plant,Unit 2,from Requirements of 10CFR50, App J,Sections III.D.2(a) & III.D.3
ML20046C6791993-07-23023 July 1993
Exemption from Requirements in Section III.A.6(b) of App J to 10CFR50 Re Accelerated Test Frequency
ML20056C4731993-06-18018 June 1993
Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60,such That in Determining Setpoint for LTOP Events,App G Curves for PT Limits Are Not Exceeded by More than 10% in Order to Be in Compliance W/Regulations
ML20096A0401992-05-0101 May 1992
Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed 10CFR,Chapter 1, Elimination of Requirements Marginal to Safety
ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992
Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting
ML20091Q8161992-01-29029 January 1992
Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys (10CFR50.72 & 50.73):Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting
ML20029B2381991-03-0404 March 1991
Transcript of 910304 Telcon in Bethesda,Md W/Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union & Util Re Tech Specs for Work Schedules.Pp 1-7
ML20029B5881991-02-28028 February 1991
Notice of Appearance.* Notice Hearby Given of Appearance of Dr Nichols,Ej Vigluicci & TC Doolan as Counsel for TVA in Proceeding 91-623-07-OLA.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20070E5671991-02-27027 February 1991
Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-9 Re Threat of Radiological Sabotage
ML20066J4281991-01-29029 January 1991
Exemption from Requirement in Section III.D.1(a) of App J to Allow 10-yr Inservice Insp to Be Scheduled Independently of ILRT 10-yr Svc Periods
ML20028G8541990-08-27027 August 1990
Exemption Allowing Unit 2 to Continue on Normal Type a Test Frequency Having Util Conduct Third Type a Test of First 10- Yr Svc Period in Unit 2,Cycle 5 Refueling Outage in 1992
ML20056B4121990-07-23023 July 1990
Transcript of 900723 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md Re Plant Cable Testing Program.Pp 1-95
ML20055G5681990-07-20020 July 1990
Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $75,000, Per Notice of Violation on 900412
ML20246J8141989-06-0909 June 1989
Transcript of 890609 TVA QA Conference in Rockville,Md Re Dissolution of TVA Engineering Assurance Organization.Pp 1- 126
ML20235T8991989-02-28028 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rule Would Result in Greater Operator Turnover Rate
ML20207J4071988-08-0404 August 1988
Changes to Transcript of 880804 Briefing Re Status of Sequoyah-1
ML20196C1801988-06-22022 June 1988
Notice of NRC Proposal to Amend OL at Subj Plant.Amend Would Delete Organizational Charts from Administrative Controls Section of Tech Specs Per Generic Ltr 88-06
ML20196G0621988-06-21021 June 1988
Transcript of TVA 880621 Briefing in Bethesda,Md Re Util Reorganization & Plant Status
ML20150E2551988-06-13013 June 1988
Transcript of 880613 Hearing in Rockville,Md Re Restart of Util from Recent Scrams.Pp 1-77
ML20154E1171988-04-22022 April 1988
Receipt of Petition for Directors Decision Under 10CFR2.206.* Petition Requests That Commission Issue Order Suspending Full Power Operation of Facility Until Remedial Action Taken
ML20148K9441988-03-0909 March 1988
Transcript of 880309 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re 10CFR50,App R Issues.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20196J1151988-03-0404 March 1988
Transcript of 880304 Meeting in Washington,Dc Re Briefing on Plant Restart.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20196H2791988-02-24024 February 1988
Transcript of 880224 Public Meeting in Chattanooga,Tn Re Util Operational Readiness.Presentation Slides Also Encl
ML20195J6821988-01-20020 January 1988
Transcript of 880120 Briefing on Status of Plant Restart in Washington,Dc.Pp 1-59.Viewgraphs Encl
ML20237B5401987-12-14014 December 1987
Exemption from 10CFR50,App A,Gdc 55 Re RHR Supply Line Isolation Using Two Check Valves & Remote Manual Valve
ML20237B4211987-12-14014 December 1987
Exemption from 10CFR50,App a Re GDC 56 for Vacuum Relief Lines.Vacuum Relief Lines Can Be Isolated Using spring- Loaded Check Valve in Series W/Butterfly Valve
ML20236X5011987-11-24024 November 1987
Transcript of 871124 Meeting in Bethesda,Md Re Silicone Rubber Insulated Cable at Plant.Pp 1-122.List of Attendees & TVA Presentation Matl Encl
ML20235B1491987-09-11011 September 1987
Transcript of 870911 Proceedings Re Findings from Integrated Design Insp at Tva.Pp 1-71
ML20235G3091987-09-10010 September 1987
Notice of Denial of Portion of Request for Licenses DPR-77 & DPR-79 & Opportunity for Hearing.Proposed Changes to Delete Requirement for Plant Operations Review Committee Review of Temporary Procedure Intent Denied
ML20235B2651987-09-10010 September 1987
Transcript of 870910 NRC-TVA Meeting in Knoxville,Tn.Pp 1- 89.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20235X1171987-07-13013 July 1987
Transcript of 870713 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md Re Cable Testing at Plant.Pp 1-140.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20235Y4551987-07-0808 July 1987
Transcript of NRC & TVA 870708 Meeting in Chattanooga,Tn Re Independent Design Insp.Pp 1-34.Related Info Encl
ML20215F2101987-06-0808 June 1987
Transcript of 870608 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md Re Idvp Insp for Plant.Pp 1-42.Related Documentation Encl
ML20214R0291987-05-21021 May 1987
Transcript of 870521 Meeting W/Util in Chattanooga,Tn Re Status of Essential Elements of Plant Restart Program. Pp 1-301.Viewgraphs Encl
ML20214L6001987-04-20020 April 1987
Transcript of 870420 NRC-TVA Meeting in Chattanooga,Tn.Pp 1- 286.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20214F4501987-04-10010 April 1987
Transcript of 870410 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md.Pp 1-158. Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20211K0991986-06-20020 June 1986
Order Scheduling Prehearing Conference on 860708 in Hauppauge,Ny.Served on 860624
ML20199D9511986-06-13013 June 1986
Transcript of ACRS Ad Hoc Subcommittee on TVA 860613 Meeting in Daisy,Tn Re Sequoyah Nuclear Performance Plan. Pp 1-85.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20137R9531986-02-0707 February 1986
Transcript of Commission 860207 Briefing in Washington,Dc on Staff Activities Re Tva.Pp 1-75
ML20136D8111985-11-20020 November 1985
Memorandum & Order Denying TVA 850927 Request for Extension of 851130 Deadline for Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment.Licensee Failed to Demonstrate Extraordinary Circumstances to Support Extension.Served on 851120
ML20137C8601985-11-19019 November 1985
Transcript of Commission 851119 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote in Washington,Dc Re SECY-330(a) on Point Beach & SECY-225(a) on Sequoyah.Pp 1-5
1998-06-18
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20092J2551995-09-15015 September 1995
Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exams
ML20077M6381994-12-29029 December 1994
Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operation for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20065A0821994-03-22022 March 1994
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR19 & 20 Re Radiation Protection Requirements Amended Definitions & Criteria
ML20096A0401992-05-0101 May 1992
Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed 10CFR,Chapter 1, Elimination of Requirements Marginal to Safety
ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992
Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting
ML20091Q8161992-01-29029 January 1992
Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys (10CFR50.72 & 50.73):Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting
ML20070E5671991-02-27027 February 1991
Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-9 Re Threat of Radiological Sabotage
ML20235T8991989-02-28028 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rule Would Result in Greater Operator Turnover Rate
1995-09-15
[Table view] |
Text
- -. _ -
=
l9,.20 (3'1 F R 5131)
~
3 DOCKETED A
USHRC
%smeown,emmsucm.
n-,w a 94 NAR 24 A10:44 March 22, im 0FFICE OF SECRETARY 00CKETiliG 1 SERVICE BR/WCH Mr. Samuel J.
Chilk Secretary of the commission ATTN Docketing and Service Branch U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Chilk:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) - REQUEST FOR COMMENT ON PROPOSED RULEMAKING 10 CFR PARTS 19 AND 20, RADIATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS -
AMENDED DEFINITIONS AND CRITERIA The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has reviewed the subject proposed rulemaking, which was noticed in the February 4, 1994 Federal Reoister (59 FR 5132-5138), and is pleased to provide the following comments.
3 General comment:
For TVA nuclear facilities, the proposed revision would impose significant impact with little benefit.
Impact would include revisions to (1) technical specifications, (2) Offsite Dose Calculation Manuals, (3) site and corporate standards and procedures, 4) Final Safety Analysis Reports, (5) emergency action levels, and 6) monitor setpoints.
TVA recommends that the Unrestricted Area, Restricted Area, and controlled-Area definitions and concepts be retained in the regulation as presently written.
Specific Comments:
19.12 - Instructions to workers (a)
All individuals who in the course of employment in which the individual's assigned duties involve the potential for exposure to radiation and/or radioactive material shall be potential for exposure to radiation.
comment:
Use of the public dose limit (100 mrem / year) as a critorion to indicate " potentia'. for exposure" and thus require training, is ambiguous. A clear definition.of what constitutes " potential for exposure" that requires training is needed.
20.1003 - Definitions Member of the public means Comment:
Revised definition is acceptable.
h33 024 940322
[b 19 59FR5132 pyg
I' l
t-Mr. Samuel J.
Chilk Page 2 March 22, 1994 j
l occupational dose means Comment:
The proposed definition of " occupational dose" implies that it includes all dose received by individuale performing any type of work assigned by the licensee or contractor of the
.I licensee regardless of location. Dose received by
-l individuals on nuclear plant sites outside of normally l
restricted areas (i.e.,
outside of Radiologically Controlled Areas or Protected Areas) is typically a fraction of the public dose limits (100 meem/ year). Tasks such as mowing grass or working in office buildings are examples of " work" l
performed in these areas.
Training and monitoring of workers in these areas are impractical and not cost effective.
The new " occupational dose" definition should exclude dose received as discussed above.
Public dose means comment:
Revised definition is acceptable.
Unrestricted area means Comment:
Following the new definition will require either moving the effluent boundary (which is the Unrestricted Area boundary) to the existing Restricted Area boundary or moving the Restricted Area boundary to the existing Unrestricted Area boundary.
If the effluent boundary is moved, all operational flexibility for effluent releases (per 10 CFR 50, Appendix I) will be lost.
All effluent calculations will require revision (e.g., monitor setpoints, Offsite Dose-Calculation Manual, Emergency Action Levels, and Final Safety Analysis Reports).
If the Restricted Area boundary is moved, unwarranted training and monitoring requirements may be imposed based on proposed new definition of
" occupational dose."
We strongly recommend leaving the existing definition in place and retaining the " Controlled Area" concept.
20.1301 - Dose limits for individual members of the public (b)
If the licensee permits members of the public to have access to restricted areas Comment:
If the revised definitions are imposed, licensee procedures must be revised. We recommend leaving definitions as now prescribed.
20.1302 - Compliance with dose limits for individual members of the public (a)
The licensee shall make or cause to be made, as appropriate, surveys of radiation levels in unrestricted areas and comment:
We suggest this section should read, "The licensee shall make or cause to be made, as appropriate, surveys of radiation levels in restricted and unrestricted areas and radioactive materials in effluents
Hr. Samuel J.
Chilk Page 3 March 22, 1994 20.1801 - Security of stored materials The licensee shall secure from unauthorized removal.
Comment:
Removal of " controlled area" from this section is the only change. As stated previously, our recommendation.is to retain this concept.
20.1802 - Control of material not in storage The licensee shall control and maintain constant surveillance of licensed material.
Comment:
Removal of " controlled area" from this section is the only change. As stated previously, our reccmmendation is to retain this concept.
20.2104 - Determination of prior occupational dose (a) For each individual who is likely to receive Comment:
Change has no impact on licensee programs or procedures.
20.2205 - Reports to individuals of exceeding dose limits When a licensee is required, pursuant to the provisions of.
Comment:
This requirement is new.* Its addition will require licensee procedures to be revised. -We do not recommend-inclusion of this requirement.
Sincerely, Q,)
' #"t?
-_, - un- - -
- ,A/a'ruce Scho' leld
- k Manager Nuclear Licensing and Regulatory Affairs cc Mr. R. V. Crlenjak, Chief U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. Alan K. Roecklein
.)
Of fice of Regulatory Research U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 j
Hr. Thomas E..Tipton Nuclear Management and Resources Council 1776 Eye Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20006-3706 i
'i j
,
