ML20211K646

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Confirms 820105 Telcon Between SW Sutton & Recipient Re Insp 99900334/82-01 on 820125-29 Concerning Intake & Exhaust Valve Springs,Powell Check Valve Qualification & Piston Spherical Washers.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20211K646
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/14/1982
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Boyer R
TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC.
Shared Package
ML20011C460 List:
References
FOIA-86-656, REF-QA-99900334 NUDOCS 8612120208
Download: ML20211K646 (3)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:) Jg 14 1982 Docket No. 99900334/82-01 Transamerica Delaval, Inc. Engine Compressor Division ATTN: Mr. R. E. Boyer Quality Assurance Manager 550 85th Avenue Oakland, CA 94621 Gentlemen: This is to confirm the telephone conversation on January 5,1982, by Mr. J. W. Sutton of this office with you, concerning the inspection at the Oakland, CA plant on January 25-29, 1982. The NRC inspection team will consist of Messrs. J. W. Sutton and - W. E. Foster. The inspection will relate to the following problems: (1) intake and exhaust valve springs; 2) Powell Check valve qualification; (3) piston spherical washers; and 4) Piston head / skirt stud and washers. In addi-tion, the inspectors will review your corrective action on previously identified items. Your cooperation concerning this matter will be appreciated. I Sincerely, Original S!gned it/: - ' e c=- Uldis Potapovs. Chief i Vendor Inspection Branch l I l l 861212O208 861203 PDR FOIA ELLI596-656 PDR \\ k'c' >U.Y.... M...........N................ key CI:CS BC:VIB " '"" ~~* JWS'0tt'6h7?f' '11P6 tup'ovs" " 1/n/82........116/82..... e sia no,somacu eno OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

t l lb REACTIVE INSPECTION PLA'l Company: T. m. _,,,,.- n. l.uf im, Aodress: ire si s-g A, e - ( r. t l. m J, (,; 1 +.i c, a Co, nbea D.v. In :n, on Docket No. b9900 3 39 -8 3,/g1_ Inspection Dates: //.2 r-28/8 J INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS I. General: A. Verify accuracy and completeness of information that has been sup-plied on identified deficiencies. B. Determine whether vendor has evaluated all items or services which may be affected and made appropriate notifications to customers and the NRC. C. Determine whether deficiency cause has been properly identified in-cluding evaluation of adequacy of applicable QA program areas. D. Verify adequate actions have been taken to correct the deficiency and the conditions which caused or contributed to the deficiency. II. Specific: VITS No. Ri-17 4 - b den n:, e (O LJ 6 ;me n. g e n L o n e c ess e d ( Ad,,,_, m,J ) v o l g t a-n:,, L J n, I L /<m 4 Je//,J n'tia,c - M o n,: me:,u.I:en u

Arta llki:ew. ( O r t :n,n e ce,L sh e f.,,eme ) ',. fut s u r. m l, k a'J k m de u ed',Jn, 'm m. 'c o, '/c.,4: n g. :'t s c, L m L.J de) beem A n ge n-1: m, J vmL dal 0) L Jeni 4. u z m:,

J,,a n t :,1 J4J N er B /14/E l m e ne O 3 tine 4< 4 o J A n e 2,u ( D : h ml: /:< ' J:e n. cic, - e n i nt: e n nsJ J:n n er iew e f : % n w, n l., # L e f - n ec#m e ) UAl'e Inein df n] (b #9C e I w h[ V I n, o, < t:, ' ( O 'i i m' k, ' ) ( H a /,, m k L ( b ) m l' e m, LLs J & 5 ll_en Ved:/y d '41,,,,t e m e nt':v e alJ ac11 :wlennnl ewJ exlenwal caUes n, arm n e el-4,10 Dolen-,;ne ( d tJben Me valve f l,J.... M b e /w t (b),Lua6 co ld a t h e,c.sw 4, H, e i s : m. e', n. s -n e n') rt A, unUer a n, s a' ' t e d n l!. tw.o e'l:en n s) /c n J e; f al ( u s unte M'n u,:.:n c :n,c e,_ /:e n ' h,- b L uf m,11.au,, Lt., W Tr t e.4 k _, Led a'l.e1 La)Ldn J i,,l J n, mlm, cola,,: a -:r'so Lou 'L,J Ae', L ee, d :1, s:l:e ne ) Ve a:/ ' L1 fe n ' n,'l : mdJe J l'1b.4: /:,' /:. m, os>/,n :,, I, 1:,,, b fH ucnanni oani:u ( U :Jeml:/:e' /:en. A ct een f alc,n nm) J :me - 1;11,s,f /c a k. <' Lei t u,'f,,i a l ( d n'e t e :

m1,,,.1;, s 00 1/. L (i) asie,Lt.'.a,) M LiI ( t ) n el:.nz la k en a:4i, ' lie s ' n I;,,

U : /., ' W.4 n. e s e n /; m, .JJn,u : m i,. m. I ' 'm J e x t,n s. f u.a c, m,u _,1 4J l Supervisory Approval 2, f da~a i Ic 4 2 - m (Signature and Date Signed) l l L 0 39

r I i C c.'Fa"y I"^"'***";'a Dla..I,Inu.-Enj'.ne

c.,J C.ng n e4, e a D :v.

ia Doikf A;. :'/ Hee 235/E4-cs MITJ M. Bi-aa 7.o,1en n;ne ( o u k, ;.,p.p oly m., /4 lsn, j (r,,,1,:,:.y 3,1 L e,/ Jne /:,j ) -sy en:..l ~44Lc., A,,j n.1 Lun J e l<.f c /,.f h) s o m <.,0,) n e<e:v :.q : n,p d :.,, Bi-a o k .n o ;,,slallal:<n 2) uk de (,;tel si J ? ell Gd s.l Lem adinessel ;, 7

  1. e P J I nep.of b ) If # c 1 Len:e4I w a Le, s.dau eLi
,,c( Ju #< /..

7 f p,/., c n o-,/il: f,l J L I h ( 0 u t,c#,n o n,,. / g n. L Ie e, w : A M ;, 2,.L. n, o L t, I, a J L.. ay < n ; <,< e ) y,, :.al, - :/ s a, k. I,,) S<y L,, J., - s p s :4.m e ) %, :l' L I e -,,,-. s 1,,<!-)<) %) s cl.f al;<ns n,) /<, ;,s i,~ s)..., k y & c ag.,:tn,1, nLu, %) : J..):fol:n,, d u - n e,la l.< >, a,1 );sy. :l; c., e l ~,,,..,, ,,1, <~j s. l.... J e e,I, { g s A-oum bly,I (*)..:.-

-j ;,q.,lto.., h )ik.I,<.,) U)e.ue,Lt, s) och ms I.d a., ~
n d e y

,9 f. l;. -

  1. 4 I,, <..., /;. < n e.u _ r e, o l/ n o, ;, /<,,- I

.s) e x /c it.s.s / Wu/7 f co-,., u..f II.,1 .,nn,Is:,/tal GJ lu u,J -sle } k de l.-~..,e IL ;- p./ y n [ .a I., d <>.,....- ) Ia n J ~. n c., A y,t. /. <,. l..., i ls I -,. 7 x ; J.... I ie es.r, b ou c,e l a v-:,, d,l L, y L aJJ:l. nl J ef,;ent.u a.,) e y r L IL f.,- - ne.,/;<ne/ m4,. :/t a.

I Transamenca P!";;';-/s,;;%:'o...,,,, 4 ,. Delaval 5 5"5* ~"- P O Ben 2161 '~ oaklanc. California 94621 )

  • gp93 (415)577 7400 g

January 28, 1982 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Docket No: 99900334/81-02 Attention: Mr. Uldis Potapous, Chief Gentlemen: Thank you for your letter of January 14, 1982, in response to our letter of October 6, 1981. We have reviewed your comments in paragraph 2 and 3. Again, we ask that you reconsider items C and D in light of our reply which follows, and rule items C and D are, in fact, in conformance with 10CFR50B. Item C - The motor nameplate and the motor test report are the records that the motors are environmentally qualified. The motors were also seismically qualified to the seismic conditions specified for the site. Motor test reports and the seismic report were submitted to Bechtel. Item D - We submitted, to Bechtel, the letters that document compliance of the motor manufacturer to TDI's P.O. on February 3, 1978. Bechtel responded February 16 and requested additional information. In an effort to satisfy Bechtel, we attempted to get Allis-Chalmers to y. provide additional documentation. We tried to accomUdate Bechtel, but were unsuccessful. This effort was done as a courtesy and not as a ~ contractual requirement, d 2;to d DT90 MP ysr

Transamenoa f*;rf, rig lg;a..,,,, 4 .. ; Delaval 55"5"- i P.O Bom 2161 Oevan:s Cantornia 94E21 }- . glI 93 = 9i53 s7 -noo i January 28, 1982 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Uldis Potapous, Chief l Page 2 In addition to the two letters mentioned above, we have a letter in our file, dated May 30, 1978, that further documents compliance of the manufacture of the motors to Transamerica Delaval's purchase order. This letter states, "In answer to your May 2,1978, letter to me, at the time of manufacture, the subject motors were built under a Quality Assurance system that met the intent of 10CFR50, Appendix B. The motors supplied are physically, dimensionally, and performance wise no different than motors that would be built to meet Class 1E requirements of IEEE 323, 333, & 344, 1971 edition. During manufacture of motors, records were not maintained that will document these motors for Class 1E requirements of IEEE or ANSI." If you require additional information, please contact me. Sincerely yours, Nb w R. E. yer, Manager Quality Assurance REB:cjb bec: C. S. Mathews R. J. Pabers E. H. Wilson L. liong V. Dilworth

B-6 V.., INSPECTION REPORT ROUTE SHEET Rev. 11/81 VENDOR / Txa.nsA DoAad /uc. DOCKET NO. @ 9 0 0 3J y REPORT N0.8/ - p2.DATE OF INSPECTION: M.JA Al JP Z9-//- REPORT DUE DATE: 2 -/ 4. -# 2,. BY: SUBMITTED TO PROCESSING: VIB cf PRIORITY STATUS:* DRAFT URGENT FINAL URGENT EIB nh ASAP ASAP RPB dm ROUTINE ROUTINE (URGENT:1.e. stop other work in progress; ASAP:. Supersedes other scheduled work; ROUTINE: normal ord*r of work).

  • 0ther than Routine must be initialed by Branch Chief t.UN i tN T5 :

Heport, /66, /66s, inspection Data Sheets, Append 1x A, Travel Itinerary g: Review / Concurrent / Signature: Date Submitted Date Comoleted REPORT SUBMITTED TO PROCESS: (S) J2-/f-7/,- (S) RA T0: INSPECTOR /SECTION CHIEF: (S) 39 8.4 N /87 - 2) 4 C.1 5 4. 2-c wd.,Q4 2 3,,8 /cy '2 I # p. - s/ i TO: BRANCH C IEF (S) I (3) .D /~ ~ T0: ENFORCEMENT C0ORDINATOR: (S) I'. b (4) 5[/ 8' / COMMENT: SPECIAL NOTE: RETURN DRAFT COPY TO BRANCH SECRETARY AFTER ENFORCEMENT C0ORDINATOR (S) Completed by Secretary (3) Completed by Branch Chief (1) Completed by Inspector /Section Chief (4) Completed by Enforcement Coordinator (2) Completed by extra Section Chief, if more than one section is involved

  • If Enforcement Coordinator is not present, submit to Administrator for review / concurrence
  • Branch Chief makes determination about status of report, i.e. redrafted, etc.

g: Review / Concurrence / Signature: Date Submitted Date Comoleted ,,RE, PORT, S BMITTE TO PROCESS: (S) 1133 (S) JO/W6 % P i ~0' /2 r/r2 - / f' Ucw.mg / r-2/5 C,g / 5.C.. T0: INSPECTOR /SECTION CHIEF: (S) g/'10 /R.1 (1),4 J S .,4A 2) T0: BRANCH CHIEF: (S) '3'/2 4/P (3) (h Z7 n i T0: ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: (S) !TA y r- . ? mz !!n - (4) (//(-/ p7tT ' y:.1,,, w. DATE DUE AFTER 10 DAYS M / CLOSE0VT DATE @ h DATE DUE AFTER 30 DAYS (RESPONSE DUE)

c,d '

  • fe UNITED STATES

{ y5' 'i, NUCLL..t REGULATORY COMMISSION $f REGION IV k, 8 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SUITE 1000 9 ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76011 APR 151982 Docket No. 99900334/82-01 Transamerica Delaval, Inc. Engine and Compressor Division ATTN: Mr. C. Mathews General Manager 550 85th Avenue Oakland, CA 94261 Gentlemen: This refers to the inspection conducted by J. W. Sutton of this office on January 25-29, 1982, of your facility at Oakland, California, associated with the manufacture of standby diesel generators and to the discussion of our findings with you and members of your staff j at the conclusion of the inspection. Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of pro-cedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and ob-servations by the inspector. This inspection was made to review the status of previous inspection findings and also as a result of the issuance of 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) reports to the NRC, pertaining to: (1) potentially defective valve springs in diesel generators that have been furnished to the following nuclear generating stations, (a) Bellefonte, Unit Nos. I and 2, (b) Harts-ville A and B, Unit No. 2, and Phipps Bend, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; and (2) a cracked stud and three washers in the number two cylinder of the diesel generator that had been furnished to the Grand Gulf Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 1. The Engine and Compressor Division of i Transamerica Delaval, Inc., had also issued 10 CFR Part 21 reports on the aforementioned items; as well as on a potential problem with a diesel generator starting air check valve. t i i ftoSO40%Y M NM

) Transamerica Delaval, Inc. Engine and Compressor Division, During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclo-sures to this letter. Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written statement containing: (1) a desc,ription of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown. Additionally, you will note that Items B and C in the Notice of Nonconfor-mance are related to management's failure to assure compliance with conunitted actions concerning the findings identified in Inspection Report No. 80-01. Consequently, in addition to the foregoing requested response, please inform us of the steps you have taken, or plan to take, to assure that management's commitments will be accomplished and implemented. The response requested by this letter is not subject to the clearance pro-cedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paper-work Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this report contains any information that you i believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is neces-sary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written appli-cation to this office to withhold such information. If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than 7 days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established. Consistent with section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the informa-tion which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasdns on the basis which it is claimed that the infonnation should be withheld from public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit. If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

i Transamerica Delaval, Inc. Engine and Compressor Division, Shoc1d'you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleaseu to discuss them with you. Sincerel bN D Ultis Potapovs, Chi <tf Vendor Programs Branch

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A - Notice of Nonconformance 2. Appendix B - Inspection Report No. 99900334/82-01 3. Appendix C - Inspection Data Sheets (6 pages) e i k

) fp. i APPENDIX A i Transamerica Delaval, Inc. 1 Engine and Compressor Division Docket No. 99900334/82-01 i i ' NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE 3 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on January 25-29, 1982, j it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance f with NRC requirements as indicated below: Criterion V of Appendix'B to 10 CFR Part 50 states: " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished j in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings. Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative i j acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been l satisfactorily accomplished." l Nonconformances with these requirements are as follows: i A. Paragraph 16.7.1 of Section 16 dated February 27, 1981, of the Quality j Assurance Manual states, " Records will be securely stored at Transamerica Delaval and shall be protected against fire, damage or loss." Contrary to the above, the QA documents are not stored in fireproof type storage cabinets and are thus not being adequately protected against fire, damage, or loss. B. Paragraph 7.3.1 of Section 7 dated April 1, 1981, Revision 1, of the Quality Assurance Manual states, "The production Route Sheet shall specify the welding procedure (s) and revision for each operation as called for by the Engineering Drawing." In addition, as a result of a Transamerica commitment in their letter dated June 5, 1981, to finding "A", Report 81-01, each welder had been issued his personal copy of all weld procedures. For future jobs, weld procedures on a new form would be incorporated in the job package when issued to the shop. Contrary to the above, a welder was observed welding on part No. H02717-0359, Job Order No. 97-485-3085, without having the specified weld procedure in his possession as listed below: 1. The short form weld procedure had not been issued with the job package as required by Engineering Instructions. 42O6%O9I 3Pf'

I Transamerica Delaval, Inc. Engine and Compressor Division 2. The manufacture Route Sheet called for weld procedure 100W-1A, Revision 4, to be used for the operation. The welder had weld procedure 100W-1A, Revision 2, in his possession for welding information. C. Paragraph 9.1 of Specification No. 100-A-3 requires all weld material be returned to stores at the end of each four hour period. In addition, as a result of a Transamerica commitment in their letter of June 5,1981, to finding "B", Report 81-01, the weld issue room attendant is required to monitor the time out of weld material on a three hour schedule. Contrary to the above requirements: 1. 3/32" type 7018 weld rod had been issued to a welder at 9:50 a.m. on January 26, 1982, and was still in his possession at 3:30 p.m. the same day. 2. The three hour monitoring of the possession of weld material was not being complied with as required by instructiens. D. In Transamerica Delaval, Inc., (TDI) letter to the NRC dated June 5, 1981, in answer to the NRC's report of inspection and notice of nonconformance dated May 27, 1981, TDI made a general commitment to perform an audit of the ASME weld shop during the fall of 1981 to insure that the preven-tive action described in the June 5, 1981, letter would be effective. Contrary to the above, the committed weld shop audit had not been per-formed as of January 26, 1982. 1 E. Paragraph 4.4.3 of Section 4, dated February 27, 1981, of the Quality Assurance Manual states, " Quality Control representatives shall survey 4 major / critical equipment suppliers at a minimum of once every three l years to assure the vendor's ability to comply with the specification requirements and to review the implementation of the suppliers quality program." Contrary to the above, Betts Spring Company, a supplier of valve springs (major / critical), had not been surveyed a minimum of once every three years to assure their ability to comply with the specification require-ments and to review the implementation of their quality program. This was evidenced by the last Vendor Quality Program Survey form, being completed February 25, 1976. .,-,,.,-,-.-.n. n,., ---~.-----.-..,__,_an-

) Transamerica Delaval, Inc. Engine and Compressor Division F. Paragraph 6.1.3 of the Approved Supplier List (ASL) procedure, dated March 20, 1980, states in part, "The supplier will not be included on the ASL until a survey or audit is complete." Contrary to the above, Associated Spring Company (Barnes Group) had been placed on the ASL, dated August 1981, prior to completion of a survey or audit as evidenced by an incomplete Audit Form, dated August 12, 1981. Additionally, a purchase order, dated October 21, 1981, ordered valve springs. l l l l

l ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. ENGINE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.: 99900334/82-01 CATE(S) 1/25-29/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 56 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: Transamerica Delaval, Inc. Engine and Compressor Division ATTN: Mr. C. Mathews, General Manager 550 85th Avenue Oakland, CA 94621 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT: Mr. R. E. Boyer, Manager, Quality Assurance TELEPHONE NUMBER: (415) 577-7422 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Standby Diesel Generators NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Cocmercial Nuclear Production of Transamerica Delaval, Inc., Oakland, California, of Standby Diesel Generators. 3000-13,000 HP totals 12% of total company production. Two contracts are presently in-house for current and future production. bw '3 - 2.6 - P 2. ASSIGNED INSPECTOR: [' J. W. Sutton, Reactive & Components Program Section Date (R& CPS) OTHER INSPECTOR (S): W. E. Foster, R& CPS l N% 3-26-lfd APPROVED BY: I. Barnes, Chief, R& CPS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE: A. BASES: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, and 10 CFR Part 21. l B. SCOPE: This inspection was made to review the status of previous inspection findings and also as a result of the issuance of 10 CFR 50.55(e) reports to the NRC pertaining to: (1,) potentially defective valve springs in diesel generators that have been furnished to the following nuclear generating stations, (a) Bellefonte, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, (b) Hartsville A and B, Unit No. 2, and (c) Phipps Bend, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; and (2) a cracked (Cont. on next page) PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY: Potentially Defective Valve Springs: 50-519, 50-521; 50-553, 50-554; 50-458; 50-400, 50-401, 50-402, 50-403.* Cracked Stud and Spherical Washers: 50-322; 50-416, 50-417; 50-206, 50-361, 50-362.* Inadequate Starting Air Check Valve: (Cont. on next page) J2,060%Cf6 7A(f

I ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. ENGINE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION 0AKLAND, CALIFORNIA MtPORT indVtLilun NO.: 99900334/82-01 RESULTS: PAGE 2 of 10 SCOPE: (Cont.) stud and three washers in the number two cylinder of the diesel generator that had been furnished to the Grand Gulf Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 1. The Engine and Compressor Division of Transamerica Delaval, Inc., had also issued 10 CFR Part 21 reports on the aforementioned items, as well as on a potential problem with a diesel generator starting air check valve. PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY: (Cont.) 50-329, 50-330; 50-445, 50-446; 50-440, 50-441;^ 50-438, 50-439;* 50-518, 50-519, 50-520, 50-521;* 50-553, 50-554.*

  • Applicable plant unit not defined.

A. VIOLATIONS: None B. NONCONFORMANCES: 1. Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 16.7.1 of the QA Manual, QA Records were not being protected against fire, damage, or loss. 2. Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 7.3.1 of Section 7 of the QA Manual, a welder was observed welding without the applicable welding procedure being either in his possession, or having been issued in the job package as required by instructions. 3. Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, Specifi-cation 100-A-3 and corrective action commitments, weld material was not returned to stores within the prescribed time period. 4. Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Transamerica Delaval, Inc., commitment as stated in their letter of June 5, 1981, to NRC, the audit of the ASME Weld Shop had not been performed as committed. 5. Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 4.4.3 of Section 4, dated February 27, 1981, of the Quality Assurance Manual, Betts Spring Company, a supplier of valve springs (major / critical), had not been surveyed a minimum of once every three years to assure their ability to comply with the specification requirements and to review the implementation of their quality program. This was evidenced by a Vendor Quality Program Survey (VQPS) form which had been completed February 25, 1976. An updated VQPS was received by TDI-ECD on January 27, 1982. This form is completed by the vendor and does not assure their ability to comply with specifications or l review implementation of their quality program.

) ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. ENGINE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION 1 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99900334/82-01 RESULTS: PAGE 3 of 10 6. Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 6.1.3 of the Approved Supplier List (ASL) procedure, dated March 20, 1980, Associated Spring Company (Barnes Group) had been placed on the ASL, dated August 1981, prior to completion of a survey or audit as evidenced by an incomplete Audit Form, dated August 12, 1981. Additionally, a purchase order, dated October 21, 1981, ordered valve springs. C. UNRESOLVED ITEMS: 1. The ASL, dated August, 1981, lists Associated Spring Company (Barnes Group), a new supplier, with the highest possible rating (10.0); however, no hardware had been received from them. The ASL procedure indicates that a supplier is rated according to the disposition of received hardware but it does not address how a numerical rating will be awarded to a new supplier. As a result of the foregoing, the inspector was unable to determine the validity of awarding a perfect rating to an unknown quantity; i.e., a vendor who has supplied no hardware, therefore, no history of received hardware. 2. The manufacturer (Melrose Spring and Tool Works) of defective valve springs had been excluded from the ASL, dated August 1981, as a source of supply for the valve springs. That action precludes receipt of defective springs from that source; however, the manu-facturer was not performing a unique operation. There was no indi-cation that Delaval had identified the cause of the problem. Based on the foregoing, it was not apparent that adequate measures had been taken to preclude recurrence. i D. STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS: 1. (Closed) Deviation A (79-01) - Procedures and procedure manuals had not been established for the manufacturing and material control l departments. The inspector verified by reviewing revised procedure l manaals that the manuals now identify all departments that will main-tain procedures and procedure manuals. The corrective action was taken prior to the stated completion date. 2. (Closed) Deviation B (79-01) - The vendor was not recording actual readings of measuring and test equipment undergoing periodic recali-bration. The inspector verified by review of written instructions issued to supervision, and review of the revised IP 100 of the QA l {

p ) . ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. ENGINE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION i OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA i REPORT INbFtbl1UN NO.: 99900334/82-01 RESULTS: PAGE 4 of 10 Manual, that corrective action and preventive measures have been taken to prevent rectrrence. The action was taken prior to the committed completion date. 3. (Closed) Deviation C (79-01) - The Qualified Suppliers List had not been updated monthly nor had a monthly summary of the quality rating of vendors been forwarded to QC and Purchasing. The inspector reviewed the revised issue of IP 700 relating to the updating and issuance of the approved vendor summary to purchasing and other designated departments. Current lists and summaries indi-cate full compliance with the revised IP 700 section of the QA Manual. 4. (Closed) Deviation D (79-01) - The activities, use and/or status of Corrective Action Requests (CAR) had not been reported by the Manager of Quality Control to the Division General Manager on a quarterly basis. The inspector verified that the Quality Control Manual had been revised to control the issuance of CAR activities to the Division General Manager. The new reporting requirements are contained in the QA and ASME Manuals. Section 14-1 and 15-1. The procedures are currently being implemented as required. 5. (0 pen) Deviation E (79-01) - The Document Control Center has not been protected against fire. The inspector verified that the vendor had purchased new cabinets and had transferred records to a microfilm system. During the inspector's review of the corrective action taken a as a result of this deviation, it was noted that the current QA Manual Section 16.7.1, dated February 27, 1981, still requires the records to be protected from fire at Delaval. In addition, the Storage Cabinets for the microfilm are not rated as fireproof. (See Nonconformance B-1). 6. (Closed) Deviation F (79-01) - Audits of the Division Quality Assurance programs processes and procedures were not performed semiannually by Quality Engineering. The inspector verified that the Quality Assurance Manual, Section 17, dated February 27, 1981, had been revised to prevent recurrence of this item. Audits are now per-formed annually. Completed audits for 1980-1981 were reviewed for compliance. 7. (Closed) Deviation G (79-01) - Industrial Engineering had not reviewed, approved or disapproved Engineering Change Notices, Engineering Log not maintained and Drawing Change Requests had not been classified as major or minor. The inspector reviewed the corrective action taken by TDI to prevent recurrence. The Engineering Division Standard Prac-

ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. ENGINE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION 0AKLAND, CALIFORNIA REPORT IN5PECIl0N NO.: 99900334/82-01 RESULTS: PAGE 5 of 10 tice Bulletin has been revised and reissued. The Engineering Change Notice Log had been revised and was being filled out as required. Current Change Notices were reviewed for compliance and were found to be acceptable. Compliance to the required changes were completed prior to the stated completien date. 8. (Closed) Unresolved Item (79-01) - Autho'rity and dates of manufacturing and material control personnel performing activities affecting safety related functions had not been clearly established and delineated. The inspector verified that the current QA Manual clearly delineates the authority and duties of all personnel performing safety related activities. 9. (Closed) Deviation B (80-01) - Quality Engineering did not process a Corrective Action Request Form (CAR) for identified TDI failures to meet weld quality contract requirements in Diesel Engine Generator piping. The inspector verified by review of past and current issued corrective action requests that quality engineering is now generating CAR's as required by QA and contract requirements. In addition, the inspector reviewed documentation pertaining to the meeting held with all welding personnel on April 6, 1979. The corrective action was taken prior to the stated completion date. 10. (Closed) Deviation C (80-01) - TDI written practice IP 600 did not describe procedure for examination of Level III personnel.

Also, personnel performing visual examinations had not been qualified to methods covered by SNT-TC-1A documents.

The inspector verified by review of documentation that corrective action had been taken to prevent recurrence of this item. IP 600 has been revised and persons performing visual inspection have been requalified. Training sessions were held and documented for all personnel. Internal audits had been conducted to prevent recurrence. The corrective action had been l taken prior to the stated completion date. 11. (Closed) Deviation D (80-01) - Welding was being performed by a welder in the 3G position who had been qualified for the 1G position only. The inspector verified by review of welder qualification records that all welders had been recertified to the 6G position. The current qualified welders were reviewed for compliance. Current welder certifications have been reviewed by the committee appointed for the task. Corrective action had been taken prior to the stated completion date. l 12. (0 pen) Deviation E (80-01) - Unused weld rod was not being returned to the storage area within four hours of issuance. The inspector l verified by review of documentation that all welders were notified of the required control of weld materials. Corrective Action Requests

ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. EN3INE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA MtFUKl 1NbVtL61UN NO.: 99900334/82-01 RESULTS: PAGE 6 of 10 were issued and control of weld materials were verified during an audit performed on March 27, 1981. A further instance was identified during this inspection of failure to return rods within four hours of issuance. 13. (Closed) Deviation F (80-01) - Welder identification and verification of welders not identified on Route Sheets. The inspector verified by review of Production Routing Sheets that welders are being properly identified and documented on Route Sheets. A CAR was issued and training sessions have been held. Internal audits have been performed of welding operations.

14..(Closed) Deviation G (80-01) - Defective weld removed and replaced without rejection and documentation on Inspection Report.

The inspector reviewed documentation and corrective action taken to resolve this item. A CAR was issued to cover the repair - an ASME rework Record has been developed and is in use. Audits have been conducted. 15. (Closed) Deviation H (80-01) - Weld was observed to contain an area with less than a required k inch fillet resulting from a fit-up condition. The inspector reviewed current inspection reports for compliance. A CAR was issued covering the above deviation. Training for NDE personnel was conducted and eye examinations were given to all NDE personnel. 16. (Closed) Deviation I (80-01) - Inspection acceptance stamps had not been entered for operations on the production sheet, nor had inspection reports been prepared to denote a rejected condition after inspection. The inspector verified that a CAR was issued to cover this item. Current jobs in progress were reviewed for compliance to IP 500 require-ments. Audits have been conducted for compliance. 17. (Closed) Unresolved Item B.4.d (80-01) - Discrepancies in dates that seismic tests to battery rack were conducted prevented a definite acceptance of the Seismic Report and Certification. The inspector verified that a corrective revision to the Seismic Analysis Report had been issued. The Seismic Test was run from January 1, 1979 to July 19, 1979. The original package was dated March 1979. A corrected certificate now indicates the correct date. 18. (Closed) Unresolved Item D.4.c (80-01) - Rework Tag No. R-0959 did not indicate by inspection if the work had been performed. The inspector reviewed documentation that indicated that the requirements of IP 300 QA Section 14 are currently being followed. Rework tags are now being properly filled out.

ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. ENGINE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA REPORT IN5PECIlON NO.: 99900334/82-01 RESULTS: PAGE 7 of 10 19. (Closed) Nonconformance A (80-01) - Welders using veld rod not approved for weld procedure. The inspector reviewed the corrective action taken by TDI to prevent recurrence. Training sessions were held with all welders. Each welder was issued his personal copy of weld pro-cedures. The inspector verified that current weld procedures have been rewritten on a short form. These forms would be issued with the job package and used on all future jobs. The procedure would be in ti.e possession of the welder. (See nonconformance B.2). 20. (0 pen) Nonconformance B (81-01) - Specification 100-A-3 requires all weld rod be returned to stores after four hours. The inspector reviewed the corrective action taken by TDI to prevent recurrence. Training sessions were held with welding personnel regarding return of weld material before the time limit had been exceeded. In addition, the weld issue room attendant was instructed to monitor the time out of weld rod. He would contact welders on a three hour schedule to prevent running over the four hour schedule. (See nonconformance B.3). 21. (Closed) Nonconformance C (81-01) - Welder observed welding out of procedure electrical parameters. The inspector verified that a CAR had been issued covering the item. A training session for all welders was held and documented. Wclders were instructed in the use of welding procedures. 22. (Closed) Nonconformance D (81-01) - An identified nonconforming compo-nent had not been documented on the inspection report form or placed in bond. The inspector verified that corrective action reports had been prepared by TDI inspection personnel. A meeting with QC staff was held and documented. Current nonconformances have been documented and when required, placed in segregated areas. The audit of the weld department scheduled for the fall of 1981 had not been performed. (See noncon-formance B.4). 23. (Closed) Nonconformance A (81-02) - The parts list and component drawings released by Engineering had not defined the acceptance criteria for the oil plugs. In addition, the installation instruction for the oil plugs contained no acceptance criteria. The inspector verified thru the review of revised drawings, corrective action requests, docu-mentation of training of industrial engineering and engineering person-nel, and a revised Route Sheet for the oil plug that corrective action, as stated in the TDI letter of October 6, 1981, was acceptable. The steps taken to prevent recurrence were considered acceptable.

ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. ENGINE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION KEPORI INbVtLi1VN NO.: 99900334/82-01 RESULTS: PAGE 8 of 10 24. (Closed) Nonconformance B (81-02) - Measures were not established to assure that tools used in the crankshaft oil plug installation are properly controlled and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within the necessary limits. The inspector reviewed the procedure and equipment used to install the oil plug. The tool used is a rolling type tool which is opened by use of hydraulic pressure. The final proof of the rolling operation is the leak test that is applied to the installed plug. The inspector reevaluated the nonconformance and determined that the tool is being controlled in a manner consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 and the TDI QA Manual requirements. 25. (0 pen) Nonconformance C (81-02) - Records had not been maintained to furnish evidence that the motors for the auxiliary lube oil and jacket water pumps had been environmentally qualified. This item remains open for further NRC evaluation. 26. (0 pen) Nonconformance D (81-02) - Documentary evidence was not available to assure that the seller of the motors, for the auxiliary lube oil and jacket water pump had complied with the requirements of the purchase order. This item remains open for further NRC evaluation. 27. (Closed) Unresolved Item C.1 - Assembly / test Route Sheet inspection elements not signed off. The inspector reviewed the Route Sheets currently in use and found that they are being signed off as required by instructions. The current Route Sheets have been revised to prevent the recurrence of the above item. Acceptable corrective action and preventive measures have been taken. l E. OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS l l 1. Follow up on 10 CFR Part 21 Reports a. Potentially Defective Valve Springs (Associated, Betts and Connor) - Currently, there are three sources for valve springs, Part No. 03-360-02-0M. Purchase orders had been placed with Associated and Betts. A review of three vendor inspection reports (Form P-313), dated from February 24, 1978, through January 5,1982, revealed that valve springs of the specific part number had not been received from Betts in 1979 and 1980. An unidentified, undated document indicated that TDI-ECD visited l l \\ l l

i o l ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. ENGINE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPEGl10N NO.: 99900334/82-01 RESULTS: PAGE 9 of 10 Betts on July 24, 1981, for a plant tour. Prior to the close of this inspection, a completed Vendor Quality Program Survey form from Betts was received by TDI-ECD. This form was completed by Betts and does not assure their ability to comply with specifi-cations or review implementation of their quality program. Associated was identified as a new supplier who had supplied no hardware. While the supplier of the defective springs (Melrose) had been excluded from the ASLNCSRE, dated August 1981, there was no apparent indication that TDI-ECD had taken adequate measures to assure that valve springs from current suppliers would not be defective. b. Inadequate Starting Air Check Valve - The starting air check valve leaked during a seismic test at Structural Dynamic Research Corporation. The goal was a leakage rate of zero, however, the manufacturer (Wm. Powell Valve Co.) deemed that an unrealistic goal. Four valves had been returned to The Wm. Powell Valve Co., for rework and testing to the TCI-ECD newly established leak rate. Investigation is still underway; TDI-ECD submitted a revised 10 CFR Part 21 report on January 27, 1982. c. Cracked Stud and Spherical Washers - The use of spherical washers in the piston assembly was discontinued in late 1976 to mid-1977. At that tine, a new design using telleville washers was implemented. On December 31, 1980, TDI-ECD Service Information Memo No. 324 (among others) was distributed to all users of Model R and RV diesel engines below Serial Number 75080. That document provided instructions for modifying the piston assembly and replacing the spherical with believille washers. Several standby diesel generators have successfully undergone qualification tests subsequent to implementation of the design change. d. Paragraph 21.21(b)(3), and its subparagraphs (vii) and (viii) of Title 10, Part 21, of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that the written report contain to the extent known: (1) correc-tive action which had been, is being, or will be taken; and (2) any advice related to the defect that had been, is being, or will be given to purchasers or licensees.

I ~ ORGANIZATION: TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. ENGINE AND COMPRESSOR DIVISION OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99900334/82-01 RESULTS: PAGE 10 of 10 The Transamerica Delaval, Inc. - Engine and Compressor Division's (TDI-ECD) 10 CFR Part 21 report, dated July 30, 1981, related to potentially defective valve springs, did not include that total (1) corrective action, and (2) advice given to purchasers or licensees. Specifically, (1) the supplier of the potentially defective valve springs was removed from the Approved Suppliers List, and (2) a letter to purchasers or licensees provided advice on recognition of the suspect valve springs. 2. Follow Up On A Regional Request Mississippi Power and Light Company's 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report, dated December 10, 1981, addressed the item discussed above (paragraph D.1. c ). Additionally, the report identified the following deficiencies: (1) missing wrist pin keeper; (2) grooves in cylinder liners; and (3) excessive bearing wear and deterioration. TDI-ECD informed the inspector that these had been discussed during a Delivered Product Trouble meeting and determined to be workmanship problems. No docu-ments were presented to substantiate that conclusion. l i

. "d"I N" W###i U inspector -J. w. SnMw ,leport No. g-g_ o z, Scope /Hodule_[f,co 6_ggggf.ejog- . DOC..U_MENTS EXAMI.NED. ' ~ a n p.s.. 1 2 1iTLE/ SUBJECT 3 4 I. 9 Gac h An M - AMJ PA_cep A =w_. _. 1 I o 2 - 31o-o ? o A - a A._ 3 B 1mA 3 M P h - 3' 4._L. v i 4 W M-o 9 T-06 Ef_g-!!. l f S M sf<&_ P 33_j ,o3 oaf - o_1n.r2.- _ yya [1. 4%. _'2..-. l G. taw', De f / -P/ - i 7 3. ed.m / M n 72nre.- Jnu ry _.. [C~ B &.5A-Au-Itsf. n ~sn y z _ s uj A U L A b &,_ _t -J.-) 2 - l l I 1 i l I I Document Types: Columns: I 1. Drawing 5. Purchas Order 1. Sequential item Number i 2. Speci fica tion 6. Internal Memo 2. Type of Dociment j 3. Procedure 7. Letter 3. Date of Docunent 4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-if necessary) 4. Revision (if applicable) i i .f

> N' $Q 1 u on N: o = i,,;' D

  • .l l M'

, %gN' ] 3 i J s I i ~ h l i: l id l f INe "I !l !'f! l 6 h ldi i t!E-l i y 3 a ~. st=

==? l l -lyIdi i 'i l g sfc i i i 5=*= i n etts i i a; e i .. g $5 1 i m S. 5#~c= i a;wss i 4 O i q h S [ i D l n 0 i sis' c a i k N d =) = =% k o a R (d c 3 D d "a i i t i s

n. o n.

= m s yl E C N C E s. i as' j* O g n. g i 8 3 ,w 8: i o' ~ = h t ID i i s e i e e a:t l l N 4 c N l } g w M"> N 3 i + 4 3 2 i gi i o i i go o o s es tg ! ) N2 '5 k 3E 5 t e k 3d actu l d t al i e m o y i l k }%I }.f 'I u s 2322 j i 25 *e I k d* fl 80aald d l g! J,. 4 4 3 J 3 O l I 5 4 %p l s z.- .! 4 ..a e m. m. -e-a

  • 3rm

~ r 4 *2k l l wt eg Ol 5eiec a gamco O 0 l O$ bo q ". $ k Y* ~ 5 I m

f,%s, 9N e WG ^ w u i. it s es-

x i

=4

@
i l p' I

zggt

=

!l i %55m t t s, t I

  • E

~ 88 .! I s. ,+ - 9 4. i .i 4 Ws! i .2==5 ~~f i -J !? ^! I! " i t' Q S ttt k I r4 $1s mli 4 ..Eg i n '% I! 7 <!A f$I g = ET $ EE

q. ai n s m

a -i

== bdddd l ll l l ,8 l i'4 Mid i i Os - I r4 N, N CI N s I zi t y O e4 'N I el g o t H-s, o. .>. cs y s ['( D o q q 3 g N W I (I d h t ~ i = e 3 n s 4

,l

[ =l = o~ f n y 4* <* 9 I I c s o e s o 'k N 5

s. o w

i, at i TS 'L N o% ( v ~ ~h ,Im a: ~ o. o' 4 i , R e s t.g 1 4:. ? E d 3 d 1 T Y 4 f 4 4 l i a '( h J \\ 2 5.S o e 't g -c. t g h J 'V 4 m d "us o t 6 s .fr s e z.- g' g, e-J >. # + ,8g4gg ~ = r e c

  • M ns

.-s, l 3 5$$bc l 8 3 5**'* I s r u N h 'M .'>= h g* (% Q y Q f N$ b 5 N' $ ~ l i N __e

A: So: T o t,. !ll!!!!'!!l k$ kb 44: 9'i>;Qii!l'llti i i:! s l 11 i i t l tts 880 t.E i ' < s.' l l' l5 l 3**g 568 l di Ri i t' W j l 5oo; f i l i

n

'dsi5%gl?,v! A _t M e u E 8.S T 4 'N ni 41 m; f ~ l .i i .csss 7 ds 3 h 5 k 'a g , w %y s J .1 4 b P I Is{ 3 5y 0 4 i =i s. $t 4 h 4 i % ON S E o 4 0 1 g 'i s y s 4 mi i = mj Q 2 4 i $ (> a w w h C h A El b y (,f D I i I sf ,M I lI g I .S E 2 o I .D U ) N

  • l'J i

i JP n 8 J ' 6-s > $ }4, S s s e f .) e a a i t a a N m te 5 'i' i b e g; ?E g i N 1 d 4 ,7 L i i

3. "-

o 9 q M a = g / h 4 i 4 sau-1 f 5bSb I 3 4 4 ) hu.t _t,5 I %l R .H ,f ) 3, e Ol

b. i o

-l o a 4 k h. } 'N 5 3 3 8 S as u aw-i A

c. od y J

,$8'5M! f, hY ^ * ~' " 8'

  • b el nl.3

-3 52 $b5b& ~ = e.1 A A ( 5;Ws4 c 4 g $2 ~ 4 H A e o a mv g c ~ ~ ~.- g g.f .5 W-- t

1 i1) >i \\1\\j\\ \\ 1I ll / ) h a r l ~ M-e b b a m c u i N l ttp s 4 mnnp N eeea t mm t I uuf r ccI l oo( o ADD p I i n e t / tff o R k nooi J' 4 0 e s 1 ? ueei 4' 3 1 _M~ z J~ 1 r-s q pt v 3 neyae mSTDR f u lo.... C1234 ~ >P 2 i ?r 7) f L a 7 ~ 2 a f le a. r. 3 a e, i D l i O v E N T I C a M E o s o A J X B P k o ru E U S o n r e 3 S / T E a = v P f'. M N L ) E T 2 y M I a h / U T r d 3 f a C f s O / 7 7 s d a D a_ o e a h u r (2 e v I c s e y o s f. n L_ 2 u f a o - 9 L t i 2 W-o-? 3 y A =J_ W ro f 1, em 0 J i s de c 1 J 3 e - f. rM e / O p 3 s Z ?' B h l S 9 v sa ( M-d 3 4 9 anr R t hrer L L,A cete k J 1 ~. s-! d = rtth a m A unet J. 1 l u PILO 4 o in M 1 s k n - Ld d a h % faw 1 ~ s 1 s 5678 eA u e v % E n s~_ r f u r / t m n A o v i F s t l e ael is S, v p cra r 8 8 4 R 6 % B 8 s Y 6 y gi u u e 2 T nf d n u f iiea L. t wccM J o naeo erprA lu mDSPQ r d u o o c o... t M 1 3 4 f s ') 8 D1234 t 0 f 9 c / 1 e e i 2 T 2 2 2 D a 3 3 1 p p s. o c S ll l

PERSONS CCNTALito 1 Capany RAhls A Mtne LA nuaI. lue Dates l ^*~ M ~8'3 ~ OC..n n e *MW 9:V - ' Docket / Report No. WQC0 88 V b2.-ot} Inspector M/AJ Su /on/- / Page d of 1 ' LAME (Please Print) TTT1.E(Please Print) ORGANT7aTION(Please ?* int) J; w S a fe a asdor kixar as N Rc - A'epio k 17 L). E Fe1 Ele c [n:. u I n 2.m,, n [C.e ) e rt N N ~ R.oI. 9 A15 E e s h (=e w s % $/h.es ethL Tn A.o.a ex. a Da.ml2 e l S W t r. O mc.c. Q.A m s o w c4 0 sta v % C 5~ AfATWELOS g) & sng;eu f& OAggg Tg.4 c a m m c q O g g w L & 8 C $<.v.cSud OwI roar nm.-xxx f.T. 'Doessc m Fouar any M M, m uss m p,.,, puppe 1h1 Y1) 4?D n 1= % %.AJ n E l J DT 7b veAuero'ea lbLavnL. 2$EER'mo AWI /As a u &i c o. - I ! OTTO L, lh L.TEk MGR. MFG, Eh'G 7tasMIEbcA 2ELAVL 2 P-09hr_. d) M R. -QA r p.n u s D cy a v + u 2.4.Wtleen 6) Pt GR. - K FG. %n.mwonca T)elaua.l C. K, a' c Pro,-er Ena,aeer,0. tue Tene.e men o'e n. De L n ua L. D. l<o o oa u a e a Luo Ld Faee ns x a TMams m er&Do %e.Q D. 61N ' Geve-o uleM Fmaal TEsesnu b IA T t% s wd) I urge ek <- %m nowd. g) El.J 4;s A a.

PERSONS CONTACTED 3 Comp.any Ynam in n ea.'e n h eInsel E st. Dates VLT 21/92 Eng: %,- f c,ap n ma ut. , 0 cket/ Report No. 979 oo 21y./S z-cI Inspector L/.t.6/en Page d of L NAME(Please Print) TIT 1.E(Please Print) ORGANI7.ATION(Please Print) C R CAnn.'OneI Annaden Pno:e d Esd;seen:na o s s D. A. ke x Jn:,'e k Assor.'4 Gmyen PuncLi:ni G. b. k:nd Ma n n c' e n Yaod -el En a:nera si G a 4 o k. k,,. c f ae, n a ht,, conin.t , [. Mo n e t Em d l m e t tr O u4 :* (v Nff wirA % c t R. A. Pa d Ma n s e e.e C 4,,e a (e n se,cr n 4

Report No. 815.L:

Scope /Hodule fo //ow u7 on /0 CFR P./.2i Re&nt' DOCUMENTS EXAMINED Page ~L ~ G( ~ t~

pe i Te Ihn N., yr TITLE / SUBJECT Dale Rev sio = i 8 /2:m$u of toCI=st v,s s. I J l nec l:n a r 7/.to. n g h n a 7 re 8e<kteI wit C a., Pa k hs liv, D e,tecio e S,., :n s, 8/sh/st Value a 1 r., C a n o l'. u l% n t' l;l Co. - Pa f e n l:a ll u De,fes h ve Val.e Sy n 8/4ll%I s1 l __4 Tan T Vof s Ta : 2.. Cal:L Ed - Po le n l:al Del'e, l ;,, H e P:s la s Arz e, b lu Ills 3 / 8 s I L n R e /Ar L.:,,4 Co.- 0 a 1:4,v P r., a ro n L uoce A n e, ihs./ e 2 7 To: C ea n a: a Pun Po Ie d: nll b e,/e b o e Ulue o n 'n is 8lte/as y S re: LJasl. Vd, Pw Sal. Lsl-Polenl:,dl, beled:ee Ulve fo n :,, hr a< a 9 ro, um Pou cel c..- n din e sses slant:,. n:n deduke le A n.u %lar .i to r e re, u h.l:c, J e r,, Poles /: 4f De,/cd.,/ Ck viv : flanl:,; A;. E,s/ 88/u /n1 u r.:civl,1 tied zit c..- o It ror Bellel fLa Gun. 8# o n o n i a ,a r.. r @ ~ r.,ne Alei Yus. c. 7 - L v: a En,k n a k.., ne c 1 s z/u /s a l rs n: Lo.,6 Isla,.I L:al:a. L .s o 6 IL 7

r. L. Gif Q:s.

s. <a i Document Types: fBlumnse 1. Drawing 5. Purchase 0rder 1. ?nt tem 7_b_ i 2. Specifica tion 6. Internal Memo y t' l 3. Procedure 7. Letter n.

4. QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) evi L 01 ahic] l I

( DOCUMENTS EXAMINED y, ~~ I/*a No. I' W TITLE / SUBJECT e 12 7 W: Dal' R**Wa" & Re, Lle l Yan Con.,, - Vo bel,isi ne,le al ;u de P;sla n Azz,, ll/n/y- - t_ lu e. n nv i L C. _ 19 Wa. 7 & J/,%e f (Jeks ica 4 o, or '. Jo L 8t n < it a piil. - nu, yr e, tas: Li txelle ;tte 3r et ol-3 6 o - o 3 - an Lfilue &n: a L i, J.,,, & L... c, ~, 11 ), 'Wo/n Ja w f e E.,,a ar As,a : Dele.h $, n :~ 5 J/Nl 'J $ L.:,a c,. ( aonso) 7/e o/st l l 3, _ 8/a/e# 44 o fow e it L:,6 3 ~ Chet[y.llofe 'l/sisi -- E At /O t Fit e l P'o a 2L uell VoL M Co.,t:_, Pa., bh/ gt ( ORI R < u v a P.'ete Iml.E % 1s o2 s (n. s. c Wno:nelles:ste L 1ns i, e'ru _ I/ /s t d, cel3 I/er/gl__ 21 \\ P: d., G u, L,,nn I:E d, n.r. c. d '%>/91 a s 2 L a. u n,. k MJ 7%ols % 7 ul s (n.s.c n,a,D1?h L. n. r;> l., vn., Lie - "l%lB1 _ 3o 7 /2eln ase Sr..,:n b t' T%I (J.ak tbt$i YA o.) - 1 L o - o L - o n "/>/si - ]I 7 Noku . U lina n b 7/i?/a t J u lve i,r,,r : l1 7 }lus-lu n al b s,nse flesen) un >-,g. 7lalst j o y

f. -~ Pow ell vI., G - Slen, b). A:n 0,esh % lve

?L9/t/ a. PW g - _,'@c - E ' ' . _a __.c Document Types: 'I. [ h* f 169-[ '[ i 1. Drawing 5. Purchase 0rder g 2. Specifica tion 6. + n {l. $pn .olt 3. Procedure Internal Memos' f* 7. Letter 1- ?nt Ty li ItemByb_) '4. QA Manual 8. Other (Spectf'y-if [essary) C I 3. f ITo 'ntd 1 evi n4LLpid__11c} 2 w ) m% ' e

Ed9" d-.cf __ki-qt Report No. ' Scope /Modulef u .m / o c rn Pf-2 I4fr p gg3 gg __y,__ r+ t*' ir" 4 v-a an. 7~re TITLE / SUBJECT Dal' f * *I21" I/en N., y W. I, 7 r..lletLlel Ya n Con.,,- VoM i,t,I b e,le a l ; u 2, P;,l.a /1,1,, il/n/El-c. IA 7 T'o1 M P i L C. En n or o r 19 7 TorJ/seftMs/cm h 8e u e, e, .e . Jo (. It i It a pii l. n A,,, u s: L% ITelie :tle L),,L, Sin,k m. cn. w 11 J. %h t JI o1 - 3 6 o - o o h n LUI ve Ja; n s 7/t afst Ja Valve L o a ar #11at:.fN! L[:,4 c.. ( co n so ) 8/as./BI J1 /7e/r.It N,n:~; J/oN! ' 4/6/81 s 24 Po-e Il L:n b c h e$tinIx hh/ at o i M ID fFltll F % ell Vnl l;cC_ a n., l :-,. Pu n < L:aLI

  • lttis k 2L R f RV 2 Y.*e t e l% l,h'T 4

k tre lles:lle L)ns h e ru l/tt/Sl ob % 7 s o1r (n. s. C. Nke:ea l 3 '*/tr /Rt a1 P:d., G.a., Se,n na i:!ri,in. s. t. d 2 L eR Bu k. JAJ 74 o n. "l%lB1 D L % 7 so2 s (n.s.e, IL-21LCt L. u. r;> i., yn, Liu IU /si yr-e SC!NN W,J 0 3 -3 G o - a t - a m 7/i?/s t _.3c 7 11elna.re fa,n:nb ( T*ool U 3/ 7 dakw h. W o lf m - n Ndb ula e,r, r: 7/tt/81 sa hyka.pl}.3-l% ell VIdo - Slan t ) A;e 0,edt!alve 'IL9/t/ ~ o i _12 7 Jinalunal6vunse lle.nen no % ; - ?l.., $f ... e 31, -f-Document Types: , E.fnK?.e.' .my g ?t [.:W ? ' '.- fdhsmns- _it i 1. Drawing 5. Purchase 0rder {f pb_ 'i l. ?nt

  • I ii 2.

Specification 6. Internal Memo' i i 3. Procedure 7. Letter ..? Ifoc! td I ~4. QA Manual 8. Other (Specify-l{ .essary) ..evt N1 ifp1 afilel k* .E. ' oi : Il l Jb 1 1 3 lk o $6 k = o. m >e .J r g bd , 9 we, y $3 !~M E d i M2 i N "o e Y hbkSYbb.$bb5 h n- /O C 3J r% thLa [ ^ R Q A 4 4 C-A 3 i e a ' b -4 s y o m .I c 2 -s + ] O e A d V m o-G e ? ..~ ~ s 9 f C 9 g e bo i o 2 C = yN a r a; 4 i o 2 d .o 3 g o = 'S q { e m e C i 4 5 i 8 c G C5 0 .?. %s ,A E Q r >~ O c s o m u u D 4 g '8 J 4 C s N c 2 7 5 D 2 I .J d 'I m Q h o u.a

D b

%,3 m k y ,J O .N M V E o .N t

  • 4 e

4 s m r 1 W $ b 5.. U W J ) R +g 5 4'R c: 4 d 5 0 y ],' i. .2 ( 2 e

w e

g w t yy 2 z[ i A t $ U s d 1 M'M'. W:,6# d 'e a 4 a, ~.,. = ; 4 n 3 q .= w 'e- ; 1 ., e I-ii ,to - .f 8 2 d A 2 t* e { e a' o t L w d 3 t q 3 e id '$.,3. (J 2 o $. 4 I 'd C w w c) 8. 5 -v w y .u s s 3.- C ( o Q C m 0 3 ) d "= N 4

  • g d g*c y$L g

w b

3 S

V m e g 2, e t 4 g' 4 +, zuou a z w s e s ".:- og, o i ~ ~ c } =c 4 '"'+U b C m.,2 Q 2: %4. y m [.. = < d -i 2-Q

N 4;

e a M 7 r .r -a c w M d,4 6 e o %,c 0 5 3 w (J Q C t WW Q $ No (* e. k, &Nk l,,,,, m f O i CO O W W f5 0 s'.= N M CO M E k 00 00 CO CQ M k ej h $ k k &Cumc --w, & EU U K. gy C4 WQ g C L c, 6 ac" i E C m c Cr k, J A 5 Q N M N M q g a a 3 + + + +

  • +

s a +; y a l o v P j ~, 8 i 7lh l .'o l=~l i k M-ew .t d v q g 2 c. g 9 a Ef l M k+l' lo Q e ~ Q% -s c. Ns b N . clo J. g 7 (sh G [ m s A a $ z e 4 -I w X k

  1. .4J c

m Z Wv w T = W D U s y C h m' a O E f a v V r 8 m 2.s-10 .I 8 7 sz e = T b,% ' w* 1 % b l W e p s. w 2 k O T 's U i w O a i e ~ a i m y E s.~ 9 o o N 8 e .cAWL Nb-m O n =ces N 3 ) m i I a=wo O 1 o m O O ( m up p% cc d'.' i 4 4 g 6 4 l 0 e l O e o M M "8 W W mom a Ubm N ~ ( L W -T 82 FJ Cm0C c L a b aC 3 E C t.o a C "O O o v g d p 9,~ 8...- e .a ~ne 4 h-o sYu. _~ Transtrntrics 01Inv.9 Ine 8HS81DeTIOP. A ena,n.2,acomo,s.. orc-.,n D818V81 55 85"'^"""' P.O. Box 2161 67pooT Oakland. Cahfornia 94621 (415) 577 7400 (' 33

m

~ / P 's y April 26,1982 L. MAyMEcef4, 1982, )- a Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 g O 6

Dear Sir:

Please refer to Transamerica Delaval's letters of November 5,1981 and January 27, 1982. In these letters, a report of a potential defect in a component (starting air check valve) of a DSRV Standby Diesel Generator was reported, as required by 10CFR21. I In the letter of January 27, 1982, we estimated that our supplier, Wm. Powell Company would complete their investigation in February and we would be able to recommend a corrective action by April 30, 1982. We are still investigating the problem and will not be able to recommend a corrective action at this time. We currently have a modified valve at a sub-supplier (SDRC) for seismic evaluation. This evaluation will be complete within 60 days. Based on this we will be able to make our recomendation for corrective action by July 15, 1982. We will send copies of this letter to each of the cognizant parties listed in paragraph 2 of our November 5,1981 letter. Very truly yours, 91h w R. E. Bo r, Manager Quality Assurance REB:cjb cc: Mr. R. T. Dodds U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 1990 N. California Blvd. Walnut Creek, CA 94596 s2c_s o4DM p IT sp EYW

y i wo I RL ibl A *.bd Y l '.1 L W T I O.4 DISTHI8tlTION etSTEP (5105) -{ ACCESSION N6R:820504033d 00C.DATE: 82/04/26 NOTARIZED: NC DOCKET # FACIL: AUTH.hAdE AUTHuR A FFILI A110t? BCYER,H.E. Transamerica Delaval, Inc. GECIP.NAPL RECIPIdisT AFFILIATION Director's Office, Office of Inspection nne Enforcement

SUBJECT:

Followup Part 21 rept ce potential oefect in starting air eneck valve 'of OSdV standby diesel aenerator injtially reported 811105.Nodified valve at sub. supplier for seismic evaluation.Recomeence':on for torrective action by 92071". DISTRIBitTION CODE: IE19S COPIES RECEIVED LTR [.1 EhCL _h SIZE __[ ___1. TITLE: Part 21 Rent (50 DKT) NOTES: RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE /NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE /NAME LTTR ENCL BC 1 ? PM 1 L INTERhAL AE00' 1 AEOD/0MU 1 L q IE/DEGt, SECY 01 2 M MPA 1 NRR/DE 1 NRR/DL. 1 I4RR /U S I 1 l NRR/OST 1 1 RGal 1 l R N2 1 1 NG643 1 l RGN 1 RGN4/VIB 1 L PGNS 1 EXTERh4La LPUR 0 NRC POR 1 'l NTIS 1 j j

  1. 7.'

l. l!!'- l 'W 4 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES HEWUIRED: LTTR 19 ENCL )4 6 m.v - * - ~, -. _ - _ _ _. - _. _}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20211K646&oldid=4006629"