ML20211K567
| ML20211K567 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/28/1978 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Martini D TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL, INC. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20011C460 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-86-656, REF-QA-99900334 NUDOCS 8612120018 | |
| Download: ML20211K567 (3) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
\ , y. : - , a 1
e -' J.Q. y- e
.: -i e;;y ;a f.NI-MMcr-
. ..,. R i,.z - + -
,. - :, a.~ .%
~f%,
- 3 7,.:% . g ;} y
., m . , s. m . . . . -. n- n, -. w
- . . . m .4. -. = .
. 3. . 7. . . .. ..
J A h 4 ;..
.+*.- .- ! 4: . ' ~4,% 7 ,,2*:4 1 l
2 .i . . W .' St. e N N-j
, ' . . , . . . . , . . ' . . Bestdiarf4f3 . .
OMIr. DJ1tartini . . . . . i _ 'Vice Pmsident and Geneml Manager ~ ~ 560 85th Avenue
. Oakland, CA 94621
. i., ' :: . . .
Gentleenn: +< ="' '
~
This is to confim the telephone conversation an December 11,1978 by Mr. W. E. Foster of this office with Mr. .E. Deans of your staff, con- ( aming the inspection at the Oakland, Califomia plant en Ilarch 5-9 1979. The NRC inspector will be Mr. W. E. Foster. _, g.c4 The inspection will m1sta to taplementation of your QA program. Your cooperation concoming this matter will be approeisted. itacerely..
~
I
'* I,. y~..
. . . .j' $ h?
* .<~
ua.m wpew t
,. p . , .
, ,;.y .
' id . e; i,
- y. .
,5 .
Q ~'%s94&.ie ? w, ':
^~
!*]
M'$j:,Nnis* C .-
, sb!:
- b-r
; % %9, r;j.,.d,CL e,; g. g- _@ t ., ... :qgyff nawy ej ps . ~ c. < . c .hyQi:yi))[T l 5%. _. ~
"~
e n.c,g4%f U h.! MY.ChN @ s& ,.
- W l$N N ) h (. l koj21) e 1 6 Y20Y " O h ,- A ELL 1586-656
'n-PDR ' #. " , c,
_ - - *'g a g
... . - m fr3 -w? a-A -
. . .s . w . ,
Foster /ng Hunnicutt Potanwne
' Z/Zd/ /d 12/28/78 12/28/78 1
NRC FORM St. (9 76) NRCM 0240
- ve s.oovunweant esservine orrects sore-esed
i rit y . i tyf/t INSPECTION PLAN B-4 (5/78) Company Del.a a / Rah %e Ju. INSPECTION - dELECTION BASES
- Hame
- Ej no Ad
- C* vets /eA % 1. NUCLEAR INVOLVEMENT IN PERCENT Address: SSo er An . - k klaw) cA Nu " ***
Official 2.
Contact:
[2/. D. /7Aa [Is : MANUFACT/ ACTIVITIES INVOLVE UNIQUE OR SUPER CRITICAL COM-
Title:
Vue Pau:Jen $ i Ges'l n sn
- 3. INVESTIGATION (ALLEGATION)OR FTS No. F +-/ r s77-7 + a a FORMAL REQUEST BY NRC PERSON-Phone No. 415 577-7+0c Docket No. 99900 JJ 4 Report flo. 79 -01 Inspection Dates 3/s~ N7 9 Docket No. 99900 Report No. 7 -O Inspection Dates llame of AIA:
INSPECTION SCOPE: Ih ] A / /7AhA6th 6 [7eehnd 30703/l. hAdAn',1AJ/evs. 4 o o < p i OA Paeconn e
- Des;dn Condael.
4
+
[ddi wle } Cks s J r C osls e l ~ ls.rJfe :en / />r h c*o ml< b . INSPECTOR (S)_ ASSIGNMENTS Lead - Inspector: L.). E. fosles See. Seon e Accompanying Inspector (s) _ l l Others: Place of Lodging: Dates: J/S- P/79 Name of Mote 1/Notei: bhlnn A Alnsul Ylks In h2bnd le - b:& hu %he Address: ,/ //edewb e a d u . 9M/e
- 6 FTS No. F 4- / 5 (., J r- 3 ooe Phone No. f- / r 6 35 - r o o -
o IF LESS THAN 20%, OR IF BLOCKS 2 OR 3 ARE CHECKED, ELABORATE PLAN APPROVED BY: BELOW:
/9Anlhe&nt,Sbns]by C% L tc l 0 Lhtt? A 12 1 .
fff DATE g/t/' 77 pp
. VIB INSPECTION REPORT ROUTE SHEET h'h l
VENDOR / CONTRACTOR 'bilmt n A*.,e n , . - c., e : - e
<w~e<<-< /
6: . 6 DOCKET !!0.'99f ao 124 ' REPORT 110. > 9 _ n/ DATE: 3/shr REPORT DUE DATE: 1/2h/7 y BY: A r/e4 - T05 $UPERVISOR, CRESS UNIT - .
'. - PRIORITY STA1115 IOR TYPING REPORT' - ,
DRAFTI _i URGENT (Stop other work _ FIpAL: I f URGENT (Stop ether work
- inprogress) l ' in. progress) n l
1 .. l ( ASAP,'-(supersedesother. I ( ASAP '(Supersedes otherf
~
f scheduled work) 1 -
. scheduled work) !
?! , .
J'
.x/ ~
i IN _i ROUTINE' I A i ROUTIllE
's .gk .- .
j \
~
.' j s s / /
. CONTENTS: REPORT, 766, 7665, 767.(If applies) and UHITE BOOK INPLIT, 7h, Pf8a
- i ~ .'
G. DATE. . et- Vis/s .
. DRAFT: Submitted by Inspector:Sh. Ir M5
~
Typ p % .), V Y
~~
. Re ew'by Sen or: 3YbN?
~ ~. .. ,e ~.
. .? . ?: , ' ' . . ; ,
~
. ., ;,,[ . . -
_ gg .3
' ~
- + %::'.:;
- Submitted-to CRESS:
~
. . ..:; . c .. ... ,
' ' , ,~
' FINAL: Inspector (s) Review /
~' .T J ' '
Signature / Concurrence: A /f/'/9 MM.
' ~ '
Senior: 77 j,- Branch Chief ..
/ fJ7,7.
7, _ , e - DATE REPLY DUE: fj NUMBER OF DEVIATIONS: 7 i' ' j.
- t L, < , ,
l M/
- i. .s ;;p . I,g
~1
,y*g - lg Y .~ -[ . .,-
I l j.} ./ . I
)
Docket No.. 99900334/79.01. , . . ,
; - . M , ,.
. A %.%,pl%. . v ~yA w
~ . m ..a .
g, u,,) m - 3g _' . *fVg, - l no end-esw m emor 46etsien M T d.tMe . .)
-wp .7'39% ~r.
~> idiary W.7mesweerles '
Attn: Mir. 5. N. Itartist : WN&. -
-Vice Pmsident and;teneral itsnag'er k .1.
550 85th Avenue - 'I ' . 0nkland, California M621 ei , Gentlemen: ' I
' This refers to the QA P m gram inspection eenducted tty Mr. W. E. Foster of this office on March 5-9,1g79, of your facility at Oakland, California associated with the manufacture of diesel generators and to the discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection. .
This inspection was made to confim that. in the areas inspected, your
; QA Program is being effectively implemented. .The inspectlen effort is :
not designed to assure that unique quality coquirements imposed by a l customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a speci.f.ic product, component or service provided Ity you .to your customers, is of acceptable quality. As you know,.the letc requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific pmducts, esgenents or services procured fmm others. You should therefore not eseclude that l the NRC's inspection exempts you'from inspections Iqy an IEtC licensee or i l his agents nor from taking effective corrective action in.msponse to '
.their findings. m% .
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the' enclosed mport. i 1Hthin these areas, the inspection eensisted of;an.esesination of ! procedures and representative records. Satervleus. with personnel, and ) observations by the inspector.
. ~w
, . g ;. l During the inspection it was found that the tuplementaticaW your QA 1 Pmgram failed to meet certain HRC requirements. The specific findings and l refemnces to the pertinent requirements.are identified in the enclosures ~ l to this letter.
~
4.g , j
.6 ?.; :,, ~
\
Please provide us within thirt;y (30) days of your receipt ef this report i a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have . l l been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps i that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date
^f m c-- ?? 5: w ?:t? #
='a je.w.,he*'..ect;e...h.J,;.i.cc..:.he -u
* .....R1Y.
,,,,,,,,,,, W
....U..P....t....p.o..v..s..........
N. M 5f.r V
. ,f. ....
. . ...DM..H..u..n..n..i..c..u..t..t
.......E..F.o..s.t..e..../.d..w.. . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... ,,,,,
WE..@v..let.t.e.r
-.. ... 3.a.m.9........ ......v.da.9....... . .v.an.9..... .. ..W. .?.9........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........*t....
; sec saan su n.m macu osa
*....=="==.~=>...-.-... - -"
- _ - - __ -- _ _ _ _ __ _ _ 7CG290 _-24 7^ QP_ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ [
\ .
. . b.
De Laval Turbine Incorporated . In asserdance with Section 1 790 of s f PrecMan," f~ ': . Part P a 10.. Code'ef "~ ,
.ietter~
.'L Wfth
~
and your .ans en ' , t "[d' O. - 6 e.
*v ' :-; *.c .
r esed to
.~^p. p Ff eis m: ~. p . . eps _g pgy {nf
.I#. h M N y 98HFS.
dt T4 Gen aW - en the sis g;.2.L SWwh9 'ft is 41stund Wat~dtin J ,
, .end should be
> . grepared h that ' ' R4eArtiattesF t1 iteitheappiteatianis
- ~ v av essenteed in a sepamte' of the-dessaant.' .If- 1 tot hearJme you in this regard within the specified period, the will be placed in l the Public Document Room.
l
! Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely. Originaf Signed byi'
- 1. Hale l dis Potapovs. Chief bador Inspection Branch
Enclosures:
i 1. Notice of Deviation
; 2. Inspection Report No. 99900334/79-01 i bec:
! AD/RCI(Reinmuth)
IE FILES NRR:DPM:QAB
. .s. . ; . c REG. I, II, JI{ &,y. .- . g,; g ,.yjj_g r. p g:, gt
,PDR HQS ,, .
~
c ;cP , g q' g, l s
. ' CENTRAL FILES ' - "'-M -
- j ,- WEVETT3R,RIV g . _,-{.,l,3.- .j },0 .l g g;.. <
g', ! -; + . 4 : w. s. e . . mr- c - W;> y. c [ . . y.
; 3 ,
. n
%y ( ^ *t. ^ 4 . ,
4 Y .t . .
, 6 @ e, -91
- .. : a sa m;. e:. e es e gj;.. .r9
,.. ,,.. , . _. ,,,, . .., - v ,n. .
l . i I l
- - - - - - - - - e ,.-v ...--,-------,w-- -,,--r . - - , - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - . -,.,,-------------n-- , - . - - - - . - - - - - . - - - - -
l l De Laval Turbine Incorporated l Engine and Compressor Division i Docket No. 99900334/79-01 NOTICE OF DEVIATION Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on March 5-9, 1979, it appeared that certain of your activities were not conducted in full accordance with NRC requirements as indicated below: A. Criterion II of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, states in part, "The applicant shall identify the structures, systems, and components to be covered by the quality assurance program and the major organizations partici-pating in the program, together with the designated functions of these organizations." Paragraph 2.7.2 of the Quality Assurance Manual, Revision 11, dated July 6,1978 states, "Each De Laval department identified as having responsibilities in this manual establishes and maintains its own procedures and procedures manuals." Organization charts in the manual are identified as: " Engineering isepart=cr.t . . . ," " Manufacturing Department . . . ," " Material Control Department . . . ," and " Quality Control Department." Also, each of the foregoing departments is identified in the manual as having responsibilities. Contrary to the above, procedures and procedures manuals had not been established for the Manufacturing and Material Control Departments. B. Criterion XII of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 states, " Measures shall be established to assure that tools, gages, instruments, and other measuring devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated, and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within necessary 1 4its." Paragraphs 4.11.7, 4.16.4 and 4.53.3 of the Quality Control Manual No. IP-100, Revision 3, dated January 30, 1978 state, " Record Data", for Outside Micrometers, Thread Micrometers and Pressure Gages, respectively. This referred to recording actual readings of measuring and test equipment undergoing periodic recalibration. Contrary to the above, data (actual readings) had not been recorded for:
- 1. Outside Micrometers, Serial Numbers (S/N) DTE-001-B and DTE-014-B, last recalibrated in January,1979 and February,1979, respectively.
d9C&2;AM-
'iP9-
l
- 2. Pitch Micrometer, S/N DTE-002J and Thread Micrometer, S/N DTE- '
002-AC, both were last recalibrated in January,1979.
- 3. Pressure Gage, S/N DEC-007-AAM, last recalibrated in July,1978.
C. Criterion VII of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, states in part, " Measures shall be established to assure that purchased material, equipment, and services . . . confom to the procurement documents. .These
- measures shall include provisions, as appropriate, for source evalua-tion and selection, objective evidence of quality furnished by the contractor or subcontractor, inspection at the contractor or subcon-tractor source, and examination of products upon delivery. The effectiveness of the control of quality by contractors and subcon-
, tractors shall be assessed . . . at intervals consistent with the importance, complexity, and quantity of the product or services."
- 1. Paragraph 9.1.2 of the Quality Control Manual No. IP-700, Revision 1, dated January 30, 1978, states in part, "The Quality
- Engineer assigned the responsibility will update the Qualified Supplers List every 3 months"
- 2. Paragraph 6.1.1 of the Qualified Suppliers List Procedures,
, dated February 3, 1976 states, "The QSL Qualified Suppliers
, List will be issued at the beginning of each month."
- 3. Paragraph 5.2.4 of the Quality Control Manual No. QC1, Revision 2, dated January 30, 1978 states, "A monthly sunnary of the quality rating of vendors is forwarded to Quality Control and Purchasing and is added to the matrix of data used to establish the vendor quality rating."
Contrary to the above:
- 1. The Qualified Suppliers List (QSL) had not been updated every three (3) months nor monthly. The most current QSL exhibited a date of August 24, 1978.
- 2. A monthly summary of the quality rating of vendors had not been forwarded to Quality Control and Purchasing.
I D. Criterion XVI of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, states in part, " Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality . . .
- are promptly identified and corrected. The identification of the significant condition adverse to quality, the cause of the condition,
! and the corrective action taken shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of renagement."
)
j Paragraph 6.4.5 of the Quality Control Manual No. 001 Revision 2, ,
. dated January 30, 1978 states, "When the Corrective. Action Request has been completed; then.all problem areas identified, corrective ! actions required, and problem resolutions shall be reported by.the Manager of Quality Control to the Division General Manager on a quarterly basis."
4 Contrary to the above, completed Corrective Action Request activity '
- had not been reported to the Division General Manager on a quarterly basis; i.e., there was no indication this had ever been accomplished. ,
E. Criterion XVII of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, states in part, " Consistent with applicable regulatory requirements, the applicant shall establish requirements concerning record retention, such as duration, location, and assigned responsibility." Paragraph 16.7.1 of the Quality Assurance Manual Revision 11, dated July 6,1978 sttus, " Records will be securely stored at De Laval and shall be protected against fire, damage or loss." Contrary to the above, records in the Document Control Center had
- not been protected against fire inasmuch as they occupy 10/5 drawer and 1/4 drawer file cabinets. The latter (1/4 drawer files) is the only one fire-rated (3500F for one hour).
) F. Criterion XVIII of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, states in part, "A i comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits shall be carried ' out to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance l program and to determine the effectiveness of the program." l Paragraph 17.1.1 of the Quality Assurance Manual, Revision 11, dated I d July 6,1978, states in part, " Audits of the Divisions quality assurance programs, processess and procedures shall be perfomed semi-annually by Quality Control, Engineering to determine their effectiveness." ! l Contrary to the above, audits had not been perfomed semi-annually ~ for the Foundry, Manufacturing, and Support activities. Records indicated audits had been performed as follows: Foundry, March 14, 1977; Manufacturing, June 24, 1977 and May 31, 1978; and Support, i l August 15, 1977. j 4 G. Criterion III of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, states in part, " Design i changes, including field changes, shall be subject to design control ! i measures connensurate with those applied to the original design and ' i be approved by the organization that perfomed the original design unless the applicant designates another responsible organization." i 4 i
l 1 l
- 1. Paragraphs II.3. and .4. of Division Standard Practice (DSP)
No. 4.101, dated September 15, 1969, require that Industrial Engineering review all design changes or new designs, approve or disapprove and sign the Engineering Change Notice before drawings are released to the shop.
- 2. DSP No. 4.201, dated April 15, 1970:
(a) Paragraph A.4. requires that an Engineering Change Log be maintained, instructions for completion are in the DSP and on the form. (b) Paragraph A.S. requires that all accepted requests be classified major or minor. (c) Paragrar.h B.1. requires the originator of a change to obtain Fequest for Drawing and Parts List Change, Form No. E-219A and complete Section 1. Contrary to the above:
- 1. Industrial Engineering had not reviewed, approved or disapproved and signed Engineering Change Notice, Control No. 8-92 before the drawing had been released to the shop.
- 2. (a) The Engineering Change Log had not been maintained as evidenced by lack of required entries in the " Change Class" and "R Code" columns and changing the " Action Taken" heading to "Cust Job."
(b) Accepted requests, Control Nos. 8-42 and 8-217 had not been classified as major or minor. (c) The originator had not initiated Request for Drawing and Parts List Change, Form No. E-219A, for changes identified on memoranda as Control Nos. 8-19 and 8-60.
I U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900334/79-01 Program No. 51400 Company: De Laval Turbine Incorporated Engine and Compressor Division 550 85th Avenue Oakland, California 94621 Inspection Conducted: March 5-9, 1979 Inspecto[r! W W. E. Foster, Contractor Inspector, Vendor 3//9/7'/
' D6te j>
Inspection Branch Approved by: h,~ ) u. 7 3' /f 77 D. M. Hunnicutt, Chief. Components Section II, D6te Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on March 5-9, 1979 (99900334/79-01). Areas-Inspected: Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B criteria, and applicable codes and standards, including organization, quality assurance program, and change control. The initial management meeting was also conducted. The inspection involved thirty-five (35) inspector-hours on site. Results: In the three (3) areas inspected, the following deviations and unresolved items were identified. Deviations: Quality Assurance Program - Practices were not consistent with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and QA/QC Manual Connitments (Enclosure, Items A. , B., C., D., E., and F.). Change Control - Practices were not consistent with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and Division Standard Practices (Enclosure, Item G.). Unresolved Items: Organization (Details Section, paragraph C.3.b.); Quality Assurance Program (Details Section, paragraph D.3.b.).
~ -l9002,%LR ff
l Details Section A. Persons Contacted N. J. Arhontes - Liaison Engineer R. E. Boyer, Manager - Product Engineering
*D. R. Cady, Manager - Quality Engineering (NDE)
*E. G. Deane, Manager - Quality Control C. McFaddin, Technician - Document Control A. R. Fleischer, Manager - Project Engineering C. Hermann, Purchasing Agent
*D. H. Martini, Vice President and General Manager i
L. L. Mills, Director - Purchases A. B. Norman, Manager - Manufacturing Engineering C. Ostrander Inspector , *P. J. Pabers, Manager - General Sales . *W. Rhoades, Manage - Engineering
*L. E. Silvey, Manager - Materials
*E. H. Wilson, Manager - Manufacturing
- Attended exit interview.
B. Initial Management Meeting An initial management meeting was conducted to acquaint the vendor's management with the NRC responsibility to protect the health and safety of the public and to ir. form them of certain responsibilities imposed on vendors by the " Energy Reorganization Act of 1974" (Public Law 93-438). Those in attendance were: 2 D. R. Cady, Manager - Quality Engineering (NDE) , E. G. Deane, Manager - Quality Control E. Dobrec, Manager - Foundry M. Klapperich, Manager - Industrial Relations D. H. Martini, Vice President and General Manager C. S. Mathews, Assistant General Manager R. J. Pabers, Manager - General Sales W. Rhoades, Manager - Engineering L. E. Silvey, Manager - Materials ! E. D. Staub, Controller G. E. Trussell, Manager - Customer Service E. H. Wilson, Manager - Manufacturing >
- 1. Objectives
! The objectives of tne Initial Management Meeting were to: i _ _ _ . . , _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ , , _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . . .-,______.-..._,...._,__.,_,_.__m_,-, - . , . . , _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , , ~ _ . _ _ . -
l i 1
- a. Meet with the vendor's management personnel and establish channels of comunication.
- b. Acquaint them with their responsibilities under Section 206 of Public Law 93-438.
- c. Learn how the company operates and its policies and prac-tices concerning quality assurance and quality control.
- d. Obtain information related to the company's contribution to the nuclear industry.
- 2. Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
- a. Explaining the inspection base and how the inspections are conducted.
- b. Describing how inspection results are documented and how proprietary items are handled, including the vendor's opportunity to review the report for the purpose of identifying items considered to be proprietary.
- c. Describing the vendor's responsibility in responding to identified enforcement items relating to:
(1) Correction of the identified deviation. (2) Action to be implemented to prevent recurrence. (3) The dates when corrective actions for both (1) and (2) above will be implemented or completed.
- d. Explaining that all reports and communications are placed in the Public Document Room (PDR).
- e. Explaining the publication and function of the " White Book."
- f. Requesting the company's management to explain its policies and practices concerning quality assurance.
- g. Listening to management's coments during this session and plant tour.
I
- 3. Findings Management indicated that De Laval is the largest supplier of diesel generators destined for use in domestic nuclear generating stations. They estimate that 45 to 50 percent of their pro-duction is dedicated to this market.
The company currently has eight (8) active contracts with Ebasco - l Services, Inc., Texas Utilities Generating Company, Stone and Webster, Duke Power Company and others. Among the major suppliers are: E.P. Portec. Incorporated, IMO Pump Division, RTE-Delta Corporation Ingersoll-Rand Company, American Air Filter and Basler Electric Company.
~
, C. Organization
- 1. Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
- a. Authority and duties of persons and organizations performing activities affecting safety-related functions had been clearly established and delineated in writing.
- b. Performers of the quality assurance functions had sufficient authority and freedom to:
(1) Identify quality problems, (2) Initiate, recommend or provide solutions, and (3) Verify implementation of solutions.
- c. The individuals responsible for assuring effective execution of any portion of the quality assurance program had 1
independence from those directly responsible for performing , the specific activity.
- 2. Methods of Accomplishment i
The preceding objectives were accomplishe'd by:
- a. Review of the following customer orders and attendant i documents to verify that organization requirements had been invoked:
1 (1) Ebasco Services Incorporated No. NY-435079, dated August 1, 1974. (2) Texas Utilities Generating Company No. CP-0034, dated April 8, 1976. (3) Stone and Webster No. RBS-244.700-041, dated January 2, 1975.
- b. Review of the following documents to verify that authority and duties of persons and organizations performing activities affecting safety-related functions had been clearly established and delineated in writing:
(1) Quality Assurance Manual, Section 1, dated June 12, 1975 and January 30, 1978, and Section 2, dated March 1, 1974, November 30, 1976 and January 30, 1978. (2) Mr,ufacturing Engineering Departmental Procedures Manual, dated April 12, 1976, Sections I and II. (3) Inventory Control Department Manual, Undated. (4) Engineering Operating Procedure No. E0P-1, dated March 17, 1978. (5) Engineering Department Organization Chart, dated October 20, 1977 and Job Descriptions for: Design Engineer, Controls Engineer, Manager - Controls Engineer, Manager - Design and Development and Senior Design Engineer. (6) Purchasing Procedure Manual, dated February 7,1978. ! (7) Shipping and Receiving Manual, dated July 27, 1976. (8) Various Job Descriptions of various dates located in the personnel office. (9) Quality Control Manual No. QC1, Sections 2, 3, and 4, all are dated March 1, 1974 and January 30, 1978.
- c. Review of the following documents to verify that perfomers of the quality assurance functions had sufficient authority and freedom to: (1) identify quality problems; (2) initiate, recommend or provide solutions; and (3) verify implementation of solutions:
e
l (1) Quality Assurance Manual, Section 1, dated June 12, 1975 and January 30, 1978; Section 14, dated March 1, 1974 and January 30, 1978; Section 15, dated March 1, 1974 and January 30, 1978. (2) Quality Control Manual No. QC1, Section 6, dated March 1, 1974 and November 5, 1975; No. IP-200, Section 4, dated May 10, 1972; and No. IP-400, Section 4, dated May 10, 1974.
- d. Review of the following documents to verify that individuals responsible for execution of any portion of the quality assurance program had independence from those directly responsible for performing the specific activity:
(1) Quality Assurance Manual, Section 1, dated June 12, 1975 and January 30, 1978.
- (2) Quality Control Manual No. QC1, Section 2, dated March 1, 1974 and January 30, 1978.
- 3. Findings
- a. Deviation From Comitment None.
- b. Unresolved Item The inspector was unable to determine that authority and duties of manufacturing and material control personnel performing activities affecting safety-related functions had been clearly established and delineated in writing because the Job Descriptions maintained in the personnel office are of the Corporate rather than the Division structure. As such, there are instances where titles, authority and duties did not directly correlate.
In order for the inspector to make the determination the contractor needs to exercise some efforts to ensure Job Descriptions accurately reflect titles, authority and duties of employees assigned to the Engine and Compressor Division.
- c. Comments
__ - __. - - ~ ~. . . . . . ~ - . _ _ . . l The identified customer orders invoked the requirement
'for organization.
D. Quality Assurance Program
- 1. Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
- a. The program had been documented by written policies, pro-cedures, or instructions and performance was in accordance with them,
- b. Identification of hardware covered by the program, major organizations participating in the program together with their designated functions had been established.
- c. Controls had been established over activities affecting quality to an extent consistent with importance to safety.
- d. The program provided for:
(1) Special control, processes, test equipment, tools and skills to attain required quality and inspection and tests, (2) Indoctrination and training of personnel performing activities affecting quality.
- e. Management of other organizations participating in the quality assurance program regularly reviewed the status and adequacy of' that part of the quality assurance program they were executing.
- 2. Methods of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
- a. Review of the following customer orders and attendant i documents to verify that quality assurance program require- l ments had been invoked:
(1) Ebasco Services Incorporated No. NY-435079, dated August 1, 1974.
- r - . .
m .
-.m.._____,___ . _ . _ _ _ , _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ , , . . _ _ . _ _ _ - . . . _ , . _ - _ . _ _ . _ _ _
- . .. . _ ~ . . - _ . . . - . .-
I (2) Texas Utilities Generating Company No. CP-0034, dated April 8, 1976. (3) Stone and Webster No. RBS-244.700-041, dated January 2, 1975.
- b. Review of the following documents to verify the program had been documented by written policies, procedures, or instructions:
(1) Quality Assurance Manual. Revision 11, dated July 6, 1978. (2) Quality Control Manual No. QC1, Revision 2, No. IP-100, Revision 3 No. IP-200, Revision 3, No. IP-300, Revision 3, No. IP-400, Revision 2, No. IP-700, Revision 1, all are dated January 30, 1978. (3) Qualified Suppliers List Procedure, dated February 3, 1976. (4) Qualified Suppliers Lists - Alphabetical and Numerical, both dated August 24, 1978. (5) Quality Control Procedure No. QCP-2.1, Revision 0, dated May 23, 1978. (6) Manufacturing Department's Orientation for Apprentice Training Program - Foundry - Assembly - Machine Shop.
- c. Review of hardware covered by the program to verify identification had been established.
- d. Review of Engineering, Manufacturing, Material Control and Quality Control organization charts to verify major organizations participating in the program had been established.
- e. Observation of machining, assembling, and testing in-process activities to verify accomplishment in accordance with documented procedures or instructions.
- 3. Findings
- a. Deviations From Commitnent (1) See Enclosure, Item A.
1
l . I l l (2) See Enclosure, Item B. (3) See Enclosure, Item C. (4) See Enclosure Item D. (5) See Enclosure, Item E. (6) See Enclosure, Item F.
- b. Unresolved Item Documents (paragraph 4.2.2 of the QA Manual and paragraph 5.3.2 of the QC Manual) do not agree regarding the purchasing representative responsible for review of the procurement package prior to its release to the vendor. The latter indicates it is the Purchasing Manager while the former indicates it is the Responsible Buyer.
The co-rany ne;ds to align these documents,
- c. Consnent The identified customer orders invoked the requirement for quality assurance program.
E. Change Control
- 1. Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
- a. Design changes, including field changes, had been approved by the organization that originated the design, or a desig-nated responsible organization.
- b. Measures had been established to control deviations from quality standards which had been specified and made a part of design documents.
- c. Changes to procurement documents had been subjected to the same degree of control utilized in the origination.
- d. Measures had been established to control changes to docu-ments, such as instructions, procedures, and drawings, which prescribe all activities affecting quality and assured that changes are:
)
(1) Reviewed for adequacy and approved for release by authorized personnel, (2) Distributed to and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed, (3) Reviewed and approved by the organizations that per-formed the original review and approval, or a designated responsible organization,
- e. Measures had been established to control materials, parts, or components which did not confonn to requirements,
- f. Establi.shed measures had been implemented.
- 2. Methods of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
- a. Review cf the following customer orders and attendant documents to verify that requirements for software and hardware changes had been invoked:
(1) Ebasco Services Incorporated No. NY-435079, dated August 1, 1974. (2) Texas Utilities Generating Company No. CP-0034, dated April 8, 1976. (3) Stone and Webster No. RBS-244.700-041, dated January 2, 1975,
- b. Review of the following documents to verify measures had been established to control changes to hardware and software:
(1) Quality Assurance Manual - Section 3, paragraph 3.4, dated January 30, 1978; Section 4, paragraph 4.3, dated March 1,1974; Section 6, paragrar5 6.5, dated May 31, 1978; Section 14 dated March 1, 1974 and January 30, 1978. (2) Quality Control Manual No. QC1, Section 6, dated March 1, 1974 and November 5, 1975; No. IP-200 Section 4, dated May 10, 1972; and No. IP-400, Section 4, dated
- May 10, 1974.
i (3) Division Standard Practices - No. 4.101, dated September 15, 1969; No. 4.201, dated April 15, 1970; and No. 4.202, dated January 13, 1971. (4) Review of Engineering Change Log and file of Requests for Drawing and Parts List Change for 1978, to verify implementation of Division Standard Practices identified in b.(3) above.
- 3. Findings
- a. Deviations From Commitment See Enclosure, Item G.
- b. Unresolved Items None,
- c. Conment The identified customer orders invoked the requirements for design control, procurement document control, document control, and non-conforming material.
Insufficient time precluded completion of this area of the inspection. F. Exit Interview
- 1. The inspector met with management representatives denoted in paragraph A. at the conclusion of the inspection on March 9,1979.
- 2. The following subjects were discussed:
- a. Areas inspected,
- b. Deviations identified.
- c. Unresolved items identified.
- d. Contractor response to the report.
The contractor was requested to structure his response under headings of corrective action, preventive measures, and dates for each deviation.
- 3. Management representatives comments related generally to clarification of, and response to, the findings.
-- -. --.s. .+. .
e
/ *8 HIT 81 STAT 98 NUCLEAR RteuLATORY--- -
FORM NRC 766 IN( , TION Si ENFORCEMENT - STATISTICAL DATA ) FIB?U ARY 1978 (MC C535) , , F ACILITY NAME Do L att A I Tk A h
- w C Ih e - INSPECTOR (S) M E Fe f ## # PRINCIPAL INSPECTOR fe M -
LICENSEEtVENDOR Ek d. I CN#fe D IV. REVIEWER kam *C TRANS. OOCKET NUMTE R (A) REPORT NO. DAT ES INQ/INV EST/INSP R EGION ACTION 9 FROM CONDUCTING 19 24 ACTIVITY TYPE i 191919lolcl 31.714l <Cilol31ol517191 I AE 15 10 M M O D y Y ohsf 3 OR L8CENSF NO. (9V PRODUCT) C D- I 719I Clf 1 TO 2 14 25 30
~
E! IIIIIIIIIIIIII Dilol3 l ol 917191 M M DD Y Y INSPECTION PE R FORMEO BY: ag 1 % REGIONAL OFFICE STAFF 2 O RESIDENT INSPECTOR F 3 O PERFORMANCE APPRAISALTEAM TYPE OF ACTivlTY CONDUCTED (CHECK ONE BOX ONLY) 3534 , INSPECTION OTHER , G 050 MAN AGEMENT AUDIT 00 0 MATL ACCT. 13 O IMPORT 14 D INQUIRY 020 SAFETY 06 0 MANAGEMENT VISIT 10 0 PLANT SEC. I 15 G INVESTIGATION 03 O INCIDENT 07 O SPECI AL 11 O INVENT. VERIF. l gap INVEST. ALs0 CHECK 04 O ENFORCEMENT 12 O SHIPMENT / EXPORT y stoCxsi 00%ENDOR H INSPECTION OR INVESTIG ATION WARNING: IgANNOUNCED 20 UNANNOUNCED 35 6NSPECTICN SwiET: 2 O OFF. SHIFT 3 0 WEE KEND/HOLID AY I 36 1%OAY SHIFT INSPECTIONItNVESTIG ATION NOTIFICATION (CHECK ONE BOX ONLYI J 37 10591 2 IREGIONAL OFFICE LETTER 3 0 REFERRED TO HOS FOR ACTION 4 0 REGION LETTER & HOS FOR ACTION INSPECTIONisNsESTIGATION FINDINGS (CHECK ONE 80X ONLY) K 30 tC CLEAR 2 0 NONCOMPLIA*J F 3hDEVIATION 4 0 NONCOMPLIANCE & DEVIATION L ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE MELD: 1 039 M NUM8ER OF NONCOMPLIANCE ITDnS IN LETTER TO LICENSEE: NOTE: CHANot uus7 et susuiTTED ON 764 WMENEVE R PREVIOuSLY 4 43 C TED ITEu 07 NONCQuPLI ANCE N NUM8ER OF DEVIATION ITEMS IN LETTER TO LICENSEE: IS OFFIC8 ALLY DELETEo FRou THE RECORD. O NUM8ER OF LICENSEE EVENTS 46 st;SPECTION FEE 1 O NON-ROUTINE / VENDOR (No Fw) 2 O ROUTINE (No Feel 3 O ROUTINE (Feen 4 0 ROUTINE (Fee Reduced) O 47 CONTENTS 2.790D INFORM ATION O T YES REGIONAL OFFICE LETTER OR REPORT TR ANSMITTAL DATE FOR INSPECTION OR INVESTIGATION g 591 OR LETTER ISSUED TO LICENSEE REPORT SENT TO HOS FOR ACTION . IMMEDIATE ACTION LETTER ' ' 48 51 54 59 60 OATE 65 IO3 bJf371811 I IIIIII IIIIII I
~M M D ~D t f M M O D Y Y MM O D Y Y SUBJECT OF INVESTIGATION (CHECK ONE SOX ONLY) 8667 TYPE A 10 CFR 20 403 TYPE 8 to CFR 20 405 MISC.
010 lNTERNAL OVEREXPOSURE 06 0 110 lNT. OVE R EXPOSUR E 150 CRITICALITY 210 EQUIP. FAILURE 02 O EXTERNAL OVEREXPOSURE 07 O 12O EXT OVEREXPOSURE 16 0 LOSS / THEFT 220 ALLEGATION / S 03 O RELE ASE TO UNREST. AREA 00 0 13 0 EXCESS RAD. LEVELS 170 MUF COMPLAINT 04 O LOSS OF F ACILITY 09 0 14 O EXCESS CONC. LEVELS 18 O TR ANSPORTATION 230 PUBLIC INTEREST 05 O PROPERTY DAMAGE 10 0 19 O CONTAM/ LEAKING 24O SABOTAGE " SOURCE 250 A8 NORMAL OCCUR. , 20 0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVENT 260 OTHER HE ADOUARTERS EfsTR BES T HOS ACTION ON INSP/ INVEST REFERRED BY REGION: M R - i , C.e.1 bO -[ g
~ 70 75 U NOTE: SLOCKS K TO N MUST BE DATE HOS ENFORCEMENT LETTER. NOTICE. ORDER ISSUED: l l l l l ll VERIFIED BY lE:HOS M M D D Y Y WHENEVER ENTRIES ARE 76 '
MADE IN BLOCKS T,U V CivlL PENALTY ISSUED. AND V 77 80 , W OATE 766 ENTERED INTO COMPUTER FILE (MO/YR): 1IIII y y y y AITS R E F E R E NCE - r 1
)
wi soes ! 6
.mi.w3.
MW)
) _pl, .
3 z o W r 8 m
=
o 7 2 o. U ww> I g g W 8 - 5 0 5 ' W 8s --> 1 I s a
- r6 2e N w i g we w z o
" in 3 0 W
8 l g U dU N
< 8.88 8 _
tig g =g- y ==> a O ; i G z w J sj z o ( CO O o zw v 5
!G H
( ww> 2 M V w p z o z 8 W ee iC 2 W z O o -
's CE . 6 3y 13A31 '
m O
- u. o8 z z .
l 2 5z wg 36 'ON W O < U 2 gr , e g ' Mud g wo ua o 2 $Ed
> o 2>
z fd o < -ozz o-O dVH3 2 ,vnNYW ti
.2
-re h W $(000>j y y _, BSVHd l $
- a. O o. ..z M z m u Ja.O iE viv _
g snivisi II II i l iI II II II II I L_l: I n - U 2 S W E m Ww z
- e Age:;
u T 5 z m o c- , s o s3 o z C e o 52 O m 2 m
$3m
*e*o o
< o ,a Jnz mza'iI
- we z w-m q z o
ko zO t
- M z
$@8 E2 T
o : g r waa Q@o 5 3 5%sw- o- i l zuS o o 42Q geo O 2 . 13A31 g l % % 525 z m N - 3 ise .; o - % z 85g geo z w
' mud s o , i 3
di$ u g 'dyH3 O @ h o
- g u
><Om l Owg O 1VnNVW M P P9 w 2
z .J s 2
- 3
! v 3SVHd e_.t O N
*
- m # "
3 o .. m n
- l*
E on o. T -- -.-
~
d e e e e m e m e ml m l i i
.. - . . - . - ~ . . . _ _ _ __ ... . . _ ., _ _ .. ,
. FOQNRC 766-5 -U, OCTOGER 1977 )
(MC 0545)* U8stTED STA788 NUCLEAR AGOULA704Y eamanaamam INSPECTION Si ENFORCEMENT-8TATISTICAL DATA SUPPLEMENT. GEN E R AL INSTRUCTIONS: BLOCK A MUST BE CHECKED TO SHOW TYPE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE FORM. ONE FORM 15 TO BE COMPLETED FOR EACH. (A) ITEM OF NONCOMPLlANCE CITED. Is) ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE NOT CITEO AND, (C) DEVIATION CITED IN ENFORCEMENT CORRESPONDENCE 9990o324 4- ~1 DOCKET NUM8ER OR tiCENSE NuMeER REPORT NUMeER 79-O/ A-TYPE OF FINDINGS S-SPECIFIC N/C CODE puncTio' SAL ICHECA ONE 80X ONLY) OR DEVIATION CAusa PnocsoUns severity AREA 3 7 g 10 11 12 S
^ "ONCOMPLiANCE 18lclGlhl l R 1 2 g LICENSEE IDENTIFIEO ITEMS ' C-MODULE NUMBER 13 19 C h DEVIATION O 9 9 O / 7d 0-HOW ITEM IDENTIFIED N E-CONSEOUENCES (CHECK ONE SOX ONLY) (CHECK ONE SOX ONLY)
. L h LICENSEE A O CAuSE Oa CONSTiTurao ACTUAL OCCuaRENCE
, 20 I h INSPECTOR 21 P HAD POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN ACTUAL OCCUR AENCE
>p O OTHER N DID NOT HAVE POTENTIAL TO RESULT (N ACTUAL OCCURRENCE F -EXEMPf INFORMATION G-ADDITION AL UNITS (ENTER "M" lN FIRST BOX FOLLOWED SY OTHER 23 26 22 S CHECK BOX IF EXEMPT INFORMATION
"' ' i i i i i IS INCLUDED IN TEXT BELOW, PEF 10 CFR 2.790 27 H-NONCOMPLtANCE REPETiTtVE OCCUR 9ENCE (IF FIRST OCCURRENCE ENTER "1")
I-TEXT (ENTER UP TO 200 CHARACTERS FOR EACH ITEM. IF THE TEXT OF THE NONCOMPLlANCE OR DEVIATION EXCEEDS THIS NUMBER, IT WILL SE NECESSARY TO PARAPMRASE)
, 1 50
- l. c.s k a, J. ca hn w r s, n,a,a J :,e A 1. t o e ra ca n,J 3'
' naa- Aouk .:L.n a /' & Qu a l L. Aumar %,. -L Reuu': s ll. (2) a, man ~a! 1a2 n.1Ideu
'ht. f 74s> r. 'n.,'J-a d a J in....L ert LI:,L d 'ha ffe tw ta,'L a :- a a.J 1%4ea :.I c.,J.,. I "'
o,oa.L.,. 'A ' * -
/ (6) 17) a (8)
(9) (10) - 111) (12) b 1 (13) (14) (I)
, n
& l E l N l D l &l NOTE; DATA ENTRY CLERK-THE LAST LINE ENTERED MUST CONTAIN N THIS INFORMATION.
1 5 (OVER)
- .- . r FTAM to:C 766 S OCTOBER 1977
) , ,
(MC 0535)
, UNITEO STATE 4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COesasissaON
- INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT-STATISTICAL DATA SUPPLEMENT GEN E R AL INSTRUCTIONS: 8 LOCK A MUST BE CHECKED TO SHOW TYPE OF INFORNIATION CONTAINED ON THE FORM. ONE FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED FOR E ACH.
(A) ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE CITED. (8) ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE NOT CITED AND, (C) DEVIATION CITED IN ENFORCEMENT CORRESPONDENCE DOCKET NUMBER O@ I3 4 OR LICENSE NUMBER REPORT NUMBER 79-0I A-TYPE OF FINDINGS
- B-SPECIFIC N/C CODE F UNCTION A L (CHECK ONE BOX ONLY) OR DEVIATION CAU$E PROCEDURE SEVERITY AREA 3 7 9 10 11 12 g A NONCOMP ANCE l6)Cl $lh! l 1 2 S LICENSEE IDENTIFIED ITEMS C-apODULE NUMOER 13 19 C DEVIATION lOI9l 9l cl f l 7lal D-HOW ITEM IDE NTIF8 FD E-CONSEOuENCES (CHECK ONE 80X ONLY) (CHECK ONE 80X ONLY)
L LICENSEE A CAUSE OR CONSTITUTED ACTUAL OCCURRENCE 20 I h INSPECTOR 21 P O HAD POTENTiAtTO RESutTiN ACTuAtOCCuaaE~CE O OTHER N DID NOT HAVE POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE F -EXEMPT INFORMATION G-ADDITIONAL UNITS (ENTER "M" IN FIRST 80X FOLLOWED BY OTHER 23 26 22 S CHECK 80X IF EXEMPT INFORMATION
"' !!!!l IS INCLUDED IN TEXT BELOW, PER 10 CFR 2.M H-NONCOYPLIANCE REPETITIVE OCCURRENCE 27 (IF FIRST OCCURRENCE ENTER ~1")
I-TEXT (ENTER UP TO 2400 CHAR ACTERS FOR EACH ITEM. IF THE TEXT OF THE NONCOMPLIANCE OR DEVIATION EXCEEDS THIS NUMBER, IT WILL 8E NECESSARY TO PARAPHRASE) 1 50 J. Canisanu 4 Cn :-len:e s XTr J Ao.oed ;v A L 10 C PR .To . nd E i If I (2) nnoa ann Ar L II. 7 4./ L . 4 A k ] 4.. H 2 a f O a f:L l,0 l han-( a I $r .e '1 ' P. -I o n b v.1 % al,e da4 A ka! sN Lee! neusbe1 h1 i 1.. Gu4r:Je h:c.n<Nelen.r 'Urh bTE-ocl AAs) bTG- ol4 -/L la d a r e n \: Lurde J %9 aul 4,9. nerneel: vel . (
- h. p:4,L /1tu en dea J/d fYr E ~ o o .2 .1
J r$len J /w. ~ o . Sen EAJ (WN- ce'Q - A C . 68 utse la r# Recal: L a nke 0 'l79.
- e.. Pa e ir a e Gn de % b e$-co ?- A A h. Inv/ n e rabhuled % r.
O# # (9) (10) (11) (12) l 113) (14) i (k) l (48)
& l E lN l Ol &l NOTE: DATA ENTRY CLERK-THE LAST LINE ENTERED MUST CONTAIN THIS IN FO RM ATION-1 S (OVE R) i i
. -. - . . . . _ . . . . - . - -..~ ..- - ~. . ..-. ... .~ . n PEM N*.C-766 S
- OCTOtiR 1977 )
,(MCOS3bs* . UNITED STATSS NUCLEAA REeuLATomf CoblRMOB00N INSPECTION Si ENFORCEMENT-STATISTICAL DATA SUPPLEMENT GENE R AL INSTRUCTIONS: 8 LOCK A MUST BE CHECKED TO SHOW TYPE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE FORM. ONE FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED FOR EACH.
(A) ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE CITED. (0) ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE NOT CITED, AND, (C) DEVIATION CITED IN ENFORCEMENT CORRESPONDENCF DOCKET NUMOER O O 22 O OR LICENSE NUMSER REPORT NUMBER 79-OI A-TYPE OF FINDINGS 8-SPECtPlc N/C CODE PUNcTioNAL (CHECK ONE SOX ONLY) OR DEVIATION CAuss PROCEcune sevealTY AREA 3 7 3 10 11 12 A NONCOMPLtANCE l M C,l Mb l 1 2 8 LICENSEE IDENTIFIED ITEMS C-jgGWit NUMBER 13 13 C DEVIATION O 9 9 o s ? A E-<lONSEQUENCES O-HOW ITEM tDENTIFIED (CHECK ONE BOX ONLY) (CHECK ONE BOX ONLY) L LICENSEE A CAUSE OR CONSTITUTED ACTUAL OCCURRENCE 20 I h INSPECTOR 21 P HAD POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE O O OTHEa N E Dio NOr aAvE POTr i At TO RESULT iN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE F -EXEMPT INFORM ATION G-AODtTION AL UNITS (ENTER "M" IN FIRST BOX FOLLOWED BY OTHE R 23 26 22 S O CHECK.Ox iF ExEM,Ti~FOaMATiON " "u""$' IIIII 15 INCLUDED IN TEXT BELOW, PER 10 CFR 2.M H-NONCOMPLI ANCE REPETITIVE OCCURRENCE 7 (lF FIRST OCCURRENCE ENTER "1") e I-TEXT (ENTER UP TO 2400 CHAR ACTERS FOR EACH ITEM. IF THE TEXT OF THE NONCOMPLIANCE OR DEVIATION EXCEEDS THIS NUMBER, lT WILL BE NECESSARY TO PARAPHRASE) 1 50
~
be OwhA A Au Ya A YLGL *aw M n t A n n e w l .',e A L l a C.I"A To sana . f I/ !/ g2l snanL 9.l.C2 af O C h M. 7.p.7on. Ao.s.1. U e /, f' . namn. L.I.D er k' G EL Pa a Ndune. Eh h I, u ) nana .T. 5. 4 e P $lh M. O. C.'I ' '
/2,,,.o. % Chr e
.t . Ne G-, I: L a J L. ~ ha n, L :,1 (a r L \%) n .1 L eau u J,4E J -
ouea. -M'.ee (18 'l and , m a Nn AMI.l. rfe m > / a_ w e 4 0 t L
, a. D .J , a.i. .o % /n.
k.A m,. A L, .r m A e u c f l:L, aAl:a, .,P va u l.a r L a Je J ,/ + o o, n n I Leen '/.'a A o~ I:L, c. la.1 n a p-a h: a. d (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (k) (48) is l E l N l D l &l NOTE: DATA ENTRY CLERK-THE LAST LINE ENTERED MUST CONTAIN THIS INFORM ATION. 1 5 (OVER)
FORM NCC 766.$ 3 OCTOBER 1977 , (MC OS35: UNITED 5fATEE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMeS$aON INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT-STATISTICAL. DATA SUPPLEMENT GENER AL INSTRUCT (ONS: SLOCK A MUST BE CHECKED TO SHOW TYPE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE FORM. ONE FORM l$ TO BE COMPLETED FOR E ACH (A) ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE CITED. (8) ITEM OF NONCOMPLlANCE NOT CITED, AND, (C) DEVIATION CITED IN ENFORCEMENT CORRESPONDENCE DOCKET NUM8ER h kk OO I3 h OR LICENSE NUM8ER REPORT NUMBER 2 k' O/ A-TYPE OF FINDINGS 8-SPECIFIC N/C CODE puNctioNAL (CHECK ONE 80X ONLY) OR DEVI ATION CAUSE PROCE DumE SEVEmiTV AREA 3 7 g 10 11 12 S A NONCOMPOANCE lM tl MN l 1 2 8 LICENSEE 10ENT8FIED ITEMS C-MOOULE NUMBER 13 Ig C h DEVIATION lO!9l9 O ! l l "1 $l E-CONSEQUE NCES 0-HOW ITEM IDENTIFIED (CHECK ONE 80x ONLY) (CHECK ONE 80X ONLY) L LICENSEE A CAUSE OR CONSTITUTED ACTUAL OCCURRENCE 20 1 INSPECTOR 21 P HAD POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN ACTUALOCCURRENCE O OTHER N h DID NOT HAVE POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE F -EXEMPT INFORMATION c. ADDITION AL UNITS (ENTER "M" lN FIRST BOX FOLLOWED BY OTHER 23 26 UNIT NUMBERS) 22 S CHECK 80X IF EXEMPT INFORMATION l l l l l IS INCLUDED IN TEXT BELOW, PER to CF R 2.7H H-NONCOMPLI ANCE REPETITIVE OCCURRENCE 27 (IF FIRST OCCURRENCE ENTER "I") I-TEXT (ENTER UP TO 2400 CHARACTERS FOR EACH ITEM. IF THE TEXT OF THE NONCOMPLlANCE OR DEVIATION EXCEEDS THIS NUMBER, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO PAR APHRASE) 1 50
+. C es laau L Carles:a rvr or knJ v A 4,/octvro! ud on u O% nL 6. s.c o f' (3 t h W.,b.C.I.feu. 2 Uohe.e_amleh)
I I i (2)
'C-O s A a bue A J:n l2. lo,5 ul:a;4 kai ./ L 'e e n n' el si!) L 4L D : v: c:. G n o on t l'$an a s e a on o s a l u L L n :c.
o <
< ist (6) a (7)
(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
* (14) lhi (48)
&lElN Ol Af NOTE: DATA ENTRY CLERK-THE LAST LINE ENTERED MUST CONTAIN THIS INFORM ATION.
1 5 (OVER)
, F%u lEC 766 5 g CCTCB"R 1977 ,
(MC 0535) - 1
- U884720 STAT 80 NUCLEAA ASOWLATORY -""
INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT-STATISTICAL DATA SUPPLEMENT ! l l GEN 9 AL INSTRUCTIONS: eLOCK A MUST sE CHECKED TO SHOW TYPE OF INFORMATION ' CONTAINED ON THE FORM. ONE FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED FOR EACH. (A) ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE CITED. '
- 18) ITEM OF NONCOMPLtANCE NOT CITED, AND, l (C) DEVIATION CITED IN ENFORCEMENT CORRESPONOENCE DOCKET NUM0ER OR LICENSE NUMSER REPORT NUMSEg -O/
A-TYPE OF FINDINGS B-SPECIFIC N/C CODE FusscTioNAL (CHECK ONE SQX ONLY) OR DEvlATION cAuse PRoceouns seventTV AREA 3 7 1 g 10 11 12
, A NONCOMPuANCE IsleI&lAl I O 1 2 O LICENSEE IDENTIFIED ITEMS C-MODULE NUMBER 13 ig C DEVIATION 0 83 9 0 1 i d D-HOW ITEM IDENTIFIED E-CONSEQUENCES (CHECK ONE 80X ONLY) (CHECK ONE SOX ONLY) 4 L LICENSEE A b CAUSEOR CONSTITUTED ACTUALOCCURRE'NCE 20 l INSPECTOR 21 P O N*o,OTENTiALTO RE$uLTIN ACTuALOCCuRRENCE O OTHER N DID NOT HAVE POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE F -EXEMPT INFORMATION G-ADDITION AL UNITS (ENTER "M'*
IN FIRST BOX FOLLOWED BY OTHER 23 26 22 S O CHECK .Ox iF EXEMPT iNFOaMATiON " " ' ' " " " * " lIIII IS INCLUDED IN TEXT BELOW, PER 10 CFR 2.790 H-NONCOMPLfANCE REPETITIVE OCCURRENCE 7 (IF FIRST OCCURRENCE ENTER "1") I-TEXT (ENTER UP TO 2400 CHARACTERS FOR EACH ITEM. IF THE TEXTOF THE NONCOMPLIANCE OR DEVIATION EXCEEDSTHIS NUM8ER, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO PARAPHRASE) l 1 so S. Can$nanu de Ca tlen:-u TYTl" af A m emi:v A S. 10 CFA Ta . And andA A A n ob i L. 7.1 af (d A h _ ke w, l Y L l ? f. A t e A eS__r tw e h.~ L. l[ c uk.I' ceulen" L a l n ,'l L e en n. le ale <l a : a: .I hat ' n., a r n L a r ZE.- oc~n i O/r ha u esa ' d I/s inlau Ele. "' uk :- a lz . Tl'c laka :l I b oslu one nie-AaleJ ~ 3ro*r"/.s " cht b e kt.
, (71 (8)
(9) (101 6 (11) (12) (13) (14) , (I) (48)
& l E l N l O l &l NOTE: DATA ENTRY CLERK-THE LAST LINE ENTERED MUST CONTAIN THIS INFORM ATION.
FOCM NRC 766-S ) . OCTO8ER 1977 (MC 0535) < UNITED STATES MUCLEAR REOULATORV COMasestos INSPECTION 8: ENFORCEMENT-STATISTICAL DATA SUPPLEMENT GEN E R AL INSTRUCTIONS: BLOCK A MUST BE CHECKED TO SHOW TYPE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE FORM ONE FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED FOR E ACH. (A) ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE CITED. (8) ITEM OF NONCOMPLI ANCE NOT CITED, AND, (C) DEVIATION CITED IN ENFORCEMENT CORRESPONDENCE DOCKET NUMBER O1IO OR LICENSE NUMBER REPORT NUMBER - 0/ A-TYPE O' FINDINGS 8-SPECIFIC N/C CODE F UNCTs0N A L (CHECK ONE 80X ONLY) OR DEVIATION CAUSE PROCE DUR i SE VE Rif y AREA 3 7 1 g 10 11 12
, A NONCOMPuANCE I&lcl&lel l O 1 2 8 LICENSEE IDENTIFIED ITENIS C-MOOULE NUM8ER 13 19 C h DEVIATlON l0 9l9 oliI7 A E-CONSEQUE NCES 0-HOW ITEM IDENTIFIED (CHECK ONE 80X ONLY) (CHECK ONE 80X ON6Y)
L LICENSEE A CAUSE OR CONSTITUTED ACTUAL OCCURR ENCE 20 I h INSPECTOR 21 P HAD POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE O OTHER N DID NOT HAVE POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE F -EXEMPT INFORMATION G-ADDITION AL UNITS (ENTER **M" IN FIRST BOX FOLLOWED BY OTHER 23 26 22 S CHECK BOX IF EXEMPT INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN TEXT SELOW, PER 10 CFR 2.790 27 H-NONCOMPLI ANCE REPETITIVE OCCURRENCE f tF FIRST OCCURRENCE ENTIR "1"l I-TEXT (ENTER UP TO 2400 CHARACTERS FOR E ACH ITEM. IF THE TEXT OF THE NONCOMPLIANCE OR DEVI ATION EXCEEDS THIS NUM8ER, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TC PARAPHRASE) 1 60 C, Co nhaua da CR:lu:eR ivm e/'Auendh A 1. la CFA ro.a,.J "' nAna /n ok / 7./. / a l' +fe Q b M Yev.11. % /,9. Au):$> La [nel
'bem o# dfune d En:-a,,n u a r tu / L s f5?e Fad k /% Jmla-
; s s . 'a , l L oma / a d: g: hor. Ne a' an dr :nd:alled $lJ.4< YJ Lee,.
ooU. s ~ J l< 4 ll o ur r & lLa . Mc /n e /% A rb:. s . %h,
' '" ~
%,I %u'ry - l~J Lon.a L %E.
o m (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) th) (48)
& l E l N l D l &l NOTE: DAT 's E iTRY CLERK-THE LAST LINE ENTERED MUST CONTAIN THIS INFORM ATION I $ (OV E R)
~
FOI*4NRC.768-$
. OCTG4FR 1977 -
' WC 08.?) . )
- WW'TSO tTATSS NUCLEAR R40WLATORY *ananama a
- INSPECTION ik ENFORCEMENT-STATISTICAL DATA SUPPLEMENT i
GENI E *.L INSTRUCTIONS: BLOCK A MUST BE CHECKED TO SHOW TYPE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE FORM. ONE FORM 18 TO BE COMPLETED FOR EACH. (A) ITEM OF NONCOMPLlANCE CITED. (8) ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE NOT CITED, AND. IC) DEVIATION CITED IN ENFORCEMENT CORRESPONOENCE OOCKET NUMSER OO724 OR LICENSE NUMSER REPORT NUMBER N- Of A-TYPE OF FINDINGS B-SPECIFIC N/C CODE pg.cricuat ICHECK ONE SOX ONLY) OR DEVIATION CAust PROCEcumE SEVEmiTY AREA 2 7 g 10 11 ?2 A N S 1 2 8 LICENSEE IDENTIFIED ITEMS C-MODULE riuMaER 12 to C DEVIATION $ 3 I 9 7 f A E-CONSEQUENCES O-HOW ITEM IDENTIFIED (CHECK ONE SOX ONLY) (CHECK ONE BOX ONLY) L LICENSEE A CAUSE OR CONSTITUTED ACTUALOCCURRENCE 20 1 INSPECTOR 21 P O NAD eOTENTiAt TO REsutT iN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE O OTHER N DIO NOT HAVE POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN ACTUAL OCCURRENCE F -EXEMPT INFORMATION G-AODITION AL UNITS (ENTER "M" IN FIRST BOX FOLLOWED BY OTHER 23 26
*"""* 'I I I I I 22 8 O CHECK Ox iF EXEMPT iNFOaMATiO~
IS BNCLUDED IN TEXT BELOW. PER 10 CFR 2.790 H-NONCOMPLIANCE REPETITIVE OCCURRENCE 7 (IF FIRST OCCUP.RENCE ENTER ~1") I-TEXT (ENTER UP TO 2400 CHAR ACTERS FOR E ACH ITEM. IF THE TEXT OF THE NONCOMPLIANCE OR DEVIATION EXCEEDS THIS
' NUMBER. IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO PAR APHRASE) 1 50 7 Canlaana L CA:lan:n= HT ./ A, non d tv 8 de lo CFA s a . nasa r H~
.T. n ub $. of b va ST h. Pue' (b?P) N' .a 4./ 01. */tr/t 9. A ,J llss e. A . +. ' '
A.t AmJ hlL .f 6JP No. Al . 2 cl WIS/? n 1 N . In d. Em aN d G J s d Ae u:ele d. an.,i.. red as d. aar.ved As J nued o e << '5' Eld:mece: ; Cka de #,l/c , cutl['v.. f- 9 2 A,/me Jui k.A sees allJJa lf! A e n.# , %.E. d e Em e : n eeb n i (La..a L. s L1 n 4 L,o o m mai nla.~ no ) As ev:1eu.o J L., lad ./' neL:,, */ enia:ar :- 44 "cL, .:o e la ,,* l amJ "# (.d. c ol$ i 4. 2 eb m s : - 4 /4, "Atle.[ 7 k # # i l.co); a -/. "cm d J o b *. JI,e.~ "" 4
- 1. m u,t?.! .,.w.d , c.JI Wl, 2- u a )
a-.,n L,) einw n,J ni na .s -- n:-,.n. t rAa ea : s :nal.a L,J m.4 :.:1:A4 J f . e d .& s h- ... .a
~
an1 Pa 5 L:1 I c k,. .c . r.u a.. r- aIer A ' a kaeeer :)D:- "*' i e Oh M 9h a A A m A At $n YC.r. E-l9 Am b 1- O. (48) I
& l E l N l O ! &l NOTE: DATA ENTRY CLERK-THE LAST LINE ENTERED MUST CONTAIN THl3 INFORM ATION. (OVERl i
l i l h . - . . . .. ... . . . - -. -- ..-. 1
e . ggggg Transamerica DelavalInc. Engine and Compressor Divisi' hglgggl 550 85th Avenua P.O. Box 2161 I Oakland Cahfomia 94621 j < (415) 577-7400 April 13, 1979 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas, 76011 Attn: Vidia Potapovs, Chief Vendor inspection Branch Re: Docket No. 99900334/79-01
Dear Mr. Potapovs:
Enclosed is Transamerica Delaval's response to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's findings as a result of an inspection of our quality control program. The inspection was conducted by W.E. Foster at our facility March 5-9, 1979 Sincerely, CA.o_ E.G. Deane Manager Project Administration / Quality Control EGD/ds Enc: cc: D. Martini E. Wilson W. Rhoades L. Silvey
$NMQEQ TI' D/6
- l. .,, .
6
)
- TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL STATEMENT OF ACTION: RE: NRC INSPECTION, i$ MARCH 5-9, 1979 A. Finding: Contrary to paragraph 2.7.2 of Delavals Quality Assurance Manual, procedures and procedures manuals had not been estabitshed for Manufacturing and Material. control Department.
Corrective Action: Paragraph 2 7 2 of Delavals' quality Assurance Manual shall be revised to specificly identify those departments required to' maintain procedures and procedure manuals. Preventive Measures: Implementation of the revised Quality Assurance Manual and a review of department procedures and procedures manuals by use of the Internal audit program. Completion Date: August 30, 1979 B. Finding: Contrary to I.P. 100 paragraphs 4.11 7, 4.16.4 1 and 4.53 3 actual readings had not been recorded for the peri-odic recalibration of measuring and test equipment. . Corrective Action: As required by Instruction Procedure 100, actual readings of recalibration of measuring and test equip-ment shall be recorded. i Preventive Measures: Written instruction to the Inspection Supervisor responsible for Tool and Gage inspection emphasiz- ) Ing paragraphs 4.11.7, 4.16.4 and 4.53.3 of I.P. 100. Compil-ance to be verified by internal audit of Tool and Gage Labora-tory. ! ' Completion Date: April 30,1979 C.- Finding: Con t ra ry to the Quality Control Manual, Instruc-tion Procedure 700 and the Qualified Suppliers List Procedure, the Qualified Suppliers List (QSL) had not been updated month-ly or quarterly nor had a monthly summary of the quality rating l of vendors been forwarded to quality Control and Purchashing. Corrective Action: The Quality , Control Manual, l.P. 700 and QSL procedure shall be revised to reflect that the QSL shall "; be updated semi-annually and that a semi-annual summary of the' quality rating of vendors will be forewarded to Quality Control and Purchasing. ; ! Preventive Measures: Implementation of the revised manuals and procedures in addition to verification of QSL updating by use of the internal audit' program. Comptetion Date November 30, 1979 D. Finding: Contrary to the Quality Control Manual, the i activity, use, and/or status of Corrective Action Requests I had not been reported by the Manager of quality Control to
- e 1
- . - - , - , , _ _ . - . , . _ . _ - , _ . , - - . , . . . - . _ _ . _ . , _ . . ~ . _ . , _ - , ~ - _ _ , _ _ , , - _ , - -
~'
- )
h. the Division General Manager on a quarterly basis.
~
Corrective Action: The Quality Control Manual will be revised to extend the reporting of CAR activity by the Quality Control Manager to the Division General Manager on a semi-annual schedule.. Preventive Measures: Implementation of the Quality Control Manual with a verification of CAR activity through;the inter-nel audit program.
- Completion Date: August 3D, 1979 E. Finding: Contrary to the Quality Assurance Manual, the Document Control Center has not been protected against fire.
Corrective Action: Delaval is presently investigating micro flim storage for all documents kept in the Document Control Center. All micro filmed documents will be stored in fire proof cabinets / files. Should the micro film process not be feasible, the purchase of all fire proof cabinets / files is anticipated by Delaval. Preventive Measures: Development of a document micro film program for storage in fire proof cabinets and and/or the purchase of all fire proof file cabinets. Completion Date: December 14, 1979 - F. Finding: Contrary to the Quality Assurance Manual, para-graph 17.1.1, Audits of the Division's quality assurance programs, processess and procedures was not performed semi-annually by Quality Engineering. Corrective Action: The. Internal Audit schedule has been re-vised and systemized and is now being implemented. Preventive Measures: The Manager of Quality Engineering has been Instructed to implement the internal audit program as defined in the Quality Assurance Manual. The implementation of the program shall be checked by the Quality Control Manager. Completion Date: April 3D, 1979 G. Finding: Industrial Engineering had not reviewed, approved or disapproved Engineering Change Notices prior to shop release. The Engineering change log had not been maintained as dictat-ed by Division Standard Practice No. 4.201 or as indicated by the headings referenced on the change form its self. Drawing change requests had not been classified as major or minor. Informal memo's used in lieu of Reauest for Drawing and Parts List Change. Corrective Action: Division Standard Practice No. 4.201 is in the process of revision to impose review / approval of Change Notices as the responsibility of Engineering. The
1 Engineering Change Notice log shall be revised so that headings and information required is functional. Engineering will not process any Change Notices unless the proper procedu'e r and form is utilized, to include the classification of the change as major or minor. Preventive Measures: Implementation of the revision of Division Standard Practice No. 4.201, implementation of the revised log sheet for Change Notices. Verification of proper implementation of the Change Notice program by the internal audit program. Completion Date: August 30, 1979
, J< stav,
'o..
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
! *.[ . g7l'
) REGION IV g
- y J' j F 1 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE,5UITE 1000
%,'[g' o, c AR LINGTON, T E X AS 76012 2 5 MAY 1979 Docket No. 99900334/79-01 Transamerica Delaval Incorporated Engine and Compressor Division Attn: Mr. D. H. Martini Vice President and General Manager 550 85th Avenue Oakland, CA 94621 Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letters of April 13, 1979 and May 14, 1979, in response to our letters dated March 20, 1979, with an enclosure and April 26,1979. We have no further questions at this time. We will review your corrective action during a future inspection. l Sincerely. . i Uldi t aa apovs, chi s, Vendor Inspection Branch i ! Y D/ 7'
Transamenca s';;r;*#!3adL Delaval 55o 85m ^=* P.O. Box 2161 f g Oakland, Cahfomia 94621 (415) 577 7400 li, May 14, 1979 United States 11uclear Regulatory Comission Region IV 611 Ryan Pla::a Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas, 76011 Attn: Uldis Fotapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch Re: Docket l'o. 99900334/79-01
Dear Pr. Fotapovs:
Enclosed please find Transa crica Delavals corrected response to item G (flotice of Deviation) originally responded to in our letter dated April 13, 1979. Sincerely, 8.2t.0 - E.G. Deane Manager Project Ad-inistration/ Quality Control EGD/dc Enc:
~
cc: D. Partini E. Wilson W. Rhoades L. Silvey i I 0 D&h0N \ -" zpp
}
TRA!!SAMERICA DELAVAL STATHE!TT OF ACTION: Re: NRC INSPECTION, MARCH 5-9, 1979. Corrected response to item G of original response dated April 13,1979. G. Finding: Contrary to Division Standard Practice 4.101, Industrial Engineering had not appmved or disapproved Engineering Change Notices prior to shop release. 'Ihe Engineerirg change log had not been maintained as dictated by Division Standarti Practice 4.201 or as indicated by the headings referenced on the change for n its self. Drawing change request had not been classified as major or minor. Infomal meno's used in lieu of Request for Drawing and Parts List Change. Corrective Action: Division Standard Practice 4.101 will be eliminated. Division Standard Practice No. 4.201 is in the process of revision to impose review / approval of Change Notices as the responsibility of Engineering. The revised DSP 4.201 shall indicate that it supercedes DSP 4.101. The Engineering Change Notice log shall be revised so that headings and infomation required is functional. Engineering will not process any Change Notices unless the proper procedure and fom is utilized, to include the classification of the change as major or minor. Preventive Measures: Implementation of the revision of Division Standard Practice No. 4.201. Implementation of the revised log sheet for Change Notices. Verification of proper implementation of DSP 4.201 and the Change Notice program by the Internal Audit Program. Completion Date: August 30,1979
0 Docket No. 99900334/79-01 i Transamerica Delaval Incorporated Engine and Compmssor Division
)
Attn: Mr. D. H. Martini Vice Pmsident and General Manager 550 85th Avenue Oakland, California 94621 Gentlemen: i i i Thank you for your letter of April 13, 1979, in msponse to our
! letter dated March 20, 1979. As a result of our myiew, we find
; j that additional information, as discussed with your Mr. E. G. Deane j ; during a telephone call on April 24, 1979, is needed. Specifically, j i please provide a description of steps that have been or will be taken
, to correct and prevent recurrence of failure to perform in accordance with Division Standard Practice No. 4.101, dated September 15,19G9.
i This request refers to item G of the Enclosure (Notice of Deviation) to our letter. i Please provide this additional information within twenty (20) days in i order that we may complete our review in a timely manner. I t Sincerely, i a l Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch
./
1 bec: ' Central Files
, PDR HQS 1 WEVetter "
WEFoster -?)C62 g gq - i I
'PP
-. ..m.................. .....G............ . ... W6.0. ........
i W DM s W
. . . . . ..,,E, Fos te r/n g un,ni
. . , .c,u,t,t,. .UPo y
. . . . , ta,.7,....... . ...,E,Ve t,t,e,r
; unc somas He to.us Maas esa
- v........ - ... . - ... .... ......
. )
9 UNITED STATES [t>S K844 ' NUCLEAR CEIULAT30Y COMMISSION .I [ Ph g REGION IV I
- f $ 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE,SulTE 1000
~ 8 AR LINGTON, TEXAS 70011 s...../
26 APR 1979 Docket No. 99900334/79-01 Transamerica Delaval Incorporated Engine and Compressor Division Attn: Mr. D. H. Martini - Vice President and General Manager 550 85th Avenue Oakland, California 94621 Gentlemen: Thank you for your letter of April 13, 1979, in msponse to our letter dated March 20, 1979. As a result of our myiew, we find that additional information, as discussed with your Mr. E. G. Deane during a telephone call on April 24, 1979, is needed. Specifically, please provide a description of steps that have been or will be taken
, to correct and prevent recurrence of failure to perform in accordance with Division Standard Practice No. 4.101, dated September 15, 1969.
This request refers to item G of the Enclosure (Notice of Deviation) to our letter. Please provide this additional infomation within twenty (20) days in order that we may complete our review in a timely manner. Sincerely, sb h Uldis Potapovs Chief Vendor Inspection Branch
)I l
h1 M IP
.. -_ . - _- _ -}}