ML20195B411
| ML20195B411 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/11/1986 |
| From: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| References | |
| ACRS-2403, NUDOCS 8605290293 | |
| Download: ML20195B411 (18) | |
Text
_ _ _ _
- 'A .
CERTIFIED COPY DATE ISSUED: April 11, 1986 p-smpl7, \\ d. f
- l j.)dfd5 - & YU UL, nil ild
SUMMARY
/ MINUTES ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON STANDARD PLANT DESIGN WASHINGTON, D. C.
MARCH 12,1986 A meeting was held by the Standard Plant Design Subcommittee. Notice of the meeting was published in the Federal Register on February 21,1986(Attach-mentA). The schedule of items covered in the meeting is in Attachment B.
The list of attendees is in Attachment C. A list of the meeting handouts is in Attachment D. The handouts are filed with the office copy. H. Alderman was the Designated ACRS Staff member. The meeting was convened at 8:30 a.m.
Principal Attendees C. Wylie, Subcommittee Chairman R. Villa, G.E.
J. Ebersole D. Scaletti NRC C. Michelson J. Devine, EPRI G. Reed N. Dobi, FAA C. Siess M. Norin, DOE R. Priory, AIF W. Bilanin, EPRI Introductory Statement - Subcommittee Chairman C. Wylie Mr. Wylie remarked that the objective of the meeting is to continue the subcommittee's review of nuclear plant standardization activities in order to bring before the full ACRS sufficient information to guide them in formulat-ing a position on nuclear plant standardization. He noted that the 0605290293 060411 PDR ACHG PUN 240'J DESICNATO O!!1Gl!iAL
%v Mt ' i N[ .-
.nmunn 1, h \ l hhauh 'e .
1,j S
' s .
, , MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 2 PLANT DESIGN MTG, MAR.12, '86 subcommittee had last met on January 6th when it was briefed by the staff on the Connission's standardization policy statement.
R. Villa, General Electric Company, Power Worthiness Certificate Mr. Villa pointed out that the General Eler.tric Company developed the power worthiness concept about 15 years ago. GE had noticed that each nuclear plant was having unique licensing problems with regulations, the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) design, the environment and other matters. GE felt that the system supplier had to take a secondary role in licensing although the supplier was more expert in the design.
It was noticed in other high technology industries that the system supplier took the lead role in obtaining the approval for the design. From this genesis was developed the concept of licensed standardization.
One of the objectives of standardized design was that the NRC design approval could be obtained faster and further technical review could be eliminated.
The standard design would eliminate a lot of the regulatory and licensing problems. The schedule would be more predictable since standard plants would repeat themselves and planning would be simpler and less complicated.
, Mr. Villa noted that the power worthiness certificate involves having the reactor vendor and architect / engineer team design a nuclear power plant as
MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 3 PLANT DESIGN MTG, MAR.12, '86 much as can be reasonably designed. Then a NRC review would approve the standard design. The utility would take the standard design and match it with a pre-approved site and construct the plant.
There was some discussion regarding the role of the utility in the design process. Two of the subcommittee members didn't think the utility should be involved until later in the process. Mr. Villa expressed his belief that it would be beneficial to have direct utility involvement early in the process.
Mr. Villa pointed out that all through the construction process there is a continuous verification. He noted this is a confirmatory verification not a technical review.
Regarding the level of detail in a standard plant, Mr. Villa listed a pump as an example. He stated that you would not cite manufacturer and rcdel number.
You would specify flow, pressure, interface requirements, reliability and all the standards that would have to be met. This would include all the informa-tion necessary to write a procurement specification for the pump.
Mr. Villa pointed out that the equipment supplier will certify that the equipmegtwillmeetitsperformancerequirements. The utility will have to verify the performance testing had been done during the construction phase.
J. Devine Electric power Research Institute (EpRI)
o * .
, , MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 4 PLANT DESIGN MTG, MAR.12, '86 Mr. Devine pointed out that EPRI does not have a standardization program.
But he noted that many elements of their program are in line with the needs of a standardization program. He listed three prerequisites for their AdvancedLightWaterReactor(ALWR) Design. The first was regulatory stabil-ity. The second was development of specifications of the ALWR design and performance requirements tailored to utility needs. The third was develop-ment of smaller nuclear reactors.
Mr. Devine remarked that several things are absolutely necessary. One is extremely low risk of severe accident. The second is assurance that the plant is licensable. The utility can't afford to build a plant, invest a billion dollars or more without,the certainty that it can be licensed.
The third was predictable construction schedules and predictable operating cost and plant availability.
Mr. Ebersole asked about the need of the utility industry to achieve public confidence in Ll. sir product. Mr. Devine said that he absolutely agreed.
Mr. Devine discussed the EPRI's approach. First he noted that EPRI is an organization of and for utilities. The program incorporates steps to deter-mine the needs of the utilities and to assure that ALWR meets the needs. He noted reliance on experience and the need to base the design on proven technology. He cited the need for broad based industry involvement. He
___ _ W
o * .
. , MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 5 PLANT DESIGN MTG, MAR.12, '86 cited that EPRI has not proposed to make a choice between BWR's or PWR's.
The objective will be to develope documents which identify generic requirements and then develop specific requirements for BWR's and PWR's.
Mr. Devine discussed ongoing activities in the EPRI program. The first was regulatory stabilization. This is a cooperative effort with the NRC to identify and resolve outstanding issues of nuclear plant safety. The objec- ,
tive is to determine the stable regulatory requirements which must be met by any new LWR design. A methodology report was transmitted to the NRC on December 3, 1986.
1 The second objective is the need for continuing NRC interface. EPRI is developing requirements on a system by system basis. There is a continuing need to evolve an agreement from the NRC on the growing package, rather than on an individual piecemeal basis.
The last objective is to achieve a favorable Safety Evaluation Report from the NRC for each chapter of the Requirements Document and for the Require-ments Document as a whole.
Mr. Wylie asked if there has been any understanding between EPRI and the NRC.
Mr. Devine responded that the methodology document has been the vehicle to develop agreement with the NRC about the approval process. It has been delivered to the NRC and we are discussing it with them right now.
. , MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 6 PLANT DESIGN MTG. MAR.12, '86 N. Dobi, Federal Aviation Authority Mr. Dobi discussed the aircraft c"rtification process. Mr. Dobi stated that they are concerned primarily with air worthiness. In addition they have production certification which insures the quality control of the aircraft or other products involved. They also review maintenance which insures the continued air worthiness of the aircraft.
Mr. Dobi briefly reviewed the type certification process. The applicant develops data in his design. The applicant then conducts analyses and tests both ground and flight. The applicant must then show compliance with the air worthiness regulation. Mr. Dobi noted that the main role of FAA is to define the minimum safety standards referred to as the type certification bases.
Then the FAA evaluates the applicant's showing of compliance, reviews data and the prototype and mockups, participates in the certification tests and finally issues the type certificate and defines the certification limita-
' tions.
Mr. Ebersole asked if there were different levels of reliability certifi-cates. Mr. Dobi replied that there were two sets of standards. One applies to the air carrier type aircraft. These are called the transport category.
The other category is general aviation. Mr. Dobi noted that the transport category starts at 125,500 pounds.
. , MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 7 PLANT DESIGN MTG MAR.12, '86 Following the preliminary application, a Type Certification Board is estab-lished. The purpose of the board is to ensure that the FAA and the applicant is familiar with the type certification program. The Type Board resolves issues that might come up. The board also establishes and manages the schedule. The board is composed of the managers of the Aircraft Certifica-tion Division and of the other disciplines such as power plant, structures, air frames etc.
Mr. Dobi discussed the function of the Delegated Engineering Representatives (DER). These representatives are normally employees of the manufacturer, and are given the authority to represent the FAA. Mr. Dobi pointed out that only the function of evaluating the data of the manufacturer is delegated. The program and the DER's are monitored by the FAA.
The DER's evaluate designs and they make a recommendation to the FAA. The FAA approves the data or design based upon the recommendation of the DER.
Mr. Dobi talked about delegating functional responsibility to the manufactur-er in general aviation aircraft. Delegation option authorization authorizes the manufacturer to, in effect, take care of most of the functions involving evaluation of the design. This entails a certification from the manufacturer that it does comply with the basic regulations. The FAA monitors the entire process.
, MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 8 PLANT DESIGN MTG, MAR.12, '86 After the aircraf t is constructed, an experimental certificate is issued to that aircraft. This allows the manufacturer to fly that airplane for the purpose of determining compliance with the regulations. The manufacturer also makes flight tests to determine the performance of the airplane, flight characteristics and to determine reliability and functioning of the systems.
Mr. Dobi mentioned type inspection authorization. This is an inspection to make sure the aircraft conforms with the design data on file.
During the process the FAA conducts 300 hours0.00347 days <br />0.0833 hours <br />4.960317e-4 weeks <br />1.1415e-4 months <br /> of flight testing which in-volves simulated air carrier operations.
Prior to a final certificate, a provisional certificate is issued. This allows the air carrier to become familiar with the airplane and fly it over the routes it intends to fly.
At the final Type Board meeting all outstanding issues are discussed and an attempt made to resolve them. Also at the final meeting, technical details of the airplane are formulated such as maximum weight, the engines and limitation on the engines and certification basis. This information is used in the field by the inspectors to determine what regulations apply, what some of the equipment that had been approved for the airplane, and what the basic limitations are.
. . MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 9 PLANT DESIGN MTG. MAR.12, '86 When the FAA is satisfied that all the issues are resolved, the type certifi-cate is finally issued.
Mr. M. Norin, Department of Energy Mr. Norin noted the Department of Energy (DOE) advocates the passage of legislation which would encourage standardization. He noted that DOE be-lieves that standardization would be a major step toward improving power plant safety. He stated that the ability to make early firm decisions should not only enhance plant safety performance but would also improve the economics of nuclear power. He stated for both the industry and the financial community, the risk in proceeding with a plant would be significantly reduced. He noted that to the extent practicable, desig'n requirements should be defined in terms of performance requirements in preference to prescriptive requirements.
R. Priory, Atomic Industrial Forum (AIF)
Mr. Priory presented the views of AIF toward standardization. Mr. Priory n6ted that he wanted to discuss seven points. These are:
')
o Nuclear power production and its state, i
MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 10 PLANT DESIGN MTG. MAR.12, '86 o Nuclear power as a generation alternative as the utilities look upon it now, o A quick look at the AIF study group and what its accomplished thus far and intends to do, o A look at the design certification process that has been endorsed by the AIF study group, o The engineering necessary to support design certification, o The coupling of the design certification with combined construction and operating license and the importance of that, o The benefits of the overall process.
Mr. Priory noted that the nuclear industry is mature such that there are a collection of power worthy components that have proven themselves. One of the objectives of the AIF studies is to maximize and take advantages of the power worthiness of the available operating components through stan-dardization.
Regarding the current state of nuclear power, Mr.' Priory remarked that its economically risky. The time to license and construct is too long. The utilities can't afford nuclear plants on their own so many partners are needed. The utility needs the consent of the FUC and he also needs the investment community and the regulator as well. A nuclear powe'. plant has become a difficult and risky business.
. , MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 11 PLANT DESIGN MTG MAR.12, '86 Mr. Priory pointed out that one of the contributors to the current stagnation in nuclear plants is the licensing process. He noted that the licensing process has proven to be unstable and unpredictable. He said that one of the elements necessary to revive the nuclear industry or to make it a viable option is to make some changes to the licensing pNcess that is currently being used.
Mr. Priory discussed two working groups under the AIF study group. One group is on regulatory interactions and the second is the Design Information Work Group. The Design Information Work Group, under Mr. Priory, is trying to define what information can be made available in the design certification process.
Mr. Priory discussed how the design certification process would work. It is expected that a consortium would design the standard plant. They have recommended that one document would be submitted to the NRC as part of the design certification process. This would be called a plant safety report (PSR). The following information would be contained in the PSR:
o Design Basis criteria o Analysis and design methods o Functional design and physical arrangement of auxiliary, balance of plant and nuclear steam supply systems.
L l
. MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 12 PLANT DESIGN MTG. MAR.12, '86 o Plant physical arrangements sufficient to accommodate systems and components o Acceptance / test requirements o Probabalistic risk assessment methodology In summary, Mr. Priory noted that they believe nuclear power has had an excellent track record. There are a lot of power worthy components avail-able. At the present time, nuclear power is not in a competitive position.
Licensing reform is absolutely essential. He noted that industry is very supportive of the design certification coupled with the construction and license option. He stated that they believe this may well be a first step in trying to revive the industry.
D. Scaletti, NRC Mr. Scaletti provided an update on NRC standardization activities since the
' January 6, 1985 subcommittee meeting. He noted that the NRC had polled various industry groups to ask them if the proposed NRC standardization policy statement addressed their needs and concerns. Basically the response was that the ultimate goal of standardization should be the reference concept through certification. However they thought the other options, replication, duplication and manufacturing license should be maintained. They all sup-ported the AIF standardization effort.
II
. MINUTES /
SUMMARY
STANDARD 13 PLANT DESIGN MTG. MAR.12, '86 Regarding the standardization policy statement, the Commission had asked the staff to work with the office of policy evaluation to get a consensus from the Comission. This has been done and the staff is waiting for Commission concurrence.
Subcommittee Discussion Subcommittee Chairman Wylie asked the subcommittee if the standard plants discussion should be brought before the full Comittee. The response was that Subcommittee Chairman Wylie should give a summary to the full Committee.
Mr. Wylie noted that he didn't think that the subcommittee had discussed the whole topic in sufficient detail to go the full Committee with any recommendation.
The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 p.m.
NOTE: Additional meeting details can be obtained from a transcript of this meeting available in the NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H St.,
NW., Washington, D. C. or can be purchased from ACE-Federal Reporters, 444 North Capitol Street, Washington, D. C. 10001,(202) 347-3700.
a I
lh!Hdk
- /W" ' ' E 4-- .
Fedwal Register / Vol. 51, No. 35 /.Priday, Februtry 21,1966 [Noticas . ./ ,
and selection proetices and/or to defend , Durfy tb talttalportion oIthe .
,' a'm. to 3.00 p m., Room 730 of the Nancy meeting. &e bubcommittee, along with Hanks Center.1100 Pennsylvania the Foundstion'a practices in I any ofits consuftacts wlp may be I Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506. d:senmination cases.
Present,ssay ruhange preliminary A portion of this meeting wi!! be open Dated Februamaet views regardirmaatters to be . .. I on March 14.1968 from 1140 a m. to 3:00 Hermasc Fimunias. -
- "M f P "
NSIR* Ports Clearance Offroer.
e inee a d p p Doc. esme md Fao.en; etes am) . %e Subcommittee wiU than haar I
The remaining seasfons of this presentcUons by and hold discusalons
.auma coes powus meeting on March 12,1966 from 9:30 a.m. - with representatives of the NRC Staff, to 6 00 p.m., March 13.1986 frorn 9 30 lia consu'tants, and other interested a m. to 5:30 p m. and March 14,1980 NUCLEAR REGULATORY Paraov N2arding this revitw.
from 9 00 a m. to 11:00 a.m. are for the Purth er information regardmg topics l purpose of Panel review, discussion, COMMISSION to be discuseed, whethe the meeting avsluation, and recommendatisn on applications for financial assistance Advloory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Subcommittee on bu h mUed oMedAdD Ch h u'srd e p tsf d under the National Foundation on the Sabcock and Wilcox Water Assetors; opportunity to t oral statementa Arts and Humanities Act of1965, as therefor can be Postponed and the time a amended. including discussion of obtained by a prepaid telephone call to information ghen in confidence to the %e ACRS Subcommittee on Babcock the cognizant ACRS staff member, Mr.
Agency by grant apphcants. In and Wilcox Water Reactors scheduled Herman Aldennan (telephone 202/634-accordance with the determination of for February 25,1986 has been the Chairman pulitished in the Federal postponed until early April.This 1414) between 8:15 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.
Persons planning to attend this meeting Reghter of February 13.1980, these meeting notice was previously published are urged to contact the above nam sessions will be closed tu the public in the Federal Register (51 FR 4833) on Individual one or two days before the pursuant to subsection (c)(4). (6) and February 7,1986. scheduled meeting to be advised of any 9(B] of section 552b of Totle.h United Dated. February is.tesa. g g States Code. Mortoe w.uberkin, have occurred. ' ,
If you need accommodations due to a
. Assistant becutive DirecurforProject Dete& Febmary taA disability, please contact the Office for
' Review. Morton W.IJbarkla.
Specia! Constituencies. Nationel Endcwment for the Atts.1100 [FR Doc. a63453 %d F30-ee. GL45 am] . AssistanthecutiveDirectorforProfect Pennsylvania Avenue,NW., == = caos res ws Review- .
Weehington. 0C 20506. 202/682-5532, [fR Doc. e6-3851 Filed 3-at>m: e 45 am]
TTY 202/682-5496 at least eeven (7) Adyteory Committee On Reactor antasa caos resus-a days prior to the meeting. Safeguards, Subcommittee on Spent Further information with reference to /
this meeting can be obtained from Mr. Fuel Storage Facility Design; Meeting \( Advihory Committee on Reac John II. Clark. Advisory Committee The ACRS Subcommittee on Spent Safeguarda, Subcommittee on Management Officer National Fuel Storage Facility Design will hold a Standard Plant Design; Meeting Endowment for the Arts. Washington. innting on March 12,1986 Room 1MB, %e ACRS Subcommittee on Standard ,
DC 205M. or ca11202/68m33. 1717 H Street, NW., Weshington. DC.
De entire meeting will be open to Plant Design will hold a meeting on Yvonne M. Sabine, March 12.1986, Room 1046.1n7 H A cting Director. Officr of CouncilandPonel public attendance. Street, NW.. Wasbington.DC.
Operations. NationalEndowrrentfor the Arts. %e agenda for the subject meeting The entire meeting will be open to j shall be as follows: Wednesday, March
[FR Doc. 803791 Fded 2- 0-86. 8 45 am] public attendance. -
- C00* M** 12,1986-2:30 P.bf. until the conclusion
%e agenda for subjectImeeting shall
= ofbusiness. be as follows:
The Subcommittee will revie c a NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION proposed revision to 10 CFR Part 72* Wednesday, March 22. fass-430 ap.
" Inde nden St r g f pen uclear amtQe concMon ofksh ,
Fuel and High Level Radioactive ne Subcommittee wSIcontinae in accordance with the Paperwork discussion of standard plant _s- .
Reduction Act and OMB Guidelines.the Wa ste." Particularly FAA certification.CE Oral statements may be presented by National Science Foundation is posting power worthiness, industry percaptions.
this notice of information co!!ection that members of the pubtle with the DOE views,and an update on a polic/
l will affect the pub!ic. concurrence of the Subcommittee afstement.
l Asency Clearance Officer: Herman G. Chairman: written statements will be Oral statementa may be ye,sented by .
I , accepted and made available to the 1 Fleming. (202) 357-9421 Committee. Recordings will be permitted members of the public evith the ObfB Desk Officer: Carlos Tellez. (202) only during those portions of the concurrence of the Scbcornmittee 395-7340 meeting when a transcript is being kept. Chairman: written statements will be
Title:
Personal Deta Questionnaire accepted and made available to the and question s may be asked only by Committee. Recordings will be permitty fectedPublic: Individuals members of the Subcommittee,its
.A A[umberofResponses 3,000 responses; only during those portions of the consultants, and Staff. Persons desiring total of 150 burden hours. meeting when a transcript la being kept; to make oral statements should notify Abstract: Data are required to ensure compliance with laws cited in Part I and the ACRS staff member far in advance as is practicable so that members named below as and gu of the Subcommittee.its regulations cited in Part 111. Data will be consultants, and Staff. Persona desiring used to analyze Foundation recruitment appropriate arrangementa can be made.
/
e
c n - .~
.s .
l 8336_
Feder:1 R: gist:r / Vot. 5f, N '15 ] Frify., Fabruny 2h 1966 / N:t!ces.
,, to male oral statementa should notify and the time s!Wtted thereforeeen be ht- Gustave A.IAnenberger,Jr Atomic
. the ACRS staff member rnamed below as chtaired by s prepaid tettphene cell to Eafety and Ucensing Board Panel. .
far in advance as is practicable so that the cogr, tract ACRSitaff tnember,Mr. UA Nuclear Regulatory f%==tantoia. -
appropriate artangemente can be made. Faul Doehret.(relephgre 202/04-3257) Washington,DC 20555
- During the initial portion of the between a.1,3 A.M. and $20P.M. Persens meeting. the Subtommittee, along wHh lasued at BeseedaDryland,h 13W planning to attend this meetMg ste of February 1ses. -
eny ofits consultants who may be uryc4 to can' tact'the above nataed ,
present, may exchange preliminary indwidualone or two days before the 8#8"I O' I'*
[
views regerding matters ta be schedukd meet'ng to be ad<fsed of any Che and{ censmsMW Administrative /* AJamiciofety considered during the balance 9f ther changes in schedule, etc., t=hich may rneehng.
- have occicted. - Mt Doc am Mled 6 &48 am]
The SubcocNttee will thedesr Dated; Februe y id. last * * * * " * * *
- presentations by and hold discussions y,,;,, g, gg,,y,, .
with representsfives of the NPC Raff, g its cofis'ultants, a nd other interesttd j,,j .m pgACECQRpg -
gjy, Fur her nfo t on reg rd a topiCp @ # # "d Agency nformatien CON 9C#dri to be discussed. whether the meefira '*******"* Activities Under 042 Review has been cancelled or rescheduied.ihe Chairman's ruling on requests for'Abe Ithoctet ite. 50-352-004 ASLSP No. SS- AG M J eace @ o opportunity to present oral statements E22-42-tAl ACTM"r Notification cf extensfon and the time allottedherefor can be request of Peace Corps Candidate obteined by a preps!d telephene call to Phfadelphla Electdc Co.; Seleetion Invtntory.
the cognizant ACRE staff member. Mr. EntsatWishmentuf Atc.micSafstyand Herrnan Alderman Oce noing Board suestsah: The kformaflo.it collectlen 1414) betweena.m. 816and (te;ephone 5.00 p.m. 202/634- -
invento:7describedbelow has beM Persons planning to attend this meeting Pm Comsnm,uant to delegation by,the submhted to the Office of Management n dated Decembu 28,1972. and. Budget (Oh2) fot review, ac are u ed to contxt the above named pubbsbid in the. Federal Register. 371'R Indiv val one or two date before the required by the Paperwork Reduction scheduled meeting to be advised of any 2M M,3nd H 2405,2M 2.702 Act. Current autherizatf6n.forsu pf thi changes in scheduIe. etc, w hich ma'y 2 71W11a;2 717 and 2.721 of the sub!ect inventory expires Mart.h 31 Cortmission Regdations, all ae hve d . sinended an Atomic Safety and 1966. In accordance with OME Instructions, Pesce Corps wishes 1e Dit'edfebrua y 1s.lesa Ucensing Board :in being established la Mortes W. Aaarum, cominue research Ento the effectivan'esa th folloMng proceeding to rule on pf the subject hv2r tofy as a selection ,
Assistant L ect,tive Drectorfor Av/res , petitions fct leave to intervene and/or tool.H!s request then is for a k "r " eequeste for hearing and to preside over
, continustfotiof de prniougly approved illt Doc. 464ss2 FJed :-20.aa 4 45 arnj the prcreeding in the event that <a aiudy which was ultimately not some come remmew heermg is ordered. Implemented in FY '85 Pease Ccrps will Phitadelphia Electric Compar:y, Umert:k net ute the sdbject inventcyas a Generating Station, Unit No 1. . x!cction tool unless t'esults frem the Co es en e A(([ Facility Operating Ucense No. NPF-33 .preposed fcllow up study Warran.t such T s Boardis being established .
s step.
Emergency Core Cooiing Systems; ,
Revlaed Notice e.1 tiletting pursuad Io a notice published by the Assuss:Intersted persons aprinvited Commission on December 26,1965 in the to submit comments regerdify this An additional topic has beep Federal Register (50 fR 52874) entit!cd. preposal by name to Francine Pitoult, scheduled for the February 26,1966
- Consideration 6fissuance of Oss Desk Offi,cer,05ce of ACRS Sabcommitter o' n Emegency Amendment to Facuity Opstrathg Maregement and bdget.Offi.ce of Core Cooling Systems. f.30 A ht,Roorn Ucense and Proposed No Significant Informatlonend Regulatefy A17e';s.
1046.171711 Street. NW. Washington. Hazards Consideration Determinat.!o i Room 3235 WaAInsterk DC 20503.
DC. His meeting notice was previously and Opportunity for Heefing." ne published in the Federal Register 151 TTs amendment w ould revise ?. hie Technhal
'0" "" "" AN#"I"*"
50c7) en Februa to,1986. ne other Specifications to allow a one.ti:nekrtly Mad HaagJWeaMsn,Qaa items regarding h'.is meetlag remata theextensicn of time to satisfy a limited Corps, MMmeucut Annm.
aame as previously published. nuclAr of testir.g requirementa for th.e , om a .
ph ) ,
Topics for discussbn: excess flow check valvve in certais (1) Review Duke Power Company's tall. fee number' For a copy of the scale instrumentatiot lines which must be contacGr. Haag.
. request to delete use of the ECCS UH1 perfarned every 16 months mad wuch system. require .a plaat shutdown. sueeuwew7aar esPosessenoee Pesos 3 (2) The AEOD Reprt en inadvertent ne Boardis comprised of the Corps proposes to incorporate a agtf- -
j everpressurizationof thelow-prmure fo'bw!ng Adelnistrative Judgsg administered paper-and. pencil . 3 portion of the ECCS sys* ems for BWRs. Ivan W. Srnith, Chairman.. Atomic Safety taventory to help ataffimprove the and the NRR Action Plan that " and IJce 7sf Board Pench U.S. selectice of Pesce Cmps Volackm, encompasses this usue. Nuclear Regu.atory Commlesion, Current resea th wnb the inventory, the Further tnformation reparding toples Washingico.DC 20555 Overseas Aesessmentlntentory(OAI).
to be diseuned, whether de meeting pr. Richard P. Cole, Atomic Safety and f.riginaUy developed and validated to has been concelled or tescF c uted. the Ucensing Board Fansl. U,S. Nudeart ecreen naval ar.d private sector Chainoan's fuling on 'rmesifor the Kegulat ory Catnmissbn. Wadihgton. personnel for oserreat assignments. and opportunity to pre + J or.sl statements DC 33555 ,
rectatly tested on a esmpfs of Peace 1
l l
. . . _ _ e _ _. _ _ __ _ _
~ -
j f-/c-ck s b REVISION 1 - 03/10/85
- TENTATIVE SCHEDULE ACRS STANDARD PLANT DESIGN SUBC0lHITTEE MARCH 12, 1986, ROOM 1122 1717 H ST. NW., WASHINGTON, D. C.
8:30 a.m.
8:30 a.m. Introductory Remarks - Subcomittee Chairman 8:40 a.m. Power Worthiness Certificate General Electric Company - R. Villa 9:10 a.m. Electric Power Research Institute Views on Standardization - J. Devine 9:40 a.m. Aircraft Certification Process, Federal Aviation Authority - N. Dobi 10:05 a.m. BREAK 10:20 a.m. Department of Energy Views on, Standardization
- Dr. D. %nch M p)for y e dist) 10:50 a.m. Atomic Industrial Forum Views on Standardization
- R. Priory (Duke Power) 11:20 Staff Update on the Standardization Policy Statement 11:5.0 a.m. Subcomittee Discussion 12:30 p.m. ADJOURN
/
((, em ACR5' SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON STANDA% PIAst' DESIGN Room 1122, 1717 H St. hW. , Washington, D.C.
L0 CAT,10l:
.
- DAT E .
Fbrch 12,1986 8:30 a.m. gibfs gc-ATTENDANCE LIST PLEASE PRINT:
NAME BADGE N0. AFFILIATION .
F-ov s 9 inc.
L w.n e. n .i. c S. L a f Sr L A HiM f-C 9 9 Y NPRI IU4 n n K 4 Wnc t,Jncit r& 6- 0H 7
~
%Y *
.a - c22i4 -cP2 (
M L13/ toc AEReu Llcen-s,m 6eAtb!
Cadoac 9,Lel-n M-cvno he?6 NWittiti. E- 0.2d' VA 0x?t
$ Y'/k .ECV71 $nesvu.{ S/cc-k.'c 6,.
E Gif o di,we Efeckw' ('n-J QuorK 2 (>96G //ce fe,(m/
C'/nL S
/d k /27 YC'oS7 k/F M to (c o % 1 Alf/oweRam W ErrIAx;nou1G ERI?.Y S u u a E-0T&2 E- c)% C N sN % E w hes< M
&e=nw h.b:O 1 0 v l
b-0 GE b b Cah3 d M &rJ Kh>6, - kow, ,
Aff
- M m
c- .
- ATTAONENT D ACRS SUBGM!ITTEE MEETING ON STANDARD PIANT DESIGN, MAROI 12, 1986 IRNDOUTS
- 1. General Electric Company Standardization Program
- 2. Presentation by EPRI
- 3. Presentation by FAA
- 4. Statement of Richard B. Priory
- 5. Remarks by Mr. Norin, DOE
- 6. Viewgraphs of AIF 1
i I
_ _