ML20206S438
| ML20206S438 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/25/1999 |
| From: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| References | |
| ACRS-3137, NUDOCS 9905210136 | |
| Download: ML20206S438 (34) | |
Text
-
RIliED Dste lasurd:
1/25/99 Date Signed: 2/2/99 Q&tG - 8 I3 f TABLE OF CONTENTS
{g MINUTES OF THE 458TH ACRS MEETING December 3-5,1998 Paae 1.
Chairman's Recort (Open)..................................
1 ll.
NEl Whole Plant Study and Ootions to Make 10 CFR PartJO Risk-Informed
( O p e n)..................................................
2 111.
Proposed Ootions to Make 10 CFR 50.59 Risk-informed (Open).....
3 IV.
Intearated Review of Assessment Processes and imorovements to the Senior Manaaement Meetina Process (Open)...................
5 V.
Election of Officers for Calendar Year 1999 (Open)...............
8 VI.
Potential items for Meetina with the NRC Commissioners (Open)....
8 Vll.
Reoort on Plant License Renewal Subcommittee Meetina (Open).....
8 Vill.
ACRS Report to the Commission on the NRC Safety Research Proaram (O p e n )................................................... 1 0 IX.
Executive Session (Open).....................
10 Reports, Letters or Memoranda LETTERS Options for incomoratina Risk insiahts into the 10 CFR 50.59 Process (Letter to William D. Travers, Executive Director for Operations, NRC, from R. L. Seale, Chairman, ACRS, dated December 11,1998)
Prooosed Commission Paper Concernina Ootions for Risk-Informed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 50 " Domestic Licensina of Production and Utilization Facilities"(Letter to William D. Travers, Executive Director for Operations, NRC, from R. L. Seale, Chairman, ACRS, dated December 14,1998) r\\
$2 C t"; '
i 9905210136 990125
~
~
[i trv,.m,
- s y ;,,;, f
._m cu uiltd By __
I
<e Procosed imorovements to the NRC Insoection and Assessment Proarams - Interim Report (Letter to William D. Travers, Executive 3
Director for Operatior,s, NRC, from R. L. Seale, Chairman, ACRS, dated December 16,1998)
MEMORANDUM Rulemakino Plan - Protection Aasinst Discrete Radioactive Particle (DRP) Exposures (10 CFR Part 20) (Memorandum to William D.
1 Travers, Executive Director for Operations, NRC, from John T.
Larkins, Executive Director, ACRS, dated December 14,1998)
A.
Reconciliation of ACRS Comments and Recommendations B.
Report on the Meeting of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee -
Held on December 2,1998 (Open)
C.
Future Meeting Agenda l
ii
APPENDICES
' l.
Federal Register Notice 11.
Meeting Schedule and Outline Ill.
Attendees IV.
Future Agenda and Subcommittee Activities V.
List of Documents Provided to the Committee l
l l
iii
)
IRTIFlHI MINUTES OF THE 458TH MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS DECEMBER 3-5,1998 ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND The 458th meeting of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards was held in Conference Room 2B3, Two White Flint North Building, Rockville, Maryland, on December 3-5,1998. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss and take appropriate action on the items listed in the attached agenda. The meeting was open to public attendance. There were no written statements nor requests for time to make oral statements from members of the public regarding the meeting.
A transcript of selected portions of the meeting wahept and is available in the NRC Public Document Room at the Gelman Building, 2120 L(WyekStreet, N.W., Washington, D.C.
[ Copies of the transcript are available for purchase from Ann Riley & Associates, Ltd.,1250 i Street, N.W., Suite 300, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005.]
ATTENDEES ACRS Members: Dr. Robert L. Seale (Chairman), Dr. Dana A. Powers (Vice-Chairman),
Dr. George Apostolakis, Mr. John Barton, Dr. Mario H. Fontana, Dr. Thomas S. Kress, Dr.
Don W. Miller, Dr. William J. Shack, Dr. Robert E. Uhrig, and Dr. Graham Wallis. [For a list of other attendees, see Appendix 111.]
1.
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT (Open)
[ Note: Dr. John T. Larkins was the Designated Federal Official for this portion of the meeting.]
Dr. Robert L. Seale, Committee Chairman, convened the meeting at 8:30 a.m. and reviewed the schedule for the meeting. He announced that there is an important set of meetings between the Commissioners and Members of Congress coming up toward the end of January 1999. Dr. Seale stated that at the end of January the Committee will have an " Extended Planning and Procedures Subcommittee" meeting involving all Committee Members. There are several issues that will be included in that meeting that the Commissioners requested input from the Committee. A report communicating these issues will be forwarded to the Commission instead of a letter. Other items of interest mentioned were several different speeches by the Commissioners and changes in the NRC staff personnel including the retirement of Hugh L. Thompson, Jr. In February, the full Committee will meet with the Commissioners.
1 I
I r..
458th ACRS Meeting December 3-5,1998 II.
NEl Whole Plant Study and Ootions to Make 10 CFR Part 50 Risk-informed (Open)
[ Note: Mr. Noel F. Dudley was the Designated Federal Official for this portion of the meeting.]
Introduction Dr. Thomas S. Kress, Chairman of the Regulatory Policies and Practices Subcommittee, introduced the presentation by noting that the NRC staff met with joint ACRS Subcommittees on November 19,1998. During the meeting, the staff presented NRC staff and industry positions regarding the overall objectives and options for making 10 CFR Part 50 risk informed. Dr. Kress stated that the Committee was in the early stages of evaluating this matter.
Staff Presentation Messrs. Mark Cunningham, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES), and Richard Barrett, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), introduced the staff presentation concoming a proposed Commission paper regarding options for making 10 CFR Part 50 risk-informed. They presented the staffs objectives and desired outcomes of modifying Part 50, the elements of the modification, and the criteria for assessing options. Mr. Barrett presented three policy and seven implementation issues associated with modifying Part 50. They summarized the benefits and impacts of the proposed options, described the associated resource issues, and explained the role of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEl) Whole Plant Study.
The staffs preliminary recommendations included implementing a phased approach for modifying Part 50, issuing exemptions to pilot plants, and developing a detailed rulemaking plan. Mr. Barrett concluded by presenting the schedule for issuing the draft Commission paper.
The ACRS Members and the staff discussed the following issues possible use of core damage frequency (CDF) and large, early release frequency (LERF) in making Part 50 risk informed; 2
(.
-~
~-
p c.-
l-l 458th ACRS Meeting i December 3-5,1998 L
safety considerations not related to risk such as fission product releases, L
operational safety, and defense-in-depth; 1
I reasons and objectives for modifying Part 50; l
relationships between Part 50 and other regulations; whether the revised rule should be voluntary versus mandatory; and need for defining safety, adequate protection, and defense-in-depth.
l Conclusion The Committee issued a letter to the Executive Director for Operations, dated December 14,1998, on this matter.
Ill.
Proposed Ootions to Make 10 CFR 50.59 Risk-Informed (Open)
(Note: Mr. Michael T. Markley was the Designated Federal Official for this portion l
of the meeting.)
.Dr. George Apostolakis, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (RPRA) introduced the topic to the Committee. He stated that the purpose of this meeting was to discuss the staff's development of options to make 10 CFR 50.59 (Changes, Tests and Experiments) risk-informed.
He noted that the Subcommittees on RPRA, Plant Operations and Regulatory Policies and Practices had met on November 19,1998, to discuss these matters.
Dr. Apostolakis also noted that several ACRS Members had prepared comments and questions for the staff to consider in preparing for this briefing.
'NRC Staff Presentation I
i l
Ms. Mary Drouin and Mr. Jack Guttmann, RES, led the presentation for the NRC l
staff. Ms. Eileen McKenna, NRR, provided supporting discussion. Mr. Mark Cunningham, RES, also participated. The staff discussed a draft paper from RES to NRR that provides a summary of options for making 10 CFR 50.59 risk-informed, l
examples of changes which consider the use of risk criteria, and a test case 3
458th ACRS Meeting December 3-5,1998 i
regarding the reclassification of the South Texas Project essential cooling water screen wash booster pump. The staff made the following significant points during their presentation:
The draft paper is a work-in-progress and requires significant revision. The staff requested to meet with the Subcommittees in January 1999 and requested a Committee report during the February 1999 ACRS meeting.
Key areas for possible change include: the scope (related to the FSAR and technical specifications) and parameters (related to determination of unreviewed safety questions). Options for modification include: no change, scope change only, parameter change only, and scope and parameter i
changes.
Dr. Wallis questioned the basis for the options considered by the staff and suggested that the objectives be stated earlier in the report. Dr. Miller agreed and stated that there did not appear to be a clear set of objectives. Dr. Apostolakis j
suggested that the staff consider a bolder approach in evaluating the options and I
in considering the issue of combined changes. The staff agreed to consider these comments in revising the draft paper.
Dr. Wallis suggested that the staff better define terms such as safety status, adequate protection, defense-in-depth, safety margins, and operational safety so that they can be used in a more formal way to discuss and evaluate the options.
The staff stated that these terms have different levels of use and meaning, and acknowledged that better definition would be beneficial.
Dr. Apostolakis questioned the extent that the staff had evaluated the use of frequency-consequence curves. The staff stated that they did not have sufficient time to evaluate this previous ACRS suggestion.
Dr. Wallis suggested that the staff consider more than one test case in evaluating the options. The staff acknowledged that this would be beneficial but noted that good test case examples were very difficult to find.
4
p l~:.
)
- 458th ACRS Meeting-
- December 3-5,1998 -
Conclusion The Committee issued a letter to the NRC Executive Director for Operations dated December 11,1998, on this matter.
IV.
Intearated Review of Assessment Processes and imorovements to the Senior Manaaement Meetina Process (Open)
[ Note: Mr. Paul Boehnert was the Designated Federal Official for this portion of the meeting.)
Introduction Mr. John Barton, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Plant Operations, introduced this topic to the Committee. ' He noted that the purpose of this meeting discussion was to review the proposed changes to the NRC inspection and assessment
_ program, including the IRAP, the SMM process, development of a risk-informed baseline inspection program, and performance indicators (Pis). A joint meeting of
' the Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment,' Plant Operations, and Regulatory Policies and Practices Subcommittee was held on November 20,1998 to review these matters.
i Mr. Barton noted that the Commission has requested formal comment from the ACRS on the status of its review during this meeting. As such, an Interim Report, based _on the results of these discussions, will be drafted for Committee consideration. Mr. Barton said that the Committee plans to continue its review of this matter during its February meeting, with the expectation that a final report can be prepared at that time.
NRC Staff Presentations Mr. Michael Johnson, NRR, noted that the staff had established three Task Groups to develop the new NRC Performance Assessment Program. These are the Framework, Risk-Informed Baseline Inspection, and Assessment Task Groups.
Each group's charter was also noted.
The status of the Framework Task Group efforts was discussed by Mr. Patrick l
Baranowsky (AEOD).
The scope of the framework approach includes the l
f L
~~i mm nem
458th ACRS Meeting December 3-5,1998 framework bases and logic (i.e., development of the seven cornerstones of safety),
the identification and evaluation of performance indicators (Pis), identification of supplemental inspection areas, and, the evaluation of performance thresholds.
Specific topics discussed included: the relationship of the Pls and risk-informed inspection, development of specific Pls and their evaluation, supplemental inspection areas, so-called Cross-Cutting Issues for consideration in evaluation of performance, licensee performance levels (green, white, yellow, and red) and the risk-informed evaluation of same, and bench marking of the Pis.
In response to a question by Dr. Powers, the staff noted that the Pls for shutdown operations are still under development. Dr. Apostolakis requested a copy of the staff's analysis used to develop the numerical values of the Pls that delineate the performance level thresholds (e.g., the green-to-white threshold).
Dr. John Flack (RES) briefly outlined the RES research activities associated with development of risk-informed, performance-based inspections. The key issues involved, approaches (generic and plant-specific) taken, and recommendations on development of this inspection process were noted.
An outline of the risk-informed baseline inspection program was discussed by Mr.
Bruce Mallet, NRC Region 11 Office. The key concepts of the proposed program include the following:
e Inspectable areas are defined based on linkage to Safety Comerstone attributes; e
Basis documents for inspectable areas includes risk-based rationale; e
Program includes: inspection of areas defined that are not bounded by Pls, verification of the Pls, and review of licensee effectiveness of problem identification and resolution; e
Planning process for inspections based on a 12-month assessment period; e
Feedback mechanism included to adjust level of inspection effort.
Dr. Powers suggested that NRC evaluate licensee problem identification and resolution as a trending indicator. Dr. Seale noted that use of a feedback 6
1 458th ACRS Meeting December 3-5,1998 mechanism is important. In response to a question from Dr. Seale, NRR stated that they had discussed inspection experience obtained in other industries for relevant lessons-learned.
' Mr. Johnson presented a brief overview of the assessment process development.
He discussed the review mechanism for assessment of the safety cornerstones as well as the proposed action matrix that is to govem the response and communication activities of the NRC, given both acceptable and degrading licensee performance levels. Mr. Johnson noted, in response to Dr. Wallis, that the NRC is attempting to enhance communication with the public relative to its understanding oflicensee performance, and that the staff will brief representatives at the state level on the assessment process. Mr. Johnson also briefly addressed the details of the transition plan for implementation of the new assessment process.
Dr. Apostolakis expressed concem that the Commission had terminated human factors research, in light of the need for evaluation of a licensee's safety-conscious work environment. Mr. Barton suggested that the staff evaluate the licensee's root-cause analysis program to address this concern. Mr. Mallet indicated that the staff will give consideration to this issue.
NEl Presentation Mr. Steven Floyd, NEl, provided comment on the NRC revised plant assessment process. Key points included:
NRC is to be commended for the quality, quantity and professionalism of its e
. work on this matter. NEl and NRC have had an open and frank exchange of views.
The revised assessment process will be a major improvement - it is risk-e informed and more objective than the present assessment program.
There is no need for a " problem identification and resolution" inspection in e
addition to the baseline inspection program. Mr. Mallet, in response, noted that the staff has committed to provide justification for this additional inspection effort.
7
458th ACRS Meeting December 3-5,1998 in its public communication, NRC should define a plant's performance as e
either " acceptable" or " unacceptable", and qualifv the performance in the report details, Both NRC and the industry must ensure that the change associated with this e
new program be well managed and that all st,Keholders are educated.
Conclusiort The Committee issued a letter to the Executive Director for Operations, dated December 16,1998, on this matter.
V.
Election of Officers for Calendar Year 1999 (Open)
[ Note: Mr. Sam Duraiswamy was the Designated Federal Official for this portion of the meeting.]
The Committee elected Dr. Dana A. Powers as Chairman; Dr. George Apostolakis as Vice-Chairman; and Dr. Thomas S. Kress as Member-At-Large for the calendar year 1999.
VI.
Potential hems for Meetina with the NRC Commissioners (Open)
[ Note: Mr. Sam Duraiswamy was the Designated Federal Official for this portion of the meeting.]
The Committee held discussionk on potential items for the February 3,1999, scheduled meeting with the NRC Commission. Topics include proposed revisions to 10 CFR 50.59 (Changes, tests and experiments), options to make 10 CFR Pa:t 50 risk informed, status of ACRS activities associated with license renewal, proposed rulemak'ing on the use of revised source term, use of PRA insights in the regulatory process, elevation of core damage frequency (CDF) to a fundamental safety goal and possible revision of the Commission's Safety Goal Policy Statement, and the NRL Safety Research Program.
}
V!I.
Re. cort on Plant License Renewal Subcommittee Meetina (Open)
[ Note: Dr. Medhat El-Zeftawy was the Designated Federal Official for this portion of the meeting.]
8
458th ACRS Meeting December 3-5,1998 Dr. Kress, Acting Subcommittee Chairman, Plant License Renewal Subcommittee, briefed the Committee regarding the November 18,1998, Plant License Renewal Subcommittee meeting. The focus of the meeting was in three areas: the status of two app'ication reviews (Calvert Cliffs and Oconee); the on-going and planned reviews of license renewal technical reports; and the resolution process for some identified generic license renewal issues.
The NRC staff will issue a draft safety evaluation report (that includes open itema) for each applicant and a subsequent supplemental safety evaluation report to close all open items. The ACRS is scheduled to start its deliberation on final reports in February 2000, and May 2000, for Calvert Cliffs and Oconee plants, respectively.
The processing of license renewal applications is being aided by the B&W Owners Group (BWOG) and the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) development of a series of;echnical reports on the management of aging effects. These are separate reporta for the various "in-scope" structures and components subject to an aging management review. As noted in the rule, these are specifically those structures and components that perform an intended function with moving parts or without a change in configuration or properties (i.e., passive) and those that are not subject to replacement based on a qualified life or specified time period such as reactor vessel, pressurizer, containment, steam generators, and reactor coolant system piping.
The staff has identified 98 license renawal issues that are generic in nature. The staff has used judgment to prioritize these into four categories of descending priority:
1.
Resolution required to support the staff's review of an application.
2.
Important to the development of the review and application process.
3.
Non-generic and generic issues important but not important enough to include in (2) above.
4.
Those issues recommended by NEl to be low priority.
The result of the prioritization is that there are 18 issues in category 1; 24 issues in category 2; 48 issues in category 3; and 8 issues in category 4 The staff is focusing on the Category 1 issues in the current review schedule.
9
.458th ACRS Meeting December 3-5,1998 The license renewal activities are conducted in a traditional manner in which the original licensing basis is to be preserved along with its defense-in-depth provisions.
The only risk-informed considerations are those that already exist in the current regulatory structure.
The Committee discussed future plans that include several subcommittee meetings and will develop a review strategy at its retreat meeting in January 1999.
Vill.
ACRS Report to the Commission on the NRC Safety Research Prooram (Open)
(Note: Dr. Medhat El-Zeftawy was the Designated Federal Official for this portion of the meeting.]
Dr. Uhrig, Chairman of the Safety Research Program Subcommittee, discussed the need for the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) to better focus and prioritize its efforts on " mission needs of the Agency." Likewise, Dr. Uhrig stated that the ACRS should focus its review on research that it believes to be paramount and that will continue to serve the Agency's needs. Some candidate areas of focus include; Risk-informed, performance-based regulation, High-bumup fuel performance and core-power uprates, Thermal-hydraulics code integration, Advanced instrumentation and controls, Plant life extensions and decommissioning.
Follow-up efforts include discussion at the ACRS retreat in January 1999 and full Committee discussion during the February through April 1999 meetings, with a final repart to be issued to the Commission in May 1999.
IX.
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Open)
[ Note: Dr. John T. Larkins was the Designated Federal Official for this portion of the meeting.]
A. -
Reconciliation of ACRS Comments and Recommendations 10
e
. 458th ACRS Meeting.
L*
December 3-5,1998
[ Note: Mr. Sam Duraiswamy was the Designated Federal Official for this l
portion of the meeting.]
l The Committee discussed the response from the NRC Executive Director for Operations (EDO) to ACRS comments and recommendations included in recent ACRS reports:.
e The Committee discussed the response from the NRC Executive Director for Operations (EDO) dated November 19,1998, to the l
ACRS comments and recommendations included in the ACRS letter l
dated October 14,1998, concoming the risk-informed pilot application for hydrogen monitoring at Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2.
i l'
The Committee decided that it was satisfied with the EDO's response.
Wdh regard to the recommendation that the staff explore the impact of recombiners on accidents that, wh?le resulting in release of radionuclides to containment, do not progress to severe-accident status, the Committee decided to pursue this issue in the context of i
its review of the proposed elimination of hydrogen recombiners at San Onofre Units 2 and 3.
e The Committee discussed Chairman Jackson's response dated November 10,1998, to the ACRS comments and recommendations included in the ACRS report dated September 30,1998, conceming the impact of PRA results and insights on the regulatory system.
The Committee decided to continue its review of this matter during j
future meetings.
l-e The Committee discussed the response from the EDO dated November 13.1998, to the ACRS comments and recommendations included in the ACRS letter dated October 20,1998, conceming NEl Petition for Rulemaking to Amend 10 CFR 50.54(a), Conditions of Licenses.
The Committee decided that it was satisfied with the EDO's response.
11
i 458th AORS Meeting December 3-5,1998 e
The Committee discussed the response from the EDO dated November 27,1998, to the ACRS comments and recommendations included in the ACRS letter dated October 16,1998, concerning Proposed Priority Rankings of GSis, Tenth Group.
The Committee decided to continue its discussion of several issues (e.g., resolution of the Multiple System Responset Program issues and reevaluation of the GSI process) at future meetings.
B.
Report on the Meeting of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee The Committee heard a report from Dr. Seale and the Executive Director, ACRS, on the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee meeting held on December 2,1998. The following items were discussed:
All Members shouid have received the new Citibank Visa Card for Govemment Travel and should have destroyed their American Express cards.
e The Committee approved the final agenda for its January 27-29, 1999, Planning and Procedures Subcommittee meeting.
e The Charter of the Quadripartite Working Group on Reactor Fuels was completed and has been forwarded to the Advisory Committees of the other three countries. ACRS is stillwaiting forthe names of the foreign delegates to be submitted for membership to this Working Group from France and Germany. The Japanese have provided the name of an individual to serve on the Working Group, along with their views on the objectives for the Working Groups. The Subcommittee recommended that Dr. Apostolakis give a status report on the Working Groups on PRA and Human Factors.
A letterwas prepared and forwarded to Mr. Bob Christie, Performance e
Technology, Inc., and to the EDO in response to Mr. Christie's letter of October 9,1998 Members were requested to review the ACRS 1999-2000 Operating e
Plan and to make comments by January 16,1999.
12
s 458th ACRS Meeting December 3-5,1998 The American Jewish Congress addressed a letter to Dr. Seale e
concerning the elimination of the Operational Safeguards Response Evaluations (OSREs). The Subcommittee recommended that a letter be drafted to the American Jewish Congress acknowledging receipt of its letter and stating that the Committee will work with the Commission as needed to resolve the issues.
o On December 1,1998, Dr. Larkins, ACRS/ACNW Executive Director met with NRC Chairman Shirley A. Jackson to discuss recent past and future activiSes of the ACRS and the ACNW. Matters related to the ACRS include: ACRS participation in the Quadripartite Meeting; ACRS reviews related to the Chairman's Tasking Memo; ACRS Reports on Research, past and future; Resolution of Generic Safety Issues; and the ACRS/ Commission Meeting in February 1999. In reference to the Quadripartite meeting, she asked a question related to the trip report on how other countries were addressing certain technicalissues, aside from the use of risk-informed decision making.
During tlee discussion of the other topics, Chairman Jackson raised questions on the timeliness of ACRS comments on her tasking j
memorandum; assessment of the staffs progress on 50.59 revisions j
and making 10 CFR Part 50 more risk-informed. She also briefly i
discussed progress on developing a definition of safety. She stated I
that it would be useful for the Commission to have Committee insights on the proposed changes to the assessment process and inspec';)n program, prior to the Congressional hearing in January. She noted that this would be useful, both as a reassurance for the Commission and for Congress, to know the ACRS was a viable part of the regulatory process.
o On November 10,1998, the President signed the Federal Reports Elimination Act of 1998, which arnends the Atomic Energy Act by eliminating the requirement that the ACRS submit an annual report to Congress on the Reactor Safety Research Program.
The Committee approved Dr. Apostolakis' request to attend the 10*
Conference on " Risks and Safety of Technical Systems in View of 13
~
I l
458th ACRS Meeting December 3-5,1998 Profound Changes"in Engleberg, Switzerland, on March 22-27,1999.
The Committee approved Dr. Seale's request to attend the 6*
e International Conference on " Nuclear Criticality Safety" in Versailles, France, on September 18-26,1999.
1 l
l 14
p:
l.r 458th ACRS Meetity j-December 3-5,1998 C.
Future Meetina Aaenda
~ Appendix IV summarizes the proposed items endorsed by the Committee for the 459th ACRS Meeting, February 3 6,1999.
{
The 458th ACRS meeting was adjoumed at 12:30p.m. on December 5,1908.
1 l
i I
L l
l I
15
I Federal Regist:r/Vol. 63, No. 222 /Wedntsday, Nov:mber APPENDIX 1 18,1998 / Notices 64105 Karen K. Christ:nsen, Deputy Chairman Thursdiy. December 3,1998 for Grants and Awards personnel matters relating to the ACRS, Inrence M. Baden. Deputy Chairman 8:30 A.M.-8:45 A.M.: Opening mcluding status of appointment of a for Manegement and Budget Remarks b the ACRS Chairman new member to the ACRS.
Alfred B. Spellman, Jr.. Deputy (Open)-Tbe ACRS Chairman will make (Note: A portion of this session may be ofthe meeting.ning remarks regarding the conduct closed to discuss organizational and Chairmam for Guidelines, Panel, and Council Operations o
Personnel matters that relate solely to the Richard P. Woodruff, Congressional and 8:45 A.M-20:30 A.M.:NEl Whole uternal personnel rules and practices of this White House Liaison Plant Study and Options to Make 10 Advis ry Committee, and information the CFR Pan 50 Risk Informed Open)-The release of which would constitute a clearly g
Committee will hear pnsen(tations by unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.)
Acting DirectorofHuman Resources, NationalEndowmentfor the Arts.
and hold discussions with 9:45 A.M.-20:30 A.M.: Future ACRS (FR Doc. 96-30804 Filed 11-17-98; 8:45 aml representatives of the NRC stafIand the Ames (Opa)-The Comniun wm Nuclear EnerEy Institute (NEI) regarding discuss the recommendations of the an.tsso coon tuss es-as staff options to make 10 CFR Part 50 Planning and Procedures Subcommittee risk informed and NEl Whole Plant regarding items proposed for Study to evaluate options for modifying c nsideration by the full Committee NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 10 5
1 0
- Ruon'ciliation 2 5 A M-22 5 posed Notice of Permits issued Un6er the Options to Make 10 CFR 50.59 Risk.
f, Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 Informed (Open)-The Committee will WThe AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
hear presentations by and hold ComimiU discuss de inPmsn discussions with representatives of the fmm de NRC Encudve Dimeta im ACDON: Notice of permits issued under NRC staff and NEI regarding staff Operations (EDO) to comments and the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Pub. options to make 10 CFR 50.59 (Changes, E m en ns in%d b recent L.95-541.
tests and experiments) risk informed.
ACRS sfons o
mponses am gt g
g ao F)i u
o publish The Committee will fear prese(ntationsManagementMeetin Proce f is o e dar I
po mn th o
notice of permits issu under the
- " " " " " ' "I
- Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
"",'"d em -
arge This is the required notice.
by and hold discussions with FOR FURTHER INFORMAT4ON CONTAt!T:
Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Oke, representatives of the NRC staff and NEI Planning and Procedures Subcommittee.
regarding the integrated Mview of th6 2:15 P.M.-2:30 P.M.:Potentialltems Office of Polar Programs, Rm. E, National Science Foundation,4201 assessment processes, improvements to forMeeting with theNRC the Senior Management Meeting Commissioners (Open)-The Committee Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Process, changes to the inspection will discuss potentialitems for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMADON: On program, and related matters.
discussion during the ACRS meeting September 21,1998, the National 4:30 P.M.-7:00 P.M.:Preparots.on of with the Commissioners on February 3.
Science Foundation published a notice ACRS Reports (Open)-The Committee 1999. (The commission has not in the Federal Register of permit will discuss proposed ACRS npons, sp)oroved topics for this meeting.)
- 30 p.M. 7:00 PRa Preparation of applications received. A permit was including those on the role of issued on November 5,1998 to the frequency-consequence curves in risk-ACRS Repons (Open)-The Committee i
will continue its discussion of proposed following applicant:
informed decisionmaking, NRC Safety ACRS reports.
Erick Wang Penn W a M 12 Research Program, and on lessons Nedene G. Lamed
- learned from the review of the AP600 Saturday, December 5,1998 Permit Officer.
passive plant design.
8:30 A.M.-2:00P.M.: Preparation of IFR Doc. 98-30866 Filed 11-17-98; 8:45 aml Friday, December 4,1998 ACBS Reports (Open)-The Committee 8:30 A.M.-8:35 A.M.: Opening will continue its discussion of proposed munea coon sses-esan Remarks by the ACRS Chairman ACRS reports.
1:00 P.M.-2:30 P.M.: Miscellaneous (Open}-The ACRS Chairman will make (Open)-The Committee will discuss
\\
UCLEAR REGULATORY Opening remarks regarding conduct of matters related to the conduct of COMMISSION the meeting.
Committee activities and matters and 8:35 A.M.-9:00 A.M.:Subcomminee specific issues that were not completed Advisory Committee on Reector Repon (Open)-The Committee will during previous meetings, as time and Safeguards; Meeting Notloe hear a repe' of the Plant License in accordance with the purposes of Renewal Subcommittee regarding availability ofinformation permit.
Procedures for the conduct of and
. Sections 29 and 182b. of the Atomic matters discussed during ttle November panicipation in ACRS meetings were 18,1998 meeting as well as a proposed published in the Federal Register on Erergy Act (42 U.S.C. 2059,2232b), the ACRS repo't on license renewal September 29,1998 (63 FR 51968). In Advisory Committee on Reactor activities.
accordance with these procedures, oral Safeguards will hold a meeting on 9:00 A.M.-9:45 A.M.: Report of the or written views may be presented by December 3-5,1998,in Conference Planning and Procedures Subcommittee 'mcmbers of the public, including Room T-2B3,11545 Rockville Pike, (Open/ Closed}-The Committee will Rockville, Maryland. The date of this hear a report of the Planning and
' representatives of the nudearindustry.
Electronic recordings will be permitted meeting was previously published in Procedures Subcommittee on matters only during the open ponions of the the Federal Register on Thursday, related to the conduct of ACRS meeting and questions may be asked November 20,1997 (62 FR 62079).
business, and organiaational and only by members of the Committee,its
~
,^*
- 64106 Fed:rd Regista/Vcl. 63, No. 222/W2dnesday, N:vember 18,1998 / Notices consultants, and staff. Persons desiring The ACRS meeting dates for Calendar of the meeting that are open to the to make oral statements should notify Year 1999 are provided below:
pdblic, and questions may be asked only Mr. Sam Duralswamy, Chief of the by members of the Subcommittee,its Nuclear Repetors Branch, at least Sve ACRS meeting da'ys before the meeting, if possible, so No, 1999 ACRS meetsng date consultants, and staff. Persons desiring that appro riste arrangements can be to make oral statements should notify made to al ow necessary time during the Jan g i n m m the cognizant ACRS staff person named 459 February 4-6,1999 below five days prior to the meeting,if meeting for such statements. Use of still, 460 March to (1:00 p.m )-13, Possibre, so that appropriate motion picture, and television cameras
- 1999, arrangements can be made.
during this meeting may be limited to 461 Aprs 7 (100 p.m.)-10.1999.
Further information regarding topics selected portions of the meeting as 462 May 5 (1:00 p.m.)-4,1999.
to be discussed, the scheduling of determined by the Chairman.
463
. lune 2-4,1999.
sessions open to the public, whether the Information regarding the time to be set 464 Juty 7-e,1999.
meeting has been canceled or' aside for this purpose may be obtained August mS-mo mwnng.
rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on by contacting the Chief of the Nuclear requests for the opportunity to present 466 Reactors Branch prior to the meeting. In oral statements, and the time allotted
- iggg, view of the possibility that the schedule 4e7,,,,_
November 4-6.1999.
therefor can be obtained by contacting for ACRS meetings may be adjusted by 468 December N,1999.
the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr.
the Chairman as necessary to facilitate.
John T. I arkins (telephone: 301/415-the conduct of the meeting, heck with persons dated: November 13,1998.
7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.
planning to attend should c Andrewt sates, (EST). Persons planning to attend this the Chief of the Nuclear Reactors Branch Advisory Comminee Management Ofpcer.
rneeting are urged to contact the above if such rescheduling would result in (FR Doc. 96-30870 Flied 11-17-98: 8:45 aml named individual one or two working ma}or inconvenience.
days prior to the meeting to be advised in accordance with subsection 10(d) of any changes in schedule, etc., that Pub.1,.92-463,I have determined that may have occurred.
It is necessary to close portions of this NUCLEAR REGULATORY Dated: November 13,1998.
meeting noted above to discuss matters COMMISSION that relate solely to the internal Sam puraiewamy, personnel rules and practices of this Advisory Committee on Reector Chief,NuclearReactors Smnch.
Advisory Committee per 5 U.S.C.
Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on (FR Doc. 98-30871 Filed 11-17-98: 8:45 aml 552b(c)(2), and to discuss information Planning and Procedures the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of The ACRS Subcommittu on Planning personal privacyper 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). and Procedures will hold a meeting on NUCLEAR REGULATOSY Further information regarding topics December 2,1998, Room T-2B1,11545 COMMISSION to be discussed, whether the n seting Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
has been canceled or rescheduled, the The entire meeting will be open to Blweekly Notice; Applications and Chairman s ruling on requests for the public attendance, with the exception og Amendments to Facility Operating opportunity to present oral statements a portion that may be closed pursuant Licenses involving No Significant and the time allotted therefor, can be to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (2) and (6) to discusa Hazards Considerations obtained by contacting Mr. Sam organizational and personnel matters I' I'#
"d Duraiswamy, Chief of the Nuclear that relate solely to internal personnel Reactors Branch (telephone 301/415-rules and practices of ACRS, and Pursuant to Pub. I 97-415, the U.S.
information the release of which would Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the 7364), between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.
EST.
constitute a clearly unwarranted Commission or NRC staff) is publishing ACRS meeting agenda, meeting invasion of personal privacy.
this regular biweekly notice. Pub. L. 97.-
The agenda for the subject meeting 415 revised section 189 of the Atomic transcripts, and lettcr reports are shallbe as follows:
Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the available for downloading or viewing on Act), to require the Commission to the internet at http://www.ntc. gov /
Wednesday, December 2,1996--2.100 publish notice of any amendments ACRSACNW.
P.m.
Issued, or proposed to be issued, under Video teleconferencing service is The Subcommittee will discuss a new provision of section 189 of the available for observing open sessions of proposed ACRS activities and related Act. This provision grants the ACRS meetings. Those wishing to use matters. It rnay also discuss the status of Commission the authority to issue and this service for observing ACRS appointment of a new member to the make imcnediately effective any meetings should contact Mr. Theron ACRS. The purpose of this meeting is to amendmet to an operating licensa Brown, ACRS Audio Visual Technician, gather information, analyze relevant upon a dete.,nination by the (301-.415-8066) between 7:30 a.m. and issues and facts. and to formulate Commission ti.st such amendment 3:45 p.m. EST at least to days before the proposed positions and actions, as involves no signtf; cant hazards meeting to ensure the availability of this appropriate, for deliberation by the full consideration, notwithstanding the service. Individuals or organizations Committee.
pendency before the Commission of a requesting this service will be Oral statements may be presented by request for a hearing from any person.
responsible for telephone line charBes members of the public with the This biweekly notice include:.-11 and for providing the equipment concurrence of the Subcommittee notices of arr.endments issued, or facilities that they use to establish the Chairman: written statements will be proposed to be issued from October 24, video teleconferencing link.The accepted and made available to the 1998, through November 5,1998. The availability of video teleconferencing Committee. Electronic recordings will last biweekly notico was published on services is not guaranteed.
be permitted only during those portions November 4,1998 (63 FR 59584).
g APPENDIX II
/
- q, UNITED $TATES
-e P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
j ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS wAsHwaTow. o. c.zoses November 19,1998 SCHEDULE AND OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION 458th ACRS MEETING DECEMBER 3-5,1998 THURSDAY. DECEMBER 3.1998. CONFERENCE ROOM 283. TWO WHITE FLINT NORTH.
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND 00
- 1) 8:30- 8:45 A.M.
Openina Remarks by the ACRS Chairman (Open) 1.1)
Opening statement (RLS/JTL/SD)
)
1.2) ltems of current interest (RLS/NFD/SD) 1.3)
Priorities for preparation of ACRS reports (RLS/JTUSD)
UO
- 2) 8:45'- 10:30 A.M.
NEl Whole Plant Study and Ootions to Make 10 CFR Part 50 Risk-Informed (Open)(TSK/GA/NFD) 2.1)
Remarks by the Subcommittee Chairman 2.2)
Briefing by and discussions with representatives of the NRC i
staff regarding proposed staff options to make 10 CFR Part 50 risk-informed and the Nuclear Energy institute (NEl) Whole
)
Plant Study to evaluate options for modifying 10 CFR Part 50 requirements.
i Representatives of the nuclear industry will provide their views, as l(p appropriate.
Ir.oO 10:30 -19:45'A.M.
"SREAK" n:to Is 20 3)JDA50 32:45 P.M.
Proposed Ootions to Make 10 CFR 50.59 Risk-Informed (Open)
(GA/MTM) 3.1)
Remarks by the Subcommittee Chairman.
3.2)
Briefing by and discussioris with representatives of the NRC staff regarding proposed staff options to make 10 CFR 50.59 (Changes, tests and experiments) risk-informed.
Representatives of the nuclear industry will provide their views, as appropriate.
g30 I'?g 12:16 1:15 P.M.
" LUNCH" l'.26~-04f 4) t460AH5P.M.
Intearated Review of Assessment Processes and imorovements to the Senior Manaaement Meetina Process (Open) (JJB/PAB) 4.1)
Remarks by the Subcommittee Chairman.
4.2)
Briefing by and discussions with representatives of the NRC staff regarding the integrated review of the assessmat processes, improvements to the Senior Management Meeting Process, changes to the inspection program, and related matters.
, T W-3 :00 4:15 -4:309.M.
~ BREAK" Con.im uds on o F.Infejrdec! EeweO M
C' " C' N 3:00-4 @
frecestet 5 I n'9 m e e t 40 * # M (
b.
1 U.CD-5:co Brecd'-
Jh-5.w 5,,o (ca:, e b R cp& W
- 5) M-7:00 P.M.
Preoaration of the ACRS Reoorts (Open)
Discussion of proposed ACRS reports on:
5:/0 6: 0 0 A.1)
Proposed Commission Paper on options to make 10 CFR Part 50 risk-informed (TSK/GA/NFD)
(c :00 -// / 4 #.2)
Proposed options to make 10 CFR 50.59 risk-informed 5
(GA/MTM)
/.3)
Integrated review of assessment processes and proposed 5
- ,q, p.g improvements to the Senior Management Meeting Process (JJB/PAB)
FRIDAY. DECEMBER 4.1998. CONFERENCE ROOM 2B3. TWO WHITE FLINT NORTH.
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND l
- 6) 8:30 - 8:35 A.M.
Openino Remarks by the ACRS Chairman (Open)(RLS/SD) 1 9'15 W D
- 7) J:30
,&OO'A.M.
Subcommittee Reoort (Open) (TSK/MME)
Report by the Acting Chairman of the Plant License Renewal Subcommittee regarding matters discussed during the November 18, 1998 meeting.
Representatives of the NRC staff will participate, as appropriate.
l q:JO-l9;.QT
- 8).9:00 - 9,45-A.M.
Eeoort of the Plannino and Procedures Subcommittee (Open/ Closed)
(RLS/JTL)
Report of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee on matters i
/
/
related to the conduct of ACRS business, and organizational and personnel matters relating to the ACRS, including status of appointment
)
of a new member to the ACRS.
[ Note: A portion of this session may be closed to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate solely to the intemal personnel rules Y
and practices of this Advisory Committee, and information the release of i
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.)
i (C ', US- \\\\ ;O O
(
9)_.9:45'- 10:00 A.M.
Future ACRS Activities (Open)(RLS/JTUSD)
^
g Discussion of the recommendations of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee regarding items proposed for consideration by the full i
s Committee during future meetings.
i
[ D '.JS - lD '.4{.
10:30 - 10:45-A.M.
- BREAK"
\\
quo-930 N10) 10:45 - 11:00 A.M.
Reconciliation of ACRS Comments and Recommendations (Open)
(RLS, et al./SD, et al.)
Discussion of the responses from the NRC Executive Director for Operations to comments and recommendations included in recent ACRS reports.
3 ll' I
- 11) 11:00 -Sh80%.M.
Election of ONicers for Calendar Year 1999 (Open) (RLS/JTUSD)
Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman to the ACRS and Member-at-Large to the Planning and Procedures Subcomrrtee.
@t(
M 1:15 P.M.
" LUNCH" v s - N --> bdem e In-b p b, So r en t en d
T 1:15 - 2:30 P.M.
Potential items for Meetina with the NRC Commissioners (Open) (RLS, et al./MME, et al.)
(
Discussion of potential items for the ACRS meeting with the Fp gO Commissioners on February 3,1999. [The commission has not fp approved topics for this meeting.)
my26 K40 g.
13) 2 S0 - 7:00 P.M.
Preparation of ACRS Reoorts (Open)
Y[4, Discussion of proposed ACRS reports on:
13.1) Lessons Leamed from the review of the AP600 design O,
y
- e. [)
(TSK/NFD) b g(f gc,07. : c ~
, Program (REU/MME) jc 13.2) ACRS report to the Commission on the NRC Safety Research
(
N D s'. 09 /13.3)- Proposed Commission Paper on options to make 10 CFR Part l
.t- ()[
50 risk-informed (TSK/GA/NFD) y (J C A 3.4) Proposed options to make 10 CFR 50.59 risk-informed r
j,Mf (GA/MTM) g 4 f' q,' p v13.5) Integrated review of assessment processes an improvements to the Senior Menagement Meeting Process (JJB/PAB) 13.6) Issues applicable to license renewal (TSK/MHF/MME) 13.7) The role of frequency-consequence curves in risk-informed decisionmaking (TSK/GA/MTM)
SATURDAY. DECEMBER 5.1998. CONFERENCE ROOM 2B3. TWO WHITE FLINT NORTH.
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND 7 :fl2:00 P.M.[y.uI A30.
14)
Preoaration of ACRS Reports (Open)
Continue discussion of proposed ACRS reports listed under item 13.
(12:00 - 1:00 P.M.)
" LUNCH" N
s
- 15) 1500 - -2:30 P.M.
Miscellane5us (Open)(RLS/JTUSD)'
NDiscussion of matters related to the conduct of Committee activities and matters and specific issues that were not completed during previous meetings, si time and availability of information permit. N NOTE:
Presentation time should not exceed 50 percent of the total time allocated for a specific e
item. The remaining 50 percent of the time is reserved for discussion.
i Number of copies of the presentatior, materials to be provided to the ACRS - 35.
e
APPENDlX 111: MEETING ATTENDEES 458TH ACRS MEETING December 3-5,1998 NRC STAFF (December 3,1998)
M. Miller, OCM/SAJ T. Hsia, OCM/NJD J. Mitchell, OEDO R. Barrett, NRR
- M. Cheok, NRR E. McKenna, NRR -
S. Black, NRR K. Shimomuk, NRR G. Parry, NRR D. Coe, NRR C. Holden, NRR R. Pascavelli,' NRR T. Frye, NRR R. Sullivan, NRR S. Roudier, NRR A. Madison, NRR M. Johnson, NRR
' S.~ Stein, NRR J. Jacobson, NRR J. Flack, RES R. Brill, RES F. Eltawila, RES J. Costello, RES N. Siu, RES -
B. Mallett, Ril R. Bernhard, Ril M. Parker, Rill T. Martin, AEOD
. S. Mays, AEOD D. Allison, AEOD ATTENDEES FROM OTHER AGENCIES AND GENERAL PUBLIC S. Lewinson, Framatome Technologies T. Sutter, Bechtel D. Chung, NUS B. Christie, Performance Techno!ogy S. Frantz, MLB R. Huston, Licensing Support Services
Appendix lil 2
458th ACRS Meeting ATTENDEES FROM OTHER AGENCIES AND GENERAL PUBLIC (continued)
S. Floyd, NEl A. Camp, SNL D. Whitehead, SNL J. Higgins, BNL j
D. Raleigh, Bechtel M. Strand, NUS j
M. Azarm, BNL s
NRC STAFF (December 4,1998)
J. Mitchell, OEDO j
1
)
i i
APPENDIX IV gg o
UNITED STATES y
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
j i
5 I
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS i
o WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 January 27,1999 REVISED i
SCHEDULE AND OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION l
469th ACRS MEETING FEBRUARY 3-6,1999 WEDNESDAY. FEBRUARY 3.1999. CONFERENCE ROOM 2B3. TWO WHITE FLINT NORTH.
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND
- 1) 8:30- 8:45 A.M.
Openina Remarks by the ACRS Chairman (Opea) 1.1)
Opening statement (DAP/JTUSD) 1.2)
Items of current interest (DAP/NFD/SD) 1.3)
Priorities for preparation of ACRS reports (DAP/JTUSD) l
- 2) 8:45 - 10:15 A.M.
Status of the Proposed Final Revision to 10 CFR 50.59 (Chances. tests and experiments)(Open) (JJB/MTM) 2.1)
Remarks by the Subcommittee Chairman 2.2)
Briefing by and discussions with representatives of the NRC staff regarding the status of the proposed final revision to 10 CFR 50.59 and related matters.
Representatives of the nuclear industry will provide their views, as appropriate.
10:15 - 10:30 A.M.
" BREAK"
- 3) 10:30 - 12:00 Noon Proposed imorovements to the NRC Inspection and Assig.pment Procrams (Open)(JJB/PAB) 3.1)
Remarks by the Subcommittee Chairman 3.2)
Briefing by and discussions with representatives of the NRC staff regarding proposed improvements to the NRC Inspection and Assessment Programs, including initiatives related to development of performance indicators and a risk-based inspection program.
Representatives of the nuclear industry will provide their views, as appropriate.
12:00 - 1:00 P.M.
" LUNCH"
- 4) 1:00- 2:30 P.M.
Meetino with the NRC Commissioners. Commissioners' Cortference Room. One White Fiint North (Open)
Meeting with the NRC Commissioners to discuss the following items:
4.1(a) Proposed (Near-Term) Revision to 10 CFR 50.59 (Changes, tests and experiments)(JJB/MTM)
(b) Proposal for the Development of a Risk-informed Framework for 10 CFR 50.59 (GA/MTM) t
2
.A i
r 4.2)
Options to M ka 10 CFR Part 50 Risk Inform 1d (TSK/NFD) 4.3)
Proposed Rulemaking on the Use of Revised Source Term (TSK/PAB) 4.4)
Ststus of ACRS Activities Associated with License Renewal (MHF/MME) 4.5)
Impact of PRA Results and insights on the Regulatory System
- l (GA/MTM) 4.6)
Elevation of CDF to a Fundamental Safety Goal and Possible Revision of the Commission's Safety Goal Policy Statement *
(GA/TSK/MTM) 4.7)
NRC Safety Research Program * (REU/MME)
[* Time permitting, these items will be discussed) 2:30 - 3:00 P.M.
" BREAK"
- 5) 3:00 - 7:00 P.M.
Preparation of ACRS ReDoris (Open)
Discussion of proposed ACRS reports on:
5.1)
Proposed improvements to the NRC Inspection and Assessment Programs (JJB/PAB) 5.2)
The Role of Frequency-Consequence Curves in Risk-Informed Decisionmaking (TSK/GA/MTM) 5.3)
NRC Safety Research Program (REU/MME)
THURSpAY. FEBRUARY 4.1999. CONFERENCE ROOM 2B3. TWO WHITE FLINT NORTH.
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND
- 6) 8:30- 8:35 A.M.
Openino Remarks by the ACRS Chairman (Open)(DAP/SD)
- 7) 8:35 - 10:00 A.M.
Prooosed Final Revision to 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(3) of the Maintenance fhile (Open)(WJS/AS) 7.1)
Remarks by the cognizant ACRS Mrrier 7.2)
Briefing by and dircussions with representatwes of the NRC staff and the Nuclear Energy Institute regarding the proposed final revision to the Maintenance Rule, which would require the licensees to perform safety assessments prior to perfonning maintenance activities.
10:00 -10:15 A.M.
- BREAK" 8)10:15-11:45 A.M.
SECY-98-244. NRC Human Performance Plan (Open) (GA/NFD) 8.1)
Remarks by the Subcommittee Chairman 8.2)
Briefing by and discussions with representatives of the NRC staff regarding the NRC Human Performsnee Plan.
4 11:45 - 12:45 P.M.
" LUNCH"
3
':w t w
- 9) 12:45-2:15 P.M.
Proposed Resolution of Generic Safety lasue (GSI) B-61. Allowable ECCS Eauioment Outane Periods (Open) (RLS/AS/DTD) 9.1)
Remarks by the cognizant ACRS Member 9.2)
Briefing by and discussions with representatives of the NRC staff regarding the proposed resolution of GSI B-61.
Representatives of the nuclear industry will provide their views, as appropriate.
2:15 - 2:30 P.M.
"* BREAK"
- 10) 2:30 - 4:00 P.M.
Eirstfrotectionlanues (Open) (DAP/AS) 10.1) Remarks by the Subcommittee Chairman j
10.2) Briefing by and discussions with representatives of the NRC staff regarding fire protection issues, including the draft NFPA-805 fire protection standard and proposed outline for a regulatory guide on fire protection.
Representatives of the nuclear industry and other interested parties will
- provide their views, as appropriate.
4:00 - 4:15 P.M.
~ BREAK"
- 11) 4:15 - 7:00 P.M.
Preoaration of ACRS Reoorts (Open)
)
Discussion of proposed ACRS reports on:
11.1) Lessons Leamed from the Review of the AP600 Design (TSK/NFD) i 11.2) Propesed Final Revision to the Maintenance Rule (WJS/AS/MME) 11.3) NRC Human Performance Plan (GA/NFD) 11.4) NRC Safety Research Program (REU/MME) 11.5 ) Proposed Improvements to the NRC Inspection and Assessment Programs (JJB/PAB) 11.6) The Role of Frequency-Consequence Curves in Risk-Informed Decisionmaking (TSK/GA/MTM) 11.7) Proposed Resolution of GSI-B-61 (RLS/AS/DTD)
FRIDAY. FEBRUARY 6.1999. CONFERENCE ROOM 2B3. TWO WHITE FLINT NORTH.
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND
- 12) 8:30- 8:35 A.M.
Ooenina Remarks by the ACRS Chairman (Open) (DAP/SD)
- 13) 8:25 - 9 00 A.M.
Subcommittee Reoort (Open) (GBW/PAB)
Report by the Chairman of the Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena Subcommittee regarding matters discussed during the December 16-17, 1998 meeting.
- 14) 9:00- 10:15 A.M.
Follow-uo items Resultina from the ACRS Retreat (Open)(DAP/JTL)
Discussion of follow-up items resulting from the January 27-29,1999 ACRS retreat.
4
!u <
10:15 -10:30 A.M.
"EREAK"o
- 15) 10:30 - 11:15 A.M.
Reoort of the Plannina and Procedures Subcommittee (Open/ Closed)
(DAP/JTL)
Report of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee on matters I
related to the conduct of ACRS business, and organizational and personnel matters relating to the ACRS.
[ Note: A portion of this session may be closed to discuss organizational I
and personnel matters that relate solely to the intemal personnel rules and practices of this Advisory Committee, and information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.)
16)11:15 - 12:00 Noon Future ACRS Activities (Open)(DAP/JTIJSD)
Discussion of the recommendations of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee regarding items proposed for connideration by the full Committee during future meetings.
12:00 - 1:00 P.M.
" LUNCH *"
- 17) 1:00 - 1:30 P.M.
Reconciliation of ACRS Comments and Recommendations (Open)
(DAP, et al./SD, et al.)
Discussion of the responses from the NRC Executive Director for Operations to comments and recommendations included in recent ACRS reports and letters.
- 18) 1:30 - 7:00 P.M.
Preoaration of ACRS Reports (Open)
Continue discussion of proposed ACRS reports on:
18.1) Draft NFPA-805 Standard on Fire Protection (DAP/AS/DTD) 18.2) Proposed outline for Regulatory Guide on Fire Protection (DAP/AS/DTD) 18.3) Lessons Learned from the Review of(he AP600 Design J
(TSK/NFD) 18.4) Proposed Final Revision to the Maintenance Rule (WJS/AS/MME) 18.5) NRC Human Performance Plan (GA/NFD) 18.6) NRC Safety Research Program (REU/MME) 18.7 ) Proposed improvements to the NRC Inspection and Assessment Programs (JJB/PAB) 18.8) The Role of Frequency-Consequence Curves in Risk-informed Decisionmaking (TSK/GA/MTM) 18.9) Proposed Resolution of GSI-B-61 (RLS/SD/DTD)
SATURDAY. FEBRUARY 8.1999. CONFERENCE ROOM 2B3. TWO WHITE FLINT NORTH.
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND
- 19) 8:30- 12:00 Noon Preoaration of ACRS Reports (Open)
Continue discussion of proposed ACRS reporis listed under item 18.
i
- u v 5
v
- 20) 12:00 - 12:30 P.M.
Miscellaneous (Open)(DAP/JTUSD)
Discussion of matters related to the conduct of Committee activities and matters and specific issues that were not completed during previous meetings, as time and availability of information permit.
HQIE:
Presentation time should not exceed 50 percent of the total time allocated for a specific j
e ltem. The remaining 50 percent of the time is reserved for discussion.
1 Number of copies of the presentation materials to be provided to the ACRS - 35.
e
. G [ 'se J
l l
APPENDIX V l
LIST OF DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO THE COMMITTEE
[ Note: Some documents listed below may have been provided or prepared for Committee use only. These documents must be reviewed prior to release to the public.)
MEETING HANDOUTS AGENDA QQCUMENTS ITEM NO.
1 Openino Remarks by the ACRS Chairman 1.
Items of Interest, dated December 3-5,1998 2
NEl Whole Plant Study and Ootions to Make 10 CFR Part 50 Risk-Informed 2.
[ Handout) (1) E-mail dated 12/1/98 from D. Mathews, NRR, to M. Rubin, NRR,
Subject:
Revised Risk-Informed Part 50 SECY; (2) E-mail dated 11/30/98, from M. Rubin, NRR, to NRR, AEOD, and OGC reviewers,
Subject:
Revised Risk informed Part 50 SECY (draft SECY on options for risk-informed revisions to 10 CFR Part 50 was attached to the E-mail 3.
[ Handout] (1) Memorandum dated 12/1/98, from J. N. Sorensen, ACRS Fellow, to R. P. Savio, Deputy Director, ACRS,
Subject:
Comments on Draft Commission Paper," Options for Risk Informed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 50 4.
P:sk-Informed Modifications to 10 CFR 50, Staff Presentation, December 3, 1998 [Viewgraphs)
)
3
- Proposed Ootions to Make 10 CFR 50.59 Risk-Informed 5.
Risk-Informed Options for 950.59 Presentation by M. Drouin [Viewgraphs) 4 Intearated Review of Assessment Processes and imorovements to the Senior Manaaement Meetina Process 6.
Reactor Oversight Process improvements: Inspection, Assessment, &
Enforcement Presentation by P. Baranowsky, J. Flack, B. Mallet, M. Johnson
[Viewgraphs) 7.
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Presentation by Dr. John H. Flack on Risk-Informed Inspection and Plant Assessment Research Activities
[Viewgraphs) 8.
Draft Revised Regulatory Oversight Process -Transition Plan [Viewgraphs)
i v. R L Appendix V 2
'~
458th ACRS Meeting 5.
Subcommittee Reoort 9.
Report of the Plant License Renewal Subcommittee regarding matters discussed during the November 18,1998 meeting [ Handout]
6 Baconciliation of ACRS Comments and Recommendations
- 10.'
Reconciliation of ACRS Comments and Recommendations [ Handout #10-1]
7' Reoort of the Plannina and Procedures Subcommittee
. 1 1.-
. Final Draft Minutes of Planning and Procedures Subcommittee Meeting -
December 2,1998 [ Handout #8-1) 8 Future ACRS Activities i
12.
Future ACRS Activities -459th ACRS Meeting, February 3-6,1999 [ Handout
- 9-1]
9.
Election of Officers for Calendar Year 1999 Dana A. Powers, Chairman.
George Apostolakis, Vice-Chairman
)
Thomas S. Kress, Member-At-Large 10.
Defense-in-Deoth Discussion 13.
Comments on Defense-in-Depth Presentation, J. Sorensen [Viewgraphs)
. ou > v Appendix V' 3
- 458th ACRS Meeting MEETING NOTEBOOK CONTENTS
.TAE DOCUMENTS 2
NEl Whole Plant Study and Ootions to Make 10 CFR Part 50 Risk-Informed 2.'
Table of Contents 3.
Proposed Agenda 4.
' Status Report 5.
Memorandum dated November 16,1998, from Noel Dudley, ACRS to ACRS
. Members,
Subject:
Meeting of the Committee to Review Generic Requirements (CRGR) Concerning Options for Modifying 10 CFR Part 50 to be Risk-Informed 6.
Mermrandum dated November 10, 1998, from J. N. Sorensen, ACRS Feliow, to R. P. Savio, ACRS,
Subject:
Steering Committee for Risk Informed Activities 7.
Memorandum dated September 17,1998, from Noel Dudley, ACRS to ACRS Members,
Subject:
Summary of September 15,1998, Meeting Between the NRC Staff and the Nuclear Energy Institute Concerning the Whole. Plant Study.
8.
Slides used at the November 19,1998, ACRS Subcommittee Meeting 3
' Proposed Options to Make 10 CFR 50.59 Risk-Informed 9.
Table of Contents 10.
Proposed Schedule 11.
Status Report 12.
Staff Requirements Memorandum dated September 25,1998, from John C.
Hoyle, Secretary, NRC, to L. Joseph Callan, EDO,
Subject:
SECY-98-171 13.
Report dated July 16,1998, from R. L. Seale, Chairman, ACRS, to Shirley Ann Jackson, Chairman, NRC,
Subject:
Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR 50.59 (Changes, Tests and Experiments) 4
. Intearated Review of Assessment Processes and imorovements to the Senior Manaaement Meetina Process 14.
Table of Contents 15.'
Proposed Schedule
.16.'
Status Report 117.
Staff Requirements Memorandum dated June 30,1998, from John C. Hoyle, Secretary, NRC, to L.' Joseph Callan, EDO,
Subject:
Status of the Integrated
- p i
.J
.J u
Appendix V 4
458th ACRS Meeting S
Review of the NRC Assessment Process for Operating Commercial Nuclear Reactors 18.
Report dated March 13,1998, from R. L. Seale, Chairman, ACRS, to Shirley Ann Jackson, Chairman, NRC,
Subject:
Proposed improvements to the Senior Management Meeting Process
.