ML20154F139
| ML20154F139 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 04/25/1988 |
| From: | Eckert R, Evdokimoff V, Goble R, Renn O MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20154F144 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#288-6324 OL, NUDOCS 8805230114 | |
| Download: ML20154F139 (214) | |
Text
_
RELATED CORRESPON6 N
,C %!/ry
'y UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I occrren NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ; 6 APR 251988* 1 Before Administrative Judges: ,
h pag 3 3 Ivan W. Smith, Chairperson stavica runcII Gustave A. Linenberger, Jr.- NE Dr. Jerry Harbour 4 6 C e
)
In the Matter of )
) Docket Nos.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) 50-443-444-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL. ) (Off-site EP)
(Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) ) April 25, 1988
)
ATTACHMENTS 1 - 10 TO TESTIMONY OF ROBERT L. GOBLE, ORTWIN RENN, ROBERT T. ECKERT, AND VICTOR N. EVDOKIMOFF ON BEHALF OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ON SHELTERING CONTENTIONS L
Department of the Attorney General Commonwealth of Massachusetts 8805230114 000425 One Ashburton Place PDR ADOCK 05000443 Boston, MA 02108-1698 T PDR (617) 727-2265
! 4j f
- , - .m is .-.ern,,---~,,--n , - - - - - - - - ., ..e , ,--,- ,.n---...-----,,-r
l ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Professional Qualifications of Dr. Robert L. Goble
%ttachment 2: Professional Qualifications of Dr. Ortwin Renn Attachment 3: Professional Qualifications of Robert T. Eckert Attachment 4: Professional Qualifications of Victor N. Evdokimoff Attachment 5: Response of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to Massachusetts Attorney General James. M. Shannon's Off-Site Emergency Preparedness Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to FEMA (Set No. 2)
Attachment 5: Memorandum, No. RI-TH-85-20,.
dated December 31, 1985, for Regional Assistance Committee (RAC)
Radiological Emergency Preparedness Task Force (REP), from Edward A.
Thomas, Division Chief, Natural &
Technological Hazards, Federal Emergency Management Agency, re: Seabrook Emergency Plans Attachment 7: FEMA Response to Revised Town of Hampton Contention VIII to Revision 2 (of the New Hampshire RERP for Seabrook), SAPL Contention 16, and NECNP Contention RERP-8, Current FEMA Position on Admitted Contentions on New Hampshire Plans for Seabrook, Appendix A to Response of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to Attorney General James M. Shannon's Off-Site Emergency Preparedness Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to FEMA (Set No. 2), dated June 4, 1987, pp. 38-39 Attachment 8: Street Maps of Hampton Beach Area Attachment 9: A Study to Identify Potential Shelters in the Beach Areas Near Seabrook Station, performed for New Hampshire Yankee, by Stone &
Webster Engineering Corporation, dated March 1986 Attachment 10:~ Affidavit of Anthony M. Callendrello on SWEC Shelter Study, dated March 25, 1987
y ,
, Septe:ber, 1987 ROBERT L. GCBLE Center for Technology, 137 Gardner Road Environment. and Development 3reckline MA 02146 and Department of Physics Clark University 617-566-4574 Worcester MA 01610 617-793-7683 1 resent Position Research Associate Professor of Environ =ent. Technology, and Society, and adjunct Associate Professor of Physics.
Clark University.
Eduention
'3.A. (Honors) Physics. Swarthmore College, June 1962 Ph.D. . Physics, University of Wisconsin. January 1967 O evioug Emnlevaant 1984-85 Princeton University Center for Energy and Environmental Studies and Department of Philcsophy: Hewlett yellov 1976- Citrk University. Physics Department and Program on Science. Technology, and Society: Visiting Assistant Professor. Research Associate Professor (on leave 198t-85)
- 97t-76 Montana State University. Physics Depar:nent: Assistant Professor. Adjunct Assistant Professor
'972-74 University of Utah. Physics Depart =ent: Research Associate / Associate !nstuctor 1969-72 University of Minnesota. Physics Depart =ent: Rese arch Associate 1966-69 Yale University. Physics De;artment: Research Staff.
Instrue:ce 1962-66 University of Wisconsin. Physics Depart =ent: NSy Coopera-tive Pellow. Research Assistant l
^u-mt Hamed i Air Cuality/ Acid Deposition: Assess =ents and Reviews
' Tracer and Transport Studies local Air Cuality ,
Risk Assesament/Mazard Mage =ent: Cc= paring Ha:ards and Ha:ard Assess =ent Methesciogies Ethical !ssues in Tr:ard Manage =ent Planning :ssues to.J+daste Disposal l P.aden Exposure and Health Effects Isergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants t I
Recent Research Activities 1
1983 - Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants (Consultant to New Hampshire Attorney General's office. Three Mile Island Public Health Fund. Massachusetts Attorney General's Office. Ontario Nuclear Safety Review Board) Reviews. Major Planning Project at TMI. Testimony. Consequence Analysis.
1985 - Risk Assessment and Socio Economic Impacts in Radioactive Waste Manage =ent (Consultant to State of Mississippi. Citizens Against Nuclear Trash, and State of Nevada / Mountain West Inc.) Several reports, testimony.
1977- Ethical Issues in Hazard Management (supported by NST-EVIST. Hewlett Foundation. Principal Investigator and Co-Principal Investigator.) Fook in progress; articles on radicactive waste occupational and environcental hazards comparison. susceptible workers.
1983 -86 Acid Deposition Assessment. (Consultant. U.S. EPA.)
Co-author. Acid Deposition and its Effects: Critic al Assessment Document. 1985.
Section Author.1985 Assessment section on Sulfur Mass i 3alance.
1982-63 =p*
- ementation of the Occupational Lead Standard.
(Supported by CTA; Principal Investigator, four research-ers.) Report published as attachment to CIA Report:
Prever-* e 'li-e ss g ;-m g ;;g, k*e-k inee .
19 7-82 Naclear Power Plant Performance. (suppopted in part by OCE. P.-incipal Investigatore three researchers.) Articles relating nuclear power plant perfor=ance :o general plant characteristics.
976-83 De=enstration cf a Grid-Cennected Cogeneration System at Clark University; tecnnical advisor and coordinator for Clark University. The program resulted in the construction of a 82.5 million National Demonstra:Lon Power Plante based on a gas-fired 1.6 MV diesel engine with heat recovery froa the exhaust and jacket. The plant began opration in Sum =or 1982; it supplies a;p.eximately half Clark's thermal energy needs and encugh excess elec-tricity so that half the output will be sold to the utility.
I l
r
Teachine Ani ltudent Reseaach $gy -vision Dissertation Advisor for M. Yersel. May 1984 Ph.D.
Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion in an Urban Environ =ent.
Student Research Projects:
Supervision of more than 20 graduate and undergraduate students in energy, air pollution, and physics: Hign Energy Cosmic Ray Showers; Clark Energy Use Profiles and Models; Environmen al Tradeoffs in Cogeneration; Cogen-eration Road Map for Colleges and Universities; Measurements of Worcester Weather; Pollutant Dispersal in Urban Areas; Effects of Buildings on Pollutant Dispersal; Cogeneration Syste: Monitoring Envirenntnt. Technology, and Society:
Introductory Case Studies on Population and Food; Special Topics in Alter-native Energy: Cogeneration; A1:ernative Energy Systems Laboratory. Graduate Core Course: L1=its of the Earth. Science Writing Seminar.
Physics for Non-Science Student:
Einstenn's *deas; Cultural Astronomy; College Physics; Particle Physics (an nenors course with laboratory); Urban Meteorology Undergraduate Physics:
Electricity and Magne:1s=; Classical Physica Graduate Physics:
Cuantu: Mechanics; Advanced Quantu: Mechanics; Mathematical Methods P'-efe winam' g ieties A=erican Association for the Acvance:ent of Science A erican Physical Society: Forum en S:1ence and Society; Divisi:n of Particles and Tields Sig:a Il Society for Fisk Analysis Service 1976- City of Worcester Energy task Tcree 1977- Clark Science. Technciogy, and Society. Progra=
00==10:ee
'978-80 Alternate. Clark Graduate Board 1978- Clark Energy Task Force 1981- Faculty Lounge C ==ittee (instalia:1cn and operation of new faculty dining room) 1933- CENTED Steering Cc :ittee Recent Tna < vidu al Ave s g Boners National Science Teundation/ National Endov=ent for the Hu:anities:
Individual Incentive Award (Jan.1984-Jan.1986) l Princeton University: Hewlett Tellow (Sept. 198t-June 1985)
A=erican Association for tne Advace=ent of Science: Su :er Fellowship in Environ = ental Science (Su==tr 1982) l t
i
Othert Activities Consulting Agreements:
1986 - Massachusetts Attorney General's Office. Sheltering in the E=ergency Plans for the Seabrook Nuclear Reactor.
1986 Rhode Island Dept. of Environ = ental Management. Risk Assessment Methods for Toxic Substances in Seafood.
1986 State of Nevada / Mountain West Inc., Risk Analysis for Radioactive Waste Disposal.
1986 - Citizens Against Nuclear Trash - Socio Econo:1c : pacts of Radioactive Waste Disposal.
1985 - Mississippi Health and Safety Offico -- Radioactive Waste Risk Analysis. 2 1983 - New Hampshire Attorney General - Nuclear E=ergency Planning.
October 1982-[.I!!::t. U.S. EPA: Acid Deposition Assess =ent.
1986 - lecturer. Harvard Schoci of Public Health. Short Course on Risk Assessment and Occupational Health.
1981
- ectarer. Oepart=ent of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wiscor. sin--Extension Program on ~ndustrial Tacility Oogeneration.
1 I
I l
.- _ _ . m.m ._r- - - -_ . - - _ - - - - - - - - -_ - -- - -- - - -
GRANTS AND AWARD 0
\
M M AMOUNT Eniversity Grants Demonstration of a Grid-Connected Integrated Co== unity Energy System 198 -84 Mass Electric Co=pany/ Colt Industries / 20,000 Mass Electric Construction. Grants for Cogeneration Monitoring 1961-83 Mass Energy Office /DCE-Energy conser- 104,000 vation Measures in Schools and Hospitals.
2 matching grants for cogeneration heat recovery equipment co-authored with J.
Collins and B. Kimball) -
- DE-FG41-81R 113973
- DE-TG41-82R 143391 13.750 1980-82 EUD: Loan for Plant Construction 1,200,000 (co-authored with J. Collins, 3. Ki= ball) 1980-82 DOE Phase III: Cor.stuction: grid connec- 330.000 tion and constuction management costa (co-authered with J. Collins)
- 97" ~8 DOE Phase ~I: Detailed Feasibility and 206.000 Preliminary Design (cc-authored with C. Hohens:ser
'977 DOE Phase :: Preliminary Teasibility Study (co-authored with 0. Hohenesser). $ 149,000 h G-ants g S M Sunnoat Received
'JCI C AMOUIC' 198"-88
- atario Nuclear Safety Review Board Modelling 12.160 Consequence of Reactor Accidents (Principal Inver-igator) 1987-88 Rhode Island / EPA "Risk Assess =ent Methodology 10,000 for Conta=1nated Seafood (Oc-Principal Investigator with H. Brown) 1980-86 NST/NEH-Interdisciplinary :ncentive Award 05.800 Ethical :ssues in Hazard Manage =ent (Princi-pal Investigator- Individual Award)
- 952-85 NST-Sensitive Workers, Ethical :ssues and 170.500 Oifferential Sensitivity to Workplace Hazard (Co-Principal *nvestigator with R. Kasperson) OR:: 8217297 l
l i
i A - . _ _ , - , - - - - - -
I 1
1982 DOE-Nuclear Power Plant Perfor:ance 9.000 i (Principal Investigator) Purchase Order i
- DE-AP01-82 E119625 i
1982 AAAS-Summer Tellowship in Environmental 5.800 Sciences (for work on Acid Rain in EPA's Office of Strategy Assess =ent and Long Range Planning).
1980-82 NSF-Labor Laity-Oc=parison of 'a'orker 4 240,000
& Public Protection from Technological Hazards (Co-Principal Investiator with R. Kasperson). # CSS 79-24516 1979-80 Association of Physical Plant Ad 4,000 ministration. Preparation of a Cogeneration Reference Manual for Colleges and Universities (Principal Investigator) 1979 Argonne Laboratories-Testing Computer 5,240 Models for Cogeneration System Design (Principal Investigator). Univ. #98456-01 1977-80 NST-Equity Issues in Radioactive *='aste 190.000 Management dess 77-16564 (co-principal Investigator with Roger Kasperson).
1 l
l l
t l
l l
- g_
5 9
- q ..
. 1983-84 Clark Universitf-Elemental Analysis of Par- 1.500 I ticulates (Jointly with C. Hohene=ser-Faculty !
Development Award) 1982-83 CTA- mplementation of Occupational Lead 29.000 Standard (Principal Investigator) Contract
- 233-7040.0 P
n i
1 e
[
t l-
! r 1
f l
i I
l i
, 1 3
i l
~_..-._,_Q.,_._________._-_._____.._._..
9 Publi c ations
\
1RTICLES (Energy /Ha:ards/ Air Ouality)
.'Cli "Turbulence Parameters in an Urban Enviror.=ent" (with M. Yersel).
a"-d=-v Laver Etteerelecv. V. 37. #3 p.271 (1986).
"Msthods for Analy:ing and Oceparing Technological Ha:ards:
Definitions and Factor Structures" (with 0. Hohenesser J. Kasperson, R. Kasperson, R. Kates. P. Collins. P. Slovic, B. Fischoff. S.
Lichtenstein and T. Lay =an.) In Zisk Evaluations g Mnenrerent.
V. Oovello, J. Henkes and T. Murpower, eds. Plenum Press New York.
1986.
1015 "Protecting Workers. Pectacting Publics: The Ethics of Differential Protection" (with P. Derr, R. Kasperson, R. Kates) in V.T. Covello (ed.) ZiaE Ani'vris in n g,2-ivite Secter. Plenum Press. New Yo.-k.
1985.
Sosi "Ti=e Scales in the Radioactive Waste Problem" Eeuitv IS3u'S ia Padieactive Waste Manraere-t, R. Kasperson, Ed. Celgeschlager Gunn.
Main. Cambridge 1983. Chapter 6. p.139-174 "Short Distance ;iffesion in an Urban At=esphere" (with M. Tersel, J. More111). A tee rrherie Env'-a- ert . 7. 17. Nc. 2, 275 (1983).
"Responding te the toutie Standard 'of Verker/Public Protectica (with P. Derr, R. Kasperson. R. Kates). Ervi-e re-t 7. 25. No. 6. 6 (1953).
.ent "Airborne Lead: A Olear-cut Case of Differential Prc ection." (with 0.
Hattis and N. Ashford). Envi?cnrent 7. 24 No. 1. 14 (1982)
"Technological Risk Forceptien and Nuclear Pcwer Costs: The Ouantifi-cation of Uncertainty" (with 0. Shakow) "eeh--lar'a*' '^-*a"-e Ar.t See111. C;Aggi 7. 21. No. 3. 185 (1982) sont "Worker /Public Protection: The Double Standard" (with P. Derr, R.
K asperson R. Cat es ) , Env * -a--= =* . 7. 23. No. 7. 6 (1981) so-o "Nuclear Pcwer Plant Perfor:ance: An Update." (w1:n O. Hohene ser)
Inv'----=-* 7. 21. No. 8. 32 (1979) l
192.1 "Power Plant Perfor:ance" (with C. Hoheneeser). ~*daa-eet 'i. 20.
No.3. 25. (1978).
"'E0HNICAL HONOGRAPRS 109
Lathedeierv f.;; Assessi r ut i-ds g centi-i-int s in Sea *eed. (with E.
Brown, ar.d L. "eitelbaus) , sub=itted to Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.
Preciesuae h A1 ;f.1 Preresed Yucca Mountain Peresiterv. (with R.E.
Kasperson, J. Emel, J.X. Kasperson, and O. Renn). (1987) 40 p. .
"uel e a '?_ggj;1 Svstem h At m ?-eeesed vucca Meu-trin Peres!teav. (with J. E=cl. J.X. Kaspersen R.E. Kasperson, and O. Renn). (1987) i t? p.
19.11 valuatien sf. ;fg Fidtran C Medel: Useful-ass Ani Frietiemhilitv. (with C. Renn). OESTD. 01 ark University.
n .cht-tete-icatien f.1:.k1 11 ihi h.201 MS"St*i' faili: 1 # ~*"" '" '"'
(wi:n J. E=el. R. Kasperson. O. Renn). CEN C. Clark Universi:y.
~;g e- re sad Sah sre h rueie t- EA111 -ere sits"* 1.".10 1 e ,itr -t-e assessra-t a.f s e i e ^ e d ". ilk. 1"1 S oc i d ' " * **
.--.4ea-st screeser,iens, MA: (w Er:ta.rd J. E:el, Assess J. =en Kasperson, and R. 01arg Grou;.. OENTD. Kaspersen.)
University.
- con
?,i:P i s su = = A s s ee i s t a d ri;f, A C h r e e e s ' t e-v 1; P ie b t e ,
i s s i s s ie r t . (with E. Brown J. E=el. J. Kaspersen, and R.
zas;erten.) New York: Social := pac: Assess =en Network.
- ss
'det heds 3: A-mivei-a 1:1 ceretriaa aaM-eleeda*' '*
- a-d s : 2if.ir.i-
- i;
- Ani raeter St ueturas. (wi:n O. Henene:ser. J. Kasperson. R.
Kasperson, R. Kates. P. Co'. lins. A. Goldman P. Slovic, 3. Fischoff.
S. Lichtenstein, and M. Lay an) . CEN"'O Research Repor: #3. Cetober 1983.
.e me am.
'tres-herie ? eeessas Affacti-- J g Saaesitiea. 3.***=dae **a t s s e s s r e n t s ans, S u c e a s ti;;;, f, ,n f u ? -- a:- Paset-e?.. AAAS, T ail
- 9P.,2.
S c e s.t.
l Tere-a-stice: 1 .>-eus ",;;;i;;. (with 'J. Gob'e) Association of .
l Pnysical Plan Ac-inis:rators. '4ashington. 1980).
- , - - - - , , -- , , - , - .,,--ww ,- _-e n--, - ,-e w - -- ,a- w-
.l.911 Statistical Analysis d Nuclea- d M ?cwea F11rt P e - f e -- a n c e ,
(with C. Hoheneeser) Scientists Institute for Publio Infor:ation. New York. 1978.
GOVERNMEhi REPOR'"S O
helenant ation g ;tg Occueat ie-al J.Jt11 St a"hat. (with D. Hattis. H.
Ballow D. Thurston) . CENTED 'a'orking Paper HAG /'a*P 83-1. October 1983; in Preventing,T11 ness And In4uav in att Werkelace. Vol. 2, NTIS, Office of Technology Assessnent. Washington, Spring. 1985.
M M Deresitien Phenereren 2:11:1 Effects: Critical Assessrert Boa"~a-* Co-authors D. Bennett, R. Linthurst) U.S. EPA, EPA /60015-851001, August 1985. ~
so ?.;g "Grid-Connected Integrated Community Energy System Clark University":
Phase I. Preliminary Teasibility Study.
v.1: Executive Summary DCE Report #C00 4211-1/1 (NTIS, 1977) v.2: Final Report. DOE Report #C00-4211-1/2 (NTIS,1977) .
Phase II, Detailed Teasibility and Preliminary Design Preliminary Report. DOE Report #000-4211-2 (UTIS. 1978).
v.1: Final Repert, DOE Report #000-4211-3/1 (UT S,1978).
v.2: Appendices. DOE Report #C00-4211-3/2 (N!!S. 1978).
(These reports were produced by the 01 ark Demonstration Team and consultants. I wrote the =ain text and edited each vclume.)
CONFERENCE PR00EEDINGS (Energy. Manards. Air Quality) .
$ce?
Can Risk Assess =ent be Transplanted to Oeveloping Countries? (witt H. Irown)
- nvited paper for the Tourth Tallories Seminar en International Oevelpe=ent Entitled "Managing Environ = ental Risk in the Econo =le Development of Newly Industrialining Countries" May 12-14, 1987. Tufts University Ta11eries European Center, Tennee.
"Potential use of Pb as a Zielogical Marker of Exposure to Raden."
First International Sy=posium on Environ = ental Health. Pittsburga, PA. June 1987.
ene "The Variation in *4orker Response to Occupational Hanards" in Sy=posius on Managing Eign Risk 'dorkers, Society for Risk Analysis.
Cetober 1965.
IC ' A.!.
" Acid Rain." Invited talk presented at A=erican :nstitute of Hydrology Conference. Tuture :ssues in Hydrology, May 31, 1964 cas I
I
1 1
i
. l "Short Range Oispersion fro: a Point Source in an Urban Area." (with M. Tersel). Proceedirrs d ihg 11h Svr esius sn Turbulence d Siffurion A erican Meteorological Society. Boston (1983) 1211 i i
"A Participatory Approach to Undergraduate Energy Education: the Case )
of Clark Universiy" (with D. Ducsik) Proceedines 21lut International ce-ference sn Enerrv Edeettion. Providence. Rhode Island. 1981 "Clar'd University's Grid-Oonnected Cogeneration Plant." (with J.
Rodousakis. J. Cook). Sistrict Mentina. V. 67. No. 1. 4 (1981) .
~. _ s
- \ 1e o "A Microneteorological Study in the 'a'orcester Area" (with A. Mo:od, M Yersel), Freeeedia-s g *,f.1 Co fereaee = *,ti Met eereieey Egg rasia-A g m Mard" e Previ-ces. Gornas. MI (1979f. g ';e-*he-.
ic?8 "Grid-Connected Cogeneration at Clark University: The Effect or Ter=3 of-terna Utilitydams' Interconnection: (with S.E. liydick). Pre c e ed ir eg g *,ti cerference n Ere ev h Minarecen*, Tucson (1978).
io77 "Energy Profiles at Clark University: I:plications for Cogeneration a (with R. Collinse A. Gottlieb). Freenedi-en & h h Eatie mi g g n , = ees-c eev = tre ,, ee-se. .t1er, wa331,,:en, e,c,
.J
, ARTICLES (Particle Physics)
.lC ?.i
++ 0 "Determination of the -
Mass Ditterence (with J.S. Ball).
Phys. Rev. 3 .11 1971 (1975).
4;-i '
S "Two Pion Inter =ediate States in Decay KO-2 ." Phys. Rev. D 1,
- 531 (1973).
.12~2 "Sof t Pion Production in Electron-Positron Collisions" (with J.L.
Rosner). Phys. Rev. D i 2345 (1972).
1; 1 "Ourrent Algebra and Analyticity: Bootstrapping the and w:.th the Pion Decay Constant Setting the Scale" (with (L.S. Broun). Phys. Rev.
D 1 723 (1971).
.L2LL "Pion-Pion Scattering. Current Algebra. Unitarity, and the 'n'idth of the Rho Meson" (with L.S. Brown). Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 346 (1968).
"Soft Photons and the Classical Limit" (with L.S. Brown). Phys. Rev.
- . 1505 (1968).
- o6c "0ross Section for the Production of a Possible Sound Oascade-Nucleen Systen" (with M.E. Ebel) Phys. Rev. B
- to 1675 (1965).
C0hTERENCE PROCED INCE (Particle Physics)
.t "Pion Pora Pactor and Inelastic -
Scattering " Proceedings of the International Conference on - Scattering (7ti' ahassee. 1973)..
Oept d1:7:TAER3
(
Dr. Ortwin Renn August 1987 CURRICULUM V ITAE
- 1. Adresses o private: 5 Baldwin Road, Leicester MA01524 USA Tel.: (617) 892-4476 o business: Clark University CENTED-ETS 950 Main Street Worcester, MAOl610 USA Tel.: (617) 793-7686 Telex: 951829 CENTED Wor
- 2. Personal Date o Born December 26, 1951 o Marriage with Regina Renn-Kozikovski (1974) '
o Three children (born 1978, 1980, 1982)
- 3. Education o 1980: Ph.d. in Social Psychology (summa cum laude) o 1977: Master Degree in Sociology and Economics
, o 1970-1977: Undergraduate and Graduate Studies of l Sociology and Economics at Cologne University i
o 1969 - 74: Undergraduate Studies in Journalism and Business administration at Cologne University and Rodenkirchen College l
for Journaltam and Communication o 1970: High school graduation in Germany o 1969: High school graduation in Wheaton Ill.
(AFS Program)
I 1
l
2
- 4. Professional Career o since 8/1/1986: Associate Professor of Environment.
Technology and Society at the Clark University, Worcester MA, USA o 1/1/81 -
7/31/86: Head of the Research Section ' Man and Technology' within the Program Group "Technology and Society' of the Nuclear.Research Center Julich o 10/1/78 -
12/31/78: Scientific Analyst in the Program Group "Nuclear Energy and the Environment
- o 6/1/77 -
10/1/78: Head of the Conference Management Office at the Nuclear Research Center J011ch o 2/1/76 -
6/1/77: Journalist at the Public Relations Dep.
of the Nuclear Research Center J011ch o 2/1/74 -
2/1/76: High School teaching (Subject Social Sciences)
- 5. Professional Activities o Since 1984: Member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Reidel Publishing Company (Amsterdam, New York) for the series on "Technology, Risk and Society" o 1981-1986: Lecturer at the University of Stuttgart for Applied Social Sciences (since 1981) l c 1981-1986: Independent staff member of the Institute for i
Applied Social Psychology in DQsseldorf (Private Consulting Company) t o 1984-1986: Scientific consultant for the TV-Series
' Arguments' of the National German Broadcasting l Company (Science, Arts and Technology Program)
I o 1980-1986: Consultant of the "Risk Assessment Group" of the International Atomic Energy Agengy (IAEA) and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) l .- .
3 a
o 1982-1986: Member of the Editorial Board for the book series "Technology and Social Change' of the High-Tech-Publishing Company (Munich) o 1983-1985: Official German Delegate of the Versailles "Working Group on Public Acceptance of New Technologies" (London)
- 6. Professional Interests o Risk analysis and risk perception o Technology assessment and evaluation o Policy and decision analysis o Environmental impact assessment o Social impact assessment o Public participation and involvement o Energy systems and energy policies
- 7. Professional Affiliations o Arbeitsgemeinschaft for praxisorientierte Sozia1wissenschaft (Society for Applied Social Sciences) o Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Systemanalyse und Technikfolgenabschutzung (Society for Systems Analysis and Technology Assessment) o Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Soziologie (German Sociological Association) i o Internationsi Sociological Association o International Society for Risk Analysis
- 8. Proieet Manacement o 1985-1986: Social prospects of light technologies e 1985: Social impacts of information technologies o 1985: Chances and impacts of intelligent chip cards o 1982-1985: Social impact analysis of energy systems l
l 1
l l
L
4 o 1980 1986: International surveys on beliefs and attitudes towards nuclear energy o 1979-1981: Economic and social impacts of.' soft
- energy strategies o 1979-1981: Attitudes towards energy systems o 1978-1980: The perception of technological risks
- 9. Current Research Proiects o Risk management in the aftermath of Chernobyl o Siting of nuclear waste facilities o Transportation of nuclear high level vaste o Evacuation plans for emergency situations during severe nuclear incidents o Risk and regulation -
a comparison of different national styles o Environme7tal policies in the US and the Federal Republic of Germany
- 10. Scientific Consultant for o German Science Foundation, Bonn o Social Science Research Center, Los Angeles o Technological Change Cen.vr, London o International Atomic Energy Authority, Vienna o International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg (Austria) o Commission of the European Community, Brussels i o Joint Commission for Systems Analysis of the Major Research t
Centers in Germany
, o Ministry for Science and Technology, Bonn '
l O Institute for Applied Social Psychology, 00sseldorf I
l
5
- 11. Qrganization or Chairino of International Conferences o Co-Chairman of the session "Social Amplification" at the Annual Conference of the Society for Risk Analysis Hauston, November 1987 in o Chairman of the session "Public Acceptance' . BATAN Seminar on Nuclear Energy and Planning. Djakarta October, 6-10, 1986 (Indonesia),
o Member of the Scientific Advisory Committew for the First International Conference on Risk Assessment of Chemicals and Nuclear Materials. Guildford, GB, Sept., 22-26, 1986
. o Co-Director of the NATO Advanced Study Seminar and the Rockefeller University for an Expert Workshop on Expert Judgement and Expert Systems. Lisboa, August, 25-29, 1986 o Scientific Chairman for the Session on Indivualistic versus Structuralistic Theorias of Social Change. World Congress of Sociology. New Dehli, August, 18-24, 1986 o Scientific Chairman for the International Workshop on Decision Analysis and Participation. J011ch, Sept, 5-6, 1983 o Scientific Chairman for the International Workshop on Energy and Society. Bonn, Jan. 20, 1982 o Member of the Scientific Organizing Committee for the International Status Seminar on Risk Research. Bielefeld, Nov., 24-25, 1980
- 12. Selected Biblicerachy
- a. Books (German and English) I o Renn, O. ; Mumpower J., and Covello, V. (Editors):
Risk Perception. Reidel Publishing Company. Amsterdam /
New York. In preparation (to appear in 1988) o Hill, E, and Renn, O. (Editors):
New Technologies and Social Change. Special Volume of the Sociological International Review. In preparation.
o Mumpower, J. L. Phillips, L. D. Renn, O. and Uppuluri, V. R. R. (Editors):
Expert Judgment and Expert Systems. NATO ASI Series.
Computer and Systems Sciences, Vol. 35. Springer Publishing Company. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris and Tokyo 1987 m
6 o Renn, 03 Albrecht, G. ; Kotte, U. Peters, H.P.;
Stegelmann, H. U. :
Sozialvertragliche Energiepolitik. Ein Gutachten fur die Bundesregierung. HTV Edition 'Technik und Sozialer Wandel*. Munchen 1985 o Keeney, R. ; Renn, O., von Winterfeldt, D. ; Ke t t e, U. :
Die Wertbaumanalyse. Entscheidungsh11fe fur die Politik.
HTV Edition "Technik und Sozialer Wandel'. Munchen 1984 o Renn, O. :
Risikowahrnehmung der Kernenergie. Campus Verlag.
Frankfurt., New York 1984 o Renn, O. :
Verhe18ung und Illusion: Chancen und Grenzen einer alternativen Gesellschaft. Ullstein Sachbuch. Frankfurt, Berlin, Wien 1984 o Munch, E. Renn, 03 Reser. Th. (Editors):
Technik auf dem Pr0fstand. Girardet Verlag, Energiewirtschaft und Technik Verlagsgese11schaft. Essen and Grufelfing 1982 ,
o Renn, O. :
Die sanfte Revolution -
Zukunft ohne Zwang.
Girardet-Verlag, Energiewirtschaft und Technik Verlagsgesellschaft. Essen and Grufelfing 1980
- b. Selected Articles in Journals or Books (only English literature) o Kasperson, R. ; Emel, J. : Goble. R. ; Kasperson, J. X. and Renn, O. :
Radioactive Weste and the Social Amplification of Risk.
In: Proceedings of the Weste Management Conference 1987.
University of Arizona. Tuscon (in press) o Renn, O.
Discussion Paper on Risk Communication. In: H.
Kunreuther and P. Kleindorfer (editors): Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and Beyond. Springer Publishing Company. Heidelberg, New York et al. 1987 o Renn, O. :
Decision Analytic Tools for Resolving Uncertainty in the Energy Debate. Journal for Nuclear Engineering and Design. Vol. 93 (1986) Nos. 2 & 3, pp. 167-180 1
7 o Renn, O. :
Risk Perception: A Systematic Review of Concepts Research and (editor): Results. In: Air Pollution Control Avoiding and Managing Environmental Association Damage from Major Industrial Accidents. Proceedings of the APCA International Conference in Vancouver, Canada, November 1985. Pittsburgh 1986, pp. 377-408 o Renn, O. :
Risk Analysis Scope and Limitations. In: Regulating Industrial Risk, edited by H. Otway and M. Peltu.
Butterworth. London 1985 o Renn, O. :
Public Perception of the Future of Nuclear Energy. In:
Uranium and Nuclear Energy, Proceedings of the Nineth International Symposium held by the Uranium Institute, edited by T. Price. London 1985, pp 111-129 o Renn, 0. 3 Swaton, E. :
Psychological and Sociological Approaches to Study Risk Perception. In: Environment International, Vol. 10, 1984, pp. 557-575 o Renn, 03 Stegelmann, H. U. Albrecht, 01 Motte, U. :
Peters, H.P.:
An Empirical Investigation of Citizens' Preferences Among Four Energy Scenarios. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 26, No. 2 (1984) o Renn, O. :
High Technology and Social Change: In: High Tech Newsletter, Vol.I (1983), English Edition, pp. 14-24 o Renn, O.
Technology, Risk und Public Perception. In: Angewandte Systemanalyse/ Applied Systems Analysis, Vol. 4, No. 2 (1983), pp. 50-65 o Renn, O. :
Nuclear Energy and the Public Risk Perception, Attitudes and Behaviour. In: Uranium and Nuclear' Energy 1981, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium, edited by the Uranium Institute. Butterworth Scientific Ltd. London 1982, pp. 242-258 o Renn, O. :
Methodological Approaches to the Assessment of Social and Societal Risks. In: Beyond the Energy Crisis:
Opportunity and Challenge, edited by R.A. Fazzolare and C. B. Smith, Vol. IV. Pergamon Press. Oxford 1981, pp.
A375-A394
9
- d. Selected Papers for International Conferences o Renn, 0. 1 Social Amplification of Risks: Towards an integration of risk analysis, risk perception and policy implications.
Annual Conference of the Society for Risk Analysis.
Hauston, Texas, Nov. 1987 o Renn, O. :
Evaluation of Risk Communication Activities: Objectives, Approaches, and Pitfalls. APCA Specialty Conference:
Managing Environmental Risks. Washington, D.C., October 28-29, 1987 o Renn, 0. 8 Policy Options and Public Reactions in the Aftermath of Chernobyl. Tweith Annual Symposium of the Uranium Institute. London, Sept. 2-4, 1987 o Renn, O. :
Public Attitudes after Chernobyl. Invited Paper.
International Topical Conference on "Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Risk Management". Zurich, Switzerland, August 30 to Sept.4, 1987 o Renn, O. :
Risk Perception and Communication. The Second Annual New England Occupational Health and Safety Institute.
Newport, June 8-16, 1987 o Renn, O. :
The Public Perception of the Risks of New Technologies.
Conference on "New Technologies: Responding to Future Riske'. The New Technologies Safety and Health Institute. Worcester, May 28-29, 1987 o Emel, J. : Goble, R. ; Kasperson, R. Kasperson, J. X. and Renn, O. :
Risk Assessment and Social Impacts in High Level 1 Radioactive Weste Disposal. Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Chicago, Feb.18 -22 o Kasperson, R. ; Goble, R. : Hohenesser, C. and Renn, O. :
Nuclear Emergeacy Management after Chernobyl. Annual Meeting of the American As:ociation for the Advancement of Science- 2hicago, Feb.18 -22 o Bauman, E. and Penn. O. :
Regulation of Air Toxies An West-Germany and the United States: A Comparative Ana:ysis of Environmental Standard Setting. Internattenal Conference of the Air Pollution Control Association. Atlanta, Georgia, February 18
11 o Renn, O. :
Decision Analytic Tools for Citizens' Participation Public Planning in Projects. Seminar on CitAzen's Participation and Planning Cell Model. Bonn (FRG), July 1, 1986 o Renn, 0:
Energy Planning in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Seminar at the School for International Management.
Casteel Walbroek (Netherlands), April 23, 1986 o Renn, 0:
Conflict Resolution in Environmental Policy Making.
Seminar at the Center for Environment, Technology and Development (CENTED), Clark University, Worcester, March 12, 1986 o Renn, O. :
Risk Perception. A Systematic Review of Concepts and Research Results. Invited Paper for the International' Conference on ' Avoiding and Managing Environmental Damage from Major Industrial Activities'. Air Pollution Control Association. Vancouver, November 3, 1985 o Renn, O. :
Decision Analytic Tools for Resolving Uncertainty in the Energy Debate. International Seminar on "The Role of Data and Judgement in Probabilistic Risk and Safety Anal / sis." Brussels, August, 26-27, 1985 o Renn, O. :
l I
Informing and Educating the Public about Risk.
International Conference on Transportation, Storage and l Dispcaal of Hazardous Materials. Institute for Applied l
Systems Analysis. Laxenburg (Austria), July, 1 - 5, 1985 o Renn, O. :
' Decision Theory and Conflict Resolution. Invited Paper for the International Conference on Operations Research in the Energy Sector. Oslo , May, 13-14, 1985 o Renn, O. :
Premises of Risk Communication. Workshop on Risk Communication. National Science Foundation and Environmental Protection Agency. Los Angeles, Dec. 15, 1984 o Renn, O. :
Impacts and Consequences of Information Technologies on Social Change. International Conference: Social Consequences of the New Technologies. International Sociological Association. 20 rich, August, 29-31, 1984
.. . . ._ . _ _ ._ . . - . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ . _ _ . ___.. _= _ _ ._ ___ _ _____. = _ . . _ .
e A3. -
o Renn, O. s ,
Psychological Perception of Energy Systems. (
International Conferences Societal Responses to the "Energy Crists". Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, Sept. 7-11, la81 4
t i [
r i
l i
I i
l [
.l k I h I
i i
l I
t I
r b
,,,--._--.--..-_=.,.-,_m_--m_-----,-...--...,,,--m,-..___,_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ~
z VICTOR NICHOLAS EV00k tmoFF Saa We:ste Street Nee:mam, a assa:n.setts 3:tga
( 617 > 444 8564 81RTHDATE: A sgast :, 1944 9:ston, "asse:ma tetts MARITAL STATUS: Marrie:, 2 := tis e-EDUCATION:
Besten ung.e stt> 1962-66 9 A.
9:31 gy J:rns H:=p :Ps Urt.e sgty 193g.7]
i:M Rac::!s;;:a! 1:tence E18ERIENCEt 1.) Ras:st::- Sa:te:t. ton Of st :e-2:s t: ' .: <e s;t y Meet:41 Ce-te , E:st: , Ma, t97 -= esert 2ese:n.s::le F:- a: sttom safety
' a arcac ae ::s!/NRC license at the mect:a! an: co-tal sensels, Naval 21ces Resea :5 Lateratortes arc Untee stly M:se:tal.
2.) Regulattey Affetes Admints-8 trate-/ 42:st as- Sa f et y s Of'::e---Sam-a Otege:stte Lat: at: :es attle re, Pa.
Jarwa y, 1974 - Jwly, 1977 1
! tesconst:te for cc :lten:e w:tn
! all f e:e al, state, anc Ic:a!
l -agwlations involving Manciteg ,
l wse are transoortation of recto
=earmaceuticals. 0 taine: IN0*$
ame NOA'1 Po recac: mar-a:ewt tcals
, from CCA. Rescens tele for recta-
- tien safety of fa:111ty mancling 200 :.etes Malye:en.a 99 ae:
Tecnnettwe 99e.
- 3. 5 Famage- Recaccmarmaceutical Se v tee Georgetown Universit >
wes::tal an Wasmangton Hose t tal Certe* , Washtngton, D.C. Neve ee* , 1971-Ma-cm, 1972.
Rescemsttle for cre:Arteg recto-
- Pa-mace.t t:als art consola cating l
[ .
.. \
ee sources betwee t *e t.: hes-catels. Re scons t:. 3 8:* redta-tson safety of tae : :; a .
4.) Manage , Q.al;t, :-t cl/
Health Physt:t e t s t s t a a.t .
Caabanege, Pa. '.;.st. 1955-August, 1965.
- esconstele f o :.s.:t, ::-t ci of fanished Pacace:t:.s :*.;s.
Assisted healtn : ,t;; staff wtth saears , sweveys , a*: 3er:mtamta-at ton eme ations.
MEM8ER: 1.) w ealth 8%yst:: 1:::et, I.) Internat tena; : :;st t:- Pme-te:t ton Ass:::st::-
2.1 New Eeglanc l :t e --talt P Phystes Sectat.
a . ' Ameet can S t aa:s :: : tittute N A A ,3 ( Nwelsa* e:;;; e ) 1959-1972.
5.) Panel of Ess s t t-A-eatcan Boare of Nealt 8 .s t: , 1994-present.
E.) Amert an Pselt: -ea.te Assoc.
'.? American Ass:::st;:- ft- the Acvance=ent c' I::e :e f.1 New Ee;!aPO C*t?.ts* H 85 1965-cresent.
CERTIFICATION:
Ce-tt f a c a t't e n a m Mt s . t
- 8 ,stes tCmP) Ame scan 8:e : :' wealtn 8a r s t:s ,1980. Re:e-t;';es,1964 ACADEMIC AFFILIATIONS: 6:ston University 5: ::; cf Patite w
eal t h , AeJwn= t As s;s ta-i 8 ofesso-8.:11: Heal t h ( Ea.; :- e-t al wealth) at Boston v :.e st tr 5: noel o f Me:te rne. '!!*-e eeent 8106RAPHY:
E;egaachy itstes t- 6 't W*e c.tlacations 1965-CONSULTANT:
t.) Corning Meet ca;. Pe:* t eld, Ma.
1978-79
- .) Seefer: Veteraa 8: :*ts-trat t en Hosot te; . Se:f ore, Ma .
1980-presort 3.) Seragen, In:, H:c6anator, ad.
1980-cressat 4.) Registe*ec (*: eat ce da tett:-
Protection. *: acnwealte. c8 Massachusetts. 1990 = rete-t ta-ray: am: *actetsct::et PAPERS:
Paceas. leatie: :e:eas ame ::ste-sessions caeseate: at rat icas. 4 :
local setenti f ic *eetings as:* at Health Phy s ac s 1::tely are tat American Nw:les* 13:tety.
PUBLICATIONS:
1.) Eve:6ta: , v.N. ame ws; t ,
H.N. Ja. 'R:.e of Hecat.:
PPag::ytcsat ta In:Fessaa; Heavy Metal ?:*1caty.*
J:_aan! e8 A_!'.eaa "eeie: e.'
- J ne, 15?' *Austra:ts.
2.1 Evcon an:ff, .' . N . and wagre .
H.N. .' a . 'Hegatic Phagg;ptists as a Metheella for Increatt ;
Heavy Metal ? *1caty.*12 - n! .
of the na tie.!?aaest> elta Seriets. 11: 148-149fe: .aa, 1972.
- 3. ) Evcon t aa f f . V.N. anc wa;*e .
H.N. Jr. 'Re:.:ttom c' !a:..-
Tortetty by fic:tage of te Ret tewloeacetmeltal Syst e .
- Jouamal e' t*e ee tteulcea??-
taelial Seetet.. 11: 595-52!
June, it?".
4.) E v e :i t a r ' ' . '. . N . ams Swaa:.t.
9.A. ' A S a m .' e Me t ho c t o ' t s a ,
Phasen:aas-3: 'or Raetetre a:
ADDltCattoet.' 1mueaal e8 Nuelana Mafietae. 19: 1:Ei.
Oscammer, 15 5.
5.1 Evac 6 t ao f f , v.N. ' Hot La:
Redaccharma:e.t tcal Accace-t Act ent ial Anatorme Releste. '
Jeuama! e' t*e wealta 8% ,i t s Smeret. 39: 5?3-574 Se: tea:e-1990.
e ,
e 6.) Evdoktmof8 ..N. 'An Eccecat-cet anc #e:.: Detector of Wace Test Conta*tastion et e Meet-cel Centea.' leuaaal s' the wealth #m. sir, Seetetv. 41:
414-415. A.;.i t . t161
- 7. ) L. Evcob tacff.'..N. anc wetatmewe
- 0wamt :';:s t ion o f P-32 Removed Ow : ; Leub acmoresis ey Breasst e .sas C:enting.-
citateal N_r'.en- m eet tae. 9:
2 8-2 9, Jan.e*, . 1984 S.) Evoc6 tmo f f , ..N.
'Co==ent om Forcesting E.:ssure from Fall-out.* 1e_- ,.' er wealtm
- m entes ?: :,*.. 49: !!4-Sit, Acett, 1981.
S.) Evco6taoff. ..N. 'HamCCoo6:
Pactatism le8 tty in $9eltaas.*
A=eatena fe_ nl et public Healt$. 75, C4, Acett, 1985.
it.) Carcarellt, i., Caeccell, C..
anc Eveon te:", V. tme Suce tority :' s NA! $wevey Peter Over $* ownt er to Os tee t P-3* *:-tamt me t ion. '
feaaaal s' ++ wealt* 8h. ties Seriet.. Sb '!i-139, 1996.
11.) Evcobtaoff s,N.
'Cose Assess-
-ent feca 1 :.=e ation e f Ce egulatee 1:ite Bio-est:s!
Ascwa s t e. ' li .-aal e' the wealta naviire te int.. 50:
3:5-329. 19f".
' uwaarms
' RESEARCH ~
-:=- i. C o M S S D~Gl4 T E h 3.c. %. m o.
% oer fferart,m O.
s e es % e. m o. RESUME A w i .sc . m o.
- cr::c ,a w e u. m o
.,_,, ,, g R: er T. E:kea, Bom: May 7,1944 EDUCATION: The ONo S2te Un versity Ph.D. Juna 1978 S2:e Un: vers y of New York C:rege of Erw:nmental Sc:ence and Foresry M S. June 1974. B.S. January 1969 EXPERIENCE:
1984 to cresent. Assocate Professer of F: est Resources Umvers.ty et New Hames,tre 1978 to 1984 Ass s ant Professor of Fores- Resour:ess Un: vers. y of New Hamesnire OTHER 1981 Summer Lera.y Reacer EXPERIENCE: Manne Biologd t.aocrat j W:ocs He!e, Mass.
19851985 Saoba:ca)w:nIns rte et Fores Gene cs Berxefey, Ca!.fom:a MEMBERSHIPIN Xi Sp~a Pi n:n:rary forest.y soc ety PROFESSIONAL Sigma Xi SOCIETIES: Socery of Amencan Foresters Nor:n Amercan Quant:a:ve Fcres: Gene:cs Gr:La P ct'at:n B Otog ss of New Engia-d The Soesty f:r C:nserva:en Bo:ogy P.O. Box 462 Durham, New Hampshire 03324
I Robert T. Eckert, Ph.d.
2 HONORS:
Invited Moderator for the fol!oung meetings:
Fifteenth Air Polluton Workshoo Session on Genetes, Stesding and Reproducton Knoxytile, Tennessee Aoni1983 Nor:h American Quanttatve Forest Genetes Group Workshop Sessien on Norreastem Reg enal Tree lmorevement Coeur D etene, Idaho August 1980 InvitedLecuer:
Seminar on Air Pollution and Ecosystem Vulnerablity Yale Uneversity Dr. F.H. Borman, Organizer March 1982 RESEARCH GRANTS:
Enwonmental Protecton Agency,1)S Forest Sevce 5222.000 for Rec scruce resoonse to ponu:en. Oc:cber 1985 to Septemoer :ssa.
Hubbard Founcaton $35,000 for 1 year: Genetes ofintertical ma sn grasses. Oc:cber 1987 to Septemcor 1988. C. Penniman, A. Matiesen co9nnepalinvestgators.
Jasoor and Manon Wh:tng Foundaten $4500 for 1 year: Encem:c conors :
Califerrua. Apnl 1985 to March 1986.
Natonal Science Founcaton $80.000 for 2 years: Dis:ributen and gene cissnet pooulatons of serwees in to North At: ante. March 1983 to Feorvary 1985. C. Penniman, C. Neefus, and A. Ma:beson co onne;oa:
investgators.
Natonal Park Sennce $20,000 for two years: Popu!aton s:ructure of '
pouuten sensatve and tolerant eastem wnite pne in me Great Sm:ky Mov:acs. June 1983 to May 1965.
i I
~
4 1
1
- .__ __ _ _ , , , _ _ _ . , , . _ _ _ _ . _ . , , . , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , , _ , . _ _ , _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ , , , _ _ _ _ _ . _ - . ,m., -_,m_._-, . . _ , , _ .
Robert T. Ecl<ert, Ph.d.
3 N H IXPERIMENT STATION RESEAMCH:
Hat:h Funced Researcn:
H 2B8: Pollut.on eMec:s on Nor'feas*em co .!ars $22.500 for H 179: Genetes of Northeastem Trees $75 030 for 5 yeaa.
PUBLICATIONS:
Cumming, J.R., R.T. Eckert LS. Evans.1986 Effect of aluminum on 32P votaxe anc rans'oca:y oy red scruce seechngs. Can. Jov. For. Res. 16.864467.
E:xert R.T.1986. Genete ocou: acon strue:re of air oo tolerant eastern wnite one Docxtatens in to Great Smoky Mountans National Park. Nati. Park Ser. Rept SP 445046 36. 61 pp.
Penniman. C.A., C.D. Neefus, A.C. Mathieson and R.T. Eckert.1986.
Isoryme vanacons of two seaweec spec:es rat have cislunct c.smoutons in the norewest Acantic. p. 56 in: Programme anc 20:k :f Abwacts from re Twelfm in:ematonal Seaweed Symposrum, Sao Pa'.'o Braz:1,27 July-1 August 1986.
Ba re:t. J.P., R.T. i'.4ett, and R.R. Cooks.1965. Monitor:ng re g :ct a herth of wntte one in New Hamosnire. Proc. IUFR0 Conference Zec ,
1985, Birmenscorf, Ecg. Ans:st fut cas focene Versuenswesen. oo.
201 203.
Cumming, J.R., R.T. Eckert. LS. Evans.1985. E."ect of a!uminum en oomss:um totake my roc spruca seechngs Can. J. Bot 63: 1099 1103.
Cumming, J.R., R.T. E:kert. and LS. Evans.1985. Kinetes of octasse uoske in red spruce seechngs. Ca9. J. Bo:. 62(3).512 516.
E kett, R.T. and J.R. Cumming.1985. Potarsum uctake in eree provenances of red sonuce seechngs at e.ree Al 3
- fevels. Proc. 290 Norreastem Forest Tree Imorovement Coderence, West V;rgea Univers.ty, pp 107119.
i Robert T. Eckert, Ph.d.
4 Penniman, CA, C D. Nee'us. A C. Ma?!ssoa anc R.T. Eckert 1955.
Phys;otogical and gerete varatons of serweec pooutators F C:sjunct c:s70000ns #17e nCrtT*est Ata- 0. Aostra:3 of Te S& :rc Interna:enal Phyco!og. cal Congress, Cc:4- agen Denma 1965. p.124 (absr.).
Eckert, R.T. and B.S. Eckert.1984. A oroca:. e for study ofit"mu preeertes of onces;erm tssue of 6 t.;ms L Can J. For. Res.
14:142 145.
E:kert. R.T. and J.B. Ryu,1983. Foliar ison e vanaten in twevy sevon p:venances of 6 gi::ha L: Rela!;:rsh:p of three foliar is:ryr e a!!eles etn heignt growm and muttrvanas carterns of range wee vanaten. Proc. Swenth North Amenca* Forest Biofogy Woruneo.
August 7 8,1982, Urw. of Kentucky, Larrgen, KY. op. 179 187.
Ryu. J.B. and R.T. Eckert,1983. Foliar iscame variaton in !*enty sev proverances of 62::ha L. Genex eversi'y and populaton strue:gre. Proc. 28:n Normeastem Fores Tree improvement Conference ,
Ju!y 1718,1982, UrW, of New Hampante Dumam, N.H. pp. 249 261.
- t::eng, RA and R.T. Eckert,1983. Xyle- orphology anc c S::'Orat:n .n o g:com aspen (M c'tatde"Ta) P oc. 28:n Nettseas:ern F:'es:
Tree imprevement Conference. Jury 7 6 '982. Univ of New Ha?osve.
Og .am, N H. po. 118 125.
E:ker, R.T. and D.B. Hous:On 1982. FoLa*:.e cr: case ano a:c:n:s: a ase actmty response to Icw leved SO2 exposes in eas:ern wn.:e p.re c:res.
For. Sc. 28(3).661664.
Eckert, R.T., R.J. Joty and D.B. Neale 198* Genetes cf iscry e vaca 3 and knkage relatoaships among alleryme oc in 35 eastem wn. e otee !
c!ones. Can. J. For. Res.11(3).573 579.
Ricard, R. and R.T. E:kert 1981. Evaluats :'::en poiratec h:ia 2AE.'.12 seec sources gan tn c3ere :en2ners anc mee a Fr:c.
27:n Nonesas:em Forest Tree Improvem- Conference. Aug. 7 6. iiil Urw. of Vermont. Burhngton, Vt. pp. 202 212.
Eckert, R.T. and D.B. Houston,1980. Phe::r,. res:s and neoc'e e'engar:n ;
response of 6 g::ha to low level su.V c;orice eroosures. Can. J.
For. Res. 10(3):357 361.
i
.' Robert T. Eckert, Ph.d.
. 5 Eckert. R.T. anc R.D. Westa!!.1975. The factor ana!ys s of mul:veate data s)1: ems. Proc. 22nd Nortneastern Forest Tree Irnprovement Conference. Aug. 7 8,1979. Colfege of EnwonmentalScence ec Foresry, Sy*use, N.Y. pp. 4152.
hPress:
Brym, P.R. and R.T. Eckert.1987. Within stand c!vstenng of aastern wMe one genopes. Proc. 30th Nortneas ern Forest Tree 1.?provement Conference, University of Maine.
O'Ma! fey. 0.M., K Gerhard Gagnon, J. Dolan, and R.T. E:kert.1987.
Preoaraton of soruce foliage samses for starchyel t'octroonores s. F:r.
Tecn. Note 15. Agr. Exper. Sta.. UnN. of New Harnpsaire. 32 po.
Gemard Gagnon. K, D.M. OMaNey,8. Men, R.T. Eckett.1987. Soruce 8.4 c collecten merocs. For. Tech. Note 16, Agr. Exper. Sta., Univ of New Ha.?osnae. 23 pp.
Recent Presentations:
' Red soruce, a speces in troube71st Meeeng of me Socery for Conservaton B. ology, Bozeman, Montana June 1987.
'Geogracac var.aton in mut !ocus a.'iczyme genotypes and motDao!cgy eas:ern wme cine', Westem Forest Gene::cs Assocaton mee:ng.
Atany, Oreg:n. August.1986. R.D. Westall co .a cr.
e 6/4/87 UNITT.D STATES Of AMERICA
, NUCIZAR RD3ULAIDRY CDMISSION BEFORE 'lHE ATOMIC SAFTTY I.ICINSING BOARD In the Matter of )
) Docket No. 50-443 P2blic Service Co. of New Ha pshire, ) 50-444 et al. )
(Of f site)
)
(5.at:r:6. Station, tr.its 1 6 2 )
RISPCNSE of THE FEDERE EMEMDCY MasActe,7 A3ccy 7e u.'.5SA0!f.'SCS A~iCR';EY GENERE JA.*25 M. SM:00N'S OFT-5:2 Ev2 MEAY PREPA?IDNESS INTUUOGMORIES AC PIO.'EST POR PEL7 ION OF DOCUMDTS TO FTML. ( SET No. 2) i... 'ederal D.ergency Management Agency (FE.%) is not a party to the ahve-captiwed prcceeding and it is, for that reason, not obligated 'to respord to the intermteries propounded by any intervenors. FD4A voluntarily pre vides the information supplied belw, but reserves the right to coject to f uture discovery requests.
Interrecatcry No.1:
Describe in detail your position with respect to eaen contention to be litigated by the Attorney General and ea:n sa.opart of each su:h co.tenti:n.
Deserbe in detail the reasons for your position.
Ans e r Nc . 1 F .W. .' nas developed a p:sition on all Of f-site co.;entic s att :ef f t:
litigation in this proceeding. The positio . a 4 the reasoniry for it is a ttn:5+f as 2.;:;endix A and is in::rporated i .:: r y respo .se :: t*ese 1 :er-r: gat: ries.
Interrocatery No. 2 Identif y and produce all &cewnts on c.ich you hve relied de rely, or wd1 rel, to s.pp:r: year p:siti:n en ea:r. Of these c :e .:i: .s. Iden lti tr.*
f 8 AP 9A l
~ D TQ/Q I - r I
2/
informatico in each document on which you have relied, & rely, or will rely and the specific subpan of each contention which that information concerns.
Answr No. 2 In forndatirg our position on the contentions t: be litigated in this proceeding, FD% relied on the published FL% Regulati:r.s concerning Radiological L er;ency F.a . .in; (44 Cris 350 et. se:;.): it.E 06 54, T D'. . RIF '. Fevis:: .-1:
the FEP.MW Paviews of radiolcgical emergency prepare! .ess for the Seabreck site whi:?. have been se:ved on the parties to t*.is pr;,:eedin; and are listed in our answr to Attorney General A es Shannon's of f-s;te EP Interro;atory Set ib.1, Westion 2 3 and t.he FF.% me.orand;:. of De:e . er 24, 1965, (attached as Appendix B to this response to interrogatories). The FEM position on each contention and subpan of contention cites which of these doeJ*$nts was relied u;Cn in developiry that particVlar position.
Interrogatory No. 3 S tate whether you have relied, & rely, or will rely on any study, calcalaticn, or analysis to sup;crt your position on ea:h of these contentions.
!! so, please:
- a. Mscribe the nature of the study, calcalatter, or aralysts an:
ice .tify any doe. rents that discuss or des::be the study,
. ca'. 21stion or analysis
- . Icer.tif y tne person.s wna perf r ed tne s .ad; . :alc.'ati: er analysis:
- c. State when and where the study, calcalation or analysis was perf:r ed:
P
- d. Des: ribe in detail the inf 0r atien or data tr.at was studie$,
ca'. 21sted or analyzed: !
- e. Des: ribe the results of the study, calcalation or analysis:
- f. Dg'.atn tcv suen study, calculatica., or analysis provides support f r your position cc. ea:n of these conte-tio .r.
I 1
J f
3/
Answer No. 3 FD4A has no current intention to rely on any stei, or analysis twy:od those set forth in response to question 2.
Interrogatory No. 4 D: y:. inte .f c: offer tne testi ony of a .y expt.-. .titness wit'. respe:t to any contention to be litigated by the Attorney Gem n17 If so, please s
- a. Identify each ex;ert witness who you intend present wit.. respe:t to each surpart of each such co tentions
- b. State the substance of tne f acts to whien ea: ex;ert witness is expe:ted to testif y:
- c. State the substance of the opinion or opinio d to which each ex;mrt witness is expected to testify;
- d. Provide a smmary of the grounds for each oc:.. ion to which each expert witness is expected to test:.fyr
- e. State whether the f acts and opinions listed - response to the foregoirg are contained in any doewer::
- f. State whether the opinion of any expert wit.uss is teed in whole or in part on any scientific rue or principle, and, if so, set forth such rule or principler
- g. State whether the opinion of any expert witness is based in whole or in part on any code or re;lation, govermental or otherwise, and, if so, identdy ea:h such code or rsquiation and the specific sec. en er portion thereof relied upons and
- g. State whether the opinic . of any expert witnes is based in cole er in part upor, any scientif:: ::
en;ineerin; book or other publication, and, i so,.
identify the book or publication.
J. . s .m : %.4 FDG res not yet identified the witnesses it inti.es t: have testify with respe:t to any of the contentions admitted to tr.u proceeding a d can descriN naither the substan:e of their testi. ony not s .y dxcents to N relied upo- beyo-d car response to Interr:gatory 1 s.- a.
f
. 4/
Interrogatcry 2. 5 tb you intend to offer the testinony of any non-expert witness with respect to any contention to be litigated by the Attorrey General? If so, please:
- a. Identify each ncmxpert witness who you intent to prese .t with respect to each subpart of ea:h such contention;
- b. State the substa ,:s of the f acts to which ea: novexper:
witness is expected to testify; and
- c. State whether the f acts listed in response to the fore;;iN are contained in any doc' rent, and pr: duce t*.e sa. e.
Answer No. 5
.FDG has not yet identified the witnesses it intends to have testify with respect to any of the contentions admitted to this proceeding and can neither describe the substance of their testinrmy nor describe any doctanents referenced in response to Interrogatory 1 supra.
Inte_rrogatory No. 6 Identify and produce all documents in which you or any agent on your tehalf have assessed the adegaacy of state and local energency plans with respect to any contention to be litigated by the Attorney General. Include in your response any docrents concerning steps which have been taken or will be taken by the State of New Hampshire or the Appli: ants t: address inade7aa:ies in any past or eatrent local plans.
A.asser No. 6 All publicly availa::le doerents in which EM. c a a;er.t o car benalf has assessed the adegaacy of State and local pla .s with respect to the New Harpshire Radiological thergency Response Plans are referenced in res;onse to Interrogatory 1 supra.
f
. 5/
FD4A has no doctments ocr, coming the steps which hm been taken or wil.1 be taken by the State of New Hampshire or the Applicants to address thc ird adegaacies uncovered in the current local !bw Ha. pshire FIRP, other than the prcgress reports served on the parties by the thw R: pshire Attorney General.
0:3ection to Massachusetts Interrcontory 6 FWA ocjects to this Interrcgatory as irrelevant aM unduly burdensme to the exteM that this interrogatory requests doccenu in the possessio.
of FWA which concerns steps which have been taken by tra State of thw Hampshire or the Applicant to address inadegaacies in a ; past local plans.
The info =ation requested is irrelevant since previous ;*ans are not in cor.tention in this licensing hearing. It would be unduly burdensame for F&A to asser-Die the info:-.ation since these dccunents =ay well date ba:L to 1981 and are not the type which FEMA regularly maintens. Asser .blirg this infomation would require extra search of TEMA"s re:Ords and possibly records of other Federal agencies to produce the infor .r. ion regaested.
Interr catory No. 7 For each of thcee contentice.s to be litigated by tre Attorney General f:r whier. FTA has not yet adopted a posit:en,
( a) state the date by which FF% e.vpe:ts to nave a:cped a positan:
(b) state shether FD% will voluntarily ske its p:sition kncwn 4
on each contention as soo as it has adopte! ;u position and, it se, ho. it will : .1.e its p:s t u:r v. .:. -
(c) state whether, pursuant to the Ms craMr of 'ederstaMing between the h7C and F&A, 50 Fed. Reg.15485 e. seq. ,
"FF.% will respond infomally to dis:ove:y re'5ests by parties," g at 15487, af ter it has mde its p;sition known with respect to any contention te be 1:tigate: :y tne Attomey Gneral.
e I
l
W Answer No. 7 FD4A has developed and enclosed as A5peMix A a position on all admitted off-site contentions in this proceeding.
Interrcostory No. 8 3
I s it yx pxitior, that the vast .~.3,'ority of evar;atin; pers.o .s wh:,
in the event of an accident with an of f-site release Of radiation, are instructed to re;crt to reception centers for monitora; will cceply wita these instractions? hhat percentage of the evacuees dt you expect will c:rply?
Answer No. 8 FD4A has developed a national policy concernirs tais issue which is attached as Appendix B. Briefly, that policy doctanent irdicator that state and local goverrrnents shoald plan that at least 20% of t.he EM population will report to reception centers for radiolegical monitoring.
Interrogatory No. 9 4
In the event of an accident with an off-site release of radiation, e.at percer.tage of the EPZ population vxid you expe:t to be instru:ted to report t: reception centers for monitoring? hhat is the largest neder of persons t.nat might be instracte: tt rep:rt for m:.;t:rin;? k's t is the sr.allest neber of persons taat mi;r.t de instracted to report f:r monitoring'?
A. .r-e r N: . 9 The permutations of possible a::ident segaences involving off-site ,
releases; ti. e of day; ti.-e of year; weather before, caring and af ter the releases and wind characteristics darin; and af ter a release prorA:ly a
i
^ , , , . , - . - - , _ - - - . - - - - . _ - . . _ -_ ,
1/
a;ptoacti infinity. It is therefore ingossible to speculate with any worthwhile result about whas the instructions to the public concerviing nonitoring and decontmination might be in a given actual accident. Be largest nr.:er of persons who might be instracted to report for monitorirn is likewise scje:t to a nearly infirite nr N r of variables and has no t hetitt.:a'. :o;ndar .
FEUA has theref ore adopted tne national poli f on ene ratter referenced in our answer to Interrcgatory 8 s. ora. B e callest n r M r :f persons w,: r.i ?. be instra:ted to report for monitorin; co;1d be zer: in certain a::idents involvin; of f-site release such as a srall release of no:le gas.
Interm;atory 10 In the event of an accident with a wide-spread off-site release of radiation, if all persons instructed to report to re:sption centers for monitorirn do so report, could a bottleneck be created at the entrance to su:h reception centers? Have any sensitivity studies been perfor ed to deterr.ine the irpact such bottleneck (s) would have on ETEs? Please explain your res;cnses and provide any such studies.
Ar.swer 10 FFw.'. has no specific infor .ation on this. Dr. Ber as Urbanik will oe res;c.s':le for prese tin; testircny relattve t Eva.. stion T1.me Est:. .stes .
Interr:catory 11 1
With respe:t t; the PA Me crand.r., ?b. R!-TH-35-28 dated 12/31/85, f ror. F3.ard A. Boras to the Te;ional Assistance Ccrr.ittee, Radiol:q1:a1 D ergen:/ Preparedness Task Force, on the scject of Seabrook Emergenef Plans, pleases (a' des:ri:e tne foesorr., referred to in i 1 of that Me crandr that are "; .17;e (at least t- Ma; :tude P t: Seatr e 1
f l
S/
(b) describe uniquer in what manner the above-referenced factors an doerend
( c) if any of the questions raised in that mencraMm have been res; ceded to, provide such response (s) and any doctrunts sup;crting such res;cnse(s)
(d) for any questions or issues raised by that mercrande but not yet a.s.ered, to the extent possible, state e.at the cv.st@ r-atist.a are that will h.sve a bearing on the res;cnse wner. given and provide any dcctrwnts relevant to the consideration of the issaer (e) pr: vide all records and state the substance of all comanications, writte . or oral, within FEM or between FEwA and any other agen:y, pers:r., cmpany or organization that is directly or indirectly relevant to the issues raised in this mercrandu~.. -
Answer No. 11 a) The factors unique at least in magnitude to Seabrook referred to in our Decercer 31, 1985 menoraMm concerning protection of the Seabrook beach population are the size of the transient ("day tripper *) beach population; size of the beach population neber of urwinterized hcusing/
ccrnercial buildirgst voltre of corridor type road traffict emplexity of road network ntr.ber of local goverments involved in the emergency plannin; process; and lar;e geographic size of the EP2.
b)
The abcNe referenced fa: tors are unique in na;nitude and resulting need f 0r extre ely ecrplex ernergenr/ plamin;.
c A cop,. of the Febraary li,1997 me crand.r f r:r, the h% is atta:hed as Apperdix D to this subnission since it has already been released to one Of th+ parties t: this prxe+ din;. Fr.wA will not release the other res;cnses to its Dece oer 31, 1995 ne crands oat of concern that the release of these dxa ents r.ay interfere with the deliberative and collegial RC process.
If necessary, FD% will seek to pro'tect the other responses by assertin; ber.t;ve Privile;e.
I i
1 e
9/
d) the issues raised by that unmorandue have been aufficiently respcehd to for FD% to develop aM articulate a pcsition which is set forth in our response to the contentiens: Devised 7twn of Ra.mpton VIII to Bevision 2, SAPL-16, aM ND::NP PIRP-8 e ntained in AppeMix A of this ks;onse to Interrogattries.
e) By agreewn cetween counsel FDR offers the follcwing general response to this Interrogatory. As statwd ir. our response to Contentions: Revised Town of Harpton VIII t: Revision 2, SVL-16, and NTCN7 PU.2-8 contained in Appendix A of tr.is &x: rent, this issue has been of tremendous concern to FD% since cmar earliest involvament in the Seabrook emergency plannirg process. There therefore, have been rnany dozens of meetirgs, phone calls, and oort-vercations dire:tly related to the rwrcrande. within FD%, betwen FD% and the NRC, within the nenber agencies of the Asgional Assist-ance Ccmittee, between FD% and representatives of the utility, between FD% aM representatives of the State of New Hampshire, as wil as betwen FD% and the staf f of the Suba:rrt.ittee on tmegy Conse:vation and Power of the Ur ited States Fouse of Papresentatives.
Handreds and perhaps thousaMs of oral or written ccrrunications involvin; FDR and etner >ersons or organiza ,io .s ca . con:ievably be considered indire:tly relevant to the issas co..ained in our Me craMu of t>ceber 31, 1985. ;
It is the general policy of FD% that we will seek to protect conver-sations within FD%, and within the Asgional Assistance Ccrvittee
!r:n discove:y ca. the groands of be utDe Privilepe out of concern that the release ci da:wwnts or sxr. aries cf dis:.ssion r.af l l
19 interfere with the deliberative and collegial nature of the RAC process and inpair ability of FD4A staff to reach fully fully informed decisicns.
If necessary, FDiA will therefore seek to limit this interrogatory on grourds of Dcecutive Privilege. In addition this interrogatory seeks potentially hundreds of documents, and reconsttv: tion of tr, usands of phone calls concerning prMecisional material Of dubious relevance to a decision
- .sde by this Agency whos+ basis for decision is set forth in Appendix A. Therefore, ;f necessary, FD4A would seek a further protective order on the : asis t. hat a more ccrnplete answer to this interrogatory would be irrelevant and unduly burdensome.
l
! I declare, FE.Ws under penalty responses of perju:y to Contentions se: that the foregoing responses, incitding forth as A;perdix A to the Massachusetts Attorney General's Interrogatories and Request for Production of tbcu ents are true and accurate to the best Of my knowledge and belief.
N Edward A. Ihamas, Division Chief
// Natural & Technological Hazards Regio I g,j. - Federal F. ergency Management Agency Dated June 4,1987 tbston, Kassachusetts Any objections expressed are rude :y counsel.
1 H. Josep3 Flynn Attorney F e de rs' E. + rje ti F.1.a;e < .: A;en::
1 l
l
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY John W. McCormack Poet Office and Cour; house Boston, Massachusetts 02109 INFORMATION AND GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM OATE: Dec ember 31. 1985 NUMBER: RI-TH-85-23 MEMORANDUM FOR: Regional Assistance Coassfttee (RAC)
Radiological Emergency Preparedness Task Force (REP)
FROM: Edward A. Thomas, Division Chief Natural & Technological Hazards
SUBJECT:
Seabrook Emergency Plans We have all known for years that the state and local plans to protect the public in the event of an accident at the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant must include special attention to several factors which are unique (at least in magnitude) to the Seabrook area. By now, all of you should have received the formal submittal from the State of New Hampshire of the off-site emer.
gency plans for Seabrook. As we indicated in the transmittal memo, port. ions of the plan have not yet been developed and, therefore, were not included in the package sent to you. Therefore, some of the special, quasi-unique factors which affect Seabrook, such as the impact of the road network on evacuation times, cannot be addressed by the RAC at this time. However, the state and local plans do indicate what steps the state proposes to take with respect to the vital area of sheltering and evacuating the beach population.
At the earliest possible time in the RAC review process I propose that we focus in on the beach population to determine if special technical assistance from the RAC may be needed to assist state and local governments refine their plans to protect this group. It appears to us that when we discuss beach population', we are talkin beach population, and (b)gsummer about two residents different whogroups: inhabit unwinterized (a) the transient a:com.
modations on or near the beach A. The Transient Beach Population i The lant beach population is that group who make day trips to the i
beaches Seebrook by auto, bus, or other means of locomotion. This pop.
ulation has no identified place of shelter other than any vehicle in which l they may have arrived at the beach. The emergency plans submitted by the State of New Hampshire essentially indicate that this population will be protected in the event of an accident at Seabrook by closing the beaches at the earliest sign that a serious emergency is developing, and encouraging the transient beach population to leave the area. Those beachgoers who have I
nearby shelter would be encouraged to seek the shelter or evacuate as con-ditions at the plant dictated. The consulting firm of KLD Associates is in l
r e
- - _ _ , . . _ _ . _ _ _. _ ._ ___ ___,. _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . . , _ _ _ _ _ . - . _ _ , _ ,,_,_m _ , . _ , , - . _ , _ . . _ _ , _ , _ _ _ ,_ _ _ , _ , _ _ _ _ _ . . , . _ - - . _ . .
I i 1 l
the process of developing revised evacuation time e timates for all popula- l tion groups-in the Seabrook EPZ. We do not now have an estimate for how ,
long it would take to evacuate the beach population in an accident either I when everyone else in the area was told to take shelter, or when the entire fi r; was ordered to evacuate, or any combination of evacuations in between t he se ext reme s . However, for the sake of discussion, we believe that it is reasonable to assume for the present that the beach population would be out in the open, or in vehicles close to the center of the EPZ for several hours after the earliest indication that an accident was in progress.
Issue Based on the RAC's knowledge of the accepted literature in the fields of accident sequences, source terms, and the health effects of radiation, is the current planning acceptable or nearly acceptable? Before you can answer, do you require more precise information on the times that the tran-sient beach population would be in the open, or in a vehicle? If we have advice for the state and local governments on this matter, I believe that we should make it known as soon as possible. If we need additional infor-mation to deal with the issue, we should let them know now.
B. Occupants of Unwinterized Accommodations -
l A number of people associated with the Seabrook energency plans process l have suggested that special attention needed to be paid to occupants of the many unwinterized cottages, motel rooms, and camp grounds in the Seabrook
. EPZ. These people believe that the normal assumptions we make about the i protective effects of sheltering are not valid for structures which are:
(a) not designed to resist air intrusion, and/or (b) which have a very small protective factor becau*e of the slight mass of the structure.
Issue i If the RAC believes that this is an issue which sould be covered in the l emergency plans, we should raise it now to afford the state / local governments time to quantify the problem and to plan to deal with it. Finally, if we have any other preliminary cosments on the emergency plans, w probably should
, make thee known to the state / local governments as soon as possible. We would 1 be particularly interested in passing on any indication that you have as to whether the plass ape'in adequate shape for a full-scale exercise at the end
' of February as is currently planned.
We that yees respond to this memorandus within fourteen days.
After the r9sponses are in, we will call a meeting of the RAC to formulate a l position on these matters, i
HAPPY MEW YEAR!
1r t L
A, [ [ { y y j, 3 3 l
l 1
i hb A/r l 4 M 'M d
% O ?l1 O
CURRENT FEMA POSITION UN ADMITTED CONTENTIONS ON i
NEW HAMPSHIRE PLANS FOR SEABROOK 4
1 I e
. - . _ - - _ . . - , - . - , - . . . . . - _ ~ - _ . - _ - _ . . _ . _ . _ _ .
3S.
NECNP CONTEMTION RERP-9 The New Hampshire RERP does not provide a "reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a racifolorical emergency," as recuired by 10 C . F . R . 50.47(a)(1). in that the plan does not provide reasonable assurance that sheltering is an "adequate protective measure" for Seabrook. Nor does the plan provide adequate criteria for the choice between protective measures as required by I 50.47(b)(10) and NUREG-0654, f !!.J.10.m.
FDtA RESTONSE to Revised Tcwn of Har:pton Contention VIII to Revision 2 (of the New Hamosnire RERP for Seacrood , SAPL Contention 16, and NCP Contention FIRP-3 These three contentions all deal with what is fundamentally the same issue: protection frcm a radiolcgical release for beach-going population at Seabrook who do not have ready access to any effective form of sheltering.
mis group includes both "day-trippers to the beach and those persons who only have access to unwinterized or other types of construction which will offer a lesser degree of protection than that offered by standard residential or ecmnercial buildings.
Backcrcund -
his issue has been of great concern to FEMA frcm our earliest detailed involveent with the preparation of plans and the achieve-ment of a level of emergency preparedness which would acnieve our . regulatory standard set for that 44 CFR 350.5 of adequately protecting the public l
' health and safety by providing reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiolcgical emergency at the Seabrook tbclear Power Plant.
In December 1985 the State of New Hampshire sutnitted plans for protecting the public in the event of an accident at Seacrook to FDiA for review pur-suant to 44 CFR 350. mose plans were forwarded for review cy the Begional i Assistance Ccmnittee (RAC), an interagency group established pursuant to 44 1
CFR 350 to both assist state and local goverrinent in the develo;raent of l
radiological emergency response plans and to evaluate the adequacy of such plans. On Decemoer 31, 1985, FDiA, as chair of the RAC, requested that the nembers of the RAC (as well as the other FEMA staf f who were reviewirq the New Harnpshire Plans) intnediately focus on the issue of the protection of beach population and the occupants of unwinterized acccmnodations. mis norterandum is attached as Appendix C to this response to interrcgatories.
FDd.A Pcsition -
Since the ti;ne of our December 31,1985, r6amorandum on the suDject of the protection of the puclic on and near the beaches l around Seacrook, the State of New Hampshire has refined and irnproved its mergency plans and sutnitted a detailed ENacuation Time Estimate which sheds a consideraole arount of light on this issue. D e facts relevant to understanding this issue are that:
\ -
I I
l
39 W COtCT!'IC:: ?._'.0- 8 (Cont. )
o (1) me primary guidance document used by FEMA and the PAC in reviewing off-s ite emergency plans is TREG-0654, FEMA PIP-1, Pev. L, a doctrnent jointly developed y FEMA and the NRC. mat guidance document indicates on p.13 .at "(c)ne rarge of times between the onset of accident condit.:ns and the start of a major release is further is of the order of ondalf clarified on p. .our 1~,
to several hours". B is statement Table 2 to indicate that (a) the major portion of a release nay occur in a time period rangirg frcrn as little as one-half ha.r to one day af ter the release begins and (b) that the travel time of the release to exposure point can range fran one-half hour to two hours at five miles, and one hour to four hours at ten miles.
(2) on peak stmner days there are thousands of beachgoers in the StaDrook EP2 in areas begin .:.ng approximately 1.7 miles f rcrn the plant. me current New .:ampshire plans contemplate evacuating the many thousands of beachg ers who have access to no adequate
- shelter as a protective act:.n in the event of an accident at Seabrook.
We understand that the plans contain no consideration of sheltering the "day trippers" because o. stener days when there are a large number of these people, it i.s not possible to find reasonably accessible shelter for them. Bere are an additional number of persons who would be in or have access only to shelter in unwinter-ized cottages and motel roces. Be protection afforded by sheltering in these structures will definitely be less than that af forded by a normal wood frane house. .
(3) ne Evacuation Time Estimate for the SeabrooK EPZ subnitted by the State of New Hampshire indicates at pp.10-1 et. seq. that in good weather when the beaches are at 60 to 100 per:ent of capacity it ,
will taxe three and one-half nours to clear tne beaches, and a total of frcrn four hours anc fif ty minutes to five hours and fifty minutes to evacuate al*. the population on the beaches from the EP2. In scrne situations such as sudden .ad weather .following l
a peak stmner day, the total evacuation time for portions of the EPZ range up to seven hours and fifty minutes.
Berefore, using the standard guidance for the initiation and duration of radiological releases, and the curr?nt New Ha@ shire RERP including ETE, it appears that thousands of people cou'.d be unable to leave during an accident at Seabrook involving a major release of radioactivity without adequate shelter for as nmch as the entire duration of that release.
nerefore, until these issues are resclved even if all the other inadequacies and deficiencies cited in the PAC Reviews of the New Hampshire Plans, and the Paview of the Exercise of these plans were to be corrected, FDIA would not be amle to conclude that the New Bripshire State and local plans to protect the public in the event of an accident at the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant are adequate to meet our w;ulatory standard that such plans "adequately protect the public health and safety by providing reasonable assurance that appropriate protective naasures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiolcgical emergency." (5ee, 44 Cm 350.5(b)).
4
_.s v
t y ~
~
\ Y .: & ne did;'.),u ';. ' :t::C /
- f
}l, i
g i.? ~ .. -
7c..)
lc (
l sr , ,, M
- : ??
'{^
-%'- 1 f' 7 ,b T ,,
~
[ r.. ., .
g l
,c- Q*: . .yv. M:; e, n'# G ..
( ..ov, .F ,m, v. -
^
' .~. F.?+.*':,, ' - ;;;a . . . .
t.$, N *e
.:.. , . ; . .- ~
..,... e . .. . -
m'
.%i n M' s 9?4:
aa/
j7
^* h. ~~
hk.c.$hhh b
'it:S 3 Stp6
- r- ~~E=is?t2 g,p* &
' g sA,l / l
%9:q
/ -
t ,, t'r.yv2, .. ,. .
~~ . f _l
( .
, % . 9,%f -
s * , s 5J!.,h .
2 - N., ~~[ 5 - - 'p s.f i5 #
5
- ., \s,h,, ;f[ci w ,
i f.
7
= -. n . . .:_ .
n "). h.c \ '
-% &~ ~ \ % " $
DK~'
w&$c$ '
v7 ;j y
!,'s k hk ANE
/ -f .,
($ .
c,, 3 .. ,.
4 tur L ; <
N .e A8bt .
__ TN j ft
/ F-E$7if D
"' -e '
vgp s=
k ..
/ [ .. -;;;. -
- 'f3M .
g, y
- ,j
. e. ~ ' ' - s.
' s Willhws ,,, 4s ,
\ '
p -
% G .. ,
s.sg%,;g ,h N
\
% %. .e., " -.
(- "
l
+ ' .Tl ._
.5,,.. .(,
. ie d
~
. '. . . . w' . .
.M;
- u
~ S.D .*b
" l \,,7:* '*..Wh/d j .
a \ q.\*.: -
. . 3.4 --:
~sw.arar a j ., . w. . .
" . ,,, s * ,
..;:: .. .oca.
. .w.
Sey, A?f b, _
., ,,e - -.
~
- i. . , %p. .. . 2 q};fg ,
^
g 2*
y
, , .p
\
h.
A STUDY TO IDENTITY POTENTIAL SHELTERS IN THE BEACH AREAS NEAR SEABROOK STATION l
i Performed for New Hampshire Yankee I
i i
l l
i Prepared by Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation March 1986 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
}
Section !
page LISTS OF TABLIS AND FIGURES ti j INTRODUCTION g ;
APPROACH Initial Work 2 Municipal Tax Records 2 Visual Inspection 2 Shielding Factors 3 Residential Shelters 3 RESULTS Public Shelters 6 6
Residential Shelters 7
RITERENCES 8
l
. _ - - _ . - - . . _ - - - _ . . - ~ _ . . _ _ - . _ , -
L8ST OF TABLES
, Number Title 1 Sample Shelter Survey Form 2
Rye - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 3
North Hampton - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 4
Hampton - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 5
Seabrook - Characteristics of Potential Public 3nelters 6
Salisbury - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 7
Plum Island - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 8
Residences with Masonry and/or Basement Shelter LIST OF FIGURES 1 Map of Seabrook Station Beach Area 2 Typical Residences with Basements ii
ENTRODUCTION This study
. was pe rfo rmed to identify the approximate public sheltering capabilities of those municipal and commercial buildings considered to be suitable for shelter use by the beach population along the Massachusetts and New Hampshire coastlines within the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) of the Seabrook Station. The towns included in this region, from north to south, are:
Rye, NH; North Hampton, NH; Hampton, NH; Seabrook, NH; Salisbury, MA; and the portion of Plus Island between the 5- and 10-mile EPZ radii lying within the Massachusetts tovns of Newburyport and Newbury (see Figure 1).
A sample survey of private residences was also performed to estimate the number of beach-area residences with basements or masonry construction which should provide shelter (for their occupants and/or others) equivalent to that provided by the potential public shelters.
i l
1 4
APPROACH Initial Vork The first step in this study was to meet with various local, state, and federal organizations to gather background information, including prevtcus sheltering studies.
Meetings were held with officials of the Region 1 Office of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FIMA), the civil defense agencies of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, and the American Red Cross chapters at Newburyport, Massachusetts and Exeter, New Hampshire.
The only previous shelter work related to this study was undertaken by the Massachusetts Civil Defense Agency (MCDA) a few years ago (Reference 1,).
The MCDA sought to identify shelter availability for the nonresident peak populations of the Massachusetts cosusunities in the 10-mile EPZ of Seabrook Station. The resulting MCDA report (plus accompanying map) and the Nattenal Shelter Study (Reference 2) listings for Salisbury provided useful back-ground information for the current study. National Shelter Study listings are not available for the New Hampshire towns included in this study.
Municipal Tax Records ThS next step was to v'isit the Tax Assessors' offices at the town balls of Rye, NH; North Hampton, NH; Hampton, NH; Seabrook, NH; Salisbury, MA; Newbury, MA; and Newburyport, MA. Available listings of all commercial properties and tax-exempt properties (municipal and church buildings) in the beach area were examined. Maps were obtained for later field use.
2
Information from the tax assessroent card for each property was trans f e r eed to a work sheet (Shelter Survey Form, Table 1). Of particular interest were the building address, construction characteristics, and available flooe space.
Visual Inspection Each building was then visually inspected to confirm the tax assessment information.
Any discrepancies were noted; also, any features of interest not available on the tax assessment cards were recorded. From this information, a list of potential shelters was developed.
Shieldina Factors The resulting list of shelters includes masonry buildings and buildings witn masonry basements which have the potential for providing representative (typical) shielding fa: tors of 0.4 to 0.6 for airborne radionuclides (cloud) and 0.05 to 0.2' for surface-deposited radionuclides (ground) (Reference 3).
i The shielding factor is a ratio of the radiation dose that would be received by a person inside the structure to the dose received by a person outside the structure on an assumed smooth ground surface. For example, if the shielding factor is 0.6, a person sheltered inside the structure would 1
l l
receive only 40 percent of the dose that an unsheltered persoo would receive. Wood-frame buildings without basements were not included because this type of building usually does not provide sufficient shielding.
I 3 l
l
Each potential shelter listed was then visited by a health physicist -ho estimated structure-specific clouG and ground shielding factors. These f actors were estimated using information provided in Reference 3 as a gutde and allowing for such factors as number of windows and doors, percentage of basement walls exte.' ding above ground, and other construction features relating to adequate sh'.elding.
As explained in Reference 3, the shielding factors vary depending upon wall materials, construction geometry, location within the structure, etc. The resulting representative shielding factors shown in Tables 2 througl 7 of this study were assigned mainly for compara-tive purposes among the shelters.
, In some cases, structural features of a particular building would prevent use of the entire available floor area. In these cases, the areas were reduced accordingly for listing as potential shelter areas in Tables 2 through 7.
Residential Shelters In addition to identifying potential public shelters for the transient beach population, a sample survey of private residences in the beach area of each community studied was performed to determine the fraction of residences witn adequate shelter capabilities. This was acce by selecting representative l
streets at randoe and counting both the homes without basements and those with basements and/or lower masonry structures that should be as adequate as the potential public shelters for sheltering residents of those structures.
The results are shown in Table 8. The total number of residential buildings l in the beach area of each community was also obtained, primarily from street 1
le l
l
listings and tax records available in the towns. Photographs of some typical private residences with potential basement shelter capability are shown in Figure 2.
5
PISULTS Public :s .ucs .
Tables 2 through 7 list potential public shelters for Rye, North Hampton, Hampton, Seabrook, Salisbury, and Plum Island, respectively. The tables list the name and address of each potential shelter, the approximate area available for shelter use, and the representative cloud and ground shielding factors. The shelters are listed in order of decreasing shelter area.
. Rye has a total potential sheltering area of approximately 87,000 f t2 (n 7 public shelters; North Hampton has 1,500 fta in 2 public shelters; Hampton has 284,000 ft2 in 96 public shelters; Seabrook has 27,000 f t 2 in 9 public shelters; Salisbury has 90,000 ft2 in 21 public shelters; and Plum Island has 7,000 ft2 in 7 public shelters. The number of persons that can be sheltered in a given area for a few hours can be estimated by dividing the potential sheltering area by a factor in the range of 10 to 20 square feet per person.
The National Shelter Study uses 10 square feet per person.
Thus, the areas given above would provide short-term public sheltering capacities in the range of 4,350-8,700 persons for Rye,75-150 persons for North Hampton, 14,200-28,400 persons for Hampton, 1,350-2,700 persons for Seabrook, 4,500-9,000 persons for Sa'.isbury, and 350-700 persons for Plum Island.
6
Residential Shelters The results of the sample survey of private residences are shown in Table 3.
The estimated percentage of beach residences with sheltering capability available for their occupants ranges from a low of 31 percent in Hampton to a high of 78 percent in Rye.
These percentages can be used to determine numbers of residents that could take shelter in a given accident scenario:
the percentage can be applied directly to the residential population estimate of those living in private residences, or it can be applied to the total number of private residences in a given area with that result multiplied by an average number of persons per residence for the particular scenario being studied.
7
4 REFERENCES
- 1. Kelly, Robert B.; Kowalik, Leo T.,
Jr.; and Barry, Joanne M.
Protective Sheltering in the Seabrook EPZ, Massachusetts Civil D 1 Agency, undated.
f 2.
National Shelter Study, Reception and Care Facility Listings, Defen Civil' Preparedness Agency.
3.
Aldrich, David C.; Ericson, David M., Jr.; and Johnson, Jay D.
Public Protection Strategies for Potential Nuclear Reactor Accidents:
Sheltering Concepts with Existing Public and Private Structures, Sandia Laboratories, SAND 77-1725, February 1978.
e 8
TABLE 1 SAMPLZ SHELTER SURVEY TORM SHZLTER S11RVIY FORM RIT. NO.
Building Name:
Address:
Owner:
Building Use:
Year-round or Seasonal Distance Ring (st) < 2 , 2-3 ~ , 3-4 ~, 4-5 ~ , >$
Number of non-basement stories ~
Square feet per story Structure
Description:
Structure Category:
Wood-frame Masonry Large office or Industrial ( >5000 ft 2/ story)
Other (describe)
Comments:
Non-basement Baseeemt liabitable area, its Persons 9 one per 10 ft2 Cloud Shielding factor .
Ground Shielding factor 1 of 1
TABLE 2 RYE - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SKELTERS Name/ Address Shelter Shielding Facte-Area, ft2 Cloud Grou Motel (no name) 60,160 0.8* 0.a*
Ocean Boulevard at Central Road St. Theresa's Church / Parish Center To t a.' 13,000 816 Central Road Nonbasement (9.75 0) 0.4 0.1 Basement (3,250) 0.1 0.03 Rye Beach Post Office Total 5,180 830 Ctatral Road Nonbasement (2,450) 0.6 0.2 Basement (1,730) 0.3 0.05 Saunders (Restaurant) (Basement) 4,250 0.6 175 Rye Harbor Road 0.05
- Wallis Sands State Beach Bathhouse 2,550 0.6 Ocean Boulevard st Wallis Road 0.2 Pirate's Cove (Basetent) 1,290 0.6 1200 Ocean Boulas red 0.05 Pilot House (Basemen'. ) 900 0.6 Ocean Boulevard 0.05 Grand Total 87,330 f ta is 7 Shelters
- Shielding effect of brick structure reduced by large glass areas 1 of 1
^
TA3LI 3 NORTH HNtPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC S Name/ Address Shelter __Shieldior Factors Area, ft2 _ Cloud _ Ground Union Chapel (Basement)* 1,310 Lot B, Willow Avenue 0.6 0.05 Restaurant (unnamed) 240 28 Ocean Boulevard 0.7 0.3 Grand Total 1,550 fta in 2 shelters
- Not easily accessed '
1 of 1
TABLE 4 HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTERS Shelter Shielding Factors Name/ Address Area, ft2 Cloud Ground Ashworth Hotel Total 50,700 295-305 Ocean Boulevard Nonbasement (35,460) 0.5 0.1 Basement (15,240) 0.3 0.05 Giovanni's Restauract 18,460 0.6 0.2 81 Ocean Boulevard Seagate Motel / Stores / Garage 17,720 0.6 0.2 9 Ashworth Avenue State Park Bath House 10,840 0.5 0.1 Ocean Boulevard Sea Den Motel 9,820 0.6 0.2 449 Ocean Boulevard Playland Arcade 8,880 0.6 0.2 209-211 Ocean Boulevard Hampton Beach Police Station 6,100 0.6 0.2 66 Ashworth Avenue Dudley Clothier / Total 5,970 Sunset Restaurant Noobasement (3,790) 0.7 0.4 Basement (2,180) 0.5 0.3 Hampton Beach Fire 5,150 0.6 0.2 Station Garage 58 Ashworth Avenue Mai Kai Restaurant Total 5,120 52 A.'hworth Avenue Nonbasement (4,030) 0.6 0.2 Basement (1,090) 0.4 0.05 Moulton Hotel (basement) 4,770 0.7 0.4 245 Ocean Boulevard Royal Crest Motel 4,720 0.6 0.2 i
98 Ashworth Avenue Jammere Hotel 4,700 0.6 0.2 52 Ashworth Avenue l
Surf Hotel (basement) 4,560 0.6 0.2 275 Ocean Boulevard i
1 of 7 l
TABLE 4 (Continuod)
RAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHE Nase / Address Shelter Shielding Factors ,
Area, ft2 Cloud Gegund Hillcrest Ian (basement) 4,110 0.6 113 Ocean Boulevard 0.05 Atlantic Motel 3,910 20 Brown Avenue 0.5 0.1 Betty LaBranche Realty /etc. 3,660 (rear portion) 0.6 0.2 931 Ocean Boulevard Springfield Motor Lodge 3,360 0.6 (basement) 0.1 89 Ocean Boulevard Kristy's Corner 3,300 0.8 0.3 199 Ocean Boulevard Ye Colonial Ian (basement) 3,000 0.6 0.05 139 Ocean Boulevard Rest Rooms (State Beach) 3,000 0.5 0.1 Ocean Boulevard (across from Casino)
Lighthouse Convenience Store 2,950 0.7 0.3 369 Ocean Boulevard Connecticut Village 2,790 0.6 7 H Street 0.2 Kentville Motel (basement) 2,690 0.7 0.2 315 Ocean Boulevard Sea Ketch Restaurant & Pub Total 2,690 127 Ocean Boulevard Nonbasement (1,610) 0.7 0.3 1
Basement (1,080) 0.6 0.1 Grand View Motel (basement) 2,660 0.6 0.2 353 Ocean Boulevard l Pelham Hotel (basement) 2,630 0.4 0.2 121 Ocean Boulevard Junkin's 2,500 0.8 0.3 193 Ocean Boulevard 2 of 7 l
l
TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELT Name/ Address Shelter Shieldica Factors Area, ft2 Cloud Groung L Street Tavern Total 2,490 17 L Street Nonbasement (1,620) 0.6 0.2 Basement (870) 0.5 0.1 The Puritan Hotel (basement) 2,360 0.6 109-111 Ocean Boulevard 0.05 Mari-Ann Motel (basement) 2,310 0.6 2 Ocean Boulevard 0.1 Atlantic Motel (basement) 2,280 0.6 393 Ocean Boulevard 0.1 Kelly's Inn (basement) 2.190 0.6 0.1 73 Ocean Boulevard Lamazzo's Restaurant 2,080 0.6 550 k'innacunnet Road 0.2 Dolphin Metal 1,900 0.6 0.2 48 Ashworth Avenue Carland Restaurant / 1,870 0.6 Sparky's Sports 0.2 10-12 C Street Century House Motel (basement) 1,850 0.5 522 Ocean Boulevard 0.1 The Happy Hampton (basement) 1,790 0.6 0.4 253 ocean Boulevard Beacon Hotel (basenent) 1,780 0.6 0.2 105 Ocean Boulevard Ebb Tide Hotel 1,760 0.6 0.3 225 Ocean Boulevard ,
Harris Real Estate (basement) 1,760 0.6 0.1 361 Ocean Boulevard White Rock Store 1,740 0.6 0.2 22 River Road Cavalier Hotel (basement) 1,710 0.7 0.2 379 Ocean Boulevard 3 of 7
TABLE 4 (Continued)
. HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELT Name/ Address Shelter Shielding Factors Area. ft2 Cloud Ground Joaane's Restaurant (basement) 1,620 0.6 5 J Street 0.2 Motel Kelley Total 1,580 857 Ocean Boulevard Nonbasement (720) 0.6 0.2 Basement (860) 0.5 0.1 Roy Roosing House (basement) 1,550 473 Ocean Boulevard 0.7 0.2 Algier's Motel (basement) 1,520 345 Ocean Boulevard 0.6 0.1 St. Patrick's Church / 1,520 0.4 Parsonage (basement) 0.05 40 Church Street DV's Oceanside Hotel 1,490 (basement) 0.7 0.2 365 Ocean Boulevard Seaside Marketplace /CITGO 1,440 503 Ocean Boulevard 0.7 0.3 B & S Jewelry / Neptune / 1,410 0.7 0.2 Seacrest (basement) 117 Ocean Boulevard Windjammer Motel (basement) 1,380 0.4 0.05 935 Ocean Boulevard Debonair Motel 1,360 18 Ashworth Avenue 0.7 0.3 Atlantic Motel (basement) 1,360 0.5 0.1 34 Brown Avenue Gleason Roosing House 1,330 l (basement) 0.5 0.1 1 Nudd Avenue l Hampton Harbor Motel Total 1,280 208-210 Ashworth Avenue s Nonbase'ent (400) 0.6 0.2 Basement (880) 0.4 0.1 i 4 of 7 i
TABLE 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SH Name/ Address Shelter Shieldina Factors Area, ft2 Cloud Grounj White Rooming House 1,260 0.7 (basement) 0.5 335-337 Ocean Boulevard Oceanside Mall 1,240 367 Ocean Boulevard 0.6 0.2 Preston Real Estate / 1,240 Yankee Lady 0.7 0.2 63 Ocean Boulevard Duffy's Rooms (basement) 1,200 107 Ocean Boulevard 0.7 0.2 Ma rket/ Laundry /Res taurant 1,200 0.6 (2-Story Annex) 0.2 703 Ocean Boulevard Fry Doe Restaurant (basement) 1,140 115 Ocean Boulevard 0.6 0.2 Sea Squire Motor Lodge 1,140 (basement) 0.6 0.2 1088 Ocean Eoulevard Harris Sea Ranch (basement) 1,120 0.6 79 Ocean Boulevard 0.2 Shirley Motel (basement) 1,030 339 Ocean Bc.:levard 0.6 0.2 Sun & Surf Motel (basement) 1,020 0.4 0.05 528 Ocean Boulevard Americana Apartments 1,010 (basement) 0.6 0.2 61 Ocean Boulevard ,
Laurentian Motel (basement) 1,010 0.6 0.2 24 Ashworth Avenue Whispering Waves Motel 980 0.7 0.2 (ba s ement) 341 Ocean Boulevard 5 of 7
TABLE 4 (Continued)
}'MPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTER Name/ Address Shelter Shielding Factors Area, ft2 Cloud Ground Hampton Beach Casino (basement) 960 0.6 0.2 169 Ocean Boulevard Joan's Subs & Pizza 960 (basement) 0.6 0.2 132 Ashworth Avenue Royal Crest North :
950 0.6 0.2 94 Ashworth Avenue Sea Mist Motel (basement) 940 0.4 9 G Street 0.1
- Holiday House (basement) 920 17 Highland Avenue 0.5 0.1 Sea Castle Motel (basement) 910 0.7 377 Ocean Boulevard 0.2 Famous Door Realty 890 0.7 0.4 (basement) 9 Ocean Boulevard Stores /Apa rtments 860 0.6 0.2 395 Ocean Boulevard Drift Motel (basement) 830 0.6 0.2 18 Ocean Boulevard Broadview Apartments 820 0.5 0.1 (b4sement) 4 Haverhill Avenue Auge111 Rooms (basement) 810 0.5 0.1 8 Nudd Avenue Miramar Real Estate 810 0.5 0.2 (basement) 9 Nudd Avenue 1
Lorenz's Clas Stand 790 0.7 0.2 l (basement) j 9B Ocean Boulevard l
Voyager Motel (basement) 780 0.5 0.1 20 Ocean Boulevard l
6 of 7 l l l
l
TABLI 4 (Continued)
HAMPTON - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHE Name/ Address Shelter Shielding Factors Area, ft2 Cloud Grour.d Plaice House Restaurant 750 (basement) 0.5 0.1 965 Ocean Boulevard Casino Market (basement) 740 0.5 8 Q Street 0.1 Rapuano Apartments (basement) 13 G Street 730 0.4 0.1 Brownie's Motel (basement) 700 0.4 180-184 Ashworth Avenue 0.1 Kimball Real Estate (basement) 670 0.6 0.2 10 I Street Ashworth Market (basesent) 670 0.6 143 Ashworth Avenue 0.2 Rocky Vold Motel (basement) 660 0.6 349 Ocean Boulevard 0.2 I
Bromfield Motel (basement) 580 0.4 0.1 7 G Street i
Harris Motel (basement) 450 0.6 0.1 75 Ocean Boulevard Rainbow Village Motel 440 0.5 0.1 (basement) 4 P Street Windchimes Food & Spirits 400 0.6 0.2 7 Ocean. Boulevard Blue Jay Motel (basement) 290 0.4 0.1 186 Ashworth Avenue ,
Backstage /Suzy's Sportswear 210 0.6 0.2 (basement) 235 Ocean Boulevard Grand Total 283,580 fta (a 96 shelters 7 of 7
TME $
SEABROOK - CHARACTIRISTICS OF POTI.VTIAL PUBLIC Nana 'Addres s Shelter Shieldina Taetors Ares.,ft{ Cloud G ro und O'Keefe's Stora & Restaurtst 5,979 0.6 23 Rt. 1A 0.3 Cristaldf.'s 4,700 443 Rt. 286 0.7 0.3 St. Elizabeth's Catholic Church 4,690 0.6 Chelmsford St. 0.2 Dr. Queen Total 4,080 is . . 286 Nonbasement (2,720)
. 0.6 0.2 Sas ement (1,360) 0.4 0.1 Police Station /Besch Precinct 2,800 0.7 Rt. 1A 0.3 Beschway Variety Mar't- (Basement) 1,600 419 Rt. 286 0.4 0.2 P ore Stsvc's Ice Creas (Basement) 1,170 0.6 40 Rt. lA 0.1 Mac's Ciaa Bar (Basement) 820 0.6 Rt. 'A 0.1 DiBurro's Market'(Basement) ?20 0.6 0.1 Rt. LA at River Street Grand Total 26,550 fta 'in 9 Shelters j
l 1 of 1
. TA3LE 6 SALISBURY - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC S Name/ Address Shelter Shieldi.,r F Area,ft2 Cloud Carefree Arcace 14,490 0.6 23 South Ocean Front State Reservation / Beach Total 8,840 Pavillion (5,250)
Maintenance Garage 0.6 Rest Rooma of Campground (2,630) 0.7 (960) 0.6 Mcdonald's/ Arcade 8,500 24F Central Avenue 0.4~ c Bowery Playboy Lounge 7,590 11 North End Boulevard 0.6 C Police / Fire Station / Rest Rooms 6,710 Railroad Avenue 0.6 C Beach Front Motel Total 5,900 46F Central Avenue Nonbasement (3,520) 0.6 :
Basement (2,380) 0.2 C Tripoli Pizza /Mr. Mike's 5,260 47 Broadway 0.6 0 Normandy Lounge Blds (Second Floor) 4,880 Broadway and Ocean 0.6 0 Willey's Candy Shop Total 4,490 (Attached Bldgs Only) .
First Floor 12 Broadway Arcade (1,700) 0.6 0.
Remainder (2,790) 0.6 0.
Plaza (4D+1) 3,890 0.6 North End Boulevard 0.
1 of 2
TABLE 6 (Continued)
SALISBURY - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTDTIAL PtlBLIC SHELTERS Name/ Address Shelter Shteldion i Area,ft2 Clouc Tic Toc Lounce 3,690 0.6 7 Broadway Mr. K's Lounge 3,500 243 North End Boulevard 0.6 Club Edwards 2,010 Atlantic and Ocean 0.6 :
Sea Galley Restaurant (Basement) 1,870 464F North End Boulevard 0.6 C Atlantic Variety (Basement) 1,730 150 Atlantic Avenue 0.6 0 Shaffee's Lounge 1,550 9 Driftway 0.6 0 Donut Depot 1,300 0.6 C 415 North End Boulevard Mark's General Store 1,290 0.6 26 North End Boulevard 0.
Star of the Sea Church Parsonage Total 800 North End Boulevard Front Basement (120) 0.7 0.
Rear Basement (680) 0.4 0.
Shaheen Fun Park (Bathrooms) 800 0.6 0.
Driftway and Central Water Slide (Bath House) 650 0.6 0.
1 Broadway Grand Total 89,740 ft3 in 21 Shelters 2 of 2
TABLE 7 PLL71 ISLAND - CHARACTERISTICS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC SHELTE Name/ Address Shelter Shielding Factors Area, ft2 Cloud Ground; US Government Reservation Total 1,910 North end of P.I. Office Area (1,160) 0.6 0.2 House basement ( 750) 0.4 0.1 Paul & Patt's Beachcomber Rest./ Lounge 1,140 0.6 Plus Island Boulevard 0.2 Island Sub Sbop (Basement) 1,100 51 Northern Boulevard 0.5 0.1 PJ's Variety 1,100 134 Northern Boulevard 0.6 0.2 Mr. :1oe's Package Store (Basement) 800 0.4 0.1 I Plus Island Boulevard & Columbia Way Snack Bar/ Parking Office 760 0.6 0.2 South end of Southern Boulevard Plam Island Comfort Station 230 0.6 North end of P.I. 0.2 Grand Total @ ft2 in 7 Shelters e
t .
h 1 of 1
TABLE 8 RESIDENCES WITH MASONRY AND/OR BASEMENT SHELTER Total Residential Buildings in Estimated Community Beach Area Number of Residential Percent Buildings Surveyed w/ Shelter
- Rye, NH 679 249 78 North Hampton, NH 259 223 75 Hampton, NH 2,180 614 31 Seabrook, NH 822 297 53 Salisbury, MA 1,440 1,440 48 Plus Island, MA 865 280 f.8
- Shelter within residence for occupants only which gives similar protection :o :n provided by the public shelter possibilities of this study. Percentage is based :n-sample tarvey of residential buildings.
1 of 1 l
/
- #3
(\
- ,A \ PORTSWouvH ,
/ ~~==-J l
,N \ /
1 %s% \
, f == * * # ,, ,I 5 GREENLAND /
N E W FIE L O S . -./ 4
~ ~ ~ " " '
-r* STRATHAW ,. . /
7 gyg
- " \ \
s
\
t%
1 NORTH H A M PTON j-sf
- g ExtTER % ,, I ,
~.
, ,,, y ,-[ -- - . --
's M A M PTON
_ ;,- r ' \*s f g \ s
/ \ \ M A h PTON
( \ LLS A TL A N T/C g EAST g KINGSTON I
's "'"S'"I' " \ I t z wt
\ \ byd ^M. % .' ^ .. gag n.
' ' "' S ""
\\ 'sb ,, , .- a,
- mew S(A9*00N
$M m 7, f(A g "s y ", s i SOUTM
\
, ** gC y M A MPTON
[
\ . .
f 3 \ SALIS4URY
- 1 N WTON
\
/
N' s'*f \
BEACH
/ 5 Mt
/ .*p s AMESSURT
\
g STUDY AREA t
- 7
/, ,
'\ j s, ,.
. utRRlW AC **
\ ,,p f ,. ' '
~ , utW: :4veeRT Plum
,#~ ~ .s
}
hm o
l N%/ f v' f WEST
- * * ==J NEWOURY Y MtW8URY l
\ l
, s s'
1
\
'*m~~,. e a : *
+-..-
%. d ..
%y FIGURE 1 MAP OF SEABROOK STATION BEACH AREA i
l 1
l i
a I
- 4' la&N (8 p-l .~ ' n a
_,)
ROUTE 1 A - SALISBURY, MA.
h I
a a t
?^
_ I a
_ I ROUTE 1 A -SEASROCK , N.H. ;
FIGURE 2 TYPICAL RESiOENCES WITH l BASEMENTS
Dated: March 25, 1987 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCMMISSION before t;.e ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of )
)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) Docket Nos., 50-443-ot NEW HAMPSHIRI, et al. ) 50-444-OL (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) )
) Off-site Emergency 4
' Planning Issues
)
)
AFFIDAVIT OF ANTHONY M. CALLENDRELLO ON SWEC SHELTER STUDY I,
Anthony M. Callendrello, being on oath, hereby deposes and says as follows:
- 1. I am the Manager of Emergency Planning for New Hampshire Yankee.
- 2. A statement of my professional qualifications is attached hereto and marked "A". .
- 3. "A study to Identify Potential Shelters in the Beach Areas near Seabrook Station" was performed for New Hampshire Yankee by Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation in March, 1986.
w
- v. f g ,- ,
- 1
- 4. This study was performed to identify the approximate public sheltering capabilities of those municipal and commericial buildings considered to be suitable for shelter use by the beach population along the Massachusetts and New Hampshire coastlines within the 10-mile Emergency Plar.ning Zone (EPZ) of the Seabrook Station.
- 5. The study examined available listings of all commercial properties and tax-exempt properties (municipal and church buildings) in the beach area. These listings were taken from municipal tax records of the Tax Assessor offices of the seven coastal municipalities.
6.
Information was taken from tax assessment cards on each property noting particularly building address, construction characteristics, and available floor space.
7 Each property was then visually inspected to cenfirm the information taken from the tax assessment cards, and a list of potential shelters was developed.
- 8. Each potential shelter was then inspected by a health physicist who estimated the structures' specific cloud and ground shielding factors. These ranged from .3 to
.8 for cloud shielding factors and from .1 to .4 for ground shielding factors.
- 9. The results of the study showed a total potential sheltering area for the Hampton and Seabrook Beach areas of 311,000 square feet in a total of 115 public shelters. The 2
a
National Shelter Study uses a factor of 10 square feet per person. The resultant number of persons for whom short term public shelter could be provided in the Hampton and Seabrook Beach areas is 31,100.
It is noted that shielding factors assigned to these structures are significantly more ef fective than the factor assumed by the NHRERP.
- 10. The study also included a sample survey of private residences to estimate the numbers of beach area residences with basements or masonry construction and which would, therefore, provide a level of protection equivalent to that provided by potential public shelters. The results showed that 31% of beach area residential structures in Hampton and 53% of such structures in Seabrook provide equivalent shelter protection.
- 11. The estimated peak beach population for the Towns of Hampton and Seabrook is approximately 33,000. The shelter study indicates that there is adequate public and residential shelter capacity for this population in the Hampton and Seabrook beach areas.
, n "Ahtha5y M. Callendrello 3-e
+
CCMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Suffolk, ss. March 8 , 1987 The above-subscribed Anthony M. Callendrello appeared before me and made oath that he had read the foregoing affidavit to the best and thatknowledge of his the statements set forth therein are true f
Before me,
. L# M 7 Nt!Frary PQF My Commi Gion Expires UUMSG CIGN,a ,;,
80rm no>Suc I 'A h 34r88 hon,ay n ,g, 4
l 4
t e
., , - . - . - - - - . _ , - , - . . - - . - _ - --- ,,,..,,.-n----.---_--. . . . , , , , , - - . . ...,, ,._. _ - - --, , , . - . - - . .
CALLESORELLO. ANTHONY M.
ECUCaTION Stevens Institute of Technology - Bachelor of Engineering 1973 Stevens Institute of Technology - Master of Mechanical Engineering 1980 Harvard School of Public Health - Planning for Nuclear Emergencies 1983 LICENSES aNO RECTSTRATION Professional Engineer - New Jersey Professtonal Engineer - New Hampshire EXPERIENCg
SUMMARY
Mr. Callendrello has a wide variety of experience in all aspects of onstte and offsite radiological esergency planning. Currently, he is responsible for all Seabrook Station offstte radiological energency response planning work involving state and local plan development and implementation. In prior positions at Seabrook Station he has been responsible for prompt notification systesdevelopment.
ment and scenario procurement and installation, onsite procedure develop-Prior to his current esployment, Corporation. he was with Stone & Webster Engineering There nas unstte planning radtological emergency planning effort for experience included leading the generating station. a boiling water reactor tne station There he was responsible for directing the revision of emergency plan. isolementing procedures, and energency ac;t:n
- levels in response agoratsal findings.
to Nuclear Regulatory cometssion energency preparedness I He also has prepared a comprehensive audit of onstte emergency preparedness urrently unoer construction. for a bolling water reactor generating station l
the utility's sanagement Based on tne audit results, he worked wit?.
to develop a comprenensive emergency planning strategy to support the licenstng of the station.
l Me, Callendrello's emergency plancing. offsite experience tavolves all aspects of radiological
- He had lead an effort to prepare an emergency plan anc implementing procedures for a utility-taplemented offsite emergency plan In addition, he has provided technical support of the ASL5 licensing hearir.g for this same station tnrough the preparation of discovery respon-ses as well as written testtoony.
Prior to this effort. he has led five offsite esorgency planning projects
- these projects have anvolved tne preparation of 35 State and local ractoio-
' rical energency response plans and associated taplementing and standard operating procedures.
II
.t .
Of these projects, three have involved the preparation of exeretse seen-arios and support for practice and federally witnessed extrettes. Three projects have also involved the training of offstte emergency resconse ;er.
sonnel.
This required the preparatton of all training and drill saterta!s one of these efforts involved an intensive training program for all person-nel an four witnessed counties prior to their successful performance in a federally exeretse.
Mr. Callendrello has served as an observer in nineteen full-scale practice and federally paration witnessed of ALS8 haaring eterettes.
support He also has been involved in the pre.
tion systems, and the preparatton of evacuation ttee estisates.tatorial, the design of Before joining Ston* 1 Webster Engineering Curporation. Mr. Callendrel;v provided acoustical consulting services regarding the noise tapact of pro +
posed nuclear and control generating facilities. Interior and exterior noise analys:s.
of fossti cess industeles. fuel generating stations as well as a variety of pro-
' Pe0FES$f0NAL AFFftfAffCNS American Nuclear Society t
OETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORO CALLENORELLO. ANTHONY M.
NEW HAMPSHIRE YANXEE OfVisf0N.
PUBLIC SFRVfCF OF NEW MAMPSHIRE (Jan. 1964 - Present)
Appointments.
Esergency Planning Manager - 1986 Energency Preparedness Supervisor - Septeater 1985 Senior Emergency Planner - January 1984 Mr. Callendrello is currently supervisir.g the offsite emergency prepared-ness efforts for Seatrook Station. He has direct responsibility for the direction of Massachusetts. New Hampshire and Maine state and local planning and training.
Prior he was responsible for the development of onsite energency response procedures and prompt' notification system procurement and installation and scenario preparation.
STONE & WESSTER ENGINEERINO CORPORATION, NEW YORK, NY (Apr. 1980 to Dec. 1983)
Shoreham Nuetear Aewer Station. Lont Island Lightine Cocoany (Mar. 1983 to Dec. 19831 Mr. Callencrello supervised a group of planners providing technical support for offstte radiological emergee.cy planning. Principally this involved t:te preparation of an emergency response plan and laplementing procedures for the first utility implemented offsite plan developed in the e.Quntry. Mts responsab111ttes through also include the support of the ASL8 licer.stng nearings tne preparation of discovery responses and writte.n testasony Syster Cr*** Nuclear Generattnr 9tation. General Pub'.le Utilities _
10ct. 1980 to June 1983)
Mr. Callendrello supervised the development of Radiological !sergency Plans (REPS) for the county and municipalities wathan the Emergency Planning Zone of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, ihls involved the following principal efforts: the preparation of individual REPS for the county and twenty municipalities: tne preparation of toplementing and stan-dard operating procedures; the preparation of the scenario for the FEMA witnessed exercise: the training of offstte energency response personnel in the specifics of radiological duties: and the direct support of FEMA exer-case activities through tne provtston of field radiological data and field team referees. evaluators F
3
AMC This planning process involved extenstve latervtews and teetings with various offtetals of thw State. county.
and tunicipalittes. utelity manage-sent local and newssite operating personnel, the FEXA regional representative. and sedia.
James A.
New York Fit: Patrick Nuclear Power Plant. Power Authority of the State of (Mar. 1982 to July 1982)
Mr.
effort Callendrello for the J.A. supervised the onsite radiological emergency planning Fitzpatetek Nuclear Power Plant.
the modification This effort involves E.ser8ency ActionofLevels the emergency (EALal plan, implementing procedures. and guidance. in accordance with the latest Federal NRC/ FEMA graded The preparation exeres se andof these documents was in support of the 1982 the NRC appraisal, indian Potnt Nuclear Power 5tstton - Cnit 3. Power Authority of the State of New York (Jan. 1982 to Mar. 1942)
Mr. Callendrello supervised the support of offsite radiological energency response of planning Indian Point Unit for3the four counties within the Energency Planntag Zone This support involved the training of county exe-cutives and agency heads in thete role in a radiological energency response, and the training of personnel responsible for decontastnation center operatton, dose assessment. field sonttortng, reception center operattons and esergency operations center activation and operations.
In adottton. support saterial for this effort was prepared including an emergency worker's training manual: standard operating procedures for field sonttartng ans dose assessment personnel; and saterials and suggested layouts for emergency operations centers.
Finally, exeresse.
he sur.ervised the support of the successful 1982 FEMA witnessed Th's included the preparation of the offsite scenarto: the pro-vision of o?ververs/ evaluators at offsite locationst and the collection.
evaluation. and provision of evaluator critique cessents.
Salte Generatine Station. Public Service Electrie and Ces Cocoany (Aug. 1980 to May 1981)
Mr. Callendrello directed the development of Radiological Energency Plans (REPS) for the State of New Jersey and the counties and municipalities in the Energency Planning Zone of the Sales Generating Station. This work included the preparation of REPS fbr the State, two counties, and stx aunt-capalities; the development of tiplementing and standard operating proce-dures; the development of trataang satertals, and support in the staging af the 1982 FEMA observed esercise f
4 .
AMC We (MayH1960 Zliser Nuclear to Aug. power Statten C!nelnnati Oas and Electric C:,can.,
1380) -
Mr. Callendrello was responsible for the coordination and technicalewrevi of efforts to design an integrated prompt public warning systee for tne area near the Zimmer Station to support radiological emergency planning.
Curing this period. he participated in the preparation of evacuation ttse estimates sents. for the area near the Zimmer Station in response to NRC esquare-Plans for the Commonwealth of Xentucky and the countie Emergency Planning tone.
Also, he has assisted in the preparation of wrt t-ten testimony for the Accatc Safety Licensing Board licensing hearings .
, 00NLEY. MILLER & NOWIKAS INCORPORAT!Q (1976 to 19801 He was responsible for industrial and environmental noise control projects .
Industrial projects required compitance with 05KA noise standards for man industries including power generating stations, papermaking, food pro-cessing, and metal fabricating.
Environmental projects dealt with the control of noise State and local codes. from large rotating equipment in order to comply with LEWi$ S. C000FMt!ND 6 aS$0CtATES (1973 to 1976)
Mr Callendrello the predicttun. directed projects involving industrial noise control and assessment, and control of environmental noise. Typical stils, and power station equipment.in-plant equtpsent analyzed including worked dealt with a variety of power statten equapsent,Envtronmental hignways, and com-projects tunaty annoyance studies.
tigact of the noise from four In 1000 particular, MW ne assessed the environmental tire nuclear generattng plants on a single for the New York State Atoalc and Space Development Authority.
E
\
l
. I
- _ - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - ~~ ^ ~ ~ ~~~~~'~ ~ '
^
gogME.SWWM CC(KETED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 16 AR125 P6 :33
~
OCn i i -
ci' E Ta N . -
)
In the Matter of )
)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) Docket No.(s)
NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL. ) 50-443/444-OL (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) )
'N )
)
CERTlFICATE OF SERVICE I, Carol S. Sneider, hereby certify that on April 23, 1988, I made service of the following documents:
- s. Attachments 1 - 11 to Testimony of Goble, Renn, Eckert and Evdokimoff; Testimony of Thomas Adler; Testimony of Sholly, Beyea and Thompson, with Attachments; and Testimony of Robert Eckert, with Attachment (video cassette).
postage prepaid, by first class mail, or as indicated by an asterisk, by Federal Express mail, to:
"Ivan Smith, Chairman *Gustave A. Linenberger, Jr.
Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission East West Towers Building East West Towers Building 4350 East West Highway 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 Be thesda , 11D 20814
- Dr. Jerr/ Harbour *Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.
Atomir uafety & Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Idclear Regulatory Office of General Counsel Comm4ssion 15th Floor Ea.t West Towers Building 11555 Rockville Pike 4350 East West Highway Rockville, MD 20852 Bethesda, MD 20814 s gb 3
i I
- H. Joseph Flynn, Esq.
- Stephen E. Merrill !
Assistant General Counsel Atterney General l Office of General Counsel George Dana Bisbee l Federal Emergency Management Assistant Attorney General !
Agency Office of the Attorney General '
500 C Street, S.W. 25 Capitol Street Washington, DC 20472 Concord, NH 03301 [
- Docketing and Service Paul A. Fritzsche, Esq. [
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Office of the Public Advocate i Commission State House Station 112
! Washington, DC. 20555 Augusta, ME 04333 Roberta C. Pevear Diana P. Randall State Representative 70 Collins Street i Town of Hampton Falls Seabrook, NH 03874 i
. Drinkwater Road '
Hampton Falls, NH 03844
- Atomic Safety & Licensing
- Robert A. Backus, Esq.
Appeel Board Panel Backus, Meyer & Solomon l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 116 Lowell Street i Commission P.O. Box 516 ,
Washington, DC 20555 Manchester, NH 03106 l
! t Atomic Safety & Licensing Jane Doughty ,
Board Panel Seacoast Anti-Pollution League !
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 5 Market Street i Commission Portsmouth, NH 03801 i washington, DC 20555
- Paul McEachern, Esq. J. P. Nadeau t Matthew T. Brock, Fsq. Board of Selectmen i Shaines & McEachern 10 Central Road ;
25 Maplewood Avenue Rye, NH 03870 l
! P.O. Box 360
- Portsmouth, NH 03801 1 I !
! Sandra Gavutis, Chairperson Calvin A. Canney !
Board of Selectmen City Manager '
RFD 1, Box 1154 City Hall
! Rte. 107 126 Daniel Street !
! E. Kingston, NH 03827 Portsmouth, NH 03801 ,
i l Senator Gordon J. Humphrey Angelo Machircs, Chairman ;
i U.S. Senate Board of Selectmon ;
Washington, DC 20510 25 High Road j
- (Attn
- Tom Burack) Newbury, MA 10950 l l Senator Gordon J. Humphrey Edward G. Molin s 1 Eagle Square, Suite 507 Mayor !
I Concord, NH 03301 City Hall !
- (Attn
- Herb Boynton) Newburyport, MA 01950 !
f l
f
Donald E. Chick William Lord Town Manager Board of Selectmen Town of Exeter Town Hall 10 Front Street Friend Street Exeter, NH 03833 Amesbury, MA 01913 Brentwood Board of Selectmen Gary W. Holmes, Esq.
RFD Dalton Road Holmes & Ellis Brentwood, NH 03833 47 Winnacunnet Road Hampton, NH 03841 Philip Ahrens, Esq.
- Diane Curran, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General Harmon & Weiss Department of the Attorney Suite 430 General 2001 S Street, N.W.
State House Station #6 Washington, DC 20009 Augusta, ME 04333 "Thomas G. Dignan, Esq. Richard A. Hampe, Esq.
R.K. Gad III, Esq. Hampe & McNicholas Ropes & Gray 35 Pleasant Street 225 Franklin Street Concord, NH 03301 Boston, MA 02110 Beverly Hollingworth Edward A. Thomas 209 Winnacunnet Road Federal Emergency Management Hampton, NH 03842 Agency 442 J.W. McCormack (POCH)
Boston, MA 02109 William Armstrong Michael Santosuosso, Chairman Civil Defense Director Board of Selectmen Town of Exeter Jewell Street, RFD 2 10 Front Street South Hampton, NH 03827 Exeter, NH 03833 Robert Carrigg, Chairman Anne E. Goodman, Chairperson Board of Selectmen Board of Selectmen Town Office 13-15 Newmarket Road Atlantic Avenue Durham, NH 03824 North Hampton, NH 03862 Allen Lampert Sheldon J. Wolfe, Chairperson Civil Defense Director Atomic Safety and Licensing Town of Brentwood Board Panel 20 Franklin Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Exeter, NJ 03833 Commission Washington, DC 20555 Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Charles P. Graham, Esq.
5500 Friendship Boulevard McKay, Murphy & Graham Apartment 1923 Old Post Office Square Chevy Chase, MD 100 Main Street Amesbury, MA 01913
Judith H. Mizner, Esq.
Lagoulis, Clark Hill-Whilton & McGuire 79 State Street Newburyport, MA 01950 od s. heQ Carol S. Sneider Assistant Attorney General Nuclear Safety Unit Department of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108-1698 (617) 727-2265 Dated: April 23, 1988 f
k m ,,y ,, - - - -- ----- - , - , , . - - - - - - .