ML20148D956

LSCS Unit 1/Unit 2 Restart Plan

ML20148D956
Person / Time
Site:	LaSalle
Issue date:	05/16/1997
From:	Subalusky W COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20148D954	List: ML20148D947 ML20148D956
References
PROC-970516, NUDOCS 9706020203
Download: ML20148D956 (57)

Text

_ . . __ __ _ _ _ . _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

1 h

~ ~ *--- ~..n_... ...._,_ _,,_ ,_,__ ___ -

I a

k i

i l LaSalle County Station

! Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan i

i issued: May 16,19 7 Approved: /)Mi1 W.I. $ubalu 9706020203 970522 PDR ADOCK 05000373 P PDR p:\wptdo csicor r\r e st ar t\97 suintr .d oc May 16,1997

o j

- e - LaSalb County Station i

+' '

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart PI:n Page 2 4 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Overview 1.1 Plan Purpose

1.2 Background

l 2.0 Performance improvement Strategy 2.1 Restart Focus on Operations, Engineering and Plant Materiel Condition 2.2 Management Leadership and Effectiveness 2.3 Oversight and Assessment 2.4 Human Performance 2.5 Critical Work Processes and Programs i

< 2.6 Plant Materiel Condition l

4 3.0 LaSalle County Station Restart Program and Required Actions 3.1 Restart Program Overview 3.2 Restart Action Plans '

i 4.0 Restart Plan Management Responsibilities l

4.1 Responsibilities j 4.2 Assessment of Results l 4.3 Plan Communications s

1 e

Figures 1 Management Process for Unit Restart 1

Attachment A Summary of Restart Action Plans I

s p:\wptdoes\ corr \r e st art \97 suintr. doc May 16,1997 a

4 o i 4 * - *

• LaSall2 County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 3 a

LaSalle County Station Restart Action Plans 1

Strategy 1: Safe Plant Operation

{

1.1 Improve Operator Performance I i i 1.1 A Simulator Training and Instructor Performance 1.18 Operator Startup Training 1.1 C Monitoring Critical Operations Functions 1 1.1 D Operator Work Environment i 1.1 E Restart and Power Ascension Plan I

1.2 Reduce Operator Challenges 1

1.2A Operator Workarounds

! 1.2B Temporary Alterations 1.2C Main Control Room Distractions 1.3 Correct Processes that Challenge Safe Plant Operation 1.3 A Plant Labeling Program 1.3B Out-of-Service Program 1.3C Operating Procedure Readiness 1.4 Improve Operator Training and Achieve Accreditation Renewal 4

l l

Strategy 2: Plant Materiel Condition and Effective Outage Completion '

2.1 Unit 1 Outage Plan 2.2 Unit 2 Outage Plan '

i 2.3 Maintenance Backlog Review Plan Strategy 3: Corrective Action and Assessment 3.1 Corrective Action Program 3.2 Site Quality Verification Effectiveness p:\wptdocs\ corr \ restart \97suintr. doc May 16,1997

• -

• LaSalb County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 4 Strategy 4: Effective Work Control 4.1 Work Scheduling to Support Orwline Work Control 4.2 Work Package Quality Strategy 5: Human interaction and Performance 5.1 Human Performance and Interactions Strategy 6: Effective Engineering Support 6.1 Engineering Capability 6.2 Plant Operational Readiness p:\wptd ocs\ corr \ restart \97 suintr. doc May 16,1997

.. l

. *

• LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 5 1 1

l 1.0 1;4ttdoction and Overview l

1.1 Plan Purpose l

The purpose of the LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan is to summarize the actions and controls that will be implemented to ensure:

e identification, definition and completion of restart-related plant work i items, e

completion of restart-related actions to specifically improve engineering and operations performance and upgrade the plant materiel condition, e completion of a safe, event-free unit restart and ascension to 100%

power, and I e sustained safe and reliable power operation.

! 1 This Restart Plan integrates, at a summary level, all site activities associated with the restart of LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 and is a key communication and management tool to achieve the specific goals outlined above. This Plan describes our near-term performance improvement strategy emphasizing improved LaSalle County Station operational safety performance and our process for defining the work scope to be completed prior to unit  ;

restart. This Restart Plan does not control work completion activities and, '

therefore, does not replace or supersede LaSalle County Station procedures for performance of work.

LaSalle County Station Unit 1 is the initial focus of the Restart Plan because l Unit 1 is the lead unit for restart and is the priority for site work activities.

However, the improvement actions identified in the Restart Action Plans will also result in improvements in the operational safety performance of LaSalle County Station Unit 2. The LaSalle County Station Unit 2 refueling outage (L2R07) continues as a parallel activity with resources focused on maintenance of shutdown safety and completion of other plant activities that do not impact the Unit 1 restart critical path. Sufficient resources will continue to be dedicated to Unit 2 to ensure that shutdown safety margins are maintained. It is important to highlight that many of the actions performed on Unit 1 to achieve unit restart will also be applicable to Unit 2 and may affect the scope of work to be completed during L2R07.

p:\wptdocs\coAre start \97 suintr.d ac May 16,1997

• LaSalle County Station l Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page6 I i

1.2 Background

LaSalle County Station Unit 2 initiated planned refueling outage L2R07 on September 20,1996 and Unit 1 initiated forced outage L1F35 on September 22,1996 due to a failure of the No. 4 Turbine Control Valve (4TCV). The LaSalle Management Team (LMT) has completed a process to define the

' comprehensive set of actions necessary to be performed prior to restarting the units including the specific corrective actions associated with the Unit 14TCV, i After performing this review and evaluating other available inputs and assessments, it was determined that the operational safety performance improvements described in this Plan need to be completed prior to unit restart.

Many different inputs were used to define the specific actions in this Restart Plan. Key inputs used include the following:

1 e external assessments (e.g., from the NRC and INPO), l e

internal assessments providing input from several perspec+ives (e.g., j department self assessments, Safety Review Board feedback and Action Plan development teams),

e lessons learned from recent operational events, e

lessons learned and results achieved from implementing the LaSalle

Upgraded 1996 Operational Plan, and e information received from the Comed sponsored independent Self Assessment 'ISA) conducted by a group of nuclear experts and industry peers, i

in addition, several focused technical and programmatic assessments were 4

initiated as pad of this Restart Plan to provide the highest level of confidence

that the stadon will complete the operating cycle in a safe and reliable manner, i Issues identified during these assessments will be reviewed to determine j whether they require resolution prior to unit restart.

The LaSalle Upgraded 1996 Operational Plan was being implemented when the j units shutdown for L2R07 and L1F35. The LaSalle Upgraded 1996 Operational Plan produced significant positive results in several safety performance areas and provides the foundation for continued improvements in 1997 through implementation of this Restart Plan and, subsequently, in the implementation of

! the 1998 Operational Plan. The 1998 Operational Plan will be implemented j after restart of Units 1 and 2.

J

)

p:\wptdocs\ corr \re st art \97 suintr. doc May 16,1997 a

W

• LaSaMe Cv nty Station Unit 1/Uait 2 Restart Plan Page 7 i 2.0 Performance improvement Strategy The 1997/98 Nuclear Operations Division (NOD) Business Plan describes its long-term per#crmance vision as a successful participant in a competitive electric utility industry. Performance benchmarks and targets are established in i the three key performance areas of Safety, Production and Cost with Safety being the NOD focus for the short-term (0-12 months); Production being the

focus for medium terrn (12-24 months); and Cost being the long-term focus (2-5

years).

The focus on nuclear safety performance is consistent with the actions and

results of our LaSalle Upgraded 1996 Operational Plan and is the dominant

element of this Restart Plan. Significant improvements in Nuclear Safety

]'

performance are the major theme of the input documents and will be achieved through the implementation of this Restart Plan. Achieving excellence in nuclear safety performance is a prerequisite to achieving our second priority, plant production. Industry experience has shown, time and again, that when excellence in nuclear safety and plant production performance have been achieved, then attaining and maintaining production costs at competitive levels will be sure to follow. The Restart Plan implements a thorough and rigorous process, and a set of specific activities, to achieve a step change in safety performance throughout the site organization.

2.1 Restart Focus on Operations, Engineering and Plant Materiel Condition Specific performance improvements and corrective actions required for restart of the LaSalle County Station units are defined in detailed Restart Action Plans summarized herein. These actions are primarily focused on achieving substantial improvements in the performance of the Operations and Engineering organizations and upgrading the materiel condition of the plant through implementation of equipment and system assessment, maintenance and design modifications. The effectiveness of the organization in irnplementing the Corrective Action Program to identify, assess and resolve potential plant deficiencies is also being demonstrated through the implementation of the Restart Action Plans.

Completion of the Restart Action Plans and the remainder of the Restart Program described in Section 3.0 will provide assurance that the units can be safely restarted and operated.

I p nwptdoes\ corr \re s tart \97suintr. doc May 16,1997

f LaSalle County Station )

l Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan  !

Page 8

In addition to specific actions and results required to initiate unit restart, as defined in the Restart Action Plans, long-term safety improvement at LaSalle  !

1 County Station requires achieving significant improvements in the five key l

performance areas described below. A brief summary of LaSalle County

Stations' current performance in these areas and improvement actions in progress at this time is provided below. Many detailed actions are occurring throughout the station to implement these items. The Restart Action Plans also support improvements in these five key areas while implementing the specific l corrective actions required for unit restart, j l

2.2 Management Leadership and Effectiveness l i l

)

Current Performance

Management leadership at the LaSalle County Station has not been effective in

establishing the management systems, safety culture and performance improvement environment necessary to simultaneously achieve excellence in nuclear safety, production and cost.

Performance Improvement Actions: i i  !

• _ Recruiting management personnel with industry experience at plants that have achieved excellence in nuclear safety, have participated in j significant performance improvement programs and/or who have 3

demonstrated the ability sustain high standards for safety performance, and l

e establishing the basic fundamentals of effective management such as I high standards for performance, individual accountability, organizational teamwork, monitoring of specific performance measures and regular j management follow-up.

l l Additional actions to support resolution of management leadership and

effectiveness issues are included in the Restart Action Plans.

l 2.3 Oversight and Assessment Current Perform nce:

i

[ The implementation of oversight and assessment activities at the LaSalle County Station has not consistently assured that potentially significant problems are identified, appropriately evaluated and fully resolved in a timely manner.

]

J p :\wpt docs \ corr \r e st art \97 suintr. doc May 16,1997

.. i 4 .

LaSalle County Station

' j

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan  ;

Page 9 Performance improvement Actions:

• Consolidating corrective action and other oversight functions to provide

organizational focus and broadened oversight responsibilitias; e new management position has been formed to focus this effort to drive safety performance improvement, e implementing regularly scheduled department self assessment reviews with the Site Vice President and the Plant General Manager to reinforce line management responsibility to establish high standards for j performance, identify and resolve their problems and performance I weaknesses, and to implement an environment of continuous self assessment and improvement, e establishing the Safety Review Board (SRB) and re-focusing the Plant Operating Review Committee (PORC) to provide a higher standard for  !

plant performance and to implement a more rigorous and critical reviavi of plant activities and work products, and I e creating an Engineering Assurance function, and staffing it with personnel experienced in system and design basis manageme.it, to ensure that engineering work products meet performance expectations and to provide the foundation for sustained improvements.

Additional actions to support resolution of oversight and assessment issues are included in the Restart Action Plans.

2.4 Human Performance Current Performance:

Fundamentals of good human performance have not been effectively implemented at LaSalle County Station resulting in operational safety performance below industry standards. Examples of less than acceptable human performance at include unclear procedures and/or not following them as written, not consistently implementing self checking as a routine job activity, not accepting personal accountability for each and every job a.:tivity, not implementing a questioning attitude that exemplifies a strong safety culture and not effectively communicating job requirements and statJs between organizations.

p :\wptdocs\ corr \r estart\97 suintr. doc May 16,1997

b .

• LaSalle County Station  !

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 10 Performance Improvement Actions:

4 e impiementing definitive management actions to reinforce expectations for human performance and to solidify the site focus on safe operations, 3 e.g., insistence on procedure adherence and stop work actions to focus 1

on human performance errors and key lessons 166med, i

i e reallocating personnel and reassigning responsibilities to ensure supervisors spend more time coaching, mentoring and reinforcing 4

standards for performance in their work groups, 4

e developing and using performance indicators that highlight key areas of human performance weakness, e.g. maintenance rework, operator human performance errors, out-of-service errors, e ensuring that all personnel follow procedures and implementing procedure revision actions to properly revise those procedures that cannot be effectively followed as written, e performing an independent review of key engineering work productn (e.g., operability evaluations, safety evaluations and root cause analyse:.

using experienced external engineering personnel as a method to botr raise the job performance standards and train personnel on how to achieve those standards, and

= engaging the work force in identifying and resolving the barriers in work practices, processes and procedures that can potentially lead to human errors.

Additional actions to support resolution of human performance issues are included in the Restart Action Plans.

2.5 Critical Work Processes and Programs i

Current Performance:

Critical work processes and programs that are used to achieve safe and reliable l

operation have not been fully effective due to barriers such as cumbersome or i confusing process controls, inadequate trending and monitoring, poor performance measures and an insular approach that did not take advantage of industry lessons learned.

l l

p:\wptdocs\ corr \ restart \97suintr. doc May 16,1997

i LaSalla County Ctation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 11 l

l Performance Improvement Actions:

i e implementing work control process improvements to allow work to be  !

efficiently completed in the field and to minimize the occurrence' of inadequate work packages, e

including critical work processes and programs in the scope of j department self assessment activities and implementing self assessments i focused on specific programs, e.g., Out-of-Service Program and the IST Program, l

developing performance measures for critical work processes to measure the effectiveness of their implementation and to highlight areas of  ;

potential weakness, e.g., Out-of-Service Program, and i e

implementing upgrades in the Corrective Action Program to ensure I problems are identified, cause determined, corrective action implemented and post-implementation review to access effectiveness.

Additional actions to support resolution of critical work process and program issues are included in the Restart Action Plans.

2.6 Plant Materiel Condition Current Performance:

The materiel condition does not meet industry standards for excellence as indicated by measures such as the size of maintenance backlogs, occurrence of repetitive equipment problems, number of operator distractions (workarounds, temporary alterations and control room deficiencies) and system performance history and trends.

Performance Improvement Actions:

e implemented actions to fix plant deficiencies through the Materiel Condition improvement Program and resolution of operator distractions through completion of the LaSalle Upgraded 1996 Operational Plan, e using the Corrective Action Program to drive identification and resolution j of potential plant materiel condition deficiencies through review, l evaluation and trending of Problem identification Forms (PlFs), '

+

implementing the Maintenance Rule at the which will result in on-going improvements to the materiel condition and reliability of plant equipment and systems, 4

)

p:\wptdocs\ corr \ restart \97suintr doc May 16,1997 f

- - - = _ _ . - .. - . - . _.

LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 12 e

redefining the System Manager job requirements and performance expectations to exclusively focus on system management, i.e., ensuring that each system is capable of performing its design functions on a reliable basis, and e

raising standards for acceptable plant materiel condition through in-plant walkdowns and inspections.

Additional actions to address plant materiel condition issues are included in the l Restart Action Plans. l l

3.0 Restart Program and Rcquired Actions 3.1 Restart Program Overview The Restart Program consists of an integrated set of complementary programs i and activities that will result in the highest level of confidence that power l operations will be safely initiated and the units returned to reliable full power operation in a controlled manner. The process is presented as a flow chart in Figure 1 with the major elements described below. As noted previously, the  !

initial station focus is on Unit 1; however, the restart process and most of the specific actions are also applicable to Unit 2.

The Restart Program consists of four phases as follows:

l e

definition of physical plant work and other activities to be completed prior to unit restart, a work completion, e restart and operational readiness evaluation, and e unit restart and power ascension.

Work to be Completed Prior to Unit Restart Comprehensive evaluations are being conducted to define the scope of work requiring completion prior to unit restart. The resulting work scope includes significant actions relating to personnel, processes and plant equipment to correct identified deficiencies and improve operational safety performance.

These actions are defined in the Restart Action Plans and summarized in Section 3.2.

p:\wptdo es\ corr \ rest art \97 s uintr.d oc May 16,1997

LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 13 inclusion of specific items in the L1F35 outage work scope is made using a process that engages both senior site management and station personnel and is based on a foundation of ensuring operational safety. Potential work items are being identified from many sources including the following:

l

• internal and external assessments, J

e review of backlogs (e.g., maintenance, engineering, operations, l

corrective action program PIFs), j s system functional performance reviews, '

e system readiness reviews, e commitments review, and e personnel and plant performance trends.

Site management is responsible for establishing the scope of activities requiring )

completion prior to unit restart and for verifying that the work has been  !

successfully completed. Individual work items are evaluated through the line i organization with recommendations for inclusion in the outage reviewed by the supervisor / manager. Hardware oriented items are evaluated by the Scope Control Committee and items that are significant in scope are reviewed by the Senior Manager Review Committee (SMRC). The SMRC also reviews the scope '

of significant non-hardware work items, e.g., determining the scope of the  ;

, System Functional Performance Reviews and the need to either expand or l truncate this review program. '

Work Completion Work required for unit restart is completed under the direction of line management using plant processes and procedures for execution and control of work. Implementation schedules are established and managed by the Outage Management organization for ay plant hardware oriented activities and major non-hardware activities. Summary level actions to drive successful completion of all restart work items is provided in the Plant Materiel Condition and Outage Completion Action Plan. Work completion is documented consistent with plant process and procedural requirements with oversight for effective job completion provided by line management and oversight organizations, p:\wpt docs \ corr \r estart\97 suintr. doc May 16,1997

LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 14  !

1 i

Restart and Operational Readiness Evaluation 1

1 A thorough assessment of the readiness of the plant, personnel and work j

, processes to safely begin unit restart and initiate power operation will be l

completed and used as input in the decision by the Site Vice President to  !

request authorization for unit restart from the Chief Nuclear Operations Officer and Executive Vice President, Nuclear. The self assessment to be performed by each organization is an element of Action Plan 3.1 and will culminate in a recommendation from the Plant General Manager to the Site Vice President that authorization for unit restart be requested. An element of this process will be the development and approval of a Restart and Power Ascension Plan (developed as part of the Safe Plant Operation Action Plan) that summarizes the key actions, milestones, management approvals and contingencies that will be implemented during the restart process. Additional input regarding the readiness of the plant, personnel and work processes will be obtained from the Plant

Operating Review Committee (PORC), independent oversight organizations such as the SRB, SOV and from other inputs at the discretion of the Site Vice President.

" When the Site Vice President has concluded that the plant is ready for restart, ho shall request authorization for restart from the Chief Nuclear Operations Officer and Executive Vice President, Nuclear. The Chief Nuclear Operations Officer and the Executive Vice President, Nuclear will commission an independent assessment of the units' readiness for restart, and grant final j authorization for restart to the Site Vice President. '

Unit Restart and Power Ascension Following approval from the Site Vice President to initiate unit restart with the intent to proceed to full power operation, plant operators will initiate the restart and power ascension process in accordance with the approved Restart and Power Ascension Plan.

3.2 Restart Action Plans in addition to the individual and programmatic reviews performed above, the LMT also conducted several performance review sessions to define additional actions that must be completed prior to unit restart. Plant operational safety was again the focus for these planning sessions. A set of Restart Action Plans, described below resulted from these management reviews. Many of these Action Plans change or upgrade site-wide programs and processes and are, therefore, applicable to both Units 1 and 2.

1 p:\wptdoes\ corr \r e start \97 suintr . doc May 16,1997

- - . = . . - - - .-

LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Pl n Page 15 The Restart Action Plans are organized in the following six strategies that continue the site performance improvement focus established in the LaSalle Upgraded 1996 Operational Plan and extend to additional items that are required 4

to achieve a safe and event-free restart:

, e Safe Plant Operation, e' Plant Materiel Condition and Effective Outage Completion, a Corrective Action and Assessment, o Effective Work Control,

e Human Interaction and Performance, and a Effective Engineering Support.

3.2.1 Safe Plant Operation The objective of the Safe Plant Operation strategy is to ensure that restart and ascension to 100% power can be safely achieved and sustained. This objective is consistent with goal to establish a high organizational focus on operational safety and reflect our commitment to becoming an Operations-driven organization. The Safe Plant Operation strategy is focused on improving operator performance, reducing operator challenges and correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation.

A. Improve Operator Performance - the focus of this area is to ensure that plant operators are fully effective in initiating a unit restart and sustaining '

power operation with a conservative focus on operational safety.

Specific Action Plans developed to address the restart requirements j include:

Simulator Training and instructor Performance - improve instructional techniques and confirm simulator fidelity with the plant configuration to verify that individual and crew performance can support safe unit restart and power operation.

Operator Startup Training - establish operator readiness to support safe unit restart and power operation by implementing a focused operator training program, o Monitoring Critical Operating Functions - improve Operator and Supervisor professionalism ar.d ability to sustain safe plant operation through specific oversight actions using criteria that is consistent with both performar ce expectations and training activities.

p awptdocs\ corr \re st art \97 suints .do c May 16.1997

i LaSalle County Station 1

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan l 4

Page 16 '

Operator Work Environment - upgrade the operator work environment to achieve improved professionalism, operator ownership and effective communication and planning for operational activities.

Restart and Power Ascension Plan - develop and implement a Restart and Power Ascension Plan during unit restart in two

phases

prior to unit restart and during the startup and power ascension to full power.

4 I

B. Reduce Operator Challenges - the focus of this area is to ensure that potential challenges to plant operation are reduced so that station personnel can most effectively operate and maintain the plant during l 1

normal, abnormal or emerger.cy conditions. Specific Action Plans l developed to address the restart requirements include: i Operator Workarounds - reduce the number of operator i

workarounds that require compensatory actions by operators in  ;

, the normal course of their daily activities.  !

Temporary Alterations - reduce the number of temporary alterations to plant systems that may unnecessarily challenge plant operators during normal, abnormal and emergency

conditions.

' I

. Main Control Room Distractions - reduce the number of distractions in the Main Control Room so that plant operators are l 3 not unnecessarily challenged during normal, abnormal and

emergency conditions.

I C. Correct Processes that Challenge Safe Plant Operation - this focus of this i area is to ensure that key processes relied upon by plant operators l 4

support safe unit restart and power operations. Specific Action Plans developed to address the restart requirements include: )

Plant I abeling Program - implement labeling upgrades to plant

equipment so that the potential for out-of-service and personnel a

error is minimized (upgrades implemented during unit shutdown is on plant equipment located in areas with limited access during a

normal operation and on sensitive instrumentation so that the potential for unit trip during normal operation is minimized).

• Equipment Out-of-Service Program - utilize self assessments to identify problems and implement corrective actions to establich

! expectations and focus for error reduction in the out-of-service

, program, p:\wptdocs\ corr \r e st art \97suintr. doc May 16,1997

(

i

+

LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 17

=

Operating Procedure Readiness - review and revise, as required,  !

l Operating procedures necessary to implement safe unit restart and power operation. l

3.2.2 Plant Materiel Condition and Effective Outage Completion The objective of the Plant Materiel Condition and Effective Outage Completion

! strategy is to ensure that materiel condition of the plant is improved sufficiently to support safe and reliable unit restart and power operation. An outage plan i

that identifies and organizes the completion of all required plant work will be used drive key outage milestones related to scope identification and completion of scheduled .setivities. Although the initial focus of this Restart Plan is on Unit

' 1, work activities will also occur on Unit 2 to support L2R07 as resources are available. Therefore, a separate Action Plan has been assembled in this area for i

Units 1 and 2 as well as a specific plan to complete the review of corrective maintenance backlogs. I 3.2.3 Corrective Action and Assessment The objective of the Corrective Action and Assessment strategy is to use

, programmatic assessments, and corrective action program improvements so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained.

Specific Action Plans developed to address the restart requirements include:

A. Corrective Action Program - this focus is to ensure that self assessments to identify problems requiring resolution are completed, oversight and review of root cause determinations is implemented and improvements to the corrective action screening and post-corrective action review process are completed, thereby ensuring that personnel are effective in identifying and fixing problems that may impact safe unit restart and power operation.

B. Site Quality Verification (SOV) Effectiveness - this focus is to implement improvements to the SOV organization so that SQV fulfills its oversight responsibilities in an effective manner.

p:\wptdocs\ corr \ rest art \97 suintr.do c May 16,1997

LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 18

i 3.2.4 Effective Work Control .

The objective of the Effective Work Control strategy is to ensure that necessary 1 corrective and preventive maintenance work will be effectively and efficiently '

completed following unit restart via on-line maintenance and system window outages by implementing organizational and responsibility changes and work control process improvements. Specific Action Plans developed to address the restart requirements include:

A. Work Scheduling to Support On-line Work Control - this focus is to integrate existing scheduling processes, define work control roles and responsibilities, develop work week windows and train work control personnel, so that required plant work can be effectively completed.

B. Work Package Quality - this focus is to improve the quality of work packages by obtaining worker involvement in identifying the reasons for holds or delays and implementing appropriate corrective actions.

3.2. 5 Human Interaction and Performance The objective of the Human Interaction and Performance strategy is to ensure that human performance improvements are realized along with plant materiel condition and process improvements so that improved operational safety performance can be sustained into the future. The Human Interaction and Performance strategy is focused on improving communication, teamwork, supervisory follow-up and engaging the workforce in identifying and resolving i barriers to good human performance.

3.2.6 Effective Engineering Support The objective of the Effective Engineering Support strategy is to upgrade engineering capacity to conduct programmatic assessment, identify plant system or problems, provide definite resolution of technical issues and maintain plant configuration in accordance with the plants' design basis. Specific Action Plans developed to address the restart requirements include:

A. Engineering Capability - this focus is to upgrade the capability of Engineering to support safe unit restart and power operation through the addition of experienced personnel, additional training of existing personnel and organizational and programmatic changes to ensure that work products meet acceptable quality standards, p :\wptdocs\ corr \ restart \97 suintr. doc May 16,1997

s .

LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 19 B. Plant Operational Readiness - this focus is to implement a review of systems, and other focused assessments, to define work necessary to be completed prior to unit restart and to establish confidence that plant systems are capable of operating safely, reliably and in accordance with design basis requirements. These assessments will include the following:

System Reviews for the systems important to safe and reliable operation l

which identify the required system functions compared to the design '

basis requirements; determine materiel condition and design deficiencies that affect achieving these functions; evaluate whether the periodic testing and inspection activities adequately confirm the ability of the system to perform the functions; and determine any special testing, ,

, including integrated system testing, that should be performed prior to or during restart.

Desian Reviews which are performed as a complement to the System Reviews for certain systems or portions of systems to identify and i resolve substantive design issues. These Design Reviews include detailed comparison of system and equipment functional capability compared to design bases requirements, including the analytical bases supporting the design bases and the design implementation.

A Confiauration Control Evaluation that is directed toward assessing the potential significance of past practices of sometimes performing design changes without adequate design controls under the "chron letter"  ;

process and the "NDIT" process, as well as uncontrolled modifications performed during maintenance activities. These evaluations will include i detailed walkdown and configuration confirmation of selected safety {

related systems, including piping and selected instrumentation i configuration, electrical configuration and system seismic support configuration.

Backloa Review to determine activities that need to be completed prior to restart, including: Problem Identification Forms, root muse determinations, corrective actions; Operator Work Arounds; Main antrol Room Deficiencies; and outstanding Action Requests, Work Requesti and Engineering Requests. Additionally, all current operability determinations will be reviewed to resolve equipment problems fulfilling restart review criteria.

A System Readiness Review will be performed for all systems important to safe and reliable operation to confirm the adequacy of system general configuraticn and material condition, and to ensure all maintenance, design change and testing has been completed for restart of the Unit.

p:\wpt do cs\ corr \r e start \97 suintr. doc May 16,1997

LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 20' 4.0 Restart Plan Management Responsibilities Management has defined clear responsibilities for managing the Restart Plan activities.

4.1 Responsibilities Site Vice President The Site Vice President has overall responsibility for site implementation of the Restart Plan and will assure that sufficient resources are provided to complete the Restart Plan satisfactorily. In addition, he will actively participate in establishing expectations for performance results with management, monitoring plan results, reviewing management presentations for the purpose of establishing accountability within the organization, and providing overall plan leadership. The Site Vice President will recommend restart of the unit as described earlier, when the actions of this plan have been completed and he is confident that safe and reliable restart and power operations will be achieved. The Site Vice President has delegated authority to the Plant General Manager, the Restart Plan Coordinator, Strategy Sponsors and Action Plan team leaders to allow them to fulfill their Restart Plan responsibilities as defined below.

Plant General Manager and Restart Plan Coordinator The Plant General Manager is responsible for day-to-day plan management, including monitoring the performance of the Action Plans, and is accountable for overall completion of the Restart Plan. The Plant General Manager also controls changes, additions and deletions to the plan. The Executive Assistant to the Site Vice President is the Pestart Plan Coordinator and is responsible for administrative aspects of Restart Plan implementation including establishing the reporting format and content of performance results to site management. The Plant General Manager, as assisted by the Restart Plan Coordinator is responsible for the following activities:

Coordinating and preparing any required management reports for the management team, e

assuring that Action Plan activities are scheduled and integrated with the overall site schedule, e

facilitating changes to existing action plans or the development of new plans as emerging issues develop, e establishing and managing the agenda for periodic performance review meetings, and e assuring the adequacy and acceptable closure of the action plans.

p:\wptd ocs\ corr \re s tart \97 suintr. doc May 16,1997

, 8

. LaSalle County Station

. Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 21 ._

i' Strategy Sponson 1

Each of the six Restart Plan strategies has an assigned sponsor or sponsors. A L sponsor has responsibility for the completion of each Action Plan within the strategy

and for achievement of the performance measures assigned to that strategy.

j Strategy sponsors will provide support and guidance to their Action Plan Team 1

Leaders to help them succeed in completing their Action Plans.

~

Action Plan Team Leaders i Each Action Plan has an assigned Action Plan Team Leader. The responsibilities

! of the Action Plan Team Leaders'are to provide on-going management of plan j implementation to ensure that the expected performance results are achieved. In reviewing the Action Plan, the assigned team leaders will verify that it can be implemented and that it will achieve its specified perform'ance objectives. Action j Plan Team Leaders are also responsible for completing documentation that

summarizes the results of Action Plan Implementations.

i

! In cases where the Action Plan Team Leader identifies the need to enange the

[ action plan, those changes will be developed with the strategy sponsor, submitted

! to the Plant General Manager for review and approved by the Site Vice President.

s

! l

LaSalle Management Team i

The LMT is responsible for ensuring the successful implementation of the Restart

Plan and supporting the Strategy Sponsors and Action Plan Team Leaders. The 1 l LMT is responsible for conducting Restart Readiness Self Assessments for their j- organization. The LMT will review plan progress, changes and implementation i issues. The LMT will review and approve Action Plan closure and, via the Plant j General Manager, recommend to the Site Vice President the unit is ready to restart.

! 4.2 Assessment of Results Performance Review by the LMT

The LMT, facilitated by the Restart Plan Coordinator, will provide the focal point for j . review of plan effectiveness through a review of the results of the strategies and

! any barriers to successful completion of specific Action Plans. These reviews will

! be held weekly.

i l

l

)

l

i 4

i

p

\wptdoc s\ corr \re start \97 suintr. doc May 16,1997 i

i

'. LaSaNo County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Page 22 Review by Site Quality Ven6 cation Site Quality Verification (SQV) will provide independent assessment of the Restart Plan activities and results from the inGividual Action Plans in accordance with a defined assessment plan. The SQV assessment plan will ensure that the oversight a function is performed using qualified personnel (from the , other Comed locations and external personnel) and is focused on assessing whether the results achieved meet tne action plan expectations. SQV will provide assessment reports to site management on a periodic basis and this will be an input to the Site Vice President in the decision on when to authorize unit restart.

Ven6 cation of Action Plan Closure Management reviews and documentation will be used to verify that the individual action plans are satisfactorily completed. The individual Action Plan Team Leaders are responsible for reporting satisfactory plan progress during Restart Plan review meetings. SQV willindependently assess the completion of plan actions.

4.3 Plan Communications it is essential that the overall restart process and the specific contents of this Restart Plan be effectively communicated to the employees, to the NRC and to Comed executive management.

Site Communications The site communications coordinator is responsible for implementing a communication plan describing the key elements of the Restart Plan and for posting Plan performance results periodically. The intent is that all employees will see visible, high-level results from the Restart Plan as we progress toward and through unit restart. Achievement of major milestones and results will be communicated through written media.

NRC Communications The Site Vice President, Plant General Manager and Unit Managers will provide periodic briefings on the Restart Plan and results achieved to the NRC resident i inspectors and regional personnel. In addition, the residents will be encouraged to  !

attend the performance review meetings.

I l

p:\wptdoc s\ corr \ restart \97suintr. doc May 16,1997 l

l

l LaSalle County Station l Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Man l

Attachment A p Attachment' A ' ' '"-- -

. i Summary of l

Restart Action Plans I

1 1 'l l

! l 4

• .i 1

-l il I

[

4 e

4 i

i 4

1 f

! l) i l 1  ;

i l 1

i l

p:\wptdocs\ corr \r estart\97nrcint. doc May 16,1997

( '

LaSalle County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Attachment A  !

j l '

l Restart Action Plans '

l l

Strategy 1: Safe Plant Operation Sponsors: L. Guthrie S. Smith ,

1.1 Improve Operator Performance 1.1 A Simulator Training and instructor Performance H. Hayes 1.1B Operator Startup Training D. Farr ,

1.1 C Monitoring Critical Operations Functions A. Magnafici '

1.1 D Operator Work Environment J. Houston 1.1 E Restart and Power Ascension Plan A. Magnafici 1.2 Reduce Operator Challenges i 1.2A Operator Workarounds R. McConnaughay 1.2B Temporary Alterations J. Schroeder 1.2C Main Control Room Distractions R. Bengtson  !

1.3 Correct Processes that Challenge Safe Plant Operation 1.3A Plant Labeling Program J. Gables 1.3B Out-of-Service Program G. Campbell j 1.3C Operating Procedure Readiness S. Seaborn 1.4 Improve Operator Training and Achieve Accreditation Renewal G. Kaegi Strategy 2: Plant Materiel Condition and Effective Outage Completion Sponsor: P. Higgins 2.1 Unit 1 Outage Management Plan P. Higgins 2.2 Unit 2 Outage Management Plan P. Higgins 2.3 Maintenance Backlog Review Plan P. Higgins Strategy 3: Corrective Action and Assessment Sponsors: J. Mcdonald 3.1 Corrective Action Program W. Riffer 3.2 Quality Verification Effectiveness L. Spiers l

l l

l p:\wptdocs\ corr \ restart \97nrcint. doc May 16,1997

. . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - . . _ . . _ .. . _ _ _ m_ _. _ . _ . _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ . .

l LaSalle County Station ,

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan j Attachment A Strategy 4: Effective Work Control Sponsor: G. Campbell 1

4.1 Work Scheduling to Support On-line Work Control D. Hattersley 4.2 Work Package Quality T. Uznanski l l

Strategy 5: Human Interaction and Performance Sponsor: D. Boone 5.1 Human Interaction and Performance D.Boone

[ J. Gieseker i

! Strategy 6: Effective Engineering Support Sponsor: P. Hildebrandt

.i 6.1 Engineering Capability A. Javorik 6.2 Plant Operational Readiness A. Javorik I l

t i

i l

)

i p:\wptdoes\ corr \ restart \97suintr. doc May 16,1997

l

. LaSalle County Stati:n Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Attachment A i

1 I

I l

l 1

Strategy 1 Safe Plant Operation p:\wptdocs\ corr \ restart \97nrcint. doc May 16,1997

LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan '

i Restart Action Plan STRATEGY i

Strategy Number: 1 -

Title:

Safe Plant Operation i Sponsor: Steve Smith i

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:  !

e improving operator performance,

• reducing operator challenges, and e correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation e improve _ operator trainir.g.

ACTION PLAN '

Action Plan Number: 1. l A

Title:

Imp._ro_ ve Training Effectiveness i

Description:

Simulator training has not been fully effective in supporting LaSalle County Station standards ofoperational excellence. .

*^-

^Y ^ ' ^

"h ^

^

O^ "'

, ...6 e n I' 'H. 7<** '#&.- - Y IN#5 V<^ .^'"N'

'^ e'l'i t'y is' ad' e'Yqu' ate'#to suppor't"'*e'f'fe' ct'ive t'r'"a'[m',mg m, 4-< '

Objective I' m'? . prove.simu' l"a' tor mstructio' na' l't' ^ ec'h'mq'

'^

ues a' n'd'?'Yver' ify' ^tha^t' r""f'id' 'simu'"^l"a'to'I

. f i .T

~

.. ]: s support of safeLunit restart and power"operadon; i, . g J . .

Team Members: 1. H. Hayes (Team Leader) 2. R. Lewis

3. R. Bell 4. D. O'Rourke

5. T. Granlund

.. .. 1 Performance Measurel T. . . ..JPerformance Standard - .~ -. ;

Simulator training effectiveness Simulator instructor effectiveness verified by improving ratings on  ;

simulator evaluation forms.  !

Simulator fidelity No work requests that impact operator response during the conduct of

. 7- High Intensity and Startup-Train,ing.

7-,,~,.,.---.,, . s g~ ,

t% m , wa%#a w . msec e - + _.s . A- +e.4'ica % 4c uk b'4o e s b s t ' Og.>.:~h*:~~ swA we A sasm sw .da.s.a .ww# ww1isg;u2ie's ' i . J' -f t

i I

LaSalle County Nuclear Station .

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan (

Restart Action Plan STRATEGY-Strategy Number: 1 _

~ ~

Title:

Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: Les Guthrie

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:

e improving operator performance, e '

reducing operator challenges, and

+ correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation.

. improve operator training ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 1. l B l

Title:

_ Improve Operator Performance -Operator Startup Training i

Description:

Plant operators do not uniformly possess the knowledge and/or skills necessary to meet and exceed the current LaSalle County Station standards of operational excellence.

7 . _ ~ . ~ . ~ , .. . . . .,_..,_ .m m. ..

_,.s. ..y... .. _. .

qObje._.mctwea Establish operator. readiness 16 s6ppoff _ safe. uni,t restart and,p . -, operation.by,m,l,emem.nting ower unp a fo,c,u, sed o. _, . .-..y.r.,.peratottrammg?

piogram; ..

.. ... m, . . . , , . , . . sz..z .. . . . . s. ,.- - . , . . .m. . < . te. m. mx ;

Team Members: 1. D. Farr (Team Leader) 2. D. Enright .;

3. L. Blunk 4. S. Russell j

5. B. Trafton , _

6. G. Kaegi

, 0 Performance) Measure v -

_.... . ...m ..ais . . - . ._.........m. .~. 3 Performance Standard L . . . . . ~ ~. ._l

_ Operation's Event Free Clock 12 mo. and 3 mo. Rolling Average } Continuous improvement  !

Successful completion by all crews. After initial Screening, greater than 85% of all licensed operators pass High Intensity Training.  !

l I$imimbsddsnahawandMW$d&Ed$$wnedb$ddEddissastsagasdd$d!dNh$badEN$hshusssdiasmakhas$$n2dIdadshedd$tSLF l l

8

\ l l

t t

. 4 LaSalle County Nuclear Station .

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan ,

e Restart Action Plan .

STRATEGY Strategy Number: 1 '

Title:

Safe Plant Operation ,

Sponsor: Les Guthrie  !

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power  !

operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:  ;

. improving operator performance,  !

. reducing operator challenges, and

. correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation.

. improve operator training and achieving accreditation renewal ACflON PLAN .

Action Plan Number: 1. lC ..

Title:

_I,mprove Operator Performance -Monitor Critical Operation Function ,,,  ;

Description:

Follow-up verification has not been consistently implemented to ensurnhat corrective and performance improvement actions i

. - . ..have been effectively. incorporated

. . into daily,w,ork, activities _. ,n.,..

. -;~. -n v .n n n, -. ,..

l j Objective VImprove Operator and Supervisor . . professionahsm a.~id r ability to sustam safe plan.n-,t operation dirougli specificverag~~~"

~ ~~"

o ,-,h,t actions ;

using criteria that is' consistent with b6th pirformance'sxpectatiohs iuid tiainingEtivities3 ' l Team Members: 1. A. Magnafici(Team Leader) ,

P i

iPerformance tMeasure s 1 Performance Standard ?

Comprehensive weighted SCORECARD error rate (composed of the Contmuous improvement  ;

following}; i Number of errors per operator round (error rate) Improving Trend Number of missing log entries Improving Trend l 3

Number of errors per OOS (e,rror rate). j Improving Trend  ;

Number ofprocedure errors (includes surveillances) Improving Trend l

Number of errors per communication observed (error rate) Improving Trend i Number of MCR Performance Weaknesses observed (error rate) Improving Trend I L4 GAL:s thh34L A:iC' 'hmew'sedadbeLhini:Che;~ia Zh:E d ;e;1s d:didEle m'wc (

LaSalle County Nuclear Station '-

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan ,

Restart Action Plan '

STRATEGY Strategy Number: I - - .

Title:

Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: Les Guthrie .

Description:

Establ.c.h a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:

+ improving operator performance, e reducing operator challenges, and ,

e correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation.

e improve operator training and achieving accreditation renewal ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 1. l D .  !

Title:

Improve Operator Performance - Operator Work Environment

Description:

The operator work environment requires physical improvements to support standards of professionalism, ownership and effecttve plant operation.

[.ObjectiveMUpgrade the opefator w6rkinvironmist 16 Addeveimproi6djibfessidnilb5I6Serat8f6knershidiiidMehdisli~ ""

communication and planning fdr operati6nal activitiesl Team Members: 1. J. Houston (Team Leader) 2. R. Argubright

3. T. Cannon 4. D. Enright

5. J. Hellend 6. R. Hichborn 1

7. R Immke 8. L. Demick

9. M. Sebby 10. D. Sheldon

11. J. Washko 12. T. Meyer i i Performance Measure s

• & Performance Standard e 4 .

Improved Operation's performance and professionalism as measured by See AP 1.1.C.

Action Plan 1.lC. i' 1

l e s ss ae s s '- , .,

sso ,4 ' ,x '%t'm >Cs< m sL,,'s' A 'isc< s' sss&'w'ssi C a: %s 4 .su, smmi! Un 'xm

- 7."' 7 " " 7 L'

• so '

,xs ss 7s " 3 O J 7'-

esse ' ' :'s's% .s.a G'x:ulf,, sm.n ws :.fmsm4's >,.aR ht J dC'smh;e x s'u' s .

's '

's s l,

j i

LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan '

e Restart Action Plan ~

STRATEGY- . . .

Strategy Number: 1

' ~

Title:

Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: Steve Smith t

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:

• improving operator performance, e reducing operator challenges, and e correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation.

. improve operator training and achieving accreditatian renewal ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 1. l E ,

Title:

. Improve Operator Performance -Restart and Power Ascension Plan

Description:

The normal unit startup and power ascension process must be supplemented to provide effective management oversight, ensure ,

. . - ..;,. cons,ervatism.in the s.- .

.,...z startu.

~.... .

p pr.o. cess and ,ach_ieve._an

.....m .-- ..c error-free

.e _.m-startup... r, i

. Ob,ective. (Develop a Restart and Power Ascens. ion Plan and . unplement . .,.

j the Plan dun. , , ., ,,- _.re.,...,..,hmng tuut restart m two.p ases;

$ dering the startup and power ascension to full powerf

"~

Team Members: 1. Al Magnafici(Team Leader) 2. D. Enright

3. Randy Dus 4. Dave Sheldon

5. Kevin Dorwick 6. Jim Henry

7. Bill Sly 8. Guy Ford

9. Alex Javorik 10. Keith Francis

.gPerformancelMeasurel.. '

1. e. .. .y .

y sPerformance Standard:6m.- .

Infrequently performed activities are conducted in a controlled and precise 0 Human Performance Errors during infrequently performed activities.

manner.

_ Operations Event Free Clock 12 mo. and 3 mo. Rolling Average.  ! Continuous improvement.  ;

i t s. 5% L  ? b b '

Sink b NM ' $NNb t

LaSalle County Nucicar Station '.

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan -

Restart Action Plan STRATEGY I Strategy Number: 1 ,m i

Title:

Safe Plant Oyeration _

I Sponsor: Steve Smith

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by.

• improving operator performance, e reducing operator challenges, and e correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation.  !

. improve operator training and achieving accreditation renewal ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 1.2A  ![

Title:

Reduce Operator Challenges - Operator Work-arounds  ;

Description:

Plant operators are unnecessarily challenged during normal, abnormal and emergency plant conditions due to a high number of I

operator work-arounds (Objectives Reduce challenges to plant operators byjsducinglh0 nuthbEf6f0perdO@6d$arosixlTthE req 0Ee compensaidr/ Ado (bij t ~ ' ' ~ ' ~~~~ '

operators in the normal coursd of thbiidaily adtivities? ..y Team Members: 1. G. Ford (Team Leader) 2. B. McConnaughay

3. A. Trainor 4. A. Daniels

5. R. Karger 6. J. Shetterly  ;

m .. . JPerformanceAfeasure NO safety significant Operator Work-Arounds at Unit 1 startup

.mm jy .m, %JPerformance Standard!

_j All safety significant work-arounds on Unit I completed.

m[

NO safety significant Operator Work-Arounds at Unit 2 startup j All safety significant work-arounds on Unit 2 completed. j t

& e .c; a: u -- re.ne - n.: 7 = cas~ x_

i i

t LaSalle County Nuclear Station '

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan -

Restart Action Plan STRATEGY t Strategy Number: i

Title:

Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: Steve Smith  !

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power .

operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by.  !

. improving operator performance,

. reducing operator challenges and e correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation.

. improve operator trainingind achieving accreditation renewal ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 1.2B /8 '

Title:

Reduce Operator Challenges - Temporary Alterati= ,

Description:

Plant operators are unnecessarily challenged dunng normal, abnormal and emergency plant conditions due to a high number of t

.w.. .

tem, porary alterations to plant,

.. ,~c . -

systems.- .~. .

. ~ , n .. - , n ,. n n , n ,-

r nn i Objective h Reduce c.hallenges to plant operators by reduc.

mg,the . n num o

,~.,iM,f' temporary. alterations to hian~t systems that unnecessanly

~ ^~'

shallenge them during 66rmall abs 6rmal and emergency)lasi h66ditidC Team Members: 1.1 Schroeder (Team Leader) 2. R. McConnaughay -

i

3. H. Vinyard 4. D. Watson

5. R. Karger 6.

1PerformancelMeasure . ~ . .- 1 Performance Standard 4 .. _

No significant TALTs installed at Start Up As determined by collegial review with the Plant Manager with Engineering, ;

the Operations Manager, Shin Operations Supervisor, and Shin Managers. ;

% of non-outage support T/As>30 days old without an action plan per unit. 0%

i  :

w+. -%u- _e.n ~.xo mm.s. m.n< h ,mmw.L<m m~m4* a _~sms, xw:e amm 4 2 w,4 e. snm 4 a mc, wh.m ow amaema e e Ammn m mA u me . , -

1 I

t

LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan

Restart Action Plan

(

STRATEGY Strategy Number: 1

Title:

Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: Steve Smith , i 1

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by: 3 i

e improving operator performance, .

j e reducing operator challenges, and  !

e correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation. t e improve operator training and achiesing accreditation renewal ACTION PLAN '

Action Plan Number: 1.2C

^

Title:

Reduce Operator Challenges - Main Control Room Distractions i  ;

Description:

Plant operators are unnecessarily challenged during normal, abnormal and emergency plant conditions due to a high number of [

distractions in the Main Control Room.

~

TO$sctive EReduce Ehslienges to plant"oMists by red $cing ihiinud@f6fdstr5ESdnsiihd

~'

Mairi

1. challenge th$m during n6dtialjhbnorrhal shd'emeigensp plani Eddditi6rsk '

Tl- '

Team Members: 1. R. Bengtson (Team Leader) 2. R. McConnaughay '

3.B. Sly 4. J. Kutches >

I

5. R. Gremchuk 6. L. Melander I

7. D. Watson 8. J. Kodrick

• l

9. Al Trainor i

? Performance: Measure x 12  ? Performance Standard L. $ I Minimization ofMCR Distractions , <10 that cannot be supported by 12 week schedule process. I i

i I

, ~ s . , .

bb,Mhh wsGsa A g'.c scwusA~

os m- , . .

m ~!~r , ,

< m. . c, -. s , . . - , ,

s us dbM mxh4 s U Erd 3 O S 4 ~.was'wxww$$ Ab: .w y .h I 2,,o d $s^ >EddNENssU d% 'ws'.' Wdb)a'Iu.s . J bdfid :bh.c M,b,44.sh,s2 s es I

t

LaSalle County Nuclear Station ,

e i

Unit UUnit 2 Restart Plan .

Restart Action Plan STRATEGY Strategy Number: 1

Title:

Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: Steve Smith

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:

. improving operator performance,  ;

e reducing operator challenges, and j

= correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation. '

. improve operator training and achieving accreditation renewal i ACTION PLAN '

Action Plan Number: 1.3 A

Title:

Correct Processes that Challenge Safe Plant Operations - Plant Labeling

Description:

Weaknesses in plant labeling impact the ability of station personnel to implement safe plant operation and maintenance and has contri. buted to many out .,of. service errors. __ n.~ .- - c,,,, ..-

.. - ~ ,. ..

.,.v.,n,,n, ~

, .nn.e n .n , -n_

s 6:Obj,ective ; Implement. labeling upgrades. . .to plant equipment so that the potential for out9f-service and pe,rso.,nnel err,woris. min,mu,zaE C.L ,

?Iniplement upgrades during unit shutdown $ pksi equipsieni located i.tiniedwill limited acs

~ '

~

ndi !

on sensitive instrumentation solthat the potsntial fdr' unit tiifduring normal oper'ation isiminimizsd3 ~

Team Members: 1. J. Gables (Team Leader) 2. L. Johnson i

3. B. Stone 4. S. Gray

5. D. Nicklin 6. B. Murphy

7. M. Gray 8. M. Smith  :

9. T. W'mkler ,

10. L. Murphy  !'

11. N. Munoz 12. B. Werder

13. R. Patterson iPerformance: Measure) -

^

?Perfonnance Standardi Minimize Human Performance Errors as a result oflabeling deficiencies. Labeling deficiencies iderdified during " fast cruise ' procedure walkdowns are corrected. i k b b$$ssRUd hb$d$ ddkhnabdMsN$$NhIbil2m Bassid h $d$sidkb' b N$$$$!b hbESd b M N N NedmEdb M[$$ N b!k$id @2 i

i LaSalle County Nuclear Station ,-

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan ~

Restart Action Plan .

STRATEGY-Strategy Number: 1

Title:

Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: Les Guthrie

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power i operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:

e improving operator performance, i e reducing operator challenges, and e correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation.

. improve operator training and achieving accreditation renewal ACTION PLAN '

Action Plan Number: 1.3 B ,. i

Title:

Correct Processes that Challenge Safe Plant Operation - Out-of-Service Program

Description:

Many out-of-service errors have occurred with human performance, process and procedure problems being the largest root causes for the errors.

[.ObjectiseiUtilizeielf-assessments to idsstifyjrobl$ms Andimplemenf6offeitivejcilans[i6idtdlisiiGMationishOddi(fdf~dii6i["

deduction in ths out-of service prdgram by;i_mpismentinglaccoustabilitp fofpesfonnanceliscreasihgisupervisorfinvolvemenn x

f and oversight (snd _resolvhs berders that currentlp prevenilststion perssnsel frbm;cbdeals in@dshigjrogramj .

rd.requtrements4

~~

um .w , , . . .m. .x .yo m.

Team Members: [ 1. G. Campbell (Team Leader)  ! 2. J. Hedenschoug i 3. C. Maney { 4. Tim Baughman

. . . . . m.. m, 9 Performance:Measurej ..

. . . . . . . - .. J _- 7. Performance Standard s m.x Reduction of OOS errors (while maintaining a high sensitivity for Decreasing trend of OOS errors identified per month identitication oferrors) .

Frequency of resetting Event Free Clock due to OOS errors. j Average time between resetting station clock increases

. , en - ~ ..- , $+ ,e 7

Ku%LLw raL'wn,a da LA~w'dn,Ln:asA'ae:&h~'wilkwu,

La%La'n'm%Laca ,, ,n -meL,:. 7 4 . .-

_ ~ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . . _ . . - _ __..__ _.._ _. .. _ ._ _ . _ ..._._ _ _._ .

s.

LaSalle County Nuclear Station  !

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan ~

Restart Action Plan  !

STRATEGY <

E

~

Strategy Number: 1  ; .

Title:

Safe Plant Operation  !

Sponsor: Les Guthrie

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by: i e improving operator performance,  !

e reducing operator challenges, and e correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation.  :

. improve operator training and achieving accreditation renewal l ACTION PLAN .

Action Plan Number: J 3C

Title:

Correct Processes that s'hallenge Safe Plant Operation - Operating Procedures

Description:

Poor quality procedures c.calienge the ability of plant operators to implement expectations for procedure use and compliance and hinder objectives for safe operation. In addition, the scope and duration of the outage require many operations procedures

.v ~ ., ments. _ l to be revise,d _to reflect. plant conf.iguration and,to . satisfywer_ opera testing* req,uir!

n - .,

n._ _.n _ . . - -,

Jr,Ob, jest,iveeReviewand

. rev. .ise, as required,LOperan. .ng procedures ~necessary to amp ~

[following~prosedures;will beliedeneds

~ '~

~

~

MM ' " ~ "

M (Reastof SafEtyf LOR l LOMEDIAd PR,Dih$fiyah6 N ~

~ ~

L = l- 1Prbcedures'ussdin u, nit start.upX ~

. cv a .. ,. .

fe:6 l Surveillance required foricontinued operation b ""

. ,,,,.. ,.u ,. .eyond the refuel;~ cycle] ~

^

(*T s i;;Procedured' Affect $d15YDCPsMisl5 ' -

~

Team Members:

f.i s Administra$ve pfdssduies iiiipiementing thddd kdhdsnce ly

2. L. Nickel (Scope Discovery)

,,,g d ,[

1. S. Seaborn (Team Leader)  !

3. R. Immke 4. B. Boyd (Scope Discovery)

5. B. Stone 6. Operating Procedure Writers i [

I,' -

..g...  :> g.::~  : ,y

,3g:: :S :,g - +

i

~

L:S:lle County Nuclear Station

. v. . ., ,, ,,. . . .

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan

,,,,n ,, ,m._ ,J n.,,,,.m,,,,c r' n,,.nn 2 Performance;, Measure,c. .. , - P,erfo_rman_ce 7 Standar,dnn,,_,,,;,. , - s ,,

' ~_

Operating Procedure quality improves Trends improve (decrease) during Unit operation for:

Procedure-related PIFs, TPCs with permanent change required, Procedure deficiencies (TPCs, PCRs) identified during

-.--n_.- . . - . . - .- . . -, " fast c_ruise"

' < , n .:Procedure

, s, . Dy[-)'/J walkdowns are corrected. .', ' . ' ' ' .

n' .. c..,u A14 a C aL' 'd d4 w sm'All 2%n'slmid As b am b a a-a -d a , d'DS

, . ^k_ 1Af..

1. ,*phy , , ' ,, -'=

'k '-p , Q , ' ' .,.N.,s Ias iM-m uJmana aE' J' Aid 23ius,ka w - t E>s .d:$2< d EU::bh< ' rid:i's,A d wi'Addd

, _3.,.', . t

+

t 1

k L

?

I t

I 6

r O

k s

_ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ___..__s__ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . < _ _ _ _ __ - _ , -e-.

LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan  !

STRATEGY t Strategy Number: 1

' s

Title:

Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: Les Guthrie

Description:

Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:

+ improving operator performance,

. reducing operator challenges, and

. correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation. ,

e improve operator training l ACTION PLAN r

._. Action Plan Number: 1.4 .

Title:

Improve operator training by systematically developing program content.

Description:

The quality of operator training has deteriorated due to poor implementation of the systematic approach to training.

4s , , - . . . . . . . . . . ._ m .~..,,,.m -

m.m. . .: . m,, ~ -_.~.-m.,m m.

)

i Objective (Ensure. operator training program con.. .... . ....tentis;gste'matic ,...,...ally7d. .z.y.m.m.

evelop@ch'.ihh. it fullp suppons safe.unitstartup and pg, w erC '

w*

foperationi Team Members: 1. Glen Kaegi(Team Leader) 2. Randy Lewis  :

3. Al Yarmer 4. Steve Russell

5. John Connon 6. Jim Fulton ,

7. Dave Farr 8. AlMagnifici m,y. , . . .. -. . . . - . . - JPerformance>Measuret m. ~....

..<.,....t,.-

mom ;Pesformance Standard; y.< w LO training material LO training materials systematically developed and newly identified tasks i evaluated for training by the TAC. TAC recommended training is i completed prior to unit startup.  :

NLO training material NLO training materials systematically developed and newly identified tasks evaluated for training by the TAC. TAC recommended training is completed-mprior to unit startup.

nu- .

~

h m muk.3~ai<> css'd i a . ~ es'> ~ 1td N 4<ss U~S<bwMsksd3Sd>t)[ '?s>'NNN'4\ ' , us % Ids i v d +Adk N 4. dw as'JJMb42<.'u Idd s4 'e ' > d $ht ' sd '4's ',f 1-L.-..---- -- - -

l .. . .

i , LtSalle County St: tion Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Attachment A 1

l l

I l

l l

l l Strategy 2 Plant Materiel Condition and Effective Outage Completion l

i  !

l 1

l p :\wp tdocs\ corr \r e st art \97suintr. doc May 16,1997

- - _ - _. _ - . - . - . . . . - . . ~ . . . . . - . - . . - - - . - - - - - - . . . . .-

LaSalle County Nuclear Station ,

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan

~

Restart Action Plan '

STRATEGY Strategy Number: 2 * -

i

Title:

Plant Materiel Czndition and Effective Outage Completion -

Sponsor: Pat Higgins

Description:

Implement strerig outage management oversight to ensure that planned outage activities are effectively completed and result in ,

significant materiel condition improvements necessary for safe unit restart and power operation. This will be achieved by implementing a Unit I and Unit 2 Outage Plan and a Maintenance Backlog Review Plan that:

e focuses on a single unit, .

+ identifies and approves the final work scope, and

. improves schedule adherence ,

t ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 2.1 A

Title:

Unit 1 Outage Plan ,

Description:

A detailed outage implementation plan is required to ensure that the required Unit 1 outage work is defined and that all station resources are properly aligned to safely complete the work.  !

JObjhetiveiDeOelop

~~

add'imhlAment a Uhit IfoufigiplAriihst idA5tNidjddf%EcomhIetidiWall ~6 j(t'o improve the plaht matsriel condition"such thstfthere is liigh cesfid5nce id[Esfelinit NAriupland power operatios{

MuEd

- ~ . , s _ ,

Team Members: 1. P. Higgins (Team Leader) 2. K. Francis

3. J. Shetterly 4. D. Dauzvardis

5. J. Rosner 6. L. Ebersole

7. J. Steele 8. T. Riner j

9. J. Klika 10. C. Maney

11. J. Damron 12. P. Thouvenin

13. P. Weber 14. P. Sprole j

15. S. Rashidi 3 [ 3

L S:lle County Nuclear Station , ,

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan *

1. 4 <

Performance) Measure

1. 1. sferformance Standardi WM M

^

Scope growth after work discovery milestones  ; <=5%

• Complete System walkdowns and backlog reviews. Per schedule graph Complete System Functional Reviews Per schedule graph Critical Path Performance On or ahead of schedule.

• istgesamIEligE232}i1Eningigggtsieggs13aiEHietasTessivsgsarssersagagggggs!ssa  :

I r

J l

4 1

LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan ( ,

Restart Action Plan STRATEGY Strategy Number: 2 <

i

Title:

Plant Materiel Condition and Effective Outage Completion Sponsor: Pat Higgins i

Description:

Implement strong outage management oversight to ensure that planned outage activities are effectively completed and result in ,

significant materiel condition improvements necessary for safe unit restart and power operation. This will be achieved by implementing a Unit I and Unit 2 Outage Plan and a Maintenance Backlog Review Plan that:

. focuses on a single unit,

= identifies and approves the final work scope, and i

. improves schedule adherence ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 2.2

Title:

Unit 2 Outage Plan

Description:

A detailed outage implementation plan is required to ensure that the required Unit 2 outage work is defined and that all station -

resources are properly aligned to safely complete the work

~ ~

TObjsstivefDEY$16pind impliment s Unit"2[outige.plid[this;idEndfiksidi}rganidefiEA%dihletion 6fkil%IEEdlhiaid'Wdr6:Eii5sasif

"~ '

{tohtovs ths pland lmateriel 66ndition.suckilist there is highyrifidencelirijkfe shiistN. sisi ppwer operatidh2

^

g, . - - . .

g:  : gg;,1

.  : : g;gr ' - '>"  : :w : ' " m :- "*:-*-4.~~:

~

' < : : ~ ~47 ^ ^ ' ^ +: : - +gy:'  : :ggs.c Team Members: 1. P. Higgins (Tee n Leader) 2. K. Francis

3. J. Shetterly 4. D. Dauzvardis

5. J. Rosner 6. L. Ebersole

7. J. Steele 8. T. Riner -

9. J. Klika 10. C. Maney

11. J. Damron 12. P. Thouvenin

13. P. Weber 14. P. Sprole

15. S. Rashidi

, m .

my: m . . ~

i l

Y LcS:lle County' Nuclesr St: tion ,

emmt.m - . s -- , ~

Unit-=mm 1/ Unit 2mayRestart Plan ms memmmmwnemy,formance Standardmm temmrenmmyce 1 Perfor, man,:c., .v.-. --e Measure n . . mm:<  ;.

.e: -

. 1Per = e ^c Scope growth after work discovery milestones j <=5%

• Complete System walkdowns and backlog reviews. } Per schedule graph Complete System Functional Reviews j Per schedule graph Critical Path Performance -.

i On or ahead ofschedule. *

~ . .

5 4 J MM $[ Ws# 8Ess (h a 's M. . sfd 4 <wdV% 'l s .4% d ' . * . . %' / >MO[ ..'s h'vIsWAv Ak%'ve MN 9 Yiv2 $ e < < >w I

~

< ' + \v -

eh r

8 4-It h

e i

k i

l e

..am...._m... m.m _ _,_ _ , _ _ _ _ , _ . _ _ ___

LaSalle County Nuclear Station ,

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan (

Restart Action Plan STRATEGY Strategy Number: 2

Title:

Plant Materiel Condition and Effective Outage Completion '

Sponsor: Pat Higgins

Description:

Implement strong outage management oversight to ensure that planned outage activities are effectively completed and result in <

significant materiel condition improvements necessary for safe unit restart and power operation. This will be achieved by implementing a Unit I and Unit 2 Outage Plan and a Maintenance Backlog Review Plan that:

e focuses on a single unit, t e identifies and approves the final work scope, and e improves schedule adherence ACTION PLAN -

Action Plan Number: 2.3 .

Title:

Maintenance Backlog Review Plan

Description:

A review of the NWR Corrective backlog is required to insure that both units are ready to provide safe and reliable power through the next operating cycle.

1[DbjhEiisedCbniMeiSLa revievFpf'thd NWR;.Cosssilys tishid${iidAfiddliidiis@dhiiMdifacceptaSe plahl'ihitdici"6boditidEsdhi '

~

F.that thife is high."confidsnce idlssfsynititart@plasdyoperisperati6nl* ,

w. m. w m dh- w- um w Team Members: 1. P. Higgins (Team Leader) 2. A. Javorik

3. H. Vinyard 4. D. Farr

5. G. Campbell 6. J. Kodrick i

7. K. Francis e PerformanceiMeasure ? "OPerformance Standard ?

Corrective Nuclear Work Request Backlog Corrective NWRs required for Startup Complete

7. wm 3.~~,-.- .,w-..~y.,~.-w . ~ . , . ~ . , -w.-~~,..~,. , ,, . . . . g ..

s .gm, ,

, _. , ,s l

$ A, hs'An bil'&'d 'aA ys <dUdw'.M A4.c s .

sidl Ik h h'[Ad ANb 1 Uh

. . ,asd. JU2$$wddddss. As'hd '. sun'w sk'<N'> ad s MbC.'Lt'NAbd?W.A ~ ,

s 1

t

. . . . . . - .. - . _ - . .. -. . - . _ . . . - . .- . . - . . ~ ~ . -

,  ; LaSalle County Stction Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Attachment A 5

l i

i j i

Strategy 3 Corrective Action and Assessment l

l I

p :\wptdocs\ corr \r e start \97suintr. doc May 16,1997

LaSalle County Nuclear Station ,

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan ~

Restart Action Plan STRATEGY Strategy Number: 3 , .

Title:

Corrective Action and Assessment Sponsor: John Mcdonald

Description:

Conduct programmatic assessments and implement corrective action program improvements so that plant problems are identified and those required to be completed prior to unit restart are effectively resolved such that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:

. Improving assessment, and e correctiv< sction program implementation, ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 3.1 .

Title:

Corrective Action Program and Assessment Description. Implementation of the corrective action program is not effective in that self assessment is not being adequately performed to identify problems and assess potential negative trends, root cause determinations are not consistently effective in identifying the cause of the problem and corrective actions are not consistently assessed to determine their effectiveness in resolving the problem.

i TObjehtsve[Perfd'rm Ldeterminations and sElf EssesstrEnts

~ complete improvements to16 idesdip" the corrective problems action screening andreghiring resblution[impidisch{

post corrective action review process to o

~

ensure LCNS personnel are. effective in identifying and fixipg problems thai may impAcil Afd6sitiestart aAxl powerioperatidrO M

^

A

[ Team Members: 1. Bill Riffer(Team Leader) [2. A. Magnafici

i 3. Greg Gibbs j 4. D. Rhoades i 5. Les Guthrie 6. A. Javorik

( 7. Steve Smith ,8. Bill Eifert

[

,9. Steve Shields A

y  :- # .w A

LeS:ll: County Nuclear Station

~

Unit 1/ Unit_..m_,

_ . sm 2 Restart Plan q v e.~c

,;,_._ m,.,,._ ._ xm -, , _=.~, --

....,__x

m. -- .

- '- - .;; - -- . . ---  ::-.~:- --

. . : 3-_,;7_.;p y ~-

Corrective Action Items (Op_en, Closed, Total) Trend for 6 months, TBD Overdue Corrective Actions ,

<l5 / quarter Repeat (SCAQ) Events ' >10% of Total Inventory Number of PIFs writ.en Trend for 6 months; TBD CARB effectiveness >60%

$$$Id isseshadsdBabdsiUAibliE3!!$hfmWMENihnadadadEli$E5155@$$$$iddIOE!Ed$$$$5$$bi$i![$E2htd3EE@@MW$E@TEMATdd

_ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ = - _ _ - _ - _ - - - _ - _ - - _ _ - _ - _ - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ - -

Restart Action Plan ..

STRATEGY Strategy Number: 3  !

Title:

Corrective Action and Assessmerit Sponsor: John Mcdonald

Description:

Conduct programmatic assessments and implement corrective action program improvements so that plant problems are identified and those required to be completed prior to unit restart are effectively resolved such that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:

• Improving assessment, and a corrective action program implementation ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 3.2 i  : .

Title:

Improve Site Quality Verification Effectiveness

Description:

Improve SQV's ability to diagnose Nuclear Safety and Quality concerns and effectively communicate those issues to line management for resolution.

"~E"""' "P^" """ ""

EObjec'tive Team Members: 1. L. Spiers (Team Leader)

' ] 7] 2. R. Chrzanowski

" P "'^'t t

i I

1 i

Performance:Measumj -

S ,

iPerformance Standard $

1. NOV Severity weight index 1. Improving trend (quarterly average)

2. Significant plant events which SQV could have prevented. 2. Improving trend (quarterly average).

3. CAR Average Days Open , 3. 90 Days

4. Restart Plan Assessment Activity Status l 4. Complete per schedule Id ! E $d $ $ h a @ e d m a n d $ $ n d $!s u m m &gt M Es$ $ b$[ d $sa d @ di$$ U $ N E N d ssi$ N$$ mrd $$$i 5 $lsh sha$ N I$d b m @ s$ $ d $ E b d $

I i

_ _ - . . - - - - - _ _ . . . _ _ . , . . - - _ - _ _ - . - - - _ - _ . _ _ - - _ . _ . _ - - _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - - . - - . - ,+

s ,

LaSalle County Station 4,

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan

Attachment A l

1

- 1 t .

)

)

I l

1 1

i j

4 l Strategy 4

Effective Work Control i

l 4

J i

1 l

p:\wptdocs\ corr \r e start \97 suintr. doc May 16,1997

i

.s.  ;

' I LaSalle County Nuclear Station ' .!

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan (

Restart Action Plan  :

STRATEGY-Strategy Number: 4 e  :

Title:

Effective Work Control Sponsor- Guy Campbell

Description:

Implement changes to the work scheduling and work control roles and responsibilities so that required plant work can be j completed efTectively and efliciently following unit restart. 1 i

ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 4.1

Title:

Work Scheduling to Support On-line Work Control  ?

Description:

The existing work scheduling process does not provide for efTective and eflicient completion of work in the plant.  !

' lObje6tive ' integrate existing scheduling processes; define wo666Mrdiislii;asi~iesponsibilitiss7dssieldisy6rfseeEWisl6WslistE 1 plant personnel on Work Control process so that requ[te:i platit work can be effestisely conspletsd3

=

Team Members: { l. D. lia~ttersley (Team Leader) l 2. R. Morgan i t

3. Steve 11arris i 4. Gene Feller r a t i 5. Keith Taber  ! 6. Steve Novak [

l' 7. John Damron j 8. Charlie Sargent  :

' 9. Don Carpenter [ 10. Al Magnafici

11. John Bell j  !

< ..? Performance Measuret .

. _ . . ~ . 4 Performance Standard . . .. . .

N/A N/A l 4

- 9

. . W7 s s - < s ss y $m +<v%) '+$4 Sh M< s8 M <mvM& 5,*>k d b xt % >Ww . "% Ws'W M44 c< >'.<+kod" +M AIxM*X > d b fe-s ai  % N'Y 4e E' w h%$ b* ' Ys +'+ h v sM 'A A M

• t i

t i

1 e%

LaSalle County Nuclear Station J Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan '

Restart Action Plan STRATEGY Strategy Number: 4

Title:

EfTective Work Control Sponsor: Guy Campbell

Description:

Implement changes to the work scheduling and work control roles and responsibilities so that required plant work can be completed effectively and efliciently following unit restart.

ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 4.2 -  : * -

x

Title:

Work Package Quality.

Description:

Work package quality is poor and does not facilitate effective and efficient job completion.

'llObjectiveilniprove

tlis qdality of vvorli ba'cksges by daining w5ddlSvoEEsiitfliildirdifyi5gicasoAfidih61di6fdhiiEi~ifid[~7 m

Timplementing appropriate corrective actionsh  ::w wy g.

Team Members: YT. Uznanski(Team Leader) 2. D. Hattersley

3. II. Vinyard 4.J.r.iesel

5. Gary Vanderwall 6. James Land

7. Steve Novak 8. AlTrainor

9. John Bell 10. Larry Melander t Performance' Measure? - .. .._i..a ..,c...

LPorfur r.er.ce Standanis Work Package Rejection Rate Decreasing trend.

i b

e .~ v ~ ,- ~ . .

,, v , ..

._ , , < . , v., , , . - ~~

u'V"' V"hwd,V s T.w v4 u w ^, v4 < Ys70 ' ^*>A >M ' v' D <

- v DI . A (MM ' s ' dN < 4 >A A IN e.v s^.' .

u < '.4 93d[, Vs (s 4 [yg*b y'd,4 4 vb 2.^'( *^ vu QA 4dr "4d 4 hkb s s>^vu>M}Ie/Ms '4 h+4v;* <- whs Assw*

4 4 t

, ., e LcSall) County Stati:n Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan i

j Attachment A '

I I

l 1 t 4

4 i

)

i a

a 1

i Strategy 5

Human interaction and Performance i

' j a

i

)

i

]

i

'i i t i

j i

(

l i

l 1

?

I i

i I

J 1

p:\wptdocs\ corr \r estart\97 suintr. doc May 16,1997

.]

~

LaSalle County Nuclear Station #

Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan (

Restart Action Plan STRATEGY  !

Strategy Number: 5

Title:

Iluman Interaction and Performance Sponsor: Doug Boone -

Description:

Improve human performance to support safe plant operation. j htprove human interactions, focusing on teamwork and engagement of the work force, to support improved human i performance.

ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 5.1

Title:

Iluman Perfonnance and Interaction >

Description:

Provide clear expectations to site workers; communicate site direction; coach and mentor workers during theirjob activities. '

Monitor site iluman Performance and address barriers to improvement. ,

EJ Objective RTo provide a near-term sie(>-churige in tlk Hdman' Performance add team w6flE6fsiis~46fistsf ~ " ""'*"" { f .

Team Members: 1. Doug Boone/ Jim Gieseker (Team Leaders) 2. F. Dacimo ,

3. II. Ilayes ,

4. R. Ragan  ;

, 5. P. Resler ~ 6. Tony Cardenas l 7. LMT  !

t

"~"-

. Performance < Measurec iPerformance Standard +

Event Free Clock Resets Improving trend, evaluated by LMT l 2nduksdsN&kkkN $$5Nh$ f kNAff5!d$ b$hhb5 bbNnnf$$N$b0 tt

• b 3  !!!at bhfd h I f f

i I

L 5

m__. . . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ . . ._ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . . _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _

v ' '

4

• LaSalb County Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Attachment A 1

I i

i l

i Strategy 6 Effective Engineering Support p:\wpt docs \ corr \re st art \97 s uintr. doc May 16,1997

=

LaSalle County Nuclear Station 5 Unit UUnit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan

[

STRATEGY Strategy Number: 6 *

Title:

Engineering Support Sponsor: PhilIlildebrandt

Description:

Conduct programmatic assessments, Upgrade engineering capability so that plant problems are identilied and those require be completed prior to unit restart are effectively resolved such that an uneventful restart is achieved and long, uneventful  !

power run is achieved.

ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number- 6.1  ! -

.  : T'

Title:

Engineering Capability

Description:

Engineering work products do not meet standards necessary for the effective support of plant operational and maintenance activities and do not consistently include suflicient technical basis to ensure that the plant design basis is maintained. The  !

technical capability, judgment and work quality of Engineering requires improvement to support safe unit restart and power i operation.

~ (ObjectiveRUpgrade the capabilltp~6f Engineerins is supp6rilssf6 unit festads6d p6Wer opsisii6iiilishslilliE^ addition 6fixperienc61 ~

Lpersonnel, additional training of existing personnel and organisatiohal dnd Tproinsmmaticihahpes to ensure tiiat n6M

~ " ' '

f produsts meet acceptable quality l standards. ' v Team Members: 1. A. Javorik (Team Leader) 2. G. Poletto

3. W. Eifert 4. J. Pollock

7. i Performance?Msasures . ., , .. . J . .-

J!PsifdrmancE.S., t..a..i.k.. la,,i,~d ;

ag . . . . .. .. ... . . , . , . . , . ...

1. System Engineer Qualification 1. Completion as scheduled

2. Engineering Assurance assessment of selected engineering products 2. All graded as A or B.

(e.g. calculations, DCPs, safety evaluations, operability evaluations, '

LERs, respnse to NOVs.) s - . _ ., ,~.

vv .

^,./.ws < 4 /% sve s N N N) v )N < ss -'h * + v.4+4 N%Ww(,' /, h [' h) '< $s< +%> / U <v A )o<m wy vat # K ^ <<< %v kN% 's.-u eM(,W '/  % y 'h , ks e v)@?. ,v,s v v"<A 9de /# ss [s(shi Mv gAsyh x 9x. o s hs' o b

i f

w_..

9 .

-o Restart Action PI::n 7 STRATEGY '

Strategy Number: 6 _

Title:

Engineering Support Sponsor: Phil Ilildebrandt

Description:

Conduct programmatic assessments and upgrade engineering capability so that plant problems are identified and those  ;

required to be completed prior to unit restart are effectively resolved such that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained.

ACTION PLAN Action Plan Number: 6.2 ,

Title:

Plant Operational Readiness

Description:

The functional readiness of some plant systems is uncertain due to design configuration discrepancies, open design evaluations and degraded materiel condition. *

'~

~ ? Objective [ Implement a systim funntio~nsi' performance review and othefTochiidbiessnichfiofpianilififenii}6defus%'rkWeceisary?

Nri

~

i to be completed prior to unit restart so that ihbie is cohfidenes thhthe, system is capable of 6@ rating;reliabl(and in?

l'

', accordance with design basis requirements? '

i

. t

n. !

Team Members: 1. G. Poletto (Team Leader) 2. S. Smith

3. M. Lehman 4. T. Best

5. Alex Javorik l 6. J. Barron

7. Les Guthrie } 8. John Pollock

9. Greg Gibbs l

Perfonnance : Measure ; '

_ E Per_formance Standard _L. .

l. System Functional Perfonnance Review 1 Completion as scheduled

2. System Readiness Review Walkdown 2. Completion as scheduled

3. System Restoration & Recovery Team 3. Completion of work activities as scheduled ,

t

4. Drawing Upgrade Workoff Curve 4. Completion as scheduled

5. ER Workoff Curve , 5. Completion as scheduled

6. DCP Workoff Curve 6. Completion as scheduled j

7. PIF Workoff Curve 7. Completion as scheduled m ,, .nv ,

y, ,p .,n b s . .+m ,~ . 2 c 'A bJa<4 ad,% ddea.Ala_ 'v4 ' ea.G.- ~6 ^ r's.wwhhba.w un. ' A4mnsa . :'4 42.m sur 'hs.shh; 1 :a L

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _