ML20138B271

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to LaSalle Station Proactive Mgt Plan
ML20138B271
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/22/1985
From:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20138B265 List:
References
PROC-851122, NUDOCS 8512120257
Download: ML20138B271 (37)
v • d • e


Text

.. -

i

+ *,g Ga eta-8 (t(s m'

g sm x%itta w

^

i

?

t i

i l

t 1

LASALLE STATION I

i 1

i t

I I

PRGACTWE MANAGEENT PLAN 4

1 l

i i

i i

i 1

4 REVISION 0 11/22/85 4

i.

c

+

l i

1 e

i i

i i

0512120257 851205 PDR ADOCK 05000373

{

P PDR i

i 1

1 i

.., - ~ _, _ _,. _,, -

.. = - _ - -

- ~ -. _.

l

? ** l \\

4 s

TAM E OF C0FFERTS T

1 PAGE 2

SCRAM REDUCTION h

ESF ACTUATIONS 4

7 SCHEDULING / PLANNING I

CONTROL ROOM INMRMATION DEFICIENCIES 9

i 12 WORK REQUEST BACKI4G TIME CI4CKS/ DEGRADED EQUIPMENT IDG (DEL) 1h i

PROCEDURES BACKLOG 15 17 MODIFICATIONS 19 DESIGN CONTROL i

j COMMUNICATION WITH RESIDENT INSPECTOR 21 l

RADIATION PROTECTION PERMPFANCE 22 I

PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE 2h 27 REGUIATORY PER N RMANCE f

ORGANIZATION 28 i

GRAPHS

}

MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 1

~

I l

SCRAMS 3

1 ESF ACTUATIONS 6

11 CONTROL ROOM IN MRMATION DEFICIENCIES WORK REQUEST BACKIcG 13 i

PROCEDURES BACKLOG 16 i

l.

CATEGORIZATION /PRIORITIZATION OF MODIFICATIONS 18 k

HI RADIATION DOOR VIDIATIONS 23 PERSONNEL ERROR LERS 25 i

CUMUIATIVE LER HISTORY (NUMBER) 26 I

i

.I l

i

?

. ~ -. - - _ =. -...... -

~

5 1

4

{

I ij.

4 l

i INTRODUCTION The objective of this plan is to reali:e a significant improve-ment, in t/ue per fut un:c cf T***11a Station. Although, the primary l

focus is on improved Regulatory Performance, benefits in Ctstion availability as well as other areas are expected to result.

The plan is divided into major areas with a detailed action plan l

Where appropriate, measurement standards such i

for each area.

as trend graphs and projected completion dates are provided.

,f The plan is intended to be a living document subject to change as conditions dictate. Although some variation in meeting pro-l jected goals should be expected due to unforeseen. circumstances, the Station considers itself accountable for rigorous adherence i

to this plan.

i i

f LASALLE COUNTY STATION ACTION PLAN STATUS l

I 100-l$e 80-

C l0 0

60-

.'O ll 8

5 lt

/

4

}0 I

20

[

l 5

)

O j

NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT f

1985 1986 4

r.

4 SCRAN REDUCTION PROJECTED ACTUAL i

COMPMTION COMPETION RFSP.

DATE DATE COM(ENTS -

a A. Establish Comunittee CES/ACS 8/6/85 l

B. Scram History Review, including list or scrams and CES/ACS 9/3/85 root causes.

I C. Review Station Conduct of Operations CES/ACS 9/26/85 1

D. Review RPS Sury. testing CES/ACS 9/26/85 E. Turbine trip channel redundancy l

1. Identify alternatives CES/ACS Complete Complete

{

}

2. Feasibility / Cost study CES/ACS 2/28/86
3. Establish schedule for improvement CES/ACS 6/01/86 t hedule Depend-ent Upon Results i

of Feasibility I

Study F. Inst. line hydraulic transient RPS trips i

1. Identify alternatives CES/ACS Complete Complete
2. Feasibility / Cost Study CES/ACS Complete Complete 1

l

3. Establish schedule for improvement CES/ACS 5/01/86 l

i 7

i

~

i

LASALLE COUNTY STATION l

l REACTOR SCRAMS i

4 i

20 k

10 i

j 10 f

14 i

i 12 10 O

O

/

l 2

~

I J F M AM J J A S O N D J F M AM J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

,=

1983 1984 1985 1

__._._-.__._m.

i e

W htNMTim PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIATION COMPILTION i

RESP.

DATE DATE COpttEFIS A. Task Force DSB

1. Form Task Force Complete Complete i
2. Initiate' ongoing tracking / trending Complete Complete
3. Review all actuations since 1/1/84 to identiry Complete Complete I

problem areas

%.-Review actuations for root cause as they occur On Coing On Going and reccamend corrective actions to prevent recurrence

5. RWCU delta-flow cal-data Modirleation
a. SNED letter RFJ 12/02/85
b. MOD to OSR 1/08/86 t
c. MOD to ISO 2/01/86 I

t

d. MOD installed (both units) 2/15/86
6. VC Chlorine detector Modification
a. Beview SNED Scoping analysis DSB 11/08/85 11/13/85 f
b. Decision on MOD /rtmding GID/KG 11/15/85 11/15/85 Estimated cost

$324,000.

I I

Will do.

l

c. Modification Package engineered HFJ 1/15/85 t
d. Modification Package installed PFM/

3/09/85 l

a'

e. Submit Tech Syce Change Request DSB/TAH 3/03/85

0 ESF ACTilATIOES (ContintW)

PROJECTED AC'I1JAL COMPIJTION COMPIETION RESP.

DATE DATE C0f0fENTS

7. Schedule RWCU valve replacement Review MOD to decrease cost / increase Station DSB/PFM 12/22/85 options

/IG Options include - downgrade system from code

- reduce number or valves f rutalled 1

- velded instead of rianged l

Installation Decision on ibnding KG/GID 1/31/8(2 Modification schedule IEB/PFN 2/28/8(2 l

l I

l i

l l

L

i I

~

LASALLE COUNTY STATION ESF ACTUATIONS

)

I 1

l 2C-h i

15 '

,\\

i I

sc k

/

3 s

\\

t 1

1 J F M A M J J AS O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D m

1AR4 1985

__-_-..-___._-.-_.-___..->_--___m.

i i

neumsmearu p ggg PROJECTED ACIVAL C0fG>IJT. ION C0fG2I17 ION RESP.

DATE DATE COf94ENTS A. Establish a task force to evaluate implementation CES Complete Complete

[

- of a Planning Department consisting of major Station departments B. Develop technique for planning:

CES/JEL

[

4

1. Hefuel Outage Complete Complete e
2. Pbreed Outage Complete Complete
3. Daily 'elork (jobs which Interface)

Complete Complete C. Develop a Performnce Tracking Scheme 1

1. Starts / Completions / Cancels /% Compliance CES/JEL 12/09/85 l
2. Reports to Production Superintendent CES/JEL 12/09/85 Start Date i
3. Publish periodic status reports around Station CES/JEL 12/09/85 Start Date D. Implement a Planning Group f
1. Establish an Assistant Superintendent level position CJD 1/31/85
2. Organization, authority, responsibility, size, CESI/JEL 12/30/85 l

cossposition (preliminary) i

3. Assign operating personnel (5 Operators)

Complete Complete j

%. Assign additional department personnel CES/WES 12/30/85 i

1 4

i I

mRumm2EG/FMMIES (Oostlanned)

I t

PfKUECTED ACTUAL COWIETION COWIETION RESP.

DATE DATE CO M irTS t

i i

E. Computerize the Planning Programs

1. Refuel Outage Complete Complete j
2. Fbreed Odtage complete Complete i

i

3. Daily llork CES/JEL 3/01/86 Need Computer Type Person By j

by 1/1/86 i

j F. Inform Station personnel of Planning Department's CES/JEL 1/31/86 l

functions l

P L

i i

I l

i 1,

i i

i i

I i

i 1

I i

i e

i I

= -.. -.. - - -

I GWrRDL RDGE IRNMIRTION BEFICIWCIES*

PROJECTED AC'ItJAL COMPIEPION COMPIETION RESP.

DATE DATE COD 9ENTS A. New Control Room Work Request's (CRWR) B-1 priority.

WRll On Coing On Going (B-1 = Start work next work day and work normal hours to completion)

B. Control N Work Requests integrated into daily WE3 On Going On Going schedule (Interface WR's only)

C. Complete U-2 CRWR's requiring outage WES 12/08/85 End of current outage D. Black panel in effect on Unit 1 at startup WES 3/01/86 End of 1st Refuel Outage E. Complete U-1 CRWR's requiring outage WES 3/1/86 End of lat Refuel Outage F. Schedule and complete 25 CRWR's per week WES 11/19/85 11/19/85 Start Date G. Daily Status Report (Planned & Completed)

WES 11/25/85 11/20/85 Start Date H. Weekly plot of CRWR's WRif 12/03/85 12/03/85 Start Date I. Permanent Fix Program for repetitive equip. problems

1. Identify 5 repetitive problems needing long-term solutions WES/M3 1/01/86
2. Identify alternatives PlH Schedule depend-ent on problem definit ion
  • That: Directly affect the controls used by operators during emergency situations, off-norm 1 situations or routine operations.

Results in information, relied on by operators to take action, being inaccurate or indeterminate.

Results in an annunciated Control Room alarm that reflects an off-normal condition.

?

g l

e

GETWE WERI INW MFICIBCIES*

PROJECTED AC'IUAL COMPIATION COMPIATION RESP.

DATE DATE C00MElflS

3. Perform reasibility/ cost study PPM Schedule depend-ent on problem definition
4. Establish schedule for resolution PPM Schedule depend-ent on problem definition
  • That: Directly.arrect the controls used by operators during emergency situations, off-normal situations or routine operations.

Results in inforantion, relled on by operators to take action, being inaccurate or indeterminate.

Results in an annunicated Control Room alarm that reflects an off-normal condition.

?

5

LASALLE COUNTY STATION

~

CONTROL ROOM WORK REQUESTS CONTROL ROOM ALARMS I

r i

WORK REQUEST << << <<

A L A R M S """"""

h i

iN

.! E i

l0 t e O-

!b ig 140-

,+

^'

'(

1 120-

~

O 100-N i

.80-s

!. s

}

~

{

60-in,,,,,,,'""'"""",,,,,,,""

a

",,,,,,,,,,"'""",,,,,,,,,r",,,,,"'"

40-g 4,g s

20--

~

n.....,,

l l

2)25 3)9 I

3 0

, 12/31 1I14 '

1)28 2 11

~

11/19 12/3 12/17 g

5 1986 l

1985

9 l

m m namtan PROJECTED AC'111AL COMPik. ION COMPIETION T

RESP.

DATE DATE COM4ENTS 6

A. Define accountability of actual tacklog

1. Review of current backlog CES/WES 1/31/86
2. Mainte e of backlog record via improved CES/WES 2/28/86 l

reporting system i

3. Assign an individual to expedite Work Request processing GJD 1/01/86 I

B. Review of outstanding Work Requests on U-1 CES/WHH 1/31/86 Intent is to to identify those with safety impact which cleanup prior to restart should be done prior to U-1 startup C. Define an optisman backlog level and assess resource level CES/WES 1/31/86 i

vs. workload, actual backlog, and optimum backlog r

D. Reduce backlog to optimaam level CES/WES 9/01/86 E. Optimize parts / materials procurement CES/WES 2/28/86 F. Permanent Fix Program for repetitive equipment problems

1. Identify five repetitive problems needing long-term CES/WES 1/31/86 solution PFM Schedule depend-i
2. Identify alternatives ent on problem definition l

6

3. Perform feasibility / cost study PFM Schedule depend-ent on problem l

definition L

i

%. Establish schedule for improvement PFN Schedule depend-ent on problem definition y

0

LASALLE COUNTY STATION WORK REQUEST BACKLOG 4 0 0 0-4 3500-3000-i 2500-2000-i 1500-1000-

)

I l

500-l J F M A M J 'J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D y

1984 1985 l

1983

~

a TIlet CLOCKS / DEGRADED E(BIIPDGGIT IlX: (DEL)

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIFI' ION COMPIF. TION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS A. Reduce # of time clocks in effect to a reasonable level

1. Conduct overall assessment of time clocks, i.e.,

WRII/DMP 12/20/85 ca'uses, repetitive problema, etc. *This may require a record system or log on time clocks to collect data.

2. Review results and make recommendations to reduce WRil/DMP 1/06/86
  1. of time clocks in effect WRH 12/02/85 12/02/85
3. Formally define priority requirements for time clock related Work Requests WRil/0E's 12/02/85 12/03/85
h. Implement priority system WRif 3/01/86

$. Establish a preliminary target number prior to Unit 1 startup and monitor

6. Reevaluate with both units in power operation CES/WRif h/15/86 WRH 5/01/86
7. Establish a target number B. Reduce # of DEL's in effect WRil/JAA 12/02/85
1. Review history and commitments
2. Conduct overall assessment of DEL to identify WRII/DMP 12/20/85 causes for number of entries
3. Make recommendations to reduce the number during WRil/DMP 1/06/86 normal operation
h. Formalize use of DEL. What goes in log, what does WRII/JAA 2/01/86

/SCRE's degraded mean, etc.

5. Establish a preliminary target number prior to Unit WRif 3/01/86 y

1 startup and monitor m

6. Reevaluate status with both units in operation CES/WHi!

5/01/86

PROCEDURES BACKLDG PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIETION COMPIETION RFSP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS A. Improve procedures process to make it more' effective RDB/JCK 10/21/85 10/21/85 RDB/JCK 10/21/85 10/21/85 B. Establish target backlog RDB/JCK Ongoing Ongoing C. Monitor backlog RDB/JCK 2/28/86 Prior to Unit I i

D. Review procedures outstanding, especially those Startup resulting from U-1 Modifications during Refuel Outage, prior to Unit 1 Startup 3

e A

p i

0

1 LASALLE COUNTY STATION j

OUTSTANDING PROCEDURE CHANGES 1

i l

i 4

3200.

,,,-~

1 O O O-

%,,, N 8

800-

~

600-

\\

,,,~~~

i

~ ~.***~.

i 400-

\\

\\

        • = %,

\\

~200 -

i NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT O'

P 9

1985 1986 5

3

MODIFICATIONS

~

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPIETION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS A. 5 Year Modification Plan RDB Complete C mplete

1. Establish a Modification Review Committee RDB 10/25/85 10/25/85
2. Develop a priority / category scheme HDB 11/11/85 10/25/85
3. Develop mechanism to handle new modification requests RDB 1/05/86
1. Redefine scope of Modification Program 4

(i.e. - setpoint changes, etc.)

HDB 1/05/86

5. Categorize existing modifications
6. Prioritize modifications within categories RDB 1/20/86 RDB 2/28/86
7. Review outstanding modifications for safety impact prior to Unit 1 startup
8. Schedale specific modifications for completion RDB 3/114/86 commensurate with established rate and publish schedule (preliminary schedule)
9. Review preliminary schedule with all responsible GJD/RDB h/25/86 organizations and establish final schedule consis-tent with the commitment of the responsible organizations.
10. Issue monthly status reports - Include RDB 12/05/85 11/20/85 Start Date executive sunnary
11. Hold all responsible organizations accountable KG/GJD On Going on Going for performing activities within the commited schedule

?

4

1 LASALLn COUNTY STATION l

MODIFICATIONS l

l C ATEGORIZED T ARGET '"

l PRIO RITIZED T AR G ET in.....unni i

AC T U A L F O R B O T H==-.

/

'OO s

s i

,,s e

f e

e n' Of

/

a

/

i p

/

p

, O.

/

,,y o

/

/

/

p 0***S #'

nm n

g S

M

~

y /

f f

f

/

p p

/

y

/

7,' e I/20

/

/

/

i 7Is'2 7'/Se 7O/'O lO/Of

/

l

/

'One

/

/

1gOG

/

y

/

/

t IMSIGN CONTHDL l

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPiFFION COMPIPPION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS A. Improve Design Schedule & Quality i

(

l. Assign Cognizant Engineer to all Modifications
a. Define Cognizant Engineer responsibility /

RDB/PFM Complete Complete accountability for successful completion of Modification from initial design to declar-ation of operability

b. Training / Expectations Program for cognizant EDB/PFM 11/18/85 11/15/85 Engineers l
c. Assign Modifications RDB/PFN Complete Complete l
2. Improve quality / content of modification design packages 1/25/86
a. Implement feedback program which utilizes RDB/PI'N 4

lessons learned from deficient modification packages to improve the Modification Program

3. Environmental Qualification Program implementation review and corrective action as required
a. Conduct " Big Picture" status meeting to review GJD Complete Complete total program and compliance with intent as well as letter of the law
b. Request a QC and QA audit of implementation GJD Complete Complete i
c. Conduct QC audit and prepare report RDB Complete Complete

'd.

Conduct QA audit and prepare report RDB Complete Complete

?

l 4

r

.~

DESIGI 00rmOL (Continued)

PROJECTED ACTdAL COMPIETION COMPIETION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS

1. Identify backlogs in the design process (other 4

than design) such as DCR's, FCR's, etc. that are potentials for future mistakes and develop trending / tracking measures to reduce to a manageable level.

a. DCR's (1) Establish a reasonable turnaround time for RDB/PFN 1/31/86 DCR's and target for cleanup of tacklog (2) Obtain SNED concurrence KG/GJD 1/31/86 (3) Monitoring method and summary report RDB/PFN 1/31/86
b. Other RDB/PFN 3/31/86
5. Post Modification / Maintenance Testing
a. Assign / define a required committee to GJD Complete Complete review all safety related post maintenance /

Modification tests for adequacy. liigh level

- Master & T.S.S.?

O.E.?

b. Review checklists in effect to assess adequacy IMR(NSG) 1/31/86 Itr Nuclear Safety Group

?

8

i l

1 I

~

C(ENENICATION WITH RESIIENT INSPEC'lDRS PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIETION COMPLETION HESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS l

A. Aggressive interaction with Resident Inspector to GJD/RDB On Going On Going better understand concerns and address, as well as

/CES/

market the good things-Depart-ment lleads B. Weekly meeting with Resident GJD On Going On Going l

1 J

l3 l

..~. _ _ _..

l RADIATION PROTECTION PERFUlBIANCE PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIETION COMPLETION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS

'A. Procedural Compliance 1.' Documented tailgates conducted with all personnel Complete Complete

a. IaSalle problem areas
b. Byron Enforcement Action
2. All 1st line supervisors reminded of their responsi-Complete Complete bility for procedural compliance at Expectation

-Meetings held with Station's upper management

3. on going program to upgrade procedures and training ongoing ongoing l

B. Prisking (See Also Item A - Procedural

  • Compliance)
1. Setup of nine (9) frisker booths in progress.

IRA Refuel Complete Five additional booths awaiting setup.

2. Four (4) state-of-the-art whole body friskers en order LRA Refuel 50% Complete.

2 have bad boards. Pro-ject: 12/13/85 Five (5) more are proposed for 1986 budget LRA 1986

3. Forty-eight (h8) additional RM-lh friskers (handheld)

LRA Refuel All h8 rec'd.

are on order 18 in service.

Remainder in service.

12/9/85 a'

m G

r

RADIATION PR(FFECFIM PER70151ANG (Continued)

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIETION COMPLEPION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS

h. Five (5) IRT monitors from CAF to replace Eberline IJtA -

12/30/85 hand and foot monitors 4

IRA Refuel Complete

5. New step off pads on. order to remind personnel of requirement for whole body frisk
6. Permanent cement block frisker stations proposed IRA 1986 i

for 1986 budget.

C. Staffing i

1. Add an Assistant to Rad Chem Supervisor (SRO License)

RDB Refuel Complete IRA 1986

2. Add a Lead Foreman
3. Add a Timekeeper / Scheduler (should allow a IRA 1986 Complete Foreman to be in the plant 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> / day)

IRA Re fuel Complete

4. Contract 10-15 qualified techs for Unit 1 lat 2

Refuel including supervision

5. Supplement existing HP's and RCT's with Braidwood/

IRA /TK As Avall-On Going able Dresden/ General Office as available l

IRA As Avall-On Going

~

6. Encourage Health Physicist exchange program able D. Space JL Refuel Complete
1. Convert approximately 1000 ft' of lunchroom to badge issue and RWP processing area, etc.

t

2. Addition of approximately 500 ft* In trailer IRA Refuel Complete park for HP office to eliminate crowded conditions

?

i IS t

-~-

3 RADIATION PRDFECFI(N PERFoI50ANCE (Continued)-

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIATION COMPil. ION T

RIEP.

DATE DATE COPMENTS E. Persoenel Contamination (See also Item A - Procedural l

Compliance.)

l. Each event is investigated by Department with Had Ongoing Ongoing Ci.= representation to determine root cause and propose corrective action
2. Daily report of contamination events provided to Ongoing Ongoing Department Heads and Station upper management (monthly trending).
3. Reviewing contamination survey.. techniques and frequency JL Refuel Complete

+

of contamination surveys for areas of known problems

'3. Developing a system to assign priority to Work Requests JL Refuel Complete Informally

{

I 4

t related to contamination control and provide followup implemented, i

Procedure in i

OSR

~

5. Continued tailgates by individual departments Ongoing Ongoing l
6. RCT's stationed at high traffic areas for. contamination Complete Complete control and proper frisking technique F. Area Contamination (See also Item A - Procedural j.

Compliance.)

1

1. Establish a Contamination Control Coordinator HDB Refuel Complete
a. Area contamination cleanup RDB/JL On Going On Going i
b. Event investigation RDB/JL On Going On Going i

2 i

9

l 1

l

~

l RADIATION PROTECTION PERFOIBIANCE (Continued)

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPIETION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS

c. Review contamination history to identify methods RDB/JL 2/17/85 for minimizing contaminating events
d. Reclaim long-term contaminated areas RDB/JL 1986
2. Technical Staff to evaluate ventilation as a possible PFN 1/05/86 contributor to spread of contamination
3. Equipment designed to aid in contamination control DH Reruel Complete
a. Tents
b. Drip pans
c. Filtered air movers
h. More extensive use of Kelley closures to prevent Ongoing Ongoing g

spread of contamination

5. Contamination carts located at frisker locations LRA Refuel Complete
6. Major contamination event investigations to determine Ongoing ongoing root cause and propose corrective action to preclude repetition G. High Radiation Door Viointions (See also Item A -

Procedural Complianee. )

l

1. All personnel instructed to challenge high rad doors Cctnplete Complete to assure closure.

a

l RADIATION PR(FFECTI(M PERPol5GANCE (Continued)

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIfrION COMPIEPION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS

2. All personnel instructed on responsibilities and Complete Complete expectations regarding high radiation door security
3. Reinforcement of management expectations and personnel Dept.

10/1h/85 Complete l

l responsibilities provided to all personnel lleads 1

4. Guidance provided in N-GET training has been expanded RDC 10/08/85 Complete to include more emphasis on responsibility of com-i pliance with high radiation door security
5. Responsibility assigned for assuring high rad doors Complete Complete are repaired expeditiously
6. Thorough investigation (DVR & ROR) conducted for each Ongoing Ongoing high radiation door violation with consideration of disciplinary action for identified violators / supervisors
7. Surveillance of high rad doors implemented (IAP-1100-13)

IRA Refuel Complete l

8. Continue evaluation of installation.of local alarru WL 3/86 l

on selected doors

9. High Rad Door Task Force (Corporate)

CM 10/15/85 11/15/85

10. Submit proposed Tech Spec revision flDB/TAII 1/05/86 12/03/85
11. Evaluate implementation of recommendations from LRA 12/15/85 Corporate High Radietion Door Task Force
12. Implement add 1+.lonal restrictions on issue of high IRA 1/17/85 radiation key-fiey cards
13. Attach high radiation area door security guidelines IRA 10/1h/85 Complete to high radiation keys / key cards for issuance M

l L.. _

RADIATION PROTECTION PERFolgtANCE (Continued)

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIETION COMPIETION RPliP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS

14. Evaluate / implement issuance of pocket-sized Radiation MAP 12/20/85 Folders on Protection Awareness folder which includes high radia-order tion door security guidelines

~

15. Consider periodic preventative unintenance program MAP 11/01/85 Complete Will do.

for high radiation door hardware H. Noble Gas Contamination

1. ALARA review required when opening Off Gas process lines Dil 10/85 Complete
2. Showering utilized for decontamination rather than Conplete Complete decay method until guidance provided by Corporate
3. SCBA utilized for areas of noble gas contamination Complete Complete if air sample is impractical or untimely 1
4. Additional training will be provided to RCT's and IIP's Complete Complete on noble gas contamination I. Unconditional Releases
1. Security Guard instructed to ensure unconditional Complete Complete j

release pass for a broader range of items

2. Program drastically tightened following contaminated Complete Complete i

solvent problem

3. Secure dumpsters JL 12/31/85
4. Designate a trash holding area prior to survey JL 12/31/85
5. Designate an enclosed area for survey of trash JL 12/31/85
6. Evaluate purchase of a trash compactor Complete Complete y

3 S

RADIATION PHOTECTION PERFOI51ANCE (Continued)

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIEPION COMPIEPION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS J. Interface with Other Departments (Communications)

1. Twice weekly meetings with Services Department Heads RDB On Going On Going

~

2. Rad Chem participates in Contamination Investigations IRA On Going On Going
3. Had Chem participates in Scheduling Program IRA On Going On Going IRA On Going On Going Is. Daily interface with Shift IRA On Going On Going
5. Had Chem participates in tailgates of other departments IRA On Going On Going
6. Weekly Department lleads Meeting IRA On Going On Going
7. Outage Planning Meeting
8. Rad Chem representative is Chairman of Delian Task IRA Complete Complete Force Maintenance Scheduling
9. Rad Chem participates in Daily Planning Meeting IRA On Going On Going Dil CT: Going On Going l
10. ALARA lines IRA 1/01/86
11. Delian Team Building
12. Restructuring of Indging area (See Item D - Space.)

IRA Complete Complete K. Miscellaneous

1. Remote barrel monitor operational DH Refuel Complete
2. Issue contractor film indges with security lodge IRA 12/09/85
3. Issue Ceco film indges with security indge IRA Re fuel Complete

?

2 i

l LASALLE COUNTY STATION HIGH RAD AREA DOORS LEFT OPEN 19 8 5 ""'""'"".

l 19 8 6 T A R G E T===========

i 30-1 l

f................o"""

2 S~

s/'

/

20, o,.....................

I' o

'",o l

y o

6,o '

o o'o i

7 O-o#,o+'

o

,c i

= = = =

/

d*o'o',#* " " * * " " " " " " * " " " " " * " = = = = = =

/

l

/

jay FSB Mkp APR M

y JYy J

L A$a SEp OCy NOy DEC O

2'

?

a io

7 t

e s

PERBOM EL PERF0151ABCE 1.c., Teamwork, Effectiveness, Compliance with Requirements, etc.

PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIETION COMPIEPION RESP.

DATE DATE COMMENTS A. Expectations Meetings

1. lat Line Supervisors GJD Complete Complete
2. Convey expectations to senior management with GJD Complete Complete emphasis on team work B. Delian Efforts GJD 1/01/86 C. Connaanication on R.P. procedure compliance GJD 9/01/85 Complete D. Missed Rad Chem Surveillances
1. Conduct detailed root cause review DSB/FRL 1/31/86
2. Identify effective corrective action (s) to DSB/FRL 2/14/86 minimize recurrence.

9 s

f LASALLE COUNTY STATION PERSONNEL ERROR LERS l

1984''

l

'98s,,,,,"**,,,,

i,s' l

/

1oag A R c E T..*....****

/

f 60 5,s'

/

l

!'y r',i So s i

,,,s I

l g

1 o " n n,,,,,'" ",,,,,," ",,,,,,,,,

o 40 t!o i

o l

pr a't"",,,

30

..............!p w=

1' o,,,,o."....#,,,

a.=

=.

l l

/

l 2o

  • p

'U,,,o s!'f i

=.

i l

a>,,,,

,e

=.

,,,,0,0*

= = = = = = =.

j 10

/

==

j i

JAN P58 Mhg Asg Mby J0N J0L AOc SEp OCT NOV DEC

/

/

a'

?

?

l H

l

LASALLE COUNTY STATION NUMBER OF LERS 19 8 4 s s s s sis 19 8 5 "ninnuun NOO.

[

s'

O

,,,r W

s' G 1 so.

'i s'

L s

i

[f,,,,s 4

T l ICO.

,y,gg,[,,,,.",,,,

y

""u

,,s n a V

"""""'",,,i s

E

,..........n.

s

a "",,,,,,

s So~

s n

s s

.....n s s s s s s s

s I

,,,,,,,,,s

/

s s

s s

s s

s g

,s r

O JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 5

W

l O..,

.-e.

M IEATIM PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIETION COMPIETION RESP.

DATE DATE COMENTS Review of ISCS Organization KG/GJD 3/86 I

4 in (R

W W.

\\,

'oC 9

m.,e-PROJECTED ACTUAL COMPIE1' ION COMPIETION RESP.

DATE DATE-CO M NTS A. Independent review to identify Root Causes Gerner 3/01/86

%

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20138B271&oldid=4203306"