ML20127J304

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to LAP-100-15, Control of Vendor Equipment Technical Info
ML20127J304
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/11/1985
From:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20127J297 List:
References
0448A, 448A, LAP-100-15, NUDOCS 8505210442
Download: ML20127J304 (11)
v • d • e


Text

- _ _

LAP-100-15 Revision 0 March 11, 1985 1

( . .

CouTROL OF VENDOR EQUIPMENT TECHNICAL IMPCEMATION a

A. PURPOSE

- The purpose of this procedure is to establish control of vendor supplied

+ -

safety-related and significant non-safety related equipment technical information, as determined by the station. j E. REFEREICES

1. IMPO Good Practice Mh-304, " Control of vendor Manuals" dated i september 1984.
2. MED Directive - MD2, " Control of Vendor Equipment Technical Information" dated Movember 27, 1984.
3. " supplemental Flow Chart for MSD Directive - MD2" dated December 24, 1984.

C. PEEREQUISITES

1. Mone.

D. PRECAUTIONS

1. Addition of personal notes o'r new or revised vendor information to a controlled vendor manual may be accomplished only in accordance with this procedure.
2. Use of uncontrolled vendor manuals for safety related or significant non-safety related work is prohibited.

E. LIMITATIONS Alm ACTIONS ,

1. This procedure will be gradually implemented as vendor manual reviews and updates are accomplished. Pull implementation is targeted for July 1, 1985.

F. PROCEDURE

1. Vendor Equipment Technical Information (ETI) which is presently in possession of the station.
a. Verify that the satellite file copies of the vendor ETI agree s with the central file mester copy by performing a page check.

> Any differences, such as hand written notes, comments, etc.

i should be noted.

i i

! DoCUMEur ID 0448A/

8505210442 850516

- PDR ADOCK 05000373PDR p

-y y--rweew, - --w-. ,wg,,m,g y __ _ - _.m_m .,yyg_,m_w, , - -+www wwwm_ m-,--e_ _,,-w,eem-y ww e.

[ . . . . . . . . .

LAP-100-15 Revision 0 March 11, 1985 2

b. Check the vendor manual out of central file per LAP 810-4,

" Retrieving Materials From Central File, Satellite, and the Archive Files".

c. Insert a copy of Attachments A, B, C, D, E & F in the front of the vendor manual to be reviewed.
d. Perform a technical review by one or more cognizant station personnel, as assigned on Attachment B. This review should consist of at least the following:

lEZIE Record any coments or discrepancies in the Comments section of Attachment B.

1) Are there any significant errors or missing information?
2) Does the technical manual reflect the "as-built" condition of the equipment in the plant? ,

i lE2EE If the equipment is modified, the vendor should be notified of the modification and the effect of the modification on the maintenance procedures in the technical manual.

3) Are there'any portions of this technical manual which do not apply to the equipment as installed at Lasalle? If so, record affected paragraphs, pages, etc. in the comments section of Attachment B.
4) Escord on Attachment I the Equipment Piece Number (EPN) of all the equipment to which this technical manual applies.
e. Upon completion of review, sign and date Attachment A and forward the technical manual to the next reviewer listed on Attachment B.
f. Using the information from the comments section of Attachment B, complete Attachment D.
1) Those sections, listed on Attachment D, which are determined to be not applicable to the equipment installed at LaSalle should be lined out initialed, dated and marked N/A.

IEZIE When the above steps are completed Attachment B can be removed and destroyed.

Docusewr ID 0448A/

~

- ~ ~ - ' ^ ~~ ~ ^ ~ ~

F- -.-

. LAP-100-15 Revision 0 March 11, 1985 3

g. Make copies of Attachments A, C, D, E, and F and insert into the satellite file copies of the manual, and insure that satellite

^

copies are up to date by performing a page check against the master.

h. When the above steps have been completed, the vendor manual is considered controlled and any revisions should be reade per this procedure.
i. Utilizing the existing numbering system, vendor ETI that has been reviewed and approved will be designated by placing a "C" i

after the present manual number.

j. An index of vendor ETI, the ntamber of duplicate copies and their
location will be maintained in Central Fie.
k. Vsndor ETI, as controlled by this procedure, will be recalled annually for auditing purposes and to ensure completeness of the I

vendor ETI doctament. .

1. Station procedures should be reviewed to create a cross reference, Attachment C, between the vendor ETI and station procedures.
2. Revisions to Controlled Vendor Manuals.

Revisions to vendor ETI can come from a nusber of different sources.

The following are a,few examples:

(a) Revisions received from the equipment vendor (1) Written (2] Instructions received with spare parts.

[3] Instructions received per phone conversation with a vendor.

(b] Service Information Letters (SIL's).

(c) Turbine Information Letters (TIL's).

(d] Maintenance Instructions from Electro Motive Diesel (e) IE Bulletins, Notices, etc.

(f] IMPO SOER's.

(g] uuclear network.

[h] Modifications to equipment.

DOCUMENT ID 0448A/

LAP-100-15

> Revision 0

  • March 11, 1985 4

t *

(. .

a. Forward all vendor technical information to the vendor Equipment Technical Information (VRTI) coordinator where it will be determined if the information should be, or is already, included in the applicable technical manual.

EEK If the information is already included in the technical manual, no further action is required.

b.- If it is determined that the informati<m should be included in the technical manual, perform the following:

1) check the affected technical marral out of central file per LAP 810-4.  ;
2) By referring to the Attachment '! in the front of the technical manual, assign the next sequential revision nnseber.
3) Place an Attachment B on the new revision and assign at least 2 cognizant individuals to perform a technical review. This review should esnsist of at least the following:

ENE Any comments should be recorded in thes comments section of the i

! Attachment B.

1

[a] Are there any significant errors or missing information?

[b] could this revision cause or prevent degradation or failure l

of safety related equipment?

[c] Are any training lesson plans affected by this revision?

[d] Are there any portions of this revision which do not apply to the equipment as installed at LaSalle?

c. Upon completion of the technical review, forward the revision and Attachment B to the VETI coordinator, who should perform the following:
1) contact the equipment supplier for his review, if the l

~

revision was not issued by the supplier. This review could l be performed by telephone or written correspondence, and should be documented in the comments section of Attachment B.

DocunENT ID 0448A/

. , . ...w. . + . . - = _ . . . -

,~..,_.--..___ __ . . - - , . . . , , - _ . - . - _ . , - . - . - _ _ . _ . - . - - _ - - - - - . . - __

LAP-100-15 Revision 0 March 11, 1985 5

2) Notify the Nuclear safety Group if the revision could cause or prevent degradation or failure of safety related equipment.
3) Notify the Training Department if any lesson plans are affected.
4) Line out initial, date, and mark N/A any portions of the revision which do not apply to the equipment as installed at Lasalle Record these sections on Attachments D.
5) Refer to Attachment C of the technical manual to determine if any station procedures requires revision, if so initiate the revision.
6) Complete the Attachment F in the front of the technical manual.
d. Forward the technical unual, the new revision, and the Attachments B & F to Central File, where the following should be performed.
1) .The new revision and Attachments B & F should be photocopied.
2) The originals should be placed in the master ETI document.
3) The photocopied copies should be placed in all satellite file copies.

G. CHECKLISTS

1. None.

H. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REFERENCES i

1. None.

l l

i l

.)

i DOCUMENT ID 0448A/

l I

I 6 -

M , _g_g

- LAP-100-15

  • Revision 0 March 11, 1985 6

( .

ATTAQWEbrf A VBEDCE IWhMUAL REVHbf/ APPROVAL SHEET Vendor Manual Title Vendor Manual No.

Revision Mc:

Signature Est,t Reviewed by:

..w.-

Approved by:

Vendor Concurrence (if applicable)

COIWEENTS l

4 O

- DOCUMENT ID 0448A/

eum eso .> m -- . .

-- i- - , - - , .y-w--y- , 7-.-.- - ,- , -% ,,,v---- ... , - - --,y--. ----,,-,-rm-w-w- - - - - e----v ---w- -w -r-- - - - --tw---+-&e-- + = -w--w-- w i- e s e ==e -m-- -"-

i

~

  • ATTacienNT B EDUTING/CGGENT SHEET Vendor ManualJ Route to / Vendor Manual No.

Signature

/ Vendor Manual Title Signature

/

Signature

/ Vendor Manual Rev. No.

Signature

/

Signature Last: Vendor Bauimeent Technical Coordinator Note: Sign the Routing /Comument Sheet prior to routing to next individual.

N DOCUMENT ID 0448A/

~ ~

LAP-100-15 Revision 0 March 11, 1985 8

ATTRCIEENT C a.*.~. . a > u s . .=t w <-v Vendor Manual No.

Vendor Manual Revision No.

Vendor Manual Title This document was used as reference inatorial for the preparation of the station procedures listed below. Any revision to this inanual requires that these station procedures be reviewed for possible change.

Procedure No.

Procedure No.

Procedure No.

. Procedure No.

Procedure No.

Procedure No.

Procedure No.

Procedure No.

Procedure No.

Procedure No.

Procedure No.

Procedure No.

Procedure No. '

~-

DOCUMENT ID 0448A/

W D **6 -e-e e e. .

LAP-100-15 Revision 0 March 11, 1985 9

k f

ATEROBEN! D MN AFFLICRELE PROES SHEET vendor Manual No.

Vendor Manual Revision No.

Vendor Manual Title Listed below are the pages/ sections which do not apply to the procedures and equipment in the plant. Do not refer to these pages.

Page(s) through i

Reviewer Date i

l l

DOCUMNT ID 0448A/

l

-- ,.m.--ey, ,,,.-y-y-.w--..,<,..._ ,,.- . . -

LAP-100-15 Revision 0 March 11. 1985 10 ATTRCIEENT E

, APPLICABLE 80UIPfENT PTECE NUlBERS The following pieces of equipment installed at LaSalle County Units'1 and 2 are covered by this technical inanual.

Vendor, Manual No.

Vendor Manual Rev. No.

Vendor Manual Title j -

l l

l

/

DOCUMENT ID 0448A/

l -

l . .

LAP-100-15 Revision 0 March 11, 1985 11 RJfAC i

ATTRQEENT F BBCORD OF REVISICW SHEET Vendor Manual No.:

Title:

REV. REV. REASON FOR NO. DATE LE5Giilrr10ii 0F CHANGE CHANGE INITIAL l

O e

DOCUMNT ID 0448A/

i l

A _ @ __

i -

  1. ^

NSD Directive NSDD-M02 NUCLEAR STATI0flS DIVISI0tl Rv Mar 985 CONTROL OF VENDOR EQUIPhENT TECHNICAL INFORMATION 1.0 Purpose This Directive defines the minimum requirements for implementation of the Vendor Eculpment Technical Information Procram and INPO Good Practice, MA-304, Control at vendor Manuals.

2.0 Scope This Directive is applicable to the following Vendor Equipment Technical Information in operating nuclear stations:

2.1 Safety-Related Equipment Technical Information 2.2 Significant Non-Safety-Related Equipment Technical Information as determined by the Station.

3.0 Definitions

3.1 VETIP

Vendor Equipment Technical Information Program 3.2 ETI: Equipment Technical Information

3.3 NU1AC

Nuclear Utility Task Action Committee 3.4 Controlled dccument: A document whose published contents cannot be changed without a review procedure as described by this Directive.

4.0 References 4.1 Vendor Equipmen. Technical Information Program, March 1984, IPO 84-010 (NUTAC) 4.2 IWO Good Practice, MA-304, Control of Vendor Manuals, (preliminary) May 1984.

Page 1 of 6 31198

___;C.- I

NSD Directive-NO2 Revision 2 March 4, 1985 5.0 Directive 5.1- Vendor ETI which is Presently in Station's Possession 5.1.1 Control of Vendor ETI documents shall be initiated when:

5.1.1.1 A station proceoure directs the use of Vendor ETI occuments which are defined in the Scope of the Directive.

5.1.1.2 A department head or his designate authorizes control of a Vendor ETI derument.

5.1.2 Control of-Vendor ETI documents shall include the following:

5.1.2.1 A Master ETI Document:

5.1.2.1.1 Which has been determined by the cognizant station reviewer to:

5.1.2.1.1.1 Be applicable to station procedures and equipment 5.1.2.1.1.2 Contain no significant errors or omissions 5.1.2.1.1.3 Reflect the "as-built" condition of the equipment.

This determination shall be based upon the available knowledge and information of one or more station personnel as deemed appropriate and designated by the cognizant station cepartment head.

Page 2 of 6 31198 L

=q  ;

.g'-

NSD Directive-M02

' Revision 2 March 4,.1985

'5.1.2.1.2 Whose contents shall have been corrected by the cognizant station. i reviewer if the conditions of paragraph 5.1.2.1.1 cannot be achieved. -The cognizant' station reviewer shall subsequently solicit

, and cocument the concurrence of'the equipment supplier in order to resolve or confirm significant issues regarding technical content and warranties- If the concurrence of the equipment supplier cannot be obtained, the reasons for the lack of concurrence.shall also be @==nted.

5.1.2.2 Controlled Copies which are:

5.1.2.2.1 Numbereo and maintained in accordance with the Master ETI %= ant. An index of vendor ETI titles and the number of duplicate copies (at least one) shall be prepared and maintained.

, t.I.2.2.2 Clearly identified as such, with a means provided to allow periodic verification that they have been controlled according to paragraph 5.1.2.1 above.

5.1.3 hhen significant technical changes to controlled vendor ETI cocuments are made by station personnel:

5.1.3.1 1 hose changes shall be reflected in all Master and Controlled copies of Vendor ETI documents in accordance with paragraph 5.1.2.

5.1.3.2 A means shall be established whereby significant ETI changes will be reflected in all applicable station procedures. An example of such means is a cross-reference between station procedures and the vendor ETI documents which they reference.

Page 3 of 6 31198

,, .. d- ~ =w. ~ m m

n 4

y NSO Directive-602 Revision 2 March 4,-1985 5.1.4 - A vendor.ETI document should not .be used.in place of procedures, but rather as.a verified reference for procedure development, troubleshooting, or as part of.a proceoure which clearly defines lthose vencor ETI or portions thereof, which are to be.used in performing the procedure.

5.1.5 -- If uncontrolled ETI documents are directec to'be used by a station procedure, then those uncontrolled ETI documents-shall be controlled in accordance with paragraph 5.1.2 of this Directive.

5.1.6 ETI documents which are affected by station modifications shall be updated to reflect the "as-built" condition of the equipment. If significant ETI document changes occur, those changes shall be reflected in all Master and Controlled copies of Vencor ETI documents in accordance with paragraph 5.1.2.

5.2 Incomina ETI 5.2.1 Incoming ETI documents which are adoressed to the station shall receive a preliminary review by station personnellin.

orcer to identify safety related or significant non-safety related ETI as identified by the scope of this Directive.

This preliminary review of incoming ETI shall include vendor ETI documents which accompany the receipt of newly-arrived equipment. ' '

ETI which has been identified by the station as requiring control and/or action shall subsequently receive an appropriate review and evaluation by station personne1' who shall recommend one or more of the following courses of action, subject to the approval of the cognizant department head or his designate:

5.2.1.1 Promptly notify appropriate personnel and NUCLEAR NETWORK if such ETI identifies a concern which could contribute to a degradation of safety. NLCLEAR NETWORK notifications'are made through the Office of Nuclear Safety.

5.2.1.2 Ioentify new ETI documents which should be placed under the control of this vendor ETI program.

Page 4 of 6 31198

NSO Directive-NO2 Revision 2 March 4, 1985 5.2.1.3 Incorporate such significant ETI into:

5.2.1.3.1 Existing station procedures 5.2.1.3.2 Equipment data and/cr purchasing records 5.2.1.3.3_ Training programs 5.2.1.3.4 Existing ETI documents If it has been determined that incoming ETI should be incorporated into an existing uncontrolled ETI document which is in the possession of the station, then the existing uncontrolled ETI document shall be controlled in accordance with paragraph 5.1.2 of this Directive.

5.2.2 The decision to incorporate pertinent incoming ETI into the program cescribed in this Directive remains within the scope of the Commonwealth Edison review and approval requirements.

5.3 Outqoino ETI 5.3.1 Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPROS).

5.3.1.1 All nuclear stations shall participate in the NPRDS program.

5.3.1.2 In the event that a complete failure description cannot be provided within the NPROS time frame, a preliminary report should be submitted within that time frame and a revision to the report should be transmitted when the complete failure description is available.

l Page 5 of 6 31198

  • 7, ;-

NSD Directive-M02 Revision 2 March 4,1985 5.3.2 Incorrect or' incomplete vendor ETI which may cause a significant degradation or failure of safety related equipment shall be reported over NUCLEAR NETWORK by way of the Office or Nuclear Safety.

I s inwo )+N' 3 lb 55 Dennis P. Galle Division Vice President and General Manager Nuclear Stations Division Page 6 of 6 31198

_ .- - _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20127J304&oldid=2901383"