ML20129H874
Text
_._
E
- ~* i ThE'--p NAL INFORMATION'T INTERNAL 0 T IBUTION ONLY,/
i "JUL 301991
\\
p@
Note To:
Ben B. ' Hayes, 01 James Lieberman, OE Stewart D. Ebneter, RII Lawrence J. Chandler, OGC From:
David B. Matthews, NRR
SUBJECT:
V0GTLE 2.206 COORDINATING GROUP A meeting'was held on Thursday, July 25, 1991, to discuss the activities underway throughout the agency related to Vogtle. The meeting was chaired by NRR the office with primary responsibility for responding to the 2.206 petition (and supplements) filed by Hobby and Nosbaugh. The following individuals were present or participated by phone:
~
At OWFN At RII Offices (Atlanta)
- 5. Hayes, 01 J. M11hoan, RII D. Murphy, 0I B. Uryc, RII J. Lieberman, OE G. Jenkins, RII S. Varga, NRR L. Reyes, RII G. Lainas, NRR S. Sparks, RII D. Matthews, NRR J. Vorse. 01 D. Hood, NRR P.. Skinner, RII S. Vias, RII Following a presentation by NRR on the status of the activities underway throughout the agency, the participants discussed the means by which the respective offices could best coordinate their efforts. It was agreed that a Vogtle Working Group would be established consisting of representatives from NRR, 01, OE, RII, and 0GC.
The primary focus of the group would be to insure communication among the participating offices regarding actions relating to Vogtle.
The working group members are:
D.Matthews,NRR(Chair)
D. Hood NRR R. Hoefling, OGC (Legal Advisor)
J. Luehman, OE D. Murphy, 01 S. Vias, RII
/1/
s 1.4 RMATION -JWTEhqISTRI$UTION_0NLC M NSITI k RE-CISIONAL 9611040094 960827 PDR FOIA KOHN95-211
,PDR
=..-
l SE SITIVE y AE-DECJMcNANNFORMAJMINTERNALDISTRIBUIIDN ONLG 7
'4 p
lt was further agreed that the group would meet periodically to review progress and schedules. The first two meeting dates were established:
Tuesday, August 6, 1991 2 p.m. at OWFN Tuesday, A gust 27l1991 RII Atlanta The initial dates were selected with consideration for the present schedule established by NRR for preparation of the initial (partial) 2.206 response.
i Subsequent meetings will be agreed upon by the working group.
I In view of the upcoming enforcement conference in RII on September 19, 1991, it was decided that the working group would make a presentation to NRC senior managers on the status of their efforts on September 18, 1991, in Atlanta.
Subsequent periodic reports to the senior managers of the offices represented i
on the working group will be provided as the need arises.
4 NRR has' agreed to promptly issue a brief summary of each working group meeting.
Enclosed are copies of the materials that have been developed by NRR and RII to assist in monitoring this activity and that were presented at the July 25 meeting.
4 Please note that all of this information is sensitive and distribution should i
be limited and confined only to NRC staff.
D. Matthews l
]
Enclosures i
1.
MilestoneSchedule(dated 7/24/91) 2.
Coordination Chart 3.
IssuesMatrices(5)(dated 7/5/91) i cc: J. Sniezek, ED0 D. Hood, NRR T. Murley, NRR P. Skinner, RII F. Miraglia, NRR S. Vias, RII J. Partlow, NRR J. Milhoan, RII J. Goldberg, OGC B. Uryc, RII D. Murphy, 01 G. Jenkins, RII S. Varga, NRR L. Reyes, RII G. Lainas, NRR S. Sparks, RII D. Matthews, NRR J. Vorse, OI OGC J. Luehman, OE R. Hoefling,isor)
(Legal Adv
-1310N$LINFOR$ATEN3 STRIBUTION ONM_.____-
J
, g,, g %
ENCLOSURE 1
- for ee.
GPC: 2.208 RESPONSE MAJOR MILESTONES
.e, n,,
May
.s.n se, om mee see
.sen 4.
tM iM iM IM IM IM 1 96 IM IM 1 85 IE e
.er, m
2.m.s PARiiAt RESPO.NSE nosese.se,.es m. ~
=
=
=
- simm o seese ser _
.3P**
gf, e nues se nsene e
a e NWSPECTION REPORT 98-19 (OPERATIONSI e noyereasemos 1,f,,,,
e na seesw*inne asen 0 *=
i'g e na en et-w seemed e INSPECTION REPORT SS-XX (ALLEGATIONSI e ses, e -
Too l
e na seeswg inspeese== sesee e
O *'8""
17g e see en es.w seemed e sen sees and stessoue as i
veseened Tao 2
e OTHER RM INSPECTION REPORT FINDINGS sens seen. seas. sMe. ns 171 anam 7
i e Itse somew-up inspoeseen est M-M
?
i e slal somew-up Inspeemen tot 91-1s
?,
S8'M i
e Of INVESTIGATIONS e of Cens No. 2, see.pt(Chesn. Int. Vetues)
Se 1 mm i
8 e ne, es e cemend Leeeers seemed isism o Peepenses due U
,y,,y, e asenesesment Ceneseenee O""
,fis m e nos esseseus et seehiseses a
e of Come see. 2-sSet2(l:esst. east. Wh so-os nones seem. anwmee. nun r==,. osie,.d act. sm En y) m, -
i e menen som=ed i
o
- Eselueelen by nel Too e Feesw-up ocelone by stIt Too 6
e lemmesesou Teo i
e ce Case see. 2-sS@re neAshmey) l e no t is d e sessmeesen by nas Tao e F eew-, messens by sees Tso e leeue %
Tso e of Come see. 2 M _
[_- _ ^ _
^)
, gggg e no,reise.es o
t e Eastseelen by nel Too e penew-, oce no by nn Too e i.e.e case.,e 730 e AUDIO TAPES
)
e Tepee e,ensevehod i erswet e Tapes em.s,ed a,y es week aseekes.h i sise m i
e Tepen esseewed a,y nesiol O r,e m e as sene...,scorenes Tso e nos esseeem og seessees Too 4
e ce asm,es a 7tso m LEoEsso l
9 2.38 FINAL RESPONSE -
O senc/ enc MTo O maisense arte e necesse in,.e. s,esn es gre.,e Teo 1
e ovese ser ;--
.___x Tao A IsaC reeduct O Intinspeetlen e Rnel T,_
Too O erc sehniseene 1lfA I 1
i
j i
I-ENCLOSURE <.
Audio Supp.
{
Tapes 1
Allegations Informant i
s s
i g
V l
I 1 r DOL-oc 01 Enf.
Proceedings 2.206 Investigations Actions Decision i
I
}
.g i r 1 r s r i
NRR Reviews c
Ril Inspections Ops.
i IR AHeg.
Related IR j
1Rs i
i I
I i
E i f l
Farley Lic. Transfer Hatch Amend. Request Coordination of Activities impacting GPC 2.206 Decision i
)
m - ser rem Pambre suunnsa ENCLOSURE 3 searr - W stammL Imere -wick' N
\\
aaly 5,1991 VOGTLE i:
maraza or seguist se.'
- h dO' 9%/
lgh4 esames 4 %,.
seen mar====r suas TcPac sermonum p==rmemmer or ansa so.
soap 7, "y a '_Si-us, amersas
== - =rarnas ene.
1
- L 222184. W.
2.206 FETITICEI unamunnfsom SEMmesR 11, 1990 e.
2.296 Nobby forced out of iPC before rending DOL actions.
RII region II actione 1 II.e being able to resolve improper will be takaa transfer of license, folloeing the actions taken by DOL.
b.
2.296 Mosbaugh removed from PRS after he RII found no besia for this RII see 2.206 1 111.3.1 1 II.b atte gted to resolve safety issues
.1,_ ^.12.
Thle wee a with the PRB.
temporary assignment for Mr.
Mf f. e Moebeagh. The position on ths PRS wee perennently assigned to the Assistant General Manager-support (mbt-8). The permanently 3
assigned person to MWe-S returned to his original position and amoumed his duties on the PRB.
1.
2.296 JJJegal Transfer of Ideense to NRR Draft being 1 III.1 SONOPCO reviewed by SNet.
1.a 2.206 Mr. Farley, SONOPCO's acting CEO, WmR
- ,/O supplemental chose the GPC corporate officere 4
Inforention which would be staffing the SONOPCO p
7 Letter 10/1/90.
project even though he is not an Page 1.
of ficer or egloyee of GPC.
[g y. g. gylf, M-artisse g
neomre. m j
i 1
m m
.a
^,
Of M M.
T?
e - ra." - - -
M
- 4;j',MY.
35W M MM TOPIC N
Pau T"*"'
M M W.
&~
. w a ue m.
mies
=nr- -==rias EEE haS. W.
' '.wL
.s 1.b 2.296 Mr. farley and not GPC's CEO gepa Supplemental controle mattern related to the Information staffing of GPC's asuelear setter 18/1/99.
facilities.
PeWe 2.
' 1.c 2.296 GPC's concern over whether SOIeOPCO guget Supplemental see operating GPC's acclear plante Information eithout a license continued well letter 10/1/99.
after Mr. IsabbF raised the lesse in Page 3.
hie April 27, 1999 memo.
1.d 2.296 Vogtle project management assomme asum Supplemental that Mr. Farley and not Mr.
Information Dehlberf controle voTtle's Imtter 10/1/96, operation.
Page 4.
2.
2.296 GPC Mieload the Commisefon about Statement le mene h Isum IIIut allegation 1 III.2 the Chain of Commmand from the false -mader-Ged. Meelen review board held WDTtJe Project's PJant dennager to wee inadvertent.
pp 6/3/91. 3Se Fgh -
8 [v Projects to merking its CEO.
Rrr.se-A-ee26 with Rxt, coc and
,g OP888 OE to determine en-appropriate ehe 4 3.
2.296 30180PCO IntentJonally misled the IR 90-17 RII-90-12 of 01 case pending 1 311.3 septC about the conditfoe of the 1 2.b.(6) 2-90-029 (not included in FogtJe F2 ant after a Site Area IR 99-XE OPlus initial partial v
amorgency Ja order to hasten the 1 2.7 reopense.)
restart of the reactor.
VIO 90-II-43 R11-96-A-8992 opgge Position 10.19 (C2)
OPsII vio 90-xx-45 (A3)
Ortes i
3.a 2.296 Confirmation of Action Resgense IR 94-II R11-90-12 of 01 case pending I
1 111.3.a/
(CORR) and IAR 99-906 contained 1 2.7 2-90-929 (not included la'
.b/.c/.df.e known falso statemento intended to OPsB8 laitial partial mislead the seltc.
reopenee.)
I
- =,s. a 4
5 I
... ~.. -.
e g
g
$w?'
8.
" ('LI feet h '. ' ^ "e#
mamarme m. ass
.- -.s.sm.u.cs.
.aser luorre suy m
og gnes me.
w m.-
amers.
n
--m.s c*
' Y!s, : 7 ?%%
mEE aan.' no.
3.b 2.296.
SONOPCO intentionally delayed IR 90-II RII-90-12 OI OI cose pending
-1 III.3.f/
revising the Lan until after 1 2.7 2-90-429 teot included in
.g/.h critical meetings with the Espec.
tPEN initial partial rav=.)
3.c 2.296 Intentional falso information to -
IR 94-17 RII-90-12 OI 01 case pending 1 III.3.1 IsptC concerning reliability data of 1 2.b.(6) 2-90-429 feet included in EDG.
IR 99-IX OPEN initial partial 1 2.7 response.)
URI 90-17-01 opIpe RII-96-A-4992 VIO 90-XX-95 OPEN Position 18,19 (A3) opsge RII-91-A-8109 OPEIS 3.d 2.296 GPC had known that the EDG was RII-99-12 OI.
OI caso pending 1 III.3.j/.k unreliable for years and remained 2-90-929 (not included in uncorrected.
cesis initial partial RII-90-A-0092 Orest Tape 10 RII-91-A-4109 CPEst 3.e..
2.206 Sose0PCO reta11ated agelnet peosaRUGet AV See 2.206 1 II,b
{
1 III.3.1 by removing him from Pfts.
g (not included in initial partial response.)
4.
2.296 GPC's Executive vice President Iso concleolon. This item le IsetR Forther testC action, 1 111.4 submitted perjured testimony during being reviewed by DOL.
if any, pending the course of a proceeding 2.296 information referred results of DOL com.mraced ender Section 210 of the to D01, by setR on 12/21/90.
review.
l Emergy Reorganfration Act.
t 6
h astrear momen.m 3
1 I
1
.~
OE 6 BISl
")
IM NM TOPIC m
pamL M gg CRg g. 3 M
1 ~[,M ],&
M.
M M
M M9
?
RIS &as 35. l.
5.
2.236 40NOPCU routineJr threatens the IR 90-19 leutC has cencluded that RII Positione 1 III.5 safe operation of GPC's nucJear Weaknese $1,3,4 SONOPCO (GPC) does not 1,15,24,26,27,31 facilities by allowing them to Closed IR91-14, routinely threaten the safe enter " motherhood.*
1 4.c,.e, E
operation of v5GP by IR 90-19 allowing them to enter 1 2.1.1.3 s
- notherhood." Entry into TS 2.1.1.4 3.0.3 (motherhood) was found IR 90-EK to be a true statement.
1 2.6 Deview of this isome GL 97-09 identified that the licensee TS 3.9.3 did enter TS se en IFI 99-KI-94 Orth operational practice.
VIO 90-II-95 (A2.A5) OPEN IR 99-05 (Strength) 5.a 2.296 GPC failed to notify MRC upon entry IR 99-19 On many occasione GPC RII Getry into 3.9.3 1 III.5 of 3.0.3.
1 2.1.1.3 entered Ts 3.e.3 without dess not require realising it, when lead Isac motification sequencers were inoperable.
innlees power Ilouever the time limite were reduction le mot violated.
performed.
- 5.b 2.296 Both unite safety related load IR 99-II RII Positions 1,3,24 1 III.S.a sequencore have been inoperable due 1 2.6 to many conditions on many IFI 99-RI-94 occasions.
OPSII seeme 4
neesta.ets
s.
.j l
OE 6 M.
- e. 4* emaammeh}a J*
. Y stes nn-meme ime -
serrc nursemes emme.=meman,
an enesso.
sese
' W.
m erICE 90cimenarts N
me.
hisr >
A s-
., n 4MJ REE ABS. W.
+
6.
2.296 SONOPCD routinely endangers the OI did not substantiate en RIE 1 III.6 pubile's safety by ignoring overall tread, or pattern of Technical Specifications.
a " cavalier" approach to regulatory respairements by TEGP management. However a tendency was shown, on the part of VEGP management, to interpret TS 3.4.1.4.2, its j
spp11 cable ection statement, and the asecciated Implementing procedures in a highly questionable, if not convoluted menner, without mmc contact er consultation.
6.a 2.206 The licensee willfully and ygN R11-90-02 p
M44-est-tus:sep-1 III.6.a knowingly violatM TS by opening 2-90-991 N
- Dilution valves" required locksd f M Qg CLOSED
" n; T..
Demand closed by TS.
.lettere sent to GPC l
pg @
and 3 individuals on June 3, 1991.
mesponses due by August 31, 1991.
6.b.
2.296 on 2/26/90, the temC found that the.
IR 90-05 1 2.a RII 1 III.6.b same dilution valves identified in VIo 90-05-01, 6.a above were again unsecured CleSED 1R 91-14, while at "mid-loop
- in violation of 1 4.1 TS. (Another emasple of willful RII-90-A-0005 violation of TS by GPC management, OPEN see 6.a above.)
6.c 2.296 Procedural errors made by two g
1 111.6.c shifte licensed coeratore g
miscalculated the ahutdown margin for Unit 1 which was shutdown at the time.
6.d 2.296 GPC employees were told to keep ggg 1 111.6.d planned shutdowns on schedule by "taking" 12R' S.
estram fleente.eTh
.e OE 6 NB.
- m 3
2M WM MIC EN penL-OKCam W.
gm
', 6 +O;i
- v d> I*
an.
- smessar mar===nerles numramazems oms.
4 o
REI ARA. St.
+
[
Peettiene 15.21 6.e 2.296 Licensee knowingly concealed a IR 90-II, 1 2.3 Allegation not fully RII-90-08 1 III.G.e.1) violation of TS 4.6.1.1.a in that NCY 425/96-01-01 substantiated.
2-96-812 they failed to properly test = 39 1AR 2-90-001 OPEN containment isolation valves.
CICSED IR 90-10, 1 3.b.(2).(h)
VIO 90-II-95 ggg_gg.a.g92 (All Ortet OPEN UO 94-1942 CLOSED IR 91-14, 1 4.b 6.f 2.296 SONorCO knosingly concealed a TS IR 90-II, 1 2.4 Allegatica mot fully RII-90-OS OI Positica 26 1 III.6.e.11) violation in that they changed from IAR 1-90-094 substantiated.
2-90-412 NODE 5 to peode 6 even though CICSED IR 90-18, Orset required equignment was not 1 3.b.(2).(c) operable.
DeCV 424/90-19-33 RII-96-4-992 VIO 90-II-03 OPEN (C1) OraN 6.g 2.296 SOIP3rCO knowingly concealed a Ts IR 90-II, 1 2.2 seo indication that SONorCO RII-96-44 01 Poeition 22 1 III.6.e.111) vio;ation when 'a' ment pump was not VIO 99-II-42 made a conscious decision to 2-90-012 declared inoperable after crocking (til Orset endesger public.
Orest of stSCW water cooling line and ' A' msIR pu g was inoperable due to RII-90-A-092 outage work.
OrsN 1.
2.206 SolearCO repostedly conceefed RII-96-15 OI j
1 131.7 safeguards problems from the astc.
2-91-003 OrtN m
RI I-90-A,-0,12 4 0,,
$$$[ N I
239emfa PTR
=
m
j l
. e I
i
- E 2d et M no.
!ffl's,umammmmm?
M em8mmeum MM.
14r2C BWWWEB amma.ummmmer OE E2m m.
m
- s 3
att tag. 39.1
-: ; h.,
-:i M,7 i
W.
.'N N
rumresuevamm BB.
5jih e
7.e-2.296 (1) ScuoPCO knowingly and u!I-M 01 1 III.7.a repeatedly hid safeguards probleme 2-91-993 from the NRC and (2) willfully OPEN refused to cosyly with mandatory reporting requirements.
(3).
30NorCO vice President made false RII-M-A-gI24 statements to the NRC during an OPEN Enforcement Conference about the states of safeguards meteriale in Birmingham.
7.b 2.294 90u0PCO senior management prwented RII-99-15 01 1 III.7.b the Site Security Meneger from 2-91-993 making a med Phone notification CPEN within one hour as required by 10 Crn 73.71.
RII-90-A-124 OPEN O.
2.296 30pDPCO has endangered the public's RII 1 III.S health and safety by operating radioactive waste systeme and facilities known to be in gross RII-99-A-9995 violation of Nec requirements.
OPEN 8.a 2.296 Radioactive waste filter system IR 90-II, 1 2.1 RIE Position 25 1 III.9 (FAVA) wee installed and operated IFI 90-XX-01 by VEGP in groes violation of RG 1.143.
The system had been ehetdown by OA for prograsmatic breakdowns in procurement and design, but SONOPCO approved resumption prior to corrective actions were coupleted. This could have resulted in a redlooctive leak into hover Creek. The 59.59 evaluation and accident analysis are inadequate and/or incorrect for FAVA system.
8.b 2.296 GPC management intimidated h re IR 99-XX, 1 2.10 RII Poeition 13 1 III.5 of the PRS on the lesoe of the FAVA IR 91-99, 1 5 system.
estram 7
neesta.rta e
m
__._m r.},
MP;M
?A- " A em:*M os eeumsg um e
, :R 4
i
- Y M.
emasmanne m Wettc EN sessmanst
- et m m. D m
I N,s q$:q',?#ffy ?'
- N O
m.
.M Docu m NmF30R meuremascus W
gag has.igo;7 ;
9.
2.296 SONOFC0 management routinely rists see 1 III.9 the safe operation of GPC's apucieer feeliities through non-conservative end guestionabin managennent practices.
9.e 2.296 80NorCO preloos management for IR 90-XX, 1 2.4
~
seen 1 III.9.e taking riske.
9.b 2.296 seot taking any adverse action see 1 III.9.b ogainst managere or employees who engege in non-conservative end geestionable compliance practices.
i 9.e 2.296 metusing to critically investigate sum 1 III.9.c events or practices resulting in Imts.
9.d 2.296 motellating egelnet managers who num 1 III.9.d make their regulatory concerne to GPC/SONOFC0 --- _
t.
RII-Dogion II, Divielen of Deector Steven Wies Projects tege-testR, Diviolon of reactor Projects, Darl Rood Directorate II-3 OI-Office of Investigation, Den 90erphy/
Headquarters or Region II Larry Robinson DOL-Department of Labor DCM-t* prtment of Justice OGC-Lifice of General Counsel Dick Noefling/Bogene Roller DLPQ-IsIWL, Division of Licensee Fred A11onopech Forformance & Ouelity Evaluation i
i i
t pit /ea, 21eeeffe.Pfe l
i
l l
MJC envapens' Te DI
- mor
- u. N
- r==nar's!
4.ir s, i,,i voorra erscIAL Inesectrons ammasz
?'
$$ 'D ~
i N
N N
OE M W.
SW N
I
-M-N ON
- mint Ont.
N RIE AIA. 50.
RII IserscTIon BaroStr 50-424,425/90-II ISSUED: (FEIBING)
(Allegations)
I2 90 -XX Improper installation of FAVA system.
IR 90-xx, 1 2.1 RII 2.206, 1 III.S.a 1 2.1 IFI 90-xx-01 CPEN Position 25 12 90-II Operability of RNR Pump.
IR 90-II, 1 2.2 RII 2.206,1 III.6.e.111 1 2.2 VIO 90-xx-02 tet) cesN Position 22 12 90-xx Missed Containment Isolation valve IR 90-xx, 1 2.3 RII 2.206, 1 III.6.e.1 5
12.3 surve111amee.
In 90-19, 1 2.2.1.1 roeition 15,21 TIO 90-xx-05 (All orEN 12 90-xx toods change eith inoperable source IR 90-xx,
- 1 2.4 RII 2.206, 1 III.6.E.11 1 2.4 range monitor ecclear instrummet.
VIO 90-xx-03 (C15 OPEN Position 20 IAR 1-90-004 CICSED IR 90-10, 1 3.b.(2).(c) 12 90-II Sockdating of signatures.
IR 90-xx, 1 2.5
- II rosition 23 1 2.5 VIo 90-xx-02 (R2) OrtN 12 90-xx Reportethility of previous Engineered IR 90-xx, 1 2.6 RII 2.206, 1 111.5 1 2.6 Safety Features Actuation System Road IFI 90-xx-04 OPEN Foeition 1,24 Ter outages.
l 1
ID-90-XX Reliability of Diesel Generators.
IR 90-xx, 1 2.7 RII-90-12 RII 2.206, 1 III.3 i
g 2,7 IR 90-17, 1 2.b.(6) 2-90-020 Position 10,19 i
VIO 90-xx-03 (C2) OPEN orest vio 90-xx-05 (Ain oesN IAR 1-90-006 CICSED IR 90-10, 1 3.b.(2).(e)
"j%.no
J
. _. ~.. -.. _ -
m _.... _
.m.
4 1
B
%-s Og ESouBeg 30 t
N N
Og M m3.
Oma rumannsyg 4
M N,
N
-8"t43W 43 8.
M htt sin. NO.
M i
12 90-xx Air ginality of meergency Diesel IR 90-xx, 1 2.0 RII-90-12 RII OI investigation still 1 2.0 generator starting air systesn.
2-90-020 pending.
OPEN Position 17,10.19 L
RII-90-A-0092 OPEN 12 90-xX Reportability of previous system IR 90-xx, 1 2.9 RII 1 2.9 outages.
+
12 90-xx Intimidation of Plant Review Board IR 90-xx, 1 2.10 RII 2.206, 1 III.O.b 1 2.10 e ra.
Position 13 IR 90-xx Personnel accountability.
IR 90-xx, 1 2.11 RII Position 30 1 2.11 v!O 90-xx-oS that OPEN RII INSFECTIcel ItBroetr 50-424,425/90-19 l
ISSUED: JBIRR9tr 11,1991 amascuss: yemanamT S, 1991 (cperations)
In 90-19 seeknese: 91 - Review licensee's CICSED IR 91-14, 1 4.c RII 2.206 1 111.5 Summary method for TS interpretatione.
IR 90-19, Eg. 2 s 1 2.1.1.1 13 90-19 Weaknese: 82 - Review 11cenese's CIASED IR 91-14, 1 4.d RII 01 2-90-801 Report Summary method for interdepartmental procedure IR 90-19, Pg. 2 s 1 2.1.1.6 Concern 02 noviour.
12 90-19 Weebemos: 83 - Voluntary entry into TS CIASED IR 91-14, 1 4.e RII 2.206 1 III.5 g
Seoumery 140.
IR 90-19, pg. 3 s 1 2.1.1.4 Position 15,26,27 I2 90-19 maakmese: 94 - Licensee interpretation-CLOSED IR 91-14, 1 4.f Rgg 2.206 1 333.5 Summmary of TS ICO shutdown action time.
IR 90-19, pg. 3 & 1 2.1.1.3 Position 31 VIO 90-xx-05 (AS) OPEN
[
1R 90-19 Weehoses: 55 - Certification of CICSED IR 91-14, 1 4.g RII Position 6 Susumery agualifications for plant egalpment IR 90-19, Pg. 3 s 1 2.1.3.2 operatore.
IR 90-19 anehmose: 96 - Procedures for defining CIASED IR 91-14, 1 4.h ggg Summary miniense acceptable performance of IR 90-19, Pg. 3 & 1 2.2.6 j
plant eepsipment operator general inopoetions.
I3 t#8N D
Steelktt.FTe l
?
.. ~
s l
14
- 1J TA4.
og gegangg m,
, ;g L ?*..# j -
~ fassumsnme,
w J K.i -
. saysc asymmmma yInnt.
or tasE 30.
sesP W
s
^
A-ymg
?"M7q1
.p narums==ERTION N
ggg.
? g]
NM-
- fi.
R11 118. 300.
12 90-19 bWn f.? - seethod for authorizing CLOSED IR 91-14, 1 4.1 RII Position 4 Sumsmary overtime.
IR 90-19, eg. 3 s 1 2.1.3.1 12 90-19 h
90 - Review licensee's C10 SED IR 91-14, 1 4.j RII Position 11 Summary method of holding periodic sahai-safety IR 90-19, Pg. 4 & 1 2.2.4 meetings for operations personnel.
12 90-19 h s 99 - Review licenseo's CICSED IR 91-14, 1 4.k RII Position 20 Summa ry method for implementing the si 411ty IR 90-19, pg. 4 s 1 2.1.3.3 concerne program.
12 90-19 Implementation of Technical IR 90-19, 1 2.1.1 RII 1 2.1.1 Specification requirements.
IR 90-19 Review and approval of TS IR 90-19, 1 2.1.1.1 RII 2.206, 1 III.5 1 2.1.1.1 interpretations.
IR 90-19, tesakness El CIDSED IR 91-14, 1 4.c 12 90-19 Calibration requirements for RCs flow IR 90-19, 1 2.1.1.2 RII Position 29 t
1 2.1.1.2 instrumente.
VIO 90-19-91 CIOSED IR 91-14, 1 4.a j
i Anticl eted actions for TS 3.0.3.
IR 90-19, 1 2.1.1.3 RII 2.20s,1 III.5 12 90-19 P
1 2.1.1.3 IR 90-19, speaknese 04 Poe'. tion 1,3,15,24,31 CIOSED IR 91-14, 1 4.f L
12 90-19 voluntary Entry into TS LCO action IR 90-19, 1 2.1.1.4 RII 2.206, 1 III.5 g 2.1.1.4 to.
IR 90-19, essakness 03 Position 1,3,15,24,26,27 CIOSED IR 91-14, 1 4.e VIO 90-XX-05 (A2p OPEst In 90-19 Implementation of TS surveillance IR 90-19, 1 2.1.1.'5 RII 1 2.1.1.5 respairements.
12 90-19 Interdepartmental review of TS IR 90-19, 1 2.1.1.6 rig 1 2.1.1.6 serve 111ance procedures.
IR 90-19, speaknese 02 CIDSED IR 91-14, 1 4.d 12 90-19 Review of deficiencies for unanalyzed IR 90-19, 1 2.1.2 RII 1 2.1.2 conditions.
I2 90-19 Personnel practices in the Operations IR 90-19, 1 2.1.3 RII 1 2.1.3 Departmoet.
senseJe 3seente.FT9 8
8 j
(L 7
.,u 4 -
sem 1
mm 2,
m 8
5 1
m 4
6 2
1 1
u-n n
n n
n n
e o
o o
o t
i i
i i
t t
t t
t i
i i
i i
s s
s s
s o
o o
o o
p P
P P
P y.
ss I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I g
g ua I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I g
g sg R
R R
R R
R R
R R
R R
g 0
E o.
e u
m Wc as ss a
a Ba rr ac E
c-N smm IF 1
9 k.
b.
h.
)
4 4
4 3
4 4
4 N
71 51 91 2
1E 81 61 18 29 38 0
9 N
1.1
,P 2
3 O
O
- 3. s 1
- 3. s 1
- 3. s 1 1
- 1. s 1
1 2
3
- 4. s 1 5
- 6. s 1 e4 s4 e4 0
4 e4 s4 N""
I 1
1l T
e-e-
e-e-
e-
-)
l 2
2 2
2
- 2. n 1 2
- 2. n 1 R
- 1. n 1
- 1. n 1
- 1. n 1 2
- 2. 4 9b 1A 2h9 2k9 2k9 2
2 9(
9(
2 2
2 2
2k9 2
2k9 E
a a
a g
a a
a 1oR 1eR 1eR 1
1r1R)2R5 1
1 1
1 1eR 1
1sR pI wI wI 0I29I0 WI uI
( - -
,,8
,D
,,D D 9D
,,D
,,D
,,D 9n9S0Eb.1En 9
9 9
9 99E 9
99E 99E 99E 99E 9
1 S-1 1
1 1
11S 1
11S 11S 11S 11S 1
D D
D D30O0
- - D
- D 001 00I 90I 0
042I 9L9 0
0 0
0 00I 0
00I 99C 99C 99C 9
99 C1 C 9
9 9
9 99C 9
99C R
RRE I
I R
R R
R RR R
RR II II II I
IIL V V I
I I
I II I
I1 o
s t
s r
e o
e s
i t-s e
c a
e n
i i
r c
o e
c l
e n
p c
n o
p a
s n
e t
p o
1 e
a i
n 1
r i
c e
g t
1 e
t l
i m
n n
e v
e d
p f
p i
e v
l e
n m
e i
r a
t a
o d.
u m
f n
q m
u v
c f
g
_=
C a
i a
s e
s rs e
I t
u r
n c
s l
oe P
e q
g d
o n
e a
s fr t
0 e
o n
i a
n r
n u
n u
o sl a
e.
1 t
r a
t l
v d
i ei l
f t
P a
l i
n s
l e
i is e
t ca p
h a
n n
o m
e tn c
a if s
l r
o s
m v
no o
c t
f p
e i
I i
r ei r
i ct o
d c
t t
u tt p
n an n
f n
u ty s.
t8 n
e e.
s m
em c
aM a
o o
l nt n
s s
n n
vp ns C
o.
ei o
de e
g r
o o
ii ar v
ml i
er
^
o i
c tu mo m
n y
eg ni t
t
?.
i i
t n
ib c
e?
t t
cq rt t
n i
ti aa a
l at a
t ee oa hx
'/:1, rn r
f r
fr r
i l
nt tr p+_
ea e
i rd re i'
e a
a as ne 0
m g
o T
Q rt Co 1
Cr Op o
s Ca Po v
r u
ie op 0
o pl p
h on ep duJg sP; 1
2 3
1 2
3 MNW'a i
se 93 93 93 91 91 91 91 92 93 94 95 96 e
s 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 f
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 F.
u 1
1 1
2 2
0 9
0 0
0 9
t 9
9 9
0 9
9 u
92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 f
c Nn U
R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 n1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 Ge tt
,%i=
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I8 t3 S
j'
llll l
l
' P 4*
1 i-9
/
?
t
/
N 17 b.
- 3. no G.
1i 1t I
1 c I
e I
1p 1
,sn 6I 6
0 0
- 2. /
2 G
2D 2
NS I
t t
I EB I
I I
I BC R
R R
R 2
9 O
W W
9 0
N 0
1 T
0 0
n ne s
eR 2
s mO 4
10a Ao aa
]R 00w 0w 1w 5
2 1
eC 9-9 9
r mI I
0 I
I9 I
I gO R
I -
I I
o R2 R
R W
W Nr Tm a'
uW' 1
4 1
l W
E N
4 7
0
(
Na.
I s
1 T
e g
2 2
- b. 7. c a.
1 g
2 2
22 2 9 e
m 1
1 111 11R 0
0I w
,,7
,5 D 9
9 7x1 50E 1
1 1x-0S 0
0A 0
0 009 09I 9
9 99 9 C I
O R
R RRR RI I
I IIU IV no e
i v
t n
la a
o.
v c
i s0 f
e9 es i
)
sr9 0) ra t
0t nu1 9t u
o 9r ol 9r c5.
n
? 9o t 01o e c ii,
9 se.
t ta5 t
d g
1p cf E
9 p
d2
,e yo.
e a y 051 n
O7 e
a P
,R tl r
4R 1n4 M
1 0
1 E
eru E
,2 n t1 R9 r
veJ n
R6 r
s.
o 0
en.
0 it yo ii4 o
tad I92 s/Nt n
i 9
t c n E/
ef n
nr o
t O
c eGa C5lB au3 i
a 5
I e
rD I
hd t
c 2i c S 2
r 0 T
e5T i
i T
p oe9 d
f r
4, p :e -
C4, e
ch9 C
m7 n
i E
m t1 B
1y o
s F
I e
F4 A eT ob 4
c s
2 2
t4 a
S S tg, E4:s Ud 4
an2 l
l E
ot N
t ui1 n
I Dpn ee a
c I-0E r0r 0:e qe i
D eol se u0i r
t 5Ed dli I5Ued l2o e
n X
t e
I Ui alr I
Smi i1g S
ae a
v R Ss nop R
s F1r et a
IfA Ico So Im rm
(
G(
)
5
- mm
^
97 90 7(
S s
r 1
1 1.
O e
s.
b.
0 2
2 0
e 0
0 92 92 92 92 r.
s R1 R1 R1 R1 E
I I
I I
I*
_..m._.
m t
O i
1,IMETED DISTernhTI
- WOT FtML FtMLECWrmem DARFT SI M I M T1 July 5, 1991 eencInn. nuescrieme EheRIE OE M NO.
2-WWIC BM"'"
Feat -
01 Ca0E 30.
W N
marummmme M Dece mBER52tNE
- 1058 cas.
r a m,:
R11 A34. 30.
01 REQUEST 30.: RII-90-02 01 CASE 30.:
2-90-001 REFOEtT ISSOED: 35hBCE 26, 1991 This Investigation alleged that the VEGP See 2.206, 1 III.6.a s operatione manager, on October 13,1998, had 1 III.6.e intentionally ordered the opening of two IR 90-05,1 2.a valves which were required to be closed and RII-90-A-0005 i
secured with *.he plant in the stetus it see at opgge the time.
i C1 CASE 38 0.
Alleged latentional violation of Four demand lettere OE FIIstaBS: Rnowingly and RII Pending RII followup.
2-90-691 TS 3.4.1.4.2 by vogtle Operations isoned June 3, 1991.
intentionally violated TS action page 10 menegament RA-91-063 3.4.1.4.2 EA-91-964 EA-91-465 OE FIIBINS: Enowingly and BA-91-066 intentionally violated VROP Proc. Iso. 12996-C.
CI CASE 80 0.
Alleged inteetional non-reporting OE FIEDIES: vietation of RI!
Pending RI1 followup 2-90-901 of Technical Specification reportability of action page 29 violation by VBGP Pas 18 CFR 50.73 avermest $1 10CFR 59.59 reviene do not appear CIOSED IR 91-14, ngg to be laplemmated to review 1 2.a procedures and procedure changee.
rnureum 92 Croce disciplinary reviews are not IR 90-19, WEAIGIESS 92 ggg beleg adesymately performed.
CICSED IR 91-14, 1 4.d IR 90-19, 1 2.1.1.6 ColeCapst 03 I.ack of guidance provided to CIOSED 1R 91-14 RII l
operatore for entry into TS 1 2.b j
conditione.
COIIC58We 84 Overall management philosophy CIDSED IR 91-14, ggg appears that TS action statemente 1 2.c l
can be entered, changed, or violated it me==T - at dictates.
2
- im m
1+
l I:
L i
l I
4
~N v~
i OI tegBBST W.
i NM i ;, -
TEWIC s '
N P
"""Y OE(2M W.
MW N
' f, m
'1.
N marv*ItNW (MS.
R11 Ala. W.
ruusrenes 95 Corporate
- position statemente" are RII not reviewed by the Safety Review Board.
Casurwaas 06 Licensed sit 0's do not appear to be RII se knowledgeable of the T3 bases.
CCOICEfes 07 89)
Deficiency carde system appears to Cl4 SED IR 91-14, RII have some oversight problesmo in 1 2.d that the same individual submitting the card can review for disposition.
C008 Capes 50110)
Several personnel indicated that RII the Vice-President knew of a questionable altuation when the VF
?
etated that he knew nothing of the problem.
CnIICEful 09 t11)
There appears to be a lack of C148SD IR 91-14, RII control docummete available to the 1 2.e i
watchetanders to identify ocheduling activities.
I w ele (12) teenagement interface with the RII i
resident inspectore appears to be very week.
avuormuus $11(13) teumerous Ito's and smo's would "do C1cesD IR 91-14, mig j
uhatever n; _
1 telle them."
1 2.t CCEICB8e8 912(14)
The processing of " functional C148aD IR 91-14, RII teste" appears to be lacking 1 2.g adegente < "_. ^ t review.
CoseCases 813(1S1 Some
- clearances" are made without C14 SED IR 91-14, RII the I M 4 ate knowledge of the 1 2.h control room operatore.
COIICB8st 814(15)
The procese of review by the FftB C14 SED IR 91-09, f 5 RII does not appear to be i
't.
COIECases 015t17) sets does not appear to review in RII depth issues addressed by the Fits.
es pese 9
steente.rTC
3 yp Q, _
s s
1
~
i1 gg
- 1. l.1 1
g,
g
- e. e. e.
3 3
7 666 I
g I
1 I
g III I
1 I
e A
III 1
I III 1
b 1
1 111 1
, 5 6
6 6
6 0
0 e
0 0
2 2
p 2
2 a
2 2
T 2
2 y
gg g
I I
f 1
1 1
R o
0 0
0 y
2 2
9 4
g,
>M 9
9 4 2
g 0
0 1
1 g
y3 0
0 0
0 y
- NN y
3 AERE A,
Ag g
- PP E
3 A
0n 0O1C 0n 9
9 9
g 9
x g
t g
I I
I g
E g
I I
I gg g
R R R
W mep
)
6(N
.E 3
- b. O P
)
)
)
7
?
?
2 M
(
(
(
1 10 E
)
1 M
6
,1 x
- 3. x 7(
71 x
x 1.
1 -
E 234 I
- 7. 0b.
0 0
6I0 09 9222 0I9292 9
R111 2.1R1R1 Rh I
2 I
I IU d
, ol e
e e n s
t a h
t l
a seRnc ht a
i 0
a t
Tvnii t
r la t
if u
n9 f
a ea yi wo c
so9 y
tv) rr c
n 1
yl n,
a 3tc eCy a
os llo4 rn n sot n
ie, lai9 tr5 5
ais9 S
aodel 2
lNi i
ce G
fei s
a1 y 1
nrs1s O
pi n a 1
a l
G G
etadn
- 0 itc,d oeu 1l 3
- 2 I
l I
ta i
eau 00 N 01 N sa,yi 02 eo N
"hb n
r C>
90 I
tas2a d i a
vfJ 90 eorat 90 nmi2u M
W
.I B
esoli i
e d g
edl t
E ttd tn ye dee n
0 I0I rItede I0 crn I1 E
normf
. 9 I9E h iddm I9 E ier o
I9 RF ttn ai RF vl c
eaa RF iieasa noe t
oee rt td s 2
eemtd 2
rih e
re0 2
dann rm aie pmt s
o 9 amuos er nrog n
cG9 e
hro r e 'e D
vioeva D
yot o
D1
.:M E
oarbat
.:E 1tu p
e tfece.
tg, 0
0
.U 0
o s
0
.U ctti u
sntns aa2 30 S oitenm S
nuloo EO N0 S
ndb e
Ml1 5
m area 3
noeet N S iea.
r T S eemecr
<p <
T S oCnd r T
e wd el I
gs fig I
onsr 6 I
een/
neeo 0
=lr ES T nlho r ESr a)gh e d ES T ktct 2
= op cy s :
Uat g1ntmn Ua 0a actceP R
nna 0CW Ifa QCE i a ea QC ms h
eiar 2.
E O tt rot B 0 a re n
3 iottn 3
ntse
'o i 31p rdt o
9 6eun o
D ae sa R1 o.
RI e
gi 0M l yt i ant E
enelte O
w% eg, My E
vocAsm 0
t 3
ensg a
1 a
I nir i
1 cea ale s -
m 0
elo vm O
ite.ont 0
im l
r eovrlr ao leoe o
)
feooo n
slopih tss f
6 c lfvf Nm' e
io mtt eale n
hi) eca htai in 7(
toeonn C
a etrsiI T
1 n
T v2 pa p Tsfd Li 1.
4; a b.
r.
0 e
t 92 Nn e
Sc mw y n1
/e I
tr it D
r==
a e
a wa.
L
,a a
m 4ma
-,a e-a 7
t g.g 5 3 ~.
Lii s
N 3
E E
Ei i e
g g
a
~
I hh hh8 hh8 s i si 6??
6?
8 an unn an l
j J
a 1
~
e
=
4 Y
l Y
i fata 1-s a
1~ R:
g l
Y!Ejkg l
!jk!
!!El iR E - s..
E *=.
Eg E n i"*l !
..EsEss
..gstsi i
..Est ;
..n diesel isess'l
.i ise' 5 !
s s
1 s
I }
l
- c s
a i
e sg a
a L
- m7 l
g aly l
l g
l
~
E
~
E E
E
[
i a
a
. ~ ~.
m
_m.
I l
l 9-E h
g 4
- Mas.
- 1
'Est1C w
remavammaanr et Cass 310.
segy ruummasts
- m.,
NM tverT N gas.
REX A14. 50.
Licensee 2.206 response contains RII-90-12 RII Tape S1 Aneccurate inforunation 2-90-020 1
CRnt RII-Region II, Division of Reactor Steven Vlas Projects seRR-IIRR, Division of Reactor Darl Rood Projects, Directorate 11-3 01-Office of Investigation, Dan seurphy/
Iseedquarters or Region II tarry Robinson SRI-Senior Resident Inspector Brian Bonser DOL-Department of Labor DOJ-Departament of Justice CAC-Office of General Counsel Dick Boefling/
Itsedquarters Eugene Roller D120-81RR, Division of Licensee Fred Allenspech Performance s Otsality Evaluation b
b 4
1
[
6 mII#8Jv 33eepfa.FTC 0
~
.... --... ~..
.... ~ > -
. ~ -...
I dI LIMI DE ION -
CA V
V July 5, 1991 M
seettat Immrectrons mate 2X e
4,
mes AAER 89 Temmmmfat M ECIFIC Igu m 0F IMEEAAST SIGEIrrrimum Saft-99E.Emp4W BCrtens CBBASIES
- . M : '-
Et RI2/Of IEWO m.
e-N Wimmps 9
3/23/98 N/N 19e 3/23/9g y/t teambers of the Critique team CAICON evitch problene were the direct MONE I glications of this following the March 20, 1990 event, cause of the failure of the DG to tape were brought to stating there was a general provide AC power during the event.
the attention of OI indication that there was a long During the Enforcement Conference, GPC for inclusion in history of problems with CAICOst totally disavowed any basis for their their investigation tagerature switches. A Statement being able to predict. CAIKON failures.
of licensee that the DG testing program was to misrepresentaticas.
- show progress" not necessarily to be a controlled event.
41 4/11/90 N/N l
42 4/11/99 M/T I
Sne 4/19/90 Y/Y Serly discussions of the compilation No significant lop 11 cations were drawn ISONE t
l of DG start information requested by from this tape.
the NRC.
Also discuestone concerning the performance of the Emergency 300tification Itetwork.
373e 4/19/99 T/Y Discuselon about eliminating The first item could indicate collusion te0NE 01 Case 82-90-020 I
l reference in the Ian to 17 min.
by GFC, in that intentional celesion of RII Allegatione l
being due to problems with Eiss.
relevant info was being considered. The att-90-A-0092 is concerned with possibility of third item indicated that the enewe s RII-91-A-0109
(
teaterial False Statement on the DG.
were being forunnlated by GPC did not
}
The araber of DG false starts was address the intent of the RA questions.
l being manipulated, to show the most This had direct bearing on the units j
favorable results.
restart after the event.
i i
es uen Heenfa.Me I
.m.
.m..
.o f
s
-^
,e a
N M W INEMAST stwryzancs WUtamm W acrIm s W
~.
- . a
..,u.,
50*
4/19/94 Y/T Site management was intentionally This tape indicates that there was MoseE deleting data that was relative to consideration within the highest levels the start performance of DG.
They of VEGP to ensure that information was did not analyse starts during the presented in such a manner to allow
" testing period *.
The Event erroneous conclusions to be made by teltC.
Critique Team directed the testimony Also there were indications that a of the PROe about what they saw at totally straightforward and complete the DG local control panel. GPC was disclosure of the facts to the seltC was t
not evaluating start failures until not made.
after the DG was declared operable.
The SOS was concerned about not being able replicate the data and that they may have providad the NItC with wrong Informatloa.
i 13 4/30/90 N/Y 14 4/30/99 N/N 15 4/30/90 N/N 16 4/30/90 N/N l
=
St N/T 43 N/N 95*
S/4/9e lT/Y Discussion on whether copy 815 of the Thle info le being reviewed by 01 for IsossE Security plan had been shredded and possible implications about the handling whether distribution of the Security of Safeguarde meterial within GPC and riens were under Document Control Soseoeco.
i (GPCI or SCS.
90 5/8/90 N/N i
j 99 5/0/99 N/W l
l 104 S/8/90 N/N 101 S/0/94 N/N l
l l
asusse i
e l
aseente.rve
__..___-._-m=
s i
l l
9
.i.
'WM
. yt mes
,maam e '
emm--og p segy2C ITWIB er Tsurm est steNfswamrw ears-posacN gr acyIUse n um - men ~
4 m.
- met ;
. Em gages I
W REI/UE' Im
- v.
155' 6/8/99 Y/Y Concerns about not following Indications that the OA medits that were NOME procedures when performing an audit being performed were not being done in or procedures they know are not conformance with the governing opdated. Indications that SONOPCO procedures and that auditors and plant was holding up the review process for management know of this deficiency the 12R for the event. Discussions without taking corrective actions. Also of what to do with the sequencer when that SONOPCO unnecessarily delayed and it is powered down and how it relates impacted the content of the subadtted to TS 3.5.c and 3.4.4.3.
IAR.
156 6/e/90 N/Y 150 6/11/90 N/N 159 6/11/99 N/N l
16.
m 145 N/N N/A N/A N/A N/A IgeAUD1BLE 166 6/15/90 N/N 161 6/15/90 N/Y 168*
6/10/99 T/Y Nistory concerning the down-time of Potential operations outside of ISONE the ESFAS P r.
Potential that procedural Tuldence during the rod drop t
operators were operating outside the event procedures when the plant esperienced
[
the rod drop event. teore discussione 1
of the revisions that were being made to the taft for the event 169*
6/10/99 T/Y TS change for the Sequencer. A Concern about the "adjwatment* which Is0NE tutorial from the plant General could have been made to the r
Nenager concerning what is accountability times. The significant enough to report wrt laterpretation by the GBt was not out of 50.12 eM 50.13.
Discuestons about line or inappropriate.
the Southern Company Services ESCS)
Licensing Snqineer (Security) input concerning security issues and a discussion of the " accountability letter" sent out after the continuing security violatione.
115 6/29/90 N/Y i
i l
4 I
posism 8
[
i aseasts. rte i
i
~ _.
o
{
4 i
gape 38ED M
MW smemmumT WW2FIC 2TM OF N stestyremaru sw ym m numaannse{
NB.
9954 N
guages
.,.s gr 312/0f Eume i.
182 6/28/90 N/N 183 N/N 104 N/W 105 N/T 106 6/29/90 N/W 187 6/29/99 N/N 199 1/11/90 N/N 299 7/11/90 N/N 201 7/11/90 N/W r
204 1/13/90 N/1 205 7/13/90 N/N 212 1/19/98 N/N 213 7/19/90 N/Y 214e 1/23/90 Y/Y Dates for the internal comunitments This supporte the allegation that the BIONE
~
associated with the EER on the management of VBGP intentionally delayed safeguarde event. Impacts of the in reperting safeguards meteriale safeguarde event and a confirmation control violatione and that there was a that the TEGP management know that significant problem within SCS.
discrepencies idmetified as part of the corrective action process were not esempt from the reporting requirements of $0.73.
SCS intentionally held up reporting the safeguarde materiale discrepancies found. SCS Security 11 m eing engineer indicated that there was a
- big problem" with safeguards material control within the SCS organimation.
l 215 7/23/99 N/Y
- i m..
illil l
L
,oi j
,i,
l l
i, g
9.
6
. j
- +
~
M M
E E
M N
O O
W N
de eec y
hhny t
ttel ir il l e tgra iw anen boy hi po a pt tnxi r e ret etf n
n paa imtt o
se ohs t
t nn y g a
ei n nn o oi g v eRes pid l2 a ti l1 sw Rar a
l Nl r eas Wue ehie cv htrc feo.
t ei op ftf sss soaf t
an m mo newo rn eh i mtnt iosS.
fidCt e oa ntrSn toir oaa e atte crueg t
ad a ghi ssri s pe tl des i ef g
eann hrate heeo T ps a n Tl gc e g ns s
hdn yr in a
ttni ae o
w a ad mg ei f
f a
aIdt "g
rodoRe enTaa ye e Ar caSmr n
t gl c s I dimO b i iaonn l
rf si t
rnreoya aftoav s
uatiiti uontw i cmnrsir g a p
wCe oesre ellrtm tRsycpuut fePonu N
t scce af iep m eifesem sh rm rehro iS c. pe R ahtu lD s
eed tN "t
csa ed hBelaR.
hr t
yet s resi.ta eonsel ttosor aif les u thrn hi x,
hc e tefg attoAtm tisheacoe h ss o2 tner.t/
lnThmi f-r eeo t fna ide n i sfoS n
ps 1
oot.ddoi osn we itaser ta itegec1 enin1 t
cmsaSa tebive nhibce a iesuCrf a
'a c
prrg c
fl ugSao.
i epeen p m id d
vetfi tosfeeeo n arnee o ri a h r s o n pd s t p u r I d h pi r b I
p g
m g
a
/
Y Y
Y 1
N N
N N
1 N
W N
T Y
2
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
g 3
e 3
Y N
N N
m N
N 'N W
N N
N T
N W
g i.
9 0
0 0
4 0
9 4
8 0
8 0
0 4
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
?
9 9
' mw.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
3 3
3 4
4 5
6 7
7 4
0 9
I 1
3 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
3 3
1 1
1
/
/
3
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
g 8
7 7
7 1
7 1
7 1
7 8
8 8
- ' vL B
ff.
S T
v 7
9 0
2 3
S 6
1 e
4 5
7 Nn 6
6 1
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
3 4
4 ae 4
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
r 1
2 1N 1
T 1
2 8$
9
e s
a V$y t
M
.u i
m m
8
- tBe E
E bMm s
a N
N Silg O
O S
N N
h tu o
Cr te Pt h
G dt e
e fh td ot sn ea ty.
t rl m ts ana ai poe s
N t
sy et gl haI na thy in.
t5 ha n 0 t
e oe kt re sr suh lia l st lrt I
en a s S
aeo o
h t
otG po d D mtd t
e e tcf td oeo sni np aev sg wmo den er i ri egp d
t ra hn ene Ctu has Pio Ymu Gwc hd d
f yor e.tlde s
ce noo ea i t.
at al b ew h
rh1hatb w-g rdet tiou T
ne eeb t tnn m
arm y
t pm oi r n e m
heo b toutneed chr e
el n Uttie u
tf rr le d todh s
l
.ee veefep t.
n etnI nw 9ehtol C r v
naoNn dtr ePge nhi0as.
l ot9rGnw ott1mtC i gr pr9 e io W'
s cY rN rnoea/wtop rdeheaN pi f r t 1 ad eerGht Ae s1sh t
.m~..
pwi2tse bcee/rtra odI h
e irr6e o
-,4 th Ltdt h*
ge bnfm
.E :;7 aseAui troweemo a C1.
h t
olo el h h ui e r thaYbat np tttnst g I
crSav oasa sso R
stoS nd h o o ti yr p'C t t t n m l p E,-
napOeie e
oNrNn/t neP uda E
i o( o r otGsreoAnn ttc ldo li tocc ao N
an D oi p ehtrin i
c a gC sl e sNmareG.kt i
ilnPuar u* e t prD gs c
)-
lPoOcw c es e ni a p rNs d see Cfeord
^
mttOiGn ih r G N e h r e
IasSDDa D t pD N N t w a r T
M"* Ng ggg Y
N N
T N
N N
T N
N N
W T
N g
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
M'm n a Y
N W
N N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
N a9 g
- E.
s,W,
M M M M
0 0
0 0
0 4
4 6
6 0
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
M,r
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
lm w 4
4 4
5 5
5 5
5 6
6 7
7 7
7 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
v '-
8 0
O 8
8 8
S 0
t 8
t 8
8 O
e ff.
t u3;e f
9 0
1 2
3 4
6 7
0 9
9 1
vR 3
3 5
eI 4
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 6
6 ee
- 33w 4
5 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 r0 2
2 t8 s3a
b
}
I b
k+
s -
N N W IWWWEST SIMtrtree9m mm
}M
-9 m atxfog 4.
i:
s 204*
9/29/99 Y/T Licensee did not report ESF ch!11er Indications that GPC had knowingly not MONE starts, even thou they knee they made required 50.72,and 59.73 reports.
should have. Neference to the Admission that no test was conducted repetitive inadvertent DG starts concerning the hatch closeability.
eince March 90.
The inability to Neither items is significant, but they close the etet. equip, hatch and that continue to foster the bellet that no test had been conducted to verify information een not being passed onto closeability.
the MUtC as it should have been, and the failure of GPC to close the hatch was in part due to an inadvertent validation and verification of the ROP.
266 9/29/99 W/W 267 9/29/99 N/N 269 9/30/99 N/N N/A N/A N/A N/A INAUD18tA 269 9/30/99 N/N NOWES:
277 Tepee total 291 Tepos returned to Noobaugh on February 21, 1991 16 Tapes retained by Negion II
- 13 Designated as priority by Mosbeugh i
i
- inL..r s
,