|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20212B9961999-09-15015 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3.3-52,deleting Condition G as Well as or G from Condition H,Per TS Change Request TSCR-003 ML20210B9411999-07-16016 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR to Support Operation with GE-12 Fuel with 10x10 Pin Array ML20206P2321999-05-10010 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.4,providing Specific Conditions & Required Actions for Control Bldg Barrier Degradation (as Opposed to Ventilation Train Degradation) ML20206P7401999-05-10010 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SLMCPR to Support Operation with GE-12 with 10x10 Pin Array ML20206J3011999-04-30030 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS Surveillance Requirement 3.4.3.1 to Implement More Appropriate Safety Valve & Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Tolerances ML20205P8031999-04-12012 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relaxation of Excess Flow Check Valve Surveillance Testing ML20202E5931999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.7 Re Rev to DG Surveillance Requirement ML20204A7541999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Spent Fuel Racks Storage Update ML20206S2421999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.7 for EDGs ML20154P6621998-10-15015 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.6.1.3,revising Condition E to Add Time Limit for Plant Operation If Penetration Flow Path Isolated by Single Purge Valve with Resilient Seal & Adding TS for Cb/Sbgt IAS NG-98-0720, Proposed Improved Tech Specs Page 5.0-21 for Reporting Requirements1998-04-17017 April 1998 Proposed Improved Tech Specs Page 5.0-21 for Reporting Requirements ML20217B8271998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re RTS-300,revising Reactor Vessel pressure-temp Curve Update ML20203M5021998-02-26026 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Improved Conversion of Plant ML20199K9871998-02-0303 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Vessel Hydrostatic Pressure & Leak Testing Operability Requirements ML20199K9601998-02-0303 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Standby Liquid Control Operability Requirements ML20198P8871998-01-0909 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.B LCO for PCIVs Revised to Allow 72 Hours to Isolate Failed Valve Associated W/Closed Sys ML20203G5331997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Marked Up Pages for Improved TS for Rev a Showing Changes for Rev B ML20211J2331997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Supplementing thermal-hydraulic Analysis Included as License Rept in 930326 to Murley NG-97-1010, Proposed Tech Specs Change for Instrument Setpoints1997-06-10010 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Change for Instrument Setpoints NG-97-0847, Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of LCO to Address Situation When Sys & Components Are Removed from Svc or Otherwise Made Inoperable During Secondary Modes of Operation,W/O Requiring Entry Into LCO Actions1997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of LCO to Address Situation When Sys & Components Are Removed from Svc or Otherwise Made Inoperable During Secondary Modes of Operation,W/O Requiring Entry Into LCO Actions ML20141D3621997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definitions of LSSS & Instrument/Channel Calibration to Ref New Program Being Added to TS for Control of Instrument Setpoints ML20115E0301996-07-0505 July 1996 Proposed TS Table 3.6.B.2-1,raising Reactor Water Conductivity Limit to Support Implementation of Noble Metal Chemical Addition at Plant as Method to Enhance Effectiveness of HWC in Mitigating IGSCC ML20101Q7191996-04-0909 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Recirculation Pump Trip Min Operable Channels ML20097A1871996-01-30030 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Certain CR Scram Insertion Time Testing Limits ML20096F0211996-01-18018 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Lowering RWCU Isolation Setpoint from Reactor Low Level to Reactor low-low Level ML20099L8491995-12-22022 December 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 3.7, Plant Containment Sys ML20095H2371995-12-15015 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating EDG Conditional Surveillance & Editorial Clarifications ML20095A9011995-11-30030 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs to Implement Option I-D Reactor Stability Solution ML20094M4131995-11-15015 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re RPT Operability & Surveillance Requirements ML20087F5831995-08-0707 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 6.5.2.8 & 6.5.3 Re Changes to Audit Program ML20086R8061995-07-21021 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Eliminating Inappropriate Condition Surveillance in Sections 4.5 & 4.8,clarifying Requirements Governing Spent & New Fuel Storage in Section 5.5 ML20087H7021995-04-28028 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page 3.5-20,adding Clarification for Single Core Spray Pump Requirement ML20082S0201995-04-21021 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Deletion of TS 6.5.3.1.2 Due to Audit Frequency Requirements Being Removed from TS ML20082D1171995-03-28028 March 1995 Proposed TS Table 3.2-A, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation ML20081C9891995-03-10010 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing Redundant LCOs & SRs for Containment Hydrogen & Oxygen Monitors ML20080Q8731995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Rev to TS Table of Contents, Incorporating New Section ML20080Q0851995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Pump & Valve Surveillance Criteria for LPCI & Core Spray Subsystems,Rhr Svc Water, Hpci,Esw & River Water Supply Systems from Once Every Three Months to Frequency Specified by DAEC ASME Section XI IST ML20078R9171995-02-13013 February 1995 Proposed TS Section 6.5.2.8 & 6.5..3.1,reflecting Deletion of Audit Frequency Requirements ML20080H5651995-02-13013 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Bases for Shutdown Cooling Piping Safety Limit ML20077A9191994-11-10010 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Offgas Radiation Monitors ML20149G9241994-10-28028 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Plan for Integrated Scheduling of Plant Mods ML20076K9591994-10-20020 October 1994 Revised Proposed TS to TS Changes RTS-246 & RTS-246A ML20072F1651994-08-15015 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Main Steam Isolation Valve & Deleting TS Requirements Applicable to MSIV LCS ML20071Q6211994-07-29029 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Isi/Ist Program Requirements ML20070H3321994-07-12012 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Frequencies for Rod Block Instrument Sys ML20070E0411994-06-30030 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Requirements for Audit of Conformance to Tss,Deleting Requirement for Safety Committee Oversight of Audits & Allowing Designation of Signature Authority ML20070E0621994-06-30030 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Addition of Control Bldg Chiller Operability & Surveillance Requirements ML20070E0251994-06-30030 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Revision of ESW Flow Requirement 4.8.e.1 ML20069G9181994-05-27027 May 1994 Proposed TS Section 3.7, Containment Sys ML20069A9961994-05-0606 May 1994 Proposed TS SRs Section 4.6.G, Primary Sys Boundary Structural Integrity, Deleting SR Which Refers to ISI Program Interval,Allowing DAEC Current ISI Program Interval to Be Extended Per Ruling in Fr 57FR34666 1999-09-15
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20212B9961999-09-15015 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3.3-52,deleting Condition G as Well as or G from Condition H,Per TS Change Request TSCR-003 ML20210B9411999-07-16016 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR to Support Operation with GE-12 Fuel with 10x10 Pin Array ML20206P2321999-05-10010 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.4,providing Specific Conditions & Required Actions for Control Bldg Barrier Degradation (as Opposed to Ventilation Train Degradation) ML20206P7401999-05-10010 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SLMCPR to Support Operation with GE-12 with 10x10 Pin Array ML20206J3011999-04-30030 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS Surveillance Requirement 3.4.3.1 to Implement More Appropriate Safety Valve & Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Tolerances ML20205P8031999-04-12012 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relaxation of Excess Flow Check Valve Surveillance Testing ML20202E5931999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.7 Re Rev to DG Surveillance Requirement ML20204A7541999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Spent Fuel Racks Storage Update ML20206S2421999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.7 for EDGs ML20207E9931999-01-0707 January 1999 Rev 15 to Pump & Valve IST Program for Daec ML20205P8091998-11-30030 November 1998 Excess Flow Check Valve Testing Relaxation ML20154P6621998-10-15015 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.6.1.3,revising Condition E to Add Time Limit for Plant Operation If Penetration Flow Path Isolated by Single Purge Valve with Resilient Seal & Adding TS for Cb/Sbgt IAS ML20236T8621998-06-15015 June 1998 Third Ten Yr Interval ISI Summary Rept Refueling Outage 15 from 961116-980522 for DAEC Palo,Ia NG-98-0720, Proposed Improved Tech Specs Page 5.0-21 for Reporting Requirements1998-04-17017 April 1998 Proposed Improved Tech Specs Page 5.0-21 for Reporting Requirements ML20217B8271998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re RTS-300,revising Reactor Vessel pressure-temp Curve Update ML20203M5021998-02-26026 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Improved Conversion of Plant ML20199K9871998-02-0303 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Vessel Hydrostatic Pressure & Leak Testing Operability Requirements ML20199K9601998-02-0303 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Standby Liquid Control Operability Requirements ML20198P8871998-01-0909 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.B LCO for PCIVs Revised to Allow 72 Hours to Isolate Failed Valve Associated W/Closed Sys ML20203G5331997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Marked Up Pages for Improved TS for Rev a Showing Changes for Rev B ML20211J2331997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Supplementing thermal-hydraulic Analysis Included as License Rept in 930326 to Murley NG-97-1010, Proposed Tech Specs Change for Instrument Setpoints1997-06-10010 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Change for Instrument Setpoints NG-97-0847, Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of LCO to Address Situation When Sys & Components Are Removed from Svc or Otherwise Made Inoperable During Secondary Modes of Operation,W/O Requiring Entry Into LCO Actions1997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of LCO to Address Situation When Sys & Components Are Removed from Svc or Otherwise Made Inoperable During Secondary Modes of Operation,W/O Requiring Entry Into LCO Actions ML20141D3621997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definitions of LSSS & Instrument/Channel Calibration to Ref New Program Being Added to TS for Control of Instrument Setpoints ML20138D9791996-12-0505 December 1996 Rev 9 to Offsite Dose Assessment Manual for Gaseous & Liquid Effluents ML20115E0301996-07-0505 July 1996 Proposed TS Table 3.6.B.2-1,raising Reactor Water Conductivity Limit to Support Implementation of Noble Metal Chemical Addition at Plant as Method to Enhance Effectiveness of HWC in Mitigating IGSCC ML20101Q7191996-04-0909 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Recirculation Pump Trip Min Operable Channels ML20108B6271996-03-15015 March 1996 Rev 0 to Third Ten-Yr Insp Interval ISI Plan for DAEC Palo, Ia ML20097A1871996-01-30030 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Certain CR Scram Insertion Time Testing Limits ML20096F0211996-01-18018 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Lowering RWCU Isolation Setpoint from Reactor Low Level to Reactor low-low Level ML20099L8491995-12-22022 December 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 3.7, Plant Containment Sys ML20095H2371995-12-15015 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating EDG Conditional Surveillance & Editorial Clarifications ML20095A9011995-11-30030 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs to Implement Option I-D Reactor Stability Solution ML20094M4131995-11-15015 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re RPT Operability & Surveillance Requirements ML20129H0041995-10-13013 October 1995 Weld Ref Sys ML20087F5831995-08-0707 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 6.5.2.8 & 6.5.3 Re Changes to Audit Program ML20086R8061995-07-21021 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Eliminating Inappropriate Condition Surveillance in Sections 4.5 & 4.8,clarifying Requirements Governing Spent & New Fuel Storage in Section 5.5 ML20087H7021995-04-28028 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page 3.5-20,adding Clarification for Single Core Spray Pump Requirement ML20082S0201995-04-21021 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Deletion of TS 6.5.3.1.2 Due to Audit Frequency Requirements Being Removed from TS ML20082D1171995-03-28028 March 1995 Proposed TS Table 3.2-A, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation ML20081C9891995-03-10010 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing Redundant LCOs & SRs for Containment Hydrogen & Oxygen Monitors ML20080Q8731995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Rev to TS Table of Contents, Incorporating New Section ML20080Q0851995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Pump & Valve Surveillance Criteria for LPCI & Core Spray Subsystems,Rhr Svc Water, Hpci,Esw & River Water Supply Systems from Once Every Three Months to Frequency Specified by DAEC ASME Section XI IST ML20080H5651995-02-13013 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Bases for Shutdown Cooling Piping Safety Limit ML20078R9171995-02-13013 February 1995 Proposed TS Section 6.5.2.8 & 6.5..3.1,reflecting Deletion of Audit Frequency Requirements ML20078L1201995-01-26026 January 1995 Rev 13 to Pump & Valve IST Program for Daec ML20077A9191994-11-10010 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Offgas Radiation Monitors ML20149G9241994-10-28028 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Plan for Integrated Scheduling of Plant Mods ML20076K9591994-10-20020 October 1994 Revised Proposed TS to TS Changes RTS-246 & RTS-246A ML20072F1651994-08-15015 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Main Steam Isolation Valve & Deleting TS Requirements Applicable to MSIV LCS 1999-09-15
[Table view] |
Text
DAEC-1 LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION SURVEILLANCE RE('UIREMENT i
3.1 REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM i 4.1 REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM
,1NSTRUMENTATION
{
INSTRUMENTATION l
A.
As a minimum, the reactor A1 Each reactor protection 9yst%n i
protection system instrumentation inntrurantati on channel shall be l
channels shown in Table 3.1-1 demonstrated OPERABLE by the shall be OPERABLE with the perf orstance of the CHANNEL CHECK, PROTECTIVE INSTRUMENTATION CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST and CHANNEL CALIBRATION operations for RESPONSE TIME an shown in Tablo 3.1-2.
the OPEP.t. TING MODES and at the frequencies shown in Table 4.1-1.
'Ihe designed system response timen from the opening of the l
2.
Response time measu*emouts (from sensor contact up to and actuation of set.sor contacts or including the opening of the trip trip point to de-energization of actuatnr contacts shall not scram soltnold relay) ers not part exceed 50 milliseconds.
of the normal instrument
~
calibration.
The reactor trip A
system response time of eta.h y licability reactor trip functiot, shall be As shown in Table 3.1-1, demonstrated to be within its limit once por operating cycle.
Action:
Each test shall include at leact one logic train such that both 1.
With one channel required by logic traine are tested at least Table 3.1-1 inoperable in one or once per 36 months and one channel more Trip Functions, place the per function such that all inoperable channel (s) and/or that cParnels are tasted at least once trip system in the tripped every N ;imes 18 v7nths where H is l
condition
the t-tal number of redundant channels in a specific reactor 2.
With two or more channels trip function.
required by Table 3.1-1 inoperable in one or more Trip runctions:
a.
Within one hour, verify sufficient channels remain OPERABLE or tripped
- to maintain trip capability in the Trip Functions, and b.
Within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, placc the inoperable channel (s) in one trip system and/or that trip system **
in the tripped condition *, and c.
Within 12 hoars, restore the inoperable channels in the other trip system to an OPERABLE status or tripped *,
Otherwise, take the ACTION required by Table 3.1-1 for the Trip Function.
+ An inoperable channel or trip system need not be placed in the tripped condition where this would cause the Trip Function to occur.
In these cases, if the inoperable channel is not restored to OPERABLE status within the required time, the ACTION required by Table 3.1-1 for that Trip Function shall be taken.
- This ACTION applies to that trip system with the most inoperable channels; if both systems have the same number of inoperable channels, the ACTION can be applied to either trip. system.
RTS-186A 9209020334 920825 3.1-1 08/92 PDR ADOCK 0$000331 P
PDR
DAEC-1 s
reactor pressure, reactor low water level, MSIV closurc, generator load rejection and lurbine stop valve closure are diecussed in Specifications 2.1 and 2.2.
Instrumentation (pressure switches) for the devwell are provided to detect a loss-of-coolant accident and initiate the emergency core cooling equipment.
A high daywell pressure-scram is provided at the same setting as the emergency core cooling systems (ECCS) initiation to minimize the energy which must be accommodated during a loss-of-coolant accident and to prevent return to criticality.
This instrumentation is a backup to the reactor vessel water level instrumentation.
The reactor water level trip settings are referenced to the " top of the active fuel" which has been defined to be 344.5 inches above vessel tero.
These trip settings represent the indicated water level.
i High radiation levels in the main steam line tunnel above that due to the normal nitrogen-and oxygen radioactivit/ is an indicatiun af leaking fuel. A scram is initiated whenever_such radiat^on level exceeds three times normal background.
For the performance of a Hydrogen Water Chemistry pre-implementation test, the scram setpoint may be changeu based on a calculated value of the radiation level expected during the test.
Hydrogen addition will result in an approximate one-to five-fold increase in the nitrogen (N-16) activity in the steam'due to Tncreased N-16 carryover in the main steam. The purpose of this scrum is to reduce the source of such radiation to the extent necessary to limit the amount of radioactivity released due to gross fuel failure.
Discharge of excessive amounts of radioactivity to the 1
environs is prevanted by the air ejector offgas monitors which cause an isolation of the main condenser offgas line to the main stack.
The MSIV closure scram is set to scram wnan the isolation valves are 10% closed in 3 out of 4' lines. _This scram anticipates the pressure and_ flux transient which o ild occur when the valves close. Cy scramming at this setting, the resultant trans,ont is less severe than either the pressure or flux transient which would otherwise result.
A resctor mode switch is provided which actuates or bypasses the various scram functions appropriate to the particular plant operating status.
'The manual scram function is active in all modes, thus providing for a manual means of rapidly inserting control rods during all modes of reactor operation.
The APRM (High flux in Startup or Refuel) system provides protection against excessive power levels,and.short reactor periode in the startup and intermediate power-rangen.
The IRM system provides protection against short reactor periods in these ranges.
l A source rango monitor (SRM) system is also provided to supply additional neutron level informstion during startup but has no scram functions (reference paragraph 7.6.1.4 of the Updated FSAR).
fhus, the IRM and APRM are required in the " Refuel" and "Startup/ Hot StanGby"l modes.. In the power range the APRM system provides required protection (reference paragraph 7.6.1.7 of the-_ Updated FSAR).
Thus the IRM System is not required in the "Run" mode.
The APAM's cover only the power range.
l The IRM's and APRM's provide adequate coverage in the startup and intermediate range.
The control rod drive scram system is designed so-that all of the. water which_is
- discharged from the reactor by-a scram-can be accommodated in the discharge piping.
The scram discharge volume accommodates in excess of 60 gallons of water and is the low point _in the piping.. No credit was taken for this volume in the design of the discharge piping as concerns the amount of water which must be accommodated daring a scram.
During. normal operation the discharge volume is empty; however, should it fill with water, the uater discharged to the piping from the reactor could not be accommodated.
which wauld~ result in slow scram times or partial control rod insertion.
70 preclude this occurrence, level switches have been provided in the instrument volume l.RTS-186h" 3.1-12 08/92
- - -... -. _. - -. - - - -. _. - -. - - -, ~.....~
DAEC-1 t
3.2 " BASES In addition to reactor protection instrumentation which initiates a reactor scram, protective instrumentatior has been provided which initiates action to mitigate the consequencco of accidents which are beyond the operator's ability to control, or terminates operator errors before they result in serious consequences.
The objectives of tha Specificationu ares l
1.
To enoure the effectivenous of the protective instrumentation when required l
including periodo when portions of such eyotema are out of ocrvice for l
maintenance.
When necessary, one channel may be made inoperable for briot I
intervalo to conduct required functional tests and calibrations.
2.
To properibe the trip settings required to aneure adequate performance.
Some of the settings on the instrumentation that initiate or control core and
~
containment cooling have tolerances explicit ly stated where the high and low values are both critical and may have a substantial effect on safety.
The setpoints of other instrumentation, whG e only the high or low end of the setting has a direct bearing on safet,, are chonen at a level away f rom t he normal operating range to prevent inadvertent actuation of the safety system involved and exposure to abnormal situations.
l l
I I
The instrumentation which it..tiates primary system isolation is connected in a dual buu arrangement.
The trip level settings given for reactor water level represent the indicated water level.
The reactor water level trip settings are defined or described in " inches" I
above the top of active fuel.
The term top of active fuel, however, no longer has a preciso physical meaning since the length of the fuel pellet columns has changed over time from that of the initial cora load.
Since the basis of all safety analycec is the absolute level (inches above vessel zero) of the trip settings, the
" top of tho active fuel" has been arbitrarily defined to be 344.5 inches above vessel zero.
This definition is the same as that given by Figure 5.1-1 of the Updated FSAR for the initial core and maintains the consistency between the various level definitions given in the FSAR and the technical opecifications.
The low water level instrumentatian set to trip at 170" above the top of the active fuel closes all isolation valves except those in Groups 1, 6,
7 and 9 (see notes to Table 3.7-3 for isolation valve groups). Details of valve grouping and required closing times are given l'
+cif ication 3. 7.
For valves which isolate at this level tnis trip setting 16
' equate to provent uncovering the core in the case of a break in the largeot line assuming a 60 second valve closing time.
Beguired closing times are leso than this.
The low-low reactor water level instrumentation is set to trip when reacter water level is 119.5" above top of the active fuel.
This trip initiates the HPCI and RCIC and tripo the recirculation pumps.
The low-low-low reactor water level instrumentation is set to trip when the water level is 18.5" above the top of the
! active fuel.
This trip activates the remainder of the ECCS subsystems, closes Group 7 valves, closes Pain Steam Line Isolation Valves, Main Steam Drain Valves, Recire Sample Valves (Group 1) and starts the emergency diesel generatort.
There trip level nottings were chosen to be high enough to prevent spurious actuation but low
{ rnough to initiate ECCS operation and primary system loolation so that post accident cooling can be accompliched and the guidelines of 10 CFR 100 will not be exceeded.
I For large breaks up to the complete circumferential break of a 22-inch recirculation l line and with the trip cetting given above, ECCS initiation and primary system isolation are initiated in time to meet the above criteria.
Reference Sections 6.3 and 7.3 of the Updated FSAR.
l RTS-186A 3.2-43 0B/92
.-