|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20212B9961999-09-15015 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3.3-52,deleting Condition G as Well as or G from Condition H,Per TS Change Request TSCR-003 ML20210B9411999-07-16016 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR to Support Operation with GE-12 Fuel with 10x10 Pin Array ML20206P2321999-05-10010 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.4,providing Specific Conditions & Required Actions for Control Bldg Barrier Degradation (as Opposed to Ventilation Train Degradation) ML20206P7401999-05-10010 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SLMCPR to Support Operation with GE-12 with 10x10 Pin Array ML20206J3011999-04-30030 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS Surveillance Requirement 3.4.3.1 to Implement More Appropriate Safety Valve & Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Tolerances ML20205P8031999-04-12012 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relaxation of Excess Flow Check Valve Surveillance Testing ML20202E5931999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.7 Re Rev to DG Surveillance Requirement ML20204A7541999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Spent Fuel Racks Storage Update ML20206S2421999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.7 for EDGs ML20154P6621998-10-15015 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.6.1.3,revising Condition E to Add Time Limit for Plant Operation If Penetration Flow Path Isolated by Single Purge Valve with Resilient Seal & Adding TS for Cb/Sbgt IAS NG-98-0720, Proposed Improved Tech Specs Page 5.0-21 for Reporting Requirements1998-04-17017 April 1998 Proposed Improved Tech Specs Page 5.0-21 for Reporting Requirements ML20217B8271998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re RTS-300,revising Reactor Vessel pressure-temp Curve Update ML20203M5021998-02-26026 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Improved Conversion of Plant ML20199K9871998-02-0303 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Vessel Hydrostatic Pressure & Leak Testing Operability Requirements ML20199K9601998-02-0303 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Standby Liquid Control Operability Requirements ML20198P8871998-01-0909 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.B LCO for PCIVs Revised to Allow 72 Hours to Isolate Failed Valve Associated W/Closed Sys ML20203G5331997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Marked Up Pages for Improved TS for Rev a Showing Changes for Rev B ML20211J2331997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Supplementing thermal-hydraulic Analysis Included as License Rept in 930326 to Murley NG-97-1010, Proposed Tech Specs Change for Instrument Setpoints1997-06-10010 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Change for Instrument Setpoints NG-97-0847, Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of LCO to Address Situation When Sys & Components Are Removed from Svc or Otherwise Made Inoperable During Secondary Modes of Operation,W/O Requiring Entry Into LCO Actions1997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of LCO to Address Situation When Sys & Components Are Removed from Svc or Otherwise Made Inoperable During Secondary Modes of Operation,W/O Requiring Entry Into LCO Actions ML20141D3621997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definitions of LSSS & Instrument/Channel Calibration to Ref New Program Being Added to TS for Control of Instrument Setpoints ML20115E0301996-07-0505 July 1996 Proposed TS Table 3.6.B.2-1,raising Reactor Water Conductivity Limit to Support Implementation of Noble Metal Chemical Addition at Plant as Method to Enhance Effectiveness of HWC in Mitigating IGSCC ML20101Q7191996-04-0909 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Recirculation Pump Trip Min Operable Channels ML20097A1871996-01-30030 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Certain CR Scram Insertion Time Testing Limits ML20096F0211996-01-18018 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Lowering RWCU Isolation Setpoint from Reactor Low Level to Reactor low-low Level ML20099L8491995-12-22022 December 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 3.7, Plant Containment Sys ML20095H2371995-12-15015 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating EDG Conditional Surveillance & Editorial Clarifications ML20095A9011995-11-30030 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs to Implement Option I-D Reactor Stability Solution ML20094M4131995-11-15015 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re RPT Operability & Surveillance Requirements ML20087F5831995-08-0707 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 6.5.2.8 & 6.5.3 Re Changes to Audit Program ML20086R8061995-07-21021 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Eliminating Inappropriate Condition Surveillance in Sections 4.5 & 4.8,clarifying Requirements Governing Spent & New Fuel Storage in Section 5.5 ML20087H7021995-04-28028 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page 3.5-20,adding Clarification for Single Core Spray Pump Requirement ML20082S0201995-04-21021 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Deletion of TS 6.5.3.1.2 Due to Audit Frequency Requirements Being Removed from TS ML20082D1171995-03-28028 March 1995 Proposed TS Table 3.2-A, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation ML20081C9891995-03-10010 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing Redundant LCOs & SRs for Containment Hydrogen & Oxygen Monitors ML20080Q8731995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Rev to TS Table of Contents, Incorporating New Section ML20080Q0851995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Pump & Valve Surveillance Criteria for LPCI & Core Spray Subsystems,Rhr Svc Water, Hpci,Esw & River Water Supply Systems from Once Every Three Months to Frequency Specified by DAEC ASME Section XI IST ML20078R9171995-02-13013 February 1995 Proposed TS Section 6.5.2.8 & 6.5..3.1,reflecting Deletion of Audit Frequency Requirements ML20080H5651995-02-13013 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Bases for Shutdown Cooling Piping Safety Limit ML20077A9191994-11-10010 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Offgas Radiation Monitors ML20149G9241994-10-28028 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Plan for Integrated Scheduling of Plant Mods ML20076K9591994-10-20020 October 1994 Revised Proposed TS to TS Changes RTS-246 & RTS-246A ML20072F1651994-08-15015 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Main Steam Isolation Valve & Deleting TS Requirements Applicable to MSIV LCS ML20071Q6211994-07-29029 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Isi/Ist Program Requirements ML20070H3321994-07-12012 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Frequencies for Rod Block Instrument Sys ML20070E0411994-06-30030 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Requirements for Audit of Conformance to Tss,Deleting Requirement for Safety Committee Oversight of Audits & Allowing Designation of Signature Authority ML20070E0621994-06-30030 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Addition of Control Bldg Chiller Operability & Surveillance Requirements ML20070E0251994-06-30030 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Revision of ESW Flow Requirement 4.8.e.1 ML20069G9181994-05-27027 May 1994 Proposed TS Section 3.7, Containment Sys ML20069A9961994-05-0606 May 1994 Proposed TS SRs Section 4.6.G, Primary Sys Boundary Structural Integrity, Deleting SR Which Refers to ISI Program Interval,Allowing DAEC Current ISI Program Interval to Be Extended Per Ruling in Fr 57FR34666 1999-09-15
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20212B9961999-09-15015 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3.3-52,deleting Condition G as Well as or G from Condition H,Per TS Change Request TSCR-003 ML20210B9411999-07-16016 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR to Support Operation with GE-12 Fuel with 10x10 Pin Array ML20206P2321999-05-10010 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.4,providing Specific Conditions & Required Actions for Control Bldg Barrier Degradation (as Opposed to Ventilation Train Degradation) ML20206P7401999-05-10010 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SLMCPR to Support Operation with GE-12 with 10x10 Pin Array ML20206J3011999-04-30030 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS Surveillance Requirement 3.4.3.1 to Implement More Appropriate Safety Valve & Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Tolerances ML20205P8031999-04-12012 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relaxation of Excess Flow Check Valve Surveillance Testing ML20202E5931999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.7 Re Rev to DG Surveillance Requirement ML20204A7541999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Spent Fuel Racks Storage Update ML20206S2421999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.7 for EDGs ML20207E9931999-01-0707 January 1999 Rev 15 to Pump & Valve IST Program for Daec ML20205P8091998-11-30030 November 1998 Excess Flow Check Valve Testing Relaxation ML20154P6621998-10-15015 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.6.1.3,revising Condition E to Add Time Limit for Plant Operation If Penetration Flow Path Isolated by Single Purge Valve with Resilient Seal & Adding TS for Cb/Sbgt IAS ML20236T8621998-06-15015 June 1998 Third Ten Yr Interval ISI Summary Rept Refueling Outage 15 from 961116-980522 for DAEC Palo,Ia NG-98-0720, Proposed Improved Tech Specs Page 5.0-21 for Reporting Requirements1998-04-17017 April 1998 Proposed Improved Tech Specs Page 5.0-21 for Reporting Requirements ML20217B8271998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re RTS-300,revising Reactor Vessel pressure-temp Curve Update ML20203M5021998-02-26026 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Improved Conversion of Plant ML20199K9871998-02-0303 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Vessel Hydrostatic Pressure & Leak Testing Operability Requirements ML20199K9601998-02-0303 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Standby Liquid Control Operability Requirements ML20198P8871998-01-0909 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.B LCO for PCIVs Revised to Allow 72 Hours to Isolate Failed Valve Associated W/Closed Sys ML20203G5331997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Marked Up Pages for Improved TS for Rev a Showing Changes for Rev B ML20211J2331997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Supplementing thermal-hydraulic Analysis Included as License Rept in 930326 to Murley NG-97-1010, Proposed Tech Specs Change for Instrument Setpoints1997-06-10010 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Change for Instrument Setpoints NG-97-0847, Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of LCO to Address Situation When Sys & Components Are Removed from Svc or Otherwise Made Inoperable During Secondary Modes of Operation,W/O Requiring Entry Into LCO Actions1997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of LCO to Address Situation When Sys & Components Are Removed from Svc or Otherwise Made Inoperable During Secondary Modes of Operation,W/O Requiring Entry Into LCO Actions ML20141D3621997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definitions of LSSS & Instrument/Channel Calibration to Ref New Program Being Added to TS for Control of Instrument Setpoints ML20138D9791996-12-0505 December 1996 Rev 9 to Offsite Dose Assessment Manual for Gaseous & Liquid Effluents ML20115E0301996-07-0505 July 1996 Proposed TS Table 3.6.B.2-1,raising Reactor Water Conductivity Limit to Support Implementation of Noble Metal Chemical Addition at Plant as Method to Enhance Effectiveness of HWC in Mitigating IGSCC ML20101Q7191996-04-0909 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Recirculation Pump Trip Min Operable Channels ML20108B6271996-03-15015 March 1996 Rev 0 to Third Ten-Yr Insp Interval ISI Plan for DAEC Palo, Ia ML20097A1871996-01-30030 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Certain CR Scram Insertion Time Testing Limits ML20096F0211996-01-18018 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Lowering RWCU Isolation Setpoint from Reactor Low Level to Reactor low-low Level ML20099L8491995-12-22022 December 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 3.7, Plant Containment Sys ML20095H2371995-12-15015 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating EDG Conditional Surveillance & Editorial Clarifications ML20095A9011995-11-30030 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs to Implement Option I-D Reactor Stability Solution ML20094M4131995-11-15015 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re RPT Operability & Surveillance Requirements ML20129H0041995-10-13013 October 1995 Weld Ref Sys ML20087F5831995-08-0707 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 6.5.2.8 & 6.5.3 Re Changes to Audit Program ML20086R8061995-07-21021 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Eliminating Inappropriate Condition Surveillance in Sections 4.5 & 4.8,clarifying Requirements Governing Spent & New Fuel Storage in Section 5.5 ML20087H7021995-04-28028 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page 3.5-20,adding Clarification for Single Core Spray Pump Requirement ML20082S0201995-04-21021 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Deletion of TS 6.5.3.1.2 Due to Audit Frequency Requirements Being Removed from TS ML20082D1171995-03-28028 March 1995 Proposed TS Table 3.2-A, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation ML20081C9891995-03-10010 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing Redundant LCOs & SRs for Containment Hydrogen & Oxygen Monitors ML20080Q8731995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Rev to TS Table of Contents, Incorporating New Section ML20080Q0851995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Pump & Valve Surveillance Criteria for LPCI & Core Spray Subsystems,Rhr Svc Water, Hpci,Esw & River Water Supply Systems from Once Every Three Months to Frequency Specified by DAEC ASME Section XI IST ML20080H5651995-02-13013 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Bases for Shutdown Cooling Piping Safety Limit ML20078R9171995-02-13013 February 1995 Proposed TS Section 6.5.2.8 & 6.5..3.1,reflecting Deletion of Audit Frequency Requirements ML20078L1201995-01-26026 January 1995 Rev 13 to Pump & Valve IST Program for Daec ML20077A9191994-11-10010 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Offgas Radiation Monitors ML20149G9241994-10-28028 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Plan for Integrated Scheduling of Plant Mods ML20076K9591994-10-20020 October 1994 Revised Proposed TS to TS Changes RTS-246 & RTS-246A ML20072F1651994-08-15015 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Main Steam Isolation Valve & Deleting TS Requirements Applicable to MSIV LCS 1999-09-15
[Table view] |
Text
,
R1 S-299
, to NG-98-0167 Page 1 of 2
'. ' PikOPOSED CIIANGE RTS-299 TO Tile DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS The holders oflicense DPR-49 for the Duane Arnold Energy Center propose to amend Appendix A (Technical Specificatians) to said license by deleting certain current pages, replacing them with the attached new pages, and adding a new page (3.17-1) as described in the List of Affected Pages given below.
LIST OF AFFECTED PAGES 4
1.0-2 1.0-11 3.17-1 t
SUMM ARY OF CilANGES:
The following list of proposed changes is in the order that f changes appear in the Technical Specifications (TS).
Pace Descrintion of Chances 1.0-2 Revises the definitions of COLD CONDITION and COLD SHUTDOWN to state that,"During the performance of vessel hydrostatic pressure and leak testim the reactor coolant temperature may be considered NA, the reactor may be pressurized above atmospheric, and the reactor may be considered to remain in a COLD CONDITION / COLD SHUTDOWN if the requirements of 3.17.A a e met."
1.0-11 Adds note (g) to the AVERAGE REACTOR COOLANT TEMPERATURE column of Table 1.0-1 which states, "During the performance of vessel hydrostatic pressure and leak testing the reactor coolant temperature may be considered NA and te reactor may be considered to remain in COLD SHUTDOWN if the requirements of 3.17.A are met."
e 9802090069 980203 PDR ADOCK 05000331 P
PDR
RTS-299 to NG-98-0167 Page 2 of 2
'. 3.17-i Adds a new section,3.17, VESSEL llYDROSTATIC PRESSURE AND LEAK TESTING which will require that the following remain OPERABLE during the performance of hydrostatic and leak testing: the Secondar;; Containment Isolation Functions Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low, Refuel Floor Exhaust Duct -
liigh Radiation, and Reactor Building Exhaust Shaft - High Radiation; Secondary Containment; Secondary Containment Autc matic Isolation Dampers; Standby Gas Treatment; and two low pressure core cooling pumps (Core Spray and/or LPCI) capable ofinjecting into the vessel. In addition, Surveillance Requirement 4.17.A.1 will require that the Secondary Containment Isolation Functions be channel tested every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> during the performance of hydrostatic pressure and leak testing.
DAEC-1 5, OPERABLE-OPRABILf TY
A s'ystem, suesystem, train, comoonent or devict shall be OPERABLE or have OPERASILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function (s).
in this definition shall be the assumotion that all necessary attendant Impi.
instrumentation, controls, normal and eseqency electrical power sources or seal water, lubrication cr other auxiliary emutpoent that are required for the
, cooling capable of performing their related support function (s). system, su A verification of OPERASILITY is an aaministrative chect. ty examination of appropriate plant records (logs, surveillance test reemds), to determine that a system, subsystem, train, component or device is not inoperable.
- 6. OpfRt.Tig Operating means that a system or component is performing its intended functions in its required manner.
7 IMEDIATE
!amediate means that the required action wili be initiated as toon as practical considering the safe operation of action.
Se unit and the importance of the required B
- 8. REACTOR DOWER OPFRATION Reactor power operation is any operation with the mode switch in the "Start or "Run" position with the reactor critical and above 15 rated power.
a) SINGLE L000 OpFRAT10N (SLOh of the two recirculation loops in operation.R" ACTOR POWER OPERATION w
- 9. HOT STANDBY CON 0fYTON Hot standby condition means operation with coolant temperature greater than 212 F, reactor vessel pressure less than 1055 psig, and the mode switch in the Startun/ Hot Stanomy position.
- 20. COLD CONDITION Reactor coolant temperature ewal to or less than 212*F.b
- 11. HOT SHUTDOWN The reactor is in the shutsown mode and the reactor coolant temperature gr than 212*F.
- 12. COLD SHUTDOWN The reactor is in the shutdown mode, the reactor coolant temperature equal to o less than 212*F, and the reactor vessel is vented to atmosphere. (i) 7s, y~
~
D '~Durd +ho vedo<ma,ns J uswfh d sk
><<.5sur<
w la k 4n % 6. n uh, cook ~+ u,+, a.gdr o f
\\
n w=2 kwudd%A y
s-t G c.
V1Q 'O frLS$JYl5"Y T ko u c "'
b r OG f u~ G ; Cruf O C.
Yu C e,$0 v' WQ Cb p $ t c & ha r~d W
& IP 2
(,O p bg'()O M /[Ov D $ ld VYDOW N pp. _a s s m e.Co[()
I Y eu.
_ in m
{
4-
/._~____- --
/ *
=
. ~
AUG T\\ n rm
1 DAEC-1 TABLE 1.0-1 OPERATING MODES REACTOR MODE SWITCH AVERAGEREACTORC00L6HT OPERATING MJOE POSITION TEMPERATUREm s 1.
RUN/ POWER OPERATION Run NA 2.
STARTUP Startup/ Hot Standby or NA Refuel)
3.
HOT SHLTDOWN(*)
Shutdown""*
> 212*F 4.
COLD SP.UTDOWN(*)
Shutdown""d"*)
s 212*F 5.
REFUELING (b)
Shutdowa or Refuel"""
NA (a) Fuel in the reactor vessel with the reactor vessel head closure bolts fully tensioned.
(b) Fuei in the reactor vessel with the vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed.
(c) The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Run, Startup/ Hot Standby or Refuel position to test the switch interlock functions and related instrumentation provided that the control rods are verified to remain fully inserted by a second licensed operator.
(d) The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod is being recoupled or withdrawn provided that the one-rod-out interlock is OPERABLE.
(e) The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod drive is being removed from the reactor pressure vessel per Specific:. tion 3.9.A.
(f) The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Startup position for demonstration of shutdown margin per Specification 4.3.A.I.
mmm vmmmm
}$y v'ef 4 & p rybe PM [g b d
hy;
-Q j'a c e PMW e t o v etfi e
+a+;g & a:ek cuwA 4que ~=y h c~ t h~ r* M y.ask ~
Le coas, & / fs re m ala,~ :' ot b 5 HeJT bo +1 < 9 1b c
,f 3 r7. A % m.d, "
re9,ar,,,,
~
AMENDMENT N0.198 1.0-11 Ag
DAEC-1 4
1.lMITING CONTITIONS FOR OPERATION SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS 3.17 VESSEL llYDRCSTATIC PRESSURE AND 4.17 VESSEL llYDROSTATI"' PRESSURE AND 1 EAK TESTING LEAK TESTjNJ Annlicability :
6pplicability:
Applies to the performance of ASME required Applies to the surveillance requirements during the reactor vessel hydrostatic prersure and leak testing.
performance of ASME required reactor vessel hydrostatic pressure and leak testing.
Specification:
Speci6 cation:
A.
System Avai: bility A.
System Availability 1,
Prior to and while exceeding 212'F during the 1.
Channel checks shall be performed every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> performance of vessel hydrostatic pressure and leak on the Reactor Vessel Water Level-Low, Refuel testing, the following requirements must be met:
Floor Exhaust Duct - High Radiation, and Reactor Building Exhaust ShaQ - liigh Radiation trip
- a. The Reactor Vessel Water Level-Low, Refuel functions Floor Exhau>t Duct - liigh Rsiation, and Reactor Building Exhaust Shatb HigG.adiation trip functions shall be operable and,
- b. Secondary Containment shall be operable, and
- c. Secondary Centainment Automatic isolation Dampers shall be oprable, and
- d. Both trains of Standby Gas Treatment shall'.e operable, and
- c. Two Icw pressure core cooling pumps (any combination of Core Spray and INCI) shall be operable and capable ofinjecting into the vessel.
2.
If Speci6 cation 3.17.A.1 cannot be met, immediately suspend activities that could increase average reactor coolant te~perature or pressure and reduce the average reacte coolant temperature to s 212'F within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
3.17-1 a
~
RTS 27' to.
NG-98-0167 PageIofI l
SAFETY ASSESSMENT I
By letter dated February 3,1998,IES Utilities Inc. submitted a request for revision of the
. Technical Specifications (TS) for the Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC). The proposed amendment would modify the definition of COLD CONDITION anc.' COLD
. CONDITION and add a new section,3.11, VESSEL IlYDROSTATIC PRESSURE AND LEAK TESTING, to allow required vessel hydrostatic pressure and leak testing to be performed with reactor coolant temperatures above 212'F.
Evaluation:
Since the hydrostatic or leak tests are performed at low decay heat values the stored energy in the reactor core will be very low. Under these conditions, the potential for failed fuel is minimized. The proposed changes are consistent with NUREG 1433 Rev.1, Improved Standard Technical Specifications, and the DAEC submittal for Improved Technical Specifications. Therefore, based upon tiu above, we have concluded that the proposed revision to the DAEC TS is acceptable.
b, e
l q.
RTS-299
- to NG 98-0167 Page1of1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDER ATION 10 CFR Section 51.22(c)(9) identifies certain licensing and regulatory actions which are eligible for categorical exclu, ion from the requirement to perform an environmenta!
assessme t. A proposed amendment to an operating license for a facility requires no
__k environmental assessment it operation of the facility in accordance with the proposeu g
amendment would not: (1) involve a significant hazards consideration; (2) result in a significant change in the types er significant increase in the amounts of any efnuents that may be released offsite; and (3) result in a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. IES Utilities Inc. has reviewed this request and determined that the proposed amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Section 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR Section 51.22(b),
no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment. The basis for this determination follows:
Basis h
The change meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth ia 10 CFR
{
Section 51.22(c)(9) for the following reasons:
1.
As demonstrated in Attachment I to this letter, the proposed amendment does not involve a signifcant hazards consideration.
2.
The proposed changes are consistent with NUREG 1433 Rev. I and DAEC submittal for Improved Technical Specifications. There will be no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite.
a 3.
The proposed changes will not appreciably change the way the plant or its systems are operated. There will be no significant increase in either individual or I
cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
l
_ _ - - - -