ML20091N103
Text
.
. ~
G UtJ
,e dAk
- $p ** "8%,[',
t UNITEo STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ftE0loN 111 "f
799 ROOSEVELT RoAo 4
GLEN ELLYN, ILLINolt GS137
\\ **"* /
i
'APR 2 0 983 l
1 i
, illiam D. Paton, Counsel for NRC Staff MEMORANDUM FOR:
W FROM:
R. F. Warnick, Director Office of Special Cases
SUBJECT:
ASLB ORDER FOR INTERVENOR REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY IN THE MIDLAND QA HEARING In response to the Board Order and your memorandum of April 16, 1983, the Region III staff has looked through all files (official and personal) for any and all documents pertaining to the Stamiris request of April 7, 1983.
The pertinent documents are listed in Attachment-A and are denoted as being either in the Public Document Room or are part of Attachment B.
All documents listed / included are defined as, "all information that was currently available/ existed to the best of the staff's knowledge."
The Attachment A format is constructed so the Document Request is restated by number and content, followed by the NRC response listing the document.
1 An additional request has been made for the staff to supply all documents pertaining to the Construction Completion Program. We have asked that this request be submitted in writing by GAP.
In the meantime, we are assembling the material and it will be forthcoming in the near future.
l R f b) A R. F. Warnick, Director Offica of Special Cases t
I Attachments:
A.
Listing of pertinent documents
-B.. Documents listed which are not i
in the PDR cc w/ attachments A and B:
-i DMB/ Document Contrel Desk (RIDS) i f
cc w/ attachment A:
See attached list
't e406120199 840517 m.1 PDR FOIA PDR. n RICE 94-96 c..
e-
- + -
g-p y v-
-,u,,
3 O
.APR 20.n W. D. Paton -"
cc w/ attachment A:
J. W. Cook, Vice President, CPCo Resident Inspector, RIII The Honorable Charles Bechhoefer, ASLB The Honorable Jerry LIsrbour ASLB The Honorable Frederick P. Cowan, ASLB The Honorable Ralph S. Decker, ASLB Michael Miller Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commaission Myron M. Cherry Barbara Stamiris Mary Sinclair Wendall Harahn11 Colonel Scave J. Gadler (P. E.)
Howard Levin, TERA Billie P. Garde, GAP i
i i
f>i Ril e
orrica)
..............c l
sunsaus>..Gardner s
rr son
....f..............
J 73 navn) 4/18/83
..., en..a s e e e 9M.20 9 NRCM O2 to
. rg c C I r* 3 A 3 D C"f* A D M ("* O DV
t l
m i
ATTACHMENT A DOCUMENTS REQUESTED BY GAP AND RESPONSE BY RIII REQUEST 1:
i Any and all documents relating in any way to the special inspection conducted by the Office of Special Cases, Midland Section, concerning the diesel generat'or building at the Midland Nuclear Power Plant, h7C Inspection and Enforcement Report No. 50-329/82-22 and 50-330/82-22, and any other investigation of systems which affect in any way the diesel j
generator building, including but not limited to ongoing NRC investigations, For any such ongoing NRC investigation, describe the nature and scope of the investigation.
NRC RESPONSE TO REQUEST 1:
The following documents are attached or are available in the Public Document Room as denoted:
1.
Freedom of Information Act Request 83-133 memo, (Warnick to Smidth),
dated March 31, 1983; copy attached.
2.
NRC Inspection Report No. 50-329/83-03; 50-330/83-03; in PDR (following licensee proprietary review period).
All NRC investigations are conducted by the Office of Investigations (OI).
Response to the investigation portion of request 1 should be provided by OI.
t t
}
t i
a 7
4
d REQUEST 2:
l Any and all documents relating in any way to communications between Region III and any other office, or branch of the NRC, or between offices, l
branches or divisions of the NRC, concerning (a) the reports mentioned in Document Request No. I above, or (b) the investigations listed in Document Request No. 1 above.
NRC RESPONSE TO REQUEST 2:
The following documents are attached or are available in the Public Document Room as denoted:
1.
Freedom of Information Act Request 83-133 memo, (Warnick to Smidth),
dated March 31, 1983; copy attached.
2.
NRC Inspection Report No. 50-329/83-03; 50-330/83-03; in PDR (following licensee proprietary review period).
All NRC investigations are conducted by the Office of Investigations (OI).
Response to the investigation portion of request 1 should be provided by OI.
I i
s I
t i
I i
1
' ~
2 ye
/
,3 s
REQUEST 3:
Any and all documents prepared by Region III in the 1980 to 1983 period which relate in any way to comparisons of the Midland nuclear power plant i
to other nuclear plants in terms of the following:
(a) the number of noncompliances found by the NRC; (b) the number of 50.55(e) reports filed by Consumers Power Company
("CPC"),' and (b) the overall rating of the Midland plant as compared to other plants in Region III and other plants under construction in the United States.
NRC RESPONSE TO REQUEST 3:
f The following documents are attached or are available in the Public Document Room as denoted:
(a)1.
Noncompliance comparison data Region III - 1980 to Present -
dated April 13, 1983; copy attached 2.
Memorandum (Hind to Spessard) dated May 18, 1982,
Subject:
Tabulation of Noncompliance History for Construction Sites 1976-1981; copy attached 3.
Memorandum (Hind to Spessard) dated June 8, 1982,
Subject:
An Addition to the Tabulation of Noncompliance History for Construction Sites 1976-1981; copy attached.
(b)1.
Construction Deficiency Report (50.55(e)) Region III - 1980 to Present, dated April 13, 1983 data; copy attached.
l (c)1.
Overall SALP rating data of plants under construction, com-
{
parison to Region III; SALP 2/3 table; copy attached.
2.
Overall national ratings were previously given on SALP I as stated in NUREG-0834, NRC Licensee Assessments; copy in PDR.
l J
i e
3
-m REQUEST 4:
1 Any and all documents, including any technical analyses performed by or submitted to the NRC, relating to:
a.
the NRC decision to allow underpinning work to commence in December 1982 at the Midland plan.;
b.
the NRC decision in February 1983 to allow underpinning work to be done under safety-related structures at the Midland plant; and c.
the NRC considsration and assessment of F.I.V.P. Jacking and cracking for the period January 1983 to the present.
NRC RESPONSE TO REQUEST 4:
The following documents are attached or are available in the Public Document Room as denoted:
(a)1.
NUREG-0793, Supplement No. 2, Safety Evaluation Report dated October 1982; copy in PDR.
2.
Letter (Eisenhut to J. Cook) dated May 25, 1982,
Subject:
Completion of Soils Remedial Activities Review; copy in PDR.
3.
Letter (Warnick to J. Cook) dated December 9, 1982,
Subject:
Remedial Soil Activities; copy in PDR.
4.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated September, 1982,
Subject:
Summary of September 8, 1982 Meeting on Soils-Related Quality Assurance Improvements; copy attached.
5.
Memorandum (Hernan to'Novak) dated December 21, 1983,
Subject:
December 7, 1982 Meeting on Midland QA Implementation; copy i
i attached.
t.
l (b)1.
Letter (Shafer to Miller) dated February 24, 1983,
Subject:
j Remedial Soils Werk Activities; copy in PDR.
2.
Letter (Keppler to J. Cook) dated February 24, 1983,
Subject:
Authorization for Underpinning Activities to Begin Under Safety-Related Structures; copy in PDR.
i 3.
NRC Inspection Report No. 50-329/83-01; 50-330/83-01, paragraph j
4;. copy in PDR.
4.
Letter (Miller to Shafer) dated February 4,.1983,
Subject:
Authorization Request for Auxiliary Building Underpinning Pier 9; copy attached.
1
.5.
Letter (Miller to Shafer) dated February 24, 1983,
Subject:
Revisions of the Soils Remedial Independent-Assessment Scope;-
copy attached.
4 i
l l
.~,
. ~,
.O 6.
Memorandum (Shafer tc Warnick) dated February 18, 1953,
Subject:
Credential Checks on Stone and Webster Personnel; copy attached.
7.
Telecon memorandums (three total) (SF
'or and Lucks), dated I
February 11, 1983, time 12:00; February 15, 1983, ".me 10:45; February 15, 1983, time 4:00; copies attached.
8.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated November 22, 1932,
Subject:
Summary of November 22, 1982 Meeting of i
Independent Assessment of Auxiliary Building Underpinning; copy in PDR..
9.
Memorandum (Adensam to Hood) dated October 29, 1982, Notice of Meeting - Midland, Units 1 and 2; Discussion of Stone and Webster Qualifications; copy attached.
10.
Latter (Stone and Webster - Lucks to Keppler) dated March 15, i
1983,
Subject:
Affidavits and Resumes for Additional Team Members; copy in PDR.
11.
Latter (Stone and Webster - Wild to CPCo - Schaub) dated November 9, 1982,
Subject:
Independence and Holdings; copy in PDR.
i 12.
Letter (Stone and Webster - Wild to Keppler) dated February 14, 1983,
Subject:
Independence of Assessment Team; copy in PDR.
13.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated November 22,
-1982,
Subject:
Meeting Summary of November 5, 1982, on Independent Assessment of Auxiliary Building Underpinning; copy in PDR.
14.
Stone and Webster Project QA Plan for Independent Assessment with resumes dated September 20, 1982; copy attached.
+
l l
(
15.
Ccesumers Power Company Independent Assessment of Auxiliary Building Underpinning Spec-CC-100 Revision 0 dated September 20, 1982; copy attached.
(c)1.
NRC Inspection Report No. 50-329/82-26; 50-330/82-26 paragraphs 2 and 10; copy in PDR.
2.
Letter (Miller to Shafer) dated September 21, 1982,
Subject:
FIVP Temporary Support System and Proof Load Jacking;' copy attached.
3.
' Letter (Miller to Shafer) dated January 27, 1983,
Subject:
FIVP Four Point Jacking Loads; copy in PDR.
I 4.
Report (Concrete Tcchnology Laboratories to Consumers Power
[
Compet.y) daied February 1983,
Title:
. Site Visit to Evaluate Crack Reported February 18,1983,. In Roof of Feedwater Isolation -
l Valve Pit,' Unit 1, Midland Nuclear Power Plant; copy attached.
t l
i
~5 l
.. ~
~
I I
O
?.'
5.
Drawing - Bechtel No. C-1494 (Q) Revision 3, titled, Auxiliary l
Building Underpinning FIVP Units 1 and 2 Jacking and Monitoring I
Plan with FER No. C5570 and 5593 attached; copy attached.
I i
l 1
e b
f l
?
i e
J I
0 et
~
s.
.Wn1 d'
F
.-4 9,-
.y.r-4 w
-g vS A
- 'T'#Cr
O l
REQUEST 5:
i Any and all documents relating in any way to independent audits at Midland; l
the NRC's review acceptance criteria for these audits; and NRC actions taken in response to these audits.
i j
NRC RESPONSE TO REQUEST 5:
The following documents are attached or are available in the Public Document Room as denoted. These documents are grouped into two areas (A.) audits completed and (B.) Audits to be completed.
A.
Audits Completed (past) 1.
Letter (J. Cook to Keppler) dated March 9, 1983,
Subject:
Midland Plant INPO Type Evaluation; Report dated January 31, 1983 (Revision 1, March 2, 1983) attached; copy in PDR.
2.
Presentation on the Construction Project Evaluation on Consumers Power Company Midland Energy Center Project Units 1 and 2, dated March 15, 1983; overview for A.I. above, copy attached.
3.
Letter (J. Cook to Keppler) dated June 1,1981,
Subject:
Management Analysis Company Assessment of Quality Assurance Program, Report dated May 27, 1981; ccpy attached.
4.
Internal correspondence, Consumers Power Company (D. Jones to Distribution) dated March 23,1983; Attached 1982 Biennial Quality-Assurance Audit performed.by Management Analysis Company dated March 1, 1983 (Audit periwd November 8 through December 18, 1992); copy attached.
5.
Notice of Significant Licensee Meeting dated March 9, 1983, j
Subject:
Consumers Power Company Present INPO Findings to i
NRC E*aff; copy attached.
6.
Notes (Cook) from INPO Evaluation Meetings of March 15, 1983, plus CPCo Handout; copy attached.
7.
Notes (Cook) from Review of MAC Biennial Audit (See 4. above);
copy attached.
j 9.
Miscellaneous documents; Midland Plant Independent Review and l
INPO Performance Objectives and Criteria for Construction Project Evaluation; copies attached.
B.
Audits to be Completed (future) 1.
Construction Completion Program Third Party and Independent Design and Construction Verification Program.
a.
Notice of Significant Licensee Meeting, dated January 11, 1983,
Subject:
Public Meeting; copy attached.
i
-i 7
y w,.
=--
w w
w y g yy,,yp.g---,y
-n--g r
e~-yy
+. - - -
.p 94,~a+s-,p=44-e g
y
+
4 m
s,-%
+
e
[
/
l b.
Letter (Keppler to J. Cook) dated January 17, 1983,
Subject:
I Acknowledged Receipt of Construction Completion Program l
and Announced Public Meeting; copy in PDR.
I e
c, NRC Heeting Notes from Public Heating February 8,1983; l
copy attached.
t d.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated November 8, 1982, Summary of October 25, 1982 - Meeting on Independent Design Verification Program; copy in PDR.
Public Heeting February 8, 1963, J. Keppler's Opening Remarks.
e.
f.
Memorandum (Spessard to Eisenhut) dated April 9, 1982,
Subject:
Recommendation of Board Notification (Midland);
copy attached.
5 i
g.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated September 22, 1982,
Subject:
Draft Letter on Implementation of Quality Programs; copy in PDR.
i h.
Memorandum (Warnick to Region III Files) dated August 18, 1982,
Subject:
Meeting Between NRR and Region III, Re:
Consumers Power Company Performance at Midland; copy attached.
i.
Letter (Keppler to J. Cook) dated March 28, 1983,
Subject:
Construction Completion Program Clarification and the Establishment of the Protocol; copy in PDR.
j.
February 8,1983 - Public Meeting Handouts / Notes:
ADMN Guideline G-2.00 Rev. A i
CPCo CCP Handout Third Party Reviews Midland IDVP - TERA Handout CCP Flow Chart Analysia of CPCo Proposed Construction Completion Program by GAP Citizens Council dated February 8, 1983 Personal Notes (JJH) February 8, 1983 k.
Memorandum (CPCo - Miller to Cook and Rutgers) dated March 7, 1983,
Subject:
CCP Coordination; copy attached.
i 1.
Letter (Eisenhut to Garde) draft; copy attached.
i l
i i
i 8
4 I
I
,m.,
, rr, w
-%.s
.w.
.v---
,,,..e-<w
,s-,.
.w.s
+-,m
,~
~
I m.
Letter (J. Cook to Keppler) dated January 10, 1983; copy attached with notes.
I n.
CPCo Sampling Plan Handouts; copies attached.
o.
Notice of Significant Meeting dated January 11, 1983; copy 6
attached.
p.
Letter (CPCo - Miller to Rutgers) dated January 7, 1983; copy attached.
q.
Memorandum (CPCo - Cook to Distribution) dated December 9, 1982; copy attached.
r.
Logic Diagram dated December 2, 1982; copy attached.
s.
CCP - CPCo Handout (WDS); copy attached.
t.
Letter (Keppler to J. Cook) dated January 17, 1983; copy in PDR.
u.
CPCo news article dated December 3, 1982; copy attached.
v.
Letter (J. Cook to keppler) dated March 29, 1983; copy in PDR.
w.
Memorandum (Hernan to Novak) dated December 21, 1983; copy attached.
2.
Stone and Webster (Third Party Other Than Soils) a.
Lettar (J. Cook to Keppler) dated April 6, 1983,
Subject:
Construction Completion Program Third Party Overview;-
copy in PDR.
l 3.
TERA (Third Party for Independent Design and Construction i
Verification Program)
I
~
a.
Letter (J. Cook to Keppler/Denton) dated December 3, 1982,
Subject:
Independent Design Verification Program, copy in PDR.
b.
Letter (J. Cook to Keppler/Denton) dated October 5, 1982, l
Subject:
Independent Design Review; copy in PDR.
l c.
NRC Heating Summary dated November 8, 1982, of October 25, 1982, Meeting on-Independent Design Verification; copy in l
l l
PDR.
I d.
Letter (Tera - Levin to Keppler) dated February 17, 1983, l
Subject:
Midland Independent Design Verification Program; copy in PDR.
9 w
-w g
-s.__
.,---,y y-
,-c, e.-,
i m
~
e.
Letter (Tera - Levin to Keppler/Eisenhut) dated February 9, 1983,
Subject:
Midland Independent Design Verification l
Program; copy in PDR.
4 l
f.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated March 28, 1,
1983,
Subject:
Record of Telephone Discussion Regarding j
Independence and Qualification of Tera Personnel; copy in i
PDR.
g.
Memorandum (Novak to Messrs. Muttson, Vollmer, Warnick, Taylor, Speis) dated March 11, 1983,
Subject:
Request for Review of Tera's Engineering Program Plan and Project Quality Assurance Plan for Midland Independent Design and j
Construction Verification Program; copy attached.
h.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated February 22, 1983,
Subject:
Revision 1 of Tera Corporation's Project Quality Assurance and Engineering Program Plans for the Midland Independent Design and Construction Verification l
Program; copy in PDR.
i 1.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated February 23, 1983,
Subject:
same as h. above, but Revision 2; copy in PDR.
j.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated March 2, 1983,
Subject:
same as h. above; copy in PDR.
i k.
Letter (Tera - Levin to Keppler) dated March 18, 1983,
Subject:
Overview of the Midland Construction Completion Program; copy in PDR.
1.
Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated March 21, 1983,
Subject:
same as h. above, Additional Information; I
copy in PDR.
l m.
Letter (Eisenhut to J. Cook) dated March 22, 1983,
Subject:
Selection of Additional System for Midland Plant Independent Design and Construction Verification Program; copy in PDR.
l n.
Letter (Tera - Levin to Miller - CPCo) dated March 24, 1983,
Subject:
Inspection and Maintenance of the Midland Unit 2 Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Observation Request; copy in PDR.
i o.
Letter (Tera - Levin to Keppler) dated March 18, 1983,
Subject:
Independent Design and Construction Verification i
l Program; copy in PDR.
l p.
Letter (Tera - Levin to Keppler) dated March 30, 1983, l
j
Subject:
Independent Design and Construction Verification Program / Overview of the Midland Construction Completion i
Program; copy in PDR.
l 10 li r-m ww
--mv m-m we-
'- v eay ym
l
' * * ~ *
.I Letter (Hood to Consumers Power Company) dated April 1, q.'
1983,
Subject:
Record of Telephone Request Regarding i
Tera Reviewers with Previous NRC Experience; copy in PDR.
i t
l.
(
i i
4 i
P i
g i
i i,
I i
1 1
i l.,
t I
i n
11 t
r
..r.,
. _. ~.,
y m
..y_..
m.
3 REQUEST 6:
}
l Any and all documents relating to the special investigation initiated i
by the Spessard memorandum of April 19, 1982, and to issues discussed in l
that memorandum.
}
}
NOTE: NRC legal counsel rantacted GAP and confirmed that the request should read "...the Spessard memorandum of April 9, 1982..."
NRC RESPONSE REQUEST 6:
The following documents are attached or available in the Public Document Room as denoted:
l l
1.
Freedom of Information Act Request 83-90 (Warnick to Smidth) dated April 16, 1983; copy attached.
,3 i
2.
Memorandum (Spessard to Eisenhut) dated April 9, 1983,
Subject:
Recommendation of Board Notification (Midland); copy in PDR.
3.
Draft with handwritten notes pertaining to Spessard memo of April 9, 1982; copy attached.
4.
Memorandum (Burns to Davis) dated October 26, 1982,
Subject:
Possible Material False Statements; cop' attached.
5.
NRC Investigation Report No. 50-329/82-13; 50-330/82-13; copy in t
PDR.
6.
Memorandum (Davis to Burns) dated Saptember 22, 1982,
Subject:
Possible Material False Statement; cop,e attached.
I I
i t
I 12 3
. - ~
REQUEST 7:
l Any and all documents relating to the March 1982 SALP Report, and the j
NRC's decision to postpone the SALP Report scheduled for the Spring of 1983. If no written documents exist regarding the NRC's decision to postpone the 1983 SALP Report, explain the position, reasoning and recommendations of each of the following persons respecting the NRC's decision to postpone the SALP Report:
(a) Wayne Shafer; (b) Robert Warnick; and (c) James Keppler.
NRC RESPONSE TO REQUEST 7:
The following documents are attached or are available in the Public Document Room as denoted:
SALP II 1.
Notice of Significant Licensee Meeting, dated March 5, 1982; copy attached.
2.
Notice of Significant Licensee Meeting, dated April 8, 1982; copy attached.
3.
Letter (Hind to J. Cook) dated April 20, 1982, forwarded Preliminary SALP Report; copy in PDR.
4.
Notice of Significant Licensee Meeting dated June 17, 1982; copy attached.
i 5.
Letter (Keppler to J. Cook) dated June 18, 1982, telecon memorandum confirming SALP meeting for June 21, 1982; copy in PDR.
6.
Letter (Stamiris to Keppler) dated May 6,1982,
Subject:
SALP; Inquiring Party has a copy.
7.
Memorandum (Tedesco to ASLB) dated May 4,1982, SALP Report attached; copy in PDR.
8.
Letter (Keppler to J. Cook) dated July 19, 1982,
Subject:
i SALP Disagreements; copy in PDR.
9.
Notice of Significant Licensee Meeting dated August 3,-
1982; copy attachen.
10.
Letter (Warnick to J. Cook) dated August 3,1982, SALP Meeting; copy in PDR.
b 2
13-l t
[
- 11. ASLB' Draft Testimony of J. G. Keppler for Quality Assurance; g
copy attached.
i
,i 12.
ASLB, Draft Testimony of J. G. Keppler for Quality Assurance;
.j copy attached.
INFORMATION FROM RESIDE!C INSPECTOR OFFICE'(ATTACHED) 13.
Letter R. C. Knop and C. C. Williams,
Subject:
Regional Evaluation of Licensee 14.
NRC memo fer RC&ES Branch Section Chiefs from G. Fiore111, dated 5/28/80, Se, ject: Implementation of MC 2955, Regional Evaluation of Licensee Performance 15.
USNRC I&E Manual Chapter 2955, dated 4/15/80 16.
USNRC I&E Manual TI 2500/3, dated 4/1/80 17.
USNRC Memo for RC&ES Branch Staff from G. Fiore111, dated 10/6/80, i
Subject:
SALP 18.
Four pages draft SALP Report, Appendix B
- 19. MC 2955 (App. B), dated 4/15/80 20.
6/30/80 notes for meeting.
21.
CPCo SALP Meeting 11/24/80 agenda 22.
CPCo organizational chart dated 8/20/80 23.
CPCo organizational chart d.:.ted 2/6/79 24.
Chart - Total number of noncompliances for.7/79 to 6/80 (inspection) 25.
Inspection Report No. 50-329/80-35 and 50-330/80-33
- 26. Table 1, Ratings for Operating Power Reactor Facilities for period 5/1/79 to 4/30/80 with verbal summaries of each plant
- 27. 'Nenty pages draft SALP report 28.
Forty-two pages draft SALP report with USNRC meno for Darrel Eisenhut from Darl Hood,
Subject:
NRR Performance Evaluation for SALP Cycle-2 for Midland Plant, Units.1 and 2, dated 9/21/81.
29.
Summary of Items of Noncompliance / Draft SALP report i.-
- 30. Thirteen pages draft SALP report.
- 31. Three pages handwritten notes
-l 14
--i9-p.--
>y n.
,.,.aw-9 m7 4
y
,,_A_.r m-
,,-.-,g p-,y w
e gh
- e
^
(~~)
l
- 32. Ten pages draft SALP report i
{
- 33. h enty pages worksheet notes for SALP report 34.
W enty-four pages Report Index
?
- 35. to MC 2592 dated 10/1/77 t
36.
Three pages handwritten notes j
RESPONSE TO DRA}'T S LP REPORT PACKAGE 37.
Eleven pages handwritten notes on SALP meeting with the licensee 8/4/82 at the Midland Holiday Inn, Midland, MI with Sharon Warren statement attached.
38.
USNRC memo for R. Warnick from R. J. Cook dated 7/23/82,
Subject:
Indicators of Questionable Licensee Performance - Midland Site i
39.
Notes for 8/4/82 meeting pertaining to CPCo response to draft SALP report (5 pages) 40.
Inspection Report No. 50-329/80-25 and 50-330/80-26 41.
USNRC letter to CPCo from C. E. Norelius with Report No. 82-07 attached, dated 7/15/82 t
42.
CPCo letter to J. G. Keppler from J.' W. Cook, Subje-t: Response
-to Draft SALP Report, dated S/17/82.
i 43.
Handwritten notes pertaining to CPCo response to Draft SALP Report.
}
l SALP CYCLE II. DRAFT - VERSION 2 FOLDER 44.
Forty-two pages draft SALP report with USNRC memo for D. Eisenhut from Darl Hood, dated 9/2/81,
Subject:
NRR Performance Evaluation i
for SALP Cycle 2 for Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2
~
45.
Se7enteen pages Draft SALP Report-46.
Four pages handwritten notes Draft SALP Report
.4 47.
Meeting attendance notes dated 9/24 or 9/25 48.
Thirty-six pages handwritten notes for Draft SALP Report SALP II. 1980/81 FOLDER 49.
Five pages R. J. Cook comments on CPCo Response to Draft SALP j
Report 50.
CPCo letter dated 5/17/82 from J. W. Cook to J. G. Keppler,
Subject:
Response to Draft SALP Report i
j 15 m
,w---
-w
-i-g-
+m<$
e-r
.r w-e y
51.
Sharon Warren statement on 8/4/82 - Handwritten notes taken i
at meeting 52.
J. G. Keppler letter to J. W. Cook dated 6/18/82, confirming telephone conversation
Subject:
Board Notification - SALP Report on Midland Plant l
for period July 1, 1980 to June 30, 1981 (BN 82-46).
- 54. USNRC memo for N. C. Moseley from J. A. Hind, dated 10/5/81,
Subject:
Regional SALP Board and Licensee Meetings Big Rock Point, Palisades and Midland
- 55. USNRC letter from R. L. Spessard to J. W. Cook, dated 9/15/81,
Subject:
SALP Review - Midland i
56.
SALP preparation schedule and information dated 8/19/81.
i t
57.
Fax transmittal memo for D. Boyd from G. Pirtle, dated 9/22/81,
Subject:
DETI SALP Inputs for Midland / Fax transmittal memo for D. Boyd from G. Pirtle dated 10/1/81,
Subject:
Supplemental SALP Input for Midland 58.
Fax transmittal memo for D. Eisenhut from Darl Hood, dated 9/2/81,
Subject:
NRR Performance Evaluation for SALP Cycle 2 for Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2 59.
Inspection Report No. 50-329/80-35 and 50-330/80-36 j
60.
Meeting attendance notes 61.
Three pages handwritten notes
- 62. USNRC memo for W. Dircks from Samuel Chilk, dated 10/20/81,
Subject:
Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance
- 63. Fax transmission to R. Cook from D. Boyd,
Subject:
SALP Input, dated 10/2/81 64.
SALP module cross-reference dated 9/2/81
- 65. Memo from C. E. Norelius dated 8/20/81,
Subject:
. Preparation of.
Input for the SALP Appraisals i
66.
Note to T. Tambling from D. Boyd, R. Cook,
Subject:
Comments on NRC 0516-01 67.
NRC Appendix 0516, page 17 68.
Chart of SALP assessment period i
16 4
a
~
y.-
w w
-v
,w e
m
,r.
~
j 69.
USNRC letter to J. R. Reynolds from J. G. Keppler dated 11/3/81 i
j 70.
Draft copy of NRC Chapter 0516, SALP report to R. Cook from C. Jones l
71.
Draft copy of NRC Chapter 0516, SALP report / Final copy Chapter l
Draft copy of NRC Chapter 0516, SALP Report 73.
Draft copy of NRC Chapter 0516, SALP Report 74.
SALP Milestone Schedule for period 2/28 to 3/20 75.
SALP Milestone Schedule for period 3/7 to 3/27 76.
SALP Milestone Schedule for period 3/24 to 4/3 l
+
77.
One page handwritten notes I
i SALP III 1.
Memorandum (R. Cook to Spessard) dated August 6, 1982,
Subject:
SALP III Evaluation Period; copy attached.
2.
Memorandum (Tambling to those on attached list) dated July 12, 1982,
Subject:
8 ALP III Inputs; copy attached.
3.
Memorandum (Kepoler to DeYoung) dated April 1, 1983,
Subject:
Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) for Zimmer and Midland; copy attached.
i, 1
i l-i j
17 e
,+ - --
REQUEST 8:
l Confirm in writing the NRC Staff'e previous representations that no j
documents exist which relate in any way to:
(a) The NRC Staff's differing opinions on the enforcement action i
to be taken in response to the NRC Inspection and Enforcement Report Nos. 50-329/82-22 and 50-330/82-22; and i
(b) the May, August and September 1982 stop-work orders issued by CPC and the CPC decisions to lift these stop-work orders.
NRC RESPONSE TO REQL'EST 8::
The following documents are attached or available in the Public Document Room as denoted:
l l
(a)1.
Letter (Keppler to Selby) dated February 8,1983, Diesel Generator Building Notice of Violation; Entire copy in the PDR; Mr. Warnick's comment is noted on letter con-i currence page; ccpy attached. There were no differing professional opinions.
2.
Freedom of Information Act Request 83-133 memo (Warnick to Smidth) dated March 31, 1983; copy attached.
(b) May, 1982 Stop Work Order 1.
Oral Communication Record, Consumers Power Company, dated l
May 19, 1982, Between Servo, Horn and Peck; copy attached.
(b) August, 1982 Stop Work Order 1.
NRC Inspection Report No. 50-329/82-11; 50-330/82-11, paragraoh 3; copy in PDR 1
2.
NRC Inspection Report No. 50-329/82-18; 50-330/82-18, paragraphs 4 and 5; copy in PDR 3.
Notice of Significant Licensee Meeting dated August 10, 1982; copy attached.
4.
Region III Daily Report Draft for August 11, 1982; copy attached.
l S.
Memorandum (Warnick to Keppler) dated August 18, 1982,
Subject:
Consumers Power Midland; copy attached.
6.
- !emorandum (Denton) NRR Internal,
Subject:
Remedial Soils Construction Release dated August 20, 1982; copy attached.
i l
18
YhlMCh q
m d) vb 7.
Hemorandum (Keppler to Fitzgerald) dated August 20, 1982,
Subject:
Midland - Request for Investigation; copy attached.
8.
Letter (Keppler to J. Cook) dated August 12, 1982, J
Subject:
Confirmatory Action Letter on Stopped Work in the Soils Areas; copy in PDR.
9.
Draft Notes (Warnick) from August 6,1982, meeting at
?
- Midland; copy attached.
10.
Statement of Dr. R. Landsman on the events leading up to the August 12, 1982 CAL; copy attr.ched.
(b) September. 1982 Stop Work Order i
1.
Letter (Keppler to J. Cook) dated September 24, 1982, i
Subject:
Confirmatory Action Letter on QC Qualification Problems / Remedial Soils Work Stoppage; copy in PDR.
2.
Memorandum (Warnick to Keppler) dated September 24, 1982,
Subject:
Review of Consumers Power Company Commitments; copy attached.
3.
NRC Inspection Report 50-329/82-21; 50-330/82-21, paragraphs 1 and 4; copy in PDR.
l 4.
Draft hemorandum (Warnick to Keppler) dated September 20, 1982,
Subject:
Review of Consumers Power Company Commitments; copy attached.
I 1
i i
i i
l i
1 l
i
?
t l-19
.1 s
-a e
<rv--
9' y
y
o s
- '. ~
%l R1HCt?
F s& M w, yf I Q-y 5.\\ l D
l FA C ' -
T=mr 8
.g je 1 (FI L{M0/
UL i
\\q\\\\l=
-?f April 19, 1983 e.'
JEB 14-83 4
4%@r i
8 Oeg a
.i h i
,,'R 4
Barbara Stamiris s.V '
5795 North River Road g,
Route 3 Freeland, MI 48623 Dear Ms Stamiris I am providing the following information responding to your specific questions which were not answered by documents, in accordance with the commit:::ents made at TR 1484 et. seq. Since this is informal discovery, I provide this information in letter form. An affidavit can be supplied on request.
The following relates to tracking of IPINs, irs, DRs, attachment 10s, and
" return options" in the QA system:
The basic document used to track inspections in the QC process is referred to as an inspection report (IR). The IR contains a list of items to be inspected, and places for the inspector to sign off on each item inspected. The inspector may sign off only when he has satisfied himself that the item is in conformance to all requirements. irs are the permanent record of inspections and are kept on file at the Midland site.
If an inspector determined that a deficiency existed, he could issue an IPIN,.
as more fully described in the Response to the Notice of Violation (Response).The IPIN documented the deficiency. When the IPIN was issued, the inspector noted that fact on the IR. A copy of the IPIN was thereafter kept attached to the IR as a part of the permanent inspection record. To correct the deficiency, QC transmitted a copy of the IPIN to construction, which carried out necessary corrective action and returned the IPIN to QC. QC then reinspected the item and, if appropriate, closed out the IPIN. For more 4
l details on this process, see the Response. IPINs were thus tracked by being k
attached to the IR.
DRs (deviation reports) were predecessors to the IPINs. DR's were temporary
~
records. Before close out, DRs were handled much the same as IPINs were. DRs were not tracked after closeure. The irs did contain a space for the number of DR pages reviewed in closing out all of the activities on the IR.
, 6 ;m ~>
- n.. n CDR ACCC'd 05d605dD G
PCR oc0483-0419a100 3S03 MA n 23 m
h J
- W.,
h hb
$kh kh, hf -
a*=:
- p. wry &;4%. %n';a
.w u.? p~.4.
R ;g*
- . 7 % y s,
.j
, e. 5.*.. s. p : ?. w. R,., &n,r.~.pt. ?.:
...r'.-q i.-
'~..y. ' w..irg...-
> y.~.'>.<.. %. ;hment 10's: ween. pet a formal @ record and were not tracked by QA or QC
.. t ;
i.
~
,., %.Attac;?w ;;y M;+g w ;g u..... :
s-
.<c'l9stessi'apties";is a yhtees esie9d by the 1715 task forc L,.;
. : Ac.,..
'7,,
depagtemet.Wsirg 4:.YW@.ij-),ec~i T
~
.rij.
p d
egSW:g-4@.') -$%nd w 4/9.Witla'.neferience Wp.14300 of the transcript, I as advised that the GIchippiasjanttair;ses first,$dentified as,4 asoceepliance by Resfoe 3
.m a oc c = w : = y p aneee u en. m ; ; g., -
y gy ;
p.grg;hweyqh, yof. yl e.:9..&x9;...y;:
~g:
Tety peonsg,,-
i
,v n dh.pN.-4.k.-,..,@..yN..;.pNN,,m M.kib....
y i
M z
m ps nmyw a?.?$f5W8W WWWgdw@esw$V@h@ @
i$
2 syv jr:ww.,
w%x,&$1..fll;.y.l.-)
n--
..7 g
g;A
- If $
. p ';
- 4.,a. Q
.l ays%
n:,
, s.
g. n'... u,.
e
,s,v gh.
yd u,..vg6. er
.A. r.M f. Q.
3 J.w 4^
r
[#'.f,, 5y.
g* $V w.'f h..
~.
-1 s
p'-
' hi E4 h*.'b /$h[*i'
.lW t
47.,
,,W i
e
..kE[ e.s A 97h~og'p'%e, s g, :a@.o~ '.
(f it F,... '
- h. n p.=.
z <-
~
N,i
..ck,'::.. r. ~,'
h k"
- a >J$ n
?*; Q:}4 s'. * '
v
~
y
..? C*'t p
Y
- g'.
Q
'{
e,t he Q.f
- i
~M.."
.w' go lj?g mM T;F.I'5.'
. ~p,
w-
+
cM.M f.
-Sw?.
,,j
. m(
. h _ ' 2 _% ~.s p ) 3.c; h :.
'.1 e
...Y.:
3%
- +-
s.
f
!~,. ~' ~,
.,. pe :rw: :w..
l
. f :a kMI! M d h d ' I:s ~" -
2
'O jfp:&t=:<.4Wh.,s.
I
%'sff 1
?
e :+
f.N % d M 3
'k.s. 4.ji.a y*$a,I i 5.yh; % kgT';,Q W I
- %&\\
'4 3-@., (L. Mhw.f.ib'hh.h sh$$Nb.. h..
k u
m.
.t :w4..:..r,. ; p..v
.. f.
bh T-.s '
,69gw.,f.n.gh..
v.
e,
.c :.-
- w. n w
.'dJ d.N. ;D.
r.
Qf/, k&M3. J.yf. od 4-W[,Y.h hisE/.* [E'[f,2',$$m.N0# b.$n.~ 4 '].
.s y
lb)'84W
., o% p-e.;pm, e n,. (; $, p(,..,.,;.,;
s w.pk.a
.y
.+.r
l l
-l g
.j.r 3 i
",Mf 7's
_ J '; ~j l.
',.y ' : :tp' r-Qd M ]
V..,df y l
f N'T P2:13 ~ M UNITro srATzs ce AMzRrcx NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
,g r
- - - at'f6}
s':,
- r.}:-4
.8
. <g., p -..., : 7.m... a n.
~~ --.-, u.,
.M b..., s ~-+
$lfu p#r' MG, :J'ps gyn ys.r.splp!3 's
-4
~ t y
4 rTvdNM O 9??f S?,%
@,o J>
-..M ] 1,' ASISP JIon D-03^ch W."83p3yN t
..ka the.. Matter of
- p.
J. e .. -
- 30-429-02t5P.*
- + :#
a j CONSUMERS POWBR COMPANY
)
g y Nos. '
50-329 OL i
I 50-330 OL j (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
)
50-329 OM A
I 50-330 OM
{
l l
j IN'IERVENOR BARBARA STAMIRIS' REQUEST FOR PRODUCTICN OF DOCUMENTS TO THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF
,aj
. 'l -
W
'IO:
Nuclear Regulatory Comission Staff
.bN 4
i y
o
( l' j Intervenor Barbara' Stamiris,. pursuant to the Atomic Safety and, i,ck
-l
's Order. of' Apr11 E,.1983, heraf. requests the Maois
?g Q.),'LicensingBo W
- ..::7 n s,!il,'Q W lf' Ifk ny.
(hgulatory commission ("Cosatission" or "NRC"). Staff,to lproSece, had c 4* atM i
t;.:
- ,1,
- n. ;;&
s
,r
..; x - e.
K' LI ' make available'for inspection - and/or' copying each '. document la the 4{y
[
possession or custody of the WRC. Staff or subject to the control of ' p - f S-
..I ' '
4
,.e
{ the NRC Staff, its agents, or its attorneys, as requested below.
- gq t ;
j
! DEFINITIONS
~
.}
~.
g As used herein, and unless the context otherwise requires, i
the terms:
(a)
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission or "NRC" shall mean the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, its branches, departments, offices, sections, subdivisions, its present.and former commissioners, adminis-trators, management, employees, agents, representatives, consultants or of ficials, or their agents, attorneys, or representatives.
}
~
r
_2
%- C'yfT@l h /
- y,j f
.a
.~
t.
M.m l
. : ;. ?; -:
- t > n : n-n..;..:" : 2 e. r.:
h*.
w e a,
~ :- 3,.. ;
'-.. c J
.,.,.7 l
l 4,-
.i :
L Fi!
2 --
4 4
(b)
Document" shall mean every writing of every type or descriptic.n, and every other int,trument or device by which, through 2
i !M ich, 'or on which information has been recorded and/or serv
~
.-yg::/g g.,
A.,. 2/q'{'JA y ;- p;.W gyt P
~ @f.ist,11inhoa t.o. ' e'aioranda,1 notes, let, fg.
3,-n $
<,t.x,[' ding-
"'d cE 7
,j. 7 y,gs) _...
e awih t
m 4
..q.q A _a g itiles, graphs, ' charts, photographs, slide presentations',' han5 written"7 g
I notes, logs, ledgers, studies, data cheats, appointment calendars,
,.(i iw telephone messages, voice recordings and other data compilations or
~
other media on which or through which information of any type is transmitted, recorded or preserved.
4:
0j (c) ' "Cotununication shall emean conununication, discussion,
' f :,.;
ii conversati.on, let.tcr, memorandum, telephone call, message or directick
,c N1
,Q "i
.-f Fwhether written or oral, or whether in person, by telephone, or by
-.. ~. m,
r,- C' "
e
.E y f,-
rh$
A
- l. ' i$
- < _. c Q: :..: { m.; ;
., ~
t
' m :q_ + -
- '. g 3.; p,.
o
. GWT.l
- ]. ffCd ];.Q.g{
W
.. 's
( : g. ;.
..n>---
h[l 6 boCUMENTS TO BE' PRODUCED p
- [
i 1.g mAny and all! documents relating:in anY way to the special
,y f$;j,j q
- o t
w-m p'
inspection conducted by the office of Special Cases, Midland Section,
-1 N'&
4 concerning the diesel generator building at the Midland nuclear powez u
+
i
- k.
plant, NRC Inspection and Enforcement Report Nos. 50-329/82-22 and
,r h
a 50-330/82-22, and any other. investigation of systems which affect in s
D any way the diesel generator building, including but not limited to b ongoing NRC investigations..For any such ongoing NRC investigation, ;
h
- 4 s
describe the nature and scope of the investigation.
2.
Any and all documents relating in any way to communicationn f.
1C between Region III and any other office, or branch of the NRC, or be".
a
{,,
tween offices, branches or divisions of the NRC, concerning '(a) the
,q g(
reports mentioned in Document itequest No.1 above, or (b) the invest:
4 i;
=
gations listed in Document Request No.* 1 above.
. [;
3: '.. j r
12.2 r
a 2
l
]
^-
l g;,
.4 t
i,
.Mi rw y -
3
- . t t H.}
3.
l -
Any and all documents prepared by Region III in tha g N
to 1983 pe.riod which relate in any way to comparisons of the Midland 4._.--._.__
E muclear power. plant to other e nucicar plants in terms 2 the 'following
.~: g..,.i '. i{n.'. i)'the numbe'r of rioncenep.R n'a:s hVW ~ _
MQi;%
\\ c
%3;t'i M
sjw;n g$&
M lien
[
g.i s !
y.-zm the ncmber. of' 50.55e repo,p : f1.,1 i
byD. 9....,s :@y&.
f, g
'. ~ g3 -
i' (b) rts
.. enmuner 1
.v-v Power Company ("CPC"); and
.g l
h k
(c) the overall. rating of the Midlan3 plant as compared
[
to other plants in Region III and other plants under con-1 kS.[
struction in the United States.
i 4.
Any and all documents, including any technical analyses i..p*j 1
pi$
performed by or submitted to the NRC, relating tor i1;62;q t
1
'] k.
. (a) the NRC decision to 8 allow undsrpinning work to y b
r,: D Q:
.v..
' the NRC decision.in,Febr.uary 1983 b.: ~.&,
' ' A f) sinence in December 1982.at the Midland plant;-
?. $ fF.
(hg.
a ti;;;W:
y :.. 3.. :. g
- k. (b) allow Wder.2 pf 8
.:h M
'Qg.Eg%
nning work to be done under...ma' fet;y-relatea struck {e.gp!';$;8
^i'
,.T c
..;, -., y q 7.;t ! ?.4 w.
4 res.w3M
."'1%
- Mt i T git Qe Midland plants and
.ye/ T le~oevv4?Nj!ZO'W u
9r ML9pn ;
J
'9.'
" 4 AjNpm 'T ih v
C the NRC consideration and assessment of F.T.V.y t'
+
n-k };
.g (c)
P.
t
.. w
' jacking and cracking for the period January 1983 to the p.e -
l A.r
- 5. )Any wu.co & Qwl; 0 present-l f
- uocumenL v. relating 'in any way to independent ).t N a adits at Midland; the a review acceptance criteria.for these l 5 audits: and NRC a s taken in response to these audits. i i
- 6. ' Any and all documents relating to the special investigatior, j initiated by the Sper.sard memorandum of April 19, 1982, and to issuey
- b
f l discussed in that memorandum. 1 7. Any and all documents relating to the March 1982 SALP ; g Report, and the NRC's decision to ? postpone the SALP Report scheduled Q8 for the spring of 1983. If no written documents exist regarding' the .I h e kevL,b b h [
- M '"**
l1 i , l [.1).% J
t o r i 3 j . p,.,, .y. ,,;.yp;g - 3 -- ~~.='~ &.;. w a s' m. ' u. <- +' r. f WRC's dei::ision to postpone the 1983 SALP Report. explain the psitiod Iig.o -- ~ G 0* i reasoning and recommendations of each of the following persons re-! p.", i cpecting the NRC's decision to postpone the SALP Reports A. I . ) ayne shaffer; ,; - a b nP ames Reppler +-c, L e)< mpi 2,: .1 r-e, 1.1 W 5 v,,. g.; S. Confirm in writing the NRC Staff's previous representati,,. g,{7;7 that no documents exist which relate in any way tor gg h ui N (a) the NRC Staff'a differing opinions on the enforce,T E Mt '3::g-ment action to be taken in response to the NRC Inspection anS > j.y ..e i aw s. 3Qb .Bnfor'^ement Report Nos. 50-329/82-22 and 50-330/82-22;. and, %; v ;,,* gyJn w y, ,. {b). jthe May, August and september 1982 stop-vork orders.
- 3...
g,. e j.gg. -.
- .c m.
} k 4.,,.,.5 I. 1ssued by.C yd the j.pPC idecisions to lif t these str.@ ^.nrk ordersK qi.;.0 d- ,f,{g,:y, sg 1,'a psy--g-M j D 'M qi(i,*dd.i t ? qi/ .d.,S'. : 4.-6fW -/g; M [Re'apectfull'y subunit;ted, $.:..;,n %j .]EN . Di. /,d $'}f . $$,. 4. 9 + n .t. rw. - . -c 3-
- .t; y,
%g,. ,7. .: (; E.,~
- s. -
2 ~. - ~- -xv .O iW M;&.gtgy, '. s_f;iLQ.y ?g;h d
- 2:. t ' '*y4f.
. V $? %y .w%= N,.M. &f
- BERNABEI q
f. I; NT ACCOUNTABILMT q $ f f ? :y? %5 .37. 41.TpR $ d;.Q;. /E the 2nstitute for Policy Studi "lN J '/j 1901 Q Street, N. W. i i' Washington, D. C. 20009 ,et. , j' .202/234-9382 i,, y f i. J ' Attorney for Intervenor Barbara 3, , isi
- i d
7 DATED: April 7, 1983 I 5 I ,64. 6.: T-
- t I
f .l 5 j i I i i. l I 1'.-- / .t YE] (,; .y. ~ 'e } [_ "~.1.d I
-- - - -, - ~-- ~ ~ ",,=g.=nem,5== ne - us. nucu.=% cut 4:usiv consMiscow t \\ esse nauuts:En s asAiuwa acontss evasst { j. ... s t , : ::t.
- s.. -
Yd'. <., I I'* l l 9., ' FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL crTV REQUEST ^ Istays... l. e . m.y.... - ), ' 1vu pl m .a y -n ~.., n.. -nw r..a c w.., ; .,. a V, C. RRfylff, W.3,, W..,,_ ~394-aG.9l. 3s4-abM f.} ~ p lt .... a.a... c.. .,A.. ItetV 6LL/d .T L gvu n a. 5 ~E m i f 1 MESSAGE FAOM s. s6m*=*=s... 0M A/M Face mas 6a anoses nuassan I wrespecAvsom YFLEPneses MuestER j g97gg 3n1-492 7371 ensee eesso see we s==..) be.4PE E D (*. *.= 4 s Huebersee I geensh aver .avvemavec a utone AT8C b. 11I LLI AS 1/lo < vse O vue ~ ~~ PRECEDENCE l l ewsweeress? l l Peumseewes { l Two enouns l \\ e.st soeum Nonnessosays j WPSCgAg 3pagygggyggggg . e,. ,.4, s' Y,',*h ${'. **. 4'fhf-f s' 1 J{ hag . ~ - ' ?r t t -[* ,y y, v [ }.' ). ss - 5
- e.. wa -~.
m n -{ n :. $ r .= ..[. , 3', - hj f '$ ~ .;Q; ' $} - 94) .,4
- N jI llh e
.Q L \\ I TIME /DATE f&.:.ve; macrewsc T R 4 pe tee sT 730 l \\ e 4,.g)
- ,U W o
I' . L' fe' e l. b 1
- =
,y -}}