ML20091H140

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Confirms Util Positions in Areas Re Training Concerning Ipins,How to Handle Insp Rept W/Ipins,Open Insp Repts, Performance Demonstrations by Qa/Qc Personnel & Balance of Plant Project QC Instructions
ML20091H140
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 04/21/1983
From: Wells R
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To: Harrison J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML17198A223 List: ... further results
References
CON-BOX-09, CON-BOX-9, FOIA-84-96 22124, NUDOCS 8406050073
Download: ML20091H140 (2)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:.. p4L \\ i wcmu. stars i /:?__.W~t i M J___n= # --~ + 3 ConSum8f5 EU__ t _UM C Power PH-VW ,o 4 Company (b i 1-*~-- y y MidLc=d Project office Mio.nd Project PO Box 1963.Midtand. MI 48640 15th 6314650 I ~,d p, i April 21, 1983 Mr. Jay Harrison US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road { Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT - CLARIFICATION OF CPCO POSITIONS File:

1.1.5 Serial

22124 Per request of Mr. Ron Gardner to Roy A. Wells during an exit meeting at the Midland Site on February 18, 1983, this letter confirms Consumers Power Company's positions in the areas noted below: TRAINING REGARDING IPINS Personnel are being trained that IPINS are no longer authorized for use on the Midland Project. In addition, training emphasizes that once an inspection is initiated, it will be completed to the point of construction completion and that all nonconforming conditions observed will be documented on a nonconfor-mance report. Procedures presently being written for verification and statusing activities required by the Construction Completion Plan (CCP) will cover Inspection Reports (IR) that have an associated IPIN to assure that' inspections are complete and that all existing nonconformances are documented. Personnel will be trained in these procedures. HOW TO HANDLE INSPECTION REPORTS WITH IPINS Closed irs During the verification phase of the Construction Completion Plan (CCP), all j closed Inspection Reports (irs) that had IPINS associated with them will be 1007. verified by physical reinspection where possible and by documentation verifica-tion where attributes are inaccessible. Any nonconforming condition observed will be documented on a nonconformance report. Correction of nonconforming con-ditions previously noted on the IPIN will be specifically verified. This pro-cess will assure that the item being reinspected has received a total verification. I ql 1 8406050073 840517 Apg 2 81983 PDR FOIA RICE 84-96 PDR

o .m Open irs All items with an open IR and a partial inspection will be completely reinspected i during the systems statusing phase of the CCP. This will be done as part of the l System Completion Teams Phase 1 responsibility. Inspections will be done using revised PQCIs and any nonconforming conditions will be documented on nonconfor-mance reports. During the reinspection, nonconforming conditions previously identified on an IPIN will be specifically reverified and, if they still exist, T r will then be documented on a nonconformance report as part of the normal rein-j spection process. This process will assure that nonconforming conditions will be properly documented, that rework will not cover up a nonconforming condition, and that all units receive a total inspection before the IR can be closed. PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATIONS BY QA/QC PERSONNEL In order to minimize the peer pressure that might be experienced by Level II/III personnel administering performance demonstrations for Project Quality Control Instructions (PQCIs) as part of the QCE recertification process, the following approach is being used: Balance of Plant PQCIs Performance demonstrations for QC personnel are being given by Lesel II/III personnel assigned to Balance of Plant - QA. Soils PQCIs Performance demonstrations for QC personnel are being given by Level II/III personnel who do not have an established peer relationship with the QC inspector being tested. Bechtel QC personnel are administering performance demonstrations to Contractor QC personnel and conversely, Contractor QC personnel administer performance demonstrations to Bechtel QC personnel. Personnel assigned to QA section of the Soils organization administer performance demonstrations to either j Bechtel or Contractor QC personnel. The above should be responsive to Mr R Gardner's questions. As appropriate, the above concepts will be incorporated into formal procedures. W/jin CC JWCook DBMiller JEBrunner i i 'I i [ t Y

As g e

  1. a&~-

,dwx - .l cd Nma~.hln b4 AW e . CORSumers b o nom r.Jr A power a su, u r 1 Company ""-d * " Midland Project: PO Som 1963, Mldland, MI 48640 e (S17) 6318850 LFgg,i . T/'. April 14, 1983 f cd)h W1 +.3 C...:. _ .t..__ j. (CA pT -- .~. Mr. J. J. Harrison -):--- I Midland Project Section t-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Y' Region III A'lt ' N ' 799 Roosevelt Road ' d'I Glen'Ellyn, IL 60137 detdCk.Ild id) cc J L XS. l ATTENTION: Dr. Ross Landsman MIDIAND ENERGY CEhTER GWO 7020 MEETING NOTES FOR APRIL 7, 1983, AND MARCH 7-8, 1983 DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN CPCO AND NRC j File: 0485.21 UFI: 42*05*22*04 Serial: CSC-6661 50*31*01 For your infomation and use please find the attached meeting notes April 5 and 7, 1983 and March 7-8, 1983, including the associated document submittals provided to NRC personnel on March 15, 1983. Based on providing the attached documentation of these meetings and submit-tals, we understand per discussions with R. Landsman on 4/12/83, that the l NRC Region III will provide authorization to excavate portions of Pier 8E/W. If you have any questions ple contact this office. i DBM/RW/klm Attachments 1 i zy APR 2 0;333 f 9 y

s 3 i Notes of Telecon with NRC on April 5 6 7, 1933.

Subject:

. Soils Remedial Work, Auxiliary Building Underpinning Design Documents. l-

Participants:

l J. Kane ~ l R. Landsman i -1 S. Poulous (consultant) Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) I D. Hood

  • W. Kilker *

] Stone 4 Webster i l K. Razdan ~ R. Wheeler G. Murray Constners Power Co (CPCo) i N. Ramanujam* T. B iruvengadam* J. Darby ~ + M. Lewis S. Afifi* I i J. Anderson

  • Bechtel B. Dhar*

4 S. Hunt

  • V. Verma*

(*Part time) ~ i.

Purpose:

his telecon was a follow-up to the telecon with NRC, on March 7 and 8,1983. During the March telecon, NRC commented on Appendix-D to specification C-195, dealing j with the load test for Pier Wil, and Specification C-200, dealing with the Admin-i istrative action and corrective measures for underpinning activities. Subsequent to the March telecon, NRC was supplied with proposed revisions to Appendix-D and i Specification C-200, based on agreements reached. He purmse of this telecon was 1 to get additional comments from NRC on these documents. Tw following is a stannary of agreements and discussions: 4 I

1.0 General

i a) D. Hood advised that the notes of the telecon on March 7 and 8 should be submitted along with the package of I information given to NRC on March 14, CPCo concurred. I J ~ b) D. Hood asked CPCo whether they were going to submit notes of telecon with NRC of January 25, 1983 regarding i the FIVP proof load jacking. CPCo indicated that the agreements of that telecon were already documented in D. Miller's letter dated January 27, 1983, to W. Schaffer I of Region III. R. Landsman also indicated that the l agreements reached in that telecon were covered in his report. It was agreed that no further doctmentation f was necessary. ..l' Page 1 ( l t j APR 2 01983 L . y ,, 4 ;: 1

7 l 2 5 2.0 Appendix-D to Spec C-195: Testing Procedure for Axial Compressive Load Test of Pier Wil. i a) The following agreements were made regarding additional i -{ revisions to Appendix-D:

1) Page D-2 Sec 3.1 - Add a new sentence after the fourth Q

sentence of the second paragraph " Care shall be taken to ensure that the antifriction lining does not taper inwards with depth."

2) Page D-4 Sec 5.4.3 - Last sentence of the new para-I graph to be revised as '%e RGE will require a higher

] load, not exceeding 600 kips, if needed, based on his j" evaluation of Carlson stress meter data to ensure that the tip bearing pressure is at least 28.6 k.s.f." i

3) Page D-4 Sec 5.4.3 - Add at the end of the first sent-ence "but not longer than 2 hours".

i

4) Page D-4 Sec 5.4.4 - Add the following at the beginning of the last sentence "if the short tem undrained soil j

modulus of elasticity determined by RGE from data at j bearing pressure of 6.8 to 8.8 k.s.f. is 3000 k.s.f. or more,". 1 i i j

5) Page D-4 Sec 6.1 - Delete "each 20 minutes until 2 i

hours from start".

6) Page D-5 Sec 6.2 - Revised section as "Carlson stress meters shall be read and recorded at least three times at times determined by RGE such that: one loading is j

taken near start of the load increment, one reading is i taken near the end of the load increment, and one i reading is taken in between. RGE may require additional readings to be taken if in his judgement there is variation in the readings". t

7) Page D-3 Sec 5.2 - Add a new paragraph after the first I

paragraph as follows "The specified load for the load 4 test pier is 356 kips corresponding to a nominal bearing pressure of 22 k.s.f.. The nominal bearing pressure at 4 i 130% of specified load is 28.6 k.s.f.".

8) Page D-5 Sec 6.6 - Change the number for reading and -

i recording from ".001 inch" to ".0005 inch".

9) Page D-7 Sec 8.1 (t) - Insert the word " top and tip" after the word "versus".
10) Page D-7 Sec 8.1 (u) - Insert the word "tip" after "versus".

1 E g y a +.v q - g,3 _ e u L _.

m, ) ' ll) Page D-7 Sec 8.1 (x) - Replace the word 'hvement" by l - " measurement". I f b) J. Kane requested that NRC be supplied with a copy of draw-ing C-1445-1 which gives the specified load for Pier Wil. (This is not considered necessary by CPCo since the speci-1 fled load will now be listed in the to Section 5.2 (see item a.7) above) proposed revision to i; } c) h following is a si==ary of additional discussions for Appendix-D:

1) Page D-4 Sec 5.4.4 - In response to an NRC question, CPCo stated that the calculated bearing pressure of 22 k.s.f., corresponding to the specified load for i

Pier Wil, is at least equal to or greater than the maximaan design bearing pressure for any other under-pinning pier and the pennanent wall. I

2) Page D-6 Sec 7.2 - NRC concurred with the adequacy of i

20 feet. NRC also indicated that the drifts for i Piers E/W-8 could be approved. Mcwever, NRC indicated j that they would like to review the infonnation on the load-settlement data from the initial jacking of Piers E/W-12 and E/W-9 before approving the excavation j. and remaining work for Piers E/W-8 This infonnation was transmittedto NRC and a copy is attached to these meeting notes. j, 2.0 Spec C-200: Administrative action and corrective measures for underpinning activities. a) The following revisions were agreed for Spec C-200, SO413001.

1) Page 2 of 7, revised Sec 5.2 - First sentence, replace i

"(strain for ShPS only)" by '.'(strain not applicable for i Aux Building)". 4

2) Page 3 of 7, revised Sec 5.3 - First sentence, replace

"(strain for SWPS only)" by "(strain not applicable for i j Aux Building)".

3) Page 3 of 7, revised Sec 5.3 - Add a sentence after the first 'entence "The RSE shall identify whether s

it is a category 1 event" and add at the beginning 4 of the second sentence, "in case it is not a category 1 event,".

4) Appendixes B, C 4 D - Replace " Exhibit E" by " Appendix E" where reference has been made to the former.
5) Appendixes B, C 4 D - Replace the box 'Take Emergency Action" by "Take Energency Action per Appendix E or other appropriate measures".

i I l ?

t*

g g ~' y e

5-s" m ? 4 b) He following is a sumary of other discussions about the drawings referenced in Spec. C-200:

1) NRC indicated th'at the Drawing C-2039 (Rev. 0) specified alert and action levels for strain of.001 and.002 res-l pectively instead of the values of.0007 and.0014 speci-fied in the SSER (Supplement No. 2).

(Subsequently,CPCo j reviewed this item and found that the new Revision 1 of this drawing, dated 3/21/83, had the correct values per j 4 l the SSER).' I

2) NRC indicated thatAg, values for Phase IV, shown in Draw-C-1493, were not consistent with the values given in Table 2-7 of SSER Supplement No. 2.

CPCo replied that the alert value fordg, for Phase IV on the drawing C-1493 is 0.25" and is consistent with the value given in the attachment to the meeting notes of the July 27-30, 1982 design audit issued by D. Hood. R ese were the agreed values during the audit. SSER Supplement 2 gives a value of 0.2". It seems that the SSER should be revised. NRC stated that they will get back to CPCo on this item after their review.

3.0 Attachments

a) Pier Load Test Data - Top load versus settlement for Piers 3 l E12, W9, E9, W12 - (4 sheets). } b) Plot of bearing pressure vs tip deflection, composite curve for j Piers E/W-9 6 E/W-12. l t .1 o t K. Razdan 4/13/83 4 8' }' 4 l 2" a d g e 0 1 Y i lj 1 ^ ^5

,s... ^ P!ER LOAD TE ' DATA TOP LOAD VERSUS SETTLEMENT t l t \\ t i Project MIDI AND UNITS 1 AND 2 Pier No. E #7. ** g Location - MIDLAND, MICHIGAN Date 3-IS -B3 Owner CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Engineer BECHTEL. ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Drawn By 5W OM . Job No. 7220 Top Load (klps) i o .8

      • 3,"

4:80 m *po '88*._ rso, t o _mo s e ra m asso o 88 eteo eyoo ato opo ep e ?N w .\\ ~ , rvano um c., o m m u ros O i 9% -) m 's gc ~ o la .c m timi* n ~ EL c 7 '. P lo Q "L l uit ihm j e r n Ti k. P N' i s h - i to u r o O e s. f l

.e; o

m . a, 1.- C 5 h4. JL '"'dD IlikE bdJ h#

  • r*4 T

j _ s Ee CC - i Y C C s j 2 r 2e a6 F $: 4 I m m 7 ULATlve 70 ELDG SLAS I ALL MOVGM GWY$ B ACKD 04 tO 'r0 "Lo HEIM.NADodcd Engp1* M NOMD

  1. 4 5tfATT 3 'M 6 '

TDP OF SMAFl*iPitt)6tAV Ge o f S ' ggyp yggg, g g* y(1' To P eF S CLL MLEVl 5it,$0 BAstCTt9)of get.c c a v; r9 s.o I t V ^7o9 v. b -w - - - - - - - - +

l r-PIER LOAD TEdf DATA TOP LOAD VERSUS SETTLEnflENT \\. Project MIDLAND UNITS 1 AND 2 Pier No. W -9 t Location _ MIDLAND, MICHIGAN Date 4' S - E3 Owner CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Engineer __. BECHTEL ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Drawn By S. N HmT . Job No. 7220 ~ Top toad (klps) i o P too B 400 see w 780 1ke oco see #,oe isso neo n moo a d rese sieo iseo sgao NQ dm' I 1 1 ~ 1 i i 1 I i I i E i' s. 7, m .I k gg I- & pg a r d l $b 2 k uv w' ~ n a g s ~, c k. s _. 3 g - x -m hC s S N s . 7;' 9-s, 2 h l h rev i ,a e, 9 s w ,s \\ i.4l .o h. . m., a s m.. m 8 "A ~0. raw 2 ,s ~ C ,e ' Law p r 1 C a, + ~. v. .,8 4 niu c 45 C / 1 a ar F6 4 mm 4 aurwe ro swe sies i nu. nrreo moventurs saces on to ro zo nia, neaoins swer As overso t+ SHAfr : 3 'x t L. Top of $MAF1'l P KA) ELN,* 4 0\\f,5

  • I BAsf of SttL,9% gij%

\\ W ror of Belt. ELEV: 511 G' .J 6Ast <[sp) of stu. et.svl 54%o' s

  • l%

- 3., \\% e l~ ~ - - - _. -. ~. _..

  • 9 I

-a

^ s 9 PIER LOAD TEST DATA LOAD VERSUS SETTLEMENT i f Pr'oject MIDI' ' *) UNITS 1 AND 2 thf-Pier No. Location MIDLAND, MICHIGAN Date 4-4--63 Owner CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Engineer BECHTEL. ANN ARBOR MICHIGAN Drawn By S vl MMT" Job No. 7220 l Load (kin ) n ico w w 4= sm wo w sao eso sooo tw stea 85se

  1. < e ese e so rm seu i,. -~.

x. =. i r N_i P 1 ,,,ia i,ii 3 ,s. '95 _. t L, 45 '"15-EE umi ,,s. m. I i ~, ) d' r, sc m Q 11, "O

JTJ

, '. X - [E l* Q M,Q ' a b; ;c

c-indi:O+ T) v 4

g.5 s ~ -s, c m x e '_ s. Y-T;7 E ^ s > g s. .t o x v )% L a 4 'm Jh i. ,a 3. s s e eu m g s. u, s ^ ,, x I s. Tu I 1P. E LMMN g a.v <~. --,,r-N -o u an s JJ r 1I.u. mL_ i 90 M ~Bq o 7* 1\\ e 4 cE

  • &s 6,.

ee E g v o s ( O w . 2 .r

V.

c s, ( V g l t 4 1 4 E. 4' 7220359 sis 2 k- (Ed.A7iyt 70 Syy,, SLA 4 ALL PoorfED h1cvfMCMJ R4f50 CH 1019 M MIM. MAD /H&f 6tCEff*h5 Weid'y M SH4 F"T",o % ' t (o' 7"cP of $MAfr (Fift) ELtd.' Gof 5 ' 8A$E of SELL /O'Jr// o 1*cP OF B ELL. 6 La s/. l 572 9' BASE Cr:P) *F BCt.L ELets: S*ss./ ' 1 8 1 .. _ ~. W .f

t PIER LOAD TE' DATA = TOP LOAD VERSUE, iETTLEMENT i I \\ l Project MIDLAND UNITS 1 AND 2 Pier No. S /2. " I Location MIDLAND, MICHIGAN Date 3 -//- 93 i Owner CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Drawn By T tA/ Mu M Engineer _ BECHTEL. ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN . Job No. 7220 Top Load (kips) F 2*o m= 4e= 5==.. 'ao -mo eQr %_ n gioo__non_3m.m ise, 9 rw ago. O- "-c " h, i - x-4 f N-L F V Ed ll 5 LL1La B~t : II" li r N 1 Je T' L,1 > m, (_ 'Ar 4 g 's m. 7M C s o.c 6 s x o s .m k? % l e 7:{'. - E o =' e s u g6 u l 1 e w 6 p. 2 g &. 3, m

aw_,

s 2d

  1. e 4

e u 9 .6 n -g m ed .8 cv 4 7 .E ge o @e 9 i o j E h IO ae P0 4 I mm 4 PELATWS TO Bl.D(r SMS T\\ alt. PLarrga MontEMgens BACCD Chi MO TO LQMIN RVADINGs s. E199rA$goggp

  1. n~ SWAfr :

3*gg,' T* A O f f ilA ff" l P' U ) G tr y : fao4 c' 513 BA$6(Trp) cF Bell ELEt/l 5's,f,'/ ' B ASE of BCu.*' 9'Xit.' j' p. t {. i I l

t '$ e pg_ A. l AAa _ 14 - g _,_ _ _ '* ~ i f .g.- .-i_ N ~m _ w _. T_ a_5._ -4,_. L ,g._,..y t =

w 6y_
  1. -D % }g T;

Q-g - - - ' O _^#, ,;=n r a rrs.m-o_ - ---,.. * -~~ T g --(-w'^ -1. ^ 1 Q-A _ Q r.s.cT2.;w.-n.. _g f, f._ M. ,2b - -a.=p. _- M1-. M. a ^-i m f 4231 TE r 1-4 %, M M'W--- A- .L'.1"., 3 1-n T.--k( g,,

s.

a q. _ymm_ .g 1 A &% ~ C _w .m_. _ _ =

. =- gpg xm-a,_

N A WI-M ~ mram sm- "J _ --tvT+ _"' ~" W v =. p/ =. w .= ,r - ~ l'-,. ", - 2 ,re. -- mu d.', s w.,2. a.-.-r_.

  • 7-' Qf.s

,.y m / s \\ - ?/4--1// a f -,/* f,f i.-

== " E.I m g f?: A g g3 g k / =. r . -m 2 a 4 9y ...-,s ^ u "J r' y$ N Q*M i p ^l,... u = ) Z ? ..hI ^ "M l k h h-k I-I' -2' ,H:t _de.- ^ h, at 2 _*e e$, O 4 . y y.. w/ * .r_,. v k M ..) N, ,h us w-: . _s-~. gy =_ s__te _ EOO ,M*-' W 1- ,5'.-/E h gg d.W -W-ra' uw kQ . _24

..-z s
. l m

5 = - +

c. 2

-.s.w A t -5' .m -+s...... n-u= 5 M",' _ah_F. ._'" J- -.y. 2 ^g .~____ ~ _= _. l '*'*" [ ,-y , u -p-- y..e = g .,.,_=, V7 i -= m =<4=.. gr _ a _. h k A E 8 5 5 4 4 63Ar$n.Mounfm E U ai.L 6

m Notes of Telephone Conversation with NRC, on March 7 4 8, 1983.

Subject:

Soils Remedial Work Attendees: J. Kane R. Landsman S. Poulous (consultant) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (FRC) D. Hood

  • K. Razdan R. Wheeler
  • R. Wieland G. M2rray*

Consumers Power Company (CPCo) l D. Sibbald* i N.Ramanujam* ~ S. Hunt J. Anderson B. Dhar* Bechtel J.DasGugta* M. Lewis (*Part time) 4

Purpose:

he purpose of this telecon was to discuss with NRC, the following:

1) A"xiliary Building Pier load Test Procedure.

l

2) Specification C-200, dealing with Administrative Action and corrective i

measures for underpinning.

3) Construction Dewatering in the Service Water Ptap Structure (SWPS) area.

t

4) Deep Probing for Utilities in the SWPS area.
5) Procedure for Dutch Cone for observation well ntaber 4 In addition, R. Landsman wanted to discuss the construction sequence which was presented by CPCo to NRC Region III in a meeting at Midland Plant Site on 8

March 3, 1983. Also J. Kane wanted to discuss the penetrometer readings from Piers 12 East 4 West. He following is a stamary of the discussions and the agreements:

1) Auxiliary Building Pier load Test:

a) NRC provided consents on Appendix-D to Specification C-195, Testing Procedure for Axial Compressive load Test of Pier Wil. Dese consentt were then discussed. ItwasagreedthatCPCowouldprovideNRCw}tha l marked up copy of this Appendix with the agreed changes. H is woQld allow NRC to review the proposed revisions. Subsequent to this meeting, t NRC was provided with proposed revisions to Appendix D (attached) on January 15, 1982. It should be noted that the mark-up includes additional minor proposed revisions besides those based on NRC connents. 4 Page 1 D J .k

~ n 2 4 b) CPCo agreed that two additional carlson stress meters, one at top and the other at bottom, will be provided for Pier Wil. It was also agreed that the lower carlson meters will be located as close to the l Pier bottom as practical. 1 I c) NRC questioned the basis of the 20 feet exclusion zone in Sec 7.2 l of Appendix-D. It was pointed to NRC that no work on drifts or 5 i l piers would be done in this zone while Pier W11 was being load tested. After discussions, it was agreed that-NRC would be provided with a marked-up drawing showing the exclusion zone, Further discussions would then be held between CPCo and NRC as i j to which other work can be permitted concurrently with the load i test. NRC was provided with marked-up prints of drawings C-1417 (plan) and C-1417-1 (elevation), showing the exclusion zone, on January 15, 1982. A copy of these drawings is attached to these meeting notes. 4 i j i d) NRC asked CPCo as to how long it would take them te evaluate the l test results after the load test is completed. CPCo indicated j that it was planned to have the engineers available at the site for evaluating the load test data. CPCo would be prepared to discuss the load test data and its evaluation with NRC during their site visit at the time of the load test. NRC concurred j to review the evaluation at site. i l e) NRC asked with reference to Sec 5.5 page D-4 of Appendix-D, as } to which Deep Seated Bench March (DSB) would be read for the upward movement criteria while Pier Wil is being Jacked. It j was pointed to then that DSB-2W would be the applicable bench m j mark. f) NRC asked about the minisam compressive strength required for the pier concrete before it could be jacked. It was pointed -i that 2000 p.s.i. is required and that the approximate bearing i pressure under the bearing plates under the jacFs was 275 p.s.i. j NRC was satisfied that the concrete strength was adequate. i g) NRC requested a copy of Specification C-195 for reference. This j 'was subsequently provided. 8

2) Specification C-200, dealing with Achainistrative Action and Corrective

) l Measures for Und spinning: E l NRC provided comments on Revision 1 of this sgification. 1hese comments were 5 i discussed and agreements were reached as to t wir resolution. It was agreed l j that based on these agreements a Specification Change Notice (SCN) be issued j for this specification so that the changes can be implemented at the site, n j. and a copy of the SOi be ided to NRC for their review. If NRC had any - further comments they d then be incorporated in another revision to the 3-specification. CPCo provided a co l l dated 3/11/83, to NRC on 3/15/83. py of SOf 13001 to Specification C-200, A copy of this SCN is also attached to these meeting notes. 1 E ? 4 0' { T _f m.

~_._ _ _ _____ _ _. _ _ __ _ 1 .s s j 1-3 ~

3) Constmetion Dewatering in the SWPS Area:

d 1 CPCo asked pemission for the drilling of wells ntabering approximately 130 NRC indicated that they would give pemission to drill 6 preliminary wells 4' of continuous soil sampling to confirm the elevation of the sand layer. 3 l After the drilling of these wells, discussions would be held with NRC and they would then give pemission to proceed with the remaining wells. l i }

4) Deep Probing for Utilities in the SWPS Area:

I l CPCo explained the proposed procedure, using jetting, for dees utility probing j in the SWPS area. In reply to ~an NRC question CPCo stated t ut there were i t approximately 16 deep probe holes in the area o,f soil which was not to be replaced and.the remaining probe holes wculd be in the area where soil is i i planned to be replaced. NRC indicated that they would give permission for the deep pmbing inside the area where soil is to be replaced. CPCo would then discuss with NRC the records of the first 5 or 6 probe holes i.e. the rate I of penetration, range, material type etc. Based on this record, MtC would make l a judgement whether this method of drilling would be allowed for the remaining probe holes in the area where the soil is not to be excavated and replaced. 1 i

5) Dutch Cone Penetration Test' for Observation Well (OBS) ntsaber 4:

1 1 i NRC provided comments on Specification C-113, static cone penetrometer tests i (cone soundings). After discussion of NRC comments it was agreed that the i j refusa1 rate, referenced'in. Sect.5' of the specification,would be reduced to a i j range 40 to 90 kilonewtons and the value would be determined by the Pmject j Geotechnical Engineer (PGE). Nhc indicated that with this change they would j i approve this work. (SubsequentlySec 7.5 of the specification has been revised. with SCN.13001, as follows " Refusal shall be defined as a maxima guage pressur,e i between 200 and 460 Kgf/cM (thmst of 39kn to 90kn). as determined by PGE), 1 h

6) Auxiliary Building Underpinning Construction. Sequence:

4 4 i j R. Imh made comments regarding a 3/3/83 meeting, which he attended at the plant site, between CPCo and NRC Region III, where CPCo explained the construc-tion schedule. The following is a stmaary of discussions which followed j R. Landsman's comments: j a) R. Landsman pointed out that the schedule showed that Pier W10 would be started before completion of the Pier Wil load test. t CPCo indicated that there was a slight ermr in the infonmation i presented to him. In reality, Pier 10 would be restrained by the completion of the load test. 1 t: i ~ b) R. Landsman infomed NRR that the construction schedule showed ( that CPCo was planning to use the Utility Access 1bnnel (UAT) i for approaching the CT Piers. MtR indicated that any significant ?y {- changes should be discussed with them before proceeding. CPCo V pointed that NRC was notified about the proposed change at the - W site during the March 3 meeting, and CPCo also mentioned at the meeting that they were available for technical discussions with NRC. S. Poulous indicated that this change was an improvement c It was agreed that sketches of the UAT scheme y in the design. would be supplied to Mtc. Subsequently on March 15, prints of ' drawings SK-C-856, SK-C-857 and SK-C-865 showing the sequence s, and details for the UAT scheme were provided to NRC. A copy of J these drawings is attached to these meeting notes. 'q ,rg . 4 y-y ? QfNk6 %. Y SA ./ 3 'N

4 c) NRC asked whether there were any other proposed changes which were significant. CPCo indicated that there-was one other change regarding the to piers (W Piers) p level bracing of the temporary underpinning adjacent to the electrical penetration area. Previously it was intended to brace the top level against the { contairunent. Because of the interference with the containment i r stmetural integrity test, it is now proposed to brace the top ^ 1 portion of these piers against the Turbine Building Mat. This is termed as the Tie Back scheme. CPCo indicated that this I [ change was also reflected in the constmetion schedule presented j to NRC Region III on March 3. NRC asked that they be provided with sketches of this scheme for their review. Subsequently on March 15, CPCo provided NRC with sketches SK-C-839 and SK-C-840. j Copies of these sketches are attached to these meeting notes. t d) NRC emphasized that any significant future changes to underpinning from the SSER supplement 2 should be discussed with them. CPCo i L indicated that they understand the requirements and intend to do so.

7) Penetrometer Data for Piers E/W-12:

L NRC asked about the average values obtained from the cone penetrometer readings I for Piers E/W-12. M. Lewis indicated that an average value of 6.5 to 7.0 k.s.f. for the shear strength was obtained. It was agreed that this value seemed raamable with respect to the design asstmiptions. i J. Kane was interested in the actual datafrem.the cone penetrameter readings for his information. M. Lewis arovided these values over the telephone on 3/9/83. These values are attacied. +

8) Miscellaneous:

J. Kane asked for copies of the following drawings to enable NRC to prepare for their forthcoming site visit at the time of the load test: l C-1417, C-1492, C-1492-1, C-1490, C-1491, C-1492, C-1493, C-1493-1, 2 C-1495, C-2003, C-2004, C-2039, C-2039-1, C-203.9-2, C-2039-3 l These drawings were subsequently sent.

9) Attachments:-

I i a) Proposed Revision to Appendix-D, Spec C-195, Testing Procedure for Axial Compressive load test of Pier Wil. l b) Marked-up prints of drawings C-1417 and C-1417-1, showing 20 feet exclusion zone dur:.ng the load test. h c) SCN 13001 to Specification C-200 Revision 1. d) Sketches SK-C-856, SK-C-857 and SK-g-865, showing the sequence and details for the UAT scheme. t e) Sketches SK-C-839 and SK-C-840, showing the proposed Tie Back l 5ch" - f) Cone Penetrometer data for Piers E/W-12.. (3 sheets) ^ K. Razdan 4/13/83

~ 9;

,a , qq.49;p y

~. Specificatien 7213-C-195(Q, "'.*/ 1 Appendix :: 1_p gppged (9 4 i L G 6 TESTING PROCEDURE I ], i \\ FOR 3# t AXIAL COMPRESSIVE LOAD TEST OF PIER) Wii 3 19 g3 : CONTENTS 1.0 SCOPE 1 1 2.0 EXCAVATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SOIL, 1 SOIL SAMPLING, AND TESTING 3.0 PIER INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS 2 l 4.0 PIER INSTRUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 3 5.0 LOADING REQUIREMENTS 3 6.0 LOAD TEST MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 4 7.0 OTHER UNDERPINNING ACTIVITIES - RESTRICTIONS 6 8.0 FIELD LOAD TEST REPORT 6 I {l EXHIBITS i '. --ee I A -1 Pier Load Test Data 4 Form A -t Pier L.ed Test beria carle L*4s p.~ {j n-1 T oad Versus Settlement Form t+1 Top L d Vews 3 41,w.d h C Settlement Versus Time Form D Pier Load Test Data / Set Up Fora E L Q q ca,.lse n Me W

  • 74 w*1 l

0127n i gg 2. ()ISh ( - i k ] h

~ \\ specifiestien 7220-C-195'c.). ?.sv 1 Appendix D APPENDIX D TESTING PROCEDURE i FOR a l AXIALCOMPRESSIVELOADTESTOFPIERfN4ll t' 1.0 SCOPE 1.1 GENERAL This procedure describes the specific requirements for the engineering, materials, and services required for construction of test l Pier and for performance of incremental axial j compressive load test on the designated pier. )* This procedure supplements Specification 7220-C-195(Q) by augmenting the unique requirements for construction of the test piers and monitoring of the test load. 4 i 1.2 The tests will be performed under the direction of the resident geotechnical l i engineer (RGE) or his designated !i representative and it will be his l ;' responsibility to have all test data properly documented. t, In addition to the RGE's documentation of pier 6 test data, Subcontractor shall document the i 1 pier proof load test data and pier acceptance l records, as in the case of any other pier. 1.3 ?:: the ;1r ::f crn;::::! : 10 d t::t et ;ie: "11, th: ;::i' ice 10:e 1 t0? hi; nf th:

::t 1:2f i: "00 %; ;
iting i I
' 2::: ?:::::, ;;:::::;:,:: ::.: :::.

i 2.0 EXCAVATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SOIL, SOIL SAMPLIMG, AND TESTING F 2.1 Two density tests of the pier subgrade soil shall te performed (by Contractor's testing agency) by either of the following two methods as directed by the RGE: 2.1.1 Two volumetric density tests shall be performed at,the level of approved i l' h 0127n D-1 o '.} 4 .[ e e +

T Specification 7220-C-195(Q), Rev 2 !/ \\ .i;;andix s subgtade of the pier in accordance with ASTM D-1556. 2.1.2 Between 1 and 1-1/2 feet above the minimum pier tip elevation shown in Design Drawing 7220-C-1417-1(Q), two 10-inch cube samples shall be obtained for density tests in accordance with USBR Earth Manual E-2. ew,4mme. riq$ f 2.2 In addition to densit tests, a minimum of six f cone penetrometer to a shall he performed by theRGEforthepiersubgrade[::il;;^;;1;;'!?r. 3.0 PIER IMSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS 3.1 A special antifriction lining shall be l constructed inside the pier lagging in accordance with Subcontractor's approved procedures. The antifriction lining shall be installed from the elevation of the bottom of the shaft 4' to the access drift floor (or approach pit) elevation. The lining construction shall be either of the following two options or as modified in subcontractor's approved procedure. 'f Option A - Attacha1/2-inchthick$pkYwod lining to the lagging. Coat with grease or tar as required to attach an inner lining of 14%ginch i thick asphaltic fiberboard such as i Colotex. The inner lining joints i shall be taped to prevent concrete contact with the outer lining. J ' Option 3 - Attach a 1/2-inch thicR plywo)od f_._, j lining to the lagging. 3 completely cover with a layer of grease or tar. Attach an inner lining of g l 1/f-inch thick plywood. The inner lining joints shall be taped to prevent concrete contact with the outer lining. 3.2 The lagging and support for the designated test pier shall be constructed to allow for the antifriction lining such that the minimum pier concrete dimensions shown on the design drawings or the concrete dimensions as modified in subcontractor's approved proceduras are met. 0127n D-2 a t, i + O d

h. ~~ Specification 7:00-T-!?!!O), ? rt : Appendix D 4.0 PIER INSTRUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Axial deflection measurements will be obtained from the upper and lower telltale dials described in Specification 7220-C-195(Q) and shown in Drawings 7220-C-1492(Q) and j C-1492-1(Q). t 4.2 Lateral deflection measurements will be obtained by marking the initial dial stem locations on the reaction plates and by neasuring changes in the dial stem positions. Lateral movements greater than 1/8 inch will be recorded and noted on the data records prior to applying subsequent load increments. i 5.0 LOADING REQUIREMENTS I' 5.1 The pier load testing shall not begin until the prerequisites specified in section 6.3. l. of specification 7220-C-195(Q) have bey {**g '" verified and the RGE has approved thytest setup. (1a.d LE dir44ed 6 44,E (S% a.J decre=bts,4+additsdet s'acevaientf a*f f#eed8isD ' cuecT. 4so%) V 5.2 Jack loading or test pier'anall be percornea at the following incremen.a1 sequence unless otherwise directed by th RGE or his designated representativt. 5, 25, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, L5, 80, 90, 100, 105, 2 110,115,120,125,130,Uraw,ing7220-C-!?10'G} 120 and 110% of the specified load shown in l tach increment load shall be maintained for344f-I tQ). the duration specified in section 5.4. i 5.3 Calculated gage pressures for the pier load testing shall be determined by combining the individual jack calibration data! "t:tt: ~ --' the j rte 5:r:

t : 2t ; lit;:ti:7. ;t;;%.

L.o.a.dJcremenb.u aN shall be the..following 5.4

  • N

,~ .u Loadincrements,excepta[ 5.4.1 specified in sections 5.4.2 end 5.4.3,Ashall be held 3 until the rate of pier top settlement is less than 0.005 inch in 30 minutes, but not longer than 2 hours. 5.4.2 In the unloading / reloading cycle, the decrement $at 40, 30, 20, and 10% and incrementr at 20, 30, 40, and 50% shall l i 0127n D-3 I i j _...~.. I g 4

[ 5 3;2::i'ica:ica 7:00-0-133(G), Ka.- 1 o,,,an.. o / kfI be h' eld for$e, it 2 inutes.

uring this i

loading cyc is not required to .3 w 1, t = 8-6.2 ) meet any settlement criterion before . g, j d J 3 m 1."di ":t 6 proceeding to the next decrement or 8'f A e8 increment load. M t e rd 8 7 = *A 0 g e h f 3 5.4.3 The 100 2-' 1200 increment load shall y C.! ,g be held until the rate of pier top .lf -

  • y 1}

r.A settlement is less than 0.005 in 1 hour. y,I &w$g L us 3 h;$her* [e3 i

  • 4 Wedges shall be ndtight for snugfit

'7 " y 8

  • .y.g ]& hf at 110% of load, and shall not be 3*

r aS readjusted with das.nes increments.be. {t +n y N 5.4.4 When the acceptance criterion for pier g "d g.j r 7, 3 e load is achieved, (less than 0,005 in#ch

  • h f

top settlement at the 12C? *

  • c --- =
  • Pr** M y l

g j {.3 ,t sj a in 1 hour) the jacking. load shall be M h *. g e ogpgp to 110% of the specified load.3NCg gg maintained on active jacks with [k$'gb 3 wedges handtightened for a snug fi g J, E j Q] e

s. "
  • i The construction activities in the vicinity of test pier shall then resume 5

as directed by the RGE. n 8 j! c g+ p .c y l " 48 d f 3.g $ 2. *) % s 5.4.5 cceptance of pier at 110% of the ~f i 3 pecified load, locking off the loads w .. ) 1, and maintenance of jacking loads on the pier shall be in accordance with I. a_r i. respective sections of

  • d j

h .. E, $ specification 7220-C-195(Q). s 5.5 If at any time during loading of the test pier j u.y l there is an upward movement of the existing

  • s J J
  • j structure in excess of 0.03 inch at the

}! designated acnitoring point, further jacking f,u.N a f3 operation shall follow the procedure specified

e in section 6.3.10.f of wJ*l-

,i specification 7220-C-195(Q). 3,(i 6.0 !OAD TEST MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 3 a 6.1 Unless otherwise directed by the RGE, pressure .[- {i gages and upper and lower tell-tale dial -{ r 1' indicators shall be read and recorded e-til 4 5 th: 1 ;; ' i r '--- -" -

gi ;;;r.t
for each increment, W a;t the following minimum times from the start of jackin 0 (just prior to start of jacking),51,g:b lo, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60,1 % 80, 100, 120 minutes, and each 20 minutes ^"ee^8% 2. howy b met, eack ) h r og*il to h

,3 ^^r-' 12 0 -i S t e. b SMs M N # e*4M 7. Iw M Uni'il % q. l w y,,,t fere, Q reget,emeds are met. 0127n D-4

specification 7220-C-195(Q), Rev l' Appendix D sed decrem,W es direttet hpue RGr.. 6.2 Carlsen str s meters shall be read and .I recorded least twLee per 1 cad I l y.5;g a u=m.=v ;=ne' it=@3 = ===

  • i6 increment 4 3 --t rii't.

m:c"!it<- 4.1, = %j ei s tr m --- - n": z-r -'_; r" x m __,__ m. . m "7 .---..".."'.L-'-~~"'"----"-""'~~'- e0g! 6.3 Building movement A4 and other bug'ng .) # II instrument data shall be recorded ^cr.3y 1 "U s each increment load, as specified in A Drawing 7220-C-1493(Q). I ,j4.g To the extent possible,A pesev,e peeead iellkledialyge i s Y 6.4 readings shall be Ta$ taken simultaneously a esprded along with i $ j L M* I the clock times on th Uumentation dats e, y forms. PJi::._;; i';;. The.RGE shall complete j T. the attached sample data form (Exhibit A) to 3 {j consolidate the instrumentation and pressure e 6yj,4 data into a common form. Instrumentation data , ; d 4 J +. shall be made available to subcontractor for I -g 3 g its records, as a f e,4 specification 722hecified in section 6.3.8 of C-195(Q). 4 Ir [ u 6.5 All dial indicators, reference points, and 16 pressure gages shall be clearly identified .t j h $T with a reference number or letter to assist in 1 recording data accurately. 1 4 desemest t "I 1 l' 6.6 Dial readini ts g all be and J # recorded to,0.A001 inc and averaged to the nearest 0.001 inch when computing movements, i.).'hn ~ f J Master fressure gages shall be recorded to the i i nearest 25 pai. Carlson stress meter readings .g shall be recorded to the neares,t 10 psi. i l 6.7 No d observations shall be recorded on 3 th forms and shall include, but shall I not be limited to, the followings description 1 i and esplanation of adjustments made to .1 { instrumentation or field data or both; b notation of any unusual occurrences during i testing; detectable lateral movement of the pier and directions and any other pertinent 3 observations related to th9 performance of the i /(ladadog weigNt al tite) I{ toat. 4ipaJavesage J 4a 6.0 Plots of (a) g1 d vedeus average 3 top 1 I settlement, (b oadhversus average tip 4 settlement, and (c) settlement versus time a r vill be maintained b Ret to monitor the t progress of the test.. res are attached (tshibits q andE(for these plots 4 ). i 0127n' D-S } M

m. ~ s 3pecification 72:G-C-195(Q), Rev 1 Appendix D 7.0 CTHER U'tDERPIMMIMG ACTI't!?!!S - RTCTRICTICMS i i l 7.1 Jacking other than to maintain specified loads l shall not be allowed at -any other piers within 100 feet of the test pier during the test. I { 7.2 Excavating shall not be allowed within 20 feet of the test pier during the test. t 7.3 other construction activities which cause i vibrations or which may disturb the test pier i instrumentation shall not be allowed as determined by the RGE during the test. 7.4 4 All operations in connection with pier load testing shall be carried out in such a manner so as to avoid personnel exposure to hazards. Only authorised personnel shall be permitted within the istediate test area, i' 8.0 FIELD LOAD TEST REPORT ,I 8.1 A field load test report will be prepared by ] the RGE. As a sintaus, it shall include the following informations a. Project identification b. Project location c. Test pier location and designation d. Wane of the RGE or his designated representativeto. e. Log and description of excavation and soil testing. l f. Cone penetrometer, N density,and ad$er i test results g. Brief description and sketch of Carlson stress meter installation and toiWie hotell=% h. Description friction lining As-butit pier dimension <s,,an _ u, e ea 1. d sketch ,ggg) test [Ioncretedandconcretecylinder j. Date results and de madma*Jovr.ed_naalthWwof 0127n D-6 9 .) 3

\\ specification 7220-C-195(Q), Rev. Appendix D k. Surveyed pier tip elevation and top elevation 1. List of related drawings indicating j pier rebar, instrumentation dotatis, etc t i u. Date tested n. Brief description and skete's of load application apparatus, including jack capacities, jack arrangement, pressure gage arrangement, and arrangement of pump. A sample of the form to be used it attached (Exhibit D). o. Identification, location sketch, and i I description of all gages and reference \\* points p. Certification and calibration reports of jacks and gages l Tabulation of all time q. and movement readings, load, stress, c. Notes and observations recorded during g ti g le ds aeq m e I *.venees d J,g.w.g ,,.mges s. Temperature and environmental I conditions during the test 4 t. M* 4 b, WJ ven.< m.wmn+ # 6 M* 4 t.I,Jamd vm.s se#ivae=t-4- 'YS 4 +4*4 W seMrw ven.s % W' M 4 d M **d k sm[ vers 1 s e w.e.,na wet,.c ~ ~ @ 5 f I""kd A .h*!!.@_f_ead hvis (ante kh' g) t i 0127n D-7

...a~.... ......I $lll i l 1 f I e i a i i ) i l 4 I l ?

  • i l

l' i l l l as i i i i X i I t I i i I 3 OT 4 ,,U . g N.m g5 g fc1 l 30

=

i g e b ^ l h $ f) 3 1 4 i i a ~ 3.. y 3 I y 1 1 l t; J l 5 "II if l i a Ng n a I I ~ I f 6 a., ([ t j{ - I l = a a a .t.. l ~ c

a.mm.4.the.t.- .AA_4w. .a--W M, hA-, We e ' Q w-a .et,43-.4.a.4-6M e.m A *.m Mha ^ 4 44hh,4-I l 4 1, l f --- e5 s I I sue 1 i 8 1 i I i I l ..i. ..i.... i I s I p g ,..~ ,. w.. ), e 3 4 p i t c .y.. .4 ,i 1 i 4 1 i y l t .. n. 3 .. =.. = ~ \\ A. _ I 5_ 4, ~ r g ..<l ...1 .i. .i . l .I l i 1 i i t i i ( 1 i l l ..,._..______..ll... [ e' _ \\ I lill 4 1 OK i dN{ s L { 'lB osi T s 2] ( 1hh r R A i s 4 i b. j i u a ll { n t II !i I .g 1 t m 4e5 i u ' 'p f I i l l l' 0 $ l$1 l' lllll l l t l l g 6e I is h i i 1 e es 7...., e t

=-_...... - -. - - f. m.- f-Specification 7220-C-193(Q),2v i A;pt:di: 3, ' 101: 2-i 3 l(~ PIER LOAD TEST DATA

t. CAD VE33U3 ha ILE.8r!T r *. _

I t Profect_ ulcLaND t!NTTS 1.WD 2 Location - MiCLAND MICHIGAN Mw No. i Owner CONSUVERS POWE.9 COMPANY

ggg, Engineer SECHTEL ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN Drawn By Job No.

7220 oM -?" j T-i i r + > i 1 i , i r i i i i,,, 1 r 1 1 r i i i t i I I I L & I i 1 1 ! I t ] I 1 g y j 3 I f h. 5 ) f I f I I I I I t T 1 1 i f I i 1 1 1 ! f r 1 1 I i i I I I I iI j I i i i i i, i I I I E n r T g ? I I i E t y I I I J l 1 Y I s y 9 j I I K l I I I g ' s 9 g y L y I ! = 1 1 3 ; 3 1 I I T l 5 y y l l 5 g I i I I [ I J i e j y I r i i i i i I f I f I l t I I I I t I I I I. d j } g e 4Ph. r I I I i y e. 1 i 9 1 I i, i i I 1 4 6 i f ] f I I ] g il .,.. a. -- l i i r I 1 i i g I i - I L I \\ I I f I I I I F I f e 1 e S 3 .. p r I 1 l I m i I I J i [ d 1 I 1 I I. Y t I = .i w. c -a

  • " - ' ' ' ' ' ~

[ I ^

t l i Specification 7220-C-195(o),ge. Appendix D, Exhibit B. ~ T PIER LOAD TEST %. *ip~~ /en=US Sc'TTL: MENT ~ ,s l Project MlOLAND UNITS 1 AND 2 i Location MIDLAND, MICHIGAN 4 Owner CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY l Engineer BECHTEL ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN J o 7220 39 Load (tons) h I j I I I I a i I I J j j! 1 l f I { T FI ,1, i,. 3, , q r i i i i r ri i i r a rr cr' I I f ;

j l P !

I I I ,I,l i, I I l ! j ^ " p i i. i I [ t a I I ' i i i g ' 4 i I p P j s l= x f, e 4 e l >- !^ I -qr =y 'g t ' l 4 -i 1 i-I J t. I a ( 3 \\* E l i I d x. -y 9 -.~.... -. ...-4,. _n... ....,;_....~ a ' N,_ *[ 'r g -. - - -'A $ -l

i .e m Specificatien 7220-C-195'Q), Rav 1 s.,*., La.1.n., e p-PIER LOAD TEM CATA 3s (LEMENT VE.9 SUS TIME Prefect MICL4ND UNf731 AND 2 Location - MIOLAND, MICHIGAN gr go, j Owner CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Date i Engineer SECHTEL. ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN he By Job No. 72m i Time (minutes) I I I I

  • I I

I I. I I I I I I I I [ l j( f a j I l l l [ [ g ] 1 I I 1 1 8 1 1 4 i i I I I F i 1 1 1 4 j , [ 1 I f I O i f i I f I I i i I f I i 1 l 1 5 T I ! I b I 1 i i i ] , I g g I A 1 , j 1 I 1 I i P y 4 a r y [ I I I a 1 I I I I f t I I I I I O I I I i i I i g i I g j j i j I I q j g j, I i I l i E i r j j O I q I i = i 1 l T , T e p g i i I - ) i - 1 1 I s I I i )' 5I i j i i t,. I , i I i e i 1 ' 4 f = f A I'! ] 1 e ' i I I f l -.e i r ] I f I e, 9 a m. .*w ee. 1 E I ] 3 I ( I 1 1 I I I l L f i v i I .1 i g r f t I 6 I f I I r 7 r I I r I n ,...4 I T I u q v y I L l T l 2 1 A 5 - 11 1( 'I S I ,,,,., - - = ,7 m-" Y + + ~ ' ' " _..-~e-4

  • I g

>4 ! ~~ -'N I. [ ,,,i.,, en e ."- ' ' " ' ' ' " " " " - ~ ,,,e.,.,a--e--- M i 2----- 4 ^

1 I Snectftesti n 72 C-c 1n m 2:-. A,e= dix D, Z::hibia: 0 (. PIER LOAD TEST DATA!S27U:# aneet ct t Prc4ct M;0 LAND UNITS 1 AND 2 C3to l l.0 cation _ MIOLANO, MICHIGAN Pist Nc. Cwner OON3UMERS POWER COMPANY gy - Engineer 8ECHTEL. ANN ARBOR. Y!CHfGAN JOB NO. 7220 Weather i Temp

  • F i

t ca2hn% Hydraulic Jack / Gage C JackSerialNuh1bers.A :-"::n':.SeeSheets: Gage SerialNumbers: SphericalBearing Numbers: Stress MeterSerial Numbers: Mer and Boring Locations.See Drawing Numbers: SollCata

Reference:

Notes: =. Show Sketches Below for (1) Test Setup, and (2) Plan of Mer Locations i: .4 'l C il'.i-1 ~ d. 4 3 3IlO A .i 4 t v C f g a ,t - I '+ ~ '----.z-~ ~.. ~ ',.a... ,[ ' 5 ! ~,> ' t.. e }

~-,..a..-._- - ~... -. -.

3 S ecification 7220-C-195(Q), Rev 1 P

.W.f$.,~., ~. au.o / p j \\ pmn. =i m D "* ~.a s s,msA'

  • y' Ao '64 (&RLf'ord ' y y 6 7 f.C M S

~ es gg t s J e Prclect_ MIDLAND (JNITS 1 AND 2 i 3 Location _ MIDLAND,'MICHlGAN m i owner _ CONSUMERS PCWER COMPANY ~ Engineer. SECHTEL. ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN a n8 1 t Job No. 7220

  • O l'

~ re g f !!!!l l. fl flll' l;l'l, ' ',' l II >lr llis i i l i, i.. ' l I '1 I I ,i, ,? i i 1 1 4 > 1 , g 3 I E I I I L 1 I I .f 6 I' i 1, i t J I i i, y j I I I I \\ I l ' I l l ! f I i Y T-i j g g i z y i l I I i l j f i C I i I . ! ! [, i I I L i I I 1-9 l I T ,1,. ,. l:,: 1 1 1., I I I ,I,i 9 5 i - l ii1, i i s i i 1 ' - i : i ,I i - i i y I f 1 I e I . I i i i s i g I i i i - I ' l q 1 y j l e l i f f ) }' g 4 m W. .M ' a i,. A = i h l \\ 3 g s' i I 1 4 i i i y ; s. f y I I I it l 1 1 1 7 i T-a$ ~ 7 T I g 1 1 b l

  • Q y

n I. 4 W s-h Y 1 i i s-i i~ 4 , { e O ,1 I 4. 3'-

  1. I9jQ i

~ j <1 e 1-3 D h R M 38Krs ( ktps)

d e

9,, n i1 l'e. 1. e **. - 1 I ..a .,4 ~

W G~"P Power ~~ Consumers site Manager Company um wa uusione Project: Po ses 1963, useiene, us deseo. (5173 s314eso PRINCIPAL STAFF h a 4A l [ENF i ( i D/RA i lics t c W 3 April 13, 1983 A/PA 1 pao i 6 {f, PFt? I rSLO I I E iz.Nl IRC 1 4 f I ? I 8 9 Mr. Jay Harrison Midland Project Section i I US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  1. AM Region III 799 Roodevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 i

I MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER GWO 7020 I WORK AUTHORIZATION File: 0485.16 UFI: 42*05*22*04 Serial: CSC-6662 We have completed our review of the following work activities: t 206050102 SWPS, Building Monitoring - Install Brackets 206050101 SWPS, Building Monitoring - Install Permanent Bench-j mark covers l 206050100 SWPS, Building Monitoring - Install Extensometer 206050106 SWPS, Building Monitoring - Install Instruments and ter-minate instrument cable (includes Testing and Calibration) Per the NRC-CPCo Work Authorization Procedure, we request concurrence to prceeed with the above listed activities. I 4 9 DBM/CMM/dmh i l l 3 d. APR 21 19f3 L.. -, -

r 0W ~ l O'p=' Consumem Power -. n,., su, w Company i Midland Project: Po Som 1963. Midland. MI 4884o e (s17) 83144So l)){Q gpp - l J ? 1, i 2 hb April 8, 1983 5 4.0 i ) ) l ,.g i i Mr. Jay Harrison t - i ~~ Mid1'and Project Section hj,j. l s 1 i a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission l'et. I l ?ltug Region III i 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND PROJECT GWO 7020 PURCHASE OF CHEMICAL GROUT File: 0485.16 UFI: 42*05*22*04 Serial: CSC-6655 This is to confirm a telephone conversation Glenn Murray of CPCo-SMO had with Dr. Landsman of the NRC Region III on April 5,1983. The purpose of the conversation was to obtain concurrence on the Non-Q purchase of chemical grout (polyurethane based) for soil stabilization for the Service Water Pump Structure (C-194). The above item will be purchased Non Q. However, CPCo will invoke the ap-i propriate Quality Assurance rogram requirements upon receipt and instal- {

1ation, f

j b DBM/cMM/dmh g, a a-1 'I 4 i = ~ ~ . - -. ~ -

1 % h[ g(g eSA

  • W s ohm mwr 4._ mm Am.

5/w/G5 Lu.3 W-u. A-M CPCo e,e -WA. og L]eu.m -H y w+ -tLt. m&> ^ U()61 u.y O 6J MdN4 l WA k A. Ob / 3 f i h g 3 h'3 -O h Pee d 'M J A Mooney Erfestipt MDEdgfr hph & k Ii h General offices: 194s West Parnell Road, Jackson, MI 49201 e (517) 7ss-0774 i 7 V3A 1 ENF April 4, 1983 O/RA SCSe.c Q t A/RA PAO i C OPRP 3LO F l DRMA He i l MMSP i e i dE 1 t I R F Warnick, Director g l l t Office of Special Cases pt lggtg g,, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission i Region III l 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 i MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT APPLICATION OF EXCAVATION WORK PERMIT SYSTEM FILE 0485.16 SERIAL 20506 his letter responds to questions raised by Dr R B Landsman during the ASLB Board hearings the week of February 14-18, 1983 as to why the Excavation Permit System did not include the unferpinning work. Le Excavation Permit System is intended for general excavations on site and for i. hose activities not covered and/or specifically locatediby design documents. Examples of these activities are excavation for tempo 5:ary utilities, slabs, roads, exploratory pits to locate utilities and temporary j and permanent wells. Rese permits are reviewed by appropriate discipline field engineers and superintendents to ensure that foundation subgrades tor structures are not disturbed, the integrity of compacted backfill is v intained, l and existing buried utilities are protected. l l An equivalent system of protection is in existence for underpinning work. All of the work associated with the major underpinning activities is covered by detailed procedures, drawings, quality plans and specifications and is monitored by field engineering, resident engineering and MPQAD Soils. Le design provides for protecting foundations of adjacent structures. It j specifies that the integrity of existing compacted backfill that is not to be replaced be maintained by use of lagging, bracing and/or soldier piles 4 during excavation. It also provides protection for all known underground utilities. i In the control tower area, the buried duct banks will be supported during underpinning as shown on C-1439 series drawings. He permanent support of these utilities is being incorporated in the permanent underpinning design. In the Service Water Pump Structure area, the braced excavation design f' incorporates all known utilities. Details of support for these pipes and j duct banks are shown on C-2031 series drawings. All probing including those i i for establishing water levels and soils stabilization is' carried out in accordance with approved procedures and under the surveillance of the resident { geotechnical engineering staff. 7 I APR'1 l'$83 g ' -3J Q ($fg6 o

G N, Serial 20506 2 Design documents are coordinated with representatives of engineering, construction and the quality groups, to provide the necessary control. Also, Appendix E of Specification C-200 addresses corrective measures for unplanned events. A further control of the underpinning activities is provided through the use of the CP Co-NRC Work Authorization Procedure and the soils work permit system. i 4 As explained above, it is evident that the underpinning work is adequately controlled to protect subgrades for adjacent structures, to maintain the integrity of compacted backfill, and to protect buried utilities. Therefore, i CP Co believes that it is not necessary to use the Excavation Permit System for this work. 1 M'ViCDL l CC OL/OM Service List .) i .i C

_3 ab -

~, GU

R SERVICZ LIS:' Franic J Ialley, Isq Atcmie Safety & Licensing Attorney General of the Appeal Panel Stateccf Michigan II S Nuclear Reg =1 story Cc=z 1 Carole Steinberg, Esq 'Ja-h4*-ton,. D C 20555 Assistant Attorney General Invi w.al Prctectica Dir Mr C R Stephens 720 Ianr 3M' Ad ! Chief, Dccheting & Services. t Iansing, E h8913 tr S helear Reguiscory Cema i Office of the Secretary ltren M Cherry, Esq ' Wa=h4"-ton, D C 20555 i l Sv.ite - 3700 2ree First ' aticeal Pla:s Ms Mary Sinclair Chi sse, ; cc602 5T-.1 Suzierses. Strues Mi.ittad, MI h86ko-t Mr 'W a" E Marshall i RFD.10 William D Pstenn, Esq i Midland,. E.k86ho - Counsel fer the 3RC' Staf" U S Nuclear Reguistcry Cennt. Charles 3echheefer, Isq W==h4* Sten,D C 20555 Atcud.c Safety & Licens1=g 3 card Panel I.tcaic Safety & Licensi=g i U S Tuclear Regulaccry Ccma 3ceed Panel t '4==hd--:ca,. D C 20555 U S Nuclear Regulaccry Cena Wa tington,D C 20555 Dr Frederick.? Cevan 6152 I Veria 'I=a12. Isrbara Staniris Atp 3-127 5795 North River Eced. 3cca Raven,. FL 32k 3 3 Rt 3 Freelsad, Mr k8623 Jerry ?arbcur Atenie Safety & Licensi=g 3c'ard Panel Carrell Z Mahaney U S Nuclear Reguistory Cc=:s 3ahecek & '411cez W=-h4--ten, D C 20555 70 3cz 1260 L7schhurg, Virg1=ia 2k505 Ime.L 31shcp Barmerr & '#eiss James 3 3rcz=er,.Isq 1725 "I" Street, 74 #5C6 Ccusumers ?cver Ccapan7 '#ashington, EC 2CCC6 212 'iesu Mi+d gim Avenue Jackscu, MI h9201 M I F4" er, Esq i Isham, Linccin & 3eale M.'D 7 Judd 3ree.5tticusi ?lsea 3ahecek & Wilec=. 70 3cz 1260 - 52nd Flocr Chicago,.IL 6C603

  • 7:cY.urg, 7A 24505 Jchn CeMeester, Isq Steve Gadler, Isq 2120 Car.er Avenue

. Dew Chemical 31d3 Michigan Dirisica St Paul,lc 55*08 Midland, C k86ho B &t h i -.. L q ,n g- -+- 8, y y g

3 q a .i CODSumBIS E POWBr Company. - vu, ~ u< e,mi <rs. r si << i, J e d Constructson FalNCIPAL STAFF General Officos: 1945 West Pemalt Road. Jackson. MI 49201 * (517) 788-0453 g VRA L ENF March 31, 1963 o/RA SCSe% +3 A/RA DAO 3 OPRP '3 LO - W mets.a DE I ML .F1LE A s' James G Keppler, Administrator OL Region III US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 I MIDLAND ENERGY CEhTER MIDLAND DOCKET NOS 50-329, 50-330 COMPUTER / ELECTRONIC NETWORKING SYSTEM FILE: 0505.2, E-43 SERIAL: 21642

REFERENCE:

NRC REGION III (J G KEPPLER) LETTER TO CPCO (J W COOK) DATED 3/4/83 Enclosed please find the Palisades / Big Rock Point response to the reference. Consumers Power Company would also be interested in tying into a computer / electronic networking system with Region III for Midland-related activities. The enclosure lists the Midland Energy Center hardware. l m JWC/JNL/bjb CC RJCook, Midland Resident Inspecto RHernan, US NRC HRDenton, US NRC i i i i 4 e p oc0383-0397a100 t. l r , e,4 ,,,9 APR I 1 1983 I ,h pR y I y I'

4 .q ) \\ , e.... [^ T CoRSulH8f5 Power (- E Company - @0M oeneral offices: 212, West Michleen Avenue. Jack.on, MI 49201 e (31717844650 { March 16, 1983 James G Keppler, Administrator Region III US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT - DOCKET 50-155 - LICENSE DPR BIG ROCK POINT PLANT - COMPUTER / ELECTRONIC NETWORKING SYSTDi This is in response to your letter requesting information on Consumers Power Company electronic communicating hardware. The following equipment is currently being used at the locations indicated: EQUIPMENT LOCATION IBM 5520 General Of fice, Both Parnall Road and Michigan Avenue Offices IBM 5520 Midland Energy Center IBM Displaywriter General Office, Both Parnall Road and Michigan Avenue Offices IBM Displaywriter CPCo Bethesda, MD Office In addition, we are using Comet Electronic mail on a subscription basis at both General Office (Parnall and Michigan Avenue) locations and all three nuclear plant sites (Big Rock Point, Palisades and Midland Energy Center). Should the NRC decide to implement a computer / electronic networking systen, Consumers Power Company would be most interested in tying into it. Nathan L Haskell (Signed) Nathan L Haskell Senior Licensing Engineer CC Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades j NRC Resident Inspector - Big Rock Point d i OCO383-0014A-NLO2 ~m- -- - - - + - ~ we, k

j .. j f.- ~

c.......

I s I Jeanse w cook Vice President - Projects, Engsneering and Construction General Offices: 1945 ' West Pernett Road, Jackson, MI 49201 * (5171 78& o463 VRA JoyENF / March 29, 1983 O/RA SCS/ b A/RA PAO DPRP SLO DayA RC ORMSP Mr J G Keppler, Regional Administrator OE-US Nuclear Regulatory Connaission ML Region III OL IFiLE7dC 799 Roosevelt Road l Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 1 l' MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT I DOCKET NOS 50-329 AND 50-330 RESPONSE TO SUPPORT REINSPECTION FILE 0.4.2 SERIAL 20746

Reference:

A. R F Warnick letter to J W Cook,

Subject:

Support Reinspection dated August 30, 1982. B. J W Cook letter to J G Keppler,

Subject:

Support Reinspection dated November 15, 1982. Reference A requested our schedule for the reinspection of the supports at the Midland site. Reference B identified our planned actions in this area and indicated that we expected to commence support reinspection by January 1, 1983. Our recent effort in planning and developing the. Construction Completion Program (CCP) has resulted in a revision to the planned actions and schedule. Considering the current status of construction activities, we no longer believe the approach outlined in Reference B to be consistent with timely completion of the project. We now intend to reinspect all installed supports irregardless of the time of their installation or turnover. We expect the new support reinspection procedure, training and certification of inspection personnel, QA program l revisions, and other support activities to be in place so that we can commence support reinspections during the week of April 11, 1983. It is estimated that the support reinspection program will extend into 1984. psrse6d. JWC/ RAW /lr OC0383-0040A-MP01 APR 8 W E I k bY Y i,

o,.. r- .. s 2 Serial 20746 CC RWarnick, NRC Region III WShafer, NRC Region III l RGardner, NRC Region III RJCook, NRC Resident Inspector, Midland Site BBurgess, NRC Region III g I 4 !e I t e ? ~ O ~ OC0383-0040A-MP01 J

d

~ ,s.. J~ - - -r.-., . s m.t ~ t~ 2

g i 7 bl- . s. /. .I.-, s

7.',.,,.-

James W Cook \\ 9'- Vice President - Projects, Enginernng and Construction Generea Offices: 1945 West Parnell Road, Jackson MI 49201 *(5171 78& O453 PRINCIPAL STAFF March 9, 1983 p MyRA._/1 xq ENF '/ I o/RA~ scs V 61 dfS. j 4/RA JAO U { pFRP

i_LO

~awA 1C ?.WSF l OE I Mr J G Keppler Regional Administrator i 3 i US Nuclear Regulatory Connission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glenn Ellyn, IL 60137 1 MIDLAND ENERGY CEhTER PROJECT - 1 MIDLAND DOCKET NOS 50-329, 50-330 MIDLAND PLAh7 INPO TYPE EVALUATION - FILE 0485.16 SERIAL 21769 In an October 5,1982 letter to you and Mr H R Denton we enclosed details describing the proposed Midland Plant Independent Review Program. Based upon subsequent discussions with NRR and Region III we agreed to a program consisting of separate efforts by MAC.to conduct the INPO Construction Program Evaluation and by Tera to conduct the Independent Design Verification. As indicated in the October 5,1982 letter, "the final report will be submitted to the NRC and an auditable reebrd will be maintained of all comments on any draft or final reports, any changes made as a result of such comments and the reasons for such changes." In compliance with this commitment and in keeping with industry's practice, we are submitting to you as the NRC Regional Administrator for the Midland Nuclear Plant three copies of the Self-Initiated Final Report by MAC entitled " Construction Project Evaluation of Consumers Power Company Midland Energy Center." The draft report was reviewed by INPO and changes were incorporated in the attached Final, Report in response to the INPO review. t i 1 MAR 101983 oc0383-3938a112 h f[W

J

'-\\ y ' SERIAL 2 i CC Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board, (w/o) CBechhoefer, ASLB, (w/o) j LLBishop,Esq,(w/o) j MMCherry,Esq,(w/o) [- RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector, (w/o) 1 FPCowan, ASLB, (w/o) j RSDecker,ASLB,(w/o) DGEisenhut,NRR,(w/o) l SGadler, Esq, (w/o) JHarbour, ASLB, (w/o) GHarstead, Harstead Engineering, (w/o) DSHood, NRC, (w/o) FJKelley, Esq, (w/o) WHMarshall,(w/o) WDPatton, Esq, (w/o) WDShafer, NRC, (w/o) BStamiris, (w/o) MSinclair, (w/o) a t -1 lq 4 i a 1 l 1 I oc0383-3938a112 g i - -~ :. w- '~~

t ',. ConSum8IS i Power - a ms. * ? s company Midlanad Phrjeet JHIN0lPAL STAFF h Mietend Project: PO som 1sS3 Midland. Mi esS40 e (617) 631-seso VBA Jgin:pp r il March 8, 1983 h-5V 3 R?, SYo l E.C ?.j i d Mr. W. D. Shafer, Chief 37,g, i g Midland Project Section Tff~ g g U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission d y Region III El tFI Lud i 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND PROJECT GWO 7020 FINAL DISPOSITION OF THE SLOPE LAYBACK File: 0485.16 UFI: 07070(S) Serial: CSC-6595 s This is to confirm a telephone conversation between Mr. Wheeler and Mr. Murray of our office and Dr. Landsman of Region III on March 4,1983. The purpose of the call was to inform Dr. Landsman of the final disposition of the slope layback. Bechtel Engineering analyzed the existing conditions and determined the as-built condition is acceptable. The only remaining work is to place temporary cribbing on the east side of the laybs.ck adjacent to the Unit 2 Turbine Building. Dr. Landsman concurred that the remaining work is covered under the work activity entitled " Redress the slope layback surfaces" and work could pro-ceed. D. B. Miller Site Manager DBM/CMM/dah I 4 8 .y I h anw 8 5csw ew

~T N, I PRINCIPAL STAFF l 3A I ENF i- [ Of ,A CORSumBIS $$l 3S$# Nd POW 8f Bw 8 i N Company $ L l* l OE n i Midland Project: Po som 1963, Midland, MI 4864o e (517) 631465o 4L } lf,(_ ] CL Fl LQ/O y() March 4, 1983 ? Mr. W. D. Shafer, Chief Midland Project Section

i US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III i

799 Roosevelt Road Clen Ellyn, IL 60137 I MIDLAND PROJECT GWO 7020 NON Q MATERIALS FOR UNDERPINNING File: 0485.16 UFI: 42*05*22*04 Serial: CSC-6593 This is to confirm a conversation on site between Glenn Murray of CPCo-SMO and Ron Cardner of Region III on 3/3/83. The purpose of the conversation-was to obtain concurrance on the purchase of "non-Q" materials for the un-derpinning instrumentation for the Service Water Pump Structure (C-194). i The following will be purchased "ncn-Q":

1) Structural shapes for instrument covers
2) Plexiglass for covers
3) Fasteners for covers
4) Expanded metal for covers i
5) EMT/ Rigid raceway materials
6) Instrument covers for extensometers
7) Casket material for covers
8) Dead and live end anchors for extensometers
9) Support brackets for instruments
10) PVC pipe for te11 tales
11) Centralizer material for te11 tales The above items will be purchased "non-Q".

However, CPCo will invoke Quality Assurance Program Requiremenp upon receipt and installation. 7 D. B. Miller Site Manager DBM/CMM/dmh Id DQQ 4 4 3 # h? gLs25

f.dL u O@-/ C0mpany .:s COnSumBfS w.-.* POW 8f ,,u """ad **" ww.no eroi.a: ro so. ines, wiei.ae. ui 4es4o. < sir > sai4es IFR'NCIFAL STAFFl '.M I fiNF l 1 March 3,1983 [gRA GCstrk;J 43 h!?.M PAO t CFRP HLo 1 NRVA id~~, pois; j ce i ML i i i. 1 Mr. W. D. Shafer, Chief

0L I

lFlLO f M Midland Project Section a U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Region III l 799 Roosevelt Ibad l Glen Ellyn, IL 60127 MIDIAND PInIECT GWO 7020 CIARIFICATION TO THE NORK ACTIVITY LIST File: 0485.16 LTI: 07070(S) Serial: CSC-6586 The purpose of this letter is to document discussions held with Dr. Landsman on March 2, 1983. Our R. M. Wheeler proposed deleting frtzu the Work Activity List the activity described as " Monitor and Adjust Pier Jacks after Icad Transfer". It was expla4W that this activity was already covered urder l the activity described as " Install and rmd Pier". l After reviewing the activity, Dr. Landsman concurred with deleting the activity entitled " Monitor and Adjust Pier Jacks after Load Transfer" frcxn the Work Activity List. D. B. Miller, Jr. Site Manager DBM/P2M/lrb 4 MAR 14 M83 r T3 s S.Li.d4?3 n

James W Cook B Vice President ~ Projects. Engsnsersag and Construction I Generet ofttcas: 1945 West Pernell Road Jackson. MI 49201 * (517) 788 o453 February 11, 1983 i 8'RjNCIPAL STAFF W RA Vtu /J

ENF, t

D/RA ( SCS J,p f g 73 A/RA PAO g DPRP SLO 3 DRMA RC Mr J G Keppler, Administrator ORMSP i Region III DEP l US Nuclear Regulatory Commission ML . [ 799 Roosevelt Road OL i FILE ,d. Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT MIDLAND DOCKET NOS 50-329, 50-330 INPO SELF-INITIATED EVALUATION FILE: B1.1.5 SERIAL: 21032 I This is to confirm our conversation of January 18, 1983 at which time we l agreed that the INPO self-initiated evaluation will be submitted to Region III i with the INPO overview included. This change was necessitated by INPO's l request that all participants submit their evaluation first to INPO and then to NRC with the INPO overview included. Thank you for your understanding in this matter. I d//td JVC/ /bjb CC RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector RHernan, US NRC HRDenton, NRC RWarnick, NRC ,y WDShafer, NRC --p oc0283-0345a100 g g y jg __ q -t r o 7 2 (A V G 7 l -vms na - -~

/ { CKGl'm(Ti w a==ee.

  • l%..{.{

\\ Site Manager ,/ DMapU6' ""'"' N " s I Mini no Project: Po som ises, Midiend, ui ass 40. ts17) sai4sso g -[ RA ENF i February 9, 1983 3/RA scs owq43 i A/RA PA O () 21 SLO i m ac Mr. Wayne Shafer OPMsp United States Nuclear Regulatory Ccunission DEP Region III ML i 799 Roosevelt Road .OL . F1LE M/ll) Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 7 1 MIDIRO PluTECT GWO 7020 SERVICE WNIER PUMP STRUCIURE AC1'IVITY REVIDf i File: 0485.15.2 UFI: 44*05*22*04 Serial: CSC-6541 On February 2,1983, Bob Wheeler and Don Sibbald of CPCo met with Ross LaMsman and Ron naMner to discuss Service Water Building open iters. Shalltv probing for the Service Water Pung Structure, deep probing for the Service Water Pug Structure and dewatering wells for the Service Water Pump Structure were dis-cursed with Dr Landsman. We were informed by Dr. Landsman that he was still awaiting feedback frcm Joe Kane of NRR before he could authorize the wells and the deep probing. l Dr.' Landsman received a drawing which extended the excavation area associated with the shallcw probing for the Service Water Punp Structure. Dr. Landsman said he felt the change frcm the original excavation was minor and he concurred with the new co t. l D. B. Mi , Jr. Site Manager DBM/R3f/lrb ) FEB17 gg3

Fritt:CIPAL STAFF A' l br 4 lENF [e smA PAO l ~)-f 3 br... Y bfRA lECSUMlb .l / { ('[. {,' [Rb SLO i g

r. e. -,.

m ac L L' - ' " ! - iggsp _J k JEP M kiland Project: Po Bon 1963, Midland, Mt 48640 * (517) 6314650 g( I. -l OL FILE k ( ir) j February 9, 1983 g 1 I Mr. W. D. Shafer, Chief i Midland Project Section US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND PROJECT GWO 7020 j i AUTHORIZATION FOR AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING PIER 11 l File: 0485.16 UFI: 43*05*22*04 Serial: CSC-6544 j 12*32 We have completed our review of the documents for Pier 11 E&W including the load test on Pier 11 West. Based on our review, we have concluded that we are ready to start the work. According to the NRC/CPCo Work Authorization Procedure, we request authori-zation for the following activities: 155052027 Drift from access shaft to Pier 11E 155053015 Excavate Pier 11E 1 155054015 Install and load Pier 11E I 165052027 Drift from Access Shaft to Pier 11W 165053015 Excavate Pier 11W 165054015 Install and load Pier 11W (includes install bituminous plywood forms) 105050908 Perform Pier load test l l Please note that the activities listed above are similar to the corresponding j activities for Pier which ave previously been authorized. D. B. Miller Site Manager i DBM/RMW/dmv e s b _ Q) Q L N ) ' f -- ')

'N I (, f/Rl NCIPAL STAFe: I ~ d4 .J *,1 ( ENF ~g CollSumBIS D/R^ 'CS**? 4 y A/RA PAO h POVICI opar s t.o i CD.lipE!;'1'

)Rs^

ac ORMSP i undioms P .ct: ro som ises, usaiend, ut 4ss4o. (si7) sai4sso j F6 LE W_f, i OL February 4, 1983 l i Mr. W. D. Shafer, Chief Midland Project Section US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 i MIDLAND PROJECT GWO 7020 AUTHORIZATION FOR AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING PIER 9 l File: 0485.16 UFI: 43*05*22*04 Serial: CSC-6537 5 12*32 We have completed our review of the documents for Pier 9 E&W. Based on our review, we have concluded that we are ready to start the work. According to the NRC/CPCo Work Authorization Procedure, we request authoriza-tion for the following activities: 165052010 - Drift from Access Shaft Under FIVP to Pier 9W 165053005 - Excavate Pier 9W 165054005 - Install and load Pier 9W 155052010 - Drift from Access Shaft under FIVP to Pier 9E ~" '~~ % 150053005 - Excavate Pier 9E $ / ' " " * * ~ ' 155054005 - Install and load Pier 9E Please note that the activities listed above are similar to the corresponding activities for Pier 12 which have previously been authorized. l D. B. Mille Site Manager DBM/G3J/1rb k (h 5l.iu 5f& [ ~

N ^ (. C0fi5 tim 0r! p PO\\, r fir I NC I Pfl. E}AFF ( ('[f[!;i.((i V;bl k "'- v na.v.

u. 1
1. L
r..

T~ /wpw i i Midtend Project: PO Som 1943, Midland. Mt G640 e (S17) 6314650 ,. F <, n o I ',* y C j Q l','- AJ.' GL0 t '.1'57P ! l January 5, 1983 g i OL FILE \\l \\ M f ,s Mr. W. D. Shafer, Chief Midland Project Section US Nuclear Regulatory Comission i Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND NUCLEAR COCENERATION PIRIT REMEDIAL SOILS NON-Q MATERIALS FO*A UNDERPINNING File: 0485.16 UFI: 42*05*22*04 Serial: CSC-6486 t

REFERENCE:

CSC-6323, dated 9/17/82 Per 12/22/82 discussion between Dr. R. Landsman of NRC and R. Wieland of CPCo, i CPCo will purchase the plywood /fibreboard for a bond breaker on Pier Wil "non Q." The bond breaker is required to facilitate using Pier Wil as the test load pier. This material had not been previously identified as non-Q on our 9/17/82 letter i (CSC-6323). i \\ QN__ f r-D. B~. Miller Site Manager DBM/RHW/dmw Response Required: No cc ABoos l DLavelle JMooney JSchaub KRazdan J t & 3 w>,a c, o d a - - SE M N i ~~ i vr p _ _. ~. h r

0.. h0fl30 bib PRINCIPALSli{F f j Pev.Tr A ri!) ht.L. k N. ~/ h 0 I d F ' D/M '.I 2 %__, Ar4@,--- uw.no reoj.ct: ro so.1963. maiend. m 4es4o. (sin asiasso S SE&TP {. January 27, 1983 L LFILE l.ilLU) Mr. W. D. Shafer, Chief Midland Project Section U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND PROJECT GWO 7020 FOUR POINT JACKING FOR THE FIVP File: 0485.16 UFI: 12*32 Serial: CSC-6528 42*05*22*04 4 i This letter is to confirm and document discussions with your Dr. + Landsman and Joe Kane with NRR regarding the loads to be applied during the FIVP four point jacking. Based on our discussions held on January 25, 1983, Consumers Power Company agreed to in-crease the total jack load to a value 10% above the estimated weight of the structure. Based on an estimated weight of 1715K, we would jack the structure to a maximum load of 1890K. Based on the above noted agreement, we request your authorization i to proceed with the work. D. B. Miller Site Manager DBM/RMW/dmw I 3 3 d, 3 2 M f w m zu y

4 .3 - s p / 6 s James W Cook Vice President - Projects, Engsnemng and Construction o oene. a ottice.: le4s we.t Parnest Road, Jackson, MI 49201 e (S17) 78&o453 PRINCIPAL STAFF kA d aadtN i j 4 0/RA ENF December 28, 1982 A/RA S P2.eet m 7V OP&RP PA0 0 GC Pr,0 S SLO DESTP til J G Keppler, Administrator, Region III OL FILE. A/30 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 i MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT I MIDLAND DOCXET NOS 50-329, 50-330 ACCESS TO JOBSITE BY SOURCES OF ALLEGATIONS FILE: 15.3 SERIAL: 20355

Dear Mr Keppler:

Region III has received a number of allegations regarding the Midland Project. These have been made by sources, some of whom have been publicly identified and some of whom have apparently requested non-disclosure of their identities. Recently, Region III has requested that one of its investigators be permitted access to the Midland job site with one such source in order to facilitate an NRC investigation of the merits of the allegations. Consumers Power Company wishes to cooperate fully with the NRC in its investigations into the merits of all allegations regarding the quality of construction at the site. Accordingly, we are pleased to grant the sources of I the allegt.tions access to the site in the presence of the NRC investigators. Indeed, we urge the NRC to encourage all sources of allegations to visit the site with NRC investigators to specifically point out the defects, if any, which are the subjects of the allegations. In accommodating the sources of allegations who come to the site, we wish to maintain the appropriate security measures and obtain an understanding of the j technical specifics of the allegations. Accordingly, the routine plant security measures which apply to the NRC (e.g. signing in and out, wearing badges, etc) would apply in the normal course to the sources of allegations who visit the site. Also, in conformance with our normal plant security and insurance procedures, which provide that all site visitors be escorted by an official of Consumers Power Company, we would designate a responsible official to participate in each site visit. The official would be technically competent in the area of the allegation and would record the allegation in l accordance with the existing HPQAD procedure which, upon request, includes i reasonable measures aimed at protecting the anonymity of the sources of i allegations. In addition, depe1 ding upon the source and nature of the I ocl282-0094a167-100 f i e N bb h r o ry,.. a - - - ,sa3. 4 010 i

4 1, n s i allegation, the Company may desire to have present an additional person from / its contractor or consultant organizations. He, too, will honor any request for anonymity. While the Company official may respond to NRC inquiries, during the visit he will not question or challenge the validity of the i allegations. This will certainly facilitate the NRC investigations and, to j j the extent the allegations have any merit, it will enable us to make the i necessary repairs, or otherwise resolve the matters. ii 2 i Because some of the sources may request confidential treatment or restricted j l disclosure of their identities, we are prepared to schedule the site visits at 1 times consistent with attaining that objective, e.g., site visits may be scheduled for weekends or after hours. Of course, we cannot guarantee that an j i individual visiting the site will not be recognized; we can, however, assure j you that neither we nor our contractors or consultants will engage in any retribution towards such sources. l Some sources of allegations may wish to be accompanied during the site visit i' by a person other than the NRC_ investigator and the Company official. Subject to conformance with our normal plant procedures, we will have no objection if any such source requests participation in the site visit by a co-worker on-site or by his or her union representative on-site, j Site visits, under these ground rules, will materially aid NRC investigations i and the resolution of the allegations, and will assure the safety of all site e i I visitors without jeopardy to plant security. We applaud your efforts to search out the facts behind the allegations and assure you of our full cooperation. I i I, I 1 CC: RSWarnick, NRC Region III WDShafer, NRC Region. III RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector t oc1282-0094a167-100 v 9 r E h,

p no Jesnes W Cook Vice Pressdens - Projects, Engeneenng smJ construeries oenerei Offlees: 194s west Parnen Road Jeeksen. MI 40201 * (st?) fu04s3 December 3, 1982 p g.47, g. 7.. j... 3 ,~. I GO.. ' '..- E { dI0' 3 N j Harold R Denton, Director YINi7 ~ ~. " r Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation m. I Division of Licensing OL l lm.I i h(if) US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 J G Keppler Administration, Region III US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT MIDLAND DOCEET NOS 50-329, 50-330 MIDLAND PLANT INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROGRAM FILE: B1.1.5 SERIAL: 19750

REFERENCES:

(1) J W COOK LETTER TO H R DENTON AND J G KEPPLER, SERIAL 18879 DATED 10/5/82 (2) NRC

SUMMARY

DATED 11/8/82 0F 10/25/82 MEETING ON INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATI0,N Reference (1) provided a description of the Midland Plant Independent Review Program. Reference (2) summarized the October 25, 1982 meeting wherein Consumers Power Company and their contractors, Management Analysis Company (MAC) and Tera, discussed in more detail the Independent Review Program. During this meeting, questions posed by the Staff were responded to by the Company and its contractors. At the end of the meeting, Consumers Power Company requested the Staff to provide the applicant with policy guidance on the proposed Independent Review Program. The Staff agreed to provide preliminary feedback to Consumers Power Company by October 29, 1982 and to arrange for additional meetings as deemed appropriate. This was subsequently done and an additional meeting was held on November 5,1982 to provide the NRR Staff more details of the Stone and Webster third party assessment of the implementation of the soils underpinning work. i I l DEC 8 $82 oc1182-0272a100 l 1 +

s3a, hY&[

9 4 I

t 2 Based upon the meeting of October 25, 1982 and subsequent feedback from the NRC Staff, Consumers Power proposes the following changes to the Independent l Review Program as submitted in Reference (1) and discussed at the October 25, 1982 meeting: k j (1) The three specific evaluations will not be combined into a single program ~ with coordination of the individual reports by MAC. (2) The Tera Independent Design Verification (IDV) effort will be completely separate from the MAC effort with neither subcontractor having members from their company involved in the other company's efforts. i (3) The Tera IDV will be on the Auxiliary Feedwater System (AWS) as originally planned, and will also be implemented on another system which the Staff is to select based on three candidates provided by Consumers i l Power Company on a risk assessment basis. The three candidate systems i proposed by Consumers Power Company are: I a. Electric Power System (Diesel Generator) b. Safeguards Chilled Water System c. Containment Isolation System (4) The Tera IDV will be expanded to include a more in-depth review of construction activities to provide assurance of as-built construction adequacy of the systems included in the Tera (IDV). (5) For the IDV, any discussions between project personnel and Tera on confirmed findings will take place in formal meetings with the NRC being notified of the meetings in time to attend, if they desire. (6) For the INPO Construction Project Evaluation, a copy of the final report will be given to the NRC when it is sent to INPO. We believe that this letter documents the conclusions reached between our organizations regarding the Midland Independent Review. y JWC/GSK/bjb dC Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board ~, ' CBechhoefer, ASI.B MMCherry, Esq FFCowan, ASIB RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector RSDecker, ASLB ~ ' SGadler, Esq JHarbour, ASLB GHarstead, Harstead Engineering s ~' oc1182-0272a100 .li t 1 'i s

= 3 DSHood, NRC FJKelley, Esq WHMarshall WDPatton, Esq j WDShafer, NRC l BStamiris MSinclair LLBishop i i -l l t l I I e oc1182-0272a100 -i s ~ ~ ~ -~~:-- O

I CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Midland Units 1 and 2 l Docket No 50-329, 50-330 Letter Serial 19750 Dated December 3,1982 At the request of the Commission and pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, and the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended and the Commission's Rules and Regulations thereunder, Consumers Power Company submits j Midland Plant Independent Review Program. 4 CONSUMERS COMP By J Cook, Vice President Proje s, Engineering and Construction i Sworn and subscribed before me this 3 day of December, 1982 I

=?=-

Notary Public Jackson County, Michigan My Commission Expires %rg -wer 8. 198h i oc0982-0249a100 t}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20091H140&oldid=4336571"