ML20091F365
Text
i-q
.e i
t j March 8,1984 Mr. James W. Cook
'Vice President
^kf,^
3g Consumers Power Company 1945 West Pornoll Rood
-4 g2.,
Jackson, Michigan 49201 1--
'.7
.T' b
Vhb O
Mr. J. G. Keppler pt Administrator, Region 111 l.;i i
17 l File Aoej Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear R. gulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. D. G. Eisenhut Director, Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Docket Nos. 50-329 OM, OL and 50-330 OM, OL Midland Nuclear Plant - Units I and 2 Independent Design and Construction Verification (IDCV) Program Meeting Summaries Gentlemen:
The seventh meeting on Confirmed items and Findings was held on February 29, 1984. A meeting was held on March I,1984 to discuss outstanding issues in the civil / structural review area. Summaries are provided (Attachments I and 2, respectively) to document items discussed. and actions agreed upon by the participants.
Sincerely, Howard A. Levin Project Monoger Midland IDCV Program cc: See Attoched Sheet Enclosure HAL/sl I2 W TERA CORPORATION i
7101 WISCONSIN AVENUE -
BETHESDA MAIMAND 20814 301 654 8060
~
8406020129 840517 PDR FOIA RICE 84 PDR
.a Mr. J. W. Cook 2
March 8,1984 Mr. J. G. Keppler Mr. D. G. Eisenhut cc
Participants:
L. Gibson, CPC R. J. Erhardt, CPC D. Budzik, CPC D. Quammy, CPC (site)
R. Whitaker, CPC (site)
D. Hood, NRC J. Taylor, NRC, I&E T. Ankrum, NRC, I&E J. Milhoon, NRC, l&E R. Burg, Bechtel J. Agor, B&W J. Korr, S&W (site)
IDCV Program Service List if
~
l-4 TERA CORPORATION.
SERVICE LIST FOR MIDLAPO INDEPEbOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM cc: Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclect Reactor Regelation f7j5 k.
5 is e
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissim Freeland, Michigan 4.B623 Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Wendell Marshall
.. James G. keppler, Regional Administrator Route 10 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region ll1 Midiond, Michigan 48440
- 799 Roosevelt Road Mr. Steve Godler i
Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 2120 Corter Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident inspectors Office Route 7 Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Midland, Michigan 48640 Director, Citizens Clinic for Accountable Government Mr. J. W. Cook Government Accountability Project Vice President Institute for Policy Studies Consumers Power Company 1901 Que Street, N.W.
1945 West Pornoll Rood Washington, D.C. 20009 Jackson, Michigan 49201 Chorles Bechhoefer, Esq.
Esq.
At mic 5 fety & Licensing Board Michael I. Miller'Beale U.S. Nuclew Regulatwy Commiss,im Isham, Lincoln &
Three First National Plazo, Washington, D.C. 20555 Chic 11 nois 60602
,t.
5 James E. Brunner, Esq.
6125 N. Verde Trail Consumers Power Company Boca Roton, Florido 33433 212 West Michigan Avenue Jdson, Edigm 49201 Jerry Harbour, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 57il e set W iw W shington, D.C. 20555
- Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr. Ron Collen Cherry & Flynn Michigan Public Service Commission Suite 3700 6545 Mercontile Way Three First National Plaza P.O. Box 30221 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Ledng, Wehigm 482 l
h Lm Bel Mr. Poul Rcu A
tobility Project f24Mc id reet Washington, d.C. 20009 Midland, Michigan 43640
+
4 i
4
ATTACHMENTI
SUMMARY
OF SEVENTH MEETING ON COfflRMED ITEMS Am FIPOINGS Febroory 29,1984 Midland IDCV Program FA meeting was held on February 29, 1984 of Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices to obtain additional information related to Confirmed items identified in the January IDCVP Monthly Status Report dated February 15,1984 and to status other outstanding items identified previously. Exhibit I identifies the ottendees of the meeting which included representatives of TERA, CPC, Bechte!, and NRC. Exhibit 2 presents the ogendo used for the meeting.
Howard f.evin, TERA, opened the meeting with a discussion of the ogendo and a summary of the purpose of the meeting. He noted that a discussion of item 111 on the ogendo (pertaining to plans for completion of the IDCVP) was being postponed at the request of NRC, acting on another request by GAP to hold the discussions in Bethesda, MD. The NRC hos set this meeting for March 13, 1984 of 1:00 PM in their offices. TERA ocknowledged the receipt of project responses to previous OCRs and stated that those responses were being evoluoted. The meeting then proceeded with its primary objective which is to ensure that all participants have o complete understanding of the technical issues expressed as Confirmad items in the January Monthly Status Report. The responsible TERA personnel described each item, followed by discussion by either CPC or Bechtel, who were requested to identify additionai information that may have bearing on the issues or to provide clarification which would allow these issues to be dispositioned directly.
The status of previously outstanding Confirmed items and Findings was also discussed except for those noted in the meeting announcement. The meeting announcement listed certain OCRs os being on hold or that sufficient informo-tion is cvoilable fo-TERA to disposition the item. A summary of the significant ospects of the discussion is provided in Exhibit 3 olong with any course of oction identified.
l
YAGE l0F 2 ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT 1 MIDLAND NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AliD 2 INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM SEVGTH OCR STATUS REVIEW MEETING FEBRUARY 29, 1984 p
NAME AFFILIATION Tae buns
&cawi-lNttci.ean.
.Meto ScnoM
&cata/Nuetw-Pv. L m c. <. ;
- rau, Bob (J h L ko<
c pc, fin pa o lf,;.&4 (4hvg AlAC-lac /oam=e Tare,5
/M, L 9 oad N Rc. /Ir/DQ AS2 P frank Dou anekn TEgA c ee.
~
& n ua L E Ja.J 1*CL/4 cmG P.
0
().5 W L Rt Udd t,, < t M<-e---
~
asiM c.
p / A c; 7EX/
g,, h,jgot7 denGren6C S&
/)t ienna uzw" gewn finies. cop l
B.t. M T6 aerw7sL/pery.B09-l
/fike Gediny 8,cLp,/l6,n6/.[n/en Dea;/4. Monk e<tt.t/no.sa,s.!.
G. Suvcp 13ecue//Qxtsp> G nis, cur anrapauaa
- Bob /k m CPc a /rrc
?pJ 3 5 BecLG1 lTfeeN%A
$1GE Sor 2 MIDLAND NUCLEAR PIANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM SEVDITH OCR STATUS REVIEW HEETING FEBRUARY 29, 1984 I
N AFFILIATION BudM' - /%7D'W4 ~'
ptruset L. s43 yy,,,gg,eifg.
/decMe/ - P/aib &r skff,
pp Cwh Ge.did - 91_d 3Nr SwL
/kteI BecLieI-M tc L w 'c d
' ' E: = x.. - A L Vir tu x 5
Eu r., g
. c ru -
u M c Pr on acR g,y _
nan y,g,
"G N' ' '
7 ERA ConP.
I t
i ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT 2 MIDLAPO ltOEPEFOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM AGEPOA FOR FEBRUARY 29,1984 OCR STATUS REVIEW MEETING BECHTEL OFFICES AFN ARBOR, MICHIGAN
~
1.
Estimated Time Stort:
9:00 AM Lunch:
12:00 PM to i2:45 PM Adjournment: 3:00 PM ll.
Discussion of Confirmed items, Findings, Observations, and Resolved items Item TERA Lead A.
Construction e F-047 Tulodieski e F-049 a
e F-050 a
e F-054 a
e F-055
=
e F-056 a
e F-091 a
e C-092 a
e C-093 a
e C-094 e C-095 a
e C-M6 a
B' Mechanical / Systems e R-025' Dougherty e R-074*
Witt e C-129 Witt e C-Il2 Setka e C-133 Setko e R-081*, B-142+, B-143' Dougherty i
e C-148*, C-149*, C-150' Setko l
e B-152' Dougherty i
i I
v-
-a
-+ ---
u-
ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT 2 (CONTINUED)
C.
Electrical s C-022 Bates e R-039*
Bates e R-040*
Bates e C-097 Bates e C-109 Setka e C-Il0 Setka e C-Ill Setka e C-132 Setka e C-134 Setko e C-135 Setko e B-139*
Setka e C-141*
Setko e C-146*
Setka e C-147*
Setka e B-151*
Setka e C-153*
Bates (Note: Rev. I of this OCR is attoched.
Rev. O inodvertontly mislobeled switch 39658 as 3965A. This switch is located on panel 2Cl 14.
Ill.
Discussion of programmatic issues TERA pions for comp!etion of the design verification Construction verification status and future plans IV.
Discussion of Action items and Logistics for Information Exchange Notes: 1.
Items are grouped to the degree practical to facilitate discussion and minimize manpower requirements during the entire meeting.
2.
Items that changed status during the January reporting period are i
denoted with on osterisk.
3.
The following OCRs have not reached a final disposition; however, further TERA or Midland Project octions have been identified 3.
during post public meetings.
Accordingly, discussions are not l
j contemplated by TERA unless the Midland Project has identified i
new information that is pertinent to the ongoing octivities.
.e C-005 e C-088 e C-026 e F-031 e F-036 e C-038 I
e C-048 e F-043 l
e F-053 e F-052 l
e C-084 e C-087 e C-089 l
~
?*
a
~
ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT 3 DISCUSSION OF COWIRMED ITEMS, FINDINGS, OBSERVATIONS AM)
RESOLVED ITEMS
'3201-008-F-047. This Finding pertains to certain inconsistencies observed within the site storage and molntenance programs. Discussions were focused upon a Bechtel response to the Finding. ICV reviewers noted and identified the need for odditional information and documentation necessary to clarify certain statements contained in the Bechtel response pertaining tot e
Volve 2LV-3975Al - Reconcile on apparent discrepancy between a reference cited in the response for o CCI volve whereas the installed volve is manufactured by Copes Vulcon.
e Valve 2MO-3965Al - Information necessary to differen-L tiote between lubrication requirements for the
)
Limotorque operator and those requirements for the volve itself.
e Transmitter 2FT-3969A - Information which would provide additional justification for not including the vendor's recommended storage instructions within Midland site storoge procedures, e
Air Handling Unit 2VM-54A - Information which oddresses on apparent departure from site-storage procedures relot-Ing to o megger requirement and procedures and instruc-tions which controlled the Bechtel/Zock interface.
o Copy of the revised, unopproved site storage procedure FPG 5.000.
t i
j TERA agreed to document the specifics of our Information requests in a letter to Bechtel's Mr. Robert Burg.
l 1
3201-008-F049. This Finding relates to.on opparent deviation from cable separation criterio requirements. TERA odvised that no new information had
.l been generated in responding to the Finding and that ultimate disposition would
-i l
$/
be delayed pending receipt and review of the Midland project inspection plan to be implemented in verifying cable separation criteria.
3201-008-F-050. This Finding pertains to o cable misrouting event observed during the verificotton of the cable reinspection program. Disposition is delayed
- pending TERA's receipt and review of the project's response to NCR-A-5000 CV.
3201-008-F-052. This Finding records certain apparent inconsistencies between vendor supplied documentation and that documentation specified as a require-ment by Bechtel-prepared procurement docurnents. The discussions during the meeting were general in nature and were focused upon a Bechtel response to the Finding.
ICV reviewers stated that the Bechtel response did not provide sufficient information to enable o disposition of all the items recorded by the Finding and that additional information would be required. TERA ogreed to document the specifics of the information requests in a letter to Bechtel's Mr.
Robert Burg.
3201-008-F-054. This Finding addre: sed certain apparent inconsistencies observed within certain Midland Project Quality Control Instructions (PGCI's).
TERA odvised that telecon discussions were held with cognizant CPC personnel in on ottempt to gain additional information which would enable ICV reviewers to disposition this Finding. It was stated and ogreed that ultimate disposition of this Finding would be delayed pending reco'mmencement of the ICV Construction / installation Documentation Review.
3201-008-F-055. This Finding records apparent inconsistencies observed within certoin welding procedures and procedure qualification records. TERA odvised that a formol, written response had not been received from Bechtel/CPC and requested information as to what activities had been undertaken to addren this Finding. Bechtel agreed to advise TERA reviewers of a date by which ICV I-reviewers should expect a response.
I i
r'
.i 2
4 p
(,
i' 3201-008-F-056..A CPC response to this Finding was discussed. This Finding concerns itself with apparent discreponcles in certain material test reports ossociated with Air Receiver 2T-93A and the AFW pump shafts. TERA stated J
that the response to Findings related to the Air Receiver 2T-93A were adequate and would serve to resolve the documented concerns of ICV reviewers. The Finding relating to the AFW pump shafts (no CMTR for shaft material in the QA I
dato package) was discussed in detail. TERA odvised that final dispbsition of this Finding could occur if CPC possessed sufficient assurance that the shaft material was in fact supplied in occordance with specification and BOM requirements. As'on action item, CPC/Bechtel agreed to provide addit lonal information which would serve to provide assurance that the shaft material complies with specification requirements.
3201-008-F-091. This Finding oddresses the omission of Activity 3.4 from o Lesson Plan used to train personnel in conducting pipe honger and support inspections. As a result of discussions with cognizant CPC personnel and a review of information received from CPC, ICV reviewers were prepared to disposition this Finding pending receipt and review of Lesson Plan Revisions used prior and subsequent to the Lesson Plan revision reviewed by TERA. CPC advised that the Lesson Plan revision used prior to the revision reviewed by TERA also did not include Activity 3.4 and advised of activities undertaken to investigate and reconcile this discreponey.
As on action item, CPC is to formally transmit a description of activities undertaken to reconcile the noted discrepancy with a complete and effective training program.
3201-008-C-092. This item recorded a process observed by TERA to porsess the I
potential for introducing a bios in the manner with which inspectors were being i
l qualified to conduct pipe honger and support inspections. Discussions were focused upon two CPC documented responses to this item. TERA stated that the responses were adequate and will enable ICV reviewers to disposition this l'q Confirmed item os being resolved.
l 3201-008-C-093 thru' -096. These Confirmed items address certain j
. Inconsistencies observed by ICV reviewers os a result of conducting l
a 3
H l
g g,.
-.3 w
r
---a-
i documentation and physical verification reviews of installed commodities within the CR HVAC system. TERA advised that they were recently in receipt of CPC's formal response to the Confirmed items and that a "first" review of the response would indicate that sufficient information and data were contained in the responses to enable ICV reviewers to disposition the Confirmed items.
- 3201-008-R-025. CPC has provided additional documentation of available time for operator action following a tube rupture event.
This documentation demonstrates that sufficient time is available for the operator to override the FOGG system by placing it in the manual mode. Thus, this item has been resolved.
3201-008-R-074. Bechtel has provided a calculation which serves os a basis for the resolution of this item concerning the temperature in the control room under blackout conditions. TERA considers this calculation to be odequate to resolve the concern.
3201-008-C-129.
At the previous OCR meeting Bechtel verbally provided information to explain the apparent discreponey in the isolation damper closing times.
During the visit to Ann Arbor TERA personnel reviewed available documentation to verify the previously made verbal statements. The informo-tion indicates that the system is normally aligned so that the isolation domper which must close has a one-second closing time. Thus, TERA has reviewed sufficient information to allow this item to be dispositioned.
3201-008-C-112. Bechtel stated during the meeting that on opproved calculation is expected to be released by the end of the week. This revised calculation will reflect the concerns raised by TERA as well as other new information which Bechtel has received. Upon receipt of this calculation TERA will review it and determine the disposition of C-ll2.
3201-008-C-I l 3.
Bechtel advised TERA In a letter dated February 24 that a response to C-113 will be ovalloble about April 16. During the meeting Bechtel j
stated that they had folked with the vendor, who hos completed measurements of 4
air leakoge, and that they had also completed calculations. Bechtel is requesting the vendor test data and is considering doing a calculation end forwarding it to TCRA.' TERA will review information as it becomes available and also evoluote current efforts of the TDI Owners' Group to determine whether and how Owners' Group efforts will be considered in the course of the completion of the IDVP.
'3201008 R 081 This item was concerned with calculation FM-4Il7-28(Q).
Bechtel hos revised the calculation for reasons other than the TERA review. In the process of revising the calculation, Bechtel corrected the discrepancies noted in Confirmed item C-081. Thus, this item is considered reso!ved because it was corrected as part of the normal design process. TERA also made two l
Observations with respect to the Confirmed item. These Observations are 3201-008-B-142 and 3201-008-B-143.
3201-008-C-148. This Confirmed item noted a lock of fire seals for one of the i
fuel oil day tank rooms. Bechtel stated that it has a penetration review program currently ongoing. They expect to respond to this Confirmed item within ten
&n 3
3201-008-C-149. Bechtel stated that they use NFPA standards os guidelines.
When Bechtel states compliance with on NFPA standard they are indicating that they are in compliance with the -intent of the standard. TERA noted the difficulty associated with evoluoting commitments when the extent of the commitment mode cannot be easily determined. Bechtel stated that they will respond to this item by the end of March.
I 3201-008-C-150. This item ra! sed a concern with the extent of compliance with NFPA-72-D. Bechtel will respond to this item prior to the next meeting.
3201-008-C-022.
TERA has sent a letter requesting additional information regarding testing the level control system for the AFW. CPC has reviewed the request for odditional information and has prepared a response. During the meeting a discussion was held concerning the draft response. CPC stated that they expect that the test program will generally be consistent with TERA's 5
.n ey.
g g
g.-9
--yr-
,+--
,-.-yy g---9
,y9
,y m,.p
g,--.
y _,
g-,,,- - -=
_..p,.g-
expectations, but may provide alternatives with respect to parameters measured.
CPC stated that they will prepare a written response to TERA's letter.
3201-008-R-039. This item concerning the quellfication of cables was resolved by Bechtel providing additional information, which TERA reviewed and con-currd with.
p 3201-008-R-040. TERA performed on additional review of calculation GPE-17 and reviewed schematics associated with the AFW ond CR-HVAC systems.
These additional reviews found acceptable cable lengths TERA also performed 1
additional calculations which supported,the project position that the cobie lengths for the Midland project are consistent with their commitments.
3201-008-C-097. This item was concerned with potential single failures in the CR-HVAC system.
At tha lost OCR meeting Bechtel provided verbal information regarding how the HVAC system met its design commitments. Prior to this meeting TERA reviewed the drawings to which Bechtel referred in the previous meeting. TERA stated that offer the meeting they expect to review calculations available in Ann Arbor. The drawings plus the calculations abould provide enough Informction to disposition this item.
3201-008-C-109. TERA's review indicates that the ESFAS diesel generator stort
~
signal does not override the 60-second coast down interlock. Bechtel stated that they' are preparing a response and will provide a schedule for that response within ten' days.
3201-008-C-IlO. This Confirmed item noted apparent discreponcles in GPE-1, the food calculation for the diesel generator. It was noted that SCN-4082, which was discussed at the previous OCR meeting, contains a partial response to this Confirmed item. This SCN has not yet been approved by CPC and Bechtel needs CPC input in order to complete on updated QPE-l calculation. TERA provided meeting participants with a copy of Revision I of the ottochment to C-l10 t
i (Exhibit 4). The revised ottochment reflects the results of odditional review by f.
TERA of the apparent discrepancies between GPE-l and the loads determined by 1
.}
l m.
L reviewing drawings. Bechtel will provide o schedule for a response to C-Il0.
Revision I of C-l10 will also be included in the next monthly status report.
3201-008-C-111. Bechtel stated that SCN-4162 has been issued in draft form to 1
correct FSAR staternents regarding the battery charger. The present FSAR statements appear to be inconsistent with each other. TERA will review this
'SCN in order to disposition C-111.
3201-008-C-132. Bechtel stated that the drawing has been updated to agree with the FSAR. TERA noted that the concern was more general than the specific issue raised by the lonfirmed item. Bechtel stated that on IDCN was previously issued on the issue raised by TERA. Applicable IDCNs are now listed on drawings in order to provide a better cross-referencing system.
3201-008-C-134. Bechtel stated that the drawing referenced in this Confirmed j-Item has been revised. Unit I under voltage does not initiate Unit 2 LOP sequencer.
3201-008-C-135. This Confirmed item is concerned with the diesel generator lockout of the 4.16 kv offsite power incoming breaker. The project position is that this design is not a safety concern and is not in violation of applicable IEEE stondords. TERA stated that it will conduct a further review of this subject and
' determine the oppropriate action 16be token.
3201-008-B-139. Bechtel stated that the LOP sequencer accuracy was measured during the EQ tests and shown to be 10.1 seconds. Bechtel also noted that the i
plant technical specifications allow a 110 percent occurocy in the stort times.
I Since this item was an Observation, no further action is required.
3201-008-C-141. Bechtel forecasts a response in March for this item involving
- oir quality requirements for the pneumatic control system.
i l
3201-008-C-146. Bechtel expects to respond in March to this Confirmed item concerning failure modes for the pneumatic control system. TERA noted that l
7
.+,
.-l
,n
.g.
1 m - -, -,,-,
s.
--n.
the NRC had asked on FSAR question regarding safety-related air systems and that the response did not include this system. Bechtel will respond to this item in March.
3201-008.C-147. TERA noted that the diesel generator stort time.plus the ESFAS response time oppears to be greater than the time Indicated in the FSAR.
CPC and Bechtel stated that the safety analyses are not significantly sensitive to the response time. Bechtel will provide additional information in March.
3201-008-C-IS3. The discussion of the meeting provided clarification that the demarcations on the panel drawings wer'e not intended to indicate the steam generators. It was further noted that both the main panel and the auxiliary shutdown paael use the some convention regarding placement of the isolation volve control:. Thus, TERA's original concern that the numbering of the volves as shown on the P & ID and the panel drawing were not consistent is not correct.
Based upor. Informotion received at the meeting, it con be concluded that the drawing is correct in its present form. TERA will resolve this item.
320 l-008-C-144. This item resulted from TERA's independent analysis of a section of AFW piping. Because of the confirmatory nature of the calculations, TERA made its own assumptions regarding analytical alternatives which are not discussed in detail in the FSAR.
Upon reviewing the octual calculations performed by Bechtel, it was determined that the assumptions made by TERA and by Bechtel were not consistent. It was also'noted that conformance to Regulatory Guide 1.92 is on open item with respect to the NRC staff Safety Evoluotion Report. Bechtel stated that they believe the design proctices used for the Midland project contain sufficient odditional conservatisms that consideration of the factors identified in the OCR ore not necessary. Bechtel will advise TERA of on expected date for a response.
4 L
i D
8 9
a w
wm 4
w--,,---
,,y
+w
-,y-..-,,,.--
6-,,-
7%-...,,,,~, - -.
i w
Exhibit 4 Attachment OCR 3 201-00 8-C-110 Rev. 1 Potential Load Discrepancies 1.
QPE-1 includes two RCS flakeup Pumps (2P-58B & C);.however, only one can be. running at a time (Ref. J-232, Sh 1, Rev 5).
t This is a discrepancy of 900hp.
2.
OPE-1 appears to have utilized kVA instead of kN for:
Bus 2B24 2VM-05B Switchgear Rm Unit Cooler Bus 2B24 2VH-50 B DHRS Rm Unit Cooler Bus 2B24 2VM-52B CCET Ra Unit Cooler Bus 2C24 2VU-55B
' ESP Rm Unit Cooler 3.
OPE-1 appears to have based the load of 2VM-54A on 1.Shp rather than 3.0hp.
4.
OPE-1 is inconsistent in the application of its own assumption 4,
manually started loads are assumed operating."
Examples include:
2VV-57B & D Rx Bldg Cooler Fans Assumcd On Low Speed 2VE-54B
. Hydrogen Recombiner
~
OVE-04B Fucl Eandling Electric Coil OP-76B Fuel Cooling Pump OVV-86B Fuel Area Exhaust Fan 5.
OPE-1 appears to underestimate the load for 2P-232B '(Service Uater Booster Pump).
Drawing E-18, sh 13, Rev.
10, identifies the full load current at 96 ampe res, which corresponds to ~60ku versus the 50kW stated in QPE-l.
6.
OPE-1 bases the load for 07V-86B ' (Emergency Fuel Area Exhaust Fan) on 50hp instead of 75hp as identified on E-18, sh 17, Rev. 11.
7.
OPE-1 assumes 15kW for Battery Charger 2D25 instead of 74kVA l
as indicated on E-18, sh 11, Rev.15.
8.
OPE-1 does not account for both OVV-90D & E (Se.:vice Water Supply Air Fans) nor both OF-75D E
strainers).
9.
- QPE-1 assumes ne load. on instrument trcnsformer OX95, while 4
E-18, sh 21, Rev.10, indicates 25kVA.
10.
OPE-1 identified 155kN for motor operated valves and dampers.
While the alternate calculation was relatively consistent (ie.
162.5kW),
QPE-1 does not specifically identify the individual constituents.
l Page 1 of 2 4
I F. *.
n-
Attachment OCR 3 201-008-C-110 Rev. 1 Potential Load Discrepancies (Continued) 11.
Examples of items not included in QPE-1 are:
' Bus 2B24 2VI!-106 B Aux Equip Rm Unit Cooler Bus 2D24 OVH-52B Comp Cooling Pp Em Cooler Bus 2B24 2VI*-51C
!!akeup Pump Rm Unit Cooler Bus 2B56 2VII-54 B A N Turbine Pp Rm Unit Cooler Bus 2B56 2VI!-121B Aux Bldg Unit Cocler Bus 2B90 OVli-109B Aux Equip Rm Unit Cooler Bus 2E80 Pressurizer Heater 12.
OPE-1 is not always consistent with !!CC Schedule C-18, Rev.
22 relative to equipment full load current.
Example, OPE-1 lists the following motor data:
2P-137 60hp 91.5% Efficiency 0.875 Power Factor Utilizing the,above data to compute current yields 70 amperes.
However, E-18, ah 7, Rev. 12, identifies the full load current as 77 amperes.
This is a discrepancy of 10%.
l Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2
SUMMARY
OF MEETING ON OUTSTAPOING CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ISSUES MARCH 1,1984 MIDLAPO IDCV PROGRAM A meeting was held on March 1,1984, at Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigon, offices te obtain additional information related to outstanding Confirmed items in the civil / structural review area. Exhibit I identifies the attendees of the meeting which included representatives of TERA, CPC, Bechtel, and NRC. Exhibit 2 presents the ogendo used for the meeting.'
Howard Levin, TERA, opened the meeting with a discussion of the purpose of the meeting which was to obtain Midland Project clarification of responses presented in a February 9,1984, letter to TERA and initial responses to Confirmed items previously unaddressed. The importance of responding to the specific issues at hcM as well as the potential brooder implications was stressed by TERA. The efficacy of using various " studies" that have been completed over the course of the project to assist in the evaluation of the significance of Confirmed items was discussed. It was concluded that these efforts may provide benefit in addressing the cummulative effect of a group'of items and in proceeding more directly to a conclusion addressing the overall quality of the project's civil / structural design efforts.
Rob Burg,' Bechtel, made a brief presentation to show the general arrangement of site structures for the benefit of participonts who were observing the meeting and/or ottending discussions for the first time.
I Responsible TERA personnel introduced each issue, noting Confirmed items or sub-parts of Confirmed items where the information provided by the Project was 1
currently sufficient to support TERA' review activities; thus not requiring odditional project response. Most of the attention then focused on detailed discussions of the technical issues which remained outstanding.
Exhibit 3 provides a summary of issues discussed and any octions agreed upon by TERA and Midland Project personnel.
k g
! +
a -
..n
, - ~. - -,. -' -
!!)6C l o f 'L ATTACHMENT 2, EXHIBIT 1 MIDLAND NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM.
REVIEW OF OPEN CIVIL ENGINEERING ITEMS MARCH 1, 1984 NAME AFFILIATION h()Uk llN 8m chel ~ Cly)lfk'.f+ s c.
spf ' don n'l
/}<a NR/ - C/ p /
g, g,
- L pf. E2 G AAL f Gc//r&L
- L P Y 2fGVfp1 Q-fc.ayPt. - C IvtL-lS7put7 o/2M.
8 4 t V I,. h. L a c g,. m mv ARC /ZElDaMIP Qa;-Bol % y l
M. T. Hou e) In-coiavamar to TBtA I
is.J.Asu Tau Coswwr Joe. M ArtroreE TEtzA Yo4MD LEvkJ TCast con.P No"9 Et'f" 'S fed /cl (10il f50llS
~ ~ " ~
MALA Y DAS GUPTR 8scL G4 l
DALE l-l0ARE b.achtCb / CM-A N k' $0!*
festA/
c,% s/
J ks-re k l
(
(
7htC 1cf L MIDLAND NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM REVIEW OF OPEN CIVIL ENGINEERING ITEMS MARCH 1, 1984 NAME AFFILIATION
% ka
&cw /Lu"snus mam e sso
, nun _
steve nersraew esenre<-/c w4ms Idlal4MH.doH4+a4 fAEk4fA WVfL FINY' ha (dileon ec,,, g,,,,a _,,,.,g g,,y*
hlW $1lWVen}ac\\ad Gnjurncg. Da\\
.Q.
A/M V.vnsT 4 su.we.2 - :lo;ise g g $
Q ue.a_ kJ 9 as-, - e m:t Chr s H e> o %,
w gy b
w
~
DfLawus Bac.urac h
DO N
$ bl l
l i
l i
l ATTACHMENT 2. EXHIBIT 2 i
l i
ATTACHMENT 2 MIDLAPO ltOEPENDENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGPAM AGEPOA FOR MARCH I,1984 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL REVIEW MEETING BECHTEL OFFICES AFN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 1.
Estimated Time Start:
I 00 PM Adjournment: 5:30 PM 11.
Introduction and Opening Remarks 111.
Discussion of Confirmed items Items will be oddressed Individually and fully statused prior to proceeding.
Any required clarification will be provided by TERA, followed by a presentation of pertinent information by the Midland project representatives.
A group discussion will follow to provide clarificotton on the information presented, to status and to identify any
[
necessary oction on the part of TERA or the Midland project.
Items C-015
\\
C-069 C-07i C-077 C-079
~
C-099 C-101 through C-108 C-l13 through C-ll7 C-l19 through C-122 C-125 C-130 C-131 IV.
Review of Future Plans and Commitments V.
Summery 4
=
w
-e
ATTACHMENT 2, EXHIBIT 3 DISCUSSION OF OUTSTAbDING CIVIL / STRUCTURAL CObFIRMED liEMS 3201-008-C-Ol5 - This Confirmed item questioned the bases used by the project t for addressing the effects of floor flexibility on the seismic response of equipment and structure. TERA is currently reviewing informntion generated by SMA and no further information is desired at this time.
3201-008-C-069 - This Confirmea item questioned issues associated with the seismic qualification of the AFW motor driven pump. TERA indicated that additiono! Information was not required for items I and 4. Bechtel will transmit a calculation of weld stress, addressing item 2. They pointed out a section of the yendor's report which oddressed item 3 and the load combinations used in the pump analysis.
3201-008-C-071 - This Conf!nned item identified certain apparent discrepancies ossociated with the referencing of computer files within calculation package DQ59.l. Bechtel Indicated that file TIENORA corrected on error found in file TIENOBQ; however, file TIENOBQ was still used because the error was judged to be insignificant. TERA will review file TIENOBO and disposition this item os appropriate.
l 3201-008-C-077 - This Confirmed item questioned certain discrepancies Identified in the FSAR. TERA 'ndicatM that further infr.rmation was not required and that the item would be dispositioned shortly.
i 3201-008-C-099 - This Confirmed item questioned opporont inconsistencies noted In the computation of modol displacements in the auxiliary building model.
If Bechtel will provide further clarification oddressing the potential effect on Interfacing cow rir,dities and the local floor response spectro. They will also oddress the equipment / piping located in the' area noted in item 2 as well as the -
4 input used in the analysis for evoluotion of these components and commodities.
Their. preliminary eval >ation Indicates that displacement may be offected by
= opptoximately 3.5 percent.
4 l.
4
'8 4
g g
A.
3201-008-C-101 ond C-125 - These Confirmed items questioned whether or not compatibility evaluations between seismic and finite element models had been completed for the aux!Ilary building and diesel generator building, respectively.
Bechtel indicated that in their 1982 vintage seismic / structural evoluotions for the auxillory building, they compared the N-S direction base shear for reason-
, ableness against the overage acceleration value and checked mode shapes in both horizontal directions. This year they further evoluoted computed mosses in the two models m various elevations and checked stresses under the building as represented by forces in the lumped springs and element outputs. Rotational stiffness was compared and ogreement found to be within 20 to 30 percent.
TERA indicated that these types of evaksotions were extremely important and mcy provida o vehicle for making our integrated assessment of the impact of several issues noted in Confirmed items. It was noted that numerous studies of
~
this type are completed during the design process; however, not all are da.umented in a controlled fashion because they are not always considered integral to the necessary set of evoluotions which are required as a minimum to document the design bases. However, TERA indicated a willingness to review draft or undocumented studies, if these would shed odditional light on the consistency between the two models. Several areas for additional comparisons were discussed including.-ddressing the magnitude of deflections and stiffness os i
well as the modes shapes. Bechtel committed to further consideration of the issue for both the auxillory building and diesel generator building and will provide a forecast identifying planned actions and a schedule.
320l-008-C-102 - This Confirmed item noted numerical inconsistencies between calculation SQ I48B-(G) and values in the computer output. TERA indicated that further information for items I,2,3 and 5 was not required. Bechtel Indicated that item 6 was addressed on Page 40 of 50 148G C-15(G).
Item 4 was
-p previously noted and found to have m insignificant effect. TERA questioned the j
method of checking and the reply indicated that a o number-by-number check
}
was the usual method and anticipated in this circumstance. TERA indicated that I
EDP 4.37 would be reviewed and evaluated as part of the disposition of this item and Confirmed item C-085.
3201-006-C-103 - TERA indicated that Bechtel had supplied sufficient informo-tion clarifying the use of the noted equations and that further response was not j
required.
r J
i
)
g
~
s
d 3201-008-C-104 - This Confirmed item oddressed inconsistencies and errors noted in the auxiliary building mass moment of inertia calculations. TERA indicated that further response to items I, 2, 4, 5, and 7 was not: required.
Bechtel indicated in response to item 3, that the final configuration of the underpinning will be reflected in future calculations and that this item is on the remaining work schedule. They pointed out that building behavior was relatively
' Insensitive to this boundary condition and they had completed approximately 26 porometer variations to support this conclusion. Bechtel has a summary record of these evoluotions, but no detailed backup. They will transmit the summary 3
sheets to TERA. Bechtel confirmed item 6, on omission of 25 percent live lood for the EPA wings. This represents approximately 6 percent of the slab weight.
They also confirmed item 8, on error in the center of gravity for equipment at elevation 659 feet in the auxillory building. A detailed discussion by Bechtel followed to explain various conservatisms inherent in their peak broodening of i
spectro where they have utilized a +25 percent, -30 percent criterio. It was Indicated that these criteria were arrived at by allowing a150 percent vorlation for soil modull, a 110 percent variation for Young's modulus and a 120 percent variation for mass; however, a degree of uncertainty was expressed as to the exact numerical values.. Bechtel will provide clarification. Bechtel's position is that these conservatisms outweigh the impact of the noted errors.
3201-008-C-105 - This Confirmed Item questioned the implementation of the l
ouxiliary building soil-structure interoction analysis. TERA requested that the users monuct for CE 207 be transmitted to permit further review and evoluotion of Bechtel' responses to this item.
3201-008-C-106 - This Confirmed item questioned certain inputs and assumptions on the auxiliary building soil-structure interaction analysis. TERA indicated that l
.j Bechtel's previous resi:onses were being evoluoted and that further information I
was not required at this time.
I i
3201-008-C-107 - This Confirmed item questioned ospects of the auxillory building stick model ossumptions regarding stick location. TERA indicated that l ~
l they were evoluotino. Item I internally. - Bechtel ocknowledged a decision to l
t locate sticks in the EPA of coordinates other than those which were calculated for purposes of simpitfication. They dimW their position that the impact on overall response is insignificant.
l
.}
I
~i a.
\\
r:
c:
~;
- i
~
w
~..-..._, _-
r i
e i
3201-008-C-108 - This Confirmed item questioned assumptions in the auxiliary building stick model. TERA indicated that sufficient information had been provided for items 4, 5,9, and 10. In addressing items I and 2, Bechtel described their engineering judgement of the shear flow and force distribution in area of question, noting that the unconnected walls contribute 21 percent.to shear
, stiffness. Bechtel will document in a discussion, the bases for their physical represer.totion. For item 3, TERA questioned why two sticks were used and then combined from elevation 634' to 659'.
Bechtel will respond. Bechtel also committed to respond to items 6,7, and 8.
3201-008-C-l 13 This Confirmed ' Item questioned certain apparent inconsistencies noted in load inputs to design calculations. TERA indicated that no further response or information was required.
3201-008-C-Il4 - This Confirmed item addresses methods used to compute the moment and shear loads of slobs. TERA noted tSt C-114 will be reworded to clarify the original description of concern. Bechtel indicated that tension and shear were the predominant effect (at opproximately 90 percent) and that out-of-plane bending accounted for the remainder. TERA indicated that further information was not required, since this methodology was only used for one-way slab design considerations.
i 3201-008-C-l15 - This Confirmed item questioned the methods of incorporating I
heavy equipment masses os reflected in calculations 66-6(Q) and 66-9(O).
Bechtel will provide the 95.0 series coles and TERA will select specific packages for further evoluotion.
i 3201-008-C-l16 - This Confirmed item sought clarification of food combinations used in the auxiliary building. TERA indicated that further information was not required.
3201-008-C-l17 - This Confirmed item questioned procedures for evoluoting stresses in slobs and walls based on the results of the auxillory building finite element analysis. Bechtel indicated that they will provide further response to j
ltems Ib,2, and 3. They acknowledged that their method of overoging thermal 4
1 gradients in slabs and wells was incorrect and that they are preparing a generic u ;
calculation that will oddress the impact considering o 600 _ F gradient, the
[O
' moximum to which slabs and walls are subjected. Bechtel will describe their '
j plans and ' submit a schedule for completing this evoluotion.
w--
n e-p
,,m wcm-y vw e--my wr y 4
y
3201-008-C-ll9 - This Confirmed item questioned certain ospects of the seismic
)
i qualification of 6" gate volve and operator 2M03277AV and 2M03277A. TERA indicated that further information oa. Items I, 4, and 5, was not required.
Bechtel will transmit a calculation addressing items 2 and 3.
,3201-008-C-120 through C-122 - These Confirmed items address various seismic equipment quclification issues. Bechtel indicated that they needed to coordinate a response with NUTECH ond that they were unprepared at this time. They will provide either o response or plans and schedule for addressing these items.
3201-008-C-130 - This Confirmed item sought clarification of referencing within calculation DO-52.0(G). Bechtel will provide clarification.
3201-008-C-131 - This Confirmed item questioned the significance of certain calculated moments in the N-S wall footing strips of the diesel generator building. Bechtel indicated that they have revised cole DO-52.0(O) to quantito-tively evoluote the effect and have detarmined that acceptance criteria con be met. They will transmit the revised calculation to TERA for review.
y e-i
'i I
f i
.l J
.I i
J l
l 9
l 5
7 t
b
- - ::l I
~,
had 7'r,y L J
[{-,,n;gipALSTAFF_
gn f7E e
April 4,1984 R.C gg g
gw)I A
/
t30g
%a RL I
Mr. James W. Cook p;A I Vice President p T)
Fi l6 D Consumers Power Company
~
1945 West Pomall Rood Jackson, Michigan 49201 Mr. J. G. Keppler Administrator, Region 111 Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. D. G. Eisenhut Director, Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulaticn U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Docket Nos. 50-329 OM, OL and 50-330 OM, OL Midiond Nuclear Plant - Units I ond 2 Independent Design and Construction Verification (IDCV) Program Meeting Summary Gentlemen:
The eighth meeting on Confirmed items and Findings was held m March 28, 1984. A summary is provided to document items discussed and actions agreed upon by the participants.
Sincerely, l:.<lW Howard A. Levin Project Manager Midland IDCV Program cc: See Attached Sheet Enclosure 5
M*1* ]Vw Ji; y
=>!+?
e r 13 D
TERA CORPORATION 7101 WISCONSIN AVENUE BETHESDA MARYLAND 20814 301 654 6960 s
E m_
.m
_m.
i.
Mr. J. W. Cook 2
April 4,1984 Mr. J. G. Keppler Mr. D. G. Eisenhut cc:
Participants:
L Gibson, CPC R. J. Erhardt CPC D. Budzik, CEC D. Quamme, CPC (site)
R. Whitaker, CPC (site)
D. Hood, NRC J. Taylor, NRC, l&E T. Ankrum, NRC, I&E J. Milhoon, NRC, !&E E. Poser, Bechtel R. Burg, Bechtel J. Agar, B&W J. Korr, S&W (site)
IDCV Progrom Service List HAL/dib l
l i
TERA CCr<PORATION
SERV!CE LIST FOR MIDLAtO INDEPEtOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM cc: Harold R. Denton, Director Ms. Borboro Stomiris Office of Nuci, eor Reactor Regulatim 5795 N. River U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissim Freeland, Michigan 48623 Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Wendell Marshall James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator Route 10 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Midland, Michigan 48440 Region ill 799 Roosevelt Road Mr. Steve Godler Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 2120 Corter Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident inspectors Office Ms. Billie Pirner Garde
' Micht 0n 48640 for Accountable Government i
9 Government Accountability Project Vice Pres, Cook Institute for Policy Studies Nr. J. W.
ident
- 901 Gut. Street, N.W.
Consumers Power Company Washington, D.C. 20009 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201 Charles Bechhoefer, Esq.
Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Michael I. Miller, Esq.
Isham, Lincoln & Bele U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Three First National Plazo, Sist floor Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Chicago, Illinois 60602 Apt. B-125 6125 N. Verde Trail James E. Brunner, Esq.
Boca Roton, Florido 33433 Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Jerry Harbour, Esq.
Atomic Sofety and Licensing Board Ms. Mary Sinclair U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 5711 Summerset Drive Washington, D.C. 20555 Midiond, Michigan 48640 Mr. Ron Collen Michigan Public Service Commission Cherry & Flynn Suite 3700 6545 Mercontile Way P.O. Box 30221 Three First National Plaza Lansing, Michigan 48909 Chicago, Illinois 60602 l
Mr. Paul Rau Ms. Lynne Bernabel Midland Daily News Government Accountability Project 124 Mcdonald Street 1901 Q Street, NW Midland, Michigan 48640 i
Washington, D.C. 20009 i
i
~
~
SUMMARY
OF EIGHTH STATUS REVIEW MEETING ON COfflRMED ITEMS AbD FINDINGS March 28,1984 Midland IDCV Program A meeting was held on March 28,1984 at Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices to obtain additional information related to Confirmed items identified in the February IDCVP Monthly Status Report dated March 16,1984 and to status other outstanding items identified previously. Attachment I identifies the attendees of the ms
- Ing which included representatives of TERA, CPC, Bechtel, and NRC. Attachment 2 presents the agendo issued for the meeting in a notice dated March 20,1984.
l Howard Levin, TERA, opened the meeting with a discussion of the ogendo. All items noted on the ogendo were agreed upon for discussion by the participants; however, the order was modified to improve the flow of the meeting and to utilize resources effectively. While not specifically coiled out on the agendo, o discussion of the status of selected construction verification items was added.
The meeting then proceeded with its primary objective which is to ensure that all porticiponts have a complete understanding of the technical issues expressed I
as Confirmed items and Findings in the February Monthly Status Report. The responsible TERA personnel described each item, followed by discussion. by either CPC or Bechtel, who were requested to identify odditional information that may have bearing on the issues or to provide clarification which would allow these issues to be dispositioned directly.
l The status of previously outstanding Confirmed items and Findings was also discussed, except for those noted in the meeting announcement. The meeting announcement listed certain OCRs os being on hold or that sufficient informo-tion is ovalloble for TERA to disposition the item. A summary of the significant aspects of the discussion is provided in Attachment 3 olong with any course of oction identified.
l l
l I
v
ATTACHMENTI MIDLAb0 NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS I Ato 2 ItOEPEFOENT DESIGN abo CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM OCR STATUS REVIEW MEETING March 28, A984 NAME AFFILIATION Rob Burg Bechtel/ Licensing Paul Milward Bechtel/ Site F. A. Dougherty TERA H. Levin TERA C. E. Setka TERA C. Mortgot TERA H. Wang NRC/IE/DQAISP D. F. Lewis Bechtel R. E. Whitaker CPCO/MPQAD R. F. Schofer Bechtel/ Nuclear G. Singh Bechtel/ Control Systems L. Lampson Bechtel/ Nuclear Dave Horvath Bechtel/ Mechanical B. K. Shete Bechtel/Mechonical Mike Gerding Bechtel/ Control Systems Lou Gibson CPCo A. Amin Bechtel/Mechonical Al Strunk Bechtel/ Mechanical A.Rajn Bechtel/Electricr Dennis Kelly Bechtel/ Electrical P. V. Regupathy Bechtel/ Civil V. Vegma Bechtel/ Civil A. Juluo Bechtel/ Electrical S. Roo Bechtel/ Civil Structural P. C. Gupta Bechtel/ Plant Design C. H. Per on Bechtel/P.D. Staff T. R. Thiruvengedum CPCo 1
i i
i I
2
'l
ATTACHMENT 2 MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM AGEbOA FOR MARCH 28,1984 OCR STATUS REVIEW MEETING BECHTEL OFFICES Atel ARBOR, MICHIGAN 1.
Estimated Time Start:
9:00 AM Lunch:
12:00 PM to 12:45 PM Adjournment: 3:00 PM 11.
Discussion of Confirmed items, Findings, Observations, and Resolved items item TERA Lead A.
Mechanical / Systems R-026
- Dougherty Z-043*
Dougherty C-l12 Setka R-129*
Witt C-133 Setka C-144 Witt C-148, Setka B-158*
Dougherty B.
Electrical R-097*
Witt C-109 Setka C-I l0
- Setka R-l I i
- Setko R-132*
Setka R-134*
Setka C-135 Setka C-141 Setka C-146 Setka C-147 Setka R-153
- Dougherty B-159' Setka 3
=,-_ - -. - - _ _ _. -,.
ATTACHMENT 2 (continued)
Item TERA Lead C.
Civi!/ Structural F-015
- Mortgot R-071
- Mortgot R-102
- Mortgot R-103
- Mortgot R-l l4
- Mortgot R-I l 6*
Mortgot B-155
- Mortgot C-!56
- Mortgot C-157*
Mortgot 111.
Presentation of plans / schedule for response Burg to issues discussed at the March I,1984, (Bechtel) civil / structural review meeting.
IV.
Discussion of programmatic issues - as required.
V.
Discussion of Action items and Logistics for Information Exchange Notes: 1.
Items are grouped to the degree practical to facilitate discussion and minimize manpower requirements during the entire meeting.
2.
Items that changed status during the February reporting period are denoted with on osterisk.
3.
The fol!owing OCRs have not reached a final disposition; however, furtner TERA or Midland Project ~octions have been identified during post public meetings.
Accordingly, discussions are not contemplated by TERA unless the Midiond Project has identified new information that is pertinent to the ongoing activities.
4 C-005 F-050 C-022 F-052 thru -056 F-031 C-077 F-036 C-084 C-038 C-085 l
F-047
.C-087 thru -089 C-048 F-091 F-049 C-092 thru -096 1
I i
i i
i 4
i a
m+s
i
~
ATTACHMENT 3 l
l
SUMMARY
OF DISCUSSION OF COtFIRMED ITEMS, FitOINGS, OBSERVATIONS, APO RESOLVED ITEMS 3201-008-F-047 Mr. Paul Milword, Bechtel, led a discussion which provided the project's response to this Finding which pertains to certain inconsistencies observed within the site storage and maintenance programs. He addressed specific TERA information requirements identified during the February 29,1984 IDCVP Status Review Meeting and documented in a letter from Levin to Burg dated March 6,1984.
e Valve 2LV-2975Al:
During the lost meeting, TERA indicated concurrence that storage and maintenance activities for control volves would be relatively consistent regardless of the operator and concurrence with the proposed revision to the site storoge instruction FI-197.
The additional information requested pertains to clarifying references contained in Bechtel's January 8,1984 response in a letter from Poser to Levin.. There oppeared to be o discrepancy between the refer-enced document (7220-J225B-54-6), which is on Instruction manual for o CCI volve, whereas the installed volve is manufactured by Copes Vulcon. Mr. Milward indicated that the wrong document was referenced; however, the proper document contains the some require-t ments (i.e., the storage and maintenance program is the some for both the CCI and Copes Vulcon valves).
i e
Vale 2MO-3965Als t
in their January 8 letter, Bechtel indicated their position that the prime vendor, Anchor /Dorling, misinterpreted Limitorque's lubrico-l tion instructions. TERA indicated at the February 29 meeting that r
1, S
-,,.3
._m
Bechtel's position appears inoppropriate relative to instructions con-toined in Anchor /Dorling's instruction manual, Vendor Document
- 7220-Mil 7-142, page 19, paragraph 4.1, and that it oppears these instructions reldte specifically to the volve itself and are not related to the operator. Mr. Milward stoted that certain instructions are confusing relative to when specific instructions apply (i.e., in-wore-house, in-place, or in-service). He indicated Bechtel's interpretation that the lube / stroking requirements for the volve and the operator lube requirements all apply once these components are placed in operation.
h e
Transmitter 2FT-3969A:
At the February 29 meeting, TERA Indicated that taking credit for the functional capabilities of the transmitter is appropriate for a transmitter which is energized and properly sealed, i.e., a transmitter which is in operation. However, since TERA is addressing those activities necessory to maintain proper conditions for o transmitter which was in storage, it would appear that the vendor's recommended storage Instructions should prevail unless a suitable alternative is identified. Mr. Milward indicated that while in storage, transmitters are placed in a " storage level /." humidity controlled environment where the. humidity level is continvolly chart recorded. Therefore,
)
individual component control through humidity indicators or desic-i I
conts is not necessary. Once transported to the general in-plant oreo, the transmitters are placed in a local " tented" environment which has dehumidifiers. The creos are monitored once a week.
Mr. Milward indicated that he had reviewed dato applicable back s
until March, 1981 and found the relative humidity to overage approximately 45E i
.j e
Air Handling L.htt 2VM-54A i
i j
Bechtel's January 8 response indicated that the TRAlf Company was l
I responsible for the meggering requirement prior to release from t
i t
,s t
+
s y
--e==v-
--.... - -- --.- +-.
.w-m- - -,
l storage. TERA's investigation revealed that the meggering require-ment was derived from Bechtel's storoge instructien in effect at the time the fan motor was released to construction--F-314, Rev.1. At the February 29 meeting, TERA requested information which would serve to reconcile the opporent discrepancy and those procedures, instructions, etc. used to occomplish the transfer of maintenance responsibility from Bechtel To Zock.
Mr. Milward indicated that motors (such as these) of less than 50 hp were to be meggered at turnover; however, most motors have been subjected to this requirement. TERA found I of 2 which were not.
j Bechtel supplied equipment becomes the responsibility of the subcon-tractor (Zock) when released for installation. The material withdraw I
request (MWR) is the means of notification. Zock is then responsible for maintenance in accordance with their own procedures.
Mr. Lou Gibson, CPC, indicated that the project would dccument their com-pleted response to this Finding in a transmittal to TERA.
3201-008-F-052 r
Bechtel indicated that a response was not complete. A schedule will be provided along with the 10-day response to issues discussed at this meeting.
3201-008-F-049. -050. -055. -056
~
4 Levin Indicated TERA was awaiting information on these Findings. The project concurred, and it was agreed that the status remains unchanged.
3201-008-F-053. -054 s
Levin Indicated that resolution of these Findings was on hold pending recom-i mancement of TERA's ICVP octivities.
s i
7 1
1
,,-, _ _ - _ _ _,. _ ~ -,
._._,_,m
.-, __ L i
3201-008-C-092. C4 thru -096 4
i Levin Indicated that TERA has sufficient information to disposition these Confirmed items.
3201-008-C-09l.-093 These items were not discussed; however, they remain outstanding.
3201-008-R-026 TERA explained the basis for resolving C-026. There was no further discussion of this item.
3201-008-Z-043 This is a Finding Resolution Report, which was concerned with credit being taken for non-seismic pipe and a check volve following a seismic event.
TERA discussed the bosis for this Finding Resolution Report. There was no further discussion.
320i-008-R 129 I
The oasis for resolution of this item was presented by TERA. There was no further discussion.
l 3201-008-C-Il2 TERA stated that it received the March 22 submittal by Bechtel which provides j.
a revised calculation for the diesel generator exhaust back pressure. TERA is g
presently reviewing the revised calculation.
I J
8 I
.a r
y
-m.
r
--r_,
3201-008-C-133 This Confirmed item fr'volves the operability requirements for the pneumatic control system. The initial response by the project, dated February 24, provided on April 16 date for responding to this item. At the February 29 OCf3 meeting, it was noted that TDI has leak rate information which may be of value in resolving this item. Furthermore, it was noted that this item is being reviewed as part of the design and quality review of TDI being performed by CPC. At the March 28 meeting it was ogreed that Bechtel will send TERA the available TDI leak rate data which they have. It was noted that this dato actually applies to the SMUD diesel; thus, core must be exercised in using this information. Bechtel also has developed a calculation which may in port resolve this item.
The calculation is in its final review process and should be complete within the next two weeks.
3201-008-C-144 4
This item is concerned with the assumptions used in piping stress analys:s and subsegmt calculation of support foods.
The OCR idehtified differences between the analysis method used by Bechtel and the criteria which the IDVP considers oppropriate. Bechtel stated that, although the onelysis methods differ between those used on the project and by the IDVP, sufficient margin exists that the current design is adequate. Bechtel is initiating a study M demons + rate the odequacy of the current margins. It is estimated that the study will be complete in opproximately six weeks. TERA requested that Bechtel provide a copy of the program plan document, mernorandum, er other similar information which outlines the scope and approoch being used for the stucy. In response to a f
question by TERA, Dechtet stcted that they may or may net use the SMA study in developing their response to C-144.
3201-008-C-149 This Confirmed item is concerned with the compliance of the plant with j
ffPA-12, which reqt res de-energizing equipment, such as the fuel oil transfer pumps, in the event of a fire. Further information on this Confirmed item will be provided to TERA before the next OCR meeting.
9
N 3201-008-C-l50 Bechtel stated that a SAR change will be prepared within the next two weeks to clorify the project position on implementation of NFPA requirements.
3201-008-C-148 Bechtel explained the relationship between electrical drawings and orchitecturcl drawings showing building penetrations and fire seals.
The orchitectural drawings show the os-built condition and are updated periodically. The latest revisions of the drawings which are concerned with the penetrations discussed in this OCR ore dated November 8,1983. TERA will determine whether copies of those drawings have been received.
3201-006-R-097 TERA described the basis for resolving this OCR.
There was no further discussion.
3201-008-C-109 i
Bechtel has provided a response concerning the fuel lock-out, which TERA is reviewing. TERA stated that no further information is needed at this time.
3201-008-C-l 10 Bechtel will provide a formal response to this Confirmed Item concerning Rev. I of the load tabulation within two weeks. Bechtel stated that they will provide on odvance copy following the meeting.
3201-008-R-l I i This item was resolved based on the receipt of a SAR change notice. There were no questions concerning this resolution.
10
1 4
3201-008-R-132 TEGA noted that the documentation concerning the undervoltoge set points hos been updated and mode consistent with the FSAR. No further discussion was held concerning this Resolved item.
3201-008-R-134 TERA presented the basis for resolving this Confirmed item regarding the LOP sequencer. No questions were raised concerning this resolution.
3201-008-C-l35 Bechtel has provided a response concerning the conformance of interlocks to IEEE-308. TERA will determine the appropriate action to take.
3201-008-C-141 This Confirmed item is concerned with the air quality requirements for the air supplied to the air receiver. Bechtel stated that the specification for the diesel generator is functional, and thus it is up to the vendor to determine air quality requirements. TERA noted that the specification was modified to occount for the air system offer the diesel _was procured.
Bechtel maintains that the performance of the air supply is within TDl's responsibility, and that the vendor has provided filters and dryers for the air systenT. Bechtel further stated that i
they have reviewed the system provided by TDI. TERA will review vendor information on system performance.
i 3201-008-C-l46 i
Bechtel stated that the redundancy in the diesel generator systems provides assurance of the occeptability of postulated failures. They,further stated that common mode failure is not a design basis for the plani, and that factors such as maintaining air quality minimize the potentici for such failures. TERA ques-tioned whether the FSAR is in error, in that the diesel generator and pneumatic l
l il i
y--
control system were not included in the list of pneumatic systems which the project provided to the NRC in response to o question. TERA further asked whether a failure modes and effects analysis should be provided in the event that it is catermined that the pneumatic control system should have been listed in i
response to the NRC question. Bechtel will ir.cestigate whether it, would be appropriate to include the diesel pneumatic control system in the list of pneumatic systems, and consequently whether a failure modes and ef'ects onelysis should be provided.
3201-008-C-147 This Confirmed item noted that the !!r second response time of the ESFAS system was not included in occident response times. Bechtel stated that the B&W BOP criterio documents call for the diesel generator to stort within ten seconds of the engine's receipt of the stort signc!.
The B&W criteria also call for allowances to be mode for response times. Bechtel stated they were aware of this situation and had reviewed it previously. Bechtal further stated that a SAR change notice would be needed.
3201-008 R-153 This item was fully discussed at the Confirmed item stage at the previous OCR meeting. During that meeting, Consumers Power Company explained that the demarcations on the J-909 drawing did not represent the steam generators, as TERA had assumed. With this explanation, TERA was able to classify this OCR cs resolved.
I 3201-008-C-156 TERA described how it calculated foods on the embedded channel, which resulted In this Cmfirmed item stating that the calculated foods appear to exceed the
(
a allowable. Bechtel stated that a response is scheduled for April 13.
4 12 1
3201-008-C-157 Calculation SG-I48-K(Q) was issued in response to a previous OCR. TERA's review Indicated that this calculation contained on error. TERA stated during the meeting that the error is considered to be minor. However, this calculation calls into question the checking process used on the project. Bechtel stated that they would respond by April 13 with a description of the checking process.
Other Civil / Structural items Bechtel reviewed their expected respor,se dates for all outstanding civil /struc-tural and civil /solls OCRs. During this discussion, it was noted that TERA will provide o clarification of item number 8 of OCR 3201-008-C-104. The following table presents the scheduled response dates for civil / structural and civil / soils OCRs.
SCHDULE FOR CIVIL OCRs Schedultid OCR #
Response
Civil / Structural 069 4/20 D99 (items 1,2) 4/20 104 (3,6) 4/20 104 (8) later 107 (2) 4/20 108 (l, 2, 6, 7, 8) 4/20 l
l17 (18) 4/6 I
i19 (2, 3) 4/20 Civil / Soils i17 (2, 3) 4/13 117 (4) 5/2 101 4/26 130/131 4/26 125 S/2 I
i 13
3201-008-F-01S TERA has converted Confirmed item C-OlS Into a Finding. This issue deals with the consideration of floor flexibility in the seismic analysis. TERA explained its basis for making this a Finding. Consumers Power Company stated tho,t they had discussed this issue with the NRC previously and had clearly stated that floor flexibility was not considered a design basis for the plant. TERA indicated that while the project's commitments represent on important yardstick for measuring implementation of the design, on evoluotion of the adequacy and completeness of criterio is part of the IDVP review.
In TERA's view, this phenomeno con potentially have o significant effect on the performance of certain components during on earthquake. Therefore, a determination should be made os to the safety significance of this issue to the Midland plant. TERA indicated that a basis was not provided in a Bechtel study referenced in the Finding, and that on SMA study establishes that floor flexibility con lead to significant additional amplification of response. CPC pointed out that SMA essentially has completed o current day "SRP" seismic analysis that considers the flexibility of floors and the impact on response and equipment qualification. It was concluded by CPC
~
ond TERA that the SMA study may provide additional information that would be useful in qualifying the significance of this Finding. A future meeting will be held to review the SMA seismic margins analysis and its applicability.
r i
1 I
t t
l 14
.I E
L J February 28,1984 Mr. James W. Cook
,y'FRINCIPAL STAFF Vice President jy g
gg Consumers Power Company
]/aA DE 1945 West Pornoll Road
/R, Dams =
Jackson, Michigan 49201 ac '
cauA Ol@{}+ b
?AO SCS v'
Mr. J. G. Keppler
?y) g Administrator, Region 111 pii, g' Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. D. G. Eisenhut Director, Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulat!on U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Docket Nos. 50-329 OM, OL and 50-330 OM, OL Midland Nuclear Plant - Units I and 2 Independent Design and Construction Verification (IDCV) Program Meeting Summary Dear Sirst The sixth meeting on Confirmed items and Findings was held on February 1, 1984. A summary is provided to document items discussed and actions agreed upon by the participants.
Since ely, l /
i r~A~ t, word A. Levin l
Project Monoger Midland IDCV Program cc See Attached Sheet l
l Enclosure HAL/sl j
MAR 5 1984
~ [y Q O
egulation 5795 N. River U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Freeland, Michigan 48623 . Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Wendell Marshall . James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator Route !O , U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Midland, Michigan 48440 Region ll1 799 Roosevelt Road Mr. Steve Godler Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 2120 Corter Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident inspectors Office Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Route 7 Director, Citizens Clinic Midland, Michigan 48640 for Accountable Government Government Accountability Project i Mr. J. W. Ccok Institute for Policy Studies Vice President i901 Que Street, N.W. Consumers Power Company Washington, D.C. 20009 1945 West Parnall Rood Jackson, Michigan 49201 Charles Bechhoefer, Esq. Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Michael I. Miller, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Isham, Lincoln & Beale Washington, D.C. 20555 Three First National Plaza, Sist floor Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Chicago, Illinois 60602 Apt. B-125 '6125 N. Verde Trail k James E. Brunner, Esq. Boca Raton, Florida 33433 Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jerry Harbour, Esq. Jackson, Michigan 4920I Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i M Inc ir l f7jg Washington, D.C. 20555 Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr. Ron Collen Michigan Public Service Commission Cherry & Flyre 6545 Mercantile Way Suite 3700 P.O. Box 30221 i Three First National Plaza Lansing, Michigan 48909 Chicago, Illinois 60602 L Ms. Lynne Bernabel M dl y News i Government Accountability Project 126. Mcdonald Street 1901 Q Street, NW Midland, Michigan 48640 Washington, D.C. 20009 1 ( l \\ 1 f ( -_ ~ ~_ ~
SUMMARY
OF SIXTH MEETING ON CObFIRMED ITEMS abo FitOINGS February 1,1984 Midland IDCV Program i
A meeting was held c,n February 1,1984 at Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices to obtain additional information related to confirmed items identified in the IDCVP monthly status report dated January 13, 1984 and to status other outstanding items identified previously. Attachment I identifies the attendees l
of the meeting which included representatives of TERA, CPC, Bechtel, and NRC. Attochment 2 presents the ogendo used for the mee;;ng.
Howard Levin, TERA, opened the meeting with a discussion of the agenda and a summary of the purpose of the meeting. A brief discussion of the 10-day l
response time was held. It was agreed that Bechtel would use overnight delivery services such as Federal Express to expedite the receipt of information by
{
TERA. TERA ocimowledged the receipt of project responses to previous OCRs l
and -stated that those responses were being evaluated.
The meeting then l
proceeded with its primary objective which is to ensure that all participants have o enmplete understanding of the technical issues expressed as confirmed items.
Each new confirmed item contained in tM Status Report dated January 13 was discussed. This is intended to enable Midland Project personnel to identify l
odditional information that may have bearing on the issues. Clarification or presentation of additional information by Midlarp Project personnel is also sought so that specific issues may be further dispositioned directly.
l The status of previously outstonding confirmed items and findings was also discussed except for those noted in the meeting announcement. The meeting announcement listed certain OCRs os being on hold or that sufficient informo-tion is available for TERA to disposition the item. A sum. nary of the significant aspects of the discussion is provided in Attachment 3 olong with any course of action identified. The responsible TERA personnel described each item, followed,
i l
by discussion by either CPC or Bechtel personnel as appropriate. The order !n i
L
~l which the OCRs were discussed was revised at the start of the discussion period
[
to achieve maximum efficiency in the use of the available time.
SWM i
i i'
i 9
L 6
_,,+_-,-,_,_m.,_..
ATTACHMENTI IDCV PROGRAM SIXTH OCR STATUS REVIEW MEETING FEBRUARY I,1984 BECHTEL OFFICE-Af*4 ARBOR R. Burg Bechtel S. Schofer Bechtel D. Horvath Bechtel A. Amin Bechtel L. Gibson CPCo V. Kumar Bechtel H. Wang NRC D. VanWagener Bechtel J. Seiko TERA G. Singh Bechtel G. Peimers TERA P. Rinnal Bechtel C. Mortgot TERA W. Chevaprovatdumrong Bechtel F. Dougherty TERA D. Reeves Bechtel H. Levin TERA J. Ross Bechtel 7
D. Tulodieski TERA S. Hartstern Bechtet G. Eogle CPCo M. Voutyros CPCo R. Whitoker CPCo P. Regupathy Bechtel A. Julko Bechtel S.Roo Bechtel B. Shete Bechtel D. Nims Bechtel h
9 4
f n
5 4
ATTACHMENT 2 AGEPOA FOR FEBRUARY 1,1984 IDCVP MEETING i
i BECHTEL OFFICES AP@4 ARBOR, MICHIGAN l.
Start - 9:00 AM Lunch - 12:00 PM to 12:4.5 PM 11.
Discussion of Confirmed items, Findings, Observations, and Resolved items item TERA Lead A.
Construction o F-047 Tulodieski o F-049 o F-050 a
o F-054
=
o F-055 a
o F-056
=
o F-091 a
o C-092 o
o C-093
=
o C-094 a
i o C-095
=
o C-096
=
B.
Mechanicof/ Systems o F-043
~
Dougherty o R-075*, R-076*
Witt o B-126 thru B-128*
a o C-129*
o C-085
=
o C-ll2 Setka o C-133*
i j
C.
Electrical o C-097 Dougherty o C-109 Setka o C-Il0 o C-Ill o C-132*
=
o C-134*
l
=
o C-135*
=
o B-136 thru B-138*
a i
1
~
m
Item TERA Lead i
D.
Structural o C-125*
Mortgot o C-130*
o C-131*
o C-099, C-101 thru C-108 (4)
Dougherty o C-071, C-l 13 thru C-l 17 (4)
Dougherty o C-l19 thru C-122 (4)
Dougherty i
111. Discussion of programmatic issues (if necessory)
IV.
Discussion of Action items and Logistics for Information Exchange V.
Adjournment - 3:00 PM Estimated Notes:
1.
Items are grouped to the degree practical to facilitate discus-sion and minimize monpower requirements during the entire meeting.
1 2.
Items that changed status during the December reporting period are denoted with on osterisk.
3.
The following OCRs have not reached a final disposition; however, further TERA or Midland Project actions have been identified during post public meetings. Accordingly, discussions are not contemploted by TERA unless the Midland Project hns identified new information that is pertinent to the ongoing octivities, o C-005 o
C-015 o C-022 o
C-025 i
o C-026 o
F-031 o F-036 o
C-038 o C-039 o
C-040 o C-048 o
F-052 I
o F-053 o
C-068 o C-069 o
C-074 o C-077 o
C-081 o C-084-o C-067
(
o C-088 o
C-089
'j i-4.
Discussion will be limited to o response by the Midland project oddressing plans, schedule and status of their activities.
6 i
l t
1
. ~ _....
,. ~..
. - - - =
ATTACl#4ENT 3 DISCUSSION OF COtFIRMED ITEMS, FitOINGS, OBSERVATIONS, APO RESOLVED ITEMS 3201-008-C-IO9. This OCR is concerned with the 60-second ' coast down inter-lock. TERA stated that it had received no new information concerning this item e
- since the lost meeting. Bechtel stated that they were already aware of this concern based upon the receipt of on I&E Notice.
Bechtel has provided information for TERA in a letter dated January 25. TERA stated that it will review this letter.
3201-008-C-110. This confirmed item resulted from apparent discrepancies noted by TERA between the GPE-l food tabulation and a similar tabulation prepared by TERA. Bechtel stated that SCN-4082 is currently in preparation and is being reviewed by CPC. TERA stated that it had reviewed a draft of 1
SCN-4082 and that it appears to be at least in part responsible to the concern.
Receipt of this SCN is required before TERA can determine oppropriate action to be taken on this OCR.
3201-008-C-l11. Bechtel stated that SAR change notice 4082 also addresses the inconsistency noted in this OCR concerning battery charger capabilities.
3201-008-C-132. Bechtel stated that a January revision to the drawing refer-enced in C-132 should resolve this OCR. It was stated that the FSAR describes
(
the octual system basis and that the drawings were logging behind the FSAR. It was also noted that CPC determines reiny set points and advises Bechtel, and i
then Bechtel revises the drawings.
TERA will advise CPC if odditional information is necessary to disposition C-132.
i.
3201-008-C-134. The LOP sequencer logic contained a Unit I under-voltage initiation of Unit 2 standby electric power. Bechtel stated that this is no longer ll considered necessary and that a revision was in process to update the documen-totion. It was noted that this item is an interface between the control systems and electrical groups. TERA requested additional information concerning the s
~
l~
~.-_
.. ~,
v.
=
. =
i I
process by which a previous revision resulted in the oddition of this initiotion.
The addition of this logic was a fairly recent revision to the drawing; therefore, the revision currently in process simply restores the design to its previous basis.
TERA requested information on why the logic was changed previously.
i 3201-008-C-135. The project stated that this item had been noted within the project in August when it was determined that no action need be token until offer fuel lood. It is considered by the project that the diesel generator lockout relay can be manually reset allowing closing of the normal incoming breaker. It is the project's position that the system functions properly as presently designed and there is no need to revise the design at this time. The need for a revision is 4
only a matter of convenience rather than a functional requirement. Bechtel has 1
provided documentation of the project position in a letter to TERA dated
.lanuary 8, 1984.
TERA will review this information and determine the disposition of this OCR.
1-i
+
3201-008-F-047. This finding is concerned with storcge and maintenance proc-tices at the Midland site. TERA has received various documents concernmg this issue including a copy of the Task Force prvosal for reorganization of the storoga and maintenance program; TERA has also had discussions with project j
personnel to obtain further information concerning this item. The specific l
concerns listed in F-047 have not yet been oddressed. It was expected that a formal response would have been_ received by the meeting oote. TERA is owoiting receipt of an opproved version of the storage and maintenance procedure FPG5.000. With this information and the response to the specific items in F-047, TERA should be able to disposition this finding.
3201-008-F-049. This finding is concerned with separation criterio, in porticular i
i
}
for air-lined cables. TERA has been advised that air-lined cables will be bundled l
f and wrapped and that the program for cable separation verification has not been l
.j finalized. TERA requested copies of documentation which states that construc-j tion will bundle and wrap air-lined cable. TERA will retain this item os a finding 4
.j pending review of the inspection plan to be implemented to verify cable
~{
separation.
1 l
B-84-99 2
.t
{
- \\' ;;
t e
'i 4
.j.
?
4 q
.--wpn 4
4
-y
,a v,
,,,.-y,-w.,,,
,,e
,e,_.
,,,.,,,.,.w, nn,,
...,..--,,,--,w.e,,-,,-e,,-~
i 3201-008-C-112. This OCR is concerned with the co!culation of diesel generator exhaust back pressure. The OCR noted thnt the original calculation performed by Bechtel showed a back pressure slightly in excess of the 10 inches olinwed by the vendor. Bechtel stated that the calculation has been revised to reflect newer information. TERA will review the revised calculation and will meet with Bechtel to walk through the calculation per the calculation re:eose procedure so that the calculation may be released upon its opproval, which is expected within the next twn weeks.
3201-008-C-ll3. The air stort system supplies air for the pneumatic control
{
system for the diesel generator. TERA needs additional Information to verify that odequate air is available to operate the pneumatic control system offer the diesel starts assuming that the non-category I air compressors do not supply odditional air to tRe starting air receivers. Bechtel stated that the storting air receivers are sized for control system use and that it was in the vendor's scope to properly size the occumulators. Bechtel will determine what additionci information is available on the subject.
3201-008-F-050. This finding concerns potential misrouting of cable and is I
being retained as on unresolved finding pending CPC's final disposition of
~
l NCR-A-5000-6-CV. The dispostion of this NCR will provide final program Interpretation of the cable routing criterio.
~
3201-008-F-054. A Bechtel letter dated January 19, 1984 provides additional J
l information concerning this finding. TERA stated that on issue remains based j
upon the CPC response which transcends the specific noted inconsistency. The
]
concern is how temporary attachment records are used; specifically, CPC
{
response would indicate that the temporary ottochment record is completed upon satisfactory removal of the ottochment lugs or is on after-the-fact record.
TERA's concern is that normal Industry proctice uses the temporary attachment record as a controlling document, that is, a before-the-fact record. This way the record becomes on open item that must be closed before on installation con be completed.
h i
i-l B-84-99 3
5 ii 4
F y
yy-
-m-ever
--y-ryv.,
9,.ve-b-g
-w u.r---w--pg-eg w
y---
99--wy
-r-wwg p4-e-.g--W
-,.m,i,.en-ee
-p 4-.y-=-ww-a w
3201-008-C-097. This confirmed item is concerned with the copobility to re-establish outside air to the control room following isolation of the control room l
HVAC system and given a single failure. Bechtel stated that a hand wheel is available to allow manual operation of the volve. It was further stated that the access study performed as a result of TMI shows that access con be gained to the hand wheels.
3201-008-C-129. This confirmed item is concerned with the specified closing time for dompers. Bechtel stated that the I-second closing time applies to dampers downstream of the ones TERA was reviewing. Therefore, the system must be copoble of detecting hozordous material within 4 seconds and closing volves within I second giving a total 5-second time. The 5-second value should be used for further reviews.
Bechtel also discussed the epparent discrepancies between the so-called Appen-dix A and Appendix D gases. The hozordous gas monitoring system design objective was to reach a lower limit than specified in she FSAR. Appendix A (Note 1) is the octual response to design criteria. The 5-second and 16-second values specified for hydrogen bromide and bromine meet the FSAR criteria even though they are different from the general 4-second detection time used for other materials. The octual response of the system is such that concentrations in the control room are within acceptoble limits.
TERA had noted on page 10, paragraph 6.l.2(b) of the specificotton that a reference to Appendix A is mode and commented that it appears the reference should be to Appendix D. Bechtel stated that the reference to Appendix A is correct in that the parograph is referring to the extended specific mode and that no gases are currently in this group. Appendix D refers to newly identified gases which are currently being tested. When the testing is complete they will be included in Appendix A.
TERA had also noted that the specification for the i
hozordous gas monitoring system is based t pon a 2-second isolation time for the j
dompers. This seemed to be in conflict with a 3-second isolation time in a domper specification. Bechtel stated that the 3-second closing time opplied to other damper and that the dampers in question octually have c l-second closure B-84-99 4
i
, h'
I time. The 2-second value was supplied to the hozordous monitoring system vendor as a degree of conservatism since the longer it takes to close the dompers the more sensitive the monitoring system must be in order to meet the FSAR commitments regarding concentrations in the control room. Therefore, it can be concluded that the system is correctly designed and that the apoorent discrepon-cies are in fact conservative margins being applied to the various vendors.
TERA will review ovoilable information and request additional informatim from Bechtel in order to disposition this item.
3201-008-F-055. TERA hos obtained information concerning this item from CPC personnel. TERA is awaiting the receipt of Bechtel/CPC formal response to the finding and then will determine the appropriate course of oction.
3201-008-F-056. No response has been received to date on this item.
3201-008-F-091. This OCR is concerned with the lesson plan for POCl covering
[
hanger inspections. TERA noted that a CPC memo of 9/29/83 indicates that due
).
to word processing errors activity 34 was omitted from the lesson plan, but that i
the POCl was covered in its entirety during the lesson. TERA will disposition this item pending receipt of lesson plan revisions in effect prior and subsequent i
to the lesson p!an reviewed by ICV personnel.
I 3201-008-C-092. This confirmed item was concerned with a possible bias in the method of ossigning hongers to be used for qualification of Inspectors. The current program requires Level lit personnel to assign hangers, although previ-ously the qualifying QCE was selecting his own hanger. TERA is awaiting the receipt of additional Information in order to disposition this item.
i p
3201-008-C-093. CPC is proporing a response to this confirmed item. TERA will evaluate the response and disposition the confirmed item occordingly.
1
(-
l 3201-008-C-094. This confirmed item resulted from physical verification of the I
control room HVAC system. Four inconsistencies were noted in the physical f
verification activity. Of these, CPC noted that TERA's first item was due to the L
.i hengers being destatused during the time the ICV reviewers were conducting the l
B-84-99 5
I i
l T
l.
.j l
~l
\\-
wg-
.yv g-te
-y-g t
u.-*A"y-r g.
e-wy.p-yp
,-.s-epw,m%-,
,.-,-up5 y--r,-
ge7
--,g-g-
- - -e
-ee,i..,,
4www-*y.-m.w.
,e m,-ee.
e,we-
review in order to enable removal of a test coupon for destructive testing. The entire section will eventually be removed. TERA will resolve this item and a re-inspection will be conducted later. CPC stated that item 2 was checked by CPC and found to be acceptoble. TERA will review and evoluote the CPC response.
With regard to items 3 and 4 of th'is OCR, CPC stated that per the convention used on the project, the flonge connections which TERA inspected are not
' considered port of the completed duct section, but rather are within the inspection boundorles of the incomplete dampers. TERA will disposition these I
two items.
3201-008-C-095. Information presented to TERA indicates that a means is available to indirectly verify the welders' qualificotton to o specific WPS.
Recent revisions to documentir;g procedures require the recording of the date that a weld was actually formed, thus removing this item from future concern.
CPC ogreed to provide a formo! response that TERA personnel con review in order to disposition the OCR.
l 3201-008-C-096. TERA is awaiting the receipt of CPC response to inconsis-tencies nsted with regard to certain ducts and hongers associated with the HVAC system.
3201-008-C-125. This item has been divided into two sub-items. Bechtel civil soils is doing a short study to determine the compatibility between stick and finite element models.
3201-008-C-130. This OCR was concerned with the source of the seismic force values used in calculation DOS 2.0(q). Bachtel advised that Attachment C to the calculation contains these values. TERA will determine whether Attachment C i
is ovalloble and, if not, will make o request for this information.
3201-008-C-131. Bechtel has updated its calculations with Information on why the model overstates the moments in the north-south wall footing strips. TERA will review the revision of Bechtel's calculctions.
i B-84-99 6
up e-,w~e-
3201-008-C-99, C-101-C-108, C-071, C-1 I 3-C-1 l 7, and C-1 i 9-C-l 22.
The general status of these civil structural items was discussed. CPC o,d Bechtel are prepering odditional information for TERA's review. It is expected that this information will be transmitted to TERA opproximately February 8 in order that the information be reviewed prior to the next OCR meeting. TERA recommend-ed that a separate OCR meeting be held on civil structural items. It was ogreed that consideration will be given to a two-day meeting so that more detailed discussions con be held concerning the responses being prepared to the OCR.
h
?
B-84-99 7
i i
e
,w
.*y
,w-w w..-.
--+.y w
m,%
l 1
d L J December 16,1983 Mr. James W. Cook f
Vice President Consumers Power Company 1945 West Pornoll Road
, PRINQlPAL STAFF V RA h'DE C)PRP Jackson, Michigan 49201 D/RA A/RA o
DRMSP Mr. J. G. Keppler l
Administrator, Region 111
./RC f/tM tA "A0 scs v 4 f3 Office of inspection and Enforcement SGA ML
/) _
O U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road ANF File 7/(f) V Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. D. G. Eisenhut Director, Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Docket Nos. 50-329 OM, OL and 50-330 OM, OL Midland Nuclear Plant - Units I and 2 Independent Design and Construction Verificotton (IDCV) Program Meeting Summary
Dear Sirs:
The fourth meeting on Confirmed items and Findings was held on November 30, 1983. A summary is provided to document items discussed and actions agreed upon by the participants.
_ Sincerely,
-E
&z Howard A. Levin Project Manager Midland IDCV Program cc: See Attached Sheet Enclosure HAL/jb I
r o
p z3 psS e
o TERA CORPORATION 7101 WISCONSIN AVENUE BETHESDA MAlhtAND 20814 301 654 8960
. Q.. -._... -..
- a December id,1983 Mr. J. W. Cook 2
Mr. J. G. Keppler Mr. D. G. Eidut cc:
Participants:
L. Gibson, CPC R. J. Erhardt, CPC D. Quammy, CPC (site)
R. Whitaker, CPC (site)
D. Hcod, NRC J. Taylor, NRC, I&E T. Ankrum, NRC, l&E J. Clements. Bechtel F. Levondoski, B&W IDCV Program. Service List HAL/jb 4
r i
2 TERA CORFORATION L
o SERVICE LIST FOR MIDLAPO ltOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM I
Hor'old'R. Denton, Director Ms. Barbara Stamiris-~""
cc:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 5795 N. River U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Freeland, Michigan 48623
. Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Wendell Marshall James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator Route 10
, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Midland, Michigan D440 Region ll1 799 Roosevelt Road Mr. Steve Godser Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 2120 Carter Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
Resident inspectors Office Ms. Billie Pirner Gar de i
Route 7 Director, Citizens Clinic Midland, Michigan 48640 for Accountable Government
+
^
Government Accountability Project Mr. J. W. Cook Institute for Policy Studies Vice President 1901 Que Street, N.W.
Consumers Power Cornpany Washington, D.C. 20009 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201 Charles Bechhoefer, Esq.
1 Atomic Safety & Licensing Board l
Michool I. Miller, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
Isham, Lincoln & Beale Washington, D.C. 20555 Three First National Plaza, 51st floor Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Chicago, Illinois 60602 Apt. B-125 6125 N. Verde Trall L
James E. Brunner, Esq.
Boca Roton, Florido 33433 Consumers Power Company
~
212 West Michigan Avenue Jerry Harbour, Esq.
Jackson, Michigan 49201 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ms. Mary Sinclair Washington, D.C. 20555 57II Summerset Drive Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr. Ron Collen Michigan Public Service Commission Cherry & Flynn 6545 Mercantile Way 4
Suite 3700 P.O. Box 30221 i
l Three First National Plaza Lansing, Michigan 48909 Chicago, Illinois 60602 l
Mr. Paul Rau Ms. Lynne Bernabel Midland Dolly News Government Accountability Project 124 Mcdonald Street i
1901 Q Street, NW Midland, Michigan 48640 Washington, D.C. 20009 a
L
l i
~
l
SUMMARY
OF FOURTH MEETING ON COFFIRMED ITEMS APO FitOINGS NOVEMBER 30,1983
,g MIDLA>O DCV PROGRAM 1
l A meeting was held on November 30,1983 at Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices to obtain additional information related to Confirmed items identified in the sixth IDCVP Monthly Status Report dated November 15,1983, and to status other outstanding items identified previously.
Attachment I identifies the attendees c,f the meeting which included representatives from TERA, CPC, Bechtel, and NRC. Attochment 2 presents the agenda used for the meeting.
Howard Levin, TERA, opened the meeting with a discussicn of the agendo and a summary of the purpose of the meeting. The minimum objective for the meeting was to ensure that all participants gained a complete understanding of the technical issues expressed as Confirmed items. This is intended to enable Midland project personnel to identify additional information that may have a bearing on the issues at hand. Direct clarification or presentation of additional Information by Midland project personnel is also sought so that specific issues may be further dispositioned directly.
The status of outstanding Confirmed items and Findings was also discussed,
~
including a cursory review of Observations and RescIved items. A summary of significant aspects of these discussions is provided in Attochment 3 along with any course of oction identified. The responsible lead TERA personnel described each item followed by a discussion of either CPC or Bechtel personnel, as appropriate.
The final discussions by the three parties, TERA, CPC, and NRC, focused on programmatic issues. _CPC Indicates that several constraints had compounded j
which may make a mid-course correction of the IDCVP desirable.
These constraints include the_ completion status of Midland project, recognition of a schedule delay by CPC, as well os CPC financial considerations. All parties agreed that it was reasonable for the IDCVP to respond to o changed environ-ment. Future discussion in this regard is contemplated.
f I
TERA representatives indicated that alternatives are currently being oddressed that will allow the IDCVP to meet defined objectives in a cost o,nd schedule effective manner. To date, the Midland project completion status has impacted the IDCVP, principally in the construction verification oreo. Most activities in the construction area are on hold indefinitely. The design verification effort is
_ proceeding at approximately an 80-90% pace with the exceptions being in review creas that are offected by Midland design activities which are in progress or revision. An option under consideration Is to review the enaineerina orogtgros that are in place for this 10-20%: thus enablino completion of the design review.
{
t t
j i
l e
e I
I l
1 i
1 2
1 m-w w w
---e
-,n....__..,,
'l
- e 4
TERA - IDCVP Founia OCR Graru.s Rawcw Alsarina_ -
AlcNEm"6ER. 30, A83 NAfME A FFlLIArroM Roo' burg BSCHTEL. /hlU.Cl.EAf2 04)nfLb L6Vid WM C,p /27, Funn Douanesty venn-co a t,.
p L oottsw TERA CoRf.
.o...
n,,,
,n.
c..,.
leo, c /
Su.le:
TC/A
&* P.
lOK
& & O fi
$P&
Chers Mot 2TQAT TirQ.A Cow
- R-7 h...:.......
2..
K E t:. A.. A a L -
c1%
i?iiw i.
4 9
6 i
l I
- h
-w g
+
,p__
AGEFOA FOR NOVEMBER 30,1983 IDCVP MEETING BECHTEL OFTICES At@4 ARBOR, MICHIGAN I.
Estimated Time 9:00 a.m. - Start i2:00 p.m. - l2:45 p.m. - Lunch 3:00 p.m. - Adjournment II.
Discussion of Confirmed items, Findings, Observations, and Resolved items TERA Leod item A.
Construction F-049*,F-050*
Tulodieski e
C-091*, C-092*
Tulodieski e
Z-045*, Z-046*, F-047 Tulodieski e
e C-055*
Tulodieski e C-056*
Tulodieski Tulodieski e ' C-052, C-053, C-054 Tulodieski e F-036 Tulodieski e F-031 B.
Mechanical / Systems e C-026*
Dougherty e C-081*
Dougherty F-018*, Z-O l8*
Dougherty e
R-020*, R-027*, C-005 Dougheriy e
C-087*, C-088*, C-089*
Dougherty e
e C-038 Dougherty e C-025 Dougherty e C-043 Dougherty e C-048 Dougherty B-080*, B-066*, B-090* (only if the project Dougherty e
e C-084*
Witt i
e R-073*
Witt C-066, C-074, C-075, C-076 Witt e
C.
Electrical
~
I e C-039 Bates c.
e C-040 Bates I
o C-022 Bates t
.. )
s i
9 0
e
.c
Item TERA Lead D.
Structural
~
o C-015 Mortsat o C-068 Mortgot o C-077 Mortgot Ill.
Discussion of programmatic issues (if necessary)
IV.
Discussion of Action items and Logistics for information Exchange V.
Adjournment Notes:
1.
Items are grouped to the degree practical to facilitate discuulon and minimize manpower requirements during the entire meeting.
2.
Items that changed status during the October reporting period are deno:ed with on asterisk.
i i
4 2
4 l
e ATTACHMENT 3
~
DISCUSSION OF COWIRMED ITEMS, FINDINGS,
+
OBSERVATIONS, APO RESOLVED ITEMS 3201-008.F-049 This item is concerned with cable separation. CPC Indicated that they recognize this finding as a valid issue, which will be addressed. Bechtel is looking into wrapping of the air line cables. The project's response to this finding will be submitted to TERA for future review.
3201-008-F-050 MPGAD has written a nonconformance report (NCR) on this item. The Midiond project uses NCRs to document ow Items for which final resolution is requested. This does not mean that MPOAD ogrees that there is on error; but rather that some clarification is needed. TERA will contact MPQAD for further discussion of this concern, which involves a cable routed vertleclly through an I
unscheduled borizontal cable troy.
3201-00d-C-09I This confirmed item noted that a lesson plan used for trotning of personnel for reinspection of piping supports omitted octivity 3.4, which involves snubber assemblies. TERA was advised that the lesson plan had been revised and that the project was checking how many snubber Inspections had been performed 'by personnel trained brior to the revision of the pason pfan. TERA will review the revised lesson plan and will evaluate further action needed to disposition this confirmed item.
I i
-.. ~
f 3201-006-C-092
~'
' This confirmed item relates to the method of qualifying inspectors.
C noted that both the _NRC and Stone & Webster had reviewed the quellficotton orocedure and found it accentoble. TERA's confirmed item noted the naanibility
,of the introductlan of blos into the testino method, CPC believes that the current procedure is odequate; however, they will provide o response to this confirmed item.
3 3201-006-Z-045.-044 These two findings have been resolved based upon the issvonce of revised molntenance procedures and a nonconformance report. Furthermore, the pump and turbine will be disassembled and inspected in the presence of factory representatives to determine the condition of equipment. TERA will be present to witness the inspection to verify the condition of the pump and turbine.
3201-008-F-047 1
F-047 is the generic concern about the process by which vendor-recommended storage and molntenance requirements are reflected in project procedures.
l TERA is currently wolting for the final release of project documents which oddress this concern. When these documents become ovellable, TERA will review them in order to dispos,ltion this item.
i 3201-006-C-055 TERA's review of WPs and PORs Indicated Inconsistencies or gops in recorded dato and Information. Bechtel has the action'to provide further Information for TERA. It was suggested that appropriate personnel meet to discuss the technical
- f. * ~
details of this item.
2 1
i l
I
- e s
e --
.s--r,
~ --,
n
i g
e.
3201-006-C-052. 053.-054 i
CPC Indicated that they recognize the issues rolsed in these confirditems os being issues which need resolution. The time scale for resolution, however, is uncertain. TERA quest!crmf whether the CCP and/or the QVP review the 321-D i
forms. CPC Indicated that they were uncertoin and that they would check and provide the information to TERA in a written response. TERA suggested that the speelfic items listed in these confirmed items not be reviewed further. What is recommended is for TERA to review the progrom to cddress the general issues rotsed in these confirmed items. This recommendation is made because it hos l
been unclear how it is verified that total vendor submittels have been received.
After reviewing the forthcoming progrom to oddress the general issue, TERA will take o new sample of components to verify receipt of vendor docuenentation.
3201-006-C-056 This confirmed item is concerned with material test reports for AFW ond SEP components. Bechtel has the action to respond to the specific issues raised by the confirmed item.
I 3201-006 F-036. -031 l
3
)
TERA is awolting the receipt of final procedures for FCRs and FCNs. These new I
procedures have been issued but are not yet implemented. TERA requested copies of the procedures and will review them. Bechtel will provide copies to TERA. (Notes subsequent to the meeting, TERA was provided a copy of Bechtel AAPD Project Engineering Procedure 4.62.1, Rev. I.
The subject of this j
document is fle'd change requests / field change notices.)
j l
j i
i 3
j 1
3201-008-F-018.-Z-018 This item represents a finding and its resolution, based upon the receipt of SAR Change Notice 4067 and other information as documented in the finding resolution report. The item was concerned with the method by which decoy heat was calculated for the project. Sufficient Information has been received to ellow resolutiont however, observation 3201-008-8-080 was issued to document opporent discreponcles which remoln in the B&W Interfoce criterio document for the AFW system.
3201-008.R-020. -R-027. C-005 Sufficient informotion was obtoined to ollow resolution of confirmed items number 20 and 27. The update of the FSAR clorifles the ir formation provided and allows resolution of confirmed items 20 and 27. No further oction is required for these two items. C-005 is a brooder concern about the FSATI update process. TERA has the action to review this process. CPC suggested that TERA contact Note Leech in CPC's licensing yovp to obtain Information concerning the procedures to control the FSAR.
3201-006-C-038. C-025 TERA Indicated thot it appears that all Information needed to disposition these two confirmed items hos been received. No further oction la required from the project of this time.
h i
i t
3201-006-C-043 5
TERA hos requested documents M480 and M327, and was odvised pe4of to the meeting that these documents would be ovellable on November 30. After the meeting, TERA obtained these documents and will review them during Decem-l bor.
3201-006-C-048 l
[
This item is concerned with quellfication of turbine controls for the AFW turbine-driven pump. This confirmed item will remain on hold until the vendor l
supplies documentation next year.
i 3201-006.R-073 This item concerns the sizing colculation for the cooling coil for the air handling units in the control room HVAC. Information obtained from Bechtel Indicated that the post-LOCA condition was the most limiting for cooling coil slaing.
j Consequently, this item is considered resolved and the LOCA cose will be used in l
further evoluotions of the cooling coil sizing.
320f-00 M -064 This item concerns the olignment of the control room HVAC system following
}
the three-hour pressurization period. Bechtel stated that the design basis was for the HVAC system to have the capability to be realigned to take in outside i
i-otra however, this is not on outomatic function. The operator is to evoluote the i
f situetion and take action appropriate for the circumstances.
e N
5
,~
i I
i I
p
3701-006.C-074. C-075. C-076 These three items are concerned with various aspects of the control room HVAC system. TERA stated thor sufficient Information is now available to allow disposition of all three items. No further uction from CPC or Bechtel is required of this time.
3201-008-C-084 This item is concerned with Instantaneous versus short-term or time weighted overage concentrations of hozordous chemicals.
TERA observed that the calculation method used essentially assumes instantaneous mixing of hozordous chemicals, whereas some of the identified hozordous chemicals have lower limits which are not to be exceeded, even Instantaneously. Thus, it may be possible for localized oreas in the control room to be of a higher concentration than the apparent allowable. The project will review this and respond oppropriately.
_3201-008-C-085 This item lists several examples of potential problems with calculations. The Individual items may be of relatlwly minor importance: however, TERA's principal concern is that collectively it is difficul.t to establish the odequacy of the calculational control methods. Bechtel will review the specific issues rotsed and also consider the collective impact of the concern. TERA stated that the specific issues are considered minor and that its recommendation is to focus on the more general concern.
3201-006-C-026 This item is concertwd with a field change request to reduce the design pressure in piping downstroom of a flow orifice. The change was model however, TERA 6
could not locate calculations to support the change.
Bechtel advised that co!culations had been performed and were ovalloble. It was agreed that TERA and Bechtel personnel would review the calculation outside the~ meeting in occordonce with the procedure for release of calculations to TERA.
i-3201-006-C-061 This item was concerned with a number of discroponcles In the calculation for RPSA Input. Bechtel odvised that the calculation which TERA reviewed had been subsequently superseded. It was agreed that TERA and Bechtel personnel would review the calculation M::;-ant to the meeting In occordonce with the procedure to ollow release of the calculation to TERA for further review.
3201-004-C-039 Bechtel is working on o response to the items rolsed in this confirmed item concerning qualiticotton of cable. TERA's concerns ores (l) opplication of test data for 16 gouge cable to 20 m coble, and (2) whether unshielded cable and shielded cable con be quollfled on the basis of similarity.
I 3201-006-C-060 l
This item is concerned with cable length calculations.
TERA stated that sufficient Information is currently osalloble, and that no further Information is required from Bechtel of this time.
1 i
7 d
i t
320l M C-022 l-i CPC odvised thet further informotion concerning the testing procedusas for the
' level control system is now ovoilable. TERA stated that it will review ony new Information ond is currently considering olternatives for disposition of this item.
i 3201-006.C 015 1
I TERA hos reviewed Appendix IA of the SMA report. This review indicates that the SMA study does not support the conclusion that flexibility con be neglected.
I i
l However, review of other sections of the SMA report moy provide further information to judge whether other conservatisms in the onelysis offset the j
nonconservotive neglecting of floor flexibility. TERA will discuss the SMA l
.mt with CPC personnel.
4 1
1 j
}
320l 6 -068
(
Bechtel odvised that a response to this item concerning the quellfication onelysis
[
for the AFW motor is forthcoming. TERA will review this information when it is
[
received.
l 3201-000 C-077 4
i Bechtel odvised that on omendment to the FSAR is in the process of being i
distributed. it is believed that this omendment will clorify the concerne rolsed by TERA. CPC will oiso provide additional Informotion.
I e
I a
g
320l.006-C-087. -008. -089 1
These three items are all concerned with the fire protection progrdm.' Bechtel advised that the fire hemords unolysis and related fire protection work is currently in progress. It was noted that Bechtel will be upgrading as much of the well and penetrations os possible to o three hour rating. Sechtel will provide documentation which Indicates that the NRC stoff hos concluded that the water.
tight doors to the AFW pump rooms are equ!volent to o three hour rating. An eueption will have to be taken on the pressure relief panel. The lighting study is being reviewed. Consumers indicated that it was their position that flashlights could be used as o means of providing enough light to allow on operator to move from the control room to the remote shutdown ponel. Bechtel further Indicated that spurious operoflon is now being considered as port of the fire evoluotion.
The revised fire hozords analysis is scheduled to be complete late in 1964. TERA will review any information submitted to disposition these items in the near l
term. Items not dispositioned shortly or which depend upon the revised fire l
honords analy:Is will be placed on o hold" status and not reviewed of subsequent a
OCR meetings until auffielent Information is ovellable to allow disposition.
i l
l 4
i i
I O
i i
f
.=
L J 3ppp j WJM \\2d -
Gi i
{ryg
%_ q a i
Neven*eri,i,83 mi e
Mr. James W. Cook Vlee President Censumers Power Company 1945 West Pornell Rood Jeckson, Michigan 49201 Mr. J. C. Meppler Administrotor, Region lil Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
799 Reesevelt Rood Glen Ellyn,IL 60137 Mr. D. C. Eisenhut Director, Diviolon of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Reguletory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 l
Rei Docket Nos. 54329 OM, OL and 54030 OM, OL Midfond Nuclear Plant - Units i and 2 1.nf a r.t c.t Design and Construction Verification (IDCV) Progrom Meeting Summary Door $1rst The third meeting on Confirmed items was held on October 28,1983.
A summary is provided to document items discussed and octions ogreed upon by the participonts.
$1ncerely, i
./I l5dW9w Howerd A. Levin f
Project Meneper Midland IDCV Program l
ces Porticipants Midiend IDCVP Servlee List R.Etherdt CPC D. Quemmy,EPC (site) 3 CPC (site)
B. Palmer,
~
D. Hood, NRC J. T eylor, N R C,l& E N O 4
Eneiesure
^
HAL/d)b WV 8 MB TERA COMATON 7101 Wt$CCt451N AVENUE BEb4SOA MAfhLAND 20814 001.cM8%0
SERYlCE LIST FOR MIDLAIO INDEPEPOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM cc: Harold R. Denton, Director Ms. Barbara Stamiris Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 5795 N. River U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Freeland, Michigan 48623 Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Wendell Marshall James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator Route 10 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Midland, Michigan 48440 Region ll1 799 Roosevelt Rood Mr. Steve Godler Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 2120 Carter Avenue St. Paul, Minneseta 55108 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission j
Resident Inspectors Office Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Route 7 Citizens Clinic Midland, Michigan 48640 Director,'ecountable Government for A Covernment Accountability Project Vice Pres, Cook Insthute for Policy Studies Mr. J. W.
ident 1901 Que Street, N.W.
Consumers Power Company Washington, D.C. 20009 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201 Charles Bechhoefer, Esq.
Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Michael I. Miller, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Isham, Lincoln & Beale Washington, D'.C. 20555 Three First National Plaza,
~
Sist floor Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Chicago, Illinois 60602 Apt. B-125 6125 N. Verde Trail James E. Brunner, Esq.
Boca Roton, Florida 33433 Consumers Power Compmy 212 West Michigan Avenue Jerry Harbour, Esq.
Jackson, Michigan 49201 Afomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ms. Mary Sincla.ir e
Washington, D.C. 20555 5711 Summerset Dr,ive 4
Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr. Ron Collen e
x.-
Michigan Public Service Commission Cherry & Flynn s'
65a5 Mercantile Way Suite 3700
' P.O. Box 30221 Three First National Plaza _,,,1
, Lansing, Michigan 48909
~
Chicago, Illinois 60602.
Mr. Paul Rau A Lynne Bernabei Midland Daily News Government Accountability Project 124 Mcdonald Street 1901. G Street, NW Midland, Michigan 48640 J Washington, D.C. 20009.
~
.e #b
,ar*
3
(,D
[
=
j 1
l m
1
{-
s
- ^
j 3-k j
t a
j-3 ye b*
c.
4 i,
y.,
, h 5.-
SUMMARY
OF THIRD MEETING ON CONFIRMED ITEMS OCTOBER 28,1983 MIDLAbO IDCV PROGRAM A meeting was held on October 28,1983 of Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices to obtain additional information related to Confirmed items identified in IDCVP Monthly Status Reports dated September 20,1983, and October 17,1983, and to status other outstanding items identified previously.
Attachment I identifies the attendees of the meeting which included representatives from TERA, CPC, Bechtel, and NRC. Attachment 2 presents the ogendo used for the meeting.
Howard Levin, TERA, opened the meeting with a discussion of the ogendo and o summary of the purpose of the meeting. The minimum objective for the meeting was to ensure that all participants gained a complete understcnding of the technical issues expressed as Confirmed items. This is intended to enable Midland project personnel to identify additional information that may have a bearing on the issues at hand. Direct clarification or presentation of odditional information by Midiond project per_onnel is also sought so that specific issues may be further dispositioned directly.
Lou Gibson, CPC, discussed recent actions to',cen by the Midland project to
~
facilitate the flow of information to TERA. These actions have included the revision of certain internal Bechtel procedures for handling the transmittal of information. Levin indicated that these procedures were reviewed by TERA and with representatives of the NRC, and that since their odoption en improvement in turnaround time has been recognized. Gibson indicated that the issue of Information flow is on the ogendo for mongement review, and that routine reports are provided to monogement to enable o verification thct turnaround time is not compromised by other priorities.
The status of outstanding Confirmed items and Findings was discussed next, including a cursory review of Observations and Resolved items. A summary of significant aspects of these discussions is provided in Attachment 3 olong with I
.c L
any course of action identified. The responsible lead TERA personnel described each item followed by a discussion of either CPC or Bechtel personnel, as oppropriate.
During these discussions, the topic of Observations was presented. Observations are items that are not considered sufficiently serious to warrant classification as Confirmed items; however, these cannot be dismissed directly as Resolved items because certain review and potential corrective actions may be necessary on the port of the Midland project. A consensus was developed to the effect that Observations would continue to be transmitted via the Monthly Status Reports.
Any necessary clorification required by the Midland project could be gained at similar meet'ings.
Without such questions, time will not be consumed in reviewing Observations at these meetings.
The slated topical repcrt on the AFW system performance requirements was discussed. TERA indicof ed that the original concept for the report was to pt, ovide intermediate input that may be useful to the NRC in their efforts ossociated with the Ford Amendment. It was originally anticipated that while such a topical report is but a piece of the IDCVP scope, it would provide o glimpse into the implementation of the overall IDCVP mevhodology. TERA Indicated that most of the outstanding Confirmed items and Findings are ossociated with the AFW system and that in view of this, it is premature to draw substantive conclusions. Accordingly, it has been determined that such a topical report would merely be o topical status report and not a consummate statement on the AFW system performance requirements._
The NRC representatives indicated that they would review the situation to ossess whether or not the current monthly status reporting would suffice in lieu of the slated topical report.
l
=
4 c
4 I
r L
l ATTACHMENT 1 I
' MEETING NOTICE e
BECHTEL JOB NO.
.. 7220. _.
" " ' " " ' ' " ' " " ' " ^ " " '
PROJECT SUBJECT OF THE MEETING Independent Design and Construction Verification (IDCV) Program i
I ogy Friday - October 28, 1983 TIME 9:00 a.m.
TO 3:00 p.m.
LOCATION Bechtel Ann Arbor Office - Conference Room 1B1 ATTENDEES MAA4E 046AMl 5AT*/CN by)/flVD Wdi N..
.$f.Y...O Y
Fon 1A vneary
... TEM Co~p.
p?neral Jens
. rcs2A ce n P.
~
/ A ~t' f.
1 %.le 1 -..
... TCJLA.....Go P.
n
.. A ny 6 a-u m :,
73xs coen Gl.am E M
&<Jdzl. - %)ut Gw.4s&s
/....
L.:. -
' 'e 50
$WSSWk
. hkWl *. &nS&%w.
Bob It' ann.
._ cko
_.. ;.1 c b'eh OAi&Je<
..-... G A9
. @'&4D e
. _... HA' O IE/HOl'5 G.fl. 6o
.... /. //1
.....,%2c.
.rr/h p m..
...c
/40 r: 7GA7
. 7k M-Gy.. -
.. Dou c..t.c :
/V lw Z7 TfAM'.... ;'i..c...
ch.*G'E
.S.S/ D V)*.....-
0 2 dh2..:
?Z.q.N. $A,'.)...
..... No H<>
. K.0VA<-K
.......--..- 0EC&TEL - P O
- Lt........
btllt... JUL Y.A. -
Hu*
EA MuAfffs._..
- 94#
suseu A n.....
.m+ - t Q>h 2L.Q..
..C.C.. 1LA5AD -....-
. Bo s
.T~utLocJL 9M &a........
P.
..Gup+a
= --
i
.JYhr.s. dewAv....
...__... r....r. _.
c __
M
.6,4_..A4.o._... _....
J
.6.c,. meeon a...
t ML
..... =
-l Bo s.
A4*w 0/Co
ATTACHMENT 2 INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION (IDCV)
AGENDA for OCTOBER 28, 1983, MEETING ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN I,
Introduction and opening remarks Discussion of Confirmed Items, Findings, Observations, and Resolved II.
)
Items 1
CPCo/B&W/BECHTEL LEAD ITEM TERA LEAD Construction F-045 Tulodieski B-Construction F-046 Tulodieski B-Construction F-047 Tulodieski B-Construction C-M9 Tulodieski B-Construction C-050 Tulodieski B-Construction C-052 Tulodieski B-Construction C-053 Tulodieski B-Construction C-054 Tulodieski B-Construction (Agar l Mechanical C-005 Dougherty B&W/3-Mechanical R-017 Dougherty B-Mechanical C-018 Dougherty B&W/CPCo C-020 Dougherty B-Mechanical C-027 Dougherty CPCo C-028 Dougherty B-Mechanical /CPCo C-048 Dougherty B-Mcchanical C-043 Dougherty B-Mechanical /B-Plant Design C-025 Dougherty CPCo C-038 Bates _
B-Mechanical C-066 Witt B-Mechanical C-073 Witt B-Mechanical C-074 Witt B-Mechanical i
C-075 Witt B-Mechanical C-076 Witt B-Mechanical B-057 Witt B-Mechanical B-067 Witt B-Mechanical B-063 Dougherty B-Mechanical B-064 Dougherty B-Mechanical F-031 Tulodieski B-Plant Design F-036 Tulodieski B-Plant Design I
)I a.
C
.r_
1 1
1
~
a AGENDA - Page 2 l
ITEM TERA LEAD CPCo/B&W/BECHTEL LEAD Civil' B-Civil M
Mortgat C-015 Nortsat B-Civil B-Civil C-068 Nortsat B-Civil /B-L&S C-077 Mortgat Electrical B-Electrical
.Z-012 Bates B-Electrical /B-L&S C-039 Bates B-Electrical C-040 Bates B-Electrical C-022 Bates Miscellaneous R-041 Bates B-L&S R-042 Baees B-L&S B-044 Dougherty B-L&S B-059 Dougherty B-L&S B-061 Witt B-Control Systems s
Discussion of Action Items and Logistics for Information Exchange II.
9 1
e t
0 Y
k j..
~
ATTACHMENT 3 DISCUSSION OF CObFIRMED ITEMS, FiiOINGS, OBSERVATIONS, abo RESOLVED ITEMS 3201-008-F-045. -044. -047 All three of these items relate to the storage and maintenance creo of review.
F-045 and F-046 are specific discrepancies noted in the storage and maintenance programs, while F-047 is more generic as it questions the process by which vendor recommended storage end maintenance requirements are reflected in project procedures. TERA is currently reviewing actions taken by the project to improve the storage and maintenance programs.
TERA is also currently reviewing the charter for o new organization with full-time responsibility for these issues, os well as interviewing key personnel. The emphasis of these efforts is on how vendor requirements are reconciled and the effectiveness of implementation.
TERA will also review specific changes to the in-place maintenance procedure for the AFW pump motor and witness a future overhaul of the AFW pumps and turbine.
t 3201-008-C-049 I
TERA indicated that a response was received from Bechtel which oddressed physical changes to be mode which include placing a cover on the cable troy to create o barrier between the noted channels. It wns concluded that this oction would address the noted separation issues in the locations covered, but not in the air-lined region as the cables terminate into cabinets. CPC indicated that they had uncovered similar problems and that the EFE staff (team 24) was investigo-ting solutions such as wropping. CPC is also looking into goining dispensation from the 3-foot separation requirement in the vicinity of cabinet entries. TERA will factor these actions into the continuing review.
e t
t
320l-008-C-050 TERA Indicated that a response was received from Bechtel which addressed the ergineering significance of the noted cable being routed outside of its scheduled vio it was observed that guidelines in the cable overinspection program may not be definitive in establishing criteria for decling with such a routing. Accord-ingly, OC personnel may have interpreted such circumstances in different ways.
TERA will complete a review of the technical arguments presented in this 4
specific instance and expond the existing sample to verify that the overinspee-tion has been consistently applied.
3201-008-C-052,-053 -054 All three of these issues relate to documentation that TERA wcs unable to secure. C.052 oddresses the completeness of vendor supplied documentation, while C-053 and C-054 oddress construction / installation documentation. At this juncture it is not cieor whether TERA could simply not locate the information, if l
It is misplaced, in process, or never created. Bechtel will attempt to locate the noted documents. TERA will review the closecut procedure for vendor supplied documentation including site and' Ann Arbor netivities. Discreponcles between direct spec requirements and 32 f D requirements will be reviewed further. TERA questioned whether the CCP hos o focus on a verification of completeness of vendor supplied documentation. "CPC indicated that It" did in a peripheral manner, prin ortly the ir.itollation requirements. C-053 ond C-054 bear directly on items thet are within the CCP scope and are slated to be verified as the j
program progresses.
Accordingly, TERA will review the closeout of these specific items offer the CCP hos been through and expand the somple of a future date to verify that similar items are caught and resolved.
l l
l 3201-008-7-012 TERA described the bases for resolving this Finding and Indicated that no further.
l oction is contemplated at this time.
I 2
3 i
..4 m
4
3201-008-C-039 TERA has received a letter from Bechtel on this item; however, there is still some discussion of the opplicobility of the test data to the octual design where aluminized mylor tape is used on some cables and not others. Bechtel will provide further information justifying their position that the qualification test dato is oppIIcoble.
3201-008-C-040 Bechtel indicated that the lengths shown on the circuit schedule are shop-cut lengths and may not necessority be octual installed lengths. Notwithstanding this, Bechtel has Indicated that for the specific MOV application, calculation OPE-8 is too conservative and not necessarily applicable. They further Indicated engineering judgment is the principal meons by which cables are sized. TERA indicated that this process would be reviewed along with the methods of OC verification. Addit!cnc! sompling of sizing under these applications may be worronted pending the process review.
3201-008-C-022 TERA indicated that a preliminary review was made of the startup test procedure and that it was judged that it may not fully exercise the SG level control system to the extent that its performance under all plant conditions may l
be verified. CPC committed to providing justificotton oddressing why the f
startup testing and hot functional testing would suffice to qualify the system.
3201-008-C-025 TERA has received a rate calculation for SG fill and is currently reviewing it.
DCAR 731 hos been written which oddresses changes to switching hardware ossociated with FOGG inversion. This information will be transmitted to TERA for review.
3
~
...I
3201-008-R-Ol7 TERA indicated that full clarification was received and the issue is resolved.
320 l-008-C-005, -018, -020, -027, -028 TERA indicated that each of these issues have been outstanding and that Bechtel's September 30,1983 letter is anticlooted to be sufficient for TERA to effect further disposition. No further Midland project action is required at this time.
3201-008-C-048 Bechtel indicated that the original spec required qualification to a 120 F ertvironment; however, conservative treatment of the blackout condition dic-toted raising the quellfication temperature to 150 F.
Later coleulations established pump room temperatures to be 121* F.
The vendor is currently qualifying to this level. Documentation will be ovolloble in early spring,1984 of which time it will be forwarded for TERA's review. This item will be placed on
" hold" and not discussed at future meetings until the documentation is received.
3201-008-C-038 Bechtel indicated that odditional information in addition to the vendors previous telex was being forwarded by the vendor. CPC questioned whether the 100 gpm AFW flow would N maintained under a station blockout condition with a low decoy heat food. TERA Indicated that resolution of this item w!ll require evoluoting scenarios such as blockout with low decay heat food to determine whether 100 GMP con be maintained.
TERA will review the later vendor submittal upon receipt.
4 l
t
~
~
o 3201-008-C-066 Bechtel Indicated that offer three hours the air intake con be opened monvolly and that calculations assume that this is done at three hours offer isolation, followed by continuous operation in that mode thereafter.
3201-008-C-073 Bechtel indicated that LOCA is the limiting cose for external heat loads to the control room because high energy line breaks do not offect adjacent crecs.
3201-008-C-074 Bechtel indicated that the station blackout event is not a design basis event and, tiferefore, the 75 F control room temperature does not have to be maintained under these conditions. Bechtel estimated that under design basis assumptions, the'maximurn temperature that could be reached in the control room could reach I10* F, two hours into the station bicekout. Bechtel hcs documented this in a calculation.
3201-008-C-075 Bechtel indicated that they assume that the double control room doors are on q
oirlock. They referenced p. 6.4-7 of the FSAR.
1-1l a
3201-000 C-076
.l The 2000 cfm is documented on flow diagram M-765. The 104' F is a reference design basis in many orcos of the FSAR. The 96* FDB and 79* FWB are based upon Saginow. meteorological dato.
Accordingly, Bechtel will clarify these references in the subject calculation.
5 s
s
+
L,.--
J.-
3201-008-F-031 TERA indicated that review was continuing to ossess the process by which field changes are reconciled with the design. As elements of the CCP are directed at related issues, TERA will factor this input into the overall evoluotion. In view of similar issues recently identified by MPOAD associated with the FCR/FCN process, odditional emphasis will be placed in this review areo.
3201-008-F-036 TERA ind;cated that additional inforrnation had been received from Beciitel i
which will enable a further disposition of this item.
3201-008-C-043 s
1 Bechtel indicated that the M-480 Piping Class Sheets provide the classification criteria fcr various seismic and quality categories for piping. They indicated that while the subject piping was not subject to GA requirements, it was installed according to the M-327 spec. Bechtel will eventually walkdown all piping in this category to verify general arrangement and quality of installation.
TERA will review this information_ ond note any required additional clarifico-tions.
3201-008-C-015 i
Bechtel Indicated that the vertical floor flexibility study was not the only basis which supports the statement in the C-SOI, Civil / Structural Design Criteria document that floor flexibility need not be considered in the seismic analysis of j
. the Midiond plant structures. Reference was mode to a study by SMA which
}
includes this behovloral effect. Bechtel could not comment on the results of this study. TERA reiterated the issues documented in C-OlS. It was determined that the subject study alone was insufficient and that the SMA. study should be
~
reviewed to further dispocition the item.
6
\\
a
+-
.-,s
[
f
- 4 4
320I-008-C-068 Bechel will further investigate the noted discreponey and document the results in a letter to TERA.
3201-008-C-077 5
Bechtel indicated that Sections 3.9 and 3.10 of the FSAR were purged at the request of the NRC to be replaced by NRC's "short form." CPC has recently taken responsibility for the SORT issue and should be consulted for further Information regarding the status of the SORT review and FSAR update process.
r w
4 a
~
}
.l i
}
V 7
-+ ' "'
+-
w-.
p 9
9 7,.,_,y
.,..+
.,9
,__m
,gw
...i s,mg.9 I
L J 1
p September 7,1983 l
l#4INClPAL S r,*,,:Fi Mr. James W. Cook sa i
u.y, ;
d{
i.
Vice President 0/RA !
isijs ;
3 Consumers Power Company A/2A 1 p:n e
1945 West Parnall Road DNPl Ro n Jackson, Michigan 49201 2fdro!.sc i;.
pysF' Mr. J. G. Keppler -
N I
Administrator, Region 111 gL l
l 3
Office of Inspection and Enforcement ICL i
VILEi 1
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Mr. D. G. Eisenhut Director, Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 t
Re: Docket Nos. 50-329 OM, OL and 50-030 OM, OL Midland Nuclear Plant - Units I and 2
~
Independent Design and Construction Verification (IDCV) Program Meeting Summary
Dear Sirs:
The second meeting on Confirmed items was held on August 26,1983.
A i
summary is provided to document items discussed and actions agreed upon by the participants.
i.
Sincerely, 4.c/
t"*~
l Howard A. Levin Project Manager Midland IDCV Program cc: Participants Midland IDCVP Service List t
- F. Buckmon, CPC D. Miller, CPC'(site)
B. Palmer, CPC (site)
D. Hood, NRC J. Taylor, NRC, I&E HQ M
P. Keshishion, NRC, l&E HQ
- 9' h
M Enclosure HAL/djb -
TERA CORPORATION o,
7404 uticrYwtM a\\/CMt C c TL.:cna uaovi ANO ?nAid Vli.A M.DCAO W
i
. d.
SUMMARY
OF SECOFO MEETING J
ON CObFIRMED ITEMS AUGUST 26,1983 MIDLAb0 IDCV PROGRAM A meeting was held on August 26,1983 of Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices to obtain additional information related to Confirmed items identified in IDCVP Monthly Status Reports dated May 27,1983, July 15,1983, and August 16,1983.
The status of actions taken in response to IDCVP Findings was discussed as well as programmatic options associated with the Ford Amendment. Attachment I identifies the attendees of the meeting which included representatives from TERA, CPC, Bechtel, NRC, and B&W. Attachment 2 presents the ogendo for the meeting.
I The meeting opened with on introduction of porticiponts. The initial discussions fccused on the schedule and logistics for providing odditional documentation
~
1 concerning outstanding items. TERA reiterated details of the IDCVP reporting process, differentiating between the type of information required in response to Confirmed items versus Findings or Findings resolution, it was pointed out that information assoc!ated with Confirmed items should generally be existing information that may not have been previously ovallable to the IDCVP project 4
team or, alternatively, brief clarificotton of existing information. Findings or i
Findings resolution may require the generation of new information. All pcrties I
agreed that'information supporting Confirmed items and other existing informo-tion would be transmitted to TERA within 10 days of request with on indication of the status (i.e., portial or complete) of the response relative to specific l
Confirmed items. The schedule for Findings or Findings resolution would be
}
worked out on a case-by-case basis. This agreement will provide on improved j
basis for IDCVP planning.
l The status of outstonding Confirmed items end Findings, os well os new Confirmed items and Findings, was discussed next. The responsible lead TERA l
l personnel described each item followed by a discussion by representatives of l
either CPC, Bechtel, or B&W as appropriate.
Mr. Howard Levin, TERA, L
j~
1 i
I e
-%g g
r
.cr.--
w r
ye-
- m e e-w-w,e.,,,w,,,
-..~,,,, - - -,.. - -, - - - - - -,
o Mr. Lou Gibson, CPC, Mr. Jerry Clements, Bechtel, and Mr. Jim Agor, B&W, coordinated the discussions for their respective organizations.
The following descriptions, by item, highlight important issues discussed and any course of oction identified during the meeting.
3201-008-C-005 Th!s item addresses a potential generic issue related to conflicting data on AFW
.ystem design parameters associated with Confirmed items C-017, C-Ol8, C-020, C-027, and C-028. CPC pointed out that apparently conflicting design criterio may,in fact, be valid depending upon how these criteria were otilized in specific design calculations /evoluotions. It follows that what may appear to be a t
bounding assumption in one scenario may not be bounding in another, particularly if applied out of context (i.e., a conservative assumption in one calculation may j
not be the most conservative in another). They further indicated that in certain circumstances the Midland plant may be designed to a specific set of criteria, yet evoluoted against other criteria such as NRC Bronch Technical Positions.
TERA questioned the process by which the FSAR was checked and cross-checked within Bechtel groups and between groups. Bechtel described the procedure.
Bechtel committed to provide clarification in conjunction with their response to 1
. Confirmed items C-017, C-Ol8, C-020, C-027, and C-028. TERA will review j
this information and also selectively evoluote FSAR changes.
I 3201-008-C-017 B&W indicated that the AFW flow rates documented in B&W document BAW 1612, Rev. I, do not opply to Midland. Midland AFW flow requirements are i
established in B&W document 32-0525-00, January 27,1974.
A letter and supporting evoluotion from Agar, B&W, to Gibson, CPC, dated August 25, I?83 addresses the acceptobility of the 850 gpm AFW flow requirement. TERA will review this reference. Bechtel will provide further clarification and document along with a response.to C-005.
' i L
2 e
-.s.
s
+
s, m.
4w
~ -,, --
w m e,
+.-m y
~
3201-008-C-018 This item questions which decay heat curve the Midland project is committed to meeting (i.e., B&W curve or BTP APCSB-9.2).
Bechtel indicated that SAR Change Notice No. 4067 will clarify any potential misinterpretation associated with the design bases for the decoy heat lood. B&W indicated that the Midland design was based upon a B&W decay heat curve documented in B&W manual 18KI, December 3,1969. In the August 25,1983 letter, a comparison is made to BTP APCSB-9.2 criterio. TERA will review the SCN ond the August 25,1983 letter. Bechtel will provide further clarification and document along with o i
response to C-005.
3201-008-C-020 Bechtel will provide further clarification along with a response to C-005.
3201-008-C-027 Bechtel indicated that SAR Change Notice No. 4067 clarifies the Midland design basis to be 2552 MWt. TERA will review this SCN.
3201-008-C-028 it was noted that this item primarily relates to the consistency between design porometers.
The impact on the reactor coolont system components was discussed and generally agreed by all parties to be insignificant. Bechtel and CPC indicated that if service water was used as a source of AFW on evoluotion would follow incieding on evaluation of the impact of low water temperature, os appropriate. Bechtel will provide further clarification and document this along with a response to C-005.
3201-008-C-025 CPC indicated that a DCAR was pending which simplifies the method by which on operator takes action to invert FOGG. Bob Homm, CPC and Brent Brooks, 1
t 3
g:
r B&W were identified as contacts on this issue. CPC will send TERA the DCAR and TERA will initiate further review to evoluote revised direction being token with respect to FOGG and ATOG.
3201-008-C-031 Bechtel indicated that they had completed actions necessary to correct deficien-cies noted with Findings F-032 thru -036 and that they would document these formally. TERA indicated that review was continuing to assess the process by which field changes are reconciled with the design.
3201-008-C-037 TERA indicated that this specific issue would be considered resolved in view of FSAR revision 47 which corrects the noted inconsistency. In conjunction with continuing efforts related to C-005, TERA will selectively evoluote FSAR changes.
3201-008-C-038 Bechtel indicated that the AFW purr.p minimum flow volve did not have to be powered from battery backed power because recirculation through the line was not required during the assumed 2-hour blockout period. Bechtel has received a t
telex from the pump vendor attesting to the pumps performance at a minimum flow of 100 'gpm. Bechtel will secure backup for fl5is ascertion and transmit it to TERA for review.
4 3201-008-C-022 Bechtel indicated that the steam generator level control system performance would be tested during the startup test procedures. TERA questioned whether the full performance range under. potential varying plant conditions could be simulated during these tests and if analyses might be required to supplement the I
startup testing. CPC indicated that such testing is considered sufficient to demonstrate the adequacy of the system. Bechtel described a Fodxwo Shop test 4
b of the control system which they witnessed. Foxboro initiated this test even o
though it was not required by spec due to the complexity of the control loop.
CPC will transmit the requisite startup test procedure for TERA's review.
3201-008-C-048 Bechtel is currently pursuing documentation from the vendor documenting the equipment capability to withstand a 1200F maximum temperature.
They indicated that the 1200F hos been required by specificotton. Bechtel will provide the documentation for TERA's review when received.
4 3201-008-F-Ol2 MCAR 68 was initiated in June addressing this Finding. A final report was completed on August 15,1983 which documents both specific and generic actions taken for resolution. TERA will review this information.
i 320l-008-F-036 I
^
Bechtel ocknowledged that due to inattention to detail certain dimensional errors on drawings do exist where portions of these drawings have been modified i
due to field changes. The Plant Design group has reviewed 341 FCRs against isometric drawings and has found-dimensional discrepancies associated with 9 l-FCRs. Accordingly 7 isometric drawings will be revised. Bechtel pointed out that offer the piping is installed, dimensional discrepancies to the building centerlines have little impact. Bechtel will summarize the results of their evoluotion in a letter to CPC.
TERA will review this information when i
avoilable.
1 l
3201-008-C-047, F-045, F-046
(
l TERA indicated that the two Findings relate to specific discreponcles noted
' between vendor recommended storoge and maintenance requirements cnd project procedures and actions. The Confirmed item was generated later ofter several similar instances were noted by the ICV project team, potentially pointing to a h
i l
l 5
r y
-y y
yy,w.
- --==,w a.
w_
p,
e--
e'-y--.-e-v
--w
+e
'e-
, + +
--w-w-e-.
w
,,We w
e-,,, -e
.--,-* - - - -w-
-*w v.-
more generic issue. CPC and Bechtel ocknowledged the situation presented by
+
these,0CRs and have created a Task Force whose charter will be to reconcile manufacturer and project requirements, status the current situation and see that reconciled storage and maintenance procedures are followed in the future.
TERA will review the Task Forces' charter and selectively evoluote the implementation of their activities. MPQAD representatives indicated that they had completed on audit in this oreo and would forward their report to TERA for review.
Programmatic options ossociated with the Ford Amendment were discussed.
CPC described the options that were identified during on August 5,1983 public meeting in Bethesdo. The NRC representatives questioned salient features of each of the identified options. A specific conclusion was not reached on this issue. The NRC representatives Indicated that future discussion would take place offer they had consulted with their management.
A general discussion was held relative to the interface between the CCP and ICV programs. A principal issue is the extent of construction verification progress that the ICV con ottain in view of the status of project completion and the fact that the CCP does not have full approval by NRC. TERA indicated that in view of the fact that the CCP must be considered the primary construction vehicle, that independent verification should not take place until the CCP has "GC'ed" portions of work. It was agreed that proceeding on this basis was feasible verses waiting until each of the three IDCVP systems were turned over in whole. While i
the proposed ICV opprooch hos schedular odvantages, certain efficiency and resource tradeoffs are apparent. These will be the subject of future discussions.
The meeting was adjourned.
E l
e
MEETING NOTICE l
BECHTEL JOB NO.
7220 i,
PROJECT Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 SUBJECT OF THE MEETING INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICAIION (IDCV)
Friday, August 26, 1983 OAY
,,. E OCATION Pachtel AAO, Conference Room 1/B1 ATTENDEES NAMC ctt Am sArscM a.
A.c.A11L - d!kaius. m 4 zuev
&mperr:pe. 7.'3&
dA MeC - Pm^
0
/V/M - IE NO A d.%ce
-oc
. C.
Be /e/ Qu,M Ew J
y R. F. TU Lt. oc.A l'5e u ret P t % r D e s I r. r.<
$ No'Co L Av1'
[f tf M TEC ~ 1*/f4N R AfAU B MH Tet.
- necMg m e.,
Q. h G 4 g.d3: --
hMk
-P Q... n e 9
r4(GWC CPO-MM6b, W
A efco 2Qsef p' l
Ti:/- he.s-D.e uJ Progd fvg<'aeJ
'drian 4-larrinya G P C o L ic.
s s..serm rsen l
L..D. B J s rm K. f?.sNAIDER Tun
- p. 3.Tw.pi s.mi nm n.e. Bowei, raA P.Ledw& b
. Ds TEKA-Te1Lk" LJht -
1
.b.In CPCO fl. Anch.
l l
- A M ---. __.
i
f
~
ATTACHMENT 2 AGENDA FOR AUGUST 26,1983 IDCVP MEETING BECHTEL OFFICES At+1 ARBOR, MICHIGAN Item Lead Time I.
Response to Confirmed items A.
Discussion of the schedule for providing H. Levin /
9:00 cm odditional documentation concerning out-L. Gibson/
standing items J. Clements B.
Status of IDV Confirmed items (items CPC/
9:30 cm discussed at June 3 meeting which are Bechtel still at the Confirmed item stage):
C-005, C-017, C-018, C-020, C-025, C-027, C-028, C-031, C-037, C-038 2.
New Confirmed items A.
C-022 L. Bates ll:00 cm B.
C-047 D. Tulodieski ll:15 cm
~
C.
C-048 F. Dougherty ll:30 am 3.
LUNCH 4.
Status of Findings: F-012, F-036 CPCO/Bechtel 12:30 pm 5.
New Findings: F-045, F-046 D. Tulodieski I:00 pm 6.-
Discussion of programmatic options ossociated D. Hood 1:15 pm with the Fcrd Amendment i
7.
Interface of CCP and ICV programs D. Tulodieski/
2:30 pm L. Gibson 8.
Summory H. Levin 3:00 pm
+
W n
s v
T e
m'-
T
SERVICE LIST FOR MIDLAf0 INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM cc: Harold R. Denton, Director Ms. Borboro Stomiris Office of Nuclear Reoctor Regulation 5795 N. River U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissim Freeland, Michigan 48623 Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Wendell Marshall James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator Route 10 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Midland, Michigan 48440 Region !!!
799 Roosevelt Road Mr. Steve Godler Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 2120 Corter Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident inspectors Office Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Route 7 Director, Citizens Clinic Midland, Michigan 48640 for Accountable Government Government Accountobility Project Mr. J. W. Cook Institute for Policy Studies Vice President 1901 Gue Street, N.W.
Consumers Power Company Washington, D.C. 20009 1945 West Parnali Road Jackson, Michigan 49201 Charles Bechhoefer, Esq.
Atomic Safety & Licensing Board "9 "
h Fr
- lozo, o, ilNis 60602 Chic t.
5 6125 N. Verde Troll James E. Brunner, Esq.
Boca Roton, Florido 33433 Consumers Power Company
~
212 West Michigan Avenue Jerry Harbour, Esq.
Jackson, Michigan 49201 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission f7ll Su fe7s'et Drive Washington, D.C. 20555 Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr. Ron Collen Michigan Public Service Commission Cherry & Flym 6545 Mercontile Way Suite 3700 P.O' Box 30221 Three First National Plaz Lonsing, Michigan 48909 Chicago, Illinois 60602 i
Mr. Paul Rou Ms. Lynne Bernobei Government Accountobility Project f24 Don Id reet O8' NW
- ngt D'.C, 20009 Midland, Michigan 48640 I
a f}h'0
'MAY 2 4 ss Docket No. 50-329 Docket No. 50-330 Consumers Power Company ATIN: Mr. James W. Cook Vice Frosident Midland Project 1
1945 West Parnall Road
)
Jackson, MI 49201 Gentlement i
This is to confirm the arrangements between Roy Wells of Consumers Power Company and John J. Barrison of the Region III staff scheduling June 24, 1983 at 9:00 a.m., as the date and time to discuss the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) for the Midland site. This meeting is to be held at the Quality Inn, Midland, Michigan.
J While this meeting is a presentation and disenssion forum between Coesumers i
Power Company and the MRC, it will be open to other interested parties as observers. Because of possible space limitations, thoes outside the licensee and NRC staffe should make advanca notification to the regional office by COB June 20, 1983.
l If you have any stmestions concerning this SALP Meeting, we will be happy to discuss thse with you.
l Sincerely, t
4
- "Ortsinsi signed by n. F. L'arnick" R. F. Warnick, Director
-l Office of Special Cases cca DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII The Bonorable Charles n=ehhaafer, ASLB The Honorable Jerry Harbour, ASL3
{
The Honorable Ralph S. Decker, ASL3 l
William Paton, ELD l
e Michael Miller
{}
Ronald r=11==, Michigan Public Service r===4 = = ion
^
Nyron M. Cherry l
l Barbara Stamiris l
l Mary Si=*1=*e Wendell Mar = hall 0"'C5 >i Colonel steve J. Gadler (F.E.)
H d Levia-(M)
- RIII, 5#"^"' h;........... owar
........... MM.is. L.. Car #,. r.AF...............hu7.9'9nll.9..
..N,NM............ h..n ick...
. Isehl i.na.....Har c ^" >l.............
..................l;.................
- 5. / 2,3 /.8 3..........
.. 8..........I
{................
.4mc romu vs no-aci uncu o24o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY L
-.