ML20087J645
| ML20087J645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/21/1984 |
| From: | Cordaro M, Lieberman E, Miele M, Edward Robinson, Weismantle J KLD ASSOCIATES, INC., LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| CON-DSB-63 OL-3, NUDOCS 8403230020 | |
| Download: ML20087J645 (400) | |
Text
[
LILCO, March 21, 1984 ,
C3 RELATED CORRESFONDENCE Tfp UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 34 ffAR 22 pp.g aC W U sp'2h Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board f?%lk'nj'h:F' M '
In the Matter of )
)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COi4PANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3
) (Emergency Planning (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, ) Proceeding)
Unit 1) )
LILCO'S TESTIMONY .N CONTENTIONS 24.E, 24.F.2, 24.F.3, 24.M, 61.C, AND 68-71 (SCHOOLS)
PURPOSE This testimony describes the planning that has been done for schools in the ten-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) around the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. It shows that the plan drafted by planners in the Suffolk County Planning Depart-ment had only one option for schools, namely to send the stu-dents home at an early (Site Area) stage of an emergency. Tha early dismissal approach has been endorsed by FEMA'and, for the Indian Point plants, by New York Statn.
To this early dismissal optiqn LILCO has added two other options, namely sheltering in the schools'and evacuation to predesignated reception centers. Which of the three options is recommended depends on-what protective action' recommendation has been made for the general public. The recommendation will 8403230020 840321 PDR ADOCK 05000322 '
T PDR _
r 1 be transmitted by EBS radio message; each school district has been provided with tone alert radios that will automatically receive the EBS messages.
The testimony describes the planning process for schools. It acknowledges that this process is still going on.
LILCO has offered to work with the schools to improve their present plans and has had meetings with school officials for that purpose. Representatives of all the affected school dis-tricts have attended the general meetings, and they have also been sent planning materials'in the mail. LILCO has offered to make available to the schools its own planners to help solve busing problems and health physicists to advise about the best places for sheltering.
- - The testimony-gdes on to describe in detail the planning that has been done, school by school. A plan exists for every school in the ten-mile EPZ and those schools outside the EPZ who have students who live within the EPZ. For schools within five miles of the plant, there appear to be no particular prob-lems. In particular, the Shoreham-Wading River Central School District, the closest to the plant, has an excellent plan and enough buses to evacuate its students in a single bus run.
For schools between five and ten miles of the plant, the problems are greater, both because certain of the school dis-tricts have resource limitations and because several of them have been critical of emergency plannity for Shoreham. Even if some of these school districts did no further planning, an
r l effective emergency response still could be effected for schools in these districts. The testimony describes certain compensating actions, such as having LERO personnel provide maps for bus drivers at the time of an accident, that would permit an emergency response even if the schools had declined to plan in advance.
ATTACHMENTS
' Attachment 1 - LILCO Transition Plan, p. 3.6-7 Attachment 2 - OPIP 3.6.5, pp. 10a-19c Attachment 3 - LILCO Transition Plan, Appendix A, pp. II-19 through II-21 and IV-169 through IV-171 Attachment 4 - List of schools in ten-mile EPZ Attachment 5 - Map showing schools and " Educational Facili-ties Key" Attachment 6 - Categories for Schools Attachment 7 - Categories for Parochial Schools Attachment 8 - Categories for Nursery Schools Attachment 9 - Schocl District Matrix dated 2/20/84 Attachment 10 - Memorandum of February 9, 1984, with list of schools outside the ten-mile EPZ Attachment 11 - Letters of July 31, 1980; September 5, 1980; and January 15, 1981 (2 letters) from Suffolk County agencies about planning for schools Attachment 12 . Plan drafted by Suffolk County Planning De-partment personnel, pp. II-19 through II-28
~
Attachment 13 " History of School Emergency Planning" by LILCO
! _4 ,
j Attachment 14 - Letter of January 26, 1984, from BOCES Di-rector, Administrative Services, for BOCES II Attachment 15 - Memorandum of December 1981 from James J.
O'Connell of the State Education Department Attachment 16 - Memorandum of March 7, 1983 from Brian P.
Walsh of the State Education Department Attachment 17 - Minimum Requirements for Schools in New York State 1980, pp. v, 19-20 Attachment 18 - Middle Country Central School District Reso-lution of November 7, 1983 Attachment 19 - Middle Island Central School District Reso-y lution of September 29, 1983 l Attachment 20 - Miller Place Union Free School District Res-olution of September 1, 1983 Attachment 21'- Mt. Sinai Union Free Schcol District Resola--
tion of October 18, 1983 Attachment 22 - Rocky Point Public Schools Resolution of October 31, 1983 Attachment 23 - BOCES I Civil Defense Procedures and "Go-Home" Plans for-1980-81 Attachment 24 - BOCES II Emergency Co-Home Procedure Attachment 25 - Shoreham-Wading River Emergency Go-Home Plan for 1982-83 Attachment 26A - Little Flower "Go-Home Plans" Attachment 26B - Letter of May 24, 1983 fromfManager, Admin-istrative Services, for Little Flower Chil- ,
, dren's Services to Michael J.'Sacca'of LILCO Attachment 27 - Middle Island Memorandum of October 6,.1982 re: " Transportation Contingency Plan
- Emer-gency Take Home" Attachment 28 - Miller Place Union. Free School District Emergency Go Home Plan Attachment 29 - Port' Jefferson Plans Attachm'ent 30 - Comsewogue Memoranda re: emergency closings
l Attachment 31 - Middle Country Central Tentative Schedule in Case of Early School Closing for 1982/83 Attachment 32 - South Manor "Go Home" and " Stay Where You Are" Plans Attachment 33 - Riverhead Central School District Plans Attachment 34 - William Floyd School District Civil Defense - Go Home Plan Attachment 35 - St. David's School Plan Attachment 36 - OPIP 3.8.2, Attachment 4, pp. 3-6 Attachment 37 - Sheltering at Schools During an Emergency at Shoreham 4
Attachment 38 - School District Radiological Emergency Pro-tective Action Procedures - Drafts Attachment 39 - Shoreham-Wading River Central School Dis-trict Emergency Home Contact Form Attachment 40 - Emergency Plan for St. Johu's Preschool' Attachment 41 - Preliminar3 sample plan for evacuation'of students Attachment 42 - OPIP 3.6.1, 5 5.3 Attachment 43 - Letter of March 16, 1984 to the Director of Administrative Services of BOCES II
,u. -
y w- yw
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )
)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3
) (Emergency Planning (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, ) Proceeding)
Unit 1) )
.i i
LILCO'S TESTIMONY ON CONTENIIONS 24.E, 24.F.2, 24.F.3, 24.M, 61.C, AND 68-71 (SCHOOLS)
I. THE WITNESSES
- 1. Q. Please identify yourselves.
A. [Cordaro] My name is Matthew C. Cordaro; my address is Long Island Lighting Company, 175 East Old Coun-try Road, Hicksville, New York, 11801.
[Lieberman] My name is Edward B. Lieberman; my.ad-dress is KLD Associates, Inc., 300 Broadway, Hunt-ington Station, New York, 11746.
[Miele] My name is Michael L. Miele; my_addrass is Long Island Lighting Company,- Shoreham Nuclear Power.
Station,-North Country Road, Wading' River, New York,
. 11792.
i f
i
[ Robinson] My name is Elaine D. Robinson; my ad-dress is Long Island Lighting Company, 100 East Old Country Road,.Hicksville, New York, 11801.
[Weismantle] My nama is John A. Weismantle; my ad-dress is Long Island Lighting Company, 100 East Old Country Road, Hicksville, New York, 11801.
- 2. Q. Please state your professional qualifications.
A. [Cordaro] I am Vice President, Engineering, for LILCO. I am on this panel to provide the LILCO man-agement perspective on emergency planning and to an-swer any questions pertinent to management. My role in emergency planning for Shoreham is to ensure _that the needs and requirements of emergency planning are being met and that the technical direction and con-tent of emergency planning are being conveyed to l corporate management. I accomplish ~this by su-pervising the development and implementation of.the offsite emergency response plan for Shoreham; the
' Manager of the Local Emergency Response Implementing-1
- Organization (LERIO) reports directly to me.
[Lieberman] I'am Vice President of KLD Associates, Incorporated. My familiarity with this contention stems from work KLD Associates has performud for.
l
-e _._ - _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . - _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _
c I
l 1
LILCO on evacuation time estimates for the Shoreham EPZ.
[Miela] I am employed by LILCO as the Radiation Protection Section Supervisor of the Nuclear Engi-neering Department. I am responsible for the over-all management and technical direction of all onsite and offsite aspects of radiological protection for Shoreham.
[ Robinson] I head the External Organizations Divi-sion of LERIO. As head of External Organizations, I am responsible for coordinating outside organiza-tions' efforts in emergency planning.
[Weismantle] I am Manager of LERIO for LILCO. In that capacity I am responsible for developing and implementing the offsite radiological emergency re-sponse plan for the Shoreham station, known as the LILCO Transition Plan.
[All witnesses] Statements of our professional l qualifications are being separately offered into ev-idence as part of the document entitled " Profession-al Qualifications of LILCO Witnesses."
i l
l l
I L
l l-
_4 II. THE CONTENTIONS
- 3. Q. Which of the intervenors' contentions are being ad-dressed by this testimony?
A. [All witnesses] This testimony addresses the con-tentions in Group II that have to do with emergency plann'ing for-the schools in the ten-mile plume expo-sure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). Those contentions (24.E, 24.F.2, 24.F.3, 24.M, 61.C, 68, l
69, 70, and 71) read as follows:
Contention 24.E. Under the LILCO Plan, individual schools and school districts are relied upon for imple-mentation of early dismissals, shel-tering in schools, evacuation /reloca-tion of school children, and retaining of school children in schools beyond the end of the school day. (See Ap-pendix A at II-19, 20). However, LILCO has no agreements, with the schools or school districts, to imple-ment any of these proposed protective measures for school children. In addi- --
tion, LILCO has no agreements with nursery schools or parents of children in nursery schools to permit LILCO_em-ployees to drive buses transporting their children. (See Appendix A at II-21). In the absence of such agree-ments, there is no assurance that any l protective actions for school children can or will be taken.
Contention 24.F. LILCO proposes that all people who do not have access l
to an automobile at-the-time of an evacuation order, most invalid and
, disabled persons residing at home, all school children, and large numbers of the residents of nursing and adult
- . - . - _ . ~ , . -
- n. - .. .- ..
4 i
homes, hospitals and other special fa-cilities will be' evacuated by buses.
According to LILCO's estimates, 333 forty-passenger buses are required to transport those able-bodied persons without access to cars who would need i transportation out of the EPZ (see Ap-i pendix A, at IV-74b; OPIP 3.6.4). An i '
additional 26 forty passenger buses will be necessary, according to LILCO, to evacuate most of the homebound res-
- i. idents in the EPZ and a portion of the j residents of nursing and adult homes (see Appendix A at IV-175). And, LILCO estimates that 14 sixty passen-ger buses will be necessary to evacu-i ate nursery schools. (Appendix A at
- IV-171.) These estimates do not in-
~
clude the number of buses that will.be j needed to enable all other schools to-evacuate their students or the addi-tional unspecified number of buses necessary to evacuate and relocate i certain of the approximately 630 pa-
- tients in hospitals should such evacu-i ation ce necessary (see Appendix A, at i
II-28; IV-172). However, not even the j- number of buses estimated by LILCO to j be necessary will be'be available for use by LILCO because:
Contention 24.F.2. Most buses-within a reasonable distance of the EPZ are under' contract to school dis-tricts or other entities and the let-ters. of intent signed tur bus companies
~
{ indicate that any eventual agreements
, with LILCO would be subject to such
. pre-existing commitments. Therefore, most buses in the area could not.be~
relied upon'by LILCO'for use in.an
' evacuation, even if LILCO~were to enter into. agreements concerning such~
buses.
Contention 24.F.'3. 'The LILCO Plan-assumes that all:-schools will imple-ment an early dismissal in the event 1 of any~ emergency,in which no
1 l
l 1
protective actions were recommended for the general public. The LILCO Plan also assumes that schools will evacuate and relocate their students l to locations outside the EPZ if evacu-l ation is recommended for the general :
public. If such dismissals or evacua-tions were to occur, most buses in the vicinity of the EPZ woulc be required by schools to transport children to their houses.
Contention 24.M. The LILCO Plan relies upon school bus drivers for im-plementation of early school dismiss-als and evacuation / relocation of school children. However, LILCO has no agreements with school bus drivers to perform such functions in the event of a radiological emergency at Shorehem. In the absence of such agreements, the protective actions for school children cannot and will not be implemented.
Contention 61. Intervenors con-tend that a protective action recom-mendation of sheltering would not or could not be implemented. Specifical-ly, a substantial number of the people who might be advised to shelter, as a practical matter, will be unable to do so because:
C. 1. According to-the Plan, if sheltering is recommended for the gen-eral public, schools in the EPZ are expected to shelter children in schools. (Appendix A at II-20; See also OPIP 3.8.2.at 19, 21). However, the Plan fails to indicate how, if at all, such an order could or would be implemented by the schools. Contrary to the assumption in the LILCO Plan (see OPIP 3.6.5 at 10a), most school officials have not performed
" preplanning" that makes them' capable of implementing a sheltering recommen-dation. Therefore, the Plan provides i.
no assurance that sheltering could or would be implemented for children in schools.
Many schools in the EPZ have no basements or other areas suitable for sheltering large numbers of children.
Moreover, the Plan contains no infor-mation concerning sheltering capacities or shielding factors for schools, in violation of NUREG 0654 Section II, J.lO.m. Therefore the Plan provides no information upon which those in command and control could determine whether sheltering is an appropriate protective action for children in schools, in violation of 10 C.F.R. Section 50.47(b)(10).
In addition, the Plan states that if schools have initiated early dis-missals, LILCO will not recommend to the schools that any other protective actions, including sheltering, be taken, even if such a recommendation is made for the general public. (See OPIP 3.8.2 at 5). Thus, if LILCO were to recommend that schools institute an early dismissal, and school authori-ties were to follow that recommenda-tion, school children would not have access to shelter for hours (see SC Contention 69), even though a shel-tering recommendation could be in.ef-fect for the rest of the EPZ popula-tion.
Contention 68. The LILCO Plan fails to specify the bases upon which LILCO would continue to make a protec-tive action recommendation of early dismissal (as opposed to sheltering or evacuation) to schools if they had in-itiated an early dismissal, even if other protective actions were being recommended for the general public (OPIP 3.8.2. at 5), and thus does not comply with 10 CFR Section 50.47(b)(10), and NUREG 0654,Section II.J.10.m.
Contention 69. LILCO appears to assume that its recommendation, at the time no protective actions are recom-mended for the general public, that schools implement an early dismissal, will result in children being pro-tected in the event of a subsequent protective action recommendation of sheltering or evacuation because chil-dren could thereby shelter or evacuate with their parents. (See Appendix A,
! at II-20, OPIP 3.8.2 at 5.). In fact, l there is no assurance that early dis-missal will provide children with ade-quate protection from health-threatening radiation doses, and therefore the Plan fails to comply with 10 CFR Sections 50.47(a)(1),
50.47(b)(lO), and NUREG 0654 Sections II.J.9 and J.lO, for the following reasons:
Contention 69.B. The LILCO Plan does not incorporate or provide any essential details of early dismissal plans for the schools or school dis-tricts in or near the EPZ. It is thus impossible to tell whether such plans for a Shoreham emergency actually i exist, or, if they do, the extent to which they are compatible with the LILCO Plan.
Contention 69.C. Early dismissal will not result in the timely arrival of children at their homes so they can be protected by their parents because:
- 1. Even under non-emergency con-ditions it takes hours to implement early dismissals due to the time re-quired to make the necessary decision, to mobilize the necessary personnel and vehicles, and to perform the nec-essary number of bus runs. Under emergency conditions, the time re-quired to accomplish an early dismiss-al is likely to be substantially greater, due particularly to congested road conditions and role conflict ex-perienced by bus drivers and other
personnel in authority. In addition, early dismissal policies rely-upon 4
large numbers of children walking home, distances of up to two to three miles, which can take-a substantial amount of time.
- 2. Under the LILCO Plan, schools will receive notification of an emer-gency at the same time as the rest of the public (by means of tone alert ra-dios activated by the EBS announcement (see Plan, at 3.3-4; Appen(ix A at II-19)). Therefore early dismissal traffic, including those children ex-pected to walk home, will encounter early evacuation and mobilization traffic.
Contention 69.D. The Plan does not provide for prior notification of parents if early dismissal is going to l
~
occur. According to surveys,' between 3C and 40 percent of the school chil-dren within the plume EPZ return from
_ school to an empty home because both-parents hold' daytime jobs (or, in the case of single-parent families, the sole parent holds a daytime job). As
, a result, many children will be sent home to empty houses, and may be- .)
l uncared for during the emergency.
2 Contention 69.E. The-Plan fails .
to provide a means of dealing with an escalation of the emergency (and ac-companying need to recommend protec-tive actions of. sheltering or evacua-4 tion) that may occur during the lengthy process of-early dismissal.
Indeed, the LILCO. Plan provides that 3 once schools initiate early dismissal, LILCO will not inform the-schools of subsequent sheltering or evacuation protective action-recommendations.
(OPIP 3.8.2 at 5). Thus, in the event i of such an escalation, children are likely to be stranded in schools, or .
ejl route to'their-homes (walking or on buses), without'available shelter, means of evacuation or other i
__ =
1 protection. Children would thus be exposed to health threatening radia-tion doses.
Contention 70. Although the LILCO Plan states that schools will be ad-vised to evacuate if evacuation or a combination of sheltering and evacua-tion is recommended for the general public, the Plan does not identify re-location centers for, or the means or procedures to evacuate, any of the schools. (Appendix A at II-20.)
Thus,.the LILCO Plan has no provision concerning how its proposed evacuation and relocation of children, or the safe reuniting of children with their families, could or would be imple-mented. And, contrary to LILCO's as-sumption, there is no evidence in the Plan that school officials have con-ducted " preplanning" for a Shoreham emergency. (See OPIP 3.6.5 at 10a).
Intervenors contend that in failing to provide for an implementable evacua-tion of the school children in the school districts in the EPZ the LILCO Plan fails to comply with 10 CFR Sec-tions 50.47(a)(1), 50.47(b)(10), and NUREG 0654 Sections II.J.9 and II.J.10.
Contention 71. Intervenors con-tend that the Plan's proposed evacua- -
tion of school children (Appendix A at II-19 to II-21; OPIP 3.6.5) could not and would not be implemented for the following reasons:
Contention 71.A. Assuming the availability of relocation centers for evacuated nursery school children.(the Plan fails to identify any such cen-ters), under the LILCO Plan, a timely evacuation of the nursery schools in the EPZ (see Appendix A at II-20, II-21; OPIP 3.6.5) could not be imple-mented because:
- 1. Even if LILCO had agreements i with companies to provide a sufficient
l t number of buses and agreements with I schools or parents permitting children to ride in buses being driven by LILCO employees in an evacuation of nursery schools (see Contention 24), many of the buses in fact would not be acces-sible to LILCO employees because they would be in the custody of the normal school bus drivers, or the buses would be located substantial distances away.
- 2. The LILCO Plan has no provi-sion for supervision of children at schools, on buses or at relocation centers.
Contention 71.B. An evacuation of nursery and other schools, even if buses and bus drivers were available (See Contention 24) would take too long and children would not be ade-quately protected from health threat-ening radiation doses because:
- 1. Evacuating buses would encoun-ter congestion from other mobilization and evacustion traffic, and thus would be substantially delayed in traveling from schools to relocation centers (the Plan fails to identify any such relocation centers).
- 2. Normal school dismissals re-quire substantial numbers of multiple bus runs as well as staggered dismiss--
al' times. In the event of an evacua-tion, an even larger number of multi-ple bus runs (requiring several hours) would be necessary to transport all children out of.the EPZ.
- 4. Q. First, let me ask you if any of you agrees with any of these contentions.
A. [All witnesses] No. The contentions are wrongqpfor the reasons we shall set out.below.
III.
SUMMARY
OF THE PLAN FOR SCHOOLS
- 5. Q. Where does the LILCO Transit sn Plan deal with schools?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Schools are ad-dressed on page 3.6-7 of the LILCO Transition Plan, in procedure OPIP 3.6.5, and in Sections II and IV of Appendix A (the evacuation plan) on pages II-19 through 21 and IV-169 through 171. These parts of the Plan are Attachments 1-3 to this testimony.
- 6. Q. How many school districts are involved?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle) Seventeen. Eleven districts have schools in the EPZ; six districts have no schools in the EPZ but do have pupils who live in the EPZ. In addition, there are two paro-4 chial schools inside the EPZ, three parochial schools outside the EPZ that have students who live in the EPZ, and thirteen nursery schools that are also involved. Attachments 4-10 to this testimony provide information about these schools.
- 7. Q. Can you summarize the plan for the schools?
i
4 A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] When an Alert or Site Area Emergency is declared but no protective action is recommended for the general public, j schools will be advised (by tone alert radios) to implement their early dismissal plans. If school is not in session, school officials will be contacted
- q. at home and advised to cancel classes.
1
- If school is in session when a protective action is i
recommended for the general public, all schools will be advised to take the same protective action. How-ever, if some zones of the EPZ are advised to shel-ter and others to evacuate, all the schools will be -
advised to evacuate.
- 8. Q. How will the schools be notified of an emergency .
l condition?
4
! A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle]- All the schools have been provided tone alert radios at LILCO's ex-pense. Tone alert radios are electronic devices that continuously monitor the EBS frequency and are activated automatically when WALK-FM transmits a certain signal on that frequency.
In addition, as described in OPIP 3.6.5 (Attachment 2), after the tone alert radios have been activated-l
. - _ . . ~ _ . - . , -, .. , ..- - - .
i and have broadcast the EBS message, LERO school coordinators at the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) will contact by telephone each school district superintendent and the individual in charge of each private or nursery school in the EPZ to verify that the EBS message has been received and that the schools will implement the recommendations of the message. The coordinators will ask that the indi-vidual in charge of each school district be in-structed to notify (by telephone) the appropriate coordinator when emergency operations are completed.
Also, if enough district superintendents express a desire to have LERO pagers, LILCO will consider providing them.
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] If any protective actions are recommended for the general public in
, the EPZ, district superintendents whose schools are not in the EPZ but are attended by students who re-side in the EPZ will be notified of the emergency by tone alert radio. They will, in turn, notify the principals of these schools and instruct them to keep such students after school, rather than sending them to their homes in the EPZ.
- 10. Q. What would you do if an emergency at Shoreham oc-curred as the students were-coming to school in the morning or as they were going home in the afternoon?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] If an Alert or Site Area Emergency were declared while schools were in the process of opening, and no protective action were recommended for the general public, school of-ficials would be advised to have arriving buses re-turn their students to their homes and to have stu-dents who do not normally use buses return home in their usual manner. If a protective action were recommended for the general public, school officials would be advised to shelter arriving students or.to have the school buses transport them to predesignated reception centers.
If an Alert or higher level emergency were declared while school was being dismissed, school officials would not need to take any. unusual actions. The students would already.be on their way home, and it would be best for them to rejoin their families and, then implement whatever protective action had been recommended.
l
- 11. Q. If Suffolk County or New York State were to do a ra-diological emergency plan for the schools in the Shoreham EPZ, would they likely be able to implement better protective actions, or implement them more quickly than LERO could?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] No. There are no significant protective actions for schools used in New York State other than early dismissal, shel-tering, and' evacuation. Nor is Suffolk County or the State prepared to provide additional school buses on short notice. All the County or State could do on short notice is what LERO would do, which is to advise early dismissal, sheltering, or evacuation.
It is likely, however, that the S' tate would have an easier time than LILCO has had getting the schools to participate in preplanning. .
IV. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN
- 12. Q. How did the LILCO Transition Plan for schools origi-nate?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] The LILCO plan ~ grew out of a draft prepared by the Suffolk County Plan-ning Department; indeed, most of the language in
Revision 0 of Appendix A to the Plan was written by County planners. In the spring and summer of 1980, planners from the County Planning Department held discussions with school officials from the EPZ school di'stricts (see Attachment 11). Based on these discussions the County believeu that the dis-tricts preferred to institute early dismissals at a Site Area emergency using their existing early dis-missal plans. These are the plans used by the schools to send the students home early if, for ex-ample, there is a heavy snowstorm during the school day. The Shoreham-Wading River Central School Dis-trict, which is the closest to the Shoreham plant, agreed to this plan with the qualification that if a General Emergency were declared and an immediate evacuation recommended, the district would evacuate its students directly by bus to Suffolk County Com-munity College.
In deciding on this arrangement, the schools consid-ered the pros and cons of early dismissal versus evacuation. After discussions with the County plan-ners, the school districts decided that the disad-i vantages of early dismissal were outweighed by the advantages, as outlined in Attachment'12 to this testimony, which consists of pages from the draft
plan prepared by the County planners. For the vast majority of nuclear emergencies, the early dismissal option would be perfectly adequate for ensuring the safety of school populations.
- 13. Q. So, in the beginning, the draft County emergency plan for Shoreham had only one option, namely using the schools' preexisting early dismissal plans?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Yes.
- 14. Q. Hr.e was this original draft County plan turned into the LILCO Transition Plan?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] The portions of the draft County plan dealing with protective actions for schools were simply incorporated into the origi-nal version of the LILCO Transition Plan. The lan-guage in Appendix A originated with the County plan-ners and was incorporated with very little change into the original version of the LILCO Transition Plan. The County, however, had recommended early.
dismissal at a Site Area level. This was. changed in Revision O of the LILCO Transition Plan, by inser-tion of replacement pages, to recommend early dis-missal at an Alert level.
- 15. Q. When did you add the other two options, sheltering at the schools and evacuation, to the Plan?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] We made these changes in Revision 3 of the Plan, which was issued in December 1983.
- 16. Q. Why did you decide to make these changes?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] These changes were made in order to improve the Plan. While we are confident that early dismissal would be the appro-priate action in the large majority of cases when an emergency escalates beyond the Unusual Event classi-fication, we felt it was worthwhile to explicitly include plans relating to the implementation of sheltering or evacuation.
In Revision 3 we took a simple and straightforward approach. Of course, other adequate plans could have been developed and the trade-offs that are in-evitable in developing emergency plans could have been made in different ways. For this reason, the
, options of sheltering students at schools and of evacuating them to reception centers (depending on the protective action recommended to the public) were adopted in order to provide more' flexibility
and, therefore, a better chance of achieving dose savings. All schools are given the same protective action recommendation, so that confusion about what they should do is minimized.
- 17. Q. Is LILCO wedded to this particular plan?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weicmantle) Not at all. The plan is a good one, judging from FEMA's recommenda-tion (see below), the schools' past preferences, and New York State's reported enthusiasm for early dis-missal plans for schools near Indian Point (see below). But if the schools, for whatever reasons, believe that other arrangements would be preferable, then LILCO is willing to work with them to change the present plan. For example, if the schools have changed their minds from several years ago and now think that the early dismissal plans should not be used in a radiological emergency when no protective action is recommended for the general public, the Flan could be changed on the one hand simply to dis-miss the students at the normal time or, on the other, to bus them directly to reception centers.
We discussed these options with the school adminis-trators at meetings on January 16 and March 7, 1984.
l l
l i
r-- - - - - -
V. THE PROCESS OF IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN WITH THE SCHOOLS
- 18. Q. You say that County planners had discussions with school personnel before drafting their plan. Did LILCO go back to the schools to discuss emergency planning before you submitted your Transition Plan to the NRC?
A. [Cordaro, Rcbinson, Weismantle] No, and here is why. In February 1983 Suffolk County withdrew from emergency planning and began urging the NRC to ter-minate this licensing proceeding. Because the plant I
was nearly complete, and becausc Suffolk County was arguing that no license could be issued since there was no offsite emergency plan, LILCO felt compelled to produce an offsite plan promptly. For that rea-son, we decided to stay with the County planners' approach that had been worked out in consultation with the schools, and to meet with school officials for detailed discussions concerning the Plan after it was filed. LILCO never intended to pin the schools down to any one position or to suggest that the schools had endorsed what LILCO was doing. The LILCO Transition Plan, after all, is a plan, and plans can be modified whenever better ideas arise.
~
22-
- 19. Q. Well, then, when did you start discussing ra-diological emergency planning with the schools?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] A detailed history of LILCO's school emergency planning effort is At-tachment 13 to this testimony. Revision 0 of the Transition Plan was submitted to the NRC on May 26, 1983. A few days before, on May 19, 1983, a letter signed by LILCO's Chief Executive Officer had been
- sent to a list of all superintendents and presidents of the boards of education for those school dis-tricts identified by the Suffolk County Planning De-partment as being in the EPZ. This list was later supplemented with additional contacts.
Beginning early in June 1983, visits were made to
) the individual school districts to meet with admin-istrators and obtain copies of their existing _emer-I j gency plans. Meetings were also held with supervi-l sors in BOCES I and II, since portions of both are within the EPZ.
When it became apparent that-the school administra-tors did not consider their c:,isting emergency plans adequate to respond to a radiological accident at-Shoreham, actions were taken to further the planning 3
effort. During a meeting on September 26, 1983 with j
, e, . - *, - . . . > y
- a representative of BOCES II and its attorney, LILCO requested that a meeting be scheduled for all in-volved school districts to discuss emergency plan-ning. Within a few days we were informed by tele-phone that the superintendents did not want to meet with us yet; instead they wanted to meet with repre-sentatives of school districts in Rockland County, with the New York State Education Department, with Suffolk County, and then with LILCO, in that order.
There were interim informal meetings with some school administrators, but a full-scale presentation to the school officials as a group was not. scheduled until January 16, 1984. Both Suffolk County and LILCO appeared, and following the meeting we were.
informed that the school administrators wished to meet again to discuss specific facets of emergency planning. This second meeting took place on March 7, 1984.
- 20. Q. Before we go any further, would you explain what "BOCES" means?
A. [Cordaro, Robinsen, Weismantle] "BOCES" means Board of Cooperative Educational Services. BOCES11s'a New York State agency that provides special educational services, such as occupational training and
4
- education for the handicapped, as well as help with planning and coordination, to groups of school dis-F tricts, i
- 21. Q. Have the school administrators told you whether they are willing to continue to work with LILCO or not?
)
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Yes, in a letter to LILCO of January 26, 1984 (Attachment 14), the Di-rector of Administrative Services for BOCES II said this:
Foilowing our conference [that is, the meetin.g of' January 16, 1984) it was agreed by those present that it would be most useful to arrange anoth-er session for early March in order that we can consider,-with greater specificity', prop'osal's"regarding the implementation of a LILCO evacuation plan. .
(BOCES II encompr,sses most of the school districts
, s within the ten-mile EPZ, including Rocky Point Union Free, Middle Island Central, Miller Place Union
, Free,, Mount Si^nai Un on Free,~ Port Jefferson Union Free,- boms,ewogue Union Free, Middle Country Central, 3.
Patchogue-Medford' Union Free,' South Manor Union' '
Free, WikliamFloydUnionFree, Center Moriches Union Free, and W[st Manor.
The BOCES I schools within.the ten-mile'EPZ'are Shoreham-Wading River,
..: ~
i -
i
..3 3 e5g, ,A
~~ .
i
..* -^%
N +% i
)
N -
' )W..-
I l
Little Flower Union Free, South Haven Unio'n Free, Eastport Union Free, and Riverhead Central. )*
The letter adds, however, that the superintendents' desire to further consider the feasibility of the LILCO plan is not an endorsement of the Plan or a commitment to operating under such a plan.
1
- 22. Q. Is the process of radiological emergency planning for the schools finished?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] No, and it probably never will be. Emergency planning will continue to be an ongoing process. This refler s the fact that the federal government can be expected to continue - -
updating and amending the guidance it offers to State anu local governments, in light of develop-ments such as new studies of the possible conse-quences of reactor accidents.
Another reason that emergency planning for the schools must be a continuing process is that the circumstances of the schools change from year to year, with openings and closings of schools, shifts in enrollment, changing transportation requirements, and changes in administration and organization of the districts.
1 Le-
_A a u a
- 23. Q. Has'LILCO offered to provide funds or other resourc-es to help the schools make plans?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] LILCO has always been willing to discuss financial and other assis-tance with any school district that feels it has in-adequate resources. Exactly what LILCO provides, of course, will depend on the needs of the schools and whatever terms can be worked out in discussions with the school authorities. '
- 24. Q. What else have you done about school planning?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Recently we added a full-time planner for schools in LERIO. She has had.
Also, in preparation for the March 7, 1984 meeting mentioned above, we prepared generic guidance on sheltering (Attachment 37) and sample procedures that reflect LERO's planning concepts as well as those used by school administrators elsewhere who have done similar planning for their schools (At-tachment 38). These were supplied to the school ad-ministrators in advance of the March 7 meeting. At the March 7 meeting we offered to send a health
l
)
physicist to each school in the EPZ to identify the best areas for sheltering. They have already vis-ited schools in the Shoreham-Wading River and Rocky Point school districts. In addition, our traffic consultant KLD prepared a " preliminary sample plan" for busing students to reception centers (Attachment 41).
- 25. Q. Do you think pre-emergency planning for schools can be successfully accomplished?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Yes. As the letter of January 26, 1984 mentioned above (Attachment 14) shows, most district superintendents have~ demon-strated their willingness to consider th'e feasibili-ty of the LILCO plan, though they have not endorsed it. LILCO is certainly willing to help them plan.
Of course, there is no denying that the schools, school administrators, and school boards are caught in a difficult political situation They are being subjected to pressure from people who oppose the op-eration of Shoreham and feel that planning for an emergency at Shoreham amounts to supporting the op-eration of the plant. We have emphasized-to the schools that LILCO does not expect them to endorse Shoreham but merely to plan for the safety of their
l children in case the plant does operate, which we
- believe it will. Yet, since planning for schools is something that needs to be done in order to satisfy i
NRC regulations, some people apparently see the re-fusal of the schools to cooperate as one means of
- preventing the plant from operating.
Thus school officials are in a difficult position.
If they choose to plan for a radiological emergency, they may be seen (incorrectly, we believe) as sup-porting the operation of Shoreham. If they fail to plan and Shoreham operates nevertheless, they may be sean as having failed in their duty to provide for the safety of their students.
4 Despite this dilemma, we believe the schools, by and large, will continue to plan for a radiological emergency. We believe so for several reasons.
First, there is a requirement, imposed by the State ,
) of New York, that schools be prepared for various types of emergencies, including radiological emergencies. This has been communicated to the schools by the State Education-Department (Attach-ments 15, 16, and 17). Second, it-makes sense to plan for a radiological emergency, because the plan-can be used to improve the response to other sorts a
of emergencies. Third, we would expect the school officials to recognize that Shoreham may operate and to be influenced primarily by their desire to pro-tect their students in the event it does.
Other than the political problem, another possible obstacle to full participation by the schools is lack of time by the school administrators to partic-ipate in the planning process. To solve this prob-lem, where it exists, LILCO has made it clear we are prepared to provide emergency planners and other personnel to shoulder as much of the burden of the schools as they will let us take.
- 26. Q. Have any of the school districts expressed reserva-tions about their present emergency plans? l A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Yes. Several .
school boards have passed resolutions critical of I emergency planning for.Shoreham. Copies of the five resolutions that we have received are attached to this testimony (Attachments 18-22). Four of them l are virtually identical.
- 27. Q. Does this mean that some schools are refusing to participate in emergency planning?
l
- l
i A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] The resolutions do not say that in so many words, but we have received I indications that there are indeed some school boards and school administrators who presently are declining to plan for a Shoreham emergency. Some of the school officials apparently feel that if the State and County both are refusing to participate, then it is not appropriate for the schools to take a different position. Others seem to feel that it is premature to plan, since Shoreham may never operate.
- 28. Q. Does this make the LILCO Transition Plan ineffective insofar as these school districts are concerned?
A.
[Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] No, because the LILCO Transition Plan for schools can be implemented even without more planning by the schools. Obvi-f ously the Plan will be more effective as more plan-ning activities are undertaken by the schools.
But even if some schools refuse to participate, an ef-fective emergency response for those schools can still be implemented if only the school authorities and administrators are willing, if an accident ever-g occurs,.to do what is best for the students intheir I charge -- to do, that is, what will result in the greatest dose savings. We are certain'that,they F
7 , ,
I will be willing te do that. We will explain below how a radiological emergency response would be car-ried out at a school that had failed to plan for it in advance.
- 29. Q. Does LERIO have letters of agreement with schools or school districts in the ten-mile EPZ?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] No.
- 30. Q. Why not?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] We do not regard the schools as " support organizations" for which written agreements are required under NRC regula-tions and guidelines. This does not_mean that we are neglecting the need to plan for schools; it.just means that written agreements for that purpose are not necessary or required. What we are doing in--
stead of obtaining written agreements is, of course, the subject of this testimony.
- 31. Q. How about agreements with nursery schools?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Again, we do not~ l have written agreements. But we have visited every i
nursery school.in the EPZ listed in this testimony and discussed planning with the school directors.
In many cases (as described more fully below) we have achieved agreements or understandings with the schools about what they would do, and what LERO would do for them, in an emergency. Details are provided below in section VII of this testimony.
- 32. Q. Do you have agreements with the parents of nursery school students?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle) No. Again, our un-derstanding of the NRC regulations is that they do not require agreements with individual members of the public. If they did, planners would have to
" sign up" the entire population.
- 33. Q. Do you have agreements with school bus drivers to implement early dismissals or evacuation _to recep-tion centers?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] No. The schools, however, do have their own agreements with the bus companies for early dismissals in emergencies such
, as snowstorms. Our understanding of NRC regulations is that they do not require agreements with individ-ual bus drivers.
- 34. Q. How will LERIO keep up-to-date about changes tdue schools may make in their emergency plans over the life of the Shoreham plant?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] We have requested copies of the emergency plans for all schools in the EPZ, and we will keep these on file. LERIO plans to keep up-to-date about changes in the school emergen-cy plans by reviewing these documents annually.
Changes that are identified during this review and changes that are reported to us by school adminis-trators will then be submitted as plan revisions and incorporated into the Transition Plan in accordance with OPIP 5.4.1 (Document Control).
VI. THE THREE OPTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ACTION:
EARLY DISMISSAL, SHELTERING, EVACUATION
- 35. Q. What protec.tive actions are provided for schools in the LILCO Transition Plan?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] There are three available protective actions: sending the students home, sheltering them in the schools for a time, and busing them directly from the schools to specially designated reception centers outside the EPZ. These three-protective actions are summarized in OPIP 3.6.1, page 31.A (Attachment 42 to this testimony).
A. Early Dismissal
- 36. Q. Please describe-what Revision 3 of the LILCO
' Transition Plan says about early dismissal.
i a
-l l
7 -
q
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle} "In the event of an emergency, schools will be advised to take a course of action in accordance with the schools' emergency disaster plan as indicated in OPIP 3.6.5 and Appen-dix A, Sections II and IV" (Attachment 1). "Upon declaration of an Alert or higher emergency classi-fication, all of the school districts and private schools in the EPZ will be notified by the EBS. In addition, each school district and private school will be contacted by telephone to verify that the schools received the EBS message and to inquire if
(
( the schools need additional assistance" (Attachment 3 at IV-170).
- 37. Q. How does the plan to send the children home work?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Under the early dismissal option, the schools would simply initiate l
the early dismissal plans that they presently use for snow emergencies. These plans are exercised whenever there is weather severe enough to close the schools.early, and indeed they were used as recently as January 18, 1984, during a snowstorm. (This.
early dismissal was accomplished in six. hours with poor road conditions.) Although the plans differ for each school, in general, the schools summon
I l
i 1
their school buses, put the students on them, and send .he buses along predesignated routes to the students' homes.
- 38. Q. Why was the early dismissal option included in the Plan?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] As we have said above, this was the only option under the draft plan prepared by Suffolk County planners. There are many advantages to an early dismissal plan. In the first place, people who have studied human behavior in emergencies have observed that people try to reunite with their families before evacuating. For example, according to Hans and Sell:
In most of the evacuations ob-served, more than 99 percent of the evacuees utilized private vehicles for the evacuations and evacuated as fami-ly units. If schools are evacuated, it may result in the separation of -
families. Parents are reluctant to be separated from their children and may attempt to retrieve them, causing ad-ditional congestion and, subsequently, may slow down the evacuation process. '
In order to minimize the congestion, plans should be developed whereby school children would be returned to their respective residences or evacu-ated to a specific location. The lo-
- cation could be schools located out of the impact area since they would pres-ent a somewhat familiar environment and generally have food service facil-ities and adequate supervision. The l choice of either action would be l
dependent upon an appraisal of the af-fected area. In either case, the par-ents should be advised of the type of action to be taken in order that ap-propriate family plans can be made.
J. Hans, Jr. & T. Sell, Evacuation Risks - An Evaluation 52-53 (EPA-520/6-74-002 (June 1974)).
Moreover, we felt that Suffolk County should rea-sonably be expected to support a go-home plan, judging from the views of one of its consultants, Dr. Kai Erikson. Dr. Erikson has used the observa-tion that families try to unite to criticize plans that would evacuate schoolchildren separately from their parents. For example, in testimony about the Three Mile Island accident, Dr. Erikson in 1981 ex-pressed this opinion:
[I]t is probably unreasonable to sup-pose, as well, that family members who find themselves away from home in a crisis will all be able to resist the temptation to join the family councils and participate in whatever emergency measures the family decides to under-take.
Similarly, in testimony about the Diablo Canyon-emergency plan in 1982, Dr. Erikson said this:
The plan further assumes that parents of school-age children will be willing to evacuate without firsthand reassur-ances that their offspring are being safely conveyed out of the area, and.
that is problematic as~well.- It may
turn out that the residents of the county will feel very comfortable with this arrangemont, but given what so-cial scientists have learned about the closeness of family ties and the anxieties most parents have concerning the safety of their children, it.would seem fonlhardy to take that view for granted. And if a fair number of par-ents admit upon questioning, as I would expect them to, that they might be very tempted to drive to the school themselves, then there would be sub-stantially more traffic on the roads than the present estimates allow for.
Likewise, Dr. Erikson testified in the Indian Point special proceeding as follows:
The plans for Indian Point further assume that parents of school-age children will be willing to evacuate without first-hand reassurances that their offspring are being safely con-veyed out of the area. It may turn out that the residents of the area will feel comfortable with an arrange-ment by which children are removed by bus to reception centers but given what social scientists have learned about the closeness of family ties and the anxieties of most parents concern-ing the safety of their children,oit would seem foolhardy to take that view 4 for granted. If a fair number of par-ents insist, upon questioning, as I would expect them to, that they might drive to the school themselves, then.
there would be substantially more traffic on the roads than the present estimates seem to allow for.
Also, the Federal Emergency Management, Agency has recommended an early dismissal plan. In testimony ,
r
l l
i filed in this proceeding on November 18, 1983, FEMA said the following:
We also hope that consideration will be given in the Shoreham EPZ of adopting as an option the early re-lease program developed by Westchester County for Indian Point.
Also, the Indian Point licensing board found that the State cf New York appeared to be enthusiastic about a plan te send schoolchildren home at the Alert Stage of an emergency.
Finally, a major advantage of using preexisting early dismissal plans is that the schools are expe -
rienced in using them, since they are used not in-frequently. Moreover, the plano are exercised under adverse conditions (that is, bad weather). If a ra-diological energency occurred in fair weather, the early dismissal plans would presumably work better than they ordinarily do.
A discussion of the pros and cons of sending the
. children home versus evacuating them directly to re-location centers was contained in the draft plan prepared by the County planners (Attachment 12}
- 39. Q. Have you procured the early dismissal plans for the schools in the EPZ?
s
i i
l
[
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] To date, we have received ten plans (for eight school districts plus BOCES I and II). See Attachments 23-25.
- 40. Q. How long does it take to get the students home under present early dismissal plans?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] From conversations with school officials and from our examination of the early dismissal plans and of transportation schedules, we believe the following are the correct estimated times under normal conditions to get the students home in various of the school districts:
School district Rocky Point............. 1 hr. 15 min.
Middle Country.......... 3 hr.
Mount Sinai............. 2 hr. 20 min.
Riverhead Central....... 1 hr. 30 min.
Patchogue-Medford....... 2 hr. 30 min.
Middle Island Central... 3 hr.
We have not yet been able to get estimates from the remaining school districts.
This and the information provided in response to question 41 is obviously incomplete. We have devel-oped a questionnaire, Attachment 43, that will be distributed by BOCES. The information from the com-pleted questionnaires will provide the-material needed for more detailed planning.
- 41. Q. How many times do the buses have to return to the school to get all the students home?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle) The number of bus runs varies from district to district, as follows:
School District Number of Runs Shoreham-Wading River 1 Middle Island Central 3 Miller Place Union Free 4 Port Jefferson Union Free 2 Mount Sinai Union Free 3 Comsewogue Union Free 3 Rocky Point Union Free 3 Patchogue-Medford Union Free 3 South Manor Union Free 3 Riverhead Central 3 These figures are for all the schools in the dis-trict. Again, this will be refined further when the questionnaires have been returned.
- 42. Q. Do a large number of students go home on foot?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] No. While New York State regulations allow elementary students to walk two miles and secondary students to walk three miles, most districts bus elementary school students who live more than one-half mile away, intermediate 1
level students more than one mile away, and high school students over one-and-a-half miles away (see, e.g., Attachment 25). In many of the districts, l
l l
virtually all of the students are eligible for bus transportation.
Virtually all of those who would have to walk home could get there in far less than an hour. Some early dismissal plans ask teachers to remind those who walk home to do so without delay (see Attachment 32).
- 43. Q. Would the time needed to complete an early dismissal of school children be lengthened as a result of early evacuation or mobilization traffic?
A. [Cordaro, Lieberman, Robinson, Weismantle] Early evacuation and mobilization traffic will have little or no effect on the time needed to complete an early dismissal. First, under the LILCO Transition Plan schools will be dismissed at an Alert stage. At the declaration of cn Alert, tone alerts in schools will be activated by an EBS announcement. This EBS mes-sage will be heard by members of the general public who are tuned to an EBS station, but the majority of the public will probably be unaware of the Alert condition because the sirens located throughout the EPZ will not have been activated. The Director of
~
Local Response is given the option of sounding the
-sirens at an Alert stage, however, under most
accident scenarios it is unlikely that he will e'xer-cise that option. The EBS message at an Alert stage will not suggest that EPZ residents begin evacuation preparations, instead it will merely suggest that residents stay tuned to their radios for further in-formation. See Attachment 36. Thus, it is unlikely that buses conducting an early dismissal of school children will encounter evacuation or mobilization traffic and accordingly, the time needed to complete early dismissal should not be lengthened.
Sacond, even if early dismissal were to occur simul-taneously with early evacuation and mobilization travel, the effect on the time needed to complete early dismissal would not be significant since a large percentage of the buses' travel will be on residential streets that will not be heavily trav-eled by early evacuation or mobilization traffic (see Testimony of Cordaro, et al. on Contention 65 at 91).
- 44. Q. Has LILCO analyzed whether early dismissal will re-sult in the " timely arrival" of children at their homes?
A. [Lieberman, Weismantle] Yes. KLD has performed an analysis of the effect of an early dismissal on the
i
, time at which families'can depart their homes for ,
4 their evacuation trips from the EPZ. This analysis l 1s presented in a report entitled " Development of
- _ Time Distributions for Evacuation Events and Activi-ties," KLD TM-139, which was previously introduced into this proceeding as Attachment 10 to LILCO's Testimony on Contention 65. Since that document and
! the portion of it specifically discussing the time needed to complete an early dismissal of school children have already been extensively discussed 1
during the litigation of Contention 65, that discus-sion will not.be repeated in detail here. Briefly 1
] the analyses presented in KLD TM-139 are premised'on '
- an order to evacuate being'given 25 minutes after i
j schools are-first notified.of the need to implement.
their early dismissal plans. Even under this ex-ceedingly fast accident scenario, an early dismissal was shown to be completed in a sufficiently expedi-tious manner to.have only a minor effect on the time families depart their households, and no effect on j the time the last car departs the EPZ (see Testimony.
of'Cordaro, et al. on Contention 65 at 88-90).
4 45. Q. Suppose a particular. school or' school district
- failed to-plan for a radiological emergency. Could:
the earlyf dismissal-action be implemented?
- v >$r'ri-+- t- W -.
. -44 A.
(Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Yes, because it in- ,
f volves nothing that the schools are not already nre-pared to do for snow emergencies.
- 46. Q. If early dismissal is called for, what is to be done about children who arrive home to find their parents away, either because their parents are at work or f because they have left the home temporarily?
A. [Cordaro, Weismantle] According to New York State I witnesses in the Indian Point proceeding, New York State Education Law requires that the school be fur-nished with the identities of other adults who will take care of schoolchildren if a parent is not home during an early dismissal. Some of the schoo_s' early dismissal plans make specific provision for I
this possibility by requiring that parents fill out an early school closing questionnaire (see the Shoreham-Wading River Central School District Emer-
! gency Home Contact form, Attachment 39) indicating a i -
responsible adult neighbor who has agreed to take charge of the child in the event of the parent's ab-sence from home.
- 47. Q. What would happen if the early dismissal plans were-initiated and then the emergency suddenly escalated 1
L so that sheltering or evacuation became the correct-action?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle) If a protective ac-tion recommendation to shelter were received by the school before an early dismissal had been completely carried out, then the students who had not already left could be sheltered at school. Students who had already left the school for home, whether on foot, by bus, or otherwise, would continue home. School superintendents would be able to contact the Public School Coordinator at the EOC if there were ques-tions about what to do.
If students were on their way home when it was an-nounced that sheltering or evacuation was recom-mended, they would continue home.and then take pro-tective actions with their families. (The same sort of thing could happen if students were caught in a severe blizzard when sent home due to a. snow alert.)
However, this risk is very small. Emergency classi-
~
fications are based on potential conditions. If the emergency is classified as an Alert or Site Area, it is because releases are not expected to exceed EPA Protective Action Guidelines (NUREG-0654,' Appendix 1). In all likelihood a recommendation to shelter or evacuate would be made before a radioactive plume actually reached the public.
Of course, it is always possible, in any kind of emergency, that the emergency conditions may change in some unforeseen manner. If so, officials will take what actions are appropriate, based upon condi-tions at the time and the resources available. The existence of an emergency plan does not prevent peo-ple from making judgments, based on changed circum-l
- stances, once an emergency actually occurs.
B. Sheltering
- 48. Q. How does sheltering work when applied to schools?
A. [Miele] Sheltering in school buildings is the same
_ as sheltering in one's home, which is discussed in LILCO's testimony on Contention 61.
In the unlikely event of a major airborne radioac-tive release from the Shoreham Nuclear Power Sta-tion, two types of radiation exposure might be expe-rienced. One is direct exposure from an overhead plume; the other is airborne radioactivity entering the school airspaces in.large quantities.
Under the LILCO Transition Plan, emergencies are classified using four categories of increasing seri-ousness: Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency, and General Emergency. ~Only in a General Emergency
would there be the possibility that a radioactive release would be of sufficient magnitude to poten-tially exceed, in the ten-mile EPZ, the Environ-mental Protection Agency's Protective Action Guideline dose levels.
EPA Protective Action Guidelines (PAG's) present a range of dose levels to be used in deciding upon an appropriate protective action recommendation for the population living and working around a nuclear power plant. The lowest PAG for whole-body dose is 1 to 5 r e m'; protective action recommendations should be to seek shelter as a minimum, consider evacuation, and evacuate unless constraints make it impractical.
The walls, roof, and ceilings of a building attenu-ate the direct radiation exposure to inhabitants from outside. Isolating ventilation systems to the shelterin,g locations and sealing off potential sources of air in-leakage can minimize any airborne radioactivity problem.
As a general matter, institutional buildings such as schools provide greater shielding capabilities than residential buildings, due to their heavy construc-tion materials such as brick and heavy block walls and the sturdier floors and roofs. But many rooms
I in schools are unusable as sheltering locations be- !
cause of the large number and size of windows, which decrease the amount of shielding provided.
While a school building is not a perfect sheltering location, if lower elevation rooms with the fewest windows (such as auditoriums or gymnasiums) are used, substantial dose savings can be achieved.
I am a certified health physicist, and I have pro-vided general sheltering guidance for Schools. When followed, these actions will reduce the amount of radiation exposure to the students. This protective action is used when either the sheltering provided
- is adequate to keep the doses below the PAG's or when the exposure during evacuation would result in a greater dose. The shielding factors used for schools is the same for the general population.
This is appropriate, because the shielding factor for schools (brick structure, no basement) is 0.6, and the general population ~ shielding factor for Suffolk County homes is approximately the same, 0.7.
- 49. Q. Does a school building have to have a basement.for.
sheltering to be effective?
A. [Miele] No.
- 50. Q. Why not?
A. [Miele] Most industrial type buildings such as schools afford protection due to the nature of their sturdy construction materials. For example, brick, poured concrete walls, and poured concrete floors and ceilings with terrazo overlays provide effective shielding from exterior radiation exposure.
- 51. Q. What have you done to implement the sheltering op-tion for the schools in the EPZ?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] LILCO has established some generic guidelines which can be used by schools to implement successful sheltering techniques. These include picking sheltering loca-tions in the lower elevations of the building, thus maximizing overhead shielding; picking areas with the minimum number and size of outside walls or win-dows, since they may be the highest contributors to radiation dose; and isolating all ventilation or air flow with the outside, thereby keeping radioactive contaminant outside the building. Suggested loca-tions include auditoriums and gymnasiums.
- 52. Q. What else are you willing to do?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] LILCO will work with any individual school that requests addi-tional support. We will survey that school and pro-vide more detailed sheltering recommendations. In-deed, we have already done such surveys for the Shoreham-Wading River schools and the Rocky Point schools and have agreed to do them for the South Manor schools and Little Flower.
- 53. Q. Suppose a particular school or school district failed to plan for a radiological emergency. Could the sheltering option still be idklemented?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] Yes, because sheltering can be accomplished by following rela-tively simple guidelines that require no advance training or participation.
- 54. Q. How would LERO convey these guidelines to the school during an emergency? By EBS message?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Yes. There is also a Public School Coordinator and a Private School Coordinator who are responsible for seeing that each school district is called.
1
C. Evacuation to Special Reception Centers
- 55. Q. How likely is it that immediate evacuation of school students would be required?
A. [Cordaro, Weismantle] The immediate concern from a radioactive plume is in the downwind direction. The prevailing wind direction around the Shoreham Nucle-ar Power Station is out of the northwest in the win-tertime and out of the southwest in the summertime.
Thus the wind tends to blow radioactive materials away from the majority of schools, which are located west and southwest of the plant. Furthermore,
. school is in session only 20% or less of the time.
Serious accidents that would require immediate evac-uation of school students are therefore very unlike-ly.
- 56. Q. How would evacuation of the schools work?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] LERO would recom-mend that students from all schools in the Emergency Planning Zone be evacuated to predesignated recep-tion centers (pr'eferably schools outside the EPZ) if a recommendation to evacuate the general public any-where within the EPZ were made (i.e., in the event that this declaration was not preceded by
~ ~
~ -
.~ .
L s
~
notification of an Alert or Site Area Emergency).
For' schools that are located outside the EPZ but en-
- - roll' students'living inside the EPZ, it would be recommended that they retain those students at school when the school day ends rather than send them into the EFZ. The achools would use their own transportation resources, except that nursery schools, by prior arrangement, would get buses driven by LERO personnel (Appendix A, p. IV-171). A
. General Emergency with projected offsite doses of 5 rem or more is the most severe and the least likely of the several emergency classes.
- 57. Q. Suppose a schcoit or* school district failed to plan in advance. Could the evacuation option neverthe-
' less be implemonted?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson ( Weisma'ntle] Yes. The evacua-tion ' option involves summoning the school buses, which would be done in the same way as for the early-dismissal option.(and thus in the same way as for snow emergencies). .The'only difference would be that instead of taking the students to their indi-vidual homes the buses'would take them to reception centers.
~
x
- w
.A.
i N
.g g
- 58. Q. How will you be sure that the bua drivers can find the reception centers, assuming the schools fail to plan for evacuation?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] LILCO will do the following thir.gs. First, we will pick a reception center for each school within the ten-mile EPZ. If our first choice will not agree to act as a recep-tion center, we will find another candidate and so on until we have found a reception center for every school in the EPZ. Second, LILCO will incorporate these choices into the school protective action pro-cedures so bus drivers and other school personnel will be aware of the schools' assignment.
Third, LILCO will prepare maps, one for each school in the EPZ, providing a recommended best bus route betweea the school in the EPZ and its designated re-ception center outside the EPZ. These maps will be reproduced in quantity and provided to the schools to distribute to the bus drivers in the event that an evacuation of the schools is recommended. If the.
schools refuse to accept these maps in advance of an' emergency, then LILCO will make available_LERO per-sonnel to deliver the maps to each school at the time of an emergency and, if necessary, remain to
hand out the maps to the bus drivers so that they will be sure and know how to get to the reception center.
- 59. Q. How will the parents know to which reception center their. children will be bused?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Once they have been designated, that information will be distributed an-nually to households within the school districts in question.
- 60. Q. For the protective actions that require the use of school buses (early dismissal and direct reloca-tion), how will the schools be sure that the school buses will be availtble at any time during the school day when an emergency might occur?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] As planning stands now, schools will handle this in the same way they ensure that school buses and drivers are available for early dismissal on account of snow emergencies or because of natural disasters. Some of the school early dismissal plans that we have received address this subject, others do not.
- 61. Q. How many buc trips are required to evacuate children from the EPZ should a direct evacuation be ordered?
l l
i
1 A. [Lieberman, Robinson] Based on information avail- '
able to us at this time, and which is in the process of being refined, calculations have shown that on a normal school day approximately 433 bus trips would be required to evacuate public and parochial school-children from the entire EPZ. This number of bus trips was estimated by first determining school pop-
- ulations on a school-by-school basis. These popula-1 tions were then reduced by five percent to account for daily absences, and by another three percent to
! reflect the fact that a school's entire student body i
might not be present at one time because of split sessions. The population of high schools was re-duced by an additional twenty percent to recognize
- that not all high school students would require bus transportation in the event of an evacuation since-some students would have driven cars to school and would choose to evacuate with friends in those cars.
I Having determined the number of students needing bus-transportation in each school, the next step in computing the number of bus trips was to assume loading capacities for buses: for elementary and middle school- 60 passengers:per bus were assumed; for high schools 40 passengers were assumed. Using these assumptions, the number of bus trips was then
. . . . . - . - -- , - . - . ,. _ . _ . - _ . - - . s_
computed for each school. In making this computa-tion, schools were not assumed to share buses and an extra bus was supplied if a fractional amount of students remained (for example, if an elementary school had 260 students needing transportation seven, rather than six, bus trips would have been calculated). A summation of the bus trips for each school yielded the estimate of 433 bus trips.
- 62. Q. What steps have been taken to ensure that these bus trips will be performed in an expeditious manner?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Since the process of planning for an evacuation of schools is still ongoing, our response must focus on the planning steps currently under consideration. From the pre-vious answer, it is our current belief that approxi-mately 433 bus trips would be required to evacuate public and parochial schoolchildren from the entire EPZ. This number of bus trips is greater than the number of buses currently under contract to schools within the EPZ. How much greater is a question that cannot presently be answered with precision since LILCO's current information, which is presented in Secticn VII of this testimony, includes buses that are shared by school districts and buses under I
u_______ _ _ _ _
contract to school districts that have only one or two schools within the EPZ and that would not need to use their entire supply of buses to evacuate those schools. On March 16, 1984, we forwarded a questionnaire to BOCES II for distribution to school districts that was designed to produce more accurata information on the number of buses currently under contract (Attachment 43).
Information from this questionnaire will be used to appraise two planning options. Tale first option would use existing bus resources and employ multiple bus runs to provide the 433 bus trips. The extent to which multiple bus runs can be used will depend on the location of the schools needing multiple runs and the location of the reception centers serving these schools. The other option would involve sup--
plying additional buses to replace some or all of the multiple bus runs. These additional. buses could come from the 1,300 buses LILCO currently has under contract or from school districts outside the EPZ that would be willing to release their buses to aid i
in an evacuation of the schoolchildren within EPZ.
As more information becomes available and the plan-ning effort with schools moves forward, LILCO will refine these planning options to provide an expeditious evacuation of schoolchildren.
- 63. Q. Under the terms of your contracts with bus compa-nies, how many buses are to be provided to LERO sub-ject to prior commitments to schools?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] About 970 buses are subject to prior commitments to schools both within and outside of the EPZ. Consequently, even assuming an evacuation of the entire ten-mile EPZ during school hours and the unavailability of all the buses with prior commitments to schools, there remain 271 buses available almost immediately to transport peo-ple out of the EPZ. Of course, as school runs were completed, others of the remaining 970 buses would become available.
Of the 970 buses committed to schools, less than half are committed to schools in the EPZ. (On March 16, 1984, we forwarded a questionnaire to BOCES II for distribution to the school districts. This questionnaire requests information needed for re-finement of school plans, including the number of buses under contract to schools in the EPZ.) In an emergency LERO would seek from school superinten-dents the release of some of the buses committed'to y schools outside the EPZ to respond to the emergency.
1 LILCO is confident that school officials with ;
e
l schools outside the EPZ would agree to relinquish some school buses for use within the EPZ during an emergency.
Finally, the bus companies have not committed their full fleets of buses to LILCO, but have retained some buses for other uses. At least some of these buses will be available to bus companies to meet their commitments to schools.
- 64. Q. Are there typically an excess of bus drivers?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle) One of the bus com-panies with which we are dealing, Baumann & Sons, Inc., informs us that all school districts require bus companies to have at least a 10-15 percent re-serve of bus drivers. Baumann & Sons has a 40% re-serve. Everyone in the company has a Class 2 license -- the telephone receptionist, the payroll staff, the mechanics, even Mr. Baumann himself.
- 65. Q. What happens if some of the school personnel (teach-ers, administrators, or whomever) are not-present when an emergency occurs, whether for sickness (nr because they abandon their posts for whatever reason once the emergency happens? How does this affect the implementation of the three options?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Where school emer-gency plans assign responsibilities to specific in-dividuals, provisions should be made for backup per-sonnel (alternates) in the event that the designated individuals are unavailable. Schools routinely provide for substitutes when teachers are absent
'1 (for whatever reason). The absence of some school personnel therefore should not impede protective ac-tions.
- 66. Q. What have you done to help ensure that school per-sonnel will be available in an emergency? ,
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] We will offer training, about both radiation and the LILCO Transi-tion Plan, to school bus drivers and teachers. We will offer to provide dosimeters and training in how to use them to school bus drivers.
- 67. Q. Do school bus drivers or school buses have to be specially certified before they can carry school-children?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] The buses LERO will use to transport nursery school children are already being used as school buses.
As for the drivers, most of the LERO emplo'yees who will drive these buses have " Class 2" licenses and have received training in the operation of school buses conducted by Huntington Coach and Baumann &
Sons in the summer of 1983. The balance of LERO bus drivers will be trained and will obtain Class 2 li-censes in the next several months. Certification is done by the superintendent of the school district, and so any district can certify LERO drivers. LILCO will certainly cooperate in this effort.
- 68. Q. What do you do if not enough of the regular school bus drivers show up?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Some of the school districts address this in their go-home plans. For example, Riverhead Central's plan' says - that' if a 'o cs driver cannot be reached, a properly licensad-teach-er or custodian will be assigned to drive the bus.
- 69. Q. Is it possible that the buses themselves might be unavailable, either because the bus drivers have driven them home or because they have been sent out on a route not involving schools?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle]~ Each district, in its own disaster plan, addresses the issue of l
l accessibility of' buses according to the circumstanc-es of the district (for example, some districts own their buses and keep them at a school garage, others lease buses from a company). Since the opportunity to exercise these plans arises whenever severe weather conditions necessitate early dismissal, problems with bus accessibility will have already-been worked out.
- 70. Q. What supervision will students receive either on the school buses or at the reception centers?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Supervision on school buses is typically done by the bus driver.
The locations to which the children will be taken !
will ultimately be the decision of school officials.
(As indicated earlier, .LILCO is willing to provide assistance in this regard.) If, however, the'stu-dents are taken to schools outside of the EPZ in-stead of to their homes, then supervision can be provided by the receiving school's staff. Alterna-a tively, provisions for teachers or other staff from the evacuating school to accompany the students can be included in the school's disaster plan.
4 y
_mm ________.______._______.._.__.__.______________.____._.._--.__-_____m_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
'71 . Q. Will evacuating school buses encounter a lot of traffic?
4 A. (Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] In most cases, students will be sent home by early dismissal methods prior to an evacuation. However, during an accident which has developed rapidly to a General Emergency in which evacuation has been recommended, school bus transportation will probably be affected by the evacuation traffic. Because some schools may require buses to make more than one run, the delay in evacuation of children may be extensive. This will not endanger the children because they will be sheltered in the school buildings, which. offer good -
shielding, while waiting for the' return of the buses.
VII. SPECIFIC SCHOOLS IN THE EPZ A. The Schools Closest the Plant
- 72. Q. What schools are closest to the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] The follow-ing school districts have the following schools within two miles of the plant:
Shoreham-Wading River Central School District Briarcliff Road School Miller Avenue School Shoreham-Wading River High School Wading River School Little Flower Union Free School District Little Flower Elementary School Nursery Schools Wading River Cooperative Playschool St. John's Pre-School i
l In addition, the Shoreham-Wading River Central School District has one school between two and five miles from Shoreham:
l Shbreham-Wading River Central School District Shoreham-Wading River Middle School
- 73. Q. What plans have been made for the Shoreham-Wading River Central School District?
i I
A. (Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle) The ,
Shoreham-Wading River School District has an emer-gency go-home. plan for the 1982-83 school year. It is Attacument 25 to this testimony. It includes both go-home plans and a provision for direct evacu-ation that expressly addresses the Shoreham Station.
- 74. Q. How.would the students be transported home from the Shoreham-Wading River schools under the early dismissal option?
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Students who live l farther from their school than the distances specified in the plan would be transported by school bus. School buses for the Shoreham-Wading River Central District are provided by the Seamans Bus Company. Seamans has 38 regular drivers, six spare drivers, and 35 sixty-passenger buses: 30 buses are committed to the Shoreham-Wading River Central School District and 5 to other school districts.
Seamans also has ten sixteen-passenger vans and five special vans for the handicapped.
- 75. Q. What is the availability of the buses at times other than during their ordinary runs?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] After the students are brought to school in the morning, the drivers return the buses to the Seamans lot, which is locat-ed at 82 Route 25A, Shoreham, close to the schools (1 1/2 miles from Wading River School, 1/2 mile from Briarcliff, 1 mile from the High School, 1/2 mile from the Middle School, and 1/4 mile from Miller Av- .
enue School). The drivers leave the buses at the lot. If the buses are needed to implement an early dismissal, drivers are off-duty; however,.the compa-ny maintains a list of the drivers' home telephone
numbers. In an emergency, the dispatcher would ini-tiate a six group phone chain to notify the drivers to pick up their' bus and transport students as di-rected by the school officials.
- 76. Q. Could all the Shoreham-Wading River students who need bus transportation be taken home in a single wave, or would the buses have to return to take a second lead?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle) There are enough l
buses to take all the students who need transporta-tion home in a single wave. There.are 2,205 stu-dents in the Shoreham-Wading River schools (this in-cludes all five schools, the four that are within i
two miles and the one th'at is between two and five miles away). The 26 committed buses are enough to take all the students home, since some students (those who live close to the school) go home on .
foot.
- 77. Q. What about sheltering? Do the Shoreham-Wading River 1
1 schools have suitable places for sheltering stu-dents?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle]. On March 14, 1984, LILCO Radiation Protection staff visited the
-w-y, y , , - - - , - -, w r
Shoreham-Wading River School District. They met with Mr. John Lutz, Administrator of Buildings and Grounds, and toured five schools to survey the possibilities for sheltering. The new library building attached to the High School has a large basement area composed of halls, pipe tunnels and storage areas. There is adequate space for students and staff in this area which will provide a shielding factor of approximately 0.1. The Middle School has a low-ceilinged and low-beamed basement which could be modified to accommodate the students and staff and provide a shielding factor of approxi-mately 0.3. If the first floor corridor is used, it will yield a shielding factor in the area of 0.8.
- 78. Q. What if the students in the Shoreham-Wading River Central School District had to be evacuated directly to a relocation center?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle} This could be done with a single bus run. The 30 committed buses should be sufficient to transport all the students.
This might require some students to stand, but the maximum student loading allowed by New York' State law (72 passengers) would not be exceeded.
j
- 79. Q. Where would the students be bused?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle) Originally the Shoreham-Wading River Central School District planned to bus the students to the Suffolk County Community College. At present, however, the govern-ment of Suffolk County refuses to make the Community College available to receive students evacuating from a radiological accident at Shoreham. If there were a real accident, of course, it is our judgment that the Community College would open its doors to these students, without a doubt. Also, once the Shoreham Plant is operating and there is no further tactical advantage to be gained by withholding re-sources from the emergency planning effort, we be-lieve that Suffolk County will make the college available even in advance of any real accident.
In the meantime, however, we will simply have to find an alternate relocation center for the Shoreham-Wading River schools. One possibility would be to send the students from the district to SUNY-Westbury. The Shoreham-Wading River Central School District has an enrollment of 2,205 students, and SUNY-Westbury has a capacity of 2,000 as a relo-cation. center that could be used for an extended 1
\
. .~ . _ . -- .. ~
period if sleeping facilities were required. Since most of the students, on the other hand, would be j picked up by their parents soon and would not have to stay very long at the reception center, it should be more than adequate in size. Also, of the 2,205 enrolled, at any given time at least 5% can be as-sumed to be absent from school due to illness or other reasons. So SUNY-Westbury should be adequate i
for all the Shoreham-Wading River students.
Little Flower Elementary School
- 80. Q. What plans have been made for the Little Flower Ele-'-
mentary School?
i A. {Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle]. The go-home plan for Little Flower Elementary School is Attach-ment 26.A. Additional information is provided in a letter of May 24, 1983, from the Manager, Adminis-trative Services (Attachment 26.B). The letter in-dicates that there are approximately 80 students at Little Flower. -Most of the students are residents of the school. In addition, the teachers live right l on the grounds and so would be present with.the children'to be sheltered'or evacuated.with them.
l-Since the students are already "home," a "go-home" plan is easy to. implement. As for sheltering, we-i i
l' , , . - , . . . - . . .- .. -. . -. -
believe that the main corridor of the school would be suitable for sheltering, as the plan for the school suggests. We plan to send a health physicist to the school to confirm this.
If evacuation were called for, the school believes it has " ample" transportation, according to the May 24, 1983 letter. The vehicles that would be used are kept right at the school. If upon further in-vestigation it appears that additional vehicles are needed, LILCO will buy the school a vehicle or vehi-cles that require no special driver's license, so that any teacher can drive them.
As to where the students would be taken in the event-of an evacuation, we are informed that with proper supervision, they can go anywhere-that anyone else can go. Our current plan, which is, of course, sub-ject to approval by the school, is to send the stu-dents to LILCO's Greenlawn Operations Center, where there are bathrooms and ample space for 80 students.
In the event of a long stay there, the resident staff of Little Flower, who would accompany the stu-dents, could make arrangements for food and beds.
There are already~ cots and blankets at the Greenlawn Operations Center, because it is a storm restoration i
, , . . -w -
.,n,, r yy ,e., , gy -.y-
6 area, and the overhead linesmen sleep there. If those cots are insufficient, there are a variety of alternatives. For example, in the Mississaugua evacuation in Canada a few years back, evacuees slept on air mattresses, which could be procured and stored at the operations center.
- 81. Q. What plans have been made for the two nursery schools within two miles of the plant?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] The Wading River Cooperative Play School has a maximum of 32 children, whose homes, generally speaking, are with-in five miles of the school. Since most of the par-ents are at home when their children are at school, the school's plan is to call the parents and have them come to school to pick up the children. The parents are never far away, because this is a playschool; the children are only there for two hours or so each day. Someone will always be there to pick them up within about two hours, whether or not an accident at Shoreham occurs. Even if there were some parents who could not be reached to come to the school, in all probability there would only be a handful of children in this situation,-and the director of the school could personally take care of I
I l
l
any children whose parents did not come until LERO would provide a bus and driver.
St. John's Pre-School has about 15 children. The school has an emergency plan, which is Attachment 40 to this testimony. Included is a form that parents must fill out to advise the school what to do in the event the parents are not home at tha time of an emergency. Most of the children at St. John's live within two to three miles of the school, so the best plan would be, as the written plan provides, for the parents to come and pick up the children. If neces-sary, LERO will send a bus to evacuate any children whose. parents can't.make it to the school. Actual-ly, LERO could simply send three LILCO company cars to handle the fewer than 15 children who would need to be transported.
In addition, there is religious instruction at St.
John's in six sessions each week (Monday 3:15 - 4:30 -
p.m. and 7:30 - 8:30 p.m., Tuesday 3:15 - 4:30 p.m.
l and 7:30 - 8:30 p.m., and Wednesday 3:15 - 4:30 p.m.
and 4:30 - 5:30 p.m.). At least 100 children, from grades kindergarten through sixth grade, attend each day. However, standard religious instruction lasts only one hour, so if an accident were to occur while
the children were at the school for religious in-struction, they would be picked up by their parents or someone else within 60 minutes in any event.
As for sheltering, LERIO will make available a health physicist to survey the two nursery schools
~
to advise how to shelter mest effectively. It is safe to assume, however, that tne schools would be no less effective as shelters than the homes where the children presumably would be if they were not at school.
B. Two to Five Miles from the Plant
. 82. Q. What schools are there between two and five miles from the Shoreham Station?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] In addition to the Shoreham-Wading River Middle School, which we have already addressed, the schools located from two to five miles from the Shoreham station, and the school districts they are in, are the following:
Rocky Point Union Free School District The Joseph A. Edgar School The Rocky Point Junior and Senior High Schools The Rocky Point Elementary School Middle Island Central School District
Ridge Elementary School Nursery Schools Saint Anselm's Nursery School Trinity Lutheran Nursery School
- 83. Q. What is the status of planning for the Rocky Point Union Free School District?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] We have met with the Superintendent, and the district has ac-cepted a tone alert radio for each school, but we have not yet received written information about its early dismissal plans. The district has passed a resolution about Shoreham (Attachment 22), after earlier turning down a resolution such as several other school districts have passed (Attachments-18-21). The resolution passed by the Rocky Point Union Free School District appears to call for coun-ty, state, and federal coordination on emergency planning for Shoreham.
Several features make this school district somewhat easier to plan for than some others. It is a small, compact district, with all the schools located near one another. (The schools are within a mile of one another.) There are about 2579 students. Because-of the compactness of the district, we are advised
that it takes only about one hour and 15 minutes to send all the students home from the time an early dismissal is initiated.
Radiation protection staff from LILCO visited the Rocky Point School District on March 14, 1984 and toured the three schools.
The Junior-Senior High School has a cafeteria, lounges, and a long hallway in the basement with more than adequate space for all the students and staff of this school and the population of the Rocky
, Point Elementary School. Since this area would pro-vide a shielding factor of 0.1, it is recommended that the students and staff of the Elementary School shelter there. It is less than a five minute walk between the schools across the soccer field.
The Joseph A. Edgar School has limited space in a basement " wrestling room" that could provide a shel-tering factor of 0.2, and could shelter the re-maining population 1.2 the hallways of the older part of the building with a shielding factor of approxi-mately 0.8. There would be room for the staff and students at the Junior-Senior High School, but they might need transportation.
i We will also, if the school district will let us, work with it to select a relocation center or cen-ters in case the students have to be evacuated.
Assuming hypothetically that the worst happens and the school district declines to do any planning for a radiological emergency, then LERIO will make ar-rangements on its own for a relocation center for the school district and be prepared to advise the school district at the time of an accident where the students should be sent. In this event LERO would be prepared to provide maps showing the bus route from the Rocky Point schools to the relocation cen-ters, to be handed out to the bus drivers at the time of the accident.
- 84. Q. What transportation resources does this school dis-trict have?
3 A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] The district has access to 25 buses owned by the Coram Bus Company and garaged at 128 Mt. Sinai Road in Coram. The buses are kept at the garage when not transporting students. They maintain a list of bus drivers' home telephone numbers, which may be' called to mobilize ,
I the drivers. Three bus runs are necessary to trans- j port all the students in the district. l
- 85. Q. What planning has been done for the Ridge Elementary School in the Middle Island Central School District?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] Ridge Ele-mentary has about 1,700 of the some 8,564 students in the district. The Middle Island Central School District presents a more difficult planning situa-tion than either Shoreham-Wading River or Rocky Point. The school board has passed a resolution against ths LILCO emergency plan (Attachment 19),
and two of the district's personnel (Dr. Muto and Mr. Smith) have testified against the LILCO Transi-tion Plan in this proceeding.
The entire district (not just the Ridge Elementary j School) requires some three hours and three bus runs i
f under ordinary conditions to get'all the students I home. As.shown by the attached. transportation.
schedule and memorandum on early, dismissal (Attach-ment 19), the transportation situation is very com-plicated for this school district. The problem is that the number of buses available to the district is limited.
In the depositions taken in this case, school offi-cials indicated that one of their problems is a shortage of personnel to spend. time planning.for a-
78-radiological emergency. Accordingly, LILCO will make available such personnel as the school district feels it needs to do planning, if it will let us.
We will make available professional traffic engi-neers, emergency planners, and health physicists to do the necessary planning.
- 86. Q. What transportation resources does the Middle Island Central School District have?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] The district uses 90 buses owned by the Suburbia Bus Company and ga-raged at 220 Old Town Road in Coram when not trans-porting students. It takes three bus runs ordinari-ly to get all the students in the district home.
The procedure for calling bus drivers is the same as for Shoreham-Wading River and Rocky Point Union Free, discussed above.
- 87. Q. What p'lanning has been done for the two' nursery schools in'the two-to-five-mile range?
A. [Cordaro, Miele,' Robinson, Weismantle] The nursery schools are'St. Anselm's:and Trinity Lutheran. The school session for-them each day is a short one --
perhaps two and a half toEthree hours. This.means that on a given day someoneJwould be picking up'the S
4 b *
.em .
f
children at school within two or three hours in any event. This makes the emergency planning task easi-er.
There are a maximum of 23 children at Trinity. The director of the school has indicated that she would stay with the children in an emergency. The school's emergency plan is to call the parents and have them pick up the children; the school has a I l
card for each child with the parent's phone number and five alternate numbers to call in an emergency.
LERO will provide a vehicle and driver to transport these children if an immediate evacuation is called for.
St. Anselm's has a maximum of 38 children. ife are told that many.of their parents work and that, in many cases, babysitters pick up the children at 1
school. The school maintains a card' file with the l l
parents' phone number and two other numbers for emergencies. LERO will supply & vehicle and driver for these students in case of an immediate evacua-tion.
l C. Five to___ Ten Miles from the Plant
- 88. Q. What schools are there between five and ten miles from the Shoreham plant?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] The follow-ing schools are between five and ten miles from the plant:
Middle Island Central School District West Middle Island Elementary School Coram Elementary School Middle Island Junior High School Longwood High School
, Charles E. Walters Elementary School Miller Place Union Free School District
- North Country Road School Andrew Muller Primary School Sound Beach School Miller Place High School Mt. Sinai Union Free School District Mt. Sinai Junior High School Mt.'Sinai Elementary School Port Jefferson Union Free Port' Jefferson Elementary Port Jefferson Junior High School Comsewogue Union Free Clinton Avenue Elementary School Comsewcque High School
/
._ _ - - - - _ _ - - - - _ . - _ _ _ - - - . _ _ . _ - . _ _ _ - __.---__-____-.--.---_.--_---__J
Patchogue-Medford Union Free Eagle Elementary South Manor Union Free South Street Dayton Avenue Riverhead Central Riley Avenue Elementary Parochial St. Isidore Infant Jesus Nursery Schools Middle Island Nursery Brookhaven Country Day Kids-R-Us Day Care
- Learning Center Step by Step Early Learning Center Sound Beach Pre-School Coop.
Alphabetland Child Enrichment Center Coram Child Care Center Central Brookhaven Head Start
- 89. Q. Can you summarize your planning effort for nursery schools?
A. (Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle) There are thirteen nursery schools on Long Island that either have facilities located within the ten-mile EPZ or students who live within the EPZ.
On May 19, 1983, a letter was sent to all nursery schools signed by LILCO's Chief Executive Officer.
It explained that LILCO was filing a revised local emergency response plan for Shoreham. The letter also mentioned that someone would contact them to discuss the details of the plan and to answer ques-tions.
Initial visits were made to the following nursery schools in July 1983:
- 1. Alphabetland
- 2. Central Brookhaven Head Start
- 3. Coram Childcare Center
- 4. Kids-R-Us
- 5. St. John's Pre-School.
And, similarly, visits were made to the following nursery schools in October and November 1983 to de-liver tone alert radios and "For Your Information" binders. The LILCO Transition Plan was discussed in general at this time.
- 1. Alphabetland Child Enrichment-Center
- 2. Centrcl-Brookhaven Head Start.
- 3. Cora Nhildcare Center
- 4. Kids 1 %
- 5. Middle-Island Nursery School
- 6. North Shore Christian School
- 7. St. Anselm's Nursery School
- 8. St. John's Pre-School
- 9. Sound Beach Pre-School Co-op.
- 10. Step by Step Early Learning:
l Center
- 11. . Trinity Lutheran Nursery. School.
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .=
- 12. Wading River Cooperative Play School Letters were sent out after meetings, thanking con-tact persons for meeting with us. Kids-R-Us de-clined the tone alert radio and "For Your Informa-tion" binder and Brookhaven Country Day School never answered our phone calls or letters.
Alphabetland Child Enrichment Center gave us a copy of their "go home" plan as did St. John's Nursery School. Central Brookhaven Head Start asked for our help in developing a "go home" plan. We attached a suggested Temporary Emergency Dismissal form to the letter sent to the school on November 3, 1983.
Telephone calls were made to all of the nursery schools explaining Revision 3 of the LILCO Transi-tion Plan, which pertained to them, except for Kids-R-Us and Brookhaven Country Day School. Let-ters were sent to all nursery. schools along with sections of Revision 3. Attached is a copy of the contact list regarding emergency planning for these facilities (Attachment 8).
1 I
- 90. Q. What is the status of planning for the eight nursery-schools'in the five- to ten-mile area?
L
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle) All of them have go-home plans, which include having the parents fill out a card with names of people to contact in the event the children have to go home early. More-over, all of them appear to be willing to continue the planning process with LERIO, with two possible exceptions. First, the Brookhaven Country Day i
school has not answered our requests for informa-
] tion. Second, the director of the Kids-R-Us Day
- Care Learning Center returned our tone alert to us and declined to discuss planning any further.
In an emergency, all these nursery schools could be advised to implement their early dismissal plans, and this should present no special problems, since those plans are already in existence. As for shel-tering, LERIO will provide a health physicist to survey each of the nursery schools and' advise the schools as to where sheltering would be most effec-tive. It is unlikely that any of the schools are substantially less suitable as shelters from radia-tion than would be the children's own homes, which is presumably where they would be if they were not in school.
l l
f As for evacuation, LERO will send buses to each of the schools to evacuate the children, should that become necessary.
The only real planning problem among the nursery schools is Kids-R-Us, which does not presently have a tone alert, unlike all the other schools in the ten-mile EPZ. Thus, while the facility could imple-ment an early dismissal plan, a sheltering plan, or a direct evacuation plan, it would have more diffi-culty receiving notice that it should do one of those things. Our plan, in the event that Kids-R-Us continues to decline to plan, is to have the LERO Private School Coordinator phone the school immedi-ately in the event of an emergency and give them the same sort of information that they would receive over the EBS stations if they'had a tone alert. Of course, once the school receives the initial notice, it can listen to the EBS messages by tuning in an ordinary radio. Also, we will make sure the school director knows that he can have a tone alert whenev-er he wants one.
- 91. Q. What is the status of planning for the tea parochial schools in the five- to ten-mile area?
-86'-
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] The two pa-rochial schools are St. Isidore and Infant Jesus.
St. Isidore has 253 students and no written go-home plan. The school follows the leac' of the Riverhead Central School District with respect to early dis-missal for snowstorms. St. Isidore also relies on the 30 buses and drivers of the Riverhead Central School District. Because it is a parochial school, its students are from widely dispersed homes. How-ever, only four buses would be required in order to evacuate its students immediately to a reception
~
center.
The Infant Jesus School has 519 students and no - -
written go-home plan at present. The school offi-cials do seem willing to do further planning, howev-er, and LERIO will set up meetings to work with the school to develop a plan, provide a health physicist.
to survey the school building for sheltering loca-tions.
- 92. Q. What is the status of planning for the Riley Avenue Elementary School, the one school in the Riverhead Central School District located in the EPZ?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] Riley Avenue Elementary School, in.the Riverhead Central
i 1
District, has a'facul'ty of 25 and 396 students. The l
l Riverhead Central School District has a go-home plan, dated September 1, 1982, which is Attachment 33 to this testimony. It also has a " Stay Where You Are Plan," dated April 7, 1983 (Attachment 33).
As the go-home plan indicates, the Riverhead Central School District owns its own school buses and keeps them at the school garage. It owns 49 vehicles and transports approximately 4,000 pupils daily on 45 vehicles. Since only 396 of those approximate 4,000 pupils are in the Riley Avenue Elementary School-(and therefore in the ten-mile EPZ) each school day, it should be no problem to transport these students._,-
either home or to a relocation center, provided the school district is willing to delay its ordinary busing hcme of other students in the district (in the event that the need to go home or evacuate from the ten-mile EPZ occurred at a time when students at the other schools would ordinarily be going home from school).
The go-home plan for the district says that "[i]n the event that a driver cannot be reached, or cannot report immediately, the Transportation Supervisor will assign a properly licensed teacher or custodian
)
l l
to drive a bus." Since, as the go-home plan indi-cates, the Riverhead Central School District con-sists of seven separate school buildings, a sensible place to evacuate the Riley Avenue Elementary School would be another of the District's buildings outside the EPZ. The " Stay Where You Are Plan" notes that Riverhead High School and Junior High School have been designated as fallout shelters and will serve as " central safety areas" in the event the need arises to evacuate any of the elementary buildings.
LILCO will be available to work with the school dis-l trict to further refine the Plan, if the district wishes.
As for sheltering in the Riley Avenue Elementary School, LILCO will make available a health physicist to survey the building and advise the School Dis-trict on the best place for sheltering.
- 93. Q. What is the status of planning for the two schools in the South Manor Union Free School District?
I A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] The two schools in the South Manor Union Free School Dis-trict are the South Manor Elementary School and the Dayton Avenue School. ' Dayton Avenue has 373 stu-l dents and 38 faculty members, and South Street has I
l 417 students and 30 faculty members.
l l
1 L
. =. = . . . - - .- . . - .
i The South Manor Elementary School has emergency "Go-Home" and " Stay Where You Are" plans, which are at-tached to this testimony as Attachment 32. The Dayton Avenue School also has "Go-Home" and " Stay Where You Are" plans (Attachment 32).
4 The superintendent of the South Manor Schools has a
written LERIO that these plans were "never intended to address a radiological accident." They do, how-ever, contain a procedure to be followed "in tne event of a nuclear attack." They also provide that i if a warning of at least one hour is received in the event of a nuclear attack, schools will be notified
..to-send all students home.
Since the school officials in the South Manor Union Free District-apparently are not totally satisfied with their present plans, LILCO will be available to work with them to refine the plans as necessary. In ,
particular, a sheltering survey by our' health physi-cist has been scheduled. Also, we believe the school district has a bus scheduling problem that could benefit from further planning. We will there-fore offer the. assistance of planners.
4 l 94. Q. What transportation resources!does-the South Manor.
i Union Free School-District have?
w - + w e
l l
1 l
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] It uses 17 buses owned by the Adelwerth Bus Service and garaged on Main Street in Eastport when not transporting stu-dents. Three bus runs are required to get all the students in the district home. The procedure for contacting drivers is generally the same as for the other school districts.
- 95. Q. What is the status of planning for the Eagle Elemen-tary School?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle) The Eagle Elementary School, in the Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District, has 952 students and 52 facul-ty members.
However, the school district as a whole has 10,000 students and uses a total of 70 buses, provided by the school district, United Bus Company, Crimson Coach, and Medi-Bus. Since o'nly the Eagle Elementa-ry School with its 950 students, of the entire dis-trict, is within the ten-mile EPZ,uit should be pos-sible to move the students from that school quickly by concentrating the transportation resources on the single school. If a radiological accident occurred at the time schools were letting out normally, some of the students at some of the other schools outside I
i
the ten-mile EPZ might have to be delayed in getting home.
If the students had to be evacuated directly from the Eagle Elementary School to a reception center, the obvious choice would be one of the other schools in the district. LILCO will be available to help the school district plan for such an event, if the school officials are willing, and also to provide a health physicist to survey the Eagle Elementary School for appropriate sheltering locations.
- 96. Q. What transportation resources does the Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District use?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] It uses 21 school district owned buses, three Medi-Buses,_three Crimson Coach buses, and 42 buses owned by United Bus and garaged on Old Middle Country Road in Coram wh'en not transporting students. Three bus runs are required. The procedure for contacting bus drivers generally is the same as for the other school dis-tricts.
- 97. Q. What is the status of planning for the schools in the Comsewogue Union Free School District? j 1
l l
l l
i i A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] There are
! two schools in the Comsewogue Union Free School Dis-
! trict are also within the ten-mile EPZ: The j Clinton Avenue Elementary School, with 616 students and 37 faculty members, and the Comsewogue High School, with 1565 students and 105 faculty members.
{
i We received a copy of the emergency closing plan of I
the schools in the Comsewogue School District (At-tachment 30). The whole school district relies on 21 buses provided by the Coram Bus Company. Three bus runs are required for the entire district. How-
- ever, the district has schools outside the ten-mile EPZ, and so it appears that buses could be mobilized'
- to concentrate on the Clinton Avenue and Comsewogue-High School facilities and
- effect a quick evacuation
, if necessary. Moreover, it would make sense to I
evacuate students from those schools to other schools in the district outside,the ten-mile EPZ.
1 c 98. Q. What transportation resources does the Comsewogue:
Union Free School District use?
j A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] It uses 21 buses owned by the Coram Bus Company and. garaged at 1281 Mt. Sinai~ Road in Coram when not transporting stu-dents. Three' bus. runs are' required. . Califout.
l l
- g r- w * . r --
.---, wet- n- -
r e ,9- -
a w - , - , - 3 -
procedure for bus drivera generally is the same as for the other bus companies.
- 99. Q. What is the status of planning for the schools in the Port Jefferson Union Free School District?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] There are two schools in the ten-mile EPZ in the Port Jefferson Union Free School District: the Port Jefferson Elementary School, with.767 students, and the Port Jefferson Junior High School, with 272 stu-dents. Port Jefferson has a detailed stay-in-school plan (Attachment 29), and this could be readily us-able for an accident at Shoreham.
The district as a whole includes the two schools mentioned above plus a high school with 939 stu-dents. Thus, roughly half the students in the dis-trict are within the ten-mile EPZ.
The district relies on 14 buses and three wagons, and normally moves its students in two waves of ve-hicles. Since only half the students would need to be evacuated from the EPZ, it should be possible to move them in one wave by concentrating all the buses on the two schools in the EPZ. LERIO will~make available a health physicist to assess appropriate sheltering locations.
l l
100. Q. What transporation resources does the Port Jefferson Union Free School District use?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle) It uses 14 buses owned by the Coram Bus Company and garaged at 128 Mt. Sinai Road in Coram when not transporting stu-dents. Two bus runs are required. Call-out proce-dure for bus drivers generally is the same as for the other bus companies. I 101. Q. What is the status of planning with respect to the M. Sinai Union Free School District?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] There are two schools _in the ten-mile EPZ in the Mt. Sinai Union Free School District, Mt. Sinai Junior High School and Mt. Sinai Elementary School. One of the school board members from this district testified against the LILCO plan in this proceeding. However, we understand that the district does have a go-home plan and that it takes about two hours and twenty minutes to get the students home under normal, non-emergency conditions.
The school district has a tone alert, so we can com-municate with it in an emergency. Absent any fur-ther planning, the schools ~could be advised to
implement their go-home plans, to shelter the stu-dents in interior corridors, auditoriums, or gymna-slums, or to evacuate the students to a place out-side the ten-mile EPZ determined by LILCO. The effort would undoubtedly be more organized if the school district would plan for such an event in ad-vance, but it could be accomplished even if the dis-trict had not planned.
102. Q. What transportation resources does the Mt. Sinai Union Free School District use?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] The district uses 21 buses owned by BIMCO and located at two garages (one on Route 112 in Port Jefferson Station, the other on Hallock Road in Port Jefferson Station) when not.tranaporting students. Four bus runs are required. Call-out procedure for bus drivers is the same as elsewhere.
103. Q. What is the status of planning for the schools in Miller Place Union Free School District?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] The Miller Place Union Free School District is a small, compact district with a concentrated population. The dis-trict has an " Emergency Go Home Plan," which is
I Attachment 28 to this testimony. The district has four schools in the EPZ, North Country Road School, Andrew Muller Primary School, Sound Beach School, and Miller Place High School. The district relies on l' buses and two minibuses for transport, and re-quires four waves of buses ordinarily. However, be-cause of the compactness of the district, it does not take especially long to get the students home.
The buses make short runs to the students' home and then circle back to the school to pick up other stu-dents.
104. Q. What transportation resources does the Miller Place Union Free School District use?
A. (Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] The district uses 13 buses owned by the Better Bus Company (Suburbia) and garaged in Miller Place and on Yaphank Road in Middle Island when not transporting students. Four bus runs are required. Call-out procedure for bus drivers generally is the same as elsewhere.
105. Q. What is the status of planning for the Middle Island Central School District?
A. [Cordaro, Miele, Robinson, Weismantle] In the five-to ten-mile area, the Middle Island Central School
District has five schools: West Middle Island Ele-mentary School, Coram Elementary School, Middle Is-land Junior High School, Longwood High School, and Charles E. Walters Elementary School. The status of planning for the Middle Island Central School Dis-trict is discussed in Question and Answer 85 above.
106. Q. What transportation resources does the Middle Island Central School District use?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] Middle Island Cen-tral uses 90 buses and 35 carriers owned by Suburbia and Noil. Three bus runs are required. Call-out procedure for bus drivers is generally the same as at other sch'ool bus companies.
D. Outside the EPZ 107. Q. What is the status of planning-for schools outside the EPZ that have students who live inside the EPZ?
A. [Cordaro, Robinson, Weismantle] The school dis-tricts have been given tone alerts and so can be ,
1 communicated with in an emergency. The problem for these schools is simply culling out those students who have homes inside the EPZ so they can be kept_at school at the end of the day. This requires a cer-tain amount of advance planning. For example, a a
list of students who live in the EPZ must be com-piled at the beginning of each school year and kept on file, and a means for letting these students know who they are, either in advance of an accident or at the time of one, must be established. LILCO would be willing to provide assistance in accomplishing i this. However, even without planning, the worst that would happen would be that school officials would have to keep the entire student body after school in an emergency. This might make a lot of people unhappy but would not threaten anyone's health or safety.
I h
o 5
l i
a
u - m
__. . a a e _
l l
l 1
l ATTACHMENT 1
o' Attachment l-f4) Coordinator will coordinate bus operations and 1 ensure an adequate supply of buses and drivers, 2 refer to Bus Route Procedure 3.6.4 3 4
The evacuation of special facilities will be 5 coordinated by the Special Facilities Evacuation 6 Coordinator, refer to Special Evacuation Procedure 7 3.6.5. 8 9
In the event of an emergency, schools will be 10 advised to take a course of action in accordance 11 ps 12 with the schools' indicated in OPIPemergency disaster plane'ections 3.6.5 and Appendix A, S II 13 and IV. 14 15 16 Should the evacuation of any health facilities be 17 required, the Health Facilities Coordinator will 18 l ensure that sufficient vehicles (buses and 19
, ambulances) will be provided. 20 21 In the case of the deaf population at home, a LERO 22 representative will be dispatched to their homes to 23 inform them of the need to take arotective action. 24 For those deaf who are also disailed, they will be 25 sent an appropriate vehicle to assist them in their 26
) evacuation. ,
27 28 The LERO Home Coordinator will ensure the -
29 evacuation of individuals who need assistance to 30 evacuate their homes, i.e. handicapped, invalids, 31 etc. A list of these special cases will be 32 developed from mail-in cards included in the public 33 information brochure and will be kept by LILCO. 34 35 Relo~cationcenterswillbeesb.ablishedtoprovide 36 monitoring, decontamination, temporar 37 feeding, and first aid for evacuees. y The housing, American 38 Red Cross (ARC) is responsible for the organization 39 ,
and management of the relocation centers. The 40 Relocation Center Coordinator at the Local EOC will 41 ensure availability of sufficient relocation 42 ,
centers. 43 '
i 44 l The public information brochure given to the aublic 45 l will provide information as to the supplies taey . 46 l should bring to relocation centers. The supplies 47 include: 48 l
l b
REV. 3 3.6-7
. _ _ _ . _ . _ . . . . __ m... _ . _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ .. . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
I l
(
i
(
I i
i (
i t
I I
i i
1t I
l 1 .
l i
1 i 1 l f
ATTACHMENT 2 I
l, i
- r b
I a
1 9
4
_ ,...,_g3_._,.,gegw..--,eeg.yg ggg,y* g
., f Attachment 2 OPIP 3.6.5 Page 10a of '10
{y .
5.2.4 Bus Coordinator
- a. Utilizing the Hospital, Handicapped and Nursing / Adult Home section of Attachment 2 l provided by the Health Facilities j Coordinator, dispatch buses to each facility l as indicated under the transportation
< requirements column.
- b. Direct the Bus Dispatcher to have the Bus ,
Drivers telephone back information to the Bus '
Dispatcher upon completion of evacuation of the facility that they have been assigned. ,
- c. As the Bus Drivers report that they have com-placed their current assignments, reassign the buses until all facilities have been relocated.
1
- d. Upon completion of the evacuation, direct the Bus Dispatcher to have all Bus Drivers report to the Emergency Worker Decontamination
(, ; . Center.
5.3 Evacuacion of Schools I
NOTE l OFFICIALS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SCHOOLS LOCATED IN THE 10-MILE EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE (EPZ) HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY IN A RADIO-LOGICAL EMERGENCY TO PROVIDE THEIR STUDENTS WITH THE BEST POSSIBLE PROTECTION AND ARRANGE FOR THEM TO BE SAFELY REUNITED WITH THEIR FAMILIES AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY.
THE LERO DIRECTOR OF LOCAL RESPONSE WILL PROVIDE GUIDANCE AND INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCOM-PLISH THESE PURPOSES (BASED ON PREPLANNING BY SCHOOL OFFICIALS FOR THEIR OWN FACILITIES).
l e 5.3.1 Response Level - Alert or higher emergency classification with no protective actions recommended for the general public. The Public School Coordinator and Private School Coordinator will:
Rev. 3
1 OPIP 3.6.5 Page r1.of 20
[].
- a. Obtain a copy of the Emergency Broadcast l System (EBS) message from the 1 Coordinator of Public Information.
- b. Using Attachment 3 (School Evacuation 4
i Listing), contact by telephone each District Superintendent and the individual in charge of the private schools and nursery schools in the EPZ.
Verify that the EBS message was received. If the EBS message was not received, read the message to the school official, j
- c. Verify that the school will implement the recommendation of the EBS message in
, . accordance with the schools emergency l disaster plan. If the school plans to l take a course of action not recommendri l
by the EBS message, notify the Special i .
Facilities Evacuation Coordinator of the school's decision.
l
(. d. Give the individual your title and phone number and indicate that this is their pohit of contact with LERO for obtaining ._
additional assistance.
i e. Request that the individual in charge at each school notify the appropriate School Coordinator as soon as emergency operations are completed.
- f. Advise the Special Facilities Evacuation Coordinator when the t
ols provide return calls indicatin@T the status of i emergency operations.
5.3.2 Response Level - Protective actions have been recommended for the general public. The Public j School Coordinator and Private School Coordinator '
will:
1 I
- (~
Rev. 3 r
.y p..- ..
..--.,.-..-,y ,
7.~.. . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . , .
1 OPIP 3.6.5 Page 11a of 20 l
(]i .
- a. Obtain a copy of the latest Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) message from the
, Coordinator of Public Information.
i NOTE IN THE EVENT AN EVACUATION IS ADVISED, THE
- PRIVATE SCHOOL COORDINATOR WILL CONTACT THE NURSERY SCHOOLS BEFORE CALLING THE OTHER PRIVATE SCHOOLS SINCE LERO WILL PROVIDE EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION FOR THE EVACUATION OF CHILDREN IN THE NURSERY SCHOOLS.
- b. Using Attachment 3 (School Evacuation .
Listing), contact by telephone each District Superintendent and individual l g
in charge of the private schools ,
1 (contact nursery school first) in the g EPZ. Verify that the EBS message was .
received. If the EBS message was not
({'! received, read the EBS message to the l I
school official. ~
- c. Verify that the school vill implement j the recommendation of the EBS message in j accordance with the schools emergency disaster plan. If the school plans to take a course of action not recommended a by the EBS message, notify the Special i Facilities Evacuation Coordinator of the -
school's decision. !
i
- d. FOR NURSERY SCHOOLS ONLY, if an ;
evacuation is advised, obtain from the -
school official the transportation requirements for each nursery _ school and fill in this information on Attachment
- 3. Give this information immediately to ,
the Bus Coodinator.
1 e
Rev. 3. . .
......~. - -- .. .. ,- . - ;_ --
OPIP 3.6.5 Page 12 of 20
(]s j e. Give the individual your title and phone number and indicate that this is their point of contact with LERO for obtaining any additional assistance.
- f. Request that the individual in charge at each school notify the appropriate School Coordinator as soon as emergency operations are completed.
- g. If an evacuation is advised, contact the reception centers, inform them of the situation, and give the number of students and their approximate time of arrival.
- h. Advise the Special Facilities Evacuation Coordinator when the schools provide return calls indicating the status of emergency operations.
6.0 REFERENCES
(,s; 6.1 Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan -
Appendix A " Evacuation Plan" 7.0 ATTACHMENTS
. 1. Invalid / Disabled Evacuation Listing
- 2. Health Care Facilities Evacuation Listing
- 3. School Evacuation Listing
- 4. Resident Deaf Population Listing l (?
Rev. 3 1
.;- ., "~
p O-O...
0FIF 3.6.5 ,
Fege 18 of 20 *
- Attethmeat 3 Fase 1 of 2 e
SCN00L EVAW ATION LISTINC 1
w astaf scuo0L3_ .
Transportation 3 ittee of Ialttell I I
{ 8eloca&les l Contact /Tlee l I
I I l l Bequiremente Factitty
' ofE,ecuationl I l Phsme l Ione (filled in at time Confirestion I l Description et emeraency)
'?
l '
Addrese 1 16ueber 'Destanetton -
g I Facility I l
. l _ _
ITe be arranged l l
, ls [
l928-5575I F lTble facility hee a l l l l
n lF.O. Den 787 ltotal of 70 studente.1l l l lAlphabettend Child l l liargest enount at l l ltaric1 ment Center lache Avenue l l l st?64 leny one time is 50. l l lRiller Flece. F l lI f 'l lCostact s M. ' rides l l 1 (One bue to required.*l
_l
)
l l l l 1 l 1 l To be erreged I
1 1 L just able to obtela l l 1924-4033l l ISreebhaven Cemetry lF.O.
I Boa ' 3 l l lInforsetton. Sent l l l liff Im q toleed Avenue J lletter 10/17/83. l l lTophenk,NY 11980 l l l l IDeySchool l I I
I l coetect: W. Follock I I l I I I I l I lTo be errensed
, l I
R ITotal studente - 91 l l I l 1732-7100) l l 1F.0. Sea 48 l l l Man et one time - FIl l l ICentral Broekhaves l2 busse required. l l l lM111 Road l l l luesd Start l Corse NY C. 11727 lBOCES does tremetert l l l I Crue, I l 8 l l
Contact:
l l leone of the studente ll l l l let thte f act!Ity. I I l l l l l l l 3
l i I i I I
l I' l i I ITobearressed l I I I l 3 l 1 1331-94211 E ITetetstudente-150l l l 1 110 Clemmere Lane l l lMem. et one stee - 501 l l l Corse ChilJ Core l Ceres,NY 11727 l1 bus required. l l l Center l l l l I l lCostacts C. Schroff l l l I I I i I el l I I I ITo be erreased l j i I M ITetet studente - 135 l l l l
.- 1 l924-00001 l lF.O. Boa 12 l l l Man. et one stee - 951 l l
' lKide-R-Os Def Care l Logwood Road 12 buses required. l 1 l Learning (enter l l - l 1 l Middle leland, NY 11953 lbOCES does treesport l I l l
g l l I l l Contacts 5. Itald l l leone of the studegte i l l I l let thle f actitty. I I
l l l I l l l I l l l 1 1 l I I i l ITe be errenged a I
I l 1
M ITotal studente - 33 I J l l l 1924-39225 l l Meta Street I l l Man. et one time - 16l l 1 l Middle faland l Middle latend, NT 11943 l l l 1
INursery Scheel B. Fracopene l l l 8 I
l Contacts l I l l l l' 1 l l l I I I l l I
I i I l Sev. 3 t
l a 60 studente per bus.
O O O 1 OrtP 1.6.5 Fase 18e of 20 f*
' Attachment 3 i Page le of 2 .l SCWIOL ETAGAT1006 LIST 111C (continued)
IRIRSERT SCN00LS (coettened) e I Transportetlom i ITime of InitieII I I I I l Requiremente l Selecettee I contact / fine l I l of Evecuattee l l l Phone fDesig Zone (filled in et time Feellity l Address Iluebe r net ton' Description of emeraency) Coeffraction l
- l Facility l
- l
- I l J ITe be orrenged l l l s INursery School l l 8 lNhlteen Avenue l473-2222l Out side lehrough Sch grade - l l 1 lleerth Shore Irert Jefferson, NT !!??6 l l EFZ l l l l Christian Scheel l267 studente l l l Contacts Marilya Suck l l l l I 1 l lMureery School - 30 l l l l 1 ,
l l l l
l l l l Total in nursery l l l l l lockool at one 1 l l l l l Ittee' - 20 l I l
- l 1 I I i l 1
l l I i i I l i I ITe be erreused I 1744-7730l F Ifotel studente - 136 l l l l 8 lSt. Anoale's IIereery INorth Country Road l lNes. et ons ties - 381 l l lShorehen. NY 11792 l 11 bus required I l l School No. Neline l l l l l '
l ll Contact l 1 I l I I l l l 8 lfe be errensed l l l IBerth Country Seed j 929-97221 E lietal studente - 60 l l l l lSt. John's Pre-Schee! ' Nading River, IIT 11792 l lNes. et one stee - 151 l l l I l l1 bus required l l l Contacts No. Sredy l l l l 1 l 1 l l I l l l lTo be errensed
)44-0579) F l Total studente - 73 l l l l lSoundSeate P.O. Ses 309 Ides, et one slee - 191 l l l l l Pre-School Co-op lIlow York Avenue l1 bus required l lg i l l Sound Seech, NY 11789 l l l l l l l l Contacts No. Irene Frick l l l l I i l I I l l I I l 4 I lTo be errenged 3 l744-9397l C ITotal studeste - 74 l l l l t lI Step-by-Ster l138 Radio Avenue l l Man. et one time - 301 l lEerly Lres. Centet UNiller Flece. NY !!?64 l ll bus required l l 1
l No. O' Bries l l l 5 l
l JCentacts l 1 l l l l I I l 1 I l l l 1 1
ITe be errensed l l
l744-91311 C ITotal studente - 77 l l l Trinity 1mtheren lSoute 25A l lBecky Feint, NY 18778 l l INes. et one time - 231 l ) l lNureery Scheet l 15 bue required l ,
1 I Contacts Me. Broege l l l l l 1 l l l l l l l 8 j l l l 3 l 1 l l l l l l l l 1 1 I i l l l l I l l l l l l l l l 1
l l .
see. 3
e e 9 8
amamm.
b n
.mm.e
._,-=e.-eu..mm.-=m..-..--_.m..-----e.-.----
'.=e M
2 S D
- e. M N ' .We e OS 5 6
em O wE is= O
.* O
- .ee e .S. ee we
=S A e e me
=m8A I.. &g
.Ee *= 3
=C'tP aus uA .e* ee u
- 3 *a se e* as
-ou. e..we es M tme
- 44 as e O s 8 O b d 8. O 0 - en. eu..- eu. -
- 5. u=o= Q ems.e- am. .m - me -_ .m. e=== .m=_ am.amm. e
.- - .m.-e- n.
to. -_
9
, 1
.48 .. .
O r
4 E S "44 W G to
.e* U 9 ee W
W km S
H.- -
__.__---_.========.e-.--.---
. .e .
E as >
.Oe me w ee g as e e gee M
- u to e t=
0 o en.to e S9 e .E C 4P e e g =e tas as s ** O
>= .*
ene tap e m._ ee.a.m. _.m..m.-_em e e == _ mw ump -em_ m m.ame e m e _ mem
.m.-_ M M
St em 0 W ' s
- 3 .-,
g ., e. ae .
E b t
g .be O 9 we e 51 m ~
18?"
55 5 ?%"
gi 2 S
en_._
-- - _ - _ _____ _ ~_
.Os 49 3 4 u ea o as H *e*
e__-
_________e.-______.- _ _ _ _ _
- r er to M S9 .ene A t 8S l e-.s..-a-fJ 2 --e.en..-m-a=-.--m.- -
--..m.- %
' 9 pg
'4 O.m P.4 e G to e O D* ee e 5 E WB es W Dt *
- g at to to S e$ *** en eE M S .9o
, Y Y **
es O (,
- 06 9V a e es .a. a.
nn%
y -_
~gu._-_-____
Qa he i No - - - - ___--
dif 8
" ~
~ .
e as
.e4 b eme te
+
- Of
>w U
C/
~
3 Q e we .*
he W *8 WD e 9a g .
B **
af - - -
Ut -
.P 3
e e
E m
' --' - - ~ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
e.- . . . .
O O.-
6 OPir 3.6.5 ,
Fase 19 of 20 Attachment 3 s Fe'se 2 of 2 SCN00L EVAWATI0lt LISTINC (continued) i FUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS i l Tlee et Inittel l I I i . l contact /Tsee I I I Superintendent's Name B Phone l District's l Belocotton Facility of Eveemetten lg l Number Zones and Addrese Confirmattee
. l School District - I l j 1 l
i l ITe be arranged i IDr. Raymond A. DeFeo 1288-6400 l l l l l l l 1215 Old Riverhead Road l le30Cd82 IWesthampton Beach, NY 11978 l l l l l l l I I l l I t ,
1 To be arranged l l l
- l289-2200 \ l le DOCES 2 IJames Mines l l l201 Sunrise Nighuay l l l Iratchague, NY 11772 l I l 1 l l l 1 l l l
lTo be arranged l i 1 l 878-0052 l l lClayton,R. Nuey I I
l* Center Merichee Union Free 1511 Main Street J
l 8.D. Center Moriches, NY 11934 ,
H I
lTo be arraged l l 1.Dr. R. Peter Rovegne 473-8100 i E l l iComeewegue Union Free l l l
f 400 Jayne Boulevard l l l l l I Irort Jefferson Stettoa NY 11776 I I l
- l I I l
l I 4 l
Ilfo be arreeged l
. I I
I; Arthur Figlioret 1 325-0800 l i 1 la Eastport Unten Free i I l INain street l l l l i lEsotport,NY 11941
- I i
l I 1 I i I l I iTo be arranged l l 929-4300 I E l l lLittle Flower Union Free lThomme Sherman I *l l l l North Wading River Soed l l IWading River, NY 11792 l N i
I 1 I l
l I I l
- I l 3
i 1588-0985 I ITo be arranged H 1
l IDr. George J. Jeffers 1 1
1 1 l l leMiddleCountryCentral 115 New Lane l l ISelden,NY 11784 l I I 1 I I 1 I I l ITo be arranged l lDr. Nick Nuto 1345-2172 l C. E. N l l Niddle toland Central l l l l Niddle talend-Yephank Road l l l lNiddle talend, NY 11953 l I I l 1 l 1 I I l l 1 1 I I i peu. 3
- District within EFZ - have no schools in EPZ.
O n=~ ..
0FIF 3.6.5
- Foge- 19e of 20
- Attachment 3
- Fase 2e of 2 l SCNDOL BTACSATION LISTING
- (continued)
DUBE.!C SCN000 DISTRICTS (contin 6ed)
I I I I Ytoe of Inittel l 1 Centact/ Ties I I I l Superintendent's Nees l 'home l Stetrict's l Belocettes Facility 1 of Evocusttee l and Addrese Nueber Iones Scheel Statrict 1 Centiresttee {
l i l ,
l
! l i
ll47 M213 IF, K lTo be arreased I l Dr. James B. Boyd l l i lNiller Place Watee Free l North Country Road l l l l
l l l Miller Flece, NY 11764 l 1 1 I. 1 I I l I ,
1 lTo be arrensed l 1
- IP". Willtee C. Ideugh 1473-1991 l)E l l Neunt Staat Weten Free l l l I INorth Country Road I l 1 1 l lNt. sinet NT !!766 I i I I I i I lia be errensed I 1'654-4001 l R 1
lFatchegue-tiedford Weise Free filmery P. Reed l l 1241 S. Oceen Avenue l J I
1 I
' retchosue. NY 11772 I l
' l l
\
lTo be arrassed l l !
1473-3333 14 l
\ Fort Jefferson Weten Freel Charles A. Ebetime i I i l l
l lNish Street I I l l l l Fort Jeffersee NY 11777 I l l l 1 1 l I I
- I .I I I l lTo be erreased l l i I 1727-0080 IF. S
{RichardSuprime 1 l lRiverheadCentral 1700 Geborne Avenue l l l I i l I I I l Istverheed NY 11901. l I i 1 1 "
744-1600 . l7.toarreased i lnecky Posee ease. Free lFreakJ.Corsetti i IF. c I i 1 '
-I lsocky rotat-Terhank seed I l
'socay Feint, NY 1177s i -
1 I l i l l
. I I l l
l .
1929-8500 A 5.C D Te he arrassed l IDr. Richard R. Dereous I l lSherahee-ifading River Centeel l Route 25A. 1 I I I lshorehen,NY 177s6 I l I 1
{ I I I I I I I I. I I lTo be arrassed I lAndrew D. Newene Jr. 1286-1010 l l l l* Seeth IInven Union Free l 1 l 1
l lNostauk Nighuey l l 1
' lBrookhaven, NY 18719 l I I l I I I I I 1 I l 1 1 l 1 Rev. 3
- Dietrict within EFE - have ne schools in EFZ.
1 l
e
, e M e-me
- O === e-amm eum aw --me -o e-men e-a--amm me eu --m-em eme em ammame amo ammeamoame - == em amumme - .,,
m mame . -- a-a es gag M Pe uns ene f4 S e A W est eBe we 3
- S O g u *O *OS g dA =es
= = = es == a e em A 3 ge es M =* N ese %
$s 9 w% 9 w w e es 4#
m 36 0 e,e >=
a
==.
Oa 4h . en e.Le es E ma =
C1 ==QO te O ==
-.---.-.mean=========-..meu-.um.m-
- um as.- -.am. -- a -e- a- --as.--------====es===
94 es we ese se U
e he 8 , , ,
en e e e
" F M
F
. . F.
se to he am g to hs es e e G G h $ b
. O .
De De - =
- De
-ammeneem ==. me -- a-em um em ame ------** ens--==can-==*--=***==="m" S
e es M S me 4 to E
- ee 0 e eN
-e B G e
- .O.- - e. - ame.m.amm m. en ammmm- -um em eum == - e== em em === ====== === eum - amo amme- == - - e- amm==s -a==
to se *F O
- er S Pe g g2 en N
.e 3 9
e 8
O e
8 m E e N e en.
E,,, '3 - ___ _ _ . _- _ e..- - ---__--_------------me.=----
w.
4 ee
- ed 8
C**P 4 0 p> W Mw
=
A
= G es S S 9 9 b ag N oe E Ef S S 9 9'%4 es St 59 ee =r e se
- C em 86 0 se en e se =* a es et sue S A D*
- Gm 9 3 9 O W B N a es >* 8= = 08 b 9E O E ** e a m3 3 9 9AA 8 e a e O y a
&G W e 0e e. u e we e >4 se se d 5 pe s=*
we e e es e e e es es as os ee ESD es es > se q U O en e == to E os O A 3O es 9.%
6 see* a me A e uO e g sm% eS e we v4 es 4 e S 4 OOE EN E
======-me.e-----==.=-====ne.m---==.mmem==-am-===
e me----..m- =m= eu. - U -.WB- = E- O 3
E os 8 A u
w of m e N p se em
- to to El em 48 he R e ==
+
-e Q A
- e5 A e
== ee .** **
==
A p* S gn O 3 8 to se A es 9 se es e S U U Q -e 8 8 I*
- e, N
C.f y se J
emD es G
ese ame o e
- 8 e
, f e e e = = = = = ,
s, ==a--=.-eenamma-m-===-=====m=u-en-----a--eex-eme===========-e--a==-e=========ums=
l 3 l l
l I
1 l
l t . . e i!
a .. . .
1
- n. >
i n. ,- O. . ,,
t l
l OF.F 3.6.5 Page19 eof 20l f At t achneet 3 s rage 2c of 2 l
SCN00L EVACBATION LISTINC
,1 (continued) e FAROCNIAL SCHOOLS I I I I I I flee of Initial I
' l Phone l l 1 Contact / Time I I *
' Factitty l Name and Address Number Zone Relocattee Facility of Evaeustion l
- i '
Coefirmattoe l
. , l Sr. Maryone 1 473-1211 Q ITo be arrensed l l l
lInfantJesustehool Myrtle Avenue l l l 1
- Fort Jef ferson NY !!777 l l I i f 1 1 s
- Mercy II.S. lMr. Michael Iraemer 1727-5900 l lTo be arrassed l 11225 Ostrander Avenue l l l l 1 1 l 1Riverhead,NT !!901 l
I I i i I
- I l
1727-3901 l l To be arranged l l*St. David School lMrs.MacCrimson '
l 1 1 1563 Roanoke Avaaue 1 l Riverhead, NY 11901 l l l I
l l _1 l 4 I I 1
1 l 1 727-4144 To be arrassed
! l*St. John School ISr. Mary quenten Ryan l
St. John's Flace l l l l I l Riverhead, NY !!901 I 1 t I 1 1 I i
l l I I I I I 1 I l 1727-1650 l S ITo be arranged l i 1 St. leidere School lSr. Rosella i I l 1515 Hercy Avenue l l l l l l IRiverhead,NY 11901 l 1 I
I l l 1 l I 1 1 1 I i
,: 1 1 1 I i i l 1 1 1 i i i I i 1 1
l I i 1 1 1
i i i 1 1 1
1 I i 1 1 11 l l 1 I l l 1
I I I I l i 1 l 1 1 l 1 l l
I I I i i I I l i 1 1 I i I l I i 1 1 1 I i l 1 I I I I 1
l l 1 i I l i I i l 1 1 1 I 1 1
- Schoola Outalde EPZ .
Rev. 3
^^------ ---,____
i l
l 1
]
ATTACHMENT 3
Nmm ~ ----_,___ '- ----'-_,__
O
~
Attachment 3 1
1 For a complete summary of each organization, and its dIk transportation and relocation plans, refer to the Evacuation l
Procedures of this Appendix.
Schools This section covers public and private schools, including nursery schools, which are listed in Section IV of this Appendix.
Of ficials of public and private schools located in the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) as well as schools located outside the EPZ but with students who live in the EPZ have the responsibility in a radiological emergency of providing their students with the best possible protection. There are three general alternatives available to provide for the safety of the children during an emergency. The first alternative is an early dismissal, whereby all students would be returned to their homes. The second alternative is evacuation, whereby all students would be relocated to reception centers outside the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ). The third alternative is sheltering students at their schools until conditions are safe for the children to either return g
home or be relocated. The best -alternative will depend on the nature of the emergency, plant conditions, weather conditions, and time of day. The specific course of action recommended for each emergency classification is discussed below.
In the event of an emergency, schools will be notified of any Alert or higher emergency classification by the Emergency Broadca st System and by telephone. 'Each public school district, parochial school, and nursery school in the EPZ will have a tone alert receiver which will autcmatically activate and transmit the EBS message. The EBS message will advise the schools to implement specific protective actions and may contain general information about the condition of the plant, radiological conditions, etc. In addition, each school district superintendent and individual in charge of the private schools in the EPZ will be contacted
- by telephone by either the Public Schools Coordinator or Private Schools Coordinator to verify that the EBS message was received and to receive requests for additional assistance.
(*%
l II-19 l Rev. 3 t
l
Upon an initial declaration of an Alert or a Site Area
- 3h Emergency where no protective action is recommended for the general public, school officials will be advised to implement their early dismissal plans if schools e.re in session. Students would return home as expeditiously as possible by their customary mode of trans-portation. If one of these declarations occurs when schools are in the process of opening, school officials will be advised to have arriving buses return their students to their homes, and to have students who do not normally use buses to return home in their usual manner. If school is not in session and an Alert or higher emergency classification is declared, school officials will be advised to cancel classes for all schools in the EPZ until the emergency is terminated.
If schools within the EPZ are still in session when a protective action is recommended for the general public in any area of the EPZ, the schools will be advised to take the same pro-tective action. That is, if some combination of sheltering and no action is recommended for the general public, then the schools would be advised to shelter and put their buses on standby. If some combination of sheltering and evacuation is recommended for the general public, then the schools would be advised to evacuate to pre-designated reception centers. If schools are in the process of opening, then they will be advised to implement sheltering or evacuation, as appropriate, when their students arrive. {
Those schools outside the EPZ which have students living in the EPZ will retain those students at the school when .
- he school day ends, if any protective actions are recommended for the general public in any area of the EPZ.
Nursery Schools Nursery schools will be advised to implement the same protective actions as the public and private schools for each
)
(4) II-20 Rev. 3
emergency classification and recommended protective action. If the nursery schools are advised to evacuate the children to re-ception centers, LERO will provide the necessary transoortation.
O -
e e
1 e
h II-21 Rev. 3
Schools
(:)
Eleven school districts, one BOCES supervisory district and two parochial schools, have school buildings which are located within the ten-mile planning area. They are, respectively:
o Shoreham-Wading River o Little Flower o Riverhead o South Manor o Middle Island o Rocky Point o Miller Place o Mt. Sinai o Port Jefferson o Consewogue o Patchogue-Medford o BOCES II o St. Isidore's School
( ..
o Infant Jesus School There are also six school districts with no school buildings within the EPZ but whose district boundaries include residences within the EPZ: and one BOCES supervisory district and three parochial schools with buildings located just beyond the ten-mile EPZ boundary. These are, respectively o William Floyd o South Haven o Eastport o Middle Country o Center Moriches o BOCES I o Mercy High School
- o- St. John's School o St. David's School o West Manor IV-169 Rev. 3
l .
- l
?
l Each school district office, parochial school, and nursery
( }, school in the EPZ, will have a tone alert receiver which silently monitors the WALK FM radio frequency. When WALK FM generates its Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) signal, these units will automatically activate and transmit the message being broadcast over the air. The EBS message will advise the schools to t"aka specific protective actions and may contain general information about the condition of the plant, radiological conditions, etc.
Upon declaration of an Alert or higher emergency classification, all of the school districts and private schools in the EPZ will be notified by the EBS. In addition, each school district and orivate school will be contacted by telephone to verify that the schools received the EBS message and to inquire if the schools need additional assistance.
The protective actions for schools in the event of an emergency are discussed in Section II.
1 9
h IV-170 Rev. 3 ;
1
Nursery Schools Nursery schools will be advised to implement the same protective actions as the public and private schools for each emergency classification as detailed in Section II. If the nursery schoole are advised to evacuate the children, LERO will provide buses as requested to transport the children directly-.to pse-designated reception centers.
The nursery schools are inventoried in the following table which lists (for each school) the maximum number of children in attendance at any one time and the number of buses required to evacuate each school (assuming a capacity of 60 children per bus).
Facility Students Buses Recuired (Max # at one time) (60 per bus)
Alphabetland Child 50 1 Enrichment Ctr. .
Brookhaven Country Info. Unavailable Day School Central Brookhaven 71 2 Head Start h Coram Child Care Ctr. 50 -
1 Kids-R-Us Day Care 95 2 Lrng. Ctr.
Middle Island 16 1 Nursery School North Shore 20 1 -
Christian School St. Anselm's 38 1 Nursery School St. John's Pre-School 15 1 Sound Beach Pre-School 19 1 Step by Step Early 30 1
" Trinity Lutheran 23 1 Nursery School Wading River 32 1 Cooperative Play School
(" *BOCES transports an undetermined number of students at these two facilities.
IV-171 l Rev. 3
. - - - --u e , - - --, , e
l l
l ATTACHMENT 4 I
1 I
i
{
l l
Attachment 4 Schools: (approx. miles) 0-2 miles from the Shoreham Plant
- 1) Shoreham-Wading River Central School District a) Briarcliff Road, School - approx. 1 miles b) Miller Ave. School - lh miles c) Shoreham-Wading River H.S. - 1 3/4 miles d) Wading River School - 2 miles
- 2) Little Flower Union Free School District a) Little Flower Elementary School - 2 miles 2-5 miles from the Shoreham Plant 2a) Shoreham-Wading River Middle School - 2k miles
- 3) Rocky Point Union Free School District a) Joseph A. Edgar School - 3h miles b) Rocky Point Jr.-Sr. H.S. - 4 miles c) Rocky Point Elem. School - 4h miles
- 4) Middle Island Central School District a) Ridge Elem. School 5-10 miles from the Shoreham Plant
- 5) Middle Island Central School District a) West Middle Island Elem. School - 7h miles b) Coram Elem. School - 8 miles c) Middle. Island Jr. H.S. - 6h miles d) Longwood H.S. - 7 miles e) Charles E. Walters Elem. School - 8h miles
- 6) Miller Place Union Free School District a) North Country Rd. School - 6h miles b) Andrew Muller Primary School - 6 miles c) Sound Beach School - 6 miles.
d) Miller Place H.S. - 6h miles
- 7) Mt. Sinai Union Free School District a) Mt. Sinai Elem. Jr. H.S. - 8 miles b) Mt. Sinai Elem. School - 7 3/4 miles
- 8) Port Jefferson Union Free School District a) Port Jeff. Jr. H.S. - 10 miles b) Port Jeff. Elem. School - 9 miles
- 9) Comsewogue Union Free School District -
a) Clinton Ave, Elem. School - 9h miles b) Comsewogue Sr. H.S. - 9 miles
- 10) Patchogue- Medford Union Free School District a) Eagle Elem. School - 10 miles l
I!
\
i l
- 11) South Manor Union Free School District a) South Street School - 8 miles b) Dayton Ave. School - 8h miles
- 12) Riverhead Central School District a) Riley Ave. Elem. School - 6h ndles Pulaski St. Elem. - 10k miles
- 13) Boces I
- 14) Parochial Schools:
a) St. Isidore School b) Infant Jesus c) North Shore Christian School Outside 10 miles d) St. John School e) Mercy H.S.
f) St. David School Nursery Schools:
0-2 miles a) Wading River Coop. Play School - lh miles b) St. John's Pre-School - 1 3/4 miles 2-5 miles
- c) St. Anselm's Nursery School - 2h miles d) Trinity Lutheran Nursery School - 2 3/4 miles 5-10 miles e) Sound Beach Pre-School Coop - 5 miles f) Step-By-Step Early Learning Center - Sh miles g) Alphabetland Child Enrichment Center - 6h miles
! h) Coram Child Care Center - 8h miles l i) Central.Brookhaven Head Start - 9 miles j) Middle Island Nursery School - 8 3/4 miles k) North Shore Christian School - 9h miles
- 1) Brookhaven Country Day School - 9 miles r) Kids-R-Us Day Care Learning Center - 7 miles p w.h. _
l ATTACHMENT 5 l
'I
-f
0 t
s qp' yd D f jf i
./ xceachment 5
,1 m '
s y
g ->. ..... '.,$g 3 1&.Cc- m \
s y; y - s. s+ ,.s r 3, d
t Y/ !
i kw <t I i qq 8 t
a n
e \ -
k ;'lOf I
=
f A
i o !
Ca h*& - lb } {
- a?",
Q tA [-1 gm r&.NiY %.
3,
<w edii %, E ~
i .e .
i g w
\ $$ %s-
' .: .s..,D s
> h ,h w
J ;VI ... =
an
\.
=9 Ei s-
- . r %.
l
.ri . y>
O Q>'y
\
-41.<
"O _v, C t e%,j\ i
- 2 i s '. g a- 'N ' , %.\c.. t
, i i - l' 9 0- b 3 J 1
m /
3
/ r ,. m f/
u.m
\ '. %. %e %n-
- i .sg.1, -0 E V -- on
. jf I Ni i ,
n/ .' , ,1 -
. . , -N-i.
. m..,I \ i, g
og ~
i t ,
i
.oi1 \
5 I*'*
\
.) .
' '1 - T]
t 1
\ .
. ,3 w '
j 0,a N 5
[: o_I
. ./"1 - M**l os M --)
=
g is V
' 8 a g,.
= ,:: r-a
=
a ao ino
. i N ,z to e_,.e V/' ~
-s *l s
.y- , t:3 - ..
2 5: 1 I y _1 hc <
w --
4 l oo% i m es ,I %,
- .c= i 4
~ 3 -
x\
L "
(i:.yrLtL y
go;., e.,fg, '
1 r v 3. .n. 9y, new '~1 s
yv
'Y s ,r te '.
_o p.::!:%?!A
~z ,.
k 1 4:R*@# #:::!,- .
~I~%.:s. 4. .p (
N i)/ C
'. ,d)_ -- ;* - ~. .../.,
-i h
ci i a
1 %
Ilj ~
~
'N ( Q -
1.
i n ~:' ~y.
-J.
~.*
1
.. ...d l, _ ~ '<.
m h_ f
'~~ (
l l
l EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES KEY Shoreham-Wading River Central School District
- 1. Briarcliff Road School
- 2. . Miller Ave. School
- 3. 'Shoreham - Wading River Middle School '
- 4. Shoreham - Wading River High School
- 5. Wading River School Little Flower Union Free School District
- 6. Little Flower Elementary School Rocky Point Union Free School District
- 7. Joseph A. Edgar School
- 8. Rocky Point Junior - Senior High School
- 9. Rocky Point Elementary School Middle Island Central School District
- 10. Ridge Elementary School
- 11. West Middle Island Elementary School
- 12. Coram Elementary School
- 13. Middle Island Junior High School
- 14. Longwood High School
- 15. Charles E. Walters Elementary School Miller Place Union Free School District
- 16. North Country Road School
- 17. Andrew Muller Primary School
- 18. Sound Beach School
- 19. Miller Place High School Mt. Sinai Union Free School District
- 20. Mt. Sinai Elementary Junior High School
- 21. Mt. Sinai Elementary School Port Jefferson Union Free School District
- 22. Port Jefferson Junior High School
- 23. Port Jefferson Elementary School Consewoque Union Free School District
- 24. Clinton Avenue Elementary School .
I
- 25. Consewogue Senior High School Patchoque-Medford Union Free School District
- 26. Eagle Elementary School l Page 1
South Manor Union Free School District
- 27. South Street School
- 28. Dayton Avenue School Riverhead Central School District
- 29. Riley Avenue Elementary School
- 30. Pulaski Street Elementary BOCES
- 31. Boces I
- 32. Boces II Parochial Schools
- 33. St. Isidore School
- 34. St. John School
- 35. Mercy High School
- 36. Infant Jesus School
- 37. St. David School
- 38. North Shore Christian School r
0 Page 2 l
t
""" -r -g.- ,
- .- _ a _
ATTACHMENT 6 t
Attachment 6 4
I 1
4 Categories for Schools A. Entire District in EPZ.
B. All schools in EPZ, not all residents'in the EPZ.
C. .Some schools in EPZ, some schools and some residents 0/S of EPZ.
l D. All schools outside of EPZ, some residents.
i f
L i
4 i
i ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS HAVE BEEN DELIVERED. TONE ALERTS.
'l i
I
Pcg2 1 of 19 JW SCIWML DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Little Flower Union Free 5/19/83 letter :,ent from CRP Preparation for contact from, Lilf0 regarding revised local response plan.
5/20/83 contact visit made Contact partier to be Evac Schools within District Zone Little Flower Elementary E Children live in cottages at school. Anrple Transp. available S/, . . letter received from letter discussed their plan for evac. 80 children and 20 staff "Go 11ome Plans" revised.
6/28/83 letter sent to Thank you for your visit letter.
12/1/83 letter sent to Enclosing:
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland County Emergency Response Plan
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
Action Proced. for schools in New Castle, Cty. Delaware
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" Cen. Emerg. Procedures for a Cty. School Supt.
to assist with plans.
CATECORY A - ENTIRE DISTRICT IN EPZ.
[._
i '
I.
r ,
Peg) 2 of 19 1/I7/04 JW l
SCHOOL DISTRICT COhTACT LIST l
District Date Nature Purpose Rocky Point Union Free 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inside EPZ) LILCO regarding revised local' response plan.
6/7/83 Contact visit made Contact party -
No plans received.
Evac.
Schools within District Zone ,
Joseph A. Edgar F 6/14/83 letter scrit to Thank you for visit letter.
Rocky Point Jr. - Sr. G High Rocky Point Elerentary G 12/1/83 letter sent to Enclosing:
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty.
Emerg. Response Plan.
- 2) Radiological Emerg.'Protec.
Action Procedure for Schools in New Castle.
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" Generic Emerg. Procedure for a Cty. school superintendent to assist with plans.
CATECORY A - ENTIRE DISTRICT IN EPZ.
Paga 3 of 19 1/16/84 JW SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose s
Shoreham-Wading River 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inside EPZ) LILOO regarding revised locaf response plan.
5/23/S3 Contact visit made Contact parties to be or information n,eeting.
Evac.
Schools within EPZ Zone Briarcliff Rd. A 6/20/83 Copy of letter received Instructir.g schcol districts to cooperate with LILCO.
Miller Avenue A 6/28/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit letter Shoreham-Wading B 12/1/83 letter to Enclosing:
River Middle Sch. 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty. Emerg. Resp. Plan Shoreham-Mading C describing procedures River High devised for Cty, schools.
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
Wading River D Action Procedurcs for schools in New Castle Cty., Delaware.
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Generic Emerg. Procedures for a Cty. School Superintendent to assist in plans.
CATEGORY A - ENTIRE DISTRICT IN EPZ Plans received Revised 6/21/83 to include Plan III - Nuclear Emission.
Enrollment Schedule Revised 9/15 projected student ,
received enrollment 1975-1987. 3/d3 -
projected faculty requirements.
Pegt 4 of 19 1/16/84 ,
JW i-SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Hiddle Island Cntrl S/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact f rom (within EPZ) LILOO regarding revised local
- response plan.
6/22/83 contact visit made Contact parties; i
Evac.
Schools'in District Zone Ridge Elementary G 6/29/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit letter W. Middle Is1. Elem. K 7/83 Plans Transp. Schedule & Transp.
Contingency plan - Emerg.
Emergency Take Home received.
Coram Elementary K 12/1/83 Middle Is1. Jr. High M letter sent to Langwood High sM' Enclosing:
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty Emerg. Resp. Plan ;
'Chas. E.' Walters Elem M 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
Action Proc. for -schools in New Castle, Delaware.
- 3) "Sarple School Procedures"
+
for a Cty. School Supt.
to assist with plans.
CATEGORY B - A1.L SCHOOLS IN EPZ, NOT All RESIDENTS IN THE EPZ '
4 i
'Pzgt 5 of 19 JV SCIK)OL DISTRICI CO*. TACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Miller place Union Free 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inside EPZ) LILCO regarding revised local
- response plan. ,
4 6/1/83 contact visit enade Contact party -
Evac.
Schools within District Zone 6/14/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit letter N. Country Road F Andrew Muller Prim F Received Emergency Go Home Plan for Andrew Muller Sound Beach F Sound Beach North Country Road Hiller Place High K High School 12/1/83 2.etter sent to Enclosing:
1 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty. Emerg. Response Plan
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
Action Proc. for Schools in New Castle Cty., Delaware
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" Generic Emerg. Procedures for a Cty. School Supt.
to assist with plans.
. CATEGORY B - ALL SCHOOLS IN EPZ, NOT ALL RESIDENIS IN THE EPZ i
i _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Pcg:n 6 of 19 JM SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date_ Nature Purpose Mt. Sinai Union Free 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inside EPZ) LILOO regarding revised local
- response plan. ,
Evac.
Schools within EPZ Zooe. 7/23/63 visit Binder delivered No contact made - new supt.
Mt. Sinai Jr. High K to be appt'd Dec. 1983 Dr. Peter Paciolla appt'd 4 Mt. Sinal Sr. High K Superintendent.
12/1/83 letter to Dr.
Enclosing:
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty. Emerg. Response Plan 4 describing procedures de-vised for Cty, schools.
- 2) Radiclogical Emerg. Protec.
Action Procedures for Schools in New Castle Cty., Delaware
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" Generic Emerg. Procedures for a Cty. School Supt, to assist in plans.
4 CATEGORY B -'ALL SCHOOLS IN EPZ, NOT ALL RESIDENTS IN THE EPZ
Pag 2 7 of 19 1/17 /0!'
JW SCllOOL DISTRICT cot.7ACT lit,T District Date Nature Purpose s
South Manor Union Free 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inside EPZ) LILCO regarding revised local
- response plan.
Evac.
Schools within District Zone South Street School O 6/2/83 contact visit made Contact person -
-Dayton Avenue School N 6/14/83 letter to Thank you for visit letter.
Plans for "Go-Home" and
" Stay-Where-Yuu-Are" were received.
9/7/83 letter sent to C. A. States that the plans that Daverio from were sent to LIILO were not inter.ded to be used for radiological accident.
9/12/83 Phone call to Regarding his letter con-by M. Sacca cerning their plans dated 9/7/83.
12/1/83 letter to Enclosing:
from J. A. Weistuantle 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty. Fmerg. Resp. Plan describing procedures devised for Cty, schools.
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Pro-tective Action Procedures for schools in New Castle County, Delaware.
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Generic Energ. Procedures for a Cty. School Superintendent to assist in plans.
CATECORY B - ALL SCHOOLS IN EPZ, NOT ALL RESIDENTS IN THE EPZ
P ge 8 of 19 I/ N JW 7-SO OOL DISTRICT CONTACT LIST
- District Date Nature Purpose BOCES I 7/5/83 contact visit cade contact carties to be a-s Schc.ol District Within EPZ
?
Shoreham-Uading River - 8/24/83 letter sent to. Ihank you for visit letter. J.lso from Charles enclosing copy of our school Little Flower- A. Daverio matrix for assistance in develop-
.-u 'ing evacuation plans.
Riverhead Central Peceived "Co-Hore" Plans dated 12/SO.
Infant Jesus' 12/1/83 , letter sent to ir. closing:
1
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty.
Scht>ol' District Outside EPZ Emerg. Resp. Plans describing procedures devised for Cty.
South Haven Union Free schools.
-Eastport Union Free'- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protective Action Procedures for schools St. Isidore School in !?ew Castle County, Delaware.
- St. John School 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Generic EmerF. Procedures for Mercy High School a Cty. School Superintendent to assist with plans.
.St. David School
' CATEGORY C - SOME SCll0OLS IN EPZ, SOME SCHOOLS AND Sche RESIDENIS OUTSIDE OF EPZ i
Pcge 9 of 19 1/18/64 *
.N V
SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose POCES II 7/12/83 contact visit made Contact party -
i School District Within EPZ Rocky Point Nvb Free 8/25/83 letter sent to Thark you for visit, enclosing our school district matrix to Hiddle island Central treat C.A. Daverio assist with development of their plan.
Miller Place Union Free Mt. Sinai Union Frr 9/27/83 telephone call from To discuss meeting that was held with representatives of 15 school Pt. Jefferson Union Free districts on 9/27 am. They plan on a joint plan and to meet as a Consewogue Union Free 3 bloc with BOCES I. Feeling is one for every district would be best.
Middle County Central 10/21/83 Survey form Received from Patchogue-Medford U.F. List of schools, bus com-intes, routes and number of So. Manor Union Free childrsn.
Received "Co-Home" procedure.
School Distriets Outside EP2 Wm. Floyd Union Free 12/1/83 two letters sent Enclosing:
I) Excerpts from Rockland Cty.
Center Moriches Union Free Emerg. Resp. Plan.
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
West Manor Action Procedure for schools in New Castle County, Delaware.
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Generic Emerg. Procedures for a Cty. School Superintendent to assist with plans.
. CATEGORY C - SOME SCHOOLS IN EPZ, SOME SCHOOLS AND SOPE RESIDENTS OUTSIDE OF EPZ
1/16/84 ;
Pcg2 10 of 19 JM i
SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Coa.sewogue Union Free 5/19/83 letter sent free CRP Preparation for contact from !
LILCO regarding revised local' response plan.
Evac.
Schools within EPZ ' Zone 6/20/83 contact visit s.ade Information steting - contact party l Consewogue Union bus, dist. enrollr.ent - 4769 -
Free outside faculty 316
- J. F. Kennedy, Jr. outside 6/29/83 letter sent tr Thank you for vi:it letter Terryville Eles, outside Clinton Ave. Elec:. K 12/1/83 letter sent to Enclosing:
from 1) Excerpts from Fockland Cry.
J. Weismantle Er. erg. Response Plan.
Coesewegue Sr. High K 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
Action Proced. for schools Boyle Rd. Eles. outside in New Castle Cry., Delaware.
- 3) "Santl e School Prxedures" -
Norwood Ave. Elem outside Generic Emerg. Procedures for a Cty. School Superintendent to assist with plana.
t 2/8/80 mail Received plans for Energ.
closing date 2/8/80 t
7/21/83 -visit Binder delivered.
CATECORY C - SOPE SCHOOLS IN EP2, SOME SCHOOLS AND SOME RESIDENTS OUTSIDE OF EPZ
--e .
A . 4 4 / O*
- Page 11 of 19 JS SCIKOI, DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Patchogue-Medford 11nion Free 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inside: EPZ) LIILO regarding revised local
- response plan.
Evac.
Schools k'ithin District Zone Eagle Elerentary 0 6/3/83 contact visit made Contact party - or
- information rwering.
Tremont Elementary outside 6/14/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit letter Barton Elenentary outside Bay Elesientary outside i
Canaan Elementary outside 12/1/83 letter sent to Enclosing:
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty.
~ Medford Elementary outside Emerg. response Plan
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
River Elementary outside Action Procedure for Schools in New Castle Oregon Middle School outside 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Generic Emerg. Procedures I
Saxton Middle School outside for a Cty. School Supt.
to assist with plans.
. South Ocean Middle School outside Patchogue-Medford School outside .
t CATEGORY C - SODE SCHOOLS IN EPZ, SOME SciOOLS AND SOME RESIDENTS OLTSIDE OF EPZ
Alae /O*
- P g2 12 of 19 J'J SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Port Jefferson Union Free S/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inalde EPZ) L11.00 regarding revised locaf response plan.
Evac.
Schools Within District Zone 6/2/83 contact visit made Contact party -
information meeting.
Earl L. Vandermeulen outside Go-Home Plan reccived.
Pt. Jefferson Jr. High- 6/14/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit letter.
Q Pt. Jef ferson Elem. Q 7/21/83 visit Einder delivered.
12/1/83 letter sent to Enclosing:
- 1) Excerptr from Rockland Cty. Emerg. Resp. Plan
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
Action Procedure for Schools in New Castle
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Generic Emerg. Procedure for a Cty. School Supt.
to assist with plans.
CATEGORY C - SOME SCHOOLS IN EPZ, SOME SCHOOLS AND SOME RESIDENTS OUTSIDE OF EPZ m ._,
!I !
P4gi 13 of 19 JW SCHOOL DISTRICT CDNTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Riverhead Central 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inside EPZ) LILCO regarding revised local" response plan.
7/5/83 contact visit made Contact party -
- information meeting.
Evac.
Schools Within District Zone Riley Avenue'Elem. P "Co-Home" Ilar (9/1/82) and
" Stay-Vhere-You-Are" Plan Riverhead H. S. outside (4/7/83) received.
' Riverhead Jr. H. S. outside 6/28/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit letter Pulaski St. Eles. S Enclosing:
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty.
outside Emerg. Response Plan.
..Roanoke Ave. Elem.
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
Aqueboque Eles, outside 12/1/83 letter sent to Action Procedure for schools in New Castle Phillips Ave. Elem. outside 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Generic Energ. Procedure for a Cty. School Superintendent to assist with plans.
CATEGORY C_- SOME SCHOOL IN EPZ, SOME SCllOOLS AND RESIDENTS OUTSIDE OF EPZ 6
=
_ - ~ . . _ . - . . _ . _ _ _ - . . - - - . _. . _ . . - . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
l l
t / top o + 8 Ptgn 14 of 19 JW SCHOOL DISTRICT COh"IACT LT_ST District Date Nature Purpose Center Moriches. 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from Union Free LILCO regarding revised local *
(inside EPZ) response plan.
i Evac. I Schools Within District Zone 12/1/83 letter to Enclosing:
from J. Weiseantle 1) Excerpts from Rockland Center Moriches High .outside Cty. Er. erg Response Plan describing procedures Center Moriches Eles. 'outside devised for Cty, schools
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec.
Action Proced, for Schools in New Castle Cry, Delaware.
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Generic Frerg. Procedures for a Cty. School Superintendent to assist with plans.
No appts. available Will mail copy of "Go-Itome" Plan i
r l
CA1YGDRY D - ALL SCHOOLS OUTSIDE EPZ, SOME REJIDENTS l
1 f
l l
l w - - -
L, auto-Prgt 15 of 19 JM SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Eastport Union Free 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (within EPZ) LitIO regarding revised locaI*
response plan.
Evac.
Schools Within District Zone 6/21/83 contact visit made Information utg. -
Contact Person. plans Eastport Eles. on keeping children at school.
No plan received to date.
Eastport High School outside 6/29/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit letter 12/1/83 letter sent to Enclosing:
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty.
frem J. Weismantle Emerg. Response Plan
- 2) Radiological Emerg, Protec.
Action Procedure for Schools in New Castle Cty., Delaware.
- 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Ceretic Emerg. Procedures for Cour:ty School Superintendent to assist with plans.
. CATECORY D - ALL SCHOOLS OUTSIDE OF EPZ, SOME RESIDENTS
s o s u o un e Pigt 16 of 19 JU SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Middle Country Central 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inside EPZ) L1LCO regarding revised local
- response plan.
Evac.
Schools Within District Zone 6/7/83 contact visit made Contact party - l Informatica atg.
New Lane Mem. Elem. outside Total school enrollment 12,923 Bicycle Path Elem, outside Hawkins Path Elem. outsid=; 6/14/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit letter Holbrook Rd. Elem. outside 11/16/83 Questionnaire sent to Copy of questionnaire reprding attitudes irvolving nuclear Jericho Elem. outside accident at the Shoreham Nuclear Plant.
N. Coleman Rd. Elce outside Oxhead Rd. Eles, outside Stagecoach Rd. Elen. Received a copy of student &
faculty enrollment.
I'nity Dr. Selden Junior High School Annex outside Bus waves scheduling "Go-Home" Plan 1982/1983 Eugene Auer Mem. Elem. cutside- 12/1/83 letter sent to Enclosing:
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland Cty.
Dawnwood Junior High outside Emerg. Respense Plan
- 2) Radiological En. erg. Protec.
Selden Junior High outside Action Procedure for schools in New Castle Cty., Delaware.
'Centereach High outside 3) " Sample School Procedures" -
Generic Emerg. Procedures for Newfield High outside a Cty. School Superintendent to assist with plans.
CATEGORY D - ALL SCHOOLS OUTSIDE OF EPZ, SOME RESIDENTS
. _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._ .._ _ _ _ . ._. . _. .. _ _ . m _ . . _ _ _ . _ . _ , _ . _ _ . , _. . _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . . . _ _ ,
1/1/10%
- P:s2 17 of 19 JW SCHOOL DISTRICT COKIACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose South Haven Union Free 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (inside EPZ) LI140 regarding revised local
- response plan.
Evac.
Schools Within District Zone South Haven Elementary outside No contact made.
f CATECORY D - ALL SCHOOLS OUTSIDE OF EPZ, SOFE RESIDENTS
, - .. ~_ -_ -_. ._ _ _ _ . - . __
P:ge 18 of 19 - 1/A7/04 JW SCHOOL DISTRICT C0f. TACT LIST District Date Nature Purpose Wst Manor School District -$/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from (outside EPZ) LI140 regarding revised local
- response plan.
Contact person -
Evac.
Schools Within District Zone
' West Manor School outside tio schools in district -
"Co-Home" plans can be obtained from other schools t
CATEGORY D - ALL SCHOOLS OUTSIDE OF EPZ, SOME RESIDEhTS I
. . . _ . _ - - ._ ..- ._ ~--- .
Pcg2 19 of 19 JW
.I I SCHOOL DISTRICT COffTACT LIST
! District Date Nature Purpose tan. Floyd Union Free 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from
{ (inside EPZ) LIII0 regarding revised local
- response plan.
6/23/83 contact visit made Contact person - Nicholas Poulos information atg.
Evac.
Schools Within District Zone Wm. Floyd High outside 6/28/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit letter Received Emerg. "Go-Home"
.Wm. Paca Jr. High outside Plan (11/12/82) ar.d Civil Defense "Go-H ee" Plan Nathaniel Woodhull outside (4/83).
Wm. Floyd Elem. outside Tangier Smith Elem. outside g
A' Moriches Elem. outside 12/1/83 letter sent to Enclosing:
- 1) Excerpts from Rockland
. John S. Hobart Elem. outside Cty. Emerg. Resp. Plan describing procedures
,l -nlm. Floyd kindergarten outside devised for ety, schools
- 2) Radiological Emerg. Protec, Action Procedure for schools in New Castle Cty., Delaware.
- 3) " Sample School Procedure" -
Generic Emerg. Procedures for a Cty. School Superintendent to assist in plans.
_ CATEGORY D.- ALL SCHOOLS OUTSIDE OF EPZ, SOME RESIDENTS
ll II I
ATTACHMENT 7
. 4 e
4
Attachment 7 l
j Categories for Parochial Schools A. Entire District in EPZ.
B. All schools in EPZ, not all residents in EPZ.
C. Some schools in EPZ, some schools and some residents odtside of EPZ.
D. All schools outside of EPZ, some residents within EPZ.
. - .- - . ~ . . . - . . . - . . . . ~ _. . _ . _ _ _ - - . . -- .. _ . _ _ . - . - _ _ . _ . - . _ . - . - - .
- Page 1 of 5 1/31/84 .
JW PAROCHIAL SCHOOL CONTACT LIST ,
School Date Nature Purpose Infant Jesus School S/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from LILCO regarding re-vised local response plan.
EP" zone Q' No "Go Home Plan" available No appts. available until 9/83.
IIas tone alert Contact party -
i 4
4 CATEGORY B - SCHOOL WITHIN EPZ, NOT ALL RESIDENTS IN EPZ.
- - -- ____2r___*-'-- -
Pige 2 of 5 1/31/84 JW PAROCHIAL SCHOOL CONTACT LIST School Date Nature Purpose f
l Preparation for contact St. Isidore's School 5/19/83 letter cent from CRP from LILCO regarding re-t i
vised local response plan, EPZ zone S contact visit 6/20/83 Information mtg. contact person
" G'o llome Plan" follows that of Riverhead's school dis-trict - Notification for early dismissal and buses come from Riverhead.
6/29/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit I
q 12/16/83 visit Tone Alert delivered 1 .
l 1
i CA"'EGCRY B - SCHOOL WITHIN EPZ, NOT ALL RESIDENTS IN EPZ t
\
1/31/84 Page 3 of 5 JH 9
PAROCHIAL SCHOOL CONTACT LIST Date Nature Purpose School letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact Mercy High School 5/19/83 frcm LILCO regarding local response plan.
12/12/83 phone call Contacted Outside EPZ zone to set up appt. to meet with to deliver tone alert.
12/13/83 visit To deliver Tone Alert No "Go Home Plan" a
CATEGORY D - SCHOOL OL'TSIDE OF EPZ, SOME RESIDENTS HITH.IN EPZ
7 _ .. . . _
Page 4:of 5 1/31/84 JW PAROCHIAL SCHOOL CONTACT LIST School Date Nature Purpose St. David's School 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from LILCO regarding revised local response plan. 4 Outside EPZ zone .
6/24/83 contact visit Information mtg. contact person They are dependent upon buses within a 15 min.
limit to take children home in an emergency.
6/29/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit 12/13/83 visit Delivered tone alert.
CATEGORY.D - SCHOOL OUTSIDE OF EPZ, SOME RESIDENTS WITHIN EPZ.
6, t . _ . - -
n.- - - - - _ _
f
.Page 5 of 5 1/31/84 JW PAROCHIAL SCHOOL CONTACT LIST School Date Nature Purpose St. John the Evangelist School 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from LILCO regarding re-vised local response plan.
-6/14/83 contact visit Information utg. contact Outside EPZ zone person -
Ryan. Have copy of "Go Home Plan".
6/28/83 letter sent to Thank you for visit.
12/16/83 visit Tone Alert delivered CATEGORY D - SCHOOL OUTSIDE OF EPZ, SCME RESIDENTS WITHIN EP'. Z 0
, _ _ _ _ _ _ ..._i_
AT*rACTINENT e 1
]
s Attashment 8 Cateuories for Nursery Schools A. Entire District in EPZ.
B. All nursery schools in EPZ, not all residents in the
. EPZ.
C. Some schools in EPZ, some schools and some residents outside of EPZ. ,
D. All schools outside of EPZ, some residents within EPZ.
i l
t I
i 1
i l
. . . .- . . _ . _ . . ~ . - , . . - - - . ~ - . _ - . . = -. . . - . _ . . _ _. - ... . -.. . . . - . - -.
Page 1 of 13-1/31/84 JW
' NURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST i School Date Nature Purpose Alphabetland- 5/19/83 letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact Child Enrichment Center from LILCO regarding re-vised local response plan.
EPZ Zone F 7/13/83 contact visit Information mtg.
11/16/83 phone call Contacted and set up appointment for utg with for 11/22 11/22/83 2nd contact visit made Contact person
- Alphabetland ,
will attempt to reach either parent or emer-gency number given to school.
Go Home Plan is incor-porated in their.ad-mission application.
Tone Alert and "For Your Information" bock de-livered.
l-
-CATEGORY A - EUTIRE DISTRICT IN EPZ 9.
- -- _= . ._ . - - .. - .- . . . . . -
Piga 2 of 13 1/31/84 JW NURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST Nature Purpose School Date Central Brookhaven 7/8/83 contact visit made General information Head Start meeting 2nd contact visit made contact person -
11/1/83 Information meeting In case of an emergency, EPZ Zone'E they call parents or guardians listed on their call cards.
They were given "For Your Information" book and the SNPS and radiation brochures.
]
11/3/83 Letter sent to Thank you for mtg. Ictter with attachment of a sug-gested Temporary Emergency Dismissal form. A sug-gestion was made by us to relocate students to the Head Start school in Patchogue if students could
~
not be sent home.
4 CATEGORY B - SCHOOL IN EPZ, NCff ALL RESIDENTS IN EPZ.
~ Page 3 of 13 1/31/64 .
JW NURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST School Date Nature Purpose 1 Brookhaven Country 5/19/83 Letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from LILCO regarding re-Day School vised local response plan. ,
10/17/63' Letter sent to To set up appt. to dis-EPZ Zone L cuss Dnergency Response Plan. Contact parties:
r l
CATEGORY B - NURSERY SCHOOL IN EPZ, NOT ALL RESIDENTS IN EPZ i
9
Page 4 of 13 1/31/84 JW NURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST Date Nature Purpose School f North Shore Christian 5/19/83 Letter sent from CRP Prepar& tion for contact from LILCO regarding re-j School vised local emergency re-l-
sponse plan.
10/25/83 Contact visit Informational mtg. - con-Outside EPZ. tact person Left a "For Your Information" Book. They have a tone alcri.
11/2/83 Letter sent to Thank you for visit letter.
Coram Childcare Center 5/19/83 Letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from LILCO regarding re-vised local responce plan.
EPZ Zone K i 7/13/63 Contact visit made Information mtg. - if emergency occurs they will transport students to their other facility on Hawkins Rd.,
Commack, outside of 10 mile EPZ.
9/29/83 Phone call to Scheduled an appt. for 10/7/83.
- 10/7/83 2nd contact visit. Contact party -
we left the following material:
"For Your Information" Book SNPS - An overview SNPS brochure Radiation - a fact of life Facts About Lcw-Level Padiation.
P2g2 5 of 13 1/31/84 JW NURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST School Date Nature Purpose 11/1/83 Letter sent to Thank you for visit letter.
CATEGORY B - SCliOOL IN EPZ, NOT ALL RESIDENTS IN EPZ.
O
.. . _ - . - _ . _ . . _. . _.- _- = . - _ - . . .. .. _ - . . - _ - _ - __ . _- _~
i Prge 6.oi-13 1/31/P4 3 i i
NURSEhY SCHOOL CC!.' TACT LIST t
4 Date Nature Purpose s
' School Middle Island Nursery 5/19/83 Letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact ,
from LILCO regarding re- i
- v. - School vised local emergency re- [
l'
' sponse plan. [
t Contact visit Informational utg. Contact L EPZi2cno M 10/19/83 Gave
- ?
her "For Your Information" !
-l' book and two informational !
I booklets on radiation.
Students live close to [
nursery school.
lias tone alert.
s
[
11/12/83 Letter sent tc Thank you for visit letter.
r i
I 4 -
u t
CATEGORY B SCHOOL'IN EPZ, NOT ALL RESIDENTS IN THE EPZ.
. t
[
l l
- e~ j
Page 7 of 13 1/31/84 JW NURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST Nature Purpose School Date 5/19/83 Letter from CFP Preparation for contact Kids-E-Us 3 from LILCO regarding re-vised local emergency response plan.
EPC Zone M Centact visit Informational utg. -
7/12/83 I contact person. did not show for utg.
met witn us. Said she would send plan. l 10/19/83 2nd contact visit ,
Informational mtg. net ,
' with
! Facility is ,
for handicapped pre-schoolers as well as 4
regular nursery school.
Children from all over Long Island. Would not accept tone alert or yellow book, until received a written approval from state for acceptance. He will con-tact us if state has no objection in cooperating
. with us.
11/11/83 Letter to To discuss purpose of visit - just an 8
informational visit ,
and to encourage acceptance of tone alert. I h*
. . .- - .. . .. -- -_ ~ - .. - _ - . . .. . - _ .-
Page'8'of 13 1/31/84 JW 14"RSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST Date . Purpose School ~ -Nature Wading, River Cooperative 5/19/83- Letter sent~. from CRP Preparation,for contact N. 7.---- - from LILCo regarding re-
.Plaj' School. !
3 vised emergency response N. -
plan. ,
r
~
10/21/83 contact visit Informational mtg. - con-EPZ'Zono'E tact We i left "For Your Information" ,,
.g book with two SNPS brochures
~
~
and two bookleta '
en radiation.
. e s, No Plan.
' '. .s.j '
~
a- 7, 1 11/2/03 Thank you for, visit letter s
t' '
\ #
'r.#
Y. I
, , .t
' ~
l:. , t
~
u 9
% # [
, c- ,
-' . 5'ik,,
.e 1
- i. y s
CATEGORY A - SCHOOL AND RESIDENTS WITHIN EPZ G
e
Page 9 of 13L 1/31/84 JW IIURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST School Date Nature Purpose Trinity Lutheran Nursery 5/19/83 Letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from LILCO regarding re-
' School vised emergency response plan.
10/4/83 Phone call to To set up appointment for EPZ Zone G 10/18/83.
10/18/83 Contact visit Informational mtg. - con-tact - gave them a tone alert, "For Your Information" book and two Shoreham booklets. An offer to send a speaker from LILCO's Speakers bureau was made.
11/2/83 Letter sen: to Thank you for visit letter.
CATEGORY A - SCHOOL AND RESIDENTS WITHIN EPZ 9
Ptga 10 of 13 1/31/84 JW NURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST Nature Purpose School Date 5/19/83 Letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact Step by Step Early frem LILCO regarding re-Learning. Center
- vised emergency response-plan.
10/28/83 Contact visit Informational mtc. - con-EPZ Zone G Left tact ,
a "For Your Information" book with booklets about Shoreham and 2 booklets on radiation. Has tone alert.
11/2/83 Letter sent to Thank you for visit letter.
i CATEGORY A - SCHOOL AND RESIDENTS WITHIN EPZ
_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ . - _ -,~
r
{ .Paga 11 of'13 1/31/84 JW NURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST Nature Purpose
! ' School Date 5/19/83 Letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact St.: John's Pre-School' from LILCO regarding re-vised emergency response plan.
Informational mtg. - met with EPZ Zone E 7/7/83 Contact visit 10/21/83 2nd contact visit Informational mtg. - contact Delivered tone alert ar.d "For Your Information" book, SNPS brochure, and two book-lets on radiation.
11/2/83 Letter sent to Thank you for visit letter.
They have a Tenporary Emergency Dismissal. Form to be used in the event of an emergency dismissal situation created by the Shoreham Power Plant.
Energency Plan is completed.
e
. CATEGORY A - SCHOOL AND RESIDENTS WITHIN EPZ .
e
- - . . . _ . . . . - . _ ._ m _ -.. . _ . _ , -_ __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ . ._ . _ _ _ _ _. ._. _ _ . _ _ _.___.______ _ __
i l
Page 12 of.13 1/31/84 JW i
NURSERY SCHOOL CONTACT LIST
' School Date Nature Purpose
. Sound Beacn. Pre-School 5/19/83' Letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact Co-op from LILCO regarding re-vised emergency response plan. ;
EPZ Zone P 10/25/83 Contact visit Informational mtg. - con-or We left "For Your Information"
( book. They have a tone alert. '
11/2/83 Ictter sent to Ms. Thank you for visit letter. !
No Plan.
e a
I CATEGORY A -. SCIIOOL. AND RESIDENTS WITHIN EPZ i
, y v -
l' Page 13 ef 13 1/31/84 ,.
JW NURSERY SCliOOL CONTACT LIST Date Nature Purpose School St. Anslem's Nursery 5/19/83 Letter sent from CRP Preparation for contact from LILCO regarding re-School vised emergency response plan.
Contact visit Informational mta, contact EPZ Zone F 10/18/83
- person Lef t a '2For Your Information" book, and two booklets on radiation. Has tone alert.
No formal "Go Home" plan. We offered a speaker to address the parents, is interested, but at a later date.
11/1/83 Letter sent to Thank you for visit letter.
CATEGORY A - SCHOOL AND RESIDENTS WITHIN EPZ
-.______-_____-__L_.--__- -
l l
l l
O ATTACHMENT 9 l
?
I
[
._ _ _ .m ._ ._ _ ._ - --
Fase 1 et 9 Rev. 2/20186 SCNo0L DISTRICT MATRII " STAT SCHo0LS
- c0 sus DIST. Scuoot Dist. Scuoots wrStoE . WHERE sus EnROLUEENT ENROL 1MNT DIST. noCES EVAC. W/1 to Mt. W/l 10 M1. 10 Mr. W/1 2 ut. Hoosta You ARE" TaAus- REMARE' PLAN PORTAT1oM WAVES (1901-1942) W/l EST, Scuoot. rISTRICT NO, NO. 2nNF1 EP2 EP2 EP2 EP2 M 2,205 Contact was made on May 23, 1981 0 11:00 AM I Yes Yes Seaman Shre.-Wedtog Ber. I 1 I "Go Hee" Plan tec*d. Survey rec'd.
. Bus. Co.
2/10/84 updates sent for Bew. 3 and I 50 Vehicles 203 for "For Your information" binders. 1 A I Britrcitif Rd. I I 35 (6e pass) 318 A
Millir Ave. 10 (16 pass) 591 S 3 Shre.-Wading Rvr.
Middle School 5(Mandicapped) 736 C I I 1
Shre.-Wading Sur. High I 48 Drivers 3%
D I Wadlig River 68 Contact use made on May 20, 1983 e 11 M AM I Yes Yes Staff 3 1 I 'Olldren Ilve in cottages at school"
. Littla F1wr. Union Free Vehicles
" Ample transportation would be avellable" 12/14/83 binder delivered 68 2/10/04 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for I _E
. Little Flower Eles. E "For Your Informatton" binders "Co-Home" Plan rect *ved 2,579 Contact was made on June 7, 1963, e 2:00 P.M.
I Tee
- 5. .9ucky Pt. Union Free 9 2 *Co nome" plan & Survey to be returned 2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for "For Your information" bindere F I.
Joseph A. Edgar School C I Rocky Pt. Jr.-Sr. High G I
- Rocky Pt. Elementary 8,5% Contact was made on June 22,1983 e 10.:00 A.M.
Yes No Surburla 12 2 I 550 Staff Membere
- 4. Kiddis Island Cntrl. & Woll 90 Suses 2/10/84 updates seat for Rev. 3 and for "For 35 Carriers 1,700 Your information" bindere C I St.*ge Eles. 150 Drivers 1,0% "Co-Home" Plan received E I W. Middle Island Eles. Each bus 1,100 E I d
Coram Eles. route has 1.400 M I ,,
Viddle Island Junior rt Kigh a 1 hr. 2,000 Longwood High M I 1,300 $
- r I
turnaround .
Onas. E. Walters Eles. M N
, a rt W
}
Page 2 of 9 Rev. 2/20/h e
SCHOOL DISTRICT MATRit " STAT SCHOOLS "Q) WHERE BUS DIST. SCHOOL DIST. SCHOOLS OUTSIDE BUS ENROLtJtNT ENROLLMENT 10 Mt. W/l 2 Mt. HOME" YOU ARE" TRANS* REMARES DIST. DOCES EVAC. W/I 10 M1. W/l to Hl. PIAN PLAN PORTATION WAVES (1981-1982) j _I EPZ_
EPZ EP2 _ EPZ NO. NO. TONES EPZ SCHOOL DISTRICT 2,545 Contact was made on June 1, 1983 910;00 A.M.
Yes No Better 4 8 2 3 144 Staff members
- 5. Mstitr Place Ueton Free Sus Co.
2/10/h updates sent for Rev. 3 13 + 2 Minis 15 Drivere and "For Your Information" bindera
% Home" Plan & Survey Rec'd.
450 F I 700 fl. Country Rd.
F E 600 Andrew Muller Prim. I 750 F
Sound Beach E E
Miller Place High 1,753 New Superintendant arriving in Sept.
X Call inck in Sept. for appt.
7 2
- 4. Mt. Staat Union Free Binder delivered on 7/22/83 2/10/04 updates sent for Rev. 3 K 1
- and "For Your Information" binders Mt. Sinat Jr. Hlah I K
Mt. Staat Elem. School 1,978 Contact made on June 2,1983 e ll:On A.M.
Coram 2 Tea 6 2 I Sus Co. 161 Staff membert- Binder delv'd ca 7/21/83
- 7. Pt. Jeff. Union Free 2/10/84 upJates sent for Rev. 3 and for 14 + 3 "For Your Information" binders X
Wagons
- Co-Home" flan received Earl L. Vanderneuten 272 High ~& Drivers q X Pt. Jefferson Jr. M'sh 767 I
Port Jeff*; mn Elem. Q 4,796 Contact was made on June 20, 1983 9 10:00 A.M.
Coran Bus 3 2 X' Survey rec'd.
- 8. .Consewogue Union Free' 3 Co.
316 Stelf membera 21 Buses 21 Drivers Binder eeltvered on 7/21/83 2/10/M updates sent for Rev. 3 and for "For E Your Information" binders Comeewogue High I "Co-Home" Plan received John F. Kennedy Jr. i High
__ +. . -
Page 3 of 9 Rev. 2/20/84 SCHOOL DISTRICT MATRIX SCHOOLS " STAT
- CO WHERE SUS DIST. SCHOOL ptST. SCHODLS OUTSIDE SUS ENROLINENT EMROLIJENT 10 Mt. W/1 2 Mt. IMsE" YOU ARE" TRANS* REMARKS DIST. BOCES EVAC. W/l 10 Mt. W/l 10 Mt. EP2 g PLAN _ PORTATION WAVES (1901-1982) W/l EP2 2000ES EF2 EP2 EP2 6 SCHOut. DISTRICT NO. NO._
X T:rryville Elementary 616 E I Citaton Ave. Eles. 1.565 K I Comaewogue St. High I
. Boyle Rd. Eles E Norwood Ave. Elem.
12,923 Contact was made on June 7,1981 e 10 An Yes No Mol. Cnty Middle Catry. Cattl. 11 2 I United Bus Survey rec'd.
9.
Ette "Go Home" Plan ree'd.
Carriage 817 Staff members 91 Buses 2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for 92e Drivers "For Your Information" binders I
New Lane Memortal Eles. I httycle Fath Eles. I Heihine Path Eles. I Holbrook Rd Elee.' 1 JIrtcho Eles. X North Coleman Rd. Eles. K Omhead Road Eles. I Stagecoach pd. Eles. X ,
Unity Drive Selden JMS 1 Annea X E?sene Auer Memortal
.Eles. I I Daunwood J.H. I 6
Selden J.H. 1 Centeresch High I
Newf feld High 10,000 Contact was made on June 3, 1983 4 10 AM Yes United 2 3 "Co Home" to be returned Survey rec'd.
- 13. Ptchg.-Medfd. Union Free 24 Sus-42 Criesce*3 Sinder delivered ca 7/22/83 MedtSus-2 2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for 70 Buses "For Your Information" binders 70 Petvers
+
Page 4 of 9 Rev. 2/21/84 SCHOOL DISTRICT MATRIX SCHOOLS " STAT SCHO0t.S OUTSIDE *1:0 WHERE BUS DIS 1. SCHOOL DIST.
10 Mt. W/I 2 Mt. HOME" YOU ARE" TRANS- BUS ENROLIEENT ENROLIMENT DIST. DOCES EVAC. W/l 10 MI. W/t 10 Mt. REMARES SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. NO. ZONES EPZ EP2 EP2 EPZ g PIAN FORTATION WAVES (1981-1982) W/f EPZ 950 590 Staff Members Eagle Elem. School R I I
Tremont Eles. School I
Barton Eles.
I Say Eles.
I Censan Elem.
X Medford Eles.
X River Eles.
X Oregon Middle School I
Sixton Middle School I
South Ocean Middle School X
F;tchogue-Meford High r 75 No appts. avstleble in June - Call back in late 30 1 I
- 11. South Haven Union Free August.
5 12/14/C) binder delivered South Haven Eles. 2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and "For Your School Information" binders Yes Yes Adelwerth 9 79C Contact was made on June 2. 1981 e 11:00 A.M.
21 2 2
- 12. So. Manor t'nton Free Bus Ferv. % Hene" Plan ree'd.
12 Buses Survey ree'd.
12 Drtvers 68 Staff members 2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for "For I
417 Your Informatton" binders South Street School O 373 Dayton Ave. School N I
$36 Contact was made on June 21, 1983 9 10:00 A.M.
' 1 X
- 13. Eastport Union Free 11 "Go Hume" Plan and Survey to be returned.
Revieing "Go Home" Pian Supt. on vac until Sept. Will receive %
+
Home" Plan then.
I 2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for "For Eastport Elee. Tour Information" binders
& High School
- . .m.. . _ ~ m_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ m . ,.
Pese 5 of 9 Rev. 2/20/84 SCHOOL DISTRICT MATRf* SCHOOLS " STAY "GO WHERE BUS DIST. SCHOOL DIST. SCH00I.S OUTSIDE SUS ENROLLMENT EntiwMT 10 Mt. W/I 2 Mt. HOME* YOU ARE" TRANS-DIST. BOCES EVAC W/l 10 Mt. W/l 10 Mt. REMARES NO. NO. 20NES EPZ EPT EPT EP2 g PLAN _ PORTATION WAVES (1981-1982) W/l EPZ SCHOOL DISTRICT 3,700 Contact was sede on July 5,1983 at 9:00 a.m.
Tes Yes Riverhead 18 2 1 I Central Plan survey received.
- 4. Riverhead Central Scht Diet 268 Staff Members 11 sing 2/10/04 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for Ril*y Ave. Else. School P I buses (9- 396 "For Your Information" binders I "Co-Home* Flan received Riverhead H.S. I 16 pengr)
Riverhead Jr. N.S. 40 Reg. 529 S X Piliskt Street Eles.
School I Convention
' Roanoke Av. El-3. E (58-M pengr)
Aquebogue Eles. I 47 Res.
Phtilips Ave. Eles. Drivere 12 Substitute Drivere yee United none 9.072 Contact was made on June 23.1983 911:30 A.M.
X yes 15..'Wm. Finyo Union Free 32 2 519 Factitty
(#6) Sus United Bus Co. - 58 buses, 58 drivers 58 Bus.
District Owned - 26 buses, 2fs delvers District owned Survey & Plan rec'd.
26 Sue. 2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for *For 84 Drivers Your Information" bindere
- Go-Home" Flan received X
ten Floyd High 3
. Wm Pace Jr. High 1
. Nathaniel Woodhull X Wm Floyd Eles.
2
' Tangler Smith Else , E Moriches Eles I John S. Hobart Eles -X Wm Floyd Eindergarten l', . Centir briches Adelwerth 1.029 No appts. evallable Union Free 33 2 1 Rus Co.
Will mail es copy of "Co flome" rien 500 2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for 529 "For Your Information" binders I'
Ctr Morich High X
Ctr Morich Elem.
Page 6 of 9 Bew. 2/20/84 SO100L DISTRICT MATRIX " STAY SCHOOLS "00 MIERE BUS DIST. SCHOOL DIST. SCH00(3 OtffSIDE SUS ENROLLMENT ENROLIJENT DIST. 30CES EVAC. W/I 10 Mt. W/I 10 MI. 10 Mt. W/I 2 MI. HOME" YOU ARE" TRANS* REMARES NO, NO. ZONES EPZ EPZ EPZ EPZ g PIAN PokTATION WAVES (1981-1982) W/l EPZ SCHOOL DISTRICT No schools in District Welt Manor School 31 2 I "Go Home" Plana can be obtained f rom other schools 12/14/83 binder delivered 2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for "For Your Information binders ancES Contset was made on July 5,1983 at !!s00 as Yes J. SOCES #1 1 I Plan received.
2/10/84 updates sent for Rev. 3 and for "For Your Information" binders K
. Harry 8. Ward Occupational Catt. I Contact was made on July 12.1983 e 10:00 am Tes
- 9. SOCES e2 2 X Plan rec'd. Binder delivered on 7/22/87 2/10/84 updates sent for Dev. 3 and for "For Suesey Your Informatton" binders Academy Street Suffolk Swesey Bayport Jr. Suffolk Swetey Bayport Sr. H.S. Suffolk Sweze7 Brookhaven Career Center Jay Dee
. Brookhaven Learntag Swerey Center Suffolk Suffolk Brookhaven SweZey
- Occupational Center
Page 7 of 9 Rev. 2/20/84
" STAT
- SCHOOL DISTRICT MAT 91I SCHOOLS D1$T. SCHOOL
"(D WHERE BUS D:ST. SCHOOLS OUTSIDE SUS ENh0 LIM NT ENROLIFENT W/I 2 MI. HOPE" TOU ARE" TRANS* REMARe3 DIST. SOCES EVAC. W/t 10 Mt. W/1 to Mt. 10 _MI. PtAN PtAN _ PORTATION WAVES (19811982) _V/I EPZ EPZ _ EPZ EP2
' NO. NO. ZONES SP2 _
SCHn0L DISTRICT Swesey Suffolk Central Islip 14 Be!Iport Consewegue UFSD Cordello Learning Center Suffolk Swesey Islip Career Center We-Towne Jay Dee 1.stly Jr. H.S. Jay Dee 2
1.rlty Learning Center Swesey Islip H.S. i Suffolk 1itip Sr. H.S. Suffolk Swerey Illip Occupational Center Suffolk Swerey MacArthur Airport Atlatton Center Suffolk L 3 Swesey Mid-1 stand Arena 11 i
I*II*ih K I Swesey North Brookhaven Center 11 Jay Dee S**8'I North Country North Country Learntag Center 4
/
4
. Page 8 of 9 Pev. 2/10/84 SCNonL DISTRICT MATRII " STAY SCHOOLS "00 WHERE SUS DIST. SCHOGL DIST. SCH00tJ OUTSIDE SUS ENR0tJMNT ENROLIMNT DIST. DOCES EVAC. W/l 10 M1, W/I 10 Mt. 10 M1. W/I 2 MI. HOME" YOU ARE* TRANS-g PtAM PORTATION WAVES (1984) W/I IPZ REMARES RP2 EPZ EPZ SCHouL DISTRICT 10. NO. ZONES EPZ Suffolk North Cwatry Pre Swerey 1
Jay Dee Pream Learning Center 8"'8'?
styTitle Learntog Suffolk Center 8"'8'?
Sylvan Ave. Suffolk St. Charlet Learning We T ane g
Center. Q PAROCMIAL SCHOOLS 225 Contact was made em June 20,1983 at 1:30 P.M.3 30 buses 2 1 S I E. "Go Heme" Plan follows that of Riverhead'ag
- 20. St. 11tdore 30 drivers 20 Staff Members 12/16/43 Rev.1 "For Your Information* binder a
delivered and visit made Contact was made on June 23, 1983 e 9:30 A.M.g a X yes no , Bus from 2 1490 1 12/16/83 Rev.1 "*w Your Information* binder
- 21. St. John The Evangeltet 2 .1 all dist.
24 bus delivered and viett made 1 1 24 drivers Call back for oppt. efter Aug. 15 1 1
- 22. Mercy M.S. 2 1 12/13/83 Rev. I binder delivered and visit made S19 Call back for oppt. In Sept.
6 q 1 X Binder delivered on 2/21/83
- 23. Iifant Jesus Contact was made en June 24,1983 @ 10:00 A.M.
- - 24. St. David Survey to be returned I
12/13/83 Rev. I binder delivered and visit made t
. + . - - - . -. -
Page 9 of 9 Rev. 2/10/84 SCHOOL DISTRICT MATRIX "GO N0ft" SCHOOL ENNot.tJffrr REMAGES FIAN (Maalmum At One Time)
EVAC. 20NE MURSEnf SCHmLS 50 1 Bus Sequired (On their " Application For F Yes Admission" they have a paragraph regarding
- 1. Alphabetland m ild Enttchment Chttr what to do in an emergency.)
L -- Information Not Available
- 2. Brookhaven Country Day School Asked for asstatance in developing a "Go 71 R . No Home" Han (an outline uas sent to her).
- 3. Central Brookhaven Head Start 2 Buses Required
- 50 1 Sue Required K No
- 4. Coram Otid Care Center 95 2 Buses Required
- M No
- 5. Etis-R-Us Day Care Learining Ctr.
16 1 Bus Required Middle taland Nursery School N . No 6.
20 1 Bus Required
- No
- 7. North Shore Christian School 38 1 Bus Required F No '
- 8. St. Anselm's Nursery School 15 1 Bus pequired E Yes They have a Temporary Emergency Dismissal 9.. St. John's Fre-School Form to be used in the event of an
" Emergency Dismissal situation created by the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Emergency Station. Plan is completed.
19 1 Bus Required F No
- 13. Sound Beach Fre-School 30 1 Bus Required C No
- 11. Step by Step Early Erns. Center 23 1 Bus Required C m)
- 12. Trinity Lutheran Nursery School 32 1 Bus pequired E No
- 13. Wading River Cooperative Play Schoot
- BOCES transports an undertermined number of students at these two f actittles.
- School Outalde EFZ - Some students live la EFZ (E-S listed on Farochtal School hatfla)
ATTACHMENT 10 l
)
l i
l Attachment 10 l
\
l l
February 9, 1984 Memo to: Ms. Elaine Robinson Attached is a list of Suffolk County School Districts and Schools
- outside of the 10 mile EPZ boundary. The distance from the school to the EPZ boundary is an approximation and measured by a straight line.
The list of enrollment of students and professionals was taken from a computer run off "Information Center on Education Ethnic Census - Public School Students and Staf f by School and District -
1979-80$ This information is provided to give a general idea of the size Of the building.
AGn fanWigggf JW:pr Attachment i
4 J
l i
PAGE 1 of 13 -
2/9/84
.iw Suffolk County Schools Located Outside the Emergency Preparedness Zone (EPZ), Distance From the EPZ Boundary and Student Enrollment For Approximation of Building Size approximate distance from 1979/80 Enrollment [
10 mile EPZ boundary students / professionals total !
Amagansett Unioni Free School District I Amagans et t.IPublic School 35 miles 81/12 93 '
Amityville Union Free School District
- Amity Memorial High School 20 miles 951/69 1020 j
- Amity Jr. High School 23 miles 1220/89 1309 i Park Ave. Elementary School 23 miles 572/38 610 i Northeast Elementary School 23 miles 489/22 511 Norhtwest Elementary School 23 miles 548/32 580 Sixth Grade Amity Jr. High School 23 miles Bebylon Union Free School District
. Babylon High School 16 miles 684/39 723 Babylon Memorial Grade. School 16 miles 1041/72 1113 Babylon Elementary ' School 18 miles 312/14 326 Bayport-Blue Point Union Free School District Bayport-Blue Point High School 6 miles 993/64 1057 James Wilson Young Jr. _ High School 6 miles 727/44 771 '
Academy St. Elementary . School 8. miles 443/27 470 Blue Point Elementary School 8 miles 259/16 275 Sylvan Ave. Elementary School 7 miles 510/33 543 B.y Shore Union Free School District
, .-Bay Shore High School 14 miles 1589/94 1683 Bay Shore Jr. High School 14 miles 1392/93 1485 Brook Avenue School 13 miles 406/23 429 Mary G. Clarkson School 13 miles 681/36 717 Fifth Avenue School 15 miles 419/24 443 Gardner Manor School 14 miles 640/39 679 South Country School 13 miles 474/24 498 l
PAGE 2 of 13 2/9/84 .
jw ;
approximate i distance from 1979/80 Enrollment i 10 mil'e EPZ boundary students / professionals total Brintwood Union Free School District .
Brentwood Senior High School 12 miles 4533/287 4820
'10th Grade Northwest 11 miles 960/50 1010 East-Junior High School 11 miles 977/54 1031 North Jr. High School 10 miles 901/61 962 i South Jr. High School 10 miles 966/66 1032 ;
West Jr. High School 10 miles 976/64 1040 ,
Hemlock Park Elementary School 9 miles 662/32 694 ;
Laurel Park Elementary School 10 miles 567/33 600 ,
Laretta Park Elementary School 11 miles 657/34 691 l
_ North Elementary School 10 miles 960/50 1010 j Northeas t Elementary School 11 miles 1022/49 1071 :
Oak Park Elementary School 12 miles 718/35 753 l Pine Park Elementary School 10 miles 575/30 605 .
Southeast Elementary School 12 miles 632/33 665 Southwest Elementary School 15 miles 1248/64 1312 Twin Pines Elementary 16 miles 532/27 559 Bridgehampton Union Free School District Bridgehampton Union Free School Dis trict 25 miles 209/26 235
' Crnter Moriches Union Free School District Center Moriches High School 1 mile 518/42 560 Center Moriches Elementary School 2 miles 523/34 557 Central Islip Union Free School District '
Cent al Islip High School 11 miles 2194/127 2321 Ralph C. Reed School 9 miles 1052/73 1125 Charles A. Mulligan Elementary School 12 miles 954/48 1002 Andrew T. Morrow Elementary School 10 miles 811/43 854 Marguerite T.-Mulvey Elementary School 10 miles 880/46 926 Francis J. O'Neill Elementary - School 9 miles 694/37 731 Cold Spring Harbor Central School District Cold Spring Harbor High School 20 miles 1023/78 1101 Lloyd Harbor Elementary School 18 miles 473/30 503 2 - - - - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ .
PAGE 3 of 13 2/9/84 jw i i
i approximate distance from 1979/80 Enrollment 10 mile EPZ boundary s tudents / professionals total .
Commack Union Free School District Commack High School (North) 10 miles 1899/120 2019 Commack High School (South) 11 miles 2108/128 2236 Burr Jr. High School 12 miles 702/48 750 John Mandracchia/ Sawmill Jr. High School 10 miles 863/63 926 Cedar Road School 13 miles 523/26 549 Indian Hollow School 13h miles 433/26 459 North Ridge School 13 miles 547/28 575 Old Farms School 13 miles 260/12 272 ,
Rolling Hills School 14 miles 423/25 448 1 Wood Park School 13 miles 630/32 662 Consewogue Union Free Consewogue High School 1 mile 425/36 461 John F. Kennedy Jr. High. School 2 miles 920/71 991
-Terryville Elementary School 1 mile 619/34 653 Boyle Road Elementary School 3 miles 799/38 837 Norwood Ave. Elementary School 2 miles 731/41 772 Conn:tquot Central School District of Islip Connetquot High School 15 miles 2315/151 2466 Oakdale-Bohemia Road Jr. High School 20 miles 1229/94 1323 Peconic St. 'Jr. High School 13 miles 1193/91 1284 Edward J. Bosti Elementary School 20 miles 552/36 588 Cherokee St. Elementary School 13 miles 1183/59 1242 Helen B. Duffield Elementary School .
Helen B. Duffield School Annex (First St.Elem) 15 miles 919/51 970 Idle Hour Elementary School 23 miles 472/27 499 John Pearl Elementary School 15 miles 366/23 389 Edith L. Slocum Elementary School 12 miles 654/29 683 Sycamore Ave. Elementary School 18 miles 719/44 763
, Copiague Union Free School District Copiague High School 20 miles 1770/106 1876 Copiague Jr. High School 20 miles 1165/78 1243 Deauville Gardens Elementary School 22 miles 874/46 920 Great Neck Road Elementary School 22 miles 543/26 569 Susan. E. Wiley Elementary School 23 miles 741/36 777 i
PAGE 4 of 13 2/9/84 jw approximate !
distance from 1979/80 Enrollment i 10 mile EPZ boundary students / professionals total Dzer Park Union Free School District Deer Park High School 18 miles 1909/113 2022 Robert Frost Jr. High School 19 miles 889/53 947 '
. John F. Kennedy Intermediate School 17 miles 787/53 840 May Moore Primary School 20 miles 625/29 654 -
John Quincy Adams Primary School 19 mtles 685/34 719 ;
East Hampton High School l East Hampton Middle School 23 miles 789/52 841 l John M. Marshall Elementary School 22 miles ;
298/17 315 East Hampton High School 22 miles 298/21 319
't Erst Islip Union Free School District i East Islip High School 8 miles 1758/95 1853 l Islip Terrace Jr. High School 8 miles 1082/55 1137 East Islip 'Jr. High School 8 miles 648/34 682 Timber Point Elementary School 10 miles 676/34 710 i John F. Kennedy Elementary School 11 miles 625/18 643-9 Connetquot Elementary School 8 miles 604/37 641 Ruth C. Kinney Elementary School 8 miles e
Eent Moriches Union Free School District !
East Moriches School 5 miles 550/29 579 4
Enstport Union Free School District Eastport Elementary & High School 2 miles 662/51 713 Enzt Quogue Union Free School District East Quogue Elementary School 7 miles 284/17- 301 1
1
' PAGE 5 of 13 2/9/84 l jw i approximate .
I distance from 1979/80 Enrollment Elwoed Union Free School District John H. Glenn High School 14 miles 1072/71 1143 A Elwood Jr. High School 14 miles 984/65 1049 l James H. Boyd Elementary School (Cuba Hill Elem) 16 miles 872/46 918 -
Harley Ave. Elementary School 14 miles 664/35~ 699 l.
[
Fira Island Union Free School District 't
-Woodhull School 16 miles 51/5 56 I i
Fichers Island Union Free School District Fishers Island School 30 miles 55/9 64 h
Greenport Union Free School District g Greenport High School 18 miles 480/37 517 {
Greenport Elementary School 18 miles 301/19 320 j t
Htif Hollow Hills Central School District Half Hollow Hills High School East 15 milec 1784/128 1912 Half Hollow Hills High School West 17 miles 1291/91 1382 i Burr's Lane Jr. High School 14 miles 843/70 913 Candlewood Jr. High School 14 miles 987/77 1064 W. Hollow Jr. High School 20 miles
- 1249/105 1354 Chestnut Hill Elementary School 16 miles 848/46 894 Forest Park Elementary School 15 miles ~ 453/31 484 Otsego Elementary School 16 miles 595/40 635 Paumanok Elementary School 16 miles 594/40' 634 Signal Hill Elementary School 17 miles 606/42 648 Sunquam Elementary School 20 miles 460/29 489 Vanderbilt Elementary School 16 miles 690/38 728 Hampton Bays Union School District Hampton Bays Jr. Sr. High School 12 miles 759/48 807 Hampton Bays Elementary School 13 miles 657/34 691 4
PAGE 6 of 13 2/9/84 8 jw approximate distance from 1979/80 10 mile EPZ boundary s tudents / pro fess ionals total Herborfields Central School District
.Harborfield High School 16 miles 1138/85 1223 Oldfield School 17 miles 1010/80 1090 "Ihomas J. Lahey Elementary School 16 miles 787/47 834 Hruppague Union Free School Dis trict Hauppauge High School 9 miles 2560/159 2719 Hauppauge Middle School 9 miles 1131/72 1203 Forest Brook Elementary-School 10 miles 611/35 646 The Pines Elementary School 8 miles 744/39 783 Bretton Woods Elementary School. 10 miles 808/46 854
- Huntington Union Free School District Huntington High School 20_ miles 1736/101 1837 J._ Taylor Finley Jr. High School 16 miles 1008/73 1081 Flower Hill Elementary School 18 miles 425/22 447 Huntington Elementary School 19 miles 723/40 763 Jefferson Elementary School 20 miles 305/20 325 Southdown Elementary School 19 miles 387/23 410 Washington Elementary School 18 miles 403/19 422 4
Islip Union Free School District Islip High School 15 miles 1140/67 1207 Islip Jr. High School 17 miles 1072/60 1132 Wing Elementary School 16 miles 612/29 641
.Sherwood Elementary School 17 miles 547/27 574 Commack Rd. Elementary School 13 miles 814/35 849 Kings' Park Central School District i Kings Park _ Senior High School 13 miles 1452/79 1531 Kings Park Jr. High School (Wm T. Rogers Jr.H.S.) 13 miles 1506/101 1607 Fort Salonga 12 miles 808/38 846 Park View School -12 miles 638/34 672 San Remo School 11 miles 452/23 475
PACE 7 of 13 2/9/84 jw approximate distance from 1979/80 10 mile EPZ boundary s tudents / pro fes sionals total Laural Common School District Laurel Elementary School 10 miles 70/5 75 ;
Lindsnhurst Union Free School District Lindenhurst Sr. High School 23 miles 2618/154 2772 Lindenhurst Jr. High School 24 miles 1818/114 1932 .
~ Albany Ave. Elementary School 22 miles 516/37 553 Alleghany Ave. Elementary School 23 miles 430/23 453
- Edward W. Bower Elementary School 24 miles 497/29 526 Daniel St. Elementary School 21 miles 749/42 791 Harding Ave. Elementary School 20 miles 430/28 458 i Wm. Roll Elementary School 22 miles 698/42 740 ,
West Cates Ave. Elementary School 20 miles 417/22 439 4
Mettituck-Cutchogue Union Free School District Mattituck Elementary & High School 15 miles 723/52 775 Cutchogue Elementary School West 17 miles 298/17 315 Cutchogue Elementary School East 18 miles 299/16 315 Middle Country Central School District Centereach High School 4 miles 1679/119 1798 Newfield High School 3 miles 1874/146 2020 Danwood Jr. High School 4 miles 1705/112 1817 Selden Jr. High School 5 miles 1969/146 2115 Bicycle Path Elementary School 3 miles 627/26 653 Hawkins Path Elementary School 3 miles 609/32 641 Holbrook Rd. Elementary School 5 miles 645/30 675 Jericho Elementary School 4 miles 606/36 642 New Lane Memorial Elementary School 2 miles 1491/71 1562 North Coleman Rd. Elementary School 4 miles 727/33 760 0xhead Road Elementary School 6 miles 600/34 634 Stagecoach Road Elementary 3 miles 683/37 720 Unity Drive Selden Jr. High School Annex 4 miles 543/32 575 Eugene Auer Memorial Elementary' School 8 miles Mentruk Union Free School District Montauk Public School 32 miles 250/18 268 w_________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ______
PAGE 8 of 13 2/9/84 -
jw ,
approximate distance from 1979/80 10 mile EPZ boundary s tudents / pro fessionals total I New Suffolk Common School District New Suffolk Elementary School 10 miles 31/2 33 i l
North Babylon UFSD 111 North Babylon Sr. High School 20 miles 2132/133 2265 i Peter J. Brennan Jr. High School 20 miles 872/63 935 Robt. Moses Jr. High School 20 miles 1094/69 1163 i Belmont Elementary School 21 miles 607/30 637 :
. Deer Park Ave. Elementary School 19 miles 601/29 6 30 ;
Wm'. E. DeLuca Jr. Elementary School 20 miles 625/33 658 l Parliament Place Elementary School 19 miles 655/31 686 f Phelps Lane Elementary School 21 miles 426/23 449 '
Woods Rd. Elementary School 18 miles 567/23 590 ;
Northport-Eas t Northport UFSD III i Northport High School 14 miles 2283/160 2443 Northport Jr. High School 15 miles 555/32 587 ;
East Northport Jr. High School 12 miles 835/53 888 :
Middleville Jr. High School 13 miles 720/50 770 i Bellerose Ave. Elementary School. 12 miles 579/34 613 Dickinson Ave. Elementary School 13 miles 539/29 568 Fifth Ave. Elementary School 11 miles 519/34 553 Norwood . Ave. Elementary School 13 miles 604/30 634 Ocean Ave..Elemetary School 13 miles 513/32 545 Pulaski- Rd. Elementary School 11 miles 529/31 560 Oystcrponds UFSD in Orient 1 Oysterponds Elementary School 23 miles 104/8 112 Pstchogue-Medford Union Free School District Patchogue-Medford High School. 2 miles 2601/144 2745 Oregon Middle School 3 miles 1000/54 1054 Saxton Middle School 3 miles 1299/77 1376 South Ocean Middle School 4 miles 909/58 967 Barton Elementary . School 13 miles 941/45 986 Bay. Elementary School 5 miles 503/25 528 i
- PAGE 9 of 13 2/9/84 jw approximate distance from 1979/80 10 mile EPZ boundary s tudents / professionals total Canaan Elementary School' 5 miles 768/37 805 Medford Elementary School 4 miles 622/33 655 River Elementary School 5 miles 421/25 446 Tremont Elementary. School 3 miles 773/37 810 Port Jefferson UFSD #II Earl L. Vandermeulen High School 1 mile 1031/77' 1108 Qu;gue Union Free School I Quogue Elementary School 13 miles 67/7 74 Rimsenburg-Speonk UFS Dis trict I Remsenburg-Speonk Elementary School 7 miles 163/11 174 Riverhead Central School District Riverhead High School 1 m
'ile 1296/87 1383 Riverhead Jr. High School 1 mile 617/48 665 Aquebogue Elementary School 2 miles 280/12 292 Phillips Ave. Elementary School 2 miles 384/20 404 Roanoke Ave. Elementary School 1 mile 308/19 327
- Srchem Central School District at Holbrook II Sachem High School (N. Campus)- 12 miles 2758/147 2905
' Sachem High School (S. Campus) 14 miles 3273/179 3452 Sagamore Jr. High School 6 miles 1750/105 1855 Seneca Jr. High ~ School 10 miles 1627/99 1726.
Cayuga Elementary School 12 miles 862/45 907 Chippewa Elementary School 7 miles 1002/46 1048 Gatelot Ave. Elementary School 12 miles 902/50 952 Grundy Ave. Elementary School 10 miles 948/47 995 Hiawatha Elementary School 12 miles 1018/47 1065 Lynwood' Ave. Elementary School- 6 miles 836/48 884 Merrimac Elementary School . 10 miles 946/46 992 Nokomis Elementary . School 10 miles 930/47 977 Tamarac Elementary School 7 miles 924/48 972 1
PAGE 10 of 13 .
2/9/84 jw approximate .
distance from 1979/80 10 mile EPZ boundary students / professionals total Tecumsch Elementary School 6 miles 10?6/48 1074 Waverly Ave. Elementary School 7 miles 977/51 1028 Wenonah Elementary School 11 miles 885/49 934
- Segeponack Common School District I '
Sagaponack Elementary School 23 miles 9/1 10 I lSeg H'rbor Union Free School District II Pierson High School 18 miles 352/32 384 Srg Harbor Elementary School 18 miles 258/19 277
- Scyvillo U.F.S. District II Styville High School 16 miles 1227/67 1294 Scyville Jr. High School 18 miles 1110/65 1175 Cherry Ave. Elementary School 17 miles 595/32 627 Lincoln Ave. Elementary School 16 miles 735/36 771 Sunrise Dr., Elementary School 18 miles 664/36 700 ihn1ter Island U.F.S. D #1 Shelter Island Elementary & High School 19 miles 271/27 298 imithtown Central School District III i Smithtown High School East 11 miles 2587/151 2738 Smithtown High School West 10 miles 2206/139 2345 Accompsett Int. School 9 miles 793/55 848 N3saquake Int. School 10 miles 922/65 987 Great Hollow Int. School 12 miles 912/58 970 Accompsett Elementary School 10 miles 616/32 648 Branch Brook Elementary School 9 miles 560/30 590 Dagwood Elementary School 10 miles 456/22 478 Ltnding Elementary School 9 miles 470/25 495 Mt. Pleasant Elementary School 7 miles 429/20 449 Nesconset Elementary School 13 miles 494/26 520 St. James Elementary School 10 miles 564/28 592 Saithtown Elementary School -14 miles 431/21 452 Tickan Elementary School 12 miles 619/31 650
PAGE 11 of 13 2/9/84 jw approximate distance from 1979/80 10 mile EPZ boundary students / professionals total Southampton UFS District I Southampton High School 18 miles 653/47 700 Southampton Int. School 17 miles 358/29 387 Southampton Elementary School 17 miles 431/27 458 South Country Central School District II i
Bcilport Sr. liigh School 3 miles 1422/92 1514 Be11 port Middle Schools 4 miles 721/67 788
- Brookha'ven : Ele'ahntary- School.. 2 miles 699/32 731 Kreamer St.-Elementary School 4 miles 474/23 497 Verne ~W. Critz Elementary School 5 miles 442/22 464
..q.Hampton yve. Elementary Schoo,1 3 miles 769/47 816 '
s .
L . i.,
Ssuth llaven Union Free ' School District I s
( - South Haven Elementary School 1 mile 81/5 86 1 3 .
_t -
South Huntington UFSD III'
~
r
'3 x Walt Whitman High School 18 r.iles 2482/132 2634 S'- Memo' rial 'Jr.' High Scho'ol. 16 miles 1095/76 1171 Henry L. Stimson Jr. High' S,chooli 17 miles 1048/73 '121 Birchwood Elementary School' . 16 uiles 665/34 699 17 miles 834
^
Countrywood, Elementary School '791/43 Maplewood,Elenentfry School. 18 miles 706/34 740 1
Oakwood Elementary School 17 miles 770/43 813
- Silas Wood Elementary School fq: 18 miles ' 680/34 714 Sruthold UFSDI s Southold Srd lligh Schooli 32 miles 335/29 364 Oaklawn Ave.- Middle School 32 miles 359/31 390 Peconic Lane Primary School 30 miles 161/8 169 e
6
PAGE 12 of 13 2/9/84 i jw approximate distance from 1979/80 10 mile EPZ boundarf students / pro fessionals total Springs UFSD of East Hampton -
Eprings Public School 27 miles 341/25 366 l 4 i "three Village Central School District of Brookhaven & Smithtown II '
. Ward Melville High School 2 miles 2409/137 2546 Paul J. Gelinas Jr. High School 5 miles 1167/71 1238 Robt. C. Murphy Jr. High School 7 miles 1333/82 1415
' Arrowhead School 2 miles 834/43 877 -
Minnesauke School 5 miles 886/47 933 ;
Wm. Sidney Mount School 7 miles 785/45 830 i Massakeag School . 5 miles 703/36 739 !
Setanket School 6 miles 896/46 942 l i
~ Tuckahoe Common School District at Southampton Tuckahoe School 14 mtles 150/10 160 Wain 7cott Comunon School District I Wainscott Elementary Schools 23 miles 8/1 9 Wret Babylon UFSD III.
West Babylon Sr. I!igh School- 22 miles 1884/131 2015 West _ Babylon Jr. High School 23 miles 1357/92 1449 Forest Ave. School 22 mileo 431/28 459 John F. Kennedy School 23 miles 541/33 574 Santapogue School 23 miles 525/32 557 South Bay School . 22 miles 417/25 442 Tooke Ave.' School- 23 miles 416/28 444 Wethampton Beach UFSD I Westhampton Beach Sr. High ' School 5 miles 899/48 947 '
Westhampton Beach Jr. High School 5 miles 299/22 321 Westhampton Beach Elementary School. 6 miles 401/24 425 !
v- __
PAGE 13 of 13 2/9/84 jw approximate distance from 1979/80 10 mile Ep2 boundary s tudents /profes sionals total Want Islip UFSD West Islip.Sr. High School 16 miles 2125/140 2265 West Islip Udall Rd Jr. High School 16 miles 995/64 1059 West Islip Beach St. Jr. High School 15 miles 947/66 1013 Bayview School 17 miles 497/23 520 Paul J. Bellew School 16 miles 485/25 510 Captree School 15 miles 478/23 501 Manetuck School 16 miles 428/22 450 Oquenock School 15 miles 393/22 415 Paumanok School 14 miles 419/22 441 Westbrook School 16 miles 372/19 391 Wm. Floyd UFSD of Mastic Moriches & Shirley
- Wm. Floyd High School 3 miles 1776/109 1885 Wm. Paca Jr. High School 6 miles 1797/106 1903 Nathaniel Woodhull School 6 miles 904/55 959 Wm. Floyd Elementary School 3 miles 1446/66 1512 Tangier Smith Elementary School 4 miles 969/56 1025 Moriches Elementary School 2 miles 1468/65 1533
- John S. Hobart Elementary School 4 miles 1010/30 1040 Wyandanch UFSD 111-Wyandance Memorial High School 21 miles 642/53 695 Milton Olive Midder School 19 miles 645/47 692 Martin Luther King Elementary School 20 miles 712/36 748 Straight Path Elementary School 19 miles 173/7 180 La Francis Hardiman Early Childhood Center 20 miles 120/6 126 (School built after 1980, enrollment figures as of 1984.
_ M e6 *Wa w . 44 4.4_.is_h.h2-m.wAw...uh*m 4ea 4.12_ 2 4 -.5.4-.-a 4.--. Am a.h.nm-h---Jh4 4Am4.W W D.* -4 .e4J. > - .m.3 -ha.4.=&E M M .2sh -
5 d
E t ,t:
I r
1 I
t i
e d
i 2
I 4
l i >
i t i
s 1
4
'f I
i j ATTACHMENT 11 1
I 4
1
[
i e
4 i
i i
i j
i 1
.)
'l t
1 i
t
- . . - = - . - _. - . . - -- _. . .. -- - _ _ .
. m . _, .. _ . . . _ l
- =
.4 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Attachment 11
! s .
DEPARTMENT OF TR ANSPORTATION July 31, 1980 Mr. Robert Sokal Transportation Coordinator Shoreham-Wading River School District Shoreham Middle School Randall Road Shoreham, NY 11786 ,
Dear Mr. Sokel:
This is to confirm the agreed upon procedure for the Shoreham-Wading River School District in the event a nuclear incident occurs which would result in an evacu- *
+ '
ation situation.
In the event of an inc$ dent in which unacceptable off-site doses of radiation are projected to occur several hours after incident occurrence, the school district will implement an emergency dismissal.
However, if it becomes apparent, after an incident has occurred, that immediate or near-term releases of unacceptable levels of radiation will occur off-site, the entire school population will be. relocated to the relocation center at Suffolk County Community College.
. Rithtr action will be accosplished utilizing the vehicles normally supplied through the school's transportation contractor.
In the event the relocation option becomes necessary, supervisory personnel will be furnished by the district.
. *Upon completion of our planning effort, we will make a presentation to school bus drivers to ascertain the probable percentages of drivers who would or would not drive under tha given emergency situation. We would,
, at that time, make arrangements for supplemental drivers to provide the balance of a complement of. drivers.
CClitp33 l 4020086 l
,m .. ... _..._... .. ...... .... ,,,., . ..... ..
9 s "
Mr. Robert Sokal July 31, 1980 At this time, we are requesting that you provide us with three phone numbers, if available, by which the school district could be contacted directly. These communication links saould not be through your regular ,
switchboard which conceivably could become overloaded under the circumstances.
Should any additional questions on comments arise, Please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Very truly yours, Robert C. Meunkle Assistant Director -
, Traffic Safety RCM:ftr o
~
C01660 4020086 e w = = * == =
, ifp- ---%-p--- .
/c *
~~
,. y z.
A. COUNT ( OF SUFFOLK
- ' 1 I"
, DEPARTMENT OF TR ANSPORTATION September 5,1980 t ,
Mr. Arthur Figliozzi, District Principal Eastport Union Free School Dsstrict ,
Eastport Elementary and High School Main Street Eastport, New York 11941 ,
Dear Mr. Figliozzi:
This letter is to confirm and elaborate on the issues we recently discussed regarding the response of the Eastport School District to an incident at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station which results in
.a release of unaeceptable levels of radiation into the atmosphere. .
As indicated in our discussions on August 27, 1980, there are a total of sixteen school districts involved in the evacuation plan and it is essential that the contingency plans for these districts conform with our overall planning efforts for the ten-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ). To date, we have met with all sixteen districts. With the notable exception of Shoreham-Wading River, which requires emergency relocation because of its proximity to the plant, the remaining fourteen districts have agreed to institute emergency .
dismis sals. From a planning perspective, we would like to see the E,astport district adhere to this procedure as well.
The unique nature of the Eastport district lends it a certain degree of flexibility not evidenced by the other districts within our plan, however, having analyzed the ramifications of your suggestion - where students would be retained at the school until picked up by-their I parents'- we find that such an alternative creates operational problems in terms of effecting a controlled evacuation of the entire EPZ.
Specifically, should the students be retained at the school, it then !
becomes necessary for parents to travel the additional distance from their homes to the school in order to reunite the family. Because of l the location of the school, those residents of the former East Manor C01.675 4020111
.. m . u . . . - o - o.... .... ,,,.. . ....,........
l . .
.h. -
Mr. Arthur Figliozzi .2- September 5,1980' i - -
i district will be forced to travel in an easterly direction to pick up -
their children. This constitutes a contraflow problem which will impede the evacuation of the general population whose movement is directed toward the west. It will also necessitate the establishment and staffing of additional police posts, road blocks and traffic control points on the part of the Suffolk County Police Department. !
1 .
The crucial drawback, however, is the time element involved. l The time required for parents to travel to the school under the stated conditions far exceeds the 45 minutes it would take to return students to their homes using emergency dismissal procedures.
Based on our traffic experience, we can calculate the approximate time it will take parents to reach the school and the time required for . .
them to travel back to their designated evacuation route. Conges tion
.and delay times are superimposed on these figures.
- Basically, a student enrollment of 650 is equivalent to 540 families (average of 1. 2 children per family). Given at least one vehicle per family, our times are based on 540 vehicles. Therefore. '
the trip to the school would be 540 vehicles at 2 second headways which translates into 18 minutes (this figure is also indicativ'e of the average l distance to the school, 6 miles, at 20 mph). The time consumed by l parking the car, entering the school, and signing out students is estimated l at 10 minutes (depending on the system the school establishes for
. releasing students, this time could be considerably longer). The trip .
from the school, because of congestion, is 540 vehicles at 10 second headways - or one hour and thirty minutes. The total time is one hour and fifty-eight minutes from beginning to end, or roughly two hours.
. Compared to the 45 60 minutes required to dismise students to their homes, the additional time involved in keeping them at the school is undesirable in this situation and negates the potential advantages of retaining students. Therefore, we strongly recommend that Eastport dismiss their students in the event of an incident at Shoreham.
As indicated in our discussions, we would like to secure the use of the school building as a transfer point for bus operations servicing that segment of the population without access to private automobiles.
! - As such, if building usage is agreeable with the school board, we will need to know who to contact, day or night, to guarantee access into the building year round. ,
i l
sC01676 j 4020111 l 1
l
I Mr. Arthur Figiozzi Sep. embar 5,1980 ;
a r- .
In addition, we would appreciate being provided with telephone .
numbers by which the district can be contacted directly during an incident. Ideally, these would be private or direct lines to the school. Also, home phone numbe.rs of several people will also be required in the event an incident precludes the opening of school.
If you have any questions or comments in this regard, please do ,
not hesitate to contact this office.
Very truly yours, Richard A. Strang Deputy Commissioner e
Robert C. Meunkle Assistant Director of RAS:LP:dh Traffic Safety J
l l
C01677 * '
4020111 1
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 5
f*%. .%
p ':n" t.
T 7 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Traffic Safety Division R. M. KAMMERER. I'.E LJ.
ccMwssiona n January 15, 1981 Sister Mary Quentin Ryan, Principal St. John's Evangelist School 546 St. John's Place Riverhead, NY 11901
' /
Dear Sister Mary:
In accordance with Federal regulations, this Division is currently engaged in preparing the transportation portion of an evacuation plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station and its environs. The scope of this plan addresses the entire Emergency Plann,ing Zone (EPZ), an area of 160 square miles located within a ten-mile radius of the plant, and includes provisions for evacu-ating the 160,000 residents involved. ,
_On May 12, 1980, a re p r e',s en ta tive from your school attended an inf ormational meeting sponsored by this Division at which the intricacies of school evacuation were addressed. This letter is intended to update the issues discussed at tha:. meeting.
_ Since May, we have been meeting individually with all o f the school districts and parochial schools located within the ten-mile .
planning zone. Although St. John's is beyond this ten-mile radius,
~
and therefore not encompassed in the evacuation plan, it is never-l theless affected by the actions of its neighboring schools and dis-tricts. In this regard, it is necessary to inform you of their reactions in response to an incident at Shoreham.
With the exception of the Shoreham-Wading River School District, who will be transporting their students to a relocation center beyond the ten-mile radius, the following districts Riverhead, and/or Mercy Highschools School, vill institute emergency dismissals:
St. Isidore, South Manor, South Haven, South Country, Patchogue-Medford,111ddle Country, Comsevogue, Pozt Jefferson, Mount Sinai, As Miller Place, Middle Island, Little Flower'and Rocky. Point.
,a result, these districts will also pick up any of their students whom they transport to parochial and private schools, utilizing the C01629 .
4020182
-... _..... .._.. . . _ ___ _. . ,, ,,,,, , ,,,,,....u,,
e v..- .
Sister Mary q. Ryan January 15, 1981 same strategy as that employed in a snow emergency. Therefore, these districts will be picking up any of their students who attend St. John's, even though the school is beyond ten miles.
2 Consequently, we :ould like to recommend that St. John's also consider closing under these circumstances, so that all students may be dismissed and returned home to their families. To this and, we would like both your concurrence on instituting a dismissal and a listing of all school districts (in addition to those pre-viously mentioned) who currently have students enrolled at St.
John's so that we may contact them to insure that transportation arrsngements are made for those students who reside outside our planning area.
Should you have any questions on these matters, please call Robert Maunkle of this office at (516) 234-2622 ext. 275.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
~
Richard A. Strang Director of Traffic Safety ._
RAS:LP:ftr bec: C. Roger Meeker, SCDPW e
e e
- )
G h
e o
C01630 -
4020182
.. . s.
.,' '.) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK i !
.55 .
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLiC WORKS Traffic Safety Division R. M. KA M M ER ER. P.E., L.s.
conseesssioess a l
January 15, 1981 Mrs. PicCrimmon, Principal St. David School 563 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901
Dear Mrs. MacCrimmon:
In accordance with Federal regulations, this Division is currently engaged in preparing the transportation portion of an evacuation plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station and its environs. The scope of this plan addresses the entire Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ), an area of 160 square miles located within a ten-mile radius of the plant, and includes provisions for evacu-ating the 160.000 residents involved.
On May 12, 1980, a representative from your school attended an informational meeting sponsored by this Division at which the
' intricacies of school evacuation vere addressed. This letter is intended to update the issues discussed at that meeting. . .
. Since May, we have been meeting individually with all of the school districts and parochial schools located within the ten-mile planning zone. Although St. David's is beyond this ten-mile radius, and therefore not encompassed in the evacuation plan,'it is never-theless affected by the actions of its neighboring schools and distrigts. In this regard, it is necessary to inform you of their reactions in response to an incident at Shoreham.
With the exception of the Shoreham-Wading River School District, who will be transporting their students to a relocation center
,beyond the ten-mile radius, the following districts and/or schools will institute emergency dismissals: Riverhead, Mercy High School, St. Isidore, South Manor, South Haven, South Country, Patchogue-
.Medford, Middle Country, Comsavogue, Port Jefferson, Mount Sinai, l
1 C01631 4020183 v.,.............. . m . n u ....
~
Mrs. MacCrimmon January 15, 1981 Miller Place, Middle Island, Little Flower and Rocky Point. As a result, these districts will also pick up any of their students whom they transport to parochial and private schools, utilizing the same strategy as that employed in a snow emergency. Therefore, these districts will be picking up any of their students who attend St. David's, even though the school is beyond ten miles.
Consequently, we would like to recommend that St. David's also consider closing under these circumstances, so that all students may be dismissed and returned home to their families. To this end, we would like both your concurrence os instituting a dismissal and a listing of all school districts (in addition to those previously mentioned) who currently have students enrolled at St. David's so that we may contact them to insure that transportation arrangements are made for those students who reside outside our planning area.
Should you have any questions on these matters, please call Robert Meunkle of this office at (516) 234-2622 Ext. 275.
~
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Very tru1y yours,,
Richard A. Strang
- Director of Traffic Safety RAS:LP:ftr ^
bec: C. Roger Meeker SCDPN ,
i e
C01632 .
4020183
ATTACHf!ENT 12 i
1 l
)
1 I
I {
Attachment 12 l l
l *
@ 10 miles; and Maryhaven will transport its residents to the designated public l relocation center for their area. However, Maryhaven will require an I
additional bus to transport residents Wich will be provided.
gehools One of the most complex issues to be resolved in the planning process was 4
the best way in dich to handle the student population of the plume exposure EPZ in the event that school was in session at the time an incident occurred or at the time an evacuation was mandated. The possibility of this occurring presented a number of emotional as well as technical obstacles Wich had to be considered and discussed with the 16 school districts and the parochial ~
?
schools involved before finalizing any type of contingency measures for the evacuatica of schools.
Available Alternatives Recognizing that the immediate gosi is the safe and expedient transfer of .
the student population, there were only two reasonable alternatives to pursue in securing that goal. The first alternative was an amergency dismissal, whereby all students would be returned to their homes; and the second was an j energency relocation of all students to a sheltered location outside the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EFZ). The respective serits and deficiencies inherent in each of these options will presently be discussed.
Alternative One Emergency Dismissal Conceptually, this alternative would entail the institution of prdcedures similar to those enacted under a declared snow emergency; when conditions warrant immediate responsive actions on the part of school administrators, faculty, students, and transportation personnel. This type of coordinated effort could be revised and expanded so as to include adequate provisions for II-19
O' handling the possibility of a nucisar incident as routinely and efficiently as snow emergency operations are currently conducted.
In the event an incident did occur which required response actions by the i
affected schools and/or districts, the emergency dismissal alternative would i provide the mechanism for a relatively routine - albeit vascheduled -
I dismissal of all students. Students would return home as expeditiously as possible by their customary mode of transportation.
While the dismissal method has been proven effectiv2 for clearing school facilities during snow with a minimal amount of delay, there are a number of consequences that must be considered in evaluating its feasibility as a response action in the event of a nuclear incident. Specifically, the i
l uniqueness of such an occurrence as well as the unusual probless it represents must be recognized and weighed.
The Advantages ,
The most obvious advantage to an emergency dismissal is the fact that the students will be returned home and, in most cases, will then be under the supervision of one or both parents. This is additionally advantageous to parents with more than one chid in more than one school. These parents can be secure in the knowledge that all their children, regardless of what school they attend, will arrive home thereby eliminating the need for parents to travel from school to school picking up their children. Once at home, the i family can remain together as a unit, which in itself can allevista a major portion of the apprehension that normally accompanies an unfamiliar situation.
Equally as important, should the sone in which the family resides be requested
- to evacuate, they could do so collectively. Furthermore, parents can take comfort in the fact that although the school may be endangered by exposure to ,
radiation, their homes may not, and students will be transported home as II-20
/ ~
expeditiously as possible.
In regard to working parents, arrangements could be made in advance with I
reliable naighbors who agree to assume responsibility for the children in the !
event of an energency. In this way, a person whom the parents trust and with l;
whom the children are familiar would be looking af ter the children; providing l the proper supervision, especially in the case of slesentary school age children; and in the event of an evacuation, would automatically take the childrea to a safe location. This would eliminate the need for working parents to return home, thersby reducing unnecessary traffic through the area and 1sesening the risk of exposure and eliminating additional confusion.
An emergency dismissal would allow the faculty members to return home as well, where they can provide for their own families; avait further instructions; or sake preparations to leave the area if necessary. And lastly, an energency dismissal allows for the quickest transfer of the student population from the school, sin.ee the buses are making short trips and being utilized by several schools in the dismissal process.
The Disadvantages By taking the identical situation but examining it from a slightly different perspectib, a number of flaws become apparent in attempting to yply the emergency dismissal theory to a nuclear incident. yor example, it is entirely conceivable that a school any elect to initiate a dismissal on the basis of " probable cause", even though the school itself is not in immediate dange r. In this instance, it is reasonable to assume that a percentage of the i
students transported home will actually be transferred from what was essentially a safe shelter (the school) to a potentially hazardous area, should their homes be located in the exposure pathway. What was heretofore seen on'ly as an advantage, the return of students to their residences, any II-21 I
l
\
i .. ,
Q well be a latent risk depending on the location of the school; where the i students live; and the meteorological conditions in existence at the time of
'! an incident.
' Also to be considered in proposing an usargency dismissal as a response action is the fact that students will be returned home by their regular mode of transportation. This means that those students who normally walk hoes
, would be required to do so in this situation as well. Should their school be in danger of esposure, thoss students who walk would run an increased risk of exposure, too.
In the event that working parents neglect to make prior arrangements with neighbors or frispis, there is an increased possibility of having unsupervised children home alone who wouldn't have the knowledge or understanding of what safety precautions must be taken. This is especially true in the case of ths ,
younger, elementary schcol age children.
It is equally foressemble that the opposite situation could occur where neighbors, without parental consent, elect to assume responsibility for these otherwise unsupervised children on their own accord. Their rationale for this would be that the purents trust them to provide for the children and would
- anticipate the enactment of this type of " good-neighbor" policy in an emergency. However, such actions could conceivably result in chaos and confusion.
Simply stated, parents, unaware that their children have already been .
provided for, may attempt to return home, increasing traffic, exposure, and risk. Furthermore, it would be extremely difficult to trace the children if that sone had already bean asked to evacuate. The parents may not have any idea where their neighbors chose to relocate, if they relocated, or how to get l
II-22
. s
in touch.
In the same vein, while a neighbor may be amenable to looking after the children, personally, he may be unable to take them with his to friends or relatives. This neighbor may simply see to it that the childrsa board one of f
tha buses destined for a relocation center. Once again, parents wc sid have no
}
way of knowing exactly'where their children are.
Alternative Two Energency Relocation Essentially, this alternative would involve devising a functional plan which would enable all students to be transported from their schools directly to a relocation center beyond the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ).
Parents could elect to meet their children there and subsequently take them to alternate lodgings with friends or relatives; or the entire family could remain at the relocation center for the duration of the incident, until such time as it is declared safe for residents to return home.
As with an energency dismissal, a massive relocation ef fort presents a number of distinct concerns that demand close consideration before determining the practicality of this asasure as a response action for schools. The ensuing portion of this text will address these issues and their implications.
The Advantages The most patent advantage emergency relocation has to offer is the fact
, that regardless of the type or magnitude of an incident or the location of a school, all students will be removed free the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) without hesitation. Therefore, this method is capable of circumventing several of the obstacles presented by an eargency dismissal.
By relocating all students immediately upon notification, their chances of II-23 s
i i . .
l . . . .
t i
! exposure are reduced to a minimum - especially since everyone, including valkers, will be placed on buses and transported out of the DZ. l In addition, working parnats will know in advance that the schools will I
automatically ashuse responsibility for their children in such s situation and will see to it that they are transferred to safety. This eliminates ,the need for parents to make prior arrangements with friends or neighbors (who, although willing to help, any not be available at the exact time an incident occurs - conceivably any time during the estimated 35 year life expectancy of the plant); and it safeguards those children whose parents neglected to make arrangements on their behalf.
For parents, the question of where to locate their children also beconee obsolete; every parent will know the exact location of the relocation center their children vill be taken to in the event of an emergency. Si,nce the relocation centers are beyond the 10-mile radius, parents trill have no imperativa need to return to the DZ.
A further advantage to relocating students is the time element involved, an issue of particular interest to the' schools located nearest the site. If the schools and :.b'Jir respective zones were to simultaneously receive notification to evacuate, each could begin to evacuate independently of the other. There would be no need for parents to wait for students to return 5
home, instead they could collect whatever possessions they wish to take along and begin exiting the rene at the same time their children are beJng transported from school. Realistically, parents and children could arrive at the designated relocation center concurrently, with a minimal weste of time in l the process. Once at the center, the family could remain there or proceed to alternate lodgings.
II-24 i
h
O The Disadvantages The most blatantly negative aspect to a relocation effort is that everyone, including those children whose homes are in no danger of exposure (by nature of their location), will also be among the students transported beyond the 10-mile perimeter. A major contention will be that these children wouldbemuchbetterohfinthecomfortandfamiliarityof'theirownhomes, especially if they are under no threat of exposure there. Pareats would also ,
be at esse if their children were with them at home.
In addition, if these homes are not threatened by exposure to radiation, then they will no: be required to evacuate. As such, parents will probably attempt to leave the zone, traverse the 10-mile EPZ, arrive at the relocation center to pick up their children, and return home. The contributory effects on traffic and confusion, both on the road and at the relocation center, are obvious. People who otherwise would have .no cause to be on the road, will be travaling in and around the energency area to everyone's detriment.
With respect to those students who are being relocated and whose homes are also being requested to evacuate, had these students been returned home prior to their f amilies' departure there would have been a percentage of f amilies who would have by-passed the relocation centers in favor of proceeding directly to a friend's or relative's house. Since these people must now detour to pick up their children, this percentage creates additional trafficking through the relocation centers and compounds any accommodation problems that may arise. .
The most obvious drawback to total relocation is the enormous amount of time required to complete such a task. Unlika school dismissals, the option E
II-25
- - - ~ _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ - .
i .
- 4. . . . . . ..
of reusing buses is practically non-existent since it will take several hours for a bus to transport a load of students 20 miles to a relocation center in heavy traffic, and then return 20 miles to the school for more children. A school district which requires two hours to dismiss may require four hours or more to relocate depending on traffic.
l An additional consideration in instituting a relocation of students is one of supervision. Realistically, the children cannot be allowed to. leave the school without proper supervision, particularly the younger students.
Therefore, it is reasonable to assues that the faculty, or some portion thereof, would be required to travel with the students to the relocation center to provide the necessary supervision. In the case of several ec.hool j districts, it was felt that the teachers' union would be a probles in that teachers could not be told to accompany students to a relocation center under the terms of their contracts. Therefore, any such duties would, have to be on .
a voluntary basis, and it was felt the majority of teachers would elect to leave and take care of their own f amilies.
Additional Considerations Aside from the debates which co'uld take place and the arguments which could support or refute either of these alternatives, there were basically three issues which required further thought and discussion.
One was the question of whether parents and/or neighbors should be permitted to pick children up at school. Legitimately, this would reduce the
, risk of exposure for walkers and possibly eliminate the tendency they
- Id have to dawdle or' delay t,n the way home. However, if the opportunity is presented openly to all parents, there will be mass confusion and congestion at the schools; all of which will severely hamper or deley any semblance of a II-26 l
.. s
. .. . . . .. . m dismissal. Additionally, the same drawbacks exist regarding the tendency of people to attempt picking up neighbors' or friends' children with their own.
l t Similarly, high school students with their own vehicles must be accounted for
. in developing a contingency plan for schools.
l
, The second consideration was the order in which the students or the f
schools should be picked up and returned home or relocated. Logic dictates that the younger students, therefore the elsesacary schools, be serviced
, first. However, it is equally reasonable to pricritise the dismissal or relocation schedule according to the location of a school, so that the school ;
most endangered by exposure would be vacated first. Unfortunately, this j detetaination is contingent on the seteorological conditions present at the l time of an incident, making it difficult to pre plan with any degree of accuracy.
The third contention dealt with relocation and the question of .
supe rvision. A determination regarding which faculty members (if any), or how many, should accompany students to the relocation centers had to be resolved as well as the manner in which this detsraination was to be made.
Conclusion .
Eaving examined each of these alternatives with respect to the overall plan for evacuating the entire 10-mile EPZ, there appeared to be only one i logical approach to pursue. Before deciding which action would be the most !
, prudent response, it was necessary to determine the acceptability of each of )
these measures to both school administrators and school boards, and to' consider their feasibility from a planning and implementation perspective.
Subsequent to discussions held with each of the districts involved, tentative plans were formulated which the superintendents presented to their school l II-27 .
l i
l * '
4 boards for approval. Following mutual agreement by all parties, contingency seasures for evacuating schools were finalized and appear in the Evacuation Procedures section of this Appendix. !
Mospitals Three of the County's hospitals are involved in this evacuation plan for the DZ; they ares the John T. hther hoorial Hospital, St. Charles Hospital, and Central Suffolk Mospital. Only one of these facilities, the John T.
Mather Memorial Hospital, is actually located within the 10-mile planning l
radius. However, the proximity of the other two hospitals, both of which are within a quarter-mile of the designated boundary, necessitated their inclusion as : Judicious measure of safety.
Af ter conferring with the administrations of each of these hospitals, it was possible to assess the problems inherent in an evacuation of their facilities and to discuss the reasonable alternatives available. Quite obviously, the resolution of problems and the implementation of alternatives depended in large part on the cooperation and assistance of the remaining 1
Suffolk County hospitals and their staffs.
In the event an evacuation of any or al'1 of these f acilities becomes necessary, the basic assumption used in designing an emergency evacuation contingency plan was that every patient - regardless of the acuity of illness or injury - would be removed free these institutions. The methodology for I
achieving this is outlined in the Evacuation Procedures section of this Appendix. .
Nursing Bones There are ten major nursing and adult homes within the 10-mile DZ for
- Shoreham which account for more than 1,200 residents. These facilities are
the Eiverhead Nursing Home and the Riverhead Rasich Related Facilty; the II-28
1 - - a-,- - L A s -
i ATTACllMENT 13 .
9
- . . -- ._ . - -. - =- . _ - .
o Attachment 13
- History of School Emergency Planning l
l S/19/83 Letter from LILCO to the school superintendents to prepare for contact from LILCO regarding revised local response plan.
l 5/20/83 Little Flower Union Free visit at 11:30 AM.
Contact:
Mr. Donald Peterson, Mgr., Admin. Sys.
5/23/83 Shoreham Wading River visit at 11:00 AM.
j
Contact:
Mr. Robert Stokel I
5/24/83 Letter from D. Peterson of Little Flower Union Free to LILCO transmitting evacuation information for Little Flower including "Go Home" plans.
!- 6/1/83 Miller Place Union Free visit at 10:00 AM.
Contact:
Dr. James B. Boyd, Supt.
6/2/83 Port Jefferson Union Free visit at 11:00 AM.
Contacts Mr. Charles A. Ebetino, Supt.
6/2/83 South Manor Union Free visit at 11:00 AM.
Contact:
Mr. Gary H. Schneider, Supt.
6/3/83 Patchogue Medford Union Free visit at 10:00 AM.
Contact:
Mr. Feltman 6/7/83 Rocky Point Union Free visit at 2:00 PM.
Contact:
Mr. Frank J. Carasiti, Supt.
Middle Country Central visit at 10:00 AM.
Contact:
Mr. Anthony R. Rossi "
6/14/83 Thank-you for visit letters from LILCO to:
Rocky Point Union Free Patchogue-Medford Union Free Port Jefferson Union Free Middle Country. Central Miller Place Union Free South Manor Union Free 6/14/83 St. John the Evangelist School visit at 9:30 AM.
Contact:
Sr. Mary Quentin Ryan 6/20/83 Comsewogue Union Free visit at 10:00 AM.
Contact:
Mr. Robert Noska l
l l
6/20/83 St. Isidore School-visit at 1:30 PM.
Contact:
Sr. M. Rosella
'6/21/83 East Port Union Free visit at 10:00 AM.
Contact:
Mr. Arthur Figliozzi, Supt.
Plans on keeping children at school.
6/22/83 Middle Island Central visit at 10:00 AM.
Contact:
Dr. Nick Muto, Supt.
6/23/83 Wm. Floyd Union Free visit at 11:30 AM.
Contact:
Mr. Nicholas Poulos 6/24/83 St. David's School visit at 10:00 AM.
Contact:
Mrs. Mae Crimmon s
They'are dependent upon buses within a 15 min.
- limit to take children home in an emergency.
6/28/83 Thank you for visit letters from_LILCO to:
St.'Iaidore School Middle Island Central Comsewogue Union Free East Port Union Free ,
St. David School N 7/5/83
~
BOCES,I visit at 11:00 AM.
Contac t - Dr. LaMartin 4
7/5/83 Riverhead Central visit at 9 : 00 'AM.
j
Contact:
Mr. Richard Suprina,, Supt.
b 7/7/83 St. John's Pre-school visit Cm tact: Jane Brady
, 7/8/83 Central Brookhaven Head Start visit.
Contact:
Ms. Cynthia, Crump 1
7/12/83 Kids-R-Us visit
Contact:
Millie Hansen s
7/12/83 BOCES II visit at 10:00.AM.
Contact:
Stanley H. Packman s
7/13/83 Alphabetland Child Enrichment Center visit.
Contact:
Carol Roedle 4
I t 4 8 _ [
t
. s .
[
i *b
& ~
l
- - - q
7/13/83 Coram Childcare Center visit.
Contact:
Mr. Grace Schroff.
If emergency occurs they will transport students to their other facility on Hawkins Rd., Cormack, outside of 10 mile EPZ 7/21/83 Binder delivery visits to Port Jefferson Union Free, Comsewogue and Inf ar.t Jesus.
7/22/83 Binder delivery visits to Mt. Sinai Union Free, Patchogue-Medford and BOCES II.
8/15/83 Middle Country Central Board of Education resolu-tion that LILCO plan is inadequate.
8/24/83 Thank you letter to BOCES I for meeting and trans-mittal of emergency planning information to use to modify or update school disaster plans.
8/25/83 Similiar letter as above to BOCES II.
9/1/83 Miller Place Union Free Board of Education resolu- i tion that LILCO plan is inadequate. l 9/6/83 Telephone call from BOCES II to LILCO concerning who will develop the school procedures (each .
school district not BOCES II superintendents).
9/7/83 Letter from South Manor Union Free School District Superintendent to LILCO stating that the plans re-ceived in June were not intended for radiological emergencies.
9/12/83 Telephone call to South Manor Union Free School District superintendent concerning his 9/7/83 let-ter.
9/27/83 Telephone call from BOCES II to discuss meeting of 15 school districts at which it was decided that one plan for every district would be best.
9/29/83 Telephone call to Coram Childcare Center to sched-ule 10/7/83 meeting.
9/29/83 Miller Island Central Board of Education resolu-tion that LILCO plan is inadequate.
10/4/83 Telephone-call to Trinity Lutheran Nursery School to schedule 10/18/83 visit.
4 s
.j ,
l
_4 1
+
10/7/83 Corem,Childcare Center visit.
Contacts Mrs. Grace Schroff 10/17/83 Letter from LILCO.to Brookhaven County Day.Cchool to set,bp an appointment.
Contact:
_ Mr. geil Pollock 10/18/83 Trinity, Lutheran Nursery School visit.
Contact Jane Broege'-- Has tone alert.
10/18/83 St. Ansleid's ' Nursery School visit.
Contact:
- -Mrs .' ..Jori Melius . .
Has tone alert.
No'formai "Go Home" plan. We offered her a cre'axer ter address the~ parents. She is interested for a,la:er date.
1 10/18/83 Mt. Sinat. Union Free Board of Education resolution that LILCO plan ie inadequate.
- ~ ,
10/19/83 Middle Irl_and Nursery School visit.
Contact:
Barbara Fracopane Studente.. live close to,. nursery school.
Hau tone alert.
3' , .s "
Kids-Rk Us visit.
~
10/19/83 4 Con' tact: Millie Hansen >
Facilt.ty is for handtcapped pre-schoolers as well assregular nursery schocl. Children from all over
'Long J,91and. Wouldinot accept tone alert or yel-low hook,'
writden ap,until_Mr; proval'fromHeld state (Director for acceptance. received aHe wil'l'igyptac,t us if state has no objection in l
cooperating.
e ;
10/21/83 Wading Riveh Cocp'erative Play "Sqhoo'l visit.
'Coatact:
L,orraine, Strong. No plans.
r; - , a 10/21/83, St. John',a Pre-scho61' visit. i l, ,
Contact:
" Jane Bra (.y.
~
Has one alert. -
10/21/83 Letter from BOCES II to LILCO transmitting survey forms and relat'ed information. .
. ~_
10/25/83 '
North Shore Christian School visit..
s
Contact:
'Mrg'. PJarily,s Buck. Has tone alert.
- ,e ; /G 10/25/83' Sound Beach Pre-School Co-op visit.
^
3,
Contact:
Ms. Irene Frick. Has tone' alert; no plans. 't , c' Stepjt'y Step Early Legrn{ns~ Center visit.
~
10/28/83
Contact:
, Martha O'Brien. Has tone alert.
<:'" ~. ^s ",
,. w g j ~ s@ " ^
,f & , .w s
, - .ar , . . -
e ,
A'
i i
11/1/83 Thank you for visit letter to Coram Childcare Center.
11/1/83 Central Brookhaven Head Start visit.
Contact:
Ms. Cynthia Crump i
In case of an emergency, they call parents or guardians listed on their call cards.
11/2/83 Thank you for visit letters from LILCO to:
North Shore Christian School Wading River Cooperative Play School Trinity Lutheran Nursery School Step by Step Early Learning Center St. John's Pre-School Sound Beach Pre-School Co-op St. Anslem's Nursery School 11/2/83 Meeting attended by BOCES II and LILCO to discuss status of school emergency planning. Resulted in acceptance of the school districts to proceed with developing an emergency plan.
11/3/83 Thank ycu for visit letter to Central Brookhaven Head Start. ALsuggestion was made by us to relocate students to the Head Start School in ~
Patchogue if students cou'ld not be sent home.
11/11/83 Letter to Kids-R-Us to discuss purpose of LILCO visits and to encourage acceptance of tone alert.
11/12/83 Thank you for visit letter to Middle Island Nur-sery School.
11/16/83 Telephone call to Alphabetland Child Enrichment Center to schedule 11/22/83' meeting.
11/22/83 Alphabetland Child Enrichment Center visit.
Contact:
Carol Roadle "Go Home" plan is .ncerporated in their ad-mission application.
12/1/83 Letters from LILCO to all involved school offi-cials transmitting reference materials to assist in the revision of school emergency plans.
12/12/83 Telephone call to Mercy High School to set up tone alert delivery. No plans.
12/13/83 Tone alert delivery for Mercy High School and St.
David's School.
L
. - .=. -. - . . - . . _ - - .
i 12/13/83 Letter from Shoreham-Wading River School District
- to LILCO transmitting statement on evacuation I which was submitted to the ASLB.
12/16/83 Tone alert delivery for St. John the Evangelist School and St. Isidore.
12/30/83 Letter from LILCO to Superintendent of Middle Country School District.
1/16/84 Meeting attended by all involved school super- in-tendents and LILCO to discuss school procedures and emergency planning.
1/17/84 Letter from LILCO to Westhamnton Beach High School confirming LILCO's interest in their project on disaster preparednest.
1 1/20/84 Letter from LILCO to BOCES II to LILCO trans-mitting additional concerns of the school superin-tendents not addressed or which resulted from the
- 1/16/84 meeting as well as a request for a similar coordination meeting in early March.
4 6
e i
, _ _.. . . , _ . _ . . - ~ _ . . , _ , , ,, ,
{
l ATTACHMENT 14
~
Attachment 14 BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES SECOND SUPfavtSORY De5Ta CT SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK m istsi 289 2200 BoC E .
201 Sunries Highway, Ps:chogue, New York 11772 JAMES HINES, EXECUTIVE OFFICER January 26, 1984 Ms. Elaine Robinson Community Affairs Long Island Lighting Company 100 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801
Dear 14s. Robinson:
We thank you for LILCO's presentation to school administrators on Jan-uary 16, 1984.
Following our conference, it was agreed by those present that it would be most useful to arrange another session for early March in order that we can consider, with greater specificity, proposals regarding the implementation of a LILC0 evacuation plan. In particular, the administrators would like to consider the manner in which, and the bases upon which, children would be evacuated by buses to their homes or to relocation centers.
In addition, the administrators would like to consider the necessary steps in implementing a plan which would, under certain circumstances, neces-sitate the use of a school facility as a sheltering area.
Specifically, the administrators would like to consider with you, LILC0 proposals on the matter of providing the necessary hardware for comunications both among school district personnel and between the schools and students' homes.
A greater consideration of concrete plans and procedures than those alluded to at our recent meeting would be appreciated.
We must advise you that due to the constraints of differing directives -
among the boards of education represented by the school superintendents in attendance at our recent meeting; due to the question of the legality of the implementation of a LILCO evacuation plan (note New York Times article of January 18, 1984 citing New York State testimony at W C hearing); due to the
- lack cf any directive from the New York State Education Department on the
-%-..w--. .,..,.-. , . -- -. _,~ .- . . . . . .
. . . ~ - . . - . . . - - - _ _ _ -
- Ms. Elaine Robinson Page 2 January 26, 1984 matter of establishing an evacuation plan relating to schools; and due to other concerns relating to the role that a school district should play in participating in the establishment of an evacuation plan desire to at this time, further con- there should be the understanding that the superintendents sider' the feasibility of the LILCO plan should in no way be interpreted as an endorsement thereof or a commitment to operating under such a plan.
Please contact me with regard to the identification of those LILCO repre-sentatives who would be agreeable to confer with the superintendents in early March; we would most desire to review matters with the head of your By evacuation team, as well as the individual assigned to the evacuation of schools.
conferring with those individuals who are most able to deal with the specifics of the LILC0 program, we could all profit from the up coming meeting.
The superintendents would appreciate it if you would bring with you all memoranda, reports, plans, etc., which have previously been sent to the school districts superintendents.
and those documents which you believe should be review all relevant information.
Very truly yours, Stanley Packman Director Administrative Services ra cc: Superintendents, B0CES I and II Supervisory Area
.i 0
,-- .u O
L
{
ATTACHMENT 15 s
TH3 UNIVERalTY OF THE STATE OF NEW YOF
- THE STATE EDUCATICN DEPARTMENT an.came, w w vona saats Attachment 15 assestawf commess.onse ,os sowCAfeONA FBMANCE.
.. .s-..<... .c. .. ..cs.
December 1981 1U: District Superintendents and Superintendents of Pubile and Nonpublic Schools ,
New York City Board of Education FRO 4: James J. O'Connell 1h i
SUlWECT: Disaster Preparedne/s J
Every school district has the responsibility to be prepared and to act appropriately if a disaster strikes. For this reason, it is .ippropriate that you periodically review and update standard disaster preparedncss plans and procedures for your district. Responsible actions result only from proper planning. '
Natural disasters include extreme weather conditions, such as snowstorms, thunder-storrs, hurricanes, tornadoes, and heat and cold waves, as well as earthquakes,
' tidal waves and forest fires. Man-made disasters include technological failures, such as chemical accidents, fires, and explosions. Supply problems with heating and vehicular fuels could also be considered disasters.
Assistance and advice in . formulating district plans are available from your local l
' disaster 'preparedness/ civil defense office. Every county and several cities have such offices, which are charged with coordinating survival, recovery, and'other government' functions during disasters.
In 1981, the Legislature approved a Statewide Disaster Preparedness Plan which required various levels of government to develop plans to elimiriate or control potential disasters. As part of this Plan, the county level of government is assigned the key role of managing, developing and implementing disaster pre-paredness plans. In many communities, a key element of the Plan is the potential use of school facilities as receiving and congregate-care centers and of school equipnent for transportation and evacuation purposes. Consequently, some school dis-tricts have raised a number of questions concerning disaster preparedness planning.
For instance, who has the authority to commit district resources in the event of a -
disaster? Can the Commissioner of Education excuse school absences that occur during a disaster or simulated exercises? Will a district be saved harmless in the event of an accident during a disaster?
no answers to these and other questions are sometimes unclear or simply n'ot covered by statute. Here is no law specifically requiring or prohibiting the use of schnot buildings during a disaster. *!he Commissioner of Education does not have l
t the icgal authority to excuse absences caused by certain types of disasters and I still authorir.e the payment of aid for that period. Finally, there is no law to i hold the district harmless in the event of a disaster.
\
I During the 1982 Legislative session, the Disaster Preparedness Commission, in con-
? junction with the' Education Department, will introduce legislation to eliminate this confusion. However, the problem presently faced is that different levels of
,e
- ese .. . e-a ,--===ee 7 - , _ . - , - 1 - , - -
.,,w' -
~
q
, % the government use of schools areand trying school tofacilities.
develop Ourdisaster suggestionpreparedness is that districts plans work which g closely _ with the county in developing their7ans and try_ ~to provide assistance to ~~
~~~
- the bestT_ their ability, consistent _ with common sense. -
Plans should exist for the safety and orderly dismissal of students in the event of a disaster. A plan should be developed in the event it becomes necessary to return students to their homes as rapidly as possible, but only when there are positive in- ne dications that sufficient time exists to accomplish this prior to the emergency.
decision to activate a go home plan is usually made by the school administration.
!! Portions of a
- A plan to retain children within the school provides another option. Each school building may provide protection from certain types of disasters.
,; building should be surveyed to identify the safest areas of the building in which t
i occupants could be sheltered. The local disaster preparedness office can provide assistance with such a survey. :
His Many school buildings contain marked shelter areas which are licensed as such.
in most cases, to a fomal written agreement with the St' ate licensure is pursuant, Use of such l
Civil Defense Coomission or the local disaster preparedness office.
Such areas will provide pro-shelters naast be consistent with that formal agreement.
tection from certain types of disasters; however, planning for extended use (days
' rather than hours) should be closely coordinated with the local disaster If any preparedness licensed office. In 1977 a "de-stocking" program for these areas began. '
shelter area currently contains stored supplies, such as medicines, food or water,
! the responsible school official should contact the local disaster preparedness office regarding proper disposition of these articles.
he successful implementation of any planning results from proper instruction of the staff and students about what is expected. Prs'ctice drills, although not mandated Drills should be reported to tne otsaster preparedness 4
by statute, may be advisable.of' flee and may be conducted with the assistance of disa Instruction will prepare students to respond to disaster situations intelligently and Practically. Instruction at the elementary, junior high, and senior high levels should give students basic information so that they will understand the reason for a disaster preparedness plan. The local disaster preparedness office staff may help A series of 13 videotape presentations is prepare available. this instruction assistance.nese cover disasters caused by hurricane, earthquake, nu winter storms, forest fire and t -nado. He tapes, entitled, "Your Chance to Live,"
are available through the BOCES 11.,rary and the Media Materials Distribution Center l of the Education Department, Room C7, Cultural Education Center, Albany, New York 12230 (Page 56 of the 1977-78 Video Tape Catalog).
l Coordination of statewide' disaster preparedness and civil defense concerns is pro-l vided by the Office of Disaster Preparedness, DivisionEducation of MilitaryDepartment and Naval interests Affairs, 12226 (518: 457-6660).
il State Campus, Albany, New Yorkare handled by the Bureau of Educational Facilitie
.{
Center, Albany, New York 12230 (518: 474-3906).
j i
i 4
i I -
I s
i p.
l1
- l. . _ . _ , , , , , , _ , _ , , ,
- . _ . . ~ . . . . . , ,
f .-- . ___,m._____
ATTACHMENT 16 e
1 e
a
' l F Tw3 UMevgDGeTV or TMS STt.73 cr Ngw voca 6 THE OTATE EDucATICN D3PARTMENT A4.eANv. NEW VoAE 92290 aess.m.svaaten ese .eweationaa.
ca m . . - . .,
March 7, 1983 i
i A
TO: Olstrict Superintendents and Superintendents of Public Schools,
- New York City Board of Education FROM: Brian P. Walsh
SUBJECT:
Disaster Preparedness i
This is a reminder that your district's emercancy disgster_ plans must be_ updated annually. The plans should be reviewed to assure that they and any procedures wh W are intended to implement them are up-to-date. The plans should also be reviewed to determine whether they respond to the full range of natural and man-made disasters to which the school district may conceivably be subjected.
4 Natural disasters include extreme weather conditions, such as snow and ice
- storms,. hurricanes, tornadoes, and heat and cold waves. Man-made disasters
- !nclude technological failures, such as power failures, chemical and radio-logical accidents, fire and explosions. Fuel and water shortages should also be considered in disaster planning.
Local disaster preparedness / civil defense offices are available to help school officials plan for disasters. Every county and several cities have such offices.
School officials should make sure that school district disaster plans are coor- '
dinated with local disaster preparedness plans. ,
! Some school of ficials have expressed concern that participation in disaster plan-ning with county officials involves the obligation to provide county officials
" with the unrestricted use of school district resources such as school buildings, buses and personnel. School districts have the authority to enter into agreements j-with other municipalities. School districts are also allowed to share their
' resources with other municipalities. Participation of school officials with l
county officials in emergency planning per se does not of itself' necessarily i
result in providing county officials with unabridged authority to use school resources. In fact, one of the practical _ reasons why school officials should pp 61cipate in coordinating planning with county officials is to assure th'at there are not any misunderstandings on this point and to assure that county use .
i of school district resources is strictly controlled to protect school district interests.
i
. Good planning of itself is not sufficient to provide protection to students and staff during emergencies.: Training and instruction are integral components of a disaster preparation program. Practice exercises are advisable to test the effectiveness of emergency plans and to train personnel to manage emergency i
i procedures. ,
I %
w-r .- - p ei+ -
c-, ,-- , _ +.----- --+,--r,--m, ,-e--,
.e t, .
Recently, questions have been raised about the extent to which school officials may participate in emergency exercises and there have been concerns expressed by school of ficials that participation in exercises could Jeopardize their state aid. Obviously, school of ficials work within legal constraints which preclude unrestricted participation in emergency exercises. Nevertheless, sufficient latitude exists to provide school officials with the ability to participate in emergency exercises without jeopardizing state aid.
Schqol officials are required to hold fire and bus emergency drills and they have had sufficient latitude to hold "go home" drills. In addition, school officials are required to provide students with health, safety and fire in-struction in which training in the appropriate responses to natural and man-made disasters is impiicit.
Instruction should prepare students to respond to disaster situations intelli-gently and practically. Instruction at the elementary, Junior high and senior high levels should give students basic information so that they will understand the reasons for a disaster preparedness plan. The local disaster preparedness office staff may help prepare this instruction assistance. A series of 13 videotape presentations is available. These cover disasters caused by hurricane, earthquake, radiological disaster, winter storms, forest fire and tornado. The tapes, . entitled, "Your Chance to Live," are available through the BOCES library and the Media Materials Distribution Center of the Education Department, Room C7, Cultural Education Center, Albany, New York 12230 (page 56 of the 1977-78 Video Tape Catalog).
School officials will not f_ird their,_ state,o_peratin,g aid to be jegpardized if they particienta in overcises which are hqlj;Lin_C_onj,uy)q11on u with the activities which arg,_describad _In tha.pttCQdinASaragraphs and .otherwise adhere to th'e requirements forJ gidJng a normal-dayof. instruction,includingtaking}tten-dance, and thereaf ter providing instruction which reasonably approximates that wiiicn would be given on days during which an exercise is not held. Transportation
~
aTiT"'I's~p'ro7ided'6ni~ 'for transportatio'n' of students' to and f rom school . Conse-
> quently, transportation aid is not available for transportation which is provided expressly for the disaster or emergency exercises, However, transportation aid is available for transportation which performs the function of bringing children to and f rom school even if the transportation is coincidental with an emergency exercise.
l L
I in conclusion, disaster preparedness planning is an important responsibility of f all municipal officials. Unquestionably, there are practical and legal con-y straints which limit the latitude which public officials may have with respect to disaster planning and holding emergency exercises. However, sufficient latitude is available to accommodate reasonably thought-out plans and exercises
{ in order to assure that school, students and staff, as well as other citizens t
! are adequately trained to cope with emergencies and disasters.
! w i
f
?
. l
i e
ATTACHMENT 17
f' --"
l .
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS n I 3
! FOR SCHOOLS IN s,,.- s'h[#
0 NEW YORK STATE } --
- r' eS,a awa m-,g 1980 -
l q V y-p w3x w yg o . , .. .
g s, . .
i o 1 1!m 7 -
'q E LJ kt Y %
} 4 p
c.-
" py . ; s s
e r i2 I '
o k
1 .
ll
- q }g J
W ~l
}'>} I JM_- +
lig!!
ll h$P* b .
i Foreword i
}
This revised edition of Minimum Requirements for Schools in New York State t@ dates what is required by the Laws of the State of New York, Rules of the Board of Regents, and Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. As in previous editions, the descriptions of requirements are summative and are not the of ficial wording of the statutes, rules, and regulations. For complete statements of statutory requirements, Regents Rules, and Commissioner's Regulations, consult State Education Law, Rules of the Board of Regents, and Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. This digest of minimum State requirements indicates what schools and districts must do. Pro-grams and standards which are recommended but not required are in the Education Department's bulletins, reports, and similar publications.
2 Appendix A contains guidelines to assist public school officials in determining the equivalency of nonpublic school programs in their districts and to give nonpublic Khool authorities an idea of what is expected. Appendix B is a list of the Rules of the Board of Regents and Regulations of the Commissioner applicable to elementary and secondary schools in New York State. The Rules and Regulations are published in the Of ficial Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York .
(NYCR R), Volume A, Title 8, Education Department, Copies of Voluilne A are obtainable f rom the printer, Lenz & Riecker, Inc.,135 W. 50th Street, 23rd Floor, New York, New York 10020. -
The New York State statutes relating to education are found in McKinney's Consolidated Laws of New York, Book 16, published by West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minnesota.
t 4
0 y
i 1
. . . . . . .-. - . _ -... .~ - . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 10. Licensed Privat 2 Schools rnd Ruist: red Business Schools (Ed. L,5001-5004) i o The Regents license each private school and register each business school
- offering occupational preparation for a fee to students in residence or by correspondence. Licenses or registration may be suspended or revoked or other disciplinary action taken when the Commissioner of Education con.
cludes that schools are not complying with the provisions of the Law, Regents Rules, Commissioner's Regulations.
o . Agents representing such schools for solicitation purposes must obtain individual certification issued by the State Education Department that assures principals are fully responsible for the actions, statements, and conduct of their certified agents.
o School administrators and teachers must meet qualifications established by the Commissioner of Education and obtain an appropriate license.
- 11. Disaster Planning and Civil Preparedness in Schools (New York State Office i of Disaster Preparedness) l l
o Each school district, annually, must review and update the district's emer- l gency disaster plans and standard operating procedures to assure that such plans and procedures are current.
o i Natural disasters include extreme weather conditior.s such as snow storms, thunderstorms, hurricanes, tornadoes, and heat and cold waves, floods, earthquakes, tidal waves, and forest fires.
o Man-made disasters may take the form of technological failures, accidents involving nuclear or chemical production facilities or the transportation of such materials, fires and explosions, and environmental pollution related or unrelated to the above.
o Enemy attack could cause severe damage from blast effect, fire and fallout, and could deliver chemical or biological agents.
o ,Every county and several cities have an office which has the primary
' responsibility for disaster preparedness and civil defense. This office, by whatever name known locally, is charged with the coordination of survival, recovery, and governmental functions in accordance with the mandated
" State of New York Emergency Operations Plan" prepared by the New York State Office of Disaster Preparedness. This local office should be contacted regarding assistance to the school district in the d:velopment and/or refinement of school district planning and to insure that school district plans are consistent and in concert with local community efforts.
o Plans must take into account the variable effects of each type of disaster in providing for protection and/or orderly dispersal of students. Plans include a "Go Home" plan and a " Stay Where You Are" plan with variations with regard to licensed fallout shelters, the " safest area (s)" of a school building, and " duck and cover." ~
19 6
h
- _ _ . . . - . _ - - - vb =
{# f' *(( ,[
1 "[ [. [ ".* . . e . = = - '
7 o in addition to disaster preparedness planning, every school system should oc providing instruction which will effectively prepare students to respond to -
any disaster situation in an intelligent, practical way and, hopefully, to save -
their lives in the process. Instruction should be at the elementary school, janior high school, and senior high school levels; should be an element of regular instructional activity; and should provide basic information and an understanding which can be translated into an appropriate response if and when a disaster strikes. Instruction may be based on any appropriate course area including Strand V of the Health Education curriculum and "Your Chance to 1.ive," a publication of the Defense Civil Preparedness Agency of the Federal government. This publication is on hand in many districts and available, in limited quantity, from the local disaster preparedness office.
- 12. Language of instruction (Ed.l..,3204) o In teaching the subjects of instruction other than foreign languages, English must be the language of instruction, and textbooks used must be written in English, except that for a period of three years from the date of enrollment in school, pupils who, by reason of foreign birth, ancestry or otherwise, experience difficulty in reading and understanding English, may, at the discretion of the board of education, board of trustees or trustee, be instructed in all subjects in their native language and in English. The three-year period may be extended to a period of no more than six yeaps by the Commissioner for individual pupils, upon application by the school author-ities.
- 13. Released Time for Reli;;ious Education (CR 109.2) o
- Absence of a pupil from school during school hours for religious education conducted outside the school building and grounds must be excused upon the request in writing signed Dy the parent or guardian of the pupil.
o Absence for a released time ' religious education program for K-12 must be for not more than one hour each week at the close of either the morning or af ternoon session, or both.
o The released tirne is fixed by the local school authorities, provided that the time designated for each separate unit, the primary grades (k-3), inter-mediate gradis (4-6), junior high school grades (7-9), and senior high school grades (10-12) is the same for all pupils in that unit in each school.
However, a board of education may permit pupils in departmentalized units to be released for not more than one hour a week in groups that may include less than whole units, o
In no event may any pupil be released for more than one hour a week.
o High school credit for released time ir.struction may be granted.
o A board of education may establish an optional program for high school students in grades 9-12 to permit a student with written approval of parent or guardian to enroll in a course in religion in a registered nonp~ ublic high school. Enrollment in a course of this nature must be approved in advance by the public high school principal with respect to course schedule, pupil attendance, and reporting of pupil achievement. Absence to attend such a 20
l
!l i
l 4
e ATTACHMENT 18
7 9
A ttachmen* 18 i
. ~
3 11/7/ 83 . Yolanda Puterio, President of the Middle Countyf See j terial A.ssociation 'to offer a statement rar j negot tions. . )
s .
. A repres ative of the Andrea Doria Lodge aquested considerati of band participation in t Columbus
- Day Parude n year. .
Arlene Popaleski, kins Path PT' o comment upon the success of tM Hall een Party Hsr.ekins Path; to advise the 3 card of r Theat- Club activity) and requested that there M '
whus the report of th - l RESS Committee is dis, cuss Jennie Camastra, Hawk Path- comment upon the -
underbrush along le Road and need for sidewalks there.
Roh rta Den ret substitute teacher acement' Roy Pro yahn re: aged ,, cut handicapped s ents, .
. offer his services in this regard.
- -a .s. . .a . a.m .- .
- UPERINTENDDrr's ,
Mrs. Adler led discussion concerning the resolution IEPORT 3
\ adopted last year and re-affirmed on August 15,1983 to wit:
VHEREAS, the Middle Country Central School District's.
Board of Education has as its prime concern tM welfare
- HORENAM
'0WER of the children of the School District and .
u fft VHEREAS, the Long Island Lighting Com m y has not been able to insure that its proposed Shoreham Power Plant
. can meet acceptchle safety standards, and . .
WHEREAS, no acceptable evacuation plan has been devised by the Long Island Lighting Com m y and Suffolk County ,
EE IT RESOLVED that the , Board of Education in'the
!ntainst of protecting the selfare of the children of He Country does hereby go on record as opposed to
, opening of the Shoreham Power Plant until both an acceptable. safety standard can be met and an ecceptable evacuation plan can be developed.
Mrs. Adler asked the Board to consider that the above stated resolution might be sufficient and there would be no need to go further. .
'1db
~.
The following resolution was offered by Gall moved its adoption, poconded by.Durkino,towho wit: 11/7/83 of the ShoroMa Nuclear Power rationPlant require anM amer-gency pian for communities surrounding thewhich plant will assure those communities adequate prote i eveny of a nuclear emergency; and ction in !
substantive study and lengthy hearingsM AF.AS, th
, after gancy plan can be developed to provide citize, n that no emer- I
.sufficiarit protection in a Shoreham emergency;s and s
MRT.AS, the County. of Suffolk has therefore c that it cannot, i oncluded sn emergency plan, or support full power opin good faith, p!
Shorsham Nuclear Power Plant; and eration of the -
j WHNM, the Long to meet federal Island Lighting Comp regulations ,
any, in an effort plcm wh, .h c.nly LILCo, lacking coordination ocal with lhas prepared a or state governments, will attempt to implem ent; and. ~
M RT.A5, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission' licensing board is now conducting Marings s Shorehamt o review the adequacy of the LILCO emergency an; andpl actions to be taken by scMols;rotective andM REA5, the LILCO em LILCO's . emergency planvvng for ewed schools, and ha iM RT i -
those plans with concerned parents discussed for its district;NRC'sand Shoreham licensing bocrd of the pl, wishes to advise an's workohility nesses in the LILCO emergency ,
w ng plan:M weak- RT.AS, this board
- 1. Early Dismissal i Normal early dismissal procedures , unich
? LILco's plan incorporates, cannot bring '
children to uncontaminated areas quickly 2.
enough to protect their health and safety .
Transportation -
We cannot guarantee that m erthe requisite nu bo l
\
iI
. ]
" I
- ~'
r/g3 early dismissal will be available to the
? schools. Drivers may need to first attend
. to the . safety of their own families and acy decline to drive school buses. This will prolong childrens' stay at schools in con-taminated areas. '
t
- 3. Needs of School Personnel We cannot guarantee that teaching and non-teaching personnel will stay in schools ,
to supervise early dismissal. These teach rs, and staff may need to attend to the safety of -
their own families and therefore may not h available to perform energency-related tasks.
~
- 4. Inck of Parental Supervision The success of an early dismissal plan depends
- not only on prompt dismissal from schools, but l on prompt evacuation of children from their
! . homes. In cases inewhich parents will not k at home during the day, children will be sent to unsupervised homes from which they will not be able to evacuate promptly. -
l *
- 5. Parental Intercessian We cannot be confident that parents will wait j
at home for their children to arrive. Many parents mail attempt to retrieve their children at schools, perhaps causing increased confusion and chaos.
- 6. Panic An announcement of a nuclear emergency at shoreham may cause disorientation and panic in children, teachers, non-reaching staff, and parents. This will further prohibit effective, safe di,==4-sal from schools.
- 7. Reloontion ,
If a 5}. 3reham emergency develops quickly and require.: an evacuation of children.from schools
, directly to reilbcation centers, this district will not have sufficient buses or drivers to transport all children to relocation centers in a timely, ;
efficient manner. ~
i
- 8. Supervision at Relocation Centers . -
We cannot guarantee that tetaching and/or n,on-teaching school personnel will truvel to and
~
remain at relocation centers to supervise children i
t
!t .
_i
. . . - '145 2
~
until parents arrive to retrieve them.
- 9. Sheltering .33777g3 The LILCQ p,lan suggests that sheltering (remainin g indoors) any be the. preferred protective action in specific Shoreham emergencies.
other structures necessary to provide
' protection. or adequ
- 10. Trust in Public Information -
In the LII40 plan, the only public informatio n .
will come from the utility.upon which toonsbase decisions f Public Schools Coordinator and WALK-AM RadiLILCO, through its o, will both describe recommend actions.
the extent of the emergency and Because LILCO would be both ^
actions, School potential A h 4-trators, for conflict of interest a iopera x sta.
fros LI140 and not from any governmental , will agencyreceivi be forced to decide serious consequences with upon actions with potenti a y ll from an objective source.out the benefit of information
- 11. Indemnification LIlfo does not provide indemnification for sh districts should damages, injuries, or death c ool from school administrators ' decisions during an s result emergency, decisions which can be basedpon only u information and recommendations offered by LILCo .
Now,:be Xtorherefore plans for schools do not offer children o's emergency school pers onnel, or parents of this district adequate protection in event accident at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant; of an and be it further ;
RESOLVIL.
initiate or participate thatinthis school emergency actiboard scannot schools to direct it !
fall jeopardy; to protect
- and, childrens be it further' safety, 'but place it in fons which not only' ;i 1
urther .
EsoLVb, that this school board believes that f ll u power l
licensing of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant should b -
l unless or until complete and reasonable resolution e forbidden 1
outstanding, achieved. critical emergency planning problems of these c l
, an be e
i
a
.i g
The question of the adoption of the chove stated l -
resolution was duly put to vote on Roll Cc11 which ,
resulted as follows:
Amruso voting no
- Gallo voting yes does not want plant opened Durkin voting yes :
3rodsky voting yes Boder voting yes
'Reynolds voting no Purick duplicate resclution voting yes Adler voting no duplicate resolution The resolution was thereupon declared duly adopted.
1 h Motion by Gallo seconded by Brodsky to authorize the gg Superintendent of Schools and the Director of Trans-g portation to participate in meetings prior to the '
NRC Plant;Hearings relative to the Shoreham Muclear Power 'l to appear at the NRC Hearings to state the j concerns of the district; that the statements of the Superintendent of Schools and the Director of Trans-portation be reviewed by Counsel prior to appearance and, at the present time of to advise the hearings that Counsel be them.
The question of the adoption of the above stated motion was duly put to vote on Roll Call which resulted as follows:
Amruso voting yes Gallo voting yes Durbin, voting yes Brodsky voting yes Boder voting yes Reynolds voting yes Purick voting yes Adler voting no would not like the Superintendedt <
i to this in takematter.
the time from the district
~ ~.
i The motion was carried. .
e
~ :I Notion by Gallo seconded by Brodsky to accept the, recommendation of the Superintendent and designate the , ,
1 firm of Rains, Pogrebin, represented by Terence O'Neil ,
g
- Contral School. District at a fee not,to exceed $100as g '
per hour.
i -
i * .
, The question of the adoption of the above stated motion l was follows:duly put tp vote on Roll Call ,which resulted ca '
" =_
w.a ATTACHMENT 19 1
1 1
h ~ ~~
Attachment 19 MIDDCE ISLAND CENTRAL SCHO61.5 M:DD2 Is AND . YAPHA.*?X RDC - MIDDLE 15LAf.3 NEW YORK 11oji ,,,
,516 3 3 2788 "dd,'/ ~ '
NCKF MUTC ga* T*4, BOARD Ch E*A> CATION bar"* N ' ., Geoepe E Prw 2 Pre oem Ht%RY HE's.$ENSUTTE*.
Daire: Treewer ;g f 6) g, y yi e Joh. ..., p,,,,,.
JACC%'!;.LNE LANZARO.NE i. .phtf , I. Arene 6emre m Anne.ie j ,
Dew C. era ,
,*/ Pame. hi,g ,, ,,, , ,, ,;.,,,, L GFr. . c sa.h. wem.
00CKEiitu 4 iL-SRt.NCM SERVED 0CT 251983 october 3, 1983 "r.-e,l-]hm 2..
n " ' "
' ~
hf'iI. D' 'I } .
s- SNES. )
1* . .
James A. Laurenson, Chairman J e* 1 i Atomic Safety and Licensip: Board (O'b. b. ,
'I'
~~f
.. l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CoE. mission '
..)$
20555 washington, D.C. s
,,43 Dear Mr. Laurenson.
- jh Y Please be advised that the attached School Board Resolutio'n was adopted at a regular meeting of the Middle Island Central School District's Board of Education on September *29, 1983.
Very truly yours, Lori D'Amico District Clerk
/ lad
(v t.
P.'.':, !: f". ~ 9
-w u -- -
- ' U.+ .t (. .*ih*.' ? /'."*.7
.D , ::17..' Yi T.
P.'t 4~;;! C7g .
y hN ..
c:t.^xE..
.s Ct'.n..m. r '. . . .'m.. m.... . .". ~. _ "..
'84 0I 2 J.;7.0 , fcJeral rag.*ntir.r.: fcr full pecer cparation of the ..h'.s:re 5 A10:57 hs.m Nucle:.: 'Jcnt require en ccargency plan for co =unitics surroundir. th3 plantwhichwillassurethosc'ccm.K$yypi{T/g. -
adequate pro::ct. ion in c,cnt of a nuc1 car cmargenc;.'r c (}j,gr.c,-
- r. 7.0 , tha Long J.ninnd Lighting Corp.ny, in an of ~0rt to : .cct federal :agulations, has prepared cn c: argency plan which LILCO, 1 : king coordinaticn with local or state governments, will utrompt to implomant; and
-'Z.". :/ , the ".N:: :"r :32gul., tory Ccr.:ciaci.,..' c Snorcha:- licensing -
b:ard i s nov conducting hearings to review the adequacy c f the LILCO c.v .rgency plan; and , .
- r47.5, the I.lLCO emergency pl.sn include protective actions to be take.1 by schools; cnd .
7 L.7. , ti.is lo rd hn'[ identified the follo. ing ucaknesses in the Ln.CO creargc;;cy plan:
- 1. Enr.1 v Di czin c..1 Our ca..cr pacy_ h .rly s'i rric. col rrecedure , which LILCO's plan incorporatcc, vrouldn't bring cchool children to an uncontumin-tod arca quickly enough to protect their
- health anti s a f a t;> .
- 2. Tre nm. ,
ortation
- Tno requisite number of buses and drivers required for successful carly dicmissal are not availabic to the schools. This will prolong childrens' stay at schoo]s in contaminated areas. . .
- 3. Need of C hcol Fernnnnel .
U6 cannot guarantee tact teaching and non--tcaching .
perscnnel will stay in schc.ols to supervise early disminsal. These teachars and staff inny need to attend to the safety of their een families and, therefore, rany
- not be availubic t'o, perform cmcrg.ency-related tasks.
- 4. LneN of I'arental'secorvicinn E succer.Ioi an ei rly dicn.iscal plan depends not only on prompt dicmissal from schools, but on prompt cyacua-tion of children from their homas. *In those cases in which parents will not be at home during the day, children will be sent to unsupervised homes from which they will
. not be able to evacunt.e promptly. ,,
- 5. Parental 7pterconsion . .
Mc cannot 1.v con t 2 sit'nt that parents u1]l unit at home i
for their children io arrivo. l'any parents ma'j attempt l
- * ' .~. 4 ,,
k T Doard T.csolt.1;..
Jg.*.a CL:;L%L SC:0N,'DI -2 -
/ . .
I to retrieve,their children at schools, perhaps causing increased confusion and chaos.
- 6. Relocation
,11 a Snorch:= cmcrgency develops quickly and requires an l evecbetion of children from schools cirectly to relocation j
centers, this district does not have suf ficient buses er '
drivers to transport all children to relocation centers in a timely, effective manner.
l 7. Supervision _et Relocationteaching centers and/or non-teaching He cann:- gu;ran:cc ena:
school corser.nel.will travel to and remain at relocation s
cento'rs'tc supervise school children until parents arrive to retrieve them. .
- 8. Shc1terin:' (remaining indocrr)
~The LILCO plan suggests that sheltering may be the preferred However, protective ncne ofaction in specific this district's schools ShoroLim
' emergencies.have basemente or other structures necessary to provide adequate protection.- . .
9 Trust in Public In_ formation th*
ublic information upon which in tna LiLCO pAan
- s r t c ive actions will come.frc to base pccisior.s
,-3, -
, ort rougn 'its Tublic Schools coord1:;.1-th e u - _ l tor and WALn-3M Radio, WI11 both describe theecausa
- extent o-LILCO u:uld the emergency and reco and actions.
be both operator of ,,thc I t and initiator of' emergency Schcol actions,' potentia ,c nf ict receiving information only from LILCC and of interest exists. .
not from cny.gove-....... al acency, Will wa #orced to decide administrators, -
7 upon actions with potent ^4aliy serious consequenc -
source. .-
- 10. 'Indemnificot' LILCO doesion not provi'de indemnification for school districts should damages, injuries, or' dcaths result from school administrators' decisions during an emergency, decisions
- which'can,be made based only.upon information and recom- l mendq'icn3 oficred bys3LILCO; -
v Now,beittherefok3 ~
!.' District finds that RESOLVED, that the Middle Island Central School .
LILCO's emergency plans. for schools do*not offer children or school personnel of this, district adcquate protection l t and, in be
. event of an accident. '
a't'the Shorcham Huclear P an ; !
% '- k . .
it further s . .
v -
g C
4 - w,.-,
I
~
p;5'ISIA:.7 CT.::ii'.'.L sci! DOL STRICI '
. .RD RESOLUTIO!!
s KIS OL'.'ID , that thic school board believer that liccusing of tic Shorchs .
Nucicar Plcnt shorld not be pcmitted unic:s or until completc and reason:,bic rc.colution of these outseending, critical emergency planning probices can be achieved.
~
l The above Resolution 5.as passed by the !!iddic Island Can:rcl School District Ecard of Educatien at the Icard !:cating on Septa =ber 29, 1983.
/ . .s \ ,
04L .] OD2VfY Lori D'Av ico
. District Clerk e
4 e-l .
i
. s l
t ee' e ,
8 m 8 ,.
e f
/
~
b 4
f'
.4 n
$* y a
w.
g
, + *
. - 7.
a p
V e
ATTACHMENT 20
+ p l
ar
, y 1
1 e e m
4 h g F
=
i9.,
sN y l
e e
k 8%
9 f .
e -
v
+
Je -
S O g f b a f r_
- e* ,
W p j
- r y
" ' ,. ? <
s,y ?
a f >*
$.hf f g, Attachment 20
.' MILLER MillerPLACE Place, New UNION York 11764 FREE SCHOOL DEMEO U%RC DISTRIC SCROOL BOARD RESOLUTION 13 SB' 21 4059 h Shore-k ham Nuclear Plant require an emergency p WHEREAS, c surrounding the plant which will assure those gency; an
' adequate protection in event of a nuclear emer ,
in an effort to lmeet n which WHEREAS, the Long Island Lightine Company, te governments, LILCO, lacking coordination and with local or st will attempt to implement; (
's Shoreham' licensing i
h adequacy WHERIAS, the Nuclear Regulatory Commiss onboard is now of the LILCO emergency plan; and prote'etive actions to be d
WHERIAS, the LILCO emergency plan inclu es taken by schoolsi and following weaknesses in the WHEREAS, this board has., identified the ..
LILCO emergency plan:
which LILCO's
~ Early_ Dismissal _ ,
l children to
- 1. ~
Our em'ergency early dismissal. procedure, rotect their
- plan incorporates, wouldn't bring schooan u health and safety. .-
ired for Transportation
- 2. The requisite humber of buses and ilable to the drivers hrequ ols successful early dismissal are not avaThis will prolo schools.
in contaminated areas.
"'ng Needs of School Personnel ^ teaching and non-te>ise se_1r
- 3. We cannot guarantee that d personnel will stay in schools tod supervThese therefore, may teac dismissal. lated tasks. .
to the safety of their own families an ,not be .
depends not only
- 4. Lack of parental Supervision prompt evacua-
~he T success of an early dismissal the day, children plano .
tion of children from their homes. i hich they will which parents will not be at home dur ngw not be.able to evacuate promptly. l it at home l
- 5. Parental IntercessionWe cannot be confident that pa for their children to arrive.
m
~
o l
I.y ' ..
h, !
Board Resolution r Place UFSD
.s .
.' 3 to' retrieve their children at schools, perhaps causing increased confusion and chaos. l l
- 6. *If Relocation a Shoreham emergency develops quickly and requires an evacuation of children from schools directly to relocation centars, this distri-t does not have sufficient buses or ,
drivers to transport all children to relocation centers in a timely, effective manner.
- 7. Supervision We at Relocation can: tot guarantee thatCentersteaching and/or non-teaching school personnel will travel to and remain at relocation centers to supervise school children until parents arrive
~
to retrieve them. ,
- 8. Sheltering (remaining indoors)
The LILCO plan suggests that sheltering may be the preferred protective action in specific Shoreham emergencies...However, none of this district's schools .
havg basementY or othe,r structures necessary to provide
. adequate protection.
- 9. Trust in Public Info ~rmationthe only public information upon which In the LILCo plan, to base. decisions for protective actions will come fromthr the utility. LILCO, tor and WALK-AM Radio, will both describe the extent ofBecause LIL the emergency and recommend actions. ,
be both operator of the plant and initiator of emergency School actions, potential.ft- conflict of interest exists.
- administrators, receiving information only from LILCO and not from any governmental agency, will be forced to decide upon actions with potentially serious consequences without the benefit of a directive from a responsible governmental source. .
- 10. Indemnification LILCo does not provide indemnification for school districts should damages, injuries, or deaths result from which can be made based only upon information and recom-mendations offered by LILCO.
Now, be it therefore
- ht RESOLVED, that the Miller Place Union Free School D school personnel of this di' strict adequate protection in and, be event of an accident at the Shoreham Nuclear Plant; it further ,
- e e
e 9
e .
\
/ Mg 9 '
fa, 3- Board R2 solution ler Place UFSD RESOLVED, thtt this school board believes that licensing of the Shoreham Nuclear Plant should not be peridtted unless or until complete and reasonable resolution of these outstanding, critical emergency planning problems can be achieved.
f "
The above Resolution was passed by the Miller Place Union Free School District Board of Education at the 1983. - -
Board Meeting on September 1, 1
s
_e s
// John F. Ma' 'n?
y District C rk
- e O
O e
e O O
- e e
O O
8e 4
O e
4 S
g e
4
- O e
== e
- 4. s - Ad_nL r.-- -- e"*m nso,.aAAm.-s- - - --. A a- a >mu - - '-e -,a:a----,-s m- n*- " ------ a '
-- -- s- L- - e m-.a--m- w - a -
l
]
?
e I
i i
E i
l I
4 I
J i
1 l
i 1
l I 4
k, I
1 4
h I
ATTACHMENT 21 l
f I
i l
- ..g.,
1 4
i i- __- ___ _ _.- .-.- .. , , , ,,,- ,_ _ . . . -_ - _ .. , _ . ., - ~._, ,, .. . - - . . . - . ,_-.. ,, . .m. . . ,we ,
l s
Attachment 21
- w. snar mer rpre noco ormq m
Board Resoluticut of October 18, 1983 Be it resolved that an early dierai---_1 or "go hcme plan" is net an !
appropriate response to an order to evacuate in the event of a malfunction et the Shorehan mclear Power Station until the following issues are resolved.
, 1. 'Ibe State and County goverreents approve an inplementable evacuation plan.
2.
'Ibe District can be assured that Bus Crivers, Dnergency and ,
Supervisory personnel of adequate force will be available 3 to the District to implenent the plan. J
- 3. ,
(
'Ihat such plan receives the review of the residents of the e District. {#
m I Until such time, it is the position of the Board of Education that "
no plan shall be submitted to any agency as such submittal could be viewed .-
as an agreement by the District that such a plan is feasible.
l 1
i
.- J' 1-j
- 'Q4 i
4
SBOREAM RESQWTICN Ebereas the Mount Sinai School District lies within the emergency Planning Zone of the Shoreham Nuclear Pcwer Station and Whereas the Board of Eudcation is responsible for the health and safety of the students and staff of the district while on district property and Whereas an operating license can not be granted by the Nuclear Regula-tory Comissicn for said plant without an approved implementable evacuation plan and Wbereas the government of Suffolk County adopted a resolution on February 17, 1983 stating that due to our unique island geo-graphy and limited road capacity it would be impossible to devise and implement an avacuation plan that wculd protect the public health and safety of the public l
and Whereas on that day the Governor of the State of New York announced his support of county government and stated then and subse-quently that he would not in: pose an avacuation plan on the county therefore be it resolved that the Board of Education of the Mount Sinal Unico Free Sc.hool District supports the decisions and position of the goverment of Suffolk County and the State of New Ycrk and be it further resolved that the Board believes that no operating license, i either low or full power, should be granted to LIIID for the Shoreham Power Station until an inglene stable evacuation plan that protects the.public health and sa ety is developed and approved by County and Stag Goverment.
e S
, . _ - _ , . , . - - - , . , . ~,_
L* - .--
i 4
ATTACHMENT 22
ROCKY oFFsCE POINT PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT Attachment 22 H ROCKY POINT , YAPHANK ROAD ROCKY POINT. LONG ISLAND. NEW YORK t1778 516 744 1600 EDWARD J. SH ENSEN SUPERINTENDENT oF SCelooLS Anmernate superintendent of School.
February 3, 1984 Ms. Elaine D. Robinson LERIO 100 Old Country Road Hicksville, NY 11801
Dear Elaine:
Enclosed as per your request is the Board of Education's Resolution re: Snoreham.
Yours truly,
. k_==
{ NK J.'CARASITI' Superintendent of Schools FJC/cak Enc.
cc's Board of Education
l l
SHOREHAM RESOLUTION October 31, 1983 WHEREAS, the Rocky Point School District lies within the emergency planning zone of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station and WHEREAS, the Board of Education is cognizant of its responsibilities relative to the health and safety of students and staff on its premises and WHEREAS, it is known at this date in time that no Shoreham evacuation plan has been approved by the Federal, State and County government agencies and WHEREAS, there has been no coordination relating to any evacuation plan therefore, ,
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Education of the Rocky Point School District supports any action whereby School, County, State and Federal officials work cooperatively in devising an approved evacuation plan and be it further RESOLVED, that the Board believes that no operating license be granted to LILCO until an approved evacuation plan is devised.
- s 0
...) e G
S ATTACHMENT 23
. . . . . . -. . . - . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . - - . . . ...........n- ~ . . .
s
. t. Attachment 23 c BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES .
I FIRST SUPERVISORY DISTRICT, SUFFOLK COUNTY RAYMOND A. DeFEO, EXECUTIVE OFFICER Director. Special Education Anistant Superintendents
~ " "I Carrnine T. Antonelli N. Henry Ryhtor, President BOCES Screces T Aaministrative Anistant Md T. Can - Patrick W. Kirwan
, Finance 215 Old Riverhead Road.Westhampton Beach. New York 18978 Telephone: (516) 2884400 December 1980 TO: PARENTS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS PARENTS OF OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION STUDENTS l
SUPERINTENDENTS OF SCHOOLS BUILDING PRINCIPALS Attached you will find a copy of the updated CIVIL DEFENSE PRO-CEDURES and "GO-HOME" PLANS for the 1980-81 school year.
j -
s
[
! Would you please keep this for reference. We hope we never need to use it In any emergency.
l.
I' If you have any questions with regard to these procedures, please contact me at 288-6f OO. i l
1 i
- Very truly yours,
\ M Carmine T. Antonelli
. Gr.21 4 CTA:acq Assistant Superintendent Att.
I t
i Copies to:
BOCES I Administrators i
4 t
i i
J e
I . . . - . . . _ . .
l
.. ., l BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES FIRST SUPERVISORY DISTRICT. SUFFOLK COUNTY RAYMOND A. DeFEO, EXECUTIVE OFFICER Sk Directos, special FJucation Asnistant superintendenn N. Ilenry Rightar. President -
- " U*I Carmine T. Antonelli Abinistrative Assistant
- " Patrick W. Kirman Finance 215 Okt Riverhead Road %cstlumpton licash. New York 18978 Telephone: ($16) 2884400 civil DEFENSE PROCEDURES and "GO-HOME'I PLANS f
Each building currently in use has been surveyed to determine the " safest area or areas" where students can be sheltered in event of disaster until arrangements might be made to evacuate them to their homes or other safer destinations.
These locations are as follows:
HARRY B. WARD AREA OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER o Central (Main Building) - South Wing -
Interior corridor in Administrator's Office area for staff and Offset Litho-graphy students. Students from the Assessment' Room, accompany teacher to Conference Room.
All other students and teachers will assemble in the interior corridor to the left and right sides of Commercial P'hotography Shop.
Central (Main Building) - North Wing -
All students and teachers will assemble in the interior corridor to the left and
'l right of the Licensed Practical Nursing / Health Assisting Clinical area.
! Overflow will report to the Electronics class interior wall area.
South (Shop Building) l Carpentry students and staff. assemble in the interior corridor, away from twin glass entrance doors.
- All other students and staff will report to the interior section of the Auto Body Shop, away from the bay doors, facing chalk-board and spray booth.
4 Northeast (Horticulture Building) '
i ,-
I \ Small Engine students will assemble in the classroom and face the interior wall opposite the windows.
l a
(Continued) l.
l
- l . _ _ _
~
.- ._ . . . . . . . . . - . . - . . . . . - - . . . . . . - . - . . _ - . . . . . _ . . . . . . , . - - . _ - - ~ . . .
(
CIVIL DEFENSE PROCEDURES and "GO-HOME" PLANS (Continued)
I "GO-HOME" PLAN he decision to send the students home will be made by the District Superinten-dent of Schools in conference with the Assistant Superintendent. In the absence of the District Superintendent, the Assistant Superintendent will decide in !
conference with the Assistant Superintendent for Finance and Business. In the absence of any two of these individuals the person in the office at the time will take responsibility for this procedure.
It is understood that any action taken with regard to the "GO-HOME" Plan will be done af ter consultation with the Administrators of the respective programs, namely, Occupational Education and Special Education or their designees should the Administrators be away from the building at the time.
Special Education students will be taken home. Occupational Education students will be transported according to present day-to-day arrangements for morning and af ternoon students.
The following procedure will go into effect once the "GO-HOME" decision has been made:
o Assistant -Superintendent for Finance and Business / Assistant Superintendent for BOCES Services will contact the bus contractors as follows:
SPECIAL ED U C ATION Acme Bus Company Mr. David See, Dispatcher ..... Office: 585-6565 or 737-0909 Home: 728-6469 East End Student Transportation Company Mr. John Mensch ..... Office: 728-6511 Home: 281-7139 Riverhead Bus Garage l Mr. Edward Doherty ..... Office: 727-3095 Home: 727-1745 l
l l
I( .
(Continued) e
~
. . . . I,
[
CIVIL DEFENSE PROCEDURES and "GO-HOME" PLANS (Continued)
'Ihe Assistant Superintendent - BOCES Services / Assistant Superinte} . dent for Finance and Business Management will notify the Director of Special Education and the Principal of the Occupational Education Program, and initiate a call chain to each district notifying the district officials of this "GO-HOME" procedure, as follows:
ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT - BOCES SERVICES Office will notify:
Amagansett ..... Dr. Griesmer ..... 267-3572 Bridgehampton ... Dr. McGowan ..... 537-0271 -
East Hampton ... Mr. Freidah ..... 324-4100
- Eastport ..... Mr. Figliozzi ..... 325-0800 i East Quogue ... Mr.Knab ..... 653-5210
- Fishers Island ..... Dr. Haase ..... 788-7444 t ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR FINANCE and BUSINESS MANAGEMENT i will notify:
Greenport ... Mr. Nelson ..... 477-1950 Hampton Bays ..... Mr. Gilligan ..... 728-0420 ,
Laurel ... Mr. Ware ..... 298-4848
- Little Flower . ..... Mr. Sherman ..... 929-4300
- Mattituck-Cutchogue ..... Mr. Burns ..... 298-8460
,j, Montauk ... Mr. Philley ..... 668-2474 i New Suffolk ..., Mrs. Terry ..... 734-6940 SPECIAL EDUCATION OFFICE will notify:
i
'I Oysterponds - . . . Mr. Boerum ..... 323-3713 Quogue ..... Mr. Clough ..... 653-4285
, Remsenburg-Speonk ... Mr. Boehl ..... 325-0203 I
Riverhead ..... Mr. Hernandez ..... 727-8080 Sag Harbor ... Dr.Annacone ..... 725-1550
. Sagaponack ... Mrs. Guyer ..... 537-0651 i Shoreham-Wading River ... Mr. Anderson ..... 929-8500 OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION OFFICE will notify:
8 Shelter Island ..... Dr. Bement ..... 749-0407 Southampton ... Mr. Woessner ..... 283-1714 f Southold ... Mr. Cain ... 765-5400
- Springs ... Mr. Lycke ..... 324-0144 Tuckahoe ..... Mr. Colina ..... 283-3550 Wainscott ... Mrs. Fraser ..... 537-1080
, Westhampton Beach ... Dr. McGuire ..... 288-3160 .
.i MERCY H.S. .... Sister Joan DeLap 727-5900
!!(
'i' All parents of students will receive a copy of this plan for emergency dispersal and "GO-HOME" procedures. -
l
- The above call chain will also be used on notice of emergency conditions from
(' the Suffolk county Department of Emergency Preparedness. .
~
(Continued)
l f
I 4
i ATTACIIMENT 24 A &
d i
i f
i a
1 i
. ' Attachment 24 BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Second Supervisory District of Suffolk County .
(,. 201 Sunrise Highway Patenogue, New York 11772 I
EMERGENCY GO-HOME^ PROCEDURE In the event of a natural disaster or civil alert, the Board of Cooperative Educational Services will attempt to get students back, as quickly as possible, to their homes (Special Education Program) or home high schools (Occupational Program) whe'n adequate warning is given. BOCES will notify the parents (Special Education Program) or the home school district (Occupational' Program) of the emergency and the estimated time of the students' arrival. This estimated time of arrival will necessarily be an infonned guess based on the probable delay in contacting bus drivers and the anticipated travel time to the students destination considering the particular emergency conditions.
Transportation contractors will develop plans for contacting bus drivers for the purpose of getting buses to the BOCES Centers for an emergency dismissal. All transportation contractors will hold periodic drills with bus drivers to test the emergency notification procedure and to keep drivers familiar with the emergency go-home procedure. ;
. \
The attached diagrams illustrate the comunication procedure !
which will be followed in putting the emergency go-home procedure into action.
- l l
. j
~
g_ # 4 h __ M $ M*# O 'O O N" % M49'S b6 N M 4' 9*" W _. OO M
e' l curro f occaos -D
{ '
suonoamcv oo- nous epocasone ,
,i R.H.T.P. - SPECIAL EDUCATION / PRE-KINDERGARTEN Recef pt of Report of a Natural Disaster or C11v11 Alert
- From Department of Emergency Preparedness 924-4400 ,
I !
Sidney Winfeld e .
)
289-2200 or est. 218 I I I I lq ,
Doris Towle William Stepson Reginald Feltham or James Fogarty 289-2200 or eat. 217 289-2200 or est. 217 ,
567-1121 BUS CONTRACTORS DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION 1. John Bernagozzi 1. John Ewald 472-4609
' **
- I # ** **
- 1. Beliport Bus 286-0083 1. Bayshore 2. Elizabeth Mulviht11 2. Hola Almany 472-0700 565-1700 Brookhaven L.C. 286-1212 Academy 5treet School 842-7620 2. Ce ter Moriche- 3. Carl Minkin 3. Srfen Hawkfas 472-1919 878-0052 Is11p L.C. 589-8405 Bayport Senior H.S.
728-6511 3. Central Islip 4. Charles Honman 4 Marilyn Verney 472 3381
- * " # '* ~' # *" *
- 4. Suffolk Trans.
665-3245 4. East Moriches 5. Merrill 2usmer 5. Flora Garston 473-0880 878-0162 Sayville L.C. 567-8518 St. Charles L.C.
- 5. Swerey g'
286-0061 5. Hauppauge 6. Paul Pontiert 6. Eileen Roggemann 265-36M Central Islip L.C. 582-3660 928-2842
- 6. Towne Bus Terryv111e Rd. Elem School 822-1155 6. Sayvi11e 7. Kathy Judge Weiss a 589-5100 Wing Elem. 277-4994 7. Walter Galvin 581-2560 Isilp Jr. H.S. !
7 Scath Country 8. Harriet Chomet :
286-4307 Moriches Eles. Annes 878-4500 I h
- 8. South Haven I [
4I 286-1010 l5TAFF I
- 9. South Manor 878-4900 5TAFF f
- 10. Three Village l PARENT 5 l, 987-3000 l PARENT 5 *
- 11. West Islip 422-1560
- 12. William Floyd 281-3020 A- MI
^ ^
l f ,
t i .!
EMERGENCY GO - HOME PROCEDURE Occupat1onal Educat1onal/S.H.O.E.
Recefpt of peport of a Natural Disaster or Civil Alert From Department of Emergency Preparedness 924-4400 Sidney Winfeld 289-2200 or ext. 218 1
- i ii Dori= Towle Wi11Iam Simpson 6 Donna KeirsbiIck 298-2200 cr ext. 217 289-2200 or ext. 217 589-1124 I
l '
Bus Contractors: CENTER PRINCIPALS
! Suffolk Trans. 665-3245 Swerey 286-0061
.!, Islip Brookhaven Islip Career Brookhaven Career 567-1900 286-2400 589-1344 286-0900
![
District Transportation Directors (forthosedistricttransportin9 STAFF STAFF their own students) i! Bay Shore CSS-1700 435-2493 Home High School Home High Schools Home High Home High Brentwood Center Moriches 878-0052 Town of Islip Town of Brookhaven Schools Schools
- - Central Islip 348-5048
- l Connetquot 244-2201 878-0162 i* East Moriches Hauppauge 265-3630 I
.. Islip 581 2560 Beverly Jefferson i
Middle Island 345-2788 286-2400 Mt. Sinal 473-1991 '
Sayville 589-5100 North brookhaven l South Country 286-4307 MacArthur Airport South Haven 286-1010 Mid-Island Arena South Manor 878-44al Wm. Floyd 281-30PJ l l STAFF l A . .%
_ . - .ma _ _ , w
- ..- * .,. & _2, _ _ me m up 6
ATTACHMENT 25 O
f I
I'
. . . . . . . ~ . . .
EMERGENCY 00-}DE PLAN 10R SHOREHAM-WADING RIVER SO100L DISTRICT Attachment 25 1982-83 SO100L YEAR
( his Ian is submitted in accordance with the request of the State Civil Defense Comi sion and the New York State Education Department. It is designed to
( quick 1.y evacuate all pupils from District buildings and grounds in the event that an emergency situation should occur. However, the Chief School A&tinistrator may institute a " Stay Where You Are" plan when in his/her opinion the ' safety of the children is better served. -
1
~
PLAN I - In-sc}iool emergency closing due to no heat, no water, etc.
a.' Radio stations will be notified of the dismissal.
- b. The bus coupany will be notified to proceed immediately to the schools with pick ups based upcn the regular dismissal procedure.
- c. Elementary schools will imediately put into effect the procedure for l contacting class mothers who will then contact the parents notifying them of the dismissal and the estimated time of dismissal from the school.
No elementary child will be sent home unless parent / guardian or person j listed on the emergency card is home in order to receive the children.
l l d. 'Ihe Building Principal will be responsible to see that school personnel remain until all the pupils have left the school. School personnel may voluntarily provide transportation for those prpils who are kept in school because of the inability to contact the parent / guardian or person listed
! on the emergency card.
PIAN 2 - A natural or man made disaster where there is adequate warning
(..
- a. Radio stations will be notified of the dismissal.
- b. 'Ihe bus company will be notified to proceed imediately to the schools with a pick up based upon the regular dismissal procedure. All schools will be notified of the estimated time of arrival of the buses in order that the students may be ready for imediate evacuation. >
- c. Elementary schools will imediately put into effect the procedure for contacting class mthera who will then contact the parents notifying them of the dismissal ed the estimated time of dismissal from the school.
No elementary child will be sent home unless parent / guardian or person listed on the emergency card is home in order to receive the children.
- d. The Building Principal will be responsible to see that school personnel remain until all the pupils have left the school. School personnel may voluntarily provide transportation for those pupils who are kept in
. school because of the inability to contact the parent / guardian or person listed on the emergency card. .
PIAN 3 - A natural or man made disaster where it .is necessary for inmediate evacuation *
( a. Radio stations will be notified of the dismissal.
(
- am
5Le i4s ~ l' "
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS SCHOOL EMERGENCY CLOSING
- DUE TO LACK OF HEAT, WATER, ELSCTRICITY, ETC.,
OR THREATENING WEATHER (i.e. , SNOWSTORM, HURRICANE)
'?.
Submitted to comply with a request f rom the State Civil Defense Commission and the New York State Education Department. These procedures are designed to evacuate children quickly in an emergency. However, the Chief School Administrator may institute a " Stay Where You Are" plan when 1 i
in his opinion the safety of the children is better served, If the decision to evacuate is not made before 1:00 p.m., children will be sent home at their regular dismissal time. This procedure is necessary because it often takes as many as two hours to notify all parents and alternates in an emergency closing.
Parents are requested to train their children to be able to enter their house in an emergency when no one is at home. Parents will indicate on the Emergency Home Contact form if they wish children be sent home without a parent being in the house or to be sent to a designated neighbor.
l PLAN I - EMERGENCY GO-HOME PROCEDURES:
- a. Radio stations will be notified of the dismissal.
- b. The bus company will be notified of the dismissal.
- c. Elementary schools will immediately put'into effect procedures for contacting class mothers / fathers who will then contact the Parents, or the neighbor designated by the parents, notifying them of the estimated time of dismissal from school.
PLAN II -
A NATURAL OR MAN M1DE DISASTER WHEN IMMEDIATE EVACUATION IS NECESSARY:
- a. Radio stations will be notified of the dismissal.
,4
l l
- b. The bus company will be instrucced to send an
( appropriate number of buses to eachlive school to more transport elementary students who school, middle than one-half mile from the school students who live more than one mile school, and high school studentf who from the live more than one and one-half miles from the school. Middle school and high school students not transported by buses will beproceed dismissed as immediately with instructions to quickly as possible to their homes.
- c. Elementary schools will immediately put into procedures for contacting class effect the mothers / fathers who will then contact parents, or the neighbor designated by the parents, notifying them of the estimated time of dismissal from school.
- d. The Building Principal will be responsible for are dismissal procedures for students who picked up by private automobile.
PLAN III - NUCLEAR EMISSION:
In the event of of f'-site radiation from the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, the school will evacuate students to a district
' pre-determined safe place.
Adopted 10/6/76
- Revised 9/18/78 Revised 8/28/80 Revised 8/21/81 Revised 9/21/82 Revised 6/21/83.d bb .
I i
h
, , ' ~
I l
I j
ATTACHMENT 26A
_ . - ~ . - - - . = _ _ . - . - - . _ ,. ..
Attachment 26A 1.
THOMAS J. SHERMAN - DISTRICT j LITTLE FLOWER U.F.S.D. AT WADING RIVER '
SUPERINTENDEhT
~
1 "GO-HOME PLANS" In the event of a natural disaster as well as man-made disaster, plans must i be formulated which will ensure the safety of the children in our charge.
! Our children live in cottages which are located approximately 60 yards from j the school building. Because of this close proximity to our building, the plans for dismissal will be relatively simple.
l School personnel will escort each group'to the respective cottages. The teacher will remain with the group until assured that cottage staff is present to assume the responsibility of the safety of the children. The children who live in Bishops cottage will not be escorted there. They will assemble in the i Art room #8 and the assistant principal will escort these children to the Group Living conference room with the assistance of the teacher in room 8. The
- assistant principal vill remain with the children until the Group Living supervisor assumes responsibility for their safety.
These plans will be carried out cnly if the need for dispersal arises.
At all other times our routine for Shelter will be as previously planned j line up in the main corridor of the school.
1 4
i j
i e
e
9 l
I t
t ATTACHMmT 26B
- Attachment 26B Little F ower 9 CHILDREN'S SERVICES WAD *NG RIVLR, LONG ISLAND, W)ORK!!NJ ilM/')R00 212ll1 %3282 IIROOKLYN. NLW YOE I1201, in MONTAGUL $1RLET 212a % f212 May 24, 1983 i
Mr. flichael J. Sacca T.onc, Island Lighting Company 100 East Old Country Rmd Ilicksville, NY I1801
Dear Mr. Sacca:
As we discussed, I am forwarding to you information pertinent to evacuation of Little Flower in the event of an accident at the LILCO plant.
We have on grounds, at any~one time..approximately 80 children who would have to be evacuated. In addition. we have approximately 20 staff members who would accompany the children tn an evacuation.. ,
We have .utple transportation assets- to accomplish'~this evacuation, though the exact number of vehicles available would depend on the tin.2 of, day and the amount of notice given. liowever, it is still felt that ampic transportation would be available regardless of the time.
Thc method of evacuation from grounds would most likely be accomplished by convoy with all vehicles departing f rom thb f ront gate in a- singic group. Again, this would depend upon the specific circumstances of the emergency and would be spelled out as such in our evacuation plan.
Spectfics as to various internal responsibilities, load plans for vehicles, re-fueling, prininions for suppIles and edibles, emergency medical support, supervision, etc.,
would all be handled in the evacuation plan. However, the information listed in the first three paragraphs is the information you would need to arrive at an understanding of the scope af a regional evacuation. ,
.\ s -
r
,Inadditionto\thepersonnelmentioned,Imight'alsoremindyouthatwehaveanaddi-J tional 150 employees who would seek evacuation in dif ferent directions entirely on their own. They would, however, all s he departing from our front gate, either east or
' west, alongJorth Wading River Road, either all at once or spaced over a period of
~
time, depending on amount of advance noti,cc.
s , s.
I hope this ,is pf assistance to you. Fo. anything you r4 quire further, feel free to call me,at 929,6200.
Very truly y urs.
,,'N ,
s ' D ald . Pc cr' son s 7tana WADING RIVI.R wker, TAG a kir inistrative Services J OSTI:Rsj)OM13. GROUP HOMES
~
i I
ATTACHMENT 27 l
l
r ;
l
. - _ . . . , . . . , . . . - . , - - . . . . ...---.aw--- -~~ '
_...<..--~~..e...-=-+--.
- Attachment. 27 1
f /
~
, MEMO
, /
TO: Dr. Nick Muto '
IT.CH: Mr. Tom Smith r -
~
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Transportation Contingency Plan- Emergency Taka Road Octobee 6,.1982 '.I
' Ueedlosa to say, there arc a multiple of plans that could be cAcablished to return students hocas in the event of unanticipated or une:qcceed
,c00tir.ccacies. The basic and most important derefnator is tiGe.
, Time converts to coan.unication capabilit.ies. Obviausly as the day procreases, the various alternativce diminish until a point is reached irl which the only alternative is the' regularly.eatablished tahc home, seguence. '
Pollowing, is listed the only time set;monts open fc. caucur,1 cations:
A
'1. ForeJ31owledge of school closure ,
Previous day until 5:45 A.M. == Obviously no problem!< .
2 A.M. Decision--5:45 A.M. to-7:10 C?hr The drivers assignad. to Zengwod Bish School routes would have for the moet part, departed tts garage, thereby creating the need to meet the bust.s upon arrivel 0 7:10 A.M. At this time the drivers could
- be uninformed: A) To return students to their homes ~ end/or that the -
' schools or school would be t.1csed until father notice. B) That a specific school, w%se routing has not at that point started, will not be open/no pickup until further notice. During this intarm. commua=
- ications between,the echar drivers / garage would take place.
,e -
- 3. 7:15 A.M. to _9:10 A.M. .
Total Bus fiest is now ansag4d La transporting Middle school.
- splic gassimos & Ridge E=. 3. 4. 5. to school. At 8:10 A.E. -
~
then busea arrive at school. A or B stated above, een bs conveyed. '!his is the last time-frame in which I can assime Droomt and torwke conum_rni_ cations with all drivese, _
- 4. 8:15 A.E To 9:10 * /' 't Balf of the bus fleet will noir be omgaged in transporting regular staaions at Coram. E M.I., C.E.E and at the church kindergartan. At this peint. we saa te sure of comunication with wly ethe drivers doing the above stated routing. The
', other urisers sill have dispurses returning possibly to the
-*a-~~'
gezagespotataunknoies.-].,,; ,
i
~
- 5. 9:30_to 10:45 A.E ,, .
host a d i h m e can be reached and dispatched as required. This
< +
is the last opportunity to commamieste with total fleet. ~
- 4. _ POINT,OF NO ALTERNATIVE-10:45&.M. to 12:00 neon Four'fifthe of the fleet is now engaged in midday pickupe.--
Imagwood P.E session. Ridge Midday kindergarten,
HD10--continued l
l pm split sessions at Coram, Ridge,1HII.CClf. Midday kindergarten Coram, l 11HI and Church. .:T l
After this point, regular take homo sequence is our only logidal option.
Drivers will not complete AH take howa until approximately 1:00-1:15 PH.
Between 1:15 to 2:15 PN, em==mications are virtuouly/.
VibukIIj not worth the
~ affort. The individual 10DC bua arrivals would L :;peratic at best creating possible confusion and/or delays. .
[Syovadi c 0
,e
~
-?
.i
., . .\ . < Q,* ,
O j .
~
8 5
e e
f' *
. l l
1
! l
~
e
. #a. .- ,__4- G'*- f'
ATTACIIMENT 28 O
i t
l
- 3 a- ; . .__. . _--._--_---_..=
= .: =.;.- = -.: .= w - : - -.
MILIZR PLACE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
"' Miner Pla' e",'llew' c York 11764
?.F EERGENCY 00 HG4 PLAN f(AJOR PRDUSE In the event of an emergency, it is essential that:
i (a) Cancentrations of pupils should be dispersed as quickly as possible.
(b) An young pupils abould be sent home as quickly as possible either by school bus (K,1, 2, 3) or by private car (grades 4, 5, 6).
(c) All secondary pupils (grades 7 thzu 12) will walk home immediately as they can arrive home sooner than if they waited for buses.
BASIC INPURMATION -
- 1. All secondary pupils (grades 7 thru 12) am to walk home; no bus transpor-tation.
- 2. All pupils in the Sound Beach School who live near the school abould be ;
directed to walk home.
- 3. All Sound Beach Schooi pupils who live a distance from the school and can-not walk home will be transported home by private car.
- 4. All kindergarten pupils in the North Country Road School will be picked up by a school bus driven by Ifrs. tyiles or "xs. DeHart, who will.prc,ceed dinctly to the Andrew fauller Primary School.
- 5. All pupils in the Andrew Itu11er Primary School win be transported home in school buses using their a gular dismissal procedure.
6 Any child who is temporarily or permanently handicapped and who is unable to use the ugular buses win be transported home by school nurses in their respective school buildings.
i
- 7. If available, our two minibuses win proceed to the Sound Beach School to ,
aid in the delivery of pupils to their homes and may make several trips if necessary.
r
- 8. An thirteen full-sised buces win proceed to the Andrew Wiler Primary School to carry out a regular end-of-scheol dismissal procedure.
f l
1 l 1
_-----~---- ..__. _.. . . . -a----.----.-----..~--.-..._
s ,
o e f.,.. -
OTHER INPDlHATION REGARDING S0WD BEACH DISMISSAL .
,. T
- 1. All pupils are to remain in homeroorm with their teacher until'. notified by the interem system to proceed to the first car in the driveway via the main exit.
- 2. Pupils will simply board the first available car in the line. Know that there will be no effort to group pupils by grade or by geographical location of their home. 1his would cause a serious slowdown and confusion. De ider is to get the cars out delivering pupils home as quickly as possible.
- 3. Custodians at the Sound Beach School should walk down the icog driveway to keep cars in line so that traffic congestion does not occur. Cars must be free to exit the school property onto North Country Road.
- 4. All teachers and/or personnel who will be using their cars to transport Sound Beach School pupils will be supplied with a map of the district, which they are to keep in the glove compartment of their car.
~
'tg..f \Y q ~~' I ^ '
pu *
.,$ O n
\
+
j .,* s .
(
s-p y;-hi 't=i, ch EU
~
,, ',W .
?
D4 's.
ou > g II: ' -
64 < \
, 1 ,
O ,,
t '
- I jE . I
{ g i
,,,,,ea inv :
eit
) -
- i RADIO
{
a ,,...
s
. ,, ,,,pwp - y p. ,y *[f . .-
j s, .. w TTtt8 s-g .. .
- mm9 I- -
.;,c,,,so,*<
ig g1 g pga WM , , '
q.: .
s <
,, i i o . ; t " ,
o x , e n s ; 3; o cant **'j;$5 e N
2 u ._m u-*T 5' ~
j*R ,
->. w ons si j i
va m- w -,' = , , , , , I
- i gaax -
.=% -
- ..en
,,a,.-
- ~
=* ,
^ tt ,
f
. I', ,
" ~~
o y
s - ,,
e *
' # t 4 1
'@ .Igg w at a t' *p g
]f
, El ,g
.,,1..,
~
..
- yst
.a.c.Q f .. . b
.it t i I
a =>
4 G
{t y ,,,,. . . - . . a.
\
e
.p-p e,- m
@ 'i(4.) 4 5
niet stavt etta'
.: ,,,g n -' . S . .s i
$ ** sg. :s a
g & -
N's Q t
. . g\i s ht g; p :.:
f s ,,*,$
p- '
a ,- i,' ' ,
a i z $ w ,,
..::f h '
-%T rJ 1 s
g .
.r e
,/ ,
- e vt **
b s ..'..
5 c' +
s \
. i t
- _.-e-PATCH 0GUE - MOUNT.l5IN i
4 k
- a s i I
t
?c gs :;
4, j t
,,# 1 Pars, 8
i
- g( 1 . 5 -
t YE s
4 A' f 5 avhss y gg
%o., 5 7
c> ,
l &pu
- g L> -
"2 *
-..._,,mee - -- ~ ~ ~ - .
e M ,
7.TTACHMENT 29
Attachment 29 PORT JEFFERSON' JUNIOR, HIGH SCHOOL
{1p g NSE PLAN February 1983 FEB 8 1983
' -r
. "GO HOME PLAN" -
FORT JUTirwa deuC SCHOOLS ,
The followingeplan is -suggested. in the vent.."Go Home" instructions are received from the Superintendent:
- . 1. Downtown Port Jefferson -
pupils would walk
- 2. Suassa Park, Harbor Hills, Belle Terre -
6 busses Safety Measure: -
- 1. Old Post Road hill, West of High School Mr. Ibski E Mrs. Timmerman
- 2. Helle Terre Pd. & N'o. Country Rd. Mrs. Banks
- 3. Sheep Pasture Ed. E Main Street Mr. Kay & Mrs. Caruso
- 4. Myrtle Ave. E Belle Terre Poad &s. Bailey
- 5. East Broadway & Belle Terre Road"
- Mr. Ahnstrong I
- 6. Main Street' E Liberty Ave. Mrs.-Came11iri
- 7. Beach Street E West Broadway Mr. Junior
- 8. Old Post Road E Thcmpson Street Mr. McDehot-t
- 9. Myrtle Ave.. E High Street Mrs. Robinson
- 10. North Country Road & Pine Hil1 Boad Mrs. Zusma'.t;E Miss Richartisan
- 11. Old Post Road E Puritan Fath Mrs. Keisch & Mr. Bishop '
- 12. High Street & Spring Street Miss Baker E Miss Duck
- 13. Tuthill Street E Main Street ' Mrs. Handler
- 14. Spring Street E Main Street . .- % Malley ,& Mrs. Lewis
- 15. Belle Terre Poad E Thcenpson Street ,
Miss Burr E Mr. Smith
(
cc Mr. Ebetino ! '
% Mr. He11mers .
PECEIVED
@"') b
('
PORT J UTERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 7 SCRAGGY HILL ROAD ,
OCT 271982 PORT JEFFERSON. NEW YORK 11777 pt 6 '
-r '
M KRT JEHT.RS0moL-- October. 1982 Civil Defense Plan I. GO H0t1E PLAN In the event "go home" instructions are received from the superintendent of schools. the following action will follow:
- a. Bus trar..portation will be provided for students in pre-kindergarten, kindergarten, and first grades. Children in special education classes will also ride the bus.
- b. All students in grades 2-6 will walk home - pupils with younger brothers l and sisters should accompany them home.
- c. Students who are to walk will be reminded, in advance, by classroom teachers of the safety rules to be followed for walking along highways and other roeds.
. d. Faculty members will post themselves at heavy traffic areas cnd inter-sections as follows:
Old Post Road Hill. West of H.S. - Ms. Estrin. Mrs. Michos Belle Terre Rd. & North Country Rd. - Mrs. .Baitz. Mr. Conlin Sheep Pasture & Main Street - Mr. Bassett. Mrs. Mortimer ,
Myrtle Ave. & Belle Terre Rd. - Mrs. Kahn. Mrs. Bell. Mrs. Haft East Broadway & Belle Terre Rd. - Mr. Diebel. Mrs. Manuel Main Street & Liberty Ave. Mrs. Hopkins Mrs. Chrisman Beach St. & West Brosdway - Mrs. Wesemann, Mrs. Tessler Old Post Rd. & Thompson Street - Mr. Slingerland Hyrtle Ave. & High Street - Mrs. Patterson, Mrs. Barton No. Country Rd. & Pine Hill Rd. - Mrs. O'Sullivan Old Post Rd. & Puritan Path - M. s Hallinan. Mrs. Diamond High Street & Spring Street - Mr. istin. Mrs Lesserson Myrtle Ave. & Main Street - Mrs. Davis Ms. Peritz Cliff Rd. & Harbor Hill: Drive - Mrs. Purdy. Mrs. Taibi Main St. & Stony Hill Rd. - Mrs. Witt Miss Brown Myrtle Ave. & Thompson St. - Mrs. Rogers. Mr. Mead Belle Terre Rd. & Stony Hill Rd. - Mrs. Geisler Ms. Kernan Harbor Ridge Apts. & Belle Terre Rd. - Mrs. Pearlstein. Mr. Slavin Belle Terre Rd. & Thompson St. - Ms. Austen. Mrs. Buxton Barnum Ave. & West Broadway - Ms. Naumann. Mrs. O'Keife High Street & East Broadway - Mrs. Levinson, Mrs. Cardineau No. Country Rd. & Laurita Gate - Mrs. McCarthy. Mrs. Monaco
- e. Faculty memters assigned above will make themselves immediately familiar with the locations of their assigned duty stations.
. - _ - - - _ - - . . . - = - . . _ _ _ _ _ . . .
- f. Pk, K, and 1st grade teachers plus any unasssigned faculty members will make themselves available to the principal for service as,, substitutes or for other emergency duties as may be required. This inciddes Mr. Abramson, Mr. Bedford, Mrs. DeVeau, Miss Gorning, Mr. Bangs, Mr. Gallagher, Mrs. Dick and Mrs. McNally.
All aides will also be available as required.
II. STAY AT SCHOOL PLAN:
A. Deties of School Personnel:
- 1. Each classroom teacher will remain with the students assigned to his or her homeroom for the duration of the " stay at school" situation.
Teachers are to work as teams so in the case of an emergency or when necessary, one teacher could closely supervise two classes.
- 2. First Aid: Mrs. DeVeau, Miss Gorning
- 3. Sanitation (Latrine): Custodial Staff, Pool Aides
- 4. Recreation: Physical Education Staff Art & Music Staffs Learning Center, and LD Staff
- 5. Rationing: Food: Kitchen Staff Water: Teacher Aides
- 6. Rotation of Space: Mr. Slingerland, Mr. Abramson, Mr. Conlin
- 7. Communication: Clerical Staff, Mrs. Buxton B. Civil uefense Drills:
With the architectural design of the building and with no below ground stations, there are still precautions we can take to minimize the effects of a nuclear blast.
- 1. Whenever possible, children will be placed in areas where they do not find themselves directly in the path of glassed-in areas or where glassed areas are generally minimal such as in the intermediate area halls, the west all-puroose room, large group room, etc.
- 2. Students should take their coat. with them since heavy coats, especially those worn in winter conths, could offer considerable protection from , heat and flying glass.
If in a special class, unless notified over the PA that they are not to return to classrec.ns, pupils are to return to classrooms to get p their coats.
l
\.
Students must remain quiet during drills to keep excitement 3.
and anxiety to a minimum and to pennit announcements to be made and heard. :r
- 4. All notification of drills will be made by the office in 1
advance via messengers or directly and at the moment over the PA system.
- 5. The safest areas in the building includ5 the pool area, both the west wall and locker rooms, the 500 wing hall area, the large group room corridor area outside the west all-purpose room, etc. However, all areas which offer protection from flying glass are to be utilized, particularly those most ad.jacent to the homerooms.
4 8
t
^^^
.' v4b cw' up'
- PORT JEFFERSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS "'
BUSINESS OFFICE f"* '
- t. .
i RECEIVED TO: All Administrators, nd Supervisors FROM: P. He11mers / / NEr30 g d'j DATE: Novem'ber 211, 1 , FORT g g g ggg, RE: Emergency Closing of Schools Information regarding the emergency closing of BOCES schools is attached.
Mrs. Lombardi should contact Medi-Bus, Inc., or sny other contractor providing in-district transportation for handicapped children through the Regional Transportation Program.
One of the signal districts should be contacted either by Mr. Scalzi or Mr. Ebetino in order to determine if BOCES classes will be cancelled as' stated in the BOCES memo.
9
, v. -
BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
.[ ,
Sscond Supervisory District of Suffon County RECEIVED 201 Sunrisa Highury Patchogu.e, New York 11772
(
. PCP.If.III*r b tt% c,. , ,'
MD10RANDUM TO: -
Selected Superintendents of Schools Suffolk County School Districts FRON: Sidney Winfeld Director of Finance and Transportation DATE: November 15, 1982. ,,
SUBJECT:
In-District ' Transportation of Handicapped Children as Provided by,the Regional Transportation Program (RTP) .
sooooooooocxxxn,oooootxxicoocxicooooooooocxacocoooc-
~
. During the 1978279 school year, 'our policy for in-district transportation insofar as school closing during extreme weather conditiohs was that when BOCES II special classes were forced to close because of hazardous road travel, in-district transportation of wheelchair-bound children was, automatically suspended. We found that this policy caused many problems which worked to the detrbnent of students transported by RTP in denying them transportation to programs located within their own school districts which were open. ,
In order to remedy this situatio'n, we revised this policy in 1979-80. All in-district wheelchair transportation will operate independently of the BOCES II school closing policy and will, instead, -
function in accordance with the policy of the school district in which, each such handicapped child utilizing this specialized service resides. The*
RTP. contractor will be notified of this policy change and will be directed to contact your office to establish lines of communication. -
.. g-
" It is suggested tiet steps be taken to include the present RTP transportation contractor in your emergency ~ school closin'g chain for your school district. Consequently, if your school distri:t closes because of -
extreme weather conditions, the RTP contractor will likewise be informed and will suspend transportation without ' direct ' involvement with the RTP office.
Attached you will find a list of the students in your dis'trict who we are presently transporting in the in-district transportation program.
A copy of this list is being forwarded to the RTP transportation contractor.
If you have any questions in regard to this memorandum, please do not hesitate to call.
attachment ,
. cc: RTP transportation c'ontractor -
g a w
- - . , , ,,. - . . . - -. ,,, , . - . ,-r - n-n., , ,
- -~
. . ' ,f E3ARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES SECOND SUPERVISORY DISTRICT OF SUFFOLK COUhTY 201 Sunrise Highway Patchogue, New York 11772
(
TO: Chief School Administrators in the Second Supervisory- :r -
~
District of Suffolk County U.I ',
FROM: Sidney Winfeld, Director of Finance and Transportation ,, '~._ .l DATE: November 15, 1982
SUBJECT:
Suspension of BOCES II Special and Occupational Classes Under Emergency Conditions - 1982-83 This is to remind all interested parties concerned with the BOCES II programs of Special and/or Occupational Education ~
- of the policies concerning emergency class. closings. .
In many instances, students from a single school district are attending classes in several different BOCES II f acilities.
Because of this, in order to reduce problems in the area of trans-7 portation and attendance, five (5) " SIGNAL" districts wil.. be used to determine whether all BOCES II Special Education, Occupational Education, Special BandicappedO ' ccupational E'ducati$on (SHOE), and Pre-Kindergarten classes will be closed as a unit. If three (3)_of the five (5) following districts are closed because of seve e weather' con-ditions, all BOCES II Special Education, Occupational Education, SHOE, and Pre-Kindergarten classes will be similarly closed for the day: .
Patchogue/Medford Brentwood ,
Connetquot Rocky Point Middle Island
.In the event that all BOCES II Special Education, Occupational i
Education, SHOE and Pre-Kindergarten classes are not closed as a unit based on the above procedure, all classes in the Special Education and Pre-Kinder-garten ?rograms_ will close based on the decision of the districts 1Ln which
- i
(. Special Education c'----e - e leccted. If nny one (1) of the fellering unstarred school districts closes because of severe weather cogditions, all
~
BOCES II Spec'ial Education and Pre-Kindergarten classes will close as a unit:
Bayport/ Blue Point Sayville
- Central Islip South Country Connetquot *Three Village
- Islip *Nilliam Floyd
- Port Jefferson
- Central Islip, Islip, Port Jefferson, Three Village, and William Floyd closings will not automatically close all BOCES II Special lducation and Pre-Kindergarten classes but will close only those BOCES II classes housed P
in school buildings in those districts forced to close because of adverse veather' conditions.
(
The parents of all BOCES II Special Education stu' dents have been advised of this policy. ,
For those districts transporting their own students to BOCES II," special attention should be paid to the following: If a local district suspends classes
, because of sesere weather conditions but BOCES classes remain open, it ,is under-stood that students transported to BOCES by local districts (those districts which have suspended classes for the day) vill not be transported on the days in questien.
The Special Handicapped Occupational Education Program (SHOE) for local school districts vill observe the snow closing procedure which has been outlined
[ for the Occupational Education Program; therefore, if the regular BOCES Special Education Program closes but the Occupational Education Program reaains open, the SHOE PROGRAM for the local school districts vill remain open. This program I
i
~
( -
operates out of the Brookhaven Career Center and the Islip Career Center.
The remainder of the SHOE Program which involves shutsfing BOCES Special Education students between their academic class and their occupational class will close if the Special Education Program closes.
i cc: High School Principals l Pupil Personnel / Guidance BOCES II Transportation Contractors f
{
l l
[
i e
. em fc#
O g m -pm ..e .q = ,-.m
_ _ _ _ , . _ _ - __.. __.-...- - ~..- ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ - - - -
LOARD OF COOPIRATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
' Sscond Supervisory District of Suffolk County 201 Sunties Highvey Patchogue, New York 11772
/ . l s -
. I EMERGENCY SCHOO'. CLOSING g 1982-83 School Year OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION FACILITIES DISTRICT FACILITY IS LOCATED IN Brookhaven Occupational Center South Country Central School District Islip Occupational Center Connetquot Central School District MacArthur Airport Facility Cor.netquot Central School District Mid-Island Arena Middle Island Central School District North Brookhaven Center Comsewogue School District SPECIAL HANDICAPPED OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION (SHOE) FACILITIES DISTRICT FACILITY IS LOCATED IN Brookhaven Career Center South Country Central School District Islip Career Center Connetquot Central School District SPECIALEDUCATIONFhCkLITIES DISTRICT FACILITY IS LOCATED IN Academy Street School Bayport/ Blue Point School District Bayport Junior High School Bayport/ Blue Point School District
- Bayport Senior High School' ,
Bayport/ Blue Point School District i Brookhaven Learning Center -
South Country Central School District Central Islip Learning Center Central Islip School District
'Islip Jr. Eigh School Islip School District Islip Learning Center --
Connetquot Central School District North Country Learning Center Three Village School District Premm Learning Center Connetquot Central School District Saint Charles Learping Center Port Jefferson School District Sayville Learning Center- Sayville School District Sylvan Avenue Elementary School Bayport/ Blue Poirt School District Terryville Road Elementary School Consewogue School District Wing Elementary School Islip School District ,
- PRE-KINDERGARTEN FACILITY DISTRICT FACILITY IS LOCATED IN Moriches Elementary School Annex William Floyd School District i
RADIO STATION DIAL SETTINGS WALK (1370 AM) W3LI (106 FM) l WCTO (94.3 FM) WGLI (1290 AM) l WGSM (740 AM) WLIM (1580 AM)
, , . - . , , -,. - _.. ~ ._
PORT JEFFERSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS b. -
BUSINESS.0FFICE TO: 'All Administrators & Supervisors -
' ~
9 NOV 1 7 ]S82 s y/
FROM:. P. Hellmers r g
PORT'Jf1 TERSON h!3UC S;dO0f.5 DATE: November 16, 1982 RE: BOCES Emergency Go-Home Procedure Enclosed is a copy of the Emergency Go-Home Procedure in effect for BOCES classes. Please note that the procedure is intended to deal with natural disasters or civil alert. A separate procedure will be issued for dismissal of classes in the event of impending emergency road conditions.
Note '. hat Occupational Education pupils are to be sent to the home school district. It would then be necessary to transport the _ycun.c-ters to {
their homes and your go-home plan should -include this possibility. .
Eni:. .
.. 'g .-
e 1
e k
.i
- :i.
l G 4'*2 I :, ;, .- -, .
r h. ~> .... ~
BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES / r.. e, '
Second Supervisory District of Suffolk County
.','c ,
. 201 Sunrise Highway ..
( . ,
Patchogue, New York 11772 '
a -N'. 4 .
. ~
a
- r. '- ll!
' EMERGENCY'GO-HOME' PROCEDURE In the event of a natural disaster or civil alert, the Board of Cooperative Educational Services will attempt to get students back, as quickly as possible, to their homes (Special Education. Program) or home
~
highschools(OccupationalProg' ram)'whenadequatewarningisgiven. BOCES will notify the parents' (Special Education Progra'm) or th'e home school district (Occupational Program) of the. emergency and the estim'ated time of the students', arrival. This estimated time of arrival will necessarily be an infonned guess based on the probable delay in contacting bus drivers
( .
and the anticipated travel time to the students destination considering the particular emergency condi.tions.
Transportation ' contractors will develop plans for contacting bus drivers for the purpose of, getti.ng buses to the BOCES Centers for an
. emergency dismissal. All, transportation contractors will hold p'e riodic drills with bus drivers to test the eme.rgency notification procedure and
~
to keep drivers familiar with the eme.rg6ncy, go-iiome procedure.
The attached diagrams illustrate the communication procedure which will be followed in putting the emerg6ncy go-home procedure into .
l action.
l l
l .
f l , - . - . . . - - . . , , , . - - - _ . , . . .
amanounct o'~ . n o co u epoccouno' '
- - f R.H.T.P. - SPECIAL E00 CATION / PRE-KINDERGARTEN * .
Receipt of Report of a Natural Olsaster cr Cllvil Alert , .' g From Oepartment of Emergency Prepurdness - -
924-4400 I '
Sidney Winfeld
- I. . .* .
289-2200 or est. 218
- l f,
i I I l Ooris Towle William Simpson
- Reginald Felthee or James Fogarty 289-2200 or ext.'217 289-2200 or ext. 217 _ ,
567-1121 ,
i c
BUS CONTRACTORS DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION 1. John Bernagoral . 1. John Ewald 472-4609 ORS Pm L.C. ,
- 567-4901 Sylvan Ave. Eleaf school
- 1. Be11 port Bus
- 286-0883 1. Bayshore 2. Elfrabeth'Mulvihl11 2. Nola Almany 472-0700 665-1700 Brookhaven L.C. 286-1212 Academy Street School 842-7620 2. Center Moriches 3. Carl Minkin
- 3. Brian Hawkins 472-1919 I 878-0052 Islip L.C. 589-8405 Bayport Senior H.5.
_ f 728-6511 3. Central Islip 4 Charles Hohn 4 Marilyn Verney 472-3381 i
- "" # ** ' I# #* "*'* I 4 Suffolk Trans. '
665-3245 4 Eas,t Moriches 5. Merrill Zusmer 5. Flora Garston 473-0880 ;
878-0162 Sayville L.C. 567-8518 St. Charles L.C. l
- 5. Swerey 286-0061 5. Hauppauge 6. Paul Pontierl 6. Eileen Roggemann .
265-3630 Central Islip L.C. 582-3660 928-2842 i
- 6. Towne Bus Terryville Rd. Eles School !
822-1155 6. Sayville 7. Kathy Judge Weiss 589-5100 Wing Elem. 277-4994 7. Walter Calvin 581-2560 k Islip Jr. H.5. f
- 7. South Country 1. Harriet Chomet .
i
- 286-4307 Moriches Eles. Annex 878-4500 I f
- 8. South Haven 5TAFF g 286-1010 I - - -
N,
- 9. South Manor 878-4900 5TAFF
- 10. Three Village 987 3000 P A R E N T 5- '
- 11. West Islip
- 12. William Floyd 281-3020 A- M1
- -g es
~
j -
EMERG'ENCY GO - ~HOME PROCEDURE
+
l Occupattonal Educational /5.H.O.E. .
- Receipt of Report of a Natural Disaster or Civil Alert From Department of Emergency Preparedness
{
92,4-4400 .
Sidney Winfeld .
289-2200 or ext. 218 l
l l
l .
i William Simpson Donna Keirsbitck i Doris Towle 589-1124 l 290-2200 or ext. 217 289-2200 or ext. 217 ,
CENTER PRINCIPALS Bus Contractors: ,
Suffolk Trans. 665-3245 Swerey 286-0061 Islip Career Brookhaven Career Islip Brookhaven 286-2400 589-1344 286-0900
' 567-1900 i -
District Transportation Directors STAFF (for those district transporttag STAFF t th4tr own students) l Bay Shore 665-1700 Home High Homer High 435-2493 Home High School Home High Schools '
i Brentwood Schools Schools Center Moriches 878-0052 Town of Islip Town of Brookhaven -
Central Islip 348-5048 Connetquot 244-2201 ',,
! i
, i - East Moriches 878-0162 I Hauppauge 265-3630 Beverly Jefferson Islip . 581-2560
! ; ,- 286-2400
- Middle Island 345-2788 '
Mt. Sinal 473-1991 sayville 589-5100 North Brookhaven
- South Country 286-4307 MacArthur Airport South Haven 286-1010 Mid-island Arena.
! South Manor 878-4441 I
- Wm. Floyd 281-3020 ,
l 5TAFF l I
l 1 .
l .
t A . .'s.tr>
I - - . _ _ _ . _ - _ _ - .- -
ATTACHMENT 30 9
9
, t . . .. .- ,
. . , e. .
Attachment 30
, 9* ,.
r CCE*.SGCGUE SCHOOL DISTRICT .
\ M 'E N O R I N D U M -
. . e v .
.F 4..- .
',:~*.
TO: ALL BUILDDiG PRINCIPAIS ,
FBOV.: TCM ACFJ.RA, TRA1:SPORTATION ,
LATE: F.GRUARY 8,1980 ,
RT* D'ihGEiCY CLOSINGS ,
.; se s.
. ..'.s .
As per attached memo, please be advised that the regular.
schedule will be followed, that is, the High School will be taken. ,
ho:se first, J. F. K. next, etc. ' This is the most recently revised
.l schedule. Previous ones should be disregarded. ,
~
l If you have any questions, please call me.
- e c1
- att. *
?
cc: Dr. Rovegna .
I Y
l 9
O I
I 8
- . 1
. g 73- 'e 3 }-
d e
- h- -***O L' ' M oe 4 ey m _
,g, ,,
C
.",.s ; re.r , 4 .
., j
,- ;p'W. .%v. . " , - .. . . . , .
, . .e-:
, i-e - .;..A. . e * . :,
- q,.
.. . . . s .. ,
,. .o ,
- _; ; ~. y.s
- .=; . . ... . , . ,;b .,.
+ '.
.v .. .
. . , . . 1
-- . ., y, . , , * .n '.
\ y. .* * .* ~ . .p .a 4, o .
y., *.o' -
H . ; , .-*.
\
.~.g , , . c. . .e .:,-M. , ,.
,.7,.;., q' . . . -...,,,,.s =....... .- ,
\
.. r...
1
,,, ,., t. : .... . *
. . .L '...g
- s. -
p.t , -
e ...g,..-(..p . w .. 1./
g - , =. f .* ,
- r.,
.;; CCE3ZWOGUE SCilCC DISTRICT. .
- r. .
i
,....,.r... .....
,i y' i.,-:.. ;.: .ar. ,. y -
C. : /. & , .;f,, sr%:>.;<*~
0.- . *- @ ...; .-c 4 .+ -
-t
-; a
. ~ . , . . - n ?. .c .
- . ,n '; ..
-~ -
- r. . . . . . ;. .., " .: .. ,m %. .. . . .;,~, . . ., ~ . . .. .; .. - .
.,l . s .
12tCIL'3tW
- . .'.w., ..;..'..,. . . . ..
~ -. . : ' '.
- .s;,. s - ;..f. ..- . ; ,. . .. . . ,., .
n- a .. . .*..s .~ e..s.n -;sc.
y: .-
~ .m. . : .;;.
. v u::: . ; n t.
s$. v 2. .:'.w
. .a 'i..n.y .= ;. s,.....< ,. .;. <- . :.x .. :: . .
. .n s =
. . ' . 7: J. .
.~.
. a. . .; -
a.. l Pi:'; g ; '. '-
- . a 82 ., r.C TO i't.T *,. . . "Dr. F.. Peter Pmg:s , Superic.tendent.
-I-
~
['
. z ~ . f. ;. . . .,
.i. -
Robert Ncaha, f.sJt., Sept. for . Business. i :
',:.,; . . .f... ',FROM:
... .:y . ..
cc- . , g.
u -
. ;. . . s .~ - .
',.. , ;.~ .-
Septeah.r M , ic32
- 2.. DATE: .-
g';.u. .,,, . n ~w a . :. . ; Q' * .; , n ... ,,- .: ' -.a.; C. ;.: .
Emergeacy Schc01 Clocit.1 - IM2-63, M, ,
KSt .
- +b -
- r. -'
~ s
. . ,! ~
... 3 . . , . . . ..1, ..
.n . ... .
s .- ...
.T- O' ' . ' '
T When"an e=troney sc1. col closing tecer.ss necessary dee to
- it elereht vesthir,'pover cr' epip: det fcilura, t'he fellouing notific.\ tion, -
.syste: vill be'utill:(d.
- . . ...: .- .. 3..
f.
. . Mr. Acerra and Mr,'Gladysa vill evaluate the . situation i '
JI% end'its effect on 'their operations. Er. Acerre and Mr. Gisdyst vill-cc11 Mrh NoW vith their recca erds'ic'ns. ?. , ,2D. . . ' ' ' , -
. i,
~- . . - - . s, .
'. . Mr. Nogka vill' call. Er. R vc0:n. tr. Rovegna vill deter g
'4 . .
r.!ce if it it necesacrf to close e:h. 1s If c.schoci closing is in ,
~ -
cr.ier, Dr. :<.evegr.e .: .;will actify l'r. Aus'.es. ,'. .,.}I
> . .a ..
- , .. , .y .
g
. . - - '.. . Mr.' AEstin vill rodIy the bildiri princ.ipals.. Tbn .
, }
'bellding piir.tip-Ir c kill ratify tcsir rbiusijaci en.4 clericci staff.
- ... > . . s
~ ~ '
- - Mr. Nods kill' roi.ify t}.irvituhbcard 'cperator asi the . :
'r*" - - : nicch' board cperator w'11 act!.fy cha fir;a depht=snt e.td thefradio . - l.
c tations; ' 5r. Notka vill notify Mr. t.ect'ra who vill call' the contract
~
.. ( .
traarpotteVs, and priVste .c'25 pcrochial echool,s . Mr. Foska vill. call
' ~
Fra. Feifering sehe vill.netify the cof.:terie sesif cr.d vendors.
Mr. tub vill call tire. 0:tir plohill notify the,dit,trict effice ' ~
g cleri: al rd:eff..
[ ,
,.& ..,e . O . s.i.' ; '. . . . .-
- 14. 0 * .' .,J,U . .
. ,, .g. . .. . .. - - >: . ~ . , . .. ,...;. . ~ , . '
c ,. . .
i .
.. pe .
Enc. ' s .
+ c; /J 1 Adnit:istrctere and Superviairr '
~
%~' . .;.'
. ., .g ,.
I t .n e',
ia . ._. f . I ".**, f s.
c... . . .: a
- s. . .....';,,. ...>..,.
..,..-Y.
4 ,
. . . . . . -. s.
'.,*' I l
- t. . * .-
- c. . . . . .; .. .
- i. . J.g,.v .. -
.; .. <. .. . .u .q - o....;'. . -- -
l
. , 3, s ,
s..
- . .- L.. ..
. .e . . .
. y . I
- .? .,. . , " .'?:. - g . 9.; * : .
?
f r. . &.. .
J .'. . a : ,
~ .J .*.c .. . 3 i' yn .
. . . g.d 4;.
. ? .. .i..
. .m . ..
. 4.. p. .Q.
4 y "** * ,M Q* D '. -
e ', J_2. T.'? -
.-. -. _ .. . . .. ~-.. -
~
F . 7.' .o.:O' e.F+.v,. E..'d. ,V. y",,; .~ ,
a W %. r.a.,l;.X.. ,w,.' . . , *
. . ~ . c:,e. . . .
. ..n : n ..? W:. ;=; 1.,.: s:'w.sC,w;4.
. p ..
m.. %, .a . -
- r..'. ..~ . .
,,..r,... .. . . .
. .. : q.^.,s..$.:* Q.r.,..
M. . . M.g ..-.. . .3; ..s % g,S, .'- .: .,.- '
Y:3. s s s
. - +
.' . J- .
r#. a. 2, .
..e. :. a . . .n. a. WOct!t;SC5CCL .. .u. .. - . ' * ' ' '
b'n.'.~M.,
J. . ..* '%:'.W.n'?CCs DICn.1CT " ' ' ' ' .
- '^ *
. w., .., .. -. - ,. . ,.,. - < .y. ,. n e;,.
< .- . . .,, .,. ... . ~ . . . -
. :: *. ', .- - . *. i5. Port'Jeffers6pStr. tion, Kr.: >.sY n
...,j.*;.'. 'p<-y.s <. ti:. .M y.;~
- ;;.:/?4 w 's-;.... .
.- m,.,g2gi , . ~. ..w-e c.. ..; .. L.;.* a.*..~J.,..
~. .. ...
J..%. : .% e, . t.
.. : w. g.. ~. , ~.;: ..- .
1
. . . ,.. ....... ; - ~m. ,..+ . m 5. ~ . _ .... .- .. .
1 $. . . .:Wx
. ... M... . ..rws.M. s .tW.7- ...,s. .#..
r s,cs m.% ctc g c
,.. 3 - 4
_ ... . . . _ . ,., ...ev. .. ... .. . .~. 9 n... n.. . . .. . ,
..e..,..v... . . . ....
.:a.r.
. m-.. . .:.. . . .:...-.na...:...=.t:.-ty
- .. .. a. ,+'ya ."
. . z. - . .
269-G704 .
ict Acerra . . . & , Steve - '.G.
.~ , a.is.dyc..x . ., w. c. -
willhall. ,'s'M. ..h- ..-..,Roi,nt !!::':s R..,.nrt nos.g...
. .4 , . , , , - . .
.a n11.e,..a . -
r:.n.,.: a 2.; ecell . , w..r.a.p.:.ww.p' '.;'..c 473-0303
- : .:.m .,..m. . %,s ,, . . . .. . . - . -
~
w . . . . . .v.
Dr. Lev:p.n-111 ce.11. :. ~ g. m~. ; .v..my.. . >. .p.W.61.v.ile . t.us :ca 255-S117
- v. . wa-. . /+..
. .?
s ,.v
.... ,:.:.c.s.
Altn in:tca vill ca11.*l .'.:.(/.X..%.x:m , . . . . ., C. ;.; Cw . yiced nee'. 3~m . . 751-7552 .
,f ~ -
. 413-4558
. . - . ~C... .
.....%. v -.3 .,. . .C. . w .'y 2 s i .!.i Q, %,...,. : c hyJ Wz"T.ca' u :.h- w.. ,. F- .<
.. . ,. ....7,
> .~ .,
n -
m EN:rd tir.ec i . 4'.5564 3
t< : .Mg. J . .
b '-. , :.h:r'.v .
C.4-wr.
~; :Y
. . Ccniin 256~9586
,- . : o#;~Od.%y Cu::
.' - .- a.
' U....~.a W.*:.?h(8: J. . .EW..@2.n. .s%.;;.54...Er:ca - - 744-3306 -
.e..,
. .- e.g. ._. c. . , e, ; ..- u c
.o
... .. .. .v- ..ya, z2 e . 7. ,5 . .. . .. . .
g_,g_6474 .
. . ~.,.. .. . . .
c r. . ... .. ... ..
Rch:c Node'.yill.
'. - 732-5011 g:.cal)." yd. .:,jf.Glp'(:.#@;-9,Tr.7.c/lco:rs
. . ...- :..s.O -
-:9.a o . .. ..< . 3. , y ~. a ., . s. . ~ . - .
y .,_,,sy
- s. .a -
'r. ..",.,4.C.-.......
,~
.- .M -
c.:C. h.ro. ly. hif acin. a* 473 0727
. . a .
n . .
. -/1 4 .q,;,f. ;.i.,'f .y..it. r.c;;..,..%...y.j; W h ry. Or:it ~-; . . , -
926-2391
(
. % y 4 /. .q%. .
- ,:4. :q . .
.,2:.a Pi:tvin vill call. ,,<.$f ; ,.w* b; ?lFlre hph.-Ccia 3 4'73-1224'
. , , . , . .y .
- u. .r , . ..;. t m.._s)-.n. . . - . w. . --~a.. .:.
..e. ,- .., .e. ,. ..; css m. o .
- .t
. ~.
.g..y."fy.p.. g ,
,e,: . .
.,;p . di:1 Sic S-310
. 423-5740 &
m,9c. r.
. . . - u.w. .
g- 2
- s. . . . 4 a .>
., s...., r. r.
.: . o. S. .r.
a' v".*.- $ '. '..t
.. . /. A. F. .s.e.... .yf e..# .y gyp 5-1 g.- et - . . > 17 1-2*'$"4 4
%M, . ,,
. : . .. :oq . n mi.c 1/.4 0 0. disi. ~;:d . 63 2 .-
cf.. 3 .%5Q.f',.',.p;t.,q.'Tu!_f;e'W.g, .yg' Q.1. ,
1.'ga c: di .1 Cch 1919 ~537-1023 659-13SO 732 4,930
.c.7 ,:. .. Y ...J:i.
. .e. M..O.
. ..T.p..,.,..%. .'d,d;.'y.CI- :F:.W1 en dit.1 6113
....e..
- o. ....
~
..n. . .
- s. 47*:.-5515 1*J* . i>o r, . * -
Tc !.::n ta. villic. al.l, l(yJ.,.M4,
, erb g' ;.T.5)w. y,.+9*. - *hi MW;.rf h.
c '
.W' 751--5516
- Jq.Hl;'3.p$g;.l ; 3; i.;?.. : qi it ; Cc::ig;e,: .
..': -: - , . . 421-3333 W . o.., .x . ...,-G.:: itr, 50f-5555
'-" .- . ;,,.; a + . -
' < . y.>.u , . g e.M . e51-1 4 ,4
...' :i Mi..",n . .
2n 11CO
' ,.. :. ... .'.:M.i .+' 'A ./ p.;.a . .t . . . .?_.I tt c.y. .. . ..
642-5515
. . . t , . ...,1. ',..
. .. ; ......m :
s-
..,3,..
. . .. . .,..,..3 Cr: *.yn C-ik ri .ng elli:.....,- ,wc c11- c
. v.: .
,..cr. G tw r iu n::.!i -
W'm ' . . .
. .a . . .
. ', -.'r.y. ' '. f:":... -x, n_ - .
p.. . . . - .. . . .
Ihr ,. Crt ka V!)5 pd* 0;;.. E'.2 8
. .t ..! _-C)cric:.1 emf-Dietrict. 0.~fic:i
- s. l-.
..r....,.s.*. .. . ,.-.4.,., ..
t.. .. . . ,
, . . s m. , , . -
....;.. ...a.- , . ,-..
.:. . x . e. .... ,,.
"p:h.u.* . s .e.. ...... .-
, fi..
- *.*1* j$1 .-c- ** .
.m' . -
n.u e
.: 7- ..U- I-"s .*t .- ' 'I . ' , .
"**..,.?.*d*,
(
'n
- {;.y. ...,1..- )' .':l-J .U..d. . .
L.'
- ~..n. ...
' %.W,..
Ale [*'t' N. - - A.
. < . .4 . .,- . .. ,; .- -
r.- . :,. ef.,,.. -
.,..,..,.p..n. ..s
.,.r
. . .. .s. .. -. .
, ._ s. ....
. . . . . , . . , . . -r.?.. .
g 4
,.....,v.
8 ..
.: : ,,.n
- .. : . a.t. h .f . . ..~1 .:.y .g.:. v% W '!.',> h /.F .
~
- f. _: . . .
- -~
v h
i
]l'$5].h.; :..y . # ?.&, .
. ;h.,.Qh&ff. . ..?Y -' ~.'
'~ ' !' S - " -
.~n . . . . - . ~ .. . . . . . . - . . . . . .. . - . -...... . ........-... . . .
. .- w . - -
s t ATTACHMENT 31 e
l
S %
3.
- . - 2.~, u . . .. . .... .? . _ ._...,___A.,_,,_,,,,_..,_,,, , _ _ , , ,
~~
Attachment 31 4
N
' ' TENTATIVE SCHEDULt'IN CASE OF EARLY SCHOOL CLOSING
% . .. ,, 3 x + , s f
1982/1983
.h i Plan A ,
Decision made prior to 9:30 a.m., buses will be making their 5
a.m. pick ups; s
' ~
, 1. School official willsnotify drivers as they arrive at building to stay there. , _
- 2. s.
Drivers will unload., students:and stay at that building awaiting further instructions from Transportation Office.
- 3. Buses that brought students to school ;<ill take home students, using 'a.m. busy numbers and rc 2tes, at all schools. The
- 4. Schools will be dismissed in reverse order of arrival.
following is an example'of the emergency take home schedule.
The times listed below are for the purpose of clarifying
,the order of dismissals only. The Transportation Office will set the exact schedule on the day.
s 10:00 a.m. - Dawnwocd Junior High,'Selden Junior High, Unity Annex
^
c
's 10:35 a.m.,- New Ldne (Inter'modiate) , Bicycle Path, Oxhead Road l ,
/ s 3_
1 11:10 a.m. - New. Lane (Primary) , Eugene C. Auer Memorial, Wood
'JRoad/ Stagecoach, +~
Hawkins Path
' 11:45 a.m. - Holb2bok Road School, North Coleman Road School, Jericho,. Newfield High School
- i 12:15 p.m. - Center'sach High School
- Bus to s'huttle Newfield Vocational students to Centereach 4
High School Regular classes and special education classes will be dismissed at the same time. s All drivers for out of diitrict schools will leave af ter junior -
high dismissals.
s s
(
s' '
y's I . ,
1.
I u
l ,
I
. _ - . . - - - . . . .- .-. . - .. ..... ...... - --...- -.~. .
. . . , . . t
() TENTATIVE SCHEDULE IN CASE OF EARLY SCHOOL CLOSING 1982/1983 Plan B Should a decision to close schools be ma'de later than 11:00 a.m., at least one-half hour will be required to have buses at schools to begin taking students home. Kindergarten drivers on duty where snow is Am7nent, are to keep in touch with this office before and after each route.
High school dismissal will u'se a.m. routing. All other schools will use o.m. routes to take students home, using the following schedule:
11:30 a.m. - Newfield High School, Centereach High School 12:05 p.m. -
Holbrook Road, North Coleman, Jericho 12:40 p.m. - New Lane (Primary), Eugene C. Auer Memorial, Wood Road, Stagecoach, Hawkins Path 1:20 p.m. - New Lane (Intermediate) , Bicycle Path,0xhead' Road f(:g$~p.m. - Unity Drive Annex, Dawnwood Junior High, Selden JQnior High Two (' 2 ) buses to shuttle Newfield Vocational students to Centereach High School to depart at 11:15 a.m. from vocational side of build-ing.
All drivers for out of district schools will leave for their schools af ter high school dismissal.
e o- -
p 9 .
- sae= . m ,
e
y a - W -- - .x a n1.- . ._- __,,_,,._ __
ATTACHMENT 32 e
Attachment 32 e
e
- r l
SOUTH MANDRiELEMENTARY SCHOOL l l
SOUTH STREET MANORVILLE, NE11 YORK l
EMERGENCY "GO HOM,E" AND " STAY WHERE YOU ARE" PLANS e
e t
i k
1 0
k i.
- e
e We have been requested by the State Education Department and Department of Cisil Defense, Suffolk County, New York to file school "Go Home" and " Stay Where You
,- Are" plans with the local Civil Defense Office. This mandate requires that each
, school develop a progran which provides for the maximum control and safety of all of our students in the event of national or local disaster.
During the period following a Civil Defense alert, national or lodal disaster, conditions may develop which will permit the students to go home.' This is a matter of local determination, as conditions will vary ' tom district to district.
Therefore, a workable "Go Home" plan has been developed and is being made avail-able to faculty, adm!nistration and local Civil Defense officials.
The local determination will be based on:
A. Information broadcast by federal, State and Civil Defense Authorities as to:
- 1) Time, location and intensity of strikes.
- 2) Winds and the amount of fallout being carried.
- 3) Availability of local fallout shelters (both family and group).
B. Extent of national, state or local disaster.
C. Local weather and road conditions.
D. The school district's "Go Home" plan.
The final decision in the execution of the "Go Home" or'" Stay Where You Are" plan rests with the chief school officer. Therefore, the following " Civil
( Defense" procedures have been prepared in the event of:-
A. Air alert ,
B. National crisis C. Floods D. Power failure E. Bus strike F. Snow storms ,
GENERAL PROCEDURES The primary consideration in any emergency situation must be the safety of the students placed in our care. In a real emergency, it will be necessary to ask members of the staff to perform "beyond the call of duty" in order to provide for the welfare of our students. In the event of a nuclear attack, the follow-ing procedure will be in effect:
- 1) if a warning time of at least one hour is received, schools will be notified to serd all students home. ,
- 2) If there is no advance warning, all students will remain in school and l take cover, following the Civil Defense procedures outlined in the " Stay ;
Where You Are" plan. l 1
[ -
l
- In the event of other disaster, local we th5r and traffic conditions will ba considered in determining the action to be taken.
( Both the " Stay Where You Are" and "Go Home" plans will be announced h the same way--over the P.A. System. Details of each plan are indicated below. In the event of a power failure, the word will be by messenger.
f I. " Stay Where You Are" Plan 3 When called, each class is to go it its essigned area. Wherever possible, the corridor space is near the particular classroom. Classes are to remain there until an ALL-CLEAR ANNOUNCEMENT.
Classroom shades are to be down. Sweaters and coats are to be taken from the closet and carried with the students. These garments are to be used to place over their headt as they sit back to the wall. .
Children need no further explantion other than that there is an emergency drill. These drills may be prepar tion for any type of an emergency, such as a hurricane, etc. IT IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT THAT EVERYONE BE CAUTIONED TO STAY AtlAY FROM THE llIND0hS. DO NOT CREATE FEAR BY FURTHER EXPLANATION.
Children in "Special Area Classes" should be escorted quickly to the area assigned to their regular class.
"Special Area" teachers are then requested to return to the wing of the
- building on which the classroom is located for supervision purposes.
SOUTH ST. SPACE ASSIGNMENTS -
Teacher Grade Corridor Outside Room H. Edwards K.I 8 J. Stein K-2 9
- 8. Schulze 1-1 6 H. Wels 1-2 7 C. Vail 1-3 !
5 L. Wrubleski 1-4 2
., B. Herendino 2-1 12 C. Pray 2-2 10
, D. Zureck 2-3 4 V. Leitch 2-4 , 13 H. Cappasso 3-1 20 D. Schoener 3-2 11 J. Larsen 3-3 21
- P. Connolly 4-1 17
- L.' Judge 4-2 18
, A. Mason 4-3 19
- K. Donahue 4-4 14 i ,-
r -
i e
I I
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ]
. . . _ ~
..' . 4 II. "Go Home" Plan l ,I (, 1. All students are to get their coats and return to their homerooms.
- 2. Dismissal to go home will be by announcement.
.r l, 3. A1A children who usually walk home are to be reminded to do sb without delay.
! 4. Buses will pick up at regular stations and follow normal routes.
l
- 5. Teachers may be assigned to ride buses for supervision purposes. In this 3 -
-- case, the teacher will be returned to the school upon completion of the
. bus route.
Following dismissal of students, teachers are requested to return to their class-rooms to make certain all students are out. Boys and Girls rooms should be checked by the teacher whose room is located nearest these areas. Those teachers without Homerooms are requested to help with general supervision where needed.
STAFF DISMISSAL Upon successful dismissal of all students, staff members should report to the Main Office and then will be allowed to leave the bulloing.
Other staff assignments for both the "Go Home" and " Stay Where You Are" plans are .
as follows:
- 1. Custodians will secure all boiler, electrical and water connections. They will also regulate traffic around the building and will make certain that or.ly school buses and authorized vehicles are allowed on school property.
! 2. Secretarb s are requested to remain in the Office an,d,. if necessary, notify local raolo stations of information which should be made available to the
- community. 1his will be dsne under direction of the Building Administrator.
, It is important that all pctsonnel remain calm throughout the emergency and carry i
out the assignments given to them. g
).
I h ,
s i
i .
e
,t
.u> e> *
~
I e
e t
f 1
DAYT'ON AVENUE SCHOOL i
SOUTH MANDR. SCHOOL DISTRICT 4
i MAN 0hVILLE, NEW YORK i
I
(- .
t I . EMERGENCY "GD HOME" AND " STAY-WHEPE YOU ARE" PLANS 1
I I
f e
e i
4
{
I J
4 ,l
^
..L.
. .: . s .:.. . : .-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^
- _ .:."'" ".7^~~ 2^* = ":.:.i .; . .
l l
Fr have been requested by the State Education Department and Department of Civil Defense, Suffolk County, New York to file school "Go Home" and " Stay Where You Are" plans with the local Civil Defense Office. This mandate requires that each school develop a program which provides for the maximum control and safety of all of our students in the event of national or local disaster. '*J During the period following a Civil Defense alert, national or IScal disaster, conditions mty develop which will permit the students to go home. This is a matter of local determination, as conditions will vary from district to district.
Therefore, a workable "Go Home" plan has been develr> ped and is being made avail-able to faculty, administration and local Civil Deferise officials.
The local determination will be based ca:
A.
- Information broadcast by federal, State and Civil Defense Authorities os tot
- 1) Time, location and intensity of strikes.
- 2) Winds and the amount of fallout being carried.
- 3) Availability of Iccal fallout shelters (both family and group).
B. Extent of national, state or local disaster.
C. Local weather arid road conditions.
D. The school district's "Go Home" plan.
g' The final decision in the execution of the "Go Home" or aStay Where You Are" plan rests with the chie.' school officer. Therefore, the following " Civil Defense" procedures have been prepared in the event of t-A. Air alert B. National crisis C. floods D. Power failure E. Bus strike F. Snow storms GENERAL PROCEDURES The primary consideration in any emergency cituation must be the safety of the students placed in our care. In a r6ol emergency, it will be necessary to ask members of the staff to perform "beyond the call of duty" in order to provide for the welfare of our students. In the event of a nuclear attack, the follow-ing procedure will be in effect:
f 1) if a warning time of at least one hour is received, schools will be no61ried to send all students hon.e.
- 2) If there is no advance warning, all students will remain in school and tse cover, following the Civil Defense procedures outlined in the " Stay Where You Are" plan. ., j
_ i
i l
e -
l l s f.
In the event of other disaster, local weather and traffic conditions will be conoidered in determining the action to be taken. -
Both the " Stay Where You Are" and "Go Hcae"* plans will Oc announced in the same way--over the P.A. System. Details of each plan are indicated below. In the event of a power failure, the word will be by messenger.
j I. " Stay Where You Are" Plan -
When called, all students and teachers are to return to their regularly assigned homeroom. All drapes and shades are to be closed. Homeroom teachers are then to bring their class to the assigned area in the corridor near the classroom (see map). Students are to be instructed to get their sweaters and coats from their lockers, sit nn the corridor flobr with their back to the wall and place their coat or sweater over their head.
Children need no further explanation other than that there is an EMERGENCY DRILL.
These drills may be preparation for any type of an emergency, such as a hurricane, etc. It is extremel' importanty that everyone be cautioned to STAY AWAY FROM THE WINDOWS.
DO NOT CREATE FEAR BY FURTHER EXPLANATION.
g Children to their regular in "Special class. Area Classes" should be escorted quickly to the aren assigned All teachers not assigned s homerooms.sre requested to remain in halls to assist in supervision.
P
. l
. ? \
( __ . . - . - - - . .---
l l
O .
.\ .. . --
/ -
i ;
e e
,._ _ - . .- _ f ,
e .4 M
o .
N L1I ==* Q 3oP . 2' 2
O
( -
M
)
Wj -
a- -
=
~
l t-4, 5Q h 4.
n O ,h. g r
- o
- e f 4 l
.od o .
Q 9 o
- <C . .
q '
q 4 9 M
@I .!,
~,
t
's 9,
.m o
- a f q 1 M -
. - - . _ , , JL- -, / -
l d * 's%> . O c
N
- g l
'n I A 0
- - ' ' ~ ~
f I, O.i ^) g g i
I - m , -
s -
o i
3' 9 43
. E ,
u .r g I
r
[3 I, &
+5 i ,ga j g>
l
>I -
0 d i l
t' I
j- I
')
u I s . - _ . ,
.s ~ as~ 1 u
th
- Q ad 3 9a -'
43 g J.-- , i ,@ u2'[,. e a +2 r - s
$ .r ; '.;. 4
- r v ,3 ,. ,
j .
s 4 -s g s _. .q - -
. s ,- t m i to o s>@\ O yt L
- A f m l
. 4 4c 50 m .
j %
i
<Y 4 M H T C o i l
m 0A- m -
s (. -
I
- (. ao ,
, t-o
- 4 2 m
- c. m .
I z ,
aI l
i
. eI 9
ab ^
6 D.- _
_ . . . . . . . . - _ - _ _ - . . . _ _ _ . _ . .. . _ . _ . . . . . _ - . _ . . . . . ... . .. l
, l
[ .
II. "Go Home" Plan
, 1. All students are to get their coats and return to their homerooms.
i
- 2. Dismissal to go home will be by announcement. r
- 3. All children who usually walk home are to be reminded to do so without delay.
- 4. Buses will pick up at regular stations and follow normal routes.
{ 5. Teachers may be assigned to ride buses for supervision purposes. In this
- -~
~~
case, the teacher will be returned to tne school upon completion of the bus route.
Following dismissal of students, teachers are requested to return to their class-
! rooms to make certain all students are out. Boys and Girls rooms should be checked by the teacher whose room is located nearest these areas. Those teachers without Homerooms are requested to help with general supervision where needed.
STAFF DISHISSAL Upon successful dismissal of all students, staff members should report to the Main Office and then will be allowed to leave the building.
Other staff assignments for both the "Go Home" and " Stay Where You Are" plans are .
as follows:
- 1. Custodians will secure all boiler, electrical and water connections. They will also regulate traffic around the building and will make certain that only school buses and authorized vehicles are allowed on school property.
- 2. Secretaries are requested to remain in the Office and, if necessary, notify local radio stations of information which should be'made available to the community. This will be done under direction of the Building Administrator.
It is important that all personnel remain calm throughout the emergency and carry out the assignments given to them. ,
e 6
4 t .
I I ~
!(-
i i
t i
e e
ATTACHMENT 33 I
l I
i i
l 1
l i
I
i Attacht ent 33 '
RIVEBHEAD CENTRI.L SCHOOL DISTRICT I TO'Alif OT !.Tr!'HL AD. ! .171: A*41.~iN l. M'CCdit.*lt!
, 7t .a re A.em .
Cha:Jcs 1.. lauer * 'y' *,.'* 3.l;'..
d3...
'.^*s e . * ** .ra . September 1, 1982 I m.: Aru c 6 r.ur A,,.,,,,yy,,,,,,g,,,,
GO-HO.'4E Pl.AN Th i .c plan is submitted in accordance with thc request of the Suffolk County Dcpartment of Emergency Preparedness.
The Riverhead Central School District covers a geographical distance of approxir.ately twenty miles from east to west and consists of seven (7) separate school buildings, including five elementary schools, one Junior High School, and one Central Hi;;h School that houses sp?roximately 1100 pupils. There are also six (6) ncn-public schools in the area.
The Rivt rhead Central School Dist rict owns 49 vehicles and transports approximately 4000 pupils daily on 45 vehicles. The District also transports the majcrity of its handicapped students.
Af tc r ccnsidering the aforementioned circumstances, the Riverhead Central School District submits the following "GO-HO.*!E" plan since it seems 'o be the mest prac tical fo:- the district:
hhen the go-heme signal is flashed, all cicacntary and secenJary pupils who cre not trensported to school will wik hec . School bus drivers will be called by the mechanics at the bus garage nnJ by the Transportation Supervisor. Their home and business phenes are posted in the bus garage and the Transportation Sup.'rejsor's
- office. In the event that a driver cannot be reached, or cannot report i: mediately, the Trar.Lpertation Supervisor will assign a properly licensed teacher or custodian to drire a bus. Secondary pupils fro the High School and Junior High School will be taken her first to awnit the arrival of >cunger children in the home. At the same time as these students are taken hcm, sti. dents from the non-public elemntary schcols will be taken ham on another set of buses. Buses will then return to the -
public elementary schools and will take those students hccie along with students frca Mercy High School and the H. B. h'ard Vccational School. Regular routes will be used but stops will be consolidated. In the event that a teacher or custodian is assigned to drive a bus, that route will not be in question as all routes .:re posted in the transportation office. Total time shculd not exceed one hour and -
_a half. In the event of floeds, alternate bus roates have been established.
~
Si ned:
)/ !
DALQ C'har]es L. Lauer CLL:mk I
cc: Transportation Supervisor Department of Emergency Preparedness -
Dr. Raymond DeFeo, Supt. of Schools Building Principals
- l. Mr. Revelle, Ass't Supt.
Dr. Krouse
_ . . . - . _ . . . --- - - - - ~ - - - -
,e .
e
- q .
RtVERHEAD CENTRAt. SCHOOL DISTRICT TOWNS 08 Rivt R*st AD, $OUTHAwPTON & SmOOKHAVEN g fof,dr
~
, - . ~ .
- Rev .m.ed, N.., voet 11901 M(,, . T.I. No. (S16172 74090
{
.a AN O. **t R N A N'JE Z wt '.t.' AM 8' SCNEDICT
,,.. . m ., ss . . "'""'""'""'"
,. December 11, 1979 r
l s GO-HOME PLAN This plan is submicted in accordance with the request of the State Civil Defense Commissica and the New York State Education Department. 3 The Riverhead Central School District covers a geographical distance of approximately 20 miles from east to,wgst and consists of sevein (7) separate school buildings, including five elementary schools, one Junior High School, and one Central High School that houses approximately 1200 pupils. There are also four (4) non-public schools in the area. The Riverhead Central School District owns 46 buses, three carryalls and one station wagon and transports approximately 4000 pupils daily on 40 buses.
. Aher considering the aforementioned circumstances, the Riverhead Central School District submits the following "GO-HOME" plan since it seems to be the most i
practical for the district:
~
When the go-home signal is flashed, all elementary and secondary pupils who are not transported to school will walk home. School bus drivers will be called by the mechanics at the bus garage and by the Transportation Supervisor.
Their home and business phones are posted in the bus garage and the Transporta-tion Supervisor's office. In the event that a driver cannot be reached, or cannot report immediately, the Transportation Supervisor will assign a properly licensed teacher or custodian to drive a bus. Secondary pupils from the High School and Junior High School will be taken home first to await the arrival of youngar children in the home. At the same time as these students are taken home, students from the non-public elementary schools will be taken home on another set of buses. Buses will then return to the public elementary schools and will take those students home along with students from Mercy High School and the H. B. Ward Vocational School. Regular routes will be used but stops will be
- consolidated. In the event that a teacher or custodian is assigned to drive a bus, that route will not be in question as all routes are peited in the transporta-tion office. Total time should not exceed one hour and a half. In the event of floods, alternate bus routes have been established.
Signed: ,
j
- tij k/f/'t14/
,/ AGH:mk ,
Alan G. Hernandez xc: Transportation Supervisor .
Office of Civil Defense "
- Dr. Raymond DeFeo, Supt. of Schools
/ ,
~~'
IClucrli cah (Central Etijont District q Enwns of Eturtl irsb. iifoutt ismpton & Urooki !surn n c e .. a c ,..
%*rnea1 H+:. York 11t*r ??%
1e t.:, :s
- C e W S*si.'.
Lar:ntB K ruptina Enn:Ib 6,. kus11e c ,,r. :a.e c se* v . Assis a .'seime,w.'
April 7, 1983 l
STAY WHERE YOU ARE PLAN When the stay-where-you-are signal is flashed, all elementary and secondary pupils will remain in their respective buildings. One phone line and one radio frequency will be held clear in each building for the sole purpose of receiving and transmitting emergency traffic with the District Office. The Riverhead Central School District Central Office, which is located at 700 Osborne Avenue, Riverhead, Telephone No. 727-8080, will handle all emergency-related information on behalf of the District and direct the same to the apprcpriate school buildings.
School bus drivers will be called by the mechanics at the bus garage and by the Transportation Supervisor. All drivers j will be asked to report immediately to the school bus garage in anticipation of a potential need to transport students from i, any of the District buildings to another location.
All nonpublic schools in the District will be advised by telephone as to the emergency status.
Riverhead High School and Junior High School have been designated as fallout shelters. These buildings will serve as central safety areas in the event the need arises to i evacuate any of'the elementary buildings;
'The superintendent and Assistant Superintendent of Schools will serve as emergency coordinators for the District.
_.a Jm-_m4 s.--eA- m-a.. 6a.4 - Aa .- s a .s& L-2 2m-.- .mJ ah - J-h . - .. ,L u .J &,i - _ m . . _ _ . -,.
u 1
i b
I i
a
! r ATTACHMENT 34 l
t I
i 1
e i
I 4
4 i
. . - _ .. , _..__......~ - . ...- , . - - -- ... , ...-... . ... _. . - - . . , _ . . . -_ _ _ .. .. , - - . _ _ . . . .__ ._.-
Attachment 34 CIVIL DEFENSE - GO HOME PLAN.
- 1) Upon notification of such an emergency, action will immediatety be taken to put take-home plan into operation. The bus company win be notified concerning the situation , -
- 2) If possible, announcements concerning our plans will be made over local radio stations. . .
- 3) All available buses will be used to transport children to their homes.
Au children will be kept in the safest part'of each school building until the arrival of the buses. In the case of the WH11am Paca Junior High ,
School, this would be the sheltered hanways.
- 4) Available buses would fonow their regular afternoon dismissal procedure -- reporting to their usual schools and running their regular afternoon take home. In the cases of a limited 3m7uYof buses, preference win be given to younger children.
- 5) In the event of limited time, every effort will be made to move remaining children to the security of the high school building where a.dequate fan-out shelter facilities are available.
- 6) In the event'of limited tirne, every effort win be made to move remaining children to the security of the high school building where adequate fan-out shelter facilities are available. Administrators and other
.available personnel win supervise child en. Administrators may wish to ,
designate certain teachers and should establish such a list with names and areas of supervision.
- 7) In the event that a school shelter plan (see #6) is to be implemented, available supplies and food will be utilized until wuch time as the Suffolk County Office of Emergency Preparedness will provide additional provisions,.
9 4
4/83
s
..~ '
. - .' BOARD QF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
% SECOND $UPE,tVISORY Dl5fRICT . SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YOaK i
BoC e ES -
(5161 289-220o
'- 201 E6nrise Highway, Patchogue. New York 117/2 JAMES HINES, EXECUTIVE OFFICER
. ;r A..mi.e. sop.,ine.nd *as -
A.. : ent superine.nd no Srwe L Reynor
- John F. McGowen TC. *. -
MEMORANDUM
. ,,n . . .
.a.. .
~
, )
. s0 T0: .
BOCES #2 Bus Contractors [
. District Transportation Directors .. lj
<"~~
TROM:
, Sidney Winfeld. Director of Finance & Transportation j
- f
SUBJECT:
Emergency Go-Home Procedure ,
DATE: November 12','1982 .
cc,, . XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAxXXXXXXX, m ?
, Attached is a copy of the BOCES #2 Emergency Go-Home Proccdure far 1982-83. Please review this procedure carefully.
If you have any questions, please call. .
g , e om em .e w . e e , e* -es . * ,
e *
- dt .- ?
l
< attachment .
I
, l g . b
. e 9
e .
. , e e e ee- . - . ===
l f-
.. s
.. 1 BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL. SERVICES
( Second Supervisory District of Suffolk County 201 Sunrise Highway Patchogue. New York 11772
.6
~.-
. EMERGENCY'GO-HOME' PROCEDURE In the event of a natural disaster or civil alert, the Board of Cooperative Educational Services will attempt to get students back, as quickly as possible, to their homes (Special Education Program) or home high schools (Occupational Program) when adequate warning is given. ,
BOCES will notify the parents (Special Education Program) or the home school district (Occupational Program) of the emergency and the estimated time
,of the students' arrival. This estimated time of arrival will ne.cessarily be an informed guess based on the probable delay in contacting bus drivers "
and the anticipated travel time to the students destination considering the particular emergency conditions.
,Transpo,rfation contractors will develop plans for contacting bus drivers for the purpose of getting buses to the BOCES Cent.ers for an emergency dismissal. All transportation contraciors will hold periodic drills with bus drivers to test the emergency notification procedure and to keep' drivers familiar with the emergency go-home procWure. ,
The attached diagrams illustrate the communication procedure
, which will be followed in putti.ng the emergency go-home procedure into action. -
i .
e .
e e
e
j gurrotu Ductet .
cuscorncv co Home PRec29URO e .
R.H.T.P. - SPECIAL ECUCATION/ PRE-EIEDERCARTL:I * -'
- - Receipt of Report of a Natural Olsaster or C11v11 Alert , ,
From Department of Eeergency Preparedness
.' 924-44'00 l
$1dney Winfeld 289-2200 or est. 218
- l I
. I 1
5 I -
William Stepson Reginald Feltham or Jaees Fogarty '
Doris Towle 557-1121 289-2200 or est. 217 289-2200 or ext. 217
- 1. John Ewald 472-4609 DISTRICTIRANSPORTATION 1. John Bernagorrt Sylvan Ave. Elem. School BUS CONTRACTORS Press L.C. 567-4901 DIRECTORS -
- 1. Be11 port Bus 286-0883 1. Bayshore 2. E11rabeth Mulvtht11 ' 2. Mola Almany 472-0700 665-1700 286-1212 Academy Street School Brookhaven L.C. '
842-7620 2. Center Moriches 3. Carl Minkin 3. Orlan Hawkins 472-1919 78-0052 1s11p L.C. 589-8405 Bayport Senior H.S. .
- 3. Montauk Central Is11P 4 Charles Honman 4 Marilyn verney 472-3381 728-5511 3. Bayport Jr. H.S.
343-5020 . M. Country L.C. 689-9600 i 4 Suffolk Trans. -
- 5. Flora Carsten 473-Od80 665-3245 4. East Moriches 5. Merrill Zusmer 878-0162 Sayville L.C. 567-8518 St. Charles L.C.
- 5. Sweter Paul Pontiert E. Etteen Roggemann-286-0061 5. Hauppauge 6. 928-2842 265-3630 Central 1sity L.C. 582 3560 Terryville Rd. Elem School
- 6. Towne Bus 6e Sayville 7. Kathy Judge Weiss
- 822-1155 7. Walter Calvin $81-2560 589-5100 Wing Elem. 277-4994 Is11p Jr. H.5.
- 7. South Country 8. Harriet Chomet
- 286-4307 Mortches Elem. Annex l
- 878-4500
- 8. South Haven 5yg77
- 256-1010 I * * **
- 9. South Hanor
- 10. Three Village .
937-3000 PARENT 5 i
- 11. West Islip 422-1560 .
17/ Ellliam Floyd - - A- MI P 281-3020
_______________m._ ___
"a .
E M E R G E N C Y- GO.- HOME PROCEDURE s Occupational Educational /5.H.O.E.
~
Receipt of Report of a Natural Disaster or Civil Alert .
From Department of Emergency Preparedness 924-4400 i
s e Sidney Winfeld 289-2200 or ext. 218 ,
i ,
,i 8
.. ddo
'l Doris Towle William Simpson Donna Keirsblick - P I, 298-2200 or ext. 217 289-2200 or ext. 217 ,
589-1124 I
Bus Contractors: CENTER PRINCIPALS l
'I Suf.*J1k Trans. 665-3245 '
Swerey 286-0061 il
- Is1tp Brookhaven Is11p Career Brookhaven Career l 567-1900 286-2400 589-1344 2C6-0900 i .
^
} District Transportatten Directors
,t. (for those distrfct transporting STAFF STAFF
! their own stadents)
I Say Shore 655-1700 , ,
! . Brentwood 435-2493 Home High School Home High Schools Home High Home High
!- Center Horiches 878-0052 Town of Islip Town of Brookhaven Schools $chools Central Islip 348-5048
' Connetquot 244-2201 East Moriches 878-0162
- Hauppauge 265-3630 I
'l. .. Islip 581-2560 Beverly Jefferson
! Middle Island 335-2788 286-2400 Mt. Sinal 473-1991 '
-l Sayv111e 589-5100 North Brookhaven South Country 286-4307 MacArthur Pfrport
, South Haven 286-1010 Mid.lsland Arena
.. South Hanor 878-4441 ~ . -
En. Floyd 281-3020/ - 1 l STAFF l
. . 1,
__m4 - 2. ._ _. - _a_ ___.m _- _ __ %.
I I
ATTACIIMENT 35 f
1 e
f I
1 s
- Attachment 35
.. I.
f
. j ST. DAVID'S SCHOOL
?
- f. @taca Epuopal CAuuA 583 POANOKE AVENt.tf RIVERHEAD, W., N Y.11LCI f
..u m . seat 0
..~ /2h l.+
'Y We are dependent upon buses within a 15 mile limit to take our children home in an emergency.
Parents are notified the children will be home early -
' sometimes it is impossible to get hold of a parent and we 6
are reluctant to send a child home to an empty house.
t
- Sometimes parents will call early for their children in l cars and they are permitted to leave.
I I
I
{
J r
t I
i.
t i
r i
t.
f I
I i
. .I
'S
- 't i
.I I
t
ATTACifMENT 36
Attachment 36
, OPIP 3.8.2
( Page 13 of 38 Attachment 4 Page 3 of 22 EBS SAMPLE MESSAGES (continued)
MESSAGE B - ALERT (NO RELEASE OF RADIATION) l This is the Emergency Broadcast System.
The Emergency Broadcast System has been activated due to an incident at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.
This is not a test.
An Alert condition was declared at (time) today at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. No release of radiation har occurred. No release of radiation is imminent.
An Alert is one of four emergency classifications and involves l conditions which could jeopardize the nuclear plant's safety system.
( The Director of Local Response for emergencies for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, (name), has consulted with (names, titles) scientists, LILCO officials, nuclear engineers, and officials from __ public I agencies and has recommended the following public action:
- 1. Schools within the 10-mile emergency planning zone should immediately implament their early dismissal plans. The I dismissal of school children is part nf the emergency plan
. adopted before Shoreham was put in operation. It does not mean that a release of radiation is imminent. Parents should not drive to school to meet their children.
- 2. People within the 10-mile emergency planning zone should refer to their Shoreham Public Emergency Procedures Brochure to determine the planning zone in which they live because it could --
be useful in helping you understand future messages.
The 10-mile emergency planning zone circling Shoreham is roughly l H
bounded by Main Street in downtown Riverhead to the east, Main Street in Port Jeffe'eson to the west, and Sunrise Highway to the south. If you live within the .10-mile emergency planning zone, you would have received monthly newsletters and other emergency information.
7 k
Rev. ]
OPIP 3.8.2
( Page 14 of 38 Attachment 4 Page 4 of 22 EBS SAMPLE MESSAGES (continued)
MESSAGE B - ALERT (NO RELEASE OF RADIATION)
(continued)
If you are not within these boundaries, there is no reason for you i to take any action. l If you are located within the 10-mile planning zone and do not have i a Shorcham Public Emergency Procedures Brochure, public information I and a map of the zone are included in a special insert of the Suffolk County Telephone Book and a more detailed map is in the j local Yellow Book.
Posters with emergency information have been provided to motels, l
restaurants, gas stations, public parks, beaches, and recreational facilities.
Once again, the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station is in an Alert condition. There has been no release of radiation. No release of
( radiation is imminent.
This message will be repeated every fifteen minutes over this station unless new information is available sooner. Keep tuned to this emergency broadcast station for the latest official information.
Rev. 3
OPIP 3.8.2
( Page 15 of 38 Attachment 4 Page 5 of 22 EBS SAMPLE MESSAGES (continued) -
MESSAGE C - ALERT (RELEASE OF RADIATION) l This is the Emergency Broadcast System.
l The Emergency Broadcast System has been activated due to an incident at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.
This is not a test.
An Alert condition was declared at (time) today at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. A small release of radiation into the air occurred at (time), but it does not pose an immediate danger to people near the plant. The released radiation is limited to the plant site.
An Alert is one of four emergency classifications and involves conditions which could jeopardize the nuclear plant's safety system.
{
The Director of Local Response for emergencies for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, (name), has consulted with (names, titles) scientists, L1LCO officials, nuclear engineers, and otticials from public agencies and has recommended the following public action:
- 1. Schools within the 10-mile emergency planning zone should iumediately implement their early dismissal plans. The dismissal of school children is part of the emergency plan adopted before Shoreham was put in operation. The radiation poses no danger t; children going home. Parents should not drive to school to meet their children.
- 2. People within the 10-mile emergency planning zone should refer to their Shoreham Public Emergency Procedures Brochura to determine the planning zone in which they live because it --
could be useful in helping you under~ stand future messages.
The 10-mile emergency planning zone circling Shoreham is roughly bounded by Main Street in downtown Riverhead to the east, Main Street in Port Jefferson to the wast, and Sunrise Highway to the south. If you live within the 10-mile emergency planning zone, you ,
1 would have received monthly newsletters and other emergency inf ormation.
1 Rev. 3
I i
OPIP 3.8.2
( Page 16 of 38 Attachment 4 Page 6 of 22 E5S SAMPLE MESSAGES (continued)
MESSAGE C - ALERT (RELEASE OF RADIATION)
(continued)
If you are not within these boundaries, there is no reason for you to take any action.
If you are located within the 10-mile planning zone and do not have a Shoreham Public Emergency Procedures Brochure, public information and a map of the zone are included in a special insert of the Suffolk County Telephone Book and a more detailed map is in the l local Yellow Book.
Posters with emergency information have been provided to motels, restaurants, gas stations, public parks, beaches, and recreational facilities.
Once again, the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station is in an Alert condition. There has been a small release of radiation limited to
(. the plant site. It'does not pose any hazdrd-to people near the plant.
This message will be repeated every fifteen minutes over this streion unless new information is available sooner. Keep tuned to this emergency broadcast staticn for the latest official information.
Rev. 3
.__________-_________.__----_-_-_-----__-------_--_-----.----__--_---_------------_-_d
- h. a.L.a 2na__ -a,atL .a . SAL ._um .2- sw-nA --.-a ---mArn.---- -, 3 --s.-~ _ . ._,, - , _ 2 w._,__.-~-4 - mA-A e ,a-,,- _n n __a____.
P i
+
ATTACifMENT 37 I
a f
1 1
I
, Attachr.ent 37 i
SHELTERING AT SCHOOLS
, DURING AN EMERGENCY AT SHOREHAM 1
In the event of an emergency at the Shoreham Nuclear power Station, it may be necessary to ahelter persons at schools, and other faci-lities, within the Shore?'m EPZ. Effective sheltering at such facilities can be best achieved by following these instructions:
- 1. Isolate Ventilation; air conditioning units, roof fans, heat pumps, vents, and other mechanical units, which introduce cut-side air into the building should be shut off, and if possible, covered.
- 2. Close Windows, Doors. Sky Lichts; All windows, outside doors, and sky lights should be sealed, and if possible, covered.
(This may best be accomplished by drawing blinds and curtains closed). The intent is to stop any drafts from entering the building, j 3. Shelter Individuals in Subteraneous Areas; Basements and semi-basements are very desirable chelters in that they yield a high degree of protection. The earth surrounding the basement walls is a very effective shield against radiation.
- 4. If oossible, Shelter in Heavy-Tvoe Construction Structures;
- Some schools / facilities may have a heavy type construction 3 (poured concrete, slate roef, heavy blocks) as a main structure i
with attached wings constructed of less dense materials. In these cases, it would be advantageous to move the personnel out of the wings and into the main building. This is also the case i
! with trailers, Butler buildings, and other temporary type build-ings. In the event of an emergency, personnel should be moved to the main structure portion of the school / facility.
- 5. Shelterino Inside the Buildino; When sheltering, the best areas are those which are surrounded by the most walls and ceilings.
I In most buildings, this-would be in the corridors located centrally in the structure at the basement or first-floor elevation. The intent is to surround personnel with as many walls,1 floors, and structures as possible, thus optimizing the 4
building for effective shielding.
1 i
Note: Specific recommendations can be developed for each school /
facility on the basis of sheltering' surveys performed by a health physicist.
ATTACHMENT 38 i
i 1
d i
{ Attachment 38 o a ; -
g .
i i
5 4
SCHOOL DISTRICT RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES DRAFTS
)
1 I
i, I
e
SCHOOL SYSTEM RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PROTEdTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION l
This volume contains the standard operating procedures (SOPS) to be implemented by school personnel as necessary during training exercises or emergencies at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.
It is important to remember that these procedures should be applied with common sense. Circumstances vary and procedures rarely account for all possible combinations of emergency circumstances. The individuals executing the procedures should apply judgment and experience to suitably modify these procedures to meet emergency conditions.
1 e !
SCHOOL SYSTEM RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES Thepurposeoftheseproceduresistoestablishthemethodsfor implementing protective actions should an emergency occur at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.
Under certain conditions, an airborne release from the nuclear power station may require protective actions, which are detailed in the Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Plan, to be implemented by portions of the population residing within an approximate ten mile radius of Shoreham. These protective actions are Eecly Dismissal, Shcitering or Evacuation. Early dismissal actions require that students be returned te their homes. Sheltering actions require the pupils and staff to remain within the confines of school buildings. Evacuation actions require the school population and some staff to be transported to a designated school further away from Shoreham.
The best alternative will depend on the nature of the emergency, plant conditions, weather conditions and time of day.
Procedures have been prepared to guide the school officials in !
the implementation of protective actions. Separate procedures !
are detailed for: l a
Superintendent
- All Schools in EPZ
- All Schools Outside EPZ
- Some Schools In/Out of EPZ Transportation Coordinator Schools within the Emcrgency Planning Zone (EPZ)
Schools outside the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ)
Reception Centers Bus drivers E
DRAFT School Superintendent (All Schools in EP2)
Radiological Emergency
- Protective Action Procedure Page 1 of 4 1
Introduction The School Superintendent will be rotified of an Alert or higher emergency classification by a tone alert radio receiver activated by an EBS signal froc WALK radio (97.5 FM). (Note: A telephone call from the Public or Private School Coordinator at i the LERO EOC will verify that the EBS message was received. If the EBS message was not received, the Public or Private School Coordinator will read the message at this time.)
The EBS message will adviae the schools to implement specific protective actions and may contain general information about the condition of the plant, radiological conditions, etc.
i If the School Superintendent is unavailable, the designated alternates in the order shown will implement this procedure:
TITLE NAME ,
,9 During non-school hours, the School Superintendent wf.ll receive initial notification at home and will close the schools i according to standard procedure, such as those used for snow days.
Procedure The School Superintendent or alternate, will:
- 1. Upon receiving the message verification call, State to the caller whether the schcol will implement the recommendation of the EBS message in accordance with the school protective action procedures.
Request the title, name and telephone number of the person making the verification call, as this is your-point of contact with LERO for any changes or problems in the implementation of your procedure.
l j
^
I DRAFT School Superintendent (All Schools in EPZ)
Radiological Emergency
- Protective Action Procedure Page 2 of 4 NAME TITLE TELEPHONE NO.
- 2. Notify any administrative personnel who will assist in the school system's response. (See Call List "A".)
- 3. Implement the appropriate protective action detailed below.
- 4. Stay tuned to an Emergency Broadcast System station.
A. EARLY DISMISSAL Upon an initial declaration of an Alert or Site Area Emergency where no protective actions are recommended for the general public, the school officials will be advised to implement their "Go Home" plans. See Attachment .
- 1. Notify the schools of the early dismissal.
~
- 2. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to contact the l
bus companies to notify them that early dismissal is-being implemented.
- 3. Designate assistants to help complete the above call listr, as necessary.
- 4. If the notification occurs when schools are in the process of opening, have the arriving buses return the students to their home and have students who do not normally use buses, return home in their usual manner.
B. SHELTERING If schools within the EPZ are in session when a sheli:ering action is recommended for the general rublic in any area, the schools will be advised to shelter as well. If schools are in the process of opening when the notification is received, they will be advised to implement sheltering l actions when the students arrive.
I
- 1. Notify the schools in the EPZ to shelter.
l
~
l l
I I
DRAFT 3chool Superintendent (All Schools in EPZ)
Radiological Emergency 1
- Protective Action Procedure Page 3 of 4
- 2. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to contact the bus companies and put them on stand-by.
- 3. When informed by the EBS network thct the sheltering recommendation has been lifted, notify the Transportation Coordinator to deploy buses to transport the students home.
C. EVACUATION If the schools within the EPZ are in session when an evacuation action is recommended for the general public in any part of the EPZ, all the schools in the EPZ will be advised to evacuate as well. If schools are in the process of opening when tha notification is received, they will be advised to implement evacuation actions when the students arrive.
- 1. Notify the schools in the EPZ of the evacuation.
- 2. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to contact the bus companies with instruction to relocate the students to a designated reception center.
e f
DRAFT School Superintendent (All Schools in EPZ)
. Radiological Emergency
- Protective Action Procedure Page 4 of 4 CALL LIST "A" ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL (To be provided)
J i
l l
l i
e
- +
l l
l DRAFT School Superintendent (All Schools Outside EPZ)
Radiological Emergency
- Protective Action Procedure Page 1 of 4 Introduction The School Superintendent will be notified of an Alert or higher emergency clascification by a tone alert radio receiver activated by an EBS signal from WALK radio (97.5 FM). (Note
- A telephone call from the Public or Private School Coordinator at ,
the LERO EOC will verify that the EBS message was received. If tha EBS message was not received, the Public or Private School Coordinator will read the message at this time.)
The EBS message vill advise the schools to implement specific protectivo actions and nay contain general information about the condition of the plant, radiological conditions, etc.
l If the School Superintendent is unavailable, the designated alternates in the order shown will implement this procedure:
TITLE NAME During non-school hours, the School Superintendent will receive -
initial notification at home and will close the schools according to standard procedure, such as those used for snow days.
Procedure The School Superintendent or alternate, will:
- 1. Upon receiving the message verification call.
-
- tate to the caller whether the school will implement
, the recommendation of the EBS message in accordance
_with the school protective action procedures.
l I
i l
^ "~
L_ 1. . - - 1 ._
.~ .. . . .. .
DRAFT School Superintendent t
l -
(All Schools Outside EPZ)
Radiologiccl Emergency i Protective Action Procedure
, Page 2 of 4 Request the title, name and telephone number of the person making the verification call, as this is your point of contact with LERO for any changes or problems in the implementation of your procedure.
NAME TITLE TELEPHONE NO.
- 2. Notify any administrative personnel who will assist in the schcol systen's response. (See Call List "A".)
- 3. Implement the appropriate protective action detailed below.
- 4. Stay tuned to an Emergency Broadcast System station.
A. EARLY DISMISSAL Upon an initial declaration of an Alert or Site Area Emergency where no protective actions are recommended for the general public, the school officials will be advised to implement their "Go Home" plans. See Attachment __.
- 1. Notify the schools of the early dismissal.
- 2. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to contact the bus companies to notify them that early dismissal is being implemented.
- 3. Designate assistants to help :omplete the above call lists, as necessary.
- 4. If the notification occurs when schools are in the process of opening, have the arriving buses return the students to their home and have students who do not normally use buses, return home in their usual nanner.
B. SHELTERING If schools are in session when a sheltering action is recommended for the general public in the EPZ, the schools outside the EPZ will be advised to retain those students who i
live in the EPZ until the sheltering recommendation is lifted.
1
DRAFT School Superintendent (All Schools Outside EPZ)
Radiological Emergency i Protective Action Procedure
, Page 3 of 4
- 1. Notify the schools of the sheltering actions being done in the EPZ and advise them to retain those students who reside in the EPZ.
- 2. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to contact the bus companies and put them on stand-by.
- 3. When informed by the EBS network that the sheltering recommendation has been lifted, notify the Transportation Coordinator to deploy buses to transport the students home.
C. EVACUATION If the schools are in session when an evacuation action is recommended for the general public in the EPZ, the schools outside the EPZ will be advised to retain those students who live in the EPZ until they are transported by bus to an appropriate reception center.
- 1. Notify the schools of the evacuation actions and that students who live in the EPZ are to remain at the schocis until receiving further instructions.
- 2. At the end of school hours, notify the non-evacuating schools that buses are being sent to transport those students who live inside the affected area to a designated reception center. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to arrange for these buses.
8 e
c
-l , .
DRAFT School Superintendent
[ (All Schools Outside EPZ)
Radiological Emergency l ; Protective Action Procedure Page 4 of 4 J
CALL LIST "A" ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL (To be provided) i i
l l
- - - 4 e- -y_t-
l l
I DRAFT School Superintendent (Some Schools In/Out EPZ)
Radiological Emergency
- Protective Action Procedure Page 1 of 5 Introduction The School Superintendent will be notified of an Alert or higher emergency classification by a tone alert radio receiver activated by an EBS signal from WALK radio (97.5 FM). (Note: A telephone call from the Public or Private School Coordinator at the LERO EOC will verify that the EBS message was received. If the EBS message was not received, the Public or Private School Coordinator will read the message at this time.)
The EBS message will advise the schools to implement specific protective actions and may contain general information about the condition of the plant, radiological conditions, etc.
If the School Superittendent is unavailable, the designated alternates in the order shown will implement this procedure:
TITLE NAME During non-school hours, the School Superintendant will receive initial notification at home and will close the schools according'to standard procedure, such as those used for snow days.
Procedure The School Superintendent or alternste,. will:
- 1. Upon receiving the message verification call, State to the caller whether the school will implement the recommendation of the EBS message in accordance with the school protective action procedures.
_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___-m_____m
5 DRAFT School Superintendent (Some Schools In/Out EPZ) i Radiological Emergency
- Protective Action Procedure Page 2 of 5 kequest the title, name and telephone number of the person making the verification call, as this is your point of contact with LERO for any changes or problems in the implementation of your procedure.
NAME TITLE TELEPHONE NO.
- 2. Notify any administrative personnel who will assist in the school system's response. (See Call List "A".)
- 3. Implement the appropriate protective action detailed below.
- 4. Stay tuned to an Emergency Broadcast System station.
A. EARLY DISMISSAL .
Upon ca initial declaration of an Alert or Site Area Emergency where no protective actions are recommended for the generel public, the school officials will be advised to implement their "Go Home" plans, See Attachment __.
- 1. Notify the schools of the early dismissal.
- 2. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to c'ontact the bus companies to notify them that early dismissal is being implemented.
- 3. Designate assistants to help complete the above call lists, as necessary.
- 4. If the notification occurs when schools are in the process of opening, have the arriving buses return the students to their home and have students who do not normally use buses, return home in their usual manner.
l B. SHELTERING.
If schools within the EPZ are in session when a sheltering action is recommended for the general public'in any area,
- i. the schools will be advised to shelter as well. ne schools outside the EPZ will retain the students who live in'the EPZ ,
i .until the sheltering recommendation is lifted.
l
DRAFT School Superintendent l
(Some Schools In/Out EPZ)
Radiological Emergency
' Protective Action Procedure Page 3 of 5 If schools are in the process of opening when the notification is received, they will be advised to implement sheltering actions when the students arrive.
- 1. Notify the schools in the EPZ to shelter.
- 2. Notify the schools outside the EPZ of the emergency and that students should remain at the schools until receiving further instructions. Designate an assistant to help complete the call list, if necessary.
- 3. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to contact the bus companies and put them on stand-by.
- 4. When informed by the EBS network that the sheltering recommendation has been lifted, notify the Transportation Coordinator to deploy buses to transport the students home.
C. EVACUATION If the schools within the EPZ are in session when an evacuation action is recommended for the general public in any part of the EPZ, the schools inside the EPZ will be advised to evacuate as well. The schools outside the EPZ will retain the students who live in the EPZ until N-they are transported by bus to an appropriate reception center.
If schools are in the process of opening when the notification is received, they will be advised to implement evacuation actions when the students arrive.
- 1. Notify those schools in.the EPZ of the evacuation.
- 2. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to contact the bus companies with instruction to relocate the students to a designated-reception center.
- 3. Notify the non-evacuating schools or those outside the EPZ as to the status of the emergency and that students should remain at the schools until receiving further instructions. Designate an assistant to help complete the call lists, as necessary.
R I h
il 1
DRAFT School Superintendent (Some Schools In/Out EPZ)
. Radiological Emergency Protective Action Procedure Page 4 of 5
- 4. When instructed by the EOC, notify the non-evacuating schools that buses are being sent to transport those students who live inside the affected area to a designated reception center. Instruct the Transportation Coordinator to arrange for these buses.
I l
l
DRAFT School Superintendent (Some Schools In/Out EPZ)
Radiological Emergency
- Protective Action Procedure Page 5 of 5 CALL LIST "A" ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL (To be provided) l l
DRAFT Schools in EPZ Radiological Emergency Protective Action Procedure
- (Telephone: )
Page 1 of 4 Introduction The School will be notified of an Alert or higher emergency classification by:
a tone alert radio receiver activaceC by an EBS signal from WALK radio (97.5 Fd) and/or a telephone call from the School Superintendent to verify that the EBS message was received and to receive request for additional assistance.
The EBS message and/or the Senool Superintendent will advise the schools to implement specific protective actions and may contain general information about the condition of the plant and radiological conditions.
If the School Principal is unavailable, the designated alternates, in the order shown, will implement this proceGure:
TITLE NAME Procedure If notified by telephone, the School Principal or alternate, after receiving notification from the School Superintendent or his designee, will:
- 1. Verify the message by voice recognition or by contacting the School Superintendent at .
- 2. Upon verifying the message, implement the appropriate protective action detailed below.
- 3. Stay tuned to an Emergency Broadcast System station.
i<
L
i DRAFT Schools in EPZ Radiological Emergency Protective Action Procedure 1
- (Telephone
- )
Page 2 of 4 A. EARLY DISMISSAL Upon an initial declaration of an Alert or Site Area Emergency
- where no protective actions are recommended for'the general public, the school officials will be advised to implement their "Go Home" plans. See Attachment .
B. SHELTERING If schools within the EPZ are in session when a sheltering action is recommended for the general public in any area, the schools will be advised to shelter as well. If schools are in the process of opening when the notification is received, they will be advised to implement sheltering actions when the students arrive.
- 1. Inform all school personnel to take the following actions:
Have everyone go inside the school building If possible, move the students and staff to a' basement or to the main portions of the building which are covered by the most walls and ceilings such as a central. corridor.
Go to the area with the least windows.
CAUTION See-Attachment 1 for specific plan for your building I
Close all exterior doors and windows, and draw blinds and curtains closed Turn off, and if possible, cover ventilation leading.
outdoors Have teachers explain the situation to their class t
Have teachers take roll call Wash hands before touching food Put food in containers or in the refrigerator.
- 2. Wait for further information from the School-Superintendent
! or an EBS network station.
3.
~
Inform the school population'of any-further directions or information received from'the preceding authorities.
l DRAFT !
Schools in EPZ Radiological Emergency Protectisa Action Procedure
- (Telephone
- )
Page 3 of 4 C. EVACUATION If the schools within the EPZ are in session when an evacuation action is recommended for the general public in any area, the schools will be advised to evacuate as well. If schools are in the process of opening when the notification is received, they will be advised to implement evacuation actions when the students arrive.
- 1. Notify all school personnel.
- 2. Have the teachers do the following:
Explain the situation to their class Take roll call and distribute name tags to special education students.
Instruct the students to collect their belongings (prescription medication will be taken on the buses by office personnel)
Remain with students in the classroon until permission is given to board the buses.
- 3. Have all school personnel do the following before leaving:
Close all windows, and Turn off the lights.
- 4. When the buses arrive, have the classes board the buses; lower grades first, upper grades last.
- 5. Designate a member of your staff to:
Make a final tour of the building to ch'ack safety and security and to ensure that everyone has left the building.
Place the prepared evacuation sign in a prominent window or doorway in order to provide notice that the evacuated t
school population has been sent to School j Reception Center (See Attachment ) l Lock all exterior doors i
I
f 1,
i DRAFT Schools in I?Z Radiological Emergency Protective Action Procedure
- (Telephone: )
Page 4 of 4
- 6. Verify that bus drivers have an evacuation route map (Attachment ).
- 7. Allow the buses to depart in convoy after teachers have determined that all the children listed on their studelat roster are present on the buses or are otherwise accounted for.
- 8. Proceed to the reception center.
O h
a - - - ~ - w,
i ATTACHMENT 1 Specific Sheltering Recommendations (To Be Provided) 0 O
l
O DRAFT Schools Outaide EPZ Radiological Emergency i Protective Action Procedure Page 1 of 3 Introduction Under certain conditions, an airborne release from the nuclear power station may require protective actions, which are detailed in the Local Offsite Radiological Emargency Response Plan, to be implemented by portions of the population residing within a ten mile radius of Shoreham. These protective actions are early dismissal, sheltering, which would have the population in the area remain within the confines of convenient buildings and houses, and evacuation which would have the population leave the area and proceed to designated reception centers. While school is not located within this ten mile zone,
~some students reside within it and special provisions must be made for them if protective actions are required.
The School will be notified that protective actions are being implemented in the plume exposure emergency planning zone by:
a tone alert radio receiver activated by an EBS signal from WALK radio (97.5 FM) and/or the School Superintendent by telephone, t The EBS message and/or School Superintendent will advise the schools to implement specific protective actions and may contain general information about the condition of the plant, radiological conditions, etc.
If the School Principal is unavailable, the designated alternates in the order shown will be notified to implement this procedure:
TITLE NAME k
___m ~
--- w
DRAFT Schools Outside EPZ
. Radiological Emergency
- Protective Action Procedure Page 2 of 3 Procedure If notified by telephone, the School Principal or alternate, after receiving notification from the School Superintendent, will
- 1. Verify the notification by voice recognition or by calling the School Superinter. dent at .
- 2. Upon verifying the message, implament the appropriate action detailed below.
- 3. Stay tuned to an Emergency Broadcast System station.
A. EARLY DISMISSAL Upon an initial declaration of an Alert or Site Area Emergency where no protective actions are recommended for the general public, the school officials will be advised to implement their "Go Home" plans. See Attachment .
B. SHELTERING If schools are in session when a sheltering action is recommended for the general public in the EPZ, the schools outside the EPZ will be adv.aed to retain those students who live in the EPZ until the l sheltering recommendation is lifted.
l l 1. Notify all school personnel.
- 2. Have teacherc do the fellowing:
- Explain the situation to their class
- Take roll call and note on the roster those stucents who live inside the EPZ
- Continue normal indoor routines.
DRAFT Schools Outside EPZ Radiological Emergency i Protective Action Procedura Page 3 of 3
- 3. If at the end of the day, sheltering actions are still recommended for the EPZ, retain those students who live in the affected area and diamiss the rest of the school in the normal manner.
- 4. Provide adequate supervision and recreation for the retained students.
- 5. When notified by the School Superintendent that the sheltering recommendation has been lifted, dismiss those students who had been retained.
C. EVACUATION If schools are in session when an evacuation is recommended for the general public in the FPZ, the schools outside the EP3 will be advised to retain those students who live in the EPZ.
- 1. Notify all school personnel.
- 2. Have teachers do the following:
- Explain the situation to their class
- Take roll call and note on the roster those students who live inside the EPZ
- Continue normal indoor routines.
- 3. At the end of the' school day, retain those students who live in the EPZ and dismiss the rest of the school in the normal manner.
- 4. Provide adequate supervision and recreation for-the retained students.
- 5. Those students who live in the affected area will be transported to appropriate reception centers by buses provided by the. school super-intendent.
t l
DRAFT Reception Center Schools
- Radiological Emergency i ; Protective Action Procedure Page 1 of 3 l
Introduction The purpose of this procedure is to establish the methods for implementing appropriate protective actions should an emerency occur at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.
Under certain conditions, an-airborne release from the nuclear
- power station may require protective actions, which are detailed in the Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan, to be implemented by portions of the population residing within a ten mile radius of Shoreham. These protective actions are early dismissal, sheltering which would have the population in the area remain within the confines of convenient buildi.ngs and houses, and evacuation which would have the population leave the area and proceed to designated reception centers. In the event of an evacuation, School has been designated as a i reception center for school evacuees.
The School Superintendent will be notified by a tone alert radio receiver activated by an EBS signal from WALK radio (97.5 FM) . (Note: A telephone call from the Public or
. Private School Coordinator at the LERO EOC will verify that the EBS message was received.) ~
l The School Superintendent will notify the principal of 4
School and any other appropriate school officials.
When schools are not in session,Ethe School Superintendent will receive initial notification at home and will close the schools l according to standard procedures, such.as those used for snow i
days. l In the event that LERO recommends evacuation for the plume expccure emergency planning zone, the following procedure is to
, be implemented by School.
e f
g- r-4 wy W -ey e-ww -'- r-,--
DRAFT Reception Center Schools Radiological Emergency Protective Action Procedure Page 2 of 3 Procedure The Principal is requested to:
- 1. Notify all school personnel.
- 2. Designate reception sites and prepare them for the arrival of evacuees.
- 3. Provide adequate supervision and recreation for the evacuated students.
- 4. Wait for further information from the School Superintendent.
- 5. When parents arrive for their children, verify that the pLrents have signed the Student Evacuee Retrieval Form before departing (See Attachment) .
e q* O Go O W
. - _ _ . ,_ _ , , . ~
DRAFT l
Reception Center Schools Radiological Emergency
- Protective Action Procedure Page 3 of 3 STUDENT EVACUEE RETRIEVAL FORM RECEPTION CENTER SCHOOLS I
1 This form is to be filled out by school authorities, prior to a i student leaving a reception center.
l 1
STUDENT'S NAME NAME OF PARENT / PARENTS OR LEGAL GUARDIAN WHO HAS ARRIVED TO RETRIEVE CHILD.
IDENTIFICATION (LICENSE, CREDIT CARDS, ETC.)
CHECK ONE:
( ) FAMILY WILL REMAIN AT PRESENT RECEPTION FACILITY UNTIL OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE
( ) FAMILY HAS BEEN ASSIGNED AND WILL PROCEED TO A SHELTER SHELTER:
() FAMILY WILL PROCEED TO A RELATIVE'S OR FRIEND'S HOME, OR OTHER LOCATION ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
DEPARTURE TIME:
I SIGNATURE:
COMMENTS:
y , - -A-,-p ,y -c-.g s,-.y4-- - .-m1g ,.g-,p. w ,y 9 --4 ,'y,p.py- W *w , y =*+g -am.s--mmgqrg p age -egyv e p,,w.,*,.-.,,-9 y-_w y ,m.m, .,., .*
m l
DRAFT Transportation Coordinator Radiological Emergency Protection Action Procedure Page 1 of 5 Introduction The Transportation Coordinator will be notified that protective actions are being implemented by the students and staff by the School Superintendent via telephone or personal contact.
If the Transportation Coordinator is unavailable, the School Superintendent will designate a member of the staff co implement this procedure.
Procedure - For Schools Inside EPZ The Transportation Coordinator oc alternate, after receiving notification from the School Superintendent, will:
- 1. Implement the appropriate protective action detailed below.
- 2. Stcy tuned *o a6 Emergency Broadcast System station.
- 3. Keep the School Superintendent informed of the progress of your procedure.
A. EARLY DISMISSAL
- 1. When instructed by the School Superintendent, contact the brs companies with instructions for early dismissal following usual early dismissal procedures.
B. SHELTERING
- 1. When instructed by the School Superintendent, contact the bus companies-(see attached call list) and request that buses and drivers be put on standby. See attached chart for an-estimated number of buses needed for each school.
- 2. If a sufficient-number of buses and/or drivers cannot be obtained, inform the School Superintendent.to contact the LERO EOC to request assistance.
- 3. When informed by the School-Superintendent that.the sheltering recommendation has been lifted, take buses and drivers off standby.
I
ll DRAFT Transportation Coordinator Radiological Emergency Protection Action Procedure Page 2 of 5 1
C. EVACUATION 1
- 1. When instructed by the School Superintendent, contact the bus companies (see attached call list) and request that buses be sent to the schools to transport students t to a designated reception center. See attached chart for an estimated number of buses needed for each school.
I 2. If a sufficient number of buses and/or drivers cannot
- be obtained., inform'the School Superintendent to contact i the LERO EOC to request assistance.
a Procedure - For Schools Outside EPZ l
The Transportation Coordinator or alternate, after receiving notification from the School Superintendent, will:
- 1. Implement the appropriate protective action detailed below.
- 2. Stay tuned to an Emergency Broadcast System station.
- 3. Keep the School Superintendent informed ofLthe progress of your procedure.
A. EARLY DISMISSAL
- 1. When instructed by the School Superintendent, contact the bus companies with instructions for early dismissal.
following usual early dismissal procedures.
B. SHELTERING 1
- 1. When instructed by the School Superintendent, contact the bus companies (see attached call list) and request that a sufficient number of buses and drivers be put on
. standby for those students who are being retained.-
- 2. When informed by the School Superintendent that the i sheltering' recommendation has been lifted, take buses and drivers off standby.
4 5
e i
I
,, _. , - - - _ . x . . _ . , . . - , _-- _ . - . . - . . . . - . . - _ . . , . , _ . - . . . _ . , . . . . - - . . ~ . -.
DRAFT Transportation Coordinstor Radiological Emergency Protection Action Procedure Page 3 of 5 C. EVACUATION
- 1. When instructed by the School Superintendent, contact the bus companies (see attached call list) and request that a sufficient number of buses be deployed to transport those students who live inside the affected area to a designated reception center. ,
1
- 2. If a sufficient number of buses and/or drivers cannot I be obtained, inform the School Superintendent to contact the LERO EOC to request assistance.
f I
l t'
.. -- . - .. __ . - -.. .. . . . =. _- ..
4 1
DRAFT Transportation Coordinator Radiclogical Emergency i Protection Action Procedure Page 4 of 5
)
i 1
a BUS COMPANIES CALL LIST
'I (To be provided)
+
esuun l
a W
l k
1 4
4
- - - - , --..,,d'r,. , , . , , e , , _ , , ~f _-,,y.+,, . ,,
i i
s DRAFT Transportation Coordinator Radiological Emergency j
Protection Action Procedure Page 5 of 5 i
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF BUSES NEEDED TO EVACUATE THE SCHOOLS 1
(To be provided)
I 5
l
.. . . - . _ . . _ _ . ,_ . - . , _.. , , , _ , . . . _ ~ . , , .- _ , , , , _ , , _ ,
DRAFT Bus Driver ,
Radiological Emergency l
. Protective Action Procedure
- Page 1 of 2 Procedure - For Schools Inside EPZ A. EA"1Y DISMISSAL If notified by your bus company that an early dismissal is in progress, follow your normal early dismissal procedures.
B. SHELTERING DURING NON-ROUTING HOURS t
When notified by your bus company via telephone that sheltering actions are being implemented:
- 1. Standby for further information.
C. EVACUATION DURING NON-ROUTING HOURS When notified by your bus company by telephone that evacuation actions are being implemented:
- 1. If your bus is parked at the bus garage, proceed there to get the bus and report to the garage mechanic for instructions.
- 2. Check your bus for oil, gas and operability. If the bus is not operable for any reason, immediately notify the garage mechanic.
- 3. Receive dosimetry. Record your name, dosimeter serial numbers and initial readings on the Emergency Worker Dose Record Card.
- 4. Report to the assigned school and transport the students and staff to.the reception center. (See evacuation route maps.)
ca-sc'ools-01
DRAFT Bus Driver Radiolegical Emergency
. Protective Action Procedure
- Page 2 of 2
- 5. Do not exceed speed limits.
- 6. Upon arrival at the reception center, notify the bus company. Report your status and await further instructions.
Procedure - For Schools Outside EPZ A. EARLY DISMISSAL If notified by your bus company that an early dismissal is in progress, follow your normal early dismissal procedures.
B. SHELTERING DURING NON-ROUTING HOURS When notified by your bus company via telephone that ;
sheltering actions are being implemented:
- 1. Standby for further information.
C. EVACUATION DURING NON-ROUTING HOURS When notified by your bus company by telephone that evacuation actions are being implemented in the EPZ:
- 1. At the end of school hcurs, transport those students who live in the affected area to a designated reception center. (See attached maps.)
- 2. Do not exceed speed limits.
- 3. Upon arrival at the reception center, notify the bus company. Report your status and await further instructions.
ca-schools-01
I ATTACHMENT 39 4
I Attachment 39 i SHOREHAM - WADING RIVER Central School Distri:t EMERGENCY HOME CONTAC1 929-8500 Date Grade
- tease Pnnt uudent's Name Home Phone Address ous e a o swr ==.
Father's Name Mother's Name Person (e) who we be responeene in emergency, W parente cannot be reached (GIVE TWO)
Name Name Phone Phone Physician to cas in emergency. Dentist to can ei emergency-Name Name Phone Phone Parent's place of employment Famer Phone Mother Phone er 1,.we ..oew.e.ee. roo=== %. w = =e=~ -e we, ewe.= osmee,s e.,e. .e ..r . wm, r
smos e novogo as e = pe son me. =e ce curw.po, renooneoe lor my c%re g we w es ne er'soneros en mee as escams . e rgeroes OVER Signature of Parent or Guardian HEALTH HISTORY FORM EARLY SCHOOL CLOSING INFORMATIO!
To be filled out And Retumed On The First Day Of School. If there is early dismissal due to weather or the absent of an essential utility, my child:
Has your child , during the past year had any illness, injury or operation? If so, please write NAME and DATE of illness below.
( )is capable of entering the house if there is rx a parent at home. )
Has your child received any immunizations or tests during the past year? If so, please write name and date in the space below. ( ) should be dismissed to the care of rr l neighbor who has agreed to accept this responsibilits is there anything concoming the health of your child which the My neighbor is:
school should know in order to give the child special care?
Name
- A Physical examination by a private physician or the school physi- Address cian, on entry to school and routinely at grades one, three, severi and ten is compulsory. Telephone No.
- Please check the appropriate item:
I wish lo have my child examined by the family physician at my expense and submit a report to the school by the end of ,
I wish to have my child examined without cost at the school by the school physician.
- ~-
7_
6 ATTACHMENT 40 4
I
. -- ,-- - - - - . . . - - . - ,- , , - .__ _ e -n-,, --7e erra '
- 4 Attachment 40 TEMPORARY EMERGENCY DISMISSAL ST. JOHN'S . - '0H00L Wading River, JY (child's name) may ride with (other than parent)
- 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
in the event of any emergency dismissal situation created by the Shoreham Power Plant.
The Pre-School is not responsible for the transportation of my child.
I agree that I will provide the transportation for my child within twenty (20) minutes of nullficaLion, either by public alarm or radio warning.
If circumstances arise that prevent my child from being transported by the above persons or myself, I hereby give permission for my child to be transported by an authorized staff member of St. John's Pre-School, to Suffolk Community College, Selden.
(Diomisoal will be from the lower Icyc1 cf St. John'o McLL.
Drivers are to remain in the car and receive the children from the glass doors located in the front of the building.)
Parent / guardian signature: l Date:
t i
ATTACHMENT 41
l - ,, - n., ..
Attachment 41 MEETING WITH SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS MARCH 7, 1984 The attached is a preliminary sample plan developed for the purpose of' illustrating some of the concepts contained in the emergency plan for Shoreham.
There are many alternative plans that could be developed and provide an adequate planning basis for school evacuation.
There are a number of assumptions that were made in the development of this plan:
t o Each elementary and junior high bus would carry up to 60 passengers. Each high school bus would carry up to 48 passengers. An allowance for staff was included.
o Each bus would make one trip only.
o Available, but outdated enrollment figures were used.
w ~ w - e
.m :: .r.- - ' -Mn .. -
e Identificaticn of Evacuating and Host Schools Evac.
Host Schools Enroll _.
Enroll _. 5es Rte.
District LVacuated Schools Cbnnetquot Dist.
Cannetquot H.S. 2,456 203 4 LIE 1 Briarcliff Road Connetquot H.S. 2,466 318 6 LIE
- Shoreham- Miller Ave. Ctmnetquot H.S. 2,466 591 11 LIE 2,466 Wading River Shoreham-W.R. MiM ie 16 LIE Connetquot H.S.
738 2,466
- Shoreham-W.R. H.S. 6 LIE 03nnetquot H.S.
Wading River 344
_2,194 Cdnnetauot Dist_.
2 2 LIE Peconic St. J.H.S.1,284 Little Flower Elem, 68 Little Flower anithtown Dist.
Rt. 25 Smithtown H.S.E. 2,738 3 Joseph A. Mgar Rt. 25 Smithtown H.S.E. 2,738 2,579 50 Rocky Point Pocky Pt. Jr.-Sr. H.S. Rt. 25 Smithtown H.S.E. 2,738 Rocky Pt. Elem. Sachem District Sachen H.S.N. 2,900 1,700 31 LIE Ridge Elm. Hiawatha El m. 1,065 4
1,064 20 Rt. 25 2,900 Middle Island W. Middle I. Elem. 20 Rt. 25 Sachem H.S.N.
1,100 1,726 Cbram Elm. 28 Rt. 27 Seneca J.H.S.
u 1,400 3,500 Middle I. Jr. H.S. 42 LIE Sachen H.S.S.
1 Iemgwood High 2,000 3,500 24 Rt. 27 Sach e H.S.S.
Chas. E. Walters Elem. 1,300_ ~ .
8,564 Hauppauce Dist.
Rt. 347 Hauppauge H.S. 2,719 450 8 5
N. Cbuntry M. Rt. 347 Hauppauge H.S. 2,719 700 13 Miller Place Andrew Muller Prim. Rt. 347 Hauppauge H.S. 2,719 600 11 Sourd Beach Haupoauge H.S. 2,719 750_ 16 Rt. 25 Miller Place H.S.
@ 2,500 Smithtown Dist.
Rt. 347 Smithtown H.S.W. 2,345 6 Mt. Sinal Jr. H.S. ' Pt. 347 Smithtown H.S.W. 2,345 Mt. Sinai Mt. Sinai Pl m. Smithtown Dist.
6 Rt. 25A Nesaquake Int. 987 '.
272 7 Port Jeff. Jr. H.S. 14 Rt. 25A Nesaquake Int. 987 !
767 Bart Jefferscn Port Jeff. El m _1,039 i
Cent. Islip Dist.
2,321 616 12 Rt. 347 C.I.H.S.
Clintcn Ave. Elem. 2,321 .
8 1,565 34 Rt. 347 C.I.H.S.
Ctzusewogue Ctreewogue H.S.
1 2,181 Connetquot Dist.
11 LIE Peconic St. J.H.S.1,284
- Eagle Elen. 590 e 10 Patchogue-Med, h ?( Sayville J.H.S. 1,175 c! 417 8 Rt. 27 12 South St.
373 7 Rt. 27 Sayville J.H.S. 1,175 So. Manor Daytcn Ave.
4
! 790 I
k 1
I a -. .
1 l
- w.'m e"**Y'~ ' *
. _ _ _ . , .__ -. _ . -~.--
P
' .. . A 1
Evac.
District Evacuated Schools Enroll. Buses Rte. Most Schools Entull.
396 7 IJE Sayville H.S. 1,294 14 Riley Ave. Elen 529 10 Rt. 27 Sayville H.S. 1,294 Riverhead Pulaski St. Elem.
925 Parochial Schools E. Islip Dist.
225 4 Rt. 27 Islip Terr.J.H. 1,137 St. Isidore 1,490 31 Rt. 27 E. Islip H.S. 1,853 St. John C
Mercy H.S. Rt. 27 Islip Terr. J.H. 1,137 ,
Snithtown Dist.
Infant Jesus 519 10 Rt. 347 Great Hollow Int. 970 4
4 1
5 t
O t.
- E I
L f.-
/
4 e6* ^
L
.eJ.e i gn.
,4 lR
~id !~^ 4 3
w$ \
i i J
$ &lf ; g'l g*-
~
4R e ,i k
..T, y 4l
'f 3 i
l5 e ep=.4:_e.
'x , .
- S\ gj;j
# 7' ,
$ *p7 J i k y
!,,<;De,.d,Mv.d; ' .
b . .
-a
~.
..g_
~-u 1.w. . . - . __
p m2s n m.cy ,,.
,, M l ' ,
b M,~
- , :i, In Ifc a .,n
*)} q'i
~
b;.f# Q,?y ih , {,VoU m h~L ~) I rr~5 f l'_ a * \$ !. .,!! I,. f r %;W y 5
, Jk itx Nt,t a yL.._...qn m mq
_y.
%p o
_, . m c. ,: e< q ;. > ,.= c e-- _ o3
- f p/ * ~, 4. j,} . N '
i'I il M (E .a ' ih!I e p"j
;j l Mj) ?
l[:*Q;[D; t 'h -
>-upg3 y%.es
; - glun !
f~ NY , M d ruF !*hfh % 4v -1m :
~
3; s lll'f!!s'V /_
.9l.II'qW@,f'[7rl%i g
&k_..g.
s
$lh,O ~
N 1i ;?]'\ (, v:)l g
./
I
;b b ,la I: b b)i d E d k 3 h
.. . .. *99%
,, , e e --
I I i ATTACHMENT 42 l i i L_ .-
OPIP 3.6.1 Pcgs 31A of 44 Attachment 42 J 5.3 Protective Actions - Special Facilities
~ ' '
, 5.3.1 Schools
- a. For an Alert or higher emergency classification school protective actions are recommended based upon the following table.
Protective Action for Schools Outside FPZ Protective Action Protective Action With Students Who Live for General Public for Schools in EFZ in EPZ No protective actions - Early dicaissal of Early dismissal of all recommended anywhere students to their students to their homes in EPZ homes Retain students, who Sheltering, but no - Shelter all schools live in the EPZ, at cvacuation recommended* with students living school when school day an in the EPZ. Bring ends - () ywhere in EPZ buses to schools. Retain etudents, who Evacuation recommended - Relocate students to live in the EPZ, at anywhere in EPZ reception centers school when school day - outside EPZ. ends
~
O l I k., Rev. 3
- - & ~~~ . --
e ATTACHt1ENT 43
' a.-en.
i aa i ii i
Attachment 43 e fg_{@ LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
, ,, , 175 EAST OLD COUNTRY ROAD
- H IC K S VI L LE, NEW YORK 11801 Direct Dial Number March 16, 1984 Mr. Stanley Packman Director, Admin. Services BOCES II, Suffolk 201 Sunrise Highway Patchogue, NY 11772
Dear Mr. Packman:
As requested at our March 7, 1984 meeting, enclosed is a meeting report which briefly summarizes the information presented. This report also includes a sequence of response diagrams and the sample evacuacion plan handout. As was agreed at the meeting, LILCO needs updated information about student enrollment and transportation needs. As promised, we have developed a questionnaire which we would appreciate your cooperation in distributing to the sch.ools for completion. This information will enable us to assess with greater clarity the transportation requirements for evacuating the schools. We thank you for your cooperation in this planning effort. If you desire any further information or have any questions, please feel free to call Ms. Elaine Robinson at 733-5098. [#Vhry truly yours, hn A. Weismantle oca mergency Response Implementing Organization i JAU/kv Attachment
. .. ., ._ - , ~ . - . . . . . . . . .
s March 7, 1984 School Emercency Planninc Meetina Report ) On March 7, 1984, a meeting was held at BOCES II Offices in Patchogue with representatives of LILCO and the school districts in the Shoreham Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) to discuss emergency planning for schools. Below is a summary of the information presented at that meeting for your review. Any incident at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station would be classified, in order of increasing severity, as an Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency or General Emergency. At the highest level of emergency, General Emergency, an airborne release from the plant may cause radiological. doses to the general public in excess of the federal guidelines set forth ! in the Protective Action Guides. If this were so, in order to l avoid or minimize public exposure to radiation, protective actions would be rec)mmended for the affected area. This area would include the site itself and the downwind sector. For school planning, h owever , it is planned that if protective actions are required for any segment of the population, it will be recommended that schools in the EPZ will implement the same action.- There are three choices of . protective actions for schools inside the EPZ as' delineated in the LERO plan. These protective actions are early dismissal, sheltering, or evacuation. Early dismissal actions require that students be returned to their homes. Shel-tering. actions require the students and staff to remain within the confines of school building. Evacuation actions require
the school population and some staff to be transported to a The best alternative reception center school outside the EPZ. will depend on the nature of the emergency, plant conditions, time of day, and weather conditions. Some schools are not located in the EPZ but are attended by therefore, provisions must be made students who reside in it; The following for them if protective actions are required. h table summarizes the actions of schools outside the EPZ wit those inside the EPZ and the general public. Protective Action for Schools Outside EPZ Protective Action With Students Who Live Protective Action for School in EPZ_ in EPZ for General Public Early dismissal of all No protective actions Early dismissal of students to their home: recommended anywhere students to their homes. in EPZ Retain students, who Sheltering, but no: Shelter all schools live in the EPZ, at with students living school when school day evacuation recommended in the EPZ. Bring anywhere in EPZ buses to schools, ends. Retain students, who at Evacuation recommended - Relocate students topre-designated centers anywhere in EPZ outside EPZ. ends. Diagrams depicting the sequence of response for schools inside and outside the EPZ for each of the three choices of protective
- 1. It is currently planned actions are presented in Attachment that school officials will be notified at an Alert or higher Each level of emergency by a tone alert radio activated by EBS.
school superintendent and school in the EPZ has been offered Additionally, LERO these radios for notification by LILCO. has designated members of the EOC staff to serve as Public and x .. -
_3_ d nt f Private School Coordinators who will call each school superinten e l If for some l to verify that the EBS message had been received. ! it had not, the message would be relayed at that time. reason, Additionally, these school coordinators will be accessable t to the superintendents on separate telephone lines to receive reques s f Each school superintendent or his for asssistance or information. designee is similarly requested to telephone their schools to verify notification. EARLY DISMISSAL If an Alert or higher level of emergency is declared but no s chool protective actions are recommended for the general public, This officials would be advised to implement early dismissal. l choice was included in the LERO plan originally because schoo f of ficials indicated to Suffolk County planners their pre erence for this action so that students could be reunited with parents. i i l Of course, there are concerns in' implementing an early d sm ssa , i s. These which school administrators often cite about snow emergenc e ! If the include releasing students to homes without supervision. l is consensus of school districts now is that early dismissa inadviseable, the plan could be revised to reflect this view. Providing the emergency does not escalate to the point where i be dismissed protective actions are recommended, students would then If the emergency escalates to the point where at the usual time. i l l sheltering or evacuation are recommended before regular dism ssa then the appropriate actions would be implemented. SHELTERING Sheltering involves moving all students and staf f . indoors with any I
ventilation from the outside kept to a minimum. Effective techniques include closing all windows and doors, and shutting off any ventilation systems. It is also recommended to move the students to an area with the least amount of windows and exterior walls, and possibly to a basement, if available. This will ndnimize exposure as the release passes over the building. Sheltering is not expected to be a long-term protective action; it may be used in combination withrelocating the students and staff after a certain length of time to provide the least exposure. The areas of a building which provide the best protection for sheltering can be determined by a survey. LILco offers to make available the services of health physics personnel to perform such a survey for each school in the EPZ, and to issue a report with recommendations for each school. - ~ EVACUATION A sample evacuation plan for assigning schools in the EPZ to appropriat:
.It reception centers (host school) is summarized in Attachment 2.
is emphasized that this is a sample plan, and many acceptable alternatives could be developed. Several assumptions were used to make relocation assi'gnments including:
- 1. matching capacities of the f acilities ,
- 2. using facilities nearest the evacuation routes, and
- 3. using facilities 5-12 miles outside the EPZ in the westerly direction due to the greater availability of buildings.
In ordet to specifically plan for each school, accurate information regarding the number of buses, current student enrollments and building capacities is required.
P ATTACHIENT 1 F.eeting Report l SCHOOLS IN EPZ l EARLY DISMISSAL f . VERIFICATION NOTIFICATION LER TONE CH00L LERO INTENDENT[ t t' SCHOOL TRANSPORTATIO PRINCIPALS COORDINATOR
- 1. VERIFY .. 1. CONTACT BUS COMPANIES TO
- 2. IMPLEMENT "GO HOME" PLANS IMPLEMENT EARLY DISMISSAL PLANS 9
( 4 TEACHERS G
* ~ '
..b....,,- ..-.-.y...,..- .
l SQlOOLS IIS EPZ SHELTER . NOTIFICATION VERIFICAT!oN BY BY TONE ALERT "'
- SCHOOL EBC " , # .
LERO INTENDENT OTIFICATION BY TONE ALERT t t .
, SCHOOL RANSPORTATIO PRINCIPALS COORDINATOR
~'
- 1. VERIFY l. CONTACT BUS COMPANIES
- 2. NOTIFY SCHOOL PERSONNEL TO STANDBY
- 3. CLOSE OFI' VENTILATION SYSTEME
- 4. CLOSE ALL WINDOWS AND.DOORM S. MOVE STUDEN15 TO OPTIMUM
, SHELTERING LOCATIOM AS DETERMINED BY SHEI.TERING SURVEY -
s . e %
'*e y -
- i. f. -
TEACHE]RS I -
' ^
G s
- 1. EXPLAIN SITU /cfION , ,
- 2. TAKE ROLL CA(4L <; -
^
3.,CLOSE WINDOWS AND DOORS IN '
. CLASSROOM \ '
a, e, i~
' sg L
] * .- * -
k & ,
~
g ..._- , 1, .;; _ At g 4 , [ , ,
,s . .
l 'T
,. [.. %y, ,'t.
^
, **\<
~^ N. * .
l i
- .t. . qg
. . - . . - - b,- <-'r .. , ..,....,%;.~.., . . . . . ,, . .
. . 1r ,
1 _ . _ _ . _. __.
~
L J SCHOOLS IN EPZ l EVACUATION i VERIFICATION NOTIFICATION BY ERT TELEPHONE TONE SG00L gg J <""")" < t f SCH00 PORTATIO PRINCIP RDINATOR
- 1. VERIFY 1. CONTACT BUS COMPANIES
- 2. NCffIFY SCHOOL PERSONNEL 2. IF ADDITIONAL DRIVERS OR
- 3. WHEN BUSES ARRIVE, BOARD BUSES ARE REQUIRED, HAVE
'j LOWEl'. GRADES FIRST SUPERINTENDENT CALL LERO l 4. SECURE SCHOOL FCR ASSISTANCE
'5
~
i i i i : . i[ TEACHERS l
- 1. EXPLAIN SITUATION
- 2. TAKE ROLL CALL ,
- 3. REMAIN WITH STUDENTS
-, - , _ . -,_~._.,..,.._,.,,,,,,.,,..,._,,,,--._,_m_
SCHOOLS OUTSIDE EPZ EARLY DISMISSAL VERIFICATION NOTIFICATION TONE LER CH00L
, 1J tt"*"y (LERO NOTIFICATION BY TONE ALERT T
8 SCHOOL TRANSPORTATIO-PRINCIPALS C0ORDINATOR
- 1. CONTACT BUS COMPANIES
- 1. VERIFY TO IMPLEMENT EARLY DISMISSAL
- 2. IMPLEMENT "GO HOME" PMNS PLANS ,
4 e l ? l i l l l l .
i 4 SCHOOLS OUTSIDE EPZ SHELTER . J VERIFICATION NOTIFICATION TONE LER CH00L LERO "j
~
INTENDENT NOTIFICATION BY TONE ALERT f SCHOOL TRANSPORTATIO. PRINCIPALS C0ORDINATOR
- 1. CONTACT BUS COMPANIES
- 1. VERIFY TO STANDBY
- 2. NOTIFY SCHOOL PERSONNEL
- 3. AT END OF SCHOOL DAY, RE-TAIN THOSE STUDENTS WHO
' LIVE IN EPZ -
5 1f TEACHERS
- l. EXPLAIN SITUATION
- 2. TAKE ROLL CALL AND NOTE
' WHICH STUDENT LIVE IN EPZ
- 3. AT END OF SCHOOL DAY, PROVIDE i j ,
SUPERVISION TO THOSE STUDENTS BEING RETAINED l q i t
....;.-.~..............
! _ _ _ - ~ _ - . _ . .
SCHOOLS OUTSIDE EPZ EVACUATION VERIFICATION NOTIFICATION TONE LER CH00L 0 "j PERINTE NOTIFICATION BY TONE ALERT T_ SCHOOL TRANSPORTATIO PRINCIPALS C0ORDINATOR l
- 1. CONTACT BUS COMPANIES
- 1. VERIFY
- 2. IF ADDITIONAL DRIVERS
- 2. NOTIFY SCHOOL PERSONNEL AND/OR BUSES ARE REQUIRED,
- 3. AT END OF SCHOOL DAYS A E SUPERINTENDEM CA E TRANSPORTSTUDENTSWHbLIVE O FOR ASSISTANCE IN EPZ TO RECEPTION CENTER
,l e 9 9 __ _ _ _ _ v- r
/
l PUBLIC & PRIVATE SCHOOLS TRAINING i KEY ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL
" RADIATION MTURALLY" VIDE 0 TAPE
- RADIATION HA000TS "LER0 & SHOREHAM" VIDE 0 TAPE
' FAMILY PLANNING HAE00T"
" SCHOOLS RESPONSE HANDOUT" QUESTION & ANSWER SESSION TEACHERS, BUS DRIVERS, OTHERS "SCHOOLSRESPONSEHAND00i"
" FAMILY PLANNING HAND 0UT" t
l l i l -- __
-. --- + -- --
,e . - r -
y - , e ,
l MEETING MARCH WITH SCHOOL 7, 1984 ADMINISTRATORS _ 4 The attached is a preliminary sample plan developed for the purpose of illustrating some of the concepts contained in the emergency There are many alternative plans that could plan for Shoreham. be developed and provide an adequate planning basis for school evacuation. l ment There are a number of assumptions that were made in the deve op i of this plan:
~
i ih o Each elementary and junior high bus would carry up
?
Each high school bus would carry to 60 passengers. up to 48 passengers. An allowance for staff was' included. h Each bus would make one trip only. o 1 o Available, but outdated enrollment figures were r E
.I used.
L I i
- s. l i '
)
1 I i; i I I ' >1 I i i i l I
' ^ ." * * * '
...---....~~~-.M**~~-**%'-
t
=:--*r ~ y,. . - n,t:=*.:+~~
Idaritificatism of Evacuating ard Host Schcols l Evac. Evacuated Cdicols Enroll. Raus ' Ate. Best Behools Enroll. District Omnetquot Dist. 12E G ..;.quot H.S. 2,466 1 Briarcliff med 203 4 G . 'goot H.S. 2,466
- Ehorehme- Millar Ave. 318 6 12E 591 11 LIE L . 'goot H.S. 2,466 Meding River Shorehun-W.R. Midile Shzdiam-W.R. H.S. 738 16 LIE L .='doot H.S. 2,4f6 344 6 LIE L . ^ 4act H.S. 2,466 Mading River 2,194 2
Omnetouot Dist. 68 2 LIE Peccnic St. J.H.S.1,284 Little Flower Little Flower Elen. Suithtom Dist. : Rt. 25 anithtown H.S.E:. 2,738 3 Joosph A. B$ gar 2,57 9 50 Rt. 25 Snithtown H.S.E. 2,738 Ibcky Po ht Rocky Pt. Jr.-Sr. H.S. Snithtown H.S.E. 2,738 lucky Pt. Elem. Rt. 25 Sachen District 1,700 31 LIE Sachem H.S.N. 2,900 4 Ridge Elsn. , 1,064 20 Rt. 25 Hiawatha Elen. 1,065 Middle Island W. Middle I. Elen. 2,900 Coran Elan. 1,100 20 Rt. 25 Sacham H.S.N. 1,400 28 Rt. 27 Seneca J.H.S. 1,726
, Middle I. Jr. H.S. 3,500 Icngwocd High 2,000 42 LIE Sacham H.S.S.
Q)as. E. Walters Elen. 1,300 24 Rt. 27 Sachem H.S.S. 3,500 8,564 n= = - e Dist. 450 8 Rt. 347 Hauppauge H.S. 2,719 5 N. O:nzntry Iti. 2,719 700 13 Rt. 347 u-gravy
- H.S.
Miller Place Andrew M211er Prim. Rt. 347 Hauppauge H.S. 2,719 . Sound Beach 600 11 l* 750 16 Rt. 25 Haupoauge H.S. 2,719 Millar Place H.S. 2,500 anithtown Dist. .
} Rt. 347 anithtown H.S.W. 2,345 I 6 It. Sinal Jr. B.S.
- Rt. 347 Snithtown H.S.W. 2,345 j
$, Mt. Sinai Mt. Sinai Elem.
anithtown Dist. . f 987 ! I 7 Port Jeff. Jr. H.S. 272 6 Rt. 25A . W M e Int. Ibrt Jefferum Port Jeff. Elan 7 67 14 Rt. 25A Nasaquake Int. 987 l
- i
' 1,039 ! Cent. Islip Dist.
!' 12 Rt. 347 C.I.H.S. 2,321 8 Clints Ave. Elen, 616 1,565 34 Rt. 347 C.I.H.F. 2,321 :
Qasswogue Ocneewogue H.S. *
.{ 2,181 f G . ^woot Dist.
( Poconic St. J.H.S.1,284 10 Eagle Elem. 590 11 LIE { 3 i Pm& h* _ W_ . , t i South St. 417 8 Rt. 27 Sayville J.K S. 1,175 12 Daytcm Ave. 373 7 Rt. 27 Sayville J.H.S. 1,17 5 So. Manor 790 I l
- - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - -
- i. . .. . .
I I
- Evac. t
[ District Evacuated Schools Enroll. hina= Rtc. Host Schools Enro;
! 14 Riley Ave. Elan 396 7 LIE Sayville H.S. 1,29' Riverhead Pulaski St. Elsa. 529 10 Rt. 27 Sayville H.S. 1,294 r 925 l
ll
! E. Islip Dist.
St. Ym M we 225 4 Rt. 27 Islip Terr.J.H. 1,13* St. Jdn 1,490 31 Rt. 27 E. Islip H.S. 1,85"- Mercy H.S. Rt. 27 Islip '1%rr. J.H.1,13* j anithtown Dist. Infant Jesus 519 10 Rt. 347 Great Hollow Int. 97( l l i 5
+
s 4
...w -- -
. . , . , . . ..- p. . ; -
yj o g ig - i g' jgy grl1 3 i A. ,
?
,$-h'
,111
,(1]
MI j[! ]e r!!{'\ 3 ,,- N s i s ; :; v 6
- j. ::
d .- . -
~ .
a
-x ;h -
,g (g) ._W-a5 : .-: q /r .n q
n J -
~
N , ,. I
~
ij l
- q,,)d i ,m _
i e._%. ) a -a, .. .$ ' -. 'c n u
,w/;q' .
'i .
y} i - 't l7ij ;u 11 1 l 9 bw N f I l y 78j p
# "Kt A-hI
/
,li di./
4l i e
~
": q'is b ;1 I A pi; g
s
,, x;p - ~I = <1 mi34 b-( -
-G ,
)k.-lD.ij ,
#' ~~
?~
e E I?P/ d , 3. i ,
& ~. .
% 1
)
j= -g ,J / - a 4 ,- r.l' m .
.., ) ;
~
a_ s l1 l l (3 e j ,y - .cS -
==; .- .
y
's j .
j Eh.ll , ~ l je .*. / i 3:: , C _3% DN 35 ' l
. e =cml m y y- k , y
$.T,. '
f, ,
, ,y u ir e1 1 i
4 . s[ t/,,_Jyi-a y ,
- s s/ ,f(w; il
, _?
l ! 5.. a l
.:.'f'
.-=4 o
. - i . -. .
~~ ' e U . *,--
- g y s . -
.. 7 m . , . .
- , . , , . - - - . - - -----,,,.,,_,,_.,,,._.,__,,...n. .
i ".1 '" L .1. .:.1 ..
,9 '
d OUESTIONNAIRE FOR SCHOOL I'RCYTECTIVE AC" TION SOPS 5
..+
is t
'. 1. Name of school:
- 2. Number of students:
i
- 3. Number of faculty:
- 4. Number of staff (maintenance, cooks , etc. ) :
- 5. Maximum enrollment at school site at any one time:
- 6. Average absenteeism (*) :
- 7. How many students are transported to/from school by bus?
l
- 8. How many students walk to/from school?
- 9. How many students are transported to/from school by parents and/or other vehicles?
U
- 10. If a high school, how many students drive?
. 11. Number of buses serving district:
Bus Company (ies): i,
- 12. Are any of these buses shared with other school districts?
If yes, how many and with which school districts:
- 13. How many routes do these buses make during morning routing / afternoon routing?
l
- 14. What is the estimated routing time of the buses?
I - _. -_ _ - _ , -
]
_-.~-... 2
- 15. How many bus drivers are employed, if known?
- 16. Do all drivers pick up buses at a central location (such as a garage) at beginning of morning route?
- 17. Do any drivers take the buses home during school hours between their routing? If so, how many?
- 18. Are the buses always returned to a central location (such as a garage) at the end of afternoon routing?
e S i S
.}}