ML20085H214
| ML20085H214 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 06/16/1982 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Fitzgerald J NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083L446 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-83-130 NUDOCS 8309070440 | |
| Download: ML20085H214 (2) | |
Text
.
e
+*
UMTED 8TATES E
NUCLEAR REQULATORYCOMMissioN a
I mAsHtNGToN.D.C35us
- Q 4dV June 16, 1982 ym:
- ?
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Jarres Fitzgerald, Acting Director
~
Office of Investigations l
FROM:
Darrell C. Eisenhut, Olrec. tor
' Division of Licensleg
SUBJECT:
BOARD NOTIFICAT10N FOR DIAtto C7JtV0lt I have determined that the information containeo in the attachst allegation is approprf ate for Board Motification.
l This notification is submitted for your revlaw an6 tonnant.L 'Thh ahepat\\on was transmitted to your Office for appropriste scrim $nnr..Mrdr.
to Fitzgerald, June 4,1982). Please provide your ety $s.%4 Williams by COB June 21,1982.
s fm y-Darrell C. E(W., 4(coooer Divisim of Litterrsite
Enclosure:
As Stated cc: J.Sinclair e
e f
~
7.5
- 9. t j
8309070440 830610 PDR FOIA REYNOLD83-130 PDR a
The Cocaission.
SiO r; -.
Enclosures:
1.
Letter from Concerned Engineer.
dated May 18,1982 2.
Memorandum from H. Denton to J. Fitzgerald and R. DeYoung.
dated June 4.1982 cc: ASLBP A5 LAP SECY OGC OPE Board Service List
Contact:
H. Schierling 49-28423 y
' S.
5 e
O 4
e e,
e 4
9 6
O e
g
't MGt:t *.TO. Y COW.USSMPe
~
~ '
[hg ;r 9
- . a..~ t c.
- . n. c. ames -
=
\\* s. /l, Q
y
.,y Em?stemt 2 JUN 4 St MEMRANDlM FDR:
'Jamer Fitzgerald Acting Mitctor Office of Investigatices Richard C. DeYoung Director Office of Inspection and F.nforcement i
FROM:
Harold R. Denton,-Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ANONYMOUS ALLEGATI'0HS C0prnnt* DIABLD120%
Sulk 1ECT:
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT The enclosed letter is forwarded for ' appropriate art 5sw & ysstr WTire The individual alleging deficiencies has indicated correcMye action
(
HRR does plan to hart the.p.tping she that he would find appropriate.
thennal/ deadweight analysis included within the scope of fautse 11ef the Independent Design Vertitcation Program.
.s
//
Harold R.'Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
l As stated O
e G
o
__ y,2-o Gh{5 ;[,y
~
,,w
,---,e,,
---,---,,-,,w-a-wm e
_.,_.-m
,,ae,,
.. ~,wsmw kok r.f,
- 9...cyg.q....f_-ihe 7-
~
- c..
....., e-
- n. m.
.;- ;.g,: gjf3 yj.{.y.s.-
nac Washington, D. C. '
p, p.
+
....,..;.., y.g.g.
...... n.:.
Dear Mr. Richard DiYoung:
I am currently involved in the DiaMo Cany.on lieview
. effort now in progress.. I must say that this $s ths, worst nuclear power plant that I have ever worked es.
and it is'not SAFE.
I was hoping with the' introduction of Bechtel that a complete re-analysis of Enit I sstuls s
be done.
Alas this is not to be. The PGt@ ssnagvrartf
~ -
l engineers only correct the mistakes that are found
' accidentially or are forced down their throats. If the error is an generic one, they will not revive wwwrytting but just what caused the error and they will only correct
~~
that one mistake.
The latent review is for b@ taly
~
but the real danger.is that:
- 1) The thermal / dea'dveight analysis does not match u e.
v -
the seimic or currest field support configuration.
Systems are failing when corrected.
- 2) The so-called ' As-Built" pipe support dnntings are not as-built but instead are the accmnastion of 'all the changes to the support dravig mur %s I
3 past 13 years.
The support be.vs not, bass sal %xi
- down in the field to show thed3stest scr Ipetiton or orientation to the pipe. Also.izierfar.emer arith structure are not show on the drawings.
I only ask that you have R. L. Cloud & Associates review the thermaI/ Deadweight analysis as wa11.1:t tha-Hosgri they are now doing.
This will tuntiTm 's'nat 'l ' nave said.
If action is not taken,I may be.' force to caek a public hearing on this. 'I am pro-nuclear but invalid analysis andincompetence must not be igored. This palnt in ny opinion is bad from the analysis to the supports.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely A Contered h 12mer 3
~
g g.
p 4
G
..l _;.r:93,\\
. g,.j7 f;;;;. M -M.
a..
- t....
~..:... T, %..:
. s.% r. m, y. m.v.w.a. -
-a
- ..w
- .'.
- l Q,4.,s.'. t,a.,
o 0.?
- i;vi^ Q *Mi c';
a..j %.. w.;..
.. m 5 ;,
?fu v
...s ::; -
i[ -
hington,- D. C
-" 4,... h.
.. f.....
,...... y 2
.i. '~y y;g. A;..; J -
![ 3.,.E[.N..h.c.s 'j=. : '..w g5 r.
i
.~." w :r.
1; dMais.::T-!.,. i -
y
Dear Mr. Richard DiYoung:
1
.~..
1 I am currently involved in the Diable Canyes Bedad " #f -
effort now in progress., I must say that this is the worst nuclear power plant that I haF# #Fer Forled an. r and it is not SAFE.
I was hoping with the' introduction of Bechtel that a complete re-analysis of Unit 1 would be done.
Alas this is not to be.
The PGLE managamant/
engineers only correct the mistakes that are ftmne 1
accidentially or~are forced down their throats.
If the error is an generic one, they will not review everything
)-
but just what caused the error and they will only currect that one mistake.
The latest review is for hosgri only g;.
but the real danger.is that:
~
,N -
- 1) The thermal / deadweight analysis doea et match 1.
the seimie or current field support configarstion.
Systems are failing when correcte6.
T
- 2) The so-called 'As-Built" pipe supycrt-drarizGE' are not as-built but instead are the accuaulatica A
.~
of all the changes to the support drawing *ser the past 13 years.
The support have not been wa'hed
- down in the field to show theramtest ceaftryct&te or orientation to the pipe. Also interrytenceuvith structure are not show on the drs @
- h. '
I only ask that you have*R. L UlouB 1r Assocla'tes review the thermaI/ Deadweight analysis as well as the Hosgri they are now. doing.
This will connzs sis.t I taae said.
If action is not 'aken, I ray be. force to sseh a public hearing on this.. I am pro-nuclear but invalid analysis andincompetence must,not be igored. This palat in my 4 pinion is bad from the analysis to the supports.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely A Coicered Eng,ines:
e e
t i
4
-.....-....- -. - -..-.-. -..-..--.... -. - -.. -.--