ML20062K007
| ML20062K007 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200001 |
| Issue date: | 12/07/1993 |
| From: | Quirk J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062K009 | List: |
| References | |
| MFN-223-93, NUDOCS 9312100053 | |
| Download: ML20062K007 (38) | |
Text
.
. .. _. _ . - m
- GENuclear Energy
- GeneralElectric Company 175 Curtner Avenue. San Jose. CA 95125 December 7,1993 - MFN No. 223-93 Docket No.52-001 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555 Attention: R.W. Borchardt, Director Standardization Project Directorate
Subject:
Submittal of Amendment 33, Non-Proprietary Information to GE's ABWR SSAR
References:
- 1. Submittal of Amendment 33, Proprietary hArmation to GE's AB% R SSAR, MFN No. 224-93, dated Deca:nber .,1993
- 2. Submittal of Amendment 33, Sr feguards Information to GE's ABWR SSAR, MFN No. 225-93, dated December 7,1993
- 3. Submittal of ABWR Certified Design Material, 25A5447, Revision 2, MFN No. 213-93, dated December 7,1993
- Enclosed are twenty-two (22) copies of amended non-proprietary sections of the Standard Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) for the Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR). At the .
regoest of Chet Pos!usny, an additional thineen (13) copies of this amendment are being sent
? directly to the NRC Branch Chiefs listed on Attachment 1. Except as hereinafter noted, this : -
submittal, in conjunction with prior ABWR submittals, completes satisfaction of the requirements of 10 CFR 52.47.
Amendment 33 also provides information resulting from GE's co'itinuing internal SSAR verificatica process which has been conducted in full compliance with GE procedures governing treatment of engineering documentation. GE's verification process is intended to assure that the reissued ABWR SSAR (Amendment 31) as augmented by Ismendments 32 and 33, accurately reflects its design documentation, is technically accurate and consistent within itself (including References 1 and 2), and accuratel f depicts the ABWR Cenified Design Material (Reference 3). An affirmation letter complying with the filing requirements of 10 CFR 52.45(d) and 50.30(b) is attached.
Amendment 33 includes SSAR changes resulting from the following:
- 1. Letter, Boyce to Marriott, Initial Comments on GE j Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Cenified Design / i Material, dated September 27,1993.
y w i
- 2. Letter, Boyce to Marriott, Comments on GE Advanced p Boiling Water Reactor Certified Design Material, .A, p 1 received by GE November 8,1993.
h LRBK 93-77
- 3 S 9312100053 931207 (
t A _ _
s 4
. received by GE November 8,1993.
- 4. NRC Comments on ABWR SSAR Amendment 32 received October 14,1993 (attached to NRC meeting summary by C. Poslusny dated November 1,1993).
- 5. Supplemental NRC Comments on ABWR SSAR Amendment 32 received November 8-10,1993 (NRC meeting summary in preparation).
Disposition of the comments for items I through 3 above are addresse.d by the following transmittals:
- 1. Letter, Quirk to Wilson, Responses to Questions on the ABWR Certified Design Material (25A5447), dated October 20,1993.
- 2. Transmittal from James to Boyce, Responses to Round 2 of ITAAC Comment., dated November 23,1993.
- 3. Transmittal from James to Boyce, GE Responses to IRG Comments, dated November 22,1993.
Disposition of all the comments for items 4 and 5 above are addressed in Attachment 3. In addition to dispositiorii _ each comment (indicated by " Item No." in the left hand column), a -
comment " type" as defined below was assigned:
- 1. Editorial / Typo (e.g., spelling, grammar, missed conversion, etc.)
- 2. No Change Necessary (e.g., already included, entry correct as is, etc.)
- 3. New Information/ Clarification (e.g., information requested beyond Amendment 32, addition of clarifying information, etc.)
- 4. Discrepancy (e.g., incorrect cross-reference, missing information, etc.)
The purpose of categorizing the comments was to better determine the extent of potential discrepancies. The following summarizes the types of comments:
Comment Type Number SE 1 Editorial / Typo 56 17 2 No Chaar. Necessary 76 23 3 New Information/ 136 42 Clarification 4 Discrepancy _51 18 325 Each copy of the non-proprietary portion of Amendment 33 consists of two boxes of 8-1/2 x 11 inch pages, (one box for Chapter 16 and one box for the remainder of the chapters), and one box containing the Chapter 21 large size drawings.
LTRBK 93-77
. . .. < '\ v
(
About 75% of the 8-1/2 x 11 inch pages contain changes identified by bar-markers in the left hand column. The remaining pages result from automatic pagination (i.e., rollover). All of the pages are identified in Attachment 2 (Page Chenge Instructions).
Please note hat part of Appendix 3B contains information that is designated as General Electric Proprietary Information. This information is being submitted under separate cover
, (Reference 1).
Also, note that portions of Safegurads knformation, Subsection 13.6.3, Appendix 19C and Subsection 20.3.15 are included in this amendment. This information is also being submitted under separate cover (Reference 2).
Sincerely, J sep . Quirk roject Manager ABWR Certification MC-782, (408) 925-6219 cc: R.C. Berglund (GE)
T.E. Murley (NRC)
F. J. Miraglia (NRC)
D.M. Crutchfield (NRC)
C. Poslusny, Jr. (NRC D.J. McGoff (DOE)
S.M. Franks (DOE)
F.A. Ross (DOE)
N.D. Fletcher (DOE)
K.E. Stahlkopf (EPRI)
LTRBK 93-77
' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of: )
General Electric Company )
ABWR Standard Plant Design ) DOCKET No.52-001 Final Design Approval and Design )
Certification Application )
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF "ABWR STANDARD SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT" FOR FINAL DESIGN APPROVAL AND DESIGN CERTIFICATION Steven R. Specker, being duly sworn, states that he is Vice President and General Manager, GE Nuclear Energy, General Electric Company, that he is authorized on the part of said corporation to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission this document; that all statements made and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge,information and belief.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY By:
4 Steve R. Specker Vice President and General Manager GE Nuclear Energy Subscribed and sw before me this 7grnday to of December 1993.
% ~
Notary Public mm .
MARY L. KENDALL E COMM. # 967864 2 3: ) Notory Pubhc - CoLforniu E SAfCA CLARA COUN7Y 7 Mr Comm. Expires MAR 26. M97 ,
w - .
.- ATTACHMENT 1 DIRECT SHIPMENT OF AMENDAENT 33 TO BRANCH CHIEFS-I
- . I Name - Mail Stop*
G. Bagchi 7H16-C. McCracken 8D3 R. Jones -8E21 R. Barrett 8H2 M. Rubin 10E7 G. Zech -10H6 J. Wermiel 8H1 D. Lange 10H2O L. Cunningham 10D3 C. Berlinger 7El-C. Grimes 11E22 R. Gramm (2 copies) 10H6
- One White Flint . North
Attachment 2 ABWR SSAR Amendment 33. Page change lastruction De following pages have been changed, please make the specified changes in your SSAR. Pages are listed as page pairs (front & back). Bold page numbers arpresent a page that has been changed by Amendment 33.
REMOVE ADD REMOVE ADD PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No.
Leplace Cover page and Table of Contents in CHAP 1'ER 1 (Cont'd) front of each ABWR SSAR binder with updated Pages i thru vi. 1.9-3 thru 11/12 1.9-3 thru 12 1A-5,6 1A-5,6 CHAITER 1 1A-11,12 1A-11,12 1A-13,14 1A-13,14 ;
1.0-i, il 1.0-1, il 1A-21,22 1A-21,22 l 1.0-v, vi 1.0-v, vi 1A-35,36 1A-35,36 1.0-vii/viii 1.0-vil/ vill 1AA-15,16 1AA-15,16 i 1.1-1, 2 1.1-1, 2 1.1-3, 4 1.1-3, 4 )
CHAFTER 2 1.2-25, 26 1.2-25,26 1 1.2-27, 28 1.2-27,28 2.0-3/4 2.0-3/4 ;
1.2-29,30 1.2-29,30 1 1.2-33, 34 1.2-33,34 2.1-3/4 2.1-3/4 1.2-35,36 1.2-35,36 1.2-37,38, 1.2-37,38 2.3-1, 2 2.3-1, 2 1.2-39,40 1.2-39,40 2.3-3, 4 2.3-3, 4 1.2-42,42 1.2-41,42 1.2-43,44 1.2-43, 44 2A-5,6 2A-5,6 1 1.4-3, 4 1.4-3, 4 CH APTER 3 1.6-5, 6 1.6-5,6 3.0-iii/iv 3.0-lil/iv l 1.7-23, 24 1.7-23,24 3.0-xxvii, xxviii 3.0-xxvii, xxvill l 1.8-5, 6 1.8-5, 6 3.1-49,50 3.1-49,50 1.8-7, 8 1.8-7, 8 l'
1.8-9, 10 1.8-9,10 3.2-1 thur 16 3.2-1 thru 16 1.8-25, 26 1.8-25,26 3.2-23,24 3.2-23, 24 1.8-35,36 1.8-35,36 3.2-27 thru 30 3.2-28 thru 30 1.8-37, 38 1.8-37,38 3.2-31,32 3.2-31,32 1E-39,40 1.8-39,40 3.2-35,36 3.2-35,36 1.8-41 thru 46 1.8-41 tbru 46 3.2-39,40 3.2-39,40 l 3.2-41,42 3.2-41,42 l
1.9-1, 2 1.9-1, 2 3.2-43 thru 46 3.2-43 thns 46 Decemtier 7,1993
ABWR SSAR Amendment 33 . Page change lastruction The following pages have been changed, please make the specified changes in your SSAR. Pages are listed as page pairs (front & back). Bold page numbers avpresent a page that has been changed by Amendment 33.
REMOVE ADD REMOVE ADD PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No.
CHAPTER 3 (Cont'$) CHAP 1TR 3 (Cont'd) 3.2-47,48 3.2-47,48 3.9-129, 130 3.9-129,130 3.2-49,50 3.2-49,50 3.9-131, 132 .
3.9-131,132-3.2-53,54 3.2-53,54 3.9-135 thru 142 3.9-135 thew 142 3.2-55 thru 60 3.2-55 thru 60 3.9-143,144 3.9-143,144 3.2-61,62 3.2-61,62 3.9-145 thru 148 3.9-145 thru 148 3.9-149, 150 3.9-149, 150 3.3-1, 2 3.31,2 .
j 3.10-5,6 3.10-5,6 l 3.4-3 thru 8 3.4-3 thru 8 3.10-7, 8 3.10-7,8 3.4-9,10 3.4-9,10 l 3.4-11, 12 3.4-11,12 3.11-1, 2 3.11-1,2 l 3.4-131bru 16 3.4-13 thru 16 3.11-3, 4 3.11-3,4 3.11-5, 6 3.11-5, 6 l 3.5-3, 4 3.5-3, 4 .
{
3.5-13, 14 3.5-13, 14 Add 3.13-1 thru 16 ~l 3.6-5 thru 16 3.6-5 thru 16 3A-i/ii 3A-l/li 3.6-17,18 3.6-17,18 3A-3,4 3A-3,4 3.6-19 thru 28 3.6-19 thru 28 3A-71,72 3A-71,72 3.6-33,34 3.6-33,34 3A-77,78 3A-77,78 3.6-37,38 3.6-37,38 3B-1 thru 70 3B-1 thru 70 3.7-3 thru 48 3.7-3 thru 48 3.7-77, 78 3.7-77, 78 3E-7,8 3E-7,8 3E-25,26 3E-25,26 3.8-3, 4 3.8-3, 4 3E-27,28 3E-27,28 '
3.8-5 thru 75/76 3.8-5 thru 76 3E-33,34 3E-33,34 3E-35,36 3E-35,36 3.9-5 thru 80 3.9-5 thru 80 3E-37,38 3E 37,38 3.9-81,82 3.9-81,82 3.9-83, 84 3.9-83, 84 3H.0-1,11 3H.0-1,11 3.9-85, 86 3.9-85,86 3H.0-lii, iv 3H.0-lii, iv 3.9-87, 88 3.9-87, 88 3H.0-vii, nii 3H.0-vil, viii 3.9-99,100 3.9-99,100 3.9-101 thru 122 3.9-101 thru 122 3H.1 thru 36 3H.1-1 thrs 36 3.9-123, 124 3.9-123, 124 3H.1-57,58 3H.1-57,58 3.9-125, 126 3.9-125,126 3H.1-69, 70 3H.1-69,70 3.9-127, 128 3.9-127,128 3H.1-73, 74 3H.1-73,74 l
December 7,1993
i ABWR SSAR Amendment 33 - Page change instruction (Continued) -
l
'Ibe following pages have been changed, please make the specified changes in your SSAR. Pages are fYed as page pairs (front & back). Bold page numbers represent a page that has been changed by Amendaicat 33.
REMOVE ADD REMOVE ADD PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. -
CHAPTER 3 (Cont'd) CHAFIER 4 (Cont'd)-
3H.2-1, 2 3H.2-1, 2 4.2-1, 2 . 4.2-1,2 ;
3H.2-3,4 3H.2-3,4 4.2-5, 6 4.2-5, 6 3H.2-9,10 3H.2-9,10 4.2-7, 8 4.2-7, 8 3H.2-11,12 3H.2-11,12 43-1,2 43-1,2 ,
3H3-1,2 3H3-1,2 43-7,8 43-7,8 ,
3H3-9,10 3H3-9,10 4C-1/2 4C-1 thru 3/4 3H3-11,12 3H3-11,12 3H3-21,22 3H3-21,22 3H3-23,24 3H3-23,24 CHAFIER 5 1
3H.4-13/14 3H.4-13/14 5.0-i, ii 5.0-1, li !
r 3H.5-3,4 3H.5-3,5 5.2-45 5 5.2-45,46 5.2 21, a 5.2-81,82-3 31-1, 2 31-1, 2 ,
31-3, 4 31-3, 4 53-1,2 53-1,2 l 3I-5,6 31-5, 6 5 3-21,22 53-21,22 ,
31-9, 10 31-9, 10 5 3-23, 24 53-23,24 l 31-17,18 31-17,18 5.4-3, 4 5.4-3, 4 :
3J-1/2 3J-1/2 5.4-7,8 5.4-7,8 ;
5.4-15 thru 73 5.4-15 thru 73 i 3K-1/2 3K-1/2 i
3M-7,8 3M-7,8 j 3MA-1, 2 3MA-1,2 6.0-lii, iv 6.0-111, Iv 3MA-3,4 3MA-3,4 6.0-v, vi 6.0-v, vi 3MA-5 thru 36 3MA-5 thru 36 6.0-vii, viii 6.0-vil, vill 6.0-ix, x 6.0-ix, x 6.0-xi, xii 6.0-xi, xil I CH APITR 4 6.2-1, 2 6.2-1, 2 4.0-i, ii 4.0-1, li 6.2-9 thru 228 6.2-9 thru 229 December 7,1993 1
- l. l i
ABWR SSAR Amendment 33 - Page change lastruction (Continued) f The following pages have been changed, please make the specified changes in your SSAR. Pages are listed as page pairs (front & back). Bold page numbers represent a page that has been changed by Amendment 33.
REMOVE ADD REMOVE ADD. j PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. .
I CHAPTER 6 (Cont'd) CHAPER 7 (Cont'd) i 63-1,2 63-1,2 73-53,54 7 3-53,54 1 63-5,6 63-5,6 73-55,56 73-55,56 -
! 63-7,8 63-7,8 73-57 thru 64 73-57 thru 64 '!
6 3-19,20 6 3-19,20 l
63-23,24 6 3-23,24 7.4-11,12 7.4-11, 12 l 6 3-33,34 6 3-33,34 7.4-25,26 7.4-25,26 i l
l 6.4-5 thru 8 6.4-5 thru 8 7.5-1 thru 29 7.5-1 thru 29 I
6.5-3 thru 12 6.5-3 this 32 7.7-13, 14 7.7-13, 14 7.7-35,36 7.7-35,36 ,
6.6-29,30 6.6-29,30 7.7-45 thru 94 7.7-45 thru 94 6.7-1, 2 6.7-1, 2 7A-1,2 7A-1,2 7A-21,22 7A-21,22 .;
6A-9 thru 12 6A-9 thru 12 7A-59,60 7A-59,60 .;
7A-61 thru 66 7A41 thru 68 6B-1,2 6B-1,2 ;
6B-9/10 6B-9/10 7B-1,2 7B-1,2 i 7B-5,6 7B-5,6 ' a 6C-1,2 6C-1,2 ;
7C-1 thru 10 7C-1 thru 16 6D-1,2 6D-1,2 i CHAPTER 8 ,
CHAPTER 7 8.0-i/ii 8 .0 -l / 11 :
7.0-lii, iv 7.0-lil/lv 8.0-v/vi 8.0-v/vi -
7Av, si 7Av,51 7.0-vii, viii 7.0-vil,viii 8.1-3, 4 8.1-3, 4 8.1-7, 8 8.1-7, 8 -
7.1-1 thru 10 7.1-1 thn 10 7.1-17,18 7.1-17,18 8.2-1 thru 6 8.2-1 thru 6 7.1 19,20 7.1-19,20 8.2-9 thru 16 8.2-9 thru 16 7.1-41,42 7.1-41,42 83-1,2 83-1,2 7.2-1, 2 7.2-1, 2 83-3,4 83-3,4
-4 December 7,1993 i
l l
i i
Amendment 33 - Page change instruction (Continued) -
The following pages have tua changed, please make the specified changes in your SsAR. Pages are listed as page pairs (front & hack). Bold page numbers represent a page that has been changed by Amendment 33.
REMOVE ADD REMOVE -
ADD PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No.
CHAPITR 8 (Cont'd) CHAPTER 9 (Cont'd) 83-15,16 8 3-15,16 9.4-1 thru 58 9.4-1 thru 58 8 3-19,20 8 3-19,20 8 3-21, 22 8 3-21, 22 9.5-1 thru 86 9.5-1 thru 89 8 3-23, 24 8 3-23,24 83-29 thru 66 83 29 thru 66 9A.0-i, ii 9A.0-1, il 9A.0-lii, iv 9A.0-lil, iv CHAPTER 9 9A.0-v, vi 9A.0-v, vi 9.0-1,il 9.0-1, il 9A.0-vii, viii 9A.0-vil, vill l
9.0-iii, iv 9.0-111, Iv 9A.0-ix, x , 9A.0-Ix, x 9.0-v, vi 9.0-v, vi 9A.0-xiii, xiv 9A.0-xill, xiv {
9.0-vii, viii 9.0-vil, vill
! 9.0-ix, x 9.0-Ix, x 9A.2-1, 2 9A.2-1, 2
! 9A.2-3, 4 9A.2-3, 4 i 9.1-11, 12 9.1-11,12 9A.2-5, 6 9A.2-5,6 9.1-13, 14 9.1-13, 14 9.1-19,20 9.1-19,20 9A3-3 9A3-3 1 9.1-29, 30 9.1-29,30 ;
9.1-31,32 9.1-31,32 9A.4-1 thru 520 9A.4-1 thru 507 9.1-33,34 9.1-33,34 9.1-35,36 9.1-35,36 9A.5-7,8 9A.5-7, 8 .
9.1-45,46 9.1-45,46 I 9.1-51,52 9.1-51,52 9B-1, 2 9B-1,2 l 9.1-53,54 9.1-53, 54 9B-3, 4 9B-3,4 9.1-55,46 9.1 55,56 9B-5,6 9B-5,6 )
9.1-57,58 9.1-57,58 9B-9 thru 14 9B-9 thru 14 9.1-63,64 9.1-63, 64 9.1-67,68 9.1-67, 68 9C-5,6 9C-5, 6 9.1-71, 72 9.1-71, 72 9C-7, 8 9C-7,8 9C-9,10 9C-9,10 9.2-5, 6 9.2-5, 6 9C-11,12 9C-11,12 -
9.2-7 thru 74 9.2-7 thru 76 9D-1,2 9D-1,2 93-5,6 93-5,6 9D-3,4 9D-3,4 9 3-9,10 9 3-9,10 9D 5,6 9D-5,6 9 3-13,14 9 3-13,14 i 9 3-17, 18 9 3-17,18 I 93-19 thru 46 93-19 thru 48 December 7,1993 I
l l l
Amendment 33 - Page change instruction (Continued)
'Ibe following pages have been changed, please make the specified changes in your SSAR. Pages are listed as page pairs (front & back). Bold page numbers represent a page that has been changed by Amendment 33.
l 1
i REMOVE ADD REMOVE ADD l I
! PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No.
! CHAPITR 10 CHAPTER 12 (Cont'd) 10.0-i/ii 1 0 .0 -l / 11 12 3-9,10 123-9,10 10.0-iii/iv 10.0-lil/iv 123-19,20 123-19,20 10.0-v/vi 10.0-v/vl 123-21,22 123-21,22 10.2-1 thru 21/22 10.2-1 thru 21/22 10 3-1,2 103-1,2 10 3-5,6 10 3-5, 6 13.0-lii/iv 13.0-lil/iv 13.0-v/vi 13.0-v/vi 10.4-19,20 10.4-19,20
10.4-25,26 10.4-25,26 13.2-1/2 13.2-1/2 10.4-33,34 10.4-33,34 13.5-5, 6 13.5-5, 6 ,
13.5-7, 8 13.5-7, 8 CH AFTER 11 11.0-i/ii 1 1 .0 -l / 11 CHAPTER 14 11.0-v/vi 11.0-v/vl 14.0-lii,iv 14.0-iii, IV l 11.1-1 thru 8 11.1-1 thru 8 14.0-v/vi 14.0-v/s1 11.1-11/12 11.1-11/12 14.0-vil/viii 14.0-vil/vili !
l 11.2-1 thru 8 11.2-1 thru 8 14.2-5,6 14.1.-5, 6 l 14.2-9,10 14.2-9,10 113-25,26 113-25,26 14.2-25,26 14.2-25,26 14.2-73 thru 76 14.2-73 thru 76 11.4-5 thru 7/8 11.4 5 thru 7/8 14.2-79 thru 88 14.2-79 thru 88 14.2-93,94 14.2-93,94 11.5-1 thru 26 11.5-1 thru 28 14.2-125, 126 14.2-125,126 14.2-127,128 14.2-127,128 14.2-181 thru 200 14.2-181 thru 200 CHAITER 11 ,
143-1 thru 13 143-1 thru 59 !
12.2-7,8 12.2-7, 8 l 12.2-29,30 12.2-29,30 12.2-31,32 12.2-31,32 12.2-63 thru 70 12.2-63 thru 70 1 12.2-75,76 12.2-75,76 ;
- 1 December 7,1993 1
1 i
i h
Amendment 33 - Page change instruction (Continued) f i
I
'Ibe following pages have been changed, please make the specified changes in your SSAR. Pages are listed as l page pairs (front & back). Bold page numbers represent a page that has been changed by Amendment 33. {
4 REMOVE ADD REMOVE ADD PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No.
CHAPITR 15 CHAPTER 17 l 15.0-i thru xiv 15.0 i thru xiv 17.1-5/6 17.1-5/6 15.0-3, 4 15.0-3, 4 15.0-9 thru 17/18 15.0-9 thru 19 173-5 thru 8 173-5 thru 8 15.2-7, 8 15.2-7, 8 CH APTER 18 '
15.2-15 thru 26 15.2-15 this 26 15 3-1, 2 15 3-1, 2 18.0-i, il 1 8 .0 -1, 11 l 15 3-3,4 15 3-3,4 !
15 3-9,10 15 3-9,10 18.5-1/2 1851/2 ;
15.4-1, 2 15.4-1, 2 18.8-1 thru 3 18.8-1 thru 3 15.4-11 thru 20 15.4-11 thru 20 18A-1 18A-1 15.619 thru 24 15.6-19 thru 24 15.6-27 thru 30 15.6-27 thru 30 18A 2-3,4 18A.2-3 thru 5 .
15.6-39,40 15.6-39,40 1 15.6-41,42 15.6-41,42 18A3-1 thru 4 18A3-1 thru 4 15.6-45,46 15.6-45,46 18A.4-1 thru 8 18A.4-1 thru 8 15.7-1 thru 17/18 15.7-1 thru 22 18A.4-11 thru 15 18A.4-11 thrv 15 !
15.8-1, 2 15.8-1, 2 18A3-1 thru 4 ' 18A.5-1 thru 4 18AS-7 thru 14 18A.5-7 thrv 14 15B.15,16 15B-15,16 18A.8-1,2 18A.8-1,2 15C-1 thru 15/16 15C-1 18A.11-5 thru 8 18A.11-5 thru 8 '
15E.0-v, vi 15E.0-v, vi 15E.0-vii, viii 15E.0-vil, vill 18A.12-1 thru 8 18A.12-1 thru 8 15E-1 thru 12 15E-1 thru 12 18A.13-3 18A.13-3 15E-17,10 15E-17,18 Add 15E-18.1 18B-7 thru 45/46 18B-7 thru 50 Add 15E-22.1 18C-1 thru 4 18C-1 thru 4 CHAPTER 16 - NEW December 7,1993
l l
I i
l Amendment 33 - Page change lastructica (Comtlemed) ,
i
'Ibe following pages have been changed, please make the speelned changes la your SSAR. Pages are listed u -
page pairs (front & back). Bold page numbers represent a page that has been changed by Annendment 33.
REMOVE ADD REMOVE ADD '
i PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No.
CHAPTER 18 (Cont'd) f,.li&PTER 19 (Cont'd) 18D-13,14 18D-13,14 19B-1 thru 117 19B-1 thru 124 18E-15,16 18E-15,16 19D-i thru xvi 19D-i thru xvi-18E-45 18E-45 -i 19D.4-13,14 19D.4-13,14 'l 18F-1,2 18F-1,2 ,
19D.5-27 thru 75/76 19D.5-27 thru 80 CHAP'IER 19 19D.6-27,28 19D.6-27,28 !
19D.6 59,60 19D.6-59,60 19-i thru xxii 19-1 thru xxil 19D.6-75,76 19D.6-75,76 19-xxvii, xxviii 19-xxvii, xxvill 19-xxxiii thru lv/lvi 19-xxxill thru Iv/lvi 19D.7-3 thru 39/40 19D.7-3 thru 39/40 ;
19.2-1 thru 4 19.2-1 thru 4 19D.10-1 thru 14 19D.10-1 thru 14 -i 19.2-9,10 19.2-9,10 19E-v, vi 19E-v, vi .
19 3-5, 6 19 3-5, 6 19E-xi thru xiv 19E-xi thru xiv i 193-9 thru 33/34 193-9 thru 34 19E.2-5 thru 26 19E.2-5 thru 26 ;
19.4-5, 6 19.4-5, 6 19E.2-31 thru 52 19E.2-31 thru 52 19.4-11 thru 15/16 19.4-11 thru 15/16 19E.2-55 thru 78 19E.2-55 thru 78 19E.2-81,82 19E.2-81,82 ,
19E.2-87 thru 94 19E.2-87 thru 94 ;
19.5-3/4 19.5-3/4 19E.2-121,122 19E.2-121,122 19.6-3 thru 6 19.6-3 thru 6 19E.2-125 thru 130 19E.2-125 thru 130 19E.2-139,140 19E.2-139,140 19.7-3 thru 10 19.7-3 thru 10 19E.2-143,144 19E.2-143,144 19E.2-155,156 19E.2-155,156 19.8-1 thru 39/40 19.8-1 thru 41/42 19E.2-163 thru 166 19E.2-163 thru 166 19E.2-241,242 19E.2-241,242 .
19.9-1 thru 10 19.9-1 thru 11/12 19E.2-245,246 19E.2-245,246 i I
- 19.14-1 thru 36 19.14-1/2 19E3-3 thru 8 19E3-3 thru 8 l 19E3-11,12 19E3-11,12 I 19A-1,2 19A-1,2 i 19A-5 thru 10 19A-5 thru 10 19EA-5,6 19EA-5,6. l 19A-14 thru 22 19A-14 thru 22 19EA-21,22 19EA-21,22 1 1
'I
, December 7,1993 l.
_. . . _ . _ _ y
ABWR SSAR Amendment 33 - Page change instruction (Continued) ,
t
-t
- Ihe following pages have been changed, please make the specified changes in your SSAR. Pages are listed as page pairs (front & back). Bold page numbers represent a page that has been changed by Amendment 33.
REMOVE ADD REMOVE ADD PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No. PAGE No.
CHAPTER 19 (Cont'd) CHAPIER 19 (Cont'd) 19EA-29,30 19EA-29,30 19K-1,2 19K-1,2 19EA-31 thru 34 19EA-31 thru 34 19K-5 thru 20 19K-5 thru 20 19EA-35,36 19EA-35,36 19K-23 thru 31/32 19K-23 thru 31/32 .l 19EA-43,44 19EA-43,44 19L-3,4 191-3,4 19EB-1,2 19EB-1,2 191 11 thru 18 191 11 thru 18 19EB-11,12 19EB-11,12 191 21,22 191 21,22 ;
19EB-13,14 19EB-13,14 191 23,24 191 23,24 19EB-19,20 19EB-19,20 191 27,28 191 27,28 191 33 thru 42 191-33 thru 42 19EB-21,22 19EB-21,22 191 47,48 191 47, 48 ;
19EB-29,30 19EB-29,30 19M-17,18 19M-17,18 i 19EC-1,2 19EC-1,2 19M-29,30 19M-29,30 19EC-7,8 19EC-7,8 19EC-27,28 19EC-27,28 19N-5,6 19N-5,6 19EC-39/40 19EC-39/40 19N-21,22 19N-21,22 !
^
19ED-5,6 19ED-5,6 Add 19 0-1/2 19ED-17,18 19ED-17,18 ;
19P-1,2 19P-1, 2 l 19EE-17,18 19EE-17,18 19P-9,10 19P-9,10 ,
19F-1,2 19F-1,2 190-i,il 190-1, il 19F-7,8 19F-7,8 19 0-3,4 19 0-3, 4 19F-11,12 19F-11,12 190-7 thru 50 190-7 thru 50 19F-13,14 19F-13,14 19F-17,18 19F-17,18 190B-1,2 190B-1,2 19F-19,20 19F-19,20 190B-5,6 190B-5,6 ,
19F-21,22 19F-21,22 190C-15,16 190C-15,16 19FA-3,4 19FA-3,4 190C-23 thru 28 190C-23 thru 28 190C-37,38 190C-37,38 19H-3 thru 30 19H-3 thru 33/34 190C-41,42 190C-41,42 l 190C-45,46 190C-45,46 l 191-3 thru 20 19I-3 thru 20 190C-53 thru 56 190C-53 thru 56 191-33 thru 38 191-33 thru 38 i
l 9-December 7.1993 i
Amendment 33 - Page change lastructica (Contioned) i The following pages have been changed, please make the specified changes la your SSAR. Pages an listed as I page pairs (front & back). Bold page numbers npnsent a page that has been changed by Assendment 33. )
1 REMOVE ADD PAGE No. PAGE No. I J
CHAPER 19 (Cont'd)
]
19R-1 thru 10 19R-1 thru 10 19R-15,16 19R-15,16 C
CHAFER 20 1
203.1 15,16 203.1-15,16 203.2-21,22 203.2-21,22 .
203.2 33 thru 36 203.2-33 thru 36 )
203.4-25,26 203.4-25,26 203.5-3 thru 6 203.5-3 thru 6 i
203.6-7 thru 10 203.6-7 thru 10 l I
203.7-35,36 203.7-35,36 20 3.8-5,6 203.8-5,6 203.10-13,14 203.10-13,14 203.12-9,10 203.12-9,10 203.16-17,18 203.16-17,18 'l 20 3.16-29,30 203.16-29,30 l
203.17-17,18 203.17-17,18 20A-1/2 20A-1 thru 5/6 December 7.1993 g u w, ...m, p w -- , -- w
ABWR SSAR l Amendment 33 - Page Change lastruction
- ne following pages (17x22 drawings) have been changed, please make the specified changes in your SSAR.
Pages are printed on one side. Bold page numbers represent a page that has been changed by Amendment 33.
REMOVE ADD REMOVE ADD FIG. NO. PAGE NO. PAGE PAGE NO. FIG. NO. PAGE NO. PAGE PAGE NO.
CHAPT'ER 1 CHAPTER 8 ,
1.2-4 21-6 21-6 8.2-1 21-486 1 of 7 21-486 1.2-14 21-25 21-25 8.2-1 21-487 2 of 7 21-487 1.2-17 21-28 21-28 8.2-1 21-488 3 of 7 21-488 1.2-18 21-29 21-29 8.2-1 21-489 4 of 7 21-489 1.2-25 21-35 21-35 8.2-1 21-490 5 of 7 21-490 1.2-26 21-36 21-36 8.2-1 21-491 6 of 7 21-491 8.2-1 21-492 7 of 7 21-492 CH APTER 5 83-1 21-493 1of 3 21-493 j 2 of11 5.1-3 21 75 21-75 83-3 21-497 1 thru 2 21-497 5.1-3 21-78 5 of11 21-78 83-4 21-499 1 thru 3 21-499 5.1-3 21-79 6 of11 21-79 5.1-3 21-81 8 of11 21-81 CHAFFER 9 5.4-12 21 112 1 of 4 21-112 9.2-1 21-510 3 of 9 21-510 5.4-12 21-114 3 of 4 21-114 9.2-1 21-513 6 of 9 21-513 9.2-1 21-515 8 of 9 21-515 CH APTER 6 9.4-3 21-542.2 2 of 3 21-542.2 6.2-39 21-121 2 of 3 21-121 9.4-4 21-544 2 of 3 21-544 ,
9.4-4 21-545 3 of 3 21-545 63-7 21-127 1 thru 2 21-127 i 9.5-6 21-551 21-551 CHAFFER 7 9.5-7 21-552 21-552 I
9.5-8 21-553 21 553 7.2-10* 1 thru 72 21-133.1 9.5-9 21-554 21-554 )
i 73-2 21-167 13 of 37 21-167 9A.4-1 21-555 21-555 73-5* 1 thru 77 21-209.1 9A.4-13 21-567 21-567 9A.4-19 21-575 21-575 !
7.4-1 21-273 1 of 6 21-273 9A.4-20 21-576 21-576 !
7.4-1 21-274 2 of 6 21-274 l 7.4-3 21-291 12 of 27 21-291 CHAPTER 12 7.6-2* 1 thru 28 21-307.1 123-1 21-585 21-585 12 3-2 21-586 21-586 l 7.7-8* 1 thru 3 21-447.1 12 3-3 21-587 21-587 l 123-5 21-588 21-588
December 7,1993
d ABWR SSAR Amendment 33 - Page Change Instruction
'Ibe following pages (17x22 drawings) have been changed, please maske the specified changes in your SSAR.
Pages are printed on one side. Bold page numbers represent a page that has been changed by Amendment 33.
i REMOVE ADD FIG. NO. PAGE NO. PAGE PAGE NO. PROPRIETARY CHAPTER 12 (Cont'd) Remove all proprietary pages of the following figures:
123-7 21-590 21-590 Figure 7.2-10 Sheets 1 thru 72 123-8 21-591 21-591 12 3-10 21-593 21-593 73-5 Sheets 1 thru 77 .
123-11 21-594 21-594 12 3-12 21-595 21-595 7.6~ Sheets 1 thru 28 123-21 21-603 21-603 123-39 21-608 21-608 7.7-t Sheets 11bru 3 123-41 21-610 21-610 123-43 21-612 21412 123-47 21-616 21416 >
123-50 21-619 21419 ,
123-51 21420 21420 12 3-53 21-622 21422 12 3-55 21424 21424 ,
123-56 21-625 2142S 123-70 21-638 21-638 123-71 21439 21439 CHAPTTR 20 203.4-5a 21445 21-645 203.4-5b 21-646 21-646 203.4-Sc 21-647 21447 l l
l l
1 December 7,1993 !
l l
l
l l
l AIIACHMENT_3 l NflC_ Comments _or1ABWJLSS AFLAmendment3R anttDispositions ltem Comment Disposition Comment l
No. Type (See Legend)
Chapter 2, Geosciences:
1 Table 2.1 SRP Section 2.5.3 Surface Fautting Incorporated 4 The table indicates that there are no limits on surface faulting at a site. The SSAR table should state that a site is not acceptable of there is fault at or near the ground surface.
2 Typographical error page 2.3-1 Section 2.3.1.2, incorporated 1 (1) SSE Ground Motion, third line . 3.7-2 "of* should be .
3.7-2 'for."
3 Typographical error page 2.3-4 Section 2.3.2.19 incorporated 1 third line, " water / resources" . should be . " water resources" Chapter 3, Civil Engineering:
4 (Edttorial comment): Conventionally, in SI units, kg and kgf To be provided to NRC prior to March 4,1993 (NRC 1 represent the mass and force, respe.,ctively. Use of kgt/cm2 i s letter dated November 9,1993).
more appropriate than ko/cm2for force in all SSAR sections.
5 Subsection 3.3.2.3: . Incorporated 1 The title should include " systems," and read "Effect of Failure of Structures, Systems or Components Not Design for Tomado loads."
6 Subsection 3.7.1.2: Incorporated 4 The term (3.5/f)0.2 in Equation 3.71 should be (f/3.5)0.2 7 Subsection 3.7.2 and 3H: Analysis method and procedures provided at 2/22- 3 GE did not provide the analysis method and procedur.es for 25/93 Structural Audit. Added to Subsection 3.8.5.5.
seismic sliding evaluation in the SSAR as comnstted in the resolution of DFSER Open item 3.7.2-1.
8 Subsection 3.7.5.4 should be revised to reflect a commitment incorporated. 3 for the COL applicant to describe the process for completion of the design of balance-of-plant and non-safety related systems to minimize 11/1 interactions and propose procedures for an inspection of the as-built plant for II/I interactions. '
9 (Editorial Comment): Subsection 3.8.2.1.1.4: incorporated 1 The word "torospherical" should be "torispherical."
1
10 Subsection 3.8.4.1.5: Incorporated 4 The phrase * .. combination of both. Various type of frames form a support system with transverse and longitudinal bracing to the nearest wall or ceiling to take the seismic loads." Should be added to the end of ine second paragmph 11 Appendix 3A: Incorporated 4 The title of Figures 3A-9 and 3A-10 should be switched with each other.
12 Subsection 3A.3.2: Coefficient of Equation (3A-1) converted to 70. 1 in Equation 3A-1, it appears that the value for the coefficient (1000) and the term (om) need to be corrected to account for the conversion from British units to metric units.
13 Subsection 3H.1.4.5: Incorporated 1 The loading conditions "H" and "L" should be "H and "Lo",
respectively.
14 Subsection 3H.2.4.5: Incorporated 1 The first seven lines on Page 3H.2-11 should be deleted.
15 Table 3H.2-5, page 3H.2-20: Incorporated 1 "E" should be "E**. E' and E are used differently in Section 3H.3.4.3.3.2. (Usually, e'is used for SSE and E for OBE).
Similarly, Subsection 3H.3.4.5 and 3H.3.5.3.2, the loading Condition 'E' on Pages 3H.3-9 and 3H.2-11 should read
" E*."
(Editorial Comment): Table 3H.2.4.5 is dupfcated.
Chapter 3, Mechanical Engineering:
16 Subsection 1 A.2.9 - Coolant System Values Testing incorporated 4 Requirements (ll.D.1)
Subsection I A.3.7, " Testing of SRV and Discharge Piping,"
was added in Amendment 30, and then was deleted in amendment 31. It contained a requirement for the COL applicant to confirm that any SRVs of discharge piping not similar to those that were tested in the generic program will be tested in accordance with NUREG-0737 guidelines. As discussed in FSER Section 14.1.3.3.5.11, this information provided the basis for the resolution of COL Action item 3.9.3.3-1 and 14.1.3.3.5.11-1. Therefore, it should be included in the SSAR.
2
1 17 Subsection 3.9.1.5 - Inelastic Analysis Methods Subsection 3.9.1 revised to be '.onsistent with 4 The CRD outer tube was deleted from the list of Subsection 4.5.1.2.2.9.
components that prevent ejection of the CRD in the unlikely l event of a failure of the ASME Class 1 weld that attaches
( the CRD housing to the stub tube in the bottom head of the reactor pressure vessel. This is now not consistent with the discussion in SSAR Subsection 4.5.1.2.2.9, " Integral Intemal Blowout Support," which states that the CRD outer tube and middle flange is one of the safety-related components in the load path that provides the anti-ejection function during this postulated event. The staff's evaluation of this issue in the FSER Section 3.9.1 included the outer tube as part of the load path, in addition, based on information in previous SSAR amendments, the staffs discussion in FSER Section 3.9.1 stated that the cylindrical bodies of the CRD guide tube, housing, and outer tube were the only parts of these components that were analyzed by inelastic analysis. SSAR Subsection 3.9.1.5 has now been revised to state that only the cylindrical body of the guide tube was analyzed inelastic ally. The SSAR should be revised to eliminate the discrepancy between Subsections 3.9.1 and 4.5.1.2.2.9.
18 Table 3.9 Plant Events Addressed in October 22,1993 GE letter to NRC 4 The number of cycles / events for most of the plant operating justifying all Table 3.9-1 entries with the exception of events and some of the dynamic loading events listed in this Events 6 and 14 which were increased by a factor of table have been reduced by a factor of approximately 1.5. 1.5.
This reduces the number of cycles / events back to those reported in the SSAR Amendment 1 numbers for a 60-year plant life. This was Open item 3.9.1-1. In response to this request, GE submitted Amendments 21 and 23 which generally increased these numbers by a factor of 1.5. The staff reported this in its FSER, Section 3.9.1 and found it acceptable. The number of cycles / events reported in Amendments 21 and 23 should be retained unless GE can justify the reduced numbers for a 60 year ide.
Table 3.9-8, inservice Testing Safety-Related Pumps and Valves 19 a. 821 Nuclear Boiler System Valves, P 3.9-101 incorporated 4 The figure for Valve F039 should be 5.1-3 sh.4 3
20 b. C41 Standby Liquid Control System Valves, P 3.9-104 Incorporated 4 The test parameter for Valve F003 should be R. Valves F026 and F700 are missing.
21 c. C51 Neutron Monitoring (ATIP) System Valves, P 3.9- Valve data reorganized for better categonzation. 3 105 The Code category for Valve J004 should be A,C.
22 d. D23 Containment Atmosphenc Monitcring System incorporated 4 Valves, P 3.9-105 The testing of Valves F001 should be L (test parameter) at RO (test frequency) and S (test parameter) at 3 month (lest frequency).
The testing of Valves F004 through F008 should be L P (test parameter) at RO (test frequency) and S (test parameter) at 3 month (test frequency).
23 e. E1 Residual Heat Removal System Valves, P 3.9-111 Added valves E11-F718 and F720. 4 Valves F718 and F720 are missing.
24 f. P54 instrument Air System Valves, P 3.9-132 incorporated 4 A reference to note (h3) should be added to the description column and S should be added to the test parameter column for Valves F276 and F277.
25 g. P54 High Pressure Nitrogen Gas Supply System Valves, incorporated 4 P 3.9-132 A reference to note (h1) should be added to the description column for Valve F008.
l 4
_- __ _ . _ _ _________._________________m___-_______m_ _-
3_ - ....~ .. _
. o 26 h. T31 Atmospheric Control System Valves. P 3.9-135 and incorporated 4 J.9-138 A reference to note (h2) should be added to the description column for Valves F001 through F004 and F006.
The Code category for Valve D001 should be D and its valve function should be I, P.
The Code category for Valve D002, the wetwell rupture disk, should be D.
27 i. U41 Heating. Ventilation and Air Conditioning System HVAC does not penetrate containment. "l" is for 3 Valves P 3.9-139 primary containment isolation only; thus, the valve function is "A". *L' is leak test for T only; thus, testing The valve function for Valves F001 and F002 should be is "P" only.
A, I and their testing should be P. L (test parameter) at 3 month (test frequency).
Valves F003 and F004 are missing. Valves F003 and F004 added 28 Subsecton 3.10.2.1.3.3 - Seismic Qualibcation by Testing Incorporated 3 The next to last sentence should be revised to read:
" Operability of equipment is verified as described in Subsection 3.7.3.2,* and the last sentence should be deleted. These changes cro necessary in order to become more consistent with the staff's position in SECY-93-087, Which was approved in the SRM dated July 21,1993.
29 Subsection 3.10.2.2.2 - Seismic Qualification by Testing Subsection 3.10.2.2.2 revised to be more consistent 3 with the criteria in Subsection 3.7.3.2..
For the reasons stated in 7 above, this Subsection should be completely revised to be more consistent with the criteria in Subsection 3.7.3.2.
5
_. .__ _ . -- . . - . - .. ._.= -__ - --
Eddorial Comments:
30 a. Subsection 3.9.3.3.1 - MS Satety/Rehet Valves Edited accordingly. 1 The revision which was added to this Subsection requires some editorial changes (e.g., missing spaces between words, misspelled words, incomplete sentences).
31 b. Subsection 3.9.6.2.1(1) Incorporated 1 Part of one sentence in the second paragraph is missing.
The sentence should read: "The testing of each size, type, and model shall include test data from the manufacturer, field test data for dedication by the COL applicant, empirical data supported by test, of test (such as prototype) of similar valves that support qualification of the required valve where similarity must be justified by technical data."
32 c. Subsection 3.9.7.9 - Benchmark Problems incorporated 1 The references throughout this subsection were cienged from 3.9-11 to 3.9-5. They should remain as 3.9-11.
33 d. Subsection 20.3.5 - Response to RAI 210.8 Incorporated 1 The last sentence should state: "... need not be classified Quality Group A or Safety Class I, "
34 Subsection 6.1.2.1 Incorporated 1 The SSAR erroneously refers to ANSI 101.4. The correct reference should be ANSI 101.2.
Section 3.11 The staff concludes the tables in Appendix 31 is acceptable.
However, the following are discrepancies discovered in Appendix 31 should be corrected:
35 1. The equipment and zones are not clearly identified in the Subsechon 31.2.2 clarified. 3 reference figures discussed in sections 31.2.1 and 31.22, the zones cannot be determined from given information.
6
+ - a ~ _ .- - -- . s.- . _ _ - - --_ ,_-- -a-._.-- a-.-_ - _ _ - -
t 36 2. The is a typo in Section 31.3.31, the word " designated" incorporated 1 should be " designed".
- 3. In Table 31-8, the Gamma dose rate for the heat incorporated 4 37 exchanger is listed as 2, it should be 20.
Incorporated 4 38 4. In table 31-10, the integrated Gamma dose for the RCW ,
pump and heat exchanger should be 2700 or more.
- 5. It is not clear how the integrated dose for Gamma and Clarified in Subsection 3.11.5.2 how the integrated 3 39 beta is determined in Tables 31-16,31-17,31-18 and 31- dose for Gamma and Beta is determined.
19.
Same as item 16. 2 ,
40 ECGB identified an unresolved COL Action item in FSER Section 14.1.3.3.5.11 which apparently has not yet been transmitted to GE. During the staff's review of TMI Item II.D.1, SSAR Subsection 1a.3.7," Testing of SRV and Discharge Piping' was added in Amendment 30 at the staff's request. It contained a commitment for COL applicant to confirm that any SRVs or discharge piping not similar to those that were tested in c the EPRI generic program will be tested in accordance with NUREG-0737 guidelines. As discussed on FSER Section 14.1.3.3.5.11, this information provided the basis for the resolution of COL Action items 3.9.3.3-t and 14.1.3.3.5.11-1. In Amendment 3132, Subsection 1 A.3.7 was deleted. Please inform GE that Subsection 1 A.3.7, as written in Amendment 30
' should be included in the SSAR.
in trying to resolve one of Mr. Michelson's concems the Piping incorporated 3 41 ~ '
DAC, the staff discussed with GE (T. James and M. Herzog) the need to include the following new statement in the Tier 1 Piping Design Description (Chapter 3.3):
" Structures, systems, and components that shall be required to be functional during and followng an SSE shall be protected against the effects of spraying, floodmg, pressure, and temperature due to postulated pipe breaks and cracks in seismic Category I and NNS piping systems." .
7
?
- , - . - - - _ - _ . . , . _ <.~--.i._.~i.-*-- - . -a- r ee n - 4-._ - . - . . .,w-r ,. -w-i.rr.i..r-,..-.._.,.e--.-,. - .. . .,.-,,.e- __-wr%.-w & ~~. - - , . . . ,m. + . - .--m_.-
Chapter 4 42 4.2 Fuel System design incorporated 3 On page 4.2-1, third paragraph GE should revise to state that "each COL applicant referencing the ABWR design may have different fuel and core designs which will be provided by the COL applicant to USNRC for review and approval instead of information.
Chapter 6 43 Table 6.2-7 did not identify which CIVs are locked closed. The P&lD for each system is shown in Table 6.2-7. 2.
(FSER Section 6.2.4) The P&lDs identify which CIVs are locked closed.
The staff concludes that the control room habitability systems meet the acceptance criteria of SRP Section 6.4 and are, therefore, accep'able pending satisfactory resolution of the following discrepancies:
44 1. SSAR Section 6.4.2.1 and 6.42.4 should be revised to state it was agreed that these subsections can remain 2 that the positive pressure is maintained with respect to the ' " relative to the outdoor atmosphere". (See item 47).
surrounding spaces.
45 2. SSAR Section 6.4.2.3 has dropped the reference to NAA- Since a pressurization test is being peiformed as part 2 SR-10100 for performing the control room in-leakage of ITAAC, it was concluded that the in-leakage analysis analysis which was in previous SSAR Amendments. in unnecessary.
46 3. SSAR Section 6.4.2.3 has dropped the list of the leak paths - Same as item 45. 2 to and from the MCAE and its evaluated effects, as supported by the performed in-leakage analysis, on MCAE to conform with the requirements of GDC 19.
The staff concludes that the SGTS has a removal efficiency of 99% for all forms of radioiodine The staff further concludes that the system meets the acceptance criteria of SRP Section 6.5.1 -
and is, therefore, acceptable pending satisfactory resolution of the following discrepancies:
8
, , . . , , . . , . . . , . . . . . - . , _ _.r. ,_. _, e .- .. . ,.,.,,%.- wn., , - . --4., ,-._r,mm., rp r+. . #. ,_, ,.. _,,
47 1. Revise SSAR Section 6.5.1.1.2 and 6.5.1.3.1 to state that it was agreed that these subsections can remain 3 the negative pressurization is maintained relative to the " relative to the outdoor atmosphere
- since the surrounding spaces. instrumentation is located outside the building. There was no change made to Subsection 6.5.1.3.2, and Subsection 6.5.1.3.1 was modified 48 2. Revise SSAR Section 6.5.1.3.3 to address IE Bulletin 80-03 Subsection 6.5.1.3.3 has been revised as requested. 3 to state that the charcoal tray and screen will be all welded construction to preclude the potentialloss of charcoal from absorber cells per IE Bulletin 80-03.
49 3. Revise SSAR Appendix 6A, Design Cnteria (4), incorporated 3 Maintenance, to state that the design is in compliance with this position since the Surveillance Requirements in SSAR Chapter 14 meets the intent of the Standard Technical Specifications requirements for SGTS and that it is also stated in SSAR Page 68-1.
50 4. Revise SSAR Appendix GA, Design Cnteria (5), in-Place Incorporated 3 Testing Criteria, to add reference to ASME N510 in addition to the " Industrial Ventilation" reference for any testing performed.
51 5. Revise SSAR Appendix 68 to state ASME ' Footnote 3" not Footnote 2 is correct. 2
" Footnote 2* on page 60-65.
52 6. Revise SSAR Appendix 68, Page 68-9/10 to state "SRP incorporated 1 Table 6.5.1-1" not "STP Table 6.5.1-1" 53 7. Revise SSAR Appendix 6B, Page 68-2 to state " Operation incorporated 1 of SGTS to mitigate offsite releases will not be affected by the absence of high flow alarm at the MCR."
54 8. Revise SSAR Section 6.5.1, Table 0.5-1, and Appendres 6A Two filter trains already reflected. 2 and 68 to reflect two filter trains.
Chapter 7 55 Typographical Error in Table 7.5-2 on page 7.5-21. The correct Corrected to be 0-30 Volume. 1 range required for Drywell/Wetwell Hydrogen Concentration should be 0-10 Volume % instead of 0-0 Volume %.
Chapter 8 9
4 incorporated. Statement was not intended to be a 3 56 Section 9.5.3.2.3.1 of SSAR Amendment 32 indicates that the Class 1E Associated Emergency Lighting subsystem is definition. However, to avoid possible conf usion, this classified " Associated" because the subsystem's bulbs are not sentence (and a similar are in Subsection 9.5.3.2.2.1) seismically qualified. This definition for associated is not were deleted. Also, the word "However," has been consistent with the definition for associated that is defined in added at the beginning of the sentences following Section 8.3.3.5.1 of SSAR Amendment 32. these two deletions.
4- 5 57 Section 8.3.1.1.6.4 of SSAR Amendment 32 indicates that the incorporated. Subsection 8.3.1.1.6.4 has been design for protective relays meets positions 7 of RG 1.9. This is corrected from " position 7' to " position 8". Similarly, true for Rev. 2 of the RG but not Rev. 3. There is no position 7 Paragraph 14,15 and 16 of Subsection 8.3.1.1.8.2 i in RG 1.9 Rev. 3. GE in SSAR Amendment 32 revised their have been corrected from 'see C.4.. " to see Position SSAR to indicate compliance with RG 1.9 Rev.3 from 1.4 .". Also, titles the were corrected in Table 1.8-20, i '
compliance with Rev.2 of RG 1.9. and Subsections 8.1.3.1.2.2(2) and 8.3.1.2(2)(b).
58 The last sentence of Section 8.3.4.14 of SSAR Amendment 32 incorporated. This sentence is deleted in Subsection 3 ,
I states "Furthermore, annunciation shall be provided to alarm in 8.3.4.14.
the control room whenever the breakers are in for service" is l 4
within GE's scope of supply as indicated in Sections 8.3.1.1.1 -l and 8.3.2.1.0.1 of SSAR Amendment 32. The design for alarming is not wimin a COL applicant's scope of responsibility as indicated in Section 8.3.4.14. t 59 The first sentence of the 10th paragraph of Section 8.3.3.1 of - Incorporated. This first portion of the sentence was 3 SSAR Amendment 31 and the March 31,1993 draft SSAR inadvertently deleted because it was thought to be -
. states " Associated Class 1 E circuits remain with or are ' redundant to the remaining portion. However, the -
physically separated in the same manner as those Class 1E complete sentence has been restored to the original
! sentence intact.-
circuits with which they are associated;.. " was deleted from Amendment 32. ,
Amendment 31 was consistent with the guidelines of Section 5.5.2 of IEEE 384 and posshon 4 of RG 1.75. With the deletion of this sentence in Amendment 32, associated circuits which do
- j. not have isolation device such as lighting circuits are no longer explicitly addressed in the SSAR, the design description in the
' guidelines, the deletion may be inconsistent with the staff's safety evaluation report conclusions i
1 10
. _ - _ - _ - _ _ = _ - __m.__m_ _m.__._mm ., ____ _ u. ._.. -_ _ - .v_~,... ..mm --we m% # ., ..me 5 .e *,. ...%-,:.-..es+-u.-.. ,,..>v.u x..... ..o,.. . . _., ,.c . . . .,....[,,.,m.
60 Section 8.3.4.21 of SSAR amendment 32 should be revised to The technical specifications already require periodic 3 explicitly state, consistent with other SSAR sections, that the testing of the diesel generator loading capabilities, as COL applicant shall be required to provide appropriate plant stated in Subsection 8.3.4.21. Therefore, no additional procedures for periodic testing of the diesel generator loading plant operating procedures are necessary for this part capabilities and the interlocks which restore the DGs to standby of the comment. However, the second sentence in the event of a LOCA or LOPP. regarding testing of the interlocks has been modified as follows: ' Appropriate plant procedures shall be provided for periodic testing of the interlocks which restore the units to emergency standby on event of a LOCA or LOPP."
61 Section 8.3.4.17 of SSAR amendment 32 which addresses Subsection 8.3.4.17 does not address regulatory codes 2 inclusion of regulatory codes and standards in purchase and standards. GE agrees that regulatory codes and specifications may not be appropriate as a COL action item as standards are GE responsibility, but these are already specified in the SSAR. Specifying which regulatory codes and addressed in the SSAR text in accordance with the standards should be used to meet ABWR plant design SRP. Rather, Subsection 8.3.4.17 provides a listing of requirements is a GE responsibility. Assuring their inclusion in common industrial standards to be included in the
. purchase specifications also appears to be within GEs scope of purchase specifications, which would be in addition to responsibihty. The SSAR should be revised to indicate that it is the regulatory codes and standards. The content of this a GE responsibility to specify which regulatory codes and section was added in response to a previous NRC standards should be used for the purchase of equipment. This request; not as a licensing issue, but for quality inconsistency affects SER findings addressed in Section assurance purposes.
8.3.6.1 of the SER.
62 The use of the word " redundant'" in Section 8.3.3.6.2.2 of Same as item 63 2 SSAR amendment 32 and in the 2nd paragraph of Section 8.3.3.6.2.2.3 of SSAR amendment 32 incorrectly implies that safety related equipment need not be protected from design basis events if the event or missile only affects one of two redundant systems. The term " redundant" as used in these sections should be deleted.
63 The use of the word " redundant" in Section 8.3.3.62.2 of SSAR Incorporated. The three references have been resolved 3 amendment 32 and in the 2nd paragraph of Section as follows:
8.3.3.6.2.2.3 of SSAR amendment 32 incorrectly implies that safety related equipment need not be protected from design Subsections 8.3.3.6.2.2 and 0.3.3.6.1.1: The word basis events if the event or missile affects one or two redundant " redundant" was deleted from the two referenced systems. The term " redundant" as used in these section should sentences.
be deleted. Similarly, the term " redundant" has been incorrectly used in item 2 of Section 8.3.3.6.1.1 of SSAR amendment 32. Subsection 8.3.3.6.2.2.3: The word " redundant" was replaced with " Class 1E", so the sentence reads
" ..could jeopardize Class 1E cabinets and raceways." l 4
11
i incorporated. 3 I 64 The references 13.6.3 in Section 8.3.4.19 of SSAR amendment 32 should be 8.3.3.6.1.1(5).
GE made a SSAR change due to ITAAC involving de power Inserts at the end of the htth paragraph of Subsection 3 65 supplies for the offsite circuits. Amendment 32 did not provide 8.2.3, and at second-to-last sentence in Paragraph (5) the bases to justify this change. This impacted a number of our of Subsection 8.2.3: "The instrumentation and control
). safety findings regarding independence requirements of GDC circuits for the normal and altemate preferred power i
- 17. We have revised three FSER conclusions related this area shall not rely on a single common DC power source to state that this aspect is now open. [See Subsection 82.3 items (13) and (15)].
incorporated. The last sentence of the 7th paragrapo 3 66 By SSAR Amendment 32, GE changed their design to specify that the l&C circuits at their dc power sources are routed in has been deleted, since the " preferred' version of this separato raceways separated to the extent practical versus are infxmation is already contained in the 5th paragraph. ;
7 separated by floor, wall, or 50 feet at their power supplies. The remaining first sentence of the 7th paragraph has been moved just ahead of the 5th paragraph, because By draft SSAR 10/12/93 GE further revised Amendment 32 to the commitment for the existence of the interlocks indicate that the instrumentation and control circuits for the should proceed the statement that the interlocks are .
normal cnd allemale preferred power shall not rely on a single separated. -
common dc power source.
Based on these changes to the SSAR, the ABWR design will now permit sharing of de power sources between offsite circuits.
If the two offsite circuits share two or more common dc
- sources, by implication the I&C circuits for the independent offsite sources are interconnected.
't The 7th paragraph of SSAR Amendment 32 states that the l feeder circuit breakers from the unit auxiliary and reserve auxiliary transformers to the medium voltage switchgear are interlocked to prevent paralleling the normal and alternate power sources. With the exception of these interlocks, there are -
no electrical interconnections between the instrument and ;
control circuits associated with the normal proferred circuits.-
This statement in the SSAR is not consistent with the de source interconnection defined above T
t
. 12 ,
'. _.,__......--_.-_.___.._.m.________.,____.h_.m__,.______.m__._. 1,__._,________m,_, . _ ___ , . _ _ . , ,_-..,2m, m_d..,,-_. n,-....5.~,m..__,_w-.....,,.w.,_ . _,__,...m%u_,,m...,.m.,,.,,,,._ .4,-- . , , , ,.,.,.,,.,,.,.s... , ,
Chapter 9 9.5.1.1 General Evaluation Fire Protection System in Amendment XX GE indcates that they meet the design commitments as specified in the Branch Technical Position CMEB 9.5-1 except in four cases. GE identified the following deviations to the Branch Technical Position:
- 1. Deviation from BTP CMEB 9.5-1, Section 7.j. 3 67 Diesel Fuel Storage Areas.
The staff finds GE's justification for having the diesel fuel oil Justification provided under Subsection 9.5.1, new item day tanks inside the reactor building is acceptable pending (1).
satisfactory resolution of the following discrepancy:
. Provide capacity in the fuel oil tank rooms to contain total contents of diesel fuel oil day tank and discharge from two fire hoses operatirg for 1/2 hour.
- 2. Deviation ' CMEO 9.54, S* ion 7.i. Diesel Generato. we The staff finds s O'- < sficetion accepta'>le pending satisfactory resoluu. .of the following discrepancies:
68 a. GE is to provide infonnation to demonstrate the See item 69. 3 adequacy of the foam system utilizing closed heads.
69
~
- b. Should GE change it's design to an open head system, Justification provided under Subsection 19B.2.36. Item 3 then the resolution of GI-57 will need to be revisited. 68 is related to this item and justification for item 69 covers this.
70 c. As discussed with the applicant in a meeting held on it was agreed that it was sufficient for the diked area to 3 September 21,1993, the diked area in the DG room be capable of containing 100% capacity of the tank is to be designed to the appropriate section of NFPA and 1/2 hour of water application from the automatic
- 15. The diked area is to be capable of containing foam sprinkler (2 manual hose stations not required).
100% capacity of the tank and 1/2 hour of watar application from the automatic foam sprinkler system and 2 manual hose stations.
13
71 3. Deviation from BIP CMEB 9.5-1 Section 13, Control Justification provided under Sube,ection 9.5.1, new stem 3 Room Complex. (2).
The staff finds GE's justification acceptable pending satisfactory resolution of the following discrepancy:
- The applicant is also to provide the rationale for lack of suppression and drainage in the control room subfloor.
72 4. Deviation from BTP CMEB 9.5-1 Section 13. Outdoor Subsection 9A.4.3.2.1 and 9A.4.6 specify that the wall 3 transformers. separating the turbine from 2 he transformers will be masonary and rated for a leas: one hour. NFPA 15 has The staff finds GE's justification is acceptable pending been added to the list of codes ai d standards.
satisfactory resolution of the following discrepancy:
- Specify that the wall separating the turbine from the transformers will be masonry and rated for at least one hour.
Diking will be provided as described in NFPA 15.
9.5.1.3.4 Automatic Foam Fire Suppression Systems GE committed to meet the design aspects of GDC 3 Branch Technical Position 9.5-1 and Generic issue 57, therefore, the staff concluded that the automatic foam fire suppression systems are acceptable pending satisfactory resolution of the following discrepancies:
73 1. GE proposes to utilize closed head sprinklers for the foam Repeat of item 68 2 system and has not adequately demonstrated its acceptability to control and extinguish a fire. GE is to provide the technical justification to demonstrate the adequacy of the foam system.
74 2. Should GE change it's design to an open head system, Repeat of item 69 2 then the resolution of GI-57 will need to be revisited.
75 3. As discussed with the apphcant in a meeting held on Heat of item 70 2 September 21,1993, the diked area is to be designed to the appropriate section of NFPA 15. The diked area is to be capable of containing 100% capacity of the tank and 1/2 hour of water application from the automatic foam sprinkler system and 2 manual hose stations.
i4 i
_ . . . _ . _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ - , _ _ . , _ . . . , _ - , . - . .~, _. _ . _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
9.4.1.1 Control Room Habitability Area Heating, Venting, and Air Conditioning system (CRHA HVACS)
GE has addressed IE Bulletin 80-03 comphance by providing future SSAR Amendment , which revises SSAR Section 9.4.1.1.4 to state that the charcoal tray and screen will be all welded construction to preclude the potential loss of charcoal from adsorber cell per IE Bulletin 80-03. Therefore, the emergency air filtration system of the CHRA HVAC system precludes the potential loss of charcoal from adsorber cells.
By SSAR amendments up to including Amendment , GE provided the SSAR Appendices 9C and 9D, and has provided acceptable justifications for the deviations.
By SSAR Amendment , GE revised SSAR Sections 9.4.1.1.4 and 9.1.1.1.5, stating that the unfiltered inleakage is controlled by the use of welded ducts, except galvanized steel is used for outdoor air intake and exhaust, and unfiltered in-leakage testing will be performed periodically on all system ductwork outside MCAE in accordance with ASME N510, respectively.
By amendments up to and including Amendment ,GE revised the SSAR Section 9.4.1.1 and Table 9.4-4d to include electric heaters in the ESF filter trains.
The staff concludes that the system is acceptable pending satisfactory resolutions of the following discrepancies:
76 1. Revise SSAR Sections 9.4.1.1.3, 9.4.1.1.4, and 9.4.1.1.6 it was agreed that these subsections can remain 2 to state that the positive pressurization is maintained " relative to outdoor atmosphere". (See item 47) relative to the surrounding spaces.
77 2. Revise SSAR Section 9.4.1.1.4 to state that the charcoal Incorporated 3 tray and screen will be all welded construction to preclude the potential loss of charcoal from adsorber cells per IE Bulletin 80-03.
78 3. SSAR Table 9.4-4 shows heating coil data in kcal/hr for incorporated 3 each CRHA HVAC Division. Revise SSAR Table 9.4-4 to provide the electric heater ratings in kW.
15
79 4. The deleted SSAR Table 9.4-4d listed each division's Table 9.4-4 updated to include all heaters. 3 electric heater capacity as 165 kW for MCR HVAC i' Dkisions A and B emergency filtration units. Revise SSAR Section 9.4.1.1 to restore the above component data either in the tabulated form or in the SSAR text.
80 5. Revise SSAR Section 9.4.1.2.6 to state that tests will be Incorporated 3 performed at a test facility to verify that the CRHA HVAC system fire dampers with fusible links close under anticipated air flow conditions. ,
81 6. Revise SSAR Appendix 9C, Section 90.1.(4).(d) to state incorporated 1 that the design is in compliance with this position since SR 3.4.3.1 SSAR Chapter 14 meets the intent of the Standard Technical Specifications requirements. Also, revise SSAR Section 9.4.1.1.7 to delete "except as noted l in Appendix 9C."
4 ,
- 82 7. Revise SSAR Appendix 90 to provide summation of incorporated 3
pressure drop across the entire system as stated in the SSAR Section 9.4.1.1.6. Also, ASME N509 ' Footnote 2*
should be " Footnote 3* on Page 9D-5.
. 83 8. Revise SSAR Section 9.4.1.1.4, stating that the unfiltered Inspection added to venty integrity of system. 3.
inleakage is controlled by the use of "All welded black ,
i steel ducts except galvanized steel used for outdoor air '
. intake and exhaust".
! 84- 9. Revise SSAR Section 9.1.1.1.5, stating that "The unfiltered See item 83. 3 inleakage Msting will be performed periodically on all system ductwork outside MCAE in accordance with ASME
- N510", as agreed upon with GE for the resolution of USl '
B-66, Control Room infiltration Measurements. ,
I I 85 10. Revise SSAR Figure 9.4-1, Sheet 2 of 5 to reflect an incorporated 4 independent and separate discharge to MCAE and retum from MCAE to each emergency filtration unit, as shown in Sheet 1 of 5. Also, revise SSAR text to include this.
16l ,
E _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __...__.._.a _. ._ __ _. _ ._ __ , .._ _ . ._ . _ _ _..._ n.._._.--.__.__. _ __ . . _ . . . . . _ _ . _
86 11. Revise SSAR section 9.4.1.1.5 to state that *The charcoal No change, already in Amendment 22 2 filters will be tested with an acceptable gas for bypasses."
9.4.1.2 Control Building Safety-Related Equipment AREA (CBSREA) HVAC System The staff concludes that the CBSREA HVAC system is acceptable pending satisfactory resolution of the following discrepancies:
87 1. SSAR Section 9.4.1.2.3 states that there is an electric Heater deleted from Subsection 9.4.1.2.3. 4 heater for each of the CBSREA HVAC subsystems.
However, SSAR Table 9.4-4d showing the electric heater capacity has been deleted.
88 2. Provide rationale for maintaining a minimum temperature Rationale provided to staff. 2 of 10 C in the winter.
89 3. Reconcile the differences between ITAAC Figures it was agreed to provide this information with 4 2.15.5b,2.15.5c and 2.15.5d and SSAR Section ' metrification (see item 4).
- 9.4.1.2.3 and SSAR Figures 9.4-1 Sheets 3,4, and 5 conceming the descriptions of the areas served.
90 4. Revise SSAR Section 9.4.1.2.6 to state that the test will Repeat of item 80. 3 l
be performed at test facility to verify that the CHRA HVAC system fire dampers with fusible links in HVAC ductwork are capable of closing under anticipated air flow conditions.
9.4.4 Turbine Island HVAC System The staff concludes that the turbine island HVAC system meets the applicable acceptance criteria of SRP Section 9.4.4 and is, therefore, acceptable pending resolution of the following discrepancies:
~
91 1. Revise titled captions of SSAR Tables 9.4-5 and 9.4-Sa incorporated 4 2
. through 9.4-5c to confirm with SSAR Section 9.4.4.
Reconcile SSAR section 9.4.4.2.1.5 areas with the areas shown in above tables.
92 2. Provide Capacity for the cooling coils serving SJAE A - 99,800 kcal/hr capacity provided._ 3 area recirculation unit air handler in SSAR Table 9.4-5b.
I-17
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ ._ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ -_ .~-. . u- __ , . . _
.m.
Venfied 2 93 3. Venty the capacity of cooling coils serving demineralizer pump and valves area recirculation unit air handler in SSAR Table 9.4-Sa.
incorporated. See ITAAC submittal. 4 94 4. Revise Design Desenption in ITAAC Section 2.15.5 the turbine building (T/B) HVAC system to state "T/B lube oil area exhaust system with two fans."
9.4.5.1 R/B Secondary Containment HVAC System The staff concludes that the system complies with applicable SRP Section 9.4.5 acceptance criteria, and, therefore, is acceptable pending resolution of the following discrepancies:
- 1. Section 9.4.5.1.1.2 should replace the words "outside It was agreed that this subsection can remain " relative 2 95 atmosphere" by the words ' surrounding spaces" in to outdoor atmosphere". (See item 47).
relation to the negative pressure of the secondary containment. ITAAC Table 2.15.5 should also be corrected to use the words " surrounding spaces".
- 2. Table 9.4-4g should show that the exhaust fan flow rate is Incorporated 3 96 higher than the supply fan flow rate to ensure that the secondary containment is at a negative pressure with respect to surrounding spaces.
- 3. Table 9.4-4 filter capacity data for secondary containment incorporated 4 97 exhaust should match with the exhaust fan capacity.
98 4. SSAR Section 9.4.5.1 should state that fire dampers with incorporated 3 fusible links in the HVAC duct work are capable of closing under anticipated air flow conditions (ITAAC items).
9.4.5.2 R/B Safety-Related Equipment HVAC System The staff concludes that the R/B safety-related equipment HVAC system is acceptable pending the resolution of the following discrepancies:
99 1. All the FCUs are automatically initiated upon secondary Text modified to match P&lD. 4 containment exhaust fan failure also since such a failure will resuit in the R/B secondary containment HVAC system isolation.
18
100 2. Section 9.4.5, item 2 should delete the words " secondary incorporated 1 containment" from the title of the HVAC system.
- 3. Section 9.4.5.2.2.1 should state that the FCUs will be A! ready included in Amendment 32 2 101 sized to maintain the operational temperature of the subject rooms within 40'C.
9.4.5.3 R/B Non-Safety-Related Equipment HVAC System R/B Mainsteam Tunnel HVAC System, and R/B RIP Power Supply Panel Room HVAC System The staff concludes that the R/B non-safety-related equipment HVAC system R/B main steam tunnel HVAC system, and R/B
. RIP power supply panel room HVAC system meet the applicable acceptance criteria of SRP Section 9.4.5 and are, therefore, acceptable pending the resolution of the following i discrepancies'.
i 102 1. Section 9.4.5, item 3 should read as "R/B Non-safety incorporated 1 Related Equipment HVAC System".
103 2. Section 9.4.5, item 3 and Section 9.4.5.8 should read as Clanfication made in text. 3
" Reactor Intemal Pump Power Supply Panel HVAC System" SSAR Figure 9.4-5 shows that a closed cooling loop HVAC system cools the RIP power supply panels and txA RIP ASD control panel rooms .
' Furthermore, RIP ASD control panel rooms are served by the safety related R/B electrical equipment HVAC system.
104 3. Section 9.4.5.3.2 and Figure 9.4-3, do not match with See item 89. 4 respect to rooms for which FCUs are provided. GE should correct as appropriate so that the same names are used to identify the rooms both in the figure and the section.
105 4. The SSAR tables do not list the quantity and capscity of incorporated 3 all equipment for all the 10 rooms serviced by the R/B non-safety-related HVAC system (for example, fans and cooling coils for the 10 rooms are not listed).
19-
_ __.__ _ _ _._. _~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ __ _ _ _ . . _ . _ ._. _ _ . _ _
106 5. Table 9.4-4h refers to filters for RIP ASD control panels. It is not an error. 2 This should be deleted if it is an error. Equipment listing should be given for the R/B RIP power supply panel HVAC system.
9.4.5.4 R/B Safety-Related Electncal Equipment HVAC System The staff concludes that the R/B safety-related electrical equipment HVAC system complies with applicable GDC referenced in of SRP Section 9.4.5 and, therefore, is acceptable pending the resolution as the following discrepancies:
107 1. Section 9.4.5.4.2 sentence: "The drvisional Clanfication provided. 3 rooms.... control panel rooms" is confusing and should be deleted.
108 2. Item 8 listed in the above section should be deleted. This Clantication provided. 4 is because as per Figure 9.4-5, the non-safety.related R/B RIP ASD power supply panel HVAC system takes care of the cooling needs of the power supply panel rooms.
109 3. Item 3 should be re-captioned as RIP ASD control panel Clanfication provided. 3 rooms. Divisions B and C. GE should check whether HVAC Divisions A and B serve these control panel rooms since RCW Divisions A and B serve the RIP room coolers.
110 4. The system capability to maintain the rooms other than Provided in Amendment 32. 2 the DG engine rooms below 40 C identified in the ITAAC should be included in the SSAR section.
III 5. GE should explain why electric heaters needed to assure Justification provided to staff. 2 that the temperature in the subject rooms do not dip below 10*C are deleted in Amendment 32.
112 6. SSAR should state that the system has fire dampers with Repeat of item 80. 3 fusible links in the HVAC ductwork which are capable of closing under anticipated air flow conditions (ITAAC information).
20
__ m - , - - _
_. ,M
113 7. SSAR should state that Division B of the HVAC system Sheet 2 revised. 4 serves electrical er-Jipment rooms, Division 11 and IV and Figure 9.4-4, Sheb ! should be revised to reflect the above.
9.4.8 Service Building Ventilation System The staff concludes that the service building ventilation system meets the applicable acceptance criteria of SRP Section 9.4.3 and is, therefore, acceptable pending the resolution of the following discrepancies:
114 1. Like the ITAAC, SSAR should identify 2 HVAC systems: SSAR modified to match wording of Section 11.5, 3 TSC HVAC system and controlled area HVAC system. ITAAC modified to be consistant.
Staff prefers Section 11.5.2.2.4 language, i.e., "
controlled area HVAC system *. (ITAAC which says that one of the SB HVAC system is SB HVAC system should be corrected.) Staff has used the above wording in the write-up above.
115 2. Section 9.4.8.1.1 should be corrected since the TSC incorporated 3 HVAC system operates during a high radiation mode in addition to operating during normal operation.
116 a. High radiation mode of operation for the TSC HVAC incorporated 3 system.
117 b. Location of both the HVAC systems (ITAAC should incorporated 3 identify the location of the controlled area HVAC system).
118 c. Supply fan and ACU for the controlled area HVAC ACU does not exist. 2 system.
119 d. Toxic gas protection for applicable COL applicants incorporated 3 (GE should provide COL license information).
21
120 e. Provision of 2 recirculation fans for the TSC HVAC Incorporated 3 system.
- 4. SSAR Section 9.4.8 should be revised to include the following:
121 a. Which areas are the " clean areas". TSC and OSC added. 3 122 b. Provision of a radiation monitor in the outside air incorporated 3 intake for the TSC HVAC system.
123 c. The components of ACU (i.e. heating coil and cooling it was agreed that the COL applicant will provide. 2 coil) for the controlled area HVAC system)>
124 d. Cooling and Heating sources for the ACUS in both the it was agreed that the COL applicant wi l l provide. 2 HVAC syt* ems.
125 e. Common air intake for both the HVAC systems. Incorporated 3 126 5. Both the ITAAC and Section 9.4.8.1.2 should state that it was agreed that this subsection can remain " relative 2 the TSC and clean areas are maintained at a positive to outdoor atmosphere". (See item 47).
pressure with respect to surrounding spaces.
CHAPTER 11 127 ABWR SSAR Table 11.1-6 gives the fraction of steam activity The vclue of "1" referred to in the comment is shown in 2 treated by the condensate demineralizer as 1. This is column 2 of Table 11.1-6 and is for the ANS 18-1 inconsistent with the design flow rate of 1022 Cu. Meter / hour " Reference Plant
- as defined in ANS 18-1, Table 1, per condensate polisher vessel given in SSAR Table 10.4-4. column 4 which is a non-pumped forward plant and not There are 6 such vessels one of which is standby. The design the ABWR. As noted in the comment, the ABWR flow rate through all five vessels corresponds to 0.67 of the total values which are given in the final row of Table 11.1-7 steam activity being treated by the condensate demineralizer. are correctly indicative of a pumped forward plant .
This is not un-common, since most reactors have forward Therefore, Table 11.1-7 correctly indicates the values pumping. Also, the value of 0.67 agrees with the fractions 0.18 used as indicated by the asterisk in Table 11.6-6.
and 0.01 of steam activity of iodines and others treated by the condensate demineralizer given in SSAR Table 11.1-7.
For the above reasons, the staff requires GE to correct the subject entry from 1 to 0.67 in the SS AR Table 11.1-6.
22
CHAPTER 12 128 1. Page 12.3-10: delete the first line on the page. It is repeated Incorporated. However, the page change (even though 1 from the last line on page 12.3-9. Also change the Amend. it was an oversight), requires the page to go from no. back to 31, except for the first line, Amend. 32 does not Amendment 32 to Amendment 33.
appear to have changed this page.
129 2. Page 12.319, line 11 from bottom: the last word should be Incorporated 1 "RWPs" not " raps".
130 3. Page 12.3-19, line 7 from bottom: line should start "the TIP incorporated 1 spoolers" not "the TIP spoilers".
131 4. Page 12.3-22: sub-section 12.3.3.1(2) should reference the incorporated 3 DAC Table 3.2(b). Suggest revising the penultimate sentence in this sub-sectica to state, "DAC Table 3.2(b) requires the COL Applicant to perform calculations for the expected airborne radionuclide concentrations to verify the adequacy of the ventilation system during the ITAAC stage of plant construction."
132 5. Figure 12.3-43: figure is missing the radiation zone Radiation zone designations added. 4 designations.
CHAPTER 14 Preoperational Test Program 133 In SSAR Section 14.2.3 Test Procedures, the last sentence incorporated 3 should change the word power ascension tests to startup tests to make the sentence more correct with respect to the requirements of RG 1.68 which states that test procedures will be provided to the NRC 60 days before their intended use for preoperational tests and 60 days before fuel loading for startup tests (i.e., not power ascension tests).
23
134 in Section SSAR 14.2.10.2,2nd sentence, GE states that "the incorporated 3 procedure controlling this movement w;ll specify that shutdown margin and subcritical checks be made at predetermined intervals throughout the loading, thus ensuring safe loading increments." To clarify this sentence, GE should revise this sentence to state "the procedure controlling this movement will specify that partial core shutdown margin demonstration and sub critical checks be made at predetermined intervals throughout the loading, thus ensuring safe loading increments as described in startup test abstract 14.2.12.2.3, Fuel Loading.
135 in Section SSAR 14.2.10.3.,1st sentence, GE should delete the incorporated 3 first sentence from this section and insert this sentence at the beginning of the paragraph in section 14.2.10.4. The sentence currently states
- Prior to initial criticality, the shutdown margin shall be verified for the fully loaded core. The sentence should be revised to state, "During initial criticality, the full core shutdown margin shall be verified for the fully loaded core as described in startup test abstract 14.2.12.2.4, Full Core Shutdown Margin Demonstration.
Ics1AtlstracLL422J218. RHR System Properationallest 136 The requirements of RG 1.139, Guidance for Residual Heat Removal, Position C.3, state that "to protect the RHR system against accidental over pressurization when it is in operation (not isolated from RCS), pressure relief in the RHR system should be provided with relieving capacity in accordance with the ASME boiler and pressure vessel code."
Test Abstract 14.2.12.1.8, Acceptance Criteria (3)(c), should incorporated 3 state " proper operation of system relief valves including timing, position indication, controlling function (if any for air operated valves), and verification of requirements" to meet the requirerr,ents of RG 1.139, 24
l I
Preooeiational Test Abstract 14.112.1.41 137 The staff's review identified that preoperational test abstract incorporated 3 14.2.12.1.41, " Pressure Suppression Containment Bypass Leakage Tests" removed reference to Subsection 6.2.6.2 for the applicable test procedures. Reference to subsection 6.2.1.1.5 was added for a description of and criteria for the test method.
The acceptance criteria for the test method. The test abstract should be revised testing method and the acceptance criteria.
138 GE revised Section 6.2.1.1.5 in a markup dated September 30, incorporated 3 1993 to state that "the acceptance criteria for both the high and low pressure leakage tests shall be a measured bypass leakage area which is less than 10% of the suppression pool steam bypass capability specified in subsection 6.2.1.1.5.4 (i.e.,50 cm squared). GE also revised this section to discuss specific types of high and low pressure drywell to wetwell leakage tests that will be performed. GE plans to add cross reference 6.2.6.
into test methods that would similarly be performed on the drywell for the high and low pressure suppression pool bypass leakage tests. The staff finds the incorporated into a future Chapter 14 SSAR amendment and tne above changes to chapter 6 are incorporated in a future Chapter 6 SSAR amendment.
Preoperational TestAtntract 14.2J2M3 GE removed much prerequisite and acceptance criteria information from Test Abstract 14.2.12.1.43, Wetwell to Drywell Vacuum Breaker System (WDVBS) Preoperational Test. GE removed prerequisite F.)(d), which requires approximate power sources are available for use to supply electrical power to all instrumentation. GE also removed the following acceptance criteria: (1) parts of acceptance criteria (3)(a), for testing of the system logic and timing features for proper operation of vacuum breaker valves, (2) parts of acceptance criteria (3) (b),
verification on the operability conditions of instrumentation and alarms used to monitor WDVBS during loss of preferred power conditions, and (3) acceptance criteria (3)(d), " proper functioning of vacuum breakers test features".
25
Clarification for the deletions have been provided to 3 139 After Further review of Section 6.2.1.1.4, it was noted that the vacuum relief breaker valves are swing check valves which the staff. In addition, prerequisite (2)(d) pertaining to open passively due to negative pressure across the valve disk electrical power has been reinstated, Further requiring no power source. Acceptance criteria for testing the clarification is contained in Subsection 6.2.11.5.8.1.
system logic and timing feature are not needed for swing check valves (i.e., only required for MOVs). Acceptance criteria for vacuum breaker test features in Section 6.2.1.1.4. The prerequisite on the required more discussion is needed with GE to clarify the exact reason for all of the above deletions to this test abstract.
The staff finds the above changes to the test abstract acceptable assuming the staff's interpretation of the information provided in Chapter 6 is correct as noted below.
(1) Prerequisite (a) includes instrumentation used to monitor system and component parameters needed in this test is energized for the conduct of the test. (2) proper operation of any/all instrumentation under loss of offsite power is tested per preoperational test 14.2.12.1.45, " Electrical Systems Preoperational Test".
f'reooerational test At2stract 14.2.12.1.52 140 The staff's review identified the following typographical error on incorporated 1 i
page 14.2-94. Subsection (3) (b), fist paragraph, last sentence uses "my" which should be "may".
Startup Test Program 141 in SSAR section 14.2.12.2, General Discussion of Startup Incorporated 3 Tests, GE should add a sentence which states that "startup test procedures will be provided to the NRC 60 days before fuel loading" to be consistent with similar statements in Sections 14.2.3, Test Procedures, and Section 14.2.12.1, Preoperational Test Procedures.
StAriuo TesLL4112.1.41 142 The staff's review identified that startup test 14.2.12.2.41 This startup test was deleted in Amendment 32. 2 indicates this test is deleted, however, review of prior amendments indicates that startup test 14.2.12.2.41 has never existed. This test should be removed or explanation provided for the test that is being deleted.
26
_.___.--_._._____._m____________._____.m- _ - _ ~ _ _ _ , _ -
.- - .- -, .,r-. - ...m., .w . . . , ,, ,. .. .
SSAR Section 14.2.13 COL License information 143 in SSAR Section 14.2.13.1, first sentence, GE should delete the incorporated 3 words " site specific" and replace them with the words " COL l applicant supplied". The words site specific is heavily used in the definition of interfacing systems. This will avoid any confusion with the 4 systems listed in this section as being -
t interfacing systems since all of the listed systems are not interfacing systems.
! 144 in SSAR Section 14.2.13.2, Test Procedures /Startup Incorporated 3 Administrative Manual, states that the COL applicant will provide the following to the NRC, item (4) *the approved preoperational and startup test procedures approximately 60 days before their intended use (Subsection 14.2.3)." item 4 should be revised to state that
- the approved preoperational -
test procedures approximately 60 days before their intended use and the startup test procedures approximately 60 days before fuelloading."
\
Table 14.2-1, Power Ascension Test Matrix 4 145 Table 14.2-1 should be renamed the Startup Test Matrix instead Incorporated 3 of the Power Ascension Test Matrix.
l
,. 146 The requirement of RG 1.68, Appendix A, Position 5.c.c, state
" demonstrate that gaseous and liquid radwaste processing,1 storage and release systems operate in accordance with design." Based on the staffs review of SSAR Amendment 23,'
the staff requested GE to revise Test Abstract 14.2.12.2.38 and
! Table 14.2-1 to include the Gaseous Radwaste System as part
' of the Gaseous and Liquid Radwaste Systems Performance Test to meet the !ntent of RG 1.68. GE revised the test abstract 4 and the table in SSAR Amendment 30.1 i
4 27 l
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ - - _ _ _ - - - - _ . . _ - _ - - - - . . _ . . . - . . - . - _ . - - ..-._...._..-.....-.__._2
After further review of Table 14.2-1, Test Abstracts 14.2.12.2.1, Chemical and Radiochemical Measurements, t4.2.12.2.35, Offgas System Test, and 14.2.12.2.3-8, Gaseous and Liquid Radwaste System Performance Test, and GE Proprietary Sections 11.2, Liquid Radwaste Management and 11.3, Gaseous Radwaste Management System, the staff <.oncluded that the Gaseous Radwaste System is the Offgas System; therefore this system is adequately discussed in test abstract 14.2.12.2.1, Chemical and Radiochemical Measurements. The test abstract discusses measurement testing of the release effluents but not radwaste processing and storage testing per the requirements of RG 1.68; therefore, the Liquid Radwaste system portion of the test is not an optional test as currently described in Table 14.2-1.
Based on the above, the staff requests GE to make the incorporated 3 following changes to SSAR Section 14.2 in Amendment 33.
Test Abstract 14.2.12.2.38 should be renamed the Liquid Radwaste Management System Performanco and Test Abstract 14.2.12.2.35 should be renamed the Gaseous Radwaste Management /Offgas System Performance per the titles used in Section 11.2 and 11.3. The description and acceptance criteria sections of Test Abstract 14.2.12.2.38 should delete all references to the gaseous radioactive waste system and Section 11.3. Additionally, GE should delete the 3rd through the 6th sentence in the description section. In table 14.2-1, Page 198, GE should substitute the " Gaseous Radwaste Management /Offgas System Performance" test for the "Offgas System Performance" test and substitute Liquid Radwaste management Performance test for the " Gaseous and Liquid -
Radwaste Systems Performance" test. GE should also delete the word optional for the Liquid Radwaste System Performance test in the table.
147 GE needs to verify that the page numbers are correct for all Page numbers verified. I pages in Amendment 32. Page numbers were not property changed from Amendment 31 to Amendment 32 when Section 14.2.13.3 was deleted.
28
- - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ . - - . - _ _ _ - -,.-u. -- _ -., _ ,- - , .w , -- , ,
t l
! ~i l
l 148 in Table 1.9, item No.14.3, Tests Exempt From License item No.14.3 deleted. 1 Conditions, Subsection 14.2.13.3, Page 1.9-10, should be l
deleted since Subsection 14.2.13.3 no longer exists in Chapter 14.
The following generic comments are provided on problems with <
I 149 Page 154, Units for vessel pressure are expressed in See item 4. 1 kg/cm"2*d. Since these are SI units, pressure is expressed in pascals or force per unit area (N/m"2) or kg*m/s"2/m"2 or kg/m's**2. The above expressed units don't seem to make sense. d id defined as differential pressure? Even with d i defined in this manner, the units don't match. GE seems to be
, mixing up SI units with english units. English units would be expressed as 1bf/ft"2.
150 Page 164, Same as above. Units for reactor pressure are See item 4. 1 l expressed as kg/cm"2 *g.Where g is defined as gauge '
pressure. Reactor pressure is usually expressed in pascals or force per unit area which breaks down like above to kg/m*s"2.
l With g defined in this manner, the units don't match.-
i 151 Page 165,2nd paragraph, Same problem. Incorrect units for See item 4. .1 reactor pressure given as 10.5kg/cm"2 g, where g is defined as j gauge pressure. Pressure is force per unit area which is N/m"2.
l 152 Page 180,1st paragraph. Again same problem with units. See item 4. 1 Vessel dome pressure expressed as 1.76kg/cm"2 d, where'd is
[ defined as differential pressure. Correct units are N/m"2
, 153 Page 182,1st paragraph, Same problem. Vessel dome See item 4. 1 pressure expressed as 1.76kg/cm**2 d, where d is defined as j differential pressure. Correct units are N/m"2..
EQUIPMENT SURVIVABILITY QUESTIONS (SCSB) 154 1. Table 7.5-2 Suppression pool water level only measures 1.5 Instrument ranges changed to permit the EOPs to -4
- m above normal water level. Bottom of reactor vessel is 6.1 terminate containment flooding.
l'
. m above normal level and COPS is even higher. How does this effect EOPs to terminate containment flooding?
l
- t. 29 2
____m_._.____ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _ _ _ _ _ ___._______.m ._. _. ~ . - . , . _ , . ,,,...,._-...m-...... , , , . . . . . . _ _ _ _ . . . . , ~ .. . . . . _......___ __ - _...m.
Correct. Modified Section 7.5 to reflect required ranges 4 155 2. Table 7.5-2 Drywell atmosphere temperature only measures up to 110 C as opposed to Reg. Guide 1.97 of 227 C. DBA of R.G.1.97 temperature reaches over 120 C see figures 6.2-7,8,15.
Same as item 55. 2 156 3. Table 7.5-2 Hydrogen concentration measures 0% as opposed to Reg. Guide 1.97 which indicates 30%.
Reference incorrect. Changed to Subsection 4 157 4. Table 7.5-2 Oxygen concentration cross-reference does not exist. 7.5.2.1(2)(k).
Subsection 7.5.2.1(2)(l) revised accordingly. 4 158 5. Table 7.5-2 and test Suppression pool water temperature indicates 4 divisions with deviations and this is similar to drywell atmosphere temperature with 2 divisions (Reference supp. pool temp. for acceptability).
159 6. Fig. 6.2-13 Graph indicates temp. of 1767.7C. Typographical error. Changed to 176.7 C. 1 160 7. Figs. 6.2-17 and 18 are identical. No. Look at curves past 70 seconds. Figure 6.2-17 2 shows difference between drywell and reactor building.
Figure 6.2-18 shows difference between wetwell and reactor building.
161 8. 7.5.2.1(2)(b) Rupture disks actuate at pressure of 70 psig. They actuate at 90 psig (6.3 Kg/cm2 g). The instrument 3 range provides a margin of greater than 10%.
162 9. Table 7.5-3 indicates Type A variable for Drywell water level. Deleted Drywell water level from Table 7.5-3 (not a 4 No discussion is provided on ranges, purpose etc. No type A variable). Added discussion on drywell water mention in Table 7.5-2. level in Table 7.5-2 and Subsection 7.5.2.1(2)(o).
163 10.18A.5 (PC-1) Entry condition for hydrogen is not specified, Hydrogen level COL applicant dependent. 2% is not 2 only blank entry of Hi Alarm Level. EPGs say 2%. specified.
- 11. Deleted 164 12. Table 7.5-2 Suppression pool water temperature range up Changed upper range to 140^C to accommodate all 3 to 110 C but HCTL curve have suppression pool possible suppression pool temperatures.
temperature up to 150 C.
165 13. Table 7.5-2 Drywell atmosphere temperature range up to 110 C changed to 226.7"C. 319.5*C defines the slope 3 110 C but DWSIL curves go up to 319.5 C. of the curve, it is not the maximum value.
30
, - _ . . . _ _ , . - _ , - - . - - r . m ..~., ..- 4 _ , - . , - _ _ . . _ _ _
4 CHAPTER 19 (SPSB) 166 1. A November 3,1993 letter from GE (J. Fox) regarding The interconnecting path between the wetwell and the 3 4 ' Primary Containment Pressure Control EPG-Low drywell has been added to the bypass study. The Pressure Venting" indicating that there is a potentially results of the study indicate that the bypass risk is significant suppression pool bypass path that was not below the threshold which would require further
)- assessed in SSAR Section 19E.2.3.3, the containment consideration of this in the CETs or the MAAP event trees, or GE's MAAP analyses. This path involves a analysis. Therefore, no further consideration of this common nitrogen makeup line with separate branches to path is necessary. The SSAR has been modified to the drywell and wetwell. These lines (originating at reflect this additional pathway in the bypass study.
penetrations X-80 and X-240) are said to provide a interconnecting path between the wetwell and drywell which equalizes the pressure between the two primary containment volumes. Furthermore, the valves in each of ~
the branches (F040 and F041) are said to be open during ,
normal operation. No instrumentation to detect flow through this path during an accident is apparent.
The bypass analysis should be updated to reflect these lines as potential bypass paths. The validity of the CETs and supporting MAAP analyses should also be justified given this bypass path.
CHAPTER 19
- 167 Table 19.2-1 Table incorrectly identifies concrete used in The statement in the SSAR is correct. / s discussed 2 containment as limestone rather than basaltic. further in Subsm,iion 19E.2.1.2.1(3), the containment is assumed to be made of limestone-sand concrete. - .p 1 Only sacrificial concrete in the lower drywell is specified to be made of basaltic concrete. However, as j this assumption will have little, if any, bearing on the ~
- performance of the containment, this item is deleted from the Key Assumptions. Table 19.21. Additionally, '
- in reviewing the table, other features were identified which have been incorporated in the standard design.
Thus, they are no longer " assumptions" and have been '
deleted from the table. '
1 s
t 31
. e - .- --s, -%--in w --m.-i..- w+a.-. - ..e-et--,. a m...-+-.- we--a. m... -.4m=.w-=uw. s--*mi-+. n.-a-+--- . -r w a.*-nce--we.-i--m- w w w w we w- we--N o- .--=-+-+v,-m
i l
237 SSAR Fig. indicates that the radwaste tunnel slopes The R/B sumps are at -8200mm and the flow must be 4 downward to the -8200 mm elevation at the RB and Control pumped upward to the radwaste building (Figure 1.2-building (CB) ends of the tunnel. This is in direct 23a).
contradiction to GE's discussion with the staff that the The T/B sumps are at 8800mm and the flow is highest section of the tunnel would be at the RB and CB downward to the radwaste building. The radwaste ends to ensure that any flooding in the tunnel would flow tunnels are sealed at each building wall.
away from safety-related areas.
238 4. Modify SSAR Subsection 3.5.1.1.3 to refer to Fig. 3.5-2, not incorporated 4 3.5-1 239 5. Modify the SSAR Subsection 3.5.4.5 to refer to SSAR Incorporated 4 Subsection 3.5.1.1.1.3, not 3.5.1.1.3 240 6. Add a statement in 3.6.1 that all walls, doors, floors and incorporated as item (12) cf subsection 3.6.1.1.3 with a 3 penetrations which serve as divisional boundaries will be clarification of postulated pipe failures outside primary designed to withstand the worst case pressurizations containment and within secondary containment, associated with the postulated pipe failures 241 7. GE has agreed to change the reference in SSAR Section incorporated 3 3.11 from Chapter 12 to Chapters 11 and 12.
CHAPTER 6 242 1. Section 6,2.1.1.1 (page 6.2-1), item (4): typographic error, incorporated 1
" flow form
- should be read as " flow from".
243 2. Section 6.2.1.1.1 (page 6.2-1) Item (%): typographic error, Incorporated 1
" form the reactor core" should be read as "from the reactor".
244 3. Section 6.2.1.1.1 (page 6.2-2), item (6), (7), and (8): similar incorporated 1 typographic errors ' form
- should be read as "from".
245 4. Similar typographic errors on " form" vs. "from" spreading incorporated 1 throughout the rest of Section 6.2.1 and maybe beyond.
This is a generic typographic error. GE should identify all the specific errors and correct them.
44
~- ._____.____m . _ _ -___ _- . _-- - _ . , . - - - - . - -. - - - - . - _ _ -._.m m._ _ _ _ __ _..-__ . _ _ . ._--
246 5. Section 6.2.1.1.3.3.1.2 (page 6.2-10): Assumption No. 7 in incorporated 4 the previous Amendments regarding feedwater enthalpy is See item 7 of Subsection 6.2.1.1.3.3.1.2.
missing in Amendment 32. Put it back.
247 6. Section 6.2.1.1.3.3.2.1. (page 6.2-12): Assumption No.1 incorporated 4 regarding critical flow model in the previous Amendments See item 1 of Subsection 6.2.1.1.3.3.2.1.
was taken away in Amendment 32. Put it back.
248 7. Section 6.2.1.1.3.5.1 (page 6.2-13 and -14): typographic incorporated 1 errors on " Table" and " temperature".
249 8. Section 6.2.1.1.5.6.1 (page 6.2-26): typographic error on incorporated 1 "the".
250 9. Section 6.2.1.2.2 (page 6.2-36): The break sizes of "150A" The "A" carries the dimension of mm. The definition is 2 and *50A" should be "150mm" and "50mm". provided in Figure 1.7-1. It is not necessary to duplicate.
251 10. Include Tables 6.2-37 a-e in Chapter 6 of the SSAR Tables 6.2-37a - e do not exist. 2 CHAPTEfLS 252 1. Add information to the SSAR regarding the COL applicant to Already required by Subsection 9.1.6.1 which 2 provide a criticality analysis showing that the design of the references Subsection 9.1.1.1.1 which in turn requires new storage racks will be such that Keff will not exceed 0.98 the CO!. applicant to respond to Question 430.180 (all with a fuel load of the highest reactivity, assuming optimum information requested).
moderator conditions (foam, small droplets, spray, or fogging), as described in SRP Section 9.1.1.
253 2. Add information to the SSAR discussing the storage of incorporated in Amendment 31. See Subsection 2 defective fuel assemblies and provide design requirements 9.1.4.2.8 and Table 3.2-1.
in Table 3.2-1 of the SSAR.
254 3. Provide design requnements for the spent fuel pool liner in incorporated 3 Table 3.2-1.
255 4. Incorporate information regarding protection of the filter- Incorporated 3 demineralizer resins in 9.1.3.
45
Defective fuel storage is stored in the equipment 4 256 5. Modify SSAR Subsection 9.1.4.2.8 to clarify that defective fuel assemblies are placed in special storage containers storage rack. See Subsection 9.1.4.2.8. COL license and stored in the spent fuel storage rack, not the equipment information requirements are incorporated in storage rack, and correct SSAR Subsection 9.1.4.3 to state Subsection 9.1.6.4.
that the COL license information requirements are in SSAR Subsection 9.1.6.4, not 9.1.4.3.
Incorporated 4 257 6. Correction SSAR Subsection 9.1.5.8 to refer to SSAR Subsection 9.1.6.6, not 9.1.6.7.
258 7. Modify the second paragraph of ITAAC 2.11.23 to include See ITAAC submittal 3 the Control Building in the list of buildings in which the PSW system is part of the Certified Design.
259 8. Modify SSAR Fig. 9.2-9 to include the discharge from the included in Amendment 32. 2 nonradioactive drain system. This connection is downstream of the hypocontact tank in the figure.
260 9. Modify SSAR Subsection 9.2.5.1 (11) to include capability for incorporated a full operational inspection and testing 261 10. Modify SSAR Subsection 9.2.5.10 to include inspections incorporated 3 and tests during normal operation 262 12. Modification SSAR Subsection 9.2.9.1 (5) to refer to Table Reference should be to Table 9.2-3. 3 9.2-1, not Table 9.2-2. Incorporated.
263 13. Remove references to Fig. 9.2-1a from SSAR Subsection Incorporated 1 9.2.11.2 264 14. Modify Tables 9.2-4a-c to refer to safety-related and Decision was made between GE and NRC to not make 2 nonsafety-related instead if essential and nonessential this change.
265 15. Clarify the heat capacity. SSAR Subsection 9.2.11.2 states Decay heat does not appear in Tables 9.2-4 a-c. Each 2 that the lolal reactor decay heat 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> after shutdown is division of RCW has cooling loads from the RWR 31.8 E6 kcal/hr but TatWes 9.2-4 a-c indicate that each system in addition to other cooling loads.
division will need to accommodate approximately 30 E6 kcal/hr 46
266 16. Modify SSAR Subsection 9.2.14.2.2 to remove the next to Statement is correct. For example, selected sensors 3 the last sentence of the subsection (there is no safety- for the RPS are located in the Turbine Building.
related equipment in the Turbine Building) 267 17. Modify SSAR Subsection 9.2.15.1.4 to clanfy that on a incorporated 3 LOCA signal, all standby pumps start and all standby valves open.
268 18. Modify SSAR Subsection 6.7.2 and ITAAC 2.11.13 to clarify As indicated in the second paragraph of Subsection 2 that the supply valve to the bottled nitrogen supply also 6.7.2, the values between the non-divisional and opens on a low pressure signal in the nondivisional portion divisional systems close on low pressure. Subsystem of the system. 6.7.2 and ITAAC 2.11.3 are consistent.
269 19. Delete references to Fig. 9.3-9 in SSAR Subsection incorporated 3 9.3.8.1.1 (5) (b) 270 20. Correct the reference to a COL Action item made in SSAR incorporated in Subsection 9.3.12.4. 3 Subsection 9.3.8.1.1 (5) (c). 9.3.12.1. does not refer to the DTS. It refers to the NRD. Make a separate COL Action item for the DTS.
271 21. The staff indicated that GE's design capabilities for fire incorporated in Subsection 9.5.1.3.12. 3 protection and mitigation in primary containment intemal areas during shutdown conditions, supported by operational controls and procedures appear to adequately address the concems. Further evaluation of this information will be completed and follow-up discussions will be conducted to provide feedback to GE and to identify any required SSAR changes if necessary. GE agreed to provide write-up in Section 9.5.1.3.12.
272 22. The staff had requested a change in the SSAR to indicate incorporated in Subsection 9.5.1.1.6. 3 that the smoke control capability would take into account the fact that the fire doors would be maintained open between a fire area and a non fire area. GE provided a revised markup which will be included in SSAR amendment and was found to be acceptable except that the words
" maintain open" need to be included.
47
incorporated in Subsections 9.5.1.1.4,9.5.1.1.5, 3 273 23. The staff identified a statement in the SSAR that cables in trays with bottoms were not considered in the total 9A.2.4 and 98.2.3.3 combustible loading. This was not in compliance with Generic Letter 86-10 which states that all cables in trays need to be part of the totalloading. GE agreed to delete the statements in the SSAR which indicate the exclusion. The staff found this to be acceptable. GE will provide additional changes if other exclusions are found in the SSAR.
incorporated in Subsection 9.A.3.6. 3 274 24. The staff identified that in the SSAR GE had referenced the ICBO 1495 Code for design of the type 1 walls. The staff stated that ASTM E-119 code needed to be referenced. GE committed to revising the SSAR and providing markups of the SSAR.
- 25. GE provided a discussion of deviations from the BTP. GE provided a handout GE which justifies each deviation. The following is a summary of the discussions for each item.
275 Additionally, GE is to provide a markup regarding DG room The DG room has an automatic foam system as a fire 2 fire and manual FF. suppression with closed head water sprinklers with fusible links. GE/NRC agree that current detection / suppression systems will prevent inadvertent actuation of the sprinkler sys'em.The DG room has sufficient space to hold the suppressant and it will not cause any overflow should the door be opened for manual fire fighting.
276 a. High Impedance Faults - A deviation from the incorporated, see Subsection 9.5.13.12. 3 specification of the commitment to perform a high impedance fault analysis to ensure that such faults could not affect the operation of safety related equipment. GE provided an acceptable markup.
277 b. BTP Reference Error - The staff identified a Appropriate reference to BTP CMEB 9.5-1 provided. 1 typographical error in the SSAR BTP reference. GE provided an acceptable markup' which corrected the error.
48
. ~
278 c. Diesel Fuel Storage Area - GE has located in the Justification provided under Subsection 9.5.1, new 3 reactor building, outside secondary containment,3 item (1).
diesel fuel tanks which are greater than 1100 gallons in capacity. The staff requested that GE show that the sunken floor below each tank will accommodate fire suppression water and foam for 30 minutes without forcing spilled fuel to migrate to other Greas of the plant.
GE agreed to consider the staff's concern.
279 d. Control Room Complex - GE committed to changing the incorporated in Subsection 9.5.1, item (2) 3 design to add fire detection capability to the sub-floor area which was acceptable to the staff.
280 e. Plant Computer Room - GE indicated that this was not a No change. 2 deviation from the SRP and would not need to be further discussed.
281 f. Outdoor Transformers - For this item GE indicated that Repeat of item 72 2 a commitment to NFPA 15 will be added to the SSAR and to indicate that the barrier walls to be used will be equivalent to a one-hour fire barrier.
282 26. Clarify that the diesel engine is capable of operating for Clarified 3 minutes without secondary cooling to ensure that the engine can operate at fullload in excess of the time required to restore cooling water (RCW and RSW), which are sequenced onto the emergency power supply within 1 minute following a Loss of Preferred Power (LOPP) 283 27. Modify SSAR Subsection 9.5.5.2 to state that the COL Incorporated 1 License Information is in SSAR Subsection 9.5.13.6, not 9.5.13.5 284 28. Modify SSAR Subsection 9.5.5.2 to state that the system is incorporated. 3 filled with high quality treated water from the Makeup Water
' (Purified) system, not the Demineralized Water System.
285 29. Reinstate note 4 on Fig. 9.5-8 clarifying that the air dryer incorporated. 3 includes both pre- and after-filters 49
incorporated. 3 286 30. Correction Fig. 9.5-9 to change the flow sensor shown on the lube oil sump tank to a level sensor, as had been agreed to and modified in an earlier version of the figure.
I incorporated. 3 l 287 31. Modify Fig. 9.5-6 to show the pressure sensors used to detect high pressure conditions in the crankcase (as
( discussed in SSAR Subsec:lon 9.5.8.2) and to show the differential pressure gauge used to monitor plugging on inlet filters (as discussed in SSAR Subsection 9.5.6.3)
CHAPTER.10 3
288 1. The Design Description of ITAAC 2.10.7 should add "lVs* on incorporated, see ITAAC 2.10.7.
page 2.10.7-2 for the " Actions for Protective Action."
incorporated 3 289 2. Revise SSAR Chapter 15 for the turbine CV trip closurs time to "0.08 seconds or greater."
290 3. Define "NBR" in SSAR Section 10.2.1.3.3 incorporated 1 Subsection 10.4.3.5.1.3 is correct. 2 291 4. Revise SSAR Section 10.4.10 to refer to 10.4.3.5.1.2, not l 10.4.3.5.1.3.
Incorporated 4 292 5. Revise SSAR page 10.0-iiiliv, Tables 10.4-4 through 10.4-6, i Figure 10.4-4b, and the text of Section 10.4.6 to reflect system's designation as " Condensate Purification System (CPS)." -
293 6. Revise the last paragraph of SSAR Subsection 10.4.7.2 to incorporated 3-state "The system extends... outlet to (but not including) the '
seismic interface restraint outside containment." and the last
! paragraph of SSAR Subsection 10.4.7.3 to state "The portion which connects to the seismic interface restraint outcide the containment... Reactor Building."
294 7. SSAR Figure 10.4-7 should reflect instrumentation and its Figure 10.4-7 and ITAAC Figure 2.10.2a are not the 2 corresponding locations as shown in ITAAC Figure 2.10.2a. same system.
50 n w- _ _ _ _ - _ _ ____._ - -_ u_,__u_________ -.*w.-- . m,_ .- m -. - _ w- . , +, -
i.- w- _ _ _ , 4 v -
w w_,._e.. ,_,,._ . = , 2 ., c-
. o incorporated 4 295 8. Delete Subsections 10.4.5.9 and 10.4.5.10 on page 10.4-19 of the SSAR. These are already printed on page 10.4-18 as Subsections 10.4.5.7 and 10.4.5.8.
CHAPTER 11 296 1. Reinstate the P&lD s for the DTA previously found in SSAR Chapter 11 297 Section 18.5 In forth paragraph replace " action item" with " license information incorporated 1 requirement" 298 Section 18.8.1 In last sentence replace " action" with more suitable phrase Replaced " action items are" with " license information 1 is".
Section 18.8.13 299 Put period at end of second sentence incorporated 1 300 Insert "to" between the words actions and isolate in second Incorporated 1 sentence.
301 Insert *)" following " Table 18E-1* in last sentence. Incorporated 1 302 What date for IEC964 on page 18E-20 and IEEE-1023 on Page Dates are prov:ded in Table 1.8-21. 2 18E-21.
303 What are dates for ANSI HSF-100 and IEC 964 on page 18E- Dates are provided in Table 1.8-21. 2 247 Section 13.5 304 Where is the rest of sentence pertaining to " Loss of Feedwater Sentence complete by replacing " " with")" at end of 1 System Failure? on page 13-5? sentence.
305 What happened to autoblowdown in upper portion of page 13.5- Autoblowdown applies only to PWRs. 2 87 306 What are dates for MIL-H-468558 and MIL-STD-1472D on page Dates are provided in Table 1.8-21. 2 13.5-8 51
i l
i Section 15.6 incorporated 3 307 Delete Subsection 15.6.7.2, analysis done using boundary Chi /O.
Section 11.2.5 Incorporated 3 308 Add Sections 1001-2402 after 10CFR20 under item (2).
Incorporated 3 309 Insert "10 times" following the word within under item (5).
Sections 8.7.4 and 8.2.
310 Proposed staff interface requirements / conceptual design is Final version in Amendment 33. 3 provided in Attachment 1. GE to develop, in conjunction with the staff, final version suitable for inclusion with Amendment 33.
COMMENTS RECEIVED 11/18 - 19/93 3.4.1 Flood orotection Pending clarification in the SSAR of the following discrepancies:
311 Modification of the 10th paragraph of SSAR Subsection Same as item 232 2 3.4.1.1.2 to " Analysis of the worst flooding due to pipe and tank failures and their consequences are performed in this subsection for the Reactor Building, Control Building, Radwaste Building, Iv1bineEpilding, and Service Building.
312 Modification of the third paragraph of SSAR Subsection Same as item 233 2 3.4.1.1.2.1.2 to correct "SWCU* to "SPCU".
Make the following modifications to SSAR Table 3.4-1 and the related layout drawings, 313 The first column of Table 3.4-1 and Fig.1.2-6 say that the Same as item 234 2 tunnel between the Reactor Building (RB) and Service Building (SB) is at 4800mm but Fig.1.2-6 does not clearly identify the access way and column 2 of the table, along with Figs.1.2-14 and 1,2-15, show the access way at 3500mm.
Also, Fig.1.218 shows the access way at 3500mm (in addition, the access way is not clearly labeled on this figure.)
314 Columns 2 and 3 of Table 3.4-1 state that there is an access Same as item 235 2 way between the control and service buildings at 3500mm.
However, Fig.1.2-15 does no t show this access way and Fig.1.2-18 does not clearly label the access way.
52
. _._ - ,-- ,. _ _ _ _ _ __m . _ _ ___. _.__
l l
315 Column 2 of Table 3.4-1 states that there is an access way Same as item 236 2 between the service and turbine buildings at 3500mm but Fig.1.2-18 does no t clearly label this access way.
316 SSAR Fig. indicates that the radwaste tunnel slopes Same as item 237 2 downward to the -8200mm elevation at the RB and Control Building (CB) ends of the tunnel. This is in direct contradiction to GE's discussion with the staff that the highest section of the tunnel would be at the RB and CB ends to ensure that any flooding in the tunnel would flow away f rom safety-related areas 3.5.1.1-INTERNALLY-GENERATED MISSILES OUTSID_E GQNIAINMENT Pending resolution of the following discrepancies:
317 Modify SSAR Subsection 3.5.1.1.1.3 to refer to Fig. 3.5-2, Same as item 238 2 not 3.5-1 318 Modify SSAR Subsection 3.5.4.5 to refer to SSAR Same as item 239 2 Subsection 3.5.1.1.1.3. not 3.5.1.1.3 3.6.1.EfEE Fall.URES Pending correction of the following discrepancies:
319 Addition of a statement in 3.6.1 that all walls, doors, floors, Same as item 240 2 and penetrations which serve as divisional boundaries will be designed to withstand the worst case presarrizations associated with the postulated pipe failures 320 inclusion of Tables 6.2-37 a-e in Chapter 6 of SSAR Same as item 251 2 111_EQUDIENT_QUALIFK,AIRQN 321 SSAR Section 3.11.5.2 states that normal operational exposure Same as item 241 2 is based on the radiation sources provided in chapter 12. The staff has determined that this reference is incorrect. GE indicated that this reference will change to state that the normal operational exposure is based on a source term provided in chapter 11, and inventory provided in chapter 12.
CHAPTER 14 322 Section 14.2.12.1.45.4(3)(j) of SSAR amendment 32 uses the The word is either. It has been corrected. 1 phrase "... powered from wither preferred or standby sources..."
Clarify the use of the word " wither" in this phrase.
s.
53
l l
l l 4 323 Section 14.2.12.1.45.4(3)(i) of SSAR amendment 32 references Subsection 8.3.1.5.2 changed to Subsection 8.3.1.1.5 l subsection 8.3.1.1.5.2. There is no subsection in the SSAR. in Subsection 14.2.12.1.45.4(3)(i). Design voltages are l
Clarify where the design voltages are specified in the SSAR. not specified in the SSAR. The use of design voltages in terms of i 10% fluctuations are documented in GE letter " Response to NRC comments on SSAR Section 14.2" dated May 13,1993. The phrase "as specified in" has been replaced with the phrase "in accordance with" for clarification of Subsection 14.2.12.1.45.4(3)(i)
Available bus voltages are not specified in the SSAR 3 324 Section 14.2.12.1.45.4(3)(j) of SSAR amendment 32 indicates that available bus voltage are specified in Subsection The phrase "as specified in " has been replaced with 8.3.1.1.8.3. Available bus voltages do not appear to be specified the phrase "in accordance with" for clarification of in this subsection. Provide clarification. Subsection 14.4.12.1.45.(3)(i).
Bus voltage and frequency variations Jetween no load 3 325 Section 14.2.12.1.45.4(3)(h) of SSAR amendment 32 indicates that acceptable bus voltage frequency variations between no conditions are not specified in the SSAR. The phrase load and full load conditions are specified by subsection 8.2.3. "as specified in" has been replaced with the phrase "in Acceptable bus voltage and frequency variations between no accordance with" for clarification of Subsection load and full load conditions do not appear to be specified in this 14.2.12.1.45.4.(3)(h).
subsectiori. Provide clarification.
Legend:
1 Editorial / Typos 2 No Change Necessary 3 New Information/ Clarification 4 Discrepancy i
}
54
'/