ML20059J758

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requalification Exam Rept 50-266/OL-90-02 on 900823.Exam Results:One Reactor Operator Passed Retake Exam
ML20059J758
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/12/1990
From: Burdick T, Reidinger T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20059J755 List:
References
50-266-OL-90-02, 50-266-OL-90-2, NUDOCS 9009200161
Download: ML20059J758 (3)


Text

[

. .1

)

2g i U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY: COMMISSION REGION 111 Report No. 50-266/0L-90 g DocketNo(s). 50-266; 50-301 License (s)No.DPR.-24;DPR-27 Licensee: Wisconsin Electric: Power Company 231 West Michigan Street' P379.'

Milwaukee, WI 53201 Facility Nane: Point Beach Nuclear' Power Plant Examination Administered At: Point Beach Nuclear Plant Examination Conducted: One reactor operator requalification. examination-Rlli Examiner:

0W T. Reidinger V fl-//l- 90' Approved By:

Nb

[T.M.Burdick Zlcd Operator _ Licensing Section 2 ate >

Examination Summary Examination administered on August 23. 1990 Report No. 50-266/0L-90-02)

Consisted of one operating examination administered to one reactor operator.

Results: One reactor operator passed the retake requalification examination.

9009200161 900912

< PDR ADOCK 05000266 V PDC '

].

\1 REPORT DETAILS 1.- Examiners T..D. Reidinger

2. Attendance List G. J. Maxfield, Plant Manager, Point Beach T. D. Reidinger, Rill Examiner K. Draska, Training Supervisor, Point Beach
3. Exit Meeting On August 23, 1990 the NRC met with the plant manager of Point Beach Nuclear Plant and training supervisor to discuss one generic issue. The Point Beach Job Performance Measures (JPM) needed additional revisions to address the Examiner Standards in regards to assigning the critical steps in the JPM.

The JPM questions exhibited some of the following deficiencies; ambiguous wording; i.e., answers to the JPM question did not match the intent of the ouestion, open ended questions that did not have one specific answer and supcflums wording, i.e., unnecessary information which could obfuscate the operator. The facility corrected all the identified deficiencies and they should conduct a thorough review of the JPM question bank to identify all additional questions which contain the identified deficiencies, i

l

]

L..  ; ,

. n.

~

j;

,, , 4- 4 n.

7 .

, 4

facility: Point Beach .

. Examiner: T. D. Reidinger Date of Evaluation:- August 23, 1990-

- Areas Evaluated: Written X Oral Simulator-1 Examination Results: y w R0 SRO. Tots 1. Evaluation:

Pass / Fail- Pass / Fail Pass / Fail -(Sor'U)-

Written Examination' W-Operating.Exarination Oral 1/0 _SL' Simulator W Evaluation of facility written examination-grading- N/A>

Submitted: w ded:

y#

1. Feidinger phy Approved:.

.< urdick- :G.EWright, x

~

Examiner .Section Chief. .  ; Branch: Chi,ef g.

i ss b

h.

1[ ; i

.: Y 9

'i..

4 >

c  ;

' d*

, pL s mi y

' ej B

.]