ML20057A682
| ML20057A682 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/02/1991 |
| From: | Cunningham R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055C202 | List:
|
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9309150146 | |
| Download: ML20057A682 (20) | |
Text
4 APR 0 21991 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Ross A. Scarano, Director Division of Radiation Safety anc Safeguards, RV FROM:
Richard E. Cur:ningham, Director Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS
SUBJECT:
1991 DRAFT NATIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT FOR REGION V Enclosed for your review and comment is the 1991 draft National Program Review report.
Please forward any coments your region wishes to i..ake to Leurse Ceegan cf n;y staff within two weeks. Your concents will be factored ir.to il.e final report, as appropriate. Additional comments or criticisms of the program review process may also be made at this time.
Richard E. Cunningham, Director Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS
Enclosure:
1.
Draft National Program Report s.1 %,.iatlLuas 1
DISTRIBUTION:
IM0B r/f INNS r/f a hMSS r/T LCeegan JHickey GSjoblom RBangart RBurnett PMcLaughlin LPerson i
MWangler JGlenn WFloyd CHaughney GArlotto RBernero JDelmedico RWilde At...)
/
OFFC: IM
- /
{&V : IP B
- IMN IMNS RfuGnghai NAME:GDde%%:mk: RWilde
- J key
- G m:
DATE:03/7//91 :03/ d /91 : 03/f//91: CQ/ y/91: 04/ p -/91 :
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY RSCARNO 9309150146 930830 PDR STPRG ESGGEN 2 [],.loy 1
"~
REPORT OF NMSS NATIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW AT NRC REGION V, FEBRUARY 26-27, 1991 1 BACKGROUhD AhD PLRPOSE This report provides tiie ra. Lits 01 the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS) review of Region V programs under the Headquarters responsi-bility of NMSS. The Headquarters team participating in this review consisted of two persor.s trord the Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety of NMSS, one from the Divid un v1 Sate 9tu os out '.t w.sportation, and one from the Division of Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning (Attachment 1).
Acc.itional input from other elements of NMSS and the Office of Enforcement was used in the preparation of this report. The principal regional activities are primarily under the responsibility of the Region V Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards (DRSS). The DRSS organization chart is shown on Attachment 2.
A January 25, 1991 memorandum from Richard Cunningham listed the areas to be covered and transmitted a questionnaire to the regions.
Region V responses to the questionnaire are shown on Attachment 3.
The f.Ltional Program Review (hPR) is based not only or. the visit to the Region, but also on the collective Regional / headquarters interfaces throughout the year, through review of some licensir.g casework, inspection reports, acccthpaniments of rei, ion-baseo inspectors, casework and ins ction statistics, resource utiliza-tion, technical assistance and coordination, and the questionnaire. The NPR is intended to provide a review cf effectiveness of both the Region and Headquarters activities insofar as they relate to Region V activities ar.o to identify sugges-tions for improving the effectiveness of the joint efforts of NMSS, OE and Region V.
The emphasis relates to achieving two goals:
technical quality and timely completion of licensing casework and inspections, on the basis that both einents contribute to assuring the safety of operations involving NRC licensed 6ctivities.
The repcr t is orschizeo so as to present an integrated surrar, m tech r. iI,e following areas:
1
l 1.
Background and Purpose 2.
Licensing 3.
Inspections 4.
Enforcement 5.
Training i
6.
.Initiativts 7.
Interfaces of Regien/Heu'qt.at '.er s E.
Rcsot. ce Utili:.ution 9.
Recommendatiet.s/ Suggestions
\\
a i
1 2
q l
.=
2 LICENSING a.
Materials Safety Region V currently regulates approximately 300 byproduct materials licensees.
In FY90, they cornpleted 209 licensing actions, as compared against an adjusted Cperating Plan Target of '.00 (110 per cer.t;.
iley receisee ;s; cases during this timeframe.
Through February 28, 1991, the Region had completed 96 cases, which helped to reduce the number of pending cases to 49, and put them ahead of their licensing goal for the fiscal year.
The Region continues its diliger.t oversight of " backlogged" cases.
At the tire of the NMSS visit, all but twc ci the 1 backlegged cases requirec speciai technical support from NMSS on financial and/or decommissioning issues.
The Region still has two cross-qualified reviewers to support the materials licensing program.
These people split their effort as reviewers and inspectors end have reduced the burcer cn d e pr1cury license reviewer.
The Feauquarters staff reviews a fraction of completed materials licensing actions and inspection reports as they are completed by the Regions.
Both licensing and inspection actions are in accordance with Standard Review Plans, Inspection Manuai Chapters, chu uther guidance documents.
Region V staff has sought guidance via telephone or technical assistance requests on matters that are technically complex or may have policy implications.
They have suggested that Headquarters continue to upgrade certain reviewer guides, such as well-logging, license conditions ano model licenses.
The Region continues to use telephone contacts for minor deficiencies in licensing submissions to maintain excellent turnaround time.
One item of concern to the Regional staff relates to the poor oversight exercised over radiation safety by Veterans Administration licensees, and the lack of clear assignment of responsibilities and authorities at certain hospitals.
Region V reconnended that the Regions and Headquarters work together to develop licensing and inspection strategies to improve licensee oversight of radiation protectiu.
programs at facilities with meaicci iiccuses ci bruad sccpe. Region V mer.ugtten, volunteered to take a major role in this area.
3 i
-~3 y
sm-g y
r w
M
Region V is developing a quality assurance program for materials licensing reviews. The procedure involves documented evaluation and peer review of licensing actions. Currently, the Branch Chief is reviewing 100 percent of licer: sing actions. Nf;SS supports this initiative but recomends that Region V consider what appropriate sample size should be selected. Region V staff con-tinue to follow NMSS guidance and to inform NMSS when unusual or significt.nt issues arise curing licensing actions.
Region V reviewers enpics:,eo a cesire to have NMSS-Regional workshops which focus on resolution of licensing issues.
NMSS was requested to expedite the issuance of final guidance documents once coments on drafts have been received.
If a decision is made not to issue guidance, hiiSS shculd quickly inform the Regions.
NMSS was asked to entcuiese prompt training when rule changes occur.
In parti-cular, training in the revised 10 CFR part 20 and the status of equipment changes in response to revisions of 10 CFR Part 34 were noted as priority items.
The Region 6150 recomended that hl:SS should update guidarice on the current status of the Service and Training Information System.
b.
Safeguards Licensing Region V completed two 10 CFR 70.32 case reviews during FY90.
These reviews were performed in a sound technical manner and were consistent with NRC policy and guidance.
Regional management indicateo that additionci guicance was needed regarding i
route and port surveys.
One particular issue was the use of cellular telephones as a second form of comunication.
c.
Low-level Waste Licensini There was no licensing activ'ty in the fuel cycle, reactor, materials or waste disposal site areas for this evaluation period.
l 4
3 INSPECTIONS a.
Materials Inspections In FY90,152 materials safety inspections were completed compared to a goal of 125. The kegion exceeded its unadjusted goal by 22 percent.
This figure includes a large percentage of inspections of the Department of Agriculture, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy permittees, which are licensed by other regions.
Through January 1991, the Region had completed 37 inspections.
The annual goal is 133, so the Region was somewhat behind, but they had only one Priority V cverdue inspection.
Based on a review of scheduled future inspections, the Region does not expect to have a problem meeting its inspection goal.
The Region is encouraging safety-oriented, performance-based inspections that emphasize the licensees' implenentation of safety programs rather than paperwork.
The Region's response to incidents at the Tripler Army Hospital and the San Diego VA Hospital were particularly noteworthy.
As further evidence of Region V's close contact with its licensees, they held a workshop for medical licensees in Hawaii in FY90 to discuss the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR 35 and the proposed quality assurance rule.
This work-shop was well received and may have contributed to the reporting of the signi-ficant exposure of a nursing infant at a Hawaiian medical facility. The Region is considering a similar workshop this year in Alaska where medical licensees are even more isolated than in Hawaii.
Due to a recent retirement, the inspection program is understaffed by one.
Regional management expects to fill the vacancy soon, perhaps by reassignment of Regional personnel. The Region not only met FY90 program requirements for numbers of inspections but has maintained an outstanding average turnaround time for inspection documentation of 12 to 13 days.
The Region continues to support NMSS program goals by use of performance evaluation factors, prompt acknowledgement of licensee corrective actions in response to Notices of Violation and use of Form 591 to document minor violations.
5
i Regional and NMSS managers discussed the use of the core program in plarining the materials inspections. Agreement was achieved that the expectation was to complete all inspections in the Operating Plan.
Core inspections are expected to be completed under all circumstances.
Non-core inspections are to be repro-grammed only if Regional management identifies to NMSS significant, unbudgeted utety initiatives which require urger.t attention.
regional staff raised issues concerning measurement of on-site or direct-inspection-effort (DIE), more contact with inspectors at other Regions, and the use of counterpart meetings to resolve policy issues. Regional management holds inspectors responsible for scheduling inspection time to achieve 27 percent DIE.
f,NSS representatives recommended that Regional management review scheduling of inspections, particularly travel time, to determine if this was the appropriate stancard.
In particular, NMSS has budgeted slightly higher labor rates to Region V to account for geographic considerations not relevant to more compact Regions. Regional staff supportec the concept of inter-regicnal team inspections of significant materials and fuel cycle prcgrams.
Fegic.nal staff supported counterpart meetings at all management levels.
The recent Division-level meeting was noted to have beer, particularly productive.
The Region suggested a trial program of announced inspections of radiographers in order to observe more field activities.
fiMSS supports this initiative which is permitted under current guidance in Inspection Manual Chapter 2800 and asks Region V to provide periodic feedback on its experience with this activity, b.
Safeguards Inspections With the transfer of Material Control and Accountir.g (f;C&A) inspection activities te headquarters anc the closing of the GA Catescry i Fuei Facility, regicr.cl inspection activities were decreased accordingly in FY90.
As a result, Region V completed three physical security inspections during FY90.
6
4 c.
Safeguards Transportat10n Inspectica programs Regicr V ccmpleted one safeguards transportaticn inspecticns in FY90.
No route surveys were request by Headquarters in FY90.
d.
Fuel Cycle Inspections The fuel cycle inspection program is conducted by a Senior Fuel Facility inspector, whv has reassigned into the f;uclear Materials ano Fuel Fabrication Erdnch during the past year. He receives technical support from other specialists in the Regions and from NMSS licensing staff.
There appear to have been no aaverse effects from the minor reorganization, which has helped to centralize nearly all of the NMSS functions in one Branch.
Based on FESS' review of completed inspection reports, Region V prepares clear, understandable inspection reports that demonstrate good recognition of the safety issues. The reports reach defensible conclusions and are completed ti'.h the best overall turnarcur.u time of any Region.
The Regicn also initiates oppropriate enforcement actions, as necessary.
Ouring the past year, the inspector, along with a co-op student, completed the reorganization of all fuel cycle facility files.
This has allowed him to pre-J pare more thoroughly for upcoming inspections, and to maintain more complete historical receras cn Region V facilities.
i 1
At the time of the NMSS visit, the inspector was preparing to participate in an operational safety team inspection in Region II, and was inviting a Region II inspector to participate in his assessment of ANF, tentatively scheduled for l
August. These interregional effcrts should help assure a healthy exchange of-ideas between Regional inspectors.
In FY90, the Region did not fully expend its budgeted resources in the fuel cycle program. However, there was no program impact.
Because of this, NMSS recommends the possible transfer of some fuel cycle inspection resourccs to the materials ir:spection program.
7
. ~ _.
e.
Safety Transportation Inspections Programs Region V continues to conduct inspections of transportation activities as part of its m6ttrials, reactor, anc fuel cycle inspection program activities. The tppropriate irspection mcdules are used by inspectors.
Review of Region V's program shows that inspection programs are being conducted generally by inspec-tors who are knowledgeable of and experienced in the transportation regulations.
Reports are of very high quulity.
It was noted that inspectors had available appropriate reie ence material such as Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regula-tions (Transportation) Parts 100-199. New reference materials will be sent by NMSS to the Region as those materihls become available, e.l.
Material Inspection Program Durins FYCC, IC4 i..ctcrials inspections involving transportation issues were performed.
Eleven items of noncompliance were observed. None of these items were escalated. Through February 1991, 9 inspections with one item of noncom-pliance were cbserved.
Each of these inspections took on hour or more to perform.
For these inspections, the fielo ncte format was used.
This format contains a section related to transportation. This section is consistent with Inspection flodule 86740. A review of current inspection reports showed that the transpor-tation section had been completed as appropriate.
Documented violations
]
included failures in properly completing shipping papers, failure in properly labeling packages, and failure in adequately blocking and bracing packages during transport.
Followup was adequate.
e.2.
Fuel Facilities - All licensea fuel facilities were inspected using Module 86740. These inspections were performed primarily by one inspector whose trans-portation knowledge and experience greatly contributed to transportation safety.
No violations were identified.
Up to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> of effort was involved, e.3.
Reactors - During FY90, transportation activities were inspected at all operating reactors accuroing to the SALP inspection frequency.
Procedure PS750 was used. One item of noncompliance related to proper blocking and bracing was noted.
8
e.4.
Research Reactors - Six inspections with no items of noncompliance were performed between January 1990 and February 1991.
The appropriate inspection module was used in all cases, f.
Low-Level Waste The Region V low-level waste licensing program was reviewed in the reactor, fuel cycle, and materials areas. The review consisted of interviews with the Director cf DRSS, the appropriate Dranch Chief, inspectors responsible for conducting low-level waste inspections, and examination of the inspection files.
Region V con-ducted inspections of low-level waste related issues for all reactor, materials, fuel cycle facilities and cisposal sites curing FY90. All inspectors in the Region are required to perform the full range of inspection activities for these facilities and appear knowledgeable in the area of low-level waste.
In the area of reactor inspections, the inspection effort apparently exceeds the SALP inspection frequency and one facility has received attention as a Regional initiative.
No storage problems were identified for reactor facilities.
In the fuel cycle area, one inspector is responsible for conducting low-level waste inspections. One fuel-facility has a large quantity of stored materi61 which is being processed through incineration.
In the materials area, most waste is held for decay. There were no escalated low-level waste enforcement actions during this period.
The Region inspected the special nuclear material licenses of U.S. Ecology's Richland, Washington disposal site on September 11, 1990. The inspector was accompanied by a project manager from NMSS and they looked at the areas of training, radiation protection, receipt and transfer of material, environmental monitoring and items contained in the facility performance reporting require-nents section of the license. No appdrent violations were found.
9
4 4 ENFORCEMENT The Region V perfonmance in the enforcement area will be formally evaluated by j
the Office of Enforcement in May.
Nonetheless, the NMSS team leader met briefly with a member of the Region enforcement staff and other Region V personnel.
From these oiscussion, a few observations were made:
Regional staff noted that enforcement actions would be less complex if requirements were clearly stated in unambigious terms.
In particular, the use of annual or semi-annual requirements for tests or aucits r.cy be subject to various interpretations. Guidance regarding interpretation of stpervision by authorized users at medical facilities was requested by Regional staff.
Region V management noted that recent strong enforcement actions appear to be effective in notifying cther licensees of the importance of complying with NRC requirements. One firra posted a manpower artitic about an enforcentnt action-and told employers that the "NRC means business."
10
5 TRAINING Region V provided NMSS with the training records for the six staff members of the Nuclear Materials and Fuel Fabrication Branch.
The Region continues to use the current, but soon-to-be-revised training requirements as stated in Inspection Manual Chapter 1245 and, with minor exceptions, the staff has met all such requirements.
NMSS provided the Region with a copy of the new requirements so that the Region V stuff could schedule themselves for upcoming courses.
In particuli.r. some members of the Region should try to enroll in (H-312) Whole Body Counting / Internal Dosimetry, and two of the newly required courses - OSHA Orientation (H-107) and Effective Connunications for NRC Inspectors.
- Overall, the F.egicn ceserves credit fcr er, rolling appropriate staf f members in courses as they are announced.
In the case of Region V, this has sometimes required extensive travel to attend courses offered in Chattanooga or in another Region.
'In addition, approximately 35 technical, administrative and computer training courses were cffered in the Region between December 1989 and February 1991.
host of these were one-day courses many of which were offered two or more times to allow attendance by most members of the regional staff.
The Region is aware of the fact that once its inspector vacancy is filled, that individual wiii neec to begir, cocipleting the new IMC 1245 required courses.
The Region also learned that refresher training in the transportation area will be available soon from the new NMSS Sr. Transportation Specialist.
11
d 6 INITIATIVES BY THE REGION The following Region V initiatives were under way throughout the past year:
The Nuclear Materials and Fuel Fabrication Branch was created.
This reurganization brought the fuel cycle inspector into the Branch with the nuclear materials staff.
In so doing, nearly all of the NMSS functions are now performed by this one organizational unit.
The Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, in an attempt to conserve resources, has abolished its Section Leader positions. This move has helped to reduce overhead to some extent, although it has placed additional administrative responsibilities on the Branch Chiefs and some senior staff members.
(It should be noted that in Region IV, the move was made to abolish Branch Chiefs, but retain Section Leaders.)
The Region continues to expand its cross-training program.
In past years, the concern had been that the materials licensing and fuel cycle inspec-tion functions were carried out by only one person each and that inadequate backups were available.
However, the Region has done a fine job in the last two years to support these two key individuals.
This is a constant concern in a Region with relatively few resources, but Region V seems to have struck the proper balance in its staffing.
A medical workshop was held in Hawaii to discuss the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR 35 and the proposed quality assurance rule.
Their work may have led to the reporting of a significant event a short time later at a medical facility.
12
7 HEADQUARTERS / REGION Y INTERACTIONS Both NMSS and Region V believe that interactions have been useful and effective ir, ull the ereas in inspection and licensing. Region V has been very responsive to fASS rec,uests for it. formation or sher'. '.en.. reqces,t:. iut spetic'. it.:,pd ivia.
!ESS and Region V cccperatec closely in iraestigaticns at the Tripitr Any l'edicai Lenter und t!.e San Diego VA Medical Center.
The interaction between the Region V fuel cycle inspector and Headquarters licensing staff was considered excellent. NMSS is expected to provide support for the upccming team assessment later this summer.
The counterpart calls also worked cut well.
Region y materitis licensing ar.d inspecticr.s staTf anc fASS staff cooperated at the medical workshop conducted during the past year. Regional staff expressed a need for more NRC staff workshops and counterpart meetings.
l 13
8 RESOURCE UTILIZATION I
The table on the following page shows Full Time Equivalent (FTE) allocations
- cr FYEC cnd FY91 through January 1991.
becuust Region V hus the ftv.est materials licensees, only ebout 300, it has the fewest resources allocated to support NMSS activities. This makes it essen-tial for the Region to maintain full staffing for each of its budgeted positions a.o to assure that cross-training has occurrea fcr functions performed primarily L) u.e persun.
Tu the Eq,iu.'s credit, this cress-truunny epp cach cununues to n,crk well.
The primary materials license reviewer is receiving some suppurt frcm two other individuals who were primarily inspectors.
The fuel facility inspector receives good suppurt from other technical specialists in the Division and from his licensing counterparts ut becdquarters.
The safeguarcs ir.sptutor uiso has a quulified backup.
At the time of the review, two vacancies existed. One was a result of the recent retirement of an inspector. The other was the Licensing Assistant posi-tion. Recruiting external candidates has always been difficult for Region V because of the high ccst of living in the Bay Area. Nonetheless, recruitment eficrts were unter way to fill both positicns cnc the process was moving without delay. NMSS agreed to refer any qualified health Physicists to Region V to help fill the inspector position.
The Region continues to adjust its inspection activities in accordance with changes in licensee operations at several of its fuel facilities.
Therefore, for the seccnd consecutive year, it did not fully (xpend its budgeted allotment in FY90 and is not expected to do so in FY91. During the visit, NMSS recommended that any unspent resources be reprogrammed from fuel cycle to the materiuls pro-graa to cllow the Region to complete the fuli FY91 materials licensee inspection program goals requireo in the FYS1 Cperating Plan, and to address any unplanned events.
hMSS mentioned the proposed increase of 0.3 FTE in resources in the FY92 r.iaterials program. This could create a new position for another materials 14
.=
inspector. The Region V DRMA staff agreed to monitor this situation during the FY93 budget cycle.
In order to reduce overhead und conserve resources, the Division of kaaiation Safety and Safeguards abolished Section Leader positions.
Those functions are now performed by the Branch Chiefs and some senior staff members.
The long-term impact of these changes is uncertain, but no major problems surfaced during the review. This organizational change shoula be contrasted with a recent char 4e in Region IV in which Branch Chief positions were abolishec.
The Region has good clerical support and a conscientious temporary Licensing-Assistant. This helped them control their small licensing backlog at the time of the review. The selection process for a permanent replacement was moving along well et the time of the review.
REGION V RESOURCE UTILIZATION The following table shows FTE allocations and expenditures for the review period FY91 FY90 ANNUAL BUDGET EXPENDED PROGRAM ACTIVITY bLLGET EXPENDED 1
BUDGET OCT-JAN OCT-JAN %
Fuel Facility Licensing 0
0 0
0 0
0 Fuel Facility Inspection 2.0 1.01 51 2.2 0.7 0.30 Materials Licensing 2.0 1.8 90 1.8 0.6 0.53 Materials Inspections 3.2 3.2 100 3.4 1.1 1.26 Event Evaluation 0.6 0.8 133 0.8 0.3 0.29 Transportation Insp.
& Plans 0.3 0.15 50 0.26 0.09 0.01 SG Fuel Facility Lic.
0.1 0.03 30 0.1 0.03 0
i SG Fuel Facility Insp.
0.2 0.11 55 0.2 0.07 0
Low-Level Waste 0.2 0.15 75 0.25 0.08 0.03 Decommissioning 0
0 0
0 0
0 Reactor Oecomm.
0.2 0
0 0.3 0.1 0.06 Materials Decomm.
0.1 0.2 200 0.2 0.07 0.05 NMS Section Supr.
1.0 0.9 90 1.0 0.33 0
NMTS Section Sup.
0 0.04 0
0.1 0.03 0
LLW Section Supr.
0.1 0.05 50 0.1 0.03 2.53 TOTAL 10.0 8.44 84 10.71 3.57 2.53 79 NOTE:
FY90 expenditures from regional input provided in response to FYP/ Green Book update in January 1991.
15 n
l
' l 9 RECOMMENDATIONS / SUGGESTIONS a.
For NMSS:
)
1.
Conduct future license reviewer workshops which focus on resolution of issues, not mere discussions of topics.
2.
Expedite the issuance of final guidance documents once coraments un a draft have beer, received.
3.
Encourage RES to provide prompt training when rule changes occur. Part 20 and Part 34 were noted as priority items.
4.
Provide additional guidance en route and port surveys and the use of cellular telephones.
5.
Consider additional reprograuming of resources from the fuel cycle area to the materials program.
6.
Develop guidance to clarify standard / license conditions regarding semiannual and annual tests or audits and to interpret supervision by authorized users of medical facilities.
7.
Review programmatic oversight issues related to medical broad scope B
prcgrams.
8.
Provide status Lpcate on tl.e Service and Training Information System.
b.
For Region V:
1.
Periodically review the need to perform a 100 percent quality assurance audit of all completed licensing work.
2.
Review its inspection schedules and its travel time to Getermine if its direct inspection ef fcrt goal is realistic.
16
3.
Consider conducting announced inspections of radiographers in order to observe more field activities.
4.
Continue to strive for full compliance with the soon-to-be-released training requir m a.ts in IMC 1245 (particularly the new courses listed in Section 5 of this report).
5.
Keep hMSS posted on the progress being made to fill staffing vacancies.
17 1
Heaaquarters Review Team i
- John E. Glenn, Chief, Medical, Academic and Commercial Use Safety Branch, Livision of Industrial and hecical t'uclear Safety, NMSS George d. Ceegan, Sr. Program Analyst, Operations Branch, Division of I
Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS Michael Wangler, Sr. Transportation Specialist, Domestic Safeguards and Regionni Osersight Branch, Division of Safeguards and Transportation, NMSS Leroy S. Person, Project Manager, Cperations Branch, Division of Low-Level Waste Management and Decommissioning, NMSS i
i
- Team Leader i
18
gnc4,eest[ Y Taule II' 4
Page 1 of 1 ORaANIZATION STRUCTURL DIVISION OF RADIATION SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS DIRECTOR - Ross Scorono Deputy Director - Frank Wenelowski Secretary - Chris Barrigo mart ^"m Secretary - Gene Moller-Duck rr Radiation Speciollet - Friodo Taylor Temporary - Ann Rivers Joek Homer State Ooleon Orneer Dean Munfhlre REACTOR RADeOLOG CAL PROTECTION BRANCH SAFEGUARDS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS. AND NUCt. EAR MATERIALS AND NON-POWER REACTOR BRANCH FUEL. FASRICATION BRANCH CHtEF - oreg Yuhee CHIEF - Jemee Reese CHIEF - Bob Pete Mediation Protection -
Mike C1111e Emergenof Reeponse -
i Dean Chaney Emlelo Gwrwie Fuel Foollitten -
Worren TenBrook Chuck Hooker Louis Corson E.rm ;;.7ey Properedneee -
. Lobon Coblentz Cell Good Materfoie -
Hot Reeld**
Art McQueen Jim Montgomery Both pledlinger Security -
Frank Pong hug hhuetw Dove Skov i.eRoy Norderheug
-Dennie Scheefer Kent Prendergoet Vacant Rooetor inspector.
Ucensing Aeolatant -
Phil Quello -
Ann Rivers (Terap) -
I
.