ML20057A354
| ML20057A354 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/03/1989 |
| From: | Knapp M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055C202 | List:
|
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9309140063 | |
| Download: ML20057A354 (67) | |
Text
i i
October 3, 1989 MEMORANDUM FOR:
.DRSS,. Branch _ Chiefs DRSS2ecdoo 3hiefs' FROM:
Malcolm R. Knapp
SUBJECT:
INSPECTION REPORTS To increase my awareness of DaSS Inspection Reports, beginning October 15 and continuing until further u
, glease provide Ccnnte with two Inspection Reports per Section per mor..c.
I would like to receive FF:SSB reports on the 15th of the month and NMSB reports on the 30th of the month.
Please select reports so that I see the work of as many different inspectors as possible.
7" Malcolm R. Knapp, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards cc:
Branch Secretaries l
9309140063 930830 b _ ff 4
PDR STPRG ESGGEt
us a w 11:57 i4RC RI DOCKET R M NO.845 P002 7-4 s
m i
V
/
n 1
k A
'O m
V' f
)
(
s
/u ng
\\
$)
v s
A Z
9
02/23/90 11:57 NRC R1 DOCKET ROOM NO.845 P003 I
s 1
REGION I RESPONSE OE INPUT INTO NMSS NATIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS 1.
What type and frequency of training is conducted by the region in enforcement matters?
Training for new employees and regional personnel?
How is enforcement guidance / instructions pren out to regional personnel? Has training been given under V.G.1 and Sevenly I.evel V violations?
Training for regional staff in enforcement matters is conducted on an as needed basis.
When new guidance or instructions are received, the Enforcement Coordinator reviews them and either incorporates the information into the appropriate Regional Office Instruction (s) or circulates the original document to the staff.
Specific training sessions are held when the subject matter is significantly different from past practice. For example, the subjects of non-cited violations, V.G 1, and Severity Level V violations have been reviewed in at least four training sessions for the materials staff during the past year. Enforcement policy is a specific area listed in the journals of new staff and is, of course, reviewed thoroughly with them by their Section Chief as they handle more work independently, 2.
Are repetitive violations being identified?
a) to licensee during close out b) to section chief during discussion of inspectors findings?
Yes, it has long been Region I policy to do these things.
3.
How are repetitive violations being documented?
a)
Is there a paragraph in cover letter 1.
Standard boiler plate paragraph option in preparing?
h)
Are they identified in NOV as repeats c)
If other violations, is an enforcement conference held? Safety significance?
l Repetitive violations are documented with a standard paragraph in the cover letter which is available to all inspectors as boiler plate (see attached). As a general rule we do not mark the violation in the bOV as a repeat, but the standard paragrapTealls out each repeat by item letter. Enforcement conferences are held i
based on our evaluation of the safe:y significance of the identified violations and our best estimate of the " direction' (improving or deteriorating) the licensee is headed.
Repeat violations are censidered in deciding whether to conduct a i
conference.
\\
4.
When a violation is repeated a third time, what action should be taken?
DRAFT i
02/23/90 11:57 NRC RI DOCKET ROOM NO.845 P004 6
OE INPUT 2
In keeping with current guidance, enforcement should be progressive and additional sanctions should be considered. Since violations vary in severity, it is not possible to absolutely specify the sanction for a second repeat. In any case, the action should probably include additional attem management and effectiveness of all corrective actions. pts to improve program 5.
Have inspectors had cases of repeat violations in inspections since new guidance issued by OE?
Yes, and we believe we have followed the guidance. We do not have an efficient way of recovering the cases.
l 6.
How have inspectors exercised discretion under V.G,1 during inspections of licensees?
With some reluctance, but after several training sessions and encouragement from i
supervision, we believe V.G.1 is behg routinely and properly implemented in the l
field. All such actions are reviewed by supervision.
l 7.
When and for what types of violations are 591's being used?
l See attached.
i
?..
How are repetitive violadons, non-cited violations, and open items tracked?
The Region I Nuclear Materials Safety Branch maintains a dBase file of outstanding (or open) iten s for each licensee. All such items are entered into the file.
9.
If there is a tracking system, do inspectors preview output prior to inspection and closeout old violations and f.ag repeats.
Inspectors review both the outstanding items file and the docket file in preparation for inspections, Violations and other open items are to be closed whenever possible during the current inspection. Thoses which are not closed, remain open for review during the next inspection.
10.
Could OE have copy of tracidng system output of example license?
See attached.
11.
Who does audit on tracking systema to assure input by?
As part of the final approval of the inspection documentation, the Section Chief assures that a record of the input into the outstanding items list is present.
DRAIT 1
I
02/23/90 11:57 NRC RI DOCKET ROOT 1 NO.845 POO5 OE INPUT 3
12.
How many Severity Level IV and V violations were dispu:ed by the licensee during the current FY?
While we can recall that several were disputed, we have no convenient way of recovering the cases. We believe the number is no more than five. Each received specific attention at least one level of management higher than that who signed the origital violation.
13.
How many Severi."f I2 vel IV and V violations were withdrawn during the current FY?
A few of the disputed violations described in answer to question 12 were withdrawn. We have no convenient way of recovering the cases.
14.
Do the regions perform internal audits, other than the normal concurrence process, of inspection reports and Severity Level IV and V violations?
Region I has recently begun p/or NOVs are selected and as eer review of inspection reports and violations.
Each month several reports s.nd Health Physicist who has not been previously involved with them for review and comment. The comments are proviced to the inspector, the Section Chief and the Branch Chief.
m-DRAIT
02/2350 11:57 NRC R1 DOCKET ROOM NO.845 P006 ENCLO5URE 4 OE INPLIT INTO MMS $ MTICML FROGRN1 REVIEW PROCESS 1.
What types and frequency of trafriint is conducted by the regions in enforcement matters? Training for riew employees and regional personnel?
How is enforcement guidanct/ instructions given out to regional persolnel?
Has training been given especially on repetitive violations, enforcement discretion under V.G.1 and Severity Level V violation?
2.
Are repetitive violations being 1 identified?
a) to licensee during close out b) to section chief during discussion of inspectors findings?
3.
How are repetitive violations being docua:ented?
a)
Is there a paragraph in :over letter 1.
Standard boiler plate paragraph option in preparing?
b)
Are they identified in NOV as repeats c)
If other violations, is an enforcerent conference held? Safety significance?
4 When a violation is repeated a third tine, what action should be taken?
5.
Have inspectors had cases of rep.est violations in inspections since new guidance issued by OE7 6.
How have inspectors exercised discretion under V.G.1 during inspections of licensees?
7.
When and for what types of violations are $91's being used?
8.
How are repetitive violations, non-cited vioittions, and open items tracked?
9.
If there is a tracking systes do inspectors preview out inspection and closecut old vlotations and flag repeats?put prior to 10.
Could OE have copy of tracking system output of example license?
- 11. Who does audit on tracking systems to assure input by?
12.
How many Severity Level IV and V violations were disputed by the licensee during the current FY?
13.
How many Severity Level IV and V violations were withdrawn during the current FY?
u,,,.
14.
Do the regions perform internal audits, other than the normal ccncurrence procesJ, of inspection reports and Severity Level !V and V violat!ons?
)
JJ J :iU' dio/
'rWC R1 DCOET ROOM NO.845 P007 Q
4 e
PAGE 1
'J.5. huCLEAR REGLLATORY C0HP!55!0h
- EGith l 2 fin !!EM5 tract!h3 SY!ilEM
- ..) '.."% :; '. W
- a;+ '
". A';
s;'E REvild.R CLO$ING
- i ' '.
D1LE) na E 00? ION REFER 3+
24
- ? ': 1. ':i 2 15 v.LHICF LE1 E5-0)1
.,....,..d.,.....,...:;J:
w.
..,a tia -
'."?ist
.L:4,iB asITE / !CR0 ALLES 1 :.ki ::
' :3-
.. :E.-
- i
'.1, i '
" ;'i(6 BEr5Y Lil'.IEH LER
'A z'.fE: :::.i:u..!; ::
4";. i.5Ev!EW Wh!LE INSF a J05Llh DIAL. OTR. CONCLU0'D SAL COUNT DATA.
4
'i 59 t!!1:E4
'J'.t.k l Cd LIR 87.?01
.g s
- 1
?.l. b5
- (/ ] Il(*
CiEF0.LLR!Ck V10L 59 001
',r:tt. ta;;.. i
~
l l
l 2
i l
06 4/90 ^
11:58 NRC RI DOCKET ROOM NO.845 POOB
' AGE 2 J.S. ft ;LEth kii'alATORY C0'9.!SSION HEE;;N !
e W !'Er5 1RACKIN3 SviiEM N.rh : : - U
............................................ ~... -.. -.......... -..
' 'E sEViinEF CLU$lk3
- e t s.
'h
- ' i !.
4 a l.')
u1E 0' TION AEfif
- b ;'.. e
'/JURA V!:L EG-001
'... i., n... f.. 14,1 isf.;.ls at A:EC 10 FACIL[1Y
.n.n. ;g ggn.t
... li.:t:.
azEi< ;:5F:!:.3 ee.i'
'!.':: ;'l
- C'.iSTEA VICL 69 001
- l. ! '. '
M..si,i :F 13.33 :'T ik:2:NB FA:nGES
'^
4 l' 05:i' i f,';':W1
.i.;US TRA VIOL i9-0)!
iEt., TEi-
.. :, g rp e n.:s nt ;2tg,;FE D FREXO(Y 6-
' 1 i' :: !?
/
.!NiEh VIOL i": 9...t :
v,.~. a ' i !%:Ei: rp:n ;;A.110;ximig poco 4
+
.s'..!Ei i
- ENEEN v.0L S ? ; ;i. ', t, - >k.
.; t!* f *;
,p;;kte :;t styg [u lag;
=
enume e
w e vJ
~'ilise "
NRC Ri DOCKET ROOr1' NO.845
.P009 0
e PAGE 2 J.5. f.u:
LEV RE3'LATCRf CCMI53104 J
4310N I 03Eh Irlmi tREKIM SVSTEM 30 -; s.%
- n Y.
titi FE'/ Edk LLO$tNG
~.
- '. '. 9.
.WE 0*'11Gk RUER 0
p$
g a n..
. e.,. s
. +,
e * / '. 3
.[
I (")
hkd,,k, [( (h$
h {['(
hl.hhj I
a b,
I 4 e
9 9.
i l
i l
l 1
I
w c.s 66
' u :-W. _,. _ -......NRC RI DOCKET ROOM NO.845 P010 0'
b.
u.
' S. NLCLEAR REG AFIORY COMM!!S!0N 8.EGIC's !
0*EN ITE.93 T uCKING syst(*
...v.g..,.,.n....-
~~I.'*I
.d "
- f '
Uv!EaEE.
C' 03!NG I
.a
' 1:.- Ia wi 0Fi!CN kEf(R
- C
- C.
.<?4D' i
U.LidCH L *R
,,...,...'..,,...,,,,.......,,a
..-s
.~.s.
l
' I i
me I
4 J
9 1
i l
l l
I l
1 i
i 1
'02/23/90 11:58 NRC RI DOCKET ROOM NO.845 P011 c.
i o.
October 3, 1989 MEMORANDUM FOR:
DRSS Branch Chiefs DR$$ Section Chiefs FROM:
Malcolm R. Knapp
SUBJECT:
INSPECTION REFORTS To increase my awareness of DRSS Inspection Reports, beginning October 15 and continuing until further notice, please provide Connfe with two Inspection Reports per Section per month.
I would like to receive FR$$8 reports on the 15th of the month and MMSB reports on the 30th of the month.
Please select reports so that I see the work cf as many different inspectors as possible.
7
/
Malcolm R. Knapp. Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards cc:
Branch Secretaries t'
f Oc ano e t
4
02/23/90 11:58 NRC RI DOCKET ROOM NO.845 P012 APR.O 5isto i
HEMORANDUM FOR: Nuclear Materials Safety Branch FROM:
Lee H. Bettenhausen, Chief Nuclear Materials Safety Branch
SUBJECT:
POLICY FOR THE USE OF FORM NRC-591 The NRC-591 form provides a convenient method of routine enforcement corresponderce.
results on Form NRC-591 whenever pessibts.Therefore, you should report inspection However, more significant violations re the licensee' quire correspondence between the NRC and the licensee to document s proposed corrective actions and to permit NRC review of these actions.
The Attachment to this memorandum provides a list of violations which may be cited during inspections using Form NRC-591.
Level V violations and some Severity Level IV violations.These include all Severity should not be used when there are more than three violations, when there is a A Form NRC-591 recurrent violation, when there are safety concerns that are not violations when a formal report will be issued, or for inspections which involve the review of multiple diagnostic misadministrations or a single therapeutic misadministration.
While you should issue a 591 whenever possible, you may recommend issuanc a formal Notice of Violation to your Section Chief in any circumstance when you think this action is necessary.
s W
Lee H.
ettenhausen, Chief Nuclear Materials Safety Branch
Attachment:
AL Hated.
cc:
J. Lieberman, OE J. Austin, NM55 Division Directors RII-V s
nFA (f s,u m I ' UvJ(
f)-
y e
1,
r a
1
02/23/90 11:58 NRC R1 DOOGT ROOM NO.845 P013 4
VIOLATIONS THAT PLAY BE CITE 0 ON FORM NRC-591 1.
Violations involving:
a.
The posting of " Caution, Radiation Areas" or "
caution Radioactive Material" storage areas.
b.
The labelling containers of radioactive matertal, except when associated with medical misadministrations, Leak testing of sealed sources.
c.
d.
Records of required surveys or other recordkeeping violations, Posting required by 10 CFR 19.11.
e.
f.
Reporting required by 10 CFR 20.407(b),
10 CFR 23.408(d), and 10 CFR 20.409(b).
Calibration of survey meters and pocket dosimeters, g.
h.
Inventory requirements.
1.
Notification of NRC when authorized user, RSO or teletheripy physicist discontinues the performance of activities.
J.
Eating, drinking, etc, where radioactive materials are use.
2.
Any Severity Level V violation.
Revision 0 4/1/89
02/23/90 ilt58 NRC RI DOCKET ROOM NO.845 P014
[
UNITED SYAIES p
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMiss10N e-y j
R10loN i Me ALLENDALE ROAD
+
Kif*3 0F PRUS$1A. PENNSYLVANIA 14400 t
Docket No.(s).
License No.(s)
ATTN:
i Gentlemen:
i
Subject:
Inspection Report No.
Date(s)'of Inspection __.
This letter forwards NRC Form 591, " Safety Inspection," indicating that no items of non compliance were found during the above described inspectiuti of your licensed activities. Please retsin the form in your files.
No acknowledgement of this letter is required.
be pleased to discuss them with you.However, should you have any questions, we s In,iccordance with Section 2.790 of. the 3
NRC's " Rules of Practice." Part 2, Title 10, code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this NRC Form 591 will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Your cooperation with us is appractate:1.
Sincerely, Health Physicist Nuclear Materials Safety Branch
Enclosure:
NRC Form 591 Region I Form 306 (10/88)
02/2g90 11:58 NRC RI DOCKET ROOT 1 tO,845 P015 Q
STANDARD PARAGRAPH J Item during a previous in;pection of your Beansed activities and d Notice of Violation enclosed with our let.ter dated From this thfs item has recurred. inspection, it appears that your corrective actions were additional weight in the consideration anc: Recurrent and uncorrected violations a selection of appropriate enforcement action.
Therefore, in your response to this letter, you should give particular attention to those actions taken or planned to ensure that identified items of noncompliance will be completely corrected and will not recur.
STANDARD PARAGRAPH K Items
_, and Violation enclosed with this letter was identified during a previousin the Notice of enclosed with our letter datedinspection of your licensed program and doc that your corrective actiers were not effective since these items haveFrom this recurred.
the consideration and selection of appropriate enforcement act in your response to this letter, you should give particular attention to those Therefore, actions taken or planned to ensure that identified items of noncompliance will be completely corrected and will not recur.
STANDARD PARAGRAPH L Your cooperation with us is appre:iated.
Sincerely.
John D. Kinneman, Chief Nuclear Materials Safety Section A Division of Radiation Safety
~
and Safeguards Cc:
Public Document Room (PDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC) t
\\
02/23/90 11:58 NRC RI DCO GT ROOM NO.845 P016 w
f NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY SECTIONS A, B & C DOCUMENTATION LETTER Docket No(s).
LicenseNc(s).
ATTN:
(Title):
l i
Gentlemen:
Subject:
(Circle One) Routine or Special Inspection No.
(ex.87-001)
Circle Al for COMPLETE INSPECTION (if one license)
Circle A2 for COMPLETION INSPECTION (if more than one license)
Circle 81 for LIMITED INSPECTION (if one liennse)
Circle B2 for LIMITED INSPECTION (if more than one license)
Circle any optional paragraphs desired.
Al or A2 Date(s):
- I Complete i
Inspection Inspector (s): _
Only location of inspection:
](ex."theabove address)"
B1 or B2 Date(s):
l Limited Inspection Inspector (s):
Only Location of inspection:
) (ex."Theabove address)"
Inspection limited to a review of:
i
[ Optional) Dates of licensee correspond <ence reviewed during inspection:
C.
D.
(Required)
Licensee representative at exit:
4 Region I Form 293 01/87
-h 4,.
l l'
}
. J, j
-4 6
9
.j t.
+
i la.!
1
'
- wi
- s g II ili 6 i
i E',
W i
' j rr M
t
- - t 7 i t
?
?
El i
(!
l l
M I T"!<'
j 3"
i
't l
I
- _ 1 I
T.
O r -
y
- - r
- - 7
- - -- r -
4~.
~ -
4 3
?
C f
I g;
t wI 8
i i
t
- g:
i j
-i
[
' T.'
g w
A g
1 E.'
g W
W s.W
?
g 4
!"""* t t
l
.g l
[
i 1
i i
.~ ;
'd i
I mi e
!. ( f i
S..i j
s s
a t gj s lj j
i
.x h
- -r.
h i
d I
b i
I A.
=
- 7*
1 m,b
?.
?.
?
?
t
}
g i
9 j
i i
-4 b
I l
?
=
1 1,[
I l
I t
' gl l
l i
} 5 g
u' r, '
1
- _ :. _ a a a M
l 1., '9 I
1 i
a %. _
i a
}
t a
~
)a _.
I 4
l m
5 l
4 i
t.
a s
i
-W 3
3 4
4 C
4 4
a 0
l-
. g g
- n s
k g.
l 3
m I
t
(
I i
I t
4 4
5 E
R 2
3 4
I.!N 4
a
_g 5
3 3
3.
2 a
a 2
- - _!a
_. 2.. _ _
N 3
3 5
I3 3
2 a
2 2.
.i 3
1 1
.Wg m
w a
n
=3
-e a
a 85
_ _=
_= _ _ _ _ _
a a
a I
E 2
I I
3 a"
I I
E, 2
3 a:
i a
a 4
E 2
a a
i.
)
S S
S W
S f
9
,I I
WI 3
3 3
3 3
5 3
?
E I
,E 3
a 2
a
. a.
=
2 - =
a=
12 h
I I
W
=
=
=
=
=
=
3 3 : 3 5
3 -
- 2 13 S
S 3
A 3 ;
A l4 A
a
, 2 A
& l 4,
E s
a a
a a
8 a
=8
=
=
,=
a,
=
a y
a g
ma a
al.
_ _=
u as a
x
,a g
2 a
a a
a
=
a s
=
e E
=
a
- r. e s
E E,
m s
i
- l I
i w-.
=, ~
2 g : s-E 3
.w
- g. a..
.II E., is a
3 E. r-f, a.
! E I
,0
= i a
m w
4
7.,- %,.',':j,*E.k/
- ',. j.. I',,1 y, g'd ;g.'.v '--
- . - Q. T..l.,.,..
. :',.,,p.yl.,,,,,
.,, g,,
=k k
_w- - W
.Y y
sr.y., 'J-#,;.Lgg.'g, a 3
.3..
..... [.'
....Uk.
~
FUEL'FEILITIESINSPECT!DNSFORFY88-Y,. NOVEMBER 21,1988 l
I s.
l LICOISEE TYS8 GCi-DEC FYBB JAN-MAR FYE8 APR-JUN FY88 JULY-SEP
-1: -
il
.. lCOMBET10N.,Eh61MEERIIE.,_ l JtP jgq}
._ l1,.MC&A RK -
!!CCARR_ VISIT;J:: MC&A;ltiL_.. D t
1 lSMM-1847 l
- U-CHER;HZ M Rf;R$
ti i
- RPIRS ll l
l l
- C SAFETY;JR ::
ll l
l ll
[:
lB n v PARKS TCWNSHIP ll DECON JR SNR-414
- MCLA.$EC,RK ::
M
!! RP;R$
ll II lt
=
___. n C SAF,ETY;JR.. l9 - ----.. 4':
l
-- M
,8 % W APOL.LD._....:
9 -....
c M SECURITY;RK ::
^
M M RP;RS M
l-.. _ _- -::
M-M-..
_l
!CINT!DD._ ~
_ CHEM;JJ M MCLA;RK
- EP;WI.
MPRbECT;JR M
T 2,.:. n.
g_
-n M
M M
- PEl01 STATE
- MC&A,SEC,RK ::
M i
M
,1,.
N,,
-n-
-- g
.MIT M
M M
l l,.. _ _.
l F__......
M 1:
M-
, EASTMAN.. KODAK M,,
M,,.
1',
l i.
M
-- l --
U M-M UNITG NUCLEAR CORP." '
SEC;RK ll NDA;HZ
- MCLA REASURE;J : RP;MS'
' ll lMAVAL PRODUCTS DIV.
.. MCLA;RK(2) ll SMR-348 l
M RC&A.SEC RK !!
M SEC;RK ll l
l
!!.MC&AMEA$URE;JU._
..1:
g g
g
- UNITED NUCLEAR CDRP.
- MC&A RK M ENV;JR M PROJECTS;JR M MC&AIRK ll l WOOD RIVER JUNCTIDX
- SEC;kK M
M M ENV;JR,MA N
,SNR-777 U,,
l i
l l
-u-NBS l'C SAFETY;JR ::
M
!! RP1RS
.M
- M...
U TRANSP;MS _i M
l l
M
.1
--: L_
!RPI l
- IGA;RK M
.. SEC*lE
. gp g Il I..
~
l l
M M-l WEST VALLEY l PROJECT 0)
!; TEAM lBPERSONM: PRDJECT :D
.l PR06 RAMS 14) Ut: PROJECT (D U PROSRAMS 13);W::
l ll PR06 RAMS (2) ull M
M M
M n.-
n l WESTINGHOUSE l MC&A*RK ll
- l M
M lELRIRA
- SECUEITY;RK ll M
M l
M M
ll l
M ll
-l
M------
ll
-- l :
luEST!KaiH00SE M 6A0 VISIT;JR H M
lCHESu!CK M
M M
i M
M M
T
'y ;We*l,fu).W" ^-JQ^,-^ bC,.~,h -
MM M W N W N M'7NC'%- /* 8-# W/me'M+.w s*Jo. 4.4
'[
~
.=======.=:======.=====.=====.=====.=====.=-:=====.=====.==========,=========
(%
El i
/
a q
Y i
l
- 3
==
- 4 l2
- ID iW
!=
id E
O
- 5 g
ii
- i s.
i
!M s.s-
=
=
- =
- ,4m
:
E.
- C a*
. =
- =s W
=
- 5. =
3 s
m:E E
lmw
.- - :=
'$5
+
t
========.=====.=====.=====.=====.=====,========at:t
...g lk
- tm
- t.
.====.===:;=.=====.=====.=====.::==
l
=:
1 I
9 2
9 a
=
~#
t.
- s s=
k
. =
!M i
?
- g s
m..
- g
- g
- g
=
i
}g
- ,t
- g
2
'O
- N 8
,,7 g
2:
.E,,
- g
- g
. s_=
t=
. =. :j
- =
- =2
- 8 3
- n.,
- 8=
D.
i
- =
3
. =.
- =~
- E
- k k..
.,E
- 3=
lt
- =
.Et
- =
- m=
============.=====.=====.==========.==========.=====;=t
= = = = = = =. = = = = =. = = = = =. = =
l K
i
=
y
}
l t
V D*
4
,4
].h-
- g O
s a n.
i-
! a,e.s,, a, us :E
.s o
= =:
c.
- .5 g 5"L
, e
,, a 5
.:: -En ;t8 E
l4 :=
a
= 41
=
- ==
D t.
8.s t.: at
- I w-ma c
- n g
21 tm
. b.
a w,
w.
=======================================ar.:
l
==========::--========
N i
i i
A j-j i
3 9
- 8. !
b*
3
- 3:
i i
s =-
.a p*
se
=
i I
' s 8...., e m
.L l z_,
==3.
-==,
.; g =
, = =
s E
p4,3 4.
s.
s s-2:
a.
<. mg 2.i
.ws) -'
'wm
- w a
.35
,. o 38.
s
=======_
=.-
============================-----------tew a
A ;
I
}'
- Is.
- - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - -
i
== i. h
!n
$. t. yg i mm !S %
is m % s!
- >g i sdj4 m
i sh A w
- % = %
- 3=-
to l
- g g.
- s s e o
Ns*
- *i s i ISig 64 64 it *
- S... t j t ai lt 6 jiff 6 f jifi j ffj jg4l4 it g
y at i
i y
I.
.s Il 3
g
!d I
1.s j*
t 55 M2I8
- 3*
ing ige f
.. : 3,ps =w ="
g a
{e : I.
..e k %) '
=
- g w.
=
r 5"
s s
wr r:ws3 n
.,. = r i --
- 5 g
eg e
a e;e e.
!=
e.:
ja-aE
- =g e;e a
oig m
a z
t-
==
.=.,
a ag a
a a
aga
-s
- s aga !
a-===;
=. - {
.=~
=. :,:
s.
=
.~.
.= e lm
~
.~.
.=
.g=*
=g
~.
i
g=. cg
y==
=
sg====
g= ' =g= : =*=s
- =
g
. a u =Ints. E3 B*
a E
s.Imm e
lIm3
.E.as "q
. tim 5 3 !*Im8 il as 5 ga!
Im :E s5ig gIm3i E
aI
.=
mma E.
=
J I"
- - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ - ' " - - --
i
=
1
,d
_E
- e
=
- m k' =-
Rs i4
- d i
~
I 2
"a - :sI j
Ow s
=
n
=
=
]
2
{g a
g
. E.,
=:
9 w
=
E
=
s.
y
- =
=
g
. a
=
E
.=
- .= m
- l3 j =-.-.
a
- 5
- gf
- -5
=
- .1 E----....1..--.
,I
- s s
. c
- -----.=.- --
-.s.
...5 1 :=sil
=
=
- =
- - ---.s - --- - - --- s. --- - --- - w--- : w s
- .m 3
I o
e
- h
9 0
0 o-e o
e e
a e
o o
o o
o 4
J O
t e
t
! =& C2
\\J t
t l l f 3 H.
6 e
f 6
e e e.m e.
Y D
6 s %
g
=%
t N
\\
u es-e e
tes==
e a
O O O tl*
- e em e o o o sa e Q O O O O e =a OO "J o a%
i e
o e e e e e e e e e e e a e o e e e e e o e e
2 w* N B
.J 'A 0
- ne =# e e a-v4e em on.
- a= at= em N em me ism
- 8P
+8*==e C
2O t e et 0 N
en se me I ** 3 9
- s eo e4 iOO 4 i
=
-1 O
emZ I wt 3
9 f
C an O e
8 y
e er e
e O
ua 2 9
e W
e==
4 0
COOO OOO O O O '"' O O O O s' w c O O OO
'J Q Fu 4 w e
e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e e o e o e o e O#
e K I
e.
o e..im.a ar*
=e em
- m e=
4 O es e== ve e en e
e-
- t ws. O in m
6 es : i a-e r we esa N ewe e
.a O e >Ze
~2'** w v Ek I o t
e 149 ans se O 4
3 w ine 3 a f
a wwQwO e
t OOOO
'A ** em w=OCCe C ("' O Q C O in e
'"J O OC
& wS O 1 m t
e e e a e e e e e o e e e e e e e o e e e e e o v
2
==
e = ** s
- -e e e is-e s e e= e.
== N c sa e A me em op op
- * = =
e o
en t.w s e J
ew
- ea
.m K
- me t D3e
.g o' e6 eJoe 3
d
6 2
- IJ I er e
2 9
e se==
e e
e w o-e in er e
a em we to e-em 4naen om we== e-e to ea 7 e
t as na a
ou v
e m4 e
i 3
- J**
f 6
- =
S *'t O
= r C O O #8 O w' w d
22 3 er a
3 as e
-t
==
- ne Z J2 E& 8L 2
I t
2 2
eu
=.
.e a
&a wea.4 e.
.A ca T2 2'
e e
e p
2 O
E D
s
- e..T.. e=
T 7 = me Z
a=
mo e
t e-F j=
c o.
?'
m%
8
.J l
.J u
eA
.,e e J me.J nme.
.a a.
em e
e e
.a.-
e e,.e. e.se. e.a..m.
es es e
e.
- e. -
eseEEsTss T
.J
-4 4
3 1 1%
1 y e e se
=
t ee 0 m ee 3 A me
- en om I
- = 9 e
- e E ws o w e e aw euw e
e.
u I w* & 4 a.J O 4J af X ane E eJW Q 8ekJ*ee 4.s 4
0 8'a==
4 ee e
SJ een er. me se e en E e4 m %
as an.
I 6 on g g aa n.
g e
g g g g
m
(
4 WE u 4 J ha h* we w
.J w
.J t
ta 9
.d d as e3 3
.a w.J *.s
.J.
es e esa
.s e
4 me $
en. as====
3 "3*
at.s um me
=s s
.e 3,a 13 e
3 4
f.J f e
e
- 's O 3. m O w w D
w t
e O
O
=
w as as moa m
w l
j BJ tJ J.ss.J ens
.A ds
.J f
g 8
- es s
e a me at
- f. e m e se e *>ee
.s,2 C
e 9
t er
=2 an I
6.*
Fg=2 3y a
C 4
s G
= =
0
==
c"*' N es me
- m. e-e. O ** C Q a= e= ene 4
4 y
- m. e-w e.
em== m est es e.
=e me e-me 4
4 33 w
9 I
M s
L' c w c C " '.' C '...
=
9S e
e 7
So g
4 1
- t e
=
7 a em m e'J C
3 m
m er as e at er as re
's I
4 I
4 9
as e
444 4 he f
l t
e= 0 I e
&N e
r ** en e* er me 9 OC 0 W
s
- 9 u
O me eF E as
& em erOOCe C
9 a8 V O
- J e 9 O
W en 2 2 2 4eewpuO w
e e
e 6
v e
I f
SJ t
i e
d.J.s.d e
me.e.4 2
.J.d J.J s
.J ae J J.s.J.s me ed.s e
.J e
4 t
eeee C
e se e 3
e as an e eee e
- t e== e
=.e. a. e.
e a.e e e 3
e
= e-e.
> m e p.
- m. m. e=
e.
e-a..
C. =O O. e.
O O e.
O C. e'",no O.
m.C C c O C 0 0 u.
30 O e1 e
e m
a f
O g
e w*
o
=m
.e sw >e e.
em p en e
- s. m. e. e= om en e m e= o.
a.
e I
t e
e ft e
=
u F C PS E
a's as, O3C
'1
(* "l5 2 es - the we h **
eudser nad MJ ens ges m2 u= C 6
0 O
O O E e-
- 3 0 2 m.
O r"> b O O 2 wJ COOOOCOE av O 3
='
u-D s
a C*
C
- 1 C M C
3 "3 O C C 7 O 3 O
de 2 9
O 2 h
6 t
O v ha e w o
o e ena O
he o u u e 2
w W w V W 'J w s O
we O
ve l
t 4
8=.
I e & es A
e & es N
e I e e &
O I
e e 1 e 6 e Je 8
a e &
e* *. 5. e. e, e. m. ab e.em l
t,
6 3
s ****v 3
- v O
- * = = * * * * * *
- I
.e
.a m
ori 1
- iA W E O hJ 2 O AJ he W 6J 2 Wh#WWWWWZ h8 1 m.
e>=
%d 2 e
1 e e ese a e se r3 as as as as as e e as e e as as en a
e.
as me T
. t. * ;
I t
I l
- ; J W oToRo-o o
o o
oo o.o: o o
e o
o o
o.o'.e-o o
- e
.]
4 I.
~.E
.~
.. l.
2,
\\
-F.
Q-
\\
n
. o., -
.o..
w-
- o....
- o. e. o. o.
- o. o. o
- o. o. o...
. e.. o.
~.
. ~., ~
~a
-~
s.
. =. =...
1
,~
~.
--~-
o
..o....
..r z.
o
..=
z, 1
2
. o..,o.
- o. o. o. n.
- o. o. o.
- o. m. o. o. n.
- o. o.
.w W
~~
-~-
.o.
- o. -....
o.
.~...
. o.,.
-w.-
., 5
...v.
.s.
w.
.u..
w
.o o.o. o.
c n. o.
- o. m. o
- n. o. c. o. -
- o..
- o.. o..
o o
oc
~~o
~-
-.e s.
~
.22
.o
., 2, :..
- c..
..s.
3
=
.a
.r..
-o www www we wwww
.o.--
ww e =, o
,, =.
=.
3 ow
. =.. =.
. =. =. =. =.
, ~, =
~~
,~
z
. =. =. =.
==
m
..r.e
=
s r
s.
.c.
.s.
e.
- o. w o.w w. w
- o..w w..
ww www www
.e
., s,
. =. =. =.
= :..
.. =.
=.. =,
. =. =.
3.22 c.
c
, s., e, s.
o.,
- s. s.
s
.s
,. e e e
.e.
.. e.
o=
=
===.
==
r
.o..o o.c..o.
..a......:...
r.
.n..:
- s...
n.....,
.= <.,.
s.
.w..
.ew.
..e..
. o.
4..
.. e.
.e C
g
.ew b
.W eb
.e g..
.e s e
.e..
.e.
.e
.e
..e.
- a..d.a. a oe seas s
...e..e.
.e. e
.e. d.d e s saae e
.e
.e..c c -
.e..e..o.o.
.r. n. 2..o.
.e..e..o.
.e..o..o..r.:.
..o. e.t.
l a
t l
I. -
t.
. e n n.:. -....,
f
. - c e,..
=
3.. e 3
3 3
oooo C.0.o2 C o o E.
ww 2 C=2 Co
.C w w,.
C o E.
w w w w.E
.O.
.=* www n
e ww o
w....
a
- s..
.....h a
e.
is.
e.
b..
a.
P e.
g.
%d bl W E.
.i.d %.J b.e.E.
b.d.i.#.I
- o. h#.I.
e.8 h.e.I.
40 e e E.
.O bJ w ee.
e g
_f
~
h
-W e
e e-e-e e
e ee e
e e
e e
eeee 9 -9 ee e
e-3
~
e o
e o
o e
e o
e e
o o
o o
e e
e e
e, o
o l
e s
e e
t 0
E 4
4 8
6 0
0 F
S e
8 6
4 8
8 4
0 0
9 0
8 0
t e
i 8
9 i
e 0
I e
0 8
0 0
e f
f 8
0 9
9 9
0 0
9 8
8 9
0 4
0 0
t 6
0 9
6 t
t t
9 0
t 9
8 9
0 9
4 0
t O
l 0
l 1
est e
4 E*
8 N~
e..
evv.s N~
g
\\
\\
- a. en e
e W em 0
A me==
c e
O Q O O vt OO 3O OCOO O O O e r3
- em O O.
e e
e e e e e o e e e
e e e e e e o e e e e c"
e#* Pe
$ w sWe 0 W9 emem % als 8* gp se W9W%
em b f% N em e#%
er9 9MN@
=
e.d
- e. n y
e e er s
== e=== c e.
* er s
e % ess g a 3 e ws o
ea E
oooe
=*
t d e ** E 8 3
0 0
F We C 8
5 I
en er 6
8
(*
ens a.
e a
me e e
e O O O O vs OOOO OO uo O O e e**
O u% em O wm w
.E, w e emis p
e e o e e e a e *
- e e e e o e e o e e a e ce eF e
N e4 en em em em N em ad N **
m At om C ed 9 as o'*
0 w*
- = N N D es en was 3 en e e op om O W4 0 W D $
e X ese an.s PJ.
,3 es O 9 ed O 4
n
> g 3 m
3 he W hp
- 6 O g
hp J w ans **
4 e
see te 5 ed e
3 ed e O = C*
4 a
COOOO at vm r3 C, oO O r3 O O ** **
O W* e O em
& or* C F
em g e e
e e e e e o e e e o e o e e e e e e e o e e.
g e e* g art eh et pio N 88b ed ed e6 eA emN Ad % sh an om est e4 g g-s' e
e ed a g om m en en om N,e es enem o
- een e334 vs e-E.
- 4* O 9 9 de Z l
- 4
.2
+"
eo a
e 4
er **
9 8
e em en 9
4 e8 f.
e 6
en om e.
ese eve me em m en, e6 spe er
- D 8
0 w %8 ha C *i h#
eet 'o.f k '
e e 5.
6 4
e une ses es me ene es.
m r1 O F Im e,
7 2E D
M er 0
e Ok &&
4 4 eef b
- 1.&e e se e
- s e
.s e -
.a weene ga s m e.
=
a azz
_m
,o e
--a e
- e. - ee
,r. a.
la. '.?
e 8
F*
w *n 4
e.
a f
eu' eiS e
e a= sh >
em am en as
.** es e em9 me se
& 4.e W
g Wh
& es,
,4 S,
ed me
==
e5WD eot
==== es O
b 0 tud e$ d e
auf aud esp ed E$[
t om g e= em em se ao e-as me== a=
8 em 6 e ha 4' V
g8 67
==8 b '
e e e o er9 & 6 es ee me ed T
e of de e w w eJ
) em 48 9 eum D eb ee 48 ok b & em e5 ee e e***
e
= = *
- be.
B se tep i ed ed W 4
M 9 d
r e8 e a
g
. )]
am.
3
=
e.d 6
e*
0 m ++
4 u-eua e ed ad d Sh e e g4 eg e
- - t a ea
=*
7 7
==
es
- w =>
- l:
g, e
6 e
=
e, a m I
emi ed ese 4*
ef eJ and enf 6
3 e eg a
w* e er se ee e a go n,
t S
?* 2 7 m
e=.O.
f
? E?
240 s
C
= em e
e
' )
e3 o
6
- o=
e e.
es a
em o
- J &==
em e
=
me e.=
e e
== p
=
e e
em en y
e
- e e
e em.W
- 3; s
e esN er et re &
e.
(
ne.e C=
0 A
er er 2
e es e" e
a e
e 4
r e
e' s
O D
- 0 I.
b8 e9 Gb i
6' e
a ee %
g.
- r so i
1 6
- )
en
& o, r 9
- "4' e S %A me de tJ ee E
'a' eQ J e e g, t
0 7
==
4
?
L 0
e
=8 d me amied
'a=
en8 ed of
==d d and d of gaf d ens ad d ad J ens.d 9
4 e e se e. so w
et et se e ep ee ee eeee e e e e e' m
ein en e
4 p.
a g c. e..m o.m.
es em e e ao 4.en em.m em om e. m em en
>h en e
a g
3 g-oc c *=
c gg w S.
g
- e. O D. 4-ts e
a en om en e n
em om e em een m en
- e. en e.
- o. en e m e. 4 p
9 8
se
-r
,o e., w w. e.
- a:
.e o c.
m.
r-
-e,.,..
e 2,, c s e.
3 e.
2 3: e 8
s w CCEm
- C 332>
C UE m
or t
JCC2 COCC=
8 1
p w to w e e.
v 's e iae we 2
we 3
www e
.s se 6, w a m O.
c 4.
- w r.,
4
=
er
- e. e. e da 8 4 9 em 4 4 W
h 9
4 4
T' 9 g &
0 e
- 4. e..& 48,
- m. &
-.4
- o. &
4 Oe t g e & eg
--w e
wwv=<
we zo u=
we wuoa e., e., o a o O
e e
seemo eemu
- =
em ese=
eme-c s.
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
o o
o
'o e
o o
e o
o e
o e
e e
e e
e o
o e
e o
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
6 e
e e
e e
e e
e e
- g e
e e
e e
e ef*
e see e
e e
63 e
e of e
e e
%f e
a e
e e
e e
0 e
e e
e e
e I
e e
e e
e o
e e
e a
e e
e e
e e
o e
e e
e e
a e
e e
o e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
a e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
o a
e e
e e
e e
e e
e a
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e
==
6 e
e E
e e
e9 e
G8*
e e
2 e
em a e
e 4
s W
\\
06 e
w%
e e
\\
\\
N g
== e6 e
e s
w =.
I o%
e
- e..
e e
as* O w=
c ** er*
reCO w* w*
O O em O se O O O e O O O O es* O es*
is,.e.
w e
& em e
o e e e e e e
?
en %
e a en e rw ee.
== en esae
- e *
- e e e e e e e a e e e e w w ee me N h== wee e w emome9'e ee* *
- N O a== e O
F C9 e = ar a
.=,.
es
==
w y
en ew e,
O e.e
"" e== 3 e e
=e
==
O g
e eOO e me g
e= 3 e es' e
s' e ** 2 e se 3
eoOe 3
e e
e'e e L*
e**e E
eO e
e
==
3 e
e
?
em e e
e r
me O e
Z e
e es' es W
e= er e
s w
as e
e OOC OOO C' O O OO O O e O O e O c c= 0 C O O O O em
(*
end 3 e
g, a e.
e
,s s
e en e
e o e a e a e e e e e e e e e e e e e e * * * * *
- e
- e. u en Or e.E. e* e e
a ree.
tu ew e
N w* 9 e=
A
- *= O z en a.s O 'e in 9
eE O es we em e a= a o er O
e es en e
=
em O w*
e se 3 e O
e e. a e as W eso tes eu e see O e
- e. es em en O sm e er 3 e
.40 e= *m eD Ee y we es, sw e e, O e 3aawe eO e
ao en==
eb te w J
- ear O e
e 3== er w en eC e
ena 3.4 e
e 4
sa te, sea ees O e
e e ser o ens e
e w= c em O w* are OOO we we 3 re O C eA O O O r=> tl, O O O en O O es as 3.e e
e e en 3 ea e
e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e e a e e e e e O ens O t
e
.r e g er. e es.e,.e,e ww4een we em.e e
e g e en e, e,
%.=
==
og we O ge e.r
4e=g e., e e a
==
a' e*
e 2
en en s
- 33e e =
a e
.t es e 8 Le C e we E
- es e33e ene e *** E o
.a e&
4 66 o e 3
w ea e
w D
e apJ 3 e 2
2 e
e 3
e= %9 e er e
e e
E E
e e
es. =
e e
em e
- e e
em a
e e
e en
> e=
se e
eb e=
a e.
em en we== en se en e. en a= en a= esa ao va en er e
e, eM **
e t
- )
w %9
- e
%d ed
%0
%D e
a e.
e e
. O ww O
T 34 e
e es 2 et &
p a=
? Ca a O O O C ees O et O w O nos O ete Q e
e e
e&
0 e
= 2 E 3 3 2.P &.2 eb**.Z m 2 &.E 3
3 as e
Oe e
e i
.e m -
f"
- et er es en er e
e E
i 2 3 4
E 3
E we. wm ey e
s.
e e
?
- m. 2
=e en t
O 2 2 2 2 T E E en t ** 1 en t ** 2 E
e e
,0. 2 e
e z
a=
e er e
e
==
e-
- =
e-
== e= =, en,== em ee. 6.
e e
en amo e
? e es=.,s
- =
s ee e6 O e
e
- s..a.. a.
4.e.>= s em.a >.4 m.#
me e
e m8 **
- e e6 m e
. 'e g
.g gg a= e se g em es a e
e
.a.e on em use as **e ens esa ene ans as.g e= er enn ama es e eg g
e se e
w e e%
t um e
y E.
Z Z K Z E E E d z s E.6 3.e T en 4
g, e e
==
es a
o ae.
e
., e sw e
e i.
?
e a e o e o ew ew aw ew e e
m.
e
- e..&. e en e
se.
=...
w w w w w w w se u. m. u. w. w a er e, is me ee.
e e. a.,
.up
... e... e6 en es,. ek.
e =r e
as w.. ne, w g e
a em m
e es ve s
w.,
o G
..., s. J es. s e e== a s
6 t
y e e
..s a
we.
ea w.
- 3..s s
.s w w d
- ..es.d a
- e e
=
T
== r e
. e 30
=
... e.
o p e. 3 n
3
??
O3724 %e.g ne, e 3 a a
w.
3 es =,
6 e
e e
t=
e m
e a
m*wa e6 h e6 e.v
=.. =a.
m.e m
m es e
o e
c' a
se ao e ee. d. as i
w e
e g
2P e
- a.
- en,
,.. a =$
es he
]
e e
2.?.
.?
?
o e
w
..a EEF
======.2. =2 E X,, se as me2 2 P K N.*.
e e
4 s?
e e.
e e
=
e O en o r
e m.a. =m = e. = = = emas=
p e
e e
e
- e e-e.
.a m
====no e
a se
- a e
a
.r" O.".*3 :? ? ** "3 e.' d
- w m O es C
- e ' *1 k* 7 e l 3 e
e
. ?
C s
e e
e
&a a e*
a.
f'
- e to er ab er es & en s *e et S.WW 3
OOOw ep i
e s
e e
so 3*
i e
o e
O r
e
, tl 8
e
. e a
e
_e s.
e.e
- )
6e e
~
-e..
ew*e e
r~
6,.
-O e fi e.m
- r e. e O O ro o O.
l 9.wa e
8 v-
- u. w.
e.
.r
. c wwwwwwww.
j Jul e
s
-?
e
=
f
.E e
e I
l s
==a
.s w
.a a s
.e w,.4.A a.w.# w.a.ad.a s. ad me J "M
.d.,
e e
=
I l
m e
i i
e e
m e
e O.>~
nns
==
= = =,, = = = = = =,:, =e = O O O O..O
=
nc: a n o u rm,
O e
- e j
c,,,
,a r.:
e e
t
== om e-
==e.
en e. e.
g es, em en w em en en om en en e= a=
- a= m e u.
e a
e e
m.
r
--r
- e. r_
.u 1
e l
0
. e
..e,=
- e. - e i. es a e.. e e.--
O "r?
4
- ?
e27 OS MJScenSe9COOOOO3 e
==
e e
e 6e em are w '! r.*
M 2 em c2
= w w 'eJwwwwwwwwwwwwe e
e C42 C
3 wea e r*
we O
OCCO003OOOOOC003 e
e N
e e
O se %s e Q
we a
w.
e e
A e ea e et m== eg O
en en
- = ao em a= em os en = em er en en es am no we e
'h e
e e
e e en er s.
e&
O e e e ee 8 ee e e e e oe&
F O
e e
m eom en ee s
e e.sA e.d
- b0.e.E b.J.I e.J b.3.w k.# bi b.I e.ul bu8 w ab'8 %.E h.I w b.d e.'E E taf IC
.h e
O
.-3 e
O e
e l
/
o e
I e
I O
.h
,a
-s.
j a
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
e o
o o
o o
a o
t I
f 6
8 8
8 6
8 8
e 6
e B
B e
8
.h e
g 0
4 6
4 8
8 9
8 9
9 9
0 0
e 8
4 4
4 e
t 0
0 8
1 0
4 0
0 5
e f
9 e
t 8
t 1
0 0
A e
8 0
l e
e i
a 8
9 1
f I
I s
8 v
e e
r e
e Oa=.n e
A e
e W
.N a
e W=
0 4
\\
i.a.a t
i e
.m C.a Q.m O M f** tm em OOO e Q em 3 C em Ce e Q
=
a e
e e F
- *. =
e e e e e e e e o e e e e W **.eae P.e e.s
.a e
N a.
e o e e
- " 8.e O..e C C DNN
- @
- N
.C9
- 7. O e
es 8 ee d
e== es
=00
- = sa O N
4 'h e
- a. Oe
==*N.=es
.w w
2 eCO4 e
O t g em 3g a
a i
K em. 3 e
t e
t e
. E O
O O
.8 W
u=
4 I
O a3 3 O O tl'*
O em C M em OQQ im Cl em e OOenem im
.E. v 9
e e o e
e-a g e
oe ea e e o e a e o e e o e s e e m.
e.e o e e
. oe a
- g c.
.a n em o O r e e..a sr
.O.
e=em. O se N
- e. av..* e, w
Ne e en ee a
p 34 e er. O g 4 T =* me N g in 3.4
.o f
-Sn 4 >20 i
eaWe eC 4
.9 43. ses th a e o.n e c e
e en en 3 4
e e
a e
na se
.**C**
C' em."e e C, U C C, C1 "J a. O O em se O vs
- 3 9 E 8
e o a
e
.ew.e.m o e e o e e e e e e e a.
2 e. en e am **
o e e e e
m.e.a.e w 4 r, c e.e o = N N. e 5.,J N N e ea s
.e,-
T **.a eNwe e ** O
=
ee a.
- ee a
f 33e E &
I eJ '5 0
.=
.=
ort 8 led te
.=.*
a sa e
..P e
n t
9 E
e t
4 t
s s**.*
es A s s am W* *2 e
4 se us e.
b.
O s
2 & c' "3 O C' C gW
=,
3.-
9 5
3.? # 7
.is,.
f*
4 e
e 2 2..*
r =.2 e
- e **.e.*
an e.
K
- t 3
9 9
se e e
""..C.
- .r 2
.T.t..
t,
.i. 2.T
.T..T.?..T m.s s.
-r=-..
.,.e....
-e r.
=
xx-rs:
.e.
e e.
, e o e om e
,e s e.
7
.e --.
m v.
.v m..
- u. v.s v
.e.
s s..
,..e
.. =
e,
. m
=:
=.. =.. -
=.=.= r
.. a.
==-
=. =.. =. =.
=r
--r
-=
.r..=.
c.e.
. > - =
,r s
-3 e
e 3 -.,
.f O *.
&C
.s ;
%a' 4 C. C.
i 6
-C f.
ta er N s v3 3
m as c 6
4
- 2,
s
- s..
.. ~,.
,,..e..
O e
..e,.,
a
.a a.
a.
.e.
e.
-.e,,,
e
..e 8
8
*d'*
9"
- 1
---.m.
.C.h.).U..Q.
7)
.C.f.28'*.
.T..".*.O".
e
.C.D.E,.C. Q.
5 J
- c -,..r.
.,... r, m...,
....,-..r,
)
.' J..
m.,.
v m.
c.
L' = "
.O. o u w. -
.C, w.
.&,v a e.
a, DC CC32 T C2 s.
6 C,2 a
n
. v.
- u. v.
v
.e.
.e..s...
.. u.
. e.
e m.
..--.e, ur u u. u..r.
u u. v o. a.
u u..r
- a. v u. em
- u. w..u.m. O a
r a
I 8
88 *=
e se e
O e
e e
e e
p p,
j l
i I
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
e e
e e
o e
e e
e o
o oo e
c o
e 0
4 0
0 e
f 4
e e
8 0
0 0
6 e
6 9
t de 6
0 9
h 8
0 t
9 es e
I 8
9 4
w e
4 e
4 4
La 4
4 4
8 8
4 4
8 9
e t
e e
4 8
0 e
0 0
8 0
e 4
0 t
e e
0 6
4 8
4 e
e 8
8 9
e s
0 e
t 0
9 e
s t
0 0
0 4
4 4
9 e
e 4
0 4
e 0
0 4
8 e
0 0
9 t
e 4
4 8
e e
t 4
6 e
e 0
0 e
9 0
8 e
4 4
0 e
4 1
0 e
0 I
5 4
9 e
e 8
8 0
0 e
e 9
9 I
6 1
9 e
t 8
8 e
e o
0 4
es*
I e
E 0
C5 9 9
e E
l C
1 em 1 5
6 OP f
6 l
a= ea g
e I
se %
e e
- = %
i e
up e*
4 8
W em 0
en, e=
4 1
vi O O esa em C,O 63 O N N O O 8%#
een en a
eo e%
e 8
e e e e o e e e e e e e *
- 6 6
nN 4 s ese e en vs rie O O em o no e c %
NNO
?
e 3
eN g, et g e EO e em 6 em en en w as sp's 8%8 Gro ** #
- O 2O f eaee
=
en e ** 3 0
= = * *
- m sie me ee 3p I
f GO 4 E
I OO8
'F*
g a e== E e I 69 3 > E6*
'3 8
e 3
8 l
.90 6
8 E
WO 9
e as e
e an.,r.
E en m 6
i e
O ens I g
e e,#
as 8 t
4 C O O Q #9 8'e *9 Ce *S
- e N C' O *e W
es me i
ee
.E u e es 4
e o e e e o e e e e e e e e gy e in, e
.r e F e
se em e-we
- w w
en e*
en. O es eg i *
-J es es' C5 '9 s
o 8 ** ed 6
- 9
- r'
.ae s *= 0 ets e ein ess s
- e e== ar 9 em #1 W9 4 m3 9 Os* e4 4 en s0
- a=
> O w9 0mDe
- 2 er* es em 4 see O I ed O e %
e>& 8 4 R em ens 8ee i e4 0
4 3. Ce oJ O ma%
&3 3 a= sm e.# #
I O g
Den af U
- 6 fit t
.* 'J.a e s ("9 6
g Leb9 eed WO g
g
+ es 3 a.s I
e nes w 3 ed 4
4
.3 e
a er= C U em **
- 1 3 O '1 r* C Q O P3 C 9'
& w Q een O e
e
&4 e p e g
e e e o e o e e e e e s e e
& e8e CP G 8" est g.
)*
7 sue 4 4 efR $
M* ed"em 4 OD
- 9 d'D h de 5% 8a N Fld e
t W
F em j
g 4 er as e se en en ens e=
- s s'en ed e w we se e
a g
g) f 2; 3 4 g g e ned E S eaa y e 30
.J 4 47 O e
- J e eaa 2 e ed e' &
6 eJ C e
- b#
D 9 ens g g e 4 W I
D 4
t t
2 2
4
- s=
8 4
e= em 3
3 e
e em 4
4 e
h a=
4 t
8 9
4 e4eneA
- efe eA e 9 es*
E4 04 2
9 g
=* ?
e O
- 1*
mA C t
g e
e e
s as.d
- 2. O O Cd G O
e
&=- p
.J
- J6=
f s
@ C' Gs e
e 4
4 g, aus =d P lll" XFE E
3 3 ed e
g e# 4e w W
1 e
t O
T 3
g W
4 T T 3" E T T
8 g
- 4. C e
a 1
v v.s w===**w
=
mo e
g 0
e em.
.se se ad ad eJ est t
6 6
esv. s =
.h*
en G 4 'e 1 89 e 4 g,,
g es e
g e
e g e s e enn es men
- 2. s*e e*m I E Z z '.t 2" -
o w
g gg t
~ t us g
s on e e e o e e 0
- cy e
== 6 I
I es 4 9 se & 9 es e 4 es L/ e J h4 e J W e me se g et ed
- m e4 4 4 as 4
0 ef*g (
e ens. g e om e W a=
I 4 is w-e e'
em
,p
, m 4,
to 6 as g me g g
.f 6
e a.e J 6
8
. e es ed ad ed es s
- e e
" e m> >
- * )e )E*.
j
@ g e
a
- El d
Y f.
L L 1 i
e e
w *
- en em a.
I t
I e
i 4
7
=
- en e ' = en s
e
- F **
s' 3
". * ?*
c 8
e
.r. o.
a s
e e
e e
====,=ee l
==
,4 e
g am* mo e.
= en en e em e.3 g
M '.
88 I*I e
9 d
a r4
- u *b e.
e g
j 6
m e
b e
e P
e
, vw&L m
g e
e e
6 8
e 6
6 e
1 e
s e
- 1 w e T
n*t t Pb *w
$ W
- f 6
4 m O 8 P
&L
- a
- 6 e e e
i **
Q$
$ vg 3
- 44YU 4
4 9
m e eW8 e
e 0
e i
a t
e ed as = es ed
+
.at s es ed eds ad es w 0
$ e e
de 4 ** 4 et
.S et 4 W 4 es e es de 4 4 e a
4 en om en se >
en e.
aun en en e, m a se 3
6 e e
e t'. e* n* o.s.3. mi.
e'"n e. a. > w as n'o e.
e,'
C 3 C L3 ft f*
- 9
') 0 0
4 e
am m
m m es g
g e
9 S O 4
>*. w T
- e. E f*
6 e
a s
8.
6 +
e g
e O
6 3
0 e
t"
- I
- 2 se e'
". C elO O F w
"J 2 ea B
h l
L f* ew t
e d'3 y e
- wp p 6 a
e.e w u W W e F
e# 4 --
9 4
9 0
A e 9 e & en et t t 0 0 4 &
C 9 & 5 A
s O
4 6.
=
e s
.3 en en en we v 9
- m. em ao e. a sg g
> enw e
ee I
4,P 48 had E Q 4' 4 e bd bd kJ E bI I N l
4 9
eW et me f*
e W 4 W eer em e sus 13 O
9 8e l
I e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
o e/
(.
O e
e e
e l t 3
. m r
o o
o o
o o
o o go
=
'.2 l
.- ~
-w l
l I
W-y-
e
=
o.
=.
q c
w
--a.
~~.
w-
=
-~
=
no
..=.
1
..=
. -x.-
i a
.r
-o x
s eu L
-o.
1
-o-
...~
<=-~~
t.
so -
3-
- v..
>>...a
=-
=-
o
,-o 1
s
=
. 32 oc..
-=
-c 7
3 'e#
c.
T.r t
4O
)
8 c
e 2.
r C.
.==
em g
af..
g
- as.
\\
w" I
l
. > c l.
=
r j
}
- - 5.:
ve.
..W..
.d
==
1
.I O
e ad O
't 4
5 O
e e
e e
e e
e g
,.f 4
e o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o e
e o
o o
o o
o O.
l l
0 0
i e
B
=e 9
9 9
e e
3 8
J 0
e 8
8 i
0 9
i !*
d Q 2
0 9
O **
0 0
we+1 0
6 em.%.
0 0
i u, em j
e e
et e
t c o o C,
- c are M C e f'3 OO L3 O O O es* O te em ers O a es, e
e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e o e e e e o e e e e en es e s se i Neee O e @ **
- e4 em es S
- p n sa*=ergaus FO g es e $
ed N Gb e N
M
- *
- N ee e
en g em 3g em Z
eQQ f en es
==
a 4 s.9 0== E t O
4 4
r ese o e
e I
- m e-e S
end E 9
4 a
es em 0
4 OOOC OOO e* D et em O OO Oco o o O o ers o og gv g as e
o e o e e e e e e # e e e e e a e e e e e e e
ese o g.
eg e
- = <
- f* c.
e e em art
-)
e j
g emO eP G me est $
em um 3 em om e em e e em j
- f F ** me N 4 ene 0 0 em O are 4 er 38 I
dO
- 4en 8 D E $
3 em e W 8D gg g
3 O ena end O 9
e a een 3 en 9
e a a 0 een G 9
e O '3 O O e er* na O O O O r
C. C
- 3 O n
- == O em O esem
& o9 C e se 4
e *
- e e o e e e e e 4 8 e e e e e 2
em 3 e og g As ed S e6
% ed e *$ @
ef
("a gy,e ah g C em S e4 =#
e e
3 s et 3
- =N 8%s ed P.
=a
- As een 4 33g
- =
en om m==
d 9
e,* O $
A 9 ese T 0 K
2 se e
e e
. em 0
e 6 8=
0 W
em es*
69 e4 @ en a 4
==*8' W9 C e
4
- e. 3,, m e
- m. m e
e Ok 9
Cf C
OCOO P
W eJ %s# 4J W %f 3 m.
e ao r2
- = r
==
Z" "" 2 2
- s m aos one e' tu u*
C3 e
e, ew e
e e
eeee L'
ee on 39 emwe A t &4a&&
E e
==
==
w
==
2 22222 er a
em
- 7, em r
=
2:TE
.a gC 6
e.
e en m
en amo em em em
== es==== es en 4 e6 0
s 4
J ee ed W e
e e
ne se 4
e e e se ewem as a se en =
x - - -.
e, em j g ag
=I#.id e 8 m dd en eh ein em em se enen e
we me em em se d
e O $
T $
I EIIE 4
ee a
e.
e q
.en ta
- d. ed. as W=e em.ed.ed e
e en e e e e
o e e e g
jy yyyyyy e ** e. e ov kJ u#vW e === 6 e g e
e ee e
=
F1 g es e e ee a
w==
e== ar e
%mwama a
n.
as m % w n.
e aew a 3
e*
e me ad es d d 3
ed.# s na. es a.
e G I
-=0o d
6 n-t ed. = v O
es==
en a en w ms m.3 h.s ee4 ue es es an na e
m 3 = := = 3 ;,d e
e O
m m C
im maa m
==
w>
4 8
w w
v.
u a e.
e ee e eee ee J
m**
me.s ad -# s ed e
e
- n. en.
e a
es ar me a'
e p
3
= =
C
==
eeF 2 2* 2 w
yyg rya
== ee **
N a,
.c. se 2. eQOe O
. C g
e w
a= em aj
=
en a. a= e.
ie
== est e
a
="
GC F
d
.s O 3 ".' T e e
.* s3 s3 i,p to a e
B
==
CCC w
- e. es ee en is.s m e
4 3
e er 1
=
m at 6 **
e 8
e.,
em se e e e a er a 0
0
-e e
e e
e.a 9
u e em ae as t
r,.
e
==
- ==*C T
Ea a se p. as e e M
K
=
69 e a g.
en e es C e v
w S e 4f 9
- 8" 6a ti e et fe" V f*
2y e et g ayc 9
5 W
w 4
4 4
1 v
e 0
e ad as.e d e
e ed==
E J ed d #.a af a ed eJ s
.s s a ed ad ad,
e e
er
== se e e g,
ee 3
-s e **
- es e og m e. e.
e 7
8==.se e e e e e e. e.,e o
e
e=
e
====e===m.
en =
9 8
C "J C' a**
.e,
- e. e. en = e
- e O **
C. m. e*n* =4.
O O S.
e"> se G
8 em m
= en eme m O2 e"m er me3 O O M 3 O ee
- === su =
4 en as en es.
o e
f
==
m en esee o.
4 e
==
ene e6 C
e
= a eeo% O *3
.?
em
..*m e.
t~*sa o n n r ens ein 0
e e
n **
?
r3 e
r O
t' e,,
e,.
,, v. eed sen =
em
(
=QGDE en ME O' C 1 4
8 C
C C T en O
C F e.
c",
COOOOOE e
e c
uwse 6
w 3.d
- =
a=
w w w w ".3 v'd w m."
4 4
8h 4 e Xe hm 0 E es P.
e $ e e 2 ee m
uv3 N
wwwwww3 t
he 4 e3
- e e g g g 4 g g 4
8 O
en en e w
- ")
== eu O
ta m em e* e et om e er en en a un eum o en en en en e S
h
%d%de 2
%0 e Q U LO %e %0 m Me YMe Q U U Q 6,0 ed e 0
I ee&Q
= %D eeee&
ah ee&
es e e e og e &
L I
L o
o o
o o
o-o o-o o
o o
o o
o e
o e
e o oo o
(
o o
0 8
8 8
4 8
9 8
0 8
I f
8 9
0 8
8 e
S 9
8 4
0 I
e 9
h 0
g ed 3
as t
0 b*
e 8
0 e
8 a
e 8
9 8
9 4
a 4
8 e
t 9
9 9
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 s
0 6
4 i
i e
4 4
0 t
t 9
8 1
0 e
d 0
0 I
e D
4 6
4 e
4 4
1 0
4 4
4 4
8 a
e s
I i
s e
f 8
i e
I e
8 e
4 e
f*
t 0
e 6
9 4
A I
e es*
e l
2 3
4
.4 g
P's sh 6
0 5
4 oa e
0 0
.\\
es een 9
9 ee rs a
ha==
g g
\\
sg i
- e. em a
e wt w=e w* em O r9 T
C r' O O OO OOOOO OOO q en g
e, em 9
e e ele e o e e e e e e e e o e e e e o e e en,, e-g y
== e s s.,s we e
=e->
Mwe W* en we N em M N D em N9 4Ne ag g
(D 2O 4 et Er $
em
==
d en gus e em ma y
see eg g s e
gC g g me
==
0 ea 3 6 em e"
we Z
- OO9 om em g en em i
L*
t om E9
==
T e
S.
3 e
8 em 8 49 1 e
==
3 a
E em o e
e F
m #4 e
e F
w O g
3 m2 0
0 r
en er e
C
- u. 3 9
w as e e
a O O em f* O O O O e em C OO O O w* em en OOO w
as =
Ew e
e*
- e
- e e e e o e *
- e e e e e e e e e e gw
,3 em em O '
t K e
w N **
- N e*****
N es en em O" 4== efe 9 eft e" N N
e.
%, O *
- a L.
l O se we 3 e= w t et em O an g e a=
em O er*
4 es 3e g me en. O es g
g e.
j
- F we ses N p ene O 4 u-m
- es j
.d O
== %
9 an Xe e 2 e4 en.e ce i
e-D ** GF enA #
80 0
og a p
et, m
C I
W 43 aos see O g
g 3 as er w &,
J 3 w nea 6 memes 3e 0
4 en e o is.d M e
e em na O em W* e5 O O w* w* O OO f'1 O ** em w=
0OO
.a e, aw i
ek ese O g en e
o e e e o e a e o e e e e e o e e e e e e e,s O,e M e
P
= e e se a em e= e
- 8"***O es em
'me * ** O af*
e w
a ee g g e
as my g aeg es se pt ye em 8nd vi Q g,
y
.e g e
- h em 4 Os 34 g
g y
g
'" 4 4 W f' 4 g D es.
6 3
8 sh E8 d
<*4.
g
- 4 4 em 0
W
.D.
g a e
e
=
.s ay 6
6 g
g g
ehem 0
9 se es I
tre a
e 6
"e"
- C *O
- WS
- e. m.
ase n e
g om g
e
+O e
a ee a
g www e
f* 4 4
5 a:
ee ed OOO tas w OO ce 2
7 6
6
== w t=e es 2
e er &
a e e" 2:
ew & &
em 3 2 Mr e
e P
t e
3 3 m.
+++
ed ee 2
4 9
e
- =
'9***
s' 22E
==
- g g
c t-e t
O em
- 2TT se== en om 7Y g
eb G g
3 Q
F*
44 kJ s'4 es ao >
s't as em as.
g gg, g g
eh b e
t u
av t -
ed.d ed se en en ed.se eh e
g h b
*
um me==
ee gg g
m 9
T* g en n84 **
- es ab gr ano es en se es, es*
eg 4
- D e
.Z F2 T %Z e
.d as es ZZ ee e,
g g
me g es aos g
se se sus g
e se #
4 e e e w,
Wbw 4 e y
e
- h e
en d ed W euP het 7
e e se W %#
g 6 * * *
- 5 ep
= 48 e 84 ed ed am.W en ee g een e en e e w
- "e g
6 eb ab E se, o,,
ed wI e
A
.4 d ad g
4
- 1 4
C es==
- e. d.ed ad.
1a=
333 e.d d te# ed g e 6
- t e:
6 em*
- m g
e 9
- " f e=
- e I E* 3 tb Eu e 37 e
e F
KE 6 e6 %
se at e6 m g
9 i
es 4-m ad esp eJ w
g 6
3 e
3 ms e-w tes b.
a e a es 3
ed we e
a 7
m E ?
C ** 2 E21 e,,g EF e
a te e
en es e
es g
==.=e
5 4
3
- 't 33 o L*
4
== me e
t me e
e.
a.
,,i
= u.
em en es g
om en L* iL*
e ** ?
g e
4 k
E"'" C k3 i
e
+.
ee
&CO and on s y
- 1 et GB 6k 44 86
- e.
.m a
& F g
6 e
e g
w 8
4 4
E
?
g 4
e e w
4.
2 k
A g
2 g
.e g on Ce 4 %f G e P 3 6
m as s*
2 mee f3 ha m.,
e ewe eae se e og w K
ewC es e C3 g g O
9 E
g e.
9 e
t g
m h
h ddd dedd N
dd &&
d d e
d d & d e.
2 4de e
e ese w
neen v
se==
g
==e.
3 e==.,
3 j
en a= e.
en en a-=
ume. en =
me m en enen oC m,m se, es em e
=
Oo
- e..e.s
- o..o O.
- e. c w
.O c.3 n. a.
.C. e..e, c
O o
g i
- e.
. a.
e O
e a.
i g
g 88b E'
etw 4
5 y
ep
?
=9 eddenn
(*
f hdend to en em '
C Q d".
?
O 8") Ce g
W ehe b
(
S-and es#
A e
e e
?
C P
M O
.'S C a.
e*
g er e
0 em O E a=
"l*
C O E se Q
DOOf
=
0K s
6 m'
O C O F a=
- OOE g
m.
4 e
en w 3 e.
(2 W w 3 ud r*
www3
- e w3 e
e.# w w 3 us em ww3 m.
Q Sh e
0 0
em 8 2e em 4 8 2 og om 4 9 e d
- =
0 2 858 0 0 e 2 A5 4
- e. 8 2 O
g 4
8 4
em en e i.s e.#
- =e w
O
- es. em e a
em o en
=====e w
44 g
g 6
8 kP e O bd v e Q w he w eE we W w w es O w w as
==
(L9 9
9 4 45 O ef W & O e4e&
= db 8 = e5 &O e et gb O
g g
e e
o e
o e
e o
e e
o e
e e
o e
o e
e e
e e
e e
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - ' - - - ~ - - ~ ~
~
O o
0 0
0 0
0 e
0 0
6 4
4 e
e e
e-g g
e e
f 0
4 8
S E
Ih N
e i
g I
e 6
e g
e w
9 0
e 8
9 6
9 0
e e
f 8
0 9
0 9
8 e
e 4
9 9
e s
?
e f
- e 8
8 9
6 8
f f
e B
4 e
e o
e i
e e
f e
0 8
8 e
e e
0 8
i e
0 9
9 e
e 6
9 9'
s t
4 e=
0 t
?
6 e
O **
4 9
= = *
- 9 e
w-N s'ee em
,e ee. O. O.
o* O en O to C. O O e9 S
C. om e em s
O e O ar*
ef* er* O em
~
e e e e e e e e
\\
s e.,e
...e O s.e e
e e e o e e
ees
, s m..
e. e-
~~
Coco a
=,
~e
, y re e P
2C e es e e
==
== N
- e
- ** em N e
O A a= ma.
,N a
se e.2 e #J G g V
p. 3e e
es e
e-m*
o*
e IJ e em T e
=
2 a
e F
- O.
e e
1
,r 0
e
'J e o=
c e
e C O f"' O O C' emOOOOOOOe OOOO OQe o
yu oe e
e e e e s e e e e o e a e e e e e e e e e e e e
e.e o e' 4 K e
N ef'
- A er" 0
o
- =
e em ce.
e se en e 4
we 3 en we
==
p me ee m
=
w O se ee3e e-
- 2 em es. s's e en* O 0 as J em *=
0 m20 3 es a u e eO e
J. 9 w me e.4 9
0 4=
e f
9
=, eras o e
e o en m's O c wt s' f2 e3 e9 O are O s3 O O "J am O we en e w=
em
- e ne a est C.
3 4 9
e e e e e a e e e o e e e e e o e e e e o e e
e.
r.
g e en e e.==
em en e9 **
em em = em w w *e N N e* ei. N em N see e.o
=
e E an.e esas e e
e-**
en ir a; es e e=
es e
A = en en e
,e
==
a 3 :p s N
==
e
- 6 0 JO e P
G ena 1 0
== 3 ee t
7 e
e m me e
e e
em e
e a
w e
e
= e en e* en en en en we no ea
- e. e= e.
e.
e
- T e
a www www e
e a a e
is, as is, Q O O O C d's e a rg l
7
?=
e e
w e in, w p
.eh&
22NFF2P2 s
I ma em e.
w ne==.a C
e e
m*
- e en e e en eeeee e
ta r4 e
6 22P e'
223 e
re e'
== me me
- A TTTETTTE
== ew we e
.o wa e
e e=
= e== em se e= om e
s6 e
e
=**
c
=
g w s se %e s.d.a.e en *
- O e,
w a
e e-e.==a=.
4..e se e.e * *e se.
e***
g ge
= e e.*
4
.e
,6,e ew wi m es e we m
- a. a. e.
e.
.i.
e.4 a.a E3E22ZTZ e
e e.
e 4 w.a.
P.
.z.
e e..
e t
= e 6., ww v*
v v v u n.e W W u e no g w
e e e e e e a e www f
g en s, e e e e a em se e
- i. % e
.e e eeg e e et at s
a $ i.
o e
e me e a e N
- m 4 n. a.
4 m.
e e *> e a ea e
a a w a a a.
C s
t 61 4 5.
e s*
d ed ad. is.4 e.f.e. a.d..e.d c' ens 3?
4 4
o e
m'*3 3; I
e a
- a a.
e, o
=e 2
?*3TTT se m e
e e
av a
n
.an d eo e
s wmm 6 in
- m.
r d et en
.a 0
e en e e s
eu.* eaa.ea to e se se e
e F i* ?
J
?7FT=FFF 2ZT r
g
?.
e s
1".
J C.
me
=e ae== = ** es== es c *;' e e
e me ae==
f.
en e. en en om em m. om os me ese ses a
e e
$66 4
793*TTS3 e.
c,* - C. s. o.e. e
- 4. t.*..il e 2 e
e e e o e
e e
w au e,
e 4
a e - se e e w en e
..e a
e e
se 4
e T
e 8 e e.
e
,>**e a
4.
e= *u r ea
- = a evr e L a?
n*
e e e e. e e r go a.
gCe e,
e a
e e 6, s e e e se O
- se se e *
- a4 w rs ewa
+
f i
F s
e e
e
.en 8
e as a ad as ed 4
w' r'
as J ed ed ad es =# ed d ad ad ad a, w of ss se
.s e
e
.s se e w a se e,.a ee g e e e e e *e e e eeee 4
e es ao m en en as an em**om en om e.m en om ao en ens e= en en a= em m se es e
e 9
s'e c *> D C.
C t' O O O t.e ma C. omO O.
CCC3 C c, c
=J e
- e. en en e f
omem se enen se e en e e
e o e e.
- a. e. e.
,e e.
t 6
C "et
- .rT 1m e-?
??
e C C C feOOOJE a
CCCE l
e
- t. m an -
8" e
a=
to e* ee S e' 489 c.3 O' ou as 49
%e w e..
.,a y
p.
t e
O e f*
e c ci s*.
e.
c
==
6 e
e O e O E e-A e
e a
www3a O
wp en Cg8 e
C e.
wwouuWww3 www3 e.
w 3..
o w
C.
6 e
e e 3 2 e6 ein 4 2 en e a 6 e e e 4 e E es e 9 E ew e 2 ei A
4
.e 9
0 est meen om a w f'"
ao e ese me se en en en en em en e og ae > e e
en eq C
em W 4# kJ 4 he b.P e W W W w W bI 4.i w e haf W W e weC Q
N O
e e se er 46 L$
e&
a e e e es e e GT &
eeeb ag g g gg a
D o
e e
o e
e e
e e
e e
o e
e o
e e
o e
e g
=_
l
<'a
f ~ * ' '
O 4
0 0
0 0
e e
e s
O e
g Gi O O
O C
O 4
i
u
l
.e I.
.i e.
c, i
no
.. s
- o. o. r.,.
- n. o. a.. ~. ~. ~.
e w-
-~oo.
.,~...
==.
~~
.n. r.
- a,.
~
=
-~
..r, o
so
.e s a -
. co
<=
-=
. -z.
r oo a
o
,u e-x..
~
s
=
ao r
s i
- c. o. o. o.
c.o. c.,. o. ~. ~. ~.
o
-r
.e e -
o w
=~
e s-a
=w
.,-e,
-o=
..o..-
==
.o.
o-m
~
eea..
~
.,e.. w ~-
.r. s..
-on o
====~
~...... a
===w o
so -.
se u w w o
=.o s. a
- o. n. e..
.: n. e. c. o. o.,.,
~~=
.c.
=
".P
..e.e
.v...
sa 6. e,p. c.,., e p
& M o.
m er.
I
= ma e e
I*
E
' er S
fa 8
r mmy
-3 E**
O
.g d
U GC w
I
-E D
. F I
2 i
g
=a 7 e c-
.- 6 g o e s,2 r,
.4.
do 3*
ga v r p p 3.y g'
E &.e
?"
4 1
.e g se.a,
3a
- 4 e* e e.
oe
.T..=..?. ?..g r.
E
.E f ww E
. a. a.g a y a
2 1
- a..
bo
.M
- a. a g g e.g een, e, n T
2.*
T**;37 F.
s,.
c I #%
a.
. en, w e J %er kJ n d h.e
=
- I
=.*
a.
..e g og W
g.
e n.
4.-a u,
4..
e e,,
g g y
...w.w
.w
- u....,....
e
,~
r l
l FF
?
M.. ;..E..s..;.
l l
1.;.a,s a..:,
+
.n
?.
~
=
v.
.s e.
.g
. -a.
e ss
-c
.w o
...w,
. w o.i sw..
,e
... w..
,s oc
~~os oeessooe
- u.,.
i.
. e c3
,....,J.,.
l M
for 3Foefor-9 w w 3..
- w w J w w $. r.s g
i -...
l i.
g
. e
--.v w w. o.
wwwwwwg
% i l"
..o
.M,*
g,
.A 1* -
e e
e e
e e
e
- es p e e
O e
O
- O e G -"
O2
-^ -
e4
.-b a
M
[
8 e
0 0
W* -
'a
- *1e f *t O
sen g
4
,I 1
W 4
0
- . = ~ ~
8 4
b 8
9 e
0 e
6 0
4 e
1 4
9 0
8 t
h 9
e
\\
n e
i 0
e 0
0 0
e 4
4 0
e 8
9 0
0 t
e 0
E I
6 4
4 0
4 0
9 4
4 0
0 4
9 en 0
0 2
0 0
OP G
e
- er.
8 4
ma %
6 6
W*
8 0
ans **
0 e.
E %
8 e e 2
e#w me g s e4 e an O
zO g aseee ew
$ em 3g es 8'
E QOOe s l"3l" E
-O e
E we a
O
- 82 0
g W
es en 3
g m.
EW
$ las t e me o se e ar ec W
- Q m 4g.me em e e O sie ese g
.g g n Wo O ePD
$3 3g f
4 2 et seeme awap JO n= %
l 3, g g DMWWF
$Q g
J W tes ans O g
g
- 8 3 ed 9
e en et O ene O 9
eO 6 en O O w s e E
ee 0 4 en g o'n 8
8,o a 9 8=
- *% ses 4 33g ept
- 8 0 @Og
- W 9W E4 em O
f 4 m 3
E 2
0 0
I e
l w
g
-O 8
e ea g
g 3
Sw 3
g OE 9
e 1
4 0
- e 0
hO 3
g Eh 8
e 4
e "s"e 8
E 8 e
4 Of 2
"=
=
0
== s 4
se p 9 489 & 0 18* ** t t ** 1r 4 4 #W $
4
- e 0
a e 6
Oe 0
e 0
6 9
e 4
3 1
0 0
4 e
0 0
0 8
9 9
0 0
een g C em O4 D
0 WG8 I ai w,
k l
s@*
I,
\\
..~ ;
I i
i 0
l 1 ;p, 1
l O
6 -
i.
el I
a a o
o o
l T l
i The following comments are in response to Question No. 4
~
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT The NMS Branch depends on several administ-rative support units that are external to the Branch, but also has several internal functions which contribute to the overall operation.
The main internal support group unit is the Licensing Assistance Section.
This group was organized in April 1988 with Doris Foster as Chief. Several functions are handled by the Licensing Assistance Section (LAS), including:
processing and docketing of incoming mail.
preparation of licensing actions for reviews by the technical staff.
typing of certain high priority work, such as escalated enforcement actions, preliminary notifications, urgent inspection reports, and special projects.
filing, maintenance and retrieval of docket files.
clerical effort involved with the documentation of inspections, inquiries, etc.
implementation of the materials " returned mail" procedure.
preparation for signature of amendments not requiring technical reviews.
Administrative services provided by groups outside of the Branch include travel, typing of all licensing and routine inspection documentation, inspection tracking system support and computer data entry contract support.
The groups that provide ~ administrative support typically perform their functions in a timely manner. However, timeliness is a function of workload and availability of personnel.
For example, in the processing of incoming mail received by NMSB, it has typically taken an average of three days for the mail to be available for Fees or for the' reviewer to evaluate.
Recently, the average has gone up to four days because of illnesses to LAS staff members and because of the beginning,of year concentration of holidays.
The Word Processing Center (WPC) types essentially all licenses and does the bulk of routine inspection documentation typing.
The WPC turnaround time is generally between two and three days, which is acceptable.
This is a sig-afffcant improvement from past experience, which, at times, tended to run 10 or more days, particularly for routine inspection documentation.
e
Question No. 4 2
Materials docket filing continues to be done in a meticulous and timely manner.
Documents generally are filed on a daily basis.
Unfiled materials are kept in readily accessible areas so that they are always available.
The Computer Assistant in DRMA inputs inspection data for the RITS Inspection Tracking System for DRSS. We have experienced difficulty in the past with the accuracy of information in the system.
For example, reports that had been issued still showed as overdue and inspections that had been performed did not show up at all.
In addition, occasional data entry errors result in inaccurate summary data, such as average time to issue inspection documentation. The Computer Assistant has instituted procedures that allow NMSB to review and correct the weekly report before it is published.
Lack of backup support for the Computer Assistant is an occasional problem, resulting in delays in data entry, but this problem impacts only the availability of current statistics or tracking information, In the latter part of 1988 NMSB began utilizing a DRMA computer contractor for routine data entry to the LTS and to the Region I inspection tracking system.
For the first few months there was considerable turnover in that staff and they were of little help to the Branch. Within the last few months, however the contractor's staff has become more stable and they have become a great asset and have reduced the workload of the Branch.
While there have been a number of improvements in the administrative elements in DRMA and the Branch, a number of both direct and support activities presently are being performed by other than the appropriate staff member.
Since the reorganization that resulted in establishment of the LAS and,selec-tion e' Ms. Foster as the Sectio'n Chief, the Licensing Asd ctant position has remained vacant, pending demonstration to the Regional Administrator that the position is needed.
In the meantime, the duties originally performed by the Licensing Assistant l
(such as implementation of the returned mail procedure, the purging of erroneous information from the computer data base, and the preparation of simple licensing actions) are being performed by other members of the staff, including the Processing Assistants, Reference Assistant, LAS Section Chief or members of the technical staff.
Similarly, some tasks normally done by members of the LAS, such as the preparation of inspection documentation for mailing, still must be done by a member of the technical staff because of the admin-1strative staff's involvement with other work.
9 O
j
The following comments are in response to Question No. 5.
INTERACTIONS WITH HEADQUATERS USEFULNESS OF CONFERENCE CALLS Monthly teleconferences between NMSS and the regional offices provide a forum for the sharing of information that is important to all of the participants. However, our current teleconferencing practices do not always result in the exchange of high quality information.
We believe that the calls too often involve region-specific problems and run too long. We suggest that the agenda be restricted to items that are generic, and be constrained to about one hour.
NMSS should assure that topics which relate to a region-speciflc rroblem or concern are resolved separate from the teleconference.
Each topic that is discussed should be resolved or assigned for resolution, with a due date as necessary.
Following, a report of the teleconference should be prepared and distributed. Agreed upon assignments snould be regarded as Action Items and handled accordingly.
LICENSING WORKSHOP The Licensing and Inspection Workshop held in Atlanta on January 10-11, 1989, was well done.
However, the real worth of the effort will only be realized when planned actions are completed.
Relative to this effort, we believe that it is not in the best interest of the agency to invite representatives from the Departments of the Air Force and Navy to attend the entire conference.
Rather, these licensees should be inviteo to make specific presentations and participate in selected discussions that directly concern their respective programs.
Their presence for the entire duration of the conference may prevent open discussion and the ready exchange of information, some of which may be predecisional, internal, or investigative in nature.
In the future.
participation by such NRC licensees in affairs that are clearly internal to the NRC should be carefully considered.
One of the benefits commonly expressed relative to the workshop was the
~
opportunity to compare _ approaches and problem solutions with other regions. We believe that such benefit could be further enhanced by selective and discrete exchanges of personnel (including inspection,
4 Question No. 5 2
4 licensing and management personnel) among the regions and HQ. We believe that such exchanges should be of short duration and directed toward specific areas of interest or concern INSPECTION ACCOMPANIMENTS Recent interviews with several of our inspectors and license reviewers indicate inspection accompaniments may be useful in maintaining HQ personnel cognizant of regional techniques and protocols, and the scope and type of licensed programs that the regions regulate.
However, the inspection personnel usually view such accompaniments as a one-way exchange, and are sometimes led to believe that their performance is being critically evaluated.
In such cases, the inspector tends to be uncomfortable with the accompanying HQ personnel.
Since accompaniments l.
are not performed to critique the performance of the individual inspector, the actual purpose of the exercise should be explained by the accompanying personnel.
Several inspectors voiced the opinion, that, when interviewed by members of the National Program Review Team, the emphasis appeared to be too narrowly focused on the administrative, documentat' ion, and production aspects of their job, as opposed to inquiries directed toward examples of how the inspector views and exercises responsibility for public health and safety. We recommend that the statistical and production aspects of National Program Review be reserved for management interface.
TELEPHONE CALLS ON CASE REVIEWS AND j
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED ON A DAY-TO-DAY BASIS We are generally pleased with the assistance provided by Steve Baggett, and recognize that the timeliness problems associated with Source and Device reviews is largely a function of resources available. He has, however, been very prompt in responding to questions from the staff and usually handles specific information requests within 24 to 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />.
Similarly, emergency requests for guidance in the medical area have been handled promptly and the information provided has been useful.
Problem areas include the generally long delays by NMSS in responding to written TARS and the lack of feedback on the quality of licenses or inspection reports issued by the Region.
STANDARD REVIEW GUIDES / REGULATORY G'JIDES/ POLICY AND GUIDANCE DIRECTIVES /
SOURCE AND DEVICE CATALOG We are generally pleased with the quality of information published for licensing and regulatory guidance, but note that certain Reg Guides should be considered for technical revision.
1 We often receive comments from licensees indicating that they have difficulty in understanding the applicable Reg Guide. While some of this 4
Question No. 5 3
difficulty may be a function of the licensee's limited knowledge, the NRC should assure that published guidance documents exhibit clarity, conciseness and uniformity.
Utilization of the Source and Device Catalog could be enhanced by a better indexing system. Currently, we file the material alphabetically according to manufacturer. However, such a system has limited usefulness as the manufacturing concerns change in name and ownership.
The use and adherence to Policy and Guidance Directives could be enhanced significantly by better organization and document control. We recommend that alternatives to the existing system be considered, including:
(1) Reorganizing and promulgating the' existing guidance documents in a NMSS Manual; and, (2)
Incorporating Policy and Guidance Directives in a database that is accessible by computer.
Use of a computer-accessible data file for this material would also permit timely revision of the documents.
INSPECTOR AND LICENSE REVIEWER TRAINING We continue to have difficulty in scheduling Nuclear Materials Training courses that are required for personnel qualification.
Too often the courses are not available or are offered sporadically.
For example, while teletherapy 's now considered as a Priority 1 program, we have very few personnel with sufficient training and experience to perform critical reviews, and a training program has not yet been established to fulfill this need.
DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION It has been observed that information may be distributed to licensees
.before it is available in the regional offices.
The latest example includes NUREG/BR-0133, Working Safely With Nuclear Gauges. Our inspectors had inquiries concerning this document before they even knew it existed. We recognize that information distribution is usually accomplished via contracted services.
If it is not possible to supply advance information to the regions, then including the regional offices on the contractor's mailing list would seem appropriate. We have noted a concerted effort to provide Information Notices to the regions prior to y
publication, an effort that is appreciated.
MULTI-REGIONAL INSPECTIONS Certain licensee types, principally large radiography companies, may maintain a corporate office in one NRC region and have several field offices and places of use in other NRC regions.
Usually, the license is administered by the. region in which the corporate office is located.
Examples include, U. S. Testing (Region V), Industrial NDT (Region II),
l Question No-. 5 4
Magnaflux (Region III), and PSI-Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory (Region I).
In these cases,, the NRC regional offices may not be aware of the fact that a radiography field office is established in their jurisdiction.
Consequently, these licensed activities may not be inspected.
Region I was not aware of Industrial NDT field operation in Mexico, Maine until Region II requested our assistance in following up on a source disconnect.
We recommend that an effort-be made to identify the location of such field offices, and that a system of regional assist inspections, similar I
to that employed for inspecting Navy and Air Force licensed activities, be established.
/
4 m
Y 1
-=
p 1
The following comments are in response to Question No 6 REGIONAL INITIATIVES DURING FY88 AND FY89 THROUGH FE8RUARY 28,1989 1.
Implemented the " Recommendations for Action" contained in Sections 2.5 and 5.6 of the " National Program Review Report" dated September 29, 1988, Region I routinely monitored the status of completion of inspections a.
of high priority licensees and began using the " official field note formats" in all inspections.
The region has been able to accomplish inspections, even in the lower priorities, in a timely manner and has not had to resort to the optional use of the telephone contact procedure.
b.
With one exception (an inspector who became pregnant and concentrated on licensing), all inspectors were accompanied on inspections at least once by their Section Chief during FY88. That practice has continued during FY89 with each Section Chief accompanying at least two inspectors thus far (a total of 11).
It is our intent that each inspector will be accompanied during FY89.
2.
Aggressively pursued qualification (by an oral board) of all materials i n spec to rs.
The status of each technical member of the Branch is shown in the attachments.
Thus far in FY89, seven inspectors have met (and passed) oral boards, and nine more are expected to meet oral boards before the end of FY89.
The additional flexibility that will result from this progress is expected to enable the region to meet or exceed its inspection goals for the FY.
3.
Aggressively pursued qualification (in accordance with the attached program outline) of all materials license reviewers.' This two phase process is well underway, and nine reviewers have completed at least one of the steps and been authorized by the Regional Administrator to sign licenses.
The training program associated with the qualification process has enabled the region to issue licenses (including renewals) well in excess of it's budgeted goal at this time and the annual goal is also expected to be exceeded.
4.
Developed and coordinated a national seminar for operators of NRC and Agreement State-licensed irradiators.
The seminar was held in Arlington, Texas on May 24-25, 1988, and was attended by approximately 100 repre-sentatives from the approximately 36 active irradiators in the U.S. and from NRC/ Agreement State regulatory authorities.
The meeting was transcribed and a draft of a NUREG has been prepared by Region I.
Question No. 6 2
5.
Developed several Information Notices for issuance by NMSS, including:
Criminal Prosecution of Licensee's Former President for Intentional Safety Violation (89-02)
'ose Calibrator Quality Control (89-12)
Unauthorized Transfer of Ownership or Control of Licensed
=
Activities (89-25)
Loss and Thef t of unsecured Licensed Material (submitted for review February 7, 1989) 6.
Participated in a number of meetings and seminars in support of NMSS in -
the medical area.
In addition, the region identified, during inspection of recently-licensed nuclear medicine and nuclear cardiology private practices, an apparent generic problem.
Inspection of six such facilities in late 1988 and early 1989 revealed that all six had initiated operations without satisfying all requirements of the license.
As described in a memorandum dated February 27, 1989, from S. Ebneter to R. Cunningham (copy attached), Region I has initiated a new procedure in an effort to assure safe operation of these facilities and to avoid repetition of the problem.
7.
In February 1989, the NMS Branch Chief initiated a monthly audit of inspection documentation issued during the preceding month as a quality control check.
Findings are then provided to the appropriate Section Chief.
Focus is on clarity of communication of probiems to the licensee (in both the cover letter and in the Notice of Violation) and on censistency of the inspectors' techniques of inspection and documentation.
Format, grammar and spelling errors are also noted.
8.
Heightened awareness and aggressiveness with which we identify and pursue cases in which licenses have been transferred to new owners without inform'ing NRC. The Region I program was described in a memorandum dated December 30, 1988 from Bill Russell to Hugh Thompson and Jim Lieberman, (copy attached) and a draft Information Notice was forwarded for NMSS consideration (being issued as IN 89-25).
9.
Purchased two cutaway radiography cameras and related equipment for use in training the inspection staff. A training session using the new equipment was held in February 1989.
Similar orientation sessions were held (prior to receipt of the training aids) for the Division of Reactor Safety (DRS) in November 1988 and for the Region I resident inspectors in December 1988 to familiarize them with the radiation safety requirements imposed on radiographers. DRS and resident inspectors often encounter radiographers doing work under their byproduct material license at reactor sites.
.a
Question No. 6 3
\\
10.
Developed a training program on the requirements of Part 35 to be presented to licensee nuclear medicine technologists and radiation safety staff. These training sessions, to be initiated March 10, 1989, will
(
be presented at 12-14 Region I facilities.
11.
Coordinated, and scheduled for April 27,1989, a seminar for all of the Harvard-affiliated institutions, on the NRC's expectations and requirements relative to radiation safety programs that are performed under contract by the Harvard radiation safe,ty staff.
12.
Plan and present, as soon as the final direction of rulemaking for medical quality assurance is determined, a series of workshops explaining the rule. The workshops will be held in several major metropolitan areas and will be directed at medical physicists and radiotherapists.
- 13. Aggressively pursued appropriate enforcement for those liccasees unable or unwilling to comply with NRC requirements.
This include ~d t'he conduct of 21 enforcement conferences in FY88 and 10 thus far in FY89.
14.
Reduced the average time required for issuance of inspection documentation from over 100 days in the first quarter of 1988 to less than 50 days as of the first quarter of 1989.
15.
Made a significant contribution to the effort to develop performance evaluation factors.
The region has utilized the factors as described in its memorandum to Mr. Cunningham dated September 28, 1988.
16.
Planned and implemented a major reorganization of the Nuclear Materials Safety Branch to focus attention on the safety problems of types of facilities, rather than focusing on licensing versus inspection cf all facilities.
17.
Aggressively recruited to fill all funded vacancies in the technical staff, including selection of a medical program specialist.
18.
Developed a book of guidance on inspection documentation, including model citations, which received widespread notice within the agency.
19.
Began the development of an organized book of detailed guidance on the formatting of license documents.
20.
Began reviewing licenses for which financial assurance is required. Most of the staff has attended formal workshops given by NMSS and specific procedures and guidance are in preparation by Region I.
F
QUALIFICATION STATUS - MATERIALS SECTION A 07-MAR-89 REPORT TO INSPECTOR ORAL LIMITED FULL IDP NAME REGION I JOURNAL BOARD LICENSING LICENSING J.
PELCHAT IN ECD ECD ECD IN HEAL H PHYS MAY-87 PROCESS 05/31/89 03/31/89 05/31/89 PLACE L.
TRfPP IN ECD APPROVED ECD IN HEALTH PHYS JAN-88 PROCESS 03/31/89 01/11/89 04/30/89 PLACE
- 5. COU:TEMANCHE COMPLETED PASSED-ECD ECD IN HEAL H PHYS JAN-86 02/15/89 03/31/89 07/31/89 PLACE T.
DARDEN IN ECD ECD ECD IN HEALTH PHYS MAY-82 PROCESS 04/30/89 03/31/89 07/31/89 PLACE C.
SCHULINGKAMP IN ECD ECD ECD MATERNITY HEALTH PHYS Nov-87 PROCESS 04/30/90 10/31/89 04/30/90 LEAVE J.
G;ESICK IN PASSED APPROVED ECD IN SEN.OR HP JUL-88 PROCESS FRSS 01/11/89 04/30/89 PLACE J.
JCUSTRA COMPLETED PASSED APPROVED APPROVED IN HEALTH PHYS APR-84 05/01/88 02/17/87 01/11/89 PLACE J.
F;CCONE COMPLETED PASSED APPROVED APPROVED I
h SENIOR HP MAR-87 12/22/88 10/22/87 NA 5' MBAUGH IN ECD ECD ECD IN
{J.HEAL H PHYS JAN-89 PROCESS O2/28/90 02/28/90 08/30/90
' PREP 0
s i
0 I
i!
e v
e
1 e
OUALIFICATION STATUS - MATERIALS SECTION 8 07-MAR-89 REPORT TO INSPECTOR ORAL LIMITED FULL IDP NAME REGION i JOURNAL BOARD LICENSING LICENSING F. COSTELLO COMPLETED PASSED APPROVED SENIOR HP JAN-77 02/27/78 NA 04/04/86 NA L.
FPIEDMAN COMPLETED PASSED APPROVED SENIOR HP JAN-77 01/10/78 NA 10/22/87 NA J.
.' E N S E N COMPLETED PASSED ECD ECD IN HEALTH PHYS AUG-85 02/14/89 03/31/89 09/01/89 PLACE T.
O5 ERG REG lli GRAND ECD TBD IN HEALTH PHYS AUG-84 03/05/76 FATHERED 08/01/89 PLACE R.
PROVENCHER IN ECD ECD ECD IN HEAL'E PHYS SEP-88 PROCESS 10/01/89 01/01/90 07/01/90 PLACE RA.ENDRAN IN ECD ECD ECD IN HEALTH PHYS MAY-87 PROCESS 04/30/89 06/01/89 06/01/90 PLACE E. ULLRICH COMPLETED PASSED ECD ECD IN HEAL 74 PHYS MAR-87 02/16/89 03/31/89 09/01/89 PLACE
HEAL H PHYS MAR-87 PROCESS 04/30/89 06/01/89 06/01/90 PLACE i
I J
i ii it i
l d
I v
rr%
QUALIFICATION STATUS - MATERIALS SECTION C 07-MAR-89 REPORT TO INSPECTOR ORAL LIMITED FULL IDP NAME REGION I JOURNAL BOARD LICENSING LICENSING J.
DAVIS COMPLETED PASSED APPROVED APPROVED SENIOR HP OCT-73 10/22/87 NA J.
"lLLER COMPLETED PASSED APPROVED APPROVED IN HEAL H PHYS JUN-84 11/28/88 10/22/87 PLACE i
T.
T-0MPSON IN ECD APPROVED APPPOVED IN HEAL H PHYS JAN-84 PROCESS 04/30/89 10/22/87 PLACE I
R.
HEALTH PHYS OCT-82 PROCESS 05/31/89 06/30/89 PLACE i
l D. COLLINS IN EXCEPTED ECD TBD IN l
HEAL H PHYS SEP-81 PROCESS FRPS 12/31/89 PLACE
i M.
sARELA IN ECD ECD TBD IN HEAL H PHYS Nov-80 PROCES,5 06/30/89 06/30/89 PLACE c
ll M.
TAYLOR COMPLETED PASSED ECD ECD IN ll HEAL H PHYS JAN-84 01/12/89 06/30/89 01/31/90 PLACE
!i i
l I
3 a
m.
.+-
Attac h mewt '
ttua il 19H9 ELY1110N 01 11601 AIION SAQ)y_AtjQ SA[j GtJAllD$
.i Malcolm H.
Wasapp - Director - $783 William V. Julinstun - Deputy Di rue:L u r
- > 1 tu Constance M.
Yusho - secretary - 5214 I AG!Lii t1UIAUlotoC80Al _5A[LlY AND $Al(GUAHUS $HANCit flona id it. Des 8any - 01:eef
- > 2t su Robert J. Hores - Sr. Iechnscal fie v s ewe r
- >2 8 )
Sharon 4aw Johnson - Secretary - 539's Hochetu Markner - Offste Assestaaet 5012 ENtitcLticy_f3J rAMag[13
[(( Lt!tn[ Lit AD! Al l0N l.AGIL818L1 RADIAltoM ELGI195 f80_lLGI124.5LGtl04 etolLCIIQM stcisoM sAr t.curaDs se s.a soet W. Lazarus. Chief - $208 W. Patcisk. Cliter - $281 H.
Shanbaky, Chief - $2S8 R.
kesmag. Chaur - 5255 C.
Amato - 5394 H.
Austin - 5390
- 1. Dragoun - $113 0.
Cameron. *,114 C. Conklin - $342 J. furia - 5041 A. Ceyer - $323 A. Do t t a Ita t ta - S273
- f. Fox - $044 J. Jang - $220 R.
toesch - 5082 W. t anca s t e r - 5014 C. Cordon - 5372 J. Mottan - 5214 R.
Nimitz - $267 W.
Olsent - Sil8 T.
Lopresti - 5198 88 Mcitamars - 533F P. O'ConneII - 5056 C.
Sm e t ts - S/t. 2 A.
Summers - $083 J. Roth - 5205 s. She rts i n i - $259 1.
sylvester - Slus R.
Struckmeyer - $380 W.
Ihomas - SO43 i
MWLIAR Hall!!1At S SA_{LIY_BlieftG8!
Jasses H.
Joyener - Chier - $251 Carroli Arapstrung - 5ecretary - S298 hfill_.A
((!iS$ ti h!!_$ (1C_Lf11!![QJS$ $ $! A_Nqt SLCI. ~ J. Glenn. Chier - 5209 J. Isinneman. Cheer 532$2 J. White. Cheer - $102 D. foster. Chsef - $239 S. Courtenanche - 5075
- f. Cu s t e t t o - $21*i J.
Davis
- R$u R.
B r ows.
- ,2(.i>
I. Darden - 5245 8. friedman - $2F6 O. Cottins - 5394 R. Cossaboon - SII/ J. Cresich - 53s2 J. Jensen
- iss9 A.
u n chwood
- .JSu
- f. uu t t s
- s t9a J. Joisst ra - 52S F T.
Oberg - $202 M. tadun - SalS H. we i sesibe rgei r - 5313 J. Peschat - 5048 R. I'ro.iencher - $364 J. Mi e ser - S3 34 J. Piccone - $169
- 5. Rajendran - 5309 M.
laytor - $3tl C. Schulinghamp - 5078 F. Ullrich - Sot:0 I. Ihompson - $103 J. Stambaugh - 6904 W. Wallace - 5272 M. vareta - 5268 L. Tripp - 5071.
I /4%oc_k=ht 3 i l NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY BRANCH RESPONSE TO NMSS-1989 REGIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE MARCH 9-10, 1989 1 l 1
s ~ NMSS-1989 REGIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE Thts cuestionnaire is for the purpose of obtaining information about regional NwS$ licensing and inspeciton activities. The space provided is not adequate for responding to the questions, so we ask that you provide separate sheets for each question anc response. Include as part of the response a copy of any pertinent written internal procedure which you have developed and have in place. It is not necessary for the responses to be sent to HMSS Headquarters. Rather, eight copies of the responses should be given to the National Progras Review Team vnen it conducts its review at your of fice. 1. Using the current version of your regional staffing plan related to the NMSS program, specify the approximate percentage of time that each individual spends on the following activities: fuel cycle licens.ing, fuel cycle inspection, materials licensing, materials inspection, safeguards activities, and inspections of decernmissioned facilities and reactors. 2. prodde a sumary of actual expenditures and accomplishments as compared to operating plan / budgeted expenditures and accomplishments, for FY88 and Ff89 to date. 3. Are there any changes needed in the estimate of workload projection (licensing actions and inspections conducted) for the current fiscal year? If so, please provide your suggested changes with justification. Are theft any foreseeable barriers to completing inspection modules in accordance with Manual Chapters 2600 and 2800? 4 Are regional adelnistrative support functions performed in a timely manner? Are changes needed in the manner in which these support functions are perfomed? If so, please be prepared to discuss the changes needed which would result in optimal administrative support for the programs. 5. Please provide your comments on the programs for interaction of Headquarters vita your Region. Please include your comments on the usefulness of the ccaference calls, licensing workshops, executive zanagement sefair.ars, inspection accompaniments, telephone calls on case reviews, technical assistance provided on a day-to-day basis, standard review plans, guides, etc. Include in your comments your suggestions and recommendations for modifications, changes, improvements, etc., in the interaction programs. 6. Sumarize regional initiatives to improve the quality of inspections and license reviews, particularly those aimed toward preventing licensee saf ety problems, or those ataed at licensee's performing their transportation activities in a safe sanner. 7. Sumtr.arize the total nwnber of inspections of Transportation activities at MC 2800 licenseo program fact sities (Procedure 86740) including average staff-hours per inspection and a brief summary of the most typically observed violations. Summarize (Regions II and V) referrals to other regions of state identified violations on shipments by NRC licensees to commercial burial sites. of transportation activities tiSummarize the completion status of inspections 2600 (#86740) and 2500 (#86740) and
- 86721) prcgrav faciliti n,
mate provide early observations on the impact of the Core Inspection Procedure #83750 on the inspection of transportation activities at 2500 progran facilities. _,,m e o = a
- 'm" M * '*
e ,tv The attached material is in response to Question No. 1 STAFFING AND DIVISION OF WORK 1 A copy of the current NMSB staffing plan is attached. As in the past, the Region I materials technical staff member typically performs both inspections and license reviews. The only exceptions involve those staff members who, because of pregnancy or disability, were only available for limited travel. Two staff members (Taylor and Schulingkamp) were pregnant or on~ maternity leave during FY88-89. One staff member (Darden) was injured in a fall at the office in June 1988 and has not yet been released to resume travel assignments. Thus, each of them has concentrated on licensing work for the past several months, including half time work by Taylor and Schulingkamp while on maternity leave. Ms. Taylor has now resumed performing inspections. Ms. Schulingkamp returned to full time duty on March 6, 1989. 4 The actual percentage of time spent by individuals on licensing versus inspection varies depending on a number of factors, including workload, incidents, etc. As shown in the attachment, for the NMSB in FY89 through Februa ry 15, 1989, the ratio is about 2 FTE for inspection to 1 FTE for licensing. Statistics for individuals in the Branch are also shown in the attachment. Relative to the question on inspections of decommissioned facilities, we have only recently begun charging time to that RITS code and no meaningful data are available at this time. 1 f l
4 2' et
- . EM Ponfilf1Pos. TtILi fY 89 g es t )
Proeram artican Attut-Grade Astlas ment _ 888 Ntita flA GrutlHrsd Reuclea r Ma te r f a l m Sa fe ty Branch Chier Cc-IS Oaint/t104 t Joyne r, J e me s li. CC-IS oeua 3.0-sec re ta ry ( Typ ing ) .CG-6 0148 6 Armstrong, Carroll A. CG-6 0318 1.0 orrsce or the Cheer subtotal: 2 0 o o T o-Muolaa r Materla t a Sa raty Section A Chier CC-45 4306 4 1.0 Clenn, John t. CG-15 tju6 . Senior sles t th Phyalci st CC-14 11:56 - 2 2.ts riccone, Joasphine M. CC-14 1146 Crealck, Mary Jean Alesel CC-54 13#6 Health Physicist CC-sl 1106 7 6.9 9.I Derden. Teresa II. CG-13 lit:6 Courtomanche. Steven A. CC-12 13's6 .Joustra. Josdith A. CC 13t86 1ripp, Lester M. CC-83 1306 Peachet. John M. CG-12 13u6 Schutinghamp. Clari stina M. CG-9 1306 (J. Stambaugh, LOO 1/29/89) Vacant Vacant Section Subtotal: to O ~ 79~ 0.1 'o 9 ( I l l O rit Hire I 8 c
2$- g. CostPh..al/PO5. IIILE D. 89 (Pil) Preeren Orrican Atlot-Guds AerLea Mc L. BM Mll MA everhead -leer notorials seretv secuena Chi.r CC-is no6 4 1.o Elonemen, John D. CG-15 1306 senior Hee 8tle Phyelc4et CC-14 3306 2 2.0 Centello, Francis M. CG-14 1306 F rl edoe n, Laurence F. CC-14 4306 Health Physicist CC-13 1306 6 S.S 0.2 Oberg, Carl I. CC-13 13:16 Jensen, Johse 1 GG-53 93n6 Ullrich. Eliseheth CC-82 3306 Rejendean. Selven CC-Il 33n6 Wellece. Weymon l_. CC-9 13fs6 - Prevenche r, Richa rd 8. CC-12 5306 Vecent r Section Subtotal: O 6.6 0.2 ~ 9 O Reclear hWirtels serety Section C Chle r CC-IS 83i16 4 4.0 White, John M. CG-85 1306 2*a'.,r Health Physicist CC-14 13H6 2 2.0 Miller, John J. CC-14 3306 Devle, Jorden S. CC-14 8306 HoeIth Physacaat CC-33 33u6 6 S.9 O.I Ladun. Alchard H. CG*l3 8306 Theepson, Thomas M. CC-43 1306 Col 8 Ins, David J. CC-13' 1396 Verete, Michael A. CC-Il 1316 Taylor, Marlene J. CG-53 93.s6 K8thwood, Anthony S. CGal) 1306 Vecent Sect ion Sut> tota l: 9 o- ~ T9~ 0.1 0 g
- FIE Hire i
+ e 26, M E M h.u/ PUS. 1iILE f Y 49 - tettI~ t.tageem errissa A l l ai t - Grede 1erlma mist. 868 ft8M4 ELS urgtitend Licens P -t iha n i a t eilge tinc t len Chief CC-10 0303 I foster, Ooris J. t.0 CC-10 0303 Lloonalng Assistent Veoent CC-9 0303 I l.0 Processing Assistent CG-S 03t63 2 trown, Aebecce J. CC-S 03 63 2.0 Wette, Ervin M. CC-5 03u3 Cererence As'alatsset. F a t isig CC-S 03u) t We l eenbe rge r, Mo rga re t M. CC-6 J/ 0 3883 1.0 Crrice Assistas t. typing CC-S 03u) a Cossaboon, Rebecca L. CG-S 03u3 3.0 section subtotet: 6 0 2.ts se ~ ~ s' as e Srsncle Subtotal: 36 0 29.6 H. 8s 6.0 08V8580M 10BAL: 76 26.9 38. 7 1.8 12.6' 6 l s 4
- F7C Hire Positious'a'6 1/ Present Incumbent only f
t . - ~ _ ,.-,,,. - - ~-
~ PAGE 1
SUMMARY
OF COMPLETED NORK FOR SECTION A ^ FOR PERIOD STARTING 881001 M D D O!NG 890215 FTE FTE TOTAL TOTAL NEN AMEND RDEN INSPECT ASSIST FTE FTE FTE LESS WITH NAME LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE INSPECT LICENSE INSPECT ASS!$T ASS!ST ASSIST CRISTINA SCHULIN6KAMP 7 .04 .00 .00 .04 .04 JEAN GRES!CK 7 23 16 7 .16 .24 .10 .40 .50 JDANN V. STAMBAUGH 1 .00 .00 .01 .00 .01 20HN 6LENN 21 4 .08 .00 .00 .08 .00 JOHN PELCHAT 3 5 3 7 2 .04 .10 .03 .15 .18 JOSEPHINE PICCONE 3 6 5 12 4 .06 .18 .06 .24 .30 JUDITH JOUSTRA 4 27 3 15 .10 .22 .00 .33 .33 LESTER TRIPP 11 44 15 10 2 .26 .15 .03 .41 .44 STEVEN COURTEMANCHE 7 8 4 41 .08 .61 .00 .69 .69 'A DARDEN 5 60 12 .24 .00 .00 .24 .24
- TOTAL A 33 180 76 101 16 1.06 1.51
.24 2.58 2.82 4
PAGE 3
SUMMARY
OF COMPLETED NORK FOR SECTION B FOR PERIOD STARf!NG 881001 MD DDING 890215 Fit FTE TOTAL TOTAL NEN AMEND RENEN INSPECT ASSIST FTE FTE FfE LESS WITH NME LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE INSPECT LICENSE INSPECT ASSIST ASSIST ASS!$i 8ETS7 ULLRICH 8 12 19 1 .09 .28 .01 .38 .39 FRAhK COSTELLO 10 51 2 4 4 .18 .06 .06 .24 .30 JOHN JENSD 4 13 3 5 1 .07 .07 .01 .14 .16 JOHNK!NNEMM 1 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 LAURENCE FRIEDM M 2 3 1 11 .02 .16 .00 .19 .19 QlCK PROVENCHER 15 25 .00 '. 22 .37 .22 .60 SELVAN RAJENDRAN 5 16 7 24 2 .11 . 36 .03 .47 .50 THOR OBERS 2 20 .01 .30 .00 .31 .31 NA7 MON NALLACE 1 10 7 31 8 .07 .46 .12 .54 .66 at B 22 102 34 129 41 .56 1.93 .61 2.50 3.11 O
PAGE ~3 SUMMMY OF COMPLETED WORK FOR SECTION C FOR PERIOD STARTING 881001 ANDENDIW6890215 FTE FTE TOTAL TOTAL i NEW AMEND RENEW INSPECT ASSIST FTE FTE FTE LESS WITH MARE LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE INSPECT LICENSE INSPECT ASSIST AS$1ST ASSIST ANTHONY K!Rn00D 16 2 4 .05 .06 .16 .11 .28 SAVID COLLIKS 30 .00 .45 .00 .45 .45 JACK ^^.ugs 24 49 9 ,29 ,00 ,00 ,29 ,29 JGHN MILLD 2 12 .00 .18 .00 .18 .18 MARLENE TAILOR 1 13 17 8 .14 .12 .00 .26 .26 MIKE Vt. RELA 3 11 17 9 .15 .13 .00 .28 .2B RICHARD LADUN 33 1 .00 .49 .01 .49 .51 TOM THG950h 2 15 -14 12 1 .13 .18 .01 .31 .33
- VOTAL C 30 106 59 108 13
.76 1.62 .19 2.38 2.58
PNiE 4 SUMARY OF COMPLETED WORK FOR SECTION D FOR PERIOD STARTING 881001 AND ENDING 890215 FTE FTE TOTAL TOTAL NEW MEND RENEW INSPECT ASSIST FTE FTE F1E LESS WITH mAME LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE LICENSE INSPECT LICENSE INSPECT ASSIST ASSIST AS$1ST DORIS FOSTER 2 2 .01 .00 .00 .01 .01 REE!ONI 1 6 .02 .00 .00 .02 .02 of0TAL D 3 8 .03 .00 .00 .03 .03 TOTAL BB 396 169 336 70 2.42 5.07 1.05 7.49 B.54 4 er
i The attached materials are in response to Question No. 2 EXPENDITURES / ACCOMPLISHMENTS VERSUS THE BUDGET Included in the attachments-are the following: A printout from RITS for FY88 showing the expenditure of FTE by the NMS8 A month-by-month chart showing the number of inspections completed (i.e., by issuance of 591 or inspection documentation) in FY88 and the average time required for issuance. A month-by-month chart showing the number of licensing actions completed (i.e., by issuance of the license document) in FY88 and both the total backlog of actions and the backlog of news / amends. The same documents as above for FY89 through February 15, 1989. Productivity in FY 1988 for licensing and inspection was as follows: Licensing Completions % vs. Budget New 221 100% Amendments 1070 105% Renewals 305 66% 1596 94% The region used 8.24 FTE to accomplish materials licensing versus the budgeted 8.18 FTE. The shortfall in completion of renewals resulted principally from the f act that reviewers-in-training were assigned to work on renewals and their effort exceeded the budgeted labor rate. Further, a large number of renewals started in FY88 were not iss,ued until FY89. Inspections Completions % vs. Budget 1136 95% 9
[. L, Question No. 2 2 During FY88 the region expended 12.78 FTE on the materials inspection program, a shortfall of 3.5 FTE. However, about 1.7 FTE of technical resources had to be diverted to performing clerical duties during the year due to inability to fill two clerical vacancies. Other significant resource-expenditures that prevented realization of the inspection goal included: Relocation of the Region I office 0.3 FTE Radiation Technology trial 0.2 FTE a. ' Injury and maternity leave 0.4 FTE Reorganization and retraining 1.0 FTE These diversions of resources total 3.6 FTE. Considering the above, the NMSB believes the accomplishing of 95% of the budgeted inspections represents a significant achievement. i L l 1 n_
e. 33/31/s3 H4feR14La MP l 'J 3 d PAGE 1 tidCL ' oM ** A f t d l AL 5 5AFlif SAFiGAUOO5 alt ON C H 8b tf D-C 00 E = A t.tOdf I f it M I f 4.ttL A d NO N -it t r. T0fAL H00uS 01af C i PT*5 Hou% Houus iIE'S (721) CON 50 MFD g l t INSPECfluN f M041 g-DIRECT II.5 P ES T I JN 8FFoRI 2 00 T I h l 145P8df!34 4,417.1 213.5 4,656.5 3.10523 2.1111 $ REACTIVF I n sPL C i t ati MS S. 5 201. 7 1,060.4 .70237 .41211 PO-?tC FAILURE 1,515.5 330.4 1,345.9 1.23135 .72814 S SETHCL O 5HIPMfut 41.0 3.0 50.3 .33!17 .02254 4,65d.7 754.1 1,e12.1 5.07752 3.23405 'OfHc8 I N 5pr( g g M aga(Cy (F/opy PRtPARATI0h 2,002.9 th1.0 ?,243.9 1.4853? 2907S t 0000MEutAf104 5,173.4 122.5 5 476.2 3.65429 2.48430 DIRECT I44Wil 2,415.5 747.7 3,161.6 2.10v60 1.15914
- , o S 2. 2 1,!51.5 10,903.7 7.26897 4.61405 12,510.7
?,105.$ la,516.5 12.34649 7.92d10 t o L L t G A I I.IN fulLOwu? l i st i C T FFFddl 140.i1 3.0 143.o .07511 .36720 PaEP AND DOCUMcNTAtt0N 2# 3. 5 2.5 296.0 .1?Cis .1363) 423.5
- 5. 5 429.0
.21557 .203?3 423.5 5.5 429.) .21587 .20129 TECHNICat A5515t to 04 i IECHNICAL A55ff TO 01 225.0 21.0 244.J .l>24J .10711 225.0 21.0 244.0 .16240 .10711 223.0 21.J 244.0 .16280 .10711 L IC f r45 t NG EFf 04I OIRECT LIC2M5tNG E f-8 0 d f 15 50 f 845 4 LICtN5'S 1,s23.1 48.1 1,S12.5 1.0&$20 73152 AMfn3 LICENSE 5 1,762.5 113.J 3,110.3 0.5437a 1.80633 RENEW LICEn5ES 3,w?1.4 20 9. r 4,20?.4
- 2. 8 Ji ro 1.91165 1,279.e 176.0 9,656.2 6.41$73 4.45553 h
(( Il
- 1 t 4. e 9 9 s 0 0 8 8 i e o 8 0 m 4 0 I 4 w I I u 9 0
- E I
8 C> 0 0 e t 0 6 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 e e 6 g at m P t om OeN
- m =A ir* N N NNF
- = *= N m @ *= N c e W% te S
l 6 @NM J N nn3 O P W4 OO D@S N WS O e tA @ @ ers e e,ee,,g A 4ansp4p d N N =# Ne7 N N N N fe e 0 O ** O p om eeNN I l N an e# eS d >= 0 ew v4 4 d W .e d og NdJaa*=O Oa===toin i e indOOON@ M s' N p. A se er, og ef* O e-O N O C O O to W% 0 Oe e e e e e e e o e o e e o e e e e e e e o e e e e e $ We w 9 em W% w= ce *= M* N PJ ag g I e E I t a3I O e= an 0 8 E 20 0 04 9 W8 9 9 8 0 0 8 I B 0 0 e a N N e 4 % e- *t r1 O C O O OOO Q O O O ("* O O O O O O e a en 4 O O N 23 wm 9*1 O c O OOO C UC OCc'O O O O'r"J e e e 4 O e N en C J O O M I"S O 77 M O O O O ) O O O.3 O 1 e am 8 d e' as3 N o N e= SOCOC F9 OO C 9 C C O C O O O O 1 2 g
- 9 no 0 O *= O k N 1100*30 Q00
!') *1D r'% O O O O C O O v e es e4 i e e o e o e e e e e e o e e e e e o e a e e e e e o 7 9 JN 4 8= b d 0 e w0 m 9 m 9 V 0 eum to 0 I Q* 9 68
- 0 W 9 O
9 em $ 0 0 .h I 3 8 9 88 9 9 L1 0 4 J u-e e M 6 e= 1 8 94 m 0 en 9 A O 8 m 8 8 O 8 E $ O O w 0 T 4 N N O 8"5 #* "t se S se N== e= NNN te d S N N O O we O >= N O e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e w* 4 l .J W ** O 4 88* G tri 4 *= #9 *# t# NNN & $ O '@ h O*$48 O N N ib Be 4 W G e
- 't & C9 4N ese 4 4 et =#
- J *J N
- iri N Pm sa ew
- 9 N N N 2 se il 9
es* NO 4 89 N M ett @ 4 OOO W "9 4 es NN du $ O 4 4 % tb 4 4 4 4 % 4 h 4 4 4 saw w 4 a= g e=== NN e= e=
- e d e NW tre ar. m JGO o===
W w9 C 0 t e* u I I w =9 0 0 61 9 m.s.d O 8 4 to I 8
- 4 3 4 3& 9 NNOOO@ W9
(* w* N 4 ao d4d Q 49 *= "3 @ O O C O W9 er* es ** e g e3 e e e e e o e e e e a e e e e e e e e e e e e e a e e Ee a 20 t eM
- N O s'* m' *= e e NNN en @ 4 te 9 is3 dJ G C24 4N 4 4 JMNOO 13 43 W 9N N
tm ur* a= 3 g 3 4 e= e= a= N .a d 4 9 T I I I B tt t 0 e 6 4 0 .J 8 3 0 Q h* O O ur% C 4 0 O w* Wt ep
- *'t e*5 e O P N M O G v4 O N **
LJ t 84 9 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e g an e 7 $ end in 9 O N O C N 4 to w%*<0 N to tr* se es* erg c srs O *F *# D.'O.,@= N e Dw 3 O O tt f* > N ert N N ga.# d e er= m et O,Nem we ma 4 .*3 0 NO ar* +9 O M W4 to te % **J 87 4NN Y. 83 4 f7 4 % 4 % e a n 4 e e t 4 t 4 g eZ e o= em N w= e=== e ** a9 N4 ie NN 8 I a= om em 0 0 4 8 0 i s e
=a
0 0 en 2 4 9 tes 4 9 u w 4A 9 a"e Q h8 8 0 s ?e 0 4 tad 4 24 e J e= em c u e e M 3W 2.4
- a 9
9 tj em em
- u. em sa 3m i
l M 2 69
- 49 E== w a=
- 4. I f
I ed at 4J D
- 2 T 2
W B .4 e= D h9 w t= W tems >= w 44 e C 9 2 in O 6* S 2 'E SO eM 2 .) lW and w 0 0 m me us ad 49 (% iW
- 6. !
is e Z *= =e K t F G bi =* Ed ta F F Suo .ue 'JD Dwa C er e-== 3 es t we to
- 4
- W 2e>
>= at eta =***=*d ee 3 e= l ,,3 4 2 ) W tu MQ ee .4 Da w e t'a as W e4 pm w4 b 5== 9 O O esa E 'M 3 e e sa op c.%1
- 3 2* y one g
e. 3 1 >=== 2 9 4 eu, 4 8 9 2 *= 2 ts *E we
- e..a 2 y g '.y
.J i e= a t' > 'I e= M V et t 9 es e me *g me & e. gg g Z e== qA g a g i 8 no E en
- =
es.J e. =W
- E E
- e w or ** K 4
8
== 2 W 2.J to D .J us w9 ft E ui 2. er 2 far2 2 8 D tw O ne, e ese me W F me e= L3 w 3 en e en w (7 C U b) E bd t= W9 t= Q t'W p4 2 Q W eg Q D= E W te med ed 4 g tg me 2 s'e as vt Q na 3 wg me er g= nu CE 2 C O O 2 2 ed 9 { W .J he.J Z *E at u.? er E 4 W .i en== E 4 *E 3 3 g e Z su in 0 8 to av 'S w
- in 4
9 O ed as es N I I E 2 O O 6 4 >= as 2
=
0 0 Q K se 4 8 O t 9 9
j , a '- h_.-_ I l t t 0 0 9 0 M 0 t 1 0 w 6 0 0 0 e e I 0 0 e t 8 0 4 0 4 0 0 8 9 0 e e e A m' as % h. 8 M 61 O emem 0 0
- CA 44 e
0 e=No44 I I COC00 0 O4 e e e e e 4 dw4 ae E 9 9 end 30 t e= en G 9 % 7 0 0 O 4 0 u6 4 6 a 3 4 4 8 0 0 8 I 1 0 JOOOO 9 a c n r's O ^ e O C r3 O O t
== a o r C c' M = 4
- e I OOOOO w
a
- m. a.
e e e e e e a' a wA e se e ene g u 8 a e r t me ne 0 4 2e 8 4 W 9 O 9 >0 15 e b I 3 e e e I 4 J 0 n e a f W *= 0 (P 4 eM 4 A 0
- #3 8 m I
W G D 8 s 9 O 4 .M 0 0 C ers @ C O O e e e o e e we g 8 .A 0 N e @ ea w 9 4 4 M d *= C> C* Em et 0
- O w
0 C 6 =#w ene a em 0 .d 4 Q 9 st ed C 0 8
- u 4
5 e 69 0 0 6" i med O 8 a w% 8 w as 3 0 mz e C0000 4** sm 0 0 3e o e e e e i 1 GE 9 2O I N NN w eC 3 S I
== f 2 0 1 4 0 4 K 0 E I I 6 0 8 8 9 0 e I f l .d e La 8 O e em O C y I
- I e e e e e 3
9 .d M i fe M CN*4 j t 3Y 0 e dwp9 4 J36 Q t j 0 .=.4Z 4 1 0 e I I i 0 l 6 e l a a t 0 t he 6 0 me 0 4 2e OI e 4 ee t 2 0 0 e= E O 4 e et O en D em %== 9 0 I med W D 0 wpW 4 6 Y== g S S e 3 en 6 9 9 w8 W = 9 0 C P W ff 4 O 4 m CO& 8 em 8 de 4 t= 0 w e= e. em 4 ** 4 7."*. 2 9 0 .) W w us I I 2 QOO 6 0 EE2 4 8 Q w es. w 1 8 8 O &EA O 4 u w.w w I 0 OOQ I O w .E 2 2 g g a se me as 4 5 e e. 3 I e4
- n 0
4 W 0 t e O 88 A u 0 ' s 4
- E 4 e 0
O e 0 0 0 0 4
s b' 31tGT/34 M A ir tl aL S fts lits PAGE 4 NUCLcAr MAftRIALS SaftTT SAFFGaukOS drat.C4 i ) - tub-COOF =A tFFORT IIJM s t a.IIL AP N U N-R t t, 191AL N0UR5 OIRFCI Fff'$ HOUd5 H00E5 FIE*$ (121) 7 ................................CUNSUMED ...................s..._... 5 ?,3'1?. 0 1,?46.1 55e M6.1 21.11175 25.11B19 l t s E 8 o . - a
l MATERIALS INSPECTIONS FY ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 (LESS 591'S) FINDINGS: 1 tao-NO VIOLATIONS 1 1so-VIOLATIONS _ _ _ _... AV G DAYS VIOLATIONS 3 140- . _ ___ AVG DAYS N ON E 122 (1-120-t1. i1. [ " - - ~/ 4, tos \\,,oy ,\\ o I \\ u,soo- ,'-.,,j * -L _.*. l z ,o.
- [a/
i9. / 'ga \\ s \\ \\ 7o w 77 S \\,/ 'g., '.,... -e s 73 s. z so-g, 33 .4 .3 _p To 5+ M m = 4o-4 g o OCT DEC FEB APR JUN AUG NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SF~c* MATLS MONTH
MATERIALS LICENSING ACTIONS FY ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 LEGEND: 611 616 BACKLOG e00 587 - --. N EW/AM EN D 580 COMPLETIONS b NEW/ AMEND 442 448 p go. 429 sa 382 342 342 332 E 307 y 'N M 287 293 3ng. 278 / y' N 256 ~""3 273 274 248 g 200-m m N pm 7* /* /a' / = "m m -a,". / c F= fa pc - = Fm a / / / ~ / ~ / / 7e "* / ~ / / / / R / / / / / / 5 / / / / / / / / / f ? d / f f / f f f f f OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP MATLLIC MONTH
n 4 a - e. c) ea .. =. y
- e..
,. = n ' ee ee e e t e e 9 0 0 8 0 6 e t sa 4 0 t t tad 0 0 43 9 I e 8 4 em O 9 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 8 9 4 e i e 0 es =a 4 t'
- 4 e.a d
- d O en e se 4 s=,e 4 fe e1 **
l O $ o d* T 4 O 43 N P4 A 4 4 e= 0 S
- 4 =e d a NP4N e en au e ao O am W e O em N e N *= 4 e m **
N J== N em in w* ge ze is N== N N 4 m en m
== O d== A A
= N e em nOO eA38 v C O >
N *= om N t> OOOOOO O O P1 O OCC D >=*4 4 e e e e e o e e e e e e e e e a e e e e e e I wZ t e= a= O t 8 Y t l 0 9 8 4 e N em O O O N== m as + O O v9 4 4 eeNN OOO e 5
- = O Cl e s a=== P J ** =9 O O *= o s A N
@ ** tr* te OCO sc N e c'6 e
- O 3 O*sN O O 89 4 4 ee "C =a sa e ei *5 f*
9 .e Pd I f* 889 N *F P'* 4O
== C 4 ** O O,-
- 8 w% tr*
P'9 8O e== N s em o O r~ O N w* r. m O O O O e-OOOO OM%) a wN 9 e o e e e o e o e e e e e e e e e e e e e e a w e em
== N 8 l t 8 8 6 e s 4 0 F# 4 44 ft es aim ** N es *J C* A O f% e f* 8% p p ft @ t 3 so W*.* O p an== % % am J q p r,
- em NNN g
m I 9 d ie ? N ee* @ W9 e wm tw N N em M a=CNN 8'* s e., ed e e
- a e.==
w N== tt N as '* N N ee e e es o e O ^ <.) e *= as e e= 'J O N N N e *= ma J C C O *=== COOO OOO t w4 t e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e 9 tus 0
== en es m'* 8 8 8 8 Z 0 9 %3 8 8 2 0 en 8 4 0 GE a m 0 3 e p* sus e e's e J >= 8 2 9 4OOd El O no e N O O O O O '"> O M M P9 OOO p m es a e e e e e o e e e e e o e e e e e e o e e e e ame= O 4 .d 8 J ** ""' N Ws O & am A La en O e6 OO 40 *J C C N *** N ens w e es e .9 =# =* @ m 4 f* 't er. N O N,O 4 P4 eP e" "O
- = * *
- g 9==
3 4 ers e m N N em em =o to 0 0 0 m a s e g 8 >= 9
- =
w=
- =
rd 4 e t 9 _A e i E. M If 8 9 t J l en me and e es w9 0 485 0 0 ma e oOO& e't O O in d COOOOO f"> e e* M O ("5 0 gwO t t 3 4 e e e o e o e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e mo o= u ' 4 := 0 g
==*J M ie N O e et d e e' a= em ans P J e= e=== W4 # 6 QEa d' te N N N #= N m.e E O ne 4 2 8 em se N m 3 e t e e er a e e IW 8 8 '.a e e me 1 9 u a e 3 4 hf" O O WS
- C* tr* *F M
- t c O O *'* e')
s3C OO
- J O O 7
e eB e o e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e e e e e o e e .,4 wa t
- J o* oi de
N te Pw 4 *
- ce O O.a e Pi. on 1* 13
- =e=*=
e 3& 4 P $ P m 7" en ** P=. N m's
- a em N en 6 NW N P=
e= e= e= 0,, 3 5 .e g" J' e* O, es a = 'S 4 4 4 g s 8
- 4 0
e-e= em e.s v 9 0 t t 0 0 4 9 ee a 6 I T e 4 4 8 O E 8 sa I e o e e nk 8 6 e 2 4 0 m er 4 8 O a= 0 m 2 'a 8 tL au e 9 6 K >= 2 e= 0 t a= e, d 3 O 4 6 e= em 4 0 0 2 L Q Z ed e= 0 4 I w 2 O to e J c' wa y sJ et >= 0 0 ek '"2 ese em M' t * #3 3 t.* w em .'
- 3 a 6 E I
".,== o= 2 =* L'
- ?
== o= 0 tw 0 e= s; u C .J em et 3 8 a= 0 E u u* 3 =* C o r s9 d "*s 3 .3
8 I
0 O se & .J Z k .J Z 3. =g* fl.
== 3 3 e 8
- a **
3 44. a= ar 3 .'s u e= i4 e t= em=
- 42O ese 548 Sir D tu et et t
'3 03 et t 6 cs Q l' me De >=
- "44 2
sr 3 r4 => ms ek N 3e eL c w.* .8O .s s se .,J e I w& 6 nas b J e= me f"* u e= .a w4 L me em 0 t th t'* 4e D t'* . Se se .9 J3PJ O 9ri u 3 9 es 2 2 est "" ns* J me to et 4.T l 4
- eB 69
- 's e
I M
== em O 2
- e= u 3
.J rr O u W 2 e e i= n= u a
==
- m. eJ.o
.,s
- .== e6 2
w *L T S 4 C >= 3 et w9 3 et E es f,
- ! trl O
at J .J W e f
- = Q Q.s, ins a
O ni, ed p OwQE
== me a es w g es. us eaa e-ts 2 3 y Ed K Z u J.J s'M e= 3% As >= 4 8 9 su ese
== e= g,3 2 0 8 th O C 2 ins Z o== 4 0
- 9
- a. '
.4 u O 4 8 2 3 =# tw s s me t.s es
== 8'% O e e
s. Q1/ CIl *
- H>,4tAL5 V
' '8 4a 9 P40E 3 4dCLLAR h4 f tSI AL $ .T 84ANCes auu-Coot- .A ... '> R t i n l litM dir.utAW ta1N.alb IO T AL H r)u g 5 F l* p ri. Fit'5 Nbu25 HOURS (621) (?2E) CONSUMED F-L I C i te s t f G EF&oki Dir CI LICf:45thG FFF0di j i550E a 1 e f w L t C t 'a s t 5 W.3 17.5 517.2 .40090 .3450t 24003 AMfuD LICFN5[5 1,241.5 0 2. ) 1,154.4 .M9423 .76963 .52401 AENSW LICLNSES 1,e32.2 11.u 1,563.2 1.25339 1.1091P 783FI 3, ? 2 8. t: 111.4 3,315.2 2.53352 ?.22379 1.54F65 7 l OTHER St&ECT LICENSING t LICEN5tNG A 55 t s t a ra f 57.0 3.C 40.0 .03199 .02468 .01777 I NF' NRM Af t 0N aElu(515 2' t.0 1.0 2$4.0 .21791 .19918 .13525 k LILlNSIN-y[5115 1.0 2.0 11.0 .0015! .00F14 .00432 455t5f A.iR C f M E ta f STATF5 SJ.0
- 9. 0 39.0
.03022 .02400 .01441 IR2401AT1a WORK 5 MOP m 3. 5 .0 83.3 .02456 .05555 .04003 442.3 15.0 451.3 .35420 .306Fh .21234 3,ess.1 12$.4 3,792.5 2.93/T2 2.52857 1.76023 J E,COMMI S S I O N !'Is ACil V I T !( 4 GENcRAL OsCON ACTIWtif 1+.5 4.0 13.5 .01431 .01214 .00490 14.5 4.3 18.5 .01433 .41234 .00676 14 5 4.0 13.5 .01433 .01234 .00676 OINER ACTIVITILS l. iSCALATCO E tiF 3 R Ct M f MI I51.5 4.0 155.5 .00033 .03000 .07275 NotMAL ENFORCFMfNT 199.0 15.0 20$.0 .00000 .C0000 .091T3 ) RLC10NAL 'MER RISP6N5e 32.5 23.5 5o.0 .at000 .00000 .01560 A 511 S T a ralf TO diret a OFF IC 54.5 14.5 %9.0 .0u000 .00000 .02616 l 4C 9. 5 S T. 0 4d6.5 .03003 .00013 .20624 =2a.5 57.G 4de.5 .00000 ,00000 .20624 MANAEFMfNT ACTIvtTIES PROGHAM M 4 N A S$ M F ra f 1, S is. i 30.0 1,416.5 .0000) .00090 65333 1 1, n 2. i n0.0 t,416 5 .03001 .00000 .65in3 1, t i s. i e1.0 1,416.5 .00J0J .0000J .45183 o 4 ~
l _. 'ik .e,. 3 o 9 4 e t 0 8 1 M 9 1 e e tu 4 9 o e 4 e 8 i O 8 I e t 8 4 0 4 8 0 e s 8 9 4 0 e e g 3 m.' r J C 1r* O et W O44 4 Q $ en 889 rd d 4 *** e d S On D 0 64 w 0 8% e e meeen ar* e <* OOn B e E4 deeCNOOO COS e w36
- "eO 08% O N P*
OOO $ em 54 0 e e e e e e e e e e I w2 4 em NN 4 O9 f ue t 8 0 0 8 8 O 0 0 0 C *> O 7 3OO 9 e et 0000OOO F SD i =l COOCOOCO OCO e <o en 6 O !". O 2, O r e 0 OOC OPO 4 *= v i 3 ' ) " 4. LQ i1 O O e wN g e e e o e e e e o e e I w 6 8 e 9 8 I 6 0 8 = a a t= t'* COOOOO O *5 O e 4 U C 99 O O O O O O"17 8 em 0 0OOOOOOO OSO t
- 4
- OOO 3OC7
?"* 3O 8 a= re 1 3OOQOCCO COO 8 we6 e e e e e e e e e e o e =* t G 0 8 0 t 9 0 u a e X 0 ** 8 4 0 6 0 0 0 3 8 me 0 C e a== t Z I N N v* C 8"J FS <l> d' OO em a= a e e e e o e e e a e e e e
- O I
,,J B d e d 80 89 N N N NNN 4 e as t si e, N N NN 9 om 8 Or* O NN J 9 Q 0 e. I am e= ce et t i Bd e 9 Ed S 9 8 e t J t e6 e's en* 8 tem ad 9 .60 Ca 9 aae O ss + O en O + + C00 as N O 9 s 3e e e e o e e e e e o e =*C= u e 2O9 4 ss M e NN uW e 8 C=a a tri o "e=* wE "3 8 2 9 D 0 e as er a e I Z9 4 4 ,w e g d 8 g J t t 2 6 m a P= A tO O f O e'= e= C '*3 O 2 s 4 e e e e e e e e e e e e d w* 3 4 S'* F v e= N ie to e e s A. t 3mt er% 1 *% r.
- %==
$ J39 O ? em . f 9 .J Ce 4 4 e 2 Y s e"
== 't' ne e 9 e e e 9 0 8 0 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 e p 8 I e e 4 4 6 8 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 9 9 0 K t 4 .4 6 .1 d as 'V t *= 8 v*
- i. 4 2 F" O
e== a em > A C== er 8 8 =
- t a=**>=
t.g 6 9 w EE en *= ew t ) Da te 4f W 8 3
== e-3 Cs F 9 0 e= .T 3 e= 7 t= W 2 0 g u O .* u.* i 9 J e 9 8
- t E
e* 4., t4 De 4 4 4 W X 84 22 C e s w 3== e e mi= 6 v g. 8 0 2 as W O ** Z *w s 8 t u en ene4ZOCE sso en I t E V J t=== m at 5 s e o e s. es s a e 8 et 3 4 e
== e e t 2 O w e t 4 2 O m a s E 4 0 89 0 0 O 9 8 e
J 3 / d T/ >'A MaitatALS MP 9d3 PACE 4 i nu(Leas MATERIALS. .TT B a n esc re DUD *COUE A EFF0HT = t ITEM at.us au tt<14-R r G Total Hotj e s Ftt r te F T P. ' 1 HOO4 '. H00a5 ( 0 2 '4 ) (T2*) CON 5usato (- 15,1.,0.0 71 3. 6 15,098.4
- 6. 4.' T 4 4 5.61550 T.18623 i
I F J i s e I .) s i I .) p t t 6 I e l.
MATERIALS INSPECTIONS FY 1989 THRU MARCH 1, 1989 (LESS 591'S) a FINDINGS: NONE ro- - (( VIOLATIONS 81 \\. I'. ~ so- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AVG DAYS VIO LATI O N S g \\., /i /; _ __. ___ AVG DAYS NONE h so- <a l \\, \\ '. / i ^ o \\ t \\ _ _45 I, j j@ " ' 37 9 O ' s 32 p \\ ^'$ R R 8 m. \\ \\, n c/ g a a; 4 20- \\ / 4 to-4 ~ a OCT DEC FEB APR JUN AUG NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP MATLS MONTH l 's l
~ MATERIALS LICENSING ACTIONS FY 1989 THRU MARCH 1, 1989 LEGEND: 546 549 BACKLOG ^ 500 " 514 _ _ NEW/ AMEND COM PLETION S. A NEW/ AMEND 400- - E Ob 316 312 CD 3ao- \\ 276 h N s/ g 25e a S [2 200- - V X o s / C / g cn E 7% / / ~.. / a / / / ,oo-( ~ / / / / / l / / / / f /. /. / / / L o l OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP l MATLLIC MONTH l l 4 3+ r
The following comments are in response to Question No. 3 l WORKLOAD PROJECTIONS As usual, receipts of new materials license applications and for materials 1 amendments to existing materials licenses have run behind projections during the first 5 months of FY89. It is expected that receipts of applications will increase and the final workload will approximate those in the operating plan. Currently, completions for new licenses and amendments are running behind the operating plan, but ahead of receipts. We expect to complete the number of new licenses and amendments called for in the operating plan by September 30, 1989. Total licensing actions completed in FY 89 will exceed projections by nearly 20%. This will be the result of completing approximately 350 materials renewals, well in excess of the projected workload. There are several reasons for this. 1. A large amount of FTE was expended on materials renewals during the last 2 months of FY88, but the actions were not con.pleted until FY89. 2. Two employees on maternity leave were able to work part time. Because of timeliness requirements, their assignments were limited to review of renewal applications. 3. For Health Physicists to fully meet the requirements for the job, as set forth in the position description, it is necessary that the training of each employee include completion of a minimum of 30 renewal or new applications. This training has required considerable expenditure of FTE on licensing reviews of recewal applications. Current projection based on completed inspections, indicate that approximately 1050 materials inspections will be completed during FY89. This is very close to the projected workload and we do not propose any changes at this time. We anticipate full compliance with Manual Chapter 2800 once OMB clearance is received for the medical questionnaire. e i c m ~
( FUEL FACILITIES AND POWER REACTOR TRANSPORTATION -- RESPONSE TO ENCLOSVRE 3 1. Fuel facilities, see W. Pasciak and J. Roth; for power reactor transportation see W. Pasciak. Fuel facilities: The current staffing plan is attached (#1). 4 FTE are assigned to the program. Roth and Austin spend almost 100 % of their time on fuel facility inspections. The other 2 FTE are residing in the FRPS and Safeguards sections. Requests are made of these sections for health physics (FRPS) and MC & A and securities inspections (SS). No single individual is assigned to fuel facilities in these areas, but inspectors are assigned on an availability basis. The mechanism by which requests are made is the wish-list, a copy of which is attached (#2). Power Reactors: For FY-89 in the power reactor transportation area only core inspections are expected to be done, except for a few special cases. In the past there were several individuals that did transportation inspections. Since the core program was initiated significant staffing) reductions have occurred such that one individual in the ERPS section (Furia does most of the transportation work now. He is committed 80 % (0.8 FTE The NMSS budget for transportation is abou)t 0.4 FTE.to transportation inspections. See the attached schedule (#3) for completed power reactor transportation inspections for FY-88 and FY-89. 2. See W. Pasciak. ~~~ ~ Fuel facilities: See attached schedules. Expenditures for FY-88 were on target (#4). For FY-89 we are on target in-all areas (#5) except health physics, which is badly falling behind. The reason is that higher priorities are assigned to work such as Pilgrim and Shoreham startup, maintenance team inspections and core activities than for routine fuel facility inspections. Elevation of such work to top priority mainly comes from upper level NRC Headquarters management. Also attached are the RITS system outputs for fuel facility activities (#6). i Power Reactors: In the area of transportation for FY-89 we are right on i target, but it is expected that we will fall behind as the year goes on, mainly because of an unfilled vacancy. For FY-88 about 60% of the facilities were inspected. As indicated by the attached schedule for FY-88, this occurred in all the areas (effluents, radwaste, confirmatory measurements, non-rad chemistry laboratory, non-rad chemistry operations, and environmental done by ERPS. 60% were completed not because of an underutilization of qua)lified staff, butOnly because of an inadequate number of staff FTE. Regional management made a decision to spread the FTE evenly over all the areas rather than doing all the transportation work at the expense of the other areas. l
f 3. No, fuel facility staff budget is generally good except for possible increases needed in West Valley depending on how the progress goes there and what work needs to be done. One change that should be made in the future is budgeting for NIST. Right now there is nothing in the budget and about 0.4 FTE will be needed each year. Also, there may be some decomissioning work needed if licensees submit information in the next few months for Westinghouse and/or Wood River Junction. 4. Adr mistrative support is generally adequate. However, the information system cor retrieving 766 data does not allow useful retrieval of information. Information should be tracked on RITS, but there are problems with that also. For example, in the RITS system we are still loosing time charged against the MC 2600 program. 5. Interaction with HQ is generally adequate, but some problems occasionally arise at the PM level. HQ needs to handle licensing issues more effectively and in a timely manner. Because of many problems with existing licenses, there are repeated problems at the inspection level, some of which transcend to health and safety issues. 6. License reviews is a HQ function. The main initiative has been getting another full-time employee in the fuel facility area (Austin). In the power reactor transportation area there is no staffing available for initiatives. 7. Tee W. Pasciak for reactor, J. Roth for fuel facilities. Power reactors: An attached schedule (#3) indicates exactly what inspections have been done at power reactors. At power reactors our inspections are not against 86740 but 86721. As indicated above and waste requirement inspections in all core, we are performing transportation inspections. We have done 10 core inspections to date and find that it takes an average of about 16-20 on-site hours to do a decent job on transportation, 10 CFR 61, and solid radwaste aspects of the core at a single unit site. The core has impacted this inspection area in that we used to spend about 30-35 hours in these areas. We can not look at things in the detail that we used to nor can we write as meaningful SALPS. At 16-20 hours we believe we are still doing an effective job, however. Fuel facilities: Transportation inspections are routinely conducted annually at fuel facilities in Region I using the guidance contained in 86730. 10 CFR 61 inspections are also conducted annually in accordance with 84850. Approximately eight inspections of licensee's transportation and 10 CFR 61 activities have been conducted at fuel facilities since the last program review. Significant questionable practices were identified at the Combustion Engineering facility. We also have been following preparations by DOE at West Valley to transport additional spent fuel assemblies from West Valley to 00E Idaho.
~ FF INSP 06/27/88 FUEL FACILITY INSPECTION BUDGET 3 FTE Facility Radiological Licensee tocation Docket No. Safety
- Safeguards **
Total Region I Uranium Fuel Fabrication: Babcock and Wilcox Apollo, PA 70-135 0.2 0 0.2 o./3 - Combustion Engineering Windsor, CT 70-1100 0.6 0.3 0.9 o.28 UNC Inc., UNC Naval Uncasv111e, CT 70-371 0.6 0.5 1.1 /. / 2 Products Division UNC Recovery Systems Wood River Junction, RI 70-820 0.1 0 0.1 o.o 7. 4 Interim Spent Fuel Storage: Department of Energy West Valley, NY 50-201 1.00 0 1.00 d 88 ~ ) j Advanced Fuel R&D and Pilot Plants: Babcock and Wilcox Leechburg, Parks 70-364 0.3 0 0.3 c./3 ] Township, PA t Cintichen, Inc. Tuxedo, NY 70-687 0.4 0 0.4 o.69 Westinghouse Cheswick, PA 70-1143 0 0 0 o TOTAL 3.2 0.8 4.0 3,9
- Does not include team assessments 1
- Includes physical security inspections only e
m
- m..
s < r
i ~ ) DEC 21 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard R. Kelmig, Chief, Safeguards Section, FRSSB Mohamed M. Shanbaky, Chief, Facilities Radiation Protection Section, FRSSB THRU: Ronald R. Bellamy, Chief, Facilities Radiation Safety & Safeguards Branch, DRSS FROM: Walter J. Pisciak, Chief, EfflueiItYRadiation protection Section, FRSSB i
SUBJECT:
WISH-LIST FOR SPECIALIST INSPECTION EFFORT FOR FUEL FACILITIES 2ND QUARTER, FY-89 .The following list provides requests for inspection work during the period January-March, 1989. Please provide me with your schedule by the last weet of December. A team inspection at Combustion Engineering will be held the week commencing January 30, 1989. Jerry Roth will be the team leader and inspectors should be directed to follow his instructions and guidance during this effort. An inspection plan will be provided shortly before the inspection. Facility Area Responsible secticn Priority Combustion Rad. protection FRPS high Engineering 2 inspections: Team Jan. 30, 1989 Follow-up Mar 13, 1989 CE Security SS ~ high Penn State Rad. protection FRPS low MIT Rad. protection FRPS medium (2nd request) MIT Security SS medium NIST(NBS) Rad. protection FRPS high UNC Rad. protection FRPS high l l < f 7' L'f[1 I J Gs O l"% 7' J ~\\v / \\,,
4 September 27, 1990 ) MEMORANDUM FOR: Those on Attached List FROM: Glen L. Sjoblom, Deputy Director Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS
SUBJECT:
FINAL NMSS NATIONAL PR GRAM REVIEW REPORTS FDR 1990 The NMSS reports providing final documentation of the results of the National Program Review for 1990 have been completed, following incorporation of suggestions from the Regions. The results had been shared by the NMSS teams during their earlier visits to the Regions. This report is for information and record purposes and a response is thus not necessary. Glen L. Sjoblom, Deputy Director Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMS
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBllTION: IMNS r/f NMSS r/f IMS D/D r/f J. Glenn J. Hickey G. Deegan w/ enclosures C. Haughney QO W FC :IMN AME :GLS /cy: ATE :9/1 90 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY FINAL 0 ~' U/10ftl n/)s/"7 lJ ' ' ' / '1 / /[? y
i e 4 s /pa nuang'o, UNITED STATES ~, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n { .i WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 j September 27, 1990 J MEMORANDUM FOR: Those on Attached List FROM: Glen L. Sjoblom, Deputy Director Division of Industrial,and i Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS i
SUBJECT:
FINAL NMSS NATIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW REPORTS FOR 1990 j The NMSS reports providing final documentation of the results of the i National Program Review for 1990 have been completed, following incorporation c of suggestions from the Regions. The results had been shared by the NMSS teams-during their earlier visits to the Regions. This. report is for information and record purposes and a response is thus not necessary. LM w en L. Sjobl Deputy Director Division of In strial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMS
Enclosure:
As stated 1 i ~ i 9 i I
4 MEMORANDUM FOR THOSE ON THE ATTACHED LIST Dated: 9/27/90 Malcolm Knapp, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, RI J. Philip Stohr, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, RII Charles E. Norelius, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, RIII Arthur B. Beach, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, RIV Ross A. Scarano, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, RV G
.o REPORT OF NMSS 1990 NATIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW AT NRC REGION II, MARCH 6 - MARCH 7, 1990 1. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This report provides the results of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards and Office of Enforcement review of its materials programs that were under the responsibility of NRC Region II for 1990. The National Program Review Manual dated December 11, 1987 outlines the concept and plan for the NMSS National Program Review (NPR) process, and was the basis for the review. The Headquarters team participating in this review included individuals from each of the program areas under review. The composition of the team is shown in. The principal Regional activities related to materials programs are primarily under the responsibility of the Region II Division of Radiation Safety and 4 Safeguards (DRSS). A copy of the DRSS organizational chart is shown in. The Region II responses to an information questionnaire are shown in Attachment 3. The NPR is based not only on the visit to the Region, but on the collective Regional / Headquarters interfaces throughout the year. These interfaces include the review of selected licensing casework and inspection reports, enforcement data, the accompaniment of region based inspectors, the review of casework and inspection statistics and resource utilization, technical assistance and coordination actions including conference calls, and the information questionnaire. The NPR process is intended to provide a review of the effectiveness of both the Region and Headquarters activities insofar as they relate to Region II's activitief, and to identify suggestions for improving the effectiveness of the collective efforts of NHSS, OE, and Region l II. The NPR review emphasizes the quality of licensing and ] 1 i
inspection activities, as well as numerical goals on the basis that both of these elements contribute to assuring the safety of operations involving NRC licensee activities. This report is organized so as to present an integrated summary of Region II activities in each of the following areas: 1. Background and Purpose 2. Licensing 3. Inspection 4. Enforcement 5. Training 6. Initiatives 7. Interfaces of Region II and NMSS 8. Resource Utilization 9. Recommendations and Suggestions 2. LICENSING a. Materials Safety Region II currently regulates approximately 1000 byproduct material licensees. In FY89, Region II completed 602 material licensing actions against an operating plan of 600 (100.3%). The Branch Chief, Section Chiefs, and Licensing reviewers are all aware of licensing goals for FY90. All agree that the current operating goal of 680 is not attainable to a short fall in receipts. Region II proposed to change its operating plan to 600 cases and use the additional resources to complete the computerization of the license preparation process, site reviews and increased attention to more difficult cases. This request was approved. As of March 5, 1990, Region II has completed 216 cases of the 233 cases received.
- However, the recent addition of a new experienced licensing reviewer / inspector should allow Region II to meet the revised goal of 600 cases for FY90.
2
Region II has two full-time license reviewers that handle most of the licensing workload. However, over the last two years several inspectors have been cross-trained in licensing reviews to provide backup to those full-time reviewers. Region II continues to have a stable licensing review group that is capable of handling a wide variety of casework in an efficient and highly professional manner. Region II currently is revising its process for typing J licenses to improve efficiency and timeliness. b. Safeguards 4 The 10 CFR 70.32(e) case reviews were performed in a sound and technical manner. Region II achieved a case turnaround average of 31 days. This involved 20 MC&A and Safeguards reviews plus two carryovers from FY88. As in the previous fiscal year, receipts were lower than had been projected (43). Currently, there is no case backlog for FY90. An additional 229 licensing hours were expended by the Region to support Headquarters in the licensing efforts associated with the All Chemical Isotope Enrichment, Inc. (ALCHEMIE) operation. The 229 hours included three site visits involving six staff members. 3. INSPECTIONS a. Materials Safety In FY89, Region II ceppleted 312 material inspections compared to a goal or 325 (96%). Through February 28, 1990, the Region had completed 139 inspections. This rate is somewhat below the prorated operating plan target of 161 for this time period. The Region expects to meet their FY90 targets, and has not requested a revision to the operating plan target for inspections. At the present time, Region II has no inspections in the overdue category, and is generally completing inspections on or before the next inspection due date. l 3
During last year program review, it was noted that the incumbent material inspection and facilities radiation protection section chiefs were recently appointed to these job assignments. These section chiefs have grown into their job and have had a significant impact on the efficiency of their sections. Region II averaged 29 days from inspections to transmittal of inspection documentation versus a goal of 30 days ' The Region has a system for tracking inspection completions versus the operating plan, overdue inspections, and timeliness of inspection reports. The system for tracking inspection completions and overdues is consistent with that used in other Regions. A review of selected inspection documents indicated that there were no significant problems in the areas of technical adequacy, accuracy, or quantity. An accompaniment of two Region II material inspectors revealed a professional, thorough inspection effort with considerable time devoted to education of licensees. b. Fuel Facility Inspections The Radiation Safety Project Section of the Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Program Branch has the project management responsibility for the fuel cycle inspection program. Other sections within the Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards conduct specialized inspections at fuel cycle facilities. Quarterly status reports for each licensee provide management with the status of the inspection program. During FY89 the fuel cycle inspection program was completed. To date, for FY90 the program is meeting or exceeding the operating plan in most areas. The overall inspection program remains at an effective level. Management meetings continue to be effective in obtaining improved performance at several fuel cycle licensees. 4 1 i w
3 A review of inspection reports issued during FY89 determined that the inspection reports generally communicated well the results of the inspection and were in i accordance with Manual Chapter 0610. However, some of the inspection reports were very long and detailed and others were very brief. The 30 day calendar goal for issuing inspection reports was met for most inspection reports. NMSS licensing staff members accompanied or participated in seven inspections during the appraisal period and found the Regional inspectors to be conscientious and thorough and well prepared for the inspections. In addition, the inspections were complete and consistent with NRC policy and guidance. In general, both the Region and NMSS consider the NMSS participation in inspections to be beneficial and worthwhile. c. Safeguards Inspections The Material Control and Accounting (MC&A) and physical security inspection ~ program met its goals as established by the FY89 Operating Plan, Manual Chapter 2681, and Mr. Burnett's memorandum of August 15, 1988. In FY89, Region II completed 13 safeguards and 25 MC&A inspections. The inspection reports were completed in a timely manner and were technica11y' sound. The Region maintains an internal tracking system to ensure that a 30 day turnaround on inspection reports is achieved and maintained. Region II MC&A inspectors participated in six team inspections with Headquarters inspectors in FY89. Three of these inspections were used to train Headquarters personnel as part of the MC&A consolidation program. In addition, Region II contributed a total of five inspectors for the Headquarters led and directed safeguards team inspections at the Category I Fuel Facilities. The current inspection program for FY90 is meeting or exceeding the program goals. It should be noted that Region II has been extremely helpful with the consolidation of the MC&A inspection function to Headquarters. S 5 w
l As of February 21, 1990, the responsibility for the Region MC&A inspection program has been consolidated to Headquarters. Prior to that date, the Regional staff had worked with the Headquarters staff to ensure a smooth and effective transition. Region II is continuing to provide 1.3 FTE for the FY90 MC&A inspection program. Two regional inspectors are performing needed inspections for Headquarters. d. Transportation Safeguards Region II performed eight safeguards transportation inspections in accordance with their FY89 Operating plan. Special effort was expended by the Regional staff in meeting their transportation goals, since a number of shipments were consistently delayed or postponed. All inspection reports were technically completed and submitted in a timely manner. Two route surveys were conducted in FYB9 at the request of Headquarters. One survey has already been completed in FY90 and another has been scheduled. e. Transportation Safety Materials Inspection Program (2800)- The field note formats in use by Region II were noted to be consistent with the formats prescribed in MC87100 although the Region (C. Hosey) recently received for comment, from Headquarters a set of six proposed revisiens to the field note formats. Headquarters has continued its on going review of formal reports, 591's, NOV's, and RNOV's from the RIDS system and they are noted to continue to be of good quality. During materials inspections, transportation activities are inspected as an adjunct to the inspection, based on the established frequency and priority of the license. During FY89, of some 1052 licensees in RII, 312 inspections (of a goal of 325) were completed. In these, transportation module 86740 was covered 289 times (in FY88 it was 126 of 372 inspections). Each inspection involves about one-hour devoted to transportation. The violations noted were typically non-escalated, involving mainly shipping paper deficiencies and DOT Spec 7A Documentation. 6 1
Fuel Facilities (2600)- Transportation and LLW were inspected at all of the six major fuel facilities in Region II at least once in FY89. The Headquarters Senior Transportation Specialist accompanied a Region II inspector to the NFS facility in May 1989. The inspector satisfactorily covered the required elements of 86740. No major problems have been noted in the' transportation activities at these facilities. The quality of the inspection reports. continues to be very high. During the past year, and up to the current time, the inspection of transportation /LLW at the fuel facilities has been performed by staff from the RSP Section of NMSSB. (This system is undergoing change, as is discussed below). Reactor Program (2500)- Inspection of transportation /LLW has continued under the FRPS/EPRPB (Potter). The relevant Core Inspection Procedures 83750 and 84750 are being done in accordance with the SALP cycle (32 units inspected in FY89 with about 4 to 6 hrs. per inspection devoted to Transportation). Very little additional Regional inspection effort has been done on either transportation or LLW using the basic or supplemental inspection modules. However, Region II management does feel, that module 83750 does provide sufficient level of resource effort to meet the goals of the procedures, i.e..."to detect indications of declining performance." i There were no major problems noted in the transportation activities of RII reactor facilities, with no escalated enforcement actions (two violation referrals from S.C. are presently being processed, however, involving shipments team Brunswick and Grand Gulf to Barnwell). Three S.C. referrals were made to other NRC regions of errant shipments from other NRC licensees. One inspection accompaniment was made by Headquarters with a RII inspector Gloersen, FRPS) to North Anna in June 1989. The inspector satisfactorily covered the required elements of supplemental procedure 86740. 7
Consolidation of Transportation / Radioactive Inspection Functions Region II is currently implementing a substantial change in its the method of assigning transportation /LLW inspections of fuel facilities and vendors. These inspections are being consolidated into the efforts of the Radiological Effluents and Chemistry Section (REC), of the EPRP Branch. This, staff currently consists of five inspectors plus one vacancy. One of those, is a retrained candidate from the MC&A Safeguards Section, with essentially no training or experience in either transportation or LLW. However, Region II management would like to have him become trained and "up to speed" as the in-house expert in this area. Two of the other inspectors in this section have taken course H-308, and have not had any inspection experience in this area. Essentially, this inspection function is now being integrated into a section where two of six staff (including the vacancy) have had some training, but none have any experience. Region II does plan, however, to have an substantial period wherein these persons will be accompanied by trained, experienced inspectors from FRPS and REC Sections. 4. ENFORCEMENT a. Background and Purpose This section provides the results of the Office of Enforcement's (OE) participation in the HMSS National Program Review. OE's review involved primarily the Region's treatment of recurring violations and exercise of discretion under V.G.I. of the Enforcement Policy for Severity Level V Violations. / b. Treatment of Recurring Violations In response to the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) recommendations in a draft report on the Enforcement Process, the Director, Office of Enforcement required among other things in a memorandum dated August 2, 1989 and made final 8
t by memorandum dated August 30, 1989 (EGM 89-09) that each Region prepare written instructions to assure that Severity Level IV and V violations for materials licensees are properly reviewed to determine whether they represent a significant management breakdown (Severity Level III problem) or are repetitions and, if so, appropriate enforcement actions are considered. The Regional instructions were to be prepared and submitted to OE within 90 days along with plans for training of Regional personnel within six months of issuance of the Regional instructions. Written instructions entitled " Actions Required For Similar (Repeat) Severity Level IV or V Violations," were prepared and subsmitted to OE. These instructions were prepared and submitted on February 22, 1990 (see Enclosure, Regional Office Instruction No. 0903, Rev. 1). Formal training has been given on the original instructions and are planned in the near future for the February 22 revision of the instructions. Discussions with the materials inspectors, Section Chiefs, and the NMSS Branch Chief indicated that the licensee's history is reviewed prior to inspections. Should repeat violations be identified during the inspections, they are emphasized and discussed with the licensee at the close of the inspections. Upon return to the Region, the violations are discussed with the Section Chief. The HMSS Branch Chief and DRSS Director are also advised of the repeat violations. Repeat violations are documented in inspector's field notes or formal inspection reports. Inspection letters and Notices of Violation (NOV's) sent to licensees identify those violations which are repeats. There is no computerized system to track outstanding violations except for fuel facilities. In materials, tracking is done through documentation in inspection field notes, inspection letters and NOV's which are kept in licensee's docket files. OE's review of inspection letters, NOV's, and selected field noter at the Regional office indicated that repeated violations are being identified. Regional Office Instruction No. 0903 is being foll' owed. 9
Region II has not issued any civil penalties for repeat Severity Level IV violations in materials cases except for Rappahanock Hospital. The Regional Enforcement Director is reviewing approximately 10 percent of the inspection letters and NOV's issued, Severity Level IV and V regarding violations to assure the Regional instruction is followed. C. Enforcement Discretion V.G.1 and Severity Level V Violations Written instructions regarding this topic are contained in Regional Office Instruction No. 901, Revision 3, dated August 10, 1989 entitled "Non-Cited Violations (NCVs)." Formal instruction on this subject was given in FY89 to all materials inspectors. Discussions with materials inspectors indicated that they are aware and have used enforcement discretion during inspections in accordance with the Regional Guide. One inspector identified a case where NCVs were documented in the inspection field notes. Review of this document indicated Regional instruction on NCV's was being followed. NCV's are currently identified on Form 591's to the license if this form is used. Two inspectors indicated that the documentation on the 591 Form was burdensome. Inspectors' field notes are used to track the NCV's. Inspectors review the previous inspection field notes and consider the safety significance of the NCV's should they recur. Inspectors' field notes are maintained in licensee's docket files. d. Other Topics Reviewed OE's review also covered the following topics as they relate to possible violations and the enforcement process: o Model Citations Permanent vs. Temporary Job Sites in Radiography o Determining qualifications of new RSO's, physicians, teletherapy o physicists which are not named on the license identified during inspections. 10 1
3 e o Records violations o Report writing - Manual Chapter 0610 10 CFR 35.999 o 10 CFR Part 35.999 o Information Notices e. Recommendations on Enforcement Matters The Region requested that OE put a high priority on issuance of Model Citations for Parts 19, 20, 30, 31, 39, 40, 70, 71, and other parts of 10 CFR effecting materials licensees which have been reviewed and found acceptable / legal to OGC. The Region recommended OE should continue monitoring inspection letters to assure appropriateness of violations cited and identification of repetitive violations in letters and NOV's. In addition, OE should develop a more formal audit program providing feedback to the Region. Region II recommended that professional certifying bodies be notified when NRC takes enforcement action against a certified individual, including doctors, medical physicists, and radiographers. OE requested copies of the next five inspection field notes in which enforcement discretion is documented. The materials Branch Chief requested that communications be directed to him regarding inspection letters and NOVi s for which OE has found inconsistencies or has questions about the citation. It was concluded that the next program review should cover the Escalated Enforcement Process as well as topics covered during this initial OE participation in the NMSS National Program Review. e 11
~ 5. TRAINING a. Overall Training Based on a review of the technical training records, it appears that significant ongoing training was not conducted in the Region II materials program in 1989 except for new inspectors. The Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards recognized the training needs and developed a training plan for each ORSS staff member. The Region is commended for the planning to fill this need and encouraged to fully carry out this plan. Ongoing technical training of staff should be a key element of the Regional program to ensure that NRC can effectively regulate the diverse licensees operations and it should be positive a morale factor for Regional staff. ~ b. Safeguards Training The Region II physical security inspectors and supervisors completed the Physical Protection System Vulnerabilities Workshop at Sandia Laboratories in FY89. One inspector attended the Intrusion Detection Systems Operations and Maintenance Course (S-320) at Norfolk, Virginia. Regional personnel also witnessed two Tactical Response Team (TRT) exercises at B&W Naval, Lynchburg, Virginia. Finally, one inspector participated at the INMM meeting in Orlando, Florida in July, 1989. Region II has been very supportive regarding training for their safeguards inspectors and has provided the necessary training for their MC&A inspectors so they could be transferred to other areas. The Region has expressed a desire for Headquarters to provide or arrange some in-depth training relating to the TRT exercises that will be beginning shortly. l 1 12 l
c. Transportation Training A need for Transportation Course H-308 Training has been identified for at least nine positions. 6. REGIONAL INITIATIVES a. Materials The Region has drafted two Information Notices in relation to fuel facility industrial safety issues and the proper role of licensee radiation safety committees. The Region has suggested increased inspection effort in relation to strontium eye applicators and teletherapy source exchangers. The Region has developed a proposed set of field notes for irradiators and a draft revision of Manual Chapter 2810 for master broad licenses. The Region is automating the licensing process through the use of computers, and more use of computers is planned in the future. This should help meet Regional objectives Region II is consolidating its oversight of the Navy Master i license in the past year through several interactions with the Navy Isotope committee and has instituted a project manager approach to this program. The Region has continued to e,onduct workshops with' licensee groups. The Region has continued its effective coverage of the ongoing recovery of the Decatur, Georgia irradiator problem. i I i l i i 13
b. Safeguards Region II is to be commended for providing inspection assistance for the NHSS sponsored team inspection at the Category I Fuel Facilities. A total of 160 on-site inspection hours were supplied to Headquarters in this effort. Additionally, licensing assistance was provided to NFS in writing the safeguards plan for the decommissioning of the NFS Plutonium Building.
- Finally, the Region provided guest speakers to the Southeast Nuclear Association (SENSA) on two separate occasions.
l c. Fuel Facilities The Region conducted Team ALARA inspections at two fuel facilities based on concepts developed during Team ALARA inspections at power reactors. These inspections have resulted in these licensees having a better idea of ALARA issues and approaches. During FY89 Regional management met approximately quarterly with B&W Navy licensee management regarding progress on B&W's Performance Improvement Program. In September 1989, the quarterly meetings were terminated due to B&W's improvements as a result of the PIP program. The Region upgraded its fuel facility Incident Response Plans and implementing procedures and its plans have been accepted by the NRC's incident response working group as the "model" or base plan. i The Region participated in the NRC Fuel Cycle Licensee Workshop in May 1989. 7. INTERFACE OF REGION II AND NMSS The interfaces have been cooperative and constructive. Communications are i effective and helpful. Region II has been responsive to suggestions and has consulted'with NMSS as well as offered suggestions based on their experience for potential applicability to the National Program Review. 14
1 It was suggested that a scheduled conference call on safeguards issues among NMSS, Region I and Region II would be useful, especially with respect to the TRT program. It was suggested by Region II that rotational assignments be pursued with NMSS and agreement was reached to implement this suggestion. 8. RESOURCE UTILIZATION The following table shows FTE allocations and expenditures for the review period. Region II has no program support funds in the NMSS mission areas. FY90 FY89 ANNUAL BUDGET EXPENDED PROGRAM ACTIVITY 8UDGET EXPENDED BUDGET OCT-FEB* OCT-FEB* % Fuel Facility Licensing 0 0.09 0 0.1 Event Evaluation 0.8
- 1. 9 238 0.8 0.3 0.5 Materials Licensing 3.2 3.6 113 3.1
- 1. 2
- 1. 5 Materials Inspection 6.1 5.4 89 5.9 2.2 2.3 Fuel Facility Insp.
6.2 6.5 105 5.6 2.1 2.1 i SG Fuel Facility Lic. 1.0-
- 0. 5 50
- 0. 7 0.3 0.05**
SG Fuel Facility Insp. 4.6 4.9 107 3.3 1.2 1.1 SG Transportation Insp. 0.4 0.1 25 0.4 0.15 0** j LLW Inspection 0.3 0
- 0. 4 0.15 Materials Decomm.
0 0 0.1 0.04 NMS Section Supv. 1.9 2.1 111
- 1. 9
- 0. 7 0.8 NMTS Section Supv.
- 0. 3 0.7 233
- 0. 3 0.1 0.2 TOTAL 24.8 25.8 104 22.5 8.4 8.65 NOTE:
FY89 expenditures from Regional input provided in response to FYP/ Green Book update { in 12/89 Data source is the RII final report as of February 17, 1990/
- This figure is not accurate.
It does not include all the time being charged to these actions. l 15 l I
l t In FY89, Region II completed 602 material licensing actions against an Operating Plan goal of 600 (100.3 percent) but needed 0.4 FTE more than budgeted resources (3.2). They completed 312 material inspections compared to a goal of 325 (96 percent) with 0.7 FTE less than budgeted resources (6.1). FY89 and FY90 resource expenditures for materials licensing applications are slightly higher than budgeted. Two inspectors were selected for training as license reviewers. This training started in January 1989 and lasted four months. The Nuclear Materials Safety Section was at full staffing by the end of the fiscal year and using overhire authority has employed an additional materials inspector. In FY90, the Region II Operating Plan specifies a goal of 387 materials inspections. Completions are slightly behind projections but are starting to increase with the added staff The Regional staff has written an FY90 inspection plan to accomplish resources. the Operating Plan goal. FY89 resource expenditures for materials inspections were slightly lower than budgeted and FY90 expenditures are as projected at this point in the fiscal year. FY89 fuel facility safety inspections were completed on schedule and utilized the allocated resources. Also, inspections are on schedule and within resources for FY90. Region II has identified as a problem the accounting for time expended on safeguards fuel facility licensing actions and safeguards transportation inspections. They believe most of the time spent on these activities is being charged against 50 docket actions instead of 70 docket actions in the Regulatory Information Tracking System (RITS). The team agreed to address this problem to the appropriate staff in NMSS for resolutions. 16 l
S In summary, FY89 and FY90 Operating Plan commitinents for these NMSS mission activities are being met. FY90 resource expenditures are in line with projections. Region II has assured Headquarters that the goals stated in the FY90 Operating Plan will be accomplished by year end except for materials licensing as previously discussed. The Region stated that adequate NHSS resources are provided to complete the HMSS programs. Region II recommended that the. Region II Fuel Facility project manager function be specifically called out and recognized in the future budget. 9. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS The Regional fuel facility inspection status report should be shared with o the Fuel Cycle Safety Branch. Rotational assignments should continue to be pursued. o The Region should continue to consider and implement practice ways of o striving for efficiency in the licensing, inspection and enforcement process, in anticipation of potential increases in inspection frequencies, pursuant to the Five-Year Plan The Region should identify opportunities for some inspections of Agreement o State licensees operating in Region II under reciprocity The Region should consider using a simple form for communication between o i licensing and inspection disciplines, through the docket file The Region should consider sending a modified licensee renewal o notification letter to those licensees where a complete new application would be appropriate, to improve coordination and reduce deficiency letters-The Region should carefully monitor the transition of responsibility for o. transportation inspections to ensure continued effectiveness The Region should continue to work toward use of model citations and o monitor and encourage the implementation of inspectors use of enforcement discretion per Part 2 i Section Chiefs should strive to become thoroughly familiar with facilities o through numerous inspection accompaniments and inspections 17
.. _ = t o The Region should consider the RII staff concerns about the effects'of insistance on 32 percent direct inspection efforts for materials licensees on inspection depth (historically, the Headquarter suggested goal has been 27 percent).- The Region should consider use of NMSS or Region II fire protection o expertise as an option to training emergency response staff members to conduct fire safety inspection effort. 1 r 18 1 ,m
a ATTACHMENT 1 1990 Region II Program Review - Team Members Atlanta, GA Marc 6 - March 7,1990 Glen Sjoblom, Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, Team Leader Michael Lamastra, Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety Edward Flack, Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety Ken RAynor, Program Management, Policy Development and Analysis Staff Al Grella, Division of Safeguards and Transportation Cathy Haney, Division of Safeguards and Transportation William Floyd, Division of Safeguards and Transportation Jenny Johanson, Office of Enforcement Charles Cain, NRC Region IV, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards 4 19
I Olvisii5n or mAmeAviou sArtvY I } I Asso SAFEcuAmos I i I l OICECion, J. PhiII;p Stohr - 1 I DEPUTY DIRECTOR, VACAlli i N 1 1 1 ISECRETAltV,.P. A. Niles i l i i I eg I I I I l'seuCLEAA MATERIALS SAFETY I I EfeERCEseCY PREPAftfDssESS ANO l l'RA0lotoCICAL emoitCi toes SnAseCH I 1 Ase0 sATECt8Amos estAseCH I I I I I i CHIEF, D. M. Collins 1 8 CHIEF, w. Cilne l I l 8 l I Ii 15ECAFTARY, R. soccettle l l ISECAFTARY, 4.. stretten I l IGFF. Assi., D. 8ereen I i 10F F. Assi., J. Childs I i i i i torr.-Asst., M. Witt i I i 1 1 I I I I I l I I i I_l I I I ~ l i I _I I I I I I I ITAEitetets I laAoiotoCICAL i l[A[AC(NCY I IlUEEEAA I IIAIECUAEOS I lNAOI A.Tl006 i InasAi tose I lte rturnis er i tratrAatow[ss I leeAIEn t Ats I istCiscal I isArtIV i lemos. stCliosel ICHtn. stCleonel istCleon I isAFETv SECiscost I i IrnoJ. SECi t oes t .I II II I I II Ii i ICNitF l ICHitt i ICHIEF I ICHIEF l ICHIEF l ICHIET l lJ. retter. i II. Decker i IW. Rankin l lC. Metey l 10. McCulra i lE. McAlpine 1 I _., _ i i li i i i i lI i I i i ii i i i i iI .l Itt. tellett i 15. Adamovita l IC. Sanks i 1 R Srewn i it. Clay I lC. Bessett i IW. CIpersen i 1R. Carrion i IA. Seland 1 - C. Connell l {J. Ennte i IN. Germudel i IC. Hughey i In. norston i 1A. Gooden i
- p. Hela l lJ. N i rlpy i IL, frankeln i IC. stuto l lo. Seymour l lJ. Mreh i
E. RIlne l l0. Mesnyk 8 lJ. EshletteM)l
- 12. shortridgel IT. voth l Iw. sertor I
- w. Loo i IC. Ferny I 10. Neentoki l
Ir. Wrloht i I I IC. sesyera i J. reachet i Iw. stenstnerry I IC. Troup I l l l l[. Teste 1 is. Waldron i 10. Theepson i 10. Colline I l IVACAseCY I l l lE Wright i IA. Tillman iI Ivar* W II I I I I I sw. retin iI tvAcaseCy 1 llo, Jones ! I I I I lo, a,n,e i I l Ivacasocy l I iofpol i I l g gl gg i I II I i _I I II ii i 2/21/90 7 .}}