ML20054K065
| ML20054K065 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 06/25/1982 |
| From: | Bickwit L NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20049A457 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-92-436 SECY-82-268, NUDOCS 8206300401 | |
| Download: ML20054K065 (4) | |
Text
&
c at QbQ$ ?m R, , U""QQ$ R- -iY f.;f:pN9'rpMi J p , 's'y;'*f:s.n'g
. .. ..- , . . . .: . a
. r;; : - ~ c . z ..
c: a 6
.3 /, /
-(. *
,N.
A 6 ;>-
\
I ,,
- "g o' M C s,,o, .
[s 4
June 25, 1982 .*( 7 SECY-92-268 f
-5 o., ~
l .
<,y ,j. ... .
ADJUDICATORY ISSUE /
... .' , s (Affirmation) j' ,'- \.
i.. ,
s .
For: The Commissioners '
/
's
' ( ;. _ . . . . - ' ' '
From: Leonard Bickwit, Jr.
General Counsel r
Subject:
dIU f ~~~
SAN ONOFRE 2 AND 3 f
Purpose:
t 6x<. s6 a
F _
Discussion:
.m'
)' _ J(
l m _
With the May 14 order the Board retained jurisdiction over two issues, one L:r.Ca m I m :' v.l! ? itJ relating to the adequacy of siren
! tNd0m al hif orm:iticil notification in the city of San Clemente in and the other concerning the need fcr Act,accorducc cxemptions _. ioili thc# . - - - - -
medical arrangements for the genera:
F01A_f/iffd -
public. On June .e tha L; censing carr The latest NTOL status reocrt indicates that Soutnern
~1/
California Edison does not expect Unit 2 to go critica'.
until the week of July 7 and that it would not be read,.
to exceed 5% of rated power until the week of August ' ..
! CONTACT: Marian Moe, OGC x41493 SECY NOTE: This paper is identical to l one advanced on June 24, 1982.
f 8206 onant 20625 pf/
OCK 05000g1 J
, ..r ..
.. 2 issued an order resolving the siren notification question and terminating jurisdiction over the issue. The Board decided that the information on siren notification deficiencies forwarded by the City of San Clemente and Intervenors Guard, et al., did not merit reopening the proceedings and determined that the existing siren system and alternative means of notification provide reasonable assurance that adequate notification to the public within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone will be accomplished.
See 10 CFR 50. 47 (b) (5) .
i
(
f -
{
_> As we noted '
' there is some question as'to -
[
l In our view, I e T
c
- 4
, ~- ./
l l
t I
' eg l' l .
,/ , We recommend
[ ,
1
,)
t i i A
but the question l now i
l While we'believe that j we recommend that '
i The main advantage l
-_ ./
I If j
l.
....w- m a-.
- s. i .
?.
6 The Intervenors in this proceeding have filed a motion for a stay of ti.e full-power deci.sion with .t.he Appeal
- f48. ()-
L Oral argument ~5n'the stay
~
l "m5 tic. lo scheduled for June 25 in l Bethesda .] We'dRpect tIia t- -
N !
N
( l dV {
l
\ , = = _ _ - ,
f~~6PE has reviewed l
1 1
V'Jh(
l- j Recommendation:
4 r
,- ~ ..
,_ _. $ 2. , _ ,
Leonard Bickwit, Jr.
General Counsel
Attachment:
Draft Order Commissioners' comments should be provided directly to the Office of the Secretary by c.o.b. Friday, July 9, 1982.
i Commission Staff Office comments, if any, should be submitted to the Commissioners NLT Friday, July 2, 1982, with an information i copy to the Office of the Secretary. If the paper is of such a nature that it requires additional time for analytical review and l
comment, the Commissioners and the Secretariat should be apprised j of when comments may be expected.
! DISTRIBUTION:
Commissioners
- OGC OPE OIA Secretariat
, .. _-. . , . _-.