ML20050A523

Repts Latest Conclusions Re Fuel Load Date,Produces Various Emergency Planning Documents & States Views Re Litigation of Any Offsite Emergency Planning Issues. Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20050A523
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	03/29/1982
From:	Reveley W HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To:
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8204010372
Download: ML20050A523 (25)

Text

_

. g o '.i t '

• gMarch un 3$9 f810b2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board s

In the Matter of )

) 1' LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY Docket No. 50- N OL 4bp, ,

(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, ) T ## -

Unit 1) ) 6-Q1 FUEL LOAD SCHEDULE AND EMERGENCY PLANNING 8 N c)

As directed by the Board during the prehearing confer-ence of March 10, 1982 and thereafter in the Board's Order of March 15, 1982, LILCO (a) reports its latest conclusions re-garding when Shoreham will be physically ready to load fuel, (b) produces various emergency planning documents, and (c) notes the Company's views concerning the litigation of any on-site emergency planning issues.

I. Fuel Load Schedule See the attached letter from Millard S. Pollock, LILCO's Vice President-Nuclear to W. Taylor Reveley, III, dated March 26, 1982. As Mr. Pollock makes clear, in the Company's

)gg3 1

judgment there continues to exist a strong likelihood that

//

8204010372 820329 PDR ADOCK 05000322 Q PDR

, Shoreham will be physically ready to load fuel by September 20th of this year.

II. Various Emergency Planning Documents Accompanying this paper are ten pertinent documents.

Items 1 to 3 below are being supplied to the entire service list. Due to the bulk of the remaining documents, only one copy of items 4 to 10 has been sent to the Board, New York State, NRC Staff, County, SOC, and North Shore Committee, and no copies have been sent to the rest of the service list.

Items 4 to 10 will be filed under separate cover. The docu-ments:

(1) The April 16, 1981 contract between Suffolk County and LILCO, providing for the timely preparation by the County of its emer-gency plan and for LILCO's finaricial assist-ance to that end.

(2) A February 19, 1982 letter from Lee E. Koppelman, the County's Director of Planning, to LILCO, indicating that the County "will return the funds you advanced

[under the April 16, 1981 contract] and will not call for any further funds."

(3) A March 17, 1982 letter from Matthew <

C. Cordaro, the LILCO Vice President in  !

charge of emergency planning, to Dr.

Koppelman, indicating that "LILCO is relying on the County to perform its obligations under this contract [of April 16, 1981] and will be damaged severely if the County fails to perform their obligations fully."

(4) The Shoreham Nuclear Power Station

[On-site] Emergency Plan, dated May 27, 1981 (SNRC-568), and revised January 11, 1982 (SNRC-656). Only the Board, New York State,

. and North Shore Committee are receiving copies today. The County, SOC and Staff have been previously served, though they are re-ceiving today a new, colored Figure 6.2, en-titled " Evacuation Area by Zones and Zone Designations," to supplement the black-and-white Figure 6.2.

(5) Draft Shoreham Emergency Imple-menting Procedures, dated March 25, 1982 (SNRC-685).

(6) Generic Portions of the New York State Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan, dated July 1981.

(7) A Draft Shoreham Annex to the State Plan, dated March 24, 1982 (letter to Lawrence Czech from Charles A. Daverio).

(8) Pickard, Lowe & Garrick, Draft Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Site

[ Consequence Analysis, March 26, 1982 (final l report expected in early fall 1982).

(9) Nuclear Safety Associates, Recommended Source Terms for Environmental Releases from Major LWR Accidents, dated September 1981.

(10) Nuclear Safety Associates, Recommended Source Terms for Environmental Releases from Major LWR Accidents, Supplement 1, March 1982.

l III. Contentions, if Any, Regarding the the On-Site Emergency Plan The Board directed the parties . . . to l

file by March 29, 1982, their joint (or at

)_ least coordinated) advice as to whether the filings and litigation of on-site emergency planning contentions can be scheduled in ad-vance of off-site emergency planning.

Order of March 15, 1982, at 25-26.

~

We have discussed the matter with the other parties but reached no consensus. Except for the coordination of the on-site plan with off-site emergency efforts, LILCO believes that any on-site issues are now ripe for prompt particulariza-tion and litigation. Thus, we ask that such on-site issues, if any, be identified no later than April 13, with written testi-mony to follow on May 25.

Respectfully submitted, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY

~,,

// f W.

'/4' . // lAh.

III h.

(

l 1 Tay(lo'r

/ Reveley, Hunton & Williams 707 East Main Street P. O. Box 1535 I Richmond, Virginia 23212 DATED: March 29, 1982 h

i I

r I -

c-gj @ LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COM PANY 17 5 EAST OLD COU N T RY ROAD H IC K SVI L L E NEW YORK 11801 Millard S. Pottoch Vice President - Nuclean March 26, 1982 W. Taylor Reveley, III, Esq.

Ilunton & Williams 707 East Main Street P.O. Box 1535 Richmond, VA 23212

Dear Mr. Reveley:

As you requested for submission in the OL proceeding, set out below are LILCO's latest conclusions regarding Shoreham's fuel load schedule as constrained by construction activities.

With the schedule just six month away from fuel load,'

a specific comprehensive review was undertaken over the past month to determine areas where a risk of schedule slippage might be anticipated and to evaluate the probability of maintaining the schedule for loading fuel on or about September 20, 1982.

As of this date, approximately 80% of the startup tests scheduled to begin have been started. A computerized model has been flagging the prerequisite activities along multi-ple critical paths in support of fuel load, and this emphasis has permitted a continuing reanalysis, and reemphasis on the most critical systems to bring the schedule back in line as delays are identified. In addition, this present review has weighed identified uncertainties based upon industry experience of specific occurrences that have been encountered at the Shoreham site to permit a more defined evaluation of schedule risk.

In order to perform the risk analysis,a review was made of the activities required to support the project fuel load and ten major milestones were selected for further risk analysis as follows:

1. Completing the suppression pool.

2. Making the emergency diesel generators operational.

I 1t .

W. Taylor Reveley, III, Esq.

l 3, Page Two

( March 26, 1982

3. Completing the secondary containment leak rate test.

4. Completing the primary containment structural acceptance test and integrated leak rate test.

5. Making the post LOCA hydrogen recombiner system operational.

6. Completing the radiation monitoring system.

7. Completing the post accident sampling system.

8. Completing the technical support center.

9. Making the security system operational.

10. Completing the pipe stress calculations and repairs.

These ten milestones were chosen since they are:

Prerequisite activities along the critical path in support of fuel load.

Activities which have continually run behind schedule or have required special emphasis to maintain schedule.

Activities with identified uncertainties as a result of industry experience or specific experience at the Shoreham Site.

Activities so large in scope that the potential for significant delay must be acknowledged.

The results of this analysis-produces a range of fuel load dates which have been categorized as follows:

(A) most likely, (B) less likely, and (C) least likely:

A. Most Likely It is expected that all the major milestones required for fuel load will be completed by '

September 20. The current schedule indicates four such systems slipping into October, but

.

• I

, y(

W.. Taylor Reveley, III, Esq.

j. Page Three

'e' March 26, 1982 i

A. Most Likely (cont'd.)

we are confident, based on prior experience, that corrective action over the next six

months will bring them back into the target window.

L B. Less Likely The less likely scenario would place the fuel load date between the end of October and the end of November. This scenario assumes that many of the present problems associated with the. ten major milestones could not be overcome during the next six months. This, however, has not been the history for items such as those identified since the startup testing program was initiated over two years ago.

C. Least Likely The least likely scenario assumes the compounded influence of slipping multiple activities, and therefore we believe this is a minimum risk expectation. This case assumes no ability to correct identified problem areas. The fuel load date under this scenario would be projected between the end of November and the middle of January. It is the least likely case, and a number of alternatives should mitigate against the fuel load date falling

. into this window.

In conclusion, while there are of course a number of areas of exposure that could jeopardize the schedule, our current fuel load date of late September is still achievable.

We feel all problem areas of any significance have been identified and special efforts are being applied to assure no schedule impact. I must therefore maintain our position that we will-be prepared to load fuel in late September, 1982.

4 Very truly yours, 73 )d'edJ .2df,/

Millard S. Pollock, Vice President - Nuclear 1

MSP:si

~ . . . . .

y .

s ",

e TN15 ACREDiENT, as entered into as of this /6 day of APRIL, 1981 by. and between the g Island Lighting Company (hereinafter referred to C,- of SdG/K e<l.y ~fl.. h $s as "L1LC0") and Ane 5 f folk County Departeent of Planning (hereinaf ter 6

4 N referred to as the " DEPARTMENT").

WITNESSETH THAT:

VMEREAS, LILCO desires to engage the DEPARTHENT to render certain technical'and professional services hereafter described, M', THEREFORE, the' parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:

Employrent of Contractor. LILCO hereby agrees to engage the 1.

DEPARTMENT and the DEPARDIENT hereby agrees to perform the services herein-after set forth. The relationship of the parties hereto shall be that of client and independent contractor; neither the DEPARTMENT nor any person hired by the DEPARTMENT shall be considered employees of LILCO for any purpose.

Scope of Services. The DEPARD ENT shall prepare a County Radio-2.

logical Emergency Response Plan, as required by Tederal Regulations in effect on the date of this Agreement for the LILCO Shoreham Nuclesr Power Station. Said Plan shall be prepared in accordance with'tb description contained in clause 3 " Work Statement." The DEPARD;ENT represents that it 4

has read and is f amiliar with the applicable Federal Regulations contained in Exhibit I attached hereto and that the DEPARTMENT believes it can develop a County Radiological Emergency Response Plan which complies with such regulations. If revisions to the aforesaid Tederal Regulaticas shall be made during the period of this Agreement, calling for changes in the scope of work, then the provisions of clause 10 " Changes in Scope" of this Agree-ment shall apply.

3. Work Statement

a. The DEPARD1ENT shall perform the activities described in the SCOPE OF WORK appended hereto as Exhibit A.

b. The DEPART'iENT shall conform to the Tederal Regulations and guidelines listed in Exhibit 5, appended hereto, in the formation of outputs 1

E

f b.

activities described in Exhibit A.

c. Wherever specialized technical and se,1entific inputs are necessary, t'he DEPARTMINT will retain, after consultation and concurrence by LILCO, the services of appropriate experts, at the DEPARTMENT's expense.

4. Time of Performance

a. , The DEPARTMENT will make every effort to complete the tasks listed in Exhibit A within 6 months from the date of execution of this Agreecent, subject to the ticely response by Tederal and State agencies to requests for information, and the timely receipt of Tederal and State concurrences with the draf t and final Ecergency Radiological Response Plans. In the event the DEPARTMENT f ails to receive timely response from Federal and State agencies to requests for information, the DEPARTMENT shall proeptly notify LILCO in writing of euch failure.

b. The DEPARTMENT will issue monthly progress reports, and distribute them to LILCO, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Tederal Emergency Management Agency, the New York State Department of Health, and other involved and interested agencies, as specified by LILCO and agreed to by the DEPARTMENT. The DEPARTMENT agrees to provide LILCO with reason-able, access to all meroranda, correspondence, employee qualification records, papers, reports, studies and similar documents prepar,ed by or obtained by the DEPARTMENT in connection with the performance of its obligations under this contract. LILCO shall give the DEPARTMENT 7 days' notice of its intention to exercise its rights under this paragraph.

~5. Supervision and Personnel

s. All work performed by the DEPARTMENT shall be under the direct supervision of Lee E. Koppelman,

b. The DEPARTMENT represents tha't it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perfore the services covered by this Ag~reement. Such personnel shall not be esployees of, or'have any contractual relationship with, LILCO.

2-

O,, , ,

l r

6. Compensation. LILCO agrees to reimburse the DEPARTMENT on a fined price basist total compensation shall be TWO HUNDRED AND TORTY-TIVE

' THOUSAND ($245,000.00) DOLLARS for the services described in clause 3

" Work Statement" of this Agreement unless this Agreement is amended as provided herein. The DEPARTMENT shall be compensated according to the following payment schedule: i

$75,000.00 on execution of this Agreement;

$75,000.00 on June 1,1981; galance on completion.

e l

7. Nondiscrimination. The DEPARTMENT shall not discriminate, directly I

or indirectly, on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, age, or national The DEPARTMENT origin in its employment practices related to this Agreement.

' shall take af firmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and e=-

ployees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, religion., ,

sex, age, or national origin. - .

3. Interest of contractor. The DEPARTMENT represents that it j,

presently has no interest and will not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance

• of services required to be performed under this Agreement. The DE}ARTMENT

= .

turther represents that, in tFe perforr.ance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed.

8 9. Title of Preperty. Title to property acquired under this Agree-sent vests with the DEPARTMENT.

10. Channes in Scope. If during the period of this Agreement, any

. e change in the relevant Tederal regulations causes an increase or decrease

. I

' in the DEPARTMENT's cost of, or the time required for, the performance of any part of the work under this Agreement, an equitable adjustment shall be made and this Agreement modified in writing accordingly. No charge shall be made to L1LCO for any change or increase in the obligations of l

I l .

n. __

f.

• the DEPARTMENT requiring extra work under this Agreement, unless the p'arties execute such an Agreesent specifying the work to be done there-

• ' under and the cost thereof. Disputes over such an adjustment shall be I .

,. resolved as provided in clause 11 ** Remedies" of this Agreement.

11. Remedies. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the

- laws of the State of New York. All claims, cou ter-claims, disputes and other matters in question between LILCO and the DEPARTMENT arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the rules for co=mercial disputes of the American Arbitration Association in the City of New York. The parties hereto agree that the determination of said aribtration shall be final and, binding upon the parties hereto and that a judgment on said award may

• be entered as a judg ent of record in the Supre:e Court of the State of

' New York. The fees and expenses of the arb,iters shall be borne equally by the parties. Claims and disputes shall be defined as any formal written complaint which remains unresolved between the parties af ter reasonable L- efforts to resolve such satters have failed.

IN WITNESS VHERIOF, LILCO and the DEPARTMENT have executed this Agreement as of the date first above writtee.

LONG ISLAND LICHT 15C COMPANY P* 3. '

b

• tthew C. Cordaro, Vice-President

$UTTOLK COUhTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNINO

-'- ^

r

• Sys Lee E. Koppels.an( Wirector APPROVED AS TO TORM, NOT REVIEVED AS To EXECUTION SUFFOLK COUbiY Alfred Jac' gyt M Petfr F. Cohalan, County Executive Deputy County Attorney

. E. i . .

. GENJ COU:3.L EyG$4 DatoffdH 4

e

STATE OF NEW YORK )

I es.

COUNTY OF bg.st )

On this f % day of APRIL, 1981, before me personally came MATTHEW C. CORDARO, to me known, and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as Vice-President of the LONG ISLAND LIGHTING C0llPANY, and he duly acknowledged to me that he executed the same.

. cRA:tA :N POWC'tS 96etary h%t S::ts of New York /

W/ }flJU' No. 30 4721103 Qwa'af;ed an Nessev Costy Denumssen espires Mar. 30,19h STATE OF NEW YORK) ss.:

. g COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)

Onthis[S M L

. f day of APRIL, 1981, before se personally care LEE E. KOPPELMAN, to me known, who being by ee duly sworn,

. did depose and says: That he resides at Suffolk County, New York; and that he is the Director .

of the SUTTOLK COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PLANNING, described herein, and which f,,

's 4 , ,

executed the above instrument, and that it-was executed by order of them.

. and that he signed his name thereto by like order.

, n, .a / m& .

semLt us:cu es.w y pyg,ig, g,,:, ,g y,, y 1

Re.l244Ss33 W 9*2 m SWe a tser;

• • • **** beeas Dent am I:[V j

a l

• . I g

4 s

j . .

EXH1817 A l

l I SCOPE OF WORK ,

[ The preparation of the County Radiological Emergency Response Plan consists of ,,

'nine phases. In carrying out the nine phases, the Suffolk County Department of .

! Planning (the DEPARTMENT) will provide overall sanagement and technical direc-a tion, and will be responsible for preparing document draft input (or modifica-

' tions to existing documents), typing, printing, and distribution. In the de-

.velopment and offectuation of the Emergency Radiological Response Plan, the -

. DEPARTMENT say utilite and employ the responsible County agencies and Depart-ments to the maximum degree possible. The work already performed by LILCO. *

Suffolk County emergency planning organizations, the State of New York, and ,

other New York counties surrounding operating nuclear plants 1 .2ew York State

. will be utilized to the fullest extent practicable. , ,

I

Each phase and its associated tasks is discussed below:

. Phase 1 - Assess Suffolk County Emergenev Plannint Needs

.The purpose of this phase is to review and essess the present status of the . ,

County emergency preparedness program and to make recocrendations for a de-tailed program concerning schedules for both the County Radiological Emergency . ( ,.

lResponsePlananditsImplementingProcedures. Based upon the results of this i.

~

[ analysis, Suf folk County would have clear understanding of how best to accom-t plish its emergency planning responsibilities and could add to or modify the l 3 further phases and tasks described below. The specific tasks to be performed

' follow.

, Task No. 1

.Y .

i Review and evaluate existing Suf folk County plans and procedures and determine l the level of ef fort needed to bring them into corpliance with existing regula - * *

' tions. Develop a schedule and an action plan tha t would acceeplish this.

' Task No. 2 ,

Review existing evacuation plans, evacuation time estimates and public notifica- '

tion / communication systers with those parties involved. Develop a detailed program f or upgrading or developing these plans and systems in order to meet existing requirements. , ,

l Task No. 3 l Evaluate Suf folk County's independent environmental radiological monitoring ,

. i capabilities and determine steps necessary to bring this capability up to the llevel required by Suffolk County to meet applicable Tederal and State require-iments. This task shall be coordinated with other work in this area done by -

!L1LCO and New York State. Nethods and equipment required to perform radio- ,

logical assessments to a degree desired by County officials in order to meet applicable laws and regulations will be determined. ,,

Task No. &

Prepare a needs analysis report which would address each aspect of Tasks 1-3; *

. develop a detailed recommended approach to meet these needs; and provide a re- ,

fined schedule for both the plan and its tespective implementing procedures.

6- *!

9

m. A A et

. 8 Phase 11 - Development of Draf t Plans Suffolk County Radiological Emersency Response - .

The purpose of this phase would be to develop a County RERP that incorporates

• all necessary information and which is suitable for review by all appropriate agencies. The specific tasks to be performed follow.

_Tash No. 1 Perform an in-depth review of participating County government organizations and their existing radiological emergency response plans. ,

Task No. 2 Identify County agencies involved in emergency planning, define the authoriza-tion and responsibilities of these agencies, and identify the cognizant in- - F dividuals within each agency.

Establish technical and managerial liaison with the responsible individuals .

in the County preparedness agency, LILCO, Kev York State, the Nuclear Regula-tory Coraission , and the Federal Emergency Manageoent Agency.

• l Task No. 3 , ,

l l

The DEPARTMENT will conduct familiarization meetings with the cognizant indi-

• I widuals in the County emergency preparedness agencies. The DEPARTMENT will provide guidance and background concerning the role and contribution of each agency in the emergency planning process, and recommend acasures which will l result in the sost efficient planning activity.

l_TaskNo.4 .

Identify a list of available County resources so that the overall emergency plan will make maximum use of these resources.

checklists and prepare discussion agenda to ensure thatThe DEPARTMENT will develop g -

information is obtained in an orderly fashion, is properly documentedtheand complete. ,

initial is survey These discussions will help deter =ine assignment of various responsi ,-

bilities to applicable emergency preparedness agencies and will also provide an - -

effective format for identifying special emergency planning situations and/or problema.

• Task No. 5 .

Phnage' the RIRP development effort. The DEPARTMENT will identify individual agency tasks, responsibilities and interfaces to ensure maximum coordination and to facilitate the preparation of the draft plan.

• The execution of Task No. 5 will require the completion of the following sub-tasks. .

_5ub tash No. 5.1

• Building on the work done in Phase 1. Task 3, those agencies or organizations -

having some radiological assessment role during the energency will be identifie f and their responsibilities will be delineated. ,

Discussions will be held with the Department tance role. of Energy Regional Coordinating Of fice to determine their assis-is not included as part of this program.The specifications, procurement and installation of this equipment '

.y. ..

e

, , , , .[..... .-m . . ~ * ***eP'****"=ma h 2J2 oJ'"'" -* l-*- ' *' ' "

I- . .

. . s Subtash No. 5.2 Review the existing or proposed communications nervork berveen the responsib'el

• Pederal agencies, State and local officials. LILCO and field survey teams to .

ensure that the system is effective and reliable.

• Subtesh No. 5.3 **

Review and outline existing development of an early warning system for the general public. Individuals responsible for maintaining and actuating this system will be identified and their specific roles will be determined. Twenty- -

four (24) hour per day operational capability of the systen shall be a program requiremen t.

Sub t e sk No . 5.4

• Incorporate into the County RIRP the emergency action levels developed for the #

• Shoreham Nuclear Pouer Station in accordance with NURIG-0610. -

Subtask No. 5.5 Incorporate the prepared evacuation plans and associated time estimates into '*

the County Plan. , ,

l* .

Task No. 6 **

This task will be perfotmed in parallel'with Task No. 5. and will ce= prise the following subtasks

$ubtask No. 6.1 l

The RERP will also include the use of protective measures other than general e, evacuation. The *following protective action response options will be developed: 1

• 1

- Initial Precautionary Operations (i.e., institution of road blocks. etc.) ' ~

- Selective Ivacuation

- Selective Sheltering-

- General Sheltering F

= kadioprotective Drug Administration ,

- Isolation of Ingestion Pathways and Sources '

Subtask No. 6.2

• The emergency stanning needs for special facilities and/or problems will be addressed in this suhtask along with the development of preliminary approaches

• for dealing with them. Tacilities having special etergency planning needs and/

or problems include, but are not limited to, the following '

- Nospitals .

- Nursing / Retirement Homes Jails

• i

- Recreational Areas

- Airporta i Task No. 7 Prepare and issue the draft RERP for Licensee. State and local agency review ,

and connent. This RERP shall emphasize proper and effective coordination be-tween the responsible energency preparedness agencies. All authorities and .

responsiblities, as determined in Task No. 2. will be clearly delineated in the Plans.

.g.

e

a .

l l

e

. l Phase 111 - Preparation of Final Emetrency Resoonse Plan . .

The objective of this phase vould be to finalize the emergency plan f;r sub- .

mission to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and to the Tederal Euergency Manage

• ment Agency. The following taks will be completed during this phase.

Task No. 1 ,

i Conduct meetings with the responsible County emergency planning officials, the I Licensee, and New York State of ficials to discuss their comments on the draf t l plan and to secure action, where necessary, to resolve outstanding concerns. ,

l Task No. 2 9 Cather inputs and other information from County and State planning representa-itives and the Licensee as necessary to resolve outstanding dif ferences. e

• Task No. 3 .

Finalize the County and State emergency plans by incorporating the information' ideveloped in Task No. 2. The DEPARTMINT will print and distribute the final- - 9

'ined plans to all parties. . .

Task No. 4 f Coincident with Task No.1 above. the DEPARTMINT and the cognizant emergency iplanning agencies will finalize the development of plans for the previously tidentified special emergency planning situations and/or solutions to proble=s.

l Task No.5

' Coordinate final plan sign-off meetings, print and distribute final plans to ,.

[the Licensee, State and local agencies and other organizations as designated by Ithe County. -

Phase IV - Assist in Obtaining Federal Agency Staff Concurrence With Emergency Plans ,

a The objective of this phase is to confer with the reviewing Tederal agency '

staf f s to discuss their connents and to develop a program for obtaining agency

concurrence with the plans developed in Phases I through III. ~

I *

• Task No. 1 Farticipate in meetings with the NRC. TEMA, DCT and other responsible agency staf f s to discuss the plans and, to the extent possible, resolve commission and '

~

agency concerns.

Task No. 2 Discuss agency comments with the County and State emergency planning representa-tives and the Licensee to develop a program to resolve outstanding differences. * .

Phase V - Preparation of RERP Implementing Procedures e

The objective of this phase is to develop detailed implementing procedures for the County Radiological Emergency Response Flan. .,

.g.

O I

l i

. .. ..... . a.7... ~ ~ . . - . . . . . . . .

V e

Task No. 1 Develop a listing of all nec'ssary e teplementing proceduras for the County .

emergency response plan. Any available local specific operating procedures ,

will be ut111:ed to the manieua extent feasible.

Tash No. 2 .

Hold discussions with the County emergency planning organizations to ensure that they are fully aware of the latest Tederal requirements for preparing satisfactory implementing procedures. Develop detailed outlines for each in- .

plementing procedure in cooperation with County emergency planning coordinators.

Task No. 3 +

The DEPARTMENT will prepare draf ts of the implementing procedures and distrib-, '

• ute them to the respective agencies for review and approval.

Task No. 4 ,

Coordinate comments from the agencies and prepare final drafts of the proce-8 dures. , ,

. Task No. 5 2 The DEPARTMENT will assist the County agencies in meetings held with the NRC, ."

TEMA. New York State, or other reviewing agencies as necessary to obtain final approval of the procedures.

Phase VI - Notification System Integration In cooperation with LILCO and work which LILCO contracted to an independent i*

consultant experienced in site evaluation, system design and system specifica- .

tion, the DEPARTMENT shall determine the resources, both administrative and +

. physical, that are required to como1y with the NRC 15-minute EPZ notification 4

• regulation and assist in review of the preparation of specification and pro-curement of the necessary hardware. Installation and test procedures would also be developed upon selection of a vendor. Actual installation would be a' accomplished by others.

• Task No. 1 Review survey of the 10-mile EPZ; including demographic, topographic and geo- * *

. ' graphic considerations that determine the characteristics of the required warning / notification system. Also, review the evaluation of existing notifica-tion capabilities, such as town and village fire department sirena.

Task No. 2 The DEPARTMENT will work jointly with LILC0 tot *

1. select the nofification system (s) that will be utilized;

11. review list of commercially available equipment and vendor selection /

qualification; and ,

iii. develop system installation and test procedures.

e

. 8

,y _.

l/

1

..] / -

. a r-Phase Y17 - Public Education Program Task No.1 - Define Program Scope ,

During this task'. the detailed scope and content of the public education infor-

• mation pregram will be identifier! af ter consultation with and concurrence by 1.nco. Work completea or in progress by LILCO shall also be reviewed and eval- ,

usted.' Examples of ttens which will be addressed include:

- brief factual information on radiation

- sources for additional information during emergency (i.e., Energency .

Broadcasting Sys em)

- gul:tance on respiratory protection

- protective action response options such as sheltering and evacuation 4

- energency response plannir.g areas (map) ,

l - evacuation routes (map) ' F *

- reception center assignment and location

- provisions f or identifying transit captives and those individuals requiring special handling who live in private residences .

ingestion exposure safeguares 1 - what plans and preparetions can le made now

$ - things to take during evacuation (checklist) <8

! - notification or alerting system details (sirans etc.)

Il - method for notifying authorities that residents have lef t their homes p. ,

h' (verification / confirmation) ,

i .

' Ta sk No 2 - Method of Dissewi m fen h During this task, the means of disseminating the information to the public will be developed and supported by detailed procedures formulated jointly by the DEPARU ZST and LILCO. These methods could include:

. - regional infortiation centers j l - periodic information in utility bills j I - public service announcements (radio and TV) g -

, - ads in periodicals (local newspapers and eagazines)

- posting in public areas ,

- parphlets distributed on a periodic basis ,-

- information in the telepnene book ,,,

- distribution to school children /PTA meetings. ,

- local government / community meetings '

i - telephone information service i . .

- i Tash No. 3 - Program Imple:rentation l

l During this task, the program will be implemented via procedures incorporating details developed in Tasks No. I and 2. ,

Phase VIII - Testinonial Services .

At the request of Suf folk Ceanty or appropriate Tederal or State agencies

• having jurisdiction or supervision over Emergency Response Plans, the DEPARD!Dr ,

4 I will tory provide expert concerning agency boards witness testimony beforeplanning all emergency local. State work and/or performed Federal by theregula' DEPARTMINT.

I l

1

) -

,' \

t.

. . e Phase IX - Radiological Emergenev Desponse Trainitu In cooperation with L11.C0 and New Yort State. where practire1. and in support of the everall Radiological teersency Resornse program, the DEPARDENT will provide personnel training services for all program participants. Emphasis +

will be placed on the f ollowing disciplines:

- energency plan and procedure faallierisstion *

- woe of radiological survey instruments

- radioactive waste disposal methods and techniques

- radiation protection measures .

- decontamination procedures .

- radiological exposure control record keeping  ;

- dosimetry ,

- actification procedures . l

- evacuation methodology I

. - radiolegical accident prognosis e . i

- protective action response option evaluation process ,

e b

e I -

i

, s -

b a' .

o.  ;

I N

O I

, _ ~

o'. *

. e C017877 3_

Cuideline Eocuments All finalized plans and procedures will be developed to meet NRC. TEMA. EFA and .

any other a.*plicable regulatory requirements in effect at the date of the execu-tion of thts Agreement. It is the intention of the DEFARTMENT therefore, to '

lutt11:e the f ollowing sent of the 4 appropriate criteria procedures.

plans and taplementing as the basic guideline documents f or the de .

a. NURIC-0396 +

" Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Covernment Water Radio-Nuclear Power l logical Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light ' i Flants" c Decerber, 1978

b. FL'RIC-0610 * >

%raf t Emergency Action Level Cuidelines for Nuclear Fower Flants" * ' l l Sep tember,1979

c. EFA-520/1-75-001 *

"Hanual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear i Incidents" .

i september, 1975

d. 10 CTR 50. Appendix I

• Emergency Plans for Froduction and titilization Tacilities"

=

! s. NURIC-065I., TCtA-REF-1 Rev.1 ' 4 3

" Criteria for Freparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response

{

Plans and Freparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Flants" e' .

i Novemb e r , 1980.

l

• i e

e

'o t

, e e

-Q.

, % - _ ... . . . .. - - - - ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ **~ ~~ - "

l ~.~ e m COUNTY OF SUFFOLK

~. .

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING L

ei.as es,..z.xocecLusta

., e6 ammino

_ February 19. 1902

. I -

n .

Long Island Lighting Company, . -

Executive Offices

• 250 Old Country Road .,

Mineola. New York 11501 -

Ret Radiological Emergency Response Plan

, Centlemen:

We wish to inform you that based on current evaluation we believe an apparent conflict of interest exists ir.' accepting your funds for the preparation of the County's Radiologient Emergency Response Plan. Ac::ordingly, we will return the funda

- you advanced and will not call for any further funds.

The County will continua, as required by law, to develop a plan consistent with the requirements of law and its obligation to protect the health, esfety, and welfare of the People.

very truly yours, Y ,

• Lee E. Koppolcan

. Director of Plann...',n3. -

LEKrej e

sa veven.no me===la6 wie=way .

• amam. 6. e asw ve== . m

9 h #4,4*O LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COM PANY 175 EAST OLD COUNTRY ROAD

• H IC K SVI LLE. NEW YORK 11801

"'""*f,7j ." ,l" " " March 17, 1982 Dr. Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning County of Suffolk H. Lee Dennison Bldg.

Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: Contract Between Suffolk County and LILCO Regarding Emergency Planning

Dear Dr. Koppelman:

Your letter of Februar 19, 1982, indicates that Suffolk County intends to return $y150,000 that LILCO has paid to the County pursuant to a contract under which the County is to receive financial assistance from LILCO to help defray the County 's expense in preparing its Radiological Emergency Response Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. Pursuant to the contract, the County is to complete its plan by March 18, 1982.

Your letter of February 19th also states that LILCO should not make the final payment that will become due upon completion of the County plan.

LILCO, however, has requested neither the return of the

$150,000 paid to date nor the discharge of its obligation to make final payment. The Company is at a loss to understand why the County believes that acceptance of these payments consti-tutes a conflict of interest.

LILCO is relying on the County to perform its obligations under this contract and will be damaged severely if the County fails to perform these obligations fully. LILCO will not accept the return of any money paid under this contract unless the County first assures the Company in writing (1) that acceptance of this money by LILCO will not be construed to release or discharge the County from its obligations under the contract, (2) that the County intends to perform its obligations under the contract, an ' (3) that the return of this money will not impair the County's ability to perform its contractual obligations fully. The Company intends to make final payment in accordance with the terms of the contract.

\

i

--~. . .

l LoNo esLAND UGKnNG COMfuNY

!r 1

e

)*

Dr. Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning County of Suffolk March 17, 1982 Page 2 If you would like to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours, lk 3 Uw .

cc: Hon. Peter F. Cohalan David J. Gilmartin, Esq.

W. T. Reveley, III, Esq.

I. L. Freilicher, Esq.

S 6

t

0

/

In the Matter of LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CCMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)

Docket No. 50-322 (OL)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of LILCO's FUEL LOAD AND EMERGENCY PLANNING were served upon the following people by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on March 29, 1982, except for the asterisked people, who were served by Federal Express on March 29, 1982.

Lawrence Brenner, Esq.* Atomic Safety and Licensing Administrative Judge Appeal Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Board Panel Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C. 20555 Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Dr. Peter A. Morris U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Administrative Judge Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Washington, D.C. 20555 Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Bernard M. Bordenick, Esq.*

Commission David A. Repka, Esq.

Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. James H. Carpenter

• Washington, D.C. 20555 Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing David J. Gilmartin, Esq.

Board Panel Attn: Patricia A. Dempsey, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory County Attorney Commission Suffolk County Department of Law Washington, D.C. 20555 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory l Commission .

Washing ton, D.C. 20555 l

O Herbert H. Brown, Esq.* Howard L. Blau, Esq.

Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq. 217 Newbridge Road Karla J. Letsche, Esq. Hicksville, New York 11801 Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill, Christopher & Phillips Matthew J. Kelly, Esq.*

8th Floor Staff Counsel, New York 1900 n Street, N.h. State Public Service Commission Washington, D.C. 20036 3 Rockefeller Plaza

.. Albany, New York 12223 Mr. Mark W. Goldsmith Energy Research Group Mr. Jay Dunkleberger 400-1 Totten Pond Road New York State Energy Office Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza NHB Technical Associates Albany, New York 12223 1723 Hamilton Avenue Suite K San Jose, California 95125 Stephen B. Lat.am, Esq.*

Twomey, Latham & Shea 33 West Second Street P. O. Box 398 Riverhead, New York 11901 Ralph Shapiro, Esq.*

Cammer and Shapiro, P.C.

9 East 40th Street New York, New York 10016 1 ,e

~

, l Wi Tayldr Reveley, ILI

/f

/ /

Hunton & Williams 707 East Main Street P. O. Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23212 DATED: March 29, 1982

.