|
---|
Category:ANNUAL REPORTS (COMPANY-FINANCIAL)
MONTHYEARML20207E5521998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept 1998 for Ohio Edison ML20207E5601998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept 1998 for Pennpower ML20207E5761998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept 1998 for Illuminating Co ML20207E5861998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept 1998 for Toledo Edison ML20207E5901998-12-31031 December 1998 Dqe 1998 Annual Rept to Shareholders ML20204J6751998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Rept for Dbnps,Unit 1,PNPP,Unit 1 & BVPS Units 1 & 2 ML20217K6401997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Rept First Energy ML20248K5421997-12-31031 December 1997 Dqe 1997 Annual Rept to Shareholders ML20248K5991997-12-31031 December 1997 Firstenergy 1997 Annual Rept & Financial Repts ML20140B8861996-12-31031 December 1996 PA Power Co 1996 Annual Rept ML20140B9081996-12-31031 December 1996 Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co 1996 Annual Rept ML20140B9031996-12-31031 December 1996 Toledo Edison Co 1996 Annual Rept ML20140B8971996-12-31031 December 1996 Centerior Energy 1996 Annual Rept ML20140B8781996-12-31031 December 1996 Oh Edison 1996 Annual Rept ML20140B8651996-12-31031 December 1996 Dqe 1996 Annual Rept to Shareholders ML20112D6201995-12-31031 December 1995 Annual Rept 1995 for Penn Power Co ML20112D6041995-12-31031 December 1995 Dqe 1995 Annual Rept to Shareholders ML20112D6101995-12-31031 December 1995 Oh Edison 1995 Annual Rept ML20112D6281995-12-31031 December 1995 Centerior Energy 1995 Annual Rept ML20112D6411995-12-31031 December 1995 Toledo Edison Co Annual Rept 1995 ML20084A5071994-12-31031 December 1994 Centerior Energy Annual Rept 1994 ML20084A5041994-12-31031 December 1994 Annual Rept 1994 for Penn Power ML20084A4941994-12-31031 December 1994 Oh Edison 1994 Annual Rept ML20084A4461994-12-31031 December 1994 1994 Annual Rept to Shareholders, for Duquesne Light Company ML20069G5161993-12-31031 December 1993 Ohio Edison Annual Rept 1993 ML20069G5881993-12-31031 December 1993 Dqe 1993 Annual Rept to Shareholders ML20069G5651993-12-31031 December 1993 Centerior Energy Annual Rept 1993 ML20069G5991993-12-31031 December 1993 Annual Rept 1993, for PPC ML20044D3011992-12-31031 December 1992 1992 Annual Rept for Dqe. ML20044D3031992-12-31031 December 1992 1992 Annual Rept for Toledo Edison Co. ML20044D3181992-12-31031 December 1992 1992 Annual Rept for Ohio Edison Co. ML20044D3081992-12-31031 December 1992 1992 Annual Rept for Penn Power. ML20044D3041992-12-31031 December 1992 1992 Annual Rept for Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. ML20096A7371991-12-31031 December 1991 Dqe 1991 Annual Rept to Shareholders ML20096A7401991-12-31031 December 1991 Oh Edison 1991 Annual Rept ML20096A7471991-12-31031 December 1991 Penn Power 1991 Annual Rept ML20096A7491991-12-31031 December 1991 Centerior Energy 1991 Annual Rept ML20096A7591991-12-31031 December 1991 Toledo Edison Co Annual Rept 1991 ML20081F1631990-12-31031 December 1990 Centerior Energy Annual Rept 1990 ML20081F1721990-12-31031 December 1990 1990 Annual Rept of Shareholders ML20081F1111990-12-31031 December 1990 Penn Power Annual Rept 1990 ML20081F1571990-12-31031 December 1990 Toledo Edison Co 1990 Annual Rept ML20081F1671990-12-31031 December 1990 Ohio Edison Annual Rept 1990 ML20042G9101989-12-31031 December 1989 Duquesne Light Co 1989 Annual Rept. ML20042G9131989-12-31031 December 1989 Pennsylvania Power Co 1989 Annual Rept. ML20043A6621989-12-31031 December 1989 Centerior Energy Corp 1989 Annual Rept. ML20042G9161989-12-31031 December 1989 Toledo Edison Co 1989 Annual Rept. ML20043A6511989-12-31031 December 1989 Ohio Edison Co 1989 Annual Rept. ML20246A1721988-12-31031 December 1988 Ohio Edison Co 1988 Annual Rept ML20246A1531988-12-31031 December 1988 Pennsylvania Power Co 1988 Annual Rept 1998-12-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARL-99-154, Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 199 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 199 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with L-99-139, LER 99-S01-00:on 990813,uncompensated Loss of Ability to Detect within Single Intrusion Security Detection Zone Occurred.Caused by Procedure non-compliance.Involved Personnel Received Counseling Re Event.With1999-09-0202 September 1999 LER 99-S01-00:on 990813,uncompensated Loss of Ability to Detect within Single Intrusion Security Detection Zone Occurred.Caused by Procedure non-compliance.Involved Personnel Received Counseling Re Event.With L-99-140, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with L-99-126, Monthly Operating Repts for Jul 1999 for Beaver Valley Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Jul 1999 for Beaver Valley Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With L-99-107, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with ML20209D9531999-06-27027 June 1999 Inservice Insp Ninety-Day Rept Bvps,Unit 2 Outage 7,Year 1999 L-99-096, Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for BVPS Units 1 & 2. with1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for BVPS Units 1 & 2. with L-99-078, Special Rept:On 990326,seismic Monitoring Instruments Were Declared Inoperable.Caused by Resolution of Potential TS Compliance Issue & Work Scheduling Issue.Instrumentation Was Returned to Svc Following Calibr & Declared Operable1999-05-0303 May 1999 Special Rept:On 990326,seismic Monitoring Instruments Were Declared Inoperable.Caused by Resolution of Potential TS Compliance Issue & Work Scheduling Issue.Instrumentation Was Returned to Svc Following Calibr & Declared Operable L-99-079, Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Beaver Valley Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Beaver Valley Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205L0401999-04-0909 April 1999 SER Accepting Util Relief Requests for Inservice Insp Second 10-year Interval for Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 2 L-99-054, Special Rept:On 990320,meteorological Tower Wind Speed Sensors Were Declared Inoperable.Caused by Calibration Completed by Vendor Did Not Adequately Cover Full Operating Range of Sensors.Removed Sensors & Sent Offsite1999-04-0505 April 1999 Special Rept:On 990320,meteorological Tower Wind Speed Sensors Were Declared Inoperable.Caused by Calibration Completed by Vendor Did Not Adequately Cover Full Operating Range of Sensors.Removed Sensors & Sent Offsite L-99-058, Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with ML20196K7981999-03-25025 March 1999 Rev 4 to COLR, for Cycle 8 L-99-038, Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with1999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with ML20203E1181999-02-10010 February 1999 SER Accepting Proposed Revs to Plant,Units 1 & 2 Quality Assurance Program Description L-99-019, Special Rept:On 990120,meteorological Tower Wind Speed Sensors Declared Inoperable.Caused by Processor Card for Sensor Locked Up & Needed to Be Reset.Heater That Fit Around Shaft of Sensor Replaced1999-02-0505 February 1999 Special Rept:On 990120,meteorological Tower Wind Speed Sensors Declared Inoperable.Caused by Processor Card for Sensor Locked Up & Needed to Be Reset.Heater That Fit Around Shaft of Sensor Replaced ML20196F7011999-01-31031 January 1999 BVPS Unit 2 Heatup & Cooldown Limit Curves During Normal Operation at 15 EFPY Using Code Case N-626 ML20203D4811999-01-31031 January 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Jan 1999 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2, in Accordance with NRC GL 97-02.With ML20207E6631999-01-28028 January 1999 Rev 0 to EMECH-0713-1, Operational Assessment of SG Tubing at Beaver Valley Unit 1,Cycle 13 ML20210G7041999-01-22022 January 1999 BVPS Unit 1 Facility Changes,Tests & Experiments for 980123-990122 ML20207E5861998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept 1998 for Toledo Edison ML20207E5601998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept 1998 for Pennpower ML20198B9021998-12-31031 December 1998 BVPS Unit 1 Simulator Four Yr Certification Rept for 1995-1998 ML20207E5901998-12-31031 December 1998 Dqe 1998 Annual Rept to Shareholders ML20199C9971998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with ML20207E5521998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept 1998 for Ohio Edison ML20207E5761998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept 1998 for Illuminating Co ML20204J6751998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Rept for Dbnps,Unit 1,PNPP,Unit 1 & BVPS Units 1 & 2 ML20199F5341998-12-29029 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief Requests 1-TYP-3-B3.140-1, 1-TYP-3-B5.70-1,1-TYP-3-RH-E-1-1,1-TYP-3-B-G-1, 1-TYP-3-APP-I-1,1-TYP-3-UT-1,1-TYP-3-N-509,1-TYP-3-N-521, 1-TYP-3-N-524,1-TYP-3-B3.120-1 & 1-TYP-3-C6.10-1 ML20198K8551998-12-21021 December 1998 SER Granting Relief Request PRR-5 for Third 10-year Inservice Testing for Beaver Valley Power Station,Unit 1 ML20198A1631998-12-0909 December 1998 SER Approving Implementation Program to Resolve USI A-46 at Facility That Has Adequately Addressed Purpose of 10CFR50.54(f) Request L-98-229, Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with ML20195J3131998-11-12012 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting First & Second 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Request for Relief L-98-210, Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with ML20206G0291998-10-31031 October 1998 BVPS Unit 2 Facility Changes,Tests & Experiments for Period 971101-981031 ML20154R9121998-10-20020 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to QA Program Description in Chapter 17.2 of BVPS-2 Ufsar.Proposed Changes Would Modify QA Organization to Allow Warehouse QC Inspectors to Report to Manager of Nuclear Procurement Dept ML20154P7491998-10-19019 October 1998 SE Accepting Second ten-year Interval Inservice Insp Request for Relief RR-1-TYP-2-B5.40-1,Rev 0,for Plant, Unit 1 ML20198F7611998-10-0606 October 1998 Duquesne Light Co,Beaver Valley Power Station 1998 Emergency Preparedness Ingestion Zone Exercise, Conducted on 981006 ML20154C6711998-10-0101 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Revised Model Identified in Dl Submittal Was Appropriate for Analysis of Installed Conduit Ampacity Limits.Determined That There Are No Outstanding Safety Concerns with Respect to Ampacity ML20154D5001998-09-30030 September 1998 Special Rept on Overview of BVPS-1 & BVPS-2 TS Compliance Issues & Corrective Action Taken L-98-197, Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Beaver Valley Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Beaver Valley Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20154E2171998-09-28028 September 1998 Follow-up Part 21 Rept Re Defect with 1200AC & 1200BC Recorders Built Under Westronics 10CFR50 App B Program. Westronics Has Notified Bvps,Ano & RBS & Is Currently Making Arrangements to Implement Design Mods L-98-188, Special Rept:During 1998,Unit 2 SG Eddy Current exam,26 Tubes Were Improperly Encoded in SG 2RCS-SG21C During Previous Outage.Use of Independent Databases to Track New Indications Being Implemented as Preventive Measure1998-09-21021 September 1998 Special Rept:During 1998,Unit 2 SG Eddy Current exam,26 Tubes Were Improperly Encoded in SG 2RCS-SG21C During Previous Outage.Use of Independent Databases to Track New Indications Being Implemented as Preventive Measure L-98-178, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2. with ML20155B5871998-08-28028 August 1998 Non-proprietary Rev 1 to 51-5001925-01, Risk Assessment for Installation of Electrosleeves at BVPS & Callaway Plant ML20236X2351998-08-0505 August 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Defect Associated W/Westronics 1200AC & 1200BC Recorders Built Under Westronics 10CFR50,App B Program.Beaver Valley,Arkansas Nuclear One & River Bend Station Notified.Design Mod Is Being Developed L-98-168, Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 21998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2 L-98-157, Special Rept:On 980423,inoperability of Seismic Monitoring Instrument Noted.Caused by Obsolescence of Instrument & Inability to Obtain Necessary Spare Parts.Design Change Is Being Pursued to Obtain Replacement Product1998-07-29029 July 1998 Special Rept:On 980423,inoperability of Seismic Monitoring Instrument Noted.Caused by Obsolescence of Instrument & Inability to Obtain Necessary Spare Parts.Design Change Is Being Pursued to Obtain Replacement Product L-98-139, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 21998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Bvps,Units 1 & 2 L-98-119, Monthly Operating Repts for Bvps,Units 1 & 21998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Bvps,Units 1 & 2 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
._. _ - _ _ __ __ - _ _ _ _
1 l SPEAKING OF VALUE i
l j , . . _ ,_ _ , N, "DQE is structured for the '90s." Elizabeth Moore, i >
Wall Street analyst. "The coln- )
r 4{
pant was true to its word." Charles Duritsa, enciron- 'k i
! mentalign/ator: "We're reducing costs and working cleaner electrically." ,
I Eli:abeth Lee, owner; Eastinont d' " Clea ners. "Ther l
l have been an extraordinarv fa _
partner in the new 1
! airport and in economic development possibilities for this s .:
region's future.' Tom Foerster; chair-l l ;
l man, Allegheny County Corniniuioners. "DQE is 1992 l
- Utility of the Year." Electric Light & Power inagazine.
)
gve 99g i
1
%A l 1992 Annual Report i 9305180473 930506 PDR ADOCK 05000334 j H PDR
DOE FINANCIAL AND CPERATIN3 NB HLIOHTS Change Change l' rum Ennu 1992 1991 1101 11 9 ) 1490 l'eak Inad 2,308 51W -3.9'i 2.402 51W 1.0% 2.379 h1W Retail hates 11,569 51WII -2.5% 11.861 AlWII 1.4% 11.694 h!WII Operating Revemies (billiong $1.185 -1.2% $1.110 6.0% St.131 Nei Incume (millions) 5141.5 5.9% S133.6 9.89 5121.7 Shar es Outstanding (milliong 52.95 0.1% 52.90 -1.6% 53.76 Return on Ascrage Osmmon lijuity 12.4Ci 1.6% 12.2 % RO% 11.3 %
inng-Tenn Debt (billions) $1.113 46.6 % $1.421 -5.3% S t.501 Inter est -Inng-Tenn Debt (millions) $123.4 4i.29 S131.5 -6.0% $139.9 l'r efen nt and l'iclerenc c Dividends (million4 $9.4 -13.0% $10.8 -22.9% $14.0 Net Operating Cash flow (milliong $396.6 14.9% S345.3 23.9 % S278.6 Capital Expenditmes (milliond $ 112.4 -10.4 % $125.4 20.9 % 5103.7 MW - o megawatt is o measure cd electrec use of a point in tme.
MWH . o megowatt hour is o megawatt cd elecht usage ove,r o period of hours CONTENTS Chairman's hiessage 2 Weslev W. son Sc hack discusses how our forward-looking business strategies bas e positioned the company for inricasing competition.
Strategic Perspective 4 An overview of the 1992 National Energy Policy Act -its implications for DQE and the electric p<mer industry.
Speaking of Value 7 DQE people are creating many forrns of value for customers, shareholdeis, the conununities we sene and the soutimestern Pennssivania region as a w hole. In this section, a diverse gioup of people talk about the value they have reccised from DQE.
Glossary of Terms 16 Afanagement's Discussion 17 Report of Afanagement 25 Reports of Independent Accountants and Audit Committee 26 Hnancial Statements 27 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 31 Selected Financial and Operating Data 4S Board of Directors and Officers 50 Shareholder Reference Guide Irnide I! ark Gner
almost 578,000 ( ustomers in Allegheny D Qp is an eneigt L holding ( ompanysenic that es and licaser cotmiics, the company sells
- supplies sale and icliable elecaicity. ein uitity to other utilities.
In achlition, DQE pur sues related DQE's non-utility subsidiaries business opportunities that benefit include Ducluesne Enterprises and customer s, im estoi s and connnunities Montaut. Duquesne Enterprises owns
.cned. Recognized for excellence, Allegheny Desclojunent Corporation quality,integiits and value DQE was and Property Ventur es, l.td. These named "1992 Electric l'tilitt of the companies are involved in initiatives Yeat~ hv Electric Light & Power related to the core business. inchuling j magazine. prosiding energt senis es for the new Duquesne I ight Company, whose Pittsburgh International Airport and j origins date to 1880,is the piincipal investing in r eal estate. Montauk subsidiary of DQE. Duquesne l_ight is makes both shor t-and long-term j engaged in the [noduction, transmis- invesunents, and provides a sonr(c of i sion. disuihution and sale of electric capital for DQE alliliates.
energv. Its senic e territory is approxi- The company or its predecessor.
l mately 800 square miles in southwest- Duquesne 1.ight Company, has contin-l cin Pennssivania, with a population of unusiv paid dividends on (onunon l.5 million. In addition to sening stoc L since 19YL
- COMMON STOCK TRENDS int w i
o ,mi. u,,a
, u.a, 1992 1 9'.31 lir.iG 19S9 1988 19S7 t.w thrnings l'er 5 hare $ 2.67 S 2.~en S 2.24 S 2.03 S 1.86 S 1.M3 7Ri ik ok Value at M ar-lun<l $22.12 S21.00 S20.07 S19.27 S 18.~il S17.3, a#7 i M.u Let l'ri( e l'ci 5h.u e 11igh 32 % 31 23% 23's 18 8 11% 17.Ei Inw 267 23% 20 % 17 % 114 10% 20.1' l-l M at-1 nd 32L Sn% 2n 23 + 18 % 11 % 22. I'i l
1 DOS ANNUAL DIVIDENDS PER SHARE l (Do5ars Per Shore) i i
t 'I.MJ .a n 7
I SI AMI O' ? $
" a / l NN M4 4() 41 42 l Common divodends have grown an overage of 6"< per year 1
l 4
, 1 1
- - - - . .- - . . _ ~.-
e l
}
gsTb ' k TO OUR SHAREH@LDERS Q4.~
g y
1,.a' n
g, ,
e.y - ,
4 Nincicen ninety-two was a par ticu-larly satisiving > car for DQE. In De(em- .
ber Elatric Ligla & Pmwrmagazine named us the 1992 Electric Utility of the Year. El &Psaid. three successive years j of outstanding financial and operating T '
perfbrmance prmided superior results wesley w. von schock Ior customers, employees and share- l Imiders. The company end>odies what we most far-reac hing pieces of energy legis-look for in strong corporate citizenship." lation in our nation's history, became l This pr estigious honor was enthusi- law. A primary purpose of NEPA is to asticalh received bv our people. The increase competition in the generation ,
Iban d of Directors and I personally (on- of elecuicity by remming obstacles to ;
gratulate all of them fbr their indisidual competition among producers of whoh - l contributions to the outstanding team- sale electric power. Under NEPA, almost j wor k that earned this speciah ecognition. any owner of electric power generation i El.&Palso noted that continuing will be able to compete in the wholesale !
restructming seems to have positioned electric power man ket. }
it (DQE) ideally Ibr competition within Equally important, independent ;
a iestructured and incicasingly competi- power producers will find it easier to j tise industry." This comment captures gain access to utility companies' trans- ;
the objective - and essence - of the mission lines. The Federal Eneigv Regu- !
wor k to which our people base dedicated latorv Commission mar order utilities to ;
themselves for the past seven ycars. prmide such access as long as the relia- l We base made ucmendous progress. bility of transmission service is not im- l h can be measmed in the resu ucturing paired. In efk ct, this legislation codifies i of our organisation, a cultme of com- and increases the competition in the ;
l petitiseness and conunitment to cus- wholesale bulk power maiket to whic h l tomers that has emerged, and a stronger we base been responding for the past l balance sheet. Howeser, thejob is not five years. We intend to remain competi- ;
j finished. The marketplace fbr energy tive in this mar Let, whic h accounted fbr l grows more competitive. For midable 2M1 of our kilowatt-hour sales in 1992, !
' challenges and risks ahead should not The GPU-DQE transmission project, !
be underestimated. in whic h we are a partner with General The crisis of the mid-1980s, when we Public Utilities, will open bottlenecks in i lost abnost 2Mi of retail sales in the col- the Pennssivania transmission sT, stem ,
l lapse of the local steel industry, moti- that are costing consumcis hundreds of L vated us to ichuild and reshape the way millions of dollars. This project is funda- !
! we do business. That crisis forced us to nental to achicsing the competitive aims
! take steps that might have been avoided of our national encryy policy in the Mid-
! under easier circumstances but, because Atlantic states.
we took them caily, now enable us to it is extremely disappointing that i deal more effectively with a changing attaining these national goals is ham- !
- business enviromnent. pered by the unnecessary regulatory l
! delays that our project has encountered l l Xcw Energy Act in the inm m of obtaining state l l
In October 1992, the National approval. Many independent power pro-
) Energv Policy Act (NEPA), one of the ducers nationwide are ready to dGher i i 2
1 :
im>re competithelv priced energv to impunement. We will o mtinue to consumer s as s<nm as there is a way to benchmar L as many pictes of our busi-get it to market. That is wby groups such ness as we can in the years ahead. In the as the National Independent Encigt final analysis, however, customer satisfac-Pnnluccis strongly endorse the need ibr tion and the value to customers of ahe cf ficient and timely regulatory approval senire we deliver remain our two leading to exparut transmission netwo:Ls that indicators of competitive per fbrmance.
currently h.nc major bottlenecks. These As I'se said in presions letters to groups set ognize that consumers can- you, we face a futute filled with change, not realiec the benefits associated with with no plac e ihr -business as usual.'
f ully (ompetith e w holesale ma:Lets The new Clinton administration's without aderlaate transmission capacity. implementation plan for N1 PA remains At this point it is not clear how the to lx seen. Ilowesci, we think that the Pennss h;mia Public Utility Commission legislation's ( ompetitive thrust will be (PUC) will respond to NEPA. If con- just as significant as it would have been smucis are to benefit from more com- under the pievious administration.
petition, the iesponsiveness of the PUC We also expert further expansion of ,
is Crucial We want to woiL with the gmermnental interest - and interven-PUC. and hope ther will woil with us. tion -in issues afTecting the emiron-ment. Sound public policy in this area Comfictition. Change, and Our Future will asoid fads aad issues drhen solely by 15ccoming a low rosi producer is a politirs. Government needs to ex;unine niajor part of what competition is all what coinpetent scientists say alumt the about - and it will be a basic determi- seriousness of particular issues. Decision ,
nant of success. This incans that we inust makers shouhl set policy not onlv on the I constantiv look for wap to cfTectively basis of what thev want donc, but also l take expenses out of our operations. on how much they are willing to have l
()ne of our Ley ( hallenges is to our nation pay for their decisions. I decide w hat we should not do. Whv do Our nation needs a policy that does something more cf firiently that should not plac e environmental protection in not be done at all'" Another alca of con- (ouflict with competititeness andjob (entration is to better inanage our creation. We are pioud of oui emiron-pn g esses-in other words, howwe get mental rec ord and we intend to ron-things done. tinue to be a leader with the highest As important, the ( hallenge of standards in this area of public conce n.
managing in a competithe environment Ninricen ninety-three promises to a ccluiics us to inate continuous improw- be another demanding y car. In this ments in our operations and to strhe to annual icpor t. you will icad how our be the best in our industry. The status team is wor king to delhcr value to our (luo cannot satisfy us. shareholder s, customers and the com-Several ycars ago, we set out to raise munities we senc.
Om standalds of per for main e through- On behalf of the lloard of Ditco- ;
out the company. We have adopted the tors. I thank von for sour continued test of compaiing ounches to the best c onfidence. '
pei formances inside and outside our m
. dusu y in a very ssstematic manner.
This is called -bent lunas Ling" and it is isohy ir. m sha,*
all cIfectiW way to make Continuous Chaintun of dw & unl and Cldel lhuse UWm I rbn ury 1 **. MG 7
STRATECIC PERSPECTIVE The wide-ranging 1992 National g gw ,
Energy Policy Act (NEl%) opens the J generation side of our business o new ' PeIIcy Act wlIl Intensify competitors, increases transmission access, encourages energy efficiency, esempetitive fosses elser turve pmmotes research on emimnmental Iseon aa in ear < .
issues, and streamh.nes nuclear h.eens-ing. Following is our company's perspec- g ,,
tive on key aspects of the new law.
O.. Why is the new legislation so and seliability of their transmission sys-significant? tems are preserved.
A . It will intensify competiti e forces k. What role will state public utility that hate been building in our industry cominissions play?
for sescral 3cars.
Non-utility produc ers already have A . Power purchaw apeements made strong inroads on the power gen- between EWOGs and utilines will con-eration side of the business. Irgislation tinue to be reviewed and approved by adopted in 1978 encouraged develop- state commissions. Among other ment of cogeneration facilities that things, conunissions will evaluate the could sell electric power to regulated reliability and financial viability of utilities. These non-utility generators EWOGs.
icpresent nearlv 50G of the new capacity biought on line in 1990 and 1991. k. Will this new arr:mgement NEPA increases competition by creat- require increased cooperation between ing a new class of non-utility producers state and federal regulators?
called exempt wholesale generators (EWOGs). Any companyinterested in A . The National Association of supphing electricity to utilities. munici- Regulatory Utility Commissioners pally owned elecnic systems, and rural ah cady has proposed discussions with eleciric cooperathes can enter the FERC to increase cooperation and w holesale market, hee of previous c ollaboration.
r equiicments concerning location and type of genemtion. The only requirement k. Is the existing national iransmis-is that the EWOG must register with the sion netwoil adequate to handle new Federal Energv Regulatory Commission sources of generation?
(FERC). NEPA lets the marLet decide wheie a generator will be located and A . It is adequate in many parts of the what kind of technology it will use. country. Iloweser, there is a bottleneck in Pennsylvania that limits the flow of
- k. Ilow will EWOGs get their power needed power to the cast.
to market? The GPU-1)QE transmission pioject !
can create opponunities for EWOGs by A . NEin requires utilities to provide climinating that bottleneck. It also j access to their transmission grids at rea- could serve as a test case for setting ;
sonable prices, as long as the integrity some of the rules gmerning transmis- I sion access and pricing. l 4
- k. The current legislation fi>cuses d . As discussed in the " Speaking of on the wholesale market. Can direct Value" section that fi>llows, we ar e link-sales to large retail customers he far ing customers with electric technolo-hehind? gies that incicase elficiency and icduce their impact oli the emironment.
A. Although SEPA orohibits EWOGs Our transmission prqject also suppwts from hypassing io(al utilities and sell- NEPNs energv efficiency goals. Restart ing electricity directly to large retail of the Phillips and Brunot Island power customers, we anticipate that customer stations to provide power to eastern demand and other marLet forces esen- markets is a prime example of how our tually will make " retail w heeling" a industry can maximi /c the use of exist-realitv. ing resomres. Both plants already meet Direct sales to 1 -ciil customers in the all Clean Air Act acquirements fi>r sulfur natural gas industry have been actively dioxide emissions.
encouraged by FERC since the mid-1980s. In 1991, such transactions k. The emironment is another key an ounted for about 3% of natural gas issue for the utility industry and its cus-sales. tomers. Are any emironmental piovi-sions of NEPA of special interest; A . The Icgislation expands research in a number of area , including global g ,
l warming, clean coal technologies, and electric and magnetic fields (EMFs).
{} . How are sou preparing for the NEPA also promotes use of electric s chicles.
esentuah.ty of < hanges like retail
! w heeling? rneanh has special significance to us in connection with the GPU-DQE i
""'"f ssion project. Independent A . We must continne to focus on cus-tomer needs. to def mc and deh.ver the scientific panels that have resiewed the broad range of studies conducted over energy senices they want at a competi- -
tive price. At the same tune, we must the last 20) cars have stated that there is c ontinue to look at all facets of.our no scientific en.dence to conclude that there is any adverse health eficct caused business to keep our expenses down.
Flexihilitt will be a Ley. DQE was py npoque to une o e u nd-fi>rmed in 1989 to provide a holding nuon uctal to date haw miwd quev company organization and the finana.al tions that r equire follow-up investigation, flex.bih.ty i to take advantage of.c hange, Duquesne 1.ight wd. l continue actively to support such research.
and to position our company to meet the < ompetition. Our unregulated sul>- Our transmission >roject has sub. anes - all c losely related to our c or e addressed the EMF issue in a number of utility business- were fi>rmed to pur- 5"* ' " "' "" '" "si"N "*ii"E n nw> way and awaiWng lu asily popu-sue the same strategv.
lated at cas as muc h as possible, we will 5() . hnprosing the riatiori s energt ef cotistruct I>ower line towers with a i- f.
" delta" configuration that icducer EMF oenn is another NEPA cornerstone.
What are your strategies in tln.s egard;. levels by more than a third, compared to standa d towcrs.
5
%wNMM M M@
iWM N;>l -
7 M _ _R ,.
(,.g: . ..w a
u
- g;
..x. .'
_W x
xm M
g gg n. .
l .
> a. m g-
- p:p
- x. ..
>. li:; ; .
' ;[ y - f.;j: - pgppngg ; ,[_
2" < .
- x. ; : .:. c . . .qggy. ... . ;.. ;... .
p 1 k.D .
.[,.
W :3J: JYls den 11
- ;.; yy.g; ;.3m; 3;. yb ~, ;; .. ;. .
- .C... . &.. ; f.lanneng t
e.
..x:: :c . ,.:
_g ie' , , ,
- g. .
. . + + ' '
,7. - ;. - . '.' .. ~...&, . ?,. .I. ,
, m, ;'.
.W l '.-
l'
.l
..."'.t,.
4._
,7:- l~; + [ y:. ,l.
. ;. _ .. . . ._. e .
L .' i * ' - ..
.. - -g 7j. e.g .
g ..q . . , ,, , 41% . . c .y:e - - 3 . y .
g e- 7 %gpaggpg .. ; _ m ..
^
_[ ""Mempuslw l . .
}... _
(.pa. ~W
- ' wy NWs . w w w v
- 4e 4; . ;-
a . Jr-;. 3;7. .;.[c;v .; :1 7 . p sa. s my. com - ;. + . _ .?. .
- a. #2:: ~
.' L y v, _
- i. - :. : l y ' .
A, . : . .. ..
fa-aamame.w. ... -. ~.: .
~
- "_ l
- . .
..[ .
[l . - }. [ ,
&&- .. e -
.'., ..[: ._.
, , b. 6 ' ' . [. ; [ ^ ..
- . .[ .;
.L - } '[ . j Q .l .l: :
. . . l' . _ ,
}f' }. J JJ }:3gu L ;[ ' bC..[G.XI ;;J_'k} g-L [. ;
pf ; . q. +.
i . .,
7 c. ;;:.
e n_ . ;2 L 3 . .
- . ~. ;. 3 m ;;3., , ..
7; .
- ..y .. n ;.
- -R p (sese 4.c yw.go ,
m ; m y.: / 1. .
1 4.Mk :f [ !. !
O .
, .I;". ; s
.L l1, D [i. / ' - .
...J-3 .. : e .-
iU n -U.M:
- ... , y . 9, f
.. ; I . -[.
f.i Q[77.
. ~: {
[' '
+. :-
-3 .
v . mc . 7 D . s. -
1
- 5 p cy 4 . h dump map ady fug used d e .
- m. - . . - .. .. -
=
~
[w .1 k- [ :; I' .
~
J
. ; ^ . n y; . . ;,s;.
f7 (i hhg[h{ ((..}
.p;;;7 :
u n : p.. s n
ww .
- 3. .: ::.. c.. f 7 .
- 1. P4 ~
7 --
1 y ..1-. . ;.
, g ..-
,. .,; . , . , ,l- ,.[ -,
~
~
~. .
'G.; ' ,:.l .' ' .. .: ; . .' .;,et ...
~ ' '
- . ~ g 4. t.
I~ -
Y ' ' .
41 + . w wm 1+
y
/c; .
SPEAKING k -i OF -
VALUE J
- 1. ink financial analyst. A county coniniissioner. Four members of a unique coalition. An environmental official. The owner of a drv clemaing business. A 33g g g ," .
mixed group, yet with a connuon bond -value delivered hv DQE.
This report f catures people who have inillion tluough financial icstrurturing.
gained value in a varicts of wars f rorn We will continue to seek beneficial our coinp'mv. Also pictured ar e a few of irlinancing opportunitics. Ihmever, we the inoic than 1,000 inen and woinen will intensift our cf forts to w ho are creating that nilue. cicate shar ehohler value bs incicasing the cGi-A Dip Performer in Rotal Return ciency of our operations y and hv (outrolling cost .. .
1)QE corninon stoc L provided one All of our peopic aie :
of the best total scun ns of ant electric innohed in this proc ess, in utilin in the l'nited States for the fisc large was s and in small.
h- -
1 sc.u s ended 1992, icilecting our wcov- We aic icorgani/ing wo: L e erv horn the depressed lescis of the piocedines, extending the mid-19N >s. life of equipment tinough Retail sales dec reased 2..W in 1992, la!geh due to unusually (oo! **ummer incicased presentatisc
/
/
Inaintenance, and using wcather-in sharp ( outrast to unusu- new tr( hnology to alh warm weather in 1991. Ilowever, impios e cf ficiency.
( ontinued financial Iestru( tut ing and Sortir exar!!ples of out cf fe( tive cost ( ontrol resulted in a ti.X9 Iesults in 1992 include:
inctca e in car nings per sharc. h om
- initialing a joint We are improving cash flow through 52.~iO in 1991 to 52.1i7. incter-Icadirtg pilot pro- use of hand-held computers by field Taking adumtage of fasorable capi- gram with a local natural service repres.entatrves like Makolm tal Inar Lets, we f urther reduced interest gas utility Bynum to record meter information (osts in 1992 hv appioxiinatelv $8 mil-
- using increased plan- when a customer tenninotes service, lion. In addition, in 1)c( cmber we par- ning to sedm e the length Finot bills - more than 100,000 a year ticipated in the tefinancing of $119 of srheduled power station - now con be processed ovemight, inillion of debt as ociated with the 19Se tuaintenatu e and acfuri- This is five days foster than the fonner sale and leaseba(L of out share of ing outages pope reponing system.
licasci Valk v Power Station l' nit 2. This e subleasing 20% of _ . .
transaction will fur ther redu( c operat- our (orporate of fit e spa ( c ing expenses in 1991 Sim e 1988, we
- icducing delinquent ( ustomes base icdu(cd our capital (osts by $10 an ounts.
7
n s
J
. I ; l;, ' '? s .;.% .
, ,, o s' y
't- ,y'5~.
.' 4 i, . - 5
.. , s y _
] . ' , ff? , ] '- A
, , l) f _
1f -* 5:: !" !
K'
. ,f 12:d[
s
-T . ' h.,,2 E' .T [
-J \' . 'Y 3 % ( 5:L. ;
- 3 n n f .h
,j1 .
..'\ "[f
,, , '} .:
n y
-, pet g _ -**
1 # ,
W
- ' " e
' z$ ._ m
-- n .
- g, ,
>j'- ,74.; -n r.
- s. ..
(, ~ d
.A-
- F . , - __
N!I *
,, w.-w.
e" I
i
- ,4 h
Ag y's
,k
> jy- '
. i
.. , v"._. +. . .
n e ff , .i YY,'E *l
g ~ b, . ,
ZMLi y N:,' r j,; ' , t
'4 jf,'* 4 3 t.
gj 1 p )g gag < ,
?,
- gy w
- ;L e > ;g ai.
tM. , , l a ;yy[ gin lQNQ
, rA Q mu '%
WryY;h .. Dg@@g:f!. t
.jdWyQf,$h$x;? f,'~.
i e
f~y 9, s 2y;$g.w %', .L ca
=' r ,:gyayw:,I
' g;; Nh:f3;Ti
? gh Q nud "Ws
New Airport Incirases pending in southwestern Pennsylumia.
Economic Dierrsity It is an initiative that can benefit the entire region, as well as our company.
Retail sales ihr our senice territory The potential value ofourjoint plan are In ojected to incicase approximately with General Public Utilities Corp. to 23 annually fbr the next decade. These build a 268-mile transmission line across projections assmne modest econornic Penns3h unia has been well documented:
growth and normal weather patterns.
- a $500 million investment to Because of the economic diversity of improve the st;ne's infrastructme southwestern Pennsylvania, Duquesne
- more than 11,000 constructionjobs 1.ight's servic c territory withstood the
- more than 1,500 permanentjobs accession better than some sections of in power pr oduction, coal mining and the countn. Our cronomic des elop- support senices ment professionals have added value to
- abnost 51 billion returned to the economy by being Ley participants Duquesne Light customers over the next in the seshaping of our economic base. 20 years to help keep electric rates down Since 1987, they have helped add or
- climination of the retain more than 15,500 jobs. Advan- bottleneck in the transmis-tages of the Pittsburgh region include sion giid to the east. -
its location in the middle of major retail The major loss of elec- -
and indusuial markets, its abundant tric demand from steel-l supply of natural t esom ces and energy, related customers in the I
and its strengths in education, health 1980s resuhed in a surplus ? ,10 mr care and afhndahle housing. of energv. Our solution -
Those advantages were enhanced by to mas Let that power to 'q) the October 1992 start-up of the new energshort regions to the Pittsburgh International Airport. This cast - will boost the % g 5780 million " airport of the funne' pa- icgional economy, and ,
sents an impor tant, ongoing opportu-can help create a new. .
nity Ibr emnomic growth. It is a major competitive energv expoi t .
addition to the regionalinfrastructure industry. ..
and is expected to generate 59 billion in The transmission proj-economic benefits and thous;mds of ect can enable us to sell Denny Pietrone and Lorrie Deobner jobs by the 3 car 2005, southwestern Pennsylvania represent more than 100 company DQE < ompanies were inajor con- coal "by wir e"- that is, people from io departments who built tributors to the suc(ess of this pn! ject. oser the proposed trane more than 40 miles of electrical trans-We are investing more than 570 million mission line. Further, like mission facilities in uncompromising in facilitics and infrastructure to help the new national energy terroin and odverse weather conditions meet airport-tclated growth. Allegheny legislation, the pn! ject to support the new airport. Inter-Desclopment Corporation built and plomotes incicased c om- departmental cc,c,f,s a,n, new work now operates the airport's statc<>f-the- petition in the energv mar- procedures and systems, and oggres-at i energy facility. ketplat e. The power line sive ottention to scheduling and costs will be able to carry 1,000 brought the project in on time and Benefits Tvilow hansmission Line megawatts of power capac- under budget.
ity bemnd Ihe 500 mega-With the airport completed. the pnr watts of power we plan to sell to GPU.
posed GPU-DQE transmission line is the That energs could come fiom a unicty largest economic revitalization project of local soun es including cogeneration 9
.g s-
'9 .
\
A y,
u
t 4
ty
'n
. s/
h?** d
.h .
~y I
and 'on independent powei po nhu ris icfiicling ontage. l'oit 2 set a new using < oal .md waste < oal, natural ainl station in on1 h >r unuimious opera-industrial gases. and 1.uidfill methane. tions of mi9 d.n s. ~1 he relucling outage Expanding the tange of'lurl soon es is also was a nun d scrici - our shortest wt anothc1 objecthe of'the new crer - and was c ompleted under btul-national encigs legislation. get. l' nit 2's 1992 availability was KUi"i .
The mam a<hantages of ihe tran+ l~ nit I openited omtismoush for :11 6 miwinn line - quality jobs inwstment dass before going off-line in October. Its in inf rastrurt m c. rate stabili/ation, rie- 1992 availabilits was 9:Uiri .
ation of a new encigs industn - have Aggiewhc cost reduction jnognuns attracted (onsiderable suppor t. A < oali- at our companmperated fowil stations tion ol'moic than 210 Pennssivania haw redu(cd opemtion and maintenance businesses and labor or ganizations haw expenses bs 17"i owr the last four pledged their support. Moic than ycar s. We are using < omp.uisons with 20.000 individuals haw signed petitions other c ompanic~ also known as secting approval of the project. bem hmar Ling - as wcll in April 1992, the Pennsylvania Pub- as r escaich and develop-f_m,M lir i . .h.u ty Conunission tuianimoush .
7 36. , f-1..
incut to h(,Ip ma.mtam Lg y '
n :- ,
appuned an mder romluding that the powei sale is in the publir interest. Ilow-high plant availabilit3 as b- .
cwr. we ar e inu criain when the PlL we drive down rosts.
licm hma Ling estab-h,k{
6; , g h
y 4/3~
wil! < omplete its iniew of the siting application b n the traiisilliwion line.
lishes icalistic. com petit h e MM,
.s- '
~
. '~ % .
stalidalds 18 8 measuic Y4 [
1)ctns in icgulaton inicw am delating powcr station pc formanw.
1 the benclits of this projn i foi the rus-In addition. diagnostic test "[,
tomcis and shatcholden of GPl' and l equipment. pun based as a y DQE. as well as the state as a w hole. icsult of hem lun;u king, is j ,
helping us wdm e mainic- -
Addine Ialue to Our Operations nunce t usts An ongoing irscan h i As disc ussed in the Suategic Pei- puiject is improving pri- -
spu the. the National Energt Polin Art foiin;un e at one of om m initially wih haw the most imp;u t on the plants bs enabling oper# communication has been a major focus encigs generation side of oui business. ton to at hirw an opti- of our transmission project since its in 1992, we at hiewd an all-tiinc mum heat rate iluough inception in April 1990. We formed ic< oni !or sales to other utilitics - I bil- moie pier isc bleinling of odvisory groups to develop siting crite-lion kilowatt-honis That icpicscnts oal supplies Other stud- rio, conducted 10 information work-26'i of om total siles and tuniciscows ies icsuhed in design shops along the route of the proposed Ihe impoi tatu e of 1he w holesale powcr < hanges Ih.o impiowd line, and opened four field offices. "We man Let and our abilits to pniride it with opci.ttions at om ma lear seek out opportunities to correct misin-(ompetithcit prh ed powcr. We ale able planis We will 4 outinur to formation people may have about the to make these sales because of the evahute new tu huologies project," said Sreervpo Mitro of the
< ontinued strong pc1 formaru e of Ihe and wor L lno< cues that Zelienople office. "We are listening to people who operate om generating mm ghe us a < ompetithc people's concerns, and oddressing stations edge. For exampic. we ar e them individually."
The mu lear-f ueled licaw Valin testing inethods to Power $tation set the pa< c for plant innpiow the cf firiencv of opcations in 1992. lichoe its Mas emission i onnols at oui < oal plants 11
) -
~
.f; ' 4; * \ Y' V ' \ ;
- i. Q.:7/.' f
- - , i
-i s .,
N x{ , '
4 y
- y -
" ] *, \
' 5 ,
- - g ,
a 1 4
4
'N
~ , .
+ : . -
g I f f, h25 (('
W,. ,.; =
t 3
~
====-
5 5=====l .. _ _ . . _ E
==
%;'* 1 '{ ~'P .-
. e l',
k _ _ _=- ;,
, . ~ . -
w __.
T
. - , s'(-' g , .,
- -e 'y r
'~
ufh x3 , N'
$ "l .
. - ,-k _5 .
? .
gliU e .>
h .4 "w'
, b, .;g g.uA " -
g q:m ,
o,, ,
pg.,.
,58 l
.s )
, . '(.'.
'F
,, a j.
n p:
g a e
4 i fl,.
-1
. . :.(
' ); %.': , p}
L. .g W " }M Q
- '~
. <j%& Q I
~( ky$( -
- u
- ,,
"" A t ?. -
gw A b 'Y' ' -
m%
p,4 $$,
. %. :.. :(,; . .
%. 7
,'y t .
lWg'[:[y l'" { % N y ,.x .,
afg4 3, r 7 e n g' $Yh((!. Qs u.
. , , . = , .
ggiQwg:f;p,
- m - .
AJdAO. Is 7 ; 'AISi..j $qe, .', ,j;( $t 3<.'!
7;+[. ,9? $[ 2 ;[.>/ /%,.
' is.
- cm;. e s. ~ - , . ,
.s N m f f. y, ;
nii . f' I h dh f bi1 4 .
- !f}
Initiatises like these prmide salue underscores our commitment to de iln ough increased efficiency and cost emitonmental value. At its core is a sasings. charter that conveys the guiding p L plcs for the compann management of l'aluc Grows fnnu emironmental matters: sound resource Encinnmental Incestment management, full compliance uith existing regulations, protection of the The public's growing emironmental health of our employees and the public, interest is being tramlated into new laws and the fostering of emironmental and regulations for all indusuies. Com- awareness.
panics that meet and exc eed emiron- Our current emironmental actisi-mental obligations add mlue in the long ties range from clean-coal technologv run to their shareholders. customers research. to employee can and paper and communities. iccscling, to maintaining a wildlifi-Our company's long history of emi- habitat around one of our generating ronmen tal performan( c, im estment stations.
and leadership has put us in a good In 1992, our llrunot position to meet the 1997, and 2000 Island Wildlife liabitat iequirements of the Clean Air Act Enhancement Project was Amendments of 1990. Our Pennsvivania g one of the fir st sites to be coal-fired plants are among the (leanest
- 9 g.
selected for certification in y in the nation. These facilities reduce an international r egistry of our sulfin dioxide emissions to a rate the non-profit Wildlife ";
507 less than the 1995 Phase I standard. llahitat Enhancement -
We will use a variety of methods to Council.
comply with Phase I iequirements, including increased use of our cleanest Delicering facilities, additional use oflow sulfitr coal, Customer l'a lue and the installation of equipment that r edm es nitrogen oxide emissions. .\ lect- Delisering customer ing Phase I stand.u ds will cost us about value is at the heart of S35 million, far less than many other escrything we do. As com-utilities. That's a direct result of the more petition increases, we nuist "we use a lot of water in producing tilan bOOO million we've imested in understand better what electricity,~ said Jim cool, senior com-eilvif onirleillal 00:11:01 equipmeilt while service 5 ollr ctistoiners ptionce assurance engineer. "And operating ll!) der local enlission stalldar ds valtle and deliver thCin at we're very proud of our water quality that are annong the toughest in the the lowest possible cost. comptionce record. The tremendous colmtry. We aie exploring a coinbination Reliability and avail- improvement in pittsburgh's three of (omplian(c inethods to nlect the ability of power are impor- rivers over the post 20 years is testi-Phase Il stand.u ds, includillg (lean coal timt to our customers. mony to the success of water treatment te(hnology. To the extent possibic, we Electricity's role will con- programs adopted by ouquesne Light plan to liinit long-term capital and op"r- tinue to grow in impm- and many other local corporations."
ating corninitments so we can take tance with inricased advantage of expected impr ovemeilts in national einphasis on encip efficiency emission control technologies. and envir onmental stewar dship. Elec-Our company's emironmental com- tricity has been the nation's economic mitment exceeds what is icquired. We engine for the past two decades. As cler-have deseloped a strategic plan that tricity assumed a larger shar e of total il
, ,__-___________g.
~
- s .ly
%))
- h g
~
$3 7, , , . j, .
J 7 g' -
)y .
.l ,, a'l ..
~-
L f f_g f'?'T".11al$r.
G
- f. ,
Isamedie elseios ese as deem
.* 4 asassyammIss,tIms'sulue '
E
EHzabeth Ime, owner, 9* M
, & %. .+
Depu.s Lightishelpingdry S
- s s,
,- e
- ( [ '\ <
^
's" -. .,m - -
ls h j~f}
f ,
3 v ,
+. . , .
ygl . -
eneigt use, the country achieved nmst likeh to benefit liom specific girater economic output with greater tecimologies, energy cf ficiencv. Sim e 1973, the l'.S. One program begun in 1992 is help-Gross National Pr oduct has increased by ing the 300 di v cleaning establishments 514 while energy consmnption per dol- in Duquesne 1.ight's senice territory lar of GNP has declined by 2Mi . That is meet increasingly suict emironmental due largelv to advances in electric tech- regulations while reducing costs and nologies. During the next 20 years, increasing quality. L' sing a state grant giowth in demand for electricity is In ogr2un for a ccvcling and a targeted expe(ted to account for approximatelv information campaign, we have helped 359 to 50'7 of'the growth in total dry deaners install new equipment that energs consumption. r educes their total costs even though We are using new electric te( huol- constunption of cIcctricity incicases.
ogies to add value to our customers' This " win-win' man Leting approach servi ( c. increases the vahic of our jn oduct Our abilitt to remotely switch cu+ because we are selling solutions to cus-tomers' electric service to other (ircuits tomei s. not just electric ity. ,, .
dining storm-iciated outages was Offering flexibility and 4 enhanced bv a new computer installed in 1992. L'nder most conditions, more choic e in rate plans iuul in energy end-uses is a key to h
g
~
than two-thirds of the customers on a increased customer sativ
- 1 typical 23,000 Lilmoh distribution cir- faction - and to incicased cuit can be restoicd to senice within sales. We will be carrying 3 . .
th e minutes. This te( hnologt improves this theme further. In ',
circuit icliabilitt, icduc es outage time, 1993, we will of h r addi- #
decicases operati ng msts and limits the tional options - f r om '
number of cia uits required. incicased power quality to A ( ompr ehensis c customer infor ma- alternathe wass of heating tion and hilling etem begins full oper- and air-conditioning large ation in 1993. This (omputeri/cd system commercial buildings. .
will ( entrali/c important information We'!c also cicating .
abisul ca( h of otar custorncis and the In oadel value f or our + - -
sei vit es we ale pr oviding them. With cusnamers thiough Because they interoct daily with our dir cri au ew to Inote relesant inforina- our innohemerit in their customers, Customer Service people tion than eset, our people can lespond ( omn umities. like Deb Brown and Pot Borkowski mole qilickh and ( ompichensiselv to We'ic par ticulaily play a vital rote in ochieving our custome inquiries and senic e Iequests. ploud of'our PaiIncis in related goals of improving both cus-liducation prog!;un. tomer satisfaction and operating effi-Licing and IGr/ zing Through financial sup- ciencies. Eoch year they and their co-l!ctler Electrically poi t, per soiial im oh e- workers receive opproximately inent, student Iotit s, 600,000 customer telephone calls.
Ther e is a binad range of elet tro- teac her seminar s, and in-tet hnologies, ranging fiom heating to seni( c prograins. we lighting to new industrial processes, that icward academic at hicsement and can add value to our customeis' busi- cancer des clopment u hile discouraging nesses and homes. We ar e diicctly studeros f rom dropping out.
addrewing those customer s w ho ar e 15
^ DOE V
GLOSSARY OF TERMS q ' ollowing are explanations of certain financial and operating terms used in our report, some of which are unique to our business.
Allowance for funds Federal Energy Used During Construction (AFC) Regulatory Commission (FERC)
An amotml teondcd on the books of a utility An independent five-member onmnission dming the peri
nstruction of plant or within the l'.h. Dep.u tment of Encigs whit h f~arilities to icpiesent the estimated unst of' has icsponsibility f or setting rates and ( h.u ges both debt aml equity used to finatue the for the wholesale transpm tation and sale of c onstrut tion. natural gas and electricity, and the lic ensing of' hydroelectric power in ojects, among Capitel leese other things A lease that uansfers substantialh all of the benefits and risks incidental to tiie ownership I"*'9 Y C 5' EC'* IfCEI of nI openy. and thus is au ounted for as the A provision in a utility tariff whi< h inovides aupusition of' an asset and the incunem e of for rate thanges to customeis due to inorases an obligation by the lessee. or dem cases in iucl aists inn un ed in the utilin.
Duquesne 1.ight icrosers the < ost of f url < on-Centrol Area Power sumed at its generating plants, as well as the Coordination Group (CAPCO) cost of pm< hased power, and passes through du In to its custoiners Om inofits of shor t-Duquesne 1.ight. Ohio 1:dison Company, tenu pown sa to oduT unhties Pennsylvania Powei Company, The C1nel.md Elc< tric Ilhuninating Company and The 1 oledo Edison Compam. The (ompanics N """
joined together in 1% toponth- dnclop A Lih> watt (KW) is a unit of power or capacity.
power generation and transmission f acilities. A Lilowatt hour (KWil) is a unit of energy at Lilowatts times the length of time the kilowatts Construction Work In Progress (CWlP) are used. l'or example, a loo-watt bulh has a This amount r epresents utility plant in Qnnual of 1 KW and,if burned continuousiv.
wiu umsume 1 KWil in ten hom s. One thou-proc ess of < onstru< tion but not set pla< ed in
~
suul KWs is a megawatt 01W). One thousand senic e and is shown as a c omponent of piop_
K 5'"""W"'"" h""I iib ern, plant and equipment.
OPeroting lease l Deferred Taxes These leases do not transfer the benciits ni hu ome taxes resulting f rom the secognition i of owinnhip.
l of < criain items of inenue and expense in I the tax s enu n in a diff escot period than ihn Peak load l are ic(or ded on the books of the o mpam.
Peak load is the amount of clernioty icquiicd l
TASB 5tofement No.106 during peiiods of highest demand. Peak prii-l ods Dunu.uc by season, gennaHy ou uning in An am ouming standar d. issued in 19Wl, w hi( h dw morn ng hours in winter and m, late after-will icquit e < ompanics to ( hange f r om the noon dming the sunnner.
runent pr ac ti<c of ac ununting foi posu ctiic-Inent be:Wfits ori a "[hn-as-\(ubgt[ hasis to ao ruing the at tuarialif determined o est of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC/
pioriding these benefits to emplo3ces.
The Pennnlvania gmenunental body that TASB Statement No.109 s egulates all utilities (elentic gas, telephone.
wau i, cug is inade up of fiu inenibu s (one a An ao ounting standard, issued in 19C as
< hainnan) apponited by the gmeinor.
statement No. 96 and inised in I chruar) 1992 as Statement No.109, whic h will icquire the liability method of anounting for N#9IC'Df7 A55
inn onn taxes. Costs that the Company would othenvise haic (hanged to expense th.u are rapitalized or defeired because it is probable that the PUC will allow their iconery in sates.
16
^ DOE V
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUS $10N AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS corporate DQE is an energy senices holding company. Duquesne Light Company Structure (Duquesne) is the principal subsidiary of DQE. Duquesne's operations accoimt for most of DQE's total assets, revenues aint income. Therefore, DQE's financial condition, changes in its liquidity, and its future financial outlook depend primar-ily on Duquesne's operations, investments and financial activities.
Electric utility activities will continue to comprise most of DQE's business. The Company has, however, taken impoi tant steps to develop its two non-utility sub-sidiaries: Duquesne Ente prises and Montauk. Duquesne Enterprises is involved in initiatives (such as providing all the energy services for the new Pittsburgh Inter-national Airport and imesting in real estate) related to the core business. Mon-tauk is DQE's finance and investment subsidiary.
Results of Operating Revenues Operations Retail operating revenues are based on rates authorized by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Conunission (PUC). These rates are designed to recover I)uquesne's operating expenses, investme:11 in utility assets, and a Icturn on those investments.
Sales to other utilities are made at market rates.
Components of changes in actenues h om the prior years are:
(Millhna of Dolkm) 1992 1991 1990 Rate incicase effective Man h 1988 S - $18.6 $81.0 Recovery of' defer us! customer nsenues B'
l and related can}ing costs 19.9 69.4 9.0
) Deferredcustomernsenues (19.9) (89.1) (83.5)
Retail KWII sales 139.3) 22.7 (0.6) l Energy cost rate resenues 4.8 15.1 5.9 Mate tax adjusunent suuharge 12.1 11.1 -
g ,,
y Non-KWII utenues (G.0) 7.0 5.2 a ~
j ! Resenues from other utilities
=.a.E.B y 7btal 13.5 13.8 (2.7)
S(14.9) 568.6 $12.3
Rate ina case resenues and deferred customer s evenues resulted Irom a $232 mil-lll lion rate increase granted in early 1988. The PCC icquired Duquesne to phase
, E E E, this increase in during a six-year period. The design of the phase-in plan psovided E3a a u j g} 2 j
1 that rates incicase by approximately $85 million in April of each year from 1988 through 1991, remain constant in 1992 and 1993, and decrease by approximately
. 3
{3 $85 million in April 1991. The plan also provided for recovery of deferred rev-enues and carrying (osts on such deferred revenues. The rate increase has been recognized in revenues since March 1988, and a deferred asset has been estab-M. }jl,3,3{]f lished for that portion ofievenues yct to be collected hum customers. Duquesne expects this deferred asset to be fully recovered by the end of the phase-in period.
Retail kilowatt-hour (RWil) sales in 1992 decicased 2.5 peicmt compared to 1991.
This decrease was due to lower KW1I sales to residential and commercial cus-tomers, partially offset by higher sales to industrial customer s. The lower KWil sales to residential and c ommercial customers wer e due to 1992 sunnner and win-ter temperatures being milder than normal and much milder than 1991. Sales to industrial customers incicased in 1992 as a result ofimproved economic condi-tions. Retail sales during the next decade are expected to grow at an aserage annual rate of two percent.
17
&L DCE V
Retad KWil sales in 1991 innicased 1.1 peicent compared to 19% Residential and commercial sah, gnmth during 1991, fueled by extreme summer aint winter tem-peranars was partially of f set hv lower sales to industrial customers.
Duquesne rc< mers variances in hic! and other encigv costs fium the level approved in base raics through an anmial cncrgy cost rate revenue adjustment 3
(lause (ECR). The ECR is based on piojected unit cmts aint is recalculated each
, j year subject to Pl C ap;n oval. This r:ue includes t riedit to Duquesne's cusu>mers y for profits h om short-term power sales to other utilitics, a, well as an adjustment
~
,, 1 f or any o\cr- or under< olle( tioris f ruiti customers which occuired in prior years.
El 2 The 1993 ECR is expected to f urther reduce customer costs Irom 1992 levels as a result of projected lower Iurl prices and credits for profits fiom short-term sales to other utilitics.
In Augmt 1991, the Pennsshania legislature enacted significant tax increases, most of whic h were retroactive lojanuaiy 1,1991. The PL'C allowed Duquesne to iccover these inacases in tax expense through a state tax adjustment surcharge applied to customers' hilk beginning August 24.1991. Due to the timing of the innease and rates applied. Duquesne recovcied more state tax adjmtment sur-charge icvenues in 1992 than in 1991.
Non-KWil iesenues include rental income and hillings to the other Central Area Power Coordination Group (CAPCO) (ompanics.
Sales to other utilities irached recoid levels during 1992. The incicases in these short-tci m sales to other utilitics icsulted from available transmission and generat-ing capacity, inocased demand hv other utilities for energy and Duquesne's mar-Lcting cfIorts.
Opercting and Maintenance Expenses Fluctuations in fuel expense cachS car resuh primarily from changes in the cost per ton of coal, the mix between coal and nuclear generation and the total KW1Is generated. Total fuel expense increased in 1992 and 1991 hecanse ofinricased generation of cic( tricity for sale to other utilities, partially ofIset in 1992 by lower (oal and nuclear iurl costs per KWI1.
Other operating expemes wcic lower in 1992 and 1990, as compared to 1991, pri-marily due to a 1991 inacase in the allowance for uiu ollectible ac counts. This inacase in 1991 was caused hs the deterioration of Duquesne's past due customer accounts and inn icased collection costs.
- Duquesne's fossil stations undergo planned maintenaru e outages on a periodir j _
hasis. The scheduled peiiod between outages is unique to each plant. The costs g iciated to these outages are expensed as incurred. Consistent with the rate ticat-3 ment rec eived from the Pl'C. ma lear refueling outages costs are delened and
}g amor ti/cd over the period to the next sc heduled icfueling outage. Maintenance y expense was lower in 1992 and 1991 as (oinpaved to 1999 because of the timing of
[ scheduled outages at the (nal-fired units and a deocase in the costs incurred for l icfllelirig <>tilages at ntu lean Milits irstilling lii a redtlctiori of the ainoiti/ati(nii of J stu h Ghls.
ICRC5 Taxes other than im ome taxes decicased in 1992 compar ed to 1991 as the result of Iavorabic resolution of capual stock tax, gniss acccipts tax and sales tax matters.
Income taxes and taxes other than im ome taxes inricased 21.4 prirent in 1991 IX
- L DOE
%r5 compared to 1990 as a sesult of higher taxable im ome levels and legisLttion which increased Permsylvania income and other taxes. The effectise income tax rate was 42 percent in 1992,41 percent in 1991 and 38 percent in 1990.
Other Incorne and Deductions Other income incicased in 1992 compaied to 1991 primarily due to an increase in interest income of S3.5 million and a decrease of $3.7 million in fees iclated to I)uquesuc's sale oficceivables. See Note C to the Consolidated Financial State-
~ ' ~
ments. Additionally, the 1991 amount includes a 55.3 million regulatory imposed accounting icclassification, the result of which was to decrease other income and 4 reduce depreciation expense, tims having no impact on net income.
s=
~
W Interest and Other Chorges
, q 1)uquesne achiesed reductions in interesi and other charges in 1992 and 1991 through the icfinancing of higher cost first mortgage honds and lower aserage I short-term rates on ccitain tax exempt pollution control notes. I)uquesne also retired S24.2 million and S38.5 million of preferred and preference stock during
} .
1992 and 1991,icspectively. Interest expense and dividends on pieferred and pici-crence stock declined to S135 million in 1992 irom S145 million in 1991 and S160
. ,,,,,,,y., million in 1990 w c wra i avend,rs
Earnings Per Shore resas h,qe avois
.orn,nos one mong tose 6 ge, omng luarnings per shaic increased from $2.24 in 1990 to $2.50 in 1991 and S2.67 in c.,,eol 4 * < song., j 1992 due to increases in net income in 1992 and 1991 and a decrease in the aver-age number of shares outstanding resulting from the Company's repurchases ofits conunoa stot k in 1991.
Capital Resources Construction cmd @idh 1)uring 1992,I)uquesne spent $112.4 million fbr construction. This amount exc ludes the allowance for funds used during construction (AFC) and nuclear f ucl. l>nquesne expended these amounts to improve its operating facilities.
1)uquesne estimates that it will spend approximately $100 million Ihr c onsu uction in 1993. In 1994 and 1995, construction expenditures are expected to total $170 million. These amounts exc lude AFC and nuclear fuel. They also extlude the pro-posed transaction with General Public Utilitics (GPU) (see long-Term Power Sales on page 21). expendianes fbr possihic carly icplacement of steam genera-tors at the licaser Valley Power Station (see Conunitinents and Contingencies ,
page 44) and amounts required under the Residual Waste Management Regula-tions discussed under Environmental Matters on pages 22 and 23.1)uquesne cur-sently has no plans for c onstruction of new baseload generating plants.
Financing Ej m .
The Company plans to meet its current obligations and debt maturities thiongh 1997 with funds generated hom opennions and, to a lesser degice, through new EIII financings. At 1)c< cmber 31.1992, the Company was in compliance with all ofits debt rosenams.
Iluquesne continues to seduce capital costs by refinancing and actiring securitics.
4 In 1992, the $16.1 million balance of the 59.125 prefencme sto( L and the 57.9 mil-lion balam e of the 58.375 picfer red stock weic redeemed. On April 15,1992,a shelf icgistration for the periodic sale of up to $400 million of First Collateral to
^ DOE
%r5 Trust ihmds became cf fc( tise. Duquesuc has issued the following debt under this shelf registration:
Weighted Average Principal Amount Intcsest Rate Matwity (Thousands of Dollan) 6.Os'i ll-lTr97 5 50JKO 6.55'i 11-1MN 5JKo x.759 Tr1Tr22 104JMM) 8.20'i. I l-lTr22 10JkH) 8.",s'; TelTr21 100J K)0 8.0 ri 5265Jx)0
, The proceeds of the above sales wcie used to r edeem $266 million of First Mort-gage Bonds with an aserage interest rate of 10.32 percent. See Note E to the Con- ,
I solidated Financial Statements.
On Nmember 2,1992, a shelf registration foi the periodic sale of up to an addi-tional $100 million of Fiist Collateral Trust ihmds became cf f ectise. Proceeds of sales fiom both shelfiegistrations are expected to be usedi nimarilv to redeem y long-term debt and to meet curient maturitics.
j ,
In December 1992, Duquesne participated in the issuan(c of $47.9 million of ,
) .
A y Allegheny County Industrial Development Authority Pollution Control Revenue
,,, { fj Refunding Bonds to icfund a like amount of pollution control obligations. See j .
g Note E to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
4 l1 In 1992, Duquesne iclinanced 5312.9 million and retiicd S82.1 million of long-
$ ' ter m debt. As a icsult,1993 intciest expense is expected to decline from 1992 7
g j levels by approximately 59 million.
4 dAAJIM In 1991 Duquesne icfinatu ed S19.0 million of long-term debt and retired 59.8 million of long-term debt.
Duquesne plans to tedeem the remaining S29.7 million balance of its 8%9 First Mortgage Bonds. Series due Maich 1,2000, and the remaining $ 19.0 million bal-an(e of its 9W First Moitgage Bonds, Series due March 1,2005, on Maith 1, 1993 and had issued SSO million of First Collateral Trust Bonds at an merage intei-est rate of 6.32 peu ent to fund this redemption.
In December 1992, Duquesne paiticipated in the refinancing of collaterali/cd lease bonds that wcie originally issued in 1987 foi the pm pose of partially financ-ing the lease of Beavei Vallev Unit 2. In ac cordan(e with the Bemer Valley Unit 2 lease agreement, Duquesne paid the premiums to the lessors as a supplemental rent payment in the amount of 536.4 million. See Note F to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 1989. Duquesne and an unaffiliated < or poration entered into an agreement that entitled Duquesne to sell and the (orporation to put(hase, on an ongoing basis, up to S100 million of anounts a cceivable. At December 31,1992, Duquesne had sold 576 million of icceivables.
Duquesne financ es its acquisitions of nuclear fuel ilnough a leasing arrangement under whic h it inay finant c up to $90 million of nuclear f ucl. As of Dec ember 31, 1992, Dugnesne's nuclear fuel finam ed under this arrangement totaled $77.2 million.
20
^ DOE
%r5
, Dividends may be paid on DQE (onunon stock to the extent permitted by law and as declared by the Board of Directors. Ilowever, prosisions in Duquesne's Restated Artides relating to payments of pieferred and preference dividends may affcct the payment of common dhidends. No dividends or distributions may be made on
, Duquesne's common stock il Duquesne has not paid dividends or sinking fimd m3 '
obligations on its pref erred or in eference stock. Further, the aggregate amount of Duquesne's common stock dividend pannents or distributions may not exceed h certain peu entages of net income if the ratio of common stockholders' equity to g total capitalitation is less than specified percentages. No part of retained earnings of DQE or any ofits subsidiaries was testricted at December 31,1992.
I
~
As discussed in Notes E and 11, Duquesne established an Employee Stock Owner-mj lhh ship Plan (ESOP) to fund a 401(L) mat ( h, effectisejanuary 1,1992. Duquesne
.,}jjj . may purchase shares of DQE Conunon Stock from DQE or on the open marLet to satisfy the exchange feattue of the Preference Stock, Plan Series A. The Company expects the ESOP to base minimal dilutise impact on carnings per share. ,
The Company expects that funds generated from operations will continue to be i sufficient to meet sinking fund and long-term debt maturitics, pay dividends and finance a large pari of its capital needs. The Company's need for fimds and the availability of those generated f s om operations will be af fi cted by the level of cro-nomic activity in the Company's service area, legislation, rate-related proceedings, emironmental and other matters experienced by it and the electric utility industry generally.
cyggoogc long-Term Power Sales In April 1990, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding with GPU segarding a jnoposed long-ter m power sale. In September 1990, the Company entered into joint sentme agicements with GPU As discussed below, these agice-ments were subsequently amended in January 1993 to icflect regulatory delays and changes in cost and ma:Let assumptions.
Under the ter ms of the agreements GPU will annually purchase 500 megawatts of capacity and associated energy hom the Company for 20 years and the companies willjointly build a 500 kilovolt transmission line exP.ndmg hom Pittsburgh to liarrisburg, Penn9 vania.
1 The sale will iequire reactivation of the cold-resened 300 megawatt Iully-sciubbed Phillips plant. The partneiship arrangement ]novides that GPU will contribute appiuximately $145 million fbr one-halfinterest in the Phillips plant. The Brunot Island (ILI.) combined cycle facility also will be returned to conunercial operation and will be available to support this sale.
GPU's purchase will also requite completion of the new transmission line.
Duquesne will own one-third of the new line and base an option, whic h it nmst exercise before Septembei 1995, to own up to another one-sixth of the line. The 500-megawan sale will be deli cred oser GPLPs shaic of the new line. This will lease Duquesne 500 megawatts of new transmission capacity available foi other transactions, esen if Duquesne does not excicise its option. Duquesne has filed for approval of those elements of the transaction within thejurisdiction of the Federal Energv Regulatos y Commission, im luding man Let-based pricing and open an ess to its share of the line.
In 1991, the Company and GPU filed an application with the PUC lbr siting of the line. Public hearings on the siting application began in September 1992 and tec h-nical evidentiary heatings began in Octob( r 1992.
21
A DOE V
Given the foin tern months that had clapsed sim e the siting application was made, the onnpanics had to icevaluate the o iginal x hedule for the pioject. In addition, thric wne < hanges in the long-term bulk powei supph maiLet < onditions, the Ini< c of natural gas, and < h.mges in assumptions reganling operating nlwnus whit h hase ou ut icd sim e can h 1990. IkJanuaiy 1993, these esents iesulted in a modification oli ci tain of the < oninu t terms, piimarily irlated to pricing, a delay in the estimated stai t of'thc Inmer sale and delav of'the c ompletion of' the uans-mission line to 1997.
l'pon the inuodu< tion to sci vin of these f acilitics, the Compant estiinates that its cai ning asseis will inacase by appioximatciv S 165 million. Amounts cained user the authoiiicd actur n fiom the sale will be applied against 1)uquesuc's rustomeis' rates. Ap;n oximately 5210 million of constrm tion expendituies will bc icquired to at hime this icsult. This amount has been adjusted to icflect the tramfci to GPli of one hall'iniciest in the icactivated Phillips plant for an estimated $115 million.
Also itu luded in the comtruction expenditmes figme is ap;noximately 5150 mib lion icinesenting 1)uquesne's one-third ownciship in the transmission line.
1)uquesne sulunitted a petition to the Pt'C f oi ap;noval of the an ounting azul ratemaking n eatment of the associated < mts of this transaction in 1)cccmber 1990 In Sepinnin,1991, l>uquesne, along with vanious other par ties, filed ajoint Peti-tion for Sctilement (Joint Petitionb TheJoint Petition modified 1)uquesuc's origi-nal petition and icsobed < n tain issues. The Pl'C ap; nosed theJoint Petition on Ajnil 2.1992. Thejoint Petition provides fbr rate base ticatment of the Ill. plant and 1)uquesuc's shaic of its expn ted paitnciship imestinent in the Phillips plant. .
It also pmvides that amounts carned mer the authorized ictm n I om the sale will be applied agaimt I)uquesne's customes.J rates. The seulement also piovides f or rate base ticatment of 1)uquesne's iniciest in the GPl'-1)QE trammission line.1)oc to the amendmem of thejoint scntuir agierments, bouncr several paitin to the siting pioceeding asked the PI'C to amend oi seu ind its appr oval of~ theJoint Peti-tion. ()n Fein nary 11,1993 the Pl'C denied the acquest to amend or icv inul the joint Petition, Comununation of the oansaction described abmc and the adoption of the appimed an ounting and ratemaking ticatments are subjn i to < criain conditions.
These im hide in cipt of f urther lcderal, state and local irgulatos y ap;n ovals.
There can be no assuram e as to the outcome of these pnn ecdings. ~lb date, \
lluquesne has net imestments of S17.1 million iclaicd to iondition assessment.
Incscivalion and preliminai s picparation wo:L fo: ictm ning the c ohl-resened units to so vit e, S15 million irlated to plani improvemems and S t.9 million in other transat tion < osts. Additionally,1)uquesnei shaic of'the nu sent imestment in siting the trammission line is SG.1 million. Should this projen not be ap;n med in the Pil: or othei wisc not go forwaid, a poition of'these costs may not bc in m-erabic. Foi div ussion of the (:ompany's original investment in the < ohl irses sed units, see Pmpc t3 lichi Ior Future l'sc in Note I to the Comolidated Iinam ial Statements.
En vironmental Matters The Compichemisc Linironmental itesponse, Compensation and I.iability A< i of 1980 (Supcif und) and the Supcihmd Amendments aiul Reauthoritation Art of 1986 established a varica of infor mational and environmental action progiaim.
The Emisonmental Piotn tion Agenn has infor med I)uquesne of'its imohement or potential imohement in tin ec haiaidom waste sites. If I)uquesne is ultimately deter mined to be a irspomible p.u ty with icspect to ihne sites, ii < ouhl be liable 22
A DOE
%,5 lbr all or a gun tion of the (lean-up ( osts. I hmru r, in ca( h case, of her sobcut ootentially esponsible parties ar e irnuhrd, w hit h may bear all or p;u t of any lia-bilitv. In addition, Duquesne belicscs that available defenses, along with other far-tois, inchuling its overall limited im oh ement and low estimated remediation costs for one site, will limit any [xitential liability that it may base fbr (Ican-up costs. The Company believes that it is adequately reseixed Ihr all Limwn liabilitics and aests.
Au ordingly, lhuluesne believes that these matters will not have a material atherse cfIcct on its financial position or icsults of operations.
In 1990, Congress apprmed amendments to the Clean Air A( t. The legislation requires utilities to complv with a two-phase icdumion of sulf or dioxide (SO;.)
emissions in 1995 and 2000. Reductions in nitiogen oxide (NO,) emissions ,ue also required during this same period. Duquesne's SO compliance plans fbr Phase I in 1995 include increasing the use of its scrubbed capacity, switching to lower sullur f uel and purchasing emission allowances. NO, redm tions fbr Phase I will be required at two units and anc planned to be at bicsed with low NO, burn-ers. The estimated capital cost of Phase I compliance is approximately $35 million and is included in the estimated constrursion expenditmes fbr 1993 tiuongh 1995. Duquesne experts to meet Phase 11 compliam e beginning in 2000, using a combination of compli.uu e methods including iurl swit(hing,inercased use of and impr ovements in scrubbed capacity, flue gas o mditioning, c lean ( oal ic( h-nologies and purchasing emiwion allowances.
InJuly 1992, the Pennsylvania Department of Enviionmental Resources issued Residual Waste Management Regulations goscrning the genciation ami manage-ment of non-ha/ardous waste. The Compant is curientiv descloping compliante strategies and has estimated its costs over the ocxt thice yrais to be appiuxima 'ly
$10 million.
National Energy Policy Act of 1992 In October 1992, the President signed imo law the National Energy Polics At t of 1992 (Enctgs Art). The Encigt Act addresses a wide rauge of energv issues, including several mauers afIc(ting hulk p<mes (ompetition in the electric utility industr y. Among other provisions, the Energt Art amends the Public Utility Ilolding Company Art of 1935 (1935 At t) and the Federal Power Art. The Energv Act also adopts nuticar power li(cosing and rclated regulations, energs cf firiency standards aint use of altri natise transp<n tation f ucts.
Amendments to the Federal Power Act (irate the potential for utilitics and other power pindurers to gain ino cased ar(css to transmission systems of other utilitics to f acilitate wholesale sales. The amendments would pei mit the Federal Energv Regulatory Commission (FERC) to orden a utility to trammit power over its lines fbr another supplier in a wholesale transaction, and to require utilitics to enlange or (onstrum additional transmission capacity to provide these serth es. The FERC mav not, howeser, issue any such order that would mucasonably impair the contin-uing icliability of affected ciertric ssstems nor may the FERC order whccling for r etail tr ansartions.
Arnendinents to the 1935 Art ricate a inew (law <>f irulependent power produrcrs known as Exempt Wholesale Generators (EW(>Gs), whi< h aie exempt f om the 1935 Art corporate sti urim e iegulations. I tolding companics, sm b as DQL, ar e pe mitted to own one or inore EW()Gs. whit h operate without Scruritics and Eu hange Conunission approval or icgulation. These amendments aie expet ted to increase ( ompetition in the industi v.
27
A-DOE
%r5 The energy cf ficiency title of the Energv Act iequites states to consider adopting integrated icsource planning, which allows utility imrstments in conservation and other demaml-side management tedmiques to be at least as piofitable as supply imestments. The Energy Act also establishes new efficiency stamlanis in industrial and commercial equipment ami lighting aml icquires states to establish c ommer-cial azul icsidential building codes with encigv cfliciency standards. Additionallv, the Energv Act icquires utilities to consider energv efficiency pr ograms in their integrated icsource planning. The eficcts on the Company of these standants and requirements cannot be detciinined at this time.
The Energy Act em ourages incicased use of alternative transportation f ucts by federal, state. city and power piorider fleets. The Energv A( t also provides f unding fi>r descloinnent of electric vehicles and associated inirastruttmes. The cffccts on the Company cannot be determined at this time.
The nucleai-iclated provisions of the Energy Act generally encourage further deselopment of the nuclear power industry through a variety of measures, includ-ing the consolidation of the consti uction and operating lic ense steps into one proceeding. The impact of these provisions on the Company is not expected to be material.
The Energv Act icquit es utilities (including 1)equesne) which hase purchased ura-nium enri< hment services f som the U.S. I)cpartment of Energy (1)OE) to collec-tisely contribute up to S150 million annually (adjusted for inflation) up to a total of $2.25 billion for deconunissioning and decontamination of I)OE enrichment Iarilitics. Assessments aie based on the amount of uranium a utility had processed for enri(hment prior to enartment of the Energv Act and are to be paid by such utilitics mer a 15-> car period. The Energy Act states that the assessment shall be deemed a ne< essarv and reasonable current upst of fuel and shall be fully ic(ou r-able in rates in alljurisdictions in the same manner as the utility's other fuel costs.
Duquesne believes sin h assessments will be fully icancrable in rates. Duquesne's total estiinated liability for contributions is S12.5 million.
Accounting Matters The Financial Accounting Standants Itoard has issued statements regarding the ac counting for income taxes and postrctivement benefits that the Company must adopt in the first quarter of 1993.
Statement of Finam ial Au ounting Standauls No.109. Accountingfor Income 7axn.
requis es the liability method of ac counting for income taxes and is discussed in fur ther detail in Note A to the Consolidated Finamial Statements.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.106, Em/dmed Anountingfor lutictirement Itempts Other Than />cinions, icquir es accrual of postictiv ement benefits (sm h as heahh care benefits) during the years an employee provides senic e and is discussed in further detail in Note 11 to the Consolidated Finain ial Statements.
In Nosembei 1992, the FAsilissued Statement of Financial Accounting Standaids No. I12, Emph9ed Auountingfor1%temfdmment firmfits. The Statement icquises that postemployment benefits (benefits provided to former or inactise emphnres af ter employment but before ictirement) should be an ounted for on an acciual basis. This statement, whic h must be implemented on or befin ejanuar y 1.1991. is noi expected to have a material impact on the financial position or results of oper-ations of the Company.
2-1
A DOE
%:5 Note I to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes the status of certain imestments not included in rate base and other deferred costs that the Company expects to recover. If at any time the Company determines that secovery of these items is not probable. such unrecoverable amounts would be recogniicd as a 4 (harge to carnings.
Other Duquesne's utility operations are subject to regulation by the PCC and the FERC.
This regulation is designed to provide for the recovery of operating costs and the opportunity to earn a fair return on funds invested in the utility business. The reg-ulatory proc ess imposes a time lag during which increases in operating expenses, capital costs or construction costs may not be recovered.
Contpony Report The Company is responsible fnr the financial information and representations on financial contained in the financial statements and other sections of this Annual Report.
Statements The Company believes that the consolidated financial statements have been pic-par ed in (onformity with generally accepted accounting principles appropriate in the circtunstances to reflect,in all material respects, the substance of events and transactions that should be included in the statements and that the other infbrma- -
g tion in the Annual Report is consistent with those statements. In preparing the j financial statements, the Company makes informedjudgments and estimates based on curr ently available information about the effects of certain events and transactions.
'I he Coinparty inaintains a systein of inte sial accotintiing contiol designed to [n o-vide reasonable assurance that the Company's a sets are safeguarded and that transactions are executed and ictorded in acc oidame with establishedI noce -
dmes. There are limits inherent in any system ofinternal control based on the recognition that the cost of such a system should not exceed the benefits to be derhed. The svstem ofinternal accounting control is supported by written policies and guidclines and is supplemented by a staff ofinternal auditors. The Company belieses that the internal accounting control system provides reasonable assurance that its assets ar e safeguarded and the financial information is icliable.
N %k!- .
Wesley W. von Schat k Gary 1.. Schwass Chainnan of the kard, Prnidnet Ykr President and ,
and ChiefI.krattive Officn Trenuorr 25
A DOE
'M Report of To the Directors and Stockholders of DOE: .
Independent We h.nc audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DQE and its Certified Public subsidiaries as of December 31,1992 and 1991, and the related consolidated state-Accountants inents of income, conunon stockholders' equity, and cash flows fbr each of the tluce 3 cars in the period ended December 31.1992. These financial statements ar e the icsponsibility of the Company's management. Our iesponsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing stan-dards.Those standards require that we plan and perfbrm the audit to obtain rea-sonable assurance about whether the financial statements aie free of material mis-statement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assess-ing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by manage-ment, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis fbr our opinion.
In our opinion, suc h consolidated financial statements present faisiv,in all mate- '
rial respects, the financial position of DQE and its subsidiaries as of Dec ember 31, 1992 and 1991, and the results of their operations and their cash flows fbr each of the threc ycars in the period ended December 31,1992 in conformity with gener-ally accepted accounting principles.
Mky 1.
Deloitte & Touche Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania January 26,1993 Report of the The Audit Conunittee, composed entirely of non-employec dir ectm s. meets regu-Audit committee Id'ly with the independent public accountants and the internal auditors to discuss of the Board results of their audit work, their evaluation of the adequacy of the intet nal acc ounting controls and the quah.ty of. financial r eporting.
of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities in 1992, the Audit Conunittee icconnnended to the lioard of Diiertors, subject to shareholder approval, the selection of the Com-pany's indej,endent public accountants. The Audit Conunittee reviewed the over-all s( ope and details of the independent public ac countants' and internal audi-tors' respectne audit plans. discussed the independent public acc ountants' man -
agement letter icc ommendations, and reviewed and appr oved the independent public accountants' general audit fees and non-audit services.
The (onunittee meetings are designed to facilitate open conununications with the internal auditors and the independent public ac(ountants. 'Ib ensure auditor independem e, both the independent public accountants ar.d inter nal auditors hme full and free access to the Audit Conunittee.
The Audit Committee of the 15oard of Diie(tors 26
A DOE
%r5 STATEMENT OF CCNSOLIDATED INCOME f t
l'enrEndalDnernier 31. ;
(Ihimsands afDolltm. Exapt Per Share A rn<mnts) 1992 1991 1990 Operating Custonness Revenues Cunent $1,210.319 SI,218,5KFJ $1,074.956 Defi.ntd (Note I) (98 201) (78.344) 10.784 Other utihues ,2.439 58.103 45,153 Total Opnnting Recenan 1,184.557 1,199,468 1.130,893 '
Operating Fuel 255.866 237,855 213.324 [
IKPenses Pun basect ;x nver 9,474 12,900 6,187 Other operation 277,482 287,762 267,169 Mamtenan( e ,9,146 83,773 97.756 Deln n iation and amortiration 127.924 119,264 122.251 Taxes other than income taxes 85.368 95,067 81,043 I Income taxes (Note G) 96,253 95,941 76.247 Total Opernting Expenses 931,513 932,562 863,977
- Operating Income 253,044 266.906 266.916 ;
l Other income Allowance Ibr njuity f unds ucl dwing construction 2,598 1.855 1,3 a l and (Deductions) Guping < h.uges on defi n nl inrnues 15.145 21,514 22,950 Inc ome taxes (Note G) (12,686) (5,881) (8.518) l Other - net 16.392 (8,631) (2,865)
Total Otherincome and (Deductions) 21.419 8.857 12.912 Income Before Interest and Other Charges 274,493 275,763 279,828 I
interest and Iniciest on long-tenn debt 123,402 131,118J 139,889 Other Charges Other interest 2.458 2,316 5,781 Alkmance for lxirnnvnl funds used during constmrtion (2.296) (2,418) (I,559) ,
15 efened and ni efer ence st< x L dividends of Ducinesne l.ight Company 9.411 10,801 14,015 TotalInternt and Other Garges 132,975 142,198 158,156 Net Income $ 141,518 S 133.500 S 121,672 Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding (000) 52,913 53,391 54.432 Earnings Per Share of Ccnnmon Stock $2.67 $2.50 $2.24 l
Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock $1.51 S1.46 S1.38
%r Notes to GmsulidatalfinancialStaternents.
27
N' DOE
, %t5 CCN50LIDATED DALANCE SHEET l
l h As of Daemin 31.
l f1kmsands pfDollan) 1992 1991 a
Assets Property, Plant and Ecluipment: !
Ilectric plant in senice $3,860.040 53,740,809
]
) 0,nstruction wtn L in progress 67,435 91.140 Propert3 held under capitalleaws (Note F) 212.172 220,106 a Property held for futme use (Note 1) 216.893 216,313 r
- Total 4,356.540 4,268,398 1rss accumulated depreciation and amortization (1,340,846) (1.233.283) 1%perty, f*lant and Equipment - Net 3.015.694 3,035,115 l
Other Property and hwestments (at cost) (Note C) 59,413 44,297 Current Assets: t
- Cash and temporary cash imesunents ,
(at cost which appntximates ma Let) 37,78* "5.245 Rec chables (Note C) 52.0S8 116,176 51aterials and supplies (generally at merage cost): !
Coal 39.297 36.470 Operating and consuuction 66.016 61,692 ,
Other cun ent assets 11.791 18.931 Total Current Assets 206.974 261.514 !
I I
Other Assets: !
I Extmordinan property loss (Note It) 46.447 67.514
- l'namorti/cd loss on rcauguited debt (Note E) 70.324 55.270
< P, caver Valles I! nit 2 sale /leasebac L piemium (Note F) 36,371 -
j
, income taxes on sale of Pocaver Valles l' nit 2 (Note F) 70,113 73,107 ,
I)clen cd costs of units not in rate luse (Note 1) 51.149 51.149
, Phase-in plan deferrals (Note 1) 127.996 211,053 Irase a cceivable (Note C) 34.322 7.365
- I)ciened debits 157.141 127.401 Total Other Assets 593.8(i3 592.862 Total Assets 53.875,944 $3.933.788 i
' .We Notes to Conwl datedlinancial htatnnents.
5 I
?N >
i A DOE V
t i
f i
I As olDannin 31 (Thousands of Dollars) 1992 1991 i
Capffollration Capitalization (Note E): i and Llobilities Conunon st(x-L (autlu ni/ed - 125/MMMxK) shares, l
issued- 73,119,436 shares) $ 73,119 $ 73,119 [
Capital stuplus 927,925 928,362 {
r Retained cannings 496.711 436,684 j less urasurr sux k (at cost) (20,169.349 and 20.214.579 shares. l respectively) (326.295) (327,014) '
Total conunon sux Lholden' equity 1,171,460 1.111,121 l Nois edecinable prefi ned and prefi n nce stwL 121,906 121,906 i Rech cinable prefi nwl and preference sux k 8,579 15,437 ;
Non-reck cinable prefcrence stock. Plan Series A 29,995 30fM10 !
Defenwl eniployee sto( L ownership plan benefit (28,471) (30,000) l l Total prefened and prefi rence stoc k 132,009 137.343 [
! Senior ,ecured debt (culuding Pollution Control Notes) 1,018,098 1,025.299 !
1 l
Otherlong-tenu debt 398,915 399,2,a ;
j l'narnortired debt discount and pretnium - net - (4,012) (3.848) l Total long-tenn debt 1,413.001 1.420,726 ;
Total Capitalization 2,716.470 2SG),l90 l Obligations Under Capital trases (Note F) 71,876 87,861 Current Liabiht es. .
1 Cunrnt inattuities and sinking fund eccluirmnents !
(Notes E and F) 46,054 148,093 {
Act ounts payable 119,828 128,646 ;
Arrnavlincome taxes 14,562 32,966 Acenied taxes other than income taxes 27,749 34,646 Defermd energy costs (Note A) 18,893 -
At oned inteirst 28,258 32,339 Dividends declared 26,445 25.545 Total Current Liabilitin 281.789 402.235 Other Noncurwnt Liabilities:
Investment tax credit , unamoniicd 135,580 141.5-19 Arctnnulated delen ed incorne taxes 550,361 530.580 Defenwl credits 119.868 102,373 Total OtherNonwrrent Liabilitin 805,809 774.502 Conunitments and Contingencies (Notes B sin ough 1.)
Total Capitali~ation and Liabilities S3,875,944 S3,933,788 29
..--. - - . . . . - .. - - - . = -=- -_
s%. DOE
%r5
)
- STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS l
l'mr Endal Dannin 31, (Tiamsands of Dollars) 1992 1101 IVKu l 5 !
Cash Flows Net income $141,518 $133,565 $121,672 j from Operating Princ ip.d nonrash c harges (credits) to net inonne: l l
Activities Depreciation and anuirtization 127,921 119.264 122.251 l
j Capital lease and orher amortization 49.001 56,437 49,"68 j Dricrred income taws and imesunent tax ciwlits- net (2,319) (l8,971) 20,535 j Allowance for njuity fimds insed dining construction (2.598) (1,855) (l.375) l Pha.e-in plan revennes and irlated ranting j charges renwered (delencd) 83.056 56.830 (33,731)
Changes in woiLing rapital other than cash (Note 1.) 48.670 (43,031) 281 Othe r - net (1.957) 33.912 21.153 Net Gish hvcidedfrvin Operating Acticities 41S.295 336.159 300,051 Cash Flows Used by Genstmetion expenditures-utility (112,409) (125,358) (103,701) i investing Activities Allowanc c (br lxirrown! innds used during construction (2.296) (2.418) (1.559)
Other- net (27.475) (22.947) (7.862) 1 Net Cash Uwd try Investing Articitics (142.180) (150,723) (113,122)
Cash Flows Used Salc of ixmds 312.925 50,0(N) 110.450
) in Financing Ihidends on cominon sto( L (81,191) (78,010) (74,972)
Activities Ih ductions of long-icnn obligationt 4 Piricimi s.nd picfcrence stm k (21.158) (38.503) (31,974)
, long-tenn dcht (391.951) (58.782) (211,788) l Other obligations .(43.686) (42,107) (43,5)7)
Itite schind payments -
(1.383) (17.321)
' (23,703) (34,170)
Repurchase of < ommon stock -
Beaver \'allev Unit 2 s.de/leaseluck premiinn (Note F) (36,37I) - -
Premium on scaatuired debt (18.127) (2.917) (3.319)
Other - net (2.719) (2,410) 2,12'l
! Net Cmh Uwd In Iinancing Articitics f 288.578) (198,767) (245,512)
Net interase (decrease) in cash and temix narv (ash investments 12,537 (13.331) (58.583) l Gish and temix rarv rash investments
' 38,576 at lx ginning of year 25.215 97.159 Cash arul temixnurv rash investinents at end of war $ 37,782 5 23.245 S 38.576 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION Cash Paid During Interest (net of amount capitali/cd) $126.014 $136,147 5153.751
] the Year income taws $112.859 $ 86.201 S 41,593 l
Non-Cash investing Gipitallease obligations acronled $ 17.089 $ 22.028 S 31,921
{ cad Financing 130P picicirnre sim L issued $ -
S 30.000 S -
I
- Activilles See Notes to Gm wlidated1
- nanaal Atatements.
. I i !
i RI a
i
- 1 DOE j V
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED COMMON STCCKHOLDE*15' EQUITY l t l
(Thrmsands v/Dollan) 1992 1991 1990 1989 -
l Common Stock Common stock par value ($1 per sharr) $ 73,119 S 73.119 $ 73,119 5 73.119 Capital Surplus Capit.d stm L expense azul other (change) (437) (49) 36S 597 -
Balance at end of year 927,925 928,369 498.411 928.013 Retained Earnings Net income 141,518 133,565 121,672 113.002 Dividends declaird (81,491) (78.040) (74.972) (72.397)
Balance at end of year 496,711 436JiS4 381,159 331,459 Treasury Stock Sun L reissoni (repurchased) - net 749 (23,49G) (34.117) (45.587)
Balance at end of3 rar (326,295) (327,014) (303.548) (269,431)
Total Common Stockholdm' Equity S1.171,460 51.111,121 $1.079,141 S1JWi,190 M Notes to C<noolidatalFinancialStatementu NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Q Summary of Consolidation and Reclassifications Accounting Policies The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of DQE and its sub- '
sidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been climi-nated in the jneparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Property, Plant and Equipment The asset values of properties are stated at original construction cost. This includes !
the related payroll taxes, pensions and other fringe benefits, and administrathe and general costs. Also included is an allowance for funds used dming construc- i tion (AFC), which represents the estimated cost of both debt and equity funds used to finance construction. The amount of AFC capitalized varies according to changes in the lesel of construction work in progress (CWIP) and in the cost of capital. AFC rates applied to CWIP were 10.3 percent in 1992,9.6 peicent in 1991 and 9.9 percent in 1990.The Company does not scali/c cash currently from this allowance. It realizes cash over the ses vice life of the plant through increased ;
revenues resuhing from higher rate base and higher depreciation expense.
Additions and replacements of property units are charged to plant ac(omits. Main-tenance. repairs and replacement of minor items of property are charged to expense as inctu red. The cost of property retired plus removal costs, less any sal-vage value, is charged to the accumulated provision for depicciation. Substantially i
all of Duquesne's in oper ties are subject to a first mortgage lien, as well as to a l junior lien.
l Depreciation l Depreciation of electric plant, inchiding plant-related intangibles,is recorded on a straight-line basis oser the estimated useful lives of property. Amortization of other intangibles is on a straight-line basis over a five-year period. Depreciation and amor-tiration of other piuperty are calculated on v;uious bases, st.ch as the amount of nuc lear fuel burned.
Decommissioning Duquesne has receised regulator) approval from the PUC to recoves its share of the estimated deconnnissioning costs in rates over the operating life of eac h ofits 1
i i
l n
A DOE
%r5 nuclear units. The recoscry granted was $70 million fi>r 11 caver Vallev 1, $20 million for Beaver Valley 2 and S38 million for Perry 1.
In 1988, Duquesne updated its decommissioning cost study for Beaver Valley.
Duquesne's share,inchuling removal and decontamination costs, amounted to
$80 million for Unit I and $23 million (br Unit 2. In 1992, Duquesne's share of esti-mated deconunissioning cost for Unit 2 was further updated through a site specific study to $35 million and additional fiuuling was provided in amounts consistent with the method approved by the PUC. The Company plans to continue to periodically rc+ valuate the estimated cost to deconunission, proside additional iunding consiv tent with the method approved by the PUC, and seek tegulatory apinoval to recog-nire these increased funding levels.
The Company records deconunissioning costs in other operation expense and records a liability fbr nuclear deconunissioning expense equal to the amount of cost recovery in rates. Funds recovered through the ratemaking process fbr nuclear decommissioning are deposited in external segregated trust accounts. Trust limd earnings increase the limd balance and recorded liability. Collections and s clated interest of $13.7 million are recorded in OtherPmperty and Imntments in the Consolidated Balance Sheet with the related liability in OthaD,fmed Cmlits.
Maintenance Maintenance costs incurred ihr scheduled outages at Duquesne's nm lear units ar e deferred and amortired mer the period between scheduled outages. All other maintenance costs, including the costs of fin red outages at the imclear units, aie charged to expense as incurred.
Revenues Meters are read monthly and customers are billed on the same basis. Revenues are accorded in the accounting periods fbr which they are billed. Def erred ictenues are associated with the Gmnpany's 1987 rate case. See Note 1.
Income Taxes Deferred income taxes result from timing diffeiences in the recognition of ser-enue and expense for financial and tax repm ting purposes. Deferr ed income l taxes are provided at the statutory rate in effect at the time the diffeience origi-nates. The deferred tax effects of certain timing dif ferences. however, are not pro-vided in order to be consistent with ratemaking policies. These dif ferences are rec-ognized for book purposes, and in rates, in the years they affect taxes payable. As of December 31,1992, the cunmlative net amount of timing diff erences Ihr which deferred income taxes have not been provided was approximately SB0 million.
These items are principally book versus tax basis dif ferences.
Investment tax credits related to utility propcity generally were deferred when applied to reduce the Company's income tax liability. They are subsequently reflected as reductions to tax expense over the lives of the related assets.
In February 1992, the FASB adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.109, ArrountingforIncome 7hm which effective beginning in 1993, requires the liability method of accotmting fbr income taxes. The adoption of this State-ment will not affect the Company's policy stated above Ibr investment tax credits.
Implementation of the statement will result in a favorable income statement impact of approximately 58 million in the year of adoption and the recognition of a net deferred tax liability of approximately $700 million. This liability will be of f-n
A DOE
%,s set primarily by remgnition of a coriesponding asset which the Gmnpany will recover through the regulatory process.
Deferred Energy Costs Duquesne recovers from customers fuel and other energy costs not otherwise recovered through base rates, through an annual energy cost rate (ECR). The ECR is based on projected costs and is recalculated each year. This rate includes a credit to Duquesne's customers for profits from short-term power sales to other utilities, as well as an adjustment for any orcr- or unde -collections fmm customers which occurred in prior years. Duquesne defers the difference between actual energy costs and the amounts cmrently recovered from customers through the ECR.
The difference is recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a payable to, or a receivable from, customers. At December 31,1992, $18.9 million was payable to customers and shown as D<prredEnergt Gmts, while at December 31,1991, $8.6 mil-lion was receivable from customers and included in Other Cunent Assets.
Nucleor fuel Costs Duquesne finances its acquisition of nuclear fuel through a capital lease. The cost of nuclear fuel is charged to fuel expense based on the quantity of energy gener-ated by the reactors. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is respensible Ihr the ultimate storage and disposition of spent nuclear fuel. Duquesne pays DOE a fee for future disposal service. This fce is recovered through customer rates.
Cash flows For the purpose of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liqu,d investments that mature in three or fewer months to be cash equivalents.
Reclassifications l
The 1991 and 1990 financial statements have been reclassified to conform with accounting presentations adopted during 1992.
- O 1 re orei er in 19s4. the Centrai Area Power Cooraination croup (CAPCo) companies agreed Property loss to minimize construction wmk and cash expenditures on Perry Unit 2 pending consideration of several af ternatives, including resumption of construction or can-cellation of *he unit. In 1986, Duquesne abandoned its interest in the unit.
In 1987, the PCC approved recovery of Duquesne's original $155 million invest-ment in the unit over a 10-year period. Duquesne is not earning a return on the as yet unrecovered portion ofits investment ia the unit, which was $51.1 million at Dec ember 31,1992.
In February 1992, Duquesne sold its ownership interest of 13.74 percent in the uncompleted Perrt Unit 2 to The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company fbr
$3.3 million.
$ Receivables in 1989, Duquesne entered into an arrangement with an unaffiliated corporation by which Duquesne is entitled to sell and the corporation must purchas(, on an ongoing basis, up to $100 million ofits accounts receivable. At December 31, 1992. Duquesne had sold $66.3 million of customer receivables and $9.7 million of other rec eivables. The sales agr eement includes a limited recourse obligation under which Duquesne could be icquired to repurchase certain of the receivables.
33
A DOE
%r5 The maximum amount for whic h Duquesne is contingently liable was $16.8 mil-tion at December 31,1992.
.lmounts in ihmnands ofIhallan at I)rtender .31. 1992 1991 1990 Customer ac counts icreivable $109.692 5137,706 5117.231 Other at counts re(cinthle 26,103 34.368 3WG7 less: Allowance foi uncollectible accounts (7,707) (30,898) (16.805)
Rc( cinibh s less allowance for uncolwt tible accounts 128.088 141.176 130.4S6 trss: Rc( civables sohl (76.000) (25.on0) (68.139)
Total Receivables S 52.0NN 5116,176 5 62.347 The Company, thr ough its subsidiary, Montauk, is the lessor in three leveraged lease arrangements intohing manufacturing equipment, mining equijnnent, and natural gas processing equijnnent. These leases expir e in various years beginning 2001 thiough 2011. The residual value of the equijnnent belongs to the Company at the end of the 1 cases and is estimated to approximate 13 percent of the original <
cost. The Company's aggregate equity invesunent represents 21 percent of the aggregate original cost of the property and is secmed by guarantees of the lessee's parent or af 61iate. The remannng <9 percent was Gnanced by non-recourse debt prosided by lenders who have been granted, as their sole remedy in the esent of default bv the lessecs, an assigmnent of rentals due under the leases and a security intciest in the leased property. This debt amounted to $97.9 million at December 31,1992.
The Company's net imestment in leveraged leases at December 31.1992 is com-posed of the following elemems:
Amounts in 1housands ollMlan atIbriemier 11. I992 Rentals c(cinible (net o!'p:incipal and interest on the non-recourse debt) S34,322 Estimated residual ntlue of leased assets 15.951 Irw: l'nearned income t'18.133 )
Invesunent in leveraged leases 32,140 less: Defen ed taxes aGsing f r om hscraged leases (8,910)
Net investment in Leveraged Leases $23,230 The Company's after-tax income h om leveraged leasing in 1992 was $1.2 million.
@ Shorf-Term Duquesne has an extendab!c revohing credit agreement with a group of banks Borrowing and totaling 5225 million. The current expiration date of this arrangement is trevolving credit October 29,1993. Depending on the option selected by Duquesne at the time of Arrangements each borrowing,iniciest rates can be based on prime, federal funds, Eurodollar or s CD rates. Duquesne pays a commitment fee based on the unborrowed amount of the commitment.
There were no short-term borrowings dwing 1992. During 1991 and 1990, the maximum short-term bank and commercial paper borrowings outstandmg were
$66 million and $53 million, the aserage daily short-term borrowings outstanding were $11 million and $14.3 million, and the weighted avetage daily interest rate
- applied to such borrowings was 6.36 percent and 8.34 percent, respectisely.
9
.34
A-DOE V
'& Capitalization Cornmon Stock The Compant or its in edecessor, Duquesne 1.ight Company, has continuously paid disidends on (ommon stock since 1951 The quarterly disidend paid in 1990 was 34 cents per shar e. The quar teily dhidend was increased to 36 cents per shaic cf fc(tise with the disidend paidJanuary 1,1991; to 38 cents per share effective with the disidend paidJanuary 1,1992; and to 40 cents per shaic cf fertise with the disidend paidJanuary 1,1991 The fbliowing table indicates the changes in the ntunber of shares of common stock outstanding dming 1992,1991 and 1990:
Common Stock- Amvants m Tlwunands of Main for Year 1992 1991 199)
$ f Par Value Outstanding-beginning of year 51905 51759 51340 Reissuan< c fiom treasmi stot L 45 17 4 Repun hase of common stoc L -
(871) (1.585)
Outstanding - End ojTmr 52,950 52.905 53,759 Preferred and Preference Stock Itoldens of Duquesne's picierred sto(k anc entitled to cuumlathe quarterly disidends. If four quarterly disidends on any series of preferred stock are in ancars, holders of the pr efened stock aie entitled to elect a majority of Duquesne's board of directors until all dhidends have been paid.
Ihdders of Duquesne's preference stock are entitled to runndative quarterly dividends, provided that no dhidends on any sciics of preferred stoc L are unpaid.
If six quarterly dhidends on any series of preference stock are in arrears, the hold-ers of the preference stot L are entitled to elect two of Duquesne's dhectors until all dhidends have been paid.
Duquesne is conent on all dividends.
Outstanding prefened and preference stock is generally callable on not less than 30 days' notice at the pric es stated in the table on page SG, plus accrued dividends.
Ces tain call prices decline in 1993 and beyond. One series of preference stock is suldec t to purchase and sinking fund requiiements. At December 31,1992 the maximum combined aggregate sinking fund and mandatory purchase icquhe-ment foi prelcience stock was 51.3 million ihr each > car from 1993 through 1997.
In De(ember 1991, the Company established an ESOP to inoside matching contri-butions under its 401(L) Retirement Savings Plan for Management Employees. See Note Il to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Duquesne issued and sold 845,070 shares of Preference Sto(L. Plan Series A, to the trustee of the ESOP. As consideration for the stock, Duquesne received a note valued at $30 million from the trustee. The preference stock has an annual dhidend rate of S2.80 per shaic and each share of the picierence stock is exchangeable for one share of DQE common stoc k. At December 31,1992. 52S.5 million of pref erenc e stot k issued in conne(tion with the establishment of the ESOP has been offset, for financial state-ment purposes, hv the ret ognition of a deferred compensation benefit. Dividends on the preferenc e stock and cash contributions from Duquesne will be used to icpay the 1; SOP note. As shares of preference stock are allocated to the accounts of participants in the ESOP, the Compant iccognizes compensation expense, and the arnount of the defened c ompensaion benefit is amor ti/ed. In 1992, the Com-pany iccognized S1.5 inillion of (ompensaion expense iclated to the 401(L) plan.
y
A DOE
%:5 Preferred and tin Thousands. Lwpt Per Marr A mountu Outstanding un ik<rmler 31 Preference Stock g; pg c 1992 1991 1990 of Duquesne Per Share Shares Anu >unt Shares Arnount Shar es Arnount Mglif Cornpany Pf Sio k Series- (1) 3.75ti (3)(7) S 51.00 148 5 7,407 14S S 7A07 148 $ 7A07 4.0WI (3)(7) 51.50 550 27A86 550 27AS6 550 27A86 4.lW7 (3)(7) 51.75 120 6,012 120 6.012 120 6,012 4.15(i (3)(7) 51.73 132 6.643 132 6,643 132 6.643 1 4.20!i (3)(7) 51.71 100 5,021 100 5.021 100 5.021 S2.10(3)(7) 51.81 159 8,039 159 S039 1 518 S.039 57.20(4)(7) 101.00 319 31.915 319 31.915 319 31.915 SS.375 (4 H6) - - -
80 7.945 104 10.345 TotalPnfmyl Stork 1.528 92,523 1.60S 100A6s 1.632 102.S6S Prefen nce Stock Series: (2) 52.315 (5)(7) - - - - -
1.177 29A40 52.100 (5)(7) 25.00 1,175 29,383 1.175 29.383 1.175 29,3S3 57.500 (4)(6) 101.00 86 8,579 87 8.69* 4" 4,172
$9.125 ( 1)(6) - - -
161 16.100 223 22.284 Plan Series A (7)(S) 38.30 845 29.995 845 30.0(H) - -
Total Pnferrnce Stock 2.106 67,957 2.26S S4.175 2.667 90.279 n Puu haw and sinking f und requir ements -
(17.3(K)) (4.054)
Defen ed IM)P benefit (28A71) (30.000) -
Total Pnferrrel and Ihpmur Stoch 3,634 SI32,009 3.876 5137.343 4.299 5189,093 p) Preferred stxk 4f00 03') au+honzed shares; $50 par value; cumulahve. (5) 525 per shore involuntary liquidation value (2) Preference es xk: 8 030 D3D oethorized shares; il par value. cumulatwe. (6) Redeemabie (3) $50 per shore involuntay liquidahon value. (7) Non-redeemoble.
(4) $100 per shore involunto y liavidation value (B) 535 50 per sha.e involuntary liquidation value long-Term Debt At December 31,1992. Duquesne had S1 A28 billion of outstanding debt securities, including $265 million of first collateral trust bonds, S764 million of first mortgage bonds, S393 million of pollution control notes and 56 million of debentm es.
In May 1992, Duquesne began issuing secured debt under a new First Collateral Trust Indenture. This new indenture will ultimately replace Duquesne's 1947 First Mor tgage Bond Indentur e.
The first collateral trust bonds, which total $265 million and hase an average inter-est rate of 8.04 percent, were issued in 1992: 550 million of first mortgage bonds, with an aserage intciest rate of 8.25 perc ent, were issued in 1991.
Since 1985, the Company has scacquired $848 million ofits high-cost debt. The differen(c between the pur(hase prices and the net carrying amounts of these bonds has been included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as Unamortiwdleu on Reacquired Dr/4. Duquesne amortiics and recosers these losses through rates. The
( urrent balance of Unamortiwd Lou on Reacquired Debt is 570.3 million.
A DOE V
Principal.4 rnount Outstanding Average Un Tinousands qf 5) at Dnemla.31, Interest Rate Mattuity Series 1992 1991 Long-Term Debt of Iirst O>llateral Tnist Ik>nds:
Duquesne Light 6.089 11-1597 $ 50,000 S -
Company 6.55 9 11-1598 5,000 -
8.75 9 5-1 22 100,000 -
8.209 111522 10,000 -
8.3759 51524 100,000 -
Total First Collateral Trust Bonds 265,000 -
lirst Mortgage ikinds:
8.459 12-1-92 - 73,500 99 G14)6 - 80,(KMI 10' Vi 2-1419 - 93,040 1159 12-1-15 - 94,161 849 Gl-95 50,000 50,000 5%S 2-1-96 22,800 22,800 549 2-1-97 24,600 24SK) 6%9- 2-1-98 34.700 34,700 79 l-14rj 30,000 30.000 7% ,-199 28,647 28,947 849 (1) 314K) 29,700 30,(KKI 7vi SI-01 34,650 35,000 Tiig, 12-1411 26,461 26,461 7Wi 6 1-02 28,470 28,470 7U.% l-1-03 32,670 32,670 7% ,- 1 -03 35,000 35,(KK) 8%9 4-1414 43,650 44,100 9%9 (1) S1-05 49,000 49,500 8%9 4-1-07 96,400 97.400 909 12-1-16 98.000 99,tK K) 99 2-1-17 99,000 100,000 less current maturities and sinking fund requirements (10,650) (84,050)
Total First Mortgage Bond, 753,098 1.025,209 Pollution Control Notes:
5.5889 8-1-02 1972 Allegheny County Series A - 19,(KK) 5.70'i 1(Ll413 1973 Alleghen> Countv Series 11 - 13,050 7.509 4-1-05 1975 Alk gheny County Series C - 17,000 (2)(3) 9-1-11 1992 Allegheny Giunty Series A 47,925 -
l (2) 12-1-13 1990 Alk gheny County Series A 50,000 50JK)0 5.73Wi 41-03 197315caser County Series A 9,800 10,100 (2) 8-14 r) 11PJO P.cmer Giunts Series 11 18,000 18,(K10 6.901 9-1-11 19761k aver County Series C 15,000 15fXXI 11.6255 12-1-14 1984 Ik,ner Giunty Series 11 51,000 51,000 (2) 8-1-20 1990 Ik aser Q>unty Series A 13,700 13,700 (2) 8-1-25 1990 lk aver Countv Series C 44,250 44,250 10.50'; 10-1-13 1983 Ohio Ikwelopment Authority 20,500 20,500 11.1259 (3) 2-1-15 1985 Ohiolkwelopment Authority 38,610 38.610 (2) 1L1-18 1988 Ohio lkneloinnent Authority 71,000 71,000 6.65% (4) 10 1-23 1989 0hio rknek>pment Authority 13,500 13,500 Irss cun ent mattuities and sinking hmd iequirements (690) (1,815)
TotalNlution OsntmlNotes 392,595 392,895 59 sinking fund debec*ures due Mar < h 1,2010 (5) 6,042 6,042 Miscellaneous 278 338 1rss unarnortired debt discount and premium-net (4,012) (3,848)
Totallong Terrn Debt $1,413,001 $1.420,726 il)1o be re.seemed March 1,1093 (2) Cetam d e.e Pohahon Co+d Keenae N*s how variable inte ed r* penods ro geg from one day b 360 days On 30-days naha pnar b any inte est rew d* t he Corrynny con th:rge de ssbseasent inves re penod on tfe noses e o dkenonvest rom penod ro geg from one d:'y e se had matanty d se bonds.
(3) hsued m pe form d Fest Ma t;rge Bands or Fi st Colioterd Trup bonds (4) Fmed rate th ough fev fne yetrs, thereaher becommp va iable rates as in facenate 2 (5) Sinbrg fund requirements for 1993 o,d 1994 h:we neen me and the reqsirement for 1995 has been pomallysat:sted.
3,,
N-DOE
%rs At December 31,1992 and 1991, the C.ompany was in compliance with all ofits debt covenants.
Sinking fund requirements and maturities oflong-term debt outstanding at December 31,1992 fbr the next five years are as follows (in millions): $11.0 and S.3 in 1993; S12.1 and S.1 in 1994; $11.7 and $50.1 in 1995; $11.8 and S22.9 in 1996; and S11.1 and S74.6 in 1997.
Sinking fund requirements relate primarily to the first mortgage bonds and may be satisfied hv cash or the certification of property additions equal to 166% per-cent of the bonds required to be redeemed. During 1992, $5.7 million of the annual sinking fund acquirements was satisfied by cash and $4.2 million by certifi-cation of property additions.
Total iniciest costs incun ed were $130.4 million in 1992, S143.1 million in 1991 and S158.5 million in 1990. Of these amounts, S4.7 million in 1992,59.3 million in 1991 and $13.9 million in 1990, including AFC, were capitalized. Debt discount or premium and related issuance expenses are amortized over the lhes of the appli-cable issues.
In 1992 Duquesne was imohed in the issuance of $419.0 million of collateraliicd lease bonds, whic h were originally issued by an unaffiliated (orporation for the purpose of partially financing the lease of Ileaver Valley Unit 2. Duquesne is also associated with a letter of credit securing the lessors' S188 million equity interest in the unit and certain tax benefits. If certain specified esents occur, th( leases could terminate and the bonds would become direct obligations of Duquesne.
The pollution control notes arise from the sale of bonds by public authorities to finance the construction of polhuion control facilities at Duquesne's plants or to refund such bonds. Duquesne is obligated to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. For (crtain of the pollution control notes, there is an annual conunitment fee foi an incrocable letter of credit. The letter of credit is available, under cer-tain circumstances, for the payment ofinterest on - or redemption of- a portion of the notes. In December 1992, pollution control notes totaling $17.9 million were refinanced at lower interest rates.
At December 31,1992. the fair value of the Company's long-term debt and r edeemable pr eference stock appiuximates the carrying value. The fair value of the Company's long-term debt and redeemable preference stock was estimated on the basis of (a) quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or (b) cunent rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities.
Q Lecrses The Company leases nuclear fuel, a portion of a nuclear generating plant, ollit e buildings, computer equipment and other property and equipment. The capital-iicd leases ar e summariicd below:
Amounh in Thousands ollMlan atIMender 31, 1992 lo'd 1990 <
Nudcar f uel $169,837 51",0.704 S192.657 Electric plant 42.335 39Ao2 43.134 Total 212,172 220,106 235,791 Irw accuinulated amortization (101,860) (84 003) (80,On0) 1%perty licid Under CapitalIrmes -Net (I) $110.312 513G,103 $155,79l (1) hickxies 13,782 m 1992 and $3 374 m 1991 of capd leases wA msonoied obigations remed .
TN
^ DOE
%r5 In 1987, Duquesne sold its 13.74 percent interest in Beaser Valley Unit 2, exclusive of transinission and common facilities. The total sales price was $537.9 million, which was the appraised value of Duquesne's interest in the property. Duquesne subsequently leased back its interest in the unit for a term of 295 years. The leases provide for semi-annual pavments and are accounted for as operating leases.
Duquesne is responsible under the terms of the lease fi>r all costs ofits interest in the unit. In December 1992, Duquesne participated in the refinancing of the col-lateralizef lease bonds which were originally issued in 1987 for the purpose of pai-tially financing the lease of Beaver Valley Unit 2. In accordance with the Beaver Valley Unit 2 lease agreement, Duquesne paid the premimus as a supplemental rent payment to the lessors in the amount of approximately $36.4 million. The
$36.4 million cost has been deferred as of December 31,1992, and will be amor-tiicd over the iemaining term of the lease.
I cased nuclear fuel is amortized as the fuel is burned. The amortiration of all other leased property is based on rental payments made. Payments fier capital and operating leases are charged to operating expenses on the Statement of Consoli-dated Income. The fi>llowing summarizes those rental payments reported in the Statement of Consolidated Income for the three years ended December 31,1992.
A mounts in Tiwusands of Dollim for the ) car 1992 I!Ul 1100 Operating leases s 64.986 5 65.414 S 65,989 Amortiration of capitalleases 43.119 39,323 43.368 Interest on capitalleases 7,880 10,057 10.334 Totaf RentalPaymenis S115,985 S114.794 $119.691 Future minimum lease pavments fi>r capital leases are aclated principally to the estimated usage of nuclear fuel financed through leasing arrangements and build-ing leases. .\linimum payments for operating leases are related principally to Beaver Valley Unit 2 and the corporate headquarters. Future minimum lease pay-ments at December 31,1992 were as follows:
Amounts in Thousands of Dollanfor the lear Operating Irases Capital Irases
!!U3 $ 55.715 $ 41.563 l!O4 53,196 33.396 I!O5 51.964 20.168 l!O6 51.949 10.602 l!U7 51.836 6.046 1508 and ther caf ter 1,025.915 31,914 Total Minimum Lease Payments $1,290.575 143,719 1ess amount icpresenting interest (37.189)
Present value of minimmn lease pavments for capital leases 5106.530 Future payments due to the Company under subleases of corporate headquarters space are expet ted to be S11.5 million.
n
A DOE
%r5 h income Taxes Since DQE's formation in 1989, the Company has filed consolidated federal tax returns. The Company's federal income tax returns are closed through 1987. The Internal Revenue Service is resiewing Duquesne's return for 1988 and the consoli-dated 1989 return. The consolidated 1990 and 1991 returns are subject to resiew.
The Company does not believe that the final settlement of federal and state taxes will have a material adverse cf feet on its financial position or results of operations.
Amounts in Thousands of Dolian for the l'rar 1992 1991 1990 Included in operating expenses:
Cunently payable Federal $ 80.850 S 84,862 5 44.711 State 27,797 31,980 10,861 Defen cd - net: Fedend (3.208) (4,823) 31,430 State (3,750) (10,750) (4,920)
Investment tax ciedits defen ed - net (5.436) (5,328) (5,838)
Totalincluded in Opemting hpenses 96,253 95,941 76.247 Included in other income and deductions:
Currently payable: Federal (449) 2,780 6,720 State 3,060 1.174 1,965 Defen ed: Fedend 10,231 1,943 331 State 377 443 (9)
Invesunent tax credits (533) (459) (459)
TotalIncluded in Otherinanne and Deductions 12.686 5.881 8,548 TotalIncome Tar Spense $108.939 5101,822 584,795 Total income taxes differ from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income befor e income taxes and Duquesne's preferred and pt eference dividends. The reasons for this diffetence in each year were as follows:
Computed fideral incorne tax at statutory rate $ 88.355 S 83,701 $ 74,974 Inacase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
Ext ess of book over tax depr eciation 3.830 5.333 8,547 State income taxes, net of federal incorne tax benefit 18,140 15,079 5.214 Amonization of defi n ed im esonent tax ciedits (5.969) (5.787) (6,435)
Other - net 4.583 3,493 ".495 Totalinanne Tax bpense $108.939 $101,822 S 84,795 Soun es of income taxes defen ed and the related tax effects were:
Excess of tax depicciation S 25,188 5 20,957 $ 24.230 Defen cd res enues n corded / (rt covered) for book (
} >ur} o,es (30.702) (21,240) 12,774 Allowanc e ior uncollectible an ounts 9,760 (5,930) (2,722)
Fuel costs (10,820) 1,017 (l80)
Inss on earlv retirement of debt 20,999 (166) (1,167)
Other - net (10.775) (7.855) (6.103)
Total Diferralinanne Tax hptme (Bemfit) $ 3,650 S(l3,187) 5 26,832 40
^ DOE
%5 . ,
& Employee Benefits Retirement Plans The Company has trusteed retirement plans to provide pensions for all tull-time employees. Upon retirement, employees receive a monthly pension based on length of senice and compemation. The cost of funding the pension plan is deter-mined by the unit credit actuarial cost method. The Company's polict is to record an expense in an amount at least equal to th( minimum funding requirements required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). This expense may exceed the minimum funding requirement but may not exceed the maxi-mum tax deductible amount for the year. Pension costs charged to expense or construction were $11.4 million for 1992, $11.2 million for 1991 and S12.6 million for 1990.
The following sets forth the funded status of the retirement plans and amounts icc-ognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31,1992,1991 and 1990.
A mounts in Ihmnands of Dollan at Dnemier 31, 1992 1991 1990 Actuarial present value of Irnefits tendered to date:
Vested lenefits $287,360 $279.917 S211,193 Non4csted benefits 16.252 14.294 19.915 Accumulated benefit obligations based on c ompensation to date 303.612 294.211 261,108 Additional tenefits based on estimated future salan hsels 77,017 61.919 56.434 Puje( ted Irnefit obligation 380,629 359.130 317,542 Fair mar Let value of plan assets 411,440 392.027 319,591 Projected benefit obligation under plan assets $ 30,811 S 32.897 $ 2.052 Umecognized net gain S 81,971 S 86.695 S 56.573 Unrecognized prior senice cost (20,848) (22.317) (23.959)
Utuccognized net transition liability (21,102) (22.913) (24.725)
Net pension liability per balanc e sheet (9.210) (8.568) (5,837)
Total $ 30,811 S 32,897 S 2.052 Assumed rate of return on plan assets 8.00'c 4.a0!i 8.00'i l)i . count rate used to detennine pnjected irnefit obligation 7.50'1 7.50'i 8.1Ws Assumed c hange in cornpensation levels 5.75"c a. , fi 5.75 %
Plan assets (onsist primarily of common stocks, United States obligations and cor-porate debt securities. Net pension cost for 1992,1991 and 1990 was computed as follows:
Amounts in 7 5 of Dollanfor the Year 1992 1991 1990 Senice cost L. ..a can ed during the year $ 11,397 5 9.911 5 9.710 Interest on pujected lenefit obligation 26,390 24,705 23.101 Return on plan assets (26,736) (80.716) (3.897)
Net amortization and defemds 325 57,319 (16.2x9)
Net Pernion Cost S 11.376 S 11.219 S 12,625 41
A DOE
'W Retirement Savings Plan and Other Benefit Options The Company sponsors sep.uate 401(k) Retirement Plans for its miion-repre-sented employees and its management emplosecs. The 401(L) Retirement Sasings Plan for Management Employees prosides that the Company will mat h S.25 for escry $1.00 that an employee contributes to a 401(k) account up to a maximum of 69 of their eligible salary. The Company will match up to an additional S.25 on every $1.00, if certain incentive targets apprmed by the Company's boaid of dir ec-tors ar e met. The 1992 incentive target was met. The Company is funding its ,
matching contributions with contributions to an Emplovce Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) established in December 1991. See Note E.
The Company's shareholders have approved a long-term incentive plan through which the Company may grant management employees options to purchase up to a total of three million shares of its connuon stock during the period 1987-1997 at prices equal to the fair market value of such stock on the dates the options were granted.
As of December 31,1992 arthe grants totaled 848.369 shares, at exercise prices ,
ranging hom $12.31 to 528.75 per share, which expire at various dates fiom 1997 to 2001. Stock appreciation rights (SARs) have been granted in connection with 622,869 of the options outstanding. During 1992,107.594 SARs w ere exercised, 50.205 options at prices ranging from $12.3125 to S26.So were exercised for shares and 59,330 options lapsed. Of the 848,369 grants active at December 31, 1992,232.293 were not exercisabic at December 31,1992.
Other Postretirement Benefits The FASil has issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.106, _
Empimer's .Arcountingfor Pmtretirement Hemfits Other Than Pensiorn, which requires, among other things, accrual of postictiiemc.it health care benefits during the years an employee provides service. The Company is icquired to adopt this Statement beginning in 1993.
The Company currently pavs a portion ofits early retirees' postretirement medical coserage from the date of cadv retirement to the point at which Medicare begins at age 65. The cost of this cmerage is reflected in the Company's financial state-ments and is recovered through rates, on a pay-as-you-go (cash method) account-ing basis. This cost is approximatelv S1.2 million annually.
Ilased on an actuarial study, the unfunded transition obligation iclated to con-tributing toward the cost of postrctirement medical coverage for the Company's retiiers to age 65 is estimated at approximately $31.4 million. The Company will amortiec this cost oser twenty 3 cars. The annual cost. imluding this amortization, is expected to add approximatch S4 million to the runent level of costs in 1993.
Q Rate Matters 1987 Rote Ccse The Man h 1988 PL'C rate onler inct cased annual icvenues by $232 million. This increase is being phased in from April 1.1988 thiough April 1,1994. Deficiencies in the revenues collected from customers resuhing from the phase-in were imluded in the consolidated income statement as defer red resenues. Deferred resenues are recorded on the balance sheet as a defencd asset for future iec overy.
As prior period deficiencies are billed to customers, they reduce this defened asset instead of being included in current revenues.The phase-in plan includes a return on the resenues defened for futme recovery equal to the after-tax AFC rate.
42
A DOE
%r5 Duquesne has recovered pr evionsh defei red iesenues of $183.6 million as of December 31,1992. Defened iesenues and related carrying charges of $128.0 mil-lion remain to bc iccmcied as of that date. Duquesne expects to f ullv remver this amount bv the end of the phase-in period.
At this time. Duquesne ins no pending base rate case and has no plans to file a base rate case.
Deferred Costs of Units Not in Rote Base In 1987, the PCC approsed Duquesne's petition to defir initial operating and other costs of Perry Unit I and Beaver Valley l' nit 2. The Company deferred costs incurred from the time the units went into connnercial operation until the .\laich 1988 rate order. The PUC order deferred ruling on w hether these costs are iecov-erable from ratepayers. These costs totaled $51.1 million at December 31,1992, net of deferred fuel savings :clated to the two units. The Company is not earning a current return on the deferred costs. The Company belieses that these deferred costs will be recover ed in its next base rate filing.
Deferred Cool Costs The PCC has established two market price coal cost standards. One applies only to coal delisered at the .\tansfield plant. The other, the svstem-wide coal c ost stan-dard, applies to coal delivered to the remainder of Duquesne's system. Both stan-dards are updated monthly to reflect prevailing market prices of similar coal dur-ing the month. The i UC has directed Duquesne to defer recoscry of the delivered cost of mal over generally prevailing mar ket prices for similar coal. However, the PUC does allow deferred amounts to bc recmcied from customers when the deliv-cred costs of coal fall below prevailing market prices. The unrecovered mst of Niansfield coal was S7.2 million and the unrecmcred cost of the remainder of the system-wide coal was S3.3 million at December 31,1992. The Company believes that all deferr ed coal costs will be recovered.
In 1990, the PCC approved ajoint Petition fbr Settlement that clarified certain aspects of the ss stem-wide coal cost standaid and gave the Company options to extend it through .\ larch 2000. In December 1991, Duquesne excicised the first of two options that extended the standard through 51 arch 1996.
Warwick Mine Costs The 1990 Joint Petition fbr Settlement (see Deferred Coal Costs) also iecogni/ed costs at the Company's Warwic k mine.
The Warwick mine had been on standby since 1988. In 1990, the Company entered into an agicement under which an unaffiliated firm will operate the mine umil N!ar c h 2000 and sell the coal to the Company. Production began in late 1990.
The mine icached a full production rate in early 1991. Thejoint Petition recog-nizes costs at the Company's Warwick mine and allows fbr iecmcrv of such costs, including the costs of ultimatelv (losing the mine. Duquesne expects to recmer its net imestment in the mine through the cost of coal during the period of the us-tem-wide coal cost standard, including extensions. The net investment in the mine was 530.1 million at December 31,1992. The Company has collected approxi-matelv $6.2 million toward mine closing costs as of December 31.1992.
47
^ DOE
%r5 Property Held for Future Use In 1986, the PCC approved Duquesne's icquest to remme the Phillips and most of the Brunot Island power stations f rom service and place them in " cold reserve."The Company expects to return them to sersice in conne< tion uith the long-term sale of power to General Public Utilities Corporation (GPU). Duquesne's original net investment in the cold-icsened stations was S106 million. To date, Duquesne has additional net investments of $17.4 million related to umdition assessment, preser-vation and preliminary preparation wm L for icturning the cold-reserved units to senice, S3.5 million related to plant improvements and S4.9 million in other trans-action costs. Additionally Duquesne's share of the current investment in siting the transmission line is 56.4 million. Should this project not be approved by the PCC or otherwise not go forward, a portion of these costs may not be recovemble. See more discussion of this transaction under "Long-Term Power Sales"in Management's Dis-cussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
O Commitments and Construction Contingencies .
Duquesne estimates that it wd. l spend approximately S100 imllion on construction during 1993. Construction expenditures for 1994 and 1995 are expected to total SITO million to improve its operating facilities. These amounts exclude AFC, nuclear fuel, the proposed transaction with GPU, expenditures fin possible caily replacement of steam generators at the Beaser Valley Station and expenditures required under the Residual Waste Management Regulations.
Westinghouse lawsuit The CAPCO companics are owners in various portions of Beaver Valley Units 1 and 2. In 1991, the CAPCO companies filed suit against Westinghouse Electric Corporation in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennssl-vania. The suit alleges that six steam generators supplied by Westinghouse for the two units contain serious defi cts, particularly defects causing tube corrosion and cracking. The Company is seeking monetary and corrective iclief. Steam genera-tor maintenance costs have increased due to these defects and willlikely continue to increase. The condition of the steam generators is being monitored closely. If the corrosion and cracking continue, replacement of the steam generators could be requiicd earlier than their 40-year design life. No site specific estimates of the cost of potential replacement of the steam generators are 3ct available; however, industry replacement costs base exceeded $100 million per nuclear unit. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this matter; howeser, the Company does not beliese that its resolution will have a mateiial adverse elfcct on the Company's financial position or results of operations. The Company's percentage interests (ownership and leasehold) in Beaver Valley Unit 1 and in Beaver Valley Unit 2 are 47.5 percent and 13.74 percent, respectively. with the remainder held by the other CAPCO (ompanies. Duquesne operates both units on behalf of the CAPCO com panies.
Nuclear Insurance The CAPCO companies maintain the maximtun available nuclear ins iram e for the S5.9 billion total investments in Beaver Valley Units 1 and 2. The insurance program pimides S2.6 billion for in operty damage, denmunissioning and decon-tamination liabilities. The CAPCO companies have similar property insurance for the 55.4 billion total imestment in Perry Unit 1. Duquesne would be responsible for its shaic of any damages in excess ofinsurance coverage. In addition. if the u
^ DOE V
property damage resenes of any insurer are inadequate to cover claims arising from an incident at any nuclear site in the l'nited States covered by that insmer.
Duquesne could be awessed retrospective inemiums of up to $3.1 million per year, for up to seven ycars.
The Pric e-Anderson Amendments to the Atomic Energy Act limit public liability from a single incident at a nuclear plant to S7.4 billion. Duquesne has purchased
$200 million, the maximum amount of available insurance, which prmides the first level of financial protection. Additional protection of S7.2 billion wouhl be prmided by an assessment of up to $63 million per incident on each nuclear unit in the United States. Duquesne's maxinuun total assessment is $47 million and would be limited to a maximum of $7.5 miHion per incident per year. Another sur-charge of 5 percent could be levied if the total amount of public claims exceeded the funds provided under the assessment program. Finally, Congress could impose other revenue-raising measures on the nuclear industry if funds prove insufficient to pay claims.
Duquesne carries extra expense insurance w hich includes the incremental cost er any replacement power purchased (over the costs which would have been incurred had the units been operating) and other incidental expenses after the occurrence of certain types of accidents at the Company's nuclear units. The amounts of the coverage are 100 percent of the estimated extra expense per week during the 52-week period starting 21 weeks after an accident and 67 percent of I such estimate per week for the fnilowing 104 weeks. The amount and duration of extra expenses could substantially exceed insurance coverage.
National Energy Policy Act of 1992 The National Energv Policy Act of 1992 (Energy Act) requires utilities (including Duquesne) whic h hate pmchased uranium emichment senices from the U.S.
Department of Energy to collectively contribute up to $150 million annually (adjusted for inflation) up to a total of $2.25 billion ihr decommissioning and decontamination of enrichment facilities. Assessments are based on the amount of uranium a utility had processed for emichment prior to enactment of the Energy Ac t and are to be paid by such utilities over a 15-year period. The Energv Act states that the assessment shall be deemed a necessary and reasonable current cost of fuel and shall be fully recoverable in rates in alljurisdictions in the same manner as the utility's other fut! costs. Duquesne believes such assessments wi'l be fully cecoverable in rates. Duquesne has recorded an estimated liability for contributions of $12.5 million offset by a regulatory asset.
Emission Allowances In April 1992, Duquesne entered into an agicement with Wisconsin Power & Light to purchase 5.000 allowances per year for $1.3 million in 1995, S1.4 million in 1996 and $1.4 million in 1997. Duquesne also received an option to buy an addi-tional 5,000 allowances per ycar in 1998 and 1999.
Guarantees Duquesne and the other CAPCO companies have guaranteed certain debt and lease obligations concerning a coal supply contract for the Bruce Mansfield plant.
At December 31.1992. Duquesne's share of these guarantees was S40 million. In January 1992, certain bonds weic refunded at louer interest rates that will con-tribute to lower future coal costs. The prices paid for the coal by the CAPCO com-45
%,s panies tuuler this umuat t ate expected to be suffh ient to satisfy the debt and lease obligations. See Note I to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The mini-mum futme payments in millions of dollars to be made by Duquesne that iciate solely to these obligations are S7.2 in 1993, S6.9 in 1994, S6.5 in 1995,56.2 in 1996, $5.9 in 1997 and $15.1 thereaf ter. Duquesne's total payments for coal pur-(hased under the contract were S25.2 million in 1992, S32.6 million in 1991 and S25.7 million in 1990.
~
Residual Waste Management Regulations InJuly 1992, the Pennsshania Department of Enviromnental Resources issued Residual Waste Ntanagement Regulations governing the generation and manage-ment of non-hazardous waste. The Company is curr ently developing (ompliance strategies and has estimated its costs over the next tluce ycars to be approxinuncly
$10 million.
Other Tbc Company is intohed in various other legal proceedings and environmental maners. The Company belicies such proceedings and matters in total will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
Q Generating Units in addition to its wholly owned generating units, Duquesne, together with other cle( tric utilities, has an owneiship or leaschold inter est in certainjointly owned units. Duquesne is required to pay its share of the construction and operating costs of the units. The operating expenses of the units are included in the State-ment of Consolidated Income. .
Amounts included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31,1992 as property, plant and equipment include the following (thousands of dollars):
Generating Constmction Units: Pen entage Utility Plant Ac cumulated Woil in Fuel Duquesne's Umt Intciest Megawatts in Senice Depu ciation Progress Soune Interest Cheswic L 100.0 570 5 182.250 S 72.333 S 2.909 Coal 1Jrama (1) 100.0 4S7 193.291 107,007 3,00i Coal I t. Martin 1 30.0 276 63,836 28,417 1,769 Gul Ibtlake 5 31.2 186 69,113 23,290 5.212 Coal S.unnus e 31.2 187 S2,999 28,31S 1,021 Coal Brut e Mansfichi 1 ( 1 ) 20.3 228 11,,m o a4,007 633 Coal 15ruce Mansfield 2 (1) S.O 62 32.404 14,199 166 Coal Bruce Mansfield 3 (1) 13.74 110 87,376 34,091 121 Coal BeaserValley 1 (2) 47.5 385 39S,202 140,963 10.826 Nuc lear Beascr Valk) 2 (3)(4) 13.74 113 18,0ti9 2,198 2,141 Nuclear Beaser Valle) Common I acihties 210,S38 40,093 1,972 PenTI(5) 13.74 164 752,403 124.208 4.668 Nudcar Ihtal 2,768 2,212.311 671,124 31,468 Cold-sesened units:
Bnmot Island 100.0 306 87.250 34,414 593 Fuel Oil Phillips (1) 100.0 300 144,436 67,110 2 19 Coal Ibral Generating Unin 3.374 S2.144.027 $772,648 $33,312 (1) Unit is equipped with five gas ciesulfurdotion equipment (2) %e NRC hos granted on operating lice,se theough January 2016 f 3) On October 2.1987 Duquesne cd ts 13 74% meerest in beaver vouey Unit 2. exclusse of ransmhsion t and common ,.
facils e.. Amounts shown represent facilit,es not sold and wbsequent lea >ehold improvements.
(4) The NRC has promed on operating license through May 2027.
(5) he NRC has gromed on operating license through March 2026.
4t>
A DOE
%r5 Q Changesin The l'ollowing is a stuninan of (h.uiges in wo Ling capital other than cash:
Working Capital Other Than Cash A"'"unts in Tinousaruls <?lhollan (<n slu Enzr 1992 1991 1990 A< counts c(eivable (Note (a $64,0S8 S(53.829) S(25,368)
Materials and supplies (4,151) (3,122) (17.030)
Other runrnt assets 7,140 (8.084) (2.753)
Ac(ounts pavahie (8.818) (827) 21.568 Other cunent liabilities (9.589) 22.812 20.564 Total $48.670 5(43.050) S 281 h Quarferty The following is a stunmary of selected quarterly financial data (thousands of dol-Financial lars. except per share arnounts). The quarterly data reflect seasonal weather varia-Inforneation tions in Dnquesne's service territor y.
(Unaudited) 1992 First Qu;uler Second Quarter Thin! Quarter Founh Qu.uler Operating Resenues $298,064 $290,008 $314.398 $282.087 Operating inc oine 63,063 59.626 74,720 55,635 Net Incorne 33.863 30.488 45.877 31.290 F;unings Per Share .64 .58 .86 .59 St< x L prit c:
liigh 30?m 30h 32 32?s lxnv 26's 27 % 29 % 3056 1991
()perating Resenues S2S8.020 S288.636 S333,365 S289,447 Operating incorne (1) 65,963 65.669 75.395 59.876 Net Incorne 32,56" "9.431 42,910 28.362 F.aniities Per share 61 .55 .80 .51 St(x k prire:
Iligh 257 26% 283 31 Inw 23% 25 26 28:
(1) Kestated to conform wA presentations adapted dying 1992.
2% DOE V
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA A nma nn m T&,uwnds o/Do!!an 1992 1"91 1990 19N9 l!Ns 10S7 Sekoed Income Statement items Operating Resenues:
(ini ent r esenurs fiom rustomers $1.210,319 Sl .218.909 SI,074.936 S 974.444 5 883,725 S 833.986 (98,201) (78.314) 10,784 96.287 117,544 -
Deferried customen tesenues Resenurs h om other utilmes 42.439 58.103 43.153 47.83s 39.548 50.214 1.181.557 1.199,468 1,130,893 1.118.568 1,000.817 886,200 Total opcmting Reecimes Operating I'xpenses:
Fuel and ptut hased u>wei i 265,M0 250.755 219.51] 215.0 0 m.l? N 1,2
()ther operation &
356.628 371.533 Stil,925 336.084 341,942 256.163 maintenan< c expenses 127,924 119.261 122.251 119,376 111.023 82,172 Depic< iation and .unortization 181.621 191.008 157,290 158,576 133.338 120,301 Im ome and other taxes 253.044 266.906 266,916 269,489 244.342 183,733 Operating Irnume 18,851 7,002 11,537 8.440 47.723 33,791
():het ha ome, euluding AFC 4.894 4.273 2.931 2.872 3.027 103,577 Total AFC (dcht and equin )
1rss Intet est and Othet Charges 135.271 141.616 159.715 167,799 176.526 188.131 Net income $ 141,518 S 133,563 $ 121,672 S 113.002 S 118.566 S 134,972 Earnino Per Share $2.67 52.50 $2.24 S2.03 St.86 51.83 Sek cted Balance Sheet Items Propri n. plani & equipment - net $3.015.694 S3.035.115 53,010,562 $3,055.039 $3,063,922 53 098.897 l
l otal assets 53.875,914 S3,933,788 S3,919.306 S3.920.590 S3.881,424 S1,151,615 Capitalization:
Conunon stoi kholder s' equin- $1,171,460 S1.111.121 S1.079.141 $ 1.066.190 S1,070,575 Sl.217.361 1
Picf en ed and pr efriem e ste n k 132.009 137.343 189/03 219,(01 241.816 260.903 I nng-term dcht 1,413.001 1,420,726 1.501,293 1,540,329 1,550,231 1,690f(C Total Capitali ation $2.716,470 S2f>69.190 52,769,529 S2,826.510 $2.865,622 S3,168,866 l
Capitalization Rados j (iinunon stin Lholders' equin 43.19 41.6'i 39.Ori. 37.79 37.49 38.49 l Piricrred and picicicru e st< n L 4.9'I 3.29 6.89 7.89 8.y7 8.2(i I ung-term debt 52.09 53.29 54.29 54.5 9 54.19 53.49 Total Capitali ation 100.09 10(LO'i 100.09 100.09. 10(LO9 10(LO9 Times intarst Tanuti tpre-tan 3.06 2.84 2.51 2.31 2.25 1.81 Ratio ofLaming to Tius! Onaryes Ipir-tan 2.22 2.09 1.89 1.78 1.72 1.58 Sek cted Common Stock Information Shares Outstanding (In thaumndu:
Yeat-end 52,950 52,903 53.7?.9 55,340 57.831 70JO6 As crage 52.913 53.391 54,43.. :o,790 63.748 72,845 Dis idends dec lar ed (In ILnonndo $81,491 $78.040 S74.971 S72.397 S77.571 Sx7,206 Disidend pasout rate 56.9'1 57.69 60.7c< 63.1 9 64.59 61.99 Pric e carnings ratio at scar-end (1) 12.1 12.3 11.1 11.8 10.1 64 Disic'end sickl at t rai-cod (1) 5.09 5.09 5.8% a.79 6.89 10.29 Return on ascrage < ommon equin- 12.49 12.29 11.3 9 10.6 9 10.49 11.1 9 (1) Based on year end rnadet pnce per Aart.
-l h'
N-DOE
%r5 SELECTED OPERATING DATA 1992 1001 IWO 1989 19 % 1987 Sales of Dectricitu As craue annual iesidential kilowatt-In sur use 5,901 6.331 5,933 6.otio 6.16N 6,019 c Electric energy sales billed (inillions of KWil1:
Residentral 3,069 3.283 3.078 3,119 3,156 3,065
( nnunen ial 5,3">8 5A50 3,23t > .i,143 5.055 1,str.1 Industrial 3,059 3,012 3.29ti 3.221 3,309 " 418 Niis( cilaneous 83 S4 84 54 91 98 TotalSales to Customm i1,569 11,861 11,69 I I1.569 11fo1 10,980 5 ales to other utilitics 4.060 2.979 1,S30 2,100 2,716 2,126 7'otal Sales 15,629 14,810 13,524 13fdi9 14,320 13,406 Enerp Supply and Pruduction Data:
Enerp supph Unillions of KW1!):
Net genenttion - system plants (net of ( kimpany use and losses) 15,074 14,220 13,266 13A53 14.144 13.20s Piu( hased and net inachertent power 555 620 258 214 176 198 Total Energy Supply 15.629 14.810 13,524 13fa19 14,320 13.406 Generating capability (51%) 2,834 2.833 2.835 2,835 2,836 2,832 Peak load (51%) 2.308 2.409 o,379 2,381 2,372 2,280 Cost of fuel per million liTl' 140.15c 15170c 149.62c 143.87c 143.74c 150.99c lill' pri kilowatt-hour generaird 10.370 10A14 10A41 10All 10,301 10,449 Ascrane production c ost pei kilowatt-hom 2,51c 2.sor 2.61 c 2.73c 2.5sc 2.33c Number of Customers- End of Year:
Residential 521,152 520,0 l ti 518.3"9 516,801 513,760 510.823 Conuncirial 52.839 52.614 a2,330 31,950 51.43b ao901 Industrial 1,987 2,001 2,026 2,023 2,017 1,978
()ther 1,833 1,s9] 1,847 1,818 ],828 1,s31 Total Customm 577,811 576.328 574,52a a ,2.392 369,0til 363,536 NON -
SSE N ELECTMC WTEfrMS
) If rom f deson f 41ru insfetuw f 992 Med Yeer Sumev1
~
l l
Resedenteel ( ommen ied I te ck,,,ol .
(.ommeros!
26 5% 46 3* 32 6',
f47 29 R l l Q b lf
- F
? &~
N l O ?*v \ 3 3 *,
un.ei un.ei 26 5%
l 34 4*,
l r m CU 5
~
. .t u
pJ e if 2 r y
9 tw , r , k
, Daniel Berg, John M. Arthur, Doreen E. Boyce Robert B. Pease, William H. Knoe!!, Robert Mehrobian DOE Board Daniel Berg,63 Robert B. Pease,67 of Directors Trim expiscs 1994 (l. tit Institute Piofrwor. Ter m expir es 19td (l. 5). Senior Vic c Presi-alismm hmr" Renwt Ian Poh tn imir Institute. Dia n ton dent. National Dn cloinuent (:oi por ation shii n in< inde I h-Tn h Sla< hine. Inc (manu- (: cal estate); INccutive Dir n toi. Allegheny f.u tm er of $perialn partu .uuljo.u him Confriem e on Communin Dnclopment.
AI.u hinen (:o., Inc. t di tributui of m.u hine 194is-91. Die n ronhips im lude Blue Cross of t oolu . Westa n Pennwhania and the Port Authorin of Alleghem Counn.
John M. Arthur, .,0
'l cim expiirs 1995 D. (b. Retiicd Chainnan. William II. Knocil,68 Duquc*ne I.ight. Diin tur ships im lude Alme Term expires 1991 d. 4. tH. Retired Chair Safen Applian< es Compam iworket and ma. "<l Chief lin uthe Of fic n of ()< lops plant protec tion equipment and nstema and Indur ,, lur. (hasic and sper.aln siccis and Ch.unben Dnclopment Compam. Inc. f abricaird steel pr odm ts: industrial and < om-(waste managernent olu tatione. mcu ial c onstruc tion ). Du n torships iru lude Doreen E. Boyce,58 I #'"' "" '"" I ""' C"' P"' "' "" '"""
1syl 1)uym ou I.st of Carnegic Nlellon l~nhenin. '
"' .Icrm q>iin 1993 c, ~>L Pinident of du-
- ]"jff f linhlI oundation huppoit of ediuational Robert Mehrabian. 51 2 t oml<nwton, and c onununin pu rgramu. Diin toi ships Icrm expires 1993 (l. 5). Picsident.
7 f oul,u c itu lude Alic r obar I.aboratorin, Inc. and Carnegic Slcllon l'nhersin; Dean. College of 1 Lmosan,;: Doll.u Bank,17cdn al havings llank. l rustcc 1:ngineering, l~nkenin of Cahfornia at Nanta Isyurog /gt of f rankhn & Slanhall College. Har bara,19690. Dir n u n ships im lude PPG
( vm nutu n: Industrics, Im . Ipr oduc cr of glass, < hemicals, i Im p/. p enta,u! azar nas and resing and Nupnoniahu nu 6 $, j[ Tnlynologin. Iru; (ni.unif acturn of clow trona devic es based on Ing h temperature
< ciamic supcu onducion).
DOE Officers Wesley W. von Schark. 48 David D. Marshall,40 DQI~ Chainnan of the lioard. Picsident .uul DQl:Vic e Picsident: Duquesne 1.ight lin u-( :hief I An utive Offit cr; Duquesne 1.ight the Vic e Picsident sinc c l'chruan 1992, pic-Chairman of the Board sim e september vionsh- Awistant to the President (1990) ain!
19s7 Picsident and Chief I An uthe Of ficer Vic c Pr esident. Corporate Dnclopment sim eJannan 19% and Chief l'inancial Offi. (19s7LJoined Duquesnc 1 ight in 1983 as
< ci Il<Hn Neptennhc1 198 I tllitrugli Attgust ('encral s Slanagel, Platuliilg. Nialgeling and 19sti. Previonsh henior Vic c Pinident - Rates; piniously was Assistant Vic e Piesident l'inam e and Administrathe 5cnites for of I'inan< c for Central Vermont Publu
( MillIal Velinout Publit benN e Coi poiation. hen it c ( $of por ation.
.Alvt st'Ded in exectlli\c pa rsitirgls willt Attleri-(all liln tiir Pinkel ('4Hilpan) and A}) pal.a hian Pown ( ompam.
sa
~
\
s 3e - .
1 Y T t a y- *
% y s J. Murrin, G. Christion Lontuch, Robert Eric W. Springer, Sigo Folk P. Bonone ThomasJ. 51urrin,63 Eric W. Springer,63 Tenn expires 199I (3,6). Dean, Al. Pahnnin, Tenn expites 1993 (l. 4). Partner of Ihn tv.
Sdu.ol of P>usiness Administration, Duquesne Springer and 51attern, P.C. (atiorneys-at.Lm ).
l'mver sin; fonner Deputy Sec ret.uS of I'.S. Dir ectorships inchale the Uihan I cague of Dept. of Conuncice; fonner Picsident. Piiishm gh and Preshsicrian l'niver sity Westinghouse I.let uic Can poration 1:nct gs Ilospital.
and A<haru ed Tr< hnologs Group. Dir et t<n- 3; 9 p. a t 58 ships in< lude 510:o1ola, Inc. (manufa< itu er of clet tric al equipment and c om[u ments). Tenn expir es 1993 (2,3. 1). Pri sonal im est-1Ic also is a member of the pri ate set tor incnts. Chainnan of 51amic c Fall N1edical Coum il on Competitiseness. and the NASA Fund and trus.ec of Chatham College.
Tchison ('oum il- Wesley W. von Schack,48 rLt pinuwds G. Christian Lantzsch 68 1 con expires 1993 (3. -1,5,6L Chainnan.
Term expiics 1993 (2,3). Retired Vic c Chair- President and Chief liccutisc Oflh er of man N1ction liant Corporation (hank hohl. DQl' and Duquesne 1.ight. Diretiorships ing c ompam n iciir ed Vk e Chainnan and im hule Nicllon Itant Corporation,1011 Chief Financial Oflh cr. N!clion llank, N.A. Titanium Co. (produ< ci of titanium ructal
(< onuncicial banking and tnist seni< est in oducts), ihr Regional Industrial Desclop-Dirca torships itulude Koger i quin. Inc. nient Corporation of Sonthwestern Pennssi-
' O cal estate imestment tr ust) and I rout vania the Pennuhania liusiness Roundtahic, l'nlimited (< onsenation group). and the Pittsburgh Cuharallnist. lie senes on the Goscrnor's F< onomk Deselopment Robert P. Ilonone,59 Partner ship I;o.u d and the Gmer nor's Penn-1cnn expires 1991 i1. 2L President and ss hania 2000 Fducation Ibant of Dirc< tors.
(:hief I secuthe Ofik er of Alleghem 1.udhun Corporation (spc< iahy metals pr oduc tion).
1)il e 14 n ships ilu lude AIIcglictiv I .ll(lhlin
(:orporation; Chainnan. Pittshm gh tharu h of the Federal Resene liank of Cicscland.
Frederick S. Potter,47 Diane S. Eismont,48 DQl. Vic c President sim eJanuan 1991; pns Scu rtan sionsh a senior banker with Ikcai, Stear ns &
ggp g 0 .. Inc.: a si< c picsident for Planmctni s. -
In< .. and an imesiment banker with %1errill Controller i suc h & Co. Inc. James D. 51itchell,41 Gary L Schwass. 47 Assistant Tr casm er DQl Vic c President and Treasurer; Joan S. Senchyshyn,54 DucIucsuc 1.ight Chief Financial Ofik er sim e 199; N..u e President, finan< c (198S); Assistant Secretan and Vh c President and 11casuiet (194).
Jomed Duquesne 1.ight in 195*, as Treasurer; presiously sened in a sarien of senior managernent positions for O,nsumeis Powcr Comp.un, im ludmg lica uthe 1)in ct f or of Financial Planning and Projects.
51 9
e _, .g v y- mmmyg-h ,
g .
r'
% A*r-Duquesne Light Piorning Council members are, left to right, Dionno Gree i Gary Brandenberger, Gary Schwass, WifAom DeLeo, Roger Beck, David Marshall, Edwyno Anderson, John Sieber, FreMk Potter, cod Wesley von Schock.
Duquesne Light Wesley W. von Schack,48 John D. Sieber,53 Company (:baiiman of the Board. Piesident Vic c Pr esident. Nuc lear and (:hief lic< uthe of fic er Edwyna G. Anderson,63 David D. hiarshall,40 General O.un ci lic< uthe Vic c Picsident George E. Bentz,55 Gary L Schwass,47 Assisiani Vic c President. Iluman Resouries Vi(c Picsident, l'in.nu e Diane S. Eismont,48 and ( hief I manc ial O!!ic ci se, , y,3n Roger D. Beck,56 James D. Alitchell,41 Vic c President. Mar Lening and (:ustomer Iic.nuier senic es .
Raymond H. Panza,42 Gary R. Brandenberger,55
~
nintroller Vic c Picsident. hmer supph Donald J. Clayton,38 William J. Delro,42 higaru l'scemer Vic c Pr esistent. O ni;w er ate Perfortnam e and Infor mation seni< c, William F. Fields,42 Assistani l icasu' cr Dianna L Green 46 Vu e hesident. Administiaihe seni< es Joan S. Senchyshyn,54 Assist.uu sc< ictan Duquesne l'rederick S. Potter,47 II. Donald Aiorine,55 Enterprises h esident President. A!Icghen3 Desclopment Girjuiration Anthony J. Villiotti. 46 ""d P'"Pri t) Vent"' C' 1 td-1 r castuci and 0,ntrollei John L Weinhold,56 Vi< c President. Proper n Ventur es.1.id.
Montauk Gary L Schwass,47 James D. hiitchell,4 i President Vice hesident and Treasmer
2'M- DOE
%5 SHAREHOLDER REFERENCE GUIDE Common Stock ment, dir cct deposii, ( hange of addr ess notifi-cation, and other account information should Trading Symbol: DQE Stm L Eu hanges 1.isted and 1 raded.
Mude pm nmm nundx r and h dincted
- g. '
New Yor k, Philadelphia, Midw est Nmnber of Common Shareholders of Record Shareholder Relations Department at Year End: 81,343 DQE Box 68
- "' I M**'I"9 Pittsburgh, PA 15230-006S Sharcholders are cordially invited to attend Sharcholders also can call between 7:30 a.m.
our Annual Meeting of Shareholders at and 4:30 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through 1:30 p.m. (local time), April 27,1993, at the Fridav. Please base vour account nund>cr SEB Plaia,3S8 Greenwic h Street, New Yor k, handv. '
N'Y-Pittsburgh arca: 393-6167 Dividends Toll free outside Pittsburgh area:
The Board of Directors historicalh has 1-800-247-0400 declar ed (juas terly dividends payaI>1e on the FAX: 412-39%087 11:st business day ofjanuary, April, July and Questions relating to re-iegistering stm L, October. The rec oni dates for 1993 aic including shares held in the Dividend Rein-expc< ted to be March 10, June 9 vestment and Stoc k Pun base Plan, c an be September 13 and Dec ember 10. answered by our Shareholder Relations Direct Deposit of Dividends Department. To actually transfi-r stm L certifi-cates, contact our transfer agent:
Your DQE (guanerly dividend payments can BM of Boston be de(>osited automaticalh int <y a persongd Tu erPm s' (hec kmg or savmg account. Ibrough thys 150 Rovall Street 45-01-05 irer servi (c your dru,dend mcome is avadable for use on the payment date. Standing in od M O 03 hank lines is eliminated, as well as the fear of " ""
misplacing or losing your < het L. Qdi us toll Duplicate Mailings frce for more information. If you hold nudtiple accounts,you may be Tax Status of Common Stock Dividends c(citing duplicate mailings of annual and The company estimates that all of the com- <juanctly reports. IIelp us eliminate this mon stm L dikidends paid in 1992 are taxable """"C " "I"*P""'C C" " E ""' ' "" I "*
as d.in.dend m.oome. I his estimate is subje( to number. Elimination of these duplicate audit by the Internal Resenue Seni< c. "P."
- E' ". ""' ""# "# P*'" I" ' ' #'I "'.
dindend < hecks and proxy materials to cac h form 10-K acc ount.
113 ou hold or ar e a benefi< ial owner of our financial Community inquiries sim k as of Februarv 22,1993, the record date for the 1993 Annual Meeting, we will send Ana sts, nustnu nt rnanagus, and bn Ans sou, free upon re<1uest, a (opy of DQL-. s should direct their irx;uiries to 412-393-1133.
Annual Report on For m 10-K. as filed with the """"'"'P""" *" *""*'"
Securities and Exc huge Commission for Imestor Relations Depanment 1992. All ictguests must be made in writing to: DQE Box 68 tary Pittsburgh, PA 15230-0068 O[' FAX: 412-39 % 448 Box 68 Pittsburgh, PA 15230-006s DQE and its affiliated (ompanies are Ergual Shoreholder Services /Assu.s tance Opportunity Employers.
Sharehokler in<1uiries relating to dividends, O % 13 8'" H "'""
missing stock certificates, dividend reimest-
- 4 DQE
"'A t5
@ m. - nua,,,,m.i x,,,,, m, ,,,,,,,mi m.. ..ix ,,, ,,, imi ,,,,, .,.
- --