05000278/LER-1979-001-03, /03L-0 on 790111:discovered That Recorded hi-hi Trip Valve for Steam Line Radiation Monitor Was 50 man-rem/h Greater than Tech Spec Limit & No Corrective Action Taken. Caused by Procedural Deficiency

/03L-0 on 790111:discovered That Recorded hi-hi Trip Valve for Steam Line Radiation Monitor Was 50 man-rem/h Greater than Tech Spec Limit & No Corrective Action Taken. Caused by Procedural Deficiency

ML19269D130
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	02/09/1979
From:	Cooney M PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
LER-79-001-03L, LER-79-1-3L, NUDOCS 7902270363
Download: ML19269D130 (1)

LER-1979-001, /03L-0 on 790111:discovered That Recorded hi-hi Trip Valve for Steam Line Radiation Monitor Was 50 man-rem/h Greater than Tech Spec Limit & No Corrective Action Taken. Caused by Procedural Deficiency

Event date:
Report date:
2781979001R03 - NRC Website

text

-

t i

1 Mr. Sc,yce H. Grier, Ot rector No.

3-79-1/3L-O Office of Inspection & Enforcement, Region I i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccrraission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Dear Mr. Griers This L.E.R. refers to a procedural deficiency. The governing Technical Specification is 6.9.2.b(3).

U. s. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMut5SION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL ELocx: l l l l l I lh sptgAsa PMNT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATIONI i

a R IP I A f P l 8 l S I 3 l@sc l0 l lo la l0 IO 10 l- !O l0 a@lI4lt 11 It It a@locarw@

l l

l l

)

a e vca%sas cces i. i uca~sa %weaa

s wca%ss n.n CONT I

R 7,$ d l0 15 l0 l-10 l 2 l 7 18 hl 0 l 111 t i l 719 @ 01 ? l o l 91 71 o l@

I 8

W S.

JocaET %weta 4

69 ave %f o47E T

4EpoA F Cart M

EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROSAsLJ CONSEQUENCES h IM l Durinst review of a completed surveillance test, it was found that the l

AI recorded Ri-hi trip value for the main steam line radiation monitor i

o.4 i

RIS.;-17 4518 vos 50 mR/hr greater than the Tech Spec liiit and that no l

FTTT) [

corrective action had been takea. The reactor was in a shutdown

[

o 86

[

Condition at the time the test was pe rformed. Consequences were minimal

[

ITTTl I since the redundant monitors were operable and subsequent tests showed l

Et Proper trip values, f

r ae 80 SYSTEM CAU58 CALSE CoM8 vatw g coce coca suecoes ceumaam " con suscoes susccos g

IIlAlh U,, h W h lZlZJZl 'ZlZlh y h J h

,o i2 i,

4

o SEQLR471 AL oCCLanE%Cf ag*CRT

1. E v'58o4 (gp so EVENTvfAR

• EPORf 90.

coCE TY PE

%o.

@ 4<gg l7l9l g

l0[0J1l y

l0l3l y

g g

2 a

u 2.

v m

a a

a a

W3 'sto'A a,'Br

'Tr27 LLGL..IJ@ L..JJ@ LIJO I o I o I o @I o I

• ".% ;?.c M. 't*,L9,7

.R";;b'::..

ov.,

I

. J.LJ@ W O. L1J@ l:I9I9I9'@

u a

2

~

u cAust cascRimoN ANoccRRte ive AcricNs @

o l The apparent cause was a procedural de ficiencv. Previous and subsequent t

ml tests showed the monitor setooint was stable within Tech Spec limits.

l l

Recalibration of the instrument was not conducted. The test procedure i

gl has been extensively revised to clearly identify ont-of-soec conditions.

I wI f

s,

STA 480WER oTWER $TAfus esco N otscovfRy oEscR,* Tion [q,J @ l 01 Ol Ol h NA I [,Jj h Surveillance Test is Faview I

'.c'm.T,

=Li, ou=T o,.cmiTv @

tocATro~ o, suana @

. ITTr1 W @o v.su 7

.su.si s

L.2J@l FA I

.I NA I

• fR$oNNELfn#05umEd wwstm fvF1 10 f 0 l 0 l@W@of$cAi*fto%

i 7

NA l

w c.o,,,'t'J.,easca.mo~@

...s FT 1101010 th MA I

1 n

is

/y LOSS o8 om oAM.G8 'o FACIUTY so fv85 O

l Z._3h..ESCRIPTICN NA l

I"iTil dsse.'h e's'c. mio,.g

*s

.o

(

NRC usa cNLv NA 1 !l JlIIIfI8 II l}

i

.s e,

so a h -

p, cu (21;) 841-5020 NA% { Os pagpaggs y.

J. Core V

o T'

--(-----

.79022703G3