05000278/LER-1994-001, :on 940124,HPCI Sys Declared Inoperable During Performance of Quarterly Surveillance Test.Caused by Leak on HPCI Sys Hydraulic Control Line.Hydraulic Control Line Repaired & HPCI Sys Tested

From kanterella
(Redirected from 05000278/LER-1994-001)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
:on 940124,HPCI Sys Declared Inoperable During Performance of Quarterly Surveillance Test.Caused by Leak on HPCI Sys Hydraulic Control Line.Hydraulic Control Line Repaired & HPCI Sys Tested
ML20067A280
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/03/1994
From: Geoffrey Edwards, Wasong A
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-94-001, LER-94-1, NUDOCS 9402170141
Download: ML20067A280 (4)


LER-1994-001, on 940124,HPCI Sys Declared Inoperable During Performance of Quarterly Surveillance Test.Caused by Leak on HPCI Sys Hydraulic Control Line.Hydraulic Control Line Repaired & HPCI Sys Tested
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function
2781994001R00 - NRC Website

text

.-

~.

Peach Gottorn Atomic Power Station a

YECO ENERGY 5,Mh"--

De!ta. PA 17314 7739 717 a5S 7014 February'4, 1994 Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Locket No. 50-278

SUBJECT:

Licensee Event Reoort.

fftach Bottom Atomic Power Station-Unit 3 This LER concerns the High Pressure Coolant injection system being inoperabie due to a hydraulic oil line problem.

Reference:

Docket No. 50-278 Report Number:

3-94-001 Revision Number: 00 Event Date:

01/24/94 Report Date:

i.

02/03/94-Facility:

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station RD1, Box 208, Delta, PA 17314 This LER is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v).

Sincerely,

/ Garrett D. Edwards Plant Manager GDE/GAJ:gaj enclosure cc:

R. A. Burricelli, Public Service Electric & Gas W. P. Dornsife, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania INPO Records Center T. T. Martin, US NRC, Administrator, Region i R. l. McLean, State of Maryland W. L Schmidt, US NRC, Resident inspector C. D. Schaefer, DelMarVa Power H. C. Schwemm, VP - Atlantic Electric

.I l

l CCN 94-14 015 9402170141 9402o3 3

PDR ADOCK 05000278 Q

s PDR

I' l

NRC FORM 366 U S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

. APPROVED OMB NO.3150 0104 E xPIRES 4/30/97 ESTIMATED BURDE.N PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS

  • ""^ '

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) 70MME Nr'S MGTED/Ou'aD#EsTlyAYt TEHE REC 3RDS

$ CUL TOHY COMM SONW INGT N d 20655 AND THE P APE RWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500iO4L OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTCN, DC 20503 F ACILITY NAME 11)

'DOCM E T NUMBE R (2)

PAGE 431 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station - Unit 3 0 l 5 l 010 l 01217 l 8 1lOFl013 i

M' l

High Pressure Coolant Injection System being inoperable due to a hydraulic oil line problem EVENT DATE 151 LE R NUMBE R tel REPORT DATE 17)

OTHE R F ACILITIEE INVOLVED (Si LE($ L*'

QLjdj MONTH DAY

) EAR FactitvnaMES DOCK E T NUMBE R(St MONTH DAY YEAH YEAR e

0 15101010 1 1 I 0l1 2l4 9

4 9 l4

~

0l0l1 0 l0 0l2 0l3 9l4 0 1 5l0 j o i c i l l OPE R ATING MOof iei N

20.402ii,>

20 40sw s0 ni.u2Hwi n nin>

20 406teHilld 60 ?6ictill 50 73ieH2iM 73.71(cl y

0 01 1l0 i 0 20 40sc.iOii o s0 36<. iia:

so 731.ii2H. o OTHER<spe<gv,qA,6, ope 20 406teH11 ben 50.7 3(a l t2 8 bi 50 73isH2Hvmil Al

.f66Af 20 406(sit 1Hwl 50 73feH21bs) 50 734s42HenHB) 20 406larillM 50 73isil2Hml 60 73ioM211al LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LE R 412)

NAME TE LEPHONE NUMBER ARE A CCOE Anthony J. Wasong, Manager Experience Assessment 71117 415 l 61 -1710111 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR E ACH COMPONENT F AILURE DESCRIBED IN TH18 REPORT H3t HEP [g[

[E CAU$E

$YSTEY COMPONENT O *PDS CAVSE Sv 5 TEM COv'OSENT 7

TO NPRO I

I I I I I I I

I 1 i l I I I

I I I I l l l

l 1 I l I i SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT E XPf CTED 1146 MONTH DAY vtAR Su8 viSSION 1 E $ freves comp >ete E MPECTED SUBwSSION DA TEi NO l

l l

A85TR ACT iLmt to T400 weces e e, epprommete$ hireen nrne e space typewntten Irnegl 11Sk On 01/24/94, the High Pressure Coolant injection (HPCI) system was declared inoperable during the performance of a quarterly Surveillance Test (ST). The HPCI system did not properly respond to flow controller changes during ST performance. Therefore, the applicable Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) was entered.

The HPCI system did start within its specified time limit and did control system flow greater than the Tech Spec 5000 gpm limit, however, system flow could not be reduced to a lower value. The cause of this event has been determined to be a leak on the HPCI system hydraulic controlline. An investigation was performed which identified that a HPCI system hydraulic control line pulled out of its fitting at the system hydraulic governor. This condition prevented oil from getting to the system Servo thus not allowing the HPCI system flow rate to be reduced to a value other than its maximum. Following hydraulic control line repairs, the HPCI system was tested satisfactorily and the associated Tech Spec LCO was exited. Other hydraulic control line fittings associated with HPCI system were inspected and determined to be properly secured. An evaluation is currently in progress to determine what corrective actions are necessary to prevent future recurrences. No previous similar events have been identified.

NRC Form 36616 891U.S. NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION f xPIRES 4/30/92

~

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

',S,'g*JfTOd8EEET70NEEUEsT"so'o"n"R's' IORWAE TEXT CONTINUATION iT4"Po',"1s MAOjMOffC'"^'.5/o 'u"s' "'E "f'

' ' ^"

P P APE RWO R E DUCTION R J C [3 bO O 04 O IC OF MAN AGEMENT AND OUDGCT, WASHINGTON, DC 20503 FACILITY NAME Hi DOCK ET NUMBER 121 LER NUMBER 46)

PAGE13)

TU Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 0 l5 l0 l0 l0 l2 l 7 l8 9] 4 0l0l1

- 0 l0 0l2 OF g l3 Tm or ma, ac.. w. un aesmc re, mn nn Reouirements for the Reoort

\\

1 This report is submitted to satisfy the requirements of 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(v) describing

)

conditions that alone could have prevented the fulfillment of a safety function.

]

Unit Conditions at Time of Discoverv Unit 3 was in the "RUN" mode at approximately 100 % of rated thermal reactor (Ells:EA) power. There were no systems, structures, or components that were inoperable that contributed to the event.

Descriotion of the Event On 01/24/94 at approximately 1805 hours0.0209 days <br />0.501 hours <br />0.00298 weeks <br />6.868025e-4 months <br />, the High Pressure Coolant injection (HPCI) system (Ells:BJ) was declared inoperable during the performance of a quarterly Surveillance Test (ST-O-23-301-3) "HPCI PUMP, VALVE, FLOW, AND UNIT COOLER FUNCTIONAL AND IN-SERVICE TEST". The HPCI system did not properly respond to flow controller changes during ST performance. The purpose of this test is to confirm that the HPCI system is operable as specified in the Technical Specifications (Tech Spec) j and the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report. The HPCI system did not properly control system flow per its intended design, therefore, the HPCI system was considered inoperable. The applicable Tech Spec Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) was entered. The NRC was notified via ENS at 1945 hours0.0225 days <br />0.54 hours <br />0.00322 weeks <br />7.400725e-4 months <br />. An investigation was performed which identified that a HPCI system hydraulic control line pulled out of its fitting at the system hydraulic governor. Following hydraulic controlline repairs, the HPCI system was tested satisfactorily and the associated Tech Spec LCO was exited on 01/25/94 at 0630 hours0.00729 days <br />0.175 hours <br />0.00104 weeks <br />2.39715e-4 months <br />. The HPCI system did start within its specified time limit and did control system flow greater than the Tech Spec 5000 gpm limit, however, system flow could not be reduced to a lower value.

Cause of the Event

The cause of this event has been determined to be a leak on the HPCI system hydraulic controlline. An investigation was performed which identified that a HPCI system hydraulic control line pulled out of its fitting at the system hydraulic governor. This condition prevented oil from getting to the system Servo thus not allowing the HPCI system flow rate to be reduced to a value other than its maximum.

i l

MRC Form 366A 16-HN

a-U.S. NUCLEAR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION E XPlRES 4/30/92 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) fs,'s"R 4'1 0 M N 8

^

E O R U ST 60 0 HRS ORWA 8

^

l TEXT CONTINUATION 20 #/0#, M,"N1"M',7di/c'#^/s*JG"SM5' EN Uf"#0eWOE?"#s*fk*N %2H?"Mo'o*o*k 0?di OF MA lAGEMENT AND BUDGET,W ASHINGTON. DC 20503.

F ACILITY NAME (11 DOCK k T NUMBER (2)

LER NUMBER 16)

PAGE (3)

NU UaN Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station 0 l5 l0 l0 lo l2 l 7l8 9l4 -l 0l 0 l1 0l0 0 l3 OF 0l3 TEXT W more ape <w on requo.et use admrad NRC form 366A aIl1h

Analysis of Event

No actual safety consequences occurred as a result of this event.

Prior to removing the HPCI system from operation for hydraulic control line repairs, the system would have started within its specified time limit and controlled system flow greater than the Tech Spec 5000 gpm limit, however, system flow could not be reduced to a lower value. In addition, this leak would have eventually dep'sted the control oil from the reservoir thus making HPCIinoperable. If a design basis acci*nt or transient would have occurred and HPCI failed, the Automatic Depressurization System (Ells:RV) was operable, if required, to reduce reactor (Ells:RPV) pressure to allow the Low Pressure Coolant injection (Ells:BO) Systems to inject. The Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) system was also operable to provide core cooling.

j

Corrective Actions

l Following hydraulic control line repairs, the HPCI system was tested satisfactorily and the associated Tech Spec LCO was exited.

Other hydraulic control line fittings associated with HPCI system on both units were inspected and determined to be properly secured. In addition, based on a review of Station history and Industry experience, there is no significant negative trends involving similar type fitting failures.

An evaluation is currently in progress to determine what corrective actions are necessary to prevent future recurrences. Replacement of these control lines and fittings with new lines and fittings is being considered.

Corrective actions will be incorporated as appropriate pending the results of the evaluation, j

Previous Similar Events

No previous similar events have been identified which involved HPCI or RCIC hydraulic

)

control line fitting failures.

NRC Form 3GBA 16-891