ML18005A352
| ML18005A352 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 02/11/1988 |
| From: | CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18005A336 | List: |
| References | |
| DG-VIII.19, NUDOCS 8803160336 | |
| Download: ML18005A352 (65) | |
Text
SHEARON HARRIS EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW NED DESIGN GUIDE - DG-VIII.19 REVISION SUBMITTED APPROVED 0 T~'-Z~. :~ f~OmLC V1 P -rc' g' jp p33b 88 <happ r/g$
8803ibooCS, AQ 050oPQR HPES CONCURRENC TE (REV.O only) 6 (E ah)
b SHEARON HARRIS E UIPMENT UALIFZCATZON DOCUMENTATION REVIEW GUIDELINES
~Pa e b I. INTRODUCTION A. Applicability 2 B. Purpose 2
.'b b II. GENERAL A. References B. Responsibilities C. Review Methodology II
I. PROCEDURE
A. Qualification Documentation Review Procedure
- 1. Documentation Package Preparation
- 2. Environmental Qualification Documentation Review Checklist
,0 B. Environmental Qualification Vendor Manual Supplements 12 IV. ATTACHMENTS 14 t~b A. Environmental Qualification Documentation Review bb Forms 15 B. Environmental Qualification Documentation Review Checklist 30 C. Component Evaluation Sheet Completion Instructions 38 D. Equipment Documentation Control Forms E. Environmental Qualification Vendor Manual Forms Revision 0 Page VIII.19-1 (EG97/1ah)
E UIPMENT UALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION NED personnel, including NED managed contract personnel who are involved in the review and approval of vendor-supplied" equipment qualification documentation.
B .~Pur ase To establish the methodology and procedures for reviewing and approving all vendor-supplied environmental qualification documentation for "safety-related" equipment and Regulatory Guide 1.97 instruments that require environmental qualification and documentation or analysis of environmental qualification that is generated by CPSL. This methodology is designed to ensure a consistent and adequate review of each qualification document against the applicable standards and regulatory requirements referenced in paragraph II.A.
Revisions to Equipment Qualification Documentation Packages (EQDPs) must be initiated by a Plant Change Request (PCR) in accordance with AP-600 unless the. revisions are'ditorial or grammatical in nature, or they do not affect the design of equipment and its resultant qualification, conclusion, or maintenance requirements.
GENERAL A. References
- 1. 10CFR Part 50.49, "Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants"
- 2. IEEE Standard 323-1974, "IEEE Standard for Ouali ying Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"
- 3. Regulatory Guide 1.89, "Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants" (Revision 1)
- 4. NUREG-0588, "Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Saf ety-Related Electrical Equipment" 5.. IEEE Standard 344-I.975, "IEEE Recommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" (as endorsed bv Regulatory Guide 1.100)
Revision 0 Page VIII.19-2 (EG97/lah)
- 6. Regulatory Guide 1.97, "Instrumentation for Light-Water>>Cooled Nuclear Power Plants to Access Plant and Environs Conditions During and Following an Accident" (Revision 3)
- 7. The most current revisions of IEEE "Daughter" standards and their respective NRC Regulatory Guides which endorse their application
- 8. Plant Program Procedure (PLP)-108, "Environmental Qualification Program"
- 9. AP>>600, "Plant Change Initiation Requests" B. Res onsibilities Res onsibilit Action
- 1. Equipment a~ Assigns review, responsibility Qualification to appropriate engineer/designer (E.Q.) Group and provides the necessary Leader guidance as to priority, type of review, etc.
Assigns checker responsibilities to appropriate engineer/designer and provides necessary guidance.
C ~ Provides guidance on the overall review process and to other groups providing supplemental review.
- 2. Assigned a~ Ensures that the document is Engineer/Designer logged in the Document Control (Reviewer) Log (
Reference:
Attachment Dl).
- b. Conducts a review of the equipment qualification documentation and prepares an EQ package in accordance with the Qualification Documentation.
Review procedure of Section III.
C ~ Coordinates interface with Ebasco and/or vendor on resolution of comments.
- 3. Assigned a ~ Conducts a detailed check of the Engineer/Designer EQ package prepared by the (Checker) assigned reviewer.
- b. Coordinates resolution of EQ package deficiencies noted with the reviewer.
Revision 0 Page VIIIc19-3 (EG97/lah)
Res onsibilit Action
- 4. EQ Lead Engineer a. Maintains a document review log for traceability of documents and status of review.
- b. Reviews and approves completed reports using Attachment A-10.
All documentation/analysis generated by CPSL will require the Lead EQ Engineer to assure that this information is reviewed by a qualified EQ Safety Reviewer.
C~ Forwards approved documents to the principal engineer for review and approval.
Forwards approved documents to SHNPP EQ Coordinator to initiate a baseline maintenance review.
- e. Designates equipment to be field verified, aa'pplicable.
Ensures that the EQ packages are updated, as applicable, to reflect plant modifications, design changes, and equipment changes.
- 5. Principal CL ~ Approves EQ packages and forwards Engineer (I6C) to EQ Lead Engineer for distribution.
- 6. EQ Lead Engineer a~ Retains one copy of the approved documents as the engineering working file copy.
- b. Forwards designated records to QA in accordance with AP-600 and deletes from Document Control Log. QA records include all harsh EQDPs and revisions to the harsh EQDPs.
C. Review Methodolo This procedure provides a method for the review of all environmental qualification documentation supplied for eq .ipment important to safety. This review uses plant-specific service conditions and, where possible, performance specifications as established by the Shearon Harris FSAR.
The procedure and attachments present a qualification review method and data package comprised of forms and Revision 0 Page VIIIc19-4 (EG97/lah)
checklists for documenting the qualification review.
Completion of these forms in accordance with the procedure set forth in Section III will ensure a consistent and adequate review of each qualific tion document against the applicable NRC requirements as set forth in the standards and regulatory guides listed in paragraph II.A. The review will include appropriate justification where an alternative approach has been used and/or where a deficiency has been noted.
PROCEDURE A. alification Documentation Review Procedure This procedure is structured such that environmental qualification documentation received for equipment installed in harsh environments may be reviewed by the NED staff.
Since Ebasco supplies complete documentation packages, the NED review of these packages will serve as a program overview. When necessary, this Design Guide can be l
utilized to revise these packages, including (as options) format or forms. However, the equipment qualification
~ ~
documentation received from other vendors, including Westinghouse> must be reviewed and evaluated in-house.
Additionally, safety-related equipment installed in mild environments do not require testing to demonstrate operability "i
~ in accordance with the applicable performance specifications.
In either event, a review in accordance with this procedure is required for equipment installed in harsh environments and is optional for equipment installed in mild environments.
- 1. Documentation Package Preparation The Environmental Qualification documentation package shall be assembled, reviewed, and approved as outlined below. This represents the format for CP&L generated packages. Packages prepared by Ebasco Services are in a different format. Once an Ebasco generated package will be is received by CP&L and requires revision, it converted to the CP&L format with Attachments A-l, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-6, A-7, A-8, A-ll, A-14, and Attachment B included as a minimum:
- a. Documentation Package Identification Number The Equipment Qualification Lead Engineer will select an appropriate identification number for reference and filing for all documentation packages. The designated identification number should appear on each review sheet.
Revision 0 Page VIII.19-5 (EG97/lah)
- b. Documentation Package Contents Assemble the package in the order presented below and include, as a minimum, the data and forms indicated. The tabbed sections marked with an asterisk (*) are not required for equipment installed in mild environments.
Number the pages of each section sequentially utilizing the section identifier and page number. (Example: Al, A2, A3, Dl-l, Dl-2 [for tabs with subsections], etc.)
Preface Section Function Environmental Qualification This "Documentation Package Documentation Package Approval Sheet" acts as an Approval Sheet approval record and revision (Attachment A-1) control page for the documentation package.
Environmental Qualification This "Documentation Package Documentation Package Index and Checklist" is an Index and Checklist index of the package and (Attachment A-2) assures that all required documents are enclosed.
Environmental Qualification This "Qualification Status Status Summary Sheet Summary Sheet" provides the (Attachment A-3) status of the equipment qualification. The comments may refer to discrepancy memorandums or other lists of outstanding items (e.g., letters to vendors and Tab K items).
Tabbed Section Function Equipment Identification (Attachment A-4) and Component Evaluation Sheets (CES)
(Attachment A-5). This section identifies the equipment and provides component evaluation sheets (as required) for each instrument. Complete the Component Evaluation Sheets in accordance with Attachment C.
Whenever a confl'ct exists in regard to operability/environmental parameters between the equipment specification (Tab C) and the CES, the CES takes precedence.
Revision 0 Page VIII.19-6 (Ea97/lah)
Tabbed Section Function NOTE: Each Component Evaluation Sheet is dated by the Checker as he completes the verification process.
- B Equipment Functional Description (Attachment A-6). From a reliable source (e.g., FSAR), extract and prepare a brief description (page or less) to enable an auditor to understand the equipment .function.
Indicate source of data on description.
>> c Include the specification with which the equipment was purchased or, if unavailable, the purchase order number for reference.
Documentation Index (Attachment A-7) and Qualification Test reports plus other supporting qualification
>>1 information and applicable NRC EQ notices and/or concerns. If more than one report was submitted by the equipment vendor to establish equipment qualification, provide subtabs for 'each report.in alphanumerically ascending order.
For example, if five reports were submitted by a vendor to establish equipment qualification, provide subtabs D.l, D.2, D.3, D.4, and D.5 to assist in report location.
The first page in Tab D should index the reports contained therein and the subtabs which locate those reports.
Documentation Review Checklist (Attachment B) and Supplemental Review Sheets (Attachment A-8 and A-9). This section contains the Review Checklist, supporting analyses, calculations, and evaluations that address each deficiency and support qualification acceptability and evaluation/resolution of NRC EQ
~
notices.
Revision 0 Page VIII 19-7 c
(EG97/lah) r
Tabbed Section Function Executive Review Comments (At'tachment A-10). This section contains the executive reviewer's comments and a record of resolution by the assigned engineer.
Qualification Limitations (Attachment A-11). This form is used to document any requirements placed on the plant to maintain qualification through maintenance and surveillance.
- H Field Verification Form (Attachment A-12). .This section contains completed Field Verification Forms as applicable.
- I Significant Drawings. Include reference drawings, installation drawings, motor outline drawings, etc., or a list of drawings (Attachment A-14), as applicable.
Deleted Qualification Deficiency List (Attachment A-13). This section provides a running inventory of the qualification deficiencies and their resolution status.
NOTE 1: If the volume of data in a tabbed section is extensive, provide an index as the first page of that section (Attachment A-9).
NOTE 2: Tabbed sections marked with an asterisk (*) are not required f'r nild packages.
NOTE 3: Peview and approval of environmental qualification docunentation of CPSL purchased equipment in accordance with this procedure satisfies the design verification requirements set forth in ANSI N45.2.11.
- 2. Environmental Qualification Documentation Review Checklist While completing the checklist, the reviewer shall mark the correct response to each question: YES> NO, or N/A (not applicable). Where appropriate, document Revision 0 Page VIII.19-8 (EG97/lah)
and page number(s) providing the specific information
. ~ shall be cited under the "reference and page" space provided for each question. If no reference need be listed, place "N/A" in the t'column. The document shall be identified by its assigned identification on the Documentation Index of Tab D (Attachment A-7).
Explanation and )ustification for any "NO" responses shall be provided. Reference the appropriate document and page to support or further explain the remarks, if possible. Space is provided on the checklist for short remarks. If additional space is required, Attachment A-8 and A-9, "Supplemental Review Sheets",
are to be used and included in Tab E.
Tab E should include any additional comments or Y clarifications necessary to sufficiently summarize and assess the adequacy of the qualification program.
Include additional supplemental calculations, evAyations, or analyses necessary to address deficiencies in the qualification.
a ~ alification Methodolo Identify and review the method or methods used to establish qualification. Section 5 of "0 Reference 2 defines the acceptable methods of qualification as: Type Testing, Operating Experience, Qualification by Analysis, Combined Qualification (combination of test and analysis),
and On-Going Qualification. Section 2 of Reference 4 states, in general, that for equipment sub)ect to an accident environment only type tests will be accepted to support qualification.
Y' However, to avoid confusion, Reference 1, paragraph 50.49(f) provides four methods for qualification that allow qualification by analysis if it is in combination with partial type test data that supports the analytical assumptions and conclusions. Reference 1 should Y
I be followed as the ultimate governing authority
"$ ~ in case of conflicts or confusion between t
'References 2 through 7.
Y The qualification method(s) should conform to the requirements of Reference 1 or any deviations should be )ustified.
On-going qualification as an alternative should be avoided and utilized as a last resort when no other substitutes or methods 'exist.
Revision 0 Page VIII.19-9 (EG97/lah)
~
T' E I ) =- . I g g E, ' E YY Y 0 - = ' P '
$ Y
Compare the actual test sequence against that required by Reference 2, Section 6.3.2, and Reference A, Section 2.3(1). Deviations from the required sequence s'uld be identified. The actual test sequence used should be reviewed for acceptability.
Auxiliary devices which may have an effect on or could be affected by the performance of tested equipment should be addressed in the qualification program. Any connection used during the test should be consistent with those available for use in the field. Where the qualification is dependent upon the interface or the quality of the connections, confirm that they are completely described in the reports. See Section 6.3.1.3 of Reference 2 for additional clarification.
Identify special mounting features used (bolts, clamps) and spatial orientation. Ensure that these features are such that they may be used during the actual field installation and are described in the specifications. The equipment must be installed during testing on test fixtures consistent with the specified mounting features.
See Reference 2, Section 6.3.1.2 for clarification.
- b. ~Pre Ain-Review the documentation to determine whether all significant aging mechanisms are adequately addressed. For Westinghouse, see WCAP-8587, Appendix B, for a description of potential aging mechanisms. Look particularly for appropriate consideration of synergisms, vibration (seismic and nonseismic), and cycling (electrical and mechanical) effects.
Review the documentation for evidence that equipment service life has been satisfactorily simulated in accordance with Reference 1, Section E(5); Reference 2, Section 6.3.3; and Reference 4, Section 4. The method used must be specified and )ustified.
Aging temperatures and activation energies should be specified and justified.
The qualification documentation must address the effects of radiation exposure on the equipment performance and provide Revision 0 Page VIII.19-10 (EG97/lah)
assurance that the equipment is capable of performing its required safety functions.
The means and extent of radiation exposure must be identified'nd justified consistent with Reference 1, Section E(4); Reference 2, Section 6.3.4; and Reference 4, Section 2.2(12).
For Westinghouse documentation, a discussion of required radiation exposure levels and justification for values selected is provided in WCAP-8587, Section 6.8.2 and 7.2.6.
C~ Desi Basis Event (LOCA/MSLB)
Review the documentation to determine whether the service conditions to which the equipment is exposed during LOCA, HELB, or MSLB testing are appropriate for the equipment function and location and that the postulated accident environment is adequately simulated in accordance with Reference 1, Section E; Reference 2, Section 6.3.6; and Reference 4, Section 2.2 (5),
(9), (10), and (ll). Verify that extremes of power supply voltage and frequency are applied during DBE, harsh environment testing if these affect the equipment function. Where caustic spray is a potential hazard to the equipment, verify that it is appropriately included in the testing.
Attat;h to the checklist, if supplied, copies of temperature versus time curves from qualification test reports. Curves should include specified and measured data. If curves are not available, then make a comparison of the specified profile data points to the measured test points over the time as described in the SHNPP FSAR.
For all environmental parameters, the margin incorporated into the test parameters in excess of the specified parameters should be defined.
See Section E(8) of Reference 1; Section 6.3.1.5 of Reference 2; and Sections 1.4, 3, Appendix C, and Appendix D of Reference 4 for recommended criteria in the application of margin.
NOTE: The Design Basis Event (LOCA/MSLB) section of the checklist is not applicable to eouipment installed in mild environments.
Revision 0 Page VIII.19-11 (EG97/lah)
hajj
- d. ~Mjjjjft jjj:
Review the variables measured during the test and the equipment used,' perform these measurements.
Verify that monitoring of specified variables assures performance of required safety functions in accordance with Section D(1)(2) of Reference 1; Section 6.3.1.4 of Reference 2; and Section 2.2(6),
(7), and (9) of Reference 4.
- e. Documentation Documentation should include inspection results and performance data taken before, during,'nd, after tests and should ensure that the condition/performance of equipment components is acceptable. Any modification to either the equipment or test specifications should be identified and reviewed to verify that the test has not been invalidated.
As required by Section ) (1)(2) of Reference 1 and Reference 2, the documentation must provide an auditable and traceable link between the actual equipment qualified and the equipment provided or to be provided to each plant.
The test results should demonstrate that the equipment tested Mill perform its safety function at all times. Failures must be fully explained and be consistent with the failure criteria specified in the test plan, test program, and standardized by Section I(4), (5) of Reference 1; Sections 8.3, 6.4.2, 6.5.3.1, 6.5.4, and 8.5 of Reference 2; and Sections 2.2(2), 5(l), 5(2),
2.1(2), (4), and 2.4 of Reference 4. Analyses must ensure that there is no evidence of a common mode failure mechanism. The qualified life determined by the qualification program must be explicitly stated and the aging program must )ustify and support that stated life.
Where qualified life is dependent upon special maintenance or periodic component replacement, the requirements must be explicitly stated in the documentation and described in Tab G.
(Attachment A-ll).
B. In order to allow implementation of a maintenance activity to support replacement of components, materials, etc., as identified as environmental qualification limitations in th EQDPs, NED will generate and/or update Equipment Qualification Base Line Forms (EQBLF) to be used as a supplement to the vendor manual for the appropriate equipment. This form will summarize the maintenance Revision.0 Page VIIX.19-12 (EG97/lah)
activities necessary to maintain the equipment in a qualified condition. These forms will be transmitted to the NED Vendor Manual Coordinator and the SHNPP EQ Coordinator using the transmittal forms in Attachment E. Upon receipt of these transmittals, the appropriate parties will sign and date these forms and return a copy to the EQ Lead Engineer to document receipt of this information.
EQBLF1 is a four-page form that represents Equipment Qualification Base Line maintenance requirements for the various purchase orders, vendors, and model numbers associated with the EQDP and is included in Attachment E.
EQBLF10 is a one-page form that details the lubricants, component parts, complete component, sealants, and special tools associated with each model number component. This form is also included in Attachment E. Forms EQBLF1 and EQBLF10 comprise .the vendor manual EQ supplement issued by NED.
Revision 0 page VIII.19-13 (EG97/lah)
0 0
ATTACHMENTS ll
~
1 I'
<<h
,II I<<<<
I 0 Revision 0 Page VIII.19-14 (EG97/lah)
ATTACHMENT A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW FORMS Revision 0 Page VIII.19-15 (EG97/18h) t ww 'r r -
W~r I7 ~ Yhr t ~ p~ ~l[~ fear " ~ rr~rr r~.* (Y'rr r Ir r l ~ r ' ' +
p r 'r" wl r
Attachment A-1 Rev. 1 Page Pl ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE APPROVAL SHEET PACKAGE NO.
REVIEWED BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
This revision record indicates the status of the other sheets of the of the package is revised subsequent to the original issue.
REV. PAGE REMARKS REVIEWED CHECKED APPROVED UlhCEQ Revision 0 Page VIII.19->.6 (EG97/lah)
'p ' 0 C I I
= 1% gtlf ~ 'Q L %0 1IP IP ',\ 1l
Attachment A-2 Rev. 1 Page P2 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION PACKAGE 'OCUMENTATION INDEX AND CHECKLIST PACKAGE NOA SECTION ENGINEER/DATE CONTENTS PAGES Preface (a) Documentation Package Approval Sheet Preface (b) Documentation Package Index and Checklist Preface (c) Qualification Status Summary Equipment Identification and Component Evaluation Sheet(s)
Equipment Functional Description and Summary Applicable Tech. Specification or Design Criteria
' D Qualification Documentation and Index Documentation Review Checklist, Supplemental Review Sheets, Calculations, etc.
F* Executive Review Comments G Qualification Limitations H* Field Verification Sheets I* Significant Drawings N/A Deleted it/A K Qualif ication Def iciencies
- Not required for mild package DISCEQ Revision D Page VIII.19-17 (EG97/lah)
~ T ~
4
= = 1" I
II 4'
Attachment A-3 Rev.
Page P3 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION STATUS
SUMMARY
SHEET 4
PACKAGE NO.
4 This Documentation Package meets the requirements of 10CFR50.49, IEEE-323-1974, and NUREG-0588 on Documentation and provides assurance that the safety-related equipment identified on Attachment A-4 is:
UALIFICATION STATUS PACKAGE IS Q Qualified for years (see Q Complete I
Qualification Limitations, Section G)
- -'hj Q Qualified - (A~aiting Data, Minor Q Not Complete Analysis or Comments)
~4
)
Q Interim Operation Justified 4
Q Replace/Relocate/Shield/Modify Equipment A licable Standard 43 Q Requires Ha)or Analysis Q NUREG-0588~ CAT. I Q Retest Equipment (Undergoing Qualification) Q NUREG-0588, CAT. II Q Demon. NUREG-0588 Cat. C (Not Safety Related) 4 COMMENTS:
The basis for this documentation package is the FSAR commitments in Section 3.11 of the FSAR. It is not the intent of this package to include the complete engineering of system components, rather demonstrate qualification.
it provides the direction to reasonably
'.1 Engineer: Print Name and Sign/Date Checker: Print Name and Sign/Date 41 DISCEQ
~
p Revision 0 Page VIII.19-18 (EG97/lah) 4 14 ' \ 4 '4 8 h 44 ~ p, 4 4 Vh 4
Attachment A-4 Rev. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL IF ZCATION Page Al E UIPMENT IDENTIFICATION PACKAGE NO.
DESCRIPTION:
MANUFACTURER:
MODEL NO. P. 0. NO.:
PLANT ID NUMBER:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS (WORST CASE) t LOCATION:
RAD ZONE:
NOENAL ACCIDENT TEMPERATURE:
PRESSURE:
HUMIDITY:
SPRAY, BORON:
SPRAY, pH:
RADZATION. GAMMA:
RADIATION, BETA:
CYCLING:
VOLTAGE:
OPERATING TIME:
SUBMERGENCE:
MODE: ACTIVE:
PASSIVE:
FAIL-SAFE:
REFERENCES:
ENGINEER: Print Name & Sign/Dace:
CHECKER: Print Name 6 Sign/Date:
DISCEQ Revision 0 Page VIII.19-l9 (EG97/lah)
~rr.v ~ ~ .4 ~ ~ ~ i "ir" ' Cr,'r '. r~ ~ ~
A E: ESASCO SEIIVICES IHC ~ FAC IL a TY I SMch ROH IARRI 5 NPP 1 HSS'S: HESTLHGIIOUSE " PVR PEVe-UIILITY CAROLINA Pollfk 0 LIGHT COHPQHFHT cVALUAIlotl SIIEET CAPACITY 94U I'HIE) CISY EOU Itrl4EHT I ENVIRON,IcHT DOCUMENTATION DUAL LF I tt/ML OUTS DESCRIPTION Phtt AME I I R ACTUAL Dc+ OUAL If OUALI f l METHOD )
-I -"----- "- ""---"--4-----I"-5---I--6-I ACTUAL DEH ~
L
) I 1 EMS )
I "7" TAG Ho I OPLRABIL-I . I I
' .I coMB. / I HouE LTY I I TESf R rCI INORI'/TEST I I I
~" EQUIPHEHT I ISRSO SUPP'DNA
~
I 1'YPE I I REVICH I I I I w% ~
~ 4 r COIIPCNEHT TEHPERAT-URE I COIIS I / I NONE I I fcST 5 I I REPLACEMENT)
I SUPPL I I
~ I SRST REVIEH I I MANUFACTURER I W NAI Wf A IN I
~ r:t,'r I PRESSURE I COHB I / I HONE err I TEST 5 I
)IA JOR I SUPPL~ I SUBCQ'IPOHEHIS)
SUPPLIER I ISRSP RcVIEV I IIODEL ANDI I Ho U'll QUE I >GGED SERIAL I RELAT LVE COMB ~ / I NONE I SUBCOIIPOHENIS ARE I HU)I I 0 I 1 1 fFSI I ENVELOPED BY Tl 15 EOULPMEVI FUI:Cf DES ISRSH SUPP'EVIEH I
C SERVICE I CIIEI'ICAL I C 0IIB / I NONE SPRAY I TESf C I I SUPPL ~ I ACCUR ~ SPECI I ISRSC REVI EIl I (R GAMMA C Olio ~ / ) Ho'lE ACCUR DEH Ih BEIA I TESf 5 I D 8 SHIELDS SUPPLa IS 1%1 D% I ISRSR REVIEIl SPECI F I CALI ONS:
AGE I COMB~ / I NONE Shfcff fUICIIO I P 0 R LHS'I LlfE I LES'I IPER 323- I I SUPPL>>
PLANT Loc )L9T4 DEF )) I SRSA REVIEH COORDINATES K- SUB>E RGE D I COMB / I NOIJE Y LEVEL TEST I SUPPL~
lttSTALLED IY/tl)
ISRSS RE VIE Il I I
IHSf AL ~ REF I BY-fLD I PARA SUPPL FOR PUNCHLIST.ITEMS SEE SH Eo PACKAGEI I OUALLILCAT ION SIGH-OFF OUALlf E)IEPPf Hf >Of APPLIC REVIEV FOUN) I'I DOC U'IEHI 0 T I OH aaa ~ aa ~ aaaaa ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ aaa ~ aa ~ a ~ a/OPEPABLLII Y 0 PACKAGE W ta ~ OUALLF ~ a)TEMPERATURE AN) aSLAIUS a(PRESSURE M O P CESI < rt a a I Rf L ~ HUI"0 I 1 N a g: Q MM a(CHLP ~ SPRAY C REFEREHCESI ti M aaaaa ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ aaa ~ aa ~ ~ aa ~ ~ a(RADLAT ION R 0 IL 0
(AGLI>G A Il RE V LS I OH
) SUBMERGEtlCE 5 DAIE I I hJ CI E4 PCK tt I IEtt I SYS Ul
)USR8 CAIEG (APPENDIX E I TAG
Attachment A-6 Rev. 1 Page B ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION E UIPMENT FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION PACKAGE NO.
P The following FSAR references vere used by the reviewer in the audit of the Environmental Qualification of Equipment in this package:
FSAR Sub Section(s) Amendment In addition, the equipment function is summarized as:
Engineer: Print Name & Sign/Date Checker: Print Name & Sign/Date DISCEQ Revision 0 Page VIII.19-21 (EG97/lah) y
~
~ ~P i'
. ~ I ~
Attachment A-7 Rev. 1 Page ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION INDEX PACKAGE NO.
- 1. TITLE:
REPORT NO.: DATE:
SOURCE:
- 2. TITLE:
REPORT NO.: DATE:
SOURCE:
- 3. TITLE:
REPORT NO.: DATE:
SOURCE:
- 4. TITLE:
REPORT NO.: DATE:
SOURCE:
REPORT NO.: DATE:
SOURCE:
Engineer: Print Name ~ Sign/Date Checker: Print Name & Sign/Dace DISCEO Revision 0 Page VIII.19-27 (EG97/lah)
Attachment A-8 Rev. 1 Page E ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUPPLEMENTAL REVIEW SHEET PACKAGE NO.
PARAMETER:
QUALIFICATION STATUS:
DEFICIENCIES REQUIRING RESOLUTION:
DISCEQ Revision 0 Page VIII.19-23 (EG97/lah)
V ~
~ ~
~ ~ g '
Attachment A-9 Rev. 1 Page E ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUPPLRKNTAL REVIEW SHEET (cont'd)
PACKAGE NO.
'f Pj F
- 4
~
g v =l
~
~ 1 t
DISCEQ I
Revision 0 Page VIII.19-24 C,g (EG97/18h)
~
~, .
~
Attachment A-10 Page P Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Rev. 1 Rev. 2 Rev. 3 Reviewer Date ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION EXECUTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS PACKAGE NO.
-I NO. COMMENT RESOLUTIONIINITIALIDATE e
e e e DISCEQ Revision 0 Page VIIIe19-2>
(EG97/lah)
~ N 1 ~
e ~ eu a ~
Attachment A-ll Rev. 1 Page Gl ENVIRONMENTAL UALIFICATION LIMITATIONS PACKAGE NO.
1, EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION:
DESCRIPTION:
MANUFACTURER:
MODEL NO.:
PLANT ZD NO:
- 2. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS:
MOUNTING:
INTERFACE:
OTHER:
3 ~ MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY PERIOD REFERENCE
- 4. STORAGE REQUIREMENTS:
STORAGE CLASS: SHELF LIFE:
OTHER:
5 ~ OTHER REQUIREMENTS:
DISCEQ Revision 0 Page VIIZ.19-26 (EG97/1ah)
- p>> y>> ~ yi ~ y. ~, s~ . ~ .ywl. >> ~ ',. ~, >>,*>>>>tp ~ ~ >>
yE ~
~ " ~ E' y
ATTACllMENT A- l 2 FIELD VERIFICATIOH FORM RFV. I PACKAGE NO.
NAME PLATE INSTALLATI H E UIPMFNT DESCRIPTlON 1NSTALLATION STATUS VERIFICATION COMPLETIOH SCIIEDULE o
TAG NO.: INSTAI.LATION STATUS: Is Model No Correct?
(CHECK APPLICABLE) YES:
SYSTEM: MOUNTED: NO: MOUNTING:
TERMINATED: (Date)
COMPONENT: If Ho,.enter correct Is a conduit Sealing Model Number: TERMINATING:
MANUFACTURER: Device Required? (Date)
YES:
NO: Is Serial No. Correct? CONDUIT SEAL:
YES: (if applicable) (Date)
MODEL HO. If required, is the NO:
seal now installed?
YES:
~ '1 SERIAL NUMBER: NO: Verifier's Comments:
LOCATION VERIFICATION LOCATION COORDINATES: Inside Containment:
X: Outside Containment:
Y Steam Tunnel:
2~
Are Location Coordinates Completed by:
correct,? (Signature) (Date)
YES:
NO: Reviewed by:
(Signature) (Date)
If NnE enter correct
~ 1 coordinates: Note: For in containment equipment mounted on or X: near the Post DBA Minimum flood level of 228.3, give
~- Y elevation to within plus or minus one inch; otherwise EN r4 ~
accuracy to within one foot is sufficient.
1'
ATTACl CLIENT A- I 3 REV. I ENVIRONHENTAL UAI-IFICATION DEl'ICIENCY LIST PACKAGE NO.
O ITEN COMPLETION DMC OR REF. IT& RESPONSIBLE NO DATE NO. DESCRIPTION/INFORMATION PARTY Pl Q A
wm 00 P H
- Line out Items as tliey are completed.
I tJ
ATTAQKENT A-14 REV. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION PAGE I1 REFERENCE DRAWINGS PACKAGE NO.
To reduce redundant storage of data, the following reference drawings are applicable but not included in this Eg package:
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION 5
- )
=il
~ I DISCEO Revision O Page VIII.19-29 (EG97/lah)
ATTACEPENT B ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW CHECKLIST Revision 0 Page VIII.19-30 (EG97/lah)
Attachment B Reve Page El ENV lRONMENTAL QUALIFLuVrlON DOCUMENTATION REV LEW CHECKLIST PhCKAGE NO.
RESPONSE RrraZENCE NO. QUESTION YES NU> AND PAGE A. UALIFICATION METHODOLOGY Is qualification method appropriate f'r equipment function/location per guidance of NUREG-0588?
- 2. Does the test sequence conform to IEEE 323-1974, or are deviations adequately 5ustified?
3 ~ Does the test report provide adequate equipment identification and specify the number of units tested?
- 4. Was the test specimen identifical to or of the same generic family as the SHNPP equipment?
- 5. Was the same test specimen used throughout test sequence?
- 6. Were the required auxiliary devices and interfaces appropriately simulated during the actual test? or, is an analysis provided to
)ustify other interface or auxiliary device simulation?
- 7. During the test program, vere the test specimens mounted in a manner consistent vith the SHNPP field installation?
If the test specimen vas only similar to the SHNPP equipment, is there a supporting analysis to compare the materials, components, structure, etc., to demonstrate qualification acceptability?
- acta questions marked "Nu" require additional analysis to gustif'y qualuxcation.
Nh ~ Not Applicable DISCEQ Revision 0 Page VIII.19-31 (EG97/1a}1)
I EE
Attachment B Rev. 1 Page E2 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFlCATLON DOCUMENTATION REVIEW CHECKLIST PACKhGE NO.
RESPONSE Rt,z'r,RENCE NO. QUESTION .YES Nh AND PAGE B1 PRE-AGING THERMAL AGING
.a Was the thermal aging program based on arrhenius techniques?
.b Were the effects of self>>heating considered?
1C Are age-sensitive component materials identif ied?
.d Was the temperature for accelerated thermal aging verified to be less than temperatures at which known material phase changes occur?
.e Does the aging program and accompanying analysis (if applicable) provide for a 40-year 0 qualified temperature?
life at the SHNPP defined service Is the aging program and accompanying analysis (if applicable) auditable?
2~ CYCLE AGING
~ a Was the equipment 'sub)ected to mechanical cycling consistent with the SHNPP 40 year requirement?
.b Was the equipment sub)ected to electrical cycling consistent with the SHNPP 40 year requirement?
- axi questions marked "NV" require additional analysis to )ustify qualxrxcation.
Nh < Not Applicable 0 DISCEQ Revision 0 Page VIII.19-32 (EG97/lah)
II 0
Attachment 8 Rev 1 Page E3 EN VIRONNENTAL QUALIFlUATLON r ~
DOCUMENTATION REVlEM CHECKLIST PACKJLGE NO.
RESPONSE Rr.raRENCE NO. QUESTION YES NU" Nh AND PAGE 3 ~ RADIATION AGING a Was the radiation requirement accomplished by
~
test? Or, if not, vas )ustification provided for its exclusion?
.b Was the normal radiation applied prior to and/ar simultaneously vith the accident simulation?
~ C Was Cobalt-60 used as the gamma source during testing?
.d If any radiation exemptions vere utilized, are they auditable?
'I
".4
<<~
4
~4 1
4 t '
I
- ax~. questions marked "NO" require additional analysis to )ustify qualxrxcatian.
NA ~ Nat Applicable
, ~
1 4
DISCEQ 4
'f
~
4'evision 0 Page VIII.19-33 (EG97/16h) 4 4
4
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I . ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' ~ ~ ~ ', ~
~
~ 'l II ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
' I ~ i ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
0 e
Attachment B Rev. 1 Page E5 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFLCATION DOCUMENThTION REViEW CHECKLIS>
PACKhQE NO.
RESPONSE Rr,r aKENCE NO. QUESTION YES NO< AND PAGE C. DESIGN BASIS EVENT (LOCA/MSLB)
Mere all peak temperature/pressure and time requirements during the transient phase enveloped?
'e 2. Were all temperature/pressure and time
=-
ee e requirements during the post-accident phase enveloped?
3 ~ Were margins as applied consistent vith those defined in NUREG-0588 and ZEEE 323-1974, as applicable?
- 4. Was the requirement for chemical spray enveloped?
- 5. If submergence is a requirement, does the test demonstrate acceptable operation?
- 6. Were expected extremes of power supply voltage and frequency applied during DBE testing?
7 ~ Were the functional tests as performed adequate to demonstrate that the functional requirements (accuracy, repeatability, insulation resistance, etc.) for the equipment can be met?
- ax< questions marked "NO" require additional analysis to )ustify qualuxcation.
Nh ~ Not Applicable DISCEQ Revision 0 Page VIII.19-35 (EG97/lah)
'e "\
e e' e
I ~ - '
~ ~
Attachment Rev. 1 Page E6 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFXCATXON DOCUMENTATION REVIEW CHECKLIST L~
PACKAGE NO.
RESPONSE RtraKENCE NO. QUESTION YES NO~ NA AND PAGE D. MONITORING Was the operating environment, service conditions, and performance characteristics 4c J measured and recorded?
L 2~ If these measurements vere noncontinuous, is there a Justification analysis provided?
4
'I
~
3~ Is the calibration of the instrumentation used
.I to monitor the required variables traceable to the Natl.anal Bureau of Standards?
- 4. Did the monitoring of variables during the test sequence demonstrate acceptable equipment operation?
- ax~ questions markea "Nu'equire additional anaxysis to )ustify qualxrxcation.
NA ~ sot Applicable DISCEQ DISCEQ Rcvxsion 0 Page VIII.19-36 (EG97/lah)
L C ~
L i' L ~,
0 0
Attachment B Rev. 1 Page E7 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFIUATIO DOCUMENTATION REVLEW CHECKLIST PACKAGE NO.
RESPONSE Rt'r c,KEN CE NO. QUESTION YES NU" Nh AND PAGE DOCUMENTATION If failures occurred during the test program, are adequate justifications provided in the form of a failure analysis such that the qualification is not negated?
- 2. If any modifications are made to the equipment I after start of testing, was the test program modified to reflect these changes or was justificiaton provided that indicated that such modifications did not negate the qualification?
)
s>>
3~ Are maintenance requirements and component replacement intervals specified?
'3 I
4, Were all assumptions made by the vendor documented and justified to be acceptable?
- 5. Were all known synergisms accounted for in the test sequence?
- 6. Is the documentation auditable and traceable to the SHNPP equipment?
- 7. Does the documentation demonstrate that this equipment can perform its required safety function under normal and accident conditions?
eric questions marked "No" require additional anaLysis to justify qualxrxcation.
NA ~ Not Applicable DISCEQ Revision 0 Page VIII.19->7 (EG97/lah)
ATTACHMENT C COMPONENT EVALUATION SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS Revf.sion 0 Page VIII.19-38 (EG97/lah)
COHPONENT EVALUATION SHE I COMPLETION INSECT IONS L. Enter data belov tha "Equfymeat Descrfptioa" designatfoa as foLLovs:
' TAC NQ. Enter tha syecfffc device alpha-numeric des ignatioa.
EOUIP~ TTPE Enter designatfoa of equipment (e.g.,
sensors, motors) vhfch corresyoads to NUREG-0588 Appendix E, Sec ioa L.d categoriea ~
~ 3 COMPOllEIT Eater a brfef title or desctfptfoa of tha f tarn befag evaluated (Note: components are the smaLLest breakdovn of equiyment types or categories for qualification purposes).
MUPACiiGKR Eater'ha specific vendor vho manufactured
'I
~
che comp'onent, but noc necessarily the suppLiar of the comyoneat. For example, Lfmftorque manufactures valve operators for a valve vendor vho fa turn supplies the
~ atira valve~perator assembly to tha utiLity.
KhJOR SUPPLIER Eater the veador suyplying the equfymeat to tha utflftyy ff other chan the
\
4 manufacturer .
- 'I Eater tha specific veador dasigaatfon for a SERIAL NO. family or group of like components aad serial number (if applicable).
PUN CTIONAL Eater a brief descrfptfoa of the service DESCRIPTIOH vhfch tha comyoaaat performs.
6 SKRUICE 44 4 ACCUR SPEC Eater either the requirement for accuracy
- 4S used in Statioa Safety Analysis or the 4 4c standard maaufacturer's Limits used ia 4 c gaaarfc testing or fnstruments, vhfchever requires greater accuracy Eater a value vhfch the equiymant haa demonstrated through testing. This value should be equal to or better than tha
' accur o ayeca entry Value fs for tha
~
long term stable operation of instruments.
"I SPECIFICATIOHS Enter the ayecfffcatfoa the equfymeat fs designed to meet.
4
- c
.. ~ Revision 0 Page VIII.19 (EG97/lah)
f PURCKiSE ORDER Enter the purchase ordez'sed during NOA equipment procure"ent.
PLANT LOCATION Enter the general plant area locat'on vhere the component is located (i.ess C321, etc).
COORDINATES Enter the coordinates vhich locace the
~z equipmenc vithin the "Plant Locationss and more importantly vichin the environmental parameter cones.
TNSTAELEO Enter an indicacion of installation status.
TES/NO I
~
INSTAL REF. Enter the source of data for installat'on status ~
UALIFICATION Entry (rarely made) to indicace equipment EXEIISTTON need not be qualified'y uae of CES. For example, a mechanical only device may be on the Master List and is not to be qualified.
If this is so, entry of noces in the reference section of CES is expected.
UALIFICATION Enter the environmental qualif ication STATUS status of the equipment as indicated belov:
a~ Qualified - Vithout Exception This category is based upon the existing qualification documentation demonstrating that the equipment vill be capable of performing its intended safety tuner'on at any tine during its qualified life, plus post-accident duracion as required. Total compliance vith the t'equirements has been fully documented.
- b. Qualified - hvaiting Confirmatory Data
- This category is used vhen most of the qualification report reviev and analysiss to demonstrate qualifies~us has been completed; but some open. items, vhich are identified, must be resolved. In all cases, there is a high degree of confidence thee the open items vill be resolved satisfactorN&y, chus enabling this scatus to be upgraded to Quali'ied S I4 without Exception.
'1
- c. Qualified - For Inter~~ Operation-This Category is used primarily vhen qualification testing has not been
~
t compleced, buc there is a high degree of confidence that the equipment can be qualified, thus permitting intericL Revision 0 Page VIII.19-40 (EG97/lah)
'd w -N f ~
- = V + '*V '>>.,\,T %V
~ d r ~ I
operation. In addition> the cz'teria in Enclosure 1 of Policy Issue h
SECT&2-SL issued 2/4/82 for
)ustification for incerim operation is used and documented.
- d. Relocate Equigaenc - This category is selected vhen the equipment is noc demonstrated to be qualified for its initial installation location. This equipment must be relocated to a nev location vhere qualification can be demonstrated for the nev conditions.
(See e, f, g, h, belov) ~
- e. Shield Equipmenc This category is
.used vhen equipment is not demonstzated to be qualified for its installed location and simple P
shielding (cog+ ~ fzom beta radiation) tj
~
can assure adequacy of qualification.
i Retest Equipmenc This category is used vhen equipment is undergoing zetesting to demonstrate qualification as required.
Replace Equipment - This category is used vhen qualification cannot be demonstrated and it is prudenc to replace the equipment vith a suitable, qualified zeplacement.
Qualified - Avaiting Minor Analysis.
(See b above ~ )
Demon. NURE&4588C - This categozy is used for equipment in the scope of the definition of Category "C" as state in NUREC 0588> Appendix E.
Requires Kafor Analysis - This category is used vhen there are significanc concerns related to the qualification status of the equipment and a ma]or effort is required to qualify the equipment.
- 2. Enter data below Environment Parameter Actual (Column L) as described below:
OPERABILITT Enter the zequirements for operation vhich Norm/ Test may be in time (hours, days. months, DBA years), cyclesw or both.
Revision 0 Page VIII.19-41 (EG97/lah)
Enter'he ma~ nosmal and DBA peak temperature condf tions as the equf pment location.
PRESS(mE Eater the maxmfmum normal (generally atmospheric) and DB* peak pressure condfcfoas as che equipmeac location.
Eater the maxfmum normal and DBA peak Hli!GD(T( humfdicy conditions ac che equipmenc f
locat ca.
CHEHICALSPRAY Encer the values for che chemical composition of the chemical spray (consafnment spray) utflfsed fn a pose DBA event fn containment.
R CAMMh CAMEL fs the sum total of the 40 year h BETA normal plus applicable (1 yr> 1 mo> 1 day)'
D B SHIELD DBh gamma Cosa. BETA fs che applicable S TZD (1 yr, 1 mo, 1 day) DBA Beta Dose. B.
SHRED is the credit (10 100'ermitted, to reduce che Beta Cosa, due to eaclosuces, material coveriags, and thicknesses. TID (Total Integrated Dose) fs che sum total of CASfh plus the equivalent QHKL equal co the BETh (after shielding) applicable to the equipmeat.
ACE-INST LZPE The goal or'equfremeat for equipment lite>
(pec 323 1974 DEP) usually 40 year's.
SQBHELCED LEVEL SaxLmum plant elevacfon (Ft.) reached during flood conditfons. Generally, equipmenc should be locased above chis level.
- 3. Eacer the actual values the equipmeac ia qualified co belov Environment Parameter DBl. UALZF. (column 2) vhfch corresponds on a 'ae comae" basis vith the actual paramecez'column 1) ~
- 4. Eater the refereace source belov Documencatfoa Actual (column
- 3) (generally PQR, Environmental Zone Napa, ecc.) vhich identifies the requirements ia column 1.
Enter'he r'efereace (envfanrsaatal qualfffcatfoa test reports, eagfaeerfng analysis etc.) belov Documentation DBt. UALZP (column 4) vhfch subetaatfates the information ia columa 2.
Enter che actual methodology used to demonst ate qualfficatfoa belov liffcation Method (column 5) . The most likely eacry is "Combined Tesc aad Supplementary Reviev" to indfcace that the qualification method fs a type cess supplemented by analysis/revf ev.
Revision 0 Page VIII.19-'42 (EG97/lah)
7 ~ Easer c}ata belov the H/M (column 6) as so vhesher a loners eavironmental parameter values are harsh or mild.
- 8. Enter data belov Ousssandfn Xtems (column 7) for sfgnf ficaas items of coacara vhich do noc allov aa fsem so be classifiec} as qualified. Minor items fuss requiring coaffr~sfoa vill not be coasidered outstanding items.
9 ~ Enter data belov she ri hsmoss columns as follovs:
Eater requirements so reyLace item as a condftion of. qualificatioa, if the 4 ~ equipment or compoaeat therein is not qualified to 40 yeass.
Enter only maintenance/surveillance
~ ~
n activitfes relasecL so qualification.
SUB COMP ONRiTS Enter any comyonents enveloped vishfn a larger qualificatioa package. For example, relays may be includecL here.
SAFETY FUNCTION Enter'he mafor plane safety function by she system fn vhfch the 'erformed equfpmeat fs a part. Examyles of safety functions are: Containment Isolation (CX),
Emergency Reactor Shutdovn (ERS), Reactor Core Cooling (RCC), Consainmeat Heat Removal (CHR), Core Residual Heat Removal (CRHR), Prevention of Sfgnificaat Release of Radioactive Material so the Eavirocment (PRRM), Suyportfng Systems (SS).
- 10. Enter data ia the Parameter - Suool. Reviev Box (lover mid-left side) as follovs:
PARAK'TM A list of all parameters (operability through submergence) beiag revieved.
SUPPL. R VIEQ This block identffies the items reviaved in the documentatfoa package (operability, temperature. yressure, relative humidity, chemical syray, radiacion, aging, submergeace) vhich fussfffes qualfffcatfoa.
'I NUBF~588 Enter the applicable NURE~588, Appeadfx h APPEHDZZ E E category lfstecL in paragraph 2. The I categories are "A" B y C p or D".
~
C: Ll. Eater data fa she lover middle box as follovs:
5 FOR PUNCHLIST I~A Enter'he documeasasion package number h
vhere qualfffcasfoa deficiency items may be I found I
~ Revision 0 Page VIIE.19-43 (EG97/lah)
R"-Pc~fCKS Eacer Quaiif 'catioa Information and ocher sources applicable co the equiymeat being i
qualif ed.
- 12. Eater data ia the lever riche hand box as follovs:
Eacer the documeacacion package number SICH OEP vhere the names and signatures of individuals preya"~wg/checkiag/appcoving the documencac'oa package may be found.
CKS 0 Eater the fourHigit aumber vhich identifies che individual Component Evaluat'oa Sheec. (Optional)
REVISION 0 Eater the revision number ayplicable co che component Evaluation Sheeto DhTE Enter the dace che ayylicable revtsion co the Comyoaenc Evaluation Sheet vas verified by'he "checker."
P
~
~ ~
'0 0 Revision 0 Page VIII.19-'44 (EG97/lah)
ATTACHMENT D EQUIPMENT DOCUMENTATION CONTROL FORM Revision 0 Page VIII.19-45 (EG97/lah)
~ - ~ 0 ~
I '
4 E
~
I f1NlROWftlTAL QNALlPlChTlON httacl(mant D-I DOCllllfllT CONTROL LOG Rev. l TOPlC START DATE DATE COllPLETED STATlls Pnlte
ATTACHMENT E EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION VENDOR MANUAL FORMS Revision 0 Page VIII.19-47 (EG97/13h)
Attachment E-1 Rev. 1
,EQUIPMENT VENDOR MANUAL DATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUPPLEMENT Maintenance requirement form (EQBLF1) may require different or additional maintenance than the vendor technical manual.
LIST OF MAINTENANCE RE UIREMENT FORMS ATTACHED Documentation Packa e P.O. P Foam No.
EQDP Rev. each EQBLF1 New Supplement Revised Supplement Special Instructions:
- 1. Replace existing EQBLF1 and EQBLF2 forms with attached EQBLF1, Rev.
Received by: Date:
Revision 0 Page VIIIe19-48 (EG97/lah)
Attachment E-2 Rev. 4 DATE:
TO: Manager, Technical Support, SHNPP FROM: Principal Engineer, I&C Unit, NED
SUBJECT:
'quipment Qualification Base Line The attached forms specify Maintenance Unit activities that must be performed on environmentally qualified equipment to maintain qualification.
21 These forms do not list all maintenance required on the equipment, but rather identifies additional maintenance activities from documentation sources not normally reviewed by the Maintenance Unit.
. g'I5 e~
These forms were generated based on our review of documents associated with:
5 EQDP No. Rev.
Purchase Order/Shop Order(s):
~
J~
Attached Forms:
- 1. total EQBLP1, Rev.
- 2. total EQBLP10, Rev.
e e
e Received by: Date:
e.
~
Y
. Revision 0 Page VIIIe19-49 (E('97/lah) e'
Attachment E-3 Rev. Revision 0 Pu"chase Olde" No.:
'VienCaCehhhvhev e Model Ho.:
VendOZ eeannal:
~ ~ Component:
Specification:
- ,S)
'r h
h
.'S Documentation Package Ho.:
EQUIP.
e EBASCO TAG KO. (CID) TAG NO. SEE TEL CODE SPECIFIC-ID 4
~h Devi" on 0 Page VIIIe19 50 (EG97/lah)
-O".'.sa
~
Attachment E-4 Revieian 0
- 0 e
e PTJRg+S MOD:-i. bQ.:
CQiPQhEZT:
QRD~M 'NQ ~
EQUAL ACTUR:-R:
~
I A. P RIODIC Y>INT .JANCE:
- 1. LUBRICATION:
- 2. CYCLING/HJNCTIONABILITY:
- 3. INSPECTION:
- 4. CALIBRATION:
I I
H. REPLACE. JT MAINTENANCE:
e
- 1. PARTS REPLACDfEiT:
~0
- 2. DEVICE REPLACRKiVT:
, ~ Revision Q Page VIIIe19-51 (EG97/lah) 1 v -~
v e
e
~
e y ~
~
'I I
e e
~
b e '
~
Attachment E-5 Re J. Revision 0 P"..C=4 - ORDc= hO.:
PAXWcACTtiMR:
K)DEL NO COe~OVsST C. KKDTccIAVCZ CYC Z STA'P~ DATE:
-4
~e V~
~ IP D. INSPECTION REOUIRLR!EVRTS:
RKHicGISK .tT:
P. CONPIGURAT'ION:
- 2. MOUÃTRRG:
- 2. RRALRNG:
Revision 0 Page VIIIT19-5g (EG97/lah)
T= T '
- J T T J J (1
~
- eI T T"
Attachment E-6 Revision 0 PURC&E OPSY HO.:
0 KUWJ7ACK3"-R:
'MODEL HO CO~O~c G. F C- ERIC~~~ EOUIP~T UALIPICATIOH CONS IDE.~KTIOHS:
,C Vpg PAGE PREPARED R VIr~~~D I ~
'0I Revision u Page VIII.19-53 (EG97/lah) i
Attachment E-7 iMANUFA~i RER:
Revision 0 .
i+ODE NO ~
ENDOR MUTUAL:
CONPONENT:
~ ~
A.l LUBRICANTS: CP&L PART NO.
2~
I'ESCRIPTION B. 1 CONPONE.'tT PARTS: DESCRI>TION CP&L PART NO.
2~
3 ~
4~
B.2 CONPLETE CQNPONRfT: DESCRIPTION CP&L PART NO.
0 2~
F.2 SEALANTS- DESCRIPTION CP&L PART NO-2~
H.l. SPECIAL TOOLS: DESCRIPTION CP&L PART NO.
'k<<
. '4 S;
I 2~
I H.2 MISCELLANEOUS: DESCRIPTION CP&L PART NO.
2~
TECH. REVIEW Revision 0 Page VII.19-54 (EG97/lah)
~ '