ML18005A348

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 8 to Mod Procedure MOD-103, Engineering Evaluations.
ML18005A348
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/24/1987
From: Joseph Willis
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML18005A336 List:
References
MOD-103, NUDOCS 8803160301
Download: ML18005A348 (20)
v • d • e


Text

OS3 CAROLINA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPAHY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PLAHT OPERATIHC MAHUAL VOLUME 6 PROCEDURE TYPE: Modification Procedure (MOD)

NUMBER: MOD-103 TITLE! Engineering Evaluations REVISIOH 8 jl,

~crnra S P01 tgo7 APPROVED! 8 ~~lJ'> .

Signature Date TITLE: t- Wlu.Jl >tAxr cE@e ECFIVi--0 8803160301 880222 SFP 01 1987 PDR ADOCK 05000400 8 PDR SK4'P CONTROLLED COPY 474?

FOR )NFORfYfATlON ONL'f Page 1 of 17

OS4 Tabl,e of Contents section ~Pa e 1.0 PURPOSE 4

2.0 REFERENCES

4 3.0 DEFINITIONS/ABBREVIATIONS 4 4.0 GENERAL 4 4.1 Appl,icabiLity 4 4.2 Exclusions 5 4.3 Time Limitation 5 4.4 Responsibilities 5 5.0 PROCEDURE 7 5 ' Initiation T 5.2 SEU Input 7 5.3 ResoLution Development 7 5.4 Review and Approval 7 5.5 InstaLLation 8 5.6 Closeout 8 5.T Revisions 9 5.8 Renewals 9 5.9 Voiding an Approved Engineering Evaluation 9 5.10 Emergency Engineering Evaluation 10 5.11 Procurement Problem Reviews 11 6.0 DIAGRAMS/ATTACHMENTS 11 1 - Form 2EE 12 2 " Procurement Problem Review Form 13 3 - Engineering Evaluation Contents 14 4 - Simplified MOD-103 Flow Diagram 17 7cclrucal gc. viia g/o4 I Wcz MOD-LQ3 Rev. 8 Page 2 of L7

OS4 List of Effective Pa es

~>~~

~/cv/Sb

~~ 2 r"~. Revision 8

Ac-8/i ~ /~~/W 3, 4, 4a AC-8/1 5, 6 8 7, 7a AC-8/1 8-17 8 17a AC-8/1 MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 3 of 17

OS4 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to provide the steps required to resolve a request submitted on a Plant Change Request (PCR) in accordance with AP-600 for an Engineering EvaLuation. The Engineering Evaluation serves as a document to verify code compliance, and to provide resoLution of nonconformances when appLicable. This procedure also provides guidance for performing Procurement Problem Reviews (PPR). PPRs are addressed separateLy in accordance with Section 5.11 of this procedure.

2PO REFERENCES See REFERENCES Section in PLP-601.

3PO DEFINITIONS/ABBREVIATIONS See DEFINITIONS/ABBREVIATIONS Section in PLP-601.

4 ' GENERAL

1. TechnicaL Support, Maintenance, and E6RC Specialist, or Engineers whether classified as CP&L personneL, CPIL off-site staff supplement, or contractor staff supplement use this procedure to perform Engineering Evaluations.

2 ~ This procedure appfies to all areas ~here failure of a component or disposition of an item potentially impacts the plant, a system's huclear sa'fety or constitutes a safety hazard to personneL. The Engineering Evaluation shall be performed, as appropriate, to:

a. Evaluate a permanent or temporary Repair method.

The EE shall provide the necessary personnel with the required information (e.g., repair instructions) to complete the MRNA form.

b. Evaluate fLaw indications found during nondestructive examinations (visual, surface, and volumetric) .

C ~ Evaluate reviews, material acceptance, nonconformance resolutions, minor deviations from specifications, and nonconformances to codes.

d. Ensure the seismic qualification of Seismic Category I equipment, as appropriate.
e. Ensure the environmental qualification of equipment

~n the EQ Master List. Copies of these evaluations should be sent to the EQ Coordinator.

MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 4 of 17

OS4 p

f. Other situations as appropriate. wr. s/i

[

4 h

e

, ~

0~

MOD"103 Rev.g Page 4a of 17,

~, ~

OS3 3- If during the installation or test of a modification a condition, as described in 4.1.2, arises due to the implementation of the modification, the condition is dispositioned by SEU in accordance with MOD-204 as appropriate.

4. The Procurement Problem Review shall be used as applicable to determine suitability for use of Radwaste Fire Protection and safety-related parts, including off-the-shelf, that do not meet the purchase order requirements. Design changes must be resolved in accordance with MOD-204.
5. 'Except in emergency or abnormal operating condition where imnediate actions are required to protect the health and safety of the public, to protect equipment or personnel, or to prevent the deterioration of plant

~ ~

conditions to a possible unsafe or unstable level, this procedure shall be followed when applicable so that the maintenance of equipment shall be preplanned and performed in accordance with this procedure. Where this procedure would be required and is not used, the activities that were accomplished shall be documented after the fact and receive the same degree of review as if they had been preplanned.

6. The requirements of this procedure shall apply to Engineering Evaluations addressing quality Q-class A, B, C, and D equipment.

4.2 Exclusions The requirements of this procedure do not apply to Engineering Evaluation addressing Q-class E equipment, unless specifically required by HPOS management.

4.3 Time Limitations

1. Temporary repairs shall not be left installed for a period greater than the period specified in the Evaluation unless renewed or made permanent, as applicable, as described in this procedure.

4.4 Res onsibilities

1. Document Control Make distribution of form, as required.

0 MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 5 of 17

I, ~

OS3 4.4 Res onsibilities (continued)

2. E&RC
a. Develop Engineering Evaluations when required.
b. Ensure that surveillance requirements, assigned to E&RC as a result of the Evaluation, are carried one
3. Maintenance
a. Develop Engineering Evaluation when required.
b. Ensure that the requirements for repairs as delineated in the Evaluation are carried out.
c. Ensure that surveillance requirements, assigned to Maintenance as a result of the Evaluation, are carried out.
4. ~oeratieae
a. Ensure that surveillance requirements, assigned to Operations as results of the Evaluation, are carried out.
5. ~tater it Security-related Evaluations which are designated as Safeguards Information will be controlled by Security.
6. Site En ineerin Unit/SEU Provide responses to a PCR Form 1 submitted for design information requests.
7. Technical Su ort
a. Develop Engineering Evaluations when required.
b. Ensure that surveillance requirements, assigned to Technical Support as a result of the evaluation, are carried out.
c. Track the status of Form 2EE.

MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 6 of 17

OS4

~ ~

5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Initiation A request for an Engineering Evaluation is completed by initiating a PCR Form 1 in accordance with AP-600, unless SEU design input is not required. Ln this case, the Technical Support Data Coordinator (TSDC) assigns a PCR number to Form 2EE without a Form 1 being issued once the Engineer/Specialist completes Part 1 of the From 2EE.

, ~ '2

- \ '(

5.2 ~EEV Kn Iit

1. To provide additional expertise with developing the Engineering Evaluation, SEU expertise is obtained and referenced in the package if:
a. DELETED jA 8/t
b. SeismmicalLy quai.ified equipment or structure is involved.
c. Flooding considerations are involved, including increase in potentiaL for flooding, reduced capability for handling flooding, or locating of 2 equipment where fLooding is a potentials Structures with embedded strip<<plates or base pLates with anchor bolts are involved.
e. Other as appropriate.

This input is obtained by submitting a request for design information in accordance with AP-600. SEU documents its response in accordance with AP-600.

5.3 Resolution Devei.o ment

1. The preparer completes Part 1 of the Form 2EE shown as Attachment l. If additional space is required for any item, the information is carried over on additional sheets, and attached to the Form 2EE.
2. During the resoLution development, the items listed in Attachment 3 are addressed, as applicable.

5.4 Review and A royal

1. An Engineering Evaluation receives a second technical.

review performed in accordance with MOD-201. The reviewer signs in Part 2.

MOD" 103 Rev. 8 Page 7 of 17 .

OS4 5.4 Reviev and A royal (continued)

NOTE: If the evaluation affects environmentally qualified equipment, a technical revieM must be performed by a qualified EQ Safety Reviewer. Attachment 5 provides guidance for determining if the e'valuation affects environmentally qualified equipment.

2 ~ The Engineering Evaluation receives Safety Reviews/Analysis as required by Part 3 on the Form 2EE.

av "7

,I 1

"7 7

a ~

r'"

e ~

e a

NOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 7a of 77 )

7g++/7

OS3 5.4 Review and A royal (continued) 3- Part 4 requires that the Engineering Evaluation receive an ANI/ISI review if the Engineering Evaluation impacts an ASME Section I, VIII or XI component. ISI determines ANI involvement, and obtains an ANI review when required. These reviews are documented on MOD-204 Form 2CS.

4. QA/gC reviews Quality Class A and 8 Evaluations. This review is documented in Part 5 of the Form 2EE.
5. The appropriate Project/Engineer/Specialist approves an Engineering Evaluation by signing in Part 6 of S

Qj Form 2EE. The responsible Unit Manager or his designee approves Evaluations that involve reportability.

6. The preparer issues a working copy to the installer if appropriate.

S 7 ~ The TSDC:

a. List the affected documents referenced on the DCL on the Crossreference Screen of the Document Control Menu.

l S

b. Initials and dates Form 2EE.
c. Lists Form 2EE on the 'Form 0.
8. Document Control or Security, as appropriate, makes distribution of the approved Engineering Evaluation.

5.5 Installation

1. If the Evaluation requires implementation in the field, a WRY is submitted by the preparer to request the work unless an existing WRY is to be used.

2 Changes/Deviations from the Evaluation requirements shall not be implemented without an approved revision to the Evaluation 5.6 Closeout

1. The TSDC:
a. Ensures that the documentation required by this procedure is in the file.
b. Transmits the file to Document Control in accordance with RMP-006.

S MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 8 of 17 S

S

~ >>'

OS3 5.7 Revisions Each page of an Engineering Evaluation vill identify the revision number.

2~ Individual pages shall not be revised and issued. If a revision to the Engineering Evaluation is necessary, the preparer will obtain the next revision number from the TSDC upon completion of Part 1 of the Form 2EE, change all pages to refLect the current revision number, and include a new Form 2EE. Steps affected by the revision are identified by a vertical Line in the right hand margin of the affected pages, and the assigned revision number.

3 ~ A renewal can be incorporated in a revision.

4~ Revisions are processed and'pproved in accordance with Steps 5.3 and 5.4 of this procedure. The revision is issued as a complete package and supersedes the 'previous revision.

S.S Renewals A temporary repair that is to remain installed beyond the expiration date specified by an Evaluation, shall be renewed if appropriate.

2~ Renewals shall be processed and approved in accordance with Steps 5.3.1, 5.3.2, if appropriate, and 5.4 of this procedure.

3~ A periodic renewaL is not a revision to the approved Engineering Evaluation. It is written to the most currently issued revision number of the approved Engineering Evaluation.

4, A renewal can be incorporated with a revision to the Engineering Evaluation.

5.9 'Voidin An A roved En ineerin Evaluation An approved Engineering Evaluation is voided when it is no longer required and was never implemented in the fi'eld.

2~ The voiding process is initiated by an Engineer/Specialist.

3~ The preparer takes the following steps:

a. On a copy of the original Form 2EE:

(L) Stamp or write "VOID" in bold letters.

MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 9 of 17

OS3 5.9 Voidin an A roved En ineerin Evaluation (continued)

(2) Provide a br'ief basis for the action below "VOID".

(3) Initial and date below the basis.

(4) The Project Engineer/Specialist signs and dates below the basis, unless the Evaluation was written to address a reportable item. In the latter case, the Manager or his designee signs and dates below the basis.

(5) The voided Evaluation is returned to the TSDC.

(6) The TSDC adds the From 2EE to the index, Form 0.

(7) The TSDC stamps the original Form 2EE issued I IVOZDll Document Control or Security, as appropriate, makes distribution of the voided Evaluation.

The TSDC transmits the file to Document Control in accordance with RMP-006.

5.10 Emer enc En ineerin Evaluations 1 ~ . The Engineer/Specialist:

a. Obtains a PCR number from a list of unassigned PCR numbers made available by the TSDC.
b. Obtaias thc next sequential revision number for the Form 2EE from thc Design Detail Screen on the Document Control Menu (e.g., 1, 2, 3).

C~ In the event that qualified personael. are not on site to review or approve the Engineering Evaluation as required by this procedure, performance of the review or approval by telephone is acceptable. Telephone reviews and approvals are documented by:

(1) printing the name of the reviewer or approver contacted (2) indicating thc date and time of the call (3) iadicating approval "per telecon".

d Completes Part 7 of the Form 2EE.

e. Issues a working copy of the assigned organi=ation for action, and the original of the form is left with the TSDC ~

MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 10 of 17

OS3 5.10 Emer enc En ineerin Evaluations (continued)

2. The TSDC:
a. Obtains the signature of the respective approver the next normal working day after the telecon approval.
b. Initials and dates the From 2EE.
c. Adds the Form 2EE to the index, Form 0.
3. Document Control or Security, as appropriate, makes distribution of the Form 2EE.

5.11 Procurement Problem Review Procurement and part review problems shall be resolved by either submitting a change to the procurement process per PMC-001 and PMC-002 or completing the Procurement Problem Review Form (Attachment 2), as applicable. The Procurement Problem Review From should be used to accept an item as. received without changing the requirements for future orders and shall be kept with the receiving packages for the associated purchase order. Fro purposes of this procedure, procurement is defined as the time form initiation of a requisition document through item issued to the end user.

6 ~0 DIAGRAMS/ATTACHMENTS 1 - Form 2EE 2 - Procurement Problem Review Form 3 - Engineering Evaluation Contents 4 " Simplified MOD-103 Flow Diagram MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 11 of 17

/ ~ I ~ ~

OS3 ATTACHMENT 1 FORtl 2EE ENGINEERING EVALUATION FOR PCR REV PAGE I CF

~ YES N/A PCR HUtER ISSUED TO SYSTKtl ENGINEER WITHOUT A FORtl I I. TITLE

2. SYSTEtI 3. &CLASS 4. LOCATION
5. THIS IS A: le Ef RENEWAL REVISION REVISION INCI3IPI31ATIHG A REHEWAL
6. COH'LICT/CCteITICH:

<<y>>

7 CHECK APPLICAbLE ITEtl ANO PERFM!1 A% INDICATED ACTION: IH/A ITEt15 THAT OCTET A'PPLY)

ITKtl ACTION REPORT IAW AP&15 OR APW I

IQ REPOtTAGLE PER AP&15 OR ~167 APPROPRIATE: CINCH ALRfAOY SUbtllTTKD

.PART I SURVEILLANCE CHANGE RfCUIRKD AFFECTIHG SUbtlIT T Rf TECH SPEC ECUIPt%HT7 I A WITH PLP- I IIOUT RfCUIRED FRCtl C~TE, VEIOCR ATTAOCKHT>>NUPRIN'ATI TOTAL SEU, WELDIHG EHGlfCUUNG't RKCEIVKD, AS APPLIC .P LIST TEST PROgDURKS TO bE ARE TARE AHY RETEST REOJIRftKHTS7 PKRF(%%9.'l%

IS THIS AH EV TIOH OF A TKtSORARY EXPIRATIOH DATE IS:

REPAIR '7 IS THIS A ALFOR A TKtIP~

b, QWA'I RfPAIR 9 w*

>> 1 h

10. PRfP Alga DATE:
11. PERFORMS) IAW tlCO 20'I:

PART 2 TECWICAL REV IEW: CRGANIZATKS: DATE:

12. SAFETY RfVIEW&C%CF APPRCPRIATK CPTICH Ale PERFORtI AS INSTRUCTED:
a. Q THIS RKVISiQI/RENEWAL NXS NOT AFFECT Il% SAFETY REVIEW PERFORMED CH THf PREVIOJS REVISICH/RENEWAL. ACTICH: TWO QJALIFIED SAFETY REVIEWERS CONGA AND SIGH bELOW.

RKVISICH/RENEWAL PART 3 F IRST SAFETY REVIEWER DATE SEC CtO SAF ETY REVIEWER DATE

b. P T)IIS %W EK RfQJIRK 5 AH A~ 1 I SAFETY REVIEW. ACTIOH: ATTACH THE h

CCt5%ETED ~11 SAFETY REVIEW. NO. OF PAGES hl PART 4

13. Q WA OSTAIN ANI/ISI REVIEW OOCLP1EHTED CH FCRtl 2CS Wl+N REQJIREO bY tICO 103.

">> TOTAL FORtI 2CS PAGES ATTACHED PART 5 Ii.Q N/A OA/a: CONCublENCE: TITLE: DATE:

( <&LASS A OR d ) TOTAL FORtl 2CS PAGES ATTAC%D 76 15. APPROVAL DATE:

PART 7 Q WI3KiHG CCPY ISSUE) TO INSTALLER IAW tla)-103 tXO 103 I 10 MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 12 08 17

OS3 h

ATTACHMENT 2 PROCUREMENT PROBLEM REVIEW FORM QUALITY CLASS CPhL/MFC PART NUMBER P.O. NUMBER ITEM AS ORDERED:

AS RECEIVED'ISPOSITION/JUSTIFICA TECH SUPPORT DATE QA QC DATE I'

~

(REQUIRED FOR Q, R, 6 F ITEMS)

MOD-103-2-7 MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 13 of 17

OS3 ATTACHMENT 3 En ineerin Evaluation Contents-During the resolution development of an Engineering Evaluation, the items Listed below are addressed as applicable'.

1. Reference documents
2. Defining objectives
3. Design inputs
4. Assumptions
5. Calculations
6. Evaluation of the Problem As a minimum, the following are addressed in this area.
a. Importance to operation of the pLant and/or system.
b. Method applied and analysis results used to evaluate acceptability or rejectability (include acceptance criteria, reference documents, etc.)
c. Environmental Qualification (10CFR50.49) considerations for EQ equipment.

For repairs made to equipment shown on the EQ List, the repairs are accomplished in a manner that ensures the equipment's environmental qualification is maintained.

No permanent repair which downgrades the qualification of this equipment is permissible.

d. Reportability (as outlined in AP-615 or AP-618, as appropriate) of an item. If the responsible person believes the item is reportable, he shall promptly report the concern in accordance with AP-615 .or AP"616, as appropriate.
7. Resolution/Disposition In addition to the items delineated below, the resolution indicates any reconmended measures to prevent reoccurrence
a. Corporate Comments To provide additional expertise to support the disposition, corporate expertise (nondestructive examiner, metallurgical engineer, welding engineer, code specialist, regulatory specialist, etc.) is contacted and referenced in the evaluation if:

MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 14 of 17

OS3 ATTACHMENT 3 (continued)

(1) Possible safety concerns are raised during failure analysis.

(2) Evaluation of the existing condition requires complicated techniques beyond the skills of the preparer.

s (3) Applicability to codes cannot be established.

(4) Regulatory involvement is required.

b. Vendor Input If the Evaluation addresses modes of equipment operation ~

which potentially degrade that equipment (e.g.; no minimum flow bypass, no seal water, continuous energixation, etc.) the appropriate vendor's input to the Evaluation is obtained, refer'enced in the Evaluation.

if applicable, and

c. Welding Input If the Evaluation addresses upgrading and reclassifying base materials received at HPOS warehouse to meet the ASME Code requirements, input from the Metallurgy/Melding Engineering Unit is obtained in accordance with CWP-017, unless vendor documentation can be obtained to justify the upgrade or reclassification.
8. Nonconformance Control
a. A Nonconformance can be dispositioned one of five ways:

reject/replace rework repair downgrade Use as is

b. An Engineering Evaluation is not required to dispositions a Nonconformance when.

~ the resolution is a reject or downgrade.

~ the resolution is a rework unless the rework activity is applied to ISI components.

C~ Evaluations written to support rework to ISI components are to consider the cause(s) of failure of the part or component to ensure that the selected replacement is suitable and that misting specifications are adequate in accordance with IMA-7220 of ASME Section XI Code.

MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 15 of 17 s ."i'" s s .S .; ' .

~

. s~Ss ~ ~ "...' << ~ -, s<<s <<ts."" ~

sg

OS3

d. Evaluations are to provide instructions to control,

,I rejected items to prevent inadvertent use. Also, see the section on Repair Methods for additional V

requirements to be met in the development of the repair "I

method.

9. Repair Methods NOTE: ASME Section XI interpretation XI-1-83-14 precludes the use of a temporary repair on a Section XI component.

The Evaluation is intended to only outline the repair method and evaluate its acceptability. If existing procedures were evaluated or considered to be employed in the repair method, then they are clearly referenced for use. If field work instructions beyond the skill of the craft are required to accomplish the repair-, then they are specified on the.WR&A or in a special process procedure. The foLlowing requirements, as applicable, are addressed in the repair method:

a. General requirements for any repair as a minimum are:

(1) The method of repair.

(2) Applicable code, specifications, etc.

f - ~ (3) Identification of any special materials to be used.

Pfd

,I (4) Procedures to be used.

(S) The appropriate elements of the corporate gA program.

b. The specific requirements incorporated into an ISI component repair are:

(1) Flaw removal method.

(2) Method of measurement of the cavity created by removing the flaw.

(3) Dimensional requirements for reference points during and after removal'4)

Weld procedure(s)) and postweld heat treatment (S) Inspector hold points.

C ~ For temporary repairs, an expiration date is to be established by the Evaluation.

MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 16 of 17

~ 8 f~

OS3 ATTACHMENT 4 FORt1 I IS NO EVALUATION

/&CLASS A(RD?

SYSTEI1 EHGIHEER PROCESS IAW AP~

IS SEU INPUT PROkCT EHGR /

SPECIAUST RE(VIREO 7% EVAL.

ADDRESS A OOCQ1EHT INPUT IAW AP~ REPORTASLE ITEI1?

tKI1N~N1 DEVELOPS EVALUATION IAW I1(XI 105 TSDC I1EI1ORAII01 (IF APPLICA8LE)

AOI1IHISTRATIVELY PROCESSED IAW I1OO 105 F(A1 2EE ~

(COPY)

~PCR IHSTALLER PERFORI1'W(NI(

IAW EVALUATION MOD-103 Rev. 8 page'7 of 17

OS4 ATTACHMENT 5 E TECHNICAL REVIEW FLOW CHART IS AFFECTED EQUIPMENT QUALITY CLASS A OR B OR DOES NO THE EVALUATION AFFECT AREA WHERE QUALITY CLASS A OR B E UIPMENT IS LOCATED?

YES I

IS EQUIPMENT CLASS IE OR FALL UNDER REG ~ GUIDE 1 ~ 97 N0 (INSTRUMENT IIST N4) POST ACCIDENT MONITORING RE UIREMENTS?:

YES I

DOES THE EVALUATION AFFECT MODEL NUMBER, VENDOR OR TYPE OF EXISTING E UIPMENT? YES NO I

DOES THE EVALUATION AFFECT MOUNTING, LOCATION, LUBRICANTS OR A DIRECT MODIFICATION OF E UIPMENT? YE NO DOES THE EVALUATION AFFECT THE ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH EXISTING E UIPMENT IS LOCATED? YES ETC' NO I

EQ TECHNICAL EQ TECHNICAL REVIEW NOT REVIEW RE UIRED RE UIRED NOTE: THE TERM "EQUIPMENT" AS USED ABOVE INCLUDES INSTRUMENTS AND COMMON COMPONENTS THAT ARE USED FOR INTERCONNECTING TO ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (e.g., CABLES, CONNECTORS, SPLICES, )

MOD-103 Rev. 8 Page 17a oE 17'

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18005A348&oldid=2421875"