ML18005A351
| ML18005A351 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 04/24/1987 |
| From: | Joseph Willis CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18005A336 | List: |
| References | |
| AP-618, NUDOCS 8803160331 | |
| Download: ML18005A351 (9) | |
Text
OS1 CAROLINA POWER
& LIGHT COMPANY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PLANT OPERATING MANUAL VOLUME 1 PROCEDURE TYPE:
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE NUMBER:
AP"618 TITLE:
JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION REVISION 0 APPROVED:
Signature 5lYOg gy Date TITLE 880316033k 880222 PDR ADOCN, 05000400 6
PDR'Hm cowmOLU=.o COPY Page 1 of 7
OS1 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES
~Pa e Revision 1-7 0
AP&18 Rev.
0 Page 2 of 7
~ \\ I ~
~
~ I>> rl r<<44<<
~
III I I
~
~
~
I ~
) 0 4
4 v
I "4
I
'1>>
I
(
4
Osl 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure provides guidance to plant personnel who are involved in the evaluation and disposition of conditions, found to exist in the plant, which may constitute INOPERABILITY of equipment required by the Technical Specifications.
This procedure ensures a consistent methodology for evaluation, disposition, management review and records retention of identified deficiencies.
This procedure does not replace the requirement for formaL engineering evaluations, but rather provides a consistent guideline for developing timely evaLuations.
2 ~ 0 REFERENCES 1 ~
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations 2 ~
Technical Specifications 3.
AP-615, NRC Reporting Requirements 4.
AP"616, Evaluating and Reporting of Defects and Non-Compliance in Accordance with 10CFR21 5.
RMP"006, Records Storage Area 6.
AP-011, Safety Reviews 3 0 RESPONSIBILITIES Plant General Manager - Is responsible for ensuring that appropriate and timely actions (commensurate with the potential severity) to analyze the effect of identified deficiencies on component OPERABILITY are initiated and concLuded.
As chairman of the Plant Nuclear Safety Committee, he approves each such analysis.
2.
Manager - Operations - Is responsible for providing specific direction to shift operations personnel concerning the OPERABILITY status of affected components.
3.
Unit Managers - Are responsibLe for performing evaluations of deficiencies and presenting such evaluations to the PNSC for review and approval.
4.
Director - Regulatory Compliance - Is responsible for ensuring retention of written evaluations after PNSC
- approval, and for interfacing with NRC concerning such evaluations.
AP-618 Rev.
0 Page 3 of 7
~
r
~ '
OS1 4.0 DEFINITIONS/ABBREVIATIONS 1.
PNSC - Plant NucLear Safety Committee 2.
ONS - Onsite Nuclear Safety 3.
CNS - Corporate NucLear Safety 4.
JCO - Justification for Continued Operation is a vritten document providing an eval.uation af a specific deficiency vhich concl.udes either OPERABILITY>
OPERABILITY with specific compensatory actions, ar INOPERABILITY of affected equipment.
5.
CQA - Corporate Quality Assurance 6 ~
INPO " Institute of Nuclear Pover Operation 7.
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission 5 '
PROCEDURE 5'
Initial Actions 1.
Potential deficiencies in of safety-related components may be identified by any of the folloving (non-inclusive list):
10CPR21 Notifications from Vendors QA Non"Conformance Reports Independent Audits (CQA, ONS, INPO, etc.)
NRC Inspections~~
NRC InspectZion and Enforcement Bul.letins Visual observation 2.
Personnel discovering such problems shall use AP"615, NRC Reporting Requirements, to document the discovery and to ensure avareness of shift operations personnel of the situation.
3.
If the Operations Shift Foreman is unable to determine if affected components remain OPERABLE (as defined in Technical Specifications),
he shall notify the fol.loving personnel:
~
Manager - Operations
~
Plant GeneraL Manager 4.
The Plant General Manager shall determine the appropriate actions to be taken and the time allotted for such actions based on input from the unit managers.
This vill include a determination of vhether affected components shall be immediately declared INOPERABLE or shall remain OPERABLE until an evaluation is completed.
AP-618 Rev.
0 Page 4 of 7
OSL 5.1 Initial Actions (continued)
The Plant General Manager shall assign the JCO to the appropriate unit manager; or, he may refer the matter to Harris Plant Engineering Section (HPES) for evaluation.
If HPES is to perform evaluation under their procedure, then no action under this procedure is required until Step 5.2.9.
6.
The Unit Manager shall then assign qualified individual.s to investigate and evaluate the deficiency.
5.2 Eval.uation and Documentation for JCO 1 ~
The identified deficiency shall be evaluated to determine the impact on the functional capabilities of the affected equipment.
2 ~
If at any point during this evaluation it becomes evident that a Technical Specification component is not capable of performing its identified function, then the Manager " Operations and the Plant General Manager shall be informed and appropriate action taken under the Technical Specifications.
3.
The evaluation shall. consider'.
Technical Specifications Operating License FSAR ISI Requirements Seismic Requirements Environmental Qualification Requirements Code of Federal ReguLations Engineering Design Codes (i.e.,
ASME)
Equipment Specifications 4.
Upon completion of the evaluation, the unit manager shall be notified of the conclusions reached.
He shall report these conclusions to the Plant GeneraL Manager and Manager - Operations.
Shift Operations personneL'halL be. informed of the OPERABILITY status of the affected components.
5.
A JCO shall be prepared to include the foLLowing:
a.
Revie~ Page (See Attachment
- 1) ~
b.
Deficiency - should include method of discovery, persons involved, time and date, nature of aeficiency, equipment
- impacted, Technical Specifications impacted.
AP-618 Rev.
0 Page 5 of 7
0
OSL 5valuation and Documentation for JCO (continued) c.
Functional Requirements - should be a brief discussion of the design function of affected component(s) from the sources identified in 5.2.3.
K
'I d.
Evaluation - shall be a discussion of the specific impact of the deficiency on the afEected components'apability to perform its functional requirements.
Conclusions/Recommendations
- shall be a definitive statement concerning continued OPERABILITY of the affected components, as well as recommended further actions.
- f. 'eferences - shall include documents or other sources oE information used to conduct the evaluation and support the conclusional'.
The JCO shaLL be accompanied by a safety evaluation prepared in accordance with AP-011, SaEety Reviews.
7.
The JCO shall be signed by all persons involved in its preparation, an independent technical reviewer:,
and by the appLicable unit manager.
8.
The JCO may then be used on an interim basis pending final review by the PNSC.
9.
The JCO shaLL be presented to the PNSC.
The PNSC shall review the JCO for approval and document the conclusion by the signature of the Chairman - PNSC (see ).
Kl 4 ~
10.
The JCO shall be sent to Regulatory Compliance for transmittaL to Document Services in accordance with RMP-006, Records Storage Area.
I AP-618 Rev.
0 Page 6 of 7
~"':~:-'
t
~ ~
E
~
I J
ATTACHMENT 1 0
JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION REVIEW JCO NO.
Name Title Date:
Name Title Date:
Name Title Date:
Indep. Tech. Revi'ewer:
Name Title Date:
UnitManager.'ate:
PNSC Review CommentslAction Items.
'0 J
Jf'J PNSC Review:
Approv'ed:
Disapproved:
PNSC Chairman'.
(Form AP"618-1-0)
Signature Date:
- 0 AP"618 Rev.
0 Page 7 of 7
J J
J
~ Io', >
~ ~
J ~
'r
~
J'
't
(
~'