ML17333A748

Notice of Violation from Insp on 961013-1123.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Include in Written Safety Evaluation for Design Change Package 56 Adequate Bases for Determination That Change to New Models of Isolation

ML17333A748
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	01/22/1997
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17333A747	List: IR 05000315/1996014 ML17333A748
References
50-315-96-14, 50-316-96-14, NUDOCS 9701280219
Download: ML17333A748 (4)

Text

NOTICE OF,VIOLATION Indiana Michigan Power Company Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-315; 5-316 License No. DRP-58; DPR-74 During an NRC inspection conducted from October 13 through November 23,

1996, one violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 50.59, "Changes, tests and experiments,"

section (b)(1), requires, in

part, "The licensee shall maintain records of changes in the facility...

These records must include a written safety evaluation which provides the bases for the determination that the change...

does not represent an unreviewed safety question (US().

Contrary to the above,, the licensee failed to include in the written safety evaluation for Design Change Package 56 an adequate bases for the determination that the change to new models of isolation dampers in the spent fuel pool ventilation system did not represent a US(.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Indiana Michigan Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region III, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results

achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or

revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

9701280219 970122 PDR ADOCK 050003i5 8

PDR

fj

Notice of Violation Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction.

However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be placed in the

PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from,the public.

Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 22nd day of January 1997

1 J(

J' II