ML17333A584

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 960805-29.Violation Noted:Test Program Did Not Demonstrate That CCS Performance Satisfactory as Listed in UFSAR Table 9.5-2
ML17333A584
Person / Time
Site: Cook  
Issue date: 09/27/1996
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17333A583 List:
References
50-315-96-10, 50-316-96-10, NUDOCS 9610030334
Download: ML17333A584 (2)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Indiana Hichigan Power Company Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos.

50-315; 50-316 Licenses No. DPR-58; DPR-74 During an NRC inspection conducted from August 5-29,

1996, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 50, Appendix 8, Criterion XI, "Test Control," requires, in part, that a test program shall be established to assure that all testing required to demonstrate that systems and components will perform satisfactorily in service is identified and performed in accordance with written procedures which incorporate the requirements and acceptance limits contained in design documents.

Test results shall be documented and evaluated to assure that test requirements have been satisfied.

Contrary to the above:

a

~

As of August 28, 1996, there was no periodic surveillance performed or procedure in place to assure that component cooling water system flow to the containment air recirculation fan met the 25 gpm listed in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR),

Table 9.5-2.

b.

As of August 28,

1996, the test program did not demonstrate that component cooling system performance was satisfactory as listed in the UFSAR, Table 9.5-2.

Surveillance procedures 1

EHP 4030 STP.248, "Unit 1 Component Cooling Water Flow Balance,"

completed on September 28,

1995, and 2

EHP 4030 STP.248, "CCW Flow Balance,"

completed Hay 1, 1996, did not have acceptance criteria for sample cooler flows and the flow measurements taken were less than the minimum specified in the UFSAR.

Also, no evaluation was done to assure that the resultant sample cooling flows would be adequate under all design conditions.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) (50-315/316-96006-01).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Indiana Hichigan Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control

Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region III, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice,- within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a

Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation; (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved; (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response.

If an adequate reply is not 9610030334 960927 PDR ADOCK 05000315 8

PDR

Notice of Violation received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as,may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction.

However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be placed in the

PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from the public.

Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 27th day of September 1996