Proposed Change to Tech Spec Section 3/4.9.14 & Bases, Correcting Error in Fuel Pool Cask Drop Analysis.Safety Evaluation EnclML17209A254 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Saint Lucie |
---|
Issue date: |
10/16/1980 |
---|
From: |
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML17209A253 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 8010210416 |
Download: ML17209A254 (5) |
|
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML17241A3541999-06-0101 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.5.2,allowing Up to 7 Days to Restore Inoperable LPSI Train to Operable Status ML17241A3451999-05-24024 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.5.1 Re Safety Injection Tanks ML17229B0711999-03-19019 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Requested by NRC for Use in Issuance of Proposed License Amend Re SFP Storage Capacity, Per Soluble Boron Credit ML17229B0201999-02-23023 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.1.2.9 Re Reactivity Control sys- Boron Dilution ML17229A9551998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising Administrative Controls & Incorporating Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi- Discipline Supervisor Position ML17229A9161998-11-25025 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Replacing Insert-A,attachment to 971231 Submittal & Revises LCO 3.4.9.11 & Associated Bases ML17229A9251998-11-22022 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Thermal Margin SL Lines of TS Figure 2.1-1 to Reflect Increase in Value of Design Min RCS Flow from 345,000 Gpm to 365,000 Gpm & Change Flow Rates Stated in Tables 2.2-1 & 3.2-1 ML17229A9131998-11-19019 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Administrative Contols TS 6.3, Unit Staff Qualifications & Incorporating Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi-Discipline Supervisor (MDS) Position ML20155C3061998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising Terminology Used in Notation of TS Tables 2.2-1 & 3.3-1 Re Implementation & Automatic Removal of Certain Reactor Protection Sys Trip Bypasses ML17229A8441998-08-24024 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Removing Obsolete License Conditions & Incorporating Revs Which Clarify Component Operations That Must Be Verified in Response to Containment Sump Recirculation Actuation Signal ML17229A7731998-06-15015 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 6-20,6-20a & 6-20c,correcting Info Supplied by Fuel Vendor Relative to Titles of Approved TRs That Are Referenced in Proposed TS 6.9.1.11.b ML17229A7601998-06-0303 June 1998 Proposed Marked Up TS Pages Modifying Explosive Gas Mixture Surveillance Requirement 4.11.2.5.1 to Provide for Use of Lab Gas Partitioner to Periodically Analyze Concentration of Oxygen in Svc Waste Gas Decay Tank ML17229A7511998-05-27027 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.2.2.f,revised to Allow for Use of Longer Operating Shifts of Up to Twelve Hours Duration by Plant'S Operating Crews ML17229A7481998-05-27027 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.5.1,removing Requirement for SITs to Be Operable in Mode 4,which Will Minimize Potential for Inadvertent SIT Discharge During RCS Cooldown/ Depressurization Evolutions ML17229A7441998-05-27027 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Providing for More Efficient Use of on- Site Mgt Personnel in Review & Approval Process for Plant Procedures ML17229A6501998-03-0303 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.7 Re RCS Chemistry/Design Features/ Administrative Controls ML17229A5691997-12-31031 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Modifying TS 5.6.1 & Associated Figure 5.6-1 & TS 5.6.3 to Accomodate Increase in Allowed SFP Storage Capacity ML17309A9131997-12-29029 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Specifications for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Provide Reference to St Lucie Unit 2 COLR for Limiting Values ML17229A5491997-12-0101 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Units 1 & 2 EPP Section 4, Environ Conditions & Section 5, Administrative Procedures to Incorporate Proposed Terms & Conditions of Incidental Take Statement Included in Biological Opinion ML17229A4621997-08-22022 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Specification 4.0.5 Surveillance Requirements for ISI & Testing of ASME Code Class 1,2 & 3 Components,To Relocate IST Program Requirements to Administrative Control Section 6.8 ML17229A4341997-08-0101 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Extending semi-annual Surveillance Interval Specified in Table 4.3-2 for Testing ESFAS Subgroup Relays to Interval Consistent W/Ceog Rept CEN-403,Rev 1-A for March 1996 & Associated SE ML17229A3601997-05-29029 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Administrative Changes That Improve Consistency Throughout TSs & Related Bases ML17229A1831996-12-20020 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Safety Limits & Limiting Safety Sys Settings ML17229A1611996-12-0909 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 1.9a Re Core Operating Limits Rept ML17229A1191996-10-31031 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0 Re Administrative Controls ML17229A1111996-10-30030 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.9.9 Re Containment Isolation Sys & 3/4.9.10 Re Water level-reactor Vessel ML17229A1091996-10-28028 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Rev to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria ML17229A1061996-10-28028 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 1.6 Re Channel Functional test,1.7 Re Containment Vessel integrity,1.8 Re Controlled leakage,1.9 Re Core alteration,3/4.6 Re Containment Systems & 3/4.6.1 Re Containment Vessel ML17228B5641996-07-15015 July 1996 Revised Tech Specs Re Core Alteration Definition ML17228B5041996-06-0101 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Thermal Margin & RCS Flow Limits ML17228B3761996-01-0404 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Rectifying Discrepancy for Each St Lucie Unit & Providing Assurance That Admin Controls for Hpsip Remain Effective in Lower Operational Modes ML17228B3361995-11-22022 November 1995 Proposed TS 3/4.4.6.1 for RCS Leakage Detection Instrumentation,Adapting STS for C-E Plants (NUREG-1432) Spec 3.4.15 ML17228B2451995-08-16016 August 1995 Proposed TS 3.6.6.1, Sbvs. ML17228B2421995-08-16016 August 1995 Proposed Ts,Reflecting Relocation of Selected TS Requirements Re Instrumentation & Emergency & Security Plan Review Process,Per GL 93-07 ML17228B1891995-06-21021 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Safety Injection Tank Surveillances ML17228B1811995-06-21021 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Time Allowed to Restore Inoperable LPSI Train to Operable Status ML17228B1791995-06-21021 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extended Allowed Outage Time for EDGs ML17228B1471995-05-17017 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Extending Applicability of Current RCS Pressure/Temp Limits & Maximum Allowed RCS Heatup & Cooldown Rates to 23.6 Effective Full Power Yrs of Operation ML17228B1441995-05-17017 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative & Conforming Update ML17228B0901995-04-0303 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Incorporation of line-item TS Improvements to TSs 3/4.8.1 & 4.8.1.2.2 for Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 ML17228B0591995-02-27027 February 1995 Proposed TS Re Sdcs Min Flow Rate Requirements ML17228B0521995-02-27027 February 1995 Proposed Tech Spec Tables 3.3-3 & 3.3-4 to Accommodate Improved Coincidence Logic & Relay Replacement for 4.16 Kv Loss of Voltage Relays ML17228B0331995-02-22022 February 1995 Proposed TS 4.6.1.3,reflecting Deletion of Refs to Automatic Tester for Containment Personnel Air Lock ML17228A9921995-01-20020 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Operability Requirements for Incore Detectors to (TS 3/4.3.3.2) to Updated FSAR & Revising Lhr Surveillance 4.2.1.4 & Special Test Exceptions Surveillance 4.10.2.2,4.10.4.2 & 4.10.5.2 ML17228A9031994-11-0202 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.2.1 & 3/4.6.2.3,adapting Combined Spec for Containment Spray & Cooling Sys Contained in Std TS for C-E Plants ML17228A8911994-10-27027 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Administrative Changes ML17228A6521994-07-28028 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re LTOP Requirements for Power Operated Relief Valves,Per GL 90-06 ML17228A6591994-07-25025 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Implementing Enhancements Recommended by GL 93-05, Line-Item TS Improvements to Reduce SR for Testing During Power Operation. ML17228A6561994-07-25025 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs for Main Feedwater Line Isolation Valves to Be Consistent w/NUREG-1432,standard TS for C-E Plants ML17228A5771994-05-23023 May 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Removing Option That Allows HPCI Pump 1C to Be Used as Alternative to Preferred Pump for Subsystem Operability 1999-06-01
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML17309A9961999-06-30030 June 1999 Rev 35 to HP-90, Emergency Equipment. ML17309A9941999-06-17017 June 1999 Rev 1 to COP-06.06, Guidelines for Collecting Post Accident Samples. ML17241A3541999-06-0101 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.5.2,allowing Up to 7 Days to Restore Inoperable LPSI Train to Operable Status ML17309A9951999-05-27027 May 1999 Rev 0 to COP-06.11, Establishing Remote Lab for Analyses of Accident Samples. ML17241A3451999-05-24024 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.5.1 Re Safety Injection Tanks ML17229B0711999-03-19019 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Requested by NRC for Use in Issuance of Proposed License Amend Re SFP Storage Capacity, Per Soluble Boron Credit ML17229B0441999-03-0202 March 1999 Cycle 11 Reactor Startup Physics Testing Rept. with 990304 Ltr ML17229B0201999-02-23023 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.1.2.9 Re Reactivity Control sys- Boron Dilution ML17229B0361998-12-22022 December 1998 Rev 20 to Procedure C-200, Odcm. ML17229A9551998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising Administrative Controls & Incorporating Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi- Discipline Supervisor Position ML17229A9161998-11-25025 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Replacing Insert-A,attachment to 971231 Submittal & Revises LCO 3.4.9.11 & Associated Bases ML17229A9251998-11-22022 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Thermal Margin SL Lines of TS Figure 2.1-1 to Reflect Increase in Value of Design Min RCS Flow from 345,000 Gpm to 365,000 Gpm & Change Flow Rates Stated in Tables 2.2-1 & 3.2-1 ML17229A9131998-11-19019 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Administrative Contols TS 6.3, Unit Staff Qualifications & Incorporating Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi-Discipline Supervisor (MDS) Position ML20155C3061998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising Terminology Used in Notation of TS Tables 2.2-1 & 3.3-1 Re Implementation & Automatic Removal of Certain Reactor Protection Sys Trip Bypasses ML20153G0781998-08-26026 August 1998 Rev 19 to Plstqp, Guard Training & Qualification Plan ML17229A8441998-08-24024 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Removing Obsolete License Conditions & Incorporating Revs Which Clarify Component Operations That Must Be Verified in Response to Containment Sump Recirculation Actuation Signal ML17229A7731998-06-15015 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 6-20,6-20a & 6-20c,correcting Info Supplied by Fuel Vendor Relative to Titles of Approved TRs That Are Referenced in Proposed TS 6.9.1.11.b ML17229A7601998-06-0303 June 1998 Proposed Marked Up TS Pages Modifying Explosive Gas Mixture Surveillance Requirement 4.11.2.5.1 to Provide for Use of Lab Gas Partitioner to Periodically Analyze Concentration of Oxygen in Svc Waste Gas Decay Tank ML17229A7441998-05-27027 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Providing for More Efficient Use of on- Site Mgt Personnel in Review & Approval Process for Plant Procedures ML17229A7481998-05-27027 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.5.1,removing Requirement for SITs to Be Operable in Mode 4,which Will Minimize Potential for Inadvertent SIT Discharge During RCS Cooldown/ Depressurization Evolutions ML17229A7511998-05-27027 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.2.2.f,revised to Allow for Use of Longer Operating Shifts of Up to Twelve Hours Duration by Plant'S Operating Crews ML17229A6751998-03-27027 March 1998 Cycle 15 Reactor Startup Physics & Replacement SG Testing Rept. W/980402 Ltr ML17229A6501998-03-0303 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.7 Re RCS Chemistry/Design Features/ Administrative Controls ML17229A6381998-02-12012 February 1998 Rev 19 to C-200, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. ML17229A6151998-01-12012 January 1998 Rev 0 to ISI-PSL-1, St Lucie Nuclear Plant Unit 1 ISI Plan. ML17229A6141998-01-12012 January 1998 Rev 0 to ISI-PSL-1, Third Interval ISI Program for St Lucie Nuclear Power Plant,Unit 1. ML17229A5691997-12-31031 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Modifying TS 5.6.1 & Associated Figure 5.6-1 & TS 5.6.3 to Accomodate Increase in Allowed SFP Storage Capacity ML17309A9131997-12-29029 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Specifications for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Provide Reference to St Lucie Unit 2 COLR for Limiting Values ML17229A5851997-12-12012 December 1997 Rev 0 to ADM-29.01, IST Program for Pumps & Valves. ML17229A5491997-12-0101 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Units 1 & 2 EPP Section 4, Environ Conditions & Section 5, Administrative Procedures to Incorporate Proposed Terms & Conditions of Incidental Take Statement Included in Biological Opinion ML17309A9171997-11-26026 November 1997 Rev 0 to PSL-ENG-SENS-97-068, Spent Fuel Pool Dilution Analysis. ML17229A5931997-09-26026 September 1997 Rev 4 to Procedure QI-5-PSL-1, Preparation,Rev,Review/ Approval of Procedures. ML17229A5921997-09-18018 September 1997 Rev 0 to Procedure ADM-17.11, 10CFR500.59 Screening. ML20211Q5841997-09-10010 September 1997 Rev 18 to Training & Qualification Plan ML17229A4621997-08-22022 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Specification 4.0.5 Surveillance Requirements for ISI & Testing of ASME Code Class 1,2 & 3 Components,To Relocate IST Program Requirements to Administrative Control Section 6.8 ML17229A4341997-08-0101 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Extending semi-annual Surveillance Interval Specified in Table 4.3-2 for Testing ESFAS Subgroup Relays to Interval Consistent W/Ceog Rept CEN-403,Rev 1-A for March 1996 & Associated SE ML17309A8951997-06-11011 June 1997 Rev 0 to PL-CNSI-97-004, Transportation & Emergency Response Plan for St Lucie Unit 1 SG Project. ML17229A3601997-05-29029 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Administrative Changes That Improve Consistency Throughout TSs & Related Bases ML17229A2981997-03-0606 March 1997 Final Analysis of Radiological Consequences of Main Steam Line Break Outside Containment for St Lucie Unit 1 NPP Using NUREG-0800 Std Review Plan 15.1.5 App A. ML17229A1831996-12-20020 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Safety Limits & Limiting Safety Sys Settings ML17229A1611996-12-0909 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 1.9a Re Core Operating Limits Rept ML17229A1191996-10-31031 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0 Re Administrative Controls ML17229A1111996-10-30030 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.9.9 Re Containment Isolation Sys & 3/4.9.10 Re Water level-reactor Vessel ML17229A1061996-10-28028 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 1.6 Re Channel Functional test,1.7 Re Containment Vessel integrity,1.8 Re Controlled leakage,1.9 Re Core alteration,3/4.6 Re Containment Systems & 3/4.6.1 Re Containment Vessel ML17229A1091996-10-28028 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Rev to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria ML17229A0951996-10-24024 October 1996 Rev 0 to 00000-OSW-16, In-Situ Pressure Test Results for St Lucie Unit 1 Spring 1996 Outage. ML17229A0861996-10-18018 October 1996 Startup Physics Testing Rept. W/961018 Ltr ML17229A2441996-09-23023 September 1996 Rev 18 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (Odcm). ML17228B5641996-07-15015 July 1996 Revised Tech Specs Re Core Alteration Definition ML17229A0961996-06-12012 June 1996 Rev 0 to TR-9419-CSE96-1101, Test Rept - SG Tube In-Situ Hydrostatic Pressure Test Tool Hydro Chamber Pressure Determination. 1999-06-30
[Table view] |
Text
- 3EFUK3EG 'OHRAXXQAS
'/4.9. 14 DECAY . TQK STOPAGE POOL LIMITING .CONDITION %OR OPEBAZXCB 3.9.14 The ixradiated, fuel assemblies in the fuel storage pool shall have decayed for at least 1180 hours0.0137 days <br />0.328 hours <br />0.00195 weeks <br />4.4899e-4 months <br />, unless more than one-third. core is placed into the pool, in which case the irradiated fuel assemblies shall have decayed for 1490 hours0.0172 days <br />0.414 hours <br />0.00246 weeks <br />5.66945e-4 months <br />.
APPLZCABILXTY: Prior to movement of the spent fuel 'cask into the fuel, cask compartaumt.
ACZZ(RI:
With irradiated. fuel assemblies having a decay time of less than 1180 hours0.0137 days <br />0.328 hours <br />0.00195 weeks <br />4.4899e-4 months <br />, or 1490 hours0.0172 days <br />0.414 hours <br />0.00246 weeks <br />5.66945e-4 months <br /> in the case of more than one-third core discharge, suspend all activities involving movenent of the spent fu'el cask into the fuel cask canpartment. The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.
.:SURVEIIZ'JSCE .RE UXREHENTS 4.9.14 The irradiated, fuel assariblies in the fuel storage pool have been determined to have decayed for at least 1180 hours0.0137 days <br />0.328 hours <br />0.00195 weeks <br />4.4899e-4 months <br />, 'hall or 1490 hours0.0172 days <br />0.414 hours <br />0.00246 weeks <br />5.66945e-4 months <br /> in the case of mare .than one-third. core discharge, by verification of the date and time from the aast recent sub-criticality prior to mveaent of the spent fuel cask into the fuel cask compar tment.
ST. LUCXE - UiiXT 1 3/4 9-16 10-16-80 8 $ 10210/1 4
REFUELING OPEPATIONS BASES k
3/4.9 12 FUEL POOL VENTILATION SYSTEVi-FUEL STORAGE The limitations'n the fuel handling building ventilation system ensures that a'll radioactive material released from an irradiated fuel assembly will be filt red through the HEPA filters and'charcoal prior to discharge to the atmosphere. Th OPERABILITY of this system adsorber and th resulting iodine removal capacity are consistent with the assumptions of the accident analyses.
3/4.9 13 SPENT FUEL CASK CRANE The maximum load which may be handled by the spent fuel cask cran is limited to a loaded single element cask which is equivalent to approximately 25 tons. 'his restriction is provided to ensure the structural .integrity of the spent fuel pool in the event of a dropped cask accident. Structural damage caused by dropping a load in excess of a loaded single element cask could cause leakage from the spent fuel pool in excess of the maximum makeup capability.
3/4.9.14 DECAY TINE - STORAGE POOL The minimum i.equir'ements for decay. of the irradiated fu*el assemblies 'i' the entire spent fuel storage pool prior to movement of the spent fuel cask into the fuel cask compartment insure that sufficient time has elapsed to allow radioactive decay of the fission products. The decay time of 1180 hours0.0137 days <br />0.328 hours <br />0.00195 weeks <br />4.4899e-4 months <br /> is based upon one-third of a cor'e: placed in the spent fuel pool each year during refueling for ten years to fil,l the .
p'ooT. The"dec'ay'timef'1490 hours0.0172 days <br />0.414 hours <br />0.00246 weeks <br />5.66945e-4 months <br /> is based upon one-third of a core being placed inthe spent fuel pool each year during refueling for seven years following which. an entire core is placed in the-pool to fill'it.
The cask drop analysis assumes that all of the irradiated fuel in the filled pool (3-1/3 cores) is ruptured and follows Regulatory is Guide 1.25
'applied.to methodology, except that a Radial Peak'ing Factor of 1.0 all.irradiated assemblies.
ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 B 3/4 9-3 10-16-80
SAFETY EVALUATION FOR STORAGE POOL DECAY TllIE
- 1. INTRODUCTION The Final Safety Analysis Report, (FSAR) fox St. Lucie Unit No. 1, at. page 9.1-33m, states that, the radius 'of fall of spent fuel shipping *cask into the spent fuel pool is 133 inches. This value was used in the Safety Evaluation which was submitted with FPL's request, dated August 31, 1977/ to increase the storage capacity of the spent fuel pool from 310 to 728 fuel assemblies; As used in that evaluation, 'this xadius of fall fox a potential cask drop would have resulted in a total of 168 fuel assemblies being impacted. The radiological'valuation performed followed that. described,.in the FSAR, using Regulatory Guide 1.25 methodolog'y and assuming to be'he equivalent of the
.each of the impacted assemblies highest burnup assembly. It was Qetermined that the release thus calculated would remain within 10% of 10 CFR Part 100 if limits the fuel decay time for the 168 assemblies were 1553 hours0.018 days <br />0.431 hours <br />0.00257 weeks <br />5.909165e-4 months <br /> or greater. Amendment No. 22 to Operating License the increased storage capacity was therefoxe issued ... DPR-67'pproving on March 29, 1978, with a, decay time of 1553 hours0.018 days <br />0.431 hours <br />0.00257 weeks <br />5.909165e-4 months <br /> required for those assemblies stored in the modules nearest the fuel
~ 'ask compartment.
It I has'ince been determined analysis for the drop of the that. an error existed in the FSAR spent fuel:cask i.nto the spent
. fuel pool. The 'analysis was'a originally performed assuming a single pendulum which 'gave drop radius of 133 inches. The FSAR methodology, however', specifies a double pendulum, which, gave a Qrop r'fidius of 248 inches. This meant that a dropped cask could impact more fuel elements.
- 2. 'ISCUSSION The proposed amendment to the Technical Specifications would.
require that, prior to movement, of the spent fuel cask into the fuel cask compartment, all irradiated fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pool have a decay time of at least 1180 hours0.0137 days <br />0.328 hours <br />0.00195 weeks <br />4.4899e-4 months <br />, unless more than one-third of a-full core is discharged to the pool at once, in which case the decay time is to be 1490 hours0.0172 days <br />0.414 hours <br />0.00246 weeks <br />5.66945e-4 months <br />.
These decay times are baseQ upon an analysis which conserva-tively assumes that all of the fuel in a full pool (3-l/3 cores) is ruptured as a result of a potential cask drop. The
'analysis is identical to that used, in the FSAR and the safety evaluation accompanying FPL's request to increase spent fuel storage capacity, except that the appropriate value for assembly burnup has been used.. The earlier analysis used a Radial Peaking Factor (RPF) of 1.65 as specified in Regulatory Guide 1.25 to represent the highest burnup fuel assembly to which all, the impacted fuel assemblies would be equated.
While this value may be appropriate for the analysis of a postulated accident involving a single assembly, it conservative when applied to an analysis involving 1/3 of a is grossly whose fuel assemblies have various exposure histories. 'ore An. RPF of 1.0 has been selected as being more representative for=the off-load of orie or more regions from the core anQ has been applied to each assembly. in the present analysis. The resultant decay times are those which. are necessary to assure that offsite exposures will be within 10% of 10 CFR Part 100 limits. Two cases have been evaluated:
'Ca'se X One-third of a'ore is placeQ in the spent fuel pool each year Quring refueling for ten years.
Case XX- One-third of a core is placed in the spent fuel pool each year during refueling for seven years; Following the ei.ghth year of operation, the entire core is removed from the'reactor and placed into the pool at once.
A summary of the results of the evaluation is shown in the
.table below.
DECAY TIME (HRS.) AND DOSE (HEM)
- Case I (10-yeap) Case XI (8-year)
(HRS.) (REM) (HRS.) ( REM)
Thyroid: 1180 29. 6'6 1'490 29. 27 Whole Body: 1180 0.076 1490 0.078
- Regulatory Guide 1.25 methodology used, except that the Radial Peaking Factor for each. assembly is equal to 1.0.
- 3. CONCLUSXONS Since, as described above, the resultant exposures remain within the limits stated in the FSAR, it is concluded that the. requested amendment does not involve an unreviewed safety question.
Further, the amendment requested does not involve signifi-cant new safety information of a type not considered by a previous Commission safety review of .the facility. Xt does not, involve a significant, increase in the probability or consequences of an accident, does not involve a
significant decrease in a safety margin, and, therefore does not involve a significant hazards consideration.
It is therefore concluded that there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by this action.