ML16109A092
ML16109A092 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Byron |
Issue date: | 03/23/2016 |
From: | Bielby M Operations Branch III |
To: | Exelon Nuclear |
References | |
Download: ML16109A092 (35) | |
Text
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Evaluate a Reactivity Change JPM Number: SA-a Revision Number: 02 Date: 12/10/2015 Revised By: B. Peterson 12/10/2015 Instructor Date Validated By: C. Berger 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: B. Lewin 12/11/2015 Operations Representative Date
JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST NOTE: All steps of this checklist should be performed upon initial validation.
Prior to JPM usage, revalidate JPM using steps 8 and 12 below.
__RFP__ 1. Task description and number, JPM description and number are identified.
__RFP__ 2. Knowledge and Abilities (K/A) references are included.
__RFP__ 3. Performance location specified. (in-plant, control room, simulator, or other)
__RFP__ 4. Initial setup conditions are identified.
__RFP__ 5. Initiating cue (and terminating cue if required) are properly identified.
__RFP__ 6. Task standards identified and verified by SME review.
__RFP__ 7. Critical steps meet the criteria for critical steps and are identified with an asterisk (*).
__RFP__ 8. Verify the procedure(s) referenced by this JPM reflects the current revision:
Procedure OP-AP-300-1004 Rev: 4 Procedure Rev:
Procedure Rev:
__RFP__ 9. Verify cues both verbal and visual are free of conflict.
__RFP__ 10. Verify performance time is accurate
__RFP__ 11. If the JPM cannot be performed as written with proper responses, then revise the JPM.
__RFP__ 12. When JPM is initially validated, sign and date JPM cover page. Subsequent validations, sign and date below:
B. Lewin/R. Peterson 12/11/2015 SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date
Revision Record (Summary)
Revision 00 Initial revision of JPM Comment Resolution Revision 01 Revised JPM for modification of calculation Revision 02 Revised JPM for modification of calculation and time in core life.
INITIAL CONDITIONS:
- 2. Tave is 0.5° less than Tref.
- 3. The QNE has recommended that Control Bank D be withdrawn 4 steps to control PDMA02 on the desired target, then to perform a reactivity change to match Tave to Tref.
- 4. The NSO has calculated a reactivity change to move rods then to match Tave with Tref.
INITIATING CUES:
- 1. Evaluate the reactivity change to restore PDMA02 to target and to match Tave to Tref.
- 2. Review the Reactivity Change Determination Form for approval.
- Provide completed copy of OP-AP-300-1004, attachment 1, Rev 4, Pwr Boration and Dilution Requirements
- Provide copy of Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules Information For Evaluators Use:
UNSAT requires written comments on respective step.
- Denotes critical steps 2 & 3 Number any comments in the Comment Number column on the following pages. Then annotate that comment in the Comments section. The comment section should be used to document: the reason that a step is marked as unsatisfactory, marginal performance relating to management expectations, or problems the examinee had while performing the JPM. Comments relating to procedural or equipment issues should be entered and tracked using the sites appropriate tracking system.
Some operations that are performed from outside of the control room may require multiple steps.
These items may be listed as individual steps in this JPM. It is acceptable for the candidate to direct the local operator to perform groups of procedure steps instead of calling for each individual item to be performed.
The timeclock starts when the candidate acknowledges the initiating cue.
TASK STANDARDS:
- 1. Evaluate the reactivity change to match Tave to Tref.
- 2. Review the Reactivity Change Determination Form.
MATERIALS:
- Completed OP-AP-300-1004, Rev 2, Pwr Boration and Dilution Requirements (Attachment 1 is attached)
- Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules at 8500-11000 EFPH
RECORD START TIME:
EVALUATOR NOTE: These steps may be performed in any order.
STEP ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT CMT#
CUE Provide completed copy of OP-AP-300-1004 and a copy of the Unit 2 Rema thumbrules 1 Refer to In accordance with the provided: ___ ___ ___
- OP-AP-300-1004, Rev 2, Pwr
- OP-AP-300-1004, Rev 2, Pwr Boration and Dilution Boration and Dilution Requirements Requirements
- Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules
- Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules
- 2 Part 1
- Station: Byron Unit: 2 ___ ___ ___
Review Attachment 1 of OP-AP-
- Desired change 300-1004
- Withdraw Rods 2 steps Determine wrong number of for PDMA02 control withdrawn rod steps calculated on
- Reason for change form
- PDMA02 control
- Temperature control Evaluate inaccurate calculation
- What is the method & amt for
- Should be 4 steps of the reactivity change?
Control Bank D at 50%
power: Tave-Tref = 2°
- 2 steps withdrawal of rise in temperature CB D NOTE: When examinee
- Inputs identifies the deficiency,
- Rema thumbrules inform them to review the rest of the calculations
- 3 Part 2
- From inaccurate rod ___ ___ ___
Review Attachment 1 of OP-AP- withdrawal, and 100%
300-1004 thumbrules, calculation is incorrect which yields an Determine incorrect reactivity incorrect reactivity calculation addition calculated on form due to using 100% REMA
- Calculation has incorrect thumbrules. dilution value of 93 gallons. It should be a Boration of 37.5 (Calculation is not required for gallons.
success)
- +2° - 0.5° (current
- +0.3° - 0.5° (current mismatch) = +1.5° mismatch) = -0.2°
- 25 gallons BA/1° x 1.5° =
- 465 gallons PW/1° x 0.2° = 37.5 gallons boration 93 gallons dilution
- Inputs
- Rema thumbrules CUE This JPM is complete.
RECORD STOP TIME:
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Evaluate a Reactivity Change JPM Number: SA-a Revision Number: 02 Task Number and
Title:
S-AM-151, Perform proper reactivity management on unit startup and during normal plant operations K/A Number and Importance: GEN 2.1.37 Imp Factor 4.6 Suggested Testing Environment: Classroom Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
- OP-AP-300-1004, Rev 4, Pwr Boration and Dilution Requirements
- Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 15 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE INITIAL CONDITIONS:
- 2. Tave is 0.5° less than Tref.
- 3. The QNE has recommended that Control Bank D be withdrawn 4 steps to control PDMA02 on the desired target, then to perform a reactivity change to match Tave to Tref.
- 4. The NSO has calculated a reactivity change to move rods then to match Tave with Tref.
INITIATING CUES:
- 1. Evaluate the reactivity change to restore PDMA02 to target and to match Tave to Tref.
- 2. Review the Reactivity Change Determination Form for approval.
OP-AP-300-1004 Revision 4 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT 1 REACTIVITY CHANGE DETERMINATION FORM Station: Byron Unit: 1 2 Time: Now Date: Today Desired change:
(Parameter, Magnitude, and Direction: Reactor Power, Rod Position, RCS Temp, Delta I, etc.)
Withdraw Rods 2 steps for PDMA02 control Dilute to raise Tave (0.2°F) to match Tref Reason for Change:
(Temperature control, flux control, fuel burn up)
PDMA02 control and temperature control What is the method and amount required for the reactivity change?
(Bleed Tank Volume, Gallons of Dilution/Boration/Blended Flow, Rod Insertion/Rod Withdrawal steps/percent) 2 steps withdrawal of CB D and 93 gallons Dilution Inputs:
(ReMA Thumbrules, ReMA maneuver guidance, Curve Book Figure/Table, Computer based trend plot, RCS Cb, EFPD - Preparer and Reviewer should use independent inputs when possible)
Rema thumbrules for Unit 2 at 9100 EFPH Calculation of change:
(E.G. Bwd/Byr: ReMA Thumbrule identifies 20 gallons BA = 1.0°F RCS temp reduction.
Desired change = 0.5°F drop. Calculation of change: (20 gal/1.0°F)
- 0.5°F = 10 gal.,
previously used borations and dilutions)
(TMI: Procedure 1102-4 Power Operations Fig. 1, Volume of Deminerlized Water for 1% Rod Insertion)
Withdrawal of control rods 2 steps raises temp 0.3°F.
Then dilute to raise temperature by 0.2°F: 465 gals/°F x (0.2°F) = 93 gals dilution.
Joe Rowe P Chech ______________
Preparer Reviewer Approver (RO) (RO/SRO) (SRO)
Shift Manager Notified: Yes No
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Minimum Shift Staffing JPM Number: SA-b Revision Number: 2 Date: 7/20/2010 Revised By: R. F. Peterson 7/20/2010 Instructor Date Validated By: S. Harvey 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: B. Lewin 12/11/2015 Operations Representative Date
JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST NOTE: All steps of this checklist should be performed upon initial validation.
Prior to JPM usage, revalidate JPM using steps 8 and 12 below.
__RFP__ 1. Task description and number, JPM description and number are identified.
__RFP__ 2. Knowledge and Abilities (K/A) references are included.
__RFP__ 3. Performance location specified. (in-plant, control room, simulator, or other)
__RFP__ 4. Initial setup conditions are identified.
__RFP__ 5. Initiating cue (and terminating cue if required) are properly identified.
__RFP__ 6. Task standards identified and verified by SME review.
__RFP__ 7. Critical steps meet the criteria for critical steps and are identified with an asterisk (*).
__RFP__ 8. Verify the procedure(s) referenced by this JPM reflects the current revision:
Procedure BAP 320-1 Rev: 22 Procedure BAP 320-1T1 Rev: 6 Procedure Rev:
__RFP__ 9. Verify cues both verbal and visual are free of conflict.
__RFP__ 10. Verify performance time is accurate
__RFP__ 11. If the JPM cannot be performed as written with proper responses, then revise the JPM.
__RFP__ 12. When JPM is initially validated, sign and date JPM cover page. Subsequent validations, sign and date below:
Brian Lewin/Robert Peterson 10/6/2013 SME / Instructor Date Brian Lewin/Robert Peterson 12/11/2015 SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date
Revision Record (Summary)
Revision 1 Put in current JPM Format Clarified the intent of the question and limited to asking for recommendations for desired staffing levels.
Revision 2 Added requirement to validate TS manning and Administrative manning to JPM.
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Shift Manager.
- 2. Unit 1 is in Mode 5 and Unit 2 is in Mode 1 at 100% power.
- 3. The following qualified people are inside the Protected Area as members of the oncoming shift operating crew: (Assume that AII LISTED personnel have the same shift rotation)
Name Qual Position Name Qual Position Name Qual Position Joe SRO/SM Sam NSO Mary FB EO Bill FC SRO Dave NSO Ted EC EO Tom FC SRO Ron FB EO Bob RP Andy SRO Alan FB EO Terry Chem Arnie SRO/STA Sally FB EO Karla EC Chem Tim EO FC: Fire Chief qualified FB: Fire Brigade qualified EC: Emerg Comm qualified INITIATING CUES:
DETERMINE if the crew meets the Desired staffing levels per BAP 320-1, and if not, do staffing levels meet Tech Spec Minimum staffing levels.
If staffing levels are not met DETERMINE:
- number of people in any given position needed to fill to the Tech Spec Minimum.
- number of people in any given position needed to fill to the Desired staffing levels.
- actions required to meet oncoming Shift Manning requirements.
All Work Hour Rules have been determined to be in compliance.
Fill in the JPM Start Time when the student acknowledges the Initiating Cue.
Information For Evaluators Use:
UNSAT requires written comments on respective step.
- Denotes critical steps.
Number any comments in the Comment Number column on the following pages. Then annotate that comment in the Comments section. The comment section should be used to document: the reason that a step is marked as unsatisfactory, marginal performance relating to management expectations, or problems the examinee had while performing the JPM.
Comments relating to procedural or equipment issues should be entered and tracked using the sites appropriate tracking system.
Some operations that are performed from outside of the control room may require multiple steps. These items may be listed as individual steps in this JPM. It is acceptable for the candidate to direct the local operator to perform groups of procedure steps instead of calling for each individual item to be performed.
The timeclock starts when the candidate acknowledges the initiating cue.
RECORD START TIME:
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 1. Refer to BAP 320-1, Shift Determines that BAP 320-1 is Staffing needed to make determination.
Cue: Provide a copy of BAP 320-1 and BAP 320-1T1 after correct procedure has been determined.
The staffing determination can be determined in any order.
- 2. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for Shift Manager. Desired Staffing and TS Staffing for Shift Manager IS satisfied.
- 3. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for Unit Supervisor. Desired Staffing and TS Staffing for Unit Supervisor IS satisfied.
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 4. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for WEC. Desired Staffing for WEC IS satisfied.
Note:
The candidate should determine that the WEC SRO is not required for TS minimum manning and should be used to meet minimum NSO TS Manning.
- 5. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for FS/Fire Brigade Desired Staffing for FS Chief.
IS satisfied.
- 6. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for NSO. Desired Staffing for NSOs IS NOT satisfied. ___ ___ ___
2 more are desired.
Determine that minimum TS Staffing for NSOs IS satisfied (an SRO is used to fill TS staffing levels)
- 7. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for STA. Desired Staffing for STA IS satisfied.
- 8. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for EO (SSD/FB). Desired Staffing for EOs IS NOT satisfied. ___ ___ ___
2 more SSD EOs are desired.
Determine that minimum TS Staffing for EOs IS satisfied (3 SSD EOs needed, with 0 FB needed)
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 9. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for RP. Desired Staffing for RP IS NOT satisfied. ___ ___ ___
1 more is desired.
Determine that minimum TS Staffing for RP IS satisfied (1 RP required)
- 10. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for Chemistry. Desired Staffing for Chemistry IS satisfied.
- 11. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for Emergency Desired Staffing for Emergency Communicator. Communicator IS satisfied - the extra Chemistry person (or any qualified station staff person)
- 12. Determine need to fill positions Determine that the oncoming with offgoing shift. crew will not be able to fill all of the positions of BAP 320-1T1 with qualified individuals Cue: Ask candidate on what actions are needed to meet -AND-immediate manning requirements Determine that personnel from for the oncoming shift? the current shift will be held over to fill all required positions until callout relief is in the Protected Area CUE: The JPM is complete.
RECORD STOP TIME:
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Minimum Shift Staffing JPM Number: SA-b Revision Number: 1 Task Number and
Title:
S-AM-029 Ensure Minimum Shift Staffing and Authorize Additional Shift Staffing as Necessary K/A Number and Importance: 2.1.5 3.9 Suggested Testing Environment: Classroom Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
- BAP 320-1, Rev 19, Shift Staffing
- BAP 320-1T1 CRITICAL STEPS (*) 6, 8 & 9 Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 20 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Shift Manager.
- 2. Unit 1 is in Mode 5 and Unit 2 is in Mode 1 at 100% power.
- 3. The following qualified people are inside the Protected Area as members of the oncoming shift operating crew: (Assume that AII LISTED personnel have the same shift rotation)
Name Qual Position Name Qual Position Name Qual Position Joe SRO/SM Sam NSO Mary FB EO Bill FC SRO Dave NSO Ted EC EO Tom FC SRO Ron FB EO Bob RP Andy SRO Alan FB EO Terry Chem Arnie SRO/STA Sally FB EO Karla EC Chem Tim EO FC: Fire Chief qualified FB: Fire Brigade qualified EC: Emerg Comm qualified INITIATING CUES:
DETERMINE if the crew meets the Desired staffing levels per BAP 320-1, and if not, do staffing levels meet Tech Spec Minimum staffing levels.
If staffing levels are not met DETERMINE:
- number of people in any given position needed to fill to the Tech Spec Minimum.
- number of people in any given position needed to fill to the Desired staffing levels.
- actions required to meet oncoming Shift Manning requirements.
All Work Hour Rules have been determined to be in compliance.
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Initiate a LCOAR JPM Number: SA-c Revision Number: 0 Date: 11/30/2015 Revised By: Robert Peterson 11/30/2015 Instructor Date Validated By: Shane Harvey 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: Brian Lewin 12/11//2015 Facility Representative Date
JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST NOTE: All steps of this checklist should be performed upon initial validation.
Prior to JPM usage, revalidate JPM using steps 8 and 12 below.
- 1. Task description and number, JPM description and number are identified.
See File Copy
- 2. Knowledge and Abilities (K/A) references are included.
- 3. Performance location specified. (in-plant, control room, simulator, or other)
- 4. Initial setup conditions are identified.
- 5. Initiating cue (and terminating cue if required) are properly identified.
- 6. Task standards identified and verified by SME review.
- 7. Critical steps meet the criteria for critical steps and are identified with an asterisk (*).
- 8. Verify the procedure(s) referenced by this JPM reflects the current revision:
Procedure BAP 1400-6 Rev: 33 Procedure 1BOL 7.2 Rev: 6 Procedure BAR 1-1-E5 Rev: 5 Procedure 1BOSR MS-W1 Rev: 11 Procedure BOP MS-5 Rev: 19
- 9. Verify cues both verbal and visual are free of conflict.
- 10. Verify performance time is accurate
- 12. When JPM is initially validated, sign and date JPM cover page. Subsequent validations, sign and date below:
SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date
Revision Record (Summary)
Revision 0 Comment Resolution Modified SA3 Rev. 0 Changed component that is in LCOAR
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Unit 1 Unit Supervisor.
- 2. Unit 1 is in MODE 1
- 3. MSIV 1D Hyd/Pneu Press Hi/Lo Alarm (1-1-E5) is LIT.
- 5. IR 1234567 has been written to document the issue.
- 6. No other LCOARs or DELs exist on Unit 1.
INITIATING CUE Evaluate condition and Initiate the LCOAR paperwork as necessary.
Fill in the JPM Start Time when the student acknowledges the Initiating Cue.
Information For Evaluators Use:
UNSAT requires written comments on respective step.
- Denotes critical steps 1a, 3, 4, 10 Number any comments in the Comment Number column on the following pages. Then annotate that comment in the Comments section. The comment section should be used to document: the reason that a step is marked as unsatisfactory, marginal performance relating to management expectations, or problems the examinee had while performing the JPM.
Comments relating to procedural or equipment issues should be entered and tracked using the sites appropriate tracking system.
Some operations that are performed from outside of the control room may require multiple steps. These items may be listed as individual steps in this JPM. It is acceptable for the candidate to direct the local operator to perform groups of procedure steps instead of calling for each individual item to be performed.
The timeclock starts when the candidate acknowledges the initiating cue.
RECORD START TIME:
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number NOTE Once the student demonstrates the ability to locate referenced procedure provide the student with a copy of the procedure.
- 1. Refer to BAP 1400-6, Technical ° LOCATE and OPEN BAP Specification Limiting Conditions 1400-6 for Operation Action Requirements (LCOAR)
- 1.a Evaluate required LCOAR entry
- Identify that 1BOL 7.2 LCOAR entry is required.
° T.S 3.7.2 and/or Bases
° Utilize references as
° 1BOL 7.2 required
° BAR 1-1-E5
° 1BOSR MS-W1
° BOP MS-5
- 2. Refer to 1BOL 7.2, LCOAR Main ° LOCATE and OPEN 1BOL Steam Isolation Valves (MSIVs) - 7.2 Tech Spec LCO # 3.7.2
- 3. Section A of 1BOL 7.2 ENTER into Section A:
Note: Notification occurred 5
- Time/Date: Today/5 minutes ago per initiating minutes ago Cue.
- By: Candidates name
Title:
Unit Supervisor
- Present mode: 1
- Initiating event: Initiating event: 1MS001D Standby Pneumatic Pressure <4800 psig.
- Condition: A
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 4. Safety function determination PERFORM SFD Cue: All other MSIVs pass
- Indicate No in Section C operability.
- Sign Coversheet
- Indicate NO on coversheet for invalidating current SFD 4.a LCO 3.0.6 Evaluation Placekeep OR Leave Blank Note: Acceptable if left Blank or may be placekept.
- 5. Update DEL o Check N/A box
- 6. Determine Planned or Unplanned o Mark UNPLANNED on coversheet NOTE Examinee may inform SM of entry at this time, however, the SM Notified and time/date is typically completed after Peer Check received by another SRO.
- 7. Related WR/WO block
- List IR # 1234567 Note: IR # will be recorded here
- 8. Fill in Related Clearance Orders o N/A OR Leave Blank Note: Acceptable if left Blank
- 9. Was an IR written? o Check Yes box
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 10. LCOAR TABLE of 1BOL 7.2 COMPLETE LCOAR Table:
° CIRCLE Condition A
- ENTER notification Time/Date AND sign Cue: This JPM is completed. Condition A RECORD STOP TIME:
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Initiate a LCOAR. (SRO)
JPM Number: SA-c (Mod from SA3) Revision Number: 0 Task Number and
Title:
8E.TS-007 ENSURE compliance with all applicable Tech Spec Action Statements.
K/A Number and Importance: 2.2.23 4.6 Suggested Testing Environment: Simulator Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
- BAP 1400-6, Technical Specification Limiting Conditions for Operation Action Requirements (LCOAR) (Rev 33)
- 1BOL 7.2, LCOAR Main Steam Isolation Valves (MSIVs) Tech Spec LCO # 3.7.2 (Rev 6)
- 1BOSR MS-W1, Unit One MSIV Checks Weekly Surveillance (Rev 11)
- BOP MS-5, MSIV Accumulator Operability Check (Rev 19)
CRITICAL STEPS (*) 1a, 3, 4, 10 Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 15 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Unit 1 Unit Supervisor.
- 2. Unit 1 is in MODE 1.
- 3. MSIV 1D Hyd/Pneu Press Hi/Lo Alarm (1-1-E5) is LIT.
- 5. IR 1234567 has been written to document the issue.
- 6. No other LCOARs or DELs exist on Unit 1.
INITIATING CUE Evaluate condition and Initiate the LCOAR paperwork as necessary.
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Review Liquid Release Package JPM Number: SA d Revision Number: 02 Date: 10/18/2013 Developed By: Robert Peterson 10/18/2013 Instructor Date Validated By: S. Harvey 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: B. Lewin 12/11/2015 Operations Representative Date
INITIAL CONDITIONS You are the Unit Supervisor.
A Liquid Radwaste Release Form BCP 400-TWX01 is currently being processed.
You have the Liquid Release Package and it is completed up to step 7.5 for your approval.
INITIATING CUES You are to review BCP 400-TWX01 and ensure it has been completed properly to authorize the liquid release.
TASK STANDARDS:
- 1. Determine that section 6.8.5 Rad Monitor Setpoints were incorrectly chosen.
- 2. Determine that the signature is missing for the Radiation Protection Supervisor in section 5.9 .
- 3. Determine that section 6.16.1 is incorrectly indicating the wrong release path (0WX001 is recorded instead of 0WX630).
- 4. Determine that step 6.16.10 is missing a verification initial.
RECORD START TIME:
EVALUATOR NOTE: These steps may be performed in any order.
STEP ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSA CMT#
T 1 Refer to BCP 400-TWX01, Determine procedure is ___ ___ ___
Liquid Radwaste Release completed up to step 8.5 Form. where the Field Supervisor is to review Release Package to ensure it is completed properly.
- 2. Determine that the Rad STEP 5.9 The Rad Protection ___ ___ ___
Protection Supervisor did not Supervisor signature is sign step 5.9. missing.
- 3 Determine that the Rad Monitor STEP 6.8.5 Alert and High ___ ___ ___
Setpoints are incorrect. Alarm Setpoints are reversed.
- 4 Determine that the NSO STEP 6.16.1 NSO recorded ___ ___ ___
recorded the wrong release the incorrect flow path. Should flow path in step 6.16.1. be 0WX001 NOT 0WX630.
- 5 Determine the verification blank STEP 6.16.10 The Verification ___ ___ ___
for step 6.16.10 is not initialed. Blank is not initialed for the Rad Monitor setpoints.
CUE This JPM is complete.
RECORD STOP TIME:
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Review Liquid Release Package JPM Number: SA d Revision Number: 01 Task Number and
Title:
S-HP-001 Authorize Liquid Rad Waste Release K/A Number and Importance: GEN 2.3.6, Imp Factor 2.0/3.8 Suggested Testing Environment: Classroom Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
- BCP 400-TWX01 Rev 65
- Chemistry Sample results from 0WX01T
- Radiation Protection analysis for a Liquid Release Package Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 20 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Classify Event and Fill Out a NARS Form (Loss of Required Vital DC in Mode 5)
JPM Number: SA-e Revision Number: 00 Date: 11/30/2015 Revised By: R. F. Peterson 11/30/2015 Instructor Date Validated By: S. Harvey 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: B. Lewin 12/11/2015 Operations Representative Date
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Shift Emergency Director.
- 2. The Unit 1 Supervisor has provided you with information related to a Unit 1 event and informed you to perform an Emergency Plan evaluation.
PLANT CONDITIONS:
- 1. Unit 1 is shutdown in MODE 5 preparing for refueling.
- 2. DC bus 111 is currently Out of Service (De-Energized) for a Planned Bus Outage.
- 3. DC Bus 112 just experienced a loss of Vital DC Power, indicated by voltage readings of 0VDC at DC112.
- 4. DC112 Feed Breaker is tripped and cannot be reclosed.
- 5. Electrical Maintenance Technicians and Engineering are currently in the EM Shop reviewing prints and developing a Troubleshooting plan.
INITIATING CUE
- 1. Perform an Emergency Plan evaluation and fill out the NARS form for transmittal for the plant conditions provided
- 2. This is a time critical JPM.
Page 2 of 5
JPM START TIME:
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number NOTE The completion of Step 2 fulfills the critical time portion of this JPM.
- 1. Refer to Exelon Nuclear - Locate and Open, EP-AA-Radiological Emergency Plan 1002 Addendum 3, Annex for Byron Station. Classification of Emergencies Note: This step may be performed at any time
- 2. Classify the Event utilizing
- Classify event as Unusual Section 3, Classification of Event, from CU3 Loss of Emergencies. Required DC power for 15 Minutes or Longer
(<108VDC on unit 125VDC batter busses 111 and 112)
Critical portion stop time ______
Time from start to Classification = ¢ < 15 minutes
________ minutes
100-F-01, Nuclear Accident Reporting System (NARS).
Note: Step 3 may be performed at any time NOTE Provide the examinee with a copy of the NARS form.
Page 3 of 5
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 4. Refer to EP-MW-114-100, ° Locate and Open, EP-MW-MWROG Offsite Notifications, to 114-100, MWROG Offsite complete NARS form. Notifications, Section 4.1, to complete NARS form.
Note: Step 4 is optional and may be performed at any time NOTE Provide the examinee with Wind Speed and Wind Direction cues after examinee has explained where to obtain the information from the computer or from the main control board.
- 5. Fill out NARS form according to
- Fill out NARS form instructions, EP-MW-114-100, according to instructions, Section 4.1, Completing the EP-MW-114-100, Section NARS Form. 4.1 Completing the NARS Form.
Cue: The wind direction on AM004 is 286°.
- BLOCKS 2 thru 9 must be filled correctly to meet the Cue: The wind speed on AM001 is critical portion of filling out 16 meters/sec. the NARS form. (See attached KEY).
o Block 10 should be filled in None Cue: An SRO has provided a peer o Verified with another SRO check and signed the peer check Verified With: section.
CUE: The JPM is complete.
JPM STOP TIME:
Page 4 of 5
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Classify Event and Fill Out a NARS Form Earthquake JPM Number: SA-a Revision Number: 00 Task Number and
Title:
8F.ZP-008 CLASSIFY/RECLASSIFY Emergency Action Levels K/A Number and Importance: 2.4.41 4.6 Suggested Testing Environment: Simulator Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
EP-MW-114-100 (Rev 16), Midwest Region Offsite Notifications EP-MW-114-100-F-01 (Rev. H) Nuclear Accident Reporting System (NARS) Form EP-AA-1002 Addendum 3 (Rev 0) Emergency Action Levels for Byron Station EP-AA-1002 (Rev 34) Exelon Nuclear Radiological Emergency Plan Annex for Byron Station CRITICAL STEPS (*) 2 & 5 Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 20 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
Page 5 of 5
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Evaluate a Reactivity Change JPM Number: SA-a Revision Number: 02 Date: 12/10/2015 Revised By: B. Peterson 12/10/2015 Instructor Date Validated By: C. Berger 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: B. Lewin 12/11/2015 Operations Representative Date
JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST NOTE: All steps of this checklist should be performed upon initial validation.
Prior to JPM usage, revalidate JPM using steps 8 and 12 below.
__RFP__ 1. Task description and number, JPM description and number are identified.
__RFP__ 2. Knowledge and Abilities (K/A) references are included.
__RFP__ 3. Performance location specified. (in-plant, control room, simulator, or other)
__RFP__ 4. Initial setup conditions are identified.
__RFP__ 5. Initiating cue (and terminating cue if required) are properly identified.
__RFP__ 6. Task standards identified and verified by SME review.
__RFP__ 7. Critical steps meet the criteria for critical steps and are identified with an asterisk (*).
__RFP__ 8. Verify the procedure(s) referenced by this JPM reflects the current revision:
Procedure OP-AP-300-1004 Rev: 4 Procedure Rev:
Procedure Rev:
__RFP__ 9. Verify cues both verbal and visual are free of conflict.
__RFP__ 10. Verify performance time is accurate
__RFP__ 11. If the JPM cannot be performed as written with proper responses, then revise the JPM.
__RFP__ 12. When JPM is initially validated, sign and date JPM cover page. Subsequent validations, sign and date below:
B. Lewin/R. Peterson 12/11/2015 SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date
Revision Record (Summary)
Revision 00 Initial revision of JPM Comment Resolution Revision 01 Revised JPM for modification of calculation Revision 02 Revised JPM for modification of calculation and time in core life.
INITIAL CONDITIONS:
- 2. Tave is 0.5° less than Tref.
- 3. The QNE has recommended that Control Bank D be withdrawn 4 steps to control PDMA02 on the desired target, then to perform a reactivity change to match Tave to Tref.
- 4. The NSO has calculated a reactivity change to move rods then to match Tave with Tref.
INITIATING CUES:
- 1. Evaluate the reactivity change to restore PDMA02 to target and to match Tave to Tref.
- 2. Review the Reactivity Change Determination Form for approval.
- Provide completed copy of OP-AP-300-1004, attachment 1, Rev 4, Pwr Boration and Dilution Requirements
- Provide copy of Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules Information For Evaluators Use:
UNSAT requires written comments on respective step.
- Denotes critical steps 2 & 3 Number any comments in the Comment Number column on the following pages. Then annotate that comment in the Comments section. The comment section should be used to document: the reason that a step is marked as unsatisfactory, marginal performance relating to management expectations, or problems the examinee had while performing the JPM. Comments relating to procedural or equipment issues should be entered and tracked using the sites appropriate tracking system.
Some operations that are performed from outside of the control room may require multiple steps.
These items may be listed as individual steps in this JPM. It is acceptable for the candidate to direct the local operator to perform groups of procedure steps instead of calling for each individual item to be performed.
The timeclock starts when the candidate acknowledges the initiating cue.
TASK STANDARDS:
- 1. Evaluate the reactivity change to match Tave to Tref.
- 2. Review the Reactivity Change Determination Form.
MATERIALS:
- Completed OP-AP-300-1004, Rev 2, Pwr Boration and Dilution Requirements (Attachment 1 is attached)
- Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules at 8500-11000 EFPH
RECORD START TIME:
EVALUATOR NOTE: These steps may be performed in any order.
STEP ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT CMT#
CUE Provide completed copy of OP-AP-300-1004 and a copy of the Unit 2 Rema thumbrules 1 Refer to In accordance with the provided: ___ ___ ___
- OP-AP-300-1004, Rev 2, Pwr
- OP-AP-300-1004, Rev 2, Pwr Boration and Dilution Boration and Dilution Requirements Requirements
- Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules
- Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules
- 2 Part 1
- Station: Byron Unit: 2 ___ ___ ___
Review Attachment 1 of OP-AP-
- Desired change 300-1004
- Withdraw Rods 2 steps Determine wrong number of for PDMA02 control withdrawn rod steps calculated on
- Reason for change form
- PDMA02 control
- Temperature control Evaluate inaccurate calculation
- What is the method & amt for
- Should be 4 steps of the reactivity change?
Control Bank D at 50%
power: Tave-Tref = 2°
- 2 steps withdrawal of rise in temperature CB D NOTE: When examinee
- Inputs identifies the deficiency,
- Rema thumbrules inform them to review the rest of the calculations
- 3 Part 2
- From inaccurate rod ___ ___ ___
Review Attachment 1 of OP-AP- withdrawal, and 100%
300-1004 thumbrules, calculation is incorrect which yields an Determine incorrect reactivity incorrect reactivity calculation addition calculated on form due to using 100% REMA
- Calculation has incorrect thumbrules. dilution value of 93 gallons. It should be a Boration of 37.5 (Calculation is not required for gallons.
success)
- +2° - 0.5° (current
- +0.3° - 0.5° (current mismatch) = +1.5° mismatch) = -0.2°
- 25 gallons BA/1° x 1.5° =
- 465 gallons PW/1° x 0.2° = 37.5 gallons boration 93 gallons dilution
- Inputs
- Rema thumbrules CUE This JPM is complete.
RECORD STOP TIME:
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Evaluate a Reactivity Change JPM Number: SA-a Revision Number: 02 Task Number and
Title:
S-AM-151, Perform proper reactivity management on unit startup and during normal plant operations K/A Number and Importance: GEN 2.1.37 Imp Factor 4.6 Suggested Testing Environment: Classroom Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
- OP-AP-300-1004, Rev 4, Pwr Boration and Dilution Requirements
- Unit 2 Rema Thumbrules Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 15 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE INITIAL CONDITIONS:
- 2. Tave is 0.5° less than Tref.
- 3. The QNE has recommended that Control Bank D be withdrawn 4 steps to control PDMA02 on the desired target, then to perform a reactivity change to match Tave to Tref.
- 4. The NSO has calculated a reactivity change to move rods then to match Tave with Tref.
INITIATING CUES:
- 1. Evaluate the reactivity change to restore PDMA02 to target and to match Tave to Tref.
- 2. Review the Reactivity Change Determination Form for approval.
OP-AP-300-1004 Revision 4 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT 1 REACTIVITY CHANGE DETERMINATION FORM Station: Byron Unit: 1 2 Time: Now Date: Today Desired change:
(Parameter, Magnitude, and Direction: Reactor Power, Rod Position, RCS Temp, Delta I, etc.)
Withdraw Rods 2 steps for PDMA02 control Dilute to raise Tave (0.2°F) to match Tref Reason for Change:
(Temperature control, flux control, fuel burn up)
PDMA02 control and temperature control What is the method and amount required for the reactivity change?
(Bleed Tank Volume, Gallons of Dilution/Boration/Blended Flow, Rod Insertion/Rod Withdrawal steps/percent) 2 steps withdrawal of CB D and 93 gallons Dilution Inputs:
(ReMA Thumbrules, ReMA maneuver guidance, Curve Book Figure/Table, Computer based trend plot, RCS Cb, EFPD - Preparer and Reviewer should use independent inputs when possible)
Rema thumbrules for Unit 2 at 9100 EFPH Calculation of change:
(E.G. Bwd/Byr: ReMA Thumbrule identifies 20 gallons BA = 1.0°F RCS temp reduction.
Desired change = 0.5°F drop. Calculation of change: (20 gal/1.0°F)
- 0.5°F = 10 gal.,
previously used borations and dilutions)
(TMI: Procedure 1102-4 Power Operations Fig. 1, Volume of Deminerlized Water for 1% Rod Insertion)
Withdrawal of control rods 2 steps raises temp 0.3°F.
Then dilute to raise temperature by 0.2°F: 465 gals/°F x (0.2°F) = 93 gals dilution.
Joe Rowe P Chech ______________
Preparer Reviewer Approver (RO) (RO/SRO) (SRO)
Shift Manager Notified: Yes No
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Minimum Shift Staffing JPM Number: SA-b Revision Number: 2 Date: 7/20/2010 Revised By: R. F. Peterson 7/20/2010 Instructor Date Validated By: S. Harvey 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: B. Lewin 12/11/2015 Operations Representative Date
JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST NOTE: All steps of this checklist should be performed upon initial validation.
Prior to JPM usage, revalidate JPM using steps 8 and 12 below.
__RFP__ 1. Task description and number, JPM description and number are identified.
__RFP__ 2. Knowledge and Abilities (K/A) references are included.
__RFP__ 3. Performance location specified. (in-plant, control room, simulator, or other)
__RFP__ 4. Initial setup conditions are identified.
__RFP__ 5. Initiating cue (and terminating cue if required) are properly identified.
__RFP__ 6. Task standards identified and verified by SME review.
__RFP__ 7. Critical steps meet the criteria for critical steps and are identified with an asterisk (*).
__RFP__ 8. Verify the procedure(s) referenced by this JPM reflects the current revision:
Procedure BAP 320-1 Rev: 22 Procedure BAP 320-1T1 Rev: 6 Procedure Rev:
__RFP__ 9. Verify cues both verbal and visual are free of conflict.
__RFP__ 10. Verify performance time is accurate
__RFP__ 11. If the JPM cannot be performed as written with proper responses, then revise the JPM.
__RFP__ 12. When JPM is initially validated, sign and date JPM cover page. Subsequent validations, sign and date below:
Brian Lewin/Robert Peterson 10/6/2013 SME / Instructor Date Brian Lewin/Robert Peterson 12/11/2015 SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date
Revision Record (Summary)
Revision 1 Put in current JPM Format Clarified the intent of the question and limited to asking for recommendations for desired staffing levels.
Revision 2 Added requirement to validate TS manning and Administrative manning to JPM.
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Shift Manager.
- 2. Unit 1 is in Mode 5 and Unit 2 is in Mode 1 at 100% power.
- 3. The following qualified people are inside the Protected Area as members of the oncoming shift operating crew: (Assume that AII LISTED personnel have the same shift rotation)
Name Qual Position Name Qual Position Name Qual Position Joe SRO/SM Sam NSO Mary FB EO Bill FC SRO Dave NSO Ted EC EO Tom FC SRO Ron FB EO Bob RP Andy SRO Alan FB EO Terry Chem Arnie SRO/STA Sally FB EO Karla EC Chem Tim EO FC: Fire Chief qualified FB: Fire Brigade qualified EC: Emerg Comm qualified INITIATING CUES:
DETERMINE if the crew meets the Desired staffing levels per BAP 320-1, and if not, do staffing levels meet Tech Spec Minimum staffing levels.
If staffing levels are not met DETERMINE:
- number of people in any given position needed to fill to the Tech Spec Minimum.
- number of people in any given position needed to fill to the Desired staffing levels.
- actions required to meet oncoming Shift Manning requirements.
All Work Hour Rules have been determined to be in compliance.
Fill in the JPM Start Time when the student acknowledges the Initiating Cue.
Information For Evaluators Use:
UNSAT requires written comments on respective step.
- Denotes critical steps.
Number any comments in the Comment Number column on the following pages. Then annotate that comment in the Comments section. The comment section should be used to document: the reason that a step is marked as unsatisfactory, marginal performance relating to management expectations, or problems the examinee had while performing the JPM.
Comments relating to procedural or equipment issues should be entered and tracked using the sites appropriate tracking system.
Some operations that are performed from outside of the control room may require multiple steps. These items may be listed as individual steps in this JPM. It is acceptable for the candidate to direct the local operator to perform groups of procedure steps instead of calling for each individual item to be performed.
The timeclock starts when the candidate acknowledges the initiating cue.
RECORD START TIME:
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 1. Refer to BAP 320-1, Shift Determines that BAP 320-1 is Staffing needed to make determination.
Cue: Provide a copy of BAP 320-1 and BAP 320-1T1 after correct procedure has been determined.
The staffing determination can be determined in any order.
- 2. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for Shift Manager. Desired Staffing and TS Staffing for Shift Manager IS satisfied.
- 3. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for Unit Supervisor. Desired Staffing and TS Staffing for Unit Supervisor IS satisfied.
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 4. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for WEC. Desired Staffing for WEC IS satisfied.
Note:
The candidate should determine that the WEC SRO is not required for TS minimum manning and should be used to meet minimum NSO TS Manning.
- 5. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for FS/Fire Brigade Desired Staffing for FS Chief.
IS satisfied.
- 6. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for NSO. Desired Staffing for NSOs IS NOT satisfied. ___ ___ ___
2 more are desired.
Determine that minimum TS Staffing for NSOs IS satisfied (an SRO is used to fill TS staffing levels)
- 7. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for STA. Desired Staffing for STA IS satisfied.
- 8. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for EO (SSD/FB). Desired Staffing for EOs IS NOT satisfied. ___ ___ ___
2 more SSD EOs are desired.
Determine that minimum TS Staffing for EOs IS satisfied (3 SSD EOs needed, with 0 FB needed)
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 9. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for RP. Desired Staffing for RP IS NOT satisfied. ___ ___ ___
1 more is desired.
Determine that minimum TS Staffing for RP IS satisfied (1 RP required)
- 10. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for Chemistry. Desired Staffing for Chemistry IS satisfied.
- 11. Review Desired Staffing Determine that minimum requirement for Emergency Desired Staffing for Emergency Communicator. Communicator IS satisfied - the extra Chemistry person (or any qualified station staff person)
- 12. Determine need to fill positions Determine that the oncoming with offgoing shift. crew will not be able to fill all of the positions of BAP 320-1T1 with qualified individuals Cue: Ask candidate on what actions are needed to meet -AND-immediate manning requirements Determine that personnel from for the oncoming shift? the current shift will be held over to fill all required positions until callout relief is in the Protected Area CUE: The JPM is complete.
RECORD STOP TIME:
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Minimum Shift Staffing JPM Number: SA-b Revision Number: 1 Task Number and
Title:
S-AM-029 Ensure Minimum Shift Staffing and Authorize Additional Shift Staffing as Necessary K/A Number and Importance: 2.1.5 3.9 Suggested Testing Environment: Classroom Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
- BAP 320-1, Rev 19, Shift Staffing
- BAP 320-1T1 CRITICAL STEPS (*) 6, 8 & 9 Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 20 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Shift Manager.
- 2. Unit 1 is in Mode 5 and Unit 2 is in Mode 1 at 100% power.
- 3. The following qualified people are inside the Protected Area as members of the oncoming shift operating crew: (Assume that AII LISTED personnel have the same shift rotation)
Name Qual Position Name Qual Position Name Qual Position Joe SRO/SM Sam NSO Mary FB EO Bill FC SRO Dave NSO Ted EC EO Tom FC SRO Ron FB EO Bob RP Andy SRO Alan FB EO Terry Chem Arnie SRO/STA Sally FB EO Karla EC Chem Tim EO FC: Fire Chief qualified FB: Fire Brigade qualified EC: Emerg Comm qualified INITIATING CUES:
DETERMINE if the crew meets the Desired staffing levels per BAP 320-1, and if not, do staffing levels meet Tech Spec Minimum staffing levels.
If staffing levels are not met DETERMINE:
- number of people in any given position needed to fill to the Tech Spec Minimum.
- number of people in any given position needed to fill to the Desired staffing levels.
- actions required to meet oncoming Shift Manning requirements.
All Work Hour Rules have been determined to be in compliance.
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Initiate a LCOAR JPM Number: SA-c Revision Number: 0 Date: 11/30/2015 Revised By: Robert Peterson 11/30/2015 Instructor Date Validated By: Shane Harvey 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: Brian Lewin 12/11//2015 Facility Representative Date
JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST NOTE: All steps of this checklist should be performed upon initial validation.
Prior to JPM usage, revalidate JPM using steps 8 and 12 below.
- 1. Task description and number, JPM description and number are identified.
See File Copy
- 2. Knowledge and Abilities (K/A) references are included.
- 3. Performance location specified. (in-plant, control room, simulator, or other)
- 4. Initial setup conditions are identified.
- 5. Initiating cue (and terminating cue if required) are properly identified.
- 6. Task standards identified and verified by SME review.
- 7. Critical steps meet the criteria for critical steps and are identified with an asterisk (*).
- 8. Verify the procedure(s) referenced by this JPM reflects the current revision:
Procedure BAP 1400-6 Rev: 33 Procedure 1BOL 7.2 Rev: 6 Procedure BAR 1-1-E5 Rev: 5 Procedure 1BOSR MS-W1 Rev: 11 Procedure BOP MS-5 Rev: 19
- 9. Verify cues both verbal and visual are free of conflict.
- 10. Verify performance time is accurate
- 12. When JPM is initially validated, sign and date JPM cover page. Subsequent validations, sign and date below:
SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date SME / Instructor Date
Revision Record (Summary)
Revision 0 Comment Resolution Modified SA3 Rev. 0 Changed component that is in LCOAR
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Unit 1 Unit Supervisor.
- 2. Unit 1 is in MODE 1
- 3. MSIV 1D Hyd/Pneu Press Hi/Lo Alarm (1-1-E5) is LIT.
- 5. IR 1234567 has been written to document the issue.
- 6. No other LCOARs or DELs exist on Unit 1.
INITIATING CUE Evaluate condition and Initiate the LCOAR paperwork as necessary.
Fill in the JPM Start Time when the student acknowledges the Initiating Cue.
Information For Evaluators Use:
UNSAT requires written comments on respective step.
- Denotes critical steps 1a, 3, 4, 10 Number any comments in the Comment Number column on the following pages. Then annotate that comment in the Comments section. The comment section should be used to document: the reason that a step is marked as unsatisfactory, marginal performance relating to management expectations, or problems the examinee had while performing the JPM.
Comments relating to procedural or equipment issues should be entered and tracked using the sites appropriate tracking system.
Some operations that are performed from outside of the control room may require multiple steps. These items may be listed as individual steps in this JPM. It is acceptable for the candidate to direct the local operator to perform groups of procedure steps instead of calling for each individual item to be performed.
The timeclock starts when the candidate acknowledges the initiating cue.
RECORD START TIME:
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number NOTE Once the student demonstrates the ability to locate referenced procedure provide the student with a copy of the procedure.
- 1. Refer to BAP 1400-6, Technical ° LOCATE and OPEN BAP Specification Limiting Conditions 1400-6 for Operation Action Requirements (LCOAR)
- 1.a Evaluate required LCOAR entry
- Identify that 1BOL 7.2 LCOAR entry is required.
° T.S 3.7.2 and/or Bases
° Utilize references as
° 1BOL 7.2 required
° BAR 1-1-E5
° 1BOSR MS-W1
° BOP MS-5
- 2. Refer to 1BOL 7.2, LCOAR Main ° LOCATE and OPEN 1BOL Steam Isolation Valves (MSIVs) - 7.2 Tech Spec LCO # 3.7.2
- 3. Section A of 1BOL 7.2 ENTER into Section A:
Note: Notification occurred 5
- Time/Date: Today/5 minutes ago per initiating minutes ago Cue.
- By: Candidates name
Title:
Unit Supervisor
- Present mode: 1
- Initiating event: Initiating event: 1MS001D Standby Pneumatic Pressure <4800 psig.
- Condition: A
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 4. Safety function determination PERFORM SFD Cue: All other MSIVs pass
- Indicate No in Section C operability.
- Sign Coversheet
- Indicate NO on coversheet for invalidating current SFD 4.a LCO 3.0.6 Evaluation Placekeep OR Leave Blank Note: Acceptable if left Blank or may be placekept.
- 5. Update DEL o Check N/A box
- 6. Determine Planned or Unplanned o Mark UNPLANNED on coversheet NOTE Examinee may inform SM of entry at this time, however, the SM Notified and time/date is typically completed after Peer Check received by another SRO.
- 7. Related WR/WO block
- List IR # 1234567 Note: IR # will be recorded here
- 8. Fill in Related Clearance Orders o N/A OR Leave Blank Note: Acceptable if left Blank
- 9. Was an IR written? o Check Yes box
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 10. LCOAR TABLE of 1BOL 7.2 COMPLETE LCOAR Table:
° CIRCLE Condition A
- ENTER notification Time/Date AND sign Cue: This JPM is completed. Condition A RECORD STOP TIME:
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Initiate a LCOAR. (SRO)
JPM Number: SA-c (Mod from SA3) Revision Number: 0 Task Number and
Title:
8E.TS-007 ENSURE compliance with all applicable Tech Spec Action Statements.
K/A Number and Importance: 2.2.23 4.6 Suggested Testing Environment: Simulator Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
- BAP 1400-6, Technical Specification Limiting Conditions for Operation Action Requirements (LCOAR) (Rev 33)
- 1BOL 7.2, LCOAR Main Steam Isolation Valves (MSIVs) Tech Spec LCO # 3.7.2 (Rev 6)
- 1BOSR MS-W1, Unit One MSIV Checks Weekly Surveillance (Rev 11)
- BOP MS-5, MSIV Accumulator Operability Check (Rev 19)
CRITICAL STEPS (*) 1a, 3, 4, 10 Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 15 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Unit 1 Unit Supervisor.
- 2. Unit 1 is in MODE 1.
- 3. MSIV 1D Hyd/Pneu Press Hi/Lo Alarm (1-1-E5) is LIT.
- 5. IR 1234567 has been written to document the issue.
- 6. No other LCOARs or DELs exist on Unit 1.
INITIATING CUE Evaluate condition and Initiate the LCOAR paperwork as necessary.
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Review Liquid Release Package JPM Number: SA d Revision Number: 02 Date: 10/18/2013 Developed By: Robert Peterson 10/18/2013 Instructor Date Validated By: S. Harvey 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: B. Lewin 12/11/2015 Operations Representative Date
INITIAL CONDITIONS You are the Unit Supervisor.
A Liquid Radwaste Release Form BCP 400-TWX01 is currently being processed.
You have the Liquid Release Package and it is completed up to step 7.5 for your approval.
INITIATING CUES You are to review BCP 400-TWX01 and ensure it has been completed properly to authorize the liquid release.
TASK STANDARDS:
- 1. Determine that section 6.8.5 Rad Monitor Setpoints were incorrectly chosen.
- 2. Determine that the signature is missing for the Radiation Protection Supervisor in section 5.9 .
- 3. Determine that section 6.16.1 is incorrectly indicating the wrong release path (0WX001 is recorded instead of 0WX630).
- 4. Determine that step 6.16.10 is missing a verification initial.
RECORD START TIME:
EVALUATOR NOTE: These steps may be performed in any order.
STEP ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSA CMT#
T 1 Refer to BCP 400-TWX01, Determine procedure is ___ ___ ___
Liquid Radwaste Release completed up to step 8.5 Form. where the Field Supervisor is to review Release Package to ensure it is completed properly.
- 2. Determine that the Rad STEP 5.9 The Rad Protection ___ ___ ___
Protection Supervisor did not Supervisor signature is sign step 5.9. missing.
- 3 Determine that the Rad Monitor STEP 6.8.5 Alert and High ___ ___ ___
Setpoints are incorrect. Alarm Setpoints are reversed.
- 4 Determine that the NSO STEP 6.16.1 NSO recorded ___ ___ ___
recorded the wrong release the incorrect flow path. Should flow path in step 6.16.1. be 0WX001 NOT 0WX630.
- 5 Determine the verification blank STEP 6.16.10 The Verification ___ ___ ___
for step 6.16.10 is not initialed. Blank is not initialed for the Rad Monitor setpoints.
CUE This JPM is complete.
RECORD STOP TIME:
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Review Liquid Release Package JPM Number: SA d Revision Number: 01 Task Number and
Title:
S-HP-001 Authorize Liquid Rad Waste Release K/A Number and Importance: GEN 2.3.6, Imp Factor 2.0/3.8 Suggested Testing Environment: Classroom Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
- BCP 400-TWX01 Rev 65
- Chemistry Sample results from 0WX01T
- Radiation Protection analysis for a Liquid Release Package Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 20 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
Exelon Nuclear Job Performance Measure Classify Event and Fill Out a NARS Form (Loss of Required Vital DC in Mode 5)
JPM Number: SA-e Revision Number: 00 Date: 11/30/2015 Revised By: R. F. Peterson 11/30/2015 Instructor Date Validated By: S. Harvey 12/11/2015 SME or Instructor Date Approved By: B. Lewin 12/11/2015 Operations Representative Date
INITIAL CONDITIONS
- 1. You are the Shift Emergency Director.
- 2. The Unit 1 Supervisor has provided you with information related to a Unit 1 event and informed you to perform an Emergency Plan evaluation.
PLANT CONDITIONS:
- 1. Unit 1 is shutdown in MODE 5 preparing for refueling.
- 2. DC bus 111 is currently Out of Service (De-Energized) for a Planned Bus Outage.
- 3. DC Bus 112 just experienced a loss of Vital DC Power, indicated by voltage readings of 0VDC at DC112.
- 4. DC112 Feed Breaker is tripped and cannot be reclosed.
- 5. Electrical Maintenance Technicians and Engineering are currently in the EM Shop reviewing prints and developing a Troubleshooting plan.
INITIATING CUE
- 1. Perform an Emergency Plan evaluation and fill out the NARS form for transmittal for the plant conditions provided
- 2. This is a time critical JPM.
Page 2 of 5
JPM START TIME:
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number NOTE The completion of Step 2 fulfills the critical time portion of this JPM.
- 1. Refer to Exelon Nuclear - Locate and Open, EP-AA-Radiological Emergency Plan 1002 Addendum 3, Annex for Byron Station. Classification of Emergencies Note: This step may be performed at any time
- 2. Classify the Event utilizing
- Classify event as Unusual Section 3, Classification of Event, from CU3 Loss of Emergencies. Required DC power for 15 Minutes or Longer
(<108VDC on unit 125VDC batter busses 111 and 112)
Critical portion stop time ______
Time from start to Classification = ¢ < 15 minutes
________ minutes
100-F-01, Nuclear Accident Reporting System (NARS).
Note: Step 3 may be performed at any time NOTE Provide the examinee with a copy of the NARS form.
Page 3 of 5
Comment ELEMENT STANDARD SAT UNSAT Number
- 4. Refer to EP-MW-114-100, ° Locate and Open, EP-MW-MWROG Offsite Notifications, to 114-100, MWROG Offsite complete NARS form. Notifications, Section 4.1, to complete NARS form.
Note: Step 4 is optional and may be performed at any time NOTE Provide the examinee with Wind Speed and Wind Direction cues after examinee has explained where to obtain the information from the computer or from the main control board.
- 5. Fill out NARS form according to
- Fill out NARS form instructions, EP-MW-114-100, according to instructions, Section 4.1, Completing the EP-MW-114-100, Section NARS Form. 4.1 Completing the NARS Form.
Cue: The wind direction on AM004 is 286°.
- BLOCKS 2 thru 9 must be filled correctly to meet the Cue: The wind speed on AM001 is critical portion of filling out 16 meters/sec. the NARS form. (See attached KEY).
o Block 10 should be filled in None Cue: An SRO has provided a peer o Verified with another SRO check and signed the peer check Verified With: section.
CUE: The JPM is complete.
JPM STOP TIME:
Page 4 of 5
SUMMARY
Operators Name: Job
Title:
EO RO SRO FS STA/IA SRO Cert JPM
Title:
Classify Event and Fill Out a NARS Form Earthquake JPM Number: SA-a Revision Number: 00 Task Number and
Title:
8F.ZP-008 CLASSIFY/RECLASSIFY Emergency Action Levels K/A Number and Importance: 2.4.41 4.6 Suggested Testing Environment: Simulator Alternate Path: Yes No SRO Only: Yes No Time Critical: Yes No Reference(s):
EP-MW-114-100 (Rev 16), Midwest Region Offsite Notifications EP-MW-114-100-F-01 (Rev. H) Nuclear Accident Reporting System (NARS) Form EP-AA-1002 Addendum 3 (Rev 0) Emergency Action Levels for Byron Station EP-AA-1002 (Rev 34) Exelon Nuclear Radiological Emergency Plan Annex for Byron Station CRITICAL STEPS (*) 2 & 5 Actual Testing Environment: Simulator Control Room In-Plant Other Testing Method: Simulate Perform Estimated Time to Complete: 20 minutes Actual Time Used: minutes EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Were all the Critical Elements performed satisfactorily? Yes No The operators performance was evaluated against standards contained within this JPM and has been determined to be: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Comments:
Evaluators Name: (Print)
Evaluators Signature: Date:
Page 5 of 5