ML15111A137

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 License Renewal Application - Set 1 (TAC Nos. MF5347 and MF5346)
ML15111A137
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/14/2015
From: Jeffrey Mitchell
License Renewal Projects Branch 1
To: Gallagher M
Exelon Generation Co
Mitchell J, NRR/ DLR,415-3019
References
DLR-15-0235, TAC MF5346, TAC MF5347
Download: ML15111A137 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 14, 2015 Mr. Michael P. Gallagher Vice President, License Renewal Projects Exelon Generation Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348

SUBJECT:

REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 1 (TAC NOS. MF5347 AND MF5346)

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

By letter dated December 9, 2014, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54, to renew the operating licenses NPF-11 and NPF-18 for LaSalle County Station (LSCS), Units 1 and 2, respectively. The staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review.

These requests for additional information were discussed with Mr. Christopher Wilson, and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3019 or by e-mail at Jeffrey.Mitchell2@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Jeffrey S. Mitchell, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Listserv

May 14, 2015 Mr. Michael P. Gallagher Vice President, License Renewal Projects Exelon Generation Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348

SUBJECT:

REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 1 (TAC NOS. MF5347 AND MF5346)

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

By letter dated December 9, 2014, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54, to renew the operating licenses NPF-11 and NPF-18 for LaSalle County Station (LSCS), Units 1 and 2, respectively. The staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review.

These requests for additional information were discussed with Mr. Christopher Wilson, and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3019 or by e-mail at Jeffrey.Mitchell2@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Jeffrey S. Mitchell, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

See next page ADAMS Accession Number: ML15111A137 *Concurred via e-mail OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME YEdmonds JMitchell RPlasse YDiaz-Sanabria JMitchell DATE 4/ 27/15 5/ 7 /15 5/ 7 /15 5/ 8 /15 5/ 14 /15 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Letter to Michael Gallagher from Jeffrey S. Mitchell dated May 14, 2015

SUBJECT:

REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION - SET 1 (TAC NOS. MF5347 AND MF5346)

DISTRIBUTION:

E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsNrrPMLaSalle Resource


J. Mitchell R. Plasse Y. Diaz-Sanabria D. Drucker B. Wittick J. Wachutka, OGC D. McIntyre, OPA M. Kunowski, RIII V. Mitlyng, RIII P. Chandrathil, RIII H. Logaras, RIII C. Lipa, RIII S. Sheldon, RIII R. Ruiz, RIII J. Robbins, RIII

LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - SET 1 (TAC NOS. MF5347 AND MF5346)

RAI 2.4-1

Background:

Section 3.4.1.4, Flood Protection Measures, of the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR), states in part that additional protection is provided by means of waterproofing and waterstops. All exterior walls to grade level are sealed with a waterproof membrane, and all exterior construction joints are sealed with waterstops to grade level. Category I structures that house safety-related equipment are the reactor, auxiliary, diesel-generator, and the lake screen house. However, a review of the tables in the license renewal application (LRA) for these structures did not identify such components for in-scope structures as credited for flood protection and subject to an aging management review (AMR).

Issue:

The UFSAR includes components related to additional flood protection measures that are not included in the LRA tables for the relevant structures.

Request:

If the components are addressed in the LRA, identify the location. If they are not included in the LRA, please justify their exclusion from the scope of license renewal.

RAI 2.4-2

Background:

UFSAR Section 9.4.10, Primary Containment Purge System, states in Section 9.4.10.2 that debris screens are provided for all purge penetrations. However, Section 2.4.7, Primary Containment, and Section 2.4.9, Reactor Building, of the LRA, do not discuss or include such components in their respective tables for components subject to an AMR.

Issue:

The UFSAR includes components that are not included in the LRA tables for components subject to an AMR.

Request:

If such component is relied upon to perform an intended function, please identify where it is covered in the LRA. If not included in the LRA, please justify its exclusion from the scope of license renewal.

ENCLOSURE