ML12355A042

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 9 of 14
ML12355A042
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2271 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A042 (50)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. sr 10 -13005A Equip. CIaSs 1.! 7 Equipment Description M5tVO3f45&O 5 Location:

Bldg. A Floor El. ;2-01 Room, Area 1K- I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e,, is the item one YO NE]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This. question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

LXtd6-fiUkrD V iVtIE.YE] NE] UE] N/AJf YE] NE] UE] N/At YE] NE] UE]. N!AI YE] NE] UE] NiA YVNE] UE 1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 291 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2'HV-1V005A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description

-4 0 A 4 ( (1Siy / r0s " Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Ye NEI UC[ N/AO YX NO UO N/Afl Yo NOZ UE]Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could.adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

4.N4 ti Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I]V/Wi.~A44 tidi4L ('J1650/7o Evaluated by Date: 201..8 *3 2.-< C_4 >PAGE 292 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0110 PAGE 293 of 433 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 294 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y(N. U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, '7- -g j- Equip. Class'1 S~ lSJ~Y 4 Z(&)'I Equipment Description 6 0 FS t i 6" I Location:

Bldg. AtX'5 1FloorEl.

  • Room, Area ,_ _ _ _ _ _ _Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

A6pO,] /,IfA,.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used.to record the results ofjudgmnents and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other commients.

Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SW/EL items requiring such verification)?

YE No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or !oose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage flee of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

ILJ- -. ,." 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE UE NIA'YE NE UE YE NE UE NI/A\YE NEL UE N/AN YNE] ULI 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )-PAGE 295 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentiDNo.

2 -U--96 Equip. Class'2..Equipment Description A F, L,/ , 1.fLme-ý" -,-, Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE] NX UCE1 N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NE-I UCE] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

/)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YINE] U[E] N/AE]AV NE] CE]Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý NE UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) z Ae Evaluated by: 6'A.- J"P t4 Date: 02- [G -2a< C-4 >-PAGE 296 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 297 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOP PAGE 298 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS....NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOPO PAGE 299 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y -)U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0Z-/7,'/-

3o06 9 Equip. Class'" 7 Equipment Description 1 3A 4A1 $ ' r-- ..("r,, ) /WtS/_ff Location:

Bldg. qt'X Floor El. .Room, Area &/_6-9, */,l/M 6?. ?9 -Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other. comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] N,9 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)-He. VL,, 'v 6 5 / N L/.v- /-/16 eA " 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage flee of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE] UE] N/AR1 YE] NE UVE] N/A9 YE] NE] UO NI/A YE] NE] UO N/AX 1 NO UE]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipnment.

< C-3 >PAGE 300 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061 -RPT-02, VERSION 1 .0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .Z-/1V/s -Equip. Class" 7 Equipment Description.

M41/ " ,rTfA ,' Pou Interaction, Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NEI UD N/A0 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO] X U-J N/Aln and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

~ ~oi-/cr/oM

/'fft-c1 w/5vf ev~ee /S 4 g6C~q'ys6 OF ""Z" 5R4V 6*e7-/S76/AA'c-Pe5r^

zY,,5 5" z ,O.99) ,i',v //'Az 9. Doa have adequate . attacltd lines hvadqte xibl~it'y t~oav~oid damage? ¥K NEI UF-3 N/A[]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YANEI UOE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety fuictions of the equipment?

YXNEI UE3 Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

-F`L/aA- ,,,,b -7$ V,-4 v.r, Aec p;- 6 ra 041e7rtv,9AK 41A.f& SVjcR7-eE>

R/e 4,QUF 77/15 1-4", 4C"CP74116'r Evaluated by: ./z/,o o I 00, 4 .. .Date: 102-c~< C-14.>PAGE 301 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .010 PAGE 302 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 303 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 304 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 305 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 306 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOIRO PAGE 307 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061 -RPT-02, VERSION 1 .0 Sheet I of 2 Status: fr N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.

Equip. Class'2 Equipment Description APlV Aor- -6 Location:

Bldg. /AL'" Floor El. Room, Area44 -04 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[3 N[Er of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visiblc cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

I -;-I v ----¢:P .--r,T 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NE UE NIAX YE NEI UE] N/A YE NE 0iE N/AL YEI. NEI U- N/Ax N*E UE 2 Enter the eqtuipment class name front Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 308 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 tV-.- 7 Equip. Class'2 Pnminrnpnt fl~r.rintinn Air .1 V',2",,,- .Yc. /'E ui merit Descrintion 111F I / .f"' -F&' I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

I Nit UE" N/AEJ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and .lighting, It$ NO U0 N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y'j NEI UEr- N/A0 Y, NE UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) kjo~Evaluatedby:-lemo 0'w"I 1.U ~ ia,, 5+~A:qt Date: I oL?<C-4 >PAGE 309 of 433 97ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO 2:012 PAGE 310 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 I w F PAGE 311 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2'"/V.7/-

7/',-' Equip. Class, "p- J J,/0.'e.s)

Equipment.Description Rc(277 J-f' ,.-,L.4;r'o,J V.t'4L r/w .Location:

Bldg. r146 Floor El. Zoo' Room, Area le'4A-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

S 7T ria, /1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on. the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anehorae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NtiS of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI UO N/IA YE NO UE N/An'YE NEI UE] N/As YE NE UrE N/AXja YM NEI U-12 Enter die equipmeni class name rrom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 312 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. H-7 AJ1 Z 0 Eup ls 1 7(e.4.O(t4 Equipment Description EfCfe sVlvc Interactigon Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YX N[3 U-] N/A[]YA NEI UI- N/A-"-< NEl U[: N!AE-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yx NCi Ufi adversely affect the safety fuictions of the equipment?

1k Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ,. ý -a,.. ta ',.Date: " ., ,r .,* < C-,4 >, PAGE 313 of 433

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 314 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 315 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. 7-.4-J-r{/lA.

Equip. Class'" -Mir , S /ei4A , " Equipment Description A A .- FvW /l4 ulo V Location:

Bldg. 4tY, Floor El. I q(-6'" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Ve (a0,A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.ehorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such vcrification)?.I Vj- 'i C 'i 2 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NEI UE] N/AV YE] NEI UVE] NIA YEI NE] UE] N/AM YE] NEI UE] N/Av Y*NE] UE]:2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B; Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 316 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID.No. Z7,- $///4 Equip. Class"_ -MOi;', C,,'drt i1/2! J L Lf,'e) £ef1f}0J W4't, Equipment Description e- 6 P A mrA,ý o Wm L Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y ND UE- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NEI U0 N/AD]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

K 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction.

evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yý ND-I UD- N/AD YW ND] UD]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y1 ND- U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: -- .- ' ,a. Date: t.... ., .__.__~r~-~ 44Z< C-4 >PAGE 317 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOP cvcs 10IFLOW PAGE 318 of 433 ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION.00 U PAGE 319 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1. of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. --I Equip. Class 3 2 7 Equipment Description LJ6 ; 1sdkb'. AoV Location:

Bldg. 'ý-L-W Floor El. 19S- Room, Area __10 __'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] NK of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI UE N/Aa/YE NEI UE N/AE>YE NE UIE N/A YE NE UE N/AO--ýYINE0 ULIE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 320 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment.lD No. Equip. Class'Equipment Dcscription L, 5 Pt-i EOV 2 7 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y3 N U0 N/AC Y ZNEU- N/AU Y NEI U N/AD YQN0 U-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ND UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: 6dY2 " 4 -7'? 4. -"Y /.17-<C-4 ), PAGE 321 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 322 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO.PAGE 323 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 324 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(3 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

.2-'W -'" Equip. Class'2 12 oIor Op 4 Fr 4 , Equipment Description PIK. 1 tA.i -.golo,;,nts moV Location:

Bldg. Floor El. 111' 0" Room, Area _P4-.2_.2 (1 iroaS '7 --/-P Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

S (- 00 W" Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Ne of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO U- N/Af/YO NE /AIE YE NEI U- N/AE " YE N- U- N/AEI Y&NE U[-O 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 325 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. 1-4Y-11 1R1A Equip. Class" 2 Equipment Description A Thw 7-e , 4 ~QcS tý6L~ rS 0 4.f~bn M.O V Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM/NN[l U0 N/A[L YZ.N]] U]D N/AD]Y[Q/ND urI N/AD]/UD-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y 'NO ULID adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

K 2.-zo- 0 0- Do ,.c_, zr -Pr -o l Evaluated by: t c_ýý -- c/ 5 Date: 4Y3. ILI..-a0yI zI'< C4 >PAGE 326 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 I f PAGE 327 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-/1V- 18 077A Equip. Class1 2 ,n,¢ , o. R,.'D V~t1/" - Equipment Description 4C/'Sp 5ac rl'oA/ geA4 ', ,, e"TuSs- co,' NAwcr A/Location; Bldg. At-X Floor El. /7O ' Room, Area AS,// 9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

/e/j90 r/M4W H49oL'$Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraste 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Z./N CI,,, ./ V,14g- q ,VF 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEV NEI UE N/A/YEI NEI UE N/A$Z YE- NEI UGE N/A;YE NEI UGE NIAX YX NEI GE Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, PAGE 328 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ZI/tIV- Af 0711 Equip. Class 1 2 100oro, oe1,1-e ua. c.irs 0 Equipment Description 6C/P15P SUe 76,l 01e.1R --,ROSS- o d:s-VMIc7" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

N ND' UO N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX Ni UI- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NEI UD N/ADNO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no othcr seismic conditions that could YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)FL t 19 1'%-12 -/; -P ,3 F ,,-.. -Evaluated by: 6"4 // f C>.-/1" , /Date:-97'- "/ ..Al,aV& V0401t2/i?-5A7l

< C-4 >PAGE 329 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .10 I PAGE 330 of 433 4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 331 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 332 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .-1tV -913-Equip.

Class'2 44 V4-O _____________

Equipment Description 5i1? (Omilmnl Wn,V-t4 Location:

Bldg. _.ilA ..x FloorEl, _0"0" Room,Area "0 " '7 iV0( 0'A)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1/f au4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (iLe., is the item one Y[E N;ýof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I k) --Nt-Ij V-2 C 0'O LI-?t) -0i..2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI U- N/AY YO NEI U- N/Av YE NEI UO N/ALX YED NEI UD N/AA YWINO UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 333 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdowri Checklist (SWC)/Equipment Description P10 PCnao M f mov Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets flee from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

4 NEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y N- UI- NiAD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX ND UO N/AD YeND UD Other Adverse Conditions l1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YR ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) l'~.v4~7..-

C ~~AC.'1-Evaluated by:.I o, I' J Date: "Z____ "_z_./0 a'f7-0 Z< C-4 >PAGE 334 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 335 of 433 4A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 336 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. '-t A/ Equip. Class" 2 18 Os ý%QJ d 64 t a Equipment Description t A , .( irP , r.oa IW.o,'IoA')

Location:

Bldg. Ak)A. Floor El. 19Z' Room, Area r-A =1 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

  • Tp(. " tto:&r-%Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YX NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)oo5Z?7, v/'E,. a 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yg N[3 U' N/A-YX NEI U- N/AC Y94 Ni UC N/A['YX N- UC N/AC1 Y, NE UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )-PAGE 337 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. :Il*+Yc6190A Equip. Class'2.( n [Equipment Description uI~qr'A1 L~ 4 rkrdTht (1: If CoerNr~ir fvr 14V-0 IRD A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,.

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on. the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y4'ND UD- N/AO Yj(N- U- N/AD Yb( ND UD N/AD YXND U-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yk(N- UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pagesmay be added as necessary)

A~o42L Evaluated by: -t;(l(to I/)6?~'? ~~24 L 6-/24 Vi/~ t'~'L~~b A ~ /)ate:'<C-4 >-PAGE 338 of 433 SACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 339 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 340 of 433

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12355A042&oldid=1545320"