ML11339A040
| ML11339A040 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 11/29/2011 |
| From: | Franke J Progress Energy Florida |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 3F1111-01 | |
| Download: ML11339A040 (18) | |
Text
, Progress Energy Crystal River Nuclear Plant Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Ref: 10 CFR 54 November 29, 2011 3F1111-01 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Crystal River Unit 3 - Submittal of Program for Maintenance of Irradiated Fuel and Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Analysis in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.54 (bb) and 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3)
Reference:
CR-3 to NRC letter, 3F1208-01, dated December 16, 2008, "Crystal River Unit 3
- Application for Renewal of Operating License"
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(bb), a licensee of a nuclear power plant that is within five years of the expiration of the reactor operating license shall submit to the NRC the program by which the Licensee intends to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor facility following permanent cessation of reactor operations until title and possession of the irradiated fuel is transferred to the U. S. Department of Energy for ultimate disposal. The Program for Maintenance of Irradiated Fuel at Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) is included as Enclosure 1 to this letter. Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3), a licensee of a nuclear power plant that is within five years of the expiration of the reactor operating license shall submit a preliminary decommissioning cost estimate to the NRC. The Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate for CR-3 is included as Enclosure 2.
Additionally, it should be noted that Progress Energy Florida (PEF) has submitted, by the reference letter, an application for License Renewal pursuant to 10 CFR 54. The CR-3 operating license is scheduled to expire on December 3, 2016. Therefore, PEF requests that the NRC schedule the review of the enclosed information following a final decision on the License Renewal application.
No new regulatory commitments are contained in this submittal.
If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Mike Heath, Supervisor, License Renewal, at (910) 457-3487, e-mail at mike.heath@pgnmail.com.
Jo A .F nke
/ice President Crystal River Unit 3 JAF/dwh
Enclosures:
- 1. 10 CFR 50.54(bb) Program for Maintenance of Irradiated Fuel
- 2. Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate for the Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant xc: NRC Regional Administrator, Region II NRC CR-3 Project Manager NRC License Renewal Project Manager Senior Resident Inspector Chairman, Florida Public Service Commission D. Alexander Progress Energy Florida, Inc.
Crystal River Nuclear Plant 15760 W. Power Line Street Crystal River, FL 34428
PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NUMBER 50 - 302 / LICENSE NUMBER DPR - 72 ENCLOSURE 1 10 CFR 50.54(bb) PROGRAM FOR MAINTENANCE OF IRRADIATED FUEL
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 1 of 15 10 CFR 50.54(bb) Program for Maintenance of Irradiated Fuel
- 1. Background and Introduction Florida Power Corporation, doing business as Progress Energy Florida, Inc., a subsidiary of Progress Energy, Inc., is seeking renewal of the operating license for the Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant (Crystal River), currently set to expire at midnight on December 3, 2016. An application for the renewal of Facility Operating License No. DPR-72, for an additional 20-year period, was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on December 16, 2008. The application is currently under review.
However, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(bb), licensees of nuclear power plants that are within five years of the expiration of the reactor operating license shall submit written notification to the NRC for its review and preliminary approval of the program by which the licensee intends to manage and provide funding for the caretaking of all irradiated fuel at the reactor following permanent cessation of operation of the reactor until title to and possession of the irradiated fuel is transferred to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for ultimate disposal. Since Progress Energy has submitted an application for License Renewal pursuant to 10 CFR 54, Progress Energy requests that the NRC schedule the review of this information following a final decision on the License Renewal application.
- 2. Spent Fuel Management Strategy Completion of the decommissioning process is dependent upon the DOE's ability to remove spent fuel from the site in a timely manner. DOE's repository program assumes that spent fuel allocations will be accepted for disposal from the nation's commercial nuclear plants, with limited exceptions, in the order (the "queue") in which it was discharged from the reactor. Progress Energy's current spent fuel management plan for the Crystal River spent fuel is based in general upon: 1) a 2020 start date for DOE initiating transfer of commercial spent fuel to a federal facility and 2) expectations for spent fuel receipt by the DOE for the Crystal River fuel. Progress Energy projects that the Crystal River fuel could be completely removed from the site as early as 2057, based on an oldest fuel first priority and the DOE achieving an annual rate of transfer (3,000 metric tons of uranium per year) as reflected in DOE's latest Acceptance Priority Ranking and Annual Capacity Report dated June 2004 (DOE/RW-0567).
The assumed 2020 DOE start date is nominally based on the last position stated by the DOE. On July 15, 2008, the then-Director of the DOE's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management testified before Congress that DOE, "could be ready to begin accepting spent nuclear fuel by 2020," - based on continued program funding.[1 ] The current administration has cut the budget for the geological repository program, but the administration has also appointed a Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future to make recommendations for a new plan for nuclear waste disposal. That Commission's charter includes a requirement that the Commission consider "options for safe storage of used nuclear fuel while final disposition pathways are selected and deployed." Progress Energy believes that one or more monitored retrievable storage facilities could be put into place following a Blue Ribbon Commission recommendation for the same, within a relatively short time frame, at least by 2020. For example, a facility such as that licensed by the NRC to Private Fuel Storage could be used by the
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 2 of 15 DOE to store fuel until a final disposition is determined. In any event, at this time, there is no basis for the use of another proposed start date for DOE performance.
The NRC requires (in 10 CFR 50.54(bb)) that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the caretaking of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the DOE. Interim storage of Crystal River spent fuel, until the DOE takes receipt, will be in the Crystal River auxiliary building's storage pool, and/or at an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) being constructed on the Crystal River site.
Crystal River is projected to generate 1,508 spent fuel assemblies through the end of its currently licensed operations in 2016. To date, the DOE has failed to remove fuel from the site, provide interim storage casks, identify an acceptable/compatible interim storage system, or identify what casks it will use in the future for the transfer of fuel from the site.
Because of this failure of the DOE, Progress Energy is constructing an ISFSI within the owner controlled area to support continued plant operations. The ISFSI will be operated under the site's general license. The current plan, in mitigation of the DOE's breach, is to put Crystal River spent fuel into on-site dry storage pending delivery of the fuel to the DOE.
For the purpose of this plan, Progress Energy will assume that the assemblies stored in the auxiliary building's spent fuel storage pool at the time of shutdown will be moved into dry storage modules on the ISFSI pad by 2023. From there, they will be loaded into a DOE-supplied transport cask for transport to DOE's site.
Progress Energy believes this plan would be workable for transfer of fuel to the DOE.
The use of the assumptions in this plan should not be construed by the DOE or any other party as a statement that Progress Energy believes this approach would or should be used when the DOE ultimately performs its obligations under the contract to bring a cask suitable to Crystal River. Progress Energy advances this plan only because the DOE has not identified its cask system, and the system's attributes, including but not limited to its weight, fuel capacity, and loading and handling requirements.
This plan assumes that, starting in 2024, that the dry shielded canisters (DSCs) are periodically off-loaded into DOE transport casks such that all Crystal River canisters are removed from the site by the year 2057. Progress Energy's analysis conservatively assumes, for purposes only of this report, that the Company does not employ DOE spent fuel disposal contract allowances for up to 20% additional fuel designation for shipment to the DOE each year.
In the event that Crystal River does cease operations in 2016, Progress Energy will continue to comply with existing NRC licensing requirements, including the operation and maintenance of the systems and structures needed to support continued operation of the spent fuel pool and ISFSI, as necessary, under the decommissioning scenario ultimately selected. In addition, Progress Energy will also comply with applicable license termination requirements in accordance with 10 CFR 50.82 with respect to plant shutdown and post-shutdown activities including seeking such NRC approvals and on such schedules as necessary to satisfy these requirements consistent with the continued storage of irradiated fuel.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 3 of 15
- 3. Cost Considerations The total cost to decommission Crystal River is delineated in the "Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate."' 21 In this document, decommissioning costs are allocated into the three major categories of license termination, spent fuel management and site restoration. The allocations are reproduced in Table 1 (Summary of Major Cost Contributors). All costs are reported in 2011 nominal dollars.
The timing of the spent fuel management expenditures ($271.910 million) is shown in Table 2. The expenditures include direct costs (e.g., for dry storage modules, spent fuel handling, packaging and transferring the spent fuel) as well as indirect costs such as program management and oversight, security, pool and ISFSI operating costs, fees, insurance, etc., projected to be incurred over the post-operations storage period.
The significant contributors to the direct cost of Crystal River spent fuel management are identified in Table 3. As shown, costs are included for the procurement of DSCs, as well as the loading and transfer activities associated with transferring the spent fuel from the pool to the ISFSI pad, and the eventual transfer of the fuel at the ISFSI to the DOE. The direct cost of $107.557 million is a subset of the $271.910 million shown in Table 2. The timing of the direct spent fuel management expenditures ($107.557 million) is shown in Table 4.
It must also be noted that these figures will vary based on actual DOE performance, including the actual cask provisions and requirements that the DOE settles upon. At this time, the DOE has not identified any transport casks or requirements. Therefore, there is considerable uncertainty as to the actual costs that may have to be incurred; and uncertainty as to whether the DOE will agree to bear certain of those costs. Major scheduling milestones are identified in Table 5.
At shutdown, the Crystal River spent fuel pool is expected to contain freshly discharged assemblies from the most recent refueling cycles. It is assumed, for purposes of this cost estimate, that Crystal River will transfer spent fuel directly from its pool to the ISFSI.
The transfer would occur over a six and one-half year period following the permanent cessation of Crystal River operations. The Crystal River spent fuel will be moved into DSCs and placed out on the ISFSI. It is assumed that this time period (six and one-half years) is sufficient to meet the decay heat requirements for dry storage.
To support decommissioning operations, Progress Energy anticipates loading 38 DSCs with Crystal River assemblies stored in the auxiliary building's spent fuel pool. The DSCs will then be placed in storage casks at the ISFSI. The decommissioning scenario assumes that the existing ISFSI has sufficient capacity to accommodate the pool inventory at shutdown.
In the absence of identifiable DOE cask requirements, for purposes of this plan only, the design and capacity of the DSCs is based upon Transnuclear, Inc.'s standardized NUHOMS commercial dry cask storage system (specifically, NUHOMS-32PTH1). The NUHOMS-32PTH1 dry storage canister has a capacity of 32 fuel assemblies at a unit cost of approximately $1.2 million. An additional cost of $256,000 is allocated for the concrete horizontal storage module (HSM). It should be noted that Progress Energy's contract with the DOE requires the DOE to provide transport casks to Progress Energy, but for present purposes, this estimate conservatively includes those costs.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 4 of 15 An average unit cost of approximately $700,000 was estimated for the labor and equipment to load, seal and transfer each DSC from the storage pool to the ISFSI. A unit cost of approximately $100,000 was estimated for the final transfer of the DSC at the ISFSI into a DOE transport cask. It is not known what the loading, sealing and transport costs will be for actual DOE-supplied equipment, because the DOE has not identified that equipment. It is assumed, for purposes of this plan only, that the DOE will accept the NUHOMS' DSCs and will not require offloading of the fuel to the DOE-supplied equipment.
Operation of the Crystal River spent fuel pool is discontinued in 2023 once the fuel has been transferred to dry storage. ISFSI operations will continue until such time that the DOE is able to complete the transfer of the fuel from the site (currently anticipated to be in 2057).
- 4. ISFSI Decommissioning With the spent fuel removed from the site, the ISFSI is available for decommissioning. It is assumed that once the DSCs containing the spent fuel assemblies have been removed, any required decontamination is performed on the HSMs, and the license for the facility terminated, the HSMs can be dismantled using conventional techniques for the demolition of reinforced concrete. The concrete storage pad can then be removed and the area regraded.
The cost estimated to decontaminate any activated HSMs to the extent necessary to release the facilities for conventional demolition is estimated at $1.8 million.
Conventional demolition of the HSMs and pad, and restoration of the affected area of the site is estimated at $0.9 million.
- 5. Plan for Funding Spent Fuel Management As of September 30, 2011, the aggregate trust fund balance for Crystal River was approximately $578.0 million.1 21 For the purpose of this funding analysis, this value was also used as the assumed year-end 2011 balance.
The cost to decommission Crystal River is estimated at approximately $1,077.6 million 1 31 The estimate is based (in 2011 dollars). upon a scenario under which the unit would cease operating in 2016 and be placed in safe-storage. Decommissioning would be complete no later than 60 years after cessation of permanent operations.
Approximately 70.0% of the total or $753.717 million is estimated to be required to terminate the operating license and 25.2% of the total or $271.910 million to manage the spent fuel until such time that it can be transferred to the DOE (the remaining 4.8% is associated with site restoration activities).
The decommissioning funding plan is shown in Table 6. To demonstrate the adequacy of the existing funds to cover both license termination and spent fuel management, the fund balance going forward is escalated at 2% per year. The results of this analysis demonstrate that the balance in the decommissioning trust is adequate to fund both the license termination and spent fuel management costs.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 5 of 15 Although the decommissioning trust fund is for radiological decommissioning cost only, to the extent that the trust fund balance exceeds costs required for radiological decommissioning, these funds would be available to address costs incurred by the licensee including spent fuel management costs. The licensee acknowledges the need for an exemption pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a) to use radiological decommissioning trust funds for anything beyond decommissioning activities as defined in 10 CFR 50.2.
It should be noted that the projected expenditures for spent fuel management identified in the decommissioning cost analysis do not consider the outcome of the litigation (including compensation for damages) with the DOE with regards to the delays incurred by Progress Energy in the timely removal of the spent fuel from the site. Progress Energy views the extended spent fuel management costs to be damages that should be paid by the government because of the DOE's breach of the spent fuel disposal contract.
In addition, this analysis assumes no license renewal, which is another conservatism.
- 6. References
- 1. Statement of Edward F. Sproat, III, Director Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, U.S. Department of Energy, Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives, July 15, 2008.
- 2. Total decommissioning funds available include Progress Energy Florida's share (91.8%) as well as that of the nine minority owners: City of Alachua, City of Bushnell, City of Gainesville, City of Kissimmee, City of Leesburg, City of Ocala, Orlando Utilities Commission, Seminole Electric Cooperative, and City of New Smyrna Beach.
- 3. "Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate for the Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant," Document E11-1651-001, TLG Services, Inc., November 2011.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 6 of 15 Table I Summary of Major Cost Contributors (thousands, 2011 dollars)
License Spent Fuel Site Termination Management Restoration Total Decontamination 12,409 - - 12,409 Removal 70,577 1,110 29,387 101,075 Packaging 22,676 5 - 22,681 Transportation 11,885 37 - 11,922 Waste Disposal 46,212 32 - 46,245 Off-site Waste Processing 23,246 - - 23,246 Program Management [1] 232,016 55,211 18,794 306,020 Site Security 123,271 57,985 2,422 183,679 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 11,822 - - 11,822 Spent Fuel Expenditures [2] - 129,013 - 129,013 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 60,074 966 - 61,040 Energy 12,703 589 199 13,491 Radiological Surveys 15,110 - - 15,110 Property Taxes 66,779 19,826 611 87,216 Utility Site Indirect 15,180 3,862 283 19,326 Corporate Allocations 10,718 3,272 267 14,257 Miscellaneous Equipment/Services 19,039 - 6 19,045 Total [3] 753,717 271,910 51,969 1,077,596
[1] Includes engineering costs
[21 Excludes program management costs (staffing) and security but includes capital costs for the multi-purpose dry storage containers and storage overpacks, packaging and handling (transfer of the fuel from the Crystal River pool to the ISFSI, and the multi-purpose canisters from the ISFSI to the DOE)
[3] Columns may not add due to rounding
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 7 of 15 Table 2 Schedule of Annual Expenditures Spent Fuel Management Allocation (thousands, 2011 dollars)
Equipment & LLRW Year Labor Materials Energy Disposal Other Total 2016 0 0 0 0 146 146 2017 0 0 0 0 1,838 1,838 2018 5,296 2,640 68 0 10,298 18,302 2019 9,205 4,589 118 0 16,543 30,455 2020 9,231 4,601 118 0 16,588 30,538 2021 9,205 4,589 118 0 16,543 30,455 2022 9,205 4,589 118 0 16,543 30,455 2023 5,157 2,005 50 0 7,545 14,757 2024 2,208 120 0 0 980 3,309 2025 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2026 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2027 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2028 2,208 120 0 0 980 3,309 2029 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2030 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2031 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2032 2,208 120 0 0 980 3,309 2033 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2034 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2035 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2036 2,208 120 0 0 980 3,309 2037 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2038 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2039 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2040 2,208 120 0 0 980 3,309 2041 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2042 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2043 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2044 2,208 120 0 0 980 3,309 2045 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2046 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2047 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2048 2,208 120 0 0 980 3,309 2049 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2050 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2051 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 8 of 15 Table 2 (continued)
Schedule of Annual Expenditures Spent Fuel Management Allocation (thousands, 2011 dollars)
Equipment & LLRW Year Labor Materials Energy Disposal Other Total 2052 2,208 120 0 0 980 3,309 2053 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2054 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2055 2,202 120 0 0 978 3,300 2056 2,208 120 0 0 980 3,309 2057 2,196 119 0 0 975 3,290 2058 0 0 0 0 0 0 2059 0 0 0 0 0 0 2060 0 0 0 0 0 0 2061 0 0 0 0 0 0 2062 0 0 0 0 0 0 2063 0 0 0 0 0 0 2064 0 0 0 0 0 0 2065 0 0 0 0 0 0 2066 0 0 0 0 0 0 2067 0 0 0 0 0 0 2068 0 0 0 0 0 0 2069 0 0 0 0 0 0 2070 0 0 0 0 0 0 2071 0 0 0 0 0 0 2072 124 82 0 29 1,347 1,583 2073 0 0 0 0 0 0 2074 0 0 0 0 0 0 2075 0 0 0 0 0 0 2076 156 435 0 3 193 788 2077 0 0 0 0 0 0 2078 79 239 0 0 20 338 Total 122,583 27,839 589 32 120,866 271,910 Note: Columns may not add due to rounding
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 9 of 15 Table 3 Significant Cost Contributors (2011 dollars)
Spent Fuel Management - Direct Expenditures Cost I,]
Spent Fuel Transfer Facility 3,450,000 Horizontal Storage Module Installation (for 38 HSMs) 4,370,000 Capital Costs for ISFSI DSCs and HSMs 63,627,200 Loading and Transfer Costs from Pool to ISFSI 30,590,000 DSC Transfer Costs from ISFSI to DOE (48 DSCs) 5,520,000 Total 107,557,200
[1] Contingency has been added to all costs (15%)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 10 of 15 Table 4 Estimated Expenditures for Spent Fuel Packaging, Storage and Canister Transfer *
(2011 dollars)
Pool to Horizontal Capital ISFSI ISFSI Spent Fuel Storage Costs for Loading to DOE Transfer Module DSCs and and DSC Year Facility Installation HSMs Transfer Transfer Total 2016 - - -
2017 - - -
2018 - - -
2019 - - - - -
2020 - 1,150,000 16,744,000 8,050,000 - 25,944,000 2021 - 1,150,000 16,744,000 8,050,000 - 25,944,000 2022 - 1,150,000 16,744,000 8,050,000 - 25,944,000 2023 - 920,000 13,395,200 6,440,000 - 20,755,200 2024 3,450,000 - - - 345,000 3,795,000 2025 - - - - 230,000 230,000 2026 - - - - 230,000 230,000 2027 - - - - 230,000 230,000 2028 - - - - 345,000 345,000 2029 - - - - -
2030 - - - - 230,000 230,000 2031 - - - - 230,000 230,000 2032 .- -
2033 - - - - 230,000 230,000 2034 - - - - 230,000 230,000 2035 - - - - - -
2036 - - - - - -
2037 - - - - 345,000 345,000 2038 - - 230,000 230,000 2039 .- -
2040 .- -
2041 - - 345,000 345,000 2042 .- -
2043 - - 230,000 230,000 2044 .- -
2045 - - 345,000 345,000 2046 .- -
2047 - - 230,000 230,000 2048 .- -
2049 - - 345,000 345,000
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 11 of 15 Table 4 (continued)
Estimated Expenditures for Spent Fuel Packaging, Storage and Canister Transfer *
(2011 dollars)
Pool to Horizontal Capital ISFSI ISFSI Spent Fuel Storage Costs for Loading to DOE Transfer Module DSCs and and DSC Year Facility Installation HSMs Transfer Transfer Total 2050 - -
2051 - 345,000 345,000 2052 - -
2053 - 230,000 230,000 2054 - -
2055 - 345,000 345,000 2056 - -
2057 - 230,000 230,000 Total 3,450,000 4,370,000 63,627,200 30,590,000 5,520,000 107,557,200
- A 15% contingency factor has been applied to all spent fuel related costs
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 12 of 15 Table 5 Projected Schedule and Milestones Major Milestones and Fuel-Related Events i
Currently scheduled cessation of plant operations December 2016 First DSC transferred post-shutdown from pool to ISFSI 2020 Last DSC transferred post-shutdown from pool to ISFSI 2023 End of wet storage pool operations 2023 DOE begins to receive commercial spent fuel 2020 First Crystal River fuel assembly removed from site 2024 Last Crystal River fuel assembly leaves site 2057 Last year of ISFSI operations 2057 ISFSI decommissioned 2057-2058 ISFSI demolition 2057-2058
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 13 of 15 Table 6 Decommissioning Funding Plan 2016 Shutdown Basis Year 2011 Fund Balance $578.026 (millions) (as of 09/30/2011)
Annual Escalation 0.00%
Annual Earnings 2.00%
A B C D E Total License Termination 50.75 50.54(bb) and Spent Decommissioning License Spent Fuel Fuel Total Cost Trust Fund Termination Management Management Escalated at Escalated at 2%
Cost Cost Cost 0% (minus expenses)
Year (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) 2011
- $0.00 $578.026 2012
- - $0.00 $589.586 2013
- - $0.00 $601.378 2014
- - $0.00 $613.406 2015
- - $0.00 $625.674 2016 $4.06 $0.15 $4.20 $4.20 $633.983 2017 $53.41 $1.84 $55.24 $55.24 $591.420 2018 $43.42 $18.30 $61.72 $61.72 $541.530 2019 $5.61 $30.45 $36.06 $36.06 $516.299 2020 $5.62 $30.54 $36.16 $36.16 $490.465 2021 $5.61 $30.45 $36.06 $36.06 $464.213 2022 $5.61 $30.45 $36.06 $36.06 $437.435 2023 $5.52 $14.76 $20.28 $20.28 $425.902 2024 $5.48 $3.31 $8.79 $8.79 $425.632 2025 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $425.381 2026 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $425.125 2027 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $424.863 2028 $5.48 $3.31 $8.79 $8.79 $424.572 2029 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $424.300 2030 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $424.022 2031 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $423.738 2032 $5.48 $3.31 $8.79 $8.79 $423.425 2033 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $423.129 2034 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $422.828 2035 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $422.520 2036 $5.48 $3.31 $8.79 $8.79 $422.183
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 14 of 15 Table 6 (continued)
Decommissioning Funding Plan 2016 Shutdown Basis Year 2011 Fund Balance $578.026 (millions) (as of 09/30/2011)
Annual Escalation 0.00%
Annual Earnings 2.00%
A B C D E Total License Termination 50.75 50.54(bb) and Spent Decommissioning License Spent Fuel Fuel Total Cost Trust Fund Termination Management Management Escalated at Escalated at 2%
Cost Cost Cost 0% (minus expenses)
Year (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) 2037 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $421.862 2038 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $421.535 2039 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $421.202 2040 $5.48 $3.31 $8.79 $8.79 $420.838 2041 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $420.491 2042 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $420.136 2043 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $419.775 2044 $5.48 $3.31 $8.79 $8.79 $419.383 2045 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $419.006 2046 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $418.622 2047 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $418.231 2048 $5.48 $3.31 $8.79 $8.79 $417.807 2049 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $417.399 2050 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $416.983 2051 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $416.559 2052 $5.48 $3.31 $8.79 $8.79 $416.102 2053 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $415.660 2054 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $415.209 2055 $5.46 $3.30 $8.76 $8.76 $414.749 2056 $5.48 $3.31 $8.79 $8.79 $414.256 2057 $5.46 $3.29 $8.75 $8.75 $413.786 2058 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $416.629 2059 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $419.528 2060 $5.45 $0.00 $5.45 $5.45 $422.470 2061 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $425.486 2062 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $428.562
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enclosure 1 3F1111-01 Page 15 of 15 Table 6 (continued)
Decommissioning Funding Plan 2016 Shutdown Basis Year 2011 Fund Balance $578.026 (millions) (as of 09/30/2011)
Annual Escalation 0.00%
Annual Earnings 2.00%
A B C D E Total License Termination 50.75 50.54(bb) and Spent Decommissioning License Spent Fuel Fuel Total Cost Trust Fund Termination Management Management Escalated at Escalated at 2%
Cost Cost Cost 0% (minus expenses)
Year (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) 2063 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $431.700 2064 $5.45 $0.00 $5.45 $5.45 $434.885 2065 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $438.149 2066 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $441.479 2067 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $444.875 2068 $5.45 $0.00 $5.45 $5.45 $448.324 2069 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $451.857 2070 $5.43 $0.00 $5.43 $5.43 $455.460 2071 $7.55 $0.00 $7.55 $7.55 $457.017 2072 $44.67 $1.58 $46.25 $46.25 $419.902 2073 $98.77 $0.00 $98.77 $98.77 $329.534 2074 $107.95 $0.00 $107.95 $107.95 $228.175 2075 $72.21 $0.00 $72.21 $72.21 $160.530 2076 $36.92 $0.79 $37.70 $37.70 $126.037 2077 $0.12 $0.00 $0.12 $0.12 $128.436 2078 $0.07 $0.34 $0.41 $0.41 $130.592 Total $753.72 $271.91 $1,025.63
_ _ I _ _ _ _ I __ _ I _ __ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Calculations:
Column C =A+ B Column D = (C)*(l +0%)^(current year - 2011) or for 0%, D = C Column E = (Previous year's fund balance) * (1 + .02) - D (current year's decommissioning expenditures)
PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NUMBER 50 - 302 / LICENSE NUMBER DPR - 72 ENCLOSURE 2 PRELIMINARY DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE FOR THE CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT