ML101750110

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

J.A. Fitzpatrick - Facility Comments on Draft NRC-Developed Exam (Written & Operating Tests) (Folder 2)
ML101750110
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/15/2010
From: Caruso J
Operations Branch I
To:
Entergy Nuclear Northeast
HANSELL S
Shared Package
ML092470037 List:
References
TAC U01786
Download: ML101750110 (24)
v • d • e


Text

1 JAF 2010 NRC Written Exam Changes from draft Submittal to Final Submittal.

1.Revised question to state a recirc malfunction had occurred. Did not use suggested resolution because it did not affect the question or answers.

Changed Choice C from Perform a normal plant shutdown per AOP-8 to Shutdown per OP-65, "Startup and Shutdown". Also, added per AOP-8, "Loss or Reduction of Reactor Coo/ant Flow" to the stem. Changes to ensure procedure titles included in choices, while maintaining comparable choice lengths.

  • 2. ""'u\\~CiU
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Modified wording of Choices A, C and D to include procedure noun names.

Modified wording of stem to include procedure noun name.

3. Changed distracter 'B' to place the Reactor mode switch in Shutdown.

Need check with Fitz. for AOP-43 note 1.

Rewrote uestion cha to immediate actions Accepted editorial comment JAF has rovided a clearer RHR NPSH limit curve.

14 Accepted. Changed question from 'the following' to 'above indications' NRC shortened the stem. Changed DIW temp 'A' and 'B' readings to prevent miSinterpretation on High DIW temperature entry into EOP-4.

15

1. Changed "A" distracter. Reworded B, C and D for better symmetry.
2. Removed the word 'rising' from the stem for torus water temperature to avoid confusion with graph reading and provided EOP-11 as a reference.

Changed Torus temperature to 150 degs.

3. Added to stem CST level of 57 inches. Removed wording for torus from distracters 'A' and 'D' CST level of 59.5 results in an auto swap of RCIC suction to the Torus.

JAF 2010 NRC Written Exam Changes from draft Submittal to Final Submittal.

16

1. Accepted editorial comment.

However, upon further NRC review answer A and C were subsets of each other. Moved answer C to A and created a new C distracter. Need question to be re-reviewed.

2. NRC made the change and both Fitz and the NRC accepted the change.

This improved the clarity of the question, 17

1. Accepted editorial comments
2. Changed stem level for SLC tank to 84% and changed distracters to 38%

or 48% to avoid confusion.

18

1. Accepted editorial comments
2. Minor stem formatting.
3. NRC made changes to the question based on the recommendation to add clarity to the question. NRC and Fitz accepted the changes.

19

1. NRC accepted proposed question with a change to 'c' distracter to add the word 'only. Question was a better KIA match.

20

1. Accepted editorial comments
2. Changed stem from 100% to 87% per JAF recommendation.
3. Added 1 bullet in the stem for generator terminal voltage of 24.4 kV and added Scriba to 5th bullet for breaker R935. This added clarity to the stem of the question for Mn gen capability curve.
4. Changed "325 MVAR" in choice 'c' to '175 MVAR' such that only choice 'a' will be correct.
5. NRC accepted proposed change.

21

1. Accepted editorial comments
2. -When main turbine and RFPT trips, there is no feed water injection into the RPV. Reactor power should remain stable at 25%. lAW AOP-2, guidance provided if reactor power ~ 29%, then insert a manual scram on a turbine trip.

If reactor power is < 29%, then reduce reactor power.

NRC and Fitz agreed to change reactor power to 23%.

3. NRC removed 4 bullets from the stem of the question. Added assume no operator actions to the stem and modified all 4 distracters to align the question with the correct technical information for high RPV level response. These changes greatly improved this question and is now technically accurate.

22 1. Agree with the issue; however do not agree with recommended fix. Will need to rewrite this question.'

Question has been re-written. Need to inform JAF of new question.

2. Question was re-written
3. Added the following to the stem. The following annunciator is received: 09-4-3 31 RWR MG A SPEED CNTRL SIG FAILED'
4. Re-arranged stem information for clarity, reformatted.
5. Keep control board in stem of question 23
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor editorial. Added titles to all procedure references. Replaced RMCS with Reactor Manual Control System.

JAF 2010 NRC Written Exam Changes from draft Submittal to Final Submittal.

24

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Acce ted editorial comment 25
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor stem formatting. Added titles to all procedure references.
3. Stem yth bullet was changed and question was changed as described to added clarit to the question.

26

1. Editorial corrected. Will not insert all of eop-5 but will insert max normal and max safe for these channels. Accepted
2. Reformatted embedded table to fit onto page. Added titles to all procedure references.
3. Changed bullet 1 to Rx Bldg sample ARM and changed question to describe what is occurring and what action is required. This adds plausibility to the stem of the question and avoid confusion the high Rad areas not in close proximity to each other.

27 Accepted editorial comment 28 Accepted editorial comment 29 1.Changed the 'A' Distracter to loss of 71 MCC-262-0B2 and changed justification for distracter.

2. Accepted editorial comment.

30 Accepted editorial comment 31

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Accepted editorial comment - These changes added clarity to the question and the stem 33 1.Accepted editorial comment
2. NRC added AOP-46 as a reference. Fitz and NRC agreed to the change.
3. Accepted editorial comment I

34 1. Accepted editorial comment

2. NRC changed the 'then' to 'when' Fitz and NRC agreed to the change.

I 35

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Accepted editorial comment 36 Accepted editorial comment I

37

1. Editorial - NRC added AOP-46 and procedure title into stem of question.
2. Editorial - Accepted editorial comment.

38

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Added to the stem time set to T=O. Made changes to add T=10 seconds.

Removed bullet for ADS timers actuated. Added bullet for all ECCS pumps fail to start. Changed question to ask status of all ADS valves at T=190 seconds.

Modified distracters 'A' and *C'. These chan es im roved the clarit y of the g

p

  • 3. Changed the correct answer to "C".

I Changed stem for 'A' CIS pump discharge pressure to 130 psig.

4. NRC accepted change 39 Accepted editorial comment

JAF 2010 NRC Written Exam Changes from draft Submittal to Final Submittal.

40

1. Question 40 has been re*written. Need to inform JAF of new question.

Changed RPV pressure band from 950*1050 psig to 800-1000 pSig for SRVoperation.

2. Accepted editorial comments.

41

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor stem format changes.

42 Accepted editorial comment 43

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor wording, format changes in choices.
3. Removed bullets from stem and changed question to ask on bus 10500 which would cause a trip of bus 10300*10500 4KV tie breaker 10304?

Changed distracters degraded voltages from % to voltage numbers and changed times for dragged voltage trips. JAF stated applicant do not know voltage as a percent but as a number. The change in the question added clarity to the question.

44

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. NRC accepted new Q-44 for UPS MG set. New question is much improved with clear stem and distracters
3. Added spacing between the bullets 45
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor stem, choice format changes.

46

1. NRC accepted Q-46 for new EDG ESW cooling. New question is much improved with clear stem and distracters 47
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Set point for filter DIP is not required to be committed to memory. Applicant is told in the stem of the question that service air pressure is degrading and 2 I

alarms are in. to DIP of 10 psid is not normal.

48

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor stem, choice format changes.

49 Found that question 49 was similar to question 28 then wrote a new question

49.

50 Accepted editorial comment I

51

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor choice format changes.

i 52 Accepted editorial comment 53 1. Accepted editorial comment

2. Clarified in stem that leak is in EDG air header and EDG air receivers. B I

and C took and out of answer.

3. The changes the NRC made to Q-53 change the question from a complicated stem and incorrect distracters to a smaller stem and better distracters adding clarity and improved plausibility to the question.

54 No changes 55 Accepted editorial comment

JAF 2010 NRC Written Exam Changes from draft Submittal to Final Submittal.

56

1. Minor reformatting
2. Accepted editorial comment
3. Made changes to this question stem to improve clarity of the question for rod drift indication.

57

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting 58 NRC accepted reformatted question 59
1. NRC accepted replacement question with the following proposed changes.
a.

Added "downscale failure of 0 Flow unit' in the stem.

b. Changed APRMs in distracters. 'B' distracter is now 'F' and 'C' distracter is now '0'.

60

1. Changed all distracters for this question to avoid confusion.
2. NRC recommends replacing load imbalance with 'turbine power'. Fitz agreed with the replacement.

61

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting 62
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting 63 During NRC review of proposed changes to question, determined that the question did not match the KIA as it applied to Siros only, 234000 Fuel Handling Equipment K5.02. KIA was changed to 201002 RMCS K1.03 Control rod block interlock/refueling (3.4) 64
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting 65
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Replaced with HC question from 07 NRC exams. JAF reviewed and concurred with change.

66 Recommend replacing question. NRC accepted replacement question with the following proposed changes.

1. Revised distracter '0' to make choice more plausible.
2. Added 'lAW EN-OP-115' in the stem of the question 67
1. During NRC review of proposed changes to question, determined that the question did not match the KIA. KIA was changed to G.2.1.32. And replacement question was accepted.

68

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Clarified distracter wording.
3. During NRC review of proposed changes to question, determined that the question did not match the KIA. KIA was changed to G.2.1.20.

69 Accepted editorial comment 70

1. Accepted editorial comment 2.Minor reformatting 71 Accepted editorial comment 72 1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting 73 Accepted editorial comment

JAF 2010 NRC Written Exam Changes from draft Submittal to Final Submittal.

74

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting 75
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting I

76 1.Accepted editorial comment

2. Minor reformatting
3. Changed 3rd bullet to Mn gen on line. Added bearing header pressure drops i to 16 psig. Replaced distracter A3 with AOP-2 Turbine trip without a scram.

This change mimic startup conditions and added clarity to the question and plausibility to the correct answer.

77

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Reference - TS 3.0.3 only provided.

78 Accepted editorial comment 79 Accepted editorial comment 80

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Reference - NRC will provide TIS 3.6.4.3 81
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Removed's' from SRV in C & D. Changed A & B to delete mechanical.
3. Choice 2 of distracters were changed to avoid subsets and now only 1 correct answer for this questions
4. NRC agrees to add decay heat generation to the stem of this question.

82 Will give EOP-11as a reference. References do not change question into a direct lookup.

83

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. 4th bullet deleted extra "is".
3. NRC incorporated this suggestion. This suggestion stream lined the question and added clarity to the question. Added core map to the question for SRM locations.

84

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Will provide EOP-11 as a reference. References do not change question into a direct lookup.

85 1.) Question 85 is similar to RO question 42. Will need to update SRO outline and write a new SRO question on Drywell temperature.

Informed Mike Needles and Matt Emrich of this change.

New question 85 has been written and approved.

2.) Accepted 3.) Question 85 to be replaced 2/4/10 4.) Question 85 was replaced on 2/18/10 due to oversampling of TIS

  • questions.

I 5.) Minor reformatting.

JAF 2010 NRC Written Exam Changes from draft Submittal to Final Submittal.

86

1. Editorial changes accepted.
2. Feel that general structure should know 7 day Ico for 1 eccs train out.

Denied. With TIS provided this question would be a direct lookup. NRC new position is to create ILOT exams with limited references. CE has already spoken with JAF ILOT lead about limited references on NRC exams.

3. JAF states there is no pull to lock position n the CS pump switch.

Referenced CS lesson plan and replaced PTL with 'STOP"

4. NRC position is that general structure SROs should know 7 day Ico for 1 eccs train out. Denied. With TIS provided this question would be a direct lookup. NRC new position is to create ILOT exams with limited references. CE has already spoken with JAF ILOT lead about limited references on NRC exams.
5. Accepted editorial change on 2/4/10.
6. Minor reformatting.

87

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Adjusted word wrap on transmitters. Added noun name to transmitters.
3. References - Added the following references to question 87.

TS 3.3.6.1, TS 3.3.1.1, Bases Pg B 3.3.1.1-24, Bases Pg B 3.3.6.1-26 Bases Pg B 3.3.6.1-27, OP-27A Pgs 79 and 80. References do not change question into a direct lookup.

88

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. EOP-3 overrides -Denied
3. Minor reformatting

! 4. Recommended changes were change torus level to 11.95 ft. torus temp to 180 degs. Changes were reviewed and accepted by NRC. The

, change in torus temp and level avoid confusion with the reading of HCTL curve.

5. Will provide EOP-11. References do not change question into a direct lookup.
6. Understand and agree with the issue. The original question had a Higher Torus temperature and Lower Torus temperature. Changed back to 14 feet and 175 F to maintain answer 'C' as the correct answer.

89

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting
3. NRC reviewed the replacement question and accepted the new question. This question was much improved in clarity of the question.

JAF 2010 NRC Written Exam Changes from draft Submittal to Final Submittal.

90

1. NRC accepted the proposed question with the following changes.
1. Remove 'unexpectedly' from stem, unnecessary because the stem bullet states plant conditions are normal with no other alarms in.
2. AOP-39 is not a plausible entry given all other plant conditions is normal.

NRC suggests the AOp*9; Loss of primary containment be used since it I appears to be more plausible for choice 'A' and 'C'.

91

1. Accepted editorial comment.
2. Question time line was changed to reflect seconds.

3.References - Added TS 3.1.3 and 3.1.4 as a reference. References do not change question into a direct lookup.

92 1. Accepted editorial comment

2. Minor reformatting
3. Reference - NRC accepts TS 3.0.4 only.

93 Accepted editorial comment 94

1. on 2/18/10 question 94 has been replaced due to oversampling of TIS questions
2. Removed bottom 2 bullets from stem of question. This improved the clarity of the question.

95 Accepted editorial comment 96

1. On 2/16/10 question 96 has been replaced due to oversampling of TIS questions.
2. Distracter '8' added redundant. Distracter 'C' added fix a setpoint range that is justified by other steps. This added plausibility to the distracters.
3.

Editorial - Accepted editorial comment 97 NRC accepted the proposed question on main turbine vibration. Removed EDG TIS question from the exam and TS 3.8.3 from exam reference document and exam reference.

98

1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting 99
1. Accepted. Discussed with Mike Needle will not bold distracters
2. Minor reformatting
3. Editorial-Added learning objectives EP-12.6; 1.10,EP-12.5.4.2; 2.05 100
1. Accepted editorial comment
2. Minor reformatting
3. Changed torus temperature of 135 to maintain plausibility.

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Scenario Comment resolutions Scenario/Comment Comment Submitted by Resolution Resolved by 1-1 Scenario script Incorporated Litkett Litkett vi was enhanced.

I,L comments 1-2 Changed event Litkett Incorporated Litkett

  1. 4 to 06LT-comments 52A as this transmitter is

/lite.

normally in service.

1-3 Added defeat Litkett Incorporated Litkett auto scram comments function to jlfK£ event 6.

1-4 Added 'C' EDG Litkett Incorporated Litkett output breaker comments failure to close jJlL to event 8.

I 1-5

  • Deleted event Litkett Incorporated Litkett
  1. 9. Sufficient comments component jU;tc and instrumentation failures remain.

I 1-6 Combined Litkett Incorporated Litkett event 7 and 8 comments for LOP and (LItL-EDGs breaker failures.

1-7 Replaced EHC Litkett IJlL--- Incorporated Litkett malfunction comments event #5 with ilLI)"" _P1)

--V""

'B' RFPT trip and recirc runback.

'fk-~

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Scenario Comment resolutions 1-8 Added scripting to support RFPT trip and power reduction 1-9 Added ADS auto initiation failure.

1-10 Added loss of 10500; AOP-18 to scenario on the failure of 'A' and 'C' EDG breakers to close.

1-11 Changed LOCA malfunction RR15:A severity initial severity 2% with 20 minute ramp and final severity to 40%.

1-12 Delete manual closure of 'A' EDG output breaker from critical task. 2 critical tasks remain.

1-13 Updated simulator setup.

1-14 Enhanced initial simulator setup.

2-1 Scenario script was enhanced.

Litkett Incorporated comments fJ'fLC-.

Litkett Incorporated comments

/VI-c Litkett Incorporated comments jJlc Emrich Incorporated

£<-lhv~

comments Litkett Incorporated comments fJ rLC"-.

Emrich Incorporated

~

comments I~

Incorporated comments

~dL Incorporated Litke~,t f\\.

.C-comments Litkett Litkett Litkett Emrich Litkett Emrich Emrich Litkett

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Scenario Comment resolutions 2-2 Deleted event 3 Litkett Incorporated Litkett malfunction.

comments With HPCI fUu inoperable and Drywell pressure transmitter failure was a similar TIS call with a SRO admin JPM for print reading.

2-3 Event 4 power Litkett Incorporated Litkett guidance comments changed.

jV/LA~

Procedure change for op 3A; feedwater heaters changed power guidance to reduce power to 25% when isolating a feedwater heater. However AOP-62 for loss of feedwater heating had not been revised.

2-4 Combined Litkett Incorporated Litkett events 8 and 9 comments into a single jJl-t.~

component failure.

2-5 Deleted event Litkett Incorporated Litkett

10. Sufficient comments component and

~rb~

instrumentation failures remain.

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Scenario Comment resolutions 2-6 I Changed success path from de-energizing scram solenoids to vent the scram air header.

2-7 Updated simulator setup.

Page 3, Remotes Section; add IA07 and IA01 on Trigger #9 (when Trigger #9 is activated, 03CRD-123 will shut and after 5 minutes, IA01 will activate in order to depressurize the scram air header).

2-8 Added SBGT shutdown steps from OP-20 section F.

2-9 Added Simulator booth instructions for scram solenoid door unable to open.

4-1 Scenario script was enhanced.

4-2 Updated simulator setup.

4-3 Added TS call for 02-3LT-101A Litkett tJCC_

Emrich

~~

Litkett jJ~C--

Litkett

/VU-Hedigan

{If/L(-

Hedigan jJlU.___

Hi1Jilc Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Litkett Emrich Litkett Litkett Litkett Emrich Litkett

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Scenario Comment resolutions 4-4 Added examiner note for Fuel failure to simulator booth operator to raise radiation levels to GE level if fuel failure is not large enough.

4-5 Deleted event 8 for turbine building ventilation trip.

Simulator does not have this malfunction or override capability.

4-6 Page 3, deleted time delay on Trigger 5.

4-7 Page 3; Add IC 45 as part of the Simulator Setup 4-8 Page 3; 3rd bullet, replace "operatot" with "operator" Hedigan VJIU--

Emrich

~~

Emrich....

~~

~

~

Emric~

~~

Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Litkett Litkett Emrich Emrich Emrich

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Scenario Comment resolutions 4-9 Page 3; change Emrich Incorporated ED12 and ED13 comments under remote functions to be setup on Trigger

~4.~g 10and11 respectively (should not be necessary since we discussed during validation that we would not allow the crew to restore these buses?)

4-10 Page 3, Trigger Emrich Incorporated Section: change comments Trigger 3 to Trigger 9 for RD11:18:15 4-11 Page 3, Trigger Emrich Incorporated Section: add the comments following malfunctions to Trigger 7 for Turbine Building Exhaust Rad Levels:

4-12 RM01:15 PRM Emrich Incorporated 17 -RM-434A, comments 27% severity, 9:20 delay, 6:40 ramp 4-13 RM01:16 PRM 17-Emrich Incorporated RM-434B, 27%

comments severity, 9:20 delay, 6:40 ramp

\\ ~

Emrich Emrich Emrich Emrich Emrich

4-15 Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Scenario Comment resolutions RM01 :23 PRM 17 4-14 RIS-431, 99%

severity, 3:00 delay, 10:00 ramp RM01 :24 PRM 17 RES-432,99%

severity, 3:00 delay, 10:00 ramp 4-16 Page 4, Event #2 Section; change Trigger 3 in second bullet to Trigger 9 4-17 Added malfunction for uncoupled control rod 18:15.

4-18 Added scripting for uncoupled control rod 4-19 Added scripting for Control room and Relay room ventilation manual isolation steps.

r-"

Split major 4-20 malfunction for fuel failure into a separate event for Main steam line isolation since the MSL isolation would come after the fuel failure.

4-21 Added text for ECG calling dose for Simulator booth operator.

Emrich Ik,:~

Emrich Emrich

'~

Hedigan flILL Hedigan fJ/-L.

Litkett fl).'k-Hedigan

/v/lL Hedigan

/UJt-C-Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Emrich Emrich Emrich Litkett Litkett Litkett Litkett Litkett

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Simulator JPM Comment Resolution JPM Comment Submitted By Resolution Resolved By S-1 Changed validation time from 15 Litkett Incorporated Litkett minutes to 20 minutes.

comments fUf-C S-1 Changed initiating cue from Emrich Incorporated Litkett posted attachment to OP-19; comments

  • RCIC procedure and changed cue L*,~ 'J

. to state maximize heat removal with RCIC to minimize SRV operations S-1 On page 6, change Item #1 to Emrich Incorporated Litkett state that the operator can use comments Posted Attachment at the 09-4 panel OR OP-19, D.2.

8-1 Page 8, guidance for the Emrich Incorporated Litkett Evaluator needs to clearly state comments whether or not it is acceptable for the applicant to trip RCIC due to the speed controller malfunction (it would not be incorrect to trip RCIC in this situation; so if they do trip RCIC they should not fail the ~IPM)

AND if the candidate is not to be allowed to trip RCIC, the evaluator note should state that the candidate should be stopped prior to tripping RCIC.

S-1 Change IC to IC-48.

Emrich Incorporated Litkett comments S-2 Updated JPM simulator setup Emrich Incorporated Litkett instructions.

comments

\\~

I S-2 Updated KIA number.

Litkett Incorporated Litkett comments

"-fZc I

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Simulator JPM Comment Resolution S-2 S-2 S-2 Changed validation time from 10 minutes to 15 minutes.

Page 3, change ZD123A59 in item 6 to ZD123AS9.

Page 3, change ZD123A58 in item 7 to ZD123AS8 S-3 Updated JPM simulator setup instructions..

S-3 S-3 Added note that since Rx power is low, IRMs are already inserted.

Minor editorial changes S-3 Ensure the page numbers are correct in the JPM.

S-3 Changed IC to IC-48.

S-4 Updated simulator JPM setup instructions.

Litkett Incorporated AJv.~ comments Litkett Emrich r k~

Incorporated comments Litkett Emrich Incorporated comments Litkett Emrich

'y Litkett fVP-<-

Litkett AJR.-L Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Incorporated comments Litkett Litkett Litkett Em!

~

~

~~....P~

Incorporated comments Litkett Emrich Incorporated comments Litkett Emrich

~

Incorporated comments Litkett

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Simulator JPM Comment Resolution S-4 Updated task conditions.

Litkett Incorporated Litkett Evaluator cue changed for comments RO applicant. (What alternate methods are fiff-(~

available to spray the drywell; RHRSW and Fire Protection). For SRO what recommendation would you make?

rs-4 Flow of JPM steps is Emrich Incorporated Litkett confusing; recommend comments placing actions between steps #11 and #12 (as LLC'2~~

currently written) that script actions for securing OW spray (closing 1OMOV-31 B and securing the RHR pumps)

S-4 Added evaluator cue for applicant to use 'B' Emrich I

Incorporated comments Litkett RHRSW to spray the I

drywell if requested.

S-5 Minor editorial changes Litkett Incorporated Litkett only.

lf2(~ comments S-5 Page 4 reference section; Emrich Incorporated Litkett change Revision for OP

~~

1, omments S-6 51A from 47 to Rev. 48.

Updated simulator JPM setup instructions.

EmriCh}

Incorporated comments Litkett S-6 Changed validation time to Litkett Incorporated Litkett 30 minutes.

flJR-L comments S-6 Updated scripting of JPM, Litkett Incorporated Litkett added additional cues to comments JPM if applicant decides to use single EDG shutdown method which secures the ESW pump with '0' EDG still running., added

-~

guidance from OP-22 section G.17.

S-6 Change IC from IC-39 to Emrich Incorporated Litkett IC-41 (this JPM is setup to run out of the same set of Ll C:S: il6£ L comments IC's as S-2)

S-6 Place the override for the ESW pump strainer DIP Emrich '\\ ~

Incorporated comments Litkett alarm on Trigger #1

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Simulator JPM Comment Resolution S-6 Place the Emrich Incorporated Litkett remotes for placing the B comments and D EDG LOCAL MAINTENANCE switches in LLC£A.!IfZ

  • "MAINT" on Trigger #2.

Page 1 0, item #21; delete 'THEN" from first line, add

  • "THEN" between paralleled and balance.

Page 11, item #30; delete "THEN" from

  • first line, add "THEN" between paralleled and balance. Step OP-22, G.6.1 contradicts a critical step in the JPM (the operator, if using OP-22 cannot shut down the EDG until after 10 minutes have elapsed (cylinder cooldown time>> -7 add Evaluator note and cue that (if asked for by the candidate) allows the candidate to bypass the 1 0 minute wait in the procedure and shut down the EDG to prevent damage.

S-6 Reduced scripting of JPM, Litkett Incorporated Litkett added additional cues to comments JPM if applicant decides to jUP-C_

use single EDG shutdown method which secures the ESW pump with 'D' EDG still running., added guidance from OP-22 section G.17.

I S-7 Added note the driving in Litkett Incorporated Litkett

'A' SRM takes 3.5 minutes comments and driving out 'A' SRM I

takes 3.5 minutes

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Simulator JPM Comment Resolution 7

Add "Steps 4.1 through 4.8 Litkett Incorporated Litkett 1 5 of ST -5H are complete" to comments

{tJtLc the initiating cue.

I I S-7 Is the question in step 13 Emrich NO Litkett part of the critical step?

Incorporated LlCC~'£!i comments 5-7 Changed IC to IC-48.

Emrich Incorporated Litkett comments S-8 Update JPM based on new Emrich Incorporated Litkett procedure revision.

comments Change IC to IC-48 S-8 Add M:CU10, RWCU Emrich Incorporated Litkett 12MOV-18 Auto Isolation comments Failure to Setup instructions (as a Preset);

this will cause the applicant to have to manually shut this valve as part of the AOP-28 actions Page 6, Item #4; 23MOV-16 is normally closed, therefore the applicant will only need to verify the valve SHUT (should not be a critical step since no physical action performed) Page 6, Item #7; 13MOV-16 can be closed from the 09-4 panel, therefore dispatching an operator to close the valve locally is not necessary Add notes in step 1 of JPM describing how the candidate selects of AOP-28 (Le. using Attachments 27,28, and 29 which refer the candidate to )

I I

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam Plant JPM Comment Resolution JPM P-1 Comment Change OP-25 to Rev.79.

Submitted By Emrich t-LC£P5Z't Resolution Incorporated comments Resolved By Litkett P-2 Change ISPP-3.8 to EN-IS 123.

Emrich Incorporated comments Litkett P-2 The step(s) in the EP that provide guidance to initial the respective steps for lifting leads should be properly place kept in the EP (Le. in addition to initialing for the lifted lead, the step should also be "circle-slashed".

Emrich

~I' Incorporated comments Litkett P-2 Added need key to access equipment cabinet and minor editorial changes only.

Litkett NI!-L Incorporated comments Litkett P-3 Consider adding a condition to the initiating cue and/or step 11 that states "no SRVs were

. opened from the Control Room". This will ensure that Emrich LiC£N'S2z:

Incorporated comments Litkett the applicant knows to open 7 va Ives from the 02ADS-71 panel.

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam RO Admin..IPM Comment Resolution JPM A-1-1 Comment A-1-1 Page 5, changed Revision for RAP 7.3.16 to Revision 46 A-1-2 Removed 1 RO from JPM A-1-2 Changed shift schedule and procedure to EN-OM-123, Rev.2 Change cover sheet "Revision Number" to Revision 1 A-2 Revised blocking points lAW standard tagout for 'B' RHR pump Page 3, change Revision Number to "1" A-2 Page 3, References Section; add Rev. 12 to EN-OP-102; add EN-OP-102-01, Rev. 6; add Rev. 94 to OP-13; add Rev. 68 to FM-20B Page 4, change Revision Number to "1"

A-2 Page 5, Initiating Cue Section; after internals add "per WR 123456789";

A-2 replace Shift Operations Management System with "eSOMs"; add "the" between "and" and "SM"; add "the" between "for" and "required" (also make these changes to the Handout Page)

A-2 Updated JPM to have only 1 vent and drain valve as critical A-3 Task Conditions Section; change 100% power to 70%

power (we would not expect to be at 100% power with only 2 CW pumps running A-3 change "36-1 AlB" to "36P 1A1B"; change "46-1 AlB" to "46P-1A1B" (these items should be changed on the Handout Page as well)

Submitted By Resolution Emrich Incorporated comments t-l CclV5'ZE Incorporated comments Litkett tUR..L

\\

Incorporated Litkett comments

\\

Incorporated Litkett comments Incorporated Litkett comments Incorporated Litkett comments Incorporated Litkett comments Incorporated Litkett comments

\\",

Emrich Incorporated comments f-lcttJSE(

Emrich Incorporated comments

'V Resolved By Litkett Litkett litkett Litkett Litkett Litkett litkett litkett Litkett Litkett

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam SRO Admin JPM Comment Resolution JPM Submitted By Resolution Resolved By A-1-1 Page 5, change Revision Emrich Incorporated Number to "1".Page 5, comments Litkett change Revision for RAP f.iCtA/i'if-7.3.16 to Revision 46 A-1-2 Updated references, added Emrich Incorporated step 5 in JPM for applicant to comments Litkett determine corporate notifications per AP-12. 11 added procedures and updated revision numbers.

Cover sheet, change Revision Number to "1". Page 3, change Revision Number to "1".Page 5, change Revision Number to "1"; add Rev. 11 to AOP-70 Security Threat; change Revision for EAP-1.1 to Rev. 65; add Rev. 39 to IAP-1; add Rev. 10 to AP 12.11; add Rev. 25 to EAP-3.

Page 3, 2nd bullet under the T

=8 minute conditions, add "from the East Electric Bay" after the word reports (this should also be added to the Handout Page).Page 7, Step 1, change AOP-18 to AOP 28.Page 7, Step 2, Site Area Emergency should be the classification EAL 8.1.9 (due

\\1 to vital area entry).Page 8, step 5 should not be a critical step as this action is also performed by the personnel in the EOF (see EAP-1.1)

Summary of changes for the Operating Exam SRO Admin JPM Comment Resolution JPM Comment Submitted By Resolution Resolved By A-2 Task Standard section; Emrich Incorporated change "23-57 and 23-58" to comments Litkett "23MOV-57 and 23MOV-58" (bullets #1 and #2; also J-ILZ;A.6CZ~

change on Page 6).Page 5, References Section; add "Process, Rev. 4" after "Operability Determination" (3rd bullet).Page 5, References Section; add "FM 25A, Rev. 71 and FM-25B, Rev. 33" after "HPCI Plant Piping Drawings" A-3 Removed from task Hedigan Incorporated conditions Emergency comments Litkett exposure controls have not been implemented. Added 3 NfL(~

new workers. Formatted information in a table format.

Split JPM into 2 parts. Part 1 is to calculate dose and Part 2 is to determine the emergency dose and fill out attachment 4. Page 3, capitalize the word "control" in the 3rd bullet under JPM Setup Instructions. Page 4, the 5th bullet under #4 should read 'The job will take 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> at the job site with both workers working the job full time." (change on Handout Page as well). Page 6, Change Revision Number to "2"

A-4 Updated procedure references Presby/Emrich Incorporated and attachments; updated comments Litkett plant conditions. Attached EPIC rad release screen for offsite release rates and 6o/~

Meteorological conditions in the EDAMS report.

Updated procedure references and attachments; updated plant conditions. Page 3, change Revision Number to "1". Page 3, change Revision Number for EAP-1.1 to "65".

Page 7, change Revision Number to "1". Page 7, change Revision Number for EAP-1.1 to "65".

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML101750110&oldid=5297139"